Edgar Filing: PACCAR INC

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

Commission File No. 001-14817

PACCAR Inc

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

91-0351110

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


777 - 106^th Ave. N.E., Bellevue, WA		98004
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(425) 468-7400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer ¨		Non-accelerated filer ¨		Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $1 par value — 353,973,089 shares as of July 31, 2013

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

INDEX


		Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income— Three and Six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)			3

Consolidated Balance Sheets— June 30, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012			4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows— Six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)			6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)			7

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		30

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		46

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		46

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION:

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		47

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS		47

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		47

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS		47

SIGNATURE			48

INDEX TO EXHIBITS			49

-2-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(Millions Except Per Share Amounts)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30					June 30
	2013			2012		2013		2012
TRUCK, PARTS AND OTHER:
Net sales and revenues	$	4,011.7		$	4,191.1	$	7,642.9	$	8,705.8

Cost of sales and revenues		3,494.6			3,632.5		6,683.9		7,552.4
Research and development		61.8			73.8		133.9		146.1
Selling, general and administrative		112.3			122.5		230.0		248.3
Interest and other (income) expense, net		(.4	)		1.6		1.1		(.5	)

		3,668.3			3,830.4		7,048.9		7,946.3

Truck, Parts and Other Income Before Income Taxes		343.4			360.7		594.0		759.5

FINANCIAL SERVICES:
Interest and fees		115.0			111.5		228.8		221.4
Operating lease, rental and other income		173.8			154.6		353.1		306.1

Revenues		288.8			266.1		581.9		527.5

Interest and other borrowing expenses		39.4			38.1		78.3		77.8
Depreciation and other expense		138.9			121.5		283.0		240.3
Selling, general and administrative		23.7			24.1		47.2		48.2
Provision for losses on receivables		5.3			5.0		11.8		12.5

		207.3			188.7		420.3		378.8

Financial Services Income Before Income Taxes		81.5			77.4		161.6		148.7
Investment income		8.0			8.2		14.5		17.1


Total Income Before Income Taxes		432.9			446.3		770.1		925.3

Income taxes		141.3			149.1		242.4		300.8


Net Income	$	291.6		$	297.2	$	527.7	$	624.5


Net Income Per Share:
Basic	$	.82		$	.83	$	1.49	$	1.75
Diluted	$	.82		$	.83	$	1.49	$	1.75


Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic		354.1			356.0		354.0		356.5
Diluted		355.0			356.8		354.8		357.3


Dividends declared per share	$	.20		$	.20	$	.40	$	.38


Comprehensive Income	$	220.7		$	185.2	$	377.3	$	607.6

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

-3-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Millions)


	June 30		December 31
	2013		2012*
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS

TRUCK, PARTS AND OTHER:
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,341.0	$	1,203.2
Trade and other receivables, net		1,015.0		902.1
Marketable debt securities		1,181.8		1,192.7
Inventories, net		832.0		782.4
Other current assets		349.8		331.7

Total Truck, Parts and Other Current Assets		4,719.6		4,412.1

Equipment on operating leases, net		903.7		857.9
Property, plant and equipment, net		2,390.3		2,312.9
Other noncurrent assets, net		261.0		249.4

Total Truck, Parts and Other Assets		8,274.6		7,832.3


FINANCIAL SERVICES:
Cash and cash equivalents		100.9		69.2
Finance and other receivables, net		8,307.7		8,298.3
Equipment on operating leases, net		2,103.7		2,030.8
Other assets		415.1		397.2

Total Financial Services Assets		10,927.4		10,795.5

	$	19,202.0	$	18,627.8

* The December 31, 2012 consolidated balance sheet has been derived from audited financial statements.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

-4-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Millions)


	June 30			December 31
	2013			2012*
	(Unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

TRUCK, PARTS AND OTHER:
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other	$	2,422.7		$	2,168.3
Current portion of long-term debt		150.0

Total Truck, Parts and Other Current Liabilities		2,572.7			2,168.3

Long-term debt					150.0
Residual value guarantees and deferred revenues		952.1			903.5
Other liabilities		626.8			579.5

Total Truck, Parts and Other Liabilities		4,151.6			3,801.3


FINANCIAL SERVICES:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		285.8			309.5
Commercial paper and bank loans		2,823.2			3,562.7
Term notes		4,937.5			4,167.4
Deferred taxes and other liabilities		892.3			940.0

Total Financial Services Liabilities		8,938.8			8,979.6

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value - authorized 1.0 million shares, none issued
Common stock, $1 par value - authorized 1.2 billion shares, issued 353.8 and 353.4 million shares		353.8			353.4
Additional paid-in capital		84.7			56.6
Retained earnings		5,983.0			5,596.4
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(309.9	)		(159.5	)

Total Stockholders’ Equity		6,111.6			5,846.9

	$	19,202.0		$	18,627.8

*	The December 31, 2012 consolidated balance sheet has been derived from audited financial statements.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

-5-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(Millions)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30
	2013			2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	527.7		$	624.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization:
Property, plant and equipment		97.2			97.8
Equipment on operating leases and other		285.1			248.4
Provision for losses on financial services receivables		11.8			12.5
Other, net		13.1			11.3
Pension contributions		(6.1	)		(85.4	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade and other receivables		(111.5	)		(140.3	)
Wholesale receivables on new trucks		(66.9	)		(257.6	)
Sales-type finance leases and dealer direct loans on new trucks		5.7			(65.7	)
Inventories		(70.7	)		(177.0	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		367.7			155.2
Income taxes, warranty and other		99.5			20.3

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		1,152.6			444.0

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Retail loans and direct financing leases originated		(1,432.4	)		(1,530.7	)
Collections on retail loans and direct financing leases		1,240.6			1,149.8
Marketable securities purchases		(408.1	)		(328.4	)
Marketable securities sales and maturities		365.0			297.5
Payments for property, plant and equipment		(269.7	)		(208.7	)
Acquisition of equipment for operating leases		(608.3	)		(628.0	)
Proceeds from asset disposals		159.8			175.4
Other, net		15.1			(7.3	)

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(938.0	)		(1,080.4	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash dividends paid		(141.4	)		(385.7	)
Purchase of treasury stock					(139.5	)
Stock compensation transactions		17.5			5.7
Net decrease in commercial paper and short-term bank loans		(657.7	)		(508.2	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		1,345.1			1,574.5
Payments of long-term debt		(565.5	)		(282.6	)

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities		(2.0	)		264.2
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(43.1	)		(14.6	)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		169.5			(386.8	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,272.4			2,106.7

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,441.9		$	1,719.9

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

-6-

NOTE A – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in PACCAR Inc’s (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus the effect of any participating securities. Diluted earnings per common share are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities are converted into common shares under the treasury stock method. The dilutive and antidilutive options are shown separately in the table below.

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30

2013

2012

2013

2012

Additional shares

906,200

713,000

836,000

774,000

Antidilutive options

828,800

2,536,000

1,391,700

2,551,000

New Accounting Pronouncements: In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU requires disclosure of additional information about reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2013-02 in the first quarter of 2013; the implementation of this amendment resulted in additional disclosures (see Note F), but did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, an update to ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The ASUs require entities with derivatives, repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending transactions that are either offset on the balance sheet, or subject to a master netting arrangement, to provide expanded disclosures about the nature of the rights of offset. The updated ASU is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2013-01 in the first quarter of 2013; the implementation of this amendment resulted in additional disclosures (see Note I), but did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE B – Investments in Marketable Debt Securities

The Company’s investments in marketable debt securities are classified as available-for-sale. These investments are stated at fair value with any unrealized gains or losses, net of tax, included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.

The Company utilizes third-party pricing services for all of its marketable debt security valuations. The Company reviews the pricing methodology used by the third-party pricing services including the manner employed to collect market information. On a quarterly basis, the Company also performs review and validation procedures on the pricing information received from the third-party providers. These procedures help ensure that the fair value information used by the Company is determined in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.

-7-

The Company evaluates its investment in marketable debt securities at the end of each reporting period to determine if a decline in fair value is other than temporary. Realized losses are recognized upon management’s determination that a decline in fair value is other than temporary. The determination of other-than-temporary impairment is a subjective process, requiring the use of judgments and assumptions regarding the amount and timing of recovery. The Company reviews and evaluates its investments at least quarterly to identify investments that have indications of other-than-temporary impairments. It is reasonably possible that a change in estimate could occur in the near term relating to other-than-temporary impairment. Accordingly, the Company considers several factors when evaluating debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment, including whether the decline in fair value of the security is due to increased default risk for the specific issuer or market interest rate risk.

In assessing default risk, the Company considers the collectability of principal and interest payments by monitoring changes to issuers’ credit ratings, specific credit events associated with individual issuers as well as the credit ratings of any financial guarantor, and the extent and duration to which amortized cost exceeds fair value.

In assessing market interest rate risk, including benchmark interest rates and credit spreads, the Company considers its intent for selling the securities and whether it is more likely than not the Company will be able to hold these securities until the recovery of any unrealized losses.

Marketable debt securities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:


	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
At June 30, 2013	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
U.S. tax-exempt securities	$	206.7	$	.9	$	.5	$	207.1
U.S. corporate securities		65.6		.1				65.7
U.S. government and agency securities		.6						.6
Non-U.S. corporate securities		492.3		.9		1.0		492.2
Non-U.S. government securities		314.5		2.8		.3		317.0
Other debt securities		98.7		.5				99.2

	$	1,178.4	$	5.2	$	1.8	$	1,181.8


	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
At December 31, 2012	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
U.S. tax-exempt securities	$	217.2	$	1.5	$	.1	$	218.6
U.S. corporate securities		59.8		.3				60.1
U.S. government and agency securities		.8						.8
Non-U.S. corporate securities		447.5		1.4		.2		448.7
Non-U.S. government securities		349.3		5.8		.1		355.0
Other debt securities		108.9		.6				109.5

	$	1,183.5	$	9.6	$	.4	$	1,192.7

The cost of marketable debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Amortization, accretion, interest and dividend income and realized gains and losses are included in investment income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. The proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $365.0 and $297.5, respectively. Gross realized gains were $.2 and $1.5 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and gross realized losses were $.1 for both the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

The fair value of marketable debt securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months at June 30, 2013 was $413.9 and the associated unrealized loss was $1.8. The fair value of marketable debt securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months at December 31, 2012 was $291.0 and the associated unrealized loss was $.4. The fair value of marketable debt that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or greater at June 30, 2013 was $1.0 and the associated unrealized loss was less than $.1. There were no marketable debt securities that were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or greater at December 31, 2012.

-8-

For the investment securities in gross unrealized loss positions identified above, the Company does not intend to sell the investment securities. It is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the investment securities before recovery of the unrealized losses, and the Company expects that the contractual principal and interest will be received on the investment securities. As a result, the Company recognized no other-than-temporary impairments during the periods presented.

Contractual maturities on marketable debt securities at June 30, 2013 were as follows:


	Amortized		Fair
Maturities:	Cost		Value
Within one year	$	513.1	$	514.6
One to five years		665.1		667.0
Six to ten years		.1		.1
More than ten years		.1		.1

	$	1,178.4	$	1,181.8

NOTE C – Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of inventories in the U.S. is determined principally by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Cost of all other inventories is determined principally by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Inventories include the following:


	June 30			December 31
	2013			2012
Finished products	$	460.4		$	432.0
Work in process and raw materials		541.9			519.8

		1,002.3			951.8
Less LIFO reserve		(170.3	)		(169.4	)

	$	832.0		$	782.4

Under the LIFO method of accounting (used for approximately 48% of June 30, 2013 inventories), an actual valuation can be made only at the end of each year based on year-end inventory levels and costs. Accordingly, interim valuations are based on management’s estimates of those year-end amounts.

-9-

NOTE D – Finance and Other Receivables

Finance and other receivables include the following:


	June 30			December 31
	2013			2012
Loans	$	3,762.1		$	3,738.2
Direct financing leases		2,488.3			2,489.3
Sales-type finance leases		871.8			916.8
Dealer wholesale financing		1,561.0			1,541.0
Operating lease and other trade receivables		105.4			112.0
Unearned interest on finance leases		(351.9	)		(369.0	)

	$	8,436.7		$	8,428.3
Less allowance for losses:
Loans and leases		(112.3	)		(112.6	)
Dealer wholesale financing		(11.0	)		(11.8	)
Operating lease and other trade receivables		(5.7	)		(5.6	)

	$	8,307.7		$	8,298.3

Recognition of interest income and rental revenue is suspended (put on non-accrual status) when the receivable becomes more than 90 days past the contractual due date or earlier if some other event causes the Company to determine that collection is not probable. Accordingly, no finance receivables more than 90 days past due were accruing interest at June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012. Recognition is resumed if the receivable becomes current by the payment of all amounts due under the terms of the existing contract and collection of remaining amounts is considered probable (if not contractually modified) or if the customer makes scheduled payments for three months and collection of remaining amounts is considered probable (if contractually modified). Payments received while the finance receivable is impaired or on non-accrual status are applied to interest and principal in accordance with the contractual terms.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company continuously monitors the payment performance of all its finance receivables. For large retail finance customers and dealers with wholesale financing, the Company regularly reviews their financial statements and makes site visits and phone contact as appropriate. If the Company becomes aware of circumstances that could cause those customers or dealers to face financial difficulty, whether or not they are past due, the customers are placed on a watch list.

The Company modifies loans and finance leases as a normal part of its Financial Services operations. The Company may modify loans and finance leases for commercial reasons or for credit reasons. Modifications for commercial reasons are changes to contract terms for customers that are not considered to be in financial difficulty. Modifications for credit reasons are changes to contract terms for customers considered to be in financial difficulty. The Company’s modifications typically result in granting more time to pay the contractual amounts owed and charging a fee and interest for the term of the modification.

When considering whether to modify customer accounts for credit reasons, the Company evaluates the creditworthiness of the customers and modifies those accounts that the Company considers likely to perform under the modified terms. When the Company modifies loans and finance leases for credit reasons and grants a concession, the modifications are classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). The Company does not typically grant credit modifications for customers that do not meet minimum underwriting standards since the Company normally repossesses the financed equipment in these circumstances. When such modifications do occur, they are considered TDRs.

-10-

On average, modifications extended contractual terms by approximately four months in 2013 and seven months in 2012 and did not have a significant effect on the weighted average term or interest rate of the total portfolio at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The Company has developed a systematic methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses for its two portfolio segments, retail and wholesale. The retail segment consists of retail loans and direct and sales-type finance leases, net of unearned interest. The wholesale segment consists of truck inventory financing loans to dealers that are collateralized by trucks and other collateral. The wholesale segment generally has less risk than the retail segment. Wholesale receivables generally are shorter in duration than retail receivables, and the Company requires monthly reporting of the wholesale dealer’s financial condition, conducts periodic audits of the trucks being financed and in many cases, obtains personal guarantees or other security such as dealership assets. In determining the allowance for credit losses, retail loans and finance leases are evaluated together since they relate to a similar customer base, their contractual terms require regular payment of principal and interest generally over 36 to 60 months and they are secured by the same type of collateral. The allowance for credit losses consists of both specific and general reserves.

The Company individually evaluates certain finance receivables for impairment. Finance receivables that are evaluated individually for impairment consist of all wholesale accounts and certain large retail accounts with past due balances or otherwise determined to be at a higher risk of loss. A finance receivable is impaired if it is considered probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractual interest and principal payments as scheduled. In addition, all retail loans and leases which have been classified as TDRs and all customer accounts over 90 days past due are considered impaired. Generally, impaired accounts are on non-accrual status. Impaired accounts classified as TDRs which have been performing for 90 consecutive days are placed on accrual status if it is deemed probable that the Company will collect all principal and interest payments.

Impaired receivables are considered collateral dependent. Large balance retail and all wholesale impaired receivables are individually evaluated to determine the appropriate reserve for losses. The determination of reserves for large balance impaired receivables considers the fair value of the associated collateral. When the underlying collateral fair value exceeds the Company’s recorded investment, no reserve is recorded. Small balance impaired receivables with similar risk characteristics are evaluated as a separate pool to determine the appropriate reserve for losses using the historical loss information discussed below.

For finance receivables that are not individually impaired, the Company collectively evaluates and determines the general allowance for credit losses for both retail and wholesale receivables based on historical loss information, using past-due account data and current market conditions. Information used includes assumptions regarding the likelihood of collecting current and past-due accounts, repossession rates, the recovery rate on the underlying collateral based on used truck values and other pledged collateral or recourse. The Company has developed a range of loss estimates for each of its country portfolios based on historical experience, taking into account loss frequency and severity in both strong and weak truck market conditions. A projection is made of the range of estimated credit losses inherent in the portfolio from which an amount is determined as probable based on current market conditions and other factors impacting the creditworthiness of the Company’s borrowers and their ability to repay. After determining the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses, a provision for losses on finance receivables is charged to income as necessary to reflect management’s estimate of incurred credit losses, net of recoveries, inherent in the portfolio.

In determining the fair value of the collateral, the Company uses a pricing matrix and categorizes the fair value as Level 2 in the hierarchy of fair value measurement. The pricing matrix is reviewed quarterly and updated as appropriate. The pricing matrix considers the make, model and year of the equipment as well as recent sales prices of comparable equipment through wholesale channels to the Company’s dealers (principal market). The fair value of the collateral also considers the overall condition of the equipment.

-11-

Accounts are charged-off against the allowance for credit losses when, in the judgment of management, they are considered uncollectable (generally upon repossession of the collateral). Typically the timing between the repossession and charge-off is not significant. In cases where repossession is delayed (e.g., for legal proceedings), the Company records partial charge-offs. The charge-off is determined by comparing the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, to the recorded investment.

For the following credit quality disclosures, finance receivables are classified as dealer wholesale, dealer retail and customer retail segments. The dealer wholesale segment consists of truck inventory financing to PACCAR dealers. The dealer retail segment consists of loans and leases to participating dealers and franchises that use the proceeds to fund customers’ acquisition of commercial vehicles and related equipment. The customer retail segment consists of loans and leases directly to customers for the acquisition of commercial vehicles and related equipment. Customer retail receivables are further segregated between fleet and owner/operator classes. The fleet class consists of customer retail accounts operating more than five trucks. All other customer retail accounts are considered owner/operator. Each individual class has similar measurement attributes, risk characteristics and common methods to monitor and assess credit risk.

The allowance for credit losses is summarized as follows:


	2013
	Dealer						Customer Retail
	Wholesale			Retail			Customer Retail			Other*			Total
Balance at January 1	$	11.8		$	13.4		$	99.2		$	5.6		$	130.0
Provision for losses		(.4	)		(1.0	)		12.7			.5			11.8
Charge-offs		(.1	)					(13.4	)		(.8	)		(14.3	)
Recoveries								3.0			.5			3.5
Currency translation and other		(.3	)		(.1	)		(1.5	)		(.1	)		(2.0	)

Balance at June 30	$	11.0		$	12.3		$	100.0		$	5.7		$	129.0


	2012
	Dealer						Customer Retail
	Wholesale			Retail			Customer Retail			Other*			Total
Balance at January 1	$	11.7		$	12.0		$	106.5		$	8.8		$	139.0
Provision for losses		2.8			.6			6.5			2.6			12.5
Charge-offs								(11.3	)		(3.4	)		(14.7	)
Recoveries		.1						3.1			.2			3.4
Currency translation and other		(1.8	)					1.6						(.2	)

Balance at June 30	$	12.8		$	12.6		$	106.4		$	8.2		$	140.0

* Operating lease and other trade receivables.

-12-

Information regarding finance receivables evaluated and determined individually and collectively is as follows:

Dealer

Customer
Retail

At June 30, 2013

Wholesale

Retail

Total

Recorded investment for impaired finance receivables evaluated individually

4.0

59.7

63.7

Allowance for impaired finance receivables determined individually

1.4

10.8

12.2

Recorded investment for finance receivables evaluated collectively

1,557.0

1,370.7

5,339.9

8,267.6

Allowance for finance receivables determined collectively

9.6

12.3

89.2

111.1

Dealer

Customer
Retail

At December 31, 2012

Wholesale

Retail

Total

Recorded investment for impaired finance receivables evaluated individually

3.6

67.4

71.1

Allowance for impaired finance receivables determined individually

2.2

10.8

13.0

Recorded investment for finance receivables evaluated collectively

1,537.4

1,429.6

5,278.2

8,245.2

Allowance for finance receivables determined collectively

9.6

13.4

88.4

111.4

The recorded investment for finance receivables that are on non-accrual status is as follows:


	June 30		December 31
	2013		2012
Dealer:
Wholesale	$	1.0	$	3.1
Retail				.1
Customer Retail:
Fleet		43.4		42.8
Owner/Operator		8.7		11.7

	$	53.1	$	57.7

-13-

Impaired Loans

Impaired loans with no specific reserves were $4.0 and $6.8 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Impaired loans with a specific reserve are summarized below. The impaired loans with specific reserve represent the unpaid principal balance. The recorded investment of impaired loans as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was not significantly different than the unpaid principal balance.

Dealer

Customer Retail

At June 30, 2013

Wholesale

Retail

Fleet

Owner/
Operator

Total

Impaired loans with a specific reserve

4.0

30.0

4.7

38.7

Associated allowance

(1.4

)

(4.7

)

(1.0

)

(7.1

)

Net carrying amount of impaired loans

2.6

25.3

3.7

31.6

Average recorded investment*

3.6

37.1

6.9

47.6

* Represents the average during the 12 months ended June 30, 2013.


	Dealer				Customer Retail
At December 31, 2012	Wholesale			Retail	Fleet			Owner/ Operator			Total
Impaired loans with a specific reserve	$	3.6			$	43.9		$	6.8		$	54.3
Associated allowance		(2.2	)			(7.3	)		(1.2	)		(10.7	)

Net carrying amount of impaired loans	$	1.4			$	36.6		$	5.6		$	43.6


Average recorded investment*	$	17.5			$	26.4		$	10.8		$	54.7

* Represents the average during the 12 months ended June 30, 2012.

During the period the loans above were considered impaired, interest income recognized on a cash basis is as follows:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Interest income recognized:
Dealer wholesale	$	.1	$	.1	$	.1	$	.1
Customer retail - fleet		.9		.3		1.3		.7
Customer retail - owner/operator		.2		.1		.4		.4

	$	1.2	$	.5	$	1.8	$	1.2

Credit Quality

The Company’s customers are principally concentrated in the transportation industry in North America, Europe and Australia. The Company’s portfolio is diversified over a large number of customers and dealers with no single customer or dealer balance representing over 4% of the total portfolio. The Company retains as collateral a security interest in the related equipment.

At the inception of each contract, the Company considers the credit risk based on a variety of credit quality factors including prior payment experience, customer financial information, credit-rating agency ratings, loan-to-value ratios and other internal metrics. On an ongoing basis, the Company monitors credit quality based on past-due status and collection experience as there is a meaningful correlation between the past due status of customers and the risk of loss.

-14-

The Company has three credit quality indicators: performing, watch and at-risk. Performing accounts pay in accordance with the contractual terms and are not considered high risk. Watch accounts include accounts 31 to 90 days past due and large accounts that are performing but are considered to be high-risk. Watch accounts are not impaired. At-risk accounts are accounts that are impaired, including TDRs, accounts over 90 days past-due and other accounts on non-accrual status. The tables below summarize the Company’s finance receivables by credit quality indicator and portfolio class.


	Dealer				Customer Retail
At June 30, 2013	Wholesale		Retail		Fleet		Owner/ Operator		Total
Performing	$	1,510.5	$	1,365.8	$	4,061.1	$	1,249.3	$	8,186.7
Watch		46.5		4.9		19.4		10.1		80.9
At-risk		4.0				49.8		9.9		63.7

	$	1,561.0	$	1,370.7	$	4,130.3	$	1,269.3	$	8,331.3


	Dealer				Customer Retail
At December 31, 2012	Wholesale		Retail		Fleet		Owner/ Operator		Total
Performing	$	1,479.1	$	1,423.3	$	3,878.4	$	1,365.6	$	8,146.4
Watch		58.3		6.3		23.5		10.7		98.8
At-risk		3.6		.1		54.7		12.7		71.1

	$	1,541.0	$	1,429.7	$	3,956.6	$	1,389.0	$	8,316.3

The tables below summarize the Company’s finance receivables by aging category. In determining past due status, the Company considers the entire contractual account balance past due when any installment is over 30 days past due. Substantially all customer accounts that were greater than 30 days past due prior to credit modification became current upon modification for aging purposes.


	Dealer				Customer Retail
At June 30, 2013	Wholesale		Retail		Fleet		Owner/ Operator		Total
Current and up to 30 days past due	$	1,553.6	$	1,370.7	$	4,098.0	$	1,252.1	$	8,274.4
31 – 60 days past due		2.9				20.1		7.3		30.3
Greater than 60 days past due		4.5				12.2		9.9		26.6

	$	1,561.0	$	1,370.7	$	4,130.3	$	1,269.3	$	8,331.3


	Dealer				Customer Retail
At December 31, 2012	Wholesale		Retail		Fleet		Owner/ Operator		Total
Current and up to 30 days past due	$	1,537.0	$	1,429.7	$	3,934.8	$	1,369.0	$	8,270.5
31 – 60 days past due		.5				9.4		7.9		17.8
Greater than 60 days past due		3.5				12.4		12.1		28.0

	$	1,541.0	$	1,429.7	$	3,956.6	$	1,389.0	$	8,316.3

-15-

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The balance of TDRs was $29.6 and $38.5 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. At modification date, the pre-modification and post-modification recorded investment balances for finance receivables modified during the period by portfolio class are as follows:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2013				June 30, 2013
	Recorded Investment				Recorded Investment
	Pre-Modification		Post-Modification		Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
Fleet	$	3.5	$	3.5	$	7.7	$	7.6
Owner / Operator		.2		.2		.7		.7

	$	3.7	$	3.7	$	8.4	$	8.3


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012				June 30, 2012
	Recorded Investment				Recorded Investment
	Pre-Modification		Post-Modification		Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
Fleet	$	18.7	$	18.7	$	30.6	$	29.9
Owner / Operator		.5		.5		1.5		1.5

	$	19.2	$	19.2	$	32.1	$	31.4

The effect on the allowance for credit losses from such modifications was not significant at June 30, 2013 and 2012.

TDRs modified during the previous twelve months that subsequently defaulted (i.e., became more than 30 days past-due) during the period by portfolio class are as follows:


	Six Months Ended
	June 30
	2013		2012
Fleet	$	1.4	$	4.4
Owner / Operator		.2		.4

	$	1.6	$	4.8

The TDRs that subsequently defaulted did not significantly impact the Company’s allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Repossessions

When the Company determines that a customer is not likely to meet its contractual commitments, the Company repossesses the vehicles which serve as collateral for loans, finance leases and equipment under operating lease. The Company records the vehicles as used truck inventory which is included in Financial Services other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The balance of repossessed inventory at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $13.0 and $20.9, respectively. Proceeds from the sales of repossessed assets were $33.1 and $29.6 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These amounts are included in proceeds from asset disposals in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Write-downs of repossessed equipment on operating leases are recorded as impairments and included in Financial Services depreciation and other expense on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

-16-

NOTE E – Product Support Liabilities

Product support liabilities are estimated future payments related to product warranties, optional extended warranties and repair and maintenance (R&M) contracts. The Company generally offers one year warranties covering most of its vehicles and related aftermarket parts. Specific terms and conditions vary depending on the product and the country of sale. Optional extended warranty and R&M contracts can be purchased for periods which generally range up to five years. Warranty expenses and reserves are estimated and recorded at the time products or contracts are sold based on historical data regarding the source, frequency and cost of claims, net of any recoveries. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded liabilities and adjusts them as appropriate to reflect actual experience. Revenue from extended warranty and R&M contracts is deferred and recognized to income on a straight-line basis over the contract period. Warranty and R&M costs on these contracts are recognized as incurred.

Changes in product support liabilities are summarized as follows:


	2013			2012
Balance at January 1	$	540.7		$	448.7
Cost accruals and revenue deferrals		158.3			177.9
Payments and revenue recognized		(130.3	)		(114.6	)
Currency translation		(9.1	)		(4.6	)

Balance at June 30	$	559.6		$	507.4

NOTE F – Stockholders’ Equity

Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income were as follows:


	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Net income	$	291.6		$	527.7
Other comprehensive income (OCI):
Unrealized gains on derivative contracts		10.1			13.3
Tax effect		(3.0	)		(4.1	)

		7.1			9.2

Unrealized losses on marketable debt securities		(5.5	)		(5.8	)
Tax effect		1.5			1.6

		(4.0	)		(4.2	)

Employee benefit plans		13.0			34.3
Tax effect		(4.4	)		(11.1	)

		8.6			23.2

Currency translation losses		(82.6	)		(178.6	)

Net other comprehensive loss		(70.9	)		(150.4	)

Comprehensive income	$	220.7		$	377.3

-17-


	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2012

Net income	$	297.2		$	624.5
Other comprehensive income (OCI):
Unrealized losses on derivative contracts		(4.8	)		(6.2	)
Tax effect		1.3			1.7

		(3.5	)		(4.5	)

Unrealized gains on marketable debt securities		2.2			2.7
Tax effect		(.6	)		(.8	)

		1.6			1.9

Employee benefit plans		12.7			19.1
Tax effect		(4.2	)		(6.1	)

		8.5			13.0

Currency translation losses		(118.6	)		(27.3	)

Net other comprehensive loss		(112.0	)		(16.9	)

Comprehensive income	$	185.2		$	607.6

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCI) as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the changes in AOCI, net of tax, included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, consisted of the following:

Gains and
(Losses) on
Derivative
Contracts

Unrealized Gains
and (Losses) on
Marketable Debt
Securities

Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans

Foreign
Currency
Translation

Total

Balance at December 31, 2012

(27.2

)

6.6

(496.5

)

357.6

(159.5

)

Amounts recorded in AOCI

54.1

(4.2

)

8.5

(176.6

)

(118.2

)

Amounts reclassified out of AOCI

(44.9

)

14.7

(2.0

)

(32.2

)

Net other comprehensive income (loss)

9.2

(4.2

)

23.2

(178.6

)

(150.4

)

Balance at June 30, 2013

(18.0

)

2.4

(473.3

)

179.0

(309.9

)

-18-

Reclassifications out of AOCI during the six months ended June 30, 2013 are as follows:


AOCI Components	Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income	Amount Reclassified Out of AOCI**
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges:
*Truck, Parts and Other*
Foreign-exchange contracts	Cost of sales and revenues	$	(2.3	)
	Interest and other (income) expense, net		.3

*Financial Services*
Interest-rate contracts	Interest and other borrowing expenses		(61.9	)

	Pre-tax expense reduction		(63.9	)
	Tax expense		19.0

	After-tax expense reduction		(44.9	)

Defined benefit pension plans:
*Truck, Parts and Other*
Prior service costs	Cost of sales and revenues		.6
Actuarial loss	Cost of sales and revenues $11.5, SG&A $9.6, R&D $.1		21.2

*Financial Services*
Actuarial loss	SG&A		.8

	Pre-tax expense		22.6
	Tax benefit		(7.9	)

	After-tax expense		14.7

Foreign Currency Translation:
*Truck, Parts and Other*	Interest and other (income) expense, net		(1.1	)
*Financial Services*	Interest and other borrowing expenses		(.9	)

	Expense reduction		(2.0	)

Total reclassifications out of AOCI		$	(32.2	)

** Amounts in parentheses indicate reductions in expenses, and amounts without parenthesis indicate expenses.

Stock Compensation Plans

Stock-based compensation expense was $2.7 and $8.5 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and $2.5 and $8.4 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Realized tax benefits related to the excess of deductible amounts over expense recognized amounted to $1.0 and $1.6 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and nil and $.8 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and have been classified as a financing cash flow.

During the first half of 2013, the Company issued 627,691 common shares under deferred and stock compensation arrangements.

NOTE G – Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate in the second quarter of 2013 of 32.6% decreased from 33.4% in the same period of 2012. For the first half of 2013, the effective income tax rate of 31.5% decreased from 32.5% in the first half of 2012. The decrease in the effective tax rate in both periods of 2013 was primarily due to a higher proportion of income generated in lower taxed jurisdictions.

-19-

NOTE H – Segment Information

PACCAR operates in three principal segments: Truck, Parts and Financial Services.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net sales and revenues:
Truck
Total	$	3,432.2		$	3,722.1		$	6,508.0		$	7,693.8
Less intersegment		(162.2	)		(238.4	)		(304.7	)		(415.7	)

External customers		3,270.0			3,483.7			6,203.3			7,278.1

Parts
Total		721.4			678.6			1,399.8			1,369.7
Less intersegment		(11.9	)		(12.4	)		(22.9	)		(23.1	)

External customers		709.5			666.2			1,376.9			1,346.6

Other		32.2			41.2			62.7			81.1

		4,011.7			4,191.1			7,642.9			8,705.8
Financial Services		288.8			266.1			581.9			527.5

	$	4,300.5		$	4,457.2		$	8,224.8		$	9,233.3

Income (loss) before income taxes:
Truck	$	238.4		$	272.1		$	403.4		$	572.4
Parts		109.4			89.9			204.7			191.5
Other		(4.4	)		(1.3	)		(14.1	)		(4.4	)

		343.4			360.7			594.0			759.5
Financial Services		81.5			77.4			161.6			148.7
Investment income		8.0			8.2			14.5			17.1

	$	432.9		$	446.3		$	770.1		$	925.3

Depreciation and amortization:
Truck	$	84.0		$	80.6		$	161.7		$	158.3
Parts		1.4			1.5			2.7			3.1
Other		2.4			2.5			4.9			5.1

		87.8			84.6			169.3			166.5
Financial Services		109.8			91.0			213.0			179.7

	$	197.6		$	175.6		$	382.3		$	346.2

The Truck segment includes the manufacture of trucks, and the Parts segment includes the distribution of related aftermarket parts, both of which are sold through the same network of independent dealers. These segments derive a large proportion of their revenues and operating profits from operations in North America and Europe. The Truck segment incurs substantial costs to design, manufacture and sell trucks to its customers. The sale of new trucks provides the Parts segment with the basis for parts sales that may continue over the life of the truck, but are generally concentrated in the first five years after truck delivery. To reflect the benefit the Parts segment receives from costs incurred by the Truck segment, certain expenses are allocated from the Truck segment to the Parts segment. The expenses allocated are based on a percentage of the average annual expenses for factory overhead, engineering, research and development and SG&A for the preceding five years. The allocation is based on the ratio of the average parts direct margin dollars (net sales less material and labor costs) to the total truck and parts direct margin dollars for the previous five years. The Company believes such expenses have been allocated on a reasonable basis.

-20-

Included in Other is the Company’s industrial winch manufacturing business and other sales, income and expense not attributable to a reportable segment, including a portion of corporate expenses.

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those applied in the consolidated financial statements as described in Note A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

NOTE I – Derivative Financial Instruments

As part of its risk management strategy, the Company enters into derivative contracts to hedge against interest rate and foreign currency risk. Certain derivative instruments designated as either cash flow hedges or fair value hedges are subject to hedge accounting. Derivative instruments that are not subject to hedge accounting are held as economic hedges. The Company’s policies prohibit the use of derivatives for speculation or trading. At the inception of each hedge relationship, the Company documents its risk management objectives, procedures and accounting treatment.

All of the Company’s interest-rate contracts are transacted under International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreements. Each agreement permits the net settlement of amounts owed in the event of default and certain other termination events.

For derivative financial instruments, the Company has elected not to offset derivative positions in the balance sheet with the same counterparty under the same agreement and is not required to post or receive collateral. Exposure limits and minimum credit ratings are used to minimize the risks of counterparty default. The Company had no material exposures to default at June 30, 2013.

The Company uses regression analysis to assess effectiveness of interest-rate contracts on a quarterly basis. For foreign-exchange contracts, the Company performs quarterly assessments to ensure that critical terms continue to match. All components of the derivative instrument’s gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Gains or losses on the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges are recognized currently in earnings. Hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively when the Company determines that a derivative financial instrument has ceased to be a highly effective hedge.

Interest-Rate Contracts: The Company enters into various interest-rate contracts, including interest-rate swaps and cross currency interest-rate swaps. Interest-rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed for floating rate or floating for fixed rate interest payments based on the contractual notional amounts in a single currency. Cross currency interest-rate swaps involve the exchange of notional amounts and interest payments in different currencies. The Company is exposed to interest-rate and exchange-rate risk caused by market volatility as a result of its borrowing activities. The objective of these contracts is to mitigate the fluctuations on earnings, cash flows and fair value of borrowings. Net amounts paid or received are reflected as adjustments to interest expense.

At June 30, 2013, the notional amount of the Company’s interest-rate contracts was $3,060.0. Notional maturities for all interest-rate contracts are $262.5 for the remainder of 2013, $1,318.0 for 2014, $938.2 for 2015, $304.2 for 2016, $209.5 for 2017 and $27.6 thereafter. The majority of these contracts are floating to fixed swaps that effectively convert an equivalent amount of commercial paper and other variable rate debt to fixed rates.

Foreign-Exchange Contracts: The Company enters into foreign-exchange contracts to hedge certain anticipated transactions and assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar, the euro, the British pound, the Australian dollar, the Brazilian real and the Mexican peso. The objective is to reduce fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At June 30, 2013, the notional amount of the outstanding foreign-exchange contracts was $459.6. Foreign-exchange contracts mature within one year.

-21-

The following table presents the balance sheet classification and fair value of derivative financial instruments:


	June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Assets		Liabilities		Assets		Liabilities
Derivatives designated under hedge accounting:
Interest-rate contracts:
Financial Services:
Other assets	$	42.4			$	4.6
Deferred taxes and other liabilities			$	56.7			$	111.7
Foreign-exchange contracts:
Truck, Parts and Other:
Other current assets		.6				.2
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other				.1				.1

Total	$	43.0	$	56.8	$	4.8	$	111.8

Economic hedges:
Interest-rate contracts:
Financial Services:
Deferred taxes and other liabilities							$	.6
Foreign-exchange contracts:
Truck, Parts and Other:
Other current assets	$	.9			$	.3
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other			$	.6				.2
Financial Services:
Other assets		3.5
Deferred taxes and other liabilities				.1				.4

Total	$	4.4	$	.7	$	.3	$	1.2

-22-

The following tables present the balance sheet classification of the gross and pro forma net amounts of derivative financial instruments:


As of June 30, 2013	Gross Amount Recognized in Balance Sheet		Amount Not Offset in Financial Instruments			Pro Forma Net Amount
Assets:
*Truck, Parts and Other*
Foreign-exchange contracts	$	1.5				$	1.5
*Financial Services*
Interest-rate contracts		42.4	$	(9.9	)		32.5
Foreign-exchange contracts		3.5					3.5

Total derivative assets	$	47.4	$	(9.9	)	$	37.5

Liabilities:
*Truck, Parts and Other*
Foreign-exchange contracts	$	.7				$	.7
*Financial Services*
Interest-rate contracts		56.7	$	(9.9	)		46.8
Foreign-exchange contracts		.1					.1

Total derivative liabilities	$	57.5	$	(9.9	)	$	47.6


As of December 31, 2012	Gross Amount Recognized in Balance Sheet		Amount Not Offset in Financial Instruments			Pro Forma Net Amount
Assets:
Truck, Parts and Other
Foreign-exchange contracts	$	.5				$	.5
Financial Services
Interest-rate contracts		4.6	$	(2.6	)		2.0

Total derivative assets	$	5.1	$	(2.6	)	$	2.5

Liabilities:
Truck, Parts and Other
Foreign-exchange contracts	$	.3				$	.3
Financial Services
Interest-rate contracts		112.3	$	(2.6	)		109.7
Foreign-exchange contracts		.4					.4

Total derivative liabilities	$	113.0	$	(2.6	)	$	110.4

-23-

Fair Value Hedges

Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges are recorded in earnings together with the changes in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. The expense or (income) recognized in earnings related to fair value hedges was included in interest and other borrowing expenses in the Financial Services segment of the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Interest-rate swaps	$	.1		$	(3.7	)	$	.3		$	(1.6	)
Term notes		(.2	)		3.7			(.4	)		1.5

Cash Flow Hedges

Substantially all of the Company’s interest-rate contracts and some foreign-exchange contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss to the extent such hedges are considered effective. The maximum length of time over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 6.9 years.

Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss are reclassified into net income in the same period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Net realized gains and losses from interest-rate contracts are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. Net realized gains and losses from foreign-exchange contracts are recognized as an adjustment to cost of sales or to Financial Services interest expense, consistent with the hedged transaction. The ineffective portions were nil during the second quarter of both 2013 and 2012, and were gains of $.1 and $.2 during the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following table presents the pre-tax effects of derivative instruments recognized in OCI:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2013						June 30, 2013
	Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange			Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange
	Contracts			Contracts			Contracts			Contracts
Gain recognized in OCI:
Truck, Parts and Other				$	(1.3	)				$	(2.9	)
Financial Services	$	(54.7	)				$	(74.4	)

	$	(54.7	)	$	(1.3	)	$	(74.4	)	$	(2.9	)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012						June 30, 2012
	Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange			Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange
	Contracts			Contracts			Contracts			Contracts
Loss (gain) recognized in OCI:
Truck, Parts and Other				$	(.3	)				$	.9
Financial Services	$	18.2					$	23.7

	$	18.2		$	(.3	)	$	23.7		$	.9

-24-

Expense (income) reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss into income:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013						Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange			Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange
	Contracts			Contracts			Contracts			Contracts
Truck, Parts and Other:
Cost of sales and revenues										$	(2.3	)
Interest and other (income) expense, net				$	.5						.3
Financial Services:
Interest and other borrowing expenses	$	(46.3	)				$	(61.9	)

	$	(46.3	)	$	.5		$	(61.9	)	$	(2.0	)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012						June 30, 2012
	Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange			Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange
	Contracts			Contracts			Contracts			Contracts
Truck, Parts and Other:
Cost of sales and revenues				$	.1					$	2.7
Interest and other (income) expense, net					(.4	)
Financial Services:
Interest and other borrowing expenses	$	13.3					$	16.1

	$	13.3		$	(.3	)	$	16.1		$	2.7

The amount of loss recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2013 that is estimated to be reclassified to interest expense or cost of sales in the following 12 months if interest rates and exchange rates remain unchanged is approximately $18.9, net of taxes. The fixed interest earned on finance receivables will offset the amount recognized in interest expense, resulting in a stable interest margin consistent with the Company’s risk management strategy.

Economic Hedges

For other risk management purposes, the Company enters into derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivative instruments are used to mitigate the risk of market volatility arising from borrowings and foreign currency denominated transactions. Changes in the fair value of economic hedges are recorded in earnings in the period in which the change occurs.

-25-

The expense (income) recognized in earnings related to economic hedges is as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2013						June 30, 2013
	Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange			Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange
	Contracts			Contracts			Contracts			Contracts
Truck, Parts and Other:
Cost of sales and revenues				$	.5					$	.4
Interest and other (income) expense, net					(1.3	)					.4
Financial Services:
Interest and other borrowing expenses	$	(.1	)		(4.9	)	$	(1.4	)		(4.6	)

	$	(.1	)	$	(5.7	)	$	(1.4	)	$	(3.8	)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012						June 30, 2012
	Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange			Interest-Rate			Foreign-Exchange
	Contracts			Contracts			Contracts			Contracts
Truck, Parts and Other:
Cost of sales and revenues				$	(.3	)				$	(.3	)
Interest and other (income) expense, net					(1.8	)					(2.4	)
Financial Services:
Interest and other borrowing expenses	$	(1.1	)		1.4		$	(.1	)		1.1

	$	(1.1	)	$	(.7	)	$	(.1	)	$	(1.6	)

NOTE J – Fair Value Measurements

Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value are either observable or unobservable. These inputs have been categorized into the fair value hierarchy described below.

Level 1 – Valuations are based on quoted prices that the Company has the ability to obtain in actively traded markets for identical assets or liabilities. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market or exchange traded market, valuation of these instruments does not require a significant degree of judgment.

Level 2 – Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 – Valuations are based on model-based techniques for which some or all of the assumptions are obtained from indirect market information that is significant to the overall fair value measurement and which require a significant degree of management judgment.

There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels at the end of the reporting period.

-26-

The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to measure fair value for assets and liabilities subject to recurring fair value measurements.

Marketable Debt Securities: The Company’s marketable debt securities consist of municipal bonds, government obligations, investment-grade corporate obligations, commercial paper, asset-backed securities and term deposits. The fair value of U.S. government obligations is determined using the market approach and is based on quoted prices in active markets and are categorized as Level 1.

The fair value of non-U.S. government bonds, municipal bonds, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities, commercial paper, and term deposits is determined using the market approach and is primarily based on matrix pricing as a practical expedient which does not rely exclusively on quoted prices for a specific security. Significant inputs used to determine fair value include interest rates, yield curves, credit rating of the security and other observable market information and are categorized as Level 2.

Derivative Financial Instruments: The Company’s derivative contracts consist of interest-rate swaps, cross currency swaps and foreign currency exchange contracts. These derivative contracts are traded over the counter, and their fair value is determined using industry standard valuation models, which are based on the income approach (i.e., discounted cash flows). The significant observable inputs into the valuation models include interest rates, yield curves, currency exchange rates, credit default swap spreads and forward spot rates and are categorized as Level 2.

Assets and Liabilities Subject to Recurring Fair Value Measurement

The Company’s assets and liabilities subject to recurring fair value measurements are either Level 1 or Level 2 as follows:

At June 30, 2013

Level 1

Level 2

Total

Assets:

Marketable debt securities

U.S. tax-exempt securities

207.1

U.S. corporate securities

65.7

U.S. government and agency securities

Non-U.S. corporate securities

492.2

Non-U.S. government securities

317.0

Other debt securities

99.2

Total marketable debt securities

1,181.4

1,181.8

Derivatives

Cross currency swaps

38.1

Interest-rate swaps

4.3

Foreign-exchange contracts

5.0

Total derivative assets

47.4

Liabilities:

Derivatives

Cross currency swaps

28.6

Interest-rate swaps

28.1

Foreign-exchange contracts

Total derivative liabilities

57.5

-27-


At December 31, 2012	Level 1		Level 2		Total
Assets:
Marketable debt securities
U.S. tax-exempt securities			$	218.6	$	218.6
U.S. corporate securities				60.1		60.1
U.S. government and agency securities	$	.6		.2		.8
Non-U.S. corporate securities				448.7		448.7
Non-U.S. government securities				355.0		355.0
Other debt securities				109.5		109.5

Total marketable debt securities	$	.6	$	1,192.1	$	1,192.7


Derivatives
Cross currency swaps			$	3.0	$	3.0
Interest-rate swaps				1.6		1.6
Foreign-exchange contracts				.5		.5

Total derivative assets			$	5.1	$	5.1


Liabilities:
Derivatives
Cross currency swaps			$	74.1	$	74.1
Interest-rate swaps				38.2		38.2
Foreign-exchange contracts				.7		.7

Total derivative liabilities			$	113.0	$	113.0

Fair Value Disclosure of Other Financial Instruments

For financial instruments that are not recognized at fair value, the Company uses the following methods and assumptions to determine the fair value. These instruments are categorized as Level 2, except cash which is categorized as Level 1 and fixed-rate loans which are categorized as Level 3.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Carrying amounts approximate fair value.

Financial Services Net Receivables: For floating-rate loans, wholesale financings, and operating lease and other trade receivables, carrying values approximate fair values. For fixed-rate loans, fair values are estimated using the income approach by discounting cash flows to their present value based on current rates for comparable loans. Finance lease receivables and related allowance for credit losses have been excluded from the accompanying table.

Debt: The carrying amounts of financial services commercial paper, variable-rate bank loans and variable-rate term notes approximate fair value. For fixed-rate debt, fair values are estimated using the income approach by discounting cash flows to their present value based on current rates for comparable debt.

-28-

The Company’s estimate of fair value for fixed-rate loans and debt that are not carried at fair value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was as follows:

June 30, 2013

December 31, 2012

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Assets:

Financial Services fixed-rate loans

3,412.0

3,454.3

3,361.7

3,434.8

Liabilities:

Truck, Parts and Other fixed-rate debt

150.0

155.9

150.0

160.6

Financial Services fixed-rate debt

3,494.7

3,533.6

3,277.2

3,350.5

NOTE K – Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has several defined benefit pension plans, which cover a majority of its employees. The following information details the components of net pension expense for the Company’s defined benefit plans:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Service cost	$	17.8		$	14.9		$	36.7		$	32.0
Interest on projected benefit obligation		20.1			20.7			40.4			40.7
Expected return on assets		(29.7	)		(27.8	)		(59.6	)		(55.2	)
Amortization of prior service costs		.3			.4			.6			.8
Recognized actuarial loss		11.1			11.0			22.0			21.6

Net pension expense	$	19.6		$	19.2		$	40.1		$	39.9

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company contributed $2.7 and $6.1 to its pension plans, respectively, and $2.7 and $85.4 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

-29-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW:

PACCAR is a global technology company whose Truck segment includes the design and manufacture of high-quality, light-, medium- and heavy-duty commercial trucks. In North America, trucks are sold under the Kenworth and Peterbilt nameplates, in Europe, under the DAF nameplate and in Australia and South America, under the Kenworth and DAF nameplates. The Parts segment includes the distribution of aftermarket parts for trucks and related commercial vehicles. The Company’s Financial Services segment (PFS) derives its earnings primarily from financing or leasing PACCAR products in North America, Europe and Australia. The Company’s Other business is the manufacturing and marketing of industrial winches.

Consolidated net sales and revenues in the second quarter and first six months of 2013 were $4.30 billion and $8.22 billion compared to $4.46 billion and $9.23 billion from the same periods in 2012. Truck unit sales decreased in the second quarter and first half of 2013 to 34,700 units and 65,300 units from 37,800 units and 77,600 units in the second quarter and first six months of 2012, primarily due to lower industry retail sales in the U.S. and Canada. Aftermarket parts sales in the second quarter of 2013 were $709.5 million compared to $666.2 million in the second quarter in 2012 primarily due to strong demand worldwide. Aftermarket parts sales in the first half of 2013 were $1,376.9 million compared to $1,346.6 million in the same period of 2012.

Second quarter 2013 net income was $291.6 million ($.82 per diluted share) compared to $297.2 million ($.83 per diluted share) in the second quarter of 2012. For the first six months of 2013, net income was $527.7 million ($1.49 per diluted share) compared to $624.5 million ($1.75 per diluted share) in the first six months of 2012. The results reflect lower sales in the Truck segment compared to the same period in 2012, partially offset by improved Financial Services and Parts segment results.

Construction of PACCAR’s new 300,000 square foot DAF factory in Ponta Grossa, Brasil began in January 2012. Construction is progressing on schedule with production of DAF trucks scheduled to begin in late 2013.

In the second quarter and first half of 2013, the Company’s research and development expenses (R&D) were $61.8 million and $133.9 million compared to $73.8 million and $146.1 million in the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively. R&D costs declined as new truck models and engines began production. R&D is focused on engine and other new vehicle development.

Truck and Parts Outlook

Truck industry retail sales in the U.S. and Canada in 2013 are expected to be 210,000-230,000 units compared to 224,900 units in 2012, reflecting the ongoing replacement of the aging industry fleet and some anticipated improvement in the economy. The 2013 truck industry registrations for over 16-tonne vehicles in Europe are expected to be 210,000-230,000 units compared to 221,500 units in 2012 as some customers are purchasing Euro 5 vehicles ahead of the introduction of the Euro 6 emission requirement in 2014.

Parts industry aftermarket sales in 2013 in the U.S. and Canada are expected to modestly increase due to some economic growth and an aging truck fleet. Parts industry aftermarket sales in Europe in 2013 are expected to be comparable to 2012, reflecting uneven economic conditions in the Eurozone.

Capital investments in 2013 are expected to be $425 to $475 million, focused on the completion of the truck factory in Brasil and the development of new products and services worldwide. R&D in 2013 is expected to be $250 to $275 million, focused on comprehensive product development programs and enhanced manufacturing operating efficiency.

-30-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

Financial Services Outlook

Based on the 2013 truck market outlook, average earning assets this year are expected to increase approximately 5% as new business financing from truck sales exceeds customer collections. Current levels of freight tonnage, freight rates and fleet utilization are contributing to customers’ profitability and cash flow. If current freight transportation conditions decline due to weaker economic conditions, past due accounts, truck repossessions and credit losses would likely increase from the current low levels.

See the Forward Looking Statement section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis for factors that may affect the Truck, Parts and Financial Services outlook.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
($ in millions, except per share amounts)	June 30						June 30
Six Months Ended June 30,	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net sales and revenues:
Truck	$	3,270.0		$	3,483.7		$	6,203.3		$	7,278.1
Parts		709.5			666.2			1,376.9			1,346.6
Other		32.2			41.2			62.7			81.1

Truck, Parts and Other		4,011.7			4,191.1			7,642.9			8,705.8
Financial Services		288.8			266.1			581.9			527.5

	$	4,300.5		$	4,457.2		$	8,224.8		$	9,233.3

Income (loss) before taxes:
Truck	$	238.4		$	272.1		$	403.4		$	572.4
Parts		109.4			89.9			204.7			191.5
Other		(4.4	)		(1.3	)		(14.1	)		(4.4	)

Truck, Parts and Other		343.4			360.7			594.0			759.5
Financial Services		81.5			77.4			161.6			148.7
Investment income		8.0			8.2			14.5			17.1
Income taxes		(141.3	)		(149.1	)		(242.4	)		(300.8	)

Net income	$	291.6		$	297.2		$	527.7		$	624.5

Diluted earnings per share	$	.82		$	.83		$	1.49		$	1.75

Return on Revenues		6.8	%		6.7	%		6.4	%		6.8	%

The following provides an analysis of the results of operations for the Company’s three reportable segments, Truck, Parts and Financial Services. Where possible, the Company has quantified the factors identified in the following discussion and analysis. In cases where it is not possible to quantify the impact of factors, the Company lists them in estimated order of importance. Factors for which the Company is unable to specifically quantify the impact include market demand, fuel prices, freight tonnage and economic conditions affecting the Company’s results of operations.

-31-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

2013 Compared to 2012:

Truck

The Company’s Truck segment accounted for 76.0% and 75.4% of revenues in the second quarter and first six months of 2013 compared to 78.2% and 78.8% in the second quarter and first six months of 2012.


($ in millions)	Three Months Ended June 30									Six Months Ended June 30
	2013			2012			% Change			2013			2012			% Change
Truck net sales and revenues:
U.S. and Canada	$	1,842.3		$	2,053.2			(10	)	$	3,452.5		$	4,429.6			(22	)
Europe		829.1			790.7			5			1,680.5			1,612.7			4
Mexico, South America, Australia and Other		598.6			639.8			(6	)		1,070.3			1,235.8			(13	)

	$	3,270.0		$	3,483.7			(6	)	$	6,203.3		$	7,278.1			(15	)

Truck income before income taxes	$	238.4		$	272.1			(12	)	$	403.4		$	572.4			(30	)

Pre-tax return on revenues		7.3	%		7.8	%					6.5	%		7.9	%

The Company’s worldwide truck net sales and revenues in the second quarter of 2013 of $3.27 billion decreased from the second quarter of 2012 due to lower truck deliveries in the U.S. and Canada ($210.9 million) and Colombia ($103.5 million), partially offset by higher truck deliveries in Mexico ($46.7 million) and Europe ($38.4 million). In the first six months of 2013, the Company’s worldwide truck sales and revenues decreased compared to the same period in 2012 due to lower market demand in the U.S. and Canada and Colombia.

For the second quarter and first half of 2013, Truck segment income before income taxes reflects lower truck unit deliveries and price realization due to slower economic growth.

The second quarter and first six months of 2013 Truck income before income taxes was also affected by the translation of weaker foreign currencies, primarily the British pound. Truck income before income taxes decreased by $7.1 million and $7.5 million, respectively, due to the translation effect of currencies in the second quarter and first six months of 2013.

The Company’s new truck deliveries are summarized below:


	Three Months Ended June 30							Six Months Ended June 30
	2013		2012		% Change			2013		2012		% Change
U.S.		15,300		17,500		(13	)		28,000		36,800		(24	)
Canada		2,600		3,100		(16	)		5,300		6,700		(21	)

U.S. and Canada		17,900		20,600		(13	)		33,300		43,500		(23	)
Europe		11,100		11,000		1			21,700		22,000		(1	)
Mexico, South America, Australia and Other		5,700		6,200		(8	)		10,300		12,100		(15	)

Total units		34,700		37,800		(8	)		65,300		77,600		(16	)

The truck markets in the U.S. and Canada and South America declined in the second quarter of 2013 compared to 2012, partially offset by slightly higher deliveries in Mexico and Europe.

-32-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

Industry retail sales in the heavy-duty market in the U.S. and Canada decreased to 99,600 units in the first six months of 2013 compared to 114,900 units in the same period of 2012. The Company’s heavy-duty truck retail market share was 27.6% in the first six months of 2013 compared to 29.9% in the same period of 2012. The medium-duty market was 32,800 units in the first six months of 2013 compared to 34,800 units in the same period of 2012. The Company’s medium-duty market share was 14.1% in the first six months of 2013 compared to 14.5% in the same period of 2012.

The over 16-tonne truck market in Western and Central Europe was 103,400 units in the first six months of 2013 compared to 116,800 units in the same period of 2012. The Company’s market share was 15.8% in the first six months of 2013, a decrease from 15.9% in the same period of 2012. The 6- to 16-tonne market in the first six months of 2013 was 25,600 units compared to 28,700 units in the same period of 2012. DAF market share in the 6- to 16-tonne market in the first six months of 2013 was 11.5% compared to 11.6% in the same period of 2012.

The major factors for the change in net sales and revenues, cost of sales and revenues, and gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2013 for the Truck segment are as follows:


($ in millions)	Net Sales			Cost of Sales			Gross Margin
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012	$	3,483.7		$	3,100.9		$	382.8
Increase (decrease)
Truck delivery volume		(173.6	)		(146.9	)		(26.7	)
Average truck sales prices		(57.6	)					(57.6	)
Average per truck material, labor and other direct costs					(40.1	)		40.1
Factory overhead and other indirect costs					5.9			(5.9	)
Operating lease income and depreciation expense		21.3			21.2			.1
Currency translation		(3.8	)		2.3			(6.1	)

Total decrease		(213.7	)		(157.6	)		(56.1	)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013	$	3,270.0		$	2,943.3		$	326.7

•

Truck delivery volume reflects lower truck deliveries in the U.S. and Canada and Colombia, partially offset by higher deliveries in Europe and Mexico. Average truck sales prices decreased sales by $57.6 million reflecting decreased price realization from lower market demand.

•

Average truck cost decreased $40.1 million primarily due to lower direct labor and other direct costs.

•

Factory overhead and other indirect costs increased $5.9 million primarily due to higher depreciation expense ($2.8 million) and salaries and related costs ($1.6 million).

•

Operating lease income and depreciation expense increased due to a higher volume of operating leases.

•

Truck gross margin in the second quarter of 2013 of 10.0% decreased from 11.0% in the same period in 2012 primarily from lower truck volume and price realization as noted above.

-33-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

The major factors for the change in net sales and revenues, cost of sales and revenues, and gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2013 for the Truck segment are as follows:


	Net Sales			Cost of Sales			Gross Margin
($ in millions)	Net Sales			Cost of Sales			Gross Margin
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012	$	7,278.1		$	6,486.0		$	792.1
Increase (decrease)
Truck delivery volume		(1,042.6	)		(877.8	)		(164.8	)
Average truck sales prices		(68.4	)					(68.4	)
Average per truck material, labor and other direct costs					(28.9	)		28.9
Factory overhead and other indirect costs					(13.2	)		13.2
Operating lease income and depreciation expense		41.9			41.0			.9
Currency translation		(5.7	)		2.5			(8.2	)

Total decrease		(1,074.8	)		(876.4	)		(198.4	)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013	$	6,203.3		$	5,609.6		$	593.7

•

Truck delivery volume reflects lower truck deliveries in the U.S. and Canada and Colombia. Average truck sales prices decreased sales by $68.4 million reflecting decreased price realization from lower market demand.

•

Average truck cost decreased $28.9 million primarily due to lower direct labor and other direct costs.

•

Factory overhead and other indirect costs decreased $13.2 million primarily due to lower manufacturing supplies and maintenance ($12.4 million) and salaries and related costs ($5.4 million) resulting from lower production levels, partially offset by higher depreciation expense ($3.0 million).

•

Operating lease income and depreciation expense increased due to a higher volume of operating leases.

•

Truck gross margin in the first six months of 2013 of 9.6% decreased from 10.9% in the same period in 2012 primarily from lower truck volume as noted above.

Truck SG&A of $50.4 million in the second quarter of 2013 decreased from $60.3 million in the second quarter of 2012. The lower spending for the second quarter of 2013 is primarily due to lower sales and marketing expenses of $7.5 million. In the first six months of 2013, Truck SG&A was $103.5 million compared to $121.3 million in the first six months of 2012. The lower spending for the first six months of 2013 was primarily due to lower sales and marketing expenses of $10.6 million and ongoing cost controls.

As a percentage of sales, Truck SG&A decreased to 1.5% in the second quarter of 2013 from 1.7% in the second quarter of 2012. For the first six months of 2013, Truck SG&A as a percentage of sales was 1.7%, unchanged from the first six months of 2012.

-34-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

Parts

The Company’s Parts segment accounted for 16.5% and 16.7% of revenues in the second quarter and first six months of 2013 compared to 14.9% and 14.6% in the second quarter and first six months of 2012.


($ in millions)	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2013			2012			% Change		2013			2012			% Change
Parts net sales and revenues:
U.S. and Canada	$	408.7		$	388.6			5	$	791.4		$	768.1			3
Europe		204.6			194.5			5		404.6			411.0			(2	)
Mexico, South America, Australia and Other		96.2			83.1			16		180.9			167.5			8

	$	709.5		$	666.2			6	$	1,376.9		$	1,346.6			2

Parts income before income taxes	$	109.4		$	89.9			22	$	204.7		$	191.5			7


Pre-tax return on revenues		15.4	%		13.5	%				14.9	%		14.2	%

The Company’s worldwide parts net sales and revenues increased in the second quarter primarily due to higher aftermarket demand worldwide. For the first half of 2013, parts net sales and revenues increased due to higher market demand in all markets except Europe. The increase in Parts segment income before taxes and pretax return on revenues in the second quarter and first half of 2013 was primarily due to higher sales, gross margins and cost control.

The major factors for the change in net sales and revenues, cost of sales and revenues, and gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2013 for the Parts segment are as follows:


($ in millions)	Net Sales			Cost of Sales		Gross Margin
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012	$	666.2		$	499.5	$	166.7
Increase (decrease)
Aftermarket parts volume		16.6			12.0		4.6
Average aftermarket parts sales prices		27.1					27.1
Average aftermarket parts direct costs					10.5		(10.5	)
Warehouse and other indirect costs					2.2		(2.2	)
Currency translation		(.4	)		.4		(.8	)

Total increase		43.3			25.1		18.2

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013	$	709.5		$	524.6	$	184.9

•

Higher market demand in all markets resulted in increased aftermarket parts sales volume of $16.6 million and related cost of sales by $12.0 million.

•

Average aftermarket parts sales prices increased sales by $27.1 million reflecting improved price realization.

•

Average aftermarket parts direct costs increased $10.5 million from higher material costs.

•

Warehouse and other indirect costs increased $2.2 million primarily due to higher costs from warehouse capacity expansion to support higher sales volume.

•

Parts gross margins in the second quarter of 2013 of 26.1% increased from 25.0% in the second quarter of 2012 due to the factors noted above.

-35-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

The major factors for the change in net sales and revenues, cost of sales and revenues, and gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2013 for the Parts segment are as follows:


($ in millions)	Net Sales			Cost of Sales		Gross Margin
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012	$	1,346.6		$	1,004.0	$	342.6
Increase (decrease)
Aftermarket parts volume		3.4			.9		2.5
Average aftermarket parts sales prices		27.3					27.3
Average aftermarket parts direct costs					12.6		(12.6	)
Warehouse and other indirect costs					4.0		(4.0	)
Currency translation		(.4	)		.7		(1.1	)

Total increase		30.3			18.2		12.1

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013	$	1,376.9		$	1,022.2	$	354.7

•

Higher market demand in all markets except Europe resulted in increased aftermarket parts sales volume of $3.4 million and related cost of sales by $.9 million.

•

Average aftermarket parts sales prices increased sales by $27.3 million reflecting improved price realization.

•

Average aftermarket parts direct costs increased $12.6 million from higher material costs.

•

Warehouse and other indirect costs increased $4.0 million primarily due to higher costs from warehouse capacity expansion to support sales volume.

•

Parts gross margins in the first half of 2013 of 25.8% increased from 25.4% in the first half of 2012 due to the factors noted above.

Parts SG&A was $51.0 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $52.5 million in the second quarter of 2012. In the first six months of 2013, Parts SG&A was $101.8 million compared to $104.7 million in the first six months of 2012. The lower spending for the first six months of 2013 is primarily due to lower sales and marketing expenses of $2.8 million.

As a percentage of sales, Parts SG&A decreased to 7.2% in the second quarter of 2013 from 7.9% in the second quarter of 2012, reflecting higher sales volumes and lower spending. For the first six months of 2013, Parts SG&A as a percentage of sales was 7.4%, down from 7.8% in the first six months of 2012, due to lower sales and marketing expenses.

-36-

PACCAR Inc - Form 10-Q

Financial Services

The Company’s Financial Services segment accounted for 6.7% and 7.1% of revenues in the second quarter and first six months of 2013 compared to 6.0% and 5.7% in the second quarter and first six months of 2012.


($ in millions)	Three Months Ended June 30							Six Months Ended June 30
	2013		2012		% Change			2013		2012		% Change
New loan and lease volume:
U.S. and Canada	$	704.2	$	836.9		(16	)	$	1,181.0	$	1,388.6		(15	)
Europe		199.2		220.4		(10	)		390.5		443.7		(12	)
Mexico and Australia		243.0		191.3		27			436.9		346.4		26

	$	1,146.4	$	1,248.6		(8	)	$	2,008.4	$	2,178.7		(8	)
New loan and lease volume by product:
Loans and finance leases	$	894.5	$	945.0		(5	)	$	1,575.1	$	1,718.9		(8	)
Equipment on operating leases		251.9		303.6		(17	)		433.3		459.8		(6	)

	$	1,146.4	$	1,248.6		(8	)	$	2,008.4	$	2,178.7		(8	)
New loan and lease unit volume:
Loans and finance leases		8,420		9,120		(8	)		15,120		16,970		(11	)
Equipment on operating leases		2,440		2,680		(9	)		4,240		4,230

		10,860		11,800		(8	)		19,360		21,200		(9	)
Average earning assets:
U.S. and Canada	$	6,299.5	$	5,908.1		7		$	6,221.6	$	5,630.6		10
Europe		2,384.1		2,286.6		4			2,380.3		2,296.0		4
Mexico and Australia		1,781.8		1,470.3		21			1,758.4		1,456.6		21

	$	10,465.4	$	9,665.0		8		$	10,360.3	$	9,383.2		10
Average earning assets by product:
Loans and finance leases	$	6,790.5	$	6,064.8		12		$	6,788.3	$	5,956.3		14
Dealer wholesale financing		1,493.6		1,715.9		(13	)		1,417.8		1,576.9		(10	)
Equipment on lease and other		2,181.3		1,884.3		16			2,154.2		1,850.0		16

	$	10,465.4	$	9,665.0		8		$	10,360.3	$	9,383.2		10
Revenue:
U.S. and Canada	$	153.5	$	141.9		8		$	314.3	$	278.4

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents