Form 10-K
Table of Contents

 

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009    Commission File Number 0-14384

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

OKLAHOMA   73-1221379
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

101 North Broadway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (405) 270-1086

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value Per Share   NASDAQ Global Select Market System

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant computed using the last sale price on June 30, 2009 was approximately $249,853,000.

As of February 28, 2010, there were 15,318,641 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the May 27, 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the registrant (the “2010 Proxy Statement”) to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

FORM 10-K

CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX

 

Item

   PART I    Page
  1.   

Business.

   1
  1a.   

Risk Factors.

   13
  1b.   

Unresolved Staff Comments.

   21
  2.   

Properties.

   21
  3.   

Legal Proceedings.

   22
  4.   

Reserved.

   22
   PART II   
  5.   

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

   22
  6.   

Selected Financial Data.

   23
  7.   

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

   23
  7A.   

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

   24
  8.   

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

   24
  9.   

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

   24
  9A.   

Controls and Procedures.

   24
  9B.   

Other Information.

   24
   PART III   
  10.   

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

   25
  11.   

Executive Compensation.

   25
  12.   

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

   25
  13.   

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.

   25
  14.   

Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

   25
   PART IV   
  15.   

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

   25
Signatures.    29
Financial Information.    Appendix A


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business.

General

BancFirst Corporation (the “Company”) is an Oklahoma business corporation and a financial holding company under Federal law. It conducts virtually all of its operating activities through its principal wholly-owned subsidiary, BancFirst (the “Bank” or “BancFirst”), a state-chartered bank headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The Company also owns 100% of the common securities of BFC Capital Trust II, a Delaware Business Trust, 100% of Council Oak Partners LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company engaging in investing activities, 100% of Wilcox, Jones & McGrath, Inc., an Oklahoma business corporation operating as an independent insurance agency and 100% of First State Bank (Jones), a state-chartered bank headquartered in Jones, Oklahoma that the Company acquired in December 2009 and was merged into BancFirst in early March 2010.

The Company was incorporated as United Community Corporation in July 1984 for the purpose of becoming a bank holding company. In June 1985, it merged with seven Oklahoma bank holding companies that had operated under common ownership and the Company has conducted business as a bank holding company since that time. Over the next several years the Company acquired additional banks and bank holding companies, and in November 1988 the Company changed its name to BancFirst Corporation. Effective April 1, 1989, the Company consolidated its 12 subsidiary banks and formed BancFirst. Over the intervening decades, the Company has continued to expand through acquisitions and de-novo branches. BancFirst currently has 85 banking locations serving 47 communities throughout Oklahoma.

The Company’s strategy focuses on providing a full range of commercial banking services to retail customers and small to medium-sized businesses in both the non-metropolitan trade centers of Oklahoma and the metropolitan markets of Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Lawton, Muskogee, Norman and Shawnee. The Company operates as a “super community bank”, managing its community banking offices on a decentralized basis, which permits them to be responsive to local customer needs. Underwriting, funding, customer service and pricing decisions are made by Presidents in each market within the Company’s strategic parameters. At the same time, the Company generally has a larger lending capacity, broader product line and greater operational scale than its principal competitors in the non-metropolitan market areas (which typically are independently-owned community banks). In the metropolitan markets served by the Company, the Company’s strategy is to focus on the needs of local businesses that are not served adequately by larger institutions.

The Bank maintains a strong community orientation by, among other things, selecting members of the communities in which the Bank’s branches operate to local consulting boards that assist in marketing and providing feedback on the Bank’s products and services to meet customer needs. As a result of the development of broad banking relationships with its customers and community branch network, the Bank’s lending and investing activities are funded almost entirely by core deposits.

The Bank centralizes virtually all of its processing, support and investment functions in order to achieve consistency and operational efficiencies. The Bank maintains centralized control functions such as operations support, bookkeeping, accounting, loan review, compliance and internal auditing to ensure effective risk management. The Bank also provides centrally certain specialized financial services that require unique expertise.

The Bank provides a wide range of retail and commercial banking services, including: commercial, real estate, agricultural and consumer lending; depository and funds transfer services; collections; safe deposit boxes; cash management services; retail brokerage services; and other services tailored for both individual and corporate customers. The Bank also offers trust services and acts as executor, administrator, trustee, transfer agent and in various other fiduciary capacities. Through its Technology and Operations Center, the Bank provides item processing, research and other correspondent banking services to financial institutions and governmental units.

 

1


Table of Contents

The Bank’s primary lending activity is the financing of business and industry in its market areas. Its commercial loan customers are generally small to medium-sized businesses engaged in light manufacturing, local wholesale and retail trade, commercial and residential real estate development and construction, services, agriculture, and the energy industry. Most forms of commercial lending are offered, including commercial mortgages, other forms of asset-based financing and working capital lines of credit. In addition, the Bank offers Small Business Administration (“SBA”) guaranteed loans through BancFirst Commercial Capital, a division established in 1991.

Consumer lending activities of the Bank consist of traditional forms of financing for automobiles, residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, and other personal loans. In addition, the Bank is one of Oklahoma’s largest providers of guaranteed student loans. Residential loans consist primarily of home loans in non-metropolitan areas which are generally shorter in duration than typical mortgages and reprice within five years.

The Bank’s range of deposit services include checking accounts, Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, sweep accounts, club accounts, individual retirement accounts and certificates of deposit. Overdraft protection and autodraft services are also offered. Deposits of the Bank are insured by the Bank Insurance Fund administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). In addition, certain Bank employees are licensed insurance agents qualified to offer tax deferred annuities.

Trust services offered through the Bank’s Trust and Investment Management Division (the “Trust Division”) consist primarily of investment management and administration of trusts for individuals, corporations and employee benefit plans. Investment options include pooled equity and fixed income funds managed by the Trust Division and advised by nationally recognized investment management firms. In addition, the Trust Division serves as bond trustee and paying agent for various Oklahoma municipalities and governmental entities.

BancFirst has the following principal subsidiaries: Council Oak Investment Corporation, a small business investment corporation, Council Oak Real Estate, Inc., a real estate investment company, BancFirst Agency, Inc., a credit life insurance agency, Lenders Collection Corporation, which is engaged in collection of troubled loans assigned to it by BancFirst, and BancFirst Community Development Corporation, a certified community development entity. All of these companies are Oklahoma corporations.

The Company had approximately 1,428 and 1,457 full-time equivalent employees as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Its principal executive offices are located at 101 North Broadway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, telephone number (405) 270-1086.

Market Areas and Competition

The banking environment in Oklahoma is very competitive. The geographic dispersion of the Company’s banking locations presents several different levels and types of competition. In general, however, each location competes with other banking institutions, savings and loan associations, brokerage firms, personal loan finance companies and credit unions within their respective market areas. The communities in which the Bank maintains offices are generally local trade centers throughout Oklahoma. The major areas of competition include interest rates charged on loans, underwriting terms and conditions, interest rates paid on deposits, fees on non-credit services, levels of service charges on deposits, completeness of product line and quality of service.

Management believes the Company is in an advantageous competitive position operating as a “super community bank.” Under this strategy, the Company provides a broad line of financial products and services to small to medium-sized businesses and consumers through full service community banking offices with decentralized management, while achieving operating efficiency and product scale through product standardization and centralization of processing and other functions. Each full service banking office has senior management with significant lending experience who exercise substantial autonomy over credit and pricing

 

2


Table of Contents

decisions. This decentralized management approach, coupled with continuity of service by the same staff members, enables the Bank to develop long-term customer relationships, maintain high quality service and respond quickly to customer needs. The majority of its competitors in the non-metropolitan areas are much smaller, and neither offer the range of products and services nor have the lending capacity of BancFirst. In the metropolitan communities, the Company’s strategy is to be more responsive to, and more focused on, the needs of local businesses that are not served effectively by larger institutions. As reported by the FDIC, the Company’s market share of deposits for Oklahoma was 5.64% as of June 30, 2009 and 5.37% as of June 30, 2008.

Marketing to existing and potential customers is performed through a variety of media advertising, direct mail and direct personal contacts. The Company monitors the needs of its customer base through its Product Development Group, which develops and enhances products and services in response to such needs. Sales, customer service and product training are coordinated with incentive programs to motivate employees to cross-sell the Bank’s products and services.

Control of the Company

Affiliates of the Company beneficially own approximately 53% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding as of February 28, 2010. Under Oklahoma law, holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock are able to elect all of the directors and approve significant corporate actions, including business combinations. Accordingly, the affiliates have the ability to control the business and affairs of the Company.

Supervision and Regulation

Banking is a complex, highly regulated industry. The Company’s growth and earnings performance and those of the Bank can be affected not only by management decisions and general and local economic conditions, but also by the statutes administered by, and the regulations and policies of, various governmental regulatory authorities.

These authorities include, but are not limited to, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”), the FDIC and the Oklahoma State Banking Department.

The primary goals of the bank regulatory framework are to maintain a safe and sound banking system and to facilitate the conduct of sound monetary policy. This regulatory framework is intended primarily for the protection of a financial institution’s depositors, rather than the institution’s shareholders and creditors. The following discussion describes certain of the material elements of the regulatory framework applicable to bank holding companies and financial holding companies and their subsidiaries and provides certain specific information relevant to the Company, which is both a bank holding company and a financial holding company. The descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the specific statutes and regulations discussed. Further, such statutes, regulations and policies are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures, and federal and state regulatory agencies. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company, including changes in interpretation or implementation thereof, could have a material effect on the Company’s business.

Regulatory Agencies

As a financial holding company and a bank holding company, the Company is regulated under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “Bank Holding Company Act”), as amended by the 1999 financial modernization legislation known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLB Act”), as well as other federal and state laws governing the banking business. The GLB Act preserves the role of the Federal Reserve Board as the umbrella supervisor for both financial holding companies and bank holding companies while at the same time incorporating a system of functional regulation designed to take advantage of the strengths of the various federal

 

3


Table of Contents

and state regulators. In particular, the GLB Act replaces with more limited exemptions the broad exemption from Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulation that banks previously enjoyed, and it reaffirms that states are the regulators for the insurance activities of all persons who conduct such activities, including banks.

The Company’s banking subsidiary is subject to regulation and supervision by various regulatory authorities, including the Oklahoma State Banking Department and the FDIC. The Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates are also subject to various other laws, regulations, supervision and examination by other regulatory agencies, all of which directly or indirectly affect the operations and management of the Company and its ability to make distributions to shareholders.

Additionally, the Company’s common stock is registered with the SEC under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Consequently, the Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading and other restrictions and requirements of the SEC under the Exchange Act and, as a company whose shares are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System, the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (the “NASDAQ”).

Recent Legislation

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) was signed into law. The EESA authorized the Treasury to access up to $700 billion to protect the U.S. economy and restore confidence and stability to the financial markets. One such program under the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) was action by Treasury to make significant investments in U.S. financial institutions through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Treasury’s stated purpose for implementing the TARP Capital Purchase Program was to improve the capitalization of healthy institutions, which would improve the flow of credit to businesses and consumers, and boost the confidence of depositors, investors, and counterparties alike. All federal banking and thrift regulatory agencies encouraged eligible institutions to participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Company elected not to participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Management believes that current capital sources are sufficient to support organic growth, acquisitions within our current market areas, cash dividends on our common stock and periodic stock repurchases.

Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program

In November 2008, the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a final rule relating to the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLG Program”). The TLG Program was announced by the FDIC in October 2008, preceded by the determination of systemic risk by the Secretary of the Department of Treasury (after consultation with the President), as an initiative to counter the system-wide crisis in the nation’s financial sector. Under the TLG Program, the FDIC will (i) guarantee, through the earlier of maturity or December 31, 2012 (extended from June 30, 2012 by subsequent amendment), certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued by participating institutions on or after October 14, 2008, and before October 31, 2009 (extended from June 30, 2009 by subsequent amendment) and (ii) provide full FDIC deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, NOW accounts paying less than 0.5% interest per annum and Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts held at participating FDIC insured institutions through June 30, 2010 (extended from December 31, 2009, subject to an opt-out provision, by subsequent amendment). The Company has elected to participate in the full FDIC deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts only. The fee assessment for deposit insurance coverage was 10 basis points per quarter during 2009 on amounts in covered accounts exceeding $250,000. During the six-month extension period in 2010, the fee assessment increases to 15 basis points per quarter for institutions that are in Risk Category 1 of the risk-based premium system.

 

4


Table of Contents

Incentive Compensation

On October 22, 2009, the Federal Reserve issued a comprehensive proposal on incentive compensation policies (the “Incentive Compensation Proposal”) intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The Incentive Compensation Proposal, which covers all employees who have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors. Banking organizations are instructed to begin an immediate review of their incentive compensation policies to ensure that they do not encourage excessive risk-taking and implement corrective programs as needed. Where there are deficiencies in the incentive compensation arrangements, they must be immediately addressed.

The Federal Reserve will review, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as the Company, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews will be tailored to each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies.

In addition, on January 12, 2010, the FDIC announced that it would seek public comment on whether banks with compensation plans that encourage risky behavior should be charged at higher deposit assessment rates than such banks would otherwise be charged.

The scope and content of the U.S. banking regulators’ policies on executive compensation are continuing to develop and are likely to continue evolving in the near future. It cannot be determined at this time whether compliance with such policies will adversely affect the Company’s ability to hire, retain and motivate its key employees.

Other Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives

In June 2009, President Obama’s administration proposed a wide range of regulatory reforms that, if enacted, may have significant effects on the financial services industry in the United States. Significant aspects of the administration’s proposals that may affect the Company included, among other things, proposals: (i) to reassess and increase capital requirements for banks and bank holding companies and examine the types of instruments that qualify as regulatory capital; (ii) to combine the OCC and the Office of Thrift Supervision into a National Bank Supervisor with a unified federal bank charter; (iii) to expand the current eligibility requirements for financial holding companies such as the Company so that the financial holding company must be “well capitalized” and “well managed” on a consolidated basis; (iv) to create a federal consumer financial protection agency to be the primary federal consumer protection supervisor with broad examination, supervision and enforcement authority with respect to consumer financial products and services; (v) to further limit the ability of banks to engage in transactions with affiliates; and (vi) to subject all “over-the-counter” derivatives markets to comprehensive regulation.

The U.S. Congress, state lawmaking bodies and federal and state regulatory agencies continue to consider a number of wide-ranging and comprehensive proposals for altering the structure, regulation and competitive relationships of the nation’s financial institutions, including rules and regulations related to the administration’s proposals. Separate comprehensive financial reform bills intended to address the proposals set forth by the

 

5


Table of Contents

Obama administration were introduced in both houses of Congress in the second half of 2009 and remain under review by both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. In addition, both the U.S. Treasury Department and the Basel Committee have issued policy statements regarding proposed significant changes to the regulatory capital framework applicable to banking organizations as discussed above. The Company cannot predict whether or in what form further legislation or regulations may be adopted or the extent to which the Company may be affected thereby.

In addition to the specific proposals described above, from time to time, various legislative and regulatory initiatives are introduced in Congress and state legislatures, as well as by regulatory agencies. Such initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract the powers of bank holding companies and depository institutions or proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory system. Such legislation could change banking statutes and the operating environment of the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions. The Company cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted, and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or any of its subsidiaries could have a material effect on the Company.

Bank Holding Company Activities

“Financial in Nature” Requirement

As a bank holding company that has elected to become a financial holding company pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act, the Company may affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to activities that are financial in nature. “Financial in nature” activities include securities underwriting, dealing and market making, sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies, insurance underwriting and agency, merchant banking, and other activities that the Federal Reserve Board, in consultation with the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, determines from time to time to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity or is complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a safety and soundness risk.

Federal Reserve Board approval is not required for the Company to acquire a company (other than a bank holding company, bank or savings association) engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board. Prior Federal Reserve Board approval is required before the Company may acquire the beneficial ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of a bank holding company, bank or savings association.

Because the Company is a financial holding company, if its subsidiary bank receives a rating under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (“CRA”), of less than satisfactory, the Company will be prohibited, until the rating is raised to satisfactory or better, from engaging in new activities or acquiring companies other than bank holding companies, banks or savings associations, except that the Company could engage in new activities, or acquire companies engaged in activities, that are closely related to banking under the Bank Holding Company Act. In addition, if the Federal Reserve Board finds that the Company’s subsidiary bank is not well capitalized or well managed, the Company would be required to enter into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Board to comply with all applicable capital and management requirements and which may contain additional limitations or conditions. Until corrected, the Company would not be able to engage in any new activity or acquire companies engaged in activities that are not closely related to banking under the Bank Holding Company Act without prior Federal Reserve Board approval. If the Company fails to correct any such condition within a prescribed period, the Federal Reserve Board could order the Company to divest of its banking subsidiary or, in the alternative, to cease engaging in activities other than those closely related to banking under the Bank Holding Company Act. Although the Company is a financial holding company, it continues to maintain its status as a bank holding company for purposes of other Federal Reserve Board regulations.

 

6


Table of Contents

Interstate Banking

Under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Act (the “Riegle-Neal Act”), a bank holding company may acquire banks in states other than its home state, subject to any state requirement that the bank has been organized and operating for a minimum period of time, not to exceed five years, and the requirement that the bank holding company not control, prior to or following the proposed acquisition, more than 10% of the total amount of deposits of insured depository institutions nationwide or, unless the acquisition is the bank holding company’s initial entry into the state, more than 30% of such deposits in the state (or such lesser or greater amount set by the state).

The Riegle-Neal Act also authorizes banks to merge across state lines, thereby creating interstate branches. Banks are also permitted to acquire and to establish new branches in other states where authorized under the laws of those states.

Regulatory Approval

In determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition, federal bank regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on competition, financial condition, and future prospects including current and projected capital ratios and levels, the competence, experience, and integrity of management and record of compliance with laws and regulations, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, including the acquiring institution’s record of compliance under the CRA, and the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities.

Dividend Restrictions

Various federal and state statutory provisions and regulations limit the amount of dividends the Company’s subsidiary bank and certain other subsidiaries may pay without regulatory approval. The payment of dividends by any subsidiary bank may also be affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as the maintenance of adequate capital. If, in the opinion of the applicable regulatory authority, a bank under its jurisdiction is engaged in, or is about to engage in, an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition of the bank, could include the payment of dividends), such authority may require, after notice and hearing, that such bank cease and desist from such practice. The FDIC has formal and informal policies which provide that insured banks should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings.

Holding Company Structure

Transfer of Funds from Subsidiary Bank

The Bank is subject to restrictions under federal law that limit the transfer of funds or other items of value from the Bank to the Company and its nonbank subsidiaries (including affiliates) in so-called “covered transactions.” In general, covered transactions include loans and other extensions of credit, investments and asset purchases, as well as certain other transactions involving the transfer of value from a subsidiary bank to an affiliate or for the benefit of an affiliate. Unless an exemption applies, covered transactions by a subsidiary bank with a single affiliate are limited to 10% of the subsidiary bank’s capital and surplus and, with respect to all covered transactions with affiliates in the aggregate, to 20% of the subsidiary bank’s capital and surplus. Also, loans and extensions of credit to affiliates generally are required to be secured in specified amounts. A bank’s transactions with its nonbank affiliates are also generally required to be on arm’s length terms.

Source of Strength

Federal Reserve Board policy requires bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its subsidiary banks and, under appropriate circumstances, to commit resources to support each such subsidiary bank. This support may be required at times when the bank holding company may not have the resources to provide the support.

 

7


Table of Contents

The FDIC may order the assessment of the Company if the capital of the Bank were to become impaired. If the Company failed to pay the assessment within three months, the FDIC could order the sale of the Company’s stock in the Bank to cover the deficiency.

Capital loans by a bank holding company to its subsidiary bank are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and certain other indebtedness of the subsidiary bank. In addition, in the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of its subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.

Depositor Preference

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDI Act”) provides that, in the event of the “liquidation or other resolution” of an insured depository institution, the claims of depositors of the institution (including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors) and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver, will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution. If an insured depository institution fails, insured and uninsured depositors, along with the FDIC, will have priority in payment ahead of unsecured, nondeposit creditors with respect to any extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository institution.

Capital Requirements

The Federal Reserve Board, the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC have issued substantially similar risk-based and leverage capital guidelines applicable to United States banking organizations. In addition, these regulatory agencies may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum levels, whether because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth. The risk-based guidelines of the FDIC, the regulatory agency with oversight over state nonmember banks such as the Bank, define a three-tier capital framework. Core, or “Tier 1,” capital, consists of common and qualifying preferred stockholders’ equity, less certain intangibles and other adjustments. Supplementary, or “Tier 2,” capital includes, among other items, certain other debt and equity investments that do not qualify as Tier 1 capital. Market risk, or “Tier 3,” capital, includes qualifying unsecured subordinated debt. The sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital less investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries represents qualifying total capital. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated by dividing Tier 1 and total capital by risk-weighted assets. Assets and off-balance sheet exposures are assigned to one of four categories of risk-weights, based primarily on relative credit risk. The minimum Tier 1 capital ratio is 4% and the minimum total capital ratio is 8%.

Applicable banking regulations also require banking organizations such as the Bank to maintain a minimum “leverage ratio” (Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets) of 3%. The principal objective of this measure is to place a constraint on the maximum degree to which banks can leverage their equity capital base. These ratio requirements are minimums. Any institution operating at or near those levels would be expected by the regulators to have well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate risk exposures, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, and good earnings and, in general, would have to be considered a strong banking organization. All other organizations and any institutions experiencing or anticipating significant growth are expected to maintain capital ratios at least one to two percent above the minimum levels, and higher capital ratios can be required if warranted by particular circumstances or risk profile.

The various regulatory agencies have adopted substantially similar regulations that define the five capital categories (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized) for classifying insured depository institutions, using the total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios as the relevant capital measures, and requires the respective federal regulatory agencies to implement systems for “prompt corrective action” for insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements within such categories. Such regulations establish progressively more restrictive constraints on operations, management and capital distributions depending on the category in which an institution is classified.

 

8


Table of Contents

To be “well capitalized” under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a depository institution must have (i) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater, (ii) a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, and (iii) a leverage ratio of 5% or greater. An “adequately capitalized” bank is defined as one that has (i) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4% or greater, (ii) a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, and (iii) a leverage ratio of 4% or greater, and an “undercapitalized” bank is defined as one that has (i) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4%, (ii) a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%, and (iii) a leverage ratio of less than 4%. A bank is considered “significantly undercapitalized” if the bank has (i) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3%, (ii) a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, and (iii) a leverage ratio of less than 3%, and “critically undercapitalized” if the bank has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets equal to or less than 2%. The applicable federal regulatory agency for a bank that is “well capitalized” may reclassify it as an “adequately capitalized” or “undercapitalized” institution and subject it to the supervisory actions applicable to the next lower capital category, if it determines that the bank is in an unsafe or unsound condition or deems the bank to be engaged in an unsafe or unsound practice and not to have corrected the deficiency. Under federal banking laws, failure to meet the minimum regulatory capital requirements could subject a banking institution to a variety of enforcement remedies available to federal regulatory authorities, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC and seizure of the institution. As of December 31, 2009, the Bank had a Tier 1 ratio of 12.93%, a combined Tier 1 and Tier 2 ratio of 14.18%, and a leverage ratio of 8.71% and, accordingly, was considered to be “well capitalized” as of such date.

In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has established minimum risk based capital guidelines and leverage ratio guidelines for bank holding companies that are substantially similar to those adopted by bank regulatory agencies with respect to depository institutions. These guidelines provide for a minimum leverage ratio of 3% for bank holding companies that meet certain specified criteria, including those having the highest regulatory rating. All other bank holding companies generally are required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 4%. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had a Tier 1 ratio of 13.73%, a combined Tier 1 and Tier 2 ratio of 14.96%, and a leverage ratio of 9.23% and, accordingly, was in compliance with all of the Federal Reserve Board’s capital guidelines.

From time to time, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council propose changes and amendments to, and issue interpretations of, risk-based capital guidelines and related reporting instructions. Such proposals or interpretations could, if implemented in the future, affect the Company’s reported capital ratios and net risk-adjusted assets.

As an additional means to identify problems in the financial management of depository institutions, the FDI Act requires federal bank regulatory agencies to establish certain non-capital safety and soundness standards for institutions for which they are the primary federal regulator. The standards relate generally to operations and management, asset quality, interest rate exposure and executive compensation. The agencies are authorized to take action against institutions that fail to meet such standards.

The FDIC Act requires federal bank regulatory agencies to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to FDIC-insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. A depository institution’s treatment for purposes of the prompt corrective action provisions will depend upon how its capital levels compare to various capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation.

Deposit Insurance Assessments

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005, the FDIC adopted a new risk-based premium system for FDIC deposit insurance, providing for quarterly assessments of FDIC insured institutions based on their respective rankings in one of four risk categories depending upon their examination ratings and capital ratios. Beginning in 2007, well-capitalized institutions with certain “CAMELS” ratings (under the Uniform Financial Institutions Examination System adopted by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council)

 

9


Table of Contents

were grouped in Risk Category I and were assessed for deposit insurance premiums at an annual rate, with the assessment rate for the particular institution to be determined according to a formula based on a weighted average of the institution’s individual CAMELS component ratings plus either a set of financial ratios or the average ratings of its long-term debt. Institutions in Risk Categories II, III and IV are assessed premiums at progressively higher rates.

In December 2008, the FDIC issued a final rule that raised the then current assessment rates uniformly by 7 basis points for the first quarter of 2009 assessment, which resulted in annualized assessment rates for institutions in the highest risk category (“Risk Category 1 institutions”) ranging from 12 to 14 basis points (basis points representing cents per $100 of assessable deposits). In February 2009, the FDIC issued final rules to amend the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) restoration plan, change the risk-based assessment system and set assessment rates for Risk Category 1 institutions beginning in the second quarter of 2009. For Risk Category 1 institutions that have long-term debt issuer ratings, the FDIC determines the initial base assessment rate using a combination of weighted-average CAMELS component ratings, long-term debt issuer ratings (converted to numbers and averaged) and the financial ratios method assessment rate (as defined), each equally weighted. The initial base assessment rates for Risk Category 1 institutions range from 12 to 16 basis points, on an annualized basis. After the effect of potential base-rate adjustments, total base assessment rates range from 7 to 24 basis points. The potential adjustments to a Risk Category 1 institution’s initial base assessment rate include (i) a potential decrease of up to 5 basis points for long-term unsecured debt, including senior and subordinated debt and (ii) a potential increase of up to 8 basis points for secured liabilities in excess of 25% of domestic deposits.

In May 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule which levied a special assessment applicable to all insured depository institutions totaling 5 basis points of each institution’s total assets less Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, not to exceed 10 basis points of domestic deposits. The special assessment was part of the FDIC’s efforts to rebuild the DIF. The Company’s deposit insurance expense during 2009 included $1.9 million recognized in the second quarter related to the special assessment.

In November 2009, the FDIC issued a rule that required insured depository institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The FDIC also adopted a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011. In December 2009, the Company paid $20.2 million in prepaid risk-based assessments, which included $1.2 million related to the fourth quarter of 2009 that would have otherwise been payable in the first quarter of 2010. This amount is included in deposit insurance expense for 2009. The remaining $19.0 million in prepaid deposit insurance is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.

FDIC insurance expense totaled $7.8 million, $489,000 and $359,000 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. FDIC insurance expense includes deposit insurance assessments and Financing Corporation (“FICO”) assessments. All FDIC-insured depository institutions must pay an annual FICO assessment to provide funds for the payment of interest on bonds issued by FICO to capitalize the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. FDIC-insured depository institutions paid an average of 1.06 basis points on assessable deposits in 2009. The FDIC established the FICO assessment rate effective for the first quarter of 2010 at 1.06 basis points annually of assessable deposits.

Fiscal and Monetary Policies

The Company’s business and earnings are affected significantly by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies. The Company is particularly affected by the policies of the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Among the instruments of monetary policy available to the Federal Reserve Board are (a) conducting open market operations in United States government securities, (b) changing the discount rates of borrowings of depository institutions, (c) imposing or changing reserve requirements against depository institutions’ deposits, and (d) imposing or changing reserve requirements against certain borrowings by banks and their affiliates. These methods are used in varying degrees

 

10


Table of Contents

and combinations to directly affect the availability of bank loans and deposits, as well as the interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The policies of the Federal Reserve Board may have a material effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Privacy Provisions of the GLB Act

Federal banking regulators, as required under the GLB Act, have adopted rules limiting the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose nonpublic information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. The rules require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to nonaffiliated third parties. The privacy provisions of the GLB Act affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial services companies and conveyed to outside vendors.

Regulation of Securities Activities of Banks

The GLB Act also amended the federal securities laws to eliminate the blanket exceptions that banks traditionally have had from the definition of “broker” and “dealer”, but provided for certain transactional activities that would not be considered “brokerage” activities, which banks could effect without having to register as a broker. In September 2007, the Federal Reserve Board and the SEC approved Regulation R to clarify the permissible bank securities activities that can be conducted under the transactional exceptions provided by the GLB Act. Regulation R provides exceptions for networking arrangements with third party broker-dealers and authorizes compensation for bank employees who refer bank customers to such broker-dealers. The rules also provide exemptions to banks for effecting securities transactions in a trustee or fiduciary capacity, for sweeping funds into certain money market funds, and for accepting orders to effect securities transactions for custody accounts. Banks that conduct activities outside the exceptions provided by Regulation R had until the first day of their first fiscal year that commences after September 30, 2008 to either register as a broker-dealer or “push out” their brokerage activities to affiliated broker-dealers. Regulation R did not have an effect on the current securities activities that the Bank currently conducts for customers.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) implemented a broad range of corporate governance and accounting measures to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of disclosures under federal securities laws. The Company is subject to Sarbanes-Oxley because it is required to file periodic reports with the SEC under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things, Sarbanes-Oxley and/or its implementing regulations have established new membership requirements and additional responsibilities for the Company’s audit committee, imposed restrictions on the relationship between the Company and its outside independent auditors (including restrictions on the types of non-audit services the Company’s independent auditors may provide to it), imposed additional responsibilities for the Company’s external financial statements on its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, expanded the disclosure requirements for corporate insiders, required management to evaluate the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting, and required its auditors to issue a report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The NASDAQ has imposed a number of new corporate governance requirements as well.

Patriot Act

The USA Patriot Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”) is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. law enforcement agencies and intelligence communities to work together to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The Patriot Act substantially broadened the scope of the U.S. anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and

 

11


Table of Contents

expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The U.S. Treasury Department has issued a number of implementing regulations which apply various requirements of the Patriot Act to financial institutions such as the Bank. Those regulations impose new obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing, and has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act also requires federal bank regulators to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering in determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition.

Office of Foreign Asset Control

The Company and BancFirst, like all United States companies and individuals, are prohibited from transacting business with certain individuals and entities named on the Office of Foreign Asset Control’s list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. Failure to comply may result in fines and other penalties. The Office of Foreign Asset Control has issued guidance directed at financial institutions in which it asserts that it may, in its discretion, examine institutions determined to be high-risk or to be lacking in their efforts to comply with these prohibitions.

State Regulation

BancFirst is an Oklahoma-chartered state bank. Accordingly, BancFirst’s operations are subject to various requirements and restrictions of Oklahoma state law relating to loans, lending limits, interest rates payable on deposits, investments, mergers and acquisitions, borrowings, dividends, capital adequacy, and other matters. However, Oklahoma banking law specifically empowers a state-chartered bank such as BancFirst to exercise the same powers as are conferred upon national banks by the laws of the United States and the regulations and policies of the United States Comptroller of the Currency, unless otherwise prohibited or limited by the State Banking Commissioner or the State Banking Board. Accordingly, unless a specific provision of Oklahoma law otherwise provides, a state-chartered bank is empowered to conduct all activities that a national bank may conduct.

National banks are authorized by the GLB Act to engage, through “financial subsidiaries,” in any activity that is permissible for a financial holding company and any activity that the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Federal Reserve Board, determines is financial in nature or incidental to any such financial activity, except (1) insurance underwriting, (2) real estate development or real estate investment activities (unless otherwise permitted by law), (3) insurance company portfolio investments and (4) merchant banking. The authority of a national bank to invest in a financial subsidiary is subject to a number of conditions, including, among other things, requirements that the bank must be well managed and well capitalized (after deducting from the bank’s capital outstanding investments in financial subsidiaries). The GLB Act provides that state nonmember banks, such as BancFirst, may invest in financial subsidiaries (assuming they have the requisite investment authority under applicable state law), subject to the same conditions that apply to national bank investments in financial subsidiaries.

As a state nonmember bank, BancFirst is subject to primary supervision, periodic examination and regulation by the State Banking Board and the FDIC, and Oklahoma law provides that BancFirst must maintain reserves against deposits as required by the FDI Act. The Oklahoma State Bank Commissioner is authorized by statute to accept an FDIC examination in lieu of a state examination. In practice, the FDIC and the Oklahoma State Banking Department alternate examinations of BancFirst. If, as a result of an examination of a bank, the Oklahoma Banking Department determines that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of the bank’s operations are unsatisfactory or that the management of the bank is violating or has violated any law or regulation, various remedies, including the remedy of injunction, are available to the Oklahoma Banking Department. Oklahoma law permits the acquisition of an unlimited number of wholly-owned bank subsidiaries so long as aggregate deposits at the time of acquisition in a multi-bank holding company do not exceed 20% of the total amount of deposits of insured depository institutions located in Oklahoma.

 

12


Table of Contents

In addition to the provisions of the GLB Act that authorizes state nonmember banks to invest in financial subsidiaries (assuming they have the requisite investment authority under applicable state law) on the same conditions that apply to national banks, FDICIA provides that FDIC-insured state banks such as BancFirst may engage directly or through a subsidiary in certain activities that are not permissible for a national bank, if the activity is authorized by applicable state law, the FDIC determines that the activity does not pose a significant risk to the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”), and the bank is in compliance with its applicable capital standards.

Available Information

The Company is subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and in accordance therewith, files periodic reports, proxy statement, and other information with the SEC. This Annual Report on Form 10-K and exhibits along with such future periodic reports, proxy statements, and other information may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at its principal offices at 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference facilities by contacting the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of such materials may also be obtained at prescribed rates by writing to the SEC. The SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains registration statements, reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.

The Company maintains a website www.bancfirst.com. The Company provides copies of the most recently filed 10-K and proxy statement directly on the website and also provides links to the SEC’s website where all of the Company’s filings with the SEC can be obtained. You may also request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing or telephoning us at the following address:

BancFirst Corporation

101 N. Broadway

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

ATTENTION: Joe T. Shockley, Jr.

Executive Vice President

(405) 270-1086

Item 1a. Risk Factors

In the course of conducting our business operations, the Company and our subsidiaries are exposed to a variety of risks that are inherent to the financial services industry. The following discusses some of the key inherent risk factors that could affect our business and operations, as well as other risk factors which are particularly relevant to us in the current period of significant economic and market disruption. Other factors besides those discussed below or elsewhere in this report also could adversely affect our business and operations, and these risk factors should not be considered a complete list of potential risks that may affect the Company and our subsidiaries.

Risks Related to Our Industry

The current economic environment poses significant challenges for us and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We currently are operating in a challenging and uncertain economic environment, both nationally and in the local markets that we serve. Financial institutions continue to be affected by sharp declines in the value of financial instruments and real estate values, and while we are taking steps to reduce our market and credit risk exposure, we nonetheless are affected by these issues in view of our retaining a securities portfolio and a loan portfolio consisting of commercial and residential construction loans, residential and commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans. Possible declines in the value of our investment securities could result in our recording losses on the other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) of securities, which would reduce our

 

13


Table of Contents

earnings and therefore our capital. Declines in real estate values and home sales, and an increase in the financial stress on borrowers stemming from an uncertain economic environment, including rising unemployment, continue to have an adverse effect on our borrowers or their customers, which could adversely impact the repayment of the loans we have made. The overall deterioration in economic conditions also could subject us to increased regulatory scrutiny. In addition, a prolonged recession, or further deterioration in local economic conditions, could result in further increases in loan delinquencies; increases in problem assets and foreclosures; and declines in the values of the collateral for our loans, which could reduce our customers’ borrowing power. Furthermore, a prolonged recession or further deterioration in local economic conditions could drive the level of loan losses beyond the level we have provided for in our loan loss allowance, which could necessitate an increase in our provision for loan losses, which, in turn, would reduce our earnings and capital. Additionally, the demand for our products and services could be reduced, which would adversely impact our liquidity and the level of revenues we generate.

There can be no assurance that actions of the U.S. Government, Federal Reserve and other governmental and regulatory bodies for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets will achieve the intended effect.

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, the U.S. government has responded to the ongoing financial crisis and economic slowdown by enacting new legislation and expanding or establishing a number of programs and initiatives. The U.S. Treasury, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board each have developed programs and facilities, including, among others, the TARP Capital Purchase Program and other efforts, designed to increase inter-bank lending, improve funding for consumer receivables and restore consumer and counterparty confidence in the banking sector, as more particularly described in “Item 1. Business—Supervision and Regulation.” In addition, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”) is intended to expand and establish government spending programs and provide tax cuts to stimulate the economy. Congress and the U.S. government continue to evaluate and develop various programs and initiatives designed to stabilize the financial and housing markets and stimulate the economy, including the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Stability Plan and the U.S. government’s foreclosure prevention program. Possible changes to bankruptcy legislation, such as the mortgage relief legislation for troubled homeowners, could cause financial institutions to recognize additional losses due to the forced restructuring of certain types of loans by the bankruptcy court. The final form of any such programs or initiatives or related legislation cannot be known at this time. There can be no assurance as to the impact that ARRA or any other such initiatives or governmental programs will have on the financial markets, including the extreme levels of volatility and limited credit availability currently being experienced. The failure of these efforts to stabilize the financial markets, the continuation or worsening of current financial market conditions or unintended long-term consequences of these programs or initiatives could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to credit, or the trading price of our common stock and other equity and debt securities.

Fluctuations in interest rates could reduce our profitability.

We realize income primarily from the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. We expect that we will periodically experience “gaps” in the interest rate sensitivities of our assets and liabilities, meaning that either our interest-earning assets will be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than our interest-bearing liabilities, or vice versa. Changes in market interest rates could either positively or negatively affect our net interest income and our profitability, depending on the magnitude, direction and duration of the change. If interest rates remain low, our net interest margin could experience further compression.

We are unable to predict fluctuations of market interest rates, which are affected by, among other factors, changes in inflation rates, economic growth, money supply, government debt, domestic and foreign financial markets and political developments, including terrorist acts and acts of war. Our asset-liability management strategy, which is designed to mitigate our risk from changes in market interest rates, may not be able to mitigate changes in interest rates from having a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

14


Table of Contents

We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state laws and regulations.

We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by federal and state banking authorities. Any change in applicable regulations or federal or state legislation could have a substantial impact on us and our results of operations. Additional legislation and regulations may be enacted or adopted in the future that could significantly affect our powers, authority and operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Further, regulators have significant discretion and power to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of laws by banks and bank holding companies in the performance of their supervisory and enforcement duties. The exercise of regulatory power may have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. interest rates from having a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments in the future.

Recent insured depository institution failures, as well as deterioration in banking and economic conditions, have significantly depleted the FDIC’s DIF, resulting in a decline in the ratio of reserves to insured deposits to historical lows. The FDIC anticipates that additional insured depository institutions are likely to fail in the foreseeable future so the reserve ratio may continue to decline. In addition, the deposit insurance limit on FDIC deposit insurance coverage generally has increased to $250,000 through December 31, 2013. These developments have resulted in a significant increase in the premiums assessed on us by the FDIC during 2009, and further increases are possible.

On December 16, 2008, the FDIC Board of Directors determined deposit insurance assessment rates for the first quarter of 2009 at 12 to 14 basis points per $100 of deposits. Beginning April 1, 2009, the rates increased to 12 to 16 basis points per $100 of deposits. Additionally, on May 22, 2009, the FDIC announced a final rule imposing a special emergency assessment as of June 30, 2009, payable September 30, 2009, based on $0.05 for each $100 of assets, less Tier 1 capital, as of June 30, 2009, but the amount of the assessment is capped at 10 basis points of domestic deposits. We paid a special assessment of $1.9 million.

On November 17, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule that required insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, at the same time that institutions paid their regular quarterly deposit insurance assessments for the third quarter of 2009. Under the final rule, the FDIC is to maintain assessment rates at their current levels through the end of 2010 and assessment rates will be increased by an annualized 3 basis points effective January 1, 2011. Each institution recorded the entire amount of its prepaid assessment as a prepaid expense (a non-earning asset) as of December 30, 2009, the date the payment was made. As of December 31, 2009, and each quarter thereafter, each institution records an expense (charge to earnings) for its regular quarterly assessment and an offsetting credit to the prepaid assessment until the asset is exhausted. Once the asset is exhausted, the institution would resume paying and accounting for quarterly deposit insurance assessments as currently done. The institutions would record an accrued expense payable each quarter for the assessment payment, which would be made to the FDIC at the end of the following quarter. These higher FDIC assessment rates and special assessments will have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Our FDIC insurance related costs were $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared with $489,000 and $359,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We are unable to predict the impact in future periods, including whether and when additional special assessments will occur, in the event the economic crisis continues.

Tax law changes may adversely affect our net income, effective tax rate and our overall results of operations and financial condition.

The Company’s financial performance is impacted by federal and state tax laws. Given the current economic and political environment, and ongoing state budgetary pressures, the enactment of new federal or state tax legislation may occur. The enactment of such legislation, or changes in the interpretation of existing law,

 

15


Table of Contents

including provisions impacting tax rates, apportionment, consolidation or combination, income, expenses, and credits, may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Recent changes in laws and regulations may cause us to incur additional costs.

Recently enacted and proposed changes in the laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules recently adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ, could cause us to incur increased costs as we evaluate the implications of new rules and respond to new requirements. We continue to evaluate and monitor developments with respect to these new and proposed rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of the additional costs, if any, we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Changes in monetary policies may have an adverse effect on our business.

Our results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could have an adverse effect on our deposit levels, loan demand or business earnings. See “Business-Supervision and Regulation.”

Risks Related to Our Business

Our recent results may not be indicative of future results.

We may not be able to sustain our historical rate of growth or may not be able to grow our business at all. Various factors, such as poor economic conditions, changes in interest rates, regulatory and legislative considerations and competition may also impede or inhibit our ability to expand our market presence. If we experience a significant decrease in our rate of growth, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected due to a high percentage of our operating costs being fixed expenses.

If a significant number of customers fail to perform under their loans, our business, profitability, and financial condition would be adversely affected.

As a lender, we face the risk that a significant number of our borrowers will fail to pay their loans when due. If borrower defaults cause losses in excess of our allowance for loan losses, it could have an adverse effect on our business, profitability, and financial condition. We have established an evaluation process designed to recognize loan losses as they occur. While this evaluation process uses historical and other objective information, the classification of loans and the estimation of loan losses are dependent to a great extent on our experience and judgment. If charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for possible loan losses, we will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for possible loan losses. Any increases in the allowance for possible loan losses will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly, capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” located elsewhere in this report for further discussion related to our process for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for possible loan losses. We cannot assure you that our future loan losses will not have any material adverse effects on our business, profitability or financial condition.

Adverse changes in economic conditions, especially in the State of Oklahoma, could have a material adverse effect on our business, growth, and profitability.

Our bank subsidiary operates exclusively within the State of Oklahoma and, unlike larger national or superregional banks that serve a broader and more diverse geographic region; our lending is also primarily concentrated in the State of Oklahoma. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are subject to changes in the economic conditions in such state. Our continued success is largely dependent upon the continued growth or stability of the communities we serve. A decline in the economies of these communities could negatively impact our net income and profitability. Additionally, declines in the economies of these

 

16


Table of Contents

communities and of the State of Oklahoma in general could affect our ability to generate new loans or to receive repayments of existing loans, and our ability to attract new deposits, adversely affecting our financial condition.

The soundness of other financial institutions could have a material adverse effect on our business, growth, and profitability.

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose our business to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral we hold cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to us. Any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Competition with other financial institutions could adversely affect our profitability.

We face vigorous competition from banks and other financial institutions, including savings and loan associations, savings banks, finance companies and credit unions. Certain of these banks and other financial institutions have substantially greater resources and lending limits, larger branch systems and other banking services that we do not offer. To a limited extent, we also compete with other providers of financial services, such as money market mutual funds, brokerage firms, consumer finance companies and insurance companies. When new competitors seek to enter one of our markets, or when existing market participants seek to increase their market share, they sometimes undercut the pricing and/or credit terms prevalent in that market. This competition may reduce or limit our margins on banking and trust services, reduce our market share and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. If Regulation Q is repealed and financial institutions are allowed to pay interest on commercial demand deposits, competitive pressures would cause our subsidiary bank to pay interest on demand deposits. Since we have a higher than average level of commercial demand deposits, paying interest on commercial demand deposits would have a negative impact on our net interest margin.

Our concentration of real estate loans is subject to the local real estate market in which we operate.

Loans secured by real estate have been a large portion of our loan portfolio. At December 31, 2009, this percentage was 60.4%. While our record of asset quality has historically been solid, we cannot guarantee that our record of asset quality will be maintained in future periods. Although we were not, and are not, involved in subprime lending, the ramifications of the subprime lending crisis and the turmoil in the financial and capital markets that followed have been far-reaching, with real estate values declining and unemployment and bankruptcies rising throughout the nation, including the region we serve. The ability of our borrowers to repay their loans could be adversely impacted by the significant change in market conditions, which not only could result in our experiencing an increase in charge-offs, but also could necessitate increasing our provision for loan losses. In addition, because multi-family and commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans represent the majority of our real estate loans outstanding, a decline in tenant occupancy due to such factors or for other reasons could adversely impact the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans on a timely basis, which could have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We rely heavily on our management team, and the unexpected loss of key managers may adversely affect our operations.

Our success to-date has been strongly influenced by our ability to attract and to retain senior management experienced in banking and financial services. Our ability to retain executive officers and the current management teams of each of our lines of business will continue to be important to successful implementation of

 

17


Table of Contents

our strategies. We do not have employment or non-compete agreements with these key employees. The unexpected loss of services of any key management personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results.

Our information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.

We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny or civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on certain external vendors.

We are reliant upon certain external vendors to provide products and services necessary to maintain our day-to-day operations. Accordingly, our operations are exposed to risk that these vendors will not perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements. The failure of an external vendor to perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements could be disruptive to our operations, which could have a material adverse impact on our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, we may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property’s value or limit our ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability. Although we have policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

There can be no assurance that the integration of our acquisitions will be successful or will not result in unforeseen difficulties that may absorb significant management attention.

Our completed acquisitions, or any future acquisition, may not produce the revenue, cost savings, earnings or synergies that we anticipated. The process of integrating acquired companies into our business may also result in unforeseen difficulties. Unforeseen operating difficulties may absorb significant management attention, which we might otherwise devote to our existing business. Also, the process may require significant financial resources that we might otherwise allocate to other activities, including the ongoing development or expansion of our existing operations.

If we pursue a future acquisition, our management could spend a significant amount of time and effort identifying and completing the acquisition. If we make a future acquisition, we could issue equity securities which would dilute current stockholders’ percentage ownership, incur substantial debt, assume contingent liabilities, incur a one-time charge or be required to record an impairment of goodwill, or any combination of the foregoing.

 

18


Table of Contents

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud could harm our business. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires management and our auditors to evaluate and assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. These Sarbanes-Oxley requirements may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time. Implementing these changes may take a significant amount of time and may require specific compliance training of our personnel. We have in the past discovered, and may in the future discover, areas of our internal control over financial reporting that need improvement. If we or our auditors discover a material weakness, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, could reduce the market’s confidence in our financial statements and have an adverse effect on our stock price. We may not be able to effectively and timely implement necessary control changes and employee training to ensure continued compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulatory and reporting requirements. Our historic growth and our planned expansion through acquisitions present challenges to maintaining the internal control and disclosure control standards applicable to public companies. If we fail to maintain effective internal controls we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and sanctions, our ability to recognize revenue could be impaired and investors could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports. We cannot assure you that we will continue to fully comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or that management or our auditors will conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in future periods.

Maintaining or increasing our market share depends on market acceptance and regulatory approval of new products and services.

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to adapt our products and services to evolving industry standards and consumer demand. There is increasing pressure on financial services companies to provide products and services at lower prices. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including Internet-based services, could require us to make substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products or services. A failure to achieve market acceptance of any new products we introduce, or a failure to introduce products that the market may demand, could have an adverse effect on our business, profitability, or growth prospects.

We have businesses other than banking.

In addition to commercial banking services, we provide life and other insurance products, as well as other business and financial services. We may in the future develop or acquire other non-banking businesses. As a result of other such businesses, our earnings could be subject to risks and uncertainties that are different from those to which our commercial banking services are subject.

We have a continuing need for technological change.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations as we continue to grow and expand our market area. Many of our larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. As a result, they may be able to offer additional or superior products to those that we will be able to offer, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing such products and services to our customers.

 

19


Table of Contents

We may need to raise additional capital in the future, and such capital may not be available when needed or at all.

We may need to raise additional capital in the future to provide us with sufficient capital resources and liquidity to meet our commitments and business needs, particularly if our asset quality or earnings were to deteriorate significantly. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on, among other things, conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of our control, and our financial performance. Economic conditions and the loss of confidence in financial institutions may increase our cost of funding and limit access to certain customary sources of capital, including inter-bank borrowings, repurchase agreements and borrowings from the discount window of the Federal Reserve.

We cannot assure that such capital will be available on acceptable terms or at all. Any occurrence that may limit our access to the capital markets, such as a decline in the confidence of debt purchasers, depositors or counterparties participating in the capital markets, or a downgrade of our debt ratings, may adversely affect our capital costs and our ability to raise capital and, in turn, our liquidity. Moreover, if we need to raise capital in the future, we may have to do so when many other financial institutions are also seeking to raise capital and would have to compete with those institutions for investors. An inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed could have a materially adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Associated with Our Common Stock

Our stock price can be volatile.

Investors should carefully consider the risks described in this “Risk Factors” section and the other information in this report, including our consolidated financial statements with related notes and documents incorporated by reference. If any of these risks or other risks, which have not been identified or which we may believe are immaterial or unlikely, actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. Our stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things: actual or anticipated variations in quarterly results of operations; recommendations by securities analysts; operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us; news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry; perceptions in the marketplace regarding us and/or our competitors; new technology used, or services offered, by competitors; significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving us or our competitors; failure to integrate acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions; changes in government regulations; geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.

General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause our stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.

We may not continue to pay dividends on our common stock in the future.

We have historically paid a common stock dividend. However, BancFirst Corporation is a bank holding company, and our ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. In the current stressed financial markets and declining economy, which has resulted in higher FDIC insurance premiums and special assessments on FDIC-insured financial institutions, including the Bank, there can be no certainty that our

 

20


Table of Contents

common dividend will continue to be paid at the current levels. It is possible that our common dividend could be reduced or even cease to be paid. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit.

Our common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in our common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this report and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, if you acquire our common stock, you could lose some or all of your investment.

Our directors and executive officers own a significant portion of our common stock and can influence shareholder decisions.

Our directors and executive officers, as a group, beneficially owned approximately 53% of our outstanding common stock as of February 28, 2010. As a result of their ownership, the directors and executive officers have the ability, by voting their shares in concert, to influence the outcome of any matter submitted to our shareholders for approval, including the election of directors. The directors and executive officers may vote to cause us to take actions with which our other shareholders do not agree.

Our stockholder rights plan, amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as well as provisions of Oklahoma law, could make it difficult for a third party to acquire our company.

We have a stockholder rights plan that may have the effect of discouraging unsolicited takeover proposals. The rights issued under the stockholder rights plan would cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved in advance by our board of directors. In addition, Oklahoma corporate law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contain provisions that could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of our company or our management. Together, these provisions may discourage transactions that otherwise could provide for the payment of a premium over prevailing market prices of our common stock, and also could limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

The trading volume in our common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.

Although our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the trading volume in our common stock is less than that of other, larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Given the lower trading volume of our common stock, significant sales of our common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause our stock price to fall.

Item 1b. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

The principal offices of the Company are located at 101 North Broadway, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102. The Company owns substantially all of the properties and buildings in which its various offices and facilities are located. These properties include the main bank and 84 branches. BancFirst also owns properties for future expansion. There are no significant encumbrances on any of these properties.

 

21


Table of Contents

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The Company has been named as a defendant in various legal actions arising from the conduct of its normal business activities. Although the amount of any liability that could arise with respect to these actions cannot be accurately predicted, in the opinion of the Company, any such liability will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Item 4. Reserved.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Common Stock Market Prices and Dividends

The Company’s Common Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System (“NASDAQ/GS”) and is traded under the symbol “BANF”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) the high and low sales prices of the Company’s Common Stock as reported in the NASDAQ/GS consolidated transaction reporting system and (ii) the quarterly dividends per share declared on the Common Stock.

 

     Price Range
     High    Low    Cash
Dividends
Declared

2009

        

Fourth Quarter

   $ 38.950    $ 35.130    $ 0.23

Third Quarter

   $ 39.960    $ 31.470    $ 0.23

Second Quarter

   $ 45.590    $ 34.460    $ 0.22

First Quarter

   $ 53.800    $ 29.050    $ 0.22

2008

        

Fourth Quarter

   $ 53.200    $ 37.700    $ 0.22

Third Quarter

   $ 73.100    $ 40.370    $ 0.22

Second Quarter

   $ 47.850    $ 41.740    $ 0.20

First Quarter

   $ 48.260    $ 39.690    $ 0.20

As of February 28, 2010 there were 341 holders of record of the Common Stock.

Future dividend payments will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial condition of the Company and the Bank, their capital needs, applicable governmental policies and regulations and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems appropriate.

BancFirst Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank, and its ability to pay dividends is substantially dependent upon dividend payments received from the Bank. Various laws, regulations and regulatory policies limit the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to BancFirst Corporation, as well as BancFirst Corporation’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders. See “Liquidity and Funding” and “Capital Resources” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Description of Business—Supervision and Regulation” and Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding limitations on the payment of dividends by BancFirst Corporation and the Bank.

 

22


Table of Contents

Share-Based Compensation Plans

Information regarding share-based compensation awards outstanding and available for future grants as of December 31, 2009, segregated between BancFirst Corporation’s nonqualified incentive stock option plan (the “BancFirst ISOP”) and BancFirst Corporation’s Non-Employee Director’s Stock Option Plan (the “BancFirst Director’s Stock Option Plan”), is presented in the following table. Additional information regarding share-based compensation plans is presented in Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

     Options
Outstanding
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Number of Shares
Available for
Future Grants

Plan Category

        

BancFirst ISOP

   1,094,553    $ 27.79    107,460

BancFirst Director’s Stock Option Plan

   115,000    $ 23.74    50,000
                

Total

   1,209,553    $ 27.41    157,460
                

Stock Repurchase Program

In November 1999, the Company adopted a new Stock Repurchase Program (the “SRP”) authorizing management to repurchase up to 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The SRP was amended in May 2001, August of 2002, and September of 2007 to increase the shares authorized to be purchased by 555,832 shares, 364,530 shares and 366,948 shares, respectively. The SRP may be used as a means to increase earnings per share and return on equity, to purchase treasury stock for the exercise of stock options or for distributions under the Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, to provide liquidity for optionees to dispose of stock from exercises of their stock options, and to provide liquidity for shareholders wishing to sell their stock. The timing, price and amount of stock repurchases under the SRP may be determined by management and must be approved by the Company’s Executive Committee. At December 31, 2009 there were 560,000 shares remaining that could be repurchased under the SRP. Below is a summary of the shares repurchased under the program.

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
     2009    2008

Number of shares repurchased

     —        40,000

Average price of shares repurchased

   $ —      $ 40.70

Tender Offer

In September 2007, the Company completed a modified Dutch auction self-tender offer and purchased 539,453 shares of its common stock for the maximum offering price of $45.00 per share. Cash on hand was used to pay for the purchase of the stock.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Incorporated by reference from “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” contained on page A-2 through A-3 of the attached Appendix.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Incorporated by reference from “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained on pages A-4 through A-24 of the attached Appendix.

 

23


Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Incorporated by reference from “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Market Risk” contained on page A-20 through A-22 of the attached Appendix.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The consolidated financial statements of BancFirst Corporation and its subsidiaries, are incorporated by reference from pages A-26 through A-63 of the attached Appendix, and include the following:

 

  a. Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

  b. Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

  c. Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

 

  d. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

 

  e. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

 

  f. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Disclosure Committee, which includes the Company’s Chief Risk Officer, Chief Asset Quality Officer, Chief Internal Auditor, Treasurer, Bank Controller and General Counsel, have evaluated, as of the last day of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation they concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms. No changes were made to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter of 2009 that materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting is incorporated by reference from page A-25 of the attached Appendix. The independent registered public accounting firm’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is incorporated by reference from page A-26 of the attached Appendix.

Item 9B. Other Information.

There is no information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of the year that was not reported.

 

24


Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K will be contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Election of Directors” and is hereby incorporated by reference. The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K will be contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” and is hereby incorporated by reference. The information required by Item 406 of Regulation S-K will be contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Code of Ethics” and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K will be contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K will be contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” and is hereby incorporated by reference. The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K will be contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.

The information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-K will be contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Transactions with Related Persons” and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A will be contained in the 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and is hereby incorporated by reference.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements:

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three years ended December 31, 2009

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2009

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the three years ended December 31, 2009

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

25


Table of Contents

The above financial statements are incorporated by reference from pages A-26 through A-63 of the attached Appendix.

(2) All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) The following Exhibits are filed with this Report or are incorporated by reference as set forth below:

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit

  3.1    Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of BancFirst Corporation (filed as Exhibit 1 to the Company’s 8-A/A filed July 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
  3.2    Certificate of Amendment of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of BancFirst Corporation (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
  3.3    Certificate of Designations of Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
  3.4    Amended By-Laws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference).
  3.5    Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
  3.6    Resolution of the Board of Directors amending Section XXVII of the Company’s By-Laws (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 26, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
  3.7    Resolution of the Board of Directors amending Article XVI, Section 1 and Article XVII, Section 1 of the Company’s By-Laws (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
  4.1    Instruments defining the rights of securities holders (see Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 above).
  4.2    Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of BFC Capital Trust I dated as of February 4, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 4, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
  4.3    Form of 9.65% Series B Cumulative Trust Preferred Security Certificate for BFC Capital Trust I (included as Exhibit D to Exhibit 4.2).
  4.4    Indenture dated as of February 4, 1997, relating to the 9.65% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures of BancFirst Corporation issued to BFC Capital Trust I (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 4, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
  4.5    Form of Certificate of 9.65% Series B Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture of BancFirst Corporation (included as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.4).
  4.6    Form of Series B Guarantee of BancFirst Corporation relating to the 9.65% Series B Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities of BFC Capital Trust I (filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-25599, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

26


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit

  4.7    Rights Agreement, dated as of February 25, 1999, between BancFirst Corporation and BancFirst, as Rights Agent, including as Exhibit A the form of Certificate of Designations of the Company setting forth the terms of the Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B the form of Right Certificate and as Exhibit C the form of Summary of Rights Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s 8-K dated January 28, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
  4.8    Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of February 25, 1999, between BancFirst Corporation and BancFirst, as Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s 8-K dated January 28, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
  4.9    Form of Amended and Restated Trust Agreement relating to the 7.20% Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities of BFC Capital Trust II (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-112488, and incorporated herein by reference).
  4.10    Form of 7.20% Cumulative Trust Preferred Security Certificate for BFC Capital Trust II (included as Exhibit D to Exhibit 4.8).
  4.11    Form of Indenture relating to the 7.20% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures of BancFirst Corporation issued to BFC Capital Trust II (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-112488, and incorporated herein by reference).
  4.12    Form of Certificate of 7.20% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture of BancFirst Corporation (included as Section 2.2 and Section 2.3 of Exhibit 4.10).
  4.13    Form of Guarantee of BancFirst Corporation relating to the 7.20% Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities of BFC Capital Trust II (filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-112488, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1      Ninth Amended and Restated BancFirst Corporation Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2      Amended and Restated BancFirst Corporation Employee Stock Ownership and Thrift Plan, as amended by amendments dated September 19, 1992, November 21, 2002 and December 18, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3      1988 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Security Corporation as assumed by BancFirst Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-65129 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4      1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Security Corporation as assumed by BancFirst Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-65129 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5      1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan of AmQuest Financial Corp. as assumed by BancFirst Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-65129 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6      Second Amended and Restated BancFirst Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7      Third Amended and Restated BancFirst Corporation Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

27


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit

10.8      Amendment to the Amended and Restated BancFirst Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement adopted June 25, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9      Amendment to the Amended and Restated BancFirst Corporation Thrift Plan adopted June 25, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
21.1*    Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23.1*    Consent of Grant Thornton LLP.
31.1*    Chief Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
31.2*    Chief Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
32.1*    CEO’s Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*    CFO’s Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

* Filed herewith.

 

28


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

March 16, 2010     BANCFIRST CORPORATION
    (Registrant)
   

/s/    David E. Rainbolt

    David E. Rainbolt
    President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 16, 2010.

 

/s/    H. E. Rainbolt

   

/s/    David E. Rainbolt

H. E. Rainbolt     David E. Rainbolt
Chairman of the Board     President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)     (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/    Dennis L. Brand

   

/s/    C. L. Craig, Jr.

Dennis L. Brand     C. L. Craig, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer, BancFirst and Director     Director
(Principal Executive Officer)    

/s/    William H. Crawford

   

/s/    James R. Daniel

William H. Crawford     James R. Daniel
Director     Vice Chairman of the Board
    (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/    K. Gordon Greer

   

/s/    Dr. Donald B. Halverstadt

K. Gordon Greer     Dr. Donald B. Halverstadt
Vice Chairman of the Board     Director
(Principal Executive Officer)    

/s/    John C. Hugon

   

/s/    William O. Johnstone

John C. Hugon     William O. Johnstone
Director     Vice Chairman of the Board
    (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/    David R. Lopez

   

/s/    J. Ralph McCalmont

David R. Lopez     J. Ralph McCalmont
Director     Director

 

   

/s/    Melvin Moran

Tom H. McCasland, III     Melvin Moran
Director     Director

 

29


Table of Contents

/s/    Ronald J. Norick

   

/s/    Paul B. Odom, Jr.

Ronald J. Norick     Paul B. Odom, Jr.
Director     Director

/s/    David Ragland

   

/s/    G. Rainey Williams, Jr.

David Ragland     G. Rainey Williams, Jr.
Director     Director

/s/    Michael K. Wallace

   
Michael K. Wallace    
Director    

/s/    Randy Foraker

   

/s/    Joe T. Shockley, Jr.

Randy Foraker     Joe T. Shockley, Jr.
Executive Vice President and     Executive Vice President and
Chief Risk Officer     Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)     (Principal Financial Officer)

 

30


Table of Contents

APPENDIX A

BancFirst Corporation

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

    

Pages

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

   A-2 to A-3

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   A-4 to A-24

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

   A-25

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   A-26 to A-27

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   A-28

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

   A-29

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

   A-30

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

   A-31

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   A-32 to A-63

 

A-1


Table of Contents

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth certain historical consolidated financial data as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2009. The historical consolidated financial data has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report.

 

     At and for the Year Ended December 31,  
     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
     (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)  

Income Statement Data

          

Net interest income

   $ 131,321      $ 139,107      $ 148,286      $ 143,688      $ 131,451   

Provision for loan losses

     10,389        10,676        3,329        1,790        4,607   

Noninterest income

     66,864        74,385        71,138        58,424        54,284   

Noninterest expense

     139,117        135,006        134,446        124,557        117,164   

Net income

     32,609        44,358        53,093        49,352        42,836   

Balance Sheet Data

          

Total assets

   $ 4,416,115      $ 3,867,204      $ 3,743,006      $ 3,418,574      $ 3,223,030   

Securities

     417,172        455,568        467,719        432,910        456,222   

Total loans (net of unearned interest)

     2,738,654        2,757,854        2,487,099        2,325,548        2,317,426   

Allowance for loan losses

     36,383        34,290        29,127        27,700        27,517   

Deposits

     3,929,016        3,377,608        3,288,504        2,974,305        2,804,519   

Long-term borrowings

     —          —          606        1,339        4,118   

Junior subordinated debentures

     26,804        26,804        26,804        51,804        51,804   

Stockholders’ equity

     430,750        413,791        371,962        348,355        302,349   

Per Common Share Data

          

Net income—basic

   $ 2.13      $ 2.91      $ 3.41      $ 3.14      $ 2.74   

Net income—diluted

     2.09        2.85        3.33        3.07        2.68   

Cash dividends

     0.90        0.84        0.76        0.68        0.60   

Book value

     28.14        27.08        24.44        22.10        19.34   

Tangible book value

     25.41        24.34        21.66        19.57        16.87   

Selected Financial Ratios

          

Performance ratios:

          

Return on average assets

     0 .78     1.17     1.49     1.46     1.39

Return on average stockholders’ equity

     7.70        11.30        14.66        15.10        14.80   

Cash dividend payout ratio

     42.25        28.87        22.29        21.73        21.90   

Net interest spread

     2.97        3.31        3.59        3.80        4.13   

Net interest margin

     3.42        4.05        4.63        4.75        4.76   

Efficiency ratio

     70.20        63.24        61.27        61.63        63.08   

Balance Sheet Ratios:

          

Average loans to deposits

     74.57     78.82     76.04     79.19     82.43

Average earning assets to total assets

     92.56        91.23        90.86        90.20        90.19   

Average stockholders’ equity to average assets

     10.15        10.35        10.18        9.68        9.37   

Asset Quality Ratios:

          

Nonperforming and restructured loans to total loans

     1.46     0.86     0.54     0.51     0.40

Nonperforming and restructured assets to total assets

     1.13        0.72        0.40        0.40        0.36   

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

     1.33        1.24        1.17        1.19        1.19   

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming and restructured loans

     91.06        144.52        215.57        231.41        293.36   

Net chargeoffs to average loans

     0.30        0.21        0.08        0.09        0.14   

 

A-2


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS

Taxable Equivalent Basis (Dollars in thousands)

 

    December 31, 2009     December 31, 2008     December 31, 2007  
    Average
Balance
    Interest
Income/
Expense
  Average
Yield/
Rate
    Average
Balance
    Interest
Income/
Expense
  Average
Yield/
Rate
    Average
Balance
    Interest
Income/
Expense
  Average
Yield/
Rate
 

ASSETS

                 

Earning assets:

                 

Loans (1)

  $ 2,749,544      $ 153,059   5.57   $ 2,612,553      $ 172,556   6.59   $ 2,364,618      $ 190,173   8.04

Securities—taxable

    379,702        13,436   3.54        416,587        16,387   3.92        411,443        18,397   4.47   

Securities—tax exempt

    38,081        2,151   5.65        38,000        2,214   5.81        35,657        2,151   6.03   

Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks

    695,167        2,241   0.32        385,825        7,864   2.03        419,675        21,167   5.04   
                                               

Total earning assets

    3,862,494        170,887   4.42        3,452,965        199,021   5.75        3,231,393        231,888   7.18   
                                               

Nonearning assets:

                 

Cash and due from banks

    113,207            138,002            139,919       

Interest receivable and other assets

    233,885            225,879            213,081       

Allowance for loan losses

    (36,607         (31,939         (27,890    
                                   

Total nonearning assets

    310,485            331,942            325,110       
                                   

Total assets

  $ 4,172,979          $ 3,784,907          $ 3,556,503       
                                   

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                 

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                 

Transaction deposits

  $ 518,914        1,218   0.23   $ 423,773        2,126   0.50   $ 398,786        2,989   0.75

Savings deposits

    1,228,697        15,513   1.26        1,100,184        24,945   2.26        1,048,935        39,944   3.81   

Time deposits

    885,403        19,777   2.23        834,712        29,313   3.50        784,405        35,673   4.55   

Short-term borrowings

    2,883        11   0.38        21,322        458   2.14        33,584        1,667   4.96   

Long-term borrowings

    —          —     —          218        9   4.12        931        50   5.37   

Junior subordinated debentures

    26,804        1,966   7.33        26,738        1,966   7.33        27,832        2,140   7.69   
                                               

Total interest-bearing liabilities

    2,662,701        38,485   1.45        2,406,947        58,817   2.44        2,294,473        82,463   3.59   
                                               

Interest-free funds:

                 

Noninterest bearing deposits

    1,054,291            955,847            877,474       

Interest payable and other liabilities

    32,239            30,537            22,426       

Stockholders’ equity

    423,748            391,576            362,130       
                                   

Total interest free-funds

    1,510,278            1,377,960            1,262,030       
                                   

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $ 4,172,979          $ 3,784,907          $ 3,556,503       
                                   

Net interest income

    $ 132,402       $ 140,204       $ 149,425  
                             

Net interest spread

      2.97       3.31       3.59
                             

Net interest margin

      3.42       4.05       4.63
                             

 

(1) Nonaccrual loans are included in the average loan balances and any interest on such nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis.

 

A-3


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is an analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the three years ended December 31, 2009 and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and the Selected Consolidated Financial Data included herein.

SUMMARY

BancFirst Corporation’s net income for 2009 was $32.6 million, or $2.09 per diluted share, compared to $44.4 million, or $2.85 per diluted share for 2008 and $53.1 million, or $3.33 per diluted share for 2007. The results for 2009, 2008 and 2007 include several one-time items that are more fully described below.

In 2009, net interest income was $131.3 million, compared to $139.1 million in 2008 and $148.3 million in 2007. The Company’s net interest margin was 3.42% for 2009 down 63 basis points from 4.05% in 2008 and down 121 basis points from 4.63% in 2007. The decrease is due to lower interest rates brought about by a slowing national economy, reflected in the national unemployment reaching 10%. Provision for loan losses was $10.4 million in 2009 compared to $10.7 million in 2008 up from $3.3 million in 2007. Noninterest income was $66.9 million in 2009 compared to $74.4 million in 2008 and $71.1 million in 2007, while noninterest expense was $139.1 million in 2009 compared to $135.0 million in 2008 and $134.4 million in 2007.

Total assets at year-end 2009 were $4.42 billion, up from $3.87 billion at the end of 2008 and $3.74 billion at the end of 2007. Total loans at December 31, 2009 were $2.74 billion versus $2.76 billion for 2008 and $2.49 billion for 2007. Total deposits increased to $3.93 billion from $3.38 billion for 2008 and $3.29 billion for 2007. The Company’s liquidity remains strong as its average loans-to-deposit ratio was 74.6% for 2009, compared to 78.8% for 2008 and 76.0% for 2007. Stockholders’ equity was $430.8 million, an increase of $17 million over a year ago, compared to $413.8 million for 2008 and $372.0 million for 2007. Average stockholders’ equity to average assets was 10.15% at year-end 2009, compared to 10.35% at year-end 2008 and 10.18% at year-end 2007. The Company’s borrowings include no brokered deposits and no Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings at December 31, 2009.

Asset quality deteriorated in 2009 with a ratio of nonperforming and restructured assets to total assets of 1.13% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 0.72% at year-end 2008 and 0.40% at year-end 2007. The allowance for loan losses equaled 91.1% of nonperforming and restructured loans at December 31, 2009, versus 144.5% at the end of 2008 and 215.6% at the end of 2007. Net charge-offs to average loans for 2009 increased to 0.30%, compared to 0.21% for 2008 and 0.08% for 2007. While asset quality deteriorated during the year, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans increased to 1.33% in 2009 compared to 1.24% in 2008 and 1.17% in 2007.

The financial performance of the Company in 2009 was affected primarily by three factors: first, historically low interest rates and deposit growth from money-market funds disintermediation caused further compression of the net interest margin; second, a slowing economy caused deterioration in the credit of several customers that necessitated a continued higher level of loan loss provision; and finally, a significant increase in FDIC insurance premiums caused noninterest expense to increase. In response to these items negatively affecting the Company’s earnings, management continued a number of changes designed to lower noninterest expenses including a suspension of branch expansion, a reduction of bonuses and other personnel expenses and a salary freeze for all non-exempt personnel.

On December 8, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of First Jones Bancorporation. On November 30, 2009, First State Bank, Jones, the subsidiary bank, had approximately $36 million in assets, $31 million in deposits, and $4.5 million in equity capital. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method. First State Bank, Jones operated as a subsidiary of BancFirst Corporation until it was merged into the BancFirst system, which was completed in early March 2010. The acquisition will enhance the presence of BancFirst in eastern Oklahoma County.

 

A-4


Table of Contents

In November 2009, the FDIC issued a rule that required insured depository institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The FDIC also adopted a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011. In December 2009, the Company paid $20.2 million in prepaid risk-based assessments, which included $1.2 million related to the fourth quarter of 2009 that would have otherwise been payable in the first quarter of 2010. This amount is included in deposit insurance expense for 2009. The remaining $19.0 million in prepaid deposit insurance is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.

In May 2009 the FDIC imposed a Special Assessment on member financial institutions that was based on June 30, 2009 assets less tier one capital. The amount of $1.9 million was expensed on June 30, 2009.

During 2008, the Company repurchased 40,000 shares of its common stock for $1.63 million or an average price of $40.70 per share under its ongoing Stock Repurchase Program (the “SRP”). The Company repurchased 53,000 shares for $2.46 million or an average price of $46.47 during 2007. No shares were repurchased in 2009.

In November 2008 the Company announced it would not accept funds from the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program due to current capital levels that exceeded well-capitalized guidelines and the potential for additional governmental regulation related to the program. The Company also did not elect to participate in the Debt Guarantee Program for newly issued senior unsecured debt. The Company did elect to participate in the Transaction Account Guarantee Program for extended coverage on noninterest bearing transaction deposit accounts at a cost of 10 basis points per assessable deposits. The Transaction Account Guarantee Program is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2010.

In April 2008, the Company completed an $80 million sale of securities resulting in a securities pre-tax gain of $6.1 million. The Company also purchased Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) senior debt securities of similar amounts and maturities. The after-tax impact of these transactions, net of the interest income differential, was approximately $3.3 million for the year.

In March 2008, the Company, as a member bank of Visa, recorded a $1.8 million pre-tax gain from the mandatory partial redemption of the Company’s Visa shares received in the first quarter initial public offering. The gain was included in gain on sale of other assets.

In September 2007, the Company completed a modified Dutch auction self-tender offer and purchased 539,453 shares of its common stock for the maximum offering price of $45.00 per share. Cash on hand was used to pay for the purchase of the stock.

In July 2007, the Company was awarded and received the $3.1 million bond claim by their fidelity bond carrier for the $3.3 million cash shortfall that was reported and expensed in 2005.

In June 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to sell one of its investments held by Council Oak Investment Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BancFirst, which resulted in a one-time gain of approximately $7.8 million. The transaction was consummated on August 1, 2007 and included in noninterest income—securities transactions in 2007. The Company made a $1 million contribution to its charitable foundation with the funds from the gain. This one-time gain, net of related expenses, income taxes and the contribution had a net income effect of approximately $3.9 million.

During the first quarter of 2007 the Company entered into an agreement to acquire Armor Assurance Company (“Armor”), an insurance agency in Muskogee, Oklahoma for cash of approximately $3.3 million and a $372,000 note payable in three equal annual installments. The transaction was consummated in April 2007 and the note was prepaid and retired in April 2008. Armor had total assets of approximately $364,000. As a result of the acquisition, Armor was merged with the Company’s existing property and casualty agency, Wilcox & Jones, to form Wilcox, Jones & McGrath, Inc. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Accordingly, the effects of the acquisition are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition forward. The acquisition did not have a material effect on the results of operations of the Company.

 

A-5


Table of Contents

In November 2006, the Company announced its intent to exercise the optional prepayment terms of its 9.65% Junior Subordinated Debentures. The securities were redeemed effective January 15, 2007 for a redemption price equal to 104.825% of the aggregate $25 million liquidation amount of the trust securities plus all accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. As a result of the prepayment, the Company incurred a loss of approximately $1.2 million after taxes during 2007. The loss reflects the premium paid and the recognition of the unamortized issuance costs.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Income

In 2009, net interest income, which is the Company’s principal source of operating revenue, decreased $7.8 million to $131.3 million compared to a decrease of $9.2 million in 2008, and an increase of $4.6 million in 2007. The net interest margin on a taxable equivalent basis for 2009 was 3.42%, compared to 4.05% for 2008 and 4.63% for 2007. Changes in the volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and changes in interest rates determine the changes in net interest income. The following volume/rate analysis summarizes the relative contribution of each of these components to the changes in net interest income in 2009 and 2008. Rapidly declining interest rates in 2008 leading to historically low rates and deposit growth from money-market funds disintermediation in 2009 have resulted in a significant decrease in net interest income. The low rates caused a negative rate variance in both 2009 and 2008 which was somewhat mitigated in 2009 by the implementation of rate floors in floating rate loans. The changes in net interest income in 2008 due to the growth in volume of earning assets, primarily loans, were more than offset by the negative impact of lower interest rates. If interest rates do not increase, management expects continued compression of its net interest margin in 2010 as higher rate assets mature in a continued low interest rate environment.

VOLUME/RATE ANALYSIS

Taxable Equivalent Basis

 

     Change in 2009     Change in 2008  
     Total     Due to
Volume(1)
    Due to
Rate
    Total     Due to
Volume(1)
    Due to
Rate
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

INCREASE (DECREASE)

            

Interest Income:

            

Loans

   $ (19,485   $ 7,938      $ (27,423   $ (17,617   $ 19,655      $ (37,272

Investments—taxable

     (2,875     (1,496     (1,379     (1,857     30        (1,887

Investments—tax exempt

     (66     3        (69     63        154        (91

Interest-bearing deposits with banks and Federal funds sold

     (5,708     (2,284     (3,424     (13,456     864        (14,320
                                                

Total interest income

     (28,134     4,161        (32,295     (32,867     20,703        (53,570
                                                

Interest Expense:

            

Transaction deposits

     (1,939     (1,643     (296     (859     51        (910

Savings deposits

     (3,343     3,437        (6,780     (6,691     348        (7,039

Time deposits

     (14,594     6,404        (20,998     (14,672     5,107        (19,779

Short-term borrowings

     (447     (389     (58     (1,209     (616     (593

Long-term borrowings

     (9     (9     —          (41     (39     (2

Junior subordinated debentures

     —          5        (5     (174     (84     (90
                                                

Total interest expense

     (20,332     7,805        (28,137     (23,646     4,767        (28,413
                                                

Net interest income

   $ (7,802   $ (3,644   $ (4,158   $ (9,221   $ 15,936      $ (25,157
                                                

 

(1) Changes in the mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have been combined with the changes due to volume.

 

A-6


Table of Contents

The following interest rate sensitivity analysis measures the sensitivity of the Company’s net interest margin to changes in interest rates by analyzing the repricing relationship between its earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. This analysis is limited by the fact that it presents a static position as of a single day and is not necessarily indicative of the Company’s position at any other point in time, and does not take into account the sensitivity of yields and rates of specific assets and liabilities to changes in market rates. The Company’s approach to managing the interest sensitivity gap takes advantage of the Company’s stable core deposit base and the relatively short maturity and repricing frequency of its loan portfolio, as well as the historical existence of a positively sloped yield curve, which enhances the net interest margin over the long term.

The Analysis of Interest Rate Sensitivity presents the Company’s earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities based on maturity and repricing frequency at December 31, 2009. The Company’s cumulative negative gap position in the one year interval increased to $713 million at December 31, 2009 from $647 million at December 31, 2008, and decreased as a percentage of total earning assets to 17.5% from 18.3% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This negative gap position assumes that the Company’s core savings and transaction deposits are immediately rate sensitive. In a falling rate or sustained low rate environment, the benefit of the Company’s noninterest-bearing funds is decreased, resulting in a decrease in the Company’s net interest margin over time.

ANALYSIS OF INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

December 31, 2009

 

    Interest Rate Sensitive     Noninterest Rate Sensitive      
    0 to 3
Months
    4 to 12
Months
    1 to 5
Years
    Over 5
Years
    Total
    (Dollars in thousands)

EARNING ASSETS

         

Loans

  $ 547,148      $ 508,259      $ 1,174,439      $ 508,808      $ 2,738,654

Securities

    17,795        51,298        267,375        80,704        417,172

Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits

    934,654        —          —          —          934,654
                                     

Total

  $ 1,499,597      $ 559,557      $ 1,441,814      $ 589,512      $ 4,090,480
                                     

FUNDING SOURCES

         

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits (1)

  $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 861,498      $ 861,498

Savings and transaction deposits

    1,906,761        —          —          —          1,906,761

Time deposits of $100 or more

    312,919        66,675        —          —          379,594

Time deposits under $100

    392,988        91,950        35        —          484,973

Short-term borrowings

    100        —          —          —          100

Junior subordinated debentures

    —          —          —          26,804        26,804

Stockholders’ equity

    —          —          —          430,750        430,750
                                     

Total

  $ 2,612,768      $ 158,625      $ 35      $ 1,319,052      $ 4,090,480
                                     

Interest sensitivity gap

  $ (1,113,171   $ 400,296      $ 1,438,442      $ (725,567  

Cumulative gap

  $ (1,113,171   $ (712,875   $ 725,567      $ —       

Cumulative gap as a percentage of total earning assets

    (27.2 )%      (17.4 )%      17.7     —    

 

(1) Represents the amount of demand deposits required to support earning assets in excess of interest-bearing liabilities and stockholders’ equity.

 

A-7


Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $10.4 million for 2009, compared to $10.7 million for 2008 and $3.3 million for 2007. During 2009, credit quality continued to deteriorate with higher levels of potential problem loans and nonperforming loans resulting in an additional provision for loan losses. In 2008, the increase was due to the deterioration of the credit quality of a small number of specific loans resulting from declining collateral values and to a lesser extent, nonperformance. Other than the additions in 2008 related to these credits, the provision for loan losses for the preceding three years was significantly related to loan growth. The Company establishes an allowance as an estimate of the probable inherent losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date which does not include an estimate of further deterioration in the quality of the portfolio. Net loan charge-offs were $8.3 million for 2009, compared to $5.5 million for 2008 and $1.9 million for 2007. The net charge-offs equated to 0.30%, 0.21% and 0.08% of average loans for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A more detailed discussion of the allowance for loan losses is provided under “Loans.”

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income was $66.9 million in 2009 versus $74.4 million in 2008 and $71.1 million in 2007. Total noninterest income decreased $7.5 million in 2009, a decrease of 10.1%. This compares to increases of $3.2 million, or 4.6%, in 2008, and $12.7 million, or 21.8% in 2007. Core noninterest income was up in 2009 due to increases in commercial deposit fees and sales of mortgage loans and student loans offset by lower cash management fees. Results for 2008 included one-time items totaling $9.1 million before taxes including pretax gains of approximately $1.8 million from the Company’s interest in the Visa initial public offering, $6.1 million on the sale of securities, and $1.2 million on the sale of an asset. The increase in noninterest income in 2007 included one-time items totaling $10.9 million including pretax gains of $7.8 million on the sale of an investment and a $3.1 million recovery on an insurance claim. The Company’s fee income has increased in each of the last five years due to improved pricing strategies, enhanced product lines, acquisitions and internal deposit growth.

Service charges on deposits have increased as a result of growth in deposit accounts and overdraft fees combined with the lower earnings credit on deposit balances.

The Company recognized a net gain on the sale of securities of $336,000 in 2009, compared to a gain of $6.9 million in 2008 and a gain of $8.3 million in 2007. The Company’s practice is to maintain a liquid portfolio of securities and not engage in trading activities. The Company has the ability and intent to hold securities classified as available for sale that were in an unrealized loss position until they mature or until fair value exceeds amortized cost. The net gain on sale of securities in 2008 was primarily due to the sale of U.S. Treasuries and simultaneous purchase of senior GSE debt, while the gain in 2007 was primarily related to the $7.8 million gain on the sale of a venture capital investment by Council Oak Investment Corporation.

The Company earned $2.8 million on the sale of loans in 2009 compared to $2.1 million in 2008 and $2.4 million in 2007. The activity in the secondary market for mortgage loans increased during 2009 due to a large number of refinancings in the historically low interest rate environment. The activity in student loans was up slightly in 2009 due to less local competition in the market but may decline in the future due to proposed changes to the program that would eliminate guaranteed student lending by financial institutions.

Noninterest Expense

Total noninterest expense increased by $4.1 million, or 3.0% to $139.1 million in 2009. This compares to increases of $560,000, or 0.4%, for 2008, and $9.9 million, or 7.9%, for 2007. The increase in noninterest expense in 2009 was primarily due to the FDIC special assessment and higher deposit insurance premium totaling $7.3 million which was partially offset by a $1.8 million reduction in loan origination expense and $900,000 in lower salaries and employee benefits. The slight increase in noninterest expense in 2008 is due to higher salary and occupancy expense offset by a reduction of bonus and other personnel expenses and a

 

A-8


Table of Contents

suspension of branch expansion. The increase in 2007 expenses was a result of the $1 million charitable contribution, $1.9 million expense on the trust preferred redemption, $800,000 related to the sale of the investment held by Council Oak Investment Corporation, the acquisition of Armor Assurance Company in 2007 and increased operating expenses due to branch expansion.

During 2009 and 2008, in response to the higher noninterest expense, the Company implemented a salary freeze for all non-exempt employees along with suspension of branch expansion.

The Company will experience higher deposit insurance premium expense in 2010 due to an increase in the regular assessment rate. Management believes it is reasonable to expect that the FDIC may impose additional increases in assessment rates or special assessments or both.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense totaled $16.1 million in 2009, compared to $23.5 million in 2008 and $28.6 million for 2007. Income tax expense declined in 2009 due to lower pretax income. The effective tax rates for 2009, 2008 and 2007 were 33.0%, 34.6% and 35.0%, respectively. The primary reasons for the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate were tax-exempt income, nondeductible amortization, federal and state tax credits, and state tax expense.

Certain financial information is prepared on a taxable equivalent basis to facilitate analysis of yields and changes in components of earnings. Average balance sheets, income statements and other financial statistics are also presented on a taxable equivalent basis.

Impact of Inflation

The impact of inflation on financial institutions differs significantly from that of industrial or commercial companies. The assets of financial institutions are predominantly monetary, as opposed to fixed or nonmonetary assets such as premises, equipment and inventory. As a result, there is little exposure to inflated earnings by understated depreciation charges or significantly understated current values of assets. Although inflation can have an indirect effect by leading to higher interest rates, financial institutions are in a position to monitor the effects on interest costs and yields and respond to inflationary trends through management of interest rate sensitivity. Inflation can also have an impact on noninterest expenses such as salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, services and other costs.

Impact of Deflation

In a period of deflation, it would be reasonable to expect widely decreasing prices for real assets. In such an economic environment, assets of businesses and individuals, such as real estate, commodities or inventory, could decline. The inability of customers to repay or refinance their loans could result in loan losses incurred by the Company far in excess of historical experience due to deflated collateral values.

FINANCIAL POSITION

Cash, Federal Funds Sold and Interest Bearing Balances with Banks

Cash consists of cash and cash items on hand, noninterest-bearing deposits and other amounts due from other banks, reserves deposited with the Federal Reserve Bank, and interest-bearing deposits with other banks. Federal funds sold consist of overnight investments of excess funds with other financial institutions. Due to the Federal Reserve Bank’s intervention into the Federal funds market that has resulted in near zero overnight fed funds rates, the Company has maintained the majority of its excess funds with the Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Bank pays interest on these funds based upon the lowest target rate for the maintenance period.

 

A-9


Table of Contents

The amount of cash, Federal funds sold and interest bearing balances with the Federal Reserve Bank carried by the Company is a function of the availability of funds presented to other institutions for clearing, and the Company’s requirements for liquidity, operating cash and reserves, available yields, and interest rate sensitivity management. Balances of these items can fluctuate widely based on these various factors. Cash and Federal funds sold increased $587.4 million in 2009, decreased $141.4 million in 2008 and increased $105.5 million in 2007. The increase in 2009 was primarily due to the increase in deposits from money-market funds disintermediation. At year-end 2009, the Company had $6.4 million of brokered CD’s it had purchased as an investment. All of the CD’s are under the $250,000 FDIC insured limit and have maturities of less than one year.

Securities

For the year ended December 31, 2009, total securities decreased $38.4 million to $417.2 million, a decrease of 8.4%. This compares to a decrease of $12.2 million, or 2.6%, in 2008 and an increase of $34.8 million, or 8.0%, in 2007. Securities available for sale represented 92.9% of the total securities portfolio at year-end 2009, compared to 92.4% at year-end 2008 and 94.6% at year-end 2007. Securities available for sale had a net unrealized gain of $16.9 million at year-end 2009, compared to a net unrealized gain of $22.6 million for 2008 and a net unrealized gain of $10.7 million for 2007. These unrealized gains are included in the Company’s stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income tax, in the amounts of $11.0 million, $14.7 million and $6.9 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively.

SECURITIES

 

     December 31
     2009    2008    2007
     (Dollars in thousands)

Held for Investment (at amortized cost)

        

U.S. Treasury, other Federal agencies and mortgage-backed securities

   $ 1,446    $ 1,855    $ 2,393

States and political subdivisions

     28,350      32,613      22,877
                    

Total

   $ 29,796    $ 34,468    $ 25,270
                    

Estimated market value

   $ 30,736    $ 34,975    $ 25,472
                    

Available for Sale (at estimated market value)

        

U.S. Treasury, other Federal agencies and mortgage-backed securities

   $ 346,837    $ 372,667    $ 413,230

States and political subdivisions

     9,625      11,722      15,237

Other securities

     30,914      36,711      13,982
                    

Total

   $ 387,376    $ 421,100    $ 442,449
                    

Total Securities

   $ 417,172    $ 455,568    $ 467,719
                    

The Company does not engage in securities trading activities. Any sales of securities are for the purpose of executing the Company’s asset/liability management strategy, eliminating a perceived credit risk in a specific security, or providing liquidity. Securities that are being held for indefinite periods of time, or that may be sold as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy, to provide liquidity or for other reasons, are classified as available for sale and are stated at estimated market value. Unrealized gains or losses on securities available for sale are reported as a component of stockholders’ equity, net of income tax. Securities for which the Company has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held for investment and are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts computed under the interest method. Securities that are determined to be impaired, and for which such impairment is determined to be other than temporary, are adjusted to fair value and a corresponding loss is recognized. Gains or losses from sales of securities are based upon the book values of the specific securities sold.

 

A-10


Table of Contents

Declines in the fair value of held for investment and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other things, (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Management has the ability and intent to hold the securities classified as held for investment until they mature, at which time the Company will receive full value for the securities. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had net unrealized gains largely due to decreases in market interest rates from the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. The fair value of those securities having unrealized losses is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for similar investments decline. Management does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons of credit quality. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2009, management also had the ability and intent to hold all securities classified as available for sale with an unrealized loss for a period of time sufficient for a recovery of cost. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2009, management believes the impairments were temporary and no material impairment loss was realized in the Company’s consolidated income statement. At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company held Class A shares in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka, Kansas. The book value at December 31, 2009 was $1.0 million and the book value at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $5.7 million. The value of the stock was not considered to be impaired.

MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF SECURITIES

The following maturity distribution of securities table summarizes the maturity and weighted average taxable equivalent yields of the securities portfolio at December 31, 2009. The Company manages its securities portfolio for liquidity and as a tool to execute its asset/liability management strategy. Consequently, the average maturity of the portfolio is relatively short. Securities maturing within five years represent 80.6% of the total portfolio.

 

     Within One Year     After One Year
But Within Five
Years
    After Five Years
But Within Ten
Years
    After Ten Years     Total  
     Amount     Yield*     Amount     Yield*     Amount     Yield*     Amount     Yield*     Amount     Yield*  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Held for Investment

                    

U.S. Treasury and other federal agencies

   $ 60      3.77   $ 723      4.56   $ 663      5.74   $ —        —     $ 1,446      5.07

State and political subdivisions

     7,809      4.89        17,591      5.30        2,839      6.48        111      6.31        28,350      5.31   
                                                  

Total

   $ 7,869      4.88      $ 18,314      5.27      $ 3,502      6.34      $ 111      6.31      $ 29,796      5.30   
                                                  

Percentage of total

     26.4       61.4       11.8       0.4       100.0  
                                                  

Available for Sale

                    

U.S. Treasury and other federal agencies

   $ 38,030      1.83   $ 244,971      4.23   $ 12,128      1.14   $ 51,708      1.03   $ 346,837      3.38

State and political subdivisions

     2,788      5.24        4,090      6.06        2,747      5.53        —        —          9,625      5.67   

Other securities

     20,406      2.48        —        —          —        —          10,508      7.04        30,914      4.04   
                                                  

Total

   $ 61,224      2.20      $ 249,061      4.26      $ 14,875      1.95      $ 62,216      2.05      $ 387,376      3.49   
                                                  

Percentage of total

     15.8       64.3       3.8       16.1       100.0  
                                                  

Total securities

   $ 69,093      2.51   $ 267,375      4.33   $ 18,377      2.79   $ 62,327      2.06   $ 417,172      3.62
                                                  

Percentage of total

     16.5       64.1       4.4       15.0       100.0  

 

 * Yield on a taxable equivalent basis

 

A-11


Table of Contents

Loans

The Company has historically generated loan growth from both internal originations and acquisitions. Total loans decreased $19.2 million to $2.7 billion, a decrease of 0.7%, in 2009 compared to an increase of $270.8 million, or 10.9%, in 2008 and an increase of $161.5 million, or 6.9% in 2007. Loans declined slightly in 2009 due to the slowing regional economy.

Composition

The Company’s loan portfolio is diversified among various types of commercial and individual borrowers. Commercial loans are comprised principally of loans to companies in light manufacturing, retail and service industries. Construction and development loans totaled $202 million, or 7.4% of total loans at the end of 2009, compared to $246 million, or 8.9% of total loans at the end of 2008 and $223 million, or 9.0% of total loans at the end of 2007. Real estate loans secured by farmland, multifamily, commercial and one to four family housing represented 53.0% of total loans at December 31, 2009, compared to 52.5% of total loans at December 31, 2008 and 51.6% of total loans at December 31, 2007. Consumer loans are comprised primarily of loans to individuals for automobiles and students loans. The Company did not have any credit card receivables at year end 2009, 2008 or 2007. Student loans have increased to $148.2 million at year end up from $131.2 million at December 31, 2008 and $79.5 million at December 31, 2007. The increase in student loans was due to the exit of many other financial institutions from this activity, leaving the Company as one of the few remaining student lenders in Oklahoma.

Loans secured by real estate including farmland, multifamily, commercial, one to four family housing and construction and development loans, have been a large portion of the Company’s loan portfolio. In 2009, this percentage was 60.4%, compared to 61.5% for 2008 and 60.5% for 2007. The Company is subject to risk of future market fluctuations in property values relating to these loans. The Company attempts to manage this risk through rigorous loan underwriting standards.

LOANS BY CATEGORY

 

    December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    Amount   % of
Total
    Amount   % of
Total
    Amount   % of
Total
    Amount   % of
Total
    Amount   % of
Total
 
    (Dollars in thousands)  

Commercial, financial and other

  $ 733,386   26.76   $ 726,602   26.35   $ 711,124   28.59   $ 621,675   26.73   $ 651,176   28.10

Real estate—construction

    201,704   7.37        246,269   8.93        222,820   8.96        223,561   9.61        215,965   9.32   

Real estate—one to four family

    569,592   20.80        543,183   19.70        513,969   20.67        516,727   22.22        512,513   22.11   

Real estate—farmland, multifamily and commercial

    881,495   32.19        905,862   32.84        768,451   30.89        705,452   30.34        661,398   28.54   

Consumer

    352,477   12.88        335,938   12.18        270,735   10.89        258,133   11.10        276,374   11.93   
                                                           

Total

  $ 2,738,654   100.00   $ 2,757,854   100.00   $ 2,487,099   100.00   $ 2,325,548   100.00   $ 2,317,426   100.00
                                                           

 

A-12


Table of Contents

MATURITY AND RATE SENSITIVITY OF LOANS

The following table presents the Maturity and Rate Sensitivity of Loans at December 31, 2009, for commercial, financial and other loans, and real estate loans, excluding one to four family residential loans and consumer loans. Approximately 50% of the commercial real estate and other commercial loans have maturities of one year or less. However, many of these loans are renewed at existing or similar terms after scheduled principal reductions. Also, approximately 64% of the commercial real estate and other commercial loans had adjustable interest rates at year-end 2009.

During 2009 the Company set rate floors, generally ranging from 4% to 5.5%. At year end approximately 62% of the floating rate loan portfolio was at the floor rate. Short-term rates would have to increase approximately 100 basis points before the Company’s loan portfolio would experience a measurable increase in yield.

December 31, 2009

 

     Maturing        
      Within
One Year
    After One
But
Within
Five Years
    After Five
Years
    Total  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Commercial, financial and other

   $ 416,119      $ 283,204      $ 34,063      $ 733,386   

Real estate—construction

     170,479        20,506        10,719        201,704   

Real estate—farmland, multifamily and commercial

        

(excluding loans secured by 1 to 4 family residential properties)

     320,345        333,466        227,684        881,495   
                                

Total

   $ 906,943      $ 637,176      $ 272,466      $ 1,816,585   
                                

Loans with predetermined interest rates

   $ 290,598      $ 273,299      $ 96,319      $ 660,216   

Loans with adjustable interest rates

     616,345        363,877        176,147        1,156,369   
                                

Total

   $ 906,943      $ 637,176      $ 272,466      $ 1,816,585   
                                

Percentage of total

     49.9     35.1     15.0     100.0
                                

The information relating to the maturity and rate sensitivity of loans is based upon contractual maturities and original loan terms. In the ordinary course of business, loans maturing within one year may be renewed, in whole or in part, at interest rates prevailing at the date of renewal.

Nonperforming and Restructured Loans

During 2009, nonperforming and restructured assets increased $22.1 million to $49.8 million, an increase of 79.8%. This compares to an increase of $12.6 million to $27.7 million, or 83.8%, in 2008 and an increase of $1.5 million to $15.1 million, or 10.5%, in 2007. The increase resulted from nonperformance on loans of several commercial customers in 2009 and 2008 from relatively low levels of nonperformance in 2007. Nonperforming and restructured loans as a percentage of total loans was 1.46% at year-end 2009, compared to 0.86% at year-end 2008 and 0.54% at year-end 2007.

Nonaccrual loans negatively impact the Company’s net interest margin. A loan is placed on nonaccrual status when, in the opinion of management, the future collectibility of interest or principal or both is in serious doubt. Interest income is recognized on certain of these loans on a cash basis if the full collection of the remaining principal balance is reasonably expected. Otherwise, interest income is not recognized until the principal balance is fully collected. Nonaccrual loans increased $15.8 million to $37.1 million, an increase of 73.9%, in 2009, compared to an increase of $9.8 million or 84.6% in 2008 and an increase of $2.2 million or

 

A-13


Table of Contents

23.4% in 2007. Total interest income which was not accrued on nonaccrual loans outstanding at year end was approximately $1.4 million in 2009, $1.4 million in 2008 and $564,000 in 2007. Only a small amount of this interest is expected to be ultimately collected.

The classification of a loan as nonperforming does not necessarily indicate that loan principal and interest will ultimately be uncollectible; although in a weakening economy, the Company’s experience has been that the level of collections decline. The above normal risk associated with nonperforming loans has been considered in the determination of the allowance for loan losses. At year-end 2009, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming and restructured loans was 91.1%, compared to 144.5% at the end of 2008 and 215.6% at the end of 2007. The decrease in the allowance to nonperforming and restructured loans was largely impacted by the relatively high percentage of highly collateralized loans.

At year-end 2009, other real estate owned and repossessed assets increased to $9.9 million from $4.0 million in 2008 and $1.6 million in 2007. Other real estate owned consists of properties acquired through foreclosure proceedings or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure, and premises held for sale. These properties are carried at the lower of the book values of the related loans or fair market values based upon appraisals, less estimated costs to sell. Writedowns arising at the time of reclassification of such properties from loans to other real estate owned are charged directly to the allowance for loan losses. Any losses on bank premises designated to be sold are charged to operating expense at the time of transfer from premises to other real estate owned. Decreases in values of properties subsequent to their classification as other real estate owned are charged to operating expense.

NONPERFORMING AND RESTRUCTURED ASSETS

 

     December 31,  
     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
           (Dollars in thousands)        

Past due over 90 days and still accruing

   $ 853      $ 1,346      $ 823      $ 1,884      $ 1,455   

Nonaccrual

     37,133        21,359        11,568        9,371        7,344   

Restructured

     1,970        1,022        1,121        715        581   
                                        

Total nonperforming and restructured loans

     39,956        23,727        13,512        11,970        9,380   

Other real estate owned and repossessed assets

     9,881        3,997        1,568        1,675        2,262   
                                        

Total nonperforming and restructured assets

   $ 49,837      $ 27,724      $ 15,080      $ 13,645      $ 11,642   
                                        

Nonperforming and restructured loans to total loans

     1.46     0.86     0.54     0.51     0.40
                                        

Nonperforming and restructured assets to total assets

     1.13     0.72     0.40     0.40     0.36
                                        

Potential problem loans are performing loans to borrowers with a weakened financial condition, or which are experiencing unfavorable trends in their financial condition, which causes management to have concerns as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the existing repayment terms. BancFirst had approximately $73.6 million, $66.8 million and $35.0 million of these loans at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which were not included in nonperforming and restructured assets. In general, these loans are adequately collateralized and have no specific identifiable probable loss. Loans which are considered to have identifiable probable loss potential are placed on nonaccrual status, are allocated a specific allowance for loss or are directly charged-down, and are reported as nonperforming. The Company’s nonaccrual loans are primarily commercial and real estate loans.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses reflects management’s estimate of loss incurred in the Company’s loan portfolio through the balance sheet date. The allowance and its adequacy is determined through consideration of many factors, including past loan loss experience, current evaluations of known impaired loans, levels of

 

A-14


Table of Contents

adversely classified loans, general economic conditions and other environmental factors. The Company’s methodology causes an increase in the reserve upon identification of a potential problem loan. Subsequent deterioration of the loan to nonperforming status does not necessarily cause an increase to the allowance for loan losses if the provision was adequate. The process of evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves the exercise of judgment and consideration of numerous subjective factors existing at year end. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the estimate of incurred losses will not change as economic and environmental factors change from that date. Furthermore, in the future, additional loan loss provisions will be required for future losses as they occur. In 2009, the Company’s allowance for loan losses represented 1.33% of total loans, compared to 1.24% for 2008 and 1.17% for 2007. In 2009 and 2008, the Company’s loan portfolio began to experience some isolated credit issues with several customers due primarily to a decline in collateral values and to a lesser extent, nonperformance. These credit issues along with loan growth and charge-offs caused an increase in the level of the loan loss provision. If deterioration in the national economy and the credit markets continues, it would be reasonable to expect that the allowance for loan losses would increase in future periods.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company’s recent net charge-off experience continued to remain relatively low compared to the banking industry at both the state and national levels. In 2009, the Company recognized $8.3 million of net charge-offs, which represented 0.30% of average loans, compared to $5.5 million, or 0.21%, for 2008 and $1.9 million, or 0.08%, for 2007.

 

A-15


Table of Contents

ANALYSIS OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 34,290      $ 29,127      $ 27,700      $ 27,517      $ 25,746   
                                        

Charge-offs:

          

Commercial

     (4,940     (1,901     (455     (1,383     (1,249

Real estate

     (2,182     (3,326     (1,304     (778     (1,045

Consumer

     (1,008     (897     (888     (1,226     (1,425

Other

     (823     (151     (36     (94     (125
                                        

Total charge-offs

     (8,953     (6,275     (2,683     (3,481     (3,844
                                        

Recoveries:

          

Commercial

     172        187        200        277        201   

Real estate

     137        118        203        686        101   

Consumer

     252        221        312        342        345   

Other

     96        236        66        59        60   
                                        

Total recoveries

     657        762        781        1,364        707   
                                        

Net charge-offs

     (8,296     (5,513     (1,902     (2,117     (3,137

Provision charged to operations

     10,389        10,676        3,329        1,790        4,607   

Additions from acquisitions

     —          —          —          510        301   
                                        

Balance at end of period

   $ 36,383      $ 34,290      $ 29,127      $ 27,700      $ 27,517   
                                        

Average loans

   $ 2,749,544      $ 2,612,553      $ 2,364,618      $ 2,321,459      $ 2,210,737   
                                        

Total loans

   $ 2,738,654      $ 2,757,854      $ 2,487,099      $ 2,325,548      $ 2,317,426   
                                        

Net charge-offs to average loans

     0.30     0.21     0.08     0.09     0.14
                                        

Allowance to total loans

     1.33     1.24     1.17     1.19     1.19
                                        

Allocation of the allowance by category of loans:

          

Commercial, financial and other

   $ 9,789      $ 9,520      $ 8,453      $ 7,364      $ 7,738   

Real estate—construction

     3,447        3,231        3,261        2,939        2,726   

Real estate—mortgage

     18,533        17,421        14,269        14,121        13,597   

Consumer

     4,614        4,118        3,144        3,276        3,456   
                                        

Total

   $ 36,383      $ 34,290      $ 29,127      $ 27,700      $ 27,517   
                                        

Percentage of loans in each category to total loans:

          

Commercial, financial and other

     26.90     27.76     29.02     26.58     28.10

Real estate—construction

     9.47        9.42        11.20        10.61        9.32   

Real estate—mortgage

     50.95        50.81        48.99        50.98        50.65   

Consumer

     12.68        12.01        10.79        11.83        11.93   
                                        

Total

     100.00     100.00     100.00     100.00     100.00
                                        

 

A-16


Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Assets

Identifiable intangible assets and goodwill totaled $41.8 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008 compared to $42.4 million at December 31, 2007. The value of these intangible assets and goodwill was not considered to be impaired. Other assets at December 31, 2009 include $46.4 million of cash surrender value of life insurance from life insurance companies with satisfactory credit ratings and $19.0 million of prepaid FDIC deposit insurance premium.

Liquidity and Funding

The Company’s principal source of liquidity and funding is its broad deposit base generated from customer relationships. The availability of deposits is affected by economic conditions, competition with other financial institutions, and alternative investments available to customers. Through interest rates paid, service charge levels and services offered, the Company can, to a limited extent, affect its level of deposits. The level and maturity of funding necessary to support the Company’s lending and investment functions is determined through the Company’s asset/liability management process. In addition to deposits, short-term borrowings comprised primarily of Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements provide additional funding sources. The Company does not utilize brokered CDs and currently does not have any long-term borrowings. The Company could also utilize the sale of loans, securities, and liquidation of other assets as sources of liquidity and funding.

Total deposits increased $551 million to $3.9 billion, an increase of 16.3% in 2009, compared to an increase of $89 million or 2.7%, in 2008, and $314 million, or 10.6%, in 2007. The increase in deposits during 2009 is largely due to approximately $450 million in overnight sweep funds that moved into low-rate interest-bearing transaction accounts due to low interest rates on money market funds. These deposits were insured because the Company participates in the Transaction Account Guarantee Program (“TAGP”). The increases in 2008 and 2007 were due strictly to internal growth. Demand deposits as a percentage of total deposits averaged 28.5% in 2009, 28.8% in 2008 and 28.2% in 2007. The Company’s core deposits provide it with a stable, low-cost funding source. Core deposits averaged 89.3%, 89.7% and 90.4% of total deposits in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The TAGP is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2010. Some of the deposits currently insured by the TAGP could move back into money market funds or to other depository institutions.

ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE DEPOSITS

 

     Year Ended December 31,
     2009    2008    2007    2006    2005
          (Dollars in thousands)     

Average Balances

              

Demand deposits

   $ 1,054,291    $ 955,847    $ 877,474    $ 874,013    $ 831,202

Interest-bearing transaction deposits

     518,914      423,773      398,786      428,620      379,084

Savings deposits

     1,228,697      1,100,184      1,048,935      884,714      788,587

Time deposits under $100

     504,931      492,651      486,089      499,293      461,761
                                  

Total core deposits

     3,306,833      2,972,455      2,811,284      2,686,640      2,460,634

Time deposits of $100 or more

     395,438      342,061      298,316      255,959      221,169
                                  

Total deposits

   $ 3,702,271    $ 3,314,516    $ 3,109,600    $ 2,942,599    $ 2,681,803
                                  

 

A-17


Table of Contents

Percentage of Total Average Deposits and Average Rates Paid

 

     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
     % of
Total
    Rate     % of
Total
    Rate     % of
Total
    Rate     % of
Total
    Rate     % of
Total
    Rate  

Demand deposits

   28.47     28.84     28.22     29.70     31.00  

Interest-bearing transaction deposits

   14.02      0.23   12.79      0.50   12.83      0.75   14.57      0.81   14.13      0.65

Savings deposits

   33.19      1.26      33.19      2.21      33.73      3.81      30.06      3.43      29.40      1.82   

Time deposits under $100

   13.64      2.26      14.86      3.52      15.63      4.47      16.97      3.85      17.22      2.46   
                                        

Total core deposits

   89.32        89.68        90.41        91.30        91.75     

Time deposits of $100 or more

   10.68      2.19      10.32      3.67      9.59      4.71      8.70      4.13      8.25      2.78   
                                        

Total deposits

   100.00     100.00     100.00     100.00     100.00  
                                        

Average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits

     1.36     2.39     3.52     3.07     1.68
                                        

The Company has not utilized brokered deposits. At December 31, 2009, 86.5% of its time deposits of $100,000 or more mature in one year or less.

MATURITY OF CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT

 

     December 31,
2009
     (In thousands)

$100,000 or More

  

Three months or less

   $ 125,623

Over three months through six months

     89,142

Over six months through twelve months

     113,490

Over twelve months

     51,338
      

Total

   $ 379,593
      

Short-term borrowings, consisting primarily of Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements, are another source of funds for the Company. The level of these borrowings is determined by various factors, including customer demand and the Company’s ability to earn a favorable spread on the funds obtained. Short-term borrowings totaled $100,000 at December 31, 2009, compared to $12.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $30.4 million at December 31, 2007.

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka, Kansas (the “FHLB”) and borrows, on a limited basis, from the FHLB. These borrowings are principally used to match-fund longer-term, fixed-rate loans, and are collateralized by a pledge of residential first mortgages and certain securities. The Bank had no long-term borrowings at December 31, 2009 or 2008, but had $606,000 at December 31, 2007.

Historically, the Bank is more liquid than its peers. This liquidity positions the Bank to respond to increased loan demand and other requirements for funds, or to decreases in funding sources. The liquidity of BancFirst Corporation, however, is dependent upon dividend payments from the Bank and its ability to obtain financing. Banking regulations limit bank dividends based upon net earnings retained by the bank and minimum capital requirements. Dividends in excess of these limits require regulatory approval. At January 1, 2010, the Bank had approximately $47.2 million of equity available for dividends to BancFirst Corporation without regulatory approval. During 2009, the Bank declared four common stock dividends totaling $13.8 million and two preferred stock dividends totaling $1.9 million.

 

A-18


Table of Contents

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The Company has various contractual obligations that require future cash payments. The following table presents certain known payments for contractual obligations, by payment due period, as of December 31, 2009.

 

     Payment Due By Period
     Less Than
1 Year
   1 to 3
Years
   3 to 5
Years
   Over 5
Years
   Indeterminate
Maturity
   Totals
               (Dollars in Thousands)          

Junior subordinated debentures (1)

   $ 1,872    $ 3,744    $ 3,744    $ 62,036    $ —      $ 71,396

Operating lease payments

     671      804      290      642      —        2,407

Certificates of deposit

     736,831      89,403      38,274      59      —        864,567
                                         

Total contractual cash obligations

   $ 739,374    $ 93,951    $ 42,308    $ 62,737    $ —      $ 938,370
                                         

 

(1) Includes principal and interest.

Capital Resources

Stockholders’ equity totaled $431 million at year-end 2009, compared to $414 million at year-end 2008 and $372 million at year-end 2007. Stockholders’ equity has continued to increase due to net earnings retained, stock option exercises, and unrealized gains on securities, offset by common stock repurchases, dividends and unrealized losses on securities. The Company’s average equity capital ratio for 2009 was 10.15%, compared to 10.35% for 2008 and 10.18% for 2007. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s leverage ratio was 9.23%, its Tier 1 capital ratio was 13.73%, and its total risk-based capital ratio was 14.96%; compared to minimum requirements of 3%, 4% and 8%, respectively. Banking institutions are generally expected to maintain capital well above the minimum levels.

In November 1999, the Company adopted a Stock Repurchase Program (the “SRP”) authorizing management to repurchase up to 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The SRP was amended in May 2001, August of 2002, and September of 2007 to increase the shares authorized to be purchased by 555,832 shares, 364,530 shares and 366,948 shares, respectively. The SRP may be used as a means to increase earnings per share and return on equity, to purchase treasury stock for the exercise of stock options or for distributions under the Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, to provide liquidity for optionees to dispose of stock from exercises of their stock options, and to provide liquidity for shareholders wishing to sell their stock. The timing, price and amount of stock repurchases under the SRP may be determined by management and must be approved by the Company’s Executive Committee. At December 31, 2009 there were 560,000 shares remaining that could be repurchased under the SRP.

In January 1997, BancFirst Corporation established BFC Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), a trust formed under the Delaware Business Trust Act. BancFirst Corporation owned all of the common securities of the Trust. In February 1997, the Trust issued $25 million of aggregate liquidation amount of 9.65% Capital Securities, Series A (the “Capital Securities”) to other investors. The proceeds from the sale of the Capital Securities and the common securities of the Trust were invested in $25 million of 9.65% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures, Series A (the “9.65% Junior Subordinated Debentures”) of BancFirst Corporation. The Series A Capital Securities and 9.65% Junior Subordinated Debentures were subsequently exchanged for Series B Capital Securities and Junior Subordinated Debentures, pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement. The terms of the Series A and Series B securities were identical in all material respects. Interest payments on the 9.65% Junior Subordinated Debentures were payable January 15 and July 15 of each year. Such interest payments were deferrable for up to ten consecutive semi-annual periods. The stated maturity date of the 9.65% Junior Subordinated Debentures was January 15, 2027, but they were subject to mandatory redemption pursuant to optional prepayment terms. The optional prepayment terms allowed for prepayment on or after January 15, 2007, in whole or in part, at a prepayment price equal to 104.825% of the principal amount thereof on January 15, 2007, declining ratably on each January 15 thereafter to 100% on or after January 15, 2017. The Capital

 

A-19


Table of Contents

Securities represented an undivided interest in the 9.65% Junior Subordinated Debentures and were guaranteed by BancFirst Corporation. During any deferral period or during any event of default, BancFirst Corporation may not declare or pay any dividends on any of its capital stock.

In November 2006, the Company made the determination to exercise the optional prepayment terms of the Capital Securities and the 9.65% Junior Subordinated Debentures. The securities were redeemed on January 15, 2007 for a redemption price equal to 104.825% of the aggregate $25 million liquidation amount plus all accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. As a result of these transactions, the Company incurred a one-time charge of approximately $1.2 million after taxes at the time of the redemption. The one-time charge reflects the premium paid and the recognition of the unamortized issuance costs.

In January 2004, BancFirst Corporation established BFC Capital Trust II (“BFC II”), a trust formed under the Delaware Business Trust Act. BancFirst Corporation owns all of the common securities of BFC II. In February 2004, BFC II issued $25 million of aggregate liquidation amount of 7.20% Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities (the “Trust Preferred Securities”) to other investors. In March 2004, BFC II issued an additional $1 million in Trust Preferred Securities through the execution of an over-allotment option. The proceeds from the sale of the Trust Preferred Securities and the common securities of BFC II were invested in $26.8 million of 7.20% Junior Subordinated Debentures of BancFirst Corporation. Interest payments on the 7.20% Junior Subordinated Debentures are payable January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15 of each year. Such interest payments may be deferred for up to twenty consecutive quarters. The stated maturity date of the 7.20% Junior Subordinated Debentures is March 31, 2034, but they are subject to mandatory redemption pursuant to optional prepayment terms. The Trust Preferred Securities represent an undivided interest in the 7.20% Junior Subordinated Debentures and are guaranteed by BancFirst Corporation. During any deferral period or during any event of default, BancFirst Corporation may not declare or pay any dividends on any of its capital stock. In March 2005, the Federal Reserve Board adopted a final rule that allows the continued limited inclusion of trust preferred securities in the Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies. The Trust Preferred Securities are callable at par, in whole or in part, after March 31, 2009. Given the current interest rate environment and the relatively inactive secondary markets, it is unlikely that the call provision will be exercised in the near future.

Future dividend payments will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial condition of the Company and the Bank, their capital needs, applicable governmental policies and regulations and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems appropriate. While no assurance can be given as to the Company’s ability to pay dividends, management believes that, based upon the anticipated performance of the Company, regular dividend payments will continue in 2010.

In September 2007, the Company completed a modified Dutch auction self-tender offer and purchased 539,453 shares of its common stock for the maximum offering price of $45.00 per share. Cash on hand was used to pay for the purchase of the stock.

Market Risk

Market risk refers to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and other relevant market rates and prices, such as equity prices. The risk of loss can be assessed from the perspective of adverse changes in fair values, cash flows, and future earnings. Due to the nature of its operations, the Company is primarily exposed to interest rate risk arising principally from its lending, investing, deposit and borrowing activities and, to a lesser extent, liquidity risk.

Interest rate risk on the Company’s balance sheets consists of repricing, option, and basis risks. Repricing risk results from the differences in the maturity, or repricing, of asset and liability portfolios. Option risk arises from “embedded options” present in many financial instruments such as loan prepayment options, deposit early withdrawal options and interest rate options. These options allow customers opportunities to benefit when market interest rates change, which typically results in higher costs or lower revenue for the Company. Basis risk refers

 

A-20


Table of Contents

to the potential for changes in the underlying relationship between market rates and indices, which subsequently result in a narrowing of the profit spread on an earning asset or liability. Basis risk is also present in administered rate liabilities, such as savings accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal accounts, and money market accounts where historical pricing relationships to market rates may change due to the level or directional change in market interest rates.

The Company seeks to reduce fluctuations in its net interest margin and to optimize net interest income with acceptable levels of risk through periods of changing interest rates. Accordingly, the Company’s interest rate sensitivity and liquidity are monitored on an ongoing basis by its Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). ALCO establishes risk measures, limits and policy guidelines for managing the amount of interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital. A variety of measures are used to provide for a comprehensive view of the magnitude of interest rate risk, the distribution of risk, the level of risk over time and the exposure to changes in certain interest rate relationships.

The Company utilizes an earnings simulation model as a quantitative tool in measuring the amount of interest rate risk associated with changing market rates. The model quantifies the effects of various interest rate scenarios on projected net interest income over the next 12 months. These simulations incorporate assumptions regarding pricing and the repricing and maturity characteristics of the existing balance sheet.

The ALCO continuously monitors and manages the balance between interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities. The objective is to manage the impact of fluctuating market rates on net interest income within acceptable levels. In order to meet this objective, management may lengthen or shorten the duration of assets or liabilities.

As of December 31, 2009, the model simulations projected that a 100 and 200 basis point increase would result in positive variances in net interest income of 3.26% and 6.95%, respectively, relative to the base case, over the next 12 months. Conversely, the model simulation projected that a decrease in interest rates of 25 basis points would result in a negative variance in net interest income of 2.23% relative to the base case, over the next 12 months. The likelihood of a decrease in interest rates beyond 25 basis points as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was considered to be remote given prevailing interest rate levels.

MARKET RISK

The following table presents the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, their expected maturities and their estimated fair values at December 31, 2009.

 

     Avg
Rate
    Expected Maturity / Principal Repayments at December 31,   Balance   Fair Value
     2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   Thereafter    
     (Dollars in thousands)

Interest Sensitive Assets

                  

Loans

   5.57   $ 1,694,869   $ 398,397   $ 332,074   $ 176,736   $ 57,163   $ 79,415   $ 2,738,654   $ 2,694,276

Securities

   3.63        69,094     103,312     112,617     29,074     22,372     80,703     417,172     418,112

Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits

   0.32        934,654     —       —       —       —       —       934,654     933,907

Interest Sensitive Liabilities

                  

Savings and transaction deposits

   0.96        3,064,449     —       —       —       —       —       3,064,449     3,081,210

Time deposits

   2.23        736,831     68,604     20,799     13,705     24,569     59     864,567     867,858

Short-term borrowings

   0.38        100     —       —       —       —       —       100     100

Long-term borrowings

   —          —       —       —       —       —       —       —       —  

Junior subordinated debentures

   7.33        —       —       —       —       —       26,804     26,804     26,847

Off Balance Sheet Items

                  

Loan commitments

       —       —       —       —       —       —       —       1,118

Letters of credit

       —       —       —       —       —       —       —       463

 

A-21


Table of Contents

The expected maturities and principal repayments are based upon the contractual terms of the instruments. Prepayments have been estimated for certain instruments with predictable prepayment rates. Savings and transaction deposits are assumed to mature all in the first year as they are not subject to withdrawal restrictions and any assumptions regarding decay rates would be very subjective. The actual maturities and principal repayments for the financial instruments could vary substantially from the contractual terms and assumptions used in the analysis.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in note (1) to the consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States inherently involves the use of estimates and assumptions, which affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the related disclosures. These estimates relate principally to the allowance for loan losses, income taxes, intangible assets and the fair value of financial instruments. Such estimates and assumptions may change over time and actual amounts realized may differ from those reported. The following is a summary of the accounting policies and estimates that management believes are the most critical.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is management’s estimate of the probable losses incurred in the Company’s loan portfolio through the balance sheet date.

The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions charged to operating expense and is reduced by net loan charge-offs. The amount of the allowance for loan losses is based on past loan loss experience, evaluations of known impaired loans, levels of adversely classified loans, general economic conditions and other environmental factors. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The majority of the Company’s impaired loans are collateral dependent. For collateral dependent loans, the amount of impairment is measured based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral and is included in the allowance for loan losses.

The amount of the allowance for loan losses is first estimated by each business unit’s management based on their evaluation of their unit’s portfolio. This evaluation involves identifying impaired and adversely classified loans. Specific allowances for losses are determined for impaired loans based on either the loans’ estimated discounted cash flows or the fair values of the collateral. Allowances for adversely classified loans are estimated using historical loss percentages for each type of loan adjusted for various economic and environmental factors related to the underlying loans. An allowance is also estimated for non-adversely classified loans using a historical loss percentage based on losses arising specifically from non-adversely classified loans, adjusted for various economic and environmental factors related to the underlying loans. Each month the Company’s Senior Loan Committee reviews each business unit’s allowance, and the aggregate allowance for the Company and, on a quarterly basis, adjusts and approves the adequacy of the allowance. The Senior Loan Committee also periodically evaluates and establishes the loss percentages used in the estimates of the allowance based on historical loss data, and giving consideration to their assessment of current economic and environmental conditions. To facilitate the Senior Loan Committee’s evaluation, the Company’s Asset Quality Department performs periodic reviews of each of the Company’s business units and reports on the adequacy of management’s identification of impaired and adversely classified loans, and their adherence to the Company’s loan policies and procedures.

The process of evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves the exercise of judgment and consideration of numerous subjective factors and, accordingly, there can be no assurance that the estimate of incurred losses will not change in light of future developments and economic conditions. Different assumptions and conditions could result in a materially different amount for the allowance for loan losses.

 

A-22


Table of Contents

Income Taxes

The Company files a consolidated income tax return. Deferred taxes are recognized under the liability method based upon the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities, using the tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods when the related temporary differences are expected to be realized.

The amount of accrued current and deferred income taxes is based on estimates of taxes due or receivable from taxing authorities either currently or in the future. Changes in these accruals are reported as tax expense, and involve estimates of the various components included in determining taxable income, tax credits, other taxes and temporary differences. Changes periodically occur in the estimates due to changes in tax rates, tax laws and regulations, and implementation of new tax planning strategies. The process of determining the accruals for income taxes necessarily involves the exercise of considerable judgment and consideration of numerous subjective factors.

Management performs an analysis of the Company’s tax positions annually and believes it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax positions will be realized in future years.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Core deposit intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the core deposits. Other customer relationship intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis of eighteen years. Goodwill is not amortized. Annually in the fourth quarter intangible assets are reviewed for reassessment of useful lives and goodwill is evaluated for possible impairment. Impairment losses are measured by comparing the fair values of the intangible assets with their recorded amounts. Any impairment losses are reported in the income statement.

The evaluation of remaining original core deposit intangibles for possible impairment involves reassessing the useful lives and the recoverability of the intangible assets. The evaluation of the useful lives is performed by reviewing the levels of core deposits of the respective branches acquired. The actual life of a core deposit base may be longer than originally estimated due to more successful retention of customers, or may be shorter due to more rapid runoff. Amortization of core deposit intangibles would be adjusted, if necessary, to amortize the remaining net book values over the remaining lives of the core deposits. The evaluation for recoverability is only performed if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangibles may not be recoverable.

The evaluation of goodwill for possible impairment is performed by comparing the fair values of the related reporting units with their carrying amounts including goodwill. The fair values of the related business units are estimated using market data for prices of recent acquisitions of banks and branches.

The evaluation of intangible assets and goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2009 resulted in no impairments.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Securities that are being held for indefinite periods of time, or that may be sold as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy, to provide liquidity or for other reasons, are classified as available for sale and are stated at estimated market value. Unrealized gains or losses on securities available for sale are reported as a component of stockholders’ equity, net of income tax. Securities that are determined to be impaired, and for which such impairment is determined to be other than temporary, are adjusted to fair value and a corresponding loss is recognized.

 

A-23


Table of Contents

The estimates of fair values of securities and other financial instruments are based on a variety of factors. In some cases, fair values represent quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments. In other cases, fair values have been estimated based on assumptions concerning the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates reflecting varying degrees of risk. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of year end or that will be realized in the future.

Future Application of Accounting Standards

See note (1) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.

Segment Information

See note (22) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosures regarding the Company’s operating business segments.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Company may make forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to earnings, credit quality, corporate objectives, interest rates and other financial and business matters. Forward-looking statements include estimates and give management’s current expectations or forecasts of future events. The Company cautions readers that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, including economic conditions; the performance of financial markets and interest rates; legislative and regulatory actions and reforms; competition; as well as other factors, all of which change over time. Actual results may differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

A-24


Table of Contents

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment and criteria, management has determined that the Company has maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.

Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 and has issued an unqualified report thereon.

BancFirst Corporation

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

March 16, 2010

 

/S/    DAVID E. RAINBOLT        
David E. Rainbolt
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/S/    JOE T. SHOCKLEY, JR.        
Joe T. Shockley, Jr.
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/S/    RANDY FORAKER        
Randy Foraker
Executive Vice President and
Chief Risk Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

 

A-25


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

BancFirst Corporation Board of Directors and Shareholders

We have audited internal control over financial reporting of BancFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of BancFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flow for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and our report dated March 16, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

March 16, 2010

 

A-26


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

BancFirst Corporation Board of Directors and Shareholders

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BancFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flow for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BancFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 16, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

March 16, 2010

 

A-27


Table of Contents

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

     December 31,  
     2009     2008  
ASSETS     

Cash and due from banks

   $ 106,856      $ 126,227   

Interest-bearing deposits with banks

     929,654        326,874   

Federal funds sold

     5,000        1,000   

Securities (market value: $418,112 and $456,075, respectively)

     417,172        455,568   

Loans:

    

Total loans (net of unearned interest)

     2,738,654        2,757,854   

Allowance for loan losses

     (36,383     (34,290
                

Loans, net

     2,702,271        2,723,564   

Premises and equipment, net

     91,794        91,411   

Other real estate owned, net

     9,505        3,782   

Intangible assets, net

     7,144        7,508   

Goodwill

     34,684        34,327   

Accrued interest receivable

     21,670        24,398   

Other assets

     90,365        72,545   
                

Total assets

   $ 4,416,115      $ 3,867,204   
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Deposits:

    

Noninterest-bearing

   $ 1,157,688      $ 1,025,749   

Interest-bearing

     2,771,328        2,351,859   
                

Total deposits

     3,929,016        3,377,608   

Short-term borrowings

     100        12,884   

Accrued interest payable

     3,886        5,827   

Other liabilities

     25,559        30,290   

Junior subordinated debentures

     26,804        26,804   
                

Total liabilities

     3,985,365        3,453,413   
                

Commitments and contingent liabilities (note 19)

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Senior preferred stock, $1.00 par; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued

     —          —     

Cumulative preferred stock, $5.00 par; 900,000 shares authorized; none issued

     —          —     

Common stock, $1.00 par; 20,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 15,308,741 and 15,281,141, respectively

     15,309        15,281   

Capital surplus

     69,725        67,975   

Retained earnings

     334,693        315,858   

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income tax of $(5,915) and $(7,903), respectively

     11,023        14,677   
                

Total stockholders’ equity

     430,750        413,791   
                

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 4,416,115      $ 3,867,204   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

A-28


Table of Contents

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2009     2008    2007  

INTEREST INCOME

       

Loans, including fees

   $ 152,731      $ 172,234    $ 189,786   

Securities:

       

Taxable

     13,436        16,387      18,397   

Tax-exempt

     1,398        1,439      1,398   

Federal funds sold

     1        7,315      21,047   

Interest-bearing deposits with banks

     2,240        549      121   
                       

Total interest income

     169,806        197,924      230,749   
                       

INTEREST EXPENSE

       

Deposits

     36,508        56,384      78,606   

Short-term borrowings

     11        458      1,667   

Long-term borrowings

     —          9      50   

Junior subordinated debentures

     1,966        1,966      2,140   
                       

Total interest expense

     38,485        58,817      82,463   
                       

Net interest income

     131,321        139,107      148,286   

Provision for loan losses

     10,389        10,676      3,329   
                       

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     120,932        128,431      144,957   
                       

NONINTEREST INCOME

       

Trust revenue

     5,826        5,972      6,077   

Service charges on deposits

     37,096        33,060      29,395   

Securities transactions

     336        6,938      8,337   

Income from sales of loans

     2,779        2,127      2,397   

Insurance commissions and premiums

     6,979        6,913      6,434   

Insurance recovery

     —          —        3,139   

Cash management

     8,476        10,796      9,296   

Gain on sale of other assets

     213        2,971      31   

Other

     5,159        5,608      6,032   
                       

Total noninterest income

     66,864        74,385      71,138   
                       

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

       

Salaries and employee benefits

     79,019        79,886      76,814   

Occupancy and fixed assets expense, net

     8,346        8,956      8,357   

Depreciation

     7,520        7,647      7,568   

Amortization of intangible assets

     920        902      968   

Data processing services

     3,636        3,297      2,783   

Net expense from other real estate owned

     366        179      128   

Marketing and business promotion

     5,529        6,271      7,606   

Deposit insurance

     7,833        489      359   

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     —          —        1,894   

Other

     25,948        27,379      27,969   
                       

Total noninterest expense

     139,117        135,006      134,446   
                       

Income before taxes

     48,679        67,810      81,649   

Income tax expense

     16,070        23,452      28,556   
                       

Net income

     32,609        44,358      53,093   

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax of $(1,988), $4,161 and $3,688, respectively
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities

     (3,872     3,218      7,536   

Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income

     218        4,510      (687
                       

Comprehensive income

   $ 28,955      $ 52,086    $ 59,942   
                       

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

       

Basic

   $ 2.13      $ 2.91    $ 3.41   
                       

Diluted

   $ 2.09      $ 2.85    $ 3.33   
                       

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

A-29


Table of Contents

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2009     2008     2007  
     Shares    Amount     Shares     Amount     Shares     Amount  

COMMON STOCK

             

Issued at beginning of period

   15,281,141    $ 15,281      15,217,230      $ 15,217      15,764,310      $ 15,764   

Shares issued

   27,600      28      103,911        104      45,373        45   

Shares acquired and canceled

   —        —        (40,000     (40   (592,453     (592
                                         

Issued at end of period

   15,308,741    $ 15,309      15,281,141      $ 15,281      15,217,230      $ 15,217   
                                         

CAPITAL SURPLUS

             

Balance at beginning of period

      $ 67,975        $ 63,917        $ 61,418   

Common stock issued

        460          1,763          740   

Tax effect of stock options

        252          1,103          518   

Stock option expense

        1,038          1,192          1,241   
                               

Balance at end of period

      $ 69,725        $ 67,975        $ 63,917   
                               

RETAINED EARNINGS

             

Balance at beginning of period

      $ 315,858        $ 285,879        $ 271,073   

Net income

        32,609          44,358          53,093   

Dividends on common stock ($0.90, $0.84 and $0.76 per share, respectively)

        (13,774       (12,785       (11,747

Common stock acquired and canceled

        —            (1,594       (26,540
                               

Balance at end of period

      $ 334,693        $ 315,858        $ 285,879   
                               

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

             

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:

             

Balance at beginning of period

      $ 14,677        $ 6,949        $ 100   

Net change

        (3,654       7,728          6,849   
                               

Balance at end of period

      $ 11,023        $ 14,677        $ 6,949   
                               

Total stockholders’ equity

      $ 430,750        $ 413,791        $ 371,962   
                               

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

A-30


Table of Contents

BANCFIRST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(Dollars in thousands)

 

     December 31,  
     2009     2008     2007  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

      

Net income

   $ 32,609      $ 44,358      $ 53,093   

Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Provision for loan losses

     10,389        10,676        3,329   

Depreciation and amortization

     8,440        8,549        8,536   

Net amortization of securities premiums and discounts

     2,556        1,888        261   

Realized securities gains

     (336     (6,938     (8,337

Gain on sales of loans

     (2,779     (2,127     (2,043

Cash receipts from the sale of loans originated for sale

     287,795        122,910        124,976   

Cash disbursements for loans originated for sale

     (321,856     (118,460     (122,134

Deferred income tax provision

     467        (825     504   

(Gains) losses on other assets

     (57     (3,020     119