def14a
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o   Preliminary Proxy Statement
o   Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ   Definitive Proxy Statement
o   Definitive Additional Materials
o   Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
 
READY MIX, INC.
 
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ   No fee required.
o   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
     
     
 
 
  (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
     
     
 
 
  (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
     
     
 
 
  (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
     
     
 
 
  (5)   Total fee paid:
 
     
     
 
o   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
o   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  (1)   Amount Previously Paid:
 
     
     
 
 
  (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
     
     
 
 
  (3)   Filing Party:
 
     
     
 
 
  (4)   Date Filed:
 
     
     
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2007
PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2007
MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 2. THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF SEMPLE, MARCHAL & COOPER, LLP
AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY FOR 2007.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMAITON
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCK AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTANTS
OTHER INFORMATION
OTHER BUSINESS


Table of Contents

READY MIX, INC.
3430 East Flamingo Road, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2007
     To the Shareholders of Ready Mix, Inc.:
     The 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ready Mix, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), will be held at 4602 East Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona, at 11:00 a.m., Arizona time, on June 11, 2007, for the following purposes:
  1.   To elect seven directors to serve for a one-year term;
 
  2.   To ratify the selection of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 2007; and
 
  3.   To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
     Details relating to the above matters are set forth in the attached Proxy Statement. All shareholders of record of the Company as of the close of business on April 4, 2007, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.
     Management of the Company cordially invites you to attend the annual meeting. Your attention is directed to the attached proxy statement for a discussion of the foregoing proposals and the reasons why the board of directors encourages you to vote for approval of proposals 1 and 2. A copy of the Company’s 2006 Annual Report, which includes audited financial statements, was mailed with this notice and proxy statement to all shareholders of record on the record date.
         
  BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
 
  /s/ Bradley E. Larson    
     
  Bradley E. Larson
Chief Executive Officer 
 
 
April 27, 2007
IMPORTANT: IF YOU DO NOT PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY. A REPLY CARD IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. THE GIVING OF A PROXY WILL NOT AFFECT YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING.

 


Table of Contents

READY MIX, INC.
3430 East Flamingo Road, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
Telephone: (702) 433-2090
PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2007
     This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Ready Mix, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), to be used at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (“Annual Meeting”) to be held at 4602 East Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona, at 11:00 a.m., Arizona time, on June 11, 2007, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Company anticipates that this Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy will be first mailed or given to shareholders of the Company on or about April 27, 2007.
Meeting Agenda
     At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to elect seven directors to serve for a one-year term, ratify the selection of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 2007, and transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof.
Record Versus Beneficial Ownership of Shares
     If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Corporate Stock Transfer, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “shareholder of record.” If you are a shareholder of record, we sent our Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report to Shareholders directly to you.
     If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name. In that case, our Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report to Shareholders have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record who is considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record. Your broker, bank or other holder of record will also send you instructions on how to vote. If you have not heard from your broker, bank or other holder of record who holds your stock, please contact them as soon as possible.
Record Date and Number of Votes
     The record date for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is April 4, 2007. If you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on April 4, 2007, you may vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were 3,807,500 shares of our common stock, par value $.001 per share (“Common Stock”), outstanding and entitled to vote and approximately 1500 beneficial and shareholders of record. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote per share.
How You Can Vote
     The shares represented by all proxies that are properly executed and submitted will be voted at the meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated thereon. Unless otherwise directed, votes will be cast (i) for the election of the nominees for directors hereinafter named; (ii) for the ratification of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; and (iii) to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. Shareholders who hold their shares in “street name” (i.e., in the name of a bank, broker or other record holder) must vote their shares in the manner prescribed by their brokers.

 


Table of Contents

Changing Your Vote
     You can revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised in one of three ways:
     (1) by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written instrument of revocation bearing a date later than the date of the proxy.
     (2) by duly executing and delivering to the Secretary of the Company a subsequent proxy relating to the same shares.
     (3) by attending the meeting and voting in person, provided that the shareholder notifies the Secretary at the meeting of his or her intention to vote in person at any time prior to the voting of the proxy.
Required Votes
     A plurality of votes cast by shareholders who are either present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting is required to elect the seven nominees for Director under Proposal 1. Approval of Proposal 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. The total number of votes that could be cast at the meeting is the number of votes actually cast plus the number of abstentions. Abstentions are counted as “shares present” at the meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists and have the effect of a vote “against” any matter as to which a specific proportion of affirmative votes is required for approval. Proxies submitted by brokers that do not indicate a vote for some or all of the proposals because they do not have discretionary voting authority and have not received instructions as to how to vote on these proposals (so-called “broker non-votes”) are counted for the purpose of determining the presence of or absence of a quorum but are not counted for determining the number of votes cast for or against a proposal.
Dissenter’s Rights or Appraisal
     Pursuant to applicable Nevada law, there are no dissenter’s or appraisal rights relating to the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting.
Other Matters to Be Acted Upon at the Meeting
     We do not know of any matters other than the election of directors and the ratification of independent registered public accounting firm that are expected to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, the shares represented by proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting those shares.

2


Table of Contents

MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
     The Company’s By-Laws provide for the annual election of directors. Directors serve for a one year term and until election and qualification of their successors or until their resignation, death, disqualification or removal from office.
     The Board of Directors currently consists of seven members, including three Directors employed by the Company whose terms expire in 2007 and four independent Directors whose terms expire in 2007. At the Annual Meeting, the seven Directors are to be elected to one-year terms expiring in 2008. The seven nominees receiving a plurality of votes by shares represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, if a quorum is present, will be elected as directors of the Company.
     The nominees for Directors are Charles E. Cowan, Charles R. Norton, Dan H. Stewart, Don A. Patterson, Bradley E. Larson, Robert R. Morris and Kenneth D. Nelson, all of whom presently serve on the Board of Directors.
Recommendation of the Board
     The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of the nominees for Director.
     Cumulative voting is not permitted for the election of directors. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, the person named in the accompanying proxy will vote in favor of the election of each of the persons named below as the Company’s nominees for directors of the Company. Each of the nominees has consented to be named herein and to serve if elected. It is not anticipated that any nominee will become unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, but if such should occur, the person named in the proxy intends to vote for the election in his stead of such person as the Board of Directors of the Company may recommend. Biographical information concerning the director nominees is set forth beginning at page 16 of this Proxy Statement.
PROPOSAL 2. THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF SEMPLE, MARCHAL & COOPER, LLP
AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY FOR 2007.
     Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP has been selected by the Audit Committee as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2007. The Board of Directors recommends to the shareholders the ratification of the selection of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the financial statements of the Company. Unless otherwise specified, the proxies solicited herein will be voted in favor of the ratification of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 2007.
     Ratification of the appointment of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2007 will require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding Common Stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. All of the directors and executive officers of the Company have advised the Company that they will vote their shares of Common Stock “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2007. If the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding Common Stock fail to ratify the appointment of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will consider such failure at a subsequent meeting of the Audit Committee and determine, in its discretion, what actions it should take, if any.
Recommendation of the Board
     The board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.

3


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Director Independence
     We are authorized by our Bylaws to maintain a Board of Directors comprised of seven directors. Our Board currently consists of seven directors, four of whom, Messrs. Norton, Patterson, Cowan, and Stewart, are independent as defined under rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the American Stock Exchange. In accordance with the independence standards of the American Stock Exchange, a director must be determined to have no personal, professional, familial or other relationship with our company other than as a director. Messrs. Norton, Patterson and Cowan are also independent directors of Meadow Valley Corporation, our majority shareholder and under rules of the American Stock Exchange we are considered a “controlled entity” of Meadow Valley, such that its independent directors are also considered independent directors of our company. Our directors are elected for one year terms, or until an earlier resignation, death or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or officers.
Board of Directors and Board Committees
     The Board of Directors held four regularly scheduled meetings during the last full fiscal year and one special meeting. No director attended less than 75% of the aggregate of such meetings and meetings held by committees of the Board on which he served. We do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board of Directors at our annual meeting of shareholders, but strongly encourage directors to attend. All members of our Board of Directors attended the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
     The standing committees of the Board are as follows: Audit, Nominating and Governance, and Compensation Committee. The Board has adopted a charter for its Audit Committee, which is available on our website at www.readymixinc.com by following the link “Investor Information.” The Nominating and Governance and Compensation Committees are not operating under written charters. Shareholders may also receive a free copy of the Audit Committee charter by sending a written request to 3430 East Flamingo Road, Suite 100, Las Vegas, Nevada 89121, Attention: Secretary, or calling (702) 433-2090.
     Members of the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee are footnoted below.
     
Name   Positions and Offices with the Company
Charles E. Cowan (1) (2) (3)
  Director
Charles R. Norton (1) (2) (3)
  Director
Dan H. Stewart (1) (2) (3)
  Director
Don A. Patterson (1) (2) (3)
  Director
Bradley E. Larson
  Chief Executive Officer and Director
Robert R. Morris
  President and Director
Kenneth D. Nelson
  Vice President and Director
 
(1)   Member of the Compensation Committee
 
(2)   Member of the Audit Committee
 
(3)   Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee
The Audit Committee
     Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Patterson, Cowan, Stewart and Norton. Mr. Patterson is our Audit Committee Chairman and has been determined by the Board to be a financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of the Board and as “independent” is defined under current standards of the American Stock Exchange, these directors are independent of management and free of any relationship that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment as a member of this committee. The Audit Committee reviews in detail and recommends approval by the Board of our annual and quarterly financial statements, recommends approval of the remuneration of our auditors to the Board, reviews the scope of the audit procedures and the final audit report prepared by our auditors and reviews our overall accounting practices, procedures and internal controls with our auditors.

4


Table of Contents

The Nominating and Governance Committee
     The Nominating and Governance Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Cowan, Norton, Patterson and Stewart, our independent directors. Mr. Cowan is our Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman. The committee met four times during fiscal 2006. The purpose of the Nominating and Governance Committee is as follows:
    identify, consider and nominate candidates for membership on the Board, including any nominees properly received by the Secretary of the Corporation from any shareholder;
 
    develop, recommend and evaluate corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to the Company;
 
    make recommendations regarding the structure and composition of the Board and Board committees; and
 
    advise the Board on corporate governance matters.
     All members of our Nominating and Governance Committee are “independent,” as defined under applicable law and the listing standards for companies traded on the American Stock Exchange. Nominations of candidates for election as Directors may be made by the Board of Directors upon recommendation by the Nominating and Governance Committee, or by shareholders. Shareholders may nominate candidates for election as directors if they follow the procedures and conform to the deadlines specified in our By-laws. For more information, see the disclosure in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Proposals of Shareholders for Presentation at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.”
     In evaluating the suitability of potential nominees for membership on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider the Board’s current composition, including expertise, diversity, and balance of inside, outside and independent directors, and consider the general qualifications of the potential nominees, such as:
    Unquestionable integrity and honesty;
 
    The ability to exercise sound, mature and independent business judgment in the best interests of the shareholders as a whole;
 
    Recognized leadership in business or professional activity;
 
    A background and experience that will complement the talents of the other Board members;
 
    Willingness and capability to take the time to actively participate in Board and Committee meetings and related activities;
 
    Ability to work professionally and effectively with other Board members and the Company’s management;
 
    An age to enable the Director to remain on the Board long enough to make an effective contribution; and
 
    Lack of realistic possibilities of conflict of interest or legal prohibition.
     The Committee will also see that all necessary and appropriate inquiries are made into the backgrounds of such candidates. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Nominating and Governance Committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
The Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation
     Our Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Patterson, Cowan, Stewart and Norton. Mr. Norton is our Compensation Committee Chairman. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to determine the compensation to be paid to the Company’s executive officers, and to approve any incentive compensation plans. The Compensation Committee will recommend approval to the Board of the compensation of our executive officers, the annual compensation budget for all other employees, bonuses, grants of stock options and any changes to our benefit plans. The committee met four times during fiscal 2006.

5


Table of Contents

Shareholder Communications with Directors
     Shareholders may communicate with any and all members of the Company’s Board of Directors by transmitting correspondence by mail or facsimile addressed to one or more directors by name or, for a communication to the entire board, to the Chairman of the Board at the following address and fax number: Ready Mix, Inc., 3430 East Flamingo Road, Suite 100, Las Vegas, Nevada 89121; facsimile: (702) 433-0189.
     Communications from our shareholders to one or more directors will be collected and organized by our Corporate Secretary under procedures adopted by our independent directors. The Corporate Secretary will forward all communications to the Chairman of the Board or to the identified director(s) as soon as practicable, although communications that are abusive, in bad taste or that present safety or security concerns may be handled differently. If multiple communications are received on a similar topic, the Corporate Secretary may, in his direction, forward only representative correspondence.
     The Chairman of the Board will determine whether any communication addressed to the entire Board of Directors should be properly addressed by the entire Board of Directors or a committee thereof. If a communication is sent to the Board of Directors or a committee, the Chairman of the Board or the chairman of that committee, as the case may be, will determine whether a response to the communication is warranted. If a response to the communication is warranted, the content and method of the response may be coordinated with our counsel.
Other Corporate Governance Policies
     We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors and senior management. Amendments to and waivers, if any, from our Code of Ethics will be disclosed on our website. Our Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.readymixinc.com by following the links “Investor Information – Code of Ethics.” Shareholders may also receive a free copy of these documents by sending a written request to 3430 East Flamingo Road, Suite 100, Las Vegas, Nevada 89121, Attention: Secretary, or calling (702) 433-2090.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
     We use a combination of cash and long-term equity incentive awards to compensate members of our board of directors. The following table provides information regarding compensation earned in 2006 by each individual who served as a member of our board of directors in 2006.
                                                         
                                    Change in        
                                    Pension Value and        
    Fees Earned                   Non-Equity   Nonqualified Deferred        
    or Paid in   Stock   Option   Incentive Plan   Compensation   All Other    
Name   Cash (1)   Awards   Awards (2)   Compensation   Earnings   Compensation   Total
 
Charles E. Cowan
  $ 13,000             33,300                       $ 46,300  
Charles R. Norton
  $ 13,000             33,300                       $ 46,300  
Don A. Patterson
  $ 13,000             33,300                       $ 46,300  
Dan H. Stewart
  $ 13,000             33,300                       $ 46,300  
     
 
  $ 52,000             133,200                       $ 185,200  
     
 
(1)   Directors not employed by the Company receive $7,000 per year for being a member of the Board of Directors and $2,000 for each committee upon which they serve and are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses. The above amounts do not include out-of-pocket expenses. Directors who are employed by the Company are not compensated for their service on the Board.
 
(2)   Directors are entitled to participate in our equity incentive plan and each has been issued 10,000 stock options, on November 30, 2006, for their service on the Board during 2006. This column represents the aggregate dollar amount of the awards granted in 2006. Therefore, the values shown here are not representative of the amounts that may eventually be realized by a director. Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have provided a grant date fair value for Stock Awards in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-based Payments.” At December 31, 2006, there were no restricted stock units, deferred stock units or dividend equivalent units accumulated in any director accounts.

6


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of Executive Compensation Program
     The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board is responsible for assisting the Board in defining and overseeing the Company’s general compensation practices. During fiscal 2006, the Compensation Committee engaged FMI Management Consulting to assist it in evaluating executive compensation matters and to revise the executive compensation package for the fiscal year ending 2007.
     The persons who served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during 2006, as well as other individuals named in our Summary Compensation Table for 2006, are referred to as the “named executive officers” through this proxy statement.
Executive Summary
     As discussed in more detail below, the following actions concerning the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers were taken for fiscal 2006:
    Robert A. De Ruiter, Ready Mix, Inc.’s vice-president, received a salary increase for fiscal 2006.
 
    Robert R. Morris, Robert A. De Ruiter and Clint Tryon, received bonuses pursuant to Ready Mix, Inc.’s Annual Performance Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”).
 
    Bradley E. Larson, Robert R. Morris and Clint Tryon, each received 10,000 stock options issued under the Company’s equity incentive plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”).
     Oversight of Executive Compensation Program and Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
     While the Compensation Committee approves all aspects of our executive compensation program, it reports to the full Board of Directors on a regular basis and seeks approval for certain actions. The Committee coordinates with its consultants and management to obtain marketplace and internal data analyses, project reports and program recommendations to assist the Committee in making executive compensation decisions. Our Chief Executive Officer and, in some cases, other executive officers make recommendations to the Committee with respect to various elements of executive compensation.
Compensation Objectives and Philosophy
     The Company’s primary objectives when determining compensation for its named executive officers are to:
    set levels of annual salary, bonus and equity compensation that are competitive and that will attract and retain superior executives, taking into account the difficult industry conditions and competitive environment that the Company faces,
 
    incorporate a performance-based component to executive compensation by linking the bonus to the Company’s financial and operational performance, and
 
    provide long-term equity-based compensation, thereby further aligning the interests of the Company’s executives with those of its other shareholders.
     These objectives are designed to reward each executive’s (1) past individual performance and contribution to the Company’s corporate performance, (2) level and scope of responsibility and experience, and (3) ability to influence the Company’s future growth and profitability.
Components of 2006 Executive Compensation
     Our executive compensation has three main parts: a salary paid in cash, an annual cash incentive bonus plan, in which payment is contingent on the financial performance of the Company, and a long-term equity incentive that the Company provides through the award of options to purchase the Company’s common stock. The salary component is intended to reward executives for their current, day-to-day work. The cash incentive bonus is intended

7


Table of Contents

to be a reward for the executive’s contribution to the financial success of the Company in a given year. Awards of equity are intended to create longer-term incentive for the executive to remain with the Company since the benefit is realized, if the Company is successful, over a multi-year period similar to our shareholders.
Annual Salary
     Because an executive’s annual salary is meant to reflect his value to the Company on a day-to-day basis, it is a fixed, predetermined element of his compensation. When the Compensation Committee reviews the level of an executive’s salary for a possible increase at the end of the term of his employment agreement or annual basis if no employment agreement is in place, that review is based on two main factors: his prior salary and the salary range of executives in comparable companies at a comparable level of responsibility. The Compensation Committee members take an executive’s prior salary into account because they believe that it reflects the assessment of prior boards and/or compensation committees of the executive’s value to the Company. Compensation levels of comparable companies are obtained from industry trade publications, management consulting firms such as FMI Management Consulting and other public companies similar to our size and industry. In addition, the Compensation Committee provides their knowledge of construction industry compensation levels gained in the course of the work each independent director performs in their daily business activity.
Cash Incentive Bonus Plan
     The level of compensation that an executive can earn under the Company’s cash incentive bonus plan is based on the Company’s attainment of financial success when compared to a predetermined objective, which the Board of Directors has approved in advance. Financial performance that exceeds expectations can enable the Company’s management team including its Chief Financial Officer, President, Vice-President and other management personnel to earn a bonus. The amount of the cash incentive bonus in a given year, if any, is derived from a formula based principally on the Company’s income before tax, by the manager’s primary geographic area of responsibility. The amount of income before tax for each year must be approved by the Board of Directors, which has a majority of directors who are not employees of the Company and are independent. The cash incentive bonus plan also has a discretionary element. In exercising this discretion, members of the Compensation Committee use their personal judgment of appropriate amounts after taking into account information about the executive’s work during the year, his past compensation, his current cash incentive bonus, his perceived contribution to the Company generally, his level of responsibility, and any notable individual achievements or failings in the year in question.
     The Compensation Committee authorizes the payment of incentive bonuses and, if applicable, makes any decisions on discretionary amounts, when the results for the year in question are known, typically in late February of the following year. Bonuses for 2006 were approved in March 2007. The Summary Compensation Table for 2006, below, shows the total 2006 cash incentive bonuses of each named executive officer.
Equity Incentive Plan
     The award of an option to buy the Company’s common stock is a long-term element of compensation since on the date of the award, the exercise price, or purchase price, of the shares subject to the option is the same as the price of those shares on the open market. The recipient of a stock option will only realize its value if the market price of the shares increases over the life of the option, the award gives the executive an incentive to remain with the Company and aligns his interests with those of our shareholders.
     The Company calculates the value of a stock option award on the date of its grant under accounting requirements that involve the use of a complex formula consisting of estimates about the Company, its stock price and the likelihood of the option holder forfeiting the stock option. Beginning in fiscal year 2006, recording stock option awards as an expense was required of all companies under Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (revised 2004), or FAS 123R. The dollar amount shown in the Summary Compensation Table for 2006, below, for stock option awards is the value of the options computed under SFAS 123R.
     In determining the size of a stock option award, the Compensation Committee takes into account both the value of the award to the recipient and the corresponding accounting cost to the Company.

8


Table of Contents

Other Compensation
          The only other forms of compensation of the executive officers are the personal use of company vehicles, term life insurance and other benefits made available to all salaried employees and the perquisites shown in the Summary Compensation Table for 2006, below, in the column labeled All Other Compensation. A detailed description of the perquisites is shown in footnote 4 to the table. In the case of Mr. De Ruiter, the car allowances and the payment of expenses of commuting to work reflect the fact that the use of personally owned vehicle is used for business purposes, such as visiting construction sites, attending meetings with customers and providing transportation to out-of-town business colleagues. In the case of Messrs. Morris and Tryon any amount was determined for personal use of Company vehicles. The payment of Mr. Morris, De Ruiter and Tryon’s term life insurance premiums is a benefit that has been provided to them by the Company for many years and was established when the company determined to carry a key officer life policy on each of the executives in the same amounts as the policy provided each officer.
Overall Compensation Levels
          As with salary, the Company attempts to provide its executives with a total compensation package that is comparable to their peers in the industry and that the members of the Compensation Committee believe in their personal judgment based on their business experience is fair and appropriate for the executive’s level of responsibility and contribution to the Company. The Compensation Committee, which consists of only our independent members of the Board of Directors, makes the final determination of the compensation of the named executive officers. However, the Committee discusses their compensation recommendations for each executive officer with the Chief Executive Officer in advance of making a decision.
Employment Agreements
          Messrs. Morris and De Ruiter currently are employed pursuant to employment agreements. In February 2005, the Company entered into three-year employment agreements with Messrs. Morris and De Ruiter providing for an annual base salary and including non-competition provisions for a period of two years following termination of the agreements. Both individuals are eligible to receive bonuses based upon performance as determined by our Compensation Committee and approved by our Board of Directors. In the event we terminate either individual without cause (as defined in the agreements) or we are the subject of a change of control, all options held by the individual will vest and we will be required to pay the remaining term of compensation to Mr. Morris and one year of compensation to Mr. De Ruiter. Mr. Larson’s employment agreement is with Meadow Valley Corporation. Mr. Tryon does not have an employment agreement with the Company.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer
     Employment Agreement and Compensation Elements
          Mr. Larson’s 2006 compensation was principally established by the terms of his employment agreement with Meadow Valley Corporation (“Meadow Valley”) that was in effect during 2006, which was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Meadow Valley. Mr. Larson’s salary and bonus is paid by Meadow Valley Corporation and his services rendered to Ready Mix are reimbursed to Meadow Valley through an administrative service agreement. For a more complete description of the management service agreement, please see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
Compensation Committee Report
          The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and discussions with management, we have recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
     Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:
         
 
  Charles R. Norton   Don A. Patterson
 
  Dan H. Stewart   Charles E. Cowan

9


Table of Contents

     Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that incorporates future filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the foregoing Compensation Committee Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.
     The Securities and Exchange Commission recently adopted enhanced executive compensation disclosure requirements for public companies. As a result, the following disclosure regarding the compensation of our executive officers and directors will be somewhat different in content and format from previous years.
Summary Compensation Table for 2006
     The following table provides information regarding total compensation earned in 2006 by the named executive officers, which include our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and Vice-President, who are the only executive officers whose total compensation for 2006 exceeded $100,000. The amounts include any compensation that was deferred by the executive through contributions to his defined contribution plan account under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. All amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar.
                                                                         
                                                    Change in        
                                                    Pension Value        
                                                    and        
                                            Non-Equity   Nonqualified        
Name and                                           Incentive Plan   Deferred   All Other    
Principal           Salary   Bonus   Stock Awards   Option Awards   Compensation   Compensation   Compensation   Total
Position   Year   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($) (2)   ($) (3)   Earnings ($)   ($) (4)   ($)
 
Bradley E. Larson (1)
    2006                         33,300                         33,300  
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
                                                                       
Clint Tryon (5)
    2006       140,000                   33,300       216,664             7,810       397,774  
Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer
                                                                       
Robert R. Morris
    2006       150,000                   33,300       126,000             9,055       318,355  
President and Director
                                                                       
Robert A. De Ruiter
    2006       126,000                         136,080             7,448       269,528  
Vice-President
                                                                       
 
(1)   Mr. Larson was compensated by Meadow Valley, as his services were provided to us through our Administrative Services Agreement with Meadow Valley. See the disclosure under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Mr. Larson is the Chief Executive Officer of Meadow Valley, our majority shareholder. During fiscal 2006, Mr. Larson spent approximately 25% of his time working for us. We did not pay Meadow Valley directly for his services. However, under the Administrative Services Agreement we pay $22,000 per month to Meadow Valley for the services of their executives to the Company, as well as for other administrative services provided by Meadow Valley to us. Messrs. Tryon, Morris and De Ruiter had the principal responsibility for our day-to-day operations.
 
(2)   This column represents the aggregate dollar amount of the awards granted in 2006. Therefore, the values shown here are not representative of the amounts that may eventually be realized by an executive. Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have provided a grant date fair value for option awards in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-based Payments.” For option awards, the fair value is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of certain assumptions, including the risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, volatility and expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield at the date of grant of a U.S. Treasury security with a maturity period equal to or approximating the option’s expected term. The dividend yield assumption is based on our historical dividend payouts, which is zero. The volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility of our common stock over a period equal to the option’s expected term or trading stock’s trading history which ever is shorter. The expected term of options granted is based on expectations about future exercises and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.
 
(3)   The non-equity incentive plan payments were made on March 9, 2007. See discussion of non-equity incentive plans under heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above. None of the named executive officers elected to defer their 2006 non-equity incentive plan payment.
 
(4)   The amounts shown include company-paid life insurance premiums and defined contribution plan payments for the fiscal year ended 2006. The following table identifies the separate amounts attributable to each category of perquisites and other compensation:
                         
    Company Paid   Defined    
    Life   Contribution    
Name   Insurance   Plan   Total
 
Clint Tryon
  $ 310     $ 7,500     $ 7,810  
Robert R. Morris
  $ 1,555     $ 7,500     $ 9,055  
Robert A. De Ruiter
  $ 675     $ 6,773     $ 7,448  

10


Table of Contents

 
(5)   Included in Mr. Tryon’s total non-equity incentive plan compensation was $88,200 of compensation associated with his services rendered to Meadow Valley during the fiscal year 2006. Mr. Tryon also received from Meadow Valley an option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock with an aggregate dollar amount value of $48,100. The value shown here does not represent the amount that may eventually be realized by Mr. Tryon.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2006
     The following table provides information regarding cash incentive awards and options granted under our equity incentive plan to the named executive officers in 2006.
                                                                                 
            Estimated Future Payouts Under                                   All Other Option    
            Non-Equity Incentive Plan   Estimated Future Payouts Under   All Other Stock   Awards: Number of    
            Awards   Equity Incentive Plan Awards   Awards: Number of   Securities   Exercise or Base
    Grant   Threshold   Target   Maximum   Threshold   Target   Maximum   Shares of Stock or   Underlying Options   Price of Option
Name   Date   ($)   ($)(1)   ($)(2)   ($)   ($)   ($)   Units (#)   (#)   Awards ($/Sh)
 
Bradley E. Larson
    11/30/2006     $     $       N/A                               10,000     $ 10.35  
Clint Tryon
    11/30/2006     $ 21,000     $ 216,664       N/A                               10,000     $ 10.35  
Robert R. Morris
    11/30/2006     $ 22,500     $ 126,000       N/A                               10,000     $ 10.35  
Robert A. De Ruiter
          $ 18,900     $ 136,080       N/A                                   $  
 
(1)   The non-equity incentive plan payments were made on March 9, 2007 and related to the achievement of specified financial performance objectives, as discussed under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.
 
(2)   No individual maximum is applicable since the payments were made under Non-Equity Incentive Plan, which has no individual cap.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End(1)
     The following table provides information regarding all outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2006. The Company did not issue any stock awards during fiscal 2006.
                                         
                    Equity Incentive        
                    Plan Awards:        
    Number of   Number of   Number of        
    Securities   Securities   Securities        
    Underlying   Underlying   Underlying        
    Unexercised   Unexercised   Unexercised   Option   Option
    Options (#)   Options (#)   Unearned   Exercise   Expiration
Name   Exercisable   Unexercisable   Options (#)   Price ($)(2)   Date
 
Bradley E. Larson
    4,500             2,250     $ 11.00       1/28/2010  
Chief Executive Officer and
                10,000     $ 10.35       11/30/2011  
Director
                                       
Clint Tryon
    4,500             2,250     $ 11.00       1/28/2010  
Chief Financial Officer,
                10,000     $ 10.35       11/30/2011  
Secretary and Treasurer
                                       
Robert R. Morris
    45,000             22,500     $ 11.00       1/28/2010  
President and Director
                10,000     $ 10.35       11/30/2011  
Robert A. De Ruiter
    33,750             16,875     $ 11.00       1/28/2010  
Vice-President
                                       
 
(1)   Outstanding options vest in one-third increments on each anniversary date of grant.
 
(2)   Pursuant to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, the exercise price for all outstanding options is based on the grant date fair market value, which is the market closing price of our Common Stock on the AMEX on the date of grant.

11


Table of Contents

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2006
     The following table provides information regarding each exercise of stock options, if any, by the named executive officers in 2006.
                                 
    Option Awards   Stock Awards
    Number of           Number of    
    Shares Acquired   Value Realized   Shares Acquired   Value Realized
Name   on Exercise (#)   on Exercise ($)   on Exercise (#)   on Exercise ($)
 
Bradley E. Larson
        $           $  
Clint Tryon
                       
Robert R. Morris
                       
Robert A. De Ruiter
                       
Retirement Plans
Pension Benefits
     During the fiscal year 2006 we did not have a pension benefit plan. We do not intend on implementing a pension plan in the near future.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
     During the fiscal year 2006 we did not have a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. We do not intend on implementing a nonqualified deferred compensation plan in the near future.
Equity Incentive Plan
     In January 2005, we adopted an equity incentive plan, which we refer to as our Plan, which provides for the grant of options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” and “non-statutory stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, together with the grant of bonus stock and stock appreciation rights at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Incentive stock options are issuable only to our eligible officers, directors and key employees. Non-statutory stock options are issuable only to our non-employee directors and consultants.
     The Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee. Currently, we have 675,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan. Under the Plan, the Board of Directors determines which individuals shall receive options, grants or stock appreciation rights, the time period during which the rights may be exercised, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased under the rights and the option price.
     With respect to stock options, the per share exercise price of the common stock may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. No person who owns, directly or indirectly, at the time of the granting of an incentive stock option, more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock is eligible to receive incentive stock options under the Plan unless the option price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the option on the date of grant. The option price for non-statutory options is established by the Board and may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the option on the date of grant.
     No options may be transferred by an optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of an optionee, the option may only be exercisable by the optionee. Options may be exercised only if the option holder remains continuously associated with us from the date of grant to the date of exercise, unless extended under the Plan grant. Options under the Plan have no expiration date and the exercise date of an option cannot be longer than 10 years from the date of grant, but can be shorter when established by the plan administrator. Any options that expire unexercised or that terminate upon an optionee’s ceasing to be employed by us become available once again for issuance. Shares issued upon exercise of an option rank equally with other shares then outstanding.

12


Table of Contents

     We have reserved 675,000 shares of common stock for issuance to officers, directors and employees under our equity incentive plan described above. Options will be issued to employees and executive officers based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors according to the following:
    employees holding positions of responsibility with us whose performance can have a significant effect on our success; and
 
    non-employee directors.
     Currently, we have granted under the Plan an aggregate of 348,125 stock options to officers, directors and employees at an exercise price from $10.35 to $12.50. From the grant date 33% of the options are exercisable after one year of continuous service to us, 66% after two years of continuous service and 100% after three years of continuous service.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMAITON
     The following table provides information as of December 31, 2006 regarding compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.
                         
    Number of Securities           Number of Securities
    to be Issued upon   Weighted-Average   Remaining Available for
    Exercise of   Exercise Price of   Future Issuance Under
Plan Category   Outstanding Options   Outstanding Options   Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders (1)
    466,875     $ 11.47       324,375  
 
                       
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders
                   
 
                       
 
                       
Total
    466,875               324,375  
 
                       
 
(1)   - Includes an individual compensation agreement for 116,250 warrants issued to our underwriters as a portion of their compensation in connection with our initial public offering.
 
(2)   - Includes 350,625 stock options issued to employees, directors and consultants from our 2005 equity incentive plan.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
     Prior to our initial public offering in 2005, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Meadow Valley and were provided certain administrative services by Meadow Valley, including some bookkeeping services, limited review of our operations by Meadow Valley’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, review and preparation of our financial reporting by Meadow Valley’s Principal Accounting Officer and Controller and assistance from Meadow Valley’s human resources personnel, which included administering certain insurance coverage and other benefits for us. In order to quantify the value of these services and provide for a fair payment to Meadow Valley for such services, in January 2005 we entered into a three-year Administrative Services Agreement with Meadow Valley. Under the terms of the agreement, we pay Meadow Valley $22,000 per month for all such administrative services including the time of our Chief Executive Officer who performs similar services for Meadow Valley. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the total fees associated with the above services totaled $264,000 each year.
     Notwithstanding the agreement, each company has its own separate field facilities, operating management and employees. We believe that the administrative service to be provided by Meadow Valley represents less than 33% of the total administrative services required to operate our business.

13


Table of Contents

     During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company provided construction materials to Meadow Valley in the amounts of $436,865 and $683,633, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company received construction services from Meadow Valley in the amounts of $1,012,085 and $590,376, respectively. The balance due to Meadow Valley at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $73,395 and $84,810, respectively. The advances are considered short-term in nature. Prior to August 2005, the Company agreed to pay interest at Chase Manhattan Bank’s prime, plus 1.25%, on such balances. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company paid interest in the amount of $0 and $77,561, respectively. The Company repays each current month-end balance in the following month for expenses incurred by the affiliate on behalf of the Company. As a result, the Company has not been charged interest.
     During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company acquired equipment from Meadow Valley in the amount of $224,058. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company acquired equipment from Meadow Valley in the amount of $207,341 and assumed a debt obligation in the amount of $17,541.
     For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company, pursuant to a tax sharing agreement, utilized a net operating loss carry-forward incurred by the Meadow Valley in the amounts of approximately $0 and $2,416,000, respectively. The intercompany income tax allocation payable was paid in full during 2005, bore no interest and was considered short term. As a result of the Company’s initial public offering the Company no longer qualifies to be consolidated with Meadow Valley for income tax purposes.
     During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company leased office space to Meadow Valley in the amount of $10,326. The lease agreement is for approximately 7,500 square feet of office space for a monthly rent of $10,326, plus a proportionate charge for common area maintenance and the lease term is month to month.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCK AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
     The Compensation Committee currently consists of the following four members of the Board of Directors: Messrs. Cowan, Norton, Patterson and Stewart. No member of this Committee was at any time during the Company’s 2006 fiscal year, or at any other time, an officer or employee of the Company.
     No executive officer of the Company has served on the compensation committee of any other entity that has, or has had, one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.
     Three of our independent Directors, Messrs. Cowan, Norton and Patterson, are also members of the Board of Directors of Meadow Valley.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
     The table on the following page sets forth information concerning the holdings of Common Stock by each person who, as of April 4, 2007, holds of record or is known by the Company to hold beneficially or of record, more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock, by each director, named executive officer, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.

14


Table of Contents

                 
    Amount and    
    Nature of    
    Beneficial   Percent of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner   Ownership (1)   Class (1)
Bradley E. Larson (2)(3)
    2,029,500       51.8 %
 
               
Meadow Valley Corporation (3)
    2,025,000       51.7 %
 
               
Bulldog Investors (4)
    458,270       11.7 %
 
               
Robert R. Morris (5)
    45,000       *  
 
               
Robert A. De Ruiter (6)
    34,250       *  
 
               
Kenneth D. Nelson (2)
    5,500       *  
 
               
Charles E. Cowan (2)
    4,500       *  
 
               
Charles R. Norton (2)
    4,500       *  
 
               
Don A. Patterson (2)
    2,250       *  
 
               
Dan H. Stewart (2)
    4,500       *  
 
               
Clint Tryon (2)
    4,500       *  
 
               
All executive officers and directors as a group (nine persons)
    2,134,500       54.5 %
 
*   Less than 1%.
 
(1)   Beneficial ownership includes direct and indirect ownership of shares of our Common Stock, including rights to acquire beneficial ownership of shares upon the exercise of stock options exercisable as of April 4, 2007 and that would become exercisable within 60 days of such date. To our knowledge and unless otherwise indicated, each shareholder listed below has sole voting and investment power over the shares listed as beneficially owned by such shareholder, subject to community property laws where applicable. Percentage of ownership is based on 3,807,500 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of April 4, 2007 and options exercisable within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, all shareholders listed below have an address in care of our principal executive offices which are located at 3430 East Flamingo Road, Suite 100, Las Vegas, Nevada 89121.
 
(2)   Includes vested portion of stock options to purchase 16,750 shares of Common Stock.
 
(3)   Mr. Larson is Chief Executive Officer and majority shareholder of Meadow Valley, which owns 2,025,000 shares of our Common Stock, and may be deemed a beneficial owner of these shares under the rules of the SEC. The Board of Directors of Meadow Valley, by majority vote, votes these shares through Mr. Larson.
 
(4)   Based solely on a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on December 27, 2006. According to the Schedule 13D, the address of Bulldog Investors is 60 Heritage Drive, Pleasantville, New York 10570.
 
(5)   Includes vested portion of stock options to purchase 77,500 shares of Common Stock.
 
(6)   Includes vested portion of stock options to purchase 50,625 shares of Common Stock.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
     Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our Common Stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of change in their ownership of our Common Stock. Securities and Exchange Commission regulations require our directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders to furnish us with copies of these reports. Based solely upon a review of such reports and related information furnished to us, we believe that, during the 2006 fiscal year, each person who served as a director or executive officer of our company or held more than 10% of our Common Stock complied with the Section 16(a) filing requirements.

15


Table of Contents

Executive Officers and Directors
     Information concerning our directors and executive officers is set forth below:
             
            Officer or
            Director
Name   Age   Position   Since
Bradley E. Larson
  52   Chief Executive Officer and Director   1996
Robert R. Morris
  62   President and Director   1996
Robert A. De Ruiter
  47   Vice President   2005
Clint Tryon
  37   Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary and Treasurer   2002
Kenneth D. Nelson
  49   Vice President and Director   1996
Don A. Patterson
  53   Director   2005
Charles R. Norton
  65   Director   2005
Charles E. Cowan
  60   Director   2005
Dan H. Stewart
  54   Director   2005
Business Experience of Each Executive Officer and Director
     The following is a summary of the business experience of each executive officer and director, or nominee for director, of the Company for at least the last five years:
     Bradley E. Larson has been the Chief Executive Officer of Meadow Valley Corporation, our majority shareholder, since 1995. He has been an executive officer and director of our company since inception in 1996. Mr. Larson was employed by Tanner Companies, a contracting and materials company located in Phoenix, Arizona, from 1976 until 1994. He was Division President of the Western Arizona region for Tanner from 1984 to 1988, Vice President of Operations from 1988 to 1989 and President of Tanner’s Construction Division from 1989 until 1994. Mr. Larson earned a BSE degree in Industrial Engineering from Arizona State University in 1979. He has been active in several construction industry associations and is past Chairman and Director of The Arizona Rock Products Association and past Director of the Arizona Heavy Highway Chapter of the Associated General Contractors.
     Robert R. Morris has been the President of our company since he initiated our business for us as a start-up in 1996. In 2005 he was appointed as a director. From 1985 to 1996 he was the Sales Manager for Bonanza Materials, a Henderson, Nevada, ready-mix concrete producer. From 1983 to 1985 he was Vice President of Sales for Basic Ready Mix, a ready-mix concrete producer also located in Henderson, Nevada.
     Robert A. De Ruiter has been the General Manager of our metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona ready-mix concrete business since we organized our Phoenix operations in 2000. In January 2005, Mr. De Ruiter was named our Vice President. From 1998 to 2000, he was the Regional Manager for Mineral Resources Technologies, Phoenix, Arizona, where he was responsible for operation, sales and marketing of mineral resources fly ash products in Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and California. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. De Ruiter was a Technical Sales Representative for Grace Construction Products, Las Vegas, Nevada, and he sold concrete admixtures to concrete producers, contractors, architects and engineers. From 1990 to 1995, he was a sales representative for Sunward Materials, Phoenix, Arizona, where he sold concrete and aggregate to contractors, architects and engineers.
     Clint Tryon has been the Secretary and Treasurer since September 2002 and was named our Chief Financial Officer in January 2005. He joined Meadow Valley in May 2002 and was named its Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer in September 2002. Mr. Tryon received his Bachelor of Science degree with a major in Finance from the University of Nevada Las Vegas in 1993. He then completed his post-baccalaureate certificate in accountancy from Arizona State University West in 1997 and received his Certified Public Accountant’s certificate from the State of Arizona in 1997. From 1996 to 1999, he was a supervisor at Toback CPAs/ McGladrey & Pullen. From 1999 to 2002, he held a regional financial reporting role for International FiberCom.

16


Table of Contents

     Kenneth D. Nelson has been an executive officer and director of our company since 1996 and has been involved in the financial reporting and operations management areas of the construction industry since 1982. He joined Meadow Valley in April 1989, became its Vice President of Finance in February 1992 and its Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer in April 1996. Mr. Nelson earned a Bachelors of Science Degree in Business Administration from Arizona State University in 1984.
     Don A. Patterson has been a director since November 2005. Mr Patterson began his career in public accounting, working for eight years at Arthur Andersen where he developed an extensive background in accounting for the construction and construction material industry. He left to become the managing partner of Mansperger, Patterson & McMullin CPA’s where he worked for 19 years, continuing to provide accounting service and consultation to clients in both the construction materials and contracting industries. During that period he founded Legacy Window Coverings, LLC, an importing and distribution business where he currently serves as CEO. He has devoted his full time attention to Legacy’s operations since 2004. Mr. Patterson graduated with a degree in accounting from Arizona State University in 1978 and received his Certified Public Accountant’s certificate in 1983.
     Charles R. Norton has been a director of Meadow Valley Corporation since March 1999 and a director of our company since January 2005. Since 1963, Mr. Norton has been involved in the highway construction industry as a construction foreman, subcontractor, general manager and vice president. He graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree from Brigham Young University in 1968. From 1968 to 1972, he was General Manager of Quaker Empire Construction in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. From 1972 to 1992, Mr. Norton was Sales Manager, General Manager and Vice President of Syro Steel Company, headquartered in Girard, Ohio. Since 1992 Mr. Norton has been Vice President of Trinity Industries, which purchased Syro in 1972.
     Charles E. Cowan has been a director of Meadow Valley Corporation since November 1995 and a director of our company since January 2005. Since 1993 he has been President of Charles Cowan & Associates, Ltd. and has an extensive background in government and heavy construction industry consulting. From 1991 to 1993, he held chief executive positions in Arizona’s Department of Transportation and Department of Economic Security. He graduated with a Bachelor of Economics Degree from St. Martin’s College in Olympia, Washington, and a Master’s Degree in Public Administration from the University of Missouri at Kansas City, Missouri.
     Dan H. Stewart has been a director of our company since April 2005. Since 2004, he has been President of Stewart Development Company, a firm specializing in master planned communities and mixed-use developments. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Stewart was Vice President of American Nevada Company, a privately-held firm specializing in the design and development of master planned communities and other commercial properties. Mr. Stewart’s responsibilities include identifying, evaluating and acquiring commercial properties and evaluating future opportunities in connection with the Bureau of Land Management auctions. From 1994 to 2003, Mr. Stewart was President and Chief Executive Officer of Basic Management, Inc. and a number of its subsidiaries and affiliates. Basic Management, Inc. is a privately-held, Henderson, Nevada based firm engaged in land development, water delivery systems, power distribution and switching systems and remediation of environmentally-challenged properties. He earned a B.S. degree in civil engineering from Brigham Young University, an M.S. degree in civil engineering, construction engineering and management from Stanford University and completed the Advanced Management Development Program at Harvard University Graduate School of Design. Mr. Stewart is a registered professional civil engineer, a licensed general engineering contractor and a licensed real estate broker.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
     The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
     The Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are

17


Table of Contents

required to be discussed with the Committee under generally accepted auditing standards. In addition, the Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence from management and the Company including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board and considered the compatibility of nonaudit services with the auditors’ independence.
     The Committee discussed with the Company’s independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Committee meets with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2006.
     In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Committee and the Board have also recommended and approved the selection of the Company’s independent auditors.
Don A. Patterson, Audit Committee Chair
Dan H. Stewart, Audit Committee Member
Charles R. Norton, Audit Committee Member
Charles E. Cowan, Audit Committee Member
Dated: March 6, 2007
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTANTS
     The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP to continue as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. A representative of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. He will not make a statement but will respond to appropriate questions.
Disclosure of Audit and Non-Audit Fees
     The following table shows the aggregate fees paid or accrued by the Company for the audit and other services provided by the Company’s accountants for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
                 
    For the years ended December 31,
    2006   2005
Audit fees for the years ended December 31 and fees for the review of financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
  $ 68,000     $ 47,000  
Audit related fees (1)
  $ 4,322     $ 131,712  
Tax fees
  $ 12,000     $ 12,000  
 
(1)   Fees paid in 2006 were associated with the registration of our common stock shares underlying the equity incentive plan. Fees paid in 2005 were associated with our initial public offering.
     The Audit Committee has concluded that the provision of services by Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP are compatible with maintaining their independence and has approved the above mentioned services performed.
Audit Committee Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
     The Audit Committee has a Pre-approval Policy (“Policy”) governing the approval of all audit and non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accountants in order to ensure that the performance of such services does not impair the independent registered public accountants.

18


Table of Contents

     According to the Policy, the Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the services and fees that may be provided by the independent registered public accountants during the following year. The Policy specifically describes the services and fees related to the annual audit, other services that are audit-related, preparation of tax returns and tax related compliance services and all other services that have the pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of any general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period.
     Any service to be provided by the independent registered public accountants that has not received general pre-approval under the Policy is required to be submitted to the Audit Committee for approval prior to the commencement of a substantial portion of the engagement. Any proposed service exceeding pre-approved cost levels is also required to be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific approval.
     The Audit Committee will revise the list of general pre-approved services from time to time based on subsequent determinations. The Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accountant to management.
Code of Ethics
     Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our executive officers, senior financial officers and directors of our company. We have posted the Code of Ethics on our website.
     In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange, we have adopted procedures to facilitate the submission, on a confidential and anonymous basis, of complaints, reports and concerns by any person regarding (1) accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, (2) actual or potential violations of laws, rules or regulations, and (3) other suspected wrongdoing, including in connection with our Code of Ethics.
OTHER INFORMATION
Solicitation
     All of the expenses involved in preparing, assembling and mailing this Proxy Statement and the materials enclosed herewith and all costs of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. In addition to the solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited by officers and regular employees of the Company by telephone, facsimile, or personal interview. Such persons will receive no compensation for their services other than their regular salaries. Arrangements will also be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record by such persons, and the Company may reimburse such persons for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in so doing.
Shareholder Proposals for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
     If you wish to submit a proposal for possible inclusion in our 2008 proxy materials, we must receive your notice, in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, on or before December 30, 2007. The proposal should be sent in writing to the Company’s principal executive offices, Attention: Secretary.
Director Nominations
     A Director nomination must be accompanied by a “Notice of Nomination” and proposals of shareholder business must be accompanied by a “Notice of Business.” Each such Notice must include (i) the name and record address of the shareholder and/or beneficial owner proposing such shareholder business or nomination, as they appear on the Company’s books, (ii) the class and number of shares of stock held of record and beneficially by such shareholder and/or such beneficial owner, (iii) a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such business or nomination, and (iv) all other information that would be required to be filed with the SEC if the person proposing such shareholder business or nomination were a participant in a solicitation subject to Section 14 of the Exchange Act.

19


Table of Contents

     Notices of Nominations must also include all information regarding each shareholder nominee that would be required to be set forth in a definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act, and the written consent of each such shareholder nominee to being named in a proxy statement as a nominee and to serve if elected. Notices of Business must include a brief description of the shareholder business desired to be brought before the annual meeting, the text of the proposal including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and, in the event that such business includes a proposal to amend the By-laws, the language of the proposed amendment, and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting and any material interest of the shareholder and/or beneficial owner in such shareholder business. The proponent must be a record or beneficial shareholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of shareholders on the proposal and must continue to own the securities through the date on which the meeting is held and attend the annual meeting to present the shareholder business or Director nomination.
OTHER BUSINESS
     Management of the Company is not aware of any other matters which are to be presented at the Annual Meeting, nor has it been advised that other persons will present any other proposals. However, if other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the individual named in the accompanying proxy shall vote on such matters in accordance with his best judgment.
     The above notice and Proxy Statement are sent by order of the Board of Directors.
         
     
  /s/ Bradley E. Larson    
     
  Bradley E. Larson
Chief Executive Officer 
 
 
Phoenix, Arizona
April 27, 2007

20


Table of Contents

PROXY
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
READY MIX, INC.
TO BE HELD JUNE 11, 2007
     The undersigned hereby appoints Bradley E. Larson as the lawful agent and Proxy of the undersigned (with all the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present, including full power of substitution), and hereby authorizes him to represent and to vote, as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Ready Mix, Inc. held of record by the undersigned on April 4, 2007, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held June 11, 2007, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
  1.   Election of directors:
 
                               FOR
 
                               AGAINST
 
                               WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
  NOMINEES:    Bradley E. Larson, Robert R. Morris, Kenneth D. Nelson, Charles E. Cowan, Charles R. Norton, Dan H. Stewart and Don A. Patterson
INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for individual nominees, write their names in the space provided:
         
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
       
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
       
 
   
 
   
 
       
  2.   Proposal to ratify the selection of Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007:
 
                               FOR
 
                               AGAINST
 
                               WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
     3.     In his discretion, the Proxy is authorized to vote upon any matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
     It is understood that when properly executed, this proxy will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. WHERE NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED BY THE SHAREHOLDER THE PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS NAMED IN ITEM 1 AND FOR THE REMAINING PROPOSAL ABOVE.
     The undersigned hereby revokes all previous proxies relating to the shares covered hereby and confirms all that said Proxy may do by virtue hereof.
     Please sign exactly as name appears below. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
     
 
Date
 
 
Signature
     
   
 
Signature, If Held Jointly
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY BY FOLDING THIS CARD IN HALF, SEAL WITH THE MAILING ADDRESS SHOWING, ATTACH CORRECT POSTAGE AND MAIL.
     PLEASE CHECK IF YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING:                        


Table of Contents

READY MIX, INC.
Attention: Clint Tryon
3430 East Flamingo Road
Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121