Edgar Filing: ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC

our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders (but not included in our proxy materials), a separate notice of any nomination or proposal must be received by us between December 27, 2017 and January 26, 2018. If our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders is not held within 30 days of April 26, 2018, to be timely, the stockholder’s notice must be received by us no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of the day on which the first public announcement of the date of the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders was made or the notice of our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders is mailed. The public announcement of an adjournment or postponement of our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders will not trigger a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described in this proxy statement. More information about the notice period and information required to be included in a stockholder’s notice of a nomination is included under “Consideration of Stockholder Nominees for Director” below.

WHAT IS HOUSEHOLDING AND HOW DO I OBTAIN A SEPARATE SET OF PROXY MATERIALS IF I SHARE AN ADDRESS WITH OTHER STOCKHOLDERS?

We have adopted a procedure called “householding,” which has been approved by the SEC. Under this procedure, we will deliver only one copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our printed proxy materials to stockholders of record who share the same address (if they appear to be members of the same family) unless we have received contrary instructions from an affected stockholder. A separate proxy card for each stockholder of record will be included in the printed materials. This procedure reduces our printing costs, mailing costs and fees. Upon written or oral request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice or, if applicable, the printed proxy materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of any of those documents was delivered. To receive a separate copy of the Notice or Annual Report or, if applicable, the printed proxy materials, contact us at 1(408) 749-4000 or at Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., One AMD Place, Sunnyvale, California 94085, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by email to Corporate.Secretary@amd.com. If you would like to revoke your householding consent or you are a stockholder eligible for householding and would like to participate in householding, please contact Broadridge at 1(800) 542-1061.

DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )


Filed by the Registrant ☒		Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒	Definitive Proxy Statement

☐	Definitive Additional Materials

☐	Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)

☒	No fee required.

☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

LOGO

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

ONE AMD PLACE

SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA 94085

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

You are cordially invited to attend our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (our “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time at AMD, “Commons Building,” One AMD Place, Sunnyvale, California 94085. We are holding our Annual Meeting to:

•

Elect the eight director nominees named in this proxy statement;

•

Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year;

•

Approve the amendment and restatement of the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and restated, the “2004 Plan”) to: (i) increase the number of authorized shares that can be awarded to our employees, consultants and directors under the 2004 Plan by 27 million shares; (ii) to prohibit the payment of dividends on unvested awards; and (iii) re-approve the material terms of the performance goals under the 2004 Plan;

•

Approve the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;

•

Approve on a non-binding, advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers (“Say-on-Pay”), as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”);

•

Approve on a non-binding, advisory basis the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes (“Frequency of Say-on-Pay”); and

•

Transact any other business that properly comes before our Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

We are pleased to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the SEC’s “notice and access” rules. As a result, we are mailing to our stockholders (other than those who previously requested printed or emailed materials on an ongoing basis) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) instead of printed copies of our proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet, how to vote on the Internet and how you can receive printed or emailed copies of our proxy materials. We believe that providing our proxy materials over the Internet will lower our Annual Meeting’s cost and environmental impact, while increasing the ability of our stockholders to access the information that they need.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on February 27, 2017 and holders of proxies for those stockholders may attend and vote at our Annual Meeting. To attend our Annual Meeting in person, you must present valid photo identification, and, if you hold shares through a broker, bank, trustee or nominee (i.e., in street name), you must also present a letter from your broker or other nominee showing that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on February 27, 2017.

This year, we are also pleased to offer a virtual annual meeting at which our stockholders can view our Annual Meeting at AMD.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. Stockholders at the close of business on February 27, 2017 may also ask questions and vote at our Annual Meeting via the Internet. We hope this will allow our stockholders who are unable to attend our Annual Meeting in person to participate in our Annual Meeting.

Sincerely,

LOGO

HARRY A. WOLIN

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

This notice of annual meeting is dated March 8, 2017 and will first be distributed and made available to the stockholders of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. on or about March 8, 2017.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT AND WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE PROMPTLY

Important notice regarding Internet availability of proxy materials: This proxy statement and our

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 are available at

www.proxyvote.com and on the Investor Relations pages of our Web site at www.amd.com or ir.amd.com.

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	Page

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS		1

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		6

ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS		7

Director Experience, Skills and Qualifications		7

Consideration of Stockholder Nominees for Director		12

Communications with the Board or Non-Management Directors		13

Required Vote		13

Recommendation of the Board of Directors		13

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE		14

Director Independence		14

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation		14

Board Leadership Structure		14

Risk Oversight		15

Code of Ethics		16

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS		17

Board Meetings and Attendance		17

Board Committees		17

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS		20

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS		24

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		25

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		27

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE		28

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION		29

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS		30

Executive Summary		30

Executive Compensation Policies and Practices		34

Response to 2016 “Say On Pay” Vote and Stockholder Engagement Process		35

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives		35

Fiscal 2016 Compensation Elements		40

Change in Control Agreements and Other Change in Control Arrangements		47

Severance and Separation Arrangements		48

Other Compensation Polices		48

COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP RESOURCES COMMITTEE’S REPORT		50

COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES		51

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		52

2016 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE		52

2016 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION		54

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2016 FISCAL YEAR-END		55

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2016		57

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents (continued)


	Page

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2016		58

SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS		58

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS		64

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE’S REPORT		65

ITEM 2—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		66

Required Vote		66

Recommendation of Board of Directors		66

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees		66

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures		67

ITEM 3—APPROVAL OF THE ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN		68

Why the Board is Seeking Approval of the Amended and Restated 2004 Plan		68

The Importance of Equity Compensation		68

Provisions Designed to Protect Stockholders		69

Key Equity Metrics		69

Summary of the 2004 Plan		70

Change of Control		73

Federal Tax Aspects		73

Amendment and Termination of the 2004 Plan and Prohibition on Repricing or Exchange of Awards Without Stockholder Approval		75

New Plan Benefits		75

Existing Plan Benefits		76

Summary		77

Required Vote		77

Recommendation of the Board of Directors		77

ITEM 4—APPROVAL OF THE ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 2017 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN		78

General		78

Summary of the ESPP		78

Shares Available; Administration		78

Eligibility		79

Awards		79

Certain Transactions		80

Plan Amendment		80

Federal Income Tax Consequences		80

New Plan Benefits		81

Required Vote		81

Recommendation of the Board of Directors		81

ITEM 5—APPROVAL ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (“SAY-ON-PAY”)		82

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents (continued)


	Page

Required Vote		83

Recommendation of the Board of Directors		83

ITEM 6—APPROVAL VOTE ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS OF THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE SAY-ON-PAY VOTES		84

Required Vote		84

Recommendation of the Board of Directors		84

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE		85

AVAILABLE INFORMATION		85

EXHIBIT A—AMENDED AND RESTATED ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN		A-1

EXHIBIT B—ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 2017 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN		B-1

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

In this proxy statement, the words “AMD,” the “Company,” “we,” “ours,” “us” and similar terms refer to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.


1.	Q:	WHY DID I RECEIVE A NOTICE IN THE MAIL REGARDING THE INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS INSTEAD OF A FULL SET OF PROXY MATERIALS?
	A:	In accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, commonly referred to as “Notice and Access,” we may furnish proxy materials by providing access to the documents on the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice was mailed on or about March 8, 2017 to stockholders of record on February 27, 2017 who have not previously requested to receive printed or emailed materials on an ongoing basis. The Notice instructs you as to how you may access our proxy materials on the Internet and how to vote on the Internet.
		You may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis by following the instructions in the Notice. Choosing to receive your future proxy materials by email will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the environmental impact of our annual meetings. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.
2.	Q:	WHY AM I RECEIVING PROXY MATERIALS?
	A:	Our board of directors (the “Board”) is providing these materials to you in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at our Annual Meeting, which will take place on Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time at AMD, “Commons Building,” One AMD Place, Sunnyvale, California 94085. Our stockholders as of the close of business on February 27, 2017, the record date for our Annual Meeting, are invited to attend our Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the items described in this proxy statement. This proxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you under SEC rules and is designed to assist you in voting your shares.
3.	Q:	WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE PROXY MATERIALS?
	A:	The proxy materials for our Annual Meeting include the Notice, this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (our “Annual Report”). If you received a printed copy of these materials, the proxy materials also include a proxy card or voting instruction form.
4.	Q:	HOW CAN I ACCESS THE PROXY MATERIALS OVER THE INTERNET?
	A:	The Notice, proxy card and voting instruction form contain instructions on how you may access our proxy materials on the Internet and how to vote on the Internet. Our proxy materials are also available at www.proxyvote.com and the Investor Relations pages of our Web site at www.amd.com or ir.amd.com.
5.	Q:	WHO IS SOLICITING MY VOTE?
	A:	This proxy solicitation is being made by the Board of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. We have retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., professional proxy solicitors, to assist us with this proxy solicitation. We will pay the entire cost of this solicitation, including MacKenzie’s fees and expenses, which we expect to be approximately $35,000.
6.	Q:	WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?
	A:	Stockholders as of the close of business on February 27, 2017, the record date for our Annual Meeting, are entitled to vote on all items properly presented at our Annual Meeting. On the record date, 941,398,733

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 1

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Questions and Answers (continued)


		shares of our common stock were outstanding. Every stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on the record date. A list of these stockholders will be available during regular business hours at our headquarters, located at One AMD Place, Sunnyvale, California 94085, from our Corporate Secretary at least ten days before our Annual Meeting. The list of stockholders will also be available at the time and place of our Annual Meeting.
7.	Q:	WHAT AM I BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON?
	A:	You may vote on:
	•	Proposal 1: Election of the eight director nominees named in this proxy statement.
	•	Proposal 2: Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.
	•	Proposal 3: Approval of the amendment and restatement of the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and restated, the “2004 Plan”) to: (i) increase the number of authorized shares that can be awarded to our employees, consultants and directors under the 2004 Plan by 27 million shares; (ii) to amend the plan to prohibit the payment of dividends on unvested awards; and (iii) re-approve the material terms of the performance goals under the 2004 Plan.
	•	Proposal 4: Approval of the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”).
	•	Proposal 5: Approval on a non-binding, advisory basis of the compensation of our named executive officers (“Say-On-Pay”).
	•	Proposal 6: Approve on a non-binding, advisory basis the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes (“Frequency of Say-on-Pay”).
	•	Such other business as may properly come before our Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of our Annual Meeting.
8.	Q:	HOW DOES THE BOARD RECOMMEND I VOTE ON THE PROPOSALS?
	A:	The Board recommends that you vote:
	•	FOR each of the eight director nominees named in this proxy statement.
	•	FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.
	•	FOR the approval of the amendment and restatement of the 2004 Plan.
	•	FOR the approval of the ESPP.
	•	FOR the Say-On-Pay proposal.
	•	FOR “ONE (1) YEAR” on the Frequency of Say-on-Pay proposal.
9.	Q:	WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOLDING SHARES AS A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD AND AS A BENEFICIAL OWNER?
	A:	Most of our stockholders hold their shares as a beneficial owner through a broker or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
		Stockholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and the Notice was sent directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to AMD or to vote at our Annual Meeting. If you requested to receive printed proxy materials, we have enclosed a proxy card for you to use, as described in the Notice and under Question 10 below. You may also vote on the Internet, or by telephone, as described in the Notice and under Question 10 below. You are also invited to attend our Annual Meeting in person or via the Internet.
		Beneficial Owner. If your shares are held in an account in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, trust or other similar organization (i.e., in street name), like the vast majority of our stockholders, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and the Notice should be forwarded to you by that organization. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other nominee how to vote your shares, and you are also invited to attend our Annual Meeting in person or via the Internet, as

2 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Questions and Answers (continued)


		described in the Notice and under Question 12 below. You may not vote your shares in person at our Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at our Annual Meeting and a letter from your broker or other nominee showing that you were the beneficial owner of your shares on February 27, 2017.
10.	Q:	WHO CAN ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING? CAN I VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING? CAN I ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING VIA THE INTERNET?
	A:	You can attend our Annual Meeting in person or you can attend and participate via the Internet.
		Attending in Person. Only stockholders as of the close of business on February 27, 2017 (the record date for our Annual Meeting), holders of valid proxies for those stockholders and other persons invited by us can attend our Annual Meeting in person. To attend our Annual Meeting in person, you must present valid photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, and if you were a beneficial owner, you must also present a letter from your broker or other nominee showing that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on February 27, 2017. If you were a stockholder of record on February 27, 2017, you may vote your shares in person at our Annual Meeting. If you were a beneficial owner on February 27, 2017, you must also bring a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee to vote your shares in person at our Annual Meeting.
		Attending and Participating via the Internet. Stockholders may also attend our Annual Meeting via the Internet at AMD.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. Stockholders of record and beneficial owners as of the close of business on February 27, 2017 may also submit questions and vote while attending the meeting via the Internet. Instructions on how to attend and participate at our Annual Meeting via the Internet are posted at AMD.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. To demonstrate proof of stock ownership, you will need to enter the 12-digit control number received with your Notice or proxy materials to submit questions and vote at our Annual Meeting via the Internet. We have retained Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”) to host our virtual annual meeting and to distribute, receive, count and tabulate proxies. On the day of our Annual Meeting, Broadridge, the host of our virtual annual meeting, may be contacted at 1(955) 449-0991, and will be available to answer your questions regarding how to attend and participate at our Annual Meeting via the Internet.
11.	Q:	IF I AM A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD, HOW DO I VOTE?
	A:	If you are a stockholder of record you may vote by proxy. You can vote by proxy over the Internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice, or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, you can vote by mail, telephone (from the United States and Canada) or the Internet pursuant to instructions provided on the proxy card provided to you with your printed proxy materials.
		You may also vote in person at our Annual Meeting. A ballot will be given to you upon request when you arrive at our Annual Meeting. You may also vote while attending our Annual Meeting via the Internet, as described in Question 10 above. Even if you plan to attend our Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend our Annual Meeting.
12.	Q:	IF I AM A BENEFICIAL OWNER, HOW DO I VOTE?
	A:	If you are a beneficial owner, you may submit your voting instructions by following the instructions provided in the Notice, or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, you can submit your voting instructions by following the instructions in the voting instruction form provided to you by your broker or other nominee. We urge you to instruct your broker or other nominee how to vote on your behalf. As described more fully under Question 14, your broker or other nominee cannot vote on certain items without your instructions.
		Alternatively, you can vote in person at our Annual Meeting, but you must bring to our Annual Meeting a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee as the record holder and a letter from your broker or other nominee showing that you were the beneficial owner of your shares on February 27, 2017. You may also vote while attending our Annual Meeting via the Internet, as described in Question 10 above. Even if you plan to attend our Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your voting instructions as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend our Annual Meeting.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 3

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Questions and Answers (continued)


13.	Q:	WHAT IF I AM A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD AND DO NOT SPECIFY A CHOICE FOR A MATTER WHEN RETURNING A PROXY CARD OR VOTING BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET?
	A:	If you are a stockholder of record and you return a properly executed proxy card or vote by proxy over the Internet but do not mark the boxes showing how you wish to vote, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board, as specified in Question 8 above. With respect to any other matter that properly comes before our Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, at their own discretion.
14.	Q:	WHAT IF I AM A BENEFICIAL OWNER AND DO NOT GIVE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO MY BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE? WHAT IS A BROKER NON-VOTE?
	A:	As a beneficial owner, in order to ensure your shares are voted, you must provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your broker or other nominee. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, whether your shares can be voted by such person depends on the type of item being considered for vote.
		Non-Discretionary Items. The election of directors, the amendment and restatement of the 2004 Plan, approval of the ESPP, the Say-on-Pay proposal and the Frequency of Say-on-Pay proposal are non-discretionary items and may not be voted on by brokers or other nominees who have not received specific voting instructions from beneficial owners. A broker non-vote occurs when your broker or other nominee has not received instructions from you as to how to vote your shares on a proposal and does not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on that proposal.
		Discretionary Items. The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year is a discretionary item. Generally, brokers and other nominees that do not receive voting instructions from beneficial owners may vote on this proposal in their discretion.
15.	Q:	CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I HAVE VOTED?
	A:	Yes. You may change your vote at any time before the voting concludes at our Annual Meeting. You may vote by proxy again on the Internet or by telephone (only your latest Internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to our Annual Meeting will be counted), by signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date or by attending our Annual Meeting and voting in person or via the Internet. However, your attendance at our Annual Meeting in person or via the Internet will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at our Annual Meeting or specifically request in writing that your prior proxy be revoked.
16.	Q:	WHAT IS A “QUORUM”?
	A:	For the purposes of our Annual Meeting, a “quorum” is the presence, in person or by proxy, by the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at our Annual Meeting. There must be a quorum for our Annual Meeting to be held. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.
17.	Q:	WHAT IS THE VOTING REQUIREMENT FOR EACH PROPOSAL TO PASS?
	A:	Election of Directors. Each of the eight director nominees will be elected if each of them receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of votes cast “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of these elections. Each director nominee has submitted a written resignation that will be effective if he or she does not receive a majority of the votes cast for such director and the resignation is accepted by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, another authorized committee of the Board or the Board.
		Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Because brokers and other nominees have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification, we do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with this item.

4 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Questions and Answers (continued)


		Amendment and Restatement of the 2004 Plan. The proposal to amend and restate the 2004 Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
		Approval of the ESPP. The proposal to approve the ESPP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
		Say-On-Pay Proposal. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board, the Compensation and Leadership Resources Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) or us. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions about our executive compensation program. Abstentions have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
		Frequency of Say-on-Pay Proposal. Approval, on an advisory basis, of whether the Say-on-Pay vote should occur every 1 year, 2 years or 3 years pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. We will consider the frequency that receives the highest number of votes by stockholders to be the frequency that has been approved by our stockholders. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board, the Compensation Committee or us. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions about our executive compensation program. Abstentions have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
18.	Q:	WHERE CAN I FIND THE VOTING RESULTS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING?
	A:	We will announce preliminary voting results at our Annual Meeting and publish voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the SEC within four business days after our Annual Meeting. If the official results are not available at that time, we will provide preliminary voting results in the Form 8-K and the final voting results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as they become available.
19.	Q:	IS MY VOTE CONFIDENTIAL?
	A:	Proxy cards, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are mailed or returned directly to Broadridge and handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed except as needed to permit Broadridge to tabulate and certify the vote and as required by law. However, comments written on the proxy card may be forwarded to management. In that case, your identity may not be kept confidential.
20.	Q:	HOW WILL VOTING ON ANY BUSINESS NOT DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT BE CONDUCTED?
	A:	We do not know of any business to be considered at our Annual Meeting other than the items described in this proxy statement. If any other business is presented at our Annual Meeting, your proxy gives authority to each of Dr. Lisa T. Su, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Beth Ozmun, our Corporate Secretary, to vote on such matters at their discretion.
21.	Q:	WHEN ARE THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING DUE?
	A:	For stockholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, they must be submitted in writing to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., One AMD Place, Sunnyvale, California 94085, Attention: Corporate Secretary and received by us on or before November 8, 2017. In addition, for directors to be nominated or other stockholder proposals to be properly presented at

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 5

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Questions and Answers (continued)

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements concerning Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. Forward-looking statements are commonly identified by words such as “would,” “intends,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “intends,” “plans,” “pro forma,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or the negative of these words and phrases, other variations of these words and phrases or comparable terminology. Investors are cautioned that the forward-looking statements in this proxy statement are based on current beliefs, assumptions and expectations, speak only as of the date of this proxy statement and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations. Investors are urged to review in detail the risks and uncertainties in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including but not limited to, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

6 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board currently consists of nine members. On the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated the following eight nominees: Mr. John E. Caldwell, Ms. Nora M. Denzel, Mr. Nicholas M. Donofrio, Mr. Joseph A. Householder, Mr. Michael J. Inglis, Mr. John W. Marren, Dr. Lisa T. Su and Mr. Ahmed Yahia for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Bruce L. Claflin, currently a member of the Board, is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

All directors are elected annually and serve a one-year term until our next annual meeting or until such director’s successor is appointed. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

The Board expects all nominees named below to be available for election. If a nominee declines or is unable to act as a director, your proxy may vote for any substitute nominee proposed by the Board. Your proxy will vote for the election of these nominees, unless you instruct otherwise.

Directors are strongly encouraged to attend annual meetings of our stockholders. At the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders the directors in attendance were Mr. Caldwell, Mr. Claflin, Mr. Donofrio, Mr. Inglis, Dr. Su and Mr. Yahia. Mr. Martin L. Edelman, who served as a director from February 2013 until February 2017, also attended. Mr. Householder and Ms. Denzel were unable to attend.

Director Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Our goal is to assemble a knowledgeable and highly-qualified Board that operates cohesively and works with management in a constructive way to deliver long-term value to our stockholders. We believe that the nominees set forth below, all of whom are currently directors of AMD, possess valuable experience necessary to guide us in the best interests of our stockholders. Our current Board consists of individuals with proven records of success in their chosen professions. They possess the highest integrity and a keen intellect. They are collegial, yet independent in their thinking, and are committed to the hard work necessary to be informed about the semiconductor industry, us and our key constituents, including our customers, stockholders and management. Most of our directors have broad technology sector experience, including expertise in semiconductor technology, innovation and strategy. Several members of the Board are current or former chief executive officers, thereby providing the Board with practical understanding of how large organizations operate, including the importance of employee development and retention. They also understand strategy and risk management and how these factors impact our operations.

Certain information regarding each of the nominees is set forth below, including his or her experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to conclude that the individual should serve as a director on the Board, as well as his or her principal occupation. Each nominee’ s former directorships on public company boards during the past five years are included in a table set forth below—Former Directorships During the Last Five Years. The age of each director is as of our Annual Meeting.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 7

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Item 1—Election of Directors (continued)

John E. Caldwell

Director since October 2006 and Chairman of the Board since May 2016

Age: 67

Board Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) and Audit and Finance Committee

Mr. Caldwell served as President and Chief Executive Officer of SMTC Corporation (an electronics manufacturing services company) from March 2003 until he retired in March 2011. Before joining SMTC, Mr. Caldwell served as chair of the restructuring committee of the board of directors of The Mosaic Group (a marketing services provider) from October 2002 to September 2003, as President and Chief Executive Officer of GEAC Computer Corporation, Ltd. (a computer software company) from October 2000 to December 2001 and as President and Chief Executive Officer of CAE Inc. (a simulation technologies and integrated training solutions provider for the civil aviation and defense industries) from June 1993 to October 1999. In addition, Mr. Caldwell has served in a variety of senior executive positions in finance, including Senior Vice President of Finance and Corporate Affairs of CAE and Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration of Carling O’Keefe Breweries of Canada. Over the course of his career, Mr. Caldwell has served on the audit committees of ten public companies. Mr. Caldwell has been a director of Faro Technologies, Inc. since 2002 and of IAMGOLD Corporation since 2006. Mr. Caldwell holds a bachelor of commerce degree from Carleton University, Ontario, and is a chartered professional accountant with the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario. Mr. Caldwell is an author and lecturer on the subject of board oversight of enterprise risk.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Caldwell brings to the Board extensive and diversified general management, financial management and risk assessment experience as a result of his experience at SMTC, his other executive management experience and his service as a director on the boards of directors of other public companies.

Nora M. Denzel

Director since March 2014

Age: 54

Board Committees: Compensation Committee (Chair) and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Ms. Denzel most recently served as interim Chief Executive Officer of Outerwall Inc. (an automated retail solutions provider) from January to August 2015. Prior to Outerwall, Ms. Denzel held various executive management positions from February 2008 through August 2012 at Intuit Inc. (a cloud financial management software company), including Senior Vice President of Big Data, Social Design and Marketing and Senior Vice President and General Manager of the QuickBooks Employee Management business unit. From 2000 to 2006, Ms. Denzel held several executive level positions at HP Enterprise, formerly, Hewlett-Packard Company (a technology software, services and hardware provider), including Senior Vice President and General Manager Software Global Business Unit from May 2002 to February 2006 and Vice President of Storage Organization from August 2000 to May 2002. Prior to HP Enterprise, Ms. Denzel held executive positions at Legato Systems Inc. (a data storage management software company purchased by EMC) and IBM. Ms. Denzel serves as a member of the board of directors of Ericsson (since March 2013) and Outerwall (since March 2013). She holds a master of business administration degree from Santa Clara University and a bachelor of science degree in computer science from the State University of New York.

Director Qualifications: Ms. Denzel brings to the Board more than 25 years of technology, software and leadership experience as a result of her experience at Intuit, Hewlett-Packard and IBM and her experience on the boards of directors of other public companies.

8 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Item 1—Election of Directors (continued)

Nicholas M. Donofrio

Director since November 2009

Age: 71

Board Committees: Innovation and Technology Committee (Chair), Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Mr. Donofrio held a variety of executive and technical management positions during his 44-year career at IBM in its server, advanced workstations, personal computing, manufacturing and semiconductor development divisions, including as Senior Vice President, Technology and Manufacturing from 1997 to 2005 and as Executive Vice President, Innovation and Technology from 2005 until his retirement in September 2008. Mr. Donofrio holds seven technology patents and is a member of numerous technical and science honor societies. He is a Life Fellow of the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers, a Fellow of the UK-based Royal Academy of Engineering and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Mr. Donofrio is also a member of the U.S.-based National Academy of Engineering. Mr. Donofrio is the recipient of numerous awards. For example, in 2006, he was named among Business Week magazine’s 25 Top Innovation Champions, and in 2008 was awarded the Renaissance Engineer Award by the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers for his commitment and promotion of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics for the U.S. Hispanic Community. In 2003, he received the Rodney D. Chipp Memorial Award by the Society of Women Engineers for his contributions to the advancement of women in the engineering field. Mr. Donofrio has been a director of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation since 1998 and a director of Delphi Automotive PLC since 2009. Mr. Donofrio has a bachelor of science degree in electrical engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a master of science in the same discipline from Syracuse University.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Donofrio brings to the Board significant expertise in the areas of semiconductor technology and manufacturing, system design and integration, and is able to provide us with valuable insight and guidance regarding technological and innovation strategies as well as the development and retention of our technical employee population.

Joseph A. Householder

Director since September 2014

Age: 61

Board Committees: Audit and Finance Committee (Chair) and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Mr. Householder is Corporate Group President, Infrastructure Business for Sempra Energy (a worldwide provider of energy infrastructure and gas and electric utilities). From 2011 to 2017, Mr. Householder was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sempra Energy. From 2006 to 2011, Mr. Householder was Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Sempra Energy responsible for financial reporting, accounting and controls and tax functions for all Sempra Energy companies. Prior to this role, he served as Vice President of Corporate Tax and Chief Tax Counsel for Sempra Energy. Prior to joining Sempra Energy in 2001, Mr. Householder was a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers in the firm’s national tax office. From 1986 to 1999, he served in a number of legal and financial roles at Unocal Corporation, including ultimately as Vice President of Corporate Development and Assistant Chief Financial Officer, where he was responsible for worldwide tax planning, financial reporting and forecasting and mergers and acquisitions. He also serves on the board of directors of Infraestructura Energetica Nova (IEnova, a majority-owned subsidiary of Sempra Energy that is publicly traded in Mexico). In addition, Mr. Householder is a member of the Tax Executives Institute, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the State Bar of California and the American Bar Association. He holds a bachelor of science degree in business administration from the University of Southern California and a juris doctor degree from Loyola Law School.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Householder brings to the Board significant financial and operational expertise as a result of his chief financial officer experience at Sempra Energy, his experience as a partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers and his experience at Unocal Corporation.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 9

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Item 1—Election of Directors (continued)

Michael J. Inglis

Director since March 2014

Age: 57

Board Committees: Audit and Finance Committee, Innovation and Technology Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Mr. Inglis held several senior executive positions between 2002 and 2013 at ARM Holdings plc (a semiconductor intellectual property supplier), including as Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing, as Executive Vice President, General Manager, Processor Division, and as Chief Commercial Officer. Before joining ARM, Mr. Inglis was a Principal at A.T. Kearney (a global management consulting firm) from 1999 to 2001. Mr. Inglis served as General Manager, Smartcard Division and European Hi-End Microprocessor Operations Manager amongst various roles at Motorola Semiconductor from 1991 to 1998. In addition, Mr. Inglis has held a number of operational and marketing positions at Texas Instruments (a global semiconductor company), BIS Macintosh (an electronics market research firm) and Fairchild Camera and Instrument (a semiconductor company). Mr. Inglis served on the board of directors of ARM from 2002 until his retirement in March 2013. Mr. Inglis is a member of the board of directors of IIika plc (since July 2015) and BT Group plc (since September 2015). Mr. Inglis has a master of business administration degree from Cranfield School of Management and a bachelor of science degree in electronic and electrical engineering from Birmingham University. In addition, Mr. Inglis is a Chartered Engineer and a Member of the Chartered Institute of Marketing.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Inglis brings to the Board senior leadership, management, and sales and marketing expertise, as well as his experience gained from serving as a director on the boards of other public companies. He also provides his broad understanding of the semiconductor industry.

John. W. Marren

Director since February 2017

Age: 54

Board Committees: Audit and Finance Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Mr. Marren was a Senior Partner and the Head of Technology Investments of TPG Capital from 2000 until his retirement in December of 2015. From 1996 through 2000, Mr. Marren was a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley, most recently as Co-Head of the Technology Investment Banking Group. From 1992 to 1996, he was a Managing Director and Senior Semiconductor Research Analyst at Alex Brown & Sons. While at Morgan Stanley and Alex Brown & Sons, Mr. Marren was a frequent member of the Institutional Investor All-American Research Team, which recognizes the top research analysts on Wall Street. Prior to Alex Brown, Mr. Marren spent seven years in the semiconductor industry working for VLSI Technology and Vitesse Semiconductor. Mr. Marren currently serves on a number of private company boards including Avaya Inc., Infinidat, Inc. and Isola Group. He is a Trustee of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and he serves on the US Olympic and Paralympic Foundation Board. Mr. Marren holds a bachelor of science degree in electrical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Marren brings to the Board extensive financial knowledge and technology experience as a result of his prior work at TPG Capital and Morgan Stanley. Mr. Marren also provides the Board with valuable corporate governance insight from his past and present service on private and public company boards.

10 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Item 1—Election of Directors (continued)

Dr. Lisa T. Su

Director since October 2014

Age: 47

Dr. Lisa T. Su is AMD’s President and Chief Executive Officer and also serves on the company’s board of directors. Previously, she was Chief Operating Officer responsible for integrating AMD’s business units, sales, global operations and infrastructure enablement teams into a single market-facing organization responsible for all aspects of product strategy and execution. Dr. Su joined AMD in January 2012 as Senior Vice President and General Manager, global business units and was responsible for driving end-to-end business execution of AMD’s products and solutions. Prior to joining AMD, Dr. Su served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Networking and Multimedia at Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., and was responsible for global strategy, marketing and engineering for the company’s embedded communications and applications processor business. Dr. Su joined Freescale in 2007 as Chief Technology Officer, where she led the company’s technology roadmap and research and development efforts. Dr. Su spent the previous 13 years at IBM in various engineering and business leadership positions, including Vice President of the Semiconductor Research and Development Center responsible for the strategic direction of IBM’s silicon technologies, joint development alliances and semiconductor R&D operations. Prior to IBM, she was a member of the technical staff at Texas Instruments in the Semiconductor Process and Device Center (SPDC) from 1994 to 1995. Dr. Su has bachelor’s, master’s and doctorate degrees in electrical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). She has published more than 40 technical articles and was named a Fellow of the Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers (IEEE) in 2009. Dr. Su was named “2014 Executive of the Year” at the EETimes and EDN 2014 ACE Awards and was honored in MIT Technology Review’s Top 100 Young Innovators in 2002. She also serves on the board of directors of Analog Devices.

Director Qualifications: As our President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Su brings to the Board her expertise and proven leadership in the global semiconductor industry as well as valuable insight into our operations, management and culture, providing an essential link between the management and the Board on management’s perspectives.

Ahmed Yahia

Director since November 2012

Age: 44

Board Committee: Innovation and Technology Committee

Mr. Yahia is CEO of the Technology & Industry global platform of Mubadala Development Company PJSC (“Mubadala”), where he oversees Mubadala’s technology, metals, mining and utilities portfolio. He is also a member of Mubadala’s Investment Committee, which is mandated to develop Mubadala’s investment policies, establish investment guidelines and review all proposed projects and investments to ensure they are in line with Mubadala’s business objectives. From March 2001 to February 2010, Mr. Yahia was a partner of McKinsey & Company where the central theme of his work was corporate performance transformations, business building and industrial sector development. Mr. Yahia was also the Managing Partner of McKinsey’s Abu Dhabi practice. Mr. Yahia serves on the board of directors of several private companies, including GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Emirates Global Aluminum PJSC. Mr. Yahia also serves as a non-executive director of National Central Cooling Company (Tabreed) (publicly traded in the United Arab Emirates). Mr. Yahia holds a master of science degree in mechanical engineering/product strategy from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a bachelor of science degree in industrial engineering from the Ecole Centrale Paris.

Director Qualifications: Mr. Yahia’s experience as the CEO of the Technology and Industry global platform of Mubadala and as a former partner of McKinsey & Company provides the Board with expertise in corporate strategy development, corporate performance transformations and operations.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 11

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Item 1—Election of Directors (continued)

Former Directorships in Public Companies in the Last Five Years

The table below sets forth the list of public companies on which our director nominees formerly served over the last five years including the name of the company and duration of service. Our director nominees do not currently serve on the boards of the companies listed below.


Director	Name of the Company	Term of Past Directorship
Nora M. Denzel	Saba Software, Inc.	2011—2015
Nora M. Denzel	Overland Storage, Inc.	2008—2013
Nicholas M. Donofrio	—	—
Joseph A. Householder	Southern California Gas Company	2010—2015
Joseph A. Householder	San Diego Gas and Electric Company	2010—2015
Michael J. Inglis	ARM	2002—2013
Michael J. Inglis	Pace plc	2008—2016
John W. Marren	MEMC	2001—2012
	Quantenna	2011—2014
	Freescale	2007—2015
Lisa T. Su	—	—
Ahmed Yahia	SMN Power Holding SAOG	2011—2013

Consideration of Stockholder Nominees for Director

The policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to consider properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates to serve on the Board. Pursuant to our bylaws, stockholders who wish to nominate persons for election to the Board at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders must be a stockholder of record, both when they give us notice and at our 2018 annual meeting, must be entitled to vote at our 2018 annual meeting and must comply with the notice provisions in our bylaws. A stockholder’s notice must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting. For our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, the notice must be delivered between December 27, 2017 and January 26, 2018. However, if our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders is not held within 30 days of April 26, 2018, the stockholder’s notice must be delivered no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of the day on which the first public announcement of the date of our 2018 annual meeting was made or the day the notice of our 2018 annual meeting is mailed. The public announcement of an adjournment or postponement of our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders will not trigger a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a stockholder notice as described in this proxy statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of directors to be elected to the Board at an annual meeting is increased and we do not make a public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the increased Board at least 100 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, the stockholder’s notice will be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by the increase, if it is delivered to our Corporate Secretary not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which we first make such public announcement. The stockholder’s notice must be updated and supplemented as set forth in our bylaws. The stockholder’s notice must include the following information for the person making the nomination:

•

name, age, nationality, business and residence addresses;

•

principal occupation and employment;

•

the class and number of shares owned beneficially or of record;

•

any derivative, swap or other transaction which gives economic risk similar to ownership of shares;

•

any proxy, agreement, arrangement, understanding or relationship that confers a right to vote any shares;

12 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Item 1—Election of Directors (continued)

•

any agreement, arrangement, understanding or relationship engaged in to increase or decrease the level of risk related to, or the voting power with respect to, our shares, or that provides the opportunity to profit from a decrease in price or value of shares;

•

any performance-related fees that the nominating person is entitled to, based on any increase or decrease in the value of any shares; and

•

any other information required by the SEC to be disclosed in a proxy statement.

The stockholder’s notice must also include the following information for each proposed director nominee:

•

financial or other material relationships between the nominating person and the nominee during the past three years;

•

the same information as for the nominating person (see above); and

•

all information required to be disclosed in a proxy statement in connection with election of directors.

The Chair of our Annual Meeting will determine if the procedures in the bylaws have been followed, and if not, declare that the nomination be disregarded. If the nomination was made in accordance with the procedures in our bylaws, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the same criteria in evaluating the nominee as it would any other Board nominee candidate and will recommend to the Board whether or not the stockholder nominee should be nominated by the Board and included in our proxy statement. These criteria are described below in the description of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in the section entitled “Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors–Board Committees.” The nominee must be willing to provide a written questionnaire, representation and agreement, if requested by us, and any other information reasonably requested by us in connection with our evaluation of the nominee’s independence.

Communications with the Board or Non-Management Directors

Anyone who wishes to communicate with our Board or with non-management directors may send their communications in writing to One AMD Place, Sunnyvale, California 94085, Attention: Corporate Secretary or send an email to Corporate.Secretary@amd.com. Our Corporate Secretary will forward all of these communications to our Chairman of the Board.

Required Vote

At our Annual Meeting, our directors will be elected using a majority vote standard with respect to uncontested elections, such as this election. This standard requires that each director receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of votes cast “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of these director elections. Each director nominee has submitted a written resignation that will be effective if he or she does not receive a majority of the votes cast for such director and the resignation is accepted by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, another authorized Board committee or the Board.

Recommendation of the Board Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR each of the director nominees. Unless you vote otherwise, your proxy will vote FOR the proposed nominees.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 13

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board has adopted the Principles of Corporate Governance (“Governance Principles”) to address significant corporate governance issues. The Governance Principles provide a framework for our corporate governance matters and include topics such as Board and Board committee composition and evaluation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing the Governance Principles and recommending any changes to the Governance Principles to the Board.

Director Independence

The Governance Principles provide that a substantial majority of the members of the Board must meet the criteria for independence as required by applicable law and the listing rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). Among other criteria, no director qualifies as independent unless the Board determines that the director has no direct material relationship which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. On an annual basis, the Board undertakes a review of director independence. The Board determined that all directors who served during fiscal 2016 and all of our director nominees, other than Messrs. Edelman, John R. Harding and Yahia and Dr. Su, are independent in accordance with SEC and Nasdaq rules. Mr. Harding served as a member of the Board until May 2016. In determining that Mr. Donofrio is independent, the Board considered our payments to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., in fiscal 2016 and payments made to the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) in fiscal 2016. Mr. Donofrio is a member of the board of directors of Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc. and a member of the board of directors of NACD.

In determining that Ms. Denzel is independent, the Board considered payments to the NACD in fiscal 2016. Ms. Denzel is a member of the board of directors of the NACD, Northern California Chapter.

The Board also determined that each of the members of the Audit and Finance, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Compensation and Leadership Resources Committees are independent in accordance with SEC and Nasdaq rules.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal 2016, Messrs. Caldwell, Donofrio and Claflin and Ms. Denzel served on the Compensation and Leadership Resources Committee (“Compensation Committee”). The current members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Denzel and Messrs. Claflin and Donofrio. None of the members of the Compensation Committee is or has been an executive officer or employee of AMD. In addition, none of our executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company which has an executive officer who serves on our Board or Compensation Committee.

Board Leadership Structure

The Governance Principles permit the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer to be filled by the same or different individuals, based on our needs, best practices and the interests of our stockholders. This allows the Board flexibility to determine whether the two roles should be combined or separated based upon our needs and the Board’s assessment of its leadership from time to time. The Board has the experience of functioning effectively either way.

Mr. Caldwell, who is independent in accordance with SEC and Nasdaq rules, is our Chairman of the Board. The Board first appointed Mr. Caldwell as our independent Chairman of the Board following the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. Caldwell presides at meetings of our stockholders and directors and leads the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities. The Board benefits from Mr. Caldwell’s extensive and diversified leadership experience, financial management and risk assessment experience. He also has strong public company board experience and has intimate familiarity with our history and business. The Board believes that its current leadership structure, with an independent Chairman of the Board, separate from the Chief Executive Officer, is appropriate at this time and allows the Board to fulfill its duties effectively and efficiently based on our current needs. The Board also believes that this structure allows Dr. Su, our President and Chief Executive Officer, to focus on our business strategy and market opportunities, as well as on our organizational structure and execution capabilities.

14 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance (continued)

Risk Oversight

The Board’s role in risk oversight is consistent with our leadership structure, with our Chief Executive Officer and other members of management having responsibility for day-to-day risk management activities and processes, and our Board and its committees being actively involved in overseeing our risk management. The Board and management consider “risk” for these purposes to be the possibility of an undesired occurrence that could threaten the viability of the company, result in a material destruction of our assets or shareholder value, or materially impact our long term performance. Examples of the types of risks faced by us include:

•

business-specific risks related to our ability to develop new products and services, our strategic position in key existing and new markets, our operational execution and infrastructure, our relationships with our third party manufacturing suppliers and competition in the microprocessor and graphics markets;

•

macroeconomic risks, such as adverse global economic conditions and global geo-political events; and

•

“event” risks, such as natural disasters and cybersecurity threats.

We engage in activities that seek to take calculated risks that protect the value of our existing assets and create new or future value. Management is responsible for day-to-day risk management activities and processes. Members of senior management participate in identifying and assessing risks and risk controls, developing recommendations to determine the appropriate manner in which to control risk and implementing risk mitigation activities. Our Chief Executive Officer has ultimate responsibility for management of our business, including enterprise level risks and the risk management program and processes.

In fulfilling its oversight role, the Board focuses on understanding the nature of our enterprise risks, including risks in our operations, finance and strategy, organization, compliance and external exposures as well as the adequacy of our risk assessment and risk management processes. The Board has implemented a risk oversight model and periodically receives reports and updates from management. At least annually, the Board discusses with management the appropriate level of risk relative to our strategy and objectives and reviews with management our existing risk management processes and their effectiveness. The Board also receives periodic management updates on our operations, organization, financial position and results and strategy and, as appropriate, discusses and provides feedback with respect to risks related to these topics. In addition, the Board receives full reports from the following Board committee chairs regarding each committee’s considerations and actions related to the specific risk topics over which the committee has oversight:

•

The Audit and Finance Committee assists the Board in overseeing our enterprise risk management process; reviews our portfolio of risk; discusses with management significant financial, reporting, regulatory and legal compliance risks in conjunction with enterprise risk exposures as well as risks associated with our capital structure; and reviews our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management and the actions management has taken to limit, monitor or control financial and enterprise risk exposure. The Audit and Finance Committee meets with members of our Internal Audit department to discuss any issues that warrant attention.

•

The Compensation Committee oversees risk management as it relates to our compensation policies and practices. It reviews with management whether our compensation programs may create incentives for our employees to take excessive or inappropriate risks which could be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. For additional details, see “Compensation Policies and Practices,” below. Additionally, the Compensation Committee oversees organizational risks, including leadership succession, talent capacity, capabilities, attraction, retention and culture.

•

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers potential risks related to the effectiveness of the Board, including succession planning for the Board and our overall governance and board structure.

•

The Innovation and Technology Committee assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities relating to technical and market risks associated with product development and investment as well as risk mitigation policies and procedures relating to products based on new technology or significant innovations to existing technology.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 15

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance (continued)

Code of Ethics

The Board has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all directors and employees entitled the “Worldwide Standards of Business Conduct,” which is designed to help directors and employees resolve ethical issues encountered in the business environment. The Worldwide Standards of Business Conduct covers topics such as conflicts of interest, compliance with laws (including anti-corruption laws), fair dealing, protecting our property and confidentiality of our information and encourages the reporting of any behavior not in accordance with the Worldwide Standards of Business Conduct.

The Board has also adopted a “Code of Ethics” for our executive officers and all other senior finance executives. The Code of Ethics covers topics such as financial reporting, conflicts of interest and compliance with laws, rules, regulations and our policies.

16 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The table below shows the current chairs and membership of the Board and each standing Board committee, the independence status of each Board member and the number of Board and Board committee meetings held during fiscal 2016.


Director	Board of Directors	Audit and Finance Committee	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	Compensation and Leadership Resources Committee	Innovation and Technology Committee
John E. Caldwell	C	●	C
Bruce L. Claflin	●		●	●
Nora M. Denzel	●		●	C
Nicholas M. Donofrio	●		●	●	C
Joseph A. Householder**	●	C	●
Michael J. Inglis	●	●	●		●
John W. Marren	●	●	●
Lisa T. Su*	●
Ahmed Yahia*	●				●
Number of 2016 meetings	6	12	4	5	4

C Chair ● Member * Non-Independent Director ** Financial Expert

Board Meetings and Attendance

The Board held six meetings during fiscal 2016. During fiscal 2016, all members of the Board attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of the Board and Board committees on which they served. In addition, on at least an annual basis, the Board and management discuss our strategic direction, new business opportunities and product roadmap. Independent and non-management directors also meet regularly in scheduled executive sessions without our Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management. In addition to these formal meetings, members of our Board informally interact with senior management (including our Chief Executive Officer), industry leaders and customers on a periodic basis. In fiscal 2016, sessions of only our non-employee directors were held two times, and sessions of only our independent directors were held three times.

Board Committees

The Board has four standing committees: an Audit and Finance Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a Compensation Committee and an Innovation and Technology Committee. The members of the Board committees and their Chairs are nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and appointed by the Board.

Each of the Board committees has adopted a written charter, which has been approved by the Board. You can access our current bylaws, committee charters, the Governance Principles, the Worldwide Standards of Business Conduct and the Code of Ethics on the Investor Relations pages of our web site at www.amd.com or ir.amd.com.

Audit and Finance Committee. The Audit and Finance Committee assists the Board with its oversight responsibilities regarding the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, risk assessment, the performance of our internal audit function, our financial affairs and policies and the nature and structure of major financial commitments. The Audit and Finance Committee is also directly responsible for the appointment, independence, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, which reports directly to the Audit and Finance Committee. The Audit and Finance Committee meets alone with our senior management, our financial, legal and internal audit personnel and with our independent registered public accounting firm, which has free access to the Audit and Finance Committee. The head of our Internal Audit Department reports directly to the Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee and “dotted-line” to our Chief

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 17

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors (continued)

Financial Officer, and serves a staff function for the Audit and Finance Committee. The Audit and Finance Committee currently consists of Mr. Householder, as Chair, and Messrs. Caldwell, Inglis and Marren, each determined to be financially literate and “independent” under applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules. The Board also determined that Mr. Householder is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under applicable SEC rules. The Audit and Finance Committee held 12 meetings during fiscal 2016.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in discharging its responsibilities regarding the identification of qualified candidates to become Board members, the selection of nominees for election as directors at the next annual meeting of stockholders (or special meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected), the selection of candidates to fill any vacancies on the Board and the development and recommendation to the Board of corporate governance guidelines and principles, including the Governance Principles. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the Board’s annual review of its performance (including its composition and organization) and leads a process for our non-employee directors to evaluate the performance of our Chief Executive Officer. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains a search firm for the purpose of obtaining information regarding potential candidates for Board membership. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Mr. Caldwell, as Chair, Messrs. Claflin, Donofrio, Householder, Inglis and Marren, and Ms. Denzel, each determined by the Board to be “independent” under applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2016 and one meeting during fiscal 2017 to consider director nominees for our Annual Meeting and other matters.

In evaluating candidates to determine if they are qualified to become Board members, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee looks principally for the following attributes: personal and professional character, integrity, ethics and values; general business experience and leadership profile, including experience in corporate management, such as serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly held company; strategic planning abilities and experience; aptitude in accounting and finance; expertise in domestic and international markets; experience in our industry and with relevant social policy concerns; understanding of relevant technologies; expertise in an area of our operations; communication and interpersonal skills; and practical and mature business judgment. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers Board members’ and nominees’ service on the boards of other public companies. Although we do not have a formal diversity policy, to foster and maintain a diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds and experience on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the mix of skills and experience of the directors and assesses nominees and potential candidates in the context of the current composition of the Board and our requirements, taking into consideration the diverse communities and geographies in which we operate. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses these and other criteria to evaluate potential nominees, there are no stated minimum criteria for nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses the same standards to evaluate all director candidates, regardless of who proposes them.

Compensation and Leadership Resources Committee. The Compensation Committee assists the Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to the compensation of all Section 16 officers, members of the Board and such other employees as delegated from time to time by the Board. In consultation with management, the Board and the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee designs, recommends to the Board for approval and evaluates employment, separation, severance and change of control agreements and our compensation plans, policies and programs with respect to our Section 16 officers. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all grants to the Board, our executive officers, senior vice presidents, and Section 16 officers under our equity plans. To the extent permitted by its charter, the Compensation Committee may delegate certain authority and certain responsibilities to one or more of its members, our officers or a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee aims to structure our compensation program to encourage high performance, promote accountability and align employee interests with our strategic goals and with the interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee also oversees risk management as it relates to our compensation policies and practices for employees generally.

18 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors (continued)

The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. During fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee retained Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”), a national compensation consulting firm, as its independent compensation consultant to provide assistance on executive and director compensation matters. Compensia advised the Compensation Committee on a variety of compensation-related matters in fiscal 2016, including:

•

the competitiveness of our executive compensation program by providing market review of executive compensation, evaluating our compensation peer group composition and compensation at our compensation peer group companies;

•

the pay levels of our named executive officers by assessing and proposing equity and cash compensation guidelines for various executive job levels and assessing compensation levels for our executive officers;

•

our executive compensation program design, including short-term and long-term incentive plan design and pay mix, the framework for our long-term incentive awards and our retention strategies, and evaluation of our compensation recoupment (i.e., “clawback”) policies; and

•

the compensation arrangements for our Board.

The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by members of our management team—including Dr. Su, our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Corporate Communications and Investor Relations, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and our Vice President, Compensation and Benefits. The Compensation Committee considers the input of these individuals to formulate the specific plan and award designs, including performance measures and performance levels, necessary to align our executive compensation program with our business objectives and strategies. These individuals did not attend either executive sessions or portions of any meetings of the Compensation Committee or our Board where their own compensation determinations were decided. Dr. Su does not participate in the determination of her own compensation.

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Ms. Denzel, as Chair, and Messrs. Claflin and Donofrio, each determined to be “independent” under applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules. The Compensation Committee held five meetings during fiscal 2016.

Innovation and Technology Committee. The Innovation and Technology Committee assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities regarding matters of innovation and technology. The Innovation and Technology Committee is responsible for reviewing, evaluating and making recommendations to the Board regarding our major technology plans and strategies, including our research and development activities, as well as the technical and market risks associated with product development and investment; reviewing, evaluating and making recommendations regarding talent and skills of our workforce supporting our technology and research and development activities; monitoring the performance of our technology development in support of our overall business strategy; monitoring and evaluating existing and future trends in technology that may affect our strategic plans; and assessing our risk mitigation policies and procedures relating to products based on new technology or significant innovations to existing technology. The Innovation and Technology Committee currently consists of Mr. Donofrio, as Chair, and Messrs. Inglis and Yahia. The Innovation and Technology Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2016.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 19

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

Our directors play a critical role in guiding our strategic direction and overseeing our management. In order to compensate them for their substantial time commitment, we provide a mix of cash and equity-based compensation. We do not provide pension or retirement benefits to our non-employee directors.

Mr. Henry WK Chow and Mr. John R. Harding did not stand for re-election at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. They did not receive equity awards in 2016.

2016 Non-Employee Director Compensation. The table below summarizes the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for fiscal 2016. Dr. Su, who is an employee director, did not receive any compensation for her service as a director on the Board. Mr. Marren joined the Board in February 2017. Mr. Edelman resigned from the Board in February 2017. Mr. Claflin’s Board service will end on April 26, 2017.


Name (a)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash⁽¹⁾ ($) (b)		Stock Awards⁽²⁾⁽³⁾ ($) (c)		Total ($) (d)
John E. Caldwell		140,179		297,299		437,478
Henry WK Chow		90,000		—		90,000
Bruce L. Claflin		111,635		198,197		309,832
Nora M. Denzel		118,104		198,197		316,301
Nicholas M. Donofrio		140,000		198,197		338,197
Martin L. Edelman		75,000		198,197		273,197
John R. Harding		47,500		—		47,500
Joseph A. Householder		130,000		198,197		328,197
Michael J. Inglis		125,000		198,197		323,197
Ahmed Yahia		95,000		198,197		293,197

(1)	Amounts represent annual retainers for service as directors, annual retainers for Board committee service and annual retainers for serving as Board committee chairs, where applicable. See “—Cash Fees Paid to Non-Employee Directors” below for additional information.

(2)

Amounts represent equity awards in the form of restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards granted under our Outsider Director Equity Compensation Policy. See “—Equity Awards for Non-Employee Directors” below for additional information. Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the respective director’s RSU awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”). For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuations reflected in this column, see Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The actual value that a director may realize from an RSU award is contingent upon the satisfaction of the conditions to vesting of that award. Thus, there is no assurance that the value, if any, eventually realized by the director will correspond to the amounts shown.

The following table sets forth all RSUs granted to each non-employee directors in fiscal 2016:


Name	Grant Date		RSUs Granted (#)
John E. Caldwell		5/12/2016		82,813
Bruce L. Claflin		5/12/2016		55,208
Nora M. Denzel		5/12/2016		55,208
Nicholas M. Donofrio		5/12/2016		55,208
Martin L. Edelman		5/12/2016		55,208
Joseph A. Householder		5/12/2016		55,208
Michael J. Inglis		5/12/2016		55,208
Ahmed Yahia		5/12/2016		55,208

20 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Directors’ Compensation and Benefits (continued)

(3)

The following table sets forth the aggregate number of outstanding RSUs and stock options held by our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2016, our fiscal year end. Pursuant to our Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy, Ms. Denzel and Messrs. Caldwell, Edelman, Householder and Inglis have elected to defer the issuance of shares subject to RSU awards, respectively, until such time as the respective director ceases to serve on the Board. Mr. Edelman’s deferred shares were issued to him following his resignation in February 2017. The deferred RSUs as of fiscal year end are included in the following table.


Name	RSUs Outstanding as of December 31, 2016		Options Outstanding as of December 31, 2016
John E. Caldwell		334,574		25,000
Bruce L. Claflin		55,208		—
Nora M. Denzel		55,208		—
Nicholas M. Donofrio		55,208		—
Martin L. Edelman		226,764		—
Joseph A. Householder		171,841		—
Michael J. Inglis		208,107		—
Ahmed Yahia		55,208		—

Determining Non-Employee Director Compensation. The Compensation Committee annually reviews our non-employee directors’ compensation. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee recommends any changes to our non-employee directors’ compensation to the Board for approval. In addition, the Board and Compensation Committee periodically evaluate how our director pay levels and pay policies compare to the competitive market. In fiscal 2016, the Board and Compensation Committee reviewed competitive market data regarding non-employee directors’ pay compiled by Compensia, Inc., the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. While competitive market data is important to the evaluation of the directors’ compensation, it is just one of several factors considered by the Board in approving director compensation, and the Board has discretion in determining the nature and extent of its use. In fiscal 2016, in addition to the competitive market data, the Board considered the amount of time associated with Board and Board committee services as well as annual share usage under the 2004 Plan related to non-employee director compensation.

Key Changes to Non-Employee Director Compensation. During fiscal 2016, the Board continued the practice adopted in May 2014, to reallocate the mix of cash and equity compensation paid to our non-employee directors, with the goal of maintaining total average compensation per non-employee director at approximately the same level as had been previously paid and maintaining an affordable annual share usage. These changes are further described under “—Cash Fees Paid to Non-Employee Directors” and “—Equity Awards for Non-Employee Directors,” below.

Cash Fees Paid to Non-Employee Directors. The cash fees our non-employee directors were eligible to receive in fiscal 2016 was composed of the following elements:

•

Annual retainer for services as a director;

•

Annual retainer for services on a Board committee; and

•

Annual retainer for services as a Board committee chair.

Annual Retainer for Service as Director. Non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer for their service as directors. In fiscal 2016, other than our Chairman of the Board, the non-employee directors were paid an annual retainer of $75,000. The annual retainer for the Chairman of the Board for a full year of service is 1.5 times the amount of the other Board members annual retainer, or $112,500. In fiscal 2016, the current Chairman of the Board, Mr. Caldwell, was paid a pro-rated annual retainer of $98,283, to reflect his appointment as Chairman in May of 2016. Our former Chairman of the Board, Mr. Claflin, was paid a pro-rated annual retainer of $89,217, to reflect his service as Chairman from January to May of 2016.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 21

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Directors’ Compensation and Benefits (continued)

Annual Retainer for Service on Board Committees. During fiscal 2016, the Board continued the practice of paying additional annual retainers set forth below for service on a Board committee.


Audit and Finance Committee	$	20,000
Compensation Committee	$	20,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	$	10,000
Innovation and Technology Committee	$	20,000

Annual Retainer for Service as Board Committee Chair. In addition, non-employee directors receive annual retainers for serving as a chair of a Board committee, which are set forth below. These retainers were unchanged in fiscal 2016.


Audit and Finance Committee	$	25,000
Compensation Committee	$	15,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	$	10,000
Innovation and Technology Committee	$	15,000

Equity Awards for Non-Employee Directors. In order to align the long-term interests of our directors with those of our stockholders, a portion of director compensation is provided in the form of equity. Non-employee directors participate in our 2004 Plan and are entitled to receive equity awards under our Outsider Director Equity Compensation Policy, subject to the terms of the 2004 Plan. Non-employee directors are generally eligible to receive an annual RSU award (an “Annual RSU Award”) upon re-election at each annual meeting of stockholders, and, if a non-employee directors is appointed to the Board on a date other than the date of an annual meeting of stockholders, such director is entitled to receive an initial RSU award on his or her appointment to the Board (an “Off-Cycle RSU Grant”).

Annual RSU Awards. Under our current Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy, the Annual RSU Award for each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board) who has served on the Board for at least six months prior to an annual meeting of stockholders is calculated based on the following formula, with no discretionary component: the quotient of (i) $185,000 (the “Target Equity Value”) divided by (ii) the average closing price of our common stock for the 30-day period preceding and ending with the date of the respective RSU grant. In fiscal 2016, the Chairman of the Board received an Annual RSU Award with a Target Equity Value of $277,500.

In addition, under our current Outside Director Equity Compensation Policies, if a non-employee director has served on the Board for less than six months prior to an annual meeting of stockholders, such director’s Annual RSU Award is pro-rated based on the number of months of service before the respective annual meeting of stockholders. For purposes of the pro-rata calculation, service during any portion of a month counts as a full month of service.

Off-Cycle Grants. Under our current Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy, an Off-Cycle Grant is equal to the quotient of (i) $185,000 divided by (ii) the average closing price of our common stock for the 30-day period preceding and ending with the date of the respective RSU grant. The Annual RSU Awards and the Off-Cycle RSU Grants vest on the one-year anniversary of their grant dates.

In fiscal 2016, each of our directors, other than those who did not stand for re-election, received an Annual RSU Award under our current Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy.

Deferral. Pursuant to our Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy, our non-employee directors may elect to defer the issuance of shares of our common stock that become issuable upon vesting of the RSUs granted pursuant to the 2004 Plan (and the recognition of taxable income associated with such RSUs) until such time as the director ceases to serve on our Board. A non-employee director can make this election by completing a Restricted Stock Unit Award Deferral Election Agreement before the scheduled date of an RSU grant. If a director makes this election, the issuance of the common stock subject to the RSUs may not be accelerated or changed once the Election Agreement is submitted to us. Any common stock deferred under our Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy is issued to the director, in one lump sum, within 30 days after his or her resignation from our Board.

22 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Directors’ Compensation and Benefits (continued)

Acceleration of Vesting. Pursuant to our Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy, in the event of our change of control, all of our non-employee directors’ equity compensation awards will become fully vested. In addition, in the event of the termination of a non-employee director’s service to the Board as a result of death, disability or retirement, all of his or her non-employee director’s equity compensation awards will become fully vested, provided that such non-employee director served as a member of the Board for at least three years prior to the date of termination and satisfied our stock ownership guideline requirements during his or her service as a Board member.

Other Benefits for Non-Employee Directors. We reimburse our directors for their travel and expenses in connection with attending Board meetings and Board-related activities, such as AMD site visits and sponsored events, as well as for continuing education programs.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Under our stock ownership guidelines, our non-employee directors are required to hold the lesser of (i) the number of shares equivalent to three times the then-current annual retainer divided by the average closing price of our common stock for the 30-day period immediately preceding and ending with the date of the annual meeting of stockholders or (ii) 30,000 shares (in the case of non-employee directors other than the Chairman of our Board) or 45,000 shares (in the case of the Chairman of the Board).

The stock ownership guidelines must be achieved by each non-employee director within the later of (i) October 2016, which is the five-year anniversary of the adoption of our current stock ownership guidelines, or (ii) the five-year anniversary of the respective director’s first election or appointment to the Board or first appointment as Chairman of the Board, as applicable.

As of December 31, 2016, all of our non-employee directors met the requirements of our stock ownership guidelines within the established compliance time frame. Mr. Marren has until February 2022 to meet the stock ownership guidelines.

Until the requirements of our stock ownership guidelines are achieved, each non-employee director is encouraged to retain at least 10% of the “net shares” (as defined below) obtained through our stock incentive plans. Shares counted toward the minimum stock ownership requirements include (i) shares held directly by a director, (ii) RSUs that have vested, but where the issuance of the shares have been deferred by the director pursuant to our Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy, and (iii) 50% of exercisable, “in the money” stock options. “Net shares” are the number of shares from the sale of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock, less the number of shares the director sells to cover the exercise price of stock options and sells or has withheld to pay taxes.

As of December 31, 2016, all of our non-employee directors, other than Mr. Marren, retained at least 10% of the net shares obtained through our stock incentive plans. Mr. Marren’s first equity award will vest in February 2018.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 23

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table shows each person or entity we know to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of our common stock as of February 27, 2017.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned	Percent of Class⁽¹⁾
West Coast Hitech, L.P.⁽²⁾ P.O. Box 309 GT Ugland House, South Church Street George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands	191,906,166 (shared voting and shared dispositive power as to all shares)		19.4	%
BlackRock, Inc.⁽³⁾ 40 East 52nd Street New York, New York 10022	81,784,076 (sole voting power as to 79,998,728 shares; sole dispositive power as to all shares)		8.7	%
The Vanguard Group⁽⁴⁾ 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355	71,633,026 (sole dispositive power as to 70,390,994 shares; shared dispositive power as to 1,242,032 shares; sole voting power as to 1,184,464 shares; shared voting power as to 95,268 shares)		7.6	%

(1)	Based on 941,398,733 shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 27, 2017.

(2)

Based on Amendment No. 6 of Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on September 2, 2016 by Mubadala, West Coast Hitech, L.P. (“WCH”) and West Coast Hitech G.P. Ltd. (“WCH GP”) pursuant to a joint filing agreement. Mubadala is a public joint stock company incorporated in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and is wholly-owned by the Government of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. WCH, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, and its general partner, WCH GP, a Cayman Islands corporation, are wholly owned by Mubadala. The shares include warrants to purchase 50,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.98 per share. These warrants are currently exercisable. Warrants for an additional 25,000,000 shares will become exercisable on August 30, 2017. In addition, WCH may not exercise these warrants if doing so would cause it, together with its affiliates, to own more than 19.9% of our outstanding common stock. The 191,906,166 shares of our common stock and the warrants are held by WCH and beneficially owned by Mubadala, WCH and WCH GP.

(3)	This information is based on Amendment No. 1 of Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 19, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc. and includes 81,784,076 shares of common stock owned by BlackRock and its subsidiaries.

(4)

Based on Amendment No. 5 of Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017 by The Vanguard Group. The Vanguard Group is an investment adviser deemed to be the beneficial owner of—shares of our common stock. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 1,146,764 shares of our common stock as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 132,968 shares of our common stock as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

24 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The table below shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of February 27, 2017 by our current directors, our director nominees, our Named Executive Officers (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below) and all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each person has sole investment and voting power with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned. Ownership information is based upon information provided by the individuals.


Name	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Percent of Class⁽³⁾
Lisa T. Su		5,451,946		*
John E. Caldwell		351,433		*
Bruce L. Claflin		678,902		*
Nora M. Denzel		152,899		*
Nicholas M. Donofrio		294,860		*
Joseph A. Householder		116,633		*
Michael J. Inglis		152,899		*
John W. Marren		0		*
Ahmed Yahia		164,875		*
Devinder Kumar		2,446,438		*
James R. Anderson		664,487		*
Forrest E. Norrod		1,207,133		*
Mark D. Papermaster		2,379,038		*
All current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)		15,897,493		1.6	%

*	Less than one percent

(1)	Some of the individuals may share voting power with their spouses with respect to the listed shares.

(2)

Includes beneficial ownership of the following number of shares of our common stock that are issuable upon exercise of stock options that are exercisable by April 28, 2017 (within 60 days of February 27, 2017) and upon vesting of RSUs that will vest by April 28, 2017. Also includes beneficial ownership of the following number of shares of our common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs that vested as of February 27, 2017 or will vest by April 28, 2017 where the issuance of shares of our common stock upon vesting was deferred by the director (the “Deferred RSU Shares”) pursuant to our Outside Director Equity Compensation Policy until such director ceases to serve on the Board:


Name	Shares #⁽⁴⁾		Deferred RSU Shares #
Lisa T. Su		3,638,362		—
John E. Caldwell		276,761		251,761
Bruce L. Claflin		—		—
Nora M. Denzel		—		—
Nicholas M. Donofrio		—		—
Joseph A. Householder		116,633		116,633
Michael J. Inglis		152,899		152,899
John W. Marren		—		—
Ahmed Yahia		—		—
Devinder Kumar		1,683,383		—
James R. Anderson		304,153		—
Forrest E. Norrod		511,072		—
Mark D. Papermaster		1,508,946		—
All current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)		9,240,485		521,293

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 25

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers (continued)

(3)

Based on 941,398,733 shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 27, 2017. Also, with respect to each individual, the calculation includes shares of our common stock that are issuable upon exercise of stock options held by that individual that are exercisable by April 28, 2017 and upon vesting of RSUs held by that individual that will vest by April 28, 2017, ignoring the withholding of shares of common stock to cover applicable taxes. These shares, however, were not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other individual.

(4)

With respect to each individual, the calculation includes shares of our common stock that are issuable upon exercise of stock options held by that individual that are exercisable by April 28, 2017 and upon vesting of RSUs held by that individual that will vest by April 28, 2017, ignoring the withholding of shares of common stock to cover applicable taxes. These shares, however, were not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other individual.

26 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following sets forth biographical information regarding our executive officers as of February 27, 2017. Biographical information about Dr. Su, who is both a director and an executive officer, may be found under “Item 1—Election of Directors” above. The age of each executive officer is as of our Annual Meeting.

Devinder Kumar

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Age: 61

Mr. Kumar is our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Kumar is responsible for the company’s global finance organization as well as global corporate services and facilities.

Mr. Kumar joined AMD in 1984 as a financial analyst. He spent 10 years in Asia as financial controller for AMD Penang and group finance director for AMD’s Manufacturing Services Group across Singapore, Thailand, China and Malaysia. Starting in 1998, Mr. Kumar assumed several corporate roles including leadership positions in Corporate Accounting and Corporate Finance. He was appointed corporate controller in 2001. He also served as AMD’s assistant treasurer and treasurer between 2007 and 2010 and was most recently senior vice president, corporate controller and interim CFO before being appointed chief financial officer in January 2013 and treasurer in April 2015.

Mr. Kumar serves as a member of the boards of directors of TF AMD Microelectronics (Penang) SDN. BHD. and Suzhou TF—AMD Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Mr. Kumar holds a bachelor’s degree in ecology from the University of Malaya, Malaysia, a master’s degree in biology from the University of California, Santa Barbara and an MBA in finance from the University of California, Los Angeles.

James R. Anderson

Senior Vice President and General Manager, Computing and Graphics Business Group

Age: 45

Mr. Anderson is our Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Computing and Graphics (“CG”) Business Group. Mr. Anderson joined AMD in May 2015. Mr. Anderson is responsible for managing all aspects of strategy, business management, engineering, and sales for AMD’s client and consumer graphics products and solutions. He brings to this role 20 years of business and technical expertise, deep industry knowledge, and a proven ability to transform businesses to drive profitable growth based on developing and successfully executing a holistic strategy across diverse teams. Mr. Anderson joined AMD from Intel Corporation where he served from November 2014 to May 2015 and completed the acquisition and successful integration of the Axxia processor business from Broadcom Limited (formerly, Avago Technologies) to Intel. Mr. Anderson spent the last decade at Broadcom Limited and LSI Corporation in a variety of leadership positions spanning strategic planning, marketing, engineering, sales, and general management. Prior to joining LSI Corporation in 2005, Mr. Anderson held strategic planning roles at Intel Corporation for mobile/laptop and server processors in addition to serving as a microprocessor architect.

Mr. Anderson holds numerous academic degrees, including an MBA and Master of Science in electrical engineering and computer science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He also holds a Master of Science in electrical engineering from Purdue University and a Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota. Mr. Anderson has received four patents for innovations in computer architecture.

Forrest E. Norrod

Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom Business Group

Age: 51

Mr. Norrod is our Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom (“EESC”) Business Group. Mr. Norrod joined AMD in November 2014. In this role, he is responsible for managing all aspects of strategy, business management, engineering and sales for EESC businesses. Mr. Norrod has more than 25 years of technology industry experience across a number of engineering and business management roles at both the chip and system level.

Mr. Norrod most recently was Vice President and General Manager of Dell’s server business from December 2009 to October 2014, driving the business to market share leadership in several key geographies and markets while delivering consistent revenue and profitability growth. In his role as Vice President and General Manager of Dell’s Data

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 27

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Executive Officers (continued)

Center Solutions, Mr. Norrod successfully led the creation of the company’s first internal startup, which established Dell’s leadership presence in the hyper-scale datacenter market. He joined Dell as CTO of Client Products in August 2000, then led the company’s Enterprise Engineering before ultimately having responsibility for all of Dell’s global engineering teams.

Prior to Dell, Mr. Norrod worked at Cyrix Corp from 1993 to 1997 and National Semiconductor from 1997 to 2000 leading the integrated x86 CPU businesses.

Mr. Norrod holds Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees in electrical engineering from Virginia Tech and holds 12 US patents in computer architecture, graphics and system design. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Intersil Corporation.

Mark D. Papermaster

Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President, Technology and Engineering

Age: 55

Mr. Papermaster is our Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President, Technology and Engineering responsible for corporate technical direction, and AMD’s intellectual property (IP) and system-on-chip (SOC) product research and development. His more than 30 years of engineering experience includes significant leadership roles managing the development of a wide range of products spanning from mobile devices to high-performance servers.

Before joining AMD in October 2011, Mr. Papermaster was the leader of Cisco’s Silicon Engineering Group, the organization responsible for silicon strategy, architecture, and development for the company’s switching and routing businesses.

In prior roles, Mr. Papermaster served as Apple, Inc.’s Senior Vice President of Devices Hardware Engineering, where he was responsible for the iPod products, and iPhone hardware development. He also held a number of senior leadership positions at IBM, serving on the company’s Technical Leadership Team and overseeing development of the company’s key microprocessor and server technologies.

Mr. Papermaster holds his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin and a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Vermont. He is a member of the University of Texas, Cockrell School of Engineering Advisory Board, Olin College Presidents Council, and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.

Harry A. Wolin

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

Age: 54

Mr. Wolin is our Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Wolin was also our Corporate Secretary from April 2010 until August 2015. Prior to becoming General Counsel in 2003, Mr. Wolin was our Vice President, Intellectual Property. Before joining us in 2000, Mr. Wolin spent 12 years at Motorola, Inc. (now known as Motorola Solutions, Inc., a provider of technologies, products and services that enable a broad range of mobile, wireline, digital communication, information and entertainment experiences), where his last role was Vice President and Director of Legal Affairs for the Semiconductor Products Sector.

Mr. Wolin served as a member of the board of directors of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. from February 2011 through March 2012. Mr. Wolin received the 2008 Magna Stella award for innovative management from the Texas General Counsel Forum. He is a member of the State Bars of Arizona and Texas and is registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Wolin holds a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from the University of Arizona and a juris doctor degree from Arizona State University.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

We believe that during fiscal 2016, our directors, Section 16 officers or beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements. In making the above statement, we have relied solely upon a review of information provided to us and upon the written representations of our directors and Section 16 officers.

28 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans. Our 2004 Plan, which was approved by our stockholders, is our only equity incentive plan available for the grant of new equity awards. Outstanding options and any full value awards are not transferable for consideration.


	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016
	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (a)			Weighted- Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b)		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders		72,001,211	⁽¹⁾		—		31,499,562
Options		20,110,356	⁽²⁾	$	4.16		—
Awards—RSUs and PRSUs		51,890,855	⁽³⁾		—		—
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders		72,921			—		—
Options		72,921	⁽²⁾⁽⁴⁾	$	0.68		—
Awards—RSUs and PRSUs		—			—		—
Total		72,074,132					31,499,562

(1)	Includes shares of our common stock issuable from performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), in each case representing the number of shares that could be earned assuming target achievement of the applicable performance conditions.

(2)	As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate weighted-average remaining contractual life of our outstanding stock options was 4.29 years with an aggregate weighted-average exercise price of $4.15.

(3)	Includes 47,319,826 RSU awards and 4,571,029 PRSU awards.

(4)

Represents shares of our common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options assumed from SeaMicro, Inc. (“SeaMicro”) stock plans as part of our acquisition of SeaMicro in March 2012. We have not granted any awards under this plan and we do not intend to grant any awards under this plan in the future.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 29

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation and Leadership Resources Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) oversees, among other things, the development and administration of our executive compensation program. This “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” describes our executive compensation philosophy and objectives, provides an overview of our executive compensation program, and reviews the fiscal 2016 compensation decisions for the following executive officers (our “Named Executive Officers”):


Name		Title
Lisa Su		President and Chief Executive Officer
Devinder Kumar		Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
James Anderson		Senior Vice President and General Manager, Computing and Graphics Business Group
Forrest Norrod		Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom Business Group
Mark Papermaster		Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President, Technology and Engineering

Executive Summary

Fiscal 2016 Company Performance

In 2016, we made meaningful progress across the company strengthening our product offerings, regaining share in key markets, creating a solid financial foundation for sustainable growth.

Growth across both of our business segments resulted in a 7% increase in annual revenue of $4.272 billion in 2016 from revenue of $3.991 billion in 2015 and an improvement in operating loss of $372 million in 2016 compared to an operating loss of $481 million in 2015. In 2016, we also continued to closely manage our operating expenses of $1.5 billion compared to operating expenses of $1.6 billion in 2015. We strengthened our balance sheet with strategic equity and debt capital market transactions that reduced and re-profiled our debt and lowered interest expense. We ended the fiscal year with cash and cash equivalents of $1.26 billion compared to $785 million at the end of fiscal 2015, which represents approximately a 61% increase.

Over the past two years, we have strengthened the technical, operational, and financial foundation of the company to deliver shareholder value. We were the highest performing stock in the Philadelphia Semiconductor Sector Index (SOX) in 2016 and saw our market capitalization appreciate during fiscal 2016 from approximately $2.27 billion at the end of fiscal 2015 to approximately $10.51 billion at the end of fiscal 2016, representing a 363% increase. From the start of fiscal 2014 through the end of fiscal 2016, our market capitalization increased 275%. The following graphic compares the change in our market capitalization to the change in the SOX from fiscal 2014 through fiscal 2016:

LOGO

30 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Computing and Graphics segment annual revenue grew for the first time since 2011 as our focus on strengthening this key part of our business gained momentum. We punctuated four quarters of Computing and Graphics segment execution focus throughout 2016 by delivering, in the fourth quarter of 2016, the highest:

•

Computing and Graphics quarterly revenue in two years;

•

quarterly client revenue in seven quarters; and

•

graphics processor quarterly revenue in 11 quarters.

Our Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-custom segment 2016 annual revenue also grew from the previous year and resulted in new records for semi-custom annual unit shipments and sales.

We enter 2017 positioned to capitalize on strong revenue growth and margin expansion opportunities as we prepare to launch our “Zen”-based CPUs and “Vega” GPUs that can return AMD to the high-performance markets where we have not materially participated in recent years.

We believe that our stock price performance reflects the success we have had in executing to our strategy.

Pay for Performance

Our executive compensation program for fiscal 2016 was similar to our fiscal 2015 compensation program, remaining closely linked to shareholder value creation through the achievement of our strategic and financial objectives. For fiscal 2016, our executive compensation program consisted of base salary, an annual cash bonus opportunity under our Executive Incentive Plan (EIP), long-term equity awards under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (2004 Plan), and other benefits. Annual cash bonus opportunities under our EIP are tied to the achievement of our annual financial and operating goals, which are aligned with short- and long-term objectives. Our long-term equity awards are directly tied to the performance of the price of shares of our common stock, which align our Named Executive Officers’ long-term interests directly with the interests of our stockholders.

Fiscal 2016 Pay Mix

The fiscal 2016 pay mix for our Chief Executive Officer and our other Named Executive Officers was highly performance-based and “at risk,” with target compensation (defined below) weighted heavily toward long-term equity awards. As the following charts illustrate, for fiscal 2016: (i) 90% of our Chief Executive Officer’s target compensation and 83% of the average target compensation of our other Named Executive Officers’ was delivered in the form of performance-based or “at risk” compensation, and (ii) long-term equity awards represented approximately 75% of our Chief Executive Officer’s target compensation and 66% of the average target compensation of our other Named Executive Officers.

As used in this Proxy Statement, a Named Executive Officer’s fiscal 2016 “target compensation” is the sum of his or her fiscal 2016 base salary, target EIP bonus, and the aggregate intended target value of the long-term equity awards (the accounting values of which are also included in the “Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2016” table below on page 57).

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 31

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Fiscal 2016 Realized Pay

The pay of our Named Executive Officers, as reported in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table, reflects the accounting value of long-term equity awards at grant and not the value actually realized by our Named Executive Officers from these awards. Since a significant portion of the reported compensation of our Named Executive Officers represents potential pay, we believe it is useful to supplement the information provided in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table by also looking at the pay our Named Executive Officers actually realized during the fiscal year.

As in previous years, the key drivers of the realized pay of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2016 were (i) the increase in our stock price and (ii) our actual performance against the pre-established financial targets under the EIP.

Based on these results for fiscal 2016:

•

Fiscal 2015 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units—Due to our strong stock price appreciation during fiscal 2016 (our stock price increased from $2.92 to $11.34 during fiscal 2016, providing a one-year total stockholder return of 288%), our Named Executive Officers earned the maximum number of shares of our common stock under the performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) granted to them during fiscal 2015 (the “2015 PRSUs”). One-half of the shares of our common stock earned under the 2015 PRSUs vested and was settled in November 2016. The remaining earned shares will vest and be settled on August 15, 2018, subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through such date. For a discussion of the design of the 2015 PRSUs and the determination of the performance objectives for such awards, see “Fiscal 2016 Compensation Elements—Long-Term Equity Awards—2015 PRSU Awards” below.

•

Fiscal 2016 Annual Cash Bonuses—Our Named Executive Officers earned 32.5% of their fiscal 2016 target cash performance bonus, which compares to a fiscal 2015 payout under the EIP of 0% and an average payout under the EIP for the previous three fiscal years of 21.8%. Despite a number of very positive strategic and financial achievements in fiscal 2016, we did not achieve all of the aggressive target goals the Compensation Committee set in the beginning of the year and, accordingly, the payouts under our fiscal 2016 EIP were below their target. For a discussion of the fiscal 2016 EIP, see “Fiscal 2016 Compensation Elements—Annual Cash Performance Bonuses” below.

By comparison, for fiscal 2015 no cash performance bonuses were paid to our Named Executive Officers due to underperformance relative to performance goals. In addition, the performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted to our Named Executive Officers in 2014 (excluding Messrs. Anderson and Norrod, who did not receive such awards) were forfeited in full due to not meeting the performance goals for the performance period that ended on December 26, 2015.

32 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

The table below compares our market capitalization to the “realized pay” of our Chief Executive Officer and the average “realized pay” of our other Named Executive Officers for each of our last three fiscal years. As this table demonstrates, the compensation collectively “realized” by our Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2016 represented only 0.51% of the $8.23 billion in value created for our stockholders during that period.

LOGO

(1)

Each Named Executive Officer’s “realized pay” is, for the applicable fiscal year, the sum of his or her earned base salary, actual EIP bonus, any discretionary or retention bonus amounts realized, other compensation, and income realized due to equity transactions involving shares awarded under our equity plans. Additional information is provided below in the “2016 Summary Compensation Table” on page 52 and the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2016” on page 58. Realized pay is not a substitute for total compensation. For more information on total compensation as calculated under SEC rules, see the notes accompanying the 2016 Summary Compensation Table below.

(2)	Dr. Su was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer effective October 8, 2014.

(3)	The fiscal 2014 and 2015 average of the other Named Executive Officers excludes Mr. Anderson, who began employment in May 2015.

(4)	The fiscal 2014 average of the other Named Executive Officers excludes Mr. Norrod, who began employment in October 2014.

(5)

In last year’s Proxy Statement, we defined “realized pay” to include each of the elements in Note 1, above, plus the monetary value of performance equity awards which were both outstanding during fiscal 2015 and expected to deliver income in a later fiscal year based on fiscal 2015 results using assumed financial payout projections. We adopted the definition of “realized pay” set forth in Note 1 for this year’s Proxy Statement because we believe it more closely aligns to market practice for annual realized pay disclosures.

(6)	Market capitalization data is provided by FactSet Research Systems Inc.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 33

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Executive Compensation Policies and Practices

We strive to implement sound executive compensation policies and practices, including compensation-related corporate governance standards, consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. During fiscal 2016, we maintained the following executive compensation policies and practices, which we believe drive performance and prohibit or minimize behaviors that we believe do not serve our stockholders’ long-term interests:



Policy/Practice		Summary

Recoupment (or claw-back) policy		Under our Worldwide Standards of Business Conduct, we expressly reserve the right to claw-back incentive-based or other compensation (including equity-based compensation) paid to an employee (including any Named Executive Officer) if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement as a result of our material noncompliance with any financial reporting laws. In addition, all equity awards granted to our Named Executive Officers after October 2015 include a forfeiture provision, which provides for potential claw-back of the equity award if the Named Executive Officer violates the non-competition or non-solicitation covenants in the equity award agreement.

One-year minimum vesting period for equity awards		Our 2004 Plan requires a minimum one-year vesting period for all awards granted after April 29, 2015, subject to limited exceptions such as death, disability, termination of employment or a change in control.

Cap on change in control payments and benefits		We will not enter into any change in control agreement or arrangement with a Named Executive Officer that provides for cash severance payments (in the case of a change in control of the Company and a subsequent termination of employment) in excess of (i) two times the sum of base salary and target annual cash performance bonus plus (ii) the prorated target annual cash performance bonus for the year in which the termination of employment occurs.

No excise tax payments		We will not enter into any change in control agreement or arrangement with a Named Executive Officer that provides for an excise tax gross-up payment.

Limited perquisites		We provide limited perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers and provide air and other travel for our Named Executive Officers for business purposes only.

Anti-hedging policy		Our employees, including our Named Executive Officers and Directors, are not permitted to hedge their economic exposure to our equity securities.

Incentive compensation amounts are subject to payment thresholds and maximums		Our annual cash performance bonuses and PRSUs have threshold performance requirements that must be achieved to receive payment and are subject to maximum payment “caps.”

Stock ownership requirements		Our stock ownership requirements provide that our President and/or Chief Executive Officer should attain an investment position in our common stock having a value that is at least equal to three times his or her base salary and that our other Named Executive Officers should attain an investment position having a value that is at least equal to one-and-one-half times their base salaries.

Independent compensation consultant		Pursuant to its Charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to engage independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. In fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee retained Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm, as its compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee on its decisions regarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, and to keep the Compensation Committee apprised of compensation trends and best practices. Compensia performs no other services for us.

Compensation risk assessment		The Compensation Committee conducts an annual risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices to ensure that our programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

34 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Response to 2016 “Say On Pay” Vote and Stockholder Engagement Process

The Compensation Committee seeks to align the objectives of our executive compensation program with the interests of our stockholders. In that respect, when evaluating our executive compensation program the Compensation Committee carefully considers both the results of our annual advisory resolution on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (the “say on pay” vote) as well as direct feedback from our stockholders. At our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders, our “say on pay” vote received support from only 53% of the votes cast on the proposal (after averaging 75.8% support in each of the previous three years) because, as a Delaware corporation, abstentions on a matter submitted for stockholder action are counted as “no” votes and stockholders owning a significant number of shares of our common stock abstained from voting on our “say on pay” proposal, support for our executive compensation program was lower than normal. Excluding the abstentions, our “say on pay” vote received support from 90% of the votes cast on the proposal. No significant changes have been made to our executive compensation program for 2017 based on the 2016 “say on pay” vote.

During fiscal 2016, we continued our practice of proactive stockholder engagement regarding executive compensation and other governance matters. After filing and disseminating our definitive proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders, our Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Corporate Communications and Investor Relations conducted conference calls, in-person meetings, or other discussions with many of our top 50 stockholders (which collectively represent approximately 64% of the shares entitled to vote at our annual meeting) to solicit feedback on the Company, including their views on our executive compensation structure and pay practices. The Chair of our Compensation Committee, and other members of our senior management also took part in our stockholder engagement efforts in 2016. A variety of topics, including executive compensation, corporate governance, financial performance, and corporate strategy were discussed during these engagements.

Based on these discussions, we learned that, generally, these stockholders believed our executive compensation program was aligned with their interests. The Compensation Committee continues to encourage an active dialogue with our stockholders regarding compensation and governance practices.

Talent Management Focus

We have a strong focus on talent development and retention, ensuring that our executive compensation program is designed to retain the talent required to execute our business strategy. Our pay decisions support our talent objectives by not only considering individual and Company performance, but also long-term potential, key retention needs, and organizational succession plans.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation program is guided by the following overarching principles:



Principle		Description
Business Driven		Compensation aligns to Company performance by linking rewards directly to the achievement of specific financial, operational and strategic objectives that generally lead to increased stockholder value and is structured to avoid excessive risk-taking.

Performance Differentiated		Compensation structured to create an effective link between pay and performance at both the Company and individual level.

Market Competitive		Compensation that is competitive to attract, retain and motivate high caliber senior leadership.

Ownership Oriented		Compensation that is fully aligned with stockholder interests by delivering meaningful equity awards tied to stockholder value creation and by maintaining robust stock ownership requirements.

We continually assess and adjust our executive compensation program, policies, and practices in light of these overarching principles and based on feedback obtained through our stockholder engagement efforts.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 35

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Pay for Performance

The tenets of our compensation philosophy strongly center on pay for performance. We align to the following primary principles:

•

Our compensation practices are designed to align with the interests of our stockholders.

•

Sustained, improved financial performance should result in increasing company valuation and stock price.

•

With improved company performance and increases in company valuation and stock price, our compensation programs should deliver higher rewards to our Named Executive Officers.

We continue to transition our business model through revenue diversification, by pursuing higher growth market segments and higher margin businesses that leverage our competitive advantages. This strategy is based upon opportunities in adjacent sectors where we can increase market penetration and achieve higher margins as well as recognizing that aspects of the personal computer industry have undergone fast-paced structural changes characterized by greater commoditization, lower pricing, and related margin deterioration. As such, we have diversified our business to include the growing graphics and data center markets. A greater shift towards incentive, performance-based compensation is aligned with this transition.

Competitive Compensation

It is imperative to recruit and retain top leadership and industry experts to execute our strategy, and this requires competitive compensation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee seeks to compensate our Named Executive Officers at levels that are commensurate with competitive levels of compensation for executives in similar positions at a group of peer companies (set forth below), which the Compensation Committee believes reflects the current competitive market for executive talent. The Compensation Committee also considers the scope of responsibility of each Named Executive Officer, internal pay comparisons, the in-the-money value (i.e., retention value) of each Named Executive Officer’s long-term equity awards which have not vested, as well as the Compensation Committee’s assessment of each Named Executive Officer’s performance and expected future impact on the organization in making its compensation decisions.

The Compensation Committee generally seeks to position each Named Executive Officer’s target compensation (i.e., base salary, annual target cash performance bonus opportunity, and intended target value of annual long-term equity awards, but excluding special retention awards and non-recurring new hire awards) between the 50^th and 75^th percentile of the competitive market (the “Target Positioning”), recognizing that such compensation will be realized by the executive only if performance targets and stock price appreciation are achieved. A Named Executive Officer’s target compensation may vary from the Target Positioning depending on his or her scope of responsibility, the time period in the position, job performance, skill set, prior experience, expected future contributions to our business, internal pay equity considerations, retention considerations, and business conditions. Additionally, the Compensation Committee reviews our Named Executive Officer compensation practices on an annual basis.

Align Pay Practices with Sound Risk Management

The Compensation Committee seeks to structure our executive compensation program to motivate and reward our Named Executive Officers for appropriately balancing opportunity and risk, such as investment in key initiatives designed to advance our growth in existing and new markets while at the same time avoiding pay practices that encourage excessive risk-taking.

The Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program fosters our objectives while mitigating potentially excessive risk-taking through the following means:

•

multiple internal controls and approval processes intended to prevent manipulation of outcomes;

•

pay mixes that represent an appropriate balance of “fixed” pay versus “variable” pay, as well as “short-term” versus “long-term” incentives;

•

caps on performance-based compensation opportunities;

•

annual incentive programs that include multiple Company-wide financial measures that are quantitative and measurable;

•

time-based and performance-based vesting conditions for long-term equity awards spanning multiple years;

36 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

•

minimum vesting period of one-year for all equity awards;

•

compensation recovery (“claw-back”) policies/provisions; and

•

beneficial share ownership requirements.

How We Make Compensation Decisions

Role of the Compensation Committee and our Board

The Compensation Committee is responsible to our Board for developing and overseeing our compensation and benefits policies and programs. The Compensation Committee, which consists of three independent directors, is responsible for reviewing our executive compensation program to evaluate its alignment with the strategies and needs of our business, market trends, and the interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee is responsible for formulating compensation recommendations to the non-management members of our Board regarding our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and for approving the compensation of our other Named Executive Officers. This includes:

•

reviewing and approving the performance goals and objectives that relate to performance-based compensation awarded under the EIP and the 2004 Plan;

•

conducting an annual compensation risk assessment to evaluate the Company’s compensation policies and practices;

•

evaluating the competitiveness of each Named Executive Officer’s total compensation package;

•

reviewing and approving any changes to a Named Executive Officer’s total compensation package, including, but not limited to, base salary, annual cash performance bonus opportunities, annual incentive award opportunities, and payouts and retention programs; and

•

conducting annual performance reviews of each of our Named Executive Officers.

The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by members of our management team—including our Chief Executive Officer, our Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Corporate Communications and Investor Relations, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and our head of Compensation and Benefits. The Compensation Committee considers the input of these individuals to formulate the specific plan and award designs, including performance measures and performance levels, necessary to align our executive compensation program with our business objectives and strategies. These individuals did not attend either executive sessions or portions of any meetings of the Compensation Committee or our Board where their own compensation determinations were made.

The non-management members of our Board and the Compensation Committee each conduct their own performance assessment of our Chief Executive Officer, and no management recommendation is made with regard to her compensation. The Compensation Committee will review and consider our Board’s evaluation in making its recommendations to the non-management members of our Board regarding the compensation and other terms of our Chief Executive Officer’s employment. Our Chief Executive Officer does not participate in the determination of her own compensation.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. During fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee retained Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm, as its compensation consultant to provide assistance on executive and director compensation matters. Compensia advised the Compensation Committee on a variety of compensation-related matters in fiscal 2016, including:

•

the competitiveness of our executive compensation program by providing market review of executive compensation, evaluating our compensation peer group composition, and compensation at our compensation peer group companies;

•

the pay levels of our Named Executive Officers by assessing and advising on equity and cash compensation guidelines for various executive job levels and assessing compensation levels for our executive officers;

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 37

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

•

the compensation arrangements for our Board.

Conflict of Interest Assessment for Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of receiving objective advice from its compensation consultant and, to that end, conducts an annual conflicts of interest assessment of its compensation consultant. In fiscal 2016, Compensia did not provide any services to or receive any payments from us, except in its capacity as a consultant to the Compensation Committee. In February 2017, the Compensation Committee considered whether the services provided by Compensia raised any conflicts of interest pursuant to the rules of the SEC and the listing rules of Nasdaq and concluded that the work performed by Compensia did not raise any conflicts of interest.

In the course of its engagement, Compensia attended all meetings of the Compensation Committee and, where applicable, presented its findings and recommendations for discussion. Compensia also consulted frequently with members of the Compensation Committee and met with senior management to obtain and validate market data, review materials, and discuss management’s compensation recommendations.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer

Generally, at the beginning of the year, our Chief Executive Officer reviews with the Compensation Committee her performance evaluations of each of our other Named Executive Officers and her compensation recommendations for those Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee considers these recommendations in its decision process.

Competitive Pay Analysis

Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation decisions of a custom group of peer companies, in combination with industry-specific compensation survey data, to develop a subjective representation of the “competitive market” with respect to current executive compensation levels and related policies and practices. The Compensation Committee then evaluates how our pay practices and our Named Executive Officers’ compensation levels compared to the competitive market. As part of this evaluation, the Compensation Committee also reviews the performance measures and related performance target levels generally used within the competitive market to reward performance. The Compensation Committee believes that it appropriately sets the compensation of our Named Executive Officers taking into account the practices of our peers and industry best practices.

Methodology Used to Perform the Competitive Pay Analysis

In preparation for fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee requested that Compensia provide a competitive pay analysis for each Named Executive Officer using (i) compensation data developed from publicly available information (as of January 2016) of the companies included in a custom peer group (the “2016 Custom Peer Group”) and (ii) compensation data for a special peer data cut of the Radford Custom Executive Compensation Survey (which includes all companies noted below in the 2016 Custom Peer Group except Amkor Technology, Inc. and Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.).

To develop the 2016 Custom Peer Group, in February 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed the group of companies comprising the then-existing compensation peer group, with particular reference to their industry (i.e., business segment), revenues (generally 50% to 200% of our revenues for the trailing four fiscal quarters) and market capitalization, in each case based on publicly available information as of January 2016. The Compensation Committee tends to view revenue as the primary indicator of “size,” since market capitalization can fluctuate due to factors unrelated to the underlying fundamentals. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee removed Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Inc. from the peer group because their revenues and market capitalizations exceeded our range parameters. The Compensation Committee also removed Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. because it was acquired by NXP Semiconductors N.V. and removed Broadcom Corp. due to its pending acquisition by Avago Technologies, Inc. The Compensation Committee added ARRIS International, plc and Ciena Corporation to the 2016 Custom Peer Group. Our revenues for the trailing four fiscal quarters ending December 26, 2015, would have placed us in approximately the

38 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

42^nd percentile of the 2016 Custom Peer Group based on publicly available information. The Compensation Committee believes that the composition of the 2016 Custom Peer Group reflects an appropriate set of comparator companies for purposes of assessing our executive compensation program.

The Compensation Committee used the 2016 Custom Peer Group competitive pay analysis developed by Compensia as its reference source in analyzing the competitiveness of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation. As compared to the 2016 Custom Peer Group, AMD’s fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 annual revenue was approximately $4 billion and $4.272 billion, respectively.

The companies comprising the 2016 Custom Peer Group are as follows:⁽¹⁾


Company Name		Revenue ($MM)
Sanmina Corporation		$6,238
Symantec Corporation		$6,153
NetApp, Inc.		$5,871
SanDisk Corp.		$5,757
Harris Corporation		$5,739
Lam Research Corporation		$5,707
ARRIS International, plc		$4,960
Juniper Networks, Inc.		$4,640
NVIDIA Corporation		$4,860
CA Technologies		$4,096
Lexmark International Inc.		$3,646
ON Semiconductor Corp.		$3,520
Amkor Technology, Inc.		$3,067
Marvell Technology Group Ltd.		$2,967
KLA-Tencor Corporation		$2,814
Ciena Corporation		$2,446
Vishay Intertechnology Inc.		$2,355

(1)	Table includes source data compiled by Compensia from publicly filed financials. Revenue data is based on the last four quarters from December 31, 2015 for Sanmina and as of either September 30, 2015 or October 20, 2015 for the remaining peer companies.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 39

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Fiscal 2016 Compensation Elements

The Compensation Committee determines the elements of compensation we provide to our Named Executive Officers. The principal elements of our fiscal 2016 executive compensation program, their objectives, and the factors influencing the amount, are as follows:


Element		Description	Objective	Factors Influencing Amount
Base Salary		Fixed compensation delivered in cash; reviewed annually and adjusted if appropriate	Provides base amount of market competitive pay	Experience, market data, individual role and responsibilities, and individual performance
Annual Cash Performance Bonus (EIP Awards)		Variable cash compensation based on performance against annual goals of revenue, adjusted non-GAAP net income, and adjusted free cash flow	Motivates and rewards achievement of key financial results for the year	Annual target bonus opportunity determined annually based on market data, individual role and responsibilities, and individual performance; payout based on Company performance and individual performance
Long-Term Incentives (2004 Plan Awards)	Performance- Based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs)	Variable compensation with payout in shares based on compound annual growth rate milestones related to the Company’s closing common stock price on award grant date and which may be attained during three year performance period PRSUs vest as to 50% of shares earned based on satisfaction of specific closing common stock price performance levels (and not before the first anniversary of the grant date); the remaining earned shares vest at the end of performance period	Directly aligns interests of executives with long-term stockholder value creation by linking potential payouts to stock price performance; also promotes retention	Intended target value of all LTI awards is based on individual role and responsibilities and market data; payout based on Company’s common stock price at time of settlement (for PRSUs and RSUs) or exercise (for stock options); minimum one year vesting for all LTI awards
	*Stock Options*	Variable compensation based on increase in stock price from date of grant, subject to exercise of right of ownership; award vests over three years	Directly aligns interests of executives with long-term stockholder value creation and provides upside potential over a seven year option term; also promotes retention
	Restricted Stock Units *(RSUs)*	Variable compensation with payout in shares with time-based vesting; award vests over three years	Directly aligns interests of executives with long-term stockholder value creation and promotes retention

40 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Other elements of our fiscal 2016 executive compensation program, including the deferred compensation plan, health, welfare and other personal benefits, and post-employment compensation arrangements are described below.

Base Salaries

Effective July 1, 2016, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a $925,000 base salary for Dr. Su, which represented an increase of $75,000 (8.8%) from her fiscal 2015 base salary. This increase was in recognition of Dr. Su’s past and expected future contributions to us, and improved the competitiveness of her base salary as compared to the base salaries of comparable chief executive officers in our peer group. Based on its review of the competitive market data, the Compensation Committee made no changes to the base salaries of our other Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2016.

The annual base salaries of our Named Executive Officers as of the beginning and end of fiscal 2016 are set forth in the table below.


Named Executive Officer	Base Salary as of December 30, 2016		Base Salary as of December 26, 2015		Percentage Increase
Lisa Su		$925,000		$850,000		8.8%
Devinder Kumar		$530,000		$530,000		No Change
James Anderson		$500,000		$500,000		No Change
Forrest Norrod		$530,000		$530,000		No Change
Mark Papermaster		$550,000		$550,000		No Change

Annual Cash Performance Bonuses

Generally, short-term incentives in the form of an annual cash performance bonus are provided to our Named Executive Officers under the EIP. These bonuses are designed to reward, where earned, short-term performance and the achievement of the principal goals of our annual operating plan.

Under the EIP, the amount of our Named Executive Officers’ annual cash performance bonus is calculated based on (i) his or her target annual cash performance bonus opportunity and (ii) our corporate financial performance for the applicable performance period as measured against one or more pre-established performance levels. The financial measures and related performance levels for the performance period are approved by the Compensation Committee shortly after the commencement of the fiscal year. Bonuses earned under the EIP are paid in a single lump-sum amount after the end of the fiscal year.

For fiscal 2016, each Named Executive Officer’s annual cash performance bonus under the EIP was determined based on our performance during fiscal 2016. The following illustrates how the 2016 annual cash performance bonuses under the EIP were calculated:

LOGO

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 41

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

The Compensation Committee used the following financial performance measures and weightings for fiscal 2016 to determine the amount of each Named Executive Officer’s 2016 annual cash performance bonus under the EIP:



Financial Measure	Weighting
Adjusted Non-GAAP Net Income		50	%
Revenue		25	%
Adjusted Free Cash Flow		25	%

The performance levels for each financial performance measure were established by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of fiscal 2016, in each case in consultation with senior management. The performance levels were structured to align with our fiscal 2016 financial objectives taking into account overall affordability of the bonus opportunities provided under the EIP for fiscal 2016.

The Compensation Committee chose adjusted non-GAAP net income as a performance measure because it reflects our bottom-line financial performance or profitability, which the Compensation Committee believes is directly tied to improved stock price performance. The Compensation Committee assigned it a weight of 50% because it is a key short-term financial metric for the operation of our business and is a metric of significant importance to our stockholders. For purposes of the 2016 EIP, our “adjusted non-GAAP net income” was calculated by adjusting our fiscal 2016 GAAP net loss for non-GAAP financial adjustments and amounts accrued as of December 31, 2016 for fiscal 2016 bonuses under our Annual Incentive Plan. Non-GAAP financial adjustments include: (i) after-tax gain on sale of 85% equity interest in two subsidiaries; (ii) charge related to the sixth amendment to the wafer supply agreement with GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.; (iii) restructuring and other special charges, net; (iv) loss on debt redemption; (v) equity in loss of equity-method investee; (vi) stock-based compensation; and (vii) non-cash interest expense related to convertible debt.

The Compensation Committee chose revenue as a performance measure because it reflects our top-line growth, which the Compensation Committee believes is a strong indicator of our long-term ability to increase profitability, cash flow and improve stock price performance. For purposes of the 2016 EIP, our “revenue” was calculated as our GAAP net revenue for fiscal 2016.

The Compensation Committee chose adjusted free cash flow as a performance measure because it believes effective cash management is a key component of our strategy and our annual operating plan, the successful execution of which should lower indebtedness, increase financial flexibility, and ultimately drive improved company valuation and stock price performance. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that the measure avoids artificial deflation of the annual cash performance bonus due to unusual items in the performance period and items that are not indicative of operating performance or the underlying performance of our core business. For purposes of the 2016 EIP, our “adjusted free cash flow” was calculated by adjusting our GAAP net cash provided by (used in) operating activities for fiscal 2016 for cash payments for (i) purchase of property, plant and equipment and (ii) cash payments for fiscal 2015 employee bonuses under the EIP and our Annual Incentive Plan, which were paid in March and April 2016.

The following table sets forth the fiscal 2016 performance targets and comparable actual results for the EIP:


2016 Executive Incentive Plan Financial Targets (in millions, except for percentages)
Financial Measure	(Threshold)			(Target)		(Maximum)		Actual Performance
Adjusted Non-GAAP Net Income	$	(88	)	$	112	$	363	$	(76	)
Revenue	$	3,991		$	4,704	$	5,544	$	4,272
Adjusted Free Cash Flow	$	(4	)	$	196	$	446	$	36

The threshold, target, and maximum performance levels for the 2016 EIP were determined by the Compensation Committee using our fiscal 2016 operating plan as a benchmark, and provide for appropriate payout acceleration or deceleration above or below target. The fiscal 2016 EIP target level for each performance measure was

42 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

determined by the Compensation Committee to be appropriately aggressive and aligned to our fiscal 2016 operating plan and objectives. Potential payouts are interpolated at an increasing rate between the threshold and target level and between the target and maximum level for each measure. The 2016 annual cash performance bonuses under the EIP for each Named Executive Officer are set forth below:


	2016 EIP Bonus Calculation
Named Executive Officer	Base Salary Earned During Fiscal 2016		Target Bonus Opportunity		2016 EIP Performance Factor	2016 EIP Bonus⁽¹⁾
Lisa Su	$	887,500		150.0%	33.6%	$	432,656
Devinder Kumar	$	530,000		100.0%		$	172,250
James Anderson⁽¹⁾	$	500,000		100.0%		$	162,500
Forrest Norrod	$	530,000		100.0%		$	172,250
Mark Papermaster	$	550,000		100.0%		$	178,750

(1)

The amounts reported in this column reflect the bonus amounts approved by the Compensation Committee and paid to the Named Executive Officers. Based on management’s recommendation, the Compensation Committee reduced the fiscal 2016 EIP bonuses payable to the Named Executive Officers by applying a 2016 EIP Performance Factor of 32.5% instead of 33.6%.

The Compensation Committee reviews and certifies our level of achievement for each performance measure before any payments are made. This review and certification is generally performed at the first regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting following the end of the year with any payout of the annual cash performance bonus occurring in March of such year. Under the terms of the EIP, the Compensation Committee has discretion to reduce any Named Executive Officer’s annual cash performance bonus prior to payment. Based on management’s recommendation, the Compensation Committee exercised this discretion and reduced the fiscal 2016 EIP bonuses payable to the Named Executive Officers by applying a 2016 EIP Performance Factor of 32.5% instead of 33.6%.

Long-Term Equity Awards

We believe that long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards provide a strong alignment between the interests of our Named Executive Officers and our stockholders. The Compensation Committee generally seeks to provide equity award opportunities that are consistent with our compensation philosophy (with the potential for larger payments for exceptional performance). The Compensation Committee also believes that long-term equity awards are an essential tool in promoting executive retention.

In fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee and, in Dr. Su’s case, the non-management members of the Board, approved the following awards under our 2004 Plan:


Named Executive Officer	PRSUs (Target # of Shares)		Time-Based RSUs		Time-Based Stock Options		Aggregate Intended Target Value
Lisa Su		690,008		345,004		777,214	$	7,000,000
Devinder Kumar		197,145		98,572		222,061	$	2,000,000
James Anderson		197,145		98,572		222,061	$	2,000,000
Forrest Norrod		197,145		98,572		222,061	$	2,000,000
Mark Papermaster		197,145		98,572		222,061	$	2,000,000

The aggregate intended target value was converted into a mix of 50% PRSUs, 25% RSUs and 25% stock options using a conversion price of $5.07 (the average closing price of our common stock over the 30 calendar-day period ending on July 15, 2016) and, for the stock options, also using a binomial factor of 44.39%. The amounts reported in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table represent the grant date fair values (i.e., accounting values) of the fiscal 2016 long-term equity awards computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 43

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

2016 PRSU Awards. The PRSUs granted in fiscal 2016 to our Named Executive Officers (the “2016 PRSUs”) provide for a payout ranging from 0% to 250% of the target number of shares subject to the award (the “Target Shares”) based on the compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of the Company’s closing common stock price (for 30 consecutive trading days) during the three-year performance period that began July 15, 2016 and ends August 9, 2019 (the “Performance Period”). The Compensation Committee believes that the CAGR of our common stock price is the appropriate performance measure for the 2016 PRSUs because potential payouts under these awards are directly and transparently linked to stock price performance (i.e., stockholder value creation). The Compensation Committee chose not to subject the 2016 PRSUs to additional performance metrics because it determined that any metric other than stock price performance would be difficult to accurately calibrate given our transitioning business model and the ongoing market environment.

The following table below sets forth the potential payouts (as a percentage of the Target Shares) for the 2016 PRSUs:


Potential Payouts of 2016 PRSUs
CAGR Performance Level	30-Day Common Stock Closing Price During Performance Period	No. of Earned PRSUs (% of Target Number of PRSUs)
Below Threshold	Below “threshold” performance target		0	%
Threshold	At or above “threshold” but below “target” performance target		50	%
Target	At or above “target” but below “stretch 1” performance target		100	%
Stretch 1	At or above “stretch 1” but below “stretch 2” performance target		150	%
Stretch 2	At or above “stretch 2” but below “maximum” performance target		200	%
Maximum	At or above “maximum” performance target		250	%

Each of the applicable CAGR performance levels is a pre-established positive CAGR using the baseline price of $5.07 per share. The baseline price was determined as the average closing price of our common stock for the 30 calendar-day period ending July 15, 2016 (i.e., the grant date of the 2016 PRSUs). The specific CAGR performance target levels represent aggressive double digit percentage increases from the baseline price, each calibrated to motivate and appropriately reward our Named Executive Officers for delivering improved company valuation and stock price performance over the Performance Period.

One-half of any PRSUs earned pursuant to the attainment of a CAGR performance level will vest and be paid out upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of attainment of the CAGR performance level (provided, however, that no PRSUs may be earned or vest prior to July 15, 2017, one year from the grant date), and the remaining half will vest and be paid out at the end of the Performance Period, subject in each case to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through each such vesting date, except to the extent an event triggers accelerated vesting of the PRSUs under the terms of his or her employment agreement or other agreement, as disclosed. Payout of one-half of any earned PRSUs before the end of the Performance Period is designed to motivate performance by delivering immediate value upon early achievement of the performance target.

44 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

2015 PRSU Awards. The PRSUs awarded to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2015 (the “2015 PRSUs”) provided for a payout ranging from 0% to 250% of the target number of shares of our common stock subject to each award (the “2015 Target Shares”) based on the CAGR of our common stock during the three-year performance period commencing on August 15, 2015, and that ends on August 15, 2018 (the “2015 PRSU Performance Period”). Each of the applicable CAGR performance levels was a pre-established positive CAGR using the baseline price of $2.43 per share. The baseline price was determined as the average closing price of our common stock for the 180 calendar-day period ending August 14, 2015 (i.e., the date immediately preceding the grant date of the 2016 PRSUs to our Named Executive Officers other that Mr. Anderson). Specifically, the Compensation Committee established the following CAGR performance levels and related potential payouts (as a percentage of the 2015 Target Shares) for the 2015 PRSUs:


Payouts of 2015 PRSUs
CAGR Performance Level	30-Day Common Stock Closing Price During Performance Period	Cumulative Percentage Return Based on Grant Date Closing Stock Price of $1.84 Per Share^(1),(2)			No. of Earned Shares (% of 2015 Target Shares)
Below Threshold	Below $2.81		N/A			0	%
Threshold	At or above $2.81 but below $3.23		53	%		50	%
Target	At or above $3.23 but below $4.20		76	%		100	%
Stretch	At or above $4.20 but below $4.75		128	%		200	%
Maximum	At or above $4.75		158	%		250	%

⁽¹⁾	The grant date closing stock price of $1.84 is the closing price of our common stock on August 14, 2015, the last trading day before the grant date of the 2015 PRSUs to Dr. Su and Messrs. Kumar, Norrod and Papermaster.

⁽²⁾

Mr. Anderson’s 2015 PRSUs were granted to him on November 15, 2015. The closing price of our common stock on November 13, 2015, the last trading day before the grant date, was $1.99. The cumulative percentage return on Mr. Anderson’s 2015 PRSUs was 41% at threshold, 62% at target, 111% at stretch and 139% at maximum.

Before selecting these performance levels and related potential payouts, the Compensation Committee directed its compensation consultant to prepare an analysis of the historic total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance of the companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 over the past ten years on a trailing three-year basis. This analysis indicated that, during this period, these companies demonstrated a median TSR of approximately 11.5% and TSR of approximately 21% at the 75^th percentile. Based on its evaluation of the Company’s financial and operational objectives through fiscal 2018, its understanding of the Company’s plans for achieving these objectives, the results of the TSR analysis, a review of the market price of our common stock over the past five years, and its collective business judgment, the Compensation Committee determined that a target CAGR performance goal of 10% was achievable with focused effort by our executive officers and that a maximum CAGR performance goal of 25% was an aggressive but attainable goal if we executed strongly on our near-term business plans and these efforts were well received by investors. In establishing these performance levels, the Compensation Committee noted that both the $3.23 per share target stock price and $4.75 per share “stretch” stock price milestones represented favorable returns when measured against the then-current market price of our common stock (which was $1.84 per share on the grant date of the 2015 PRSUs ($1.99 for Mr. Anderson’s 2015 PRSUs)) and would directly align the potential payout to our Named Executive Officers with the production of a significant investment return for our stockholders.

In November 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that, because the market price of our common stock closed at or above $4.75 per share for 30 consecutive trading days during fiscal 2016, each of our Named Executive Officers had earned the maximum number of shares of our common stock that could be earned under the 2015 PRSUs (which equaled 250% of the target number of shares subject to the awards).

One-half of the shares of our common stock earned under the 2015 PRSUs were vested and settled in November 2016. The remaining earned shares will vest and be settled on August 15, 2018, subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through such date. The Compensation Committee designed the 2015 PRSUs to provide for this bifurcated settlement of the awards to promote long-term decision-making by our Named Executive Officers and to maintain the alignment of their interests with the interests of our stockholders since the value of these

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 45

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

earned shares will be received only on the completion of the original three-year performance period (August 15, 2018) only if the Named Executive Officer continues to be employed through such date.

Stock Options. Stock options are intended to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with our stockholders because they will not realize any financial benefit from these awards unless our stock price increases above the exercise price over the seven-year option term. The stock options have an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, which was $6.98 per share. The stock options vest (and become exercisable) over three years, 33-¹⁄₃% on or about the first anniversary of the grant date (or such later date as may be selected by the Compensation Committee) and thereafter 8-¹⁄₃% per quarter for the next following eight quarters, subject to each Named Executive Officer’s continued employment with us through each vesting date (unless his or her employment agreement or other agreement with us provides otherwise). The service-based vesting requirements are intended to further our retention objectives. The stock options expire seven years after the grant date.

RSUs. RSUs are intended to encourage executive retention, manage share dilution, recognize individual performance, and align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with our stockholders because the value of the awards is tied to the market value of our common stock at the time of vesting. All of the RSUs awarded to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2016 vest over three years, subject to each Named Executive Officer’s continued employment with us through each vesting date (unless his or her employment agreement or other agreement with us provides otherwise); provided, however, no RSU award will vest before the first anniversary of the grant date.

Aggregate Intended Target Value of Fiscal 2016 Annual Equity Award Grants. In determining the aggregate intended target value of each Named Executive Officer’s annual long-term equity award for fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed data showing the market-competitive award levels based on our compensation peer group and the potential realizable value of each Named Executive Officer’s existing equity holdings. Additionally, in approving the fiscal 2016 equity awards for our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee considered executive retention objectives and continuity within senior management and the following high level corporate goals: achieve fiscal 2016 annual operating plan, execute industry leading roadmap and meet customer commitments. The achievement of these high level goals drive our overall Company strategy and subsequently, the attainment of the performance objectives in the annual long-term incentive plan.

Accounting Considerations. We follow ASC Topic 718 for our share-based compensation awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below, even though our Named Executive Officers may never realize any value from their awards. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their share-based compensation awards in their income statements over the period that a recipient is required to render service in exchange for the option or other award. In accordance with ASC Topic 718, the accounting value of the 2016 PRSUs was determined by an outside professional valuation consultant using a Monte-Carlo simulation model and based upon a discounted cash flow analysis of the probability-weighted payoffs of a share-based payment assuming a variety of possible stock price paths and represents the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the requisite service period determined as of the grant date under ASC Topic 718, except no assumptions for forfeitures are included.

Grant Timing Practices. We have no practice or policy of coordinating or timing the release of company information around the grant date of our annual long-term equity awards. Our annual long-term equity awards are typically made in June, July, or August. On occasion, we grant equity awards outside of our annual grant cycle for new hires, promotions, recognition, retention, or other purposes on a limited basis. These “off cycle” grants are made only on a limited basis.

See the “2016 Summary Compensation Table” and the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2016” table below for more information on the equity awards that we granted to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2016.

Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement

Our Chief Executive Officer has an employment agreement, effective October 8, 2014, approved by our Board that establishes her base salary and provides for annual incentive and long-term incentive awards under our approved

46 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

plans (i.e., the EIP and 2004 Plan). In addition, the agreement provides for certain payments and benefits in the event of certain termination of employment scenarios, including following a change in control of the Company. For further information on this agreement, see the “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements” section beginning on page 58.

Deferred Compensation

In fiscal 2016, our Named Executive Officers were eligible to participate in our Deferred Income Account Plan (DIA) Participation in the DIA is intended to assist our Named Executive Officers in their retirement planning as well as to restore Company contributions that are lost due to IRS limits applicable to contributions in our Section 401(k) plan. The Compensation Committee believes the opportunity to defer compensation is a competitive benefit that enhances our ability to attract and retain talented executives while building plan participants’ long-term commitment to the Company.

For further information about the DIA, see the “2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table below.

Health, Welfare and Other Personal Benefits (Perquisites)

In fiscal 2016, a broad population of our U.S. employees, including our Named Executive Officers, were eligible to receive the following health, welfare, perquisites and other personal benefits:

•

participation in our U.S. benefit programs, including our Section 401(k) plan, health care coverage, paid time-off, and paid holidays;

•

matching contributions under our Section 401(k) plan, which were equal to 75% of an employee’s annual contribution, up to the first 6% of compensation deferred under the plan; and

•

patent awards, if earned.

In addition to the above, our Named Executive Officers were eligible to receive an annual physical examination and executive life insurance.

The health, welfare, and other personal benefits described above are intended to be part of a competitive overall compensation program and help attract and retain executive talent.

For further information regarding the health, welfare and other personal benefits received by our Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2016, see the “2016 Summary Compensation Table” below.

Change in Control Agreements and Other Change in Control Arrangements

Any payments and benefits for our Chief Executive Officer in the event of her termination of employment in connection with a change in control of the Company are set forth in her employment agreement, the terms of which were the result of arms-length negotiations between our Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee. Each of our other Named Executive Officers is party to a change in control agreement with us. These agreements are designed to encourage our Named Executive Officers’ continued services in the event of a potential change in control of the Company and to allow for a smooth leadership transition upon such a change in control. In addition, these agreements are intended to provide incentives to our Named Executive Officers to effectively execute the directives of our Board, even in the event that such actions may result in the elimination of a Named Executive Officer’s position.

Termination of Employment Required to Trigger Payments

Under the terms and conditions of these arrangements and agreements, each of our Named Executive Officers is eligible to receive certain specified payments and benefits only if (i) a “change in control” of us occurs and (ii) the Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated or the Named Executive Officer is constructively discharged within two years of the change in control transaction. The Compensation Committee believes this structure strikes a balance between our incentive arrangements and our executive hiring and retention objectives without providing “windfall” payments and benefits to any Named Executive Officers who continue employment with an acquiring entity following a change in control of us.

For a detailed description of the payments and benefits under these arrangements and agreements payable to our Named Executive Officers, see “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements” below.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 47

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

Severance and Separation Arrangements

Any post-employment compensation payable to our Chief Executive Officer is governed solely by her employment agreement, the terms of which were the result of arms-length negotiations between her and the Compensation Committee. Under her employment agreement, our Chief Executive Officer is eligible to receive certain specified payments and benefits in the event that her employment is involuntarily terminated. The Compensation Committee believes that the amount payable to our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to her employment agreement is reasonable and competitive and provides a level of transition assistance in the event of her involuntary termination of employment with the goal of keeping her focused on our business rather than her personal circumstances.

With the exception of our Chief Executive Officer, all of our other Named Executive Officers participate in our Executive Severance Plan for Senior Vice Presidents (the “SVP Severance Plan”). The SVP Severance Plan is designed to provide uniform treatment in the event of an involuntary termination of employment of our U.S. senior executives (except our Chief Executive Officer) and to provide a level of transition assistance in such instances with the goal of keeping these senior executives focused on our business rather than their personal circumstances. A Named Executive Officer is not eligible to receive payments and benefits under the SVP Severance Plan if he or she receives severance payments and benefits in connection with a change in control of the Company pursuant to his or her change in control agreement. Although the majority of each of these Named Executive Officer’s fiscal 2016 target compensation is performance-based and contingent upon achievement of our financial goals or improvement in company valuation and stock price performance, the Compensation Committee believes that the SVP Severance Plan provides the covered executives important protections and promotes our objectives of attracting and retaining executive talent.

For a detailed description of the post-employment compensation payments and benefits payable to our Named Executive Officers, see “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements” below.

Other Compensation Policies

Compensation Recovery Policy

Our Worldwide Standards of Business Conduct provide that we may pursue all remedies available under applicable law to recover any incentive-based or other compensation (including equity awards) paid or granted to our employees or agents if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement as a result of our material noncompliance with any financial reporting laws.

In addition, the award agreement for each stock option, RSU, and PRSU granted since May 2010 to an employee at or above the level of senior vice president (which includes our Named Executive Officers) has included a compensation recovery (“claw-back”) provision. The claw-back provides the Compensation Committee with the right to recover all or a portion of the compensation attributable to the award if the employee’s direct involvement with fraud, misconduct, or his or her gross negligence contributes to or results in us being required to prepare an accounting restatement as a result of our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws. The claw-back does not apply to any award granted more than 18 months before the date of the first public issuance or SEC filing of the financial document embodying the reporting requirement. In addition, with respect to awards granted in and after August 2015, we may claw-back the award if the recipient violates the non-competition or non-solicitation terms of the award agreement. The Compensation Committee may exercise these claw-back rights by cancellation, forfeiture, repayment, or disgorgement of any profits realized by the employee from the sale of our securities.

We continue to monitor the rulemaking activities of the SEC and Nasdaq with respect to the development, implementation and disclosure of compensation recovery provisions/policies. We expect to revise our compensation recovery provisions/policies in the future if and as required by applicable law.

Stock Ownership Requirements

Our stock ownership requirements are designed to increase our Named Executive Officers’ stakes in us and to align their interests more closely with those of our stockholders.

These requirements provide that on or before the Ownership Achievement Date (as defined below), our President and Chief Executive Officer should attain an investment position in our common stock equal to three-times

48 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (continued)

her annual base salary, and our other Named Executive Officers should attain an investment position equal to one-and-one-half times their annual base salary.

Shares of our common stock counted toward the minimum stock ownership requirements include any shares held directly or indirectly by an executive officer and shares underlying vested but unexercised stock options, with 50% of the in-the-money value or shares (as applicable) of such stock options being used for this calculation.

The “Ownership Achievement Date” is five years from first appointment as an executive officer. In the case of an existing executive officer being appointed as our Chief Executive Officer, the “Ownership Achievement Date” is five years from the date of such appointment.

As of December 30, 2016, each of our Named Executive Officers was on target to comply with his or her applicable stock ownership requirement by the applicable Ownership Achievement Date.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) generally disallows public companies a tax deduction for federal income tax purposes of remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to their Chief Executive Officer and each of their three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than their Chief Financial Officer) in any taxable year. Generally, remuneration in excess of $1 million may only be deducted if it is “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of the Code or satisfies the conditions of another exemption.

The Compensation Committee believes that, in establishing the cash and equity incentive compensation plans and arrangements for our executive officers, the potential deductibility of the compensation payable under those plans and arrangements should be only one of the relevant factors taken into consideration. For that reason, the Compensation Committee may deem it appropriate to provide one or more executive officers with the opportunity to earn incentive compensation, whether through cash incentive awards or equity awards, which may not be deductible by reason of Section 162(m) or other provisions of the Code.

The Compensation Committee believes it is important to maintain cash and equity incentive compensation at the requisite level to attract and retain the individuals essential to our financial success, even if all or part of that compensation may not be deductible by reason of the Section 162(m) deduction limitation.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 49

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP RESOURCES COMMITTEE’S REPORT

The Compensation and Leadership Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP RESOURCES COMMITTEE

Nora Denzel, Chair

Bruce Claflin

Nicholas Donofrio

50 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

In February 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed our compensation policies and practices for employees generally and concluded that these policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of management, assessed our executive and broad-based compensation and benefits programs to determine if any of them created undesired or excessive risks of a material nature. The assessment included (i) a review of our compensation policies and practices for employees generally, (ii) identification of the risks that could result from such policies and practices, (iii) identification of the risk mitigators and controls, and (iv) analysis of the potential risks against the risk mitigators and controls and our business strategy and objectives. Although the Compensation Committee reviewed all of our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee focused on the programs that have variability of payout and in which employees could directly affect the payout of incentives. These programs included the EIP, Annual Incentive Plan, Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTI”), Sales Incentive Plan and 2004 Plan.

In performing the assessment and reaching its conclusion, the Compensation Committee noted the following factors that the Compensation Committee believes may reduce the likelihood of undesired or excessive risk-taking:

•

Our overall compensation levels are competitive with the market;

•

Our compensation practices and policies appropriately balance base pay versus variable pay and short-term versus long-term incentives;

•

Although the EIP, Annual Incentive Plan, LTI and Sales Incentive Plan have variability of payout, the Compensation Committee believes that any potential risks associated with such plans are controlled or mitigated by one or more of the following: (i) the performance goals being multi-dimensional (i.e., adjusted non-GAAP net income, adjusted non-GAAP free cash flow, revenue), thereby increasing the range of performance over which incentives are paid, (ii) the performance goals being aligned with our transformation plan and business objectives and being quantitative financial measures, (iii) the use of sliding payout scales, with the payouts in certain instances being linearly interpolated for performance falling between the performance levels set by the Compensation Committee, (iv) the ability of the Compensation Committee and/or management to exercise discretion to reduce payouts, (v) the existence of multiple internal controls and approval processes that are intended to prevent manipulation of outcomes by any employee, including the Named Executive Officers, (vi) the incentive opportunities being capped, and (vii) the adoption of CAGR PRSUs which directly align payouts with stockholder value creation;

•

Although the grant of equity awards under the 2004 Plan could motivate our employees to, among other things, focus on increasing our short-term stock price rather than the creation of long-term stockholder value, the Compensation Committee believes that potential risks are controlled or mitigated by one or more of the following: (i) awarding a combination of PRSUs, RSUs and stock options, (ii) a PRSU minimum vesting period of one year from the grant date and a PRSU performance period of three-years, (iii) the vesting provisions of stock options and RSUs occurring over multi-year periods, (iv) caps on performance-based compensation opportunities, and (v) our stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. In addition, we prohibit our employees, including Named Executive Officers, from engaging in hedging transactions in our securities; and

•

We have implemented claw-back provisions and policies, as described in more detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 51

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table shows, for fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, the compensation for the individuals serving as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and our three most highly compensated executive officers (other than our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) who were serving as executive officers at the end of fiscal 2016.

For information on the role of each compensation component within the total compensation packages of the Named Executive Officers, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2016 Executive Compensation Program.”

2016 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)⁽¹⁾			Option Awards ($)⁽²⁾		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)⁽³⁾		All Other Compensation ($)⁽⁴⁾		Total ($)
(a)	(b)		(c)		(d)		(e)			(f)		(g)		(i)		(j)
Lisa T. Su
President and Chief Executive Officer		2016		886,340		—		7,983,393			2,408,120		432,656		14,266		11,724,775
		2015		849,992		300,000		4,438,124	⁽⁵⁾		1,804,858		—		25,412		7,418,386
		2014		656,823		300,000		7,821,727			2,707,576		248,135		13,811		11,748,072
Devinder Kumar
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer		2016		530,005		—		2,280,965			688,034		172,250		13,337		3,684,591
		2015		530,005		—		2,429,007	⁽⁵⁾		471,358		—		24,182		3,454,552
		2014		514,882		—		1,560,973			497,563		169,950		23,452		2,766,820
James R. Anderson
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Computing and Graphics Business Group		2016		499,990		—		2,280,965			688,034		162,500		22,707		3,654,196
		2015		288,456		750,000		3,561,342	⁽⁵⁾		554,099		—		11,674		5,165,571
Forrest E. Norrod
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom Business Group		2016		530,005		—		2,280,965			688,034		172,250		13,337		3,684,591
		2015		530,005		—		2,086,902	⁽⁵⁾		471,358		—		20,431		3,108,696
		2014		91,732		900,000		1,432,814			477,612		30,271		253		2,932,682
Mark D. Papermaster
Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President, Technology and Engineering		2016		549,994		—		2,280,965			688,034		178,750		13,390		3,711,133
		2015		549,994		225,000		2,903,825	⁽⁵⁾		471,358		—		20,010		4,170,187
		2014		549,994		225,000		1,951,219			621,955		181,500		17,057		3,546,725

(1)

Amounts shown in the column do not reflect dollar amounts actually received by the Named Executive Officers. Instead, these amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs and PRSUs granted in the year indicated computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value (which is sometimes referred to in this proxy statement as the “accounting value”) is used to recognize the accounting expense for long-term equity awards. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuations reflected in this column, see Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report. For fiscal 2016, the amounts shown include the grant date fair value of the target number of PRSUs awarded in fiscal 2016 to each Named Executive Officer, as set forth in the table below. The grant date fair value of the PRSUs is determined using a Monte-Carlo simulation model and based upon a discounted cash flow analysis of the probability-weighted payoffs of a share-based payment assuming a variety of possible stock price paths and represents the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the requisite service period determined as of the grant date under ASC Topic 718, except no assumptions for forfeitures were included.

As we explain on page 43 of this proxy statement, 50% of the target value of the equity awards approved by our Compensation Committee on June 26, 2016, was converted into a target number of PRSUs by dividing the approved target value of the PRSUs by $5.07, which was the average closing price of the Company’s stock over the 30 calendar-day period ending July 15, 2016 (the grant date). The average accounting value of the PRSUs granted to our Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2016, as determined by our outside professional valuation consultant using the Monte-Carlo simulation model and captured in the table above, was $3.60 per maximum PRSU. The aggregate accounting values of the PRSUs granted to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2016 are as follows:


Named Executive Officer	Grant Date		Shares Underlying PRSUs at Target (#)		Shares Underlying PRSUs at Maximum (#)		Grant Date Fair Value at Maximum ($)
Lisa T. Su		7/15/2016		690,008		1,725,020		6,210,072
Devinder Kumar		7/15/2016		197,145		492,862		1,774,305
James R. Anderson		7/15/2016		197,145		492,862		1,774,305
Forrest E. Norrod		7/15/2016		197,145		492,862		1,774,305
Mark D. Papermaster		7/15/2016		197,145		492,862		1,774,305

52 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

2016 Summary Compensation Table (continued)

(2)

Amounts shown in this column do not reflect dollar amounts actually received by the Named Executive Officers. Instead, the amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards granted in the year indicated computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, except no assumptions for forfeiture were included. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuations reflected in this column, see Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report.

(3)

Amounts represent cash performance bonuses paid under the EIP for fiscal 2016. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Philosophy and Objectives—Annual Cash Performance Bonuses” above for more information about these payments, including the pre-established financial measures under the EIP.

(4)	The following table sets forth the components of the amounts presented in the All Other Compensation column (i) for fiscal 2016:


Named Executive Officer	Matching Contributions to 401(k) ($)		Life Insurance Premiums Paid By Company ($)		Company Contribution Under Deferred Income Account Plan ($)		Total ($)
Lisa T. Su		11,925		2,341		—		14,266
Devinder Kumar		11,925		1,412		—		13,337
James R. Anderson		11,925		1,332		9,450		22,707
Forrest E. Norrod		11,925		1,412		—		13,337
Mark D. Papermaster		11,925		1,465		—		13,390

(5)

The amount reported for each Named Executive Officer in the stock awards column for 2015 is greater than the corresponding amount reported in our 2015 Summary Compensation Table. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we learned that, due to an inadvertent error, our outside professional valuation consultant undervalued the accounting values of the PRSUs awarded to our Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2015 (the “2015 PRSUs”). The corrected accounting values of the 2015 PRSUs, which are reflected in the amount disclosed for each Named Executive Officer in the stock awards column for 2015 in this Summary Compensation Table, are: Dr. Su—$2,633,204; Mr. Kumar – $877,735; Mr. Anderson—$1,067,891; Mr. Norrod—$877,735; and Mr. Papermaster – $877,735. These amounts do not reflect dollar amounts actually received by the Named Executive Officers in respect of their 2015 PRSUs. Instead, these amounts represent the accounting values of the 2015 PRSUs computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 53

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

2016 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following table shows information for the Named Executive Officers who have accounts in the Deferred Income Account Plan (the “DIA”), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, in fiscal 2016. Except for amounts deferred and vested prior to January 1, 2005, the DIA is subject to Section 409A of the Code.


Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY⁽¹⁾ ($)		Registrant Contributions in Last FY⁽²⁾ ($)		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY⁽³⁾ ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)			Aggregate Balance at Last FYE⁽⁴⁾ ($)
(a)	(b)		(c)		(d)		(e)			(f)
Devinder Kumar		—				101,448		(152,655	)		1,521,020
James R. Anderson		25,000		9,450		2,057		—			27,056
Mark D. Papermaster		—				3,110		—			21,887

(1)	Amount is included in the “Salary” column for fiscal 2016 of the “2016 Summary Compensation Table” above.

(2)	Amounts are included in the “All Other Compensation” column for fiscal 2016 of the “2016 Summary Compensation Table” above and reflect contributions by us that posted in fiscal 2017 but are attributable to 2016.

(3)

Represents the net amounts credited to or (debited) from the DIA accounts of Messrs. Kumar, Anderson and Papermaster as a result of the performance of the investment vehicles in which their accounts were deemed invested, as more fully described in the narrative disclosure below. These amounts do not represent above-market or preferential earnings (within the meaning of 17 CFR Section 229.402(c)(2)(viii)), and as a result are not reported in the “2016 Summary Compensation Table” above.

(4)	Amount does not include the amount in column (c) because our contributions posted in fiscal 2017, although the contributions were applicable to fiscal 2016.

We maintain the DIA, which allows eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers, to voluntarily defer receipt of a portion of their salary, bonus and any commission payments until the date or dates selected by the participant. Participants may defer up to 50% of annual base salary and/or 100% of commissions and bonuses. Earnings on the deferred accounts are based on the performance of the investment funds selected by the participants. Participants make a deferral election, prior to the year in which the compensation is earned, that may not be terminated or changed during the year for which it was made. Generally, we make a discretionary contribution to the participant’s account if his or her annual base salary, minus his or her Section 401(k) contribution before the deferral, is greater than the annual compensation limit for Section 401(k) plans. The contribution, if any, is equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the deferred compensation credited to the participant’s account for the year or (ii) a discretionary percentage of the participant’s base salary in excess of the eligible Section 401(k) compensation limit for the year minus the participant’s Section 401(k) contributions. For fiscal 2016, our discretionary contribution percentage under option (ii) above was 4.5%. Participants are 100% vested in the value of their accounts. Participants may select their desired benchmark investment fund(s) in which their accounts are deemed to be invested and may change their investment elections at any time, with such change effective as of the next business day. The amount of investment gain or loss that is credited to the participant’s account depends on the participant’s investment election. For 2016, we utilized investment funds in an array of asset classes, substantially aligned to those offered under our Section 401(k) plan. We have placed assets in mutual funds held in a Rabbi trust established for the DIA. For fiscal 2016, the investment return credited to Messrs. Kumar’s, Mr. Anderson’s and Papermaster’s DIA accounts was 7.2%, 16.5% and 16.6%, respectively, based on their investment elections for their respective DIA accounts. This investment return was calculated by taking the aggregate gain in fiscal 2016 and dividing it by the aggregate balance as of the beginning of fiscal 2016.

The DIA accounts are distributed following a participant’s termination of employment with us unless the participant has elected an in-service withdrawal (scheduled or hardship withdrawal). At the time a participant makes his or her deferral election, he or she may elect a different form of distribution for such year’s deferred compensation. The participant may elect a single lump sum distribution or annual installment distributions over three to ten years. The default form of distribution is a single lump sum. A participant may change the form of distribution election, subject to the terms of the DIA.

A participant may elect to withdraw all or part of his or her account while employed by us, subject to the terms of the DIA. The in-service withdrawal date must be at least two years after the plan year in which the election was made. An in-service withdrawal date may be changed, subject to the terms of the DIA. An unscheduled payment may also be made, subject to the terms of the DIA.

54 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2016 FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2016. The equity awards reported in the Option Awards column consist of non-qualified stock options. The equity awards in the Stock Awards column consist of RSUs and PRSUs.


	Option Awards									Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)⁽¹⁾		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)⁽¹⁾
(a)	(b)		(c)		(d)	(e)		(f)		(g)		(h)		(i)		(j)
Lisa T. Su
											81,318⁽²⁾		922,146
											41,313⁽³⁾		468,489
											144,949⁽³⁾		1,643,722
											16,670⁽³⁾		189,038
											412,082⁽⁴⁾		4,673,010
											345,004⁽⁸⁾		3,912,345
											1,545,308⁽⁹⁾		17,523,793
															1,035,012⁽¹¹⁾		11,737,036
		716,972		—			5.66		1/15/2019
		214,452		—			5.87		6/15/2019
		300,553		—			3.90		7/22/2020
		470,724		156,919⁽¹²⁾			4.08		8/12/2021
		298,399		149,200⁽¹³⁾			2.80		10/31/2021
		745,999		373,000⁽¹³⁾			2.80		10/31/2021
		462,286		924,573⁽¹⁴⁾			2.92		12/26/2022
		—		777,214⁽¹⁸⁾			6.98		07/26/2023
Devinder Kumar
											40,659⁽²⁾		461,073
											384,467⁽⁵⁾		4,359,856
											137,361⁽⁴⁾		1,557,674
											98,572⁽⁸⁾		1,117,806
											515,103⁽⁹⁾		5,841,268
															295,717⁽¹¹⁾		3,353,431
		26,875		—			7.87		2/15/2017
		21,875		—			8.80		5/15/2017
		21,875		—			6.49		8/15/2017
		21,875		—			7.57		11/15/2017
		21,875		—			8.60		2/15/2018
		73,620		—			7.50		6/15/2018
		53,613		—			5.87		6/15/2019
		726,556		—			2.68		1/15/2020
		255,470		—			3.90		7/22/2020
		235,361		78,460⁽¹²⁾			4.08		8/12/2021
		208,425		291,796⁽¹⁵⁾			1.84		8/15/2022
		—		222,061⁽¹⁸⁾			6.98		7/26/2023
James R. Anderson
											501,125⁽⁶⁾		5,682,758
											143,178⁽⁶⁾		1,623,639
											98,572⁽⁸⁾		1,117,806
											589,346⁽⁹⁾		6,683,178
															295,717⁽¹¹⁾		3,353,431
		260,703		260,704⁽¹⁶⁾			2.58		6/19/2022
		—		222,061⁽¹⁸⁾			6.98		7/26/2023
Forrest E. Norrod
											61,010⁽⁷⁾		691,853
											137,361⁽⁴⁾		1,557,674
											98,572⁽⁸⁾		1,117,806
											102,778⁽¹⁰⁾		1,165,503
											515,103⁽⁹⁾		5,841,268
															295,717⁽¹¹⁾		3,353,431
		298,630		149,327⁽¹⁷⁾			2.61		11/15/2021
		158,425		291,796⁽¹⁵⁾			1.84		8/15/2022
		—		222,061⁽¹⁸⁾			6.98		7/26/2023

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement 55

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End (continued)


	Option Awards										Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable			Equity Incentive plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Expiration Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)⁽¹⁾		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)⁽¹⁾
(a)	(b)		(c)			(d)	(e)		(f)		(g)			(h)		(i)			(j)
Mark D. Papermaster
												50,825	⁽²⁾		576,356
												576,701	⁽⁵⁾		6,539,789
												137,361	⁽⁴⁾		1,557,674
												98,572	⁽⁸⁾		1,117,806
												515,103	⁽⁹⁾		5,841,268
																	295,717	⁽¹¹⁾		3,353,431
		446,993		—				5.76		11/15/2018
		214,452		—				5.87		6/15/2019
		270,497		—				3.90		7/22/2020
		294,202		98,075	⁽¹²⁾			4.08		8/12/2021
		208,425		291,796	⁽¹⁵⁾			1.84		8/15/2022
		—		222,061	⁽¹⁸⁾			6.98		7/26/2023

(1)	The dollar value of these awards is calculated by multiplying the number of units by $11.34 per share, the last reported sales price of our common stock on December 30 2016, the last trading day of fiscal 2016.

(2)	This RSU award vests 33¹⁄₃% on each of August 9, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

(3)	This RSU award vests 33¹⁄₃% on each of October 8, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

(4)	This RSU award vests 33¹⁄₃% on each of December 26, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

(5)	This RSU award vests 33% on January 15, 2017 and 67% on January 15, 2018.

(6)	This RSU award vests 33¹⁄₃% on each of June 19, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

(7)	This RSU award vests 33¹⁄₃% on each of November 9, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

(8)	This RSU award vests 33¹⁄₃ on each of August 9, 2017, 2018 and 2019.

(9)

The performance criteria for this PRSU was certified by the Compensation Committee to have achieved the milestone set forth for 250% of the target shares awarded. One-half of the earned shares were released in November 2016; the remaining shares in the table will vest on August 15, 2018, provided continued service through the end of the performance period.

(10)

The performance criteria for this sign-on PRSU award for Mr. Norrod was certified by the Compensation Committee to have achieved 56.16% of the target number of shares, based on EESC’s fiscal 2015 performance, as measured against performance goals established for each of the following performance metrics, each weighted 33¹⁄₃%: (a) EESC net revenue, (b) EESC contribution operating profit and (c) the number and value of EESC design wins. One-half of the earned shares were released in February 2016; the remaining shares in the table vested in February 2017.

(11)

The number of PRSUs that may be earned is based on three-year compound annual growth rate milestones related to AMD’s closing stock price that may be attained within the three-year performance period that began on July 15, 2016 and ends on August 9, 2019 (the “Performance Period”), with the potential payout levels of PRSUs at 50%, 100%, 150%, 200%, and 250% of the target number of PRSUs granted, provided however, no more than 50% of any PRSUs earned pursuant to the attainment of a CAGR-performance level shall vest before the first anniversary of the grant date and 50% of the shares allowed under that specific performance level shall vest at the end of the Performance Period. The table reflects the expected achievement for this PRSU at 150% of the target number of PRSUs granted, based on performance status as of fiscal year end.

(12)	This option vested 33¹⁄₃% on August 12, 2015 and then vests 8¹⁄₃% quarterly for the next two years.

(13)	This option vested 33¹⁄₃% on October 8, 2015 and then vests 8¹⁄₃% quarterly for the next two years.

(14)	This option vested 33¹⁄₃% on December 26, 2016 and then vests 8¹⁄₃% quarterly for the next two years.

(15)	This option vested 33¹⁄₃% on August 15, 2016 and then vests 8¹⁄₃% quarterly for the next two years.

(16)	This option vested 33¹⁄₃% on June 19, 2016 and then vests 8¹⁄₃% quarterly for the next two years.

(17)	This option vested 33¹⁄₃% on November 15, 2015 and then vests 8¹⁄₃% quarterly for the next two years.

(18)	This option vests 33¹⁄₃% on July 26, 2017 and then vests 8¹⁄₃% quarterly for the next two years.

56 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement

2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2016

The following table sets forth all plan-based awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2016.

Estimated Possible

Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards⁽¹⁾

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards⁽²⁾

Name

(a)

Plan

Name

(b)

Grant

Date

(c)

Compensation

Committee

Action Date

(d)

Target

($)

(e)

Maximum

($)

(f)

Threshold

(#)

(g)

Target

(#)

(h)

Maximum

(#)

(i)

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(#)⁽³⁾

(j)

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)⁽⁴⁾

(k)

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/

Share)

(l)

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock

and

Option

Awards

($)⁽⁵⁾

(m)

Lisa T. Su

EIP

—

1,331,250

2,662,500

2004 Plan

7/15/2016

6/27/2016

345,004

690,008

1,725,020

6,210,072

2004 Plan

7/15/2016

6/27/2016

345,004

1,773,321

2004 Plan

7/26/2016

6/27/2016

777,214

6.98

2,408,120

Devinder Kumar

EIP

—

530,000

1,060,000

2004 Plan

7/15/2016

6/27/2016

98,573

197,145

492,862

1,774,305

2004 Plan

7/15/2016