FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended January 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from N/A to N/A
Commission file number 0-1424
ADC Telecommunications, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
41-0743912 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
13625 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2252
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(952) 938-8080
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Common stock, $.20 par value: 96,610,966 shares as of March 2, 2009
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSUNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
515.8 |
|
|
$ |
631.4 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $18.6 and $17.3 |
|
|
173.5 |
|
|
|
215.4 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
Inventories, net of reserves of $47.9 and $50.7 |
|
|
167.2 |
|
|
|
162.7 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
918.6 |
|
|
|
1,077.4 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $415.8 and $407.7 |
|
|
169.3 |
|
|
|
177.1 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
359.3 |
|
Intangibles,
net of accumulated amortization of $124.8 and $126.3 |
|
|
105.8 |
|
|
|
161.1 |
|
Long-term available-for-sale securities |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
Long-term assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,316.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,921.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNERS INVESTMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
75.9 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
78.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Restructuring accrual |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
212.9 |
|
|
|
278.0 |
|
Pension obligations and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
78.1 |
|
Long-term notes payable |
|
|
650.5 |
|
|
|
650.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
947.4 |
|
|
|
1,006.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareowners Investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96.6 and 111.3 shares outstanding, respectively) |
|
|
369.5 |
|
|
|
914.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareowners investment |
|
$ |
1,316.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,921.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSUNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, 2009 |
|
|
February 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except earnings per share) |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
223.8 |
|
|
$ |
292.9 |
|
Services |
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
254.3 |
|
|
|
329.1 |
|
Cost of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
149.0 |
|
|
|
175.3 |
|
Services |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales |
|
|
175.6 |
|
|
|
208.7 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
78.7 |
|
|
|
120.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Selling and administration |
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
413.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
504.9 |
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
(426.2 |
) |
|
|
18.0 |
|
Other Income (Expense), Net |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
(44.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(446.5 |
) |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(442.5 |
) |
|
|
(28.4 |
) |
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(442.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (Basic) |
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (Diluted) |
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Income (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(4.45 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
$ |
(4.45 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(4.45 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
$ |
(4.45 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSUNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, 2009 |
|
|
February 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(442.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.4 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by (used for)
operating activities from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-offs |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
366.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of cost method investment |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of intangibles |
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Provision for bad debt |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Change in warranty reserves |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Non-cash stock compensation |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Change in deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenues decrease |
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
Inventories increase |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
Prepaid and other assets decrease |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Accounts payable decrease |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
Accrued liabilities decrease |
|
|
(49.1 |
) |
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash provided by (used for) operating activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
Total cash used for operating activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash provided by (used for) operating activities |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(197.1 |
) |
Property, equipment and patent additions |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash used for investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
450.0 |
|
Payments of financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
Debt payments |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchase |
|
|
(94.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(95.1 |
) |
|
|
439.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(115.6 |
) |
|
|
272.4 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
631.4 |
|
|
|
520.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
515.8 |
|
|
$ |
792.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUNAUDITED
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The interim information
furnished in this report reflects all normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary, in the
opinion of our management, for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. The
operating results for the quarter ended January 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results to be expected for the full fiscal year. These statements should be read in
conjunction with our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31,
2008.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest our
German professional services business (APS Germany). In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS 144), this business was classified as discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
Fiscal Year
Our first three quarters end on the Friday nearest to the end of January, April and July,
respectively.
On July 22, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a change in our fiscal year end from October
31st to September 30th commencing with our fiscal year 2009. This will result
in our fiscal year 2009 being shortened from 12 months to 11 months and ending on September
30th.
We plan to file our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year 2009 as our transition
report. Accordingly, we will continue to file quarterly reports on Form 10-Q on our present
quarterly reporting cycle that corresponds to an October 31st fiscal year end through
our third quarter of fiscal year 2009 ending July 31, 2009. We will then use our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for fiscal 2009 to transition to a quarterly reporting cycle that corresponds to a
September 30th fiscal year end. Therefore, for financial reporting purposes our fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009 will be shortened from the quarterly period ending October 31st
to an approximate two month period ending September 30th.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A detailed description of our significant accounting policies can be found in our most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008. We are updating our summary
of significant accounting policies to include:
Fair Value Measurements
Effective November 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), which provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets
and liabilities. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value in any
new circumstances. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP
157-2). FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities until the beginning of fiscal year 2010, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We
are currently assessing the impact that the application of SFAS 157 to nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities may have on our financial position and results of operations.
Effective November 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159), effective at the beginning of
fiscal year 2010. Under SFAS 159, a company may choose, at specified election dates, to measure
eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. Upon its adoption of
SFAS 159, we have not elected the fair value option for any eligible financial instruments as of
January 30, 2009.
6
Warranty
We provide reserves for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is
recognized. We estimate the costs of our warranty obligations based on our warranty policy or
applicable contractual warranty, our historical experience of known product failure rates, and our
use of materials and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition,
from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise.
The following table provides detail on the activity in the warranty reserve accrual balance as
of January 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
Accounting |
|
Charged to costs |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
Adjustments |
|
and expenses |
|
Deductions |
|
January 30, 2009 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Warranty Reserve
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation recognized under SFAS 123(R) Share-Based Payment: An amendment of
FASB Statement No. 123 and 95, for the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008
was $3.4 million and $5.4 million, respectively.
Note 2: Acquisitions
LGC
On December 3, 2007, we completed the acquisition of LGC Wireless, Inc. (LGC), a provider of
in-building wireless solution products, headquartered in San Jose, California. These products
increase the quality and capacity of wireless networks by permitting voice and data signals to
penetrate building structures and by distributing these signals evenly throughout the building. LGC
also offers products that permit voice and data signals to reach remote locations. The acquisition
was made to enable us to participate in this high growth segment of the industry.
We acquired all of the outstanding capital stock and warrants of LGC for $143.3 million in
cash (net of cash acquired). We acquired $58.9 million of intangible assets as part of this
purchase. Goodwill of $85.4 million was recorded in this transaction and assigned to our Network
Solutions segment. This goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. We also assumed debt of $17.3
million associated with this acquisition, the majority of which was paid off by the second quarter
of fiscal 2008. The results of LGC, subsequent to December 3, 2007, are included in our
consolidated statements of operations.
Option holders of LGC shares were given the opportunity either to receive a cash payment for
their options or exchange their options for options to acquire ADC shares. Certain LGC option
holders received $9.1 million in cash payments for their options. The remaining option holders
received ADC options with a fair value of $3.5 million as of the close of the acquisition. Of this
$3.5 million, $3.0 million was added to the purchase price of LGC and the remaining $0.5 million
will be recognized over the remaining vesting period.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 3, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
58.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
85.4 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
192.5 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
42.9 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
45.4 |
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
147.1 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired |
|
|
0.8 |
|
LGC Options exchanged for ADC Options |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid |
|
$ |
143.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
7
Century Man
On January 10, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Shenzhen Century Man Communication
Equipment Co., Ltd. and certain affiliated entities (Century Man), a leading provider of
communication distribution frame solutions, headquartered in Shenzhen, China. The acquisition has
accelerated our growth in the Chinese connectivity market, as well as provided us with additional
products designed to meet the needs of customers in other developing markets outside of China.
We acquired Century Man for $52.3 million in cash (net of cash acquired). The former
shareholders of Century Man may be paid up to an additional $15.0 million (the earn out) if,
during the three years following closing, certain financial results are achieved by the acquired
business. As of January 30, 2009, we believe $5.0 million of the potential additional consideration
of $15.0 million is probable of payment in March 2009. This has been recorded as an increase to
the goodwill associated with this acquisition.
Of the purchase price, $7.5 million is held in escrow for up to 36 months following the close
of the transaction. Of the $7.5 million, $7.0 million relates to potential indemnification claims
and $0.5 million relates to the disposition of certain buildings. As of January 30, 2009, $3.5
million of the total escrow amount has been released to the sellers. In addition, a $0.3 million
payment will also be made to the sellers for the changes in foreign exchange rates as per the escrow
agreement. This payment was accounted for as additional contingent consideration to the sellers
and increased goodwill accordingly.
We acquired $13.0 million of intangible assets as part of this purchase. Goodwill of $36.7
million was recorded in this transaction and assigned to our Global Connectivity Solutions
(Connectivity) segment. This goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. The results of Century
Man, subsequent to January 10, 2008, are included in our consolidated statements of operations.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 10, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
33.1 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
13.0 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
36.7 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
26.0 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
57.3 |
|
Less cash acquired |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid |
|
$ |
52.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Forma Results of Operations
Unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations, as though the acquisitions of LGC and
Century Man were completed at the beginning of fiscal 2008, are (in millions, except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
353.6 |
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
Loss from continuing operations per share basic and diluted |
|
|
(0.22 |
) |
Net loss per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
The allocation of the purchase prices for LGC and Century Man to the assets and liabilities
acquired was finalized in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and did not result in any material
adjustments. See Note 7 for a discussion of the goodwill and intangible
impairments recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
8
Note 3: Discontinued Operations
APS Germany
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest APS
Germany. We classified this business as a discontinued operation in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008. This business was previously included in our Professional Services segment. We expect to
close on a sale of APS Germany in fiscal 2009. We expect to receive proceeds in excess of our book
value and do not anticipate a significant gain or loss on the sale.
The financial results of our APS Germany business are reported separately as discontinued
operations for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS 144. The financial results of our APS
Germany business included in discontinued operations are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 30, |
|
February 1, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Net sales |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Note 4: Net Loss from Continuing Operations Per Share
The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and
diluted loss per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except |
|
|
|
per share amounts) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(442.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted |
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(4.45 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluded from the dilutive securities described above are employee stock options to acquire
7.2 million and 6.7 million shares for the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1,
2008, respectively. These exclusions are made if the exercise prices of these options are greater
than the average market price of our common stock for the period, if the number of shares we can
repurchase with all the forms of exercise proceeds exceed the weighted shares outstanding in the
options, or if we have net losses, all of which have an anti-dilutive effect.
We are required to use the if-converted method for computing diluted earnings per share with
respect to the shares reserved for issuance upon conversion of the notes (described in detail
below). Under this method, we add back the interest expense on the convertible notes to net income
and then divide this amount by our total outstanding shares, including those shares reserved for
issuance upon conversion of the notes. The following is our convertible debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Shares |
|
Conversion |
Convertible Subordinated Notes |
|
January 30, 2009 |
|
February 1, 2008 |
|
Price |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
$200 million, 1.0% fixed rate, paid June 15, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
28.091 |
|
$200 million, 6-month LIBOR plus 0.375%, due June 15, 2013 |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
28.091 |
|
$225 million, 3.5% fixed rate, due July 15, 2015 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
27.00 |
|
$225 million, 3.5% fixed rate, due July 15, 2017 |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
28.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to June 15, 2008, the 2008 notes and 2013 notes had been evaluated for dilution effects
together by adding back their associated interest expense and dividing this amount by our total
shares, including all 14.2 million shares that could be issued upon conversion of these notes.
These notes were evaluated together for dilution effects as the conversion price was the same on
both. Since the 2008 notes have been paid, the 2013 notes are evaluated separately by adding back
the appropriate interest expense and dividing
this amount by our total shares, including the 7.1 million shares that could be issued upon
conversion of these notes. Additionally, the 2015 notes and 2017 notes are evaluated separately by
adding back the appropriate interest expense from each and dividing by our total shares, including
all 8.3 million and 7.9 million shares, respectively, that could be issued upon conversion of each
of these notes. Based upon these calculations, all shares reserved for issuance upon conversion of
our convertible notes were excluded for the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1,
2008, because of their anti-dilutive effect.
9
Note 5: Inventories
Our inventories are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Manufactured products |
|
$ |
138.2 |
|
|
$ |
132.9 |
|
Purchased materials |
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Less: Inventory reserve |
|
|
(47.9 |
) |
|
|
(50.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
167.2 |
|
|
$ |
162.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6: Property and Equipment
Our property and equipment are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
131.9 |
|
|
$ |
134.7 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
406.4 |
|
|
|
404.6 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(415.8 |
) |
|
|
(407.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
161.1 |
|
|
|
170.5 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
169.3 |
|
|
$ |
177.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7: Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142, we review goodwill annually for impairment, or more
frequently if potential interim indicators exist that could result in
impairment. Due to the current global recession and adverse business conditions that have resulted in a sustained decline in our market capitalization,
we performed a goodwill impairment analysis of our two reporting units that contain goodwill,
Connectivity and Network Solutions. In our analysis, the fair values of each of the reporting units
were estimated for the purpose of goodwill impairment testing by applying the present value of
forecasted future cash flows, using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed
were appropriate for the circumstances. We also considered market approaches in estimating fair
value. In performing the goodwill impairment analysis, we, among other things, consulted with an
independent advisor.
In accordance with
SFAS 144, long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that
their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on recent business conditions, an impairment
review of long-lived assets was performed in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The review has
resulted in the recognition of an impairment charge related to the intangible assets of the Network
Solutions segment. The fair value of the impaired assets was estimated for the purpose of
impairment testing by applying the present value of forecasted future cash flows, using estimates,
judgments and assumptions that management believed were appropriate for the circumstances. In
preparing the estimated fair value of the impaired assets, we, among other things, consulted an
independent advisor.
As of our
first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded an estimated impairment charge of $413.5 million to
reduce the carrying value of goodwill and other long-lived intangibles. The estimated impairment
includes $280.8 million of goodwill related to Connectivity and $85.4 million of goodwill and $47.3
million of intangibles related to Network Solutions. We presently expect to finalize this analysis
in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. Any adjustments to our preliminary estimates as a result of completing this evaluation will
be recorded in our financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. These adjustments
may be material.
10
The following are changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended
January 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
274.0 |
|
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
$ |
359.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
(280.8 |
) |
|
|
(85.4 |
) |
|
|
(366.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of LGC, we recorded intangible assets of $58.9 million
related to customer relationships and technology. These intangibles were subsequently impaired as
previously discussed. In connection with the acquisition of Century Man, we recorded intangible
assets of $13.0 million related to customer relationships,
technology and non-compete agreements, which have not been written off.
Note 8: Credit Facility
On January 30, 2009 we terminated the $200.0 million secured five-year revolving credit
facility that we entered into in April 2008. This facility had no outstanding balances when it was
terminated. As a result of the current economic environment and its impact on our financial
results, we believed that the provisions of the agreement would need to be amended in order to
maintain and utilize this facility. Based on our discussions with the lenders, we determined that
the terms of an amendment as well as the ongoing cost of maintaining the facility were not
economical. As a consequence of terminating our revolving credit facility, we recorded a
non-operating charge of $1.0 million to write-off the deferred financing costs associated with the
facility.
The assets that secured the facility also served as collateral for our interest rate swap on
our $200.0 million convertible unsecured floating rate notes that mature in 2013. As a result of
the facilitys termination, we were required to pledge cash collateral to secure the interest rate
swap. On February 2, 2009, we pledged $13.4 million of cash to secure the interest rate swap
termination value, which will be included in our restricted cash balance. This collateral amount
could vary significantly as it fluctuates with the forward LIBOR.
Note 9: Income Taxes
Our income tax benefit for the three months ended January 30, 2009 primarily relates to
reversal of deferred tax liabilities attributable to U.S. tax amortization of purchased goodwill
from the acquisition of KRONE. The reversal of these deferred tax liabilities result from the
goodwill impairment charge discussed in Note 7 of the financial statements.
As of January 30, 2009, our net deferred tax assets were $1,054.9 million with a related
valuation allowance of $1,000.9 million. Deferred tax assets represent future tax benefits to be
received when certain expenses and losses previously recognized in the financial statements become
deductible under applicable income tax laws. The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on
future taxable income against which these deductions can be applied. SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not
that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, and requires periodic
adjustments to the valuation allowance when there are changes in the evidence of realizability.
Most of our deferred tax assets are related to U.S. income tax net operating losses and are
not expected to expire until after fiscal 2021, with the exception of $210.9 million relating to
capital loss carryforwards that can be utilized only against realized capital gains through fiscal
2009.
As of January 30, 2009, the gross amount of unrecognized income tax benefits (excluding
interest and penalties) was $27.3 million. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would impact the effective tax rate was $10.3 million. As of January 30, 2009, the
amount accrued for interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits was $2.5
million. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits in
income tax expense.
11
Note 10: Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) has no impact on our net income (loss) but is reflected in our
balance sheet through adjustments to shareowners investment. Comprehensive income (loss) is
derived from foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized gain (losses) and related
adjustments on available-for-sale securities and hedging activities.
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(442.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(27.3 |
) |
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Net change in fair value of interest rate swap |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on foreign currency hedge |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(453.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no net tax impact for the components of comprehensive income due to the valuation
allowance.
Note 11: Segment and Geographic Information
ADC is organized into operating segments based on product groupings. The reportable segments
are determined in accordance with how our executive managers develop and execute our global
strategies to drive growth and profitability. These strategies include product positioning,
research and development programs, cost management, capacity and capital investments for each of
the reportable segments. Segment performance is evaluated on several factors, including operating
income. Segment operating income excludes restructuring and impairment charges, interest income or
expense, other income or expense and provision for income taxes. Assets are not allocated to the
segments.
Our three reportable business segments are:
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
|
|
Network Solutions |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, management initiated a restructuring of the Network
Solutions segment by exiting several outdoor wireless product lines. During the first quarter of
fiscal 2009, management made further changes to the Network Solutions segment by moving the
Wireline solutions business to the Connectivity segment in order to better manage and utilize
resources and drive profitability. As a result of this change, we have changed our reportable
segments to conform to our current management reporting presentation. We have reclassified prior
year segment disclosures to conform to the new segment presentation.
Our Connectivity products connect wireline, wireless, cable, enterprise and broadcast
communications networks over copper (twisted pair), coaxial, fiber-optic and wireless media. These
products provide the physical interconnections between network components and access points into
networks.
Our Network Solutions products help improve coverage and capacity for wireless networks. These
products improve signal quality, expand coverage and capacity into expanded geographic areas,
increase the speed and expand the delivery and capacity of networks, and help reduce the capital
and operating costs of delivering wireless services. Applications for these products include
in-building solutions, outdoor coverage solutions and mobile network solutions.
Our Professional Services business provides integration services for broadband and
multiservice communications over wireline, wireless, cable and enterprise networks. Our
Professional Services business unit helps customers plan, deploy and maintain communications
networks that deliver Internet, data, video and voice services.
12
We have two significant customers who each account for more than 10% of our sales. AT&T
accounted for 18.5% and 15.8% of our sales in the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February
1, 2008, respectively. In addition, for the three months ended
January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008, Verizon represented 17.1% and 16.5%, respectively, of
our net sales. Revenue from AT&T and Verizon are included in each of the three reportable segments.
The following table sets forth certain financial information for each of our above described
reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
and impairment |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Three Months Ended January 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
198.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
223.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
223.8 |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external net sales |
|
$ |
198.2 |
|
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.8 |
|
|
$ |
254.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
254.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.2 |
) |
|
$ |
414.0 |
|
|
$ |
(426.2 |
) |
Three Months Ended February 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
257.5 |
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
$ |
292.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
292.9 |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external net sales |
|
$ |
257.5 |
|
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
$ |
329.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
329.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
$ |
(6.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
Geographic Information
The following table sets forth certain geographic information concerning our U.S. and foreign
sales and ownership of property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Geographic Sales Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside the United States |
|
$ |
143.1 |
|
|
$ |
198.0 |
|
Outside the United States: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific (Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan,
Korea, New Zealand, Southeast Asia and Taiwan) |
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
EMEA (Europe (excluding Germany), Middle East and Africa) |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Germany (1) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Americas (Canada, Central and South America) |
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
254.3 |
|
|
$ |
329.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside the United States |
|
$ |
110.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outside the United States |
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
169.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to the significance of its sales, Germany is broken out for geographic purposes. |
Other than the U.S., no single country has property and equipment sufficiently material to
disclose.
Note 12: Restructuring Charges
During the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008, we incurred restructuring
charges associated with workforce reductions as well as the consolidation of excess facilities. For
the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008, restructuring charges resulting from
our actions, by category of expenditures, adjusted to exclude those activities specifically related
to discontinued operations, are:
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Employee severance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Facilities consolidation and lease termination |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges include employee severance and facility consolidation costs resulting
from the closure of leased facilities and other workforce reductions attributable to our efforts to
reduce costs. During the three months ended January 30, 2009, 15 employees in our Connectivity
segment were impacted by reductions in force. The costs related to these 15 employees were offset
by favorable adjustments to costs associated with restructuring events accounted for in fiscal
2008. During the three months ended February 1, 2008, 11 employees in our Connectivity and Network
Solutions segments were impacted by reductions in force. The costs of these reductions have been
and will be funded through cash from operations.
Facility consolidation and lease termination expenses represent costs associated with our
decision to consolidate and close duplicative or excess manufacturing and office facilities. During
the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008, we incurred charges of $0.5 million
and $0.1 million, respectively, due to our decision to close unproductive and excess facilities as
well as to the continued softening of real estate markets, which resulted in lower sublease income.
The following table provides detail on our restructuring activity and the remaining accrual
balance by category as of January 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Operations Net |
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
Accrual |
|
Type of Charge |
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Charged to accrual |
|
|
January 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Employee severance costs |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
Facilities consolidation |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring accrual |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect that all but $1.0 million of the remaining $3.1 million of cash expenditures
relating to employee severance costs incurred as of January 30, 2009 will be paid by the end of
fiscal 2009. The remaining $1.0 million is expected to be paid by the end of fiscal 2013. Of the
$7.7 million to be paid for the consolidation of facilities, we expect that $1.1 million will be
paid by the end of fiscal 2009 and that the remaining balance will be paid from unrestricted cash
over the respective lease terms of the facilities through 2015. Based on our intention to continue
to consolidate and close duplicative or excess manufacturing operations in order to reduce our cost
structure, we may incur additional restructuring charges (both cash and non-cash) in future
periods. These restructuring charges may have a material effect on our operating results.
Note 13: Other Income (Loss), Net
Other income (loss), net is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Interest income on investments |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
Interest expense on borrowings |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (loss), net |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
Impairment loss on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
Impairment loss on cost method investment |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange income (loss) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other loss, net |
|
$ |
(20.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(44.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
During the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008, we recorded impairment
charges of $14.2 million and $50.2 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of certain
auction-rate securities we hold. As of January 30, 2009, we held auction-rate securities with a
fair value of $26.7 million and an original par value of $169.8 million. We have determined that
these impairment charges are other-than-temporary in nature in accordance with EITF 03-1 and FSP
No. FAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments. Given the current state of the credit
markets, when we prepare our quarterly financial results we will continue to assess the fair
value of our auction-rate securities for substantive changes in relevant market conditions, changes
in financial condition or other changes in these investments. We may be required to record
additional losses for impairment if we determine there are further declines in fair value that are
temporary or other-than-temporary.
During the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a $3.0 million impairment to write-off our
investment in E-Band Communications Corporation in connection with
the preparation of our quarterly financial results.
The $1.1 million gain on the sale of fixed assets recorded during the three months ended
January 30, 2009 is due to a $1.1 million gain recognized on the sale of our Cheltenham facility
located in the U.K.
Note 14: Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Contingencies: We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and claims arising in the
ordinary course of business or otherwise. Many of these disputes may be resolved without formal
litigation. The amount of monetary liability resulting from the ultimate resolution of these
matters cannot be determined at this time. As of January 30, 2009, we had recorded $7.8 million in
loss reserves for certain of these matters. In light of the reserves we have recorded, at this time
we believe the ultimate resolution of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims will not have a
material adverse impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Because of
the uncertainty inherent in litigation, however, it is possible that unfavorable resolutions of one
or more of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims could exceed the amount currently reserved and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Change of Control: We maintain certain employee
benefits, including severance to key employees, in the event of a change of control of
ADC.
Note 15: Common Stock Repurchase Plan
On August 12, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program for up to
$150.0 million. The program provided that share repurchases could commence beginning in September
2008 and continue until the earlier of the completion of $150.0 million in share repurchases or
July 31, 2009. As of October 31, 2008, we had repurchased 6.4 million shares of common stock for
$56.5 million, or $8.80 average per share. In early December 2008, we completed this $150.0
million repurchase program at an average price of $7.04 per share, resulting in 21.3 million shares
being purchased under the program.
Note 16: Fair Value Measurements
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. In determining fair value for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at
fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would
transact and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or
liability.
Fair Value Hierarchy
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A
financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. SFAS 157 establishes three levels
of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
15
Level 1
Level 1 applies to assets and liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities. Valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and
regularly available in an active market and do not entail a significant degree
of judgment. Our assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include money market funds that are traded in an
active market with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions.
Level 2
Level 2 applies to assets and liabilities for which there are other than Level 1 observable
inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions
(less active markets), or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or
can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Our liabilities
utilizing Level 2 inputs include derivative instruments.
Level 2 instruments require more management judgment and subjectivity as compared to Level 1
instruments. For instance:
|
|
|
Determining which instruments are most similar to the instrument being priced
requires management to identify a sample of similar securities based on the
coupon rates, maturity, issuer, credit rating and instrument type, and
subjectively select an individual security or multiple securities that are
deemed most similar to the security being priced; and |
|
|
|
|
Determining whether a market is considered active requires management judgment. |
Level 3
Level 3 applies to assets and liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the
valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or
liabilities. The determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments requires the most management
judgment and subjectivity. Our assets utilizing Level 3 inputs include auction-rate securities.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 30, 2009 were
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
515.8 |
|
|
$ |
515.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term available-for-sale securities
(auction-rate securities) |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
557.6 |
|
|
$ |
530.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap liabilities
(included in other noncurrent
liabilities) |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Currency hedge liabilities (included in
other noncurrent liabilities) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The following table provides detail on the activity in the auction-rate securities balance as
of January 30, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Measurements Using |
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
40.4 |
|
Total gains or losses (realized or unrealized) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) |
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Purchases, issuance, and settlements |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and /or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the failed auction status and lack of liquidity in the market for our long-term
available-for-sale securities, the valuation methodology we utilized includes certain assumptions
that were not supported by prices from observable current market transactions in the same
instruments nor were they based on observable market data. With the assistance of a valuation
specialist, we estimated the fair value of the auction-rate securities based on the following: (1)
the underlying structure of each security; (2) the present value of future principal and interest
payments discounted at rates considered to reflect current market conditions; (3) consideration of
the probabilities of default, passing auction, or earning the maximum rate for each period; and (4)
estimates of the recovery rates in the event of defaults for each security. These estimated fair
values could change significantly based on future market conditions.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a leading global provider of broadband communications network infrastructure products
and related services. Our products offer comprehensive solutions that enable the delivery of
high-speed Internet, data, video and voice communications over wireline, wireless, cable,
enterprise and broadcast networks. These products include fiber-optic, copper and coaxial based
frames, cabinets, cables, connectors and cards, wireless capacity and coverage solutions, network
access devices and other physical infrastructure components. Our products and services are
deployed primarily by communications service providers and owners and operators of private
enterprise networks. Our products are used primarily in the last mile/kilometer of communications
networks where Internet, data, video and voice traffic are linked from the serving office of a
communications service provider to the end-user of communication services.
We also provide professional services to our customers. These services help our customers
plan, deploy and maintain Internet, data, video and voice communication networks. We also assist
our customers in integrating broadband communications equipment used in wireline, wireless, cable
and enterprise networks. By providing these services, we have additional opportunities to sell our
hardware products.
Our customers consist primarily of long-distance and local communications service providers
and private enterprises that operate their own communication networks. In addition, our customers
include cable television operators, wireless service providers, new competitive telephone service
providers, broadcasters, government agencies, system integrators and communications equipment
manufacturers and distributors.
We offer broadband connectivity products, wireless capacity and coverage optimization
products, wireline access products and professional services to our customers through the following
three reportable business segments:
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
|
|
Network Solutions |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, management initiated a restructuring of the Network
Solutions segment by exiting several outdoor wireless product lines. During the first quarter of
fiscal 2009, management made further changes to the Network Solutions segment by moving the
Wireline solutions business to the Connectivity segment in order to better manage and utilize
resources and drive profitability. As a result of this change, we have changed our reportable
segments to conform to our current management reporting presentation. We have reclassified prior
year segment disclosures to conform to the new segment presentation.
17
Our Connectivity products connect wireline, wireless, cable, enterprise and broadcast
communications networks over copper (twisted pair), coaxial, fiber-optic and wireless media. These
products provide the physical interconnections between network components and access points into
networks.
Our Network Solutions products help improve coverage and capacity for wireless networks. These
products improve signal quality, expand coverage and capacity into expanded geographic areas,
increase the speed and expand the delivery and capacity of networks, and help reduce the capital
and operating costs of delivering wireless services. Applications for these products include
in-building solutions, outdoor coverage solutions and mobile network solutions.
Our Professional Services business provides integration services for broadband and
multiservice communications over wireline, wireless, cable and enterprise networks. Our
Professional Services business unit helps customers plan, deploy and maintain communications
networks that deliver Internet, data, video and voice services.
Marketplace Conditions
Current Global Macro-Economic Conditions
The widely reported global recession has had, and likely will continue to have, a significant
impact on our industry and our business. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009 our financial
results were impacted adversely by lower than expected spending by our customers. We believe it is
likely our customers will continue to spend conservatively throughout our fiscal 2009 because of
the uncertainties regarding the profitability and growth of their own businesses. For this reason
we continue to expect lower revenues in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008, but the extent of
the expected revenue decline is extremely difficult to predict and is dependent both on the
severity of the recession and its length. These expectations therefore could fluctuate
significantly and may impact our profitability. During the first quarter, the recession impacted
our business specifically in a number of ways. For instance:
|
|
|
Net sales decreased by 22.7% from our first quarter of fiscal 2008; |
|
|
|
|
Our net sales from countries outside the U.S. grew to 43.7% of our total net sales
versus 39.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. As a result of this and the fact that
the U.S. dollar has strengthened, our net sales were negatively
impacted by approximately $16.0 million
in the first quarter versus the same period in fiscal 2008; |
|
|
|
|
Despite reducing actual expenditures for research and development and selling and
administrative costs in the first quarter from the same period in fiscal 2008, these costs
grew as a percentage of our net sales because of lower sales volumes;
and |
|
|
|
|
Our gross profit percentage in the first quarter was 30.9% versus 36.6% in the same
period in fiscal 2008 primarily because of lower sales volumes. |
In response to the adverse impacts on our business caused by the recession, we have taken
significant steps to lower our operating cost structure. In each of the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008 and the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we announced significant restructuring initiatives.
Each of these initiatives included reductions in force designed to adjust our operations
appropriately to lower levels of demand from our customers. We also announced our intention to
sell APS Germany as well as plans to discontinue certain outdoor wireless coverage products.
Depending on the severity and length of the recession and its impact on our business we may
determine it appropriate to take additional actions to reduce costs in the future.
Industry Conditions
Longer term, we continue to believe that the ever-increasing consumption of bandwidth will drive a multi-year migration to next-generation networks that
can deliver reliable broadband services at low, often flat-rate prices over virtually any medium
anytime and anywhere. We believe this evolution particularly will impact the last mile/kilometer
portion of networks where our products and services primarily are used and where constraints in the
high-speed delivery of communications services are most likely to occur.
For us to participate as fully as possible in this evolution we must focus on the development and sale of next-generation network infrastructure products.
We believe there are two key elements driving the migration to next-generation networks:
|
|
|
First, businesses and consumers worldwide are becoming increasingly dependent on
broadband, multi-service communications networks to conduct a wide range of daily
communications tasks for business and personal purposes (e.g., emails with large amounts of
data, online gaming, video streaming and photo sharing). This demand for additional
broadband services increases the need for broadband network infrastructure products. |
18
|
|
|
Second, end-users of communications services increasingly expect to do business over a
single network connection at a low price. Both public networks operated by communications
service providers and private enterprise networks are evolving to provide combinations of
Internet, data, video and voice services that can be offered over the same high-speed
network connection. |
This evolution to next-generation networks impacts our industry significantly. Many of our
communications service provider customers have begun to focus their investments in these
next-generation networks to differentiate themselves from their competitors by providing more
robust services at increasing speeds. They believe such network advancements will attract business
and consumer customers and allow them to grow their businesses.
Next-generation network investment by communications service providers has tended to come in
the form of large, multi-year projects, and these significant projects have attracted many
equipment vendors, including us. We believe that it is important for us to participate in these
projects to grow our business and have therefore focused our strategy around the products that help
make these projects successful. These include central office fiber-based equipment, wireless
coverage and capacity equipment, and equipment to aid the deployment of fiber-based networks closer
to the ultimate customer (i.e., fiber to the node, curb, residence, or business, which we
collectively refer to as our FTTX products).
Spending on these next-generation initiatives in which we participate have not resulted in
significant overall spending increases on all categories of network infrastructure equipment. In
fact, spending on network infrastructure equipment in total has increased only modestly in recent
years as our customers have reallocated their spending towards new next-generation initiatives and away from their
legacy networks. Even prior to the current recession, industry observers anticipated that in the
next few years overall global spending on communications infrastructure equipment would be
relatively flat. Over the long-term, we therefore believe our ability to compete in the
communications equipment marketplace depends in significant part on whether we can continue to develop and
market effectively next-generation network infrastructure products.
Strategy
Given current economic conditions and our beliefs about the marketplace in our industry, we
believe we must focus on the following three priorities for us to compete effectively in our
industry over the long-term.
First, we must grow our business in areas of strategic importance. This means increasing our
business in high growth segments within fiber-based and wireless communications networks with
central office fiber, FTTX and wireless coverage and capacity product solutions. We will also
focus on rapidly growing geographies, such as developing markets in China, Latin America, Eastern
Europe and Russia, the Middle East and Africa, and India. We believe growth in these areas may
come either from our own internal initiatives to expand our product offerings through research and
development activities, additional sales, marketing and other operating resources, or from the
acquisition of new products, sales channels and operations.
Our internal research and development efforts are focused on those areas where we believe we
are most likely to achieve success and on projects that we believe directly advance our strategic
aims. Our research and development projects have varying risk and reward profiles and we
consistently monitor these efforts to ensure that they appropriately balance the potential
opportunities against the investments required.
Several of our largest customers have engaged in consolidation to gain greater scale and
broaden their service offerings. These consolidations create companies with greater market power
which, in recent years, has placed significant pricing pressure on the products we and other
equipment vendors sell. To better serve these larger customers, we believe it is appropriate for
companies within our industry to consolidate in order to gain greater scale and position themselves
to offer a wider array of products and we may engage in such activities. We also continually
evaluate and monitor our existing business and product lines for growth and profitability
potential and, when we believe appropriate, deemphasize or divest product lines and
businesses that we no longer believe can advance our strategic vision or most effectively serve our customers needs.
Second, we are focused on developing ways to sell more of our current portfolio and our newly
developed products to existing customers and to introduce our products to new customers. We have
recently reorganized many of our sales and marketing activities around the types of customers we
serve (e.g., carriers, enterprise, original equipment manufacturers, etc.). This differs from a
historical alignment of our sales and marketing resources that was focused more narrowly on the
product sets we sell. We believe this new market-based alignment will enable us to better
understand and serve the needs of our customers.
19
We also continuously seek to partner with other companies as a means to serve the public and
private communication network markets and to offer more complete solutions for our customers
needs. Many of our connectivity products in particular are conducive to incorporation by other
equipment vendors into a systems level solution. We also believe there are opportunities to sell
more of our products through indirect sales channels, including systems integrators and value added
resellers. In addition, we are expanding our relationships with distributors that make our
products more readily available to a wider base of customers worldwide.
Third, we remain highly committed to creating a compelling value proposition for our
customers. This includes helping our customers maximize their return on investment, evolve their
networks and simplify network deployment challenges. We strive to offer customer-specific
solutions, price competitive products with high functionality and quality and world-class customer
service and support that collectively will position us to grow our business in a cost-effective
manner.
We also continue to implement initiatives as part of an overall program we call competitive
transformation in order to improve the efficiency of our operations. Among other actions, these
initiatives include:
|
|
|
migrating sales volume to customer-preferred, leading technology products and sunsetting
end of life products; |
|
|
|
|
improving our customers ordering experience through a faster, simpler, more efficient
inquiry-to-invoice process; |
|
|
|
|
redesigning product lines to gain efficiencies from the use of more common components and
improve customization capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
increasing direct material savings from strategic global sourcing; |
|
|
|
|
improving cash flow from supplier-managed inventory and lead-time reduction programs; |
|
|
|
|
relocating certain manufacturing, engineering and other operations from higher-cost
geographic areas to lower-cost areas; |
|
|
|
|
reducing the number of locations from which we conduct general and administrative support
functions; and |
|
|
|
|
focusing our resources on core operations and, where appropriate, using third parties to
perform non-core processes. |
This program has yielded significant cost savings to our operations since fiscal 2006. These
savings help generate leverage in our operating model and help to offset pricing pressures and
unfavorable mixes in product sales that can have negative impacts on our operating results. Our
ability to continue to implement our competitive transformation strategy is subject to numerous
risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that this strategy will be successful. In
addition, our gross profit percentages have and will continue to fluctuate from period to period
based on several factors, including, but not limited to, raw material and freight costs, sales
volume, product mix and the impact of future potential competitive transformation initiatives.
A more detailed description of the risks to our business can be found in Item 1A of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 and in Part II of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
20
Results of Operations
Net Sales
The following table shows net sales and expense items from continuing operations for the three
months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
Percentage Increase |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) Between |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Periods |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
254.3 |
|
|
$ |
329.1 |
|
|
|
(22.7 |
)% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
175.6 |
|
|
|
208.7 |
|
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
78.7 |
|
|
|
120.4 |
|
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
Gross margin |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Selling and administration |
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
413.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(58.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
504.9 |
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
393.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(426.2 |
) |
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
(167.6 |
)% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(197.7 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
(446.5 |
) |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
366.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(442.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth our net sales for the three months ended January 30, 2009 and
February 1, 2008 for each of our reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
Reportable Segment |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Between Periods |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
$ |
198.2 |
|
|
$ |
257.5 |
|
|
|
(23.0 |
)% |
Network Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
Services |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Network Solutions |
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
Services |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Professional Services |
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
254.3 |
|
|
$ |
329.1 |
|
|
|
(22.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net sales decrease for the three months ended January 30, 2009 compared to the three
months ended February 1, 2008 was driven by sales declines in all reporting segments. These
decreases were due to the general downturn of the global economy, which grew in severity and
extended across a majority of our geographies in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The current
economic environment has driven customers to spend significantly less than they did in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008.
International sales comprised 43.7% and 39.8% of our net sales for the three months ended
January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008, respectively. This increase as a percent of sales is due to
the fact that our U.S. based sales have been more significantly impacted by the current economic
conditions than our international sales. As a result of significant international sales, our net
sales have been negatively impacted in recent quarters from the relative strengthening of the U.S.
dollar against a majority of other currencies. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
negatively impacted first quarter 2009 sales by approximately $16.0 million versus the same period
of fiscal 2008.
The three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008 included sales in Connectivity of
$15.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, as a result of the Century Man acquisition that
closed during January 2008. This increase was due to the inclusion of Century Man in our results
for a full quarter and increased demand due to the government issuance of 3G wireless licenses.
21
Gross Profit
During the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008, our gross profit
percentages were 30.9% and 36.6%, respectively. The decrease in gross margins was primarily driven
by the decrease in sales volume, partially offset by our cost reduction initiatives. The mix of
products we sell can vary substantially. If sales volumes, product mix, pricing or other
significant factors that impact our gross margins continue to be affected by the economic downturn,
our gross margins could continue to be adversely affected. As a result, our future gross margin
rate is difficult to predict with precision.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses for the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008
represented 198.5% and 31.1% of net sales, respectively. As discussed below, operating expenses
include research and development, selling and administration expenses and restructuring and
impairment charges.
Research and development: Research and development expenses for the three months ended January
30, 2009 and February 1, 2008 represented 7.5% and 5.9% of net sales, respectively. This increase
as a percent of sales is due to lower sales volumes. Research and development expenses decreased
to $19.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 from $19.5 million in the same period of
fiscal 2008. Given the rapidly changing technological and competitive environment in the
communications equipment industry, continued commitment to product development efforts will be
required for us to remain competitive. Accordingly, we intend to continue to allocate substantial
resources, as a percentage of our net sales, to product development. Most of our research will be
directed towards projects that we believe directly advance our strategic aims in segments in the
marketplace that we believe are most likely to grow.
Selling and administration: Selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended
January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008 represented 28.3% and 24.8% of net sales, respectively. This
increase as a percent of sales is due to lower sales volumes. Selling and administrative expenses
were $71.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, a reduction of $9.8 million from $81.7
million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The decrease was due to our cost reduction
initiatives, which included headcount reductions, significant decreases in discretionary spending,
and a decrease in incentives.
Restructuring charges: Restructuring charges for the three months ended January 30, 2009 and
February 1, 2008 were $0.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Restructuring charges include
employee severance and facility consolidation costs resulting from the closure of leased facilities
and other workforce reductions attributable to our efforts to reduce costs. During the three months
ended January 30, 2009, 15 employees in our Connectivity segment were impacted by reductions in
force. During the three months ended February 1, 2008, 11 employees in our Connectivity and
Network Solutions segments were impacted by reductions in force. The costs of these reductions have
been and will be funded through cash from operations.
Impairments: In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142, we review goodwill annually for impairment, or more
frequently if potential interim indicators exist that could result in
impairment. Due to the current global recession and adverse business conditions that have resulted in a sustained decline in our market capitalization,
we performed a goodwill impairment analysis of our two reporting units that contain goodwill,
Connectivity and Network Solutions. In our analysis, the fair values of each of the reporting units
were estimated for the purpose of goodwill impairment testing by applying the present value of
forecasted future cash flows, using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed
were appropriate for the circumstances. We also considered market approaches in estimating fair
value. In performing the goodwill impairment analysis, we, among other things, consulted with an
independent advisor.
In accordance with
SFAS 144, long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that
their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on recent business conditions, an impairment
review of long-lived assets was performed in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The review has
resulted in the recognition of an impairment charge related to the intangible assets of the Network
Solutions segment. The fair value of the impaired assets was estimated for the purpose of
impairment testing by applying the present value of forecasted future cash flows, using estimates,
judgments and assumptions that management believed were appropriate for the circumstances. In
preparing the estimated fair value of the impaired assets, we, among other things, consulted an
independent advisor.
As of our
first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded an estimated impairment charge of $413.5 million to
reduce the carrying value of goodwill and other long-lived intangibles. The estimated impairment
includes $280.8 million of goodwill related to Connectivity and $85.4 million of goodwill and $47.3
million of intangibles related to Network Solutions. We presently expect to finalize this analysis
in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. Any adjustments to our preliminary estimates as a result of completing this evaluation will
be recorded in our financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. These adjustments
may be material.
22
Other Income (Loss), Net
Other income (loss), net is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
February 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Interest income on investments |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
Interest expense on borrowings |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (loss), net |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
Impairment loss on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
Impairment loss on cost method investment |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange income (loss) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other loss, net |
|
$ |
(20.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(44.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended January 30, 2009 and February 1, 2008, we recorded impairment
charges of $14.2 million and $50.2 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of certain
auction-rate securities we hold. As of January 30, 2009, we held auction-rate securities with a
fair value of $26.7 million and an original par value of $169.8 million. We have determined that
these impairment charges are other-than-temporary in nature in accordance with EITF 03-1 and FSP
No. FAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments. Given the current state of the credit markets, when we prepare our quarterly
financial results we will continue to assess the fair value of our auction-rate securities for
substantive changes in relevant market conditions, changes in financial condition or other changes
in these investments. We may be required to record additional losses for impairment if we determine
there are further declines in fair value that are temporary or other-than-temporary.
During the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a $3.0 million impairment to write-off our
investment in E-Band Communications Corporation in connection with
the preparation of our quarterly financial results.
The $1.1 million gain on the sale of fixed assets recorded during the three months ended
January 30, 2009 is due to a $1.1 million gain recognized on the sale of our Cheltenham facility
located in the U.K.
Income Taxes
For the three months ended January 30, 2009, our tax benefit was $4.0 million on a pretax loss
from continuing operations of $446.5 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of 0.9%.
For the three months ended February 1, 2008, our tax provision was $1.5 million on a pretax loss
from continuing operations of $26.9 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of (5.6%).
Substantially all of our income tax benefit for the three months ended January 30, 2009
relates to reversal of deferred tax liabilities attributable to U.S. tax amortization of purchased
goodwill from the acquisition of KRONE. The reversal of these deferred tax liabilities result from
the goodwill impairment charge discussed in Note 7 of the financial statements. Substantially all
our income tax provision for the three months ended February 1, 2008 relates to foreign income
taxes and deferred tax liabilities attributable to U.S. tax amortization of purchased goodwill from
the acquisition of KRONE. In addition, our effective income tax rate is affected by changes in the
valuation allowance recorded for our deferred tax assets. See Note 9 to the financial statements
for a description of the accounting standards related to our recording of the valuation allowance.
We do not record income tax benefits in most jurisdictions where we incur pretax losses
because the deferred tax assets generated by the losses have been offset with a corresponding
increase in the valuation allowance. Likewise, we do not record income tax expense in most
jurisdictions where we have pretax income because the deferred tax assets utilized to reduce income
taxes payable have been offset with a corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance.
23
Acquisitions
LGC
On December 3, 2007, we completed the acquisition of LGC, a provider of in-building wireless
solution products, headquartered in San Jose, California. These products increase the quality and
capacity of wireless networks by permitting voice and data signals to penetrate building structures
and by distributing these signals evenly throughout the building. LGC also offers products that
permit voice and data signals to reach remote locations. The acquisition was made to enable us to
participate in this high growth segment of the industry.
We acquired all of the outstanding capital stock and warrants of LGC for $143.3 million in
cash (net of cash acquired). We acquired $58.9 million of intangible assets as part of this
purchase. Goodwill of $85.4 million was recorded in this transaction and assigned to our Network
Solutions segment. This goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. We also assumed debt of $17.3
million associated with this acquisition, the majority of which was paid off by the second quarter
of fiscal 2008. The results of LGC, subsequent to December 3, 2007, are included in our
consolidated statements of operations.
Option holders of LGC shares were given the opportunity either to receive a cash payment for
their options or exchange their options for options to acquire ADC shares. Certain LGC option
holders received $9.1 million in cash payments for their options. The remaining option holders
received ADC options with a fair value of $3.5 million as of the close of the acquisition. Of this
$3.5 million, $3.0 million was added to the purchase price of LGC and the remaining $0.5 million
will be recognized over the remaining vesting period.
Century Man
On January 10, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Century Man, a leading provider of
communication distribution frame solutions, headquartered in Shenzhen, China. The acquisition has
accelerated our growth in the Chinese connectivity market, as well as provided us with additional
products designed to meet the needs of customers in other developing markets outside of China.
We acquired Century Man for $52.3 million in cash (net of cash acquired). The former
shareholders of Century Man may be paid up to an additional $15.0 million if, during the three
years following closing, certain financial results are achieved by the acquired business. As of
January 30, 2009, we believe $5.0 million of the potential additional consideration of $15.0
million is probable of payment in March 2009. This has been recorded as an increase to the
goodwill associated with this acquisition.
Of the purchase price, $7.5 million is held in escrow for up to 36 months following the close
of the transaction. Of the $7.5 million, $7.0 million relates to potential indemnification claims
and $0.5 million relates to the disposition of certain buildings. As of January 30, 2009, $3.5
million of the total escrow amount has been released to the sellers. In addition, a $0.3 million
payment will also be made to the sellers for the changes in foreign exchange rates as per the escrow
agreement. This payment was accounted for as additional contingent consideration to the sellers
and increased goodwill accordingly.
We acquired $13.0 million of intangible assets as part of this purchase. Goodwill of $36.7
million was recorded in this transaction and assigned to our Connectivity segment. This goodwill is
not deductible for tax purposes. The results of Century Man, subsequent to January 10, 2008, are
included in our consolidated statements of operations.
The allocation of the purchase prices for LGC and Century Man to the assets and liabilities
acquired was finalized in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and did not result in any material
adjustments. See Note 7 for a discussion of the goodwill and intangible
impairments recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Discontinued Operations
APS Germany
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest APS
Germany. We classified this business as a discontinued operation in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008. This business was previously included in our Professional Services segment. We expect to
close on a sale of APS Germany in fiscal 2009. We expect to receive proceeds in excess of our book
value and do not anticipate a significant gain or loss on the sale.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
See our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008 for a discussion of our
critical accounting policies and estimates. We are updating the critical accounting policies and
estimates set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K by including the following critical
accounting policy:
24
Fair Value Measurements: We have financial assets and financial liabilities that we account
for or disclose at fair value. Our fair value measurements are performed in accordance with SFAS
No. 157, which requires the incorporation of all assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. Development of these assumptions
requires significant judgment.
The most material of our fair value measurements are our money market funds, auction-rate
securities and derivative instruments. For a detailed discussion of the methods used to calculate
our fair value measurements, see Note 16, Fair Value Measurements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Cash and cash equivalents not subject to restrictions were $515.8 million at January 30, 2009,
a decrease of $115.6 million compared to $631.4 million as of October 31, 2008. This decrease was
primarily driven by $94.1 million of stock repurchases and the payment of management and employee
incentives related to performance for fiscal 2008.
Current capital market conditions have significantly reduced our ability to liquidate our
remaining auction-rate securities. As of January 30, 2009, we held auction-rate securities with a
fair value of $26.7 million and an original par value of $169.8 million, which are classified as
long-term. We will not be able to liquidate any of these auction-rate securities until either a
future auction is successful or, in the event secondary market sales become available, we decide to
sell the securities in a secondary market. A secondary market sale of any of these securities could
take a significant amount of time to complete and could potentially result in a further loss.
Most of the $14.2 million decline in estimated value of the auction-rate securities since
October 31, 2008 is due to the election of certain issuers to exercise a right to issue
non-cumulative preferred shares in place of their interest bearing obligations. Unless redeemed by
the issuers, the non-cumulative preferred shares are perpetual. The decline in value represents an
expectation that the investors will no longer receive regularly scheduled interest or dividend
payments on these preferred shares.
We have commenced arbitration against Merrill Lynch and its agent/broker who worked on our
account in connection with their sale of auction-rate securities to us. The par value of the
auction-rate securities at issue in our claim is approximately $138.0 million. We presently would
not expect our arbitration hearing to take place until fiscal year 2010 and no hearing date has
been established at this time. Lehman Brothers sold us all other auction-rate-securities that we
hold. We are evaluating our options for potential recovery of losses associated with those
securities.
Restricted cash balances that are pledged primarily as collateral for letters of credit and
lease obligations affect our liquidity. As of January 30, 2009, we had restricted cash of $14.9
million compared to $15.3 million as of October 31, 2008, a decrease of $0.4 million. Restricted
cash is expected to become available to us upon satisfaction of the obligations pursuant to which
the letters of credit or guarantees were issued. Additional amounts of $13.4 million will be
restricted in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 relating to the
interest rate swap collateral. This collateral amount could vary
significantly as it fluctuates with the forward LIBOR.
Operating Activities
Net cash used by operating activities from continuing operations for the three months ended
January 30, 2009 was $15.0 million. Cash outflows included a $442.5 million loss from continuing
operations and a $72.0 million decrease in operating liabilities. These cash outflows were offset
by $458.6 million of non-cash adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net
cash provided by operating activities and a $40.9 million decrease in operating assets. The
non-cash adjustments of $458.6 million to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash
provided by operating activities includes $366.2 million of goodwill impairment, $47.3 million of
intangibles impairment and the $14.2 million impairment recorded on available-for-sale securities.
Working capital requirements typically will increase or decrease with changes in the level of net
sales. In addition, the timing of certain accrued incentive payments will affect the annual cash
flow as these expenses are accrued throughout the fiscal year but paid during the first quarter of
the subsequent year.
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the three months
ended February 1, 2008 was $5.6 million. Cash inflows included $73.8 million of non-cash
adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating
activities and a $16.8 million decrease in operating assets. These cash inflows were offset by a
$28.4 million loss from continuing operations and a $56.6 million decrease in operating
liabilities. The non-cash adjustments of $73.8 million to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities
includes the $50.2 million impairment recorded on available-for-sale securities.
25
Investing Activities
Cash used by investing activities from continuing operations was zero for the three months
ended January 30, 2009, which was due to $7.7 million of property, patent and equipment additions,
partially offset by $4.5 million of proceeds from the disposal of property and equipment and $2.7
million from the finalization of our purchase accounting for the acquisition of LGC. Proceeds from
the disposal of property primarily reflect the sale of our Cheltenham facility, for which we
received $4.3 million of cash proceeds during the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Cash used by investing activities from continuing operations was $172.4 million for the three
months ended February 1, 2008, which was due to $145.7 million for the acquisition of LGC, $51.4
million for the acquisition of Century Man and $7.4 million of property and equipment additions.
This was partially offset by $32.0 million of net sales of available-for-sale securities.
Financing Activities
Cash used by financing activities from continuing operations was $95.1 million for the three
months ended January 30, 2009, of which $94.1 million was due to common stock repurchases. Cash
provided by financing activities was $439.6 million for the three months ended February 1, 2008.
This was due to the issuance of $450.0 million of convertible debt, less payments for the financing
costs associated with the issuance of this debt.
Credit Facility
On January 30, 2009 we terminated the $200.0 million secured five-year revolving credit
facility that we entered into in April 2008. This facility had no outstanding balances when it was
terminated. As a result of the current economic environment and its impact on our financial
results, we believed that the provisions of the agreement would need to be amended in order to
maintain and utilize this facility. Based on our discussions with the lenders, we determined that
the terms of an amendment as well as the ongoing cost of maintaining the facility were not
economical. As a consequence of terminating our revolving credit facility, we recorded a
non-operating charge of $1.0 million to write-off the deferred financing costs associated with the
facility.
The assets that secured the facility also served as collateral for our interest rate swap on
our $200.0 million convertible unsecured floating rate notes that mature in 2013. As a result of
the facilitys termination, we were required to pledge cash collateral to secure the interest rate
swap. The fair market value of the interest rate swap was a net
unrealized loss of $12.4 million and $2.8 million on January 30, 2009
and October 31, 2008, respectively. The unrealized loss is recorded as
a component of comprehensive income. On February 2, 2009, we pledged $13.4 million of cash to secure the interest rate swap
termination value, which will be included in our restricted cash balance. This collateral amount
could vary significantly as it fluctuates with the forward LIBOR.
Share Repurchase
On August 12, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program for up to
$150.0 million. The program provided that share repurchases could commence beginning in September
2008 and continue until the earlier of the completion of $150.0 million in share repurchases or
July 31, 2009. As of October 31, 2008, we had repurchased 6.4 million shares of common stock for
$56.5 million, or $8.80 average per share. In early December 2008, we completed this $150.0
million repurchase program at an average price of $7.04 per share, resulting in 21.3 million shares
being purchased under the program.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
We do not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements. There has been no material change in our
contractual obligations out of the ordinary course of our business since the end of fiscal 2008.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, for additional
information regarding our contractual obligations.
26
Working Capital and Liquidity Outlook
Our main source of liquidity continues to be our unrestricted cash resources, which include
existing cash and cash equivalents. We currently expect that our existing cash resources will be
sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures to execute our near-term business plan. This expectation is based on current
business operations and economic conditions and assumes we are able to maintain breakeven or
positive cash flows from operations on an annual basis.
Auction-rate securities account for most of our available-for-sale securities as of January
30, 2009. Current capital market conditions have significantly reduced our ability to liquidate
our auction-rate securities. However, we do not believe we need these investments to be liquid in
order to meet the cash needs of our present operating plans. As of January 30, 2009, we held
auction-rate securities with a fair value of $26.7 million.
We also believe that our unrestricted cash resources will enable us to pursue strategic
opportunities, including possible product line or business acquisitions. However, if the cost of
one or more acquisition opportunities exceeds our existing cash resources, additional sources may
be required. Any plan to raise additional capital may involve an equity-based or equity-linked
financing, such as another issuance of convertible debt or the issuance of common stock or
preferred stock, which would be dilutive to existing shareowners. As a result of terminating the
$200.0 million revolving bank credit facility, our assets that previously secured the facility are
no longer encumbered. Such assets could be used to raise liquidity through asset sales,
securitizations, or a new lending facility. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, we may
be subject to restrictive covenants that could limit our operational flexibility and higher
interest expense that could dilute earnings per share.
In addition, our deferred tax assets, which are substantially reserved at this time, should
reduce our income tax payable on taxable earnings in future years.
On February 2, 2009, we filed a report on Form 8-K under which we announced a commitment to a restructuring plan with
respect to our business. At that time, we announced that under the plan we intended to terminate what was then an undetermined number of employment positions. At that time, we also announced we were unable to estimate the charges and related cash
expenditures associated with the restructuring plan. We now estimate that between $2.5 and $3.5 million in restructuring charges will be associated with the plan. We expect almost all of these charges to be comprised of cash restructuring charges related to severance payments.
Approximately 600 employees are impacted by the reductions in force associated with the restructuring plan and substantially all impacted employees have been notified.
We expect the restructuring
plan to be completed during the second quarter of our fiscal 2009.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information
The discussion herein, including, but not limited to, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements represent our expectations or
beliefs concerning future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements. These statements may
include, among others, statements regarding future sales, profit percentages, earnings per share
and other results of operations; statements about shareholder value; expectations or beliefs
regarding the marketplace in which we operate and the macro-economy generally; the prices of raw
materials and transportation costs; the sufficiency of our cash balances and cash generated from
operating and financing activities for our future liquidity; capital resource needs, and the effect
of regulatory changes. These statements could be affected by a variety of factors, such as: demand
for equipment by telecommunication service providers and large enterprises; variations in demand
for particular products in our portfolio and other factors that can impact our overall margins; our
ability to operate our business to achieve, maintain and grow operating profitability; changing
regulatory conditions and macroeconomic conditions both in our industry and in local and global
markets that can influence the demand for our products and services; fluctuations in the market
value of our common stock, which can be caused by many factors outside of our control and could
cause us to record additional impairment charges on our goodwill or other intangible assets in the
future if our market capitalization drops further below the book value of our assets for a
continued time period; consolidation among our customers, competitors or vendors that can disrupt
or displace customer relationships; our ability to keep pace with rapid technological change in our
industry; our ability to make the proper strategic choices regarding acquisitions or divestitures;
our ability to integrate the operations of any acquired business; increased competition within our
industry and increased pricing pressure from our customers; our dependence on relatively few
customers for a majority of our sales as well as potential sales growth in market segments we
believe have the greatest potential; fluctuations in our operating results from quarter-to-quarter,
that can be caused by many factors beyond our control; financial problems, work interruptions in
operations or other difficulties faced by customers or vendors that can impact our sales, sales
collections and ability to procure necessary materials, components and services to operate our
business; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights and defend against potential
infringement claims; possible limitations on our ability to raise any additional required capital;
declines in the fair value and liquidity of auction-rate securities we hold; our ability to attract
and retain qualified employees; potential liabilities that can arise if any of our products have
design or manufacturing defects; our ability to obtain and the
27
prices of raw materials, components and services; our dependence on contract manufacturers to
make certain products; changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity
securities prices, all of which will impact our operating results; political, economic and legal
uncertainties related to doing business in China; our ability to defend or settle satisfactorily
any litigation; and other risks and uncertainties including those identified in the sections
captioned Risk Factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,
2008 and Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We disclaim any intention or
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008, our major
market risk exposure relates to adverse fluctuations in certain commodity prices, security prices
and foreign currency exchange rates. We believe our exposure associated with these market risks has
not changed materially since October 31, 2008.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, there was no change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of
business or otherwise. Many of these disputes may be resolved without formal litigation. The amount
of monetary liability resulting from the ultimate resolution of these matters cannot be determined
at this time. As of January 30, 2009, we had recorded $7.8 million in loss reserves for certain of
these matters. In light of the reserves we have recorded, at this time we believe the ultimate
resolution of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on our
business, results of operations or financial condition. Because of the uncertainty inherent in
litigation, however, it is possible that unfavorable resolutions of one or more of these lawsuits,
proceedings and claims could exceed the amount currently reserved and could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors
contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008
filed with the SEC, which describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become
subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse
manner. We are updating the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K by including
the following risk factor:
We terminated our existing line of credit during the first quarter of fiscal 2009. If we seek
to secure other financing we may not be able to obtain it on acceptable terms and, given the
current recession, obtaining financing on any terms may not be possible.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009 we terminated our $200.0 million line of credit, which
we had not utilized. Based on current business operations and economic conditions, and expected
cash flows from operations, we currently anticipate that our available cash resources (which
include existing cash and cash equivalents), will be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for
working capital and capital expenditures to execute our near-term business plan. If our estimates
are incorrect and we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, we may need to
raise new financing. In addition, if the cost of one or more of our strategic acquisition
opportunities exceeds our existing resources, we may be required to seek additional capital. If we
determine it is necessary to seek other additional funding for any reason, we may not be able to
obtain such funding or, if such funding is available, to obtain it on acceptable terms. This
possibility is heightened by the ongoing recession and its effects on the credit market.
28
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The details of our purchases of equity securities in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 are
contained in Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008
filed with the SEC.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. The following table details purchases by us of our own
securities during the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Dollar Value of |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Publicly Announced Plans |
|
Purchased Under the Plans or |
Fiscal Month |
|
Purchased |
|
Paid per Share(1) |
|
or Programs |
|
Programs(2) |
November 1, 2008 November 28, 2008 |
|
|
12,437,803 |
|
|
$ |
6.20 |
|
|
|
12,437,803 |
|
|
$ |
16,054,298 |
|
November 29, 2008 December 26, 2008 |
|
|
2,461,496 |
|
|
$ |
6.75 |
|
|
|
2,461,496 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
December 27, 2008 January 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
14,899,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,899,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes commissions paid to brokers. |
|
(2) |
|
On August 12, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase
program for up to $150.0 million. As of October 31, 2008, we had
repurchased approximately 6.4 million shares of common stock for
approximately $56.5 million, or $8.80 average per share. In early
December 2008, we completed this repurchase program at an average
price of $7.04 per share, resulting in approximately 21.3 million
shares purchased under the program. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Our annual meeting of shareowners was held on March 4, 2009. At the annual meeting, Lois M.
Martin, Krish A. Prabhu, Ph.D, John E. Rehfeld and David A. Roberts were elected as directors for
terms expiring at the annual meeting of our shareowners in 2012. The following table shows the vote
totals with respect to the election of these directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Lois M. Martin
|
|
85,081,814
|
|
2,720,541 |
Krish A. Prabhu, Ph.D
|
|
85,479,179
|
|
2,323,176 |
John E. Rehfeld
|
|
85,204,926
|
|
2,597,429 |
David A. Roberts
|
|
84,700,236 |
|
3,102,119 |
At the annual meeting, our shareowners also approved setting the number of members of our Board of
Directors at eleven. The following table shows the vote totals with respect to setting the number
of members of our Board of Directors at eleven:
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstentions |
86,105,274
|
|
1,219,501
|
|
477,580 |
Finally, at the annual meeting, our shareowners ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.
The following table shows the vote totals with respect to the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm:
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstentions |
86,951,504
|
|
483,467
|
|
367,384 |
29
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See
Exhibit Index on page 32 for a description of the documents that are filed as exhibits to
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated
by reference is identified by a parenthetical referencing the SEC filing which included the
document.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 4, 2009 |
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James G. Mathews
|
|
|
|
James G. Mathews |
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
31
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 30, 2009
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of ADC Telecommunications, Inc., conformed to incorporate
amendments dated January 20, 2000, June 30, 2000, August 13, 2001, March 2, 2004 and May 9,
2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-a to ADCs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended July 29, 2005.) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restated Bylaws of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. effective December 9, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of ADCs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of certificate for shares of Common Stock of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4-a to ADCs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 29,
2005.) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Rights Agreement, as amended and restated as of May 9, 2007, between ADC Telecommunications,
Inc. and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent (which includes as Exhibit A,
the Form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Right of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B, the Form of Right Certificate, and as Exhibit C, the Summary of
Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-b to ADCs Form
8-A/A filed on May 11, 2007.) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Management Incentive Plan for Fiscal Year 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 of ADCs Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 22, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Executive Management Incentive Plan effective November 1, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of ADCs Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on
December 22, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Agreement provided to Robert E.
Switz under the ADC Telecommunications, Inc. 2008 Global Stock Incentive Plan on December 23,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of ADCs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 30, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement provided to Robert E.
Switz under the ADC Telecommunications, Inc. 2008 Global Stock Incentive Plan on December 23,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of ADCs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 30, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Form of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Agreement provided to employees
with respect to option grants made under the ADC Telecommunications, Inc. 2008 Global Stock
Incentive Plan beginning December 15, 2008.* |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement provided to employees
with respect to option grants made under the ADC Telecommunications, Inc. 2008 Global Stock
Incentive Plan beginning December 15, 2008.* |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Three-Year Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement provided to employees with respect to restricted stock unit grants made under the ADC
Telecommunications, Inc. 2008 Global Stock Incentive Plan beginning December 15, 2008.* |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Form of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Three-Year Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement provided to employees with respect to restricted stock unit grants made under the ADC
Telecommunications, Inc. 2008 Global Stock Incentive Plan beginning December 15, 2008.* |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Form of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Three-Year Performance-Based Cash Unit Award Agreement
provided to employees with respect to restricted cash unit grants made under the ADC
Telecommunications, Inc. 2008 Global Stock Incentive Plan beginning December 15, 2008.* |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between ADC Telecommunications, Inc. and Robert E. Switz
dated December 28, 2008.* |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)* |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)* |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32