UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

 

Form 10-K

 

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

or

 

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to           

 

Commission file no. 001-16337

Oil States International, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Three Allen Center, 333 Clay Street, Suite 4620, Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(713) 652-0582

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)  YES þ     NO o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K.  þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June 30, 2010, was $1,200,875,970.

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of February 17, 2011 was 50,868,966 shares.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which the Registrant intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “certain forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of important factors. For a discussion of important factors that could affect our results, please refer to “Item 1. Business,” “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” below.

 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

We include the following cautionary statement to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for any “forward-looking statement” made by us, or on our behalf. The factors identified in this cautionary statement are important factors (but not necessarily all of the important factors) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by us, or on our behalf. You can typically identify “forward-looking statements” by the use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “potential,” “plan,” “forecast,” and other similar words. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements regarding our future financial position, budgets, capital expenditures, projected costs, plans and objectives of management for future operations and possible future strategic transactions, are forward-looking statements. Where any such forward-looking statement includes a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying such forward-looking statement, we caution that, while we believe such assumptions or bases to be reasonable and make them in good faith, assumed facts or bases almost always vary from actual results. The differences between assumed facts or bases and actual results can be material, depending upon the circumstances.

 

In any forward-looking statement, where we, or our management, express an expectation or belief as to the future results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, there can be no assurance that the statement of expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. Taking this into account, the following are identified as important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by, or on behalf of, our company:

 

 

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no responsibility to publicly release the result of any revision of our forward-looking statements after the date they are made.

 

Our Company

 

Oil States International, Inc. (the Company or Oil States), through its subsidiaries, is a leading provider of specialty products and services to natural resources companies throughout the world. We operate in a substantial number of the world’s active oil and natural gas and coal producing regions, including Canada, onshore and offshore U.S., Australia, West Africa, the North Sea, South America and Southeast and Central Asia. Our customers include many national oil companies, major and independent oil and natural gas companies, onshore and offshore drilling companies, other oilfield service companies and mining companies. We operate in four principal business segments — accommodations, offshore products, well site services and tubular services — and have established a leadership position in certain of our product or service offerings in each segment. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, references to the “Company” or to “we,” “us,” “our,” and similar terms are to Oil States International, Inc. and its subsidiaries following the Combination.

 

Available Information

 

The Company maintains a website with the address www.oilstatesintl.com. The Company is not including the information contained on the Company’s website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company makes available free of charge through its website its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The filings are also available through the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, these filings are available on the internet at http://www.sec.gov. The Board of Directors of the Company documented its governance practices by adopting several corporate governance policies. These governance policies, including the Company’s corporate governance guidelines and its code of business conduct and ethics, as well as the charters for the committees of the Board (Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) may also be viewed at the Company’s website. The code of business conduct and ethics applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Copies of such documents will be sent to shareholders free of charge upon written request to the corporate secretary at the address shown on the cover page of this Form 10-K.

 

Our Business Strategy

 

We have in past years grown our business lines both organically and through strategic acquisitions. Our investments are focused in growth areas and on areas where we expect we can expand market share and where we believe we can achieve an attractive return on our investment. Currently, we see investment opportunities in the oil sands developments in Canada, in shale play regions in North America, in the natural resources market in Australia and in the expansion of our capabilities to manufacture and assemble deepwater capital equipment on a global basis. As part of our long-term growth strategy, we continue to review complementary acquisitions as well as organic capital expenditures to enhance our cash flows. For additional discussion of our business strategy, please read “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

Capital Spending and Acquisitions

 

Capital spending since our initial public offering in February 2001 has totaled approximately $1.2 billion and has included both growth and maintenance capital expenditures in each of our businesses as follows: accommodations — $579 million, rental tools — $268 million, drilling and other — $189 million, offshore products — $107 million, tubular services — $17 million and corporate — $4 million.

 

Since our initial public offering in February 2001, we have completed 39 acquisitions for total consideration of $1.2 billion. Acquisitions of other oilfield service businesses and, recently, in the accommodations business supporting the natural resources market in Australia, have been an important aspect of our growth strategy and plan to increase shareholder value. Our acquisition strategy has allowed us to expand our geographic locations and our product and service offerings. This growth strategy has allowed us to leverage our existing and acquired products

and services into new geographic locations, and has expanded our technology and product offerings. We have made strategic acquisitions in our accommodations, offshore products, well site services and tubular services business lines.

 

On December 30, 2010, we acquired all of the ordinary shares of The MAC Services Group Limited (The MAC), through a Scheme of Arrangement (the Scheme) under the Corporations Act of Australia. The MAC is headquartered in Sydney, Australia and supplies accommodations services to the natural resources market. The MAC currently has 5,210 rooms in six locations in Queensland and Western Australia. Under the terms of the Scheme, each shareholder of The MAC received $3.95 (A$3.90) per share in cash. This price represents a total purchase price of $638 million, net of cash acquired plus debt assumed of $87 million. The Company funded the acquisition with cash on hand and borrowings available under our new five-year, $1.05 billion senior secured bank facilities. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on our senior secured bank facilities. The MAC’s operations will be reported as part of our accommodations segment.

 

On December 20, 2010, we also acquired all of the operating assets of Mountain West Oilfield Service and Supplies, Inc. and Ufford Leasing LLC (Mountain West) for total consideration of $47.1 million and estimated contingent consideration of $4.0 million. Headquartered in Vernal, Utah, with operations in the Rockies and the Bakken Shale region, Mountain West provides remote site workforce accommodations to the oil and gas industry. Mountain West has been included in the accommodations segment since its date of acquisition.

 

On October 5, 2010, we purchased all of the equity of Acute Technological Services, Inc. (Acute) for total consideration of $30.0 million. Headquartered in Houston, Texas and with operations in Brazil, Acute provides metallurgical and welding innovations to the oil and gas industry in support of critical, complex subsea component manufacturing and deepwater riser fabrication on a global basis. Acute has been included in the offshore products segment since its date of acquisition.

 

We funded the Acute and Mountain West acquisitions using cash on hand and our then existing credit facility.

 

Accounting for the three acquisitions made in 2010 has not been finalized and is subject to adjustments during the purchase price allocation period, which is not expected to exceed a period of one year from the respective acquisition dates.

 

Our Industry

 

We operate principally in the oilfield services industry and provide a broad range of products and services to our customers through our accommodations, offshore products, well site services and tubular services business segments. We also own and operate accommodations in the natural resources market in Australia. Demand for our products and services is cyclical and substantially dependent upon activity levels in the oil and gas industry, particularly our customers’ willingness to spend capital on the exploration for and development of oil, natural gas and mineral reserves. Our customers’ spending plans are generally based on their outlook for near-term and long-term commodity prices. As a result, demand for our products and services is highly sensitive to current and expected energy prices. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for financial information by segment and a geographical breakout of revenues and long-lived assets.

 

Our historical financial results reflect the cyclical nature of the oilfield services business. Since 2001, there have been periods of increasing and decreasing activity in each of our operating segments. Because of the acquisition of The MAC, our future results will also be influenced by the level of activity in the natural resource market in Australia. For additional information about activities in each of our segments, please see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

Our accommodations business is significantly influenced by the level of development of oil sands deposits in Alberta, Canada, activity levels in support of oil and gas development in Canada and the United States and, going forward, in natural resource markets, primarily in Australia. Despite the downturn in 2009 and early 2010 as a result of the global financial crisis, activity in our accommodations business has grown significantly in the last five years.

Our offshore products segment, which is more influenced by deepwater development spending and rig and vessel construction and repair, experienced significantly increased backlog and revenues from 2005 to 2008, which resulted in improved operating results during 2006, 2007 and in 2008. A high level of backlog at the beginning of 2009 provided stability in offshore products revenues and profits in that year. However, due to project postponements, cancellations and deferrals that limited new order activity beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 which continued throughout 2009 and led to backlog declines and decreased revenues and profits in 2010. Increased regulation of offshore drilling as a result of the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion and sinking in 2010 and resultant oil spill from the Macondo well blowout also delayed drilling and development operations in the U.S. offshore. However, with the improvement in oil prices over the last twenty-two months and the improved outlook for long-term oil demand, we began to experience increased bidding and quoting activity for our offshore products beginning in the second half of 2010, and our backlog has also increased 72% since the beginning of 2010.

 

Our well site services businesses are significantly affected by movements in the North American rig count. Activity increased to peak levels during 2008, but saw material declines beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 in most of our businesses, and continued through much of 2009. Activity levels in 2010 improved significantly off their 2009 troughs. In particular, oil related drilling activities have recovered and are now at their highest levels in over 20 years; however, pricing for certain of our products and services has not recovered to prior peak levels.

 

Our tubular services business is influenced by the overall level of U.S. drilling activity, the types of wells being drilled, movements in global steel and steel input prices and the overall industry level of oil country tubular goods (OCTG) inventory and pricing. Our tubular services business has historically been our most cyclical business segment. During 2008, this segment’s margins were positively affected in a significant manner by increasing prices for steel products, including the OCTG we sell. Declining OCTG prices in 2009 coupled with weaker demand for OCTG, caused by a decline in U.S. drilling, led to significantly lower revenues and margins for our tubular services business in 2009. The recovery in U.S. drilling activity in 2010 led to increased tubular services revenues. Although price increases were announced by the major U.S. mills during the first half of 2010, margins for our tubular services business declined in 2010 due primarily to a larger portion of service related costs expensed on certain program work.

 

Accommodations

 

Overview

 

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we generated approximately 22% of our revenue and 51% of our operating income, before corporate charges, from our accommodations segment. We are one of North America’s and, beginning in 2011 as a result of our acquisition of The MAC, Australia’s largest integrated providers of accommodations services for people working in remote locations. Our scalable modular facilities provide temporary and permanent work force accommodations where traditional infrastructure is not accessible or cost effective. Once facilities are deployed in the field, we can also provide catering and food services, housekeeping, laundry, facility management, water and wastewater treatment, power generation, communications and redeployment logistics. Our accommodations are employed to support work forces in the Canadian oil sands and in a variety of mining and related natural resource applications as well as forest fire fighting and disaster relief efforts, primarily in Canada, Australia and the United States.

 

Accommodations Market

 

Our accommodations business has grown in recent years due to the increasing demand for accommodations to support workers in the oil sands region of Canada. Demand for oil sands accommodations is influenced to a great extent by the longer-term outlook for energy prices rather than current energy prices, particularly crude oil prices, given the multi-year time frame to complete oil sands projects and the costs associated with development of such large scale projects. Utilization of our existing accommodations capacity and our future expansions will largely depend on continued oil sands development spending.

 

Beginning in 2011 as a result of our acquisition of The MAC, our accommodations business entered into the Australian natural resources market. The Australian natural resources market plays a vital role in the Australian economy. The growth of Australian natural resource commodity exports over the last decade has been largely driven

by strong Asian demand for iron ore, coal and liquefied natural gas (LNG). It is Australia’s largest contributor to exports, a major contributor to gross domestic product, a major employer and a major contributor to government revenue. The MAC’s current activities are primarily related to supplying accommodations in support of metallurgical coal mining.

 

Australia is a significant producer of most of the world’s key mineral commodities including iron ore, uranium, zinc, bauxite, lead, metallurgical and thermal coal and gold. It also has extensive oil and gas reserves with its major energy resource regions including the North West Shelf off the north coast of Western Australia and the onshore Cooper/Eromanga and Bowen/Surat Basins which straddle Queensland, New South Wales and South Australia.

 

Western Australia and Queensland are the most natural resource rich states. Western Australia produces a range of commodities including almost all of Australia’s iron ore from the Pilbara region in the northwest and gold and nickel from the Eastern Goldfields region around Kalgoorlie in the southeast. Queensland has significant deposits of metallurgical and thermal coal, lead, zinc, bauxite, gold and minerals sands. The Bowen Basin region of Queensland contains the largest metallurgical coal reserves in Australia and is becoming a major part of the rapidly developing east coast coal seam gas industry. The natural resources market is also a major contributor to economic activity in the other states of Australia (e.g. South Australia is home to the Olympic Dam mine, the fourth largest copper deposit and largest uranium deposit in the world).

 

Volumes and prices of commodities have historically varied significantly and are difficult to predict. Mineral and commodity prices have fluctuated in recent years and may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future. Strong economic growth in emerging economies, such as China and India, with associated strong demand for mineral and natural gas resources such as coal, iron ore and LNG, has more than offset moderating growth in the United States, Japan and Europe. This demand is expected to underpin continued investment and growth in the Australian natural resources market.

 

Products and Services

 

Since mid-year 2006, we have installed over 6,900 rooms in four of our major lodge properties supporting oil sands activities in northern Alberta. Our growth plan for this area of our business includes the expansion of these properties where we believe there is durable long-term demand. As of December 31, 2010, these company-owned properties include PTI Beaver River Executive Lodge (732 rooms), PTI Athabasca Lodge (1,537 rooms), PTI Wapasu Creek Lodge (4,013 rooms) and PTI Conklin Lodge (608 rooms). We are currently expanding the capacity of our PTI Wapasu Creek Lodge to over 5,000 rooms by the end of the first quarter of 2011.

 

In December 2010, we acquired The MAC, which owns and operates six villages with over 5,200 rooms and has a significant development portfolio in Australia. The MAC provides accommodation services to mining and related service companies (including construction contractors) under medium-term contracts. The MAC villages are strategically located in proximity to long-life, low-cost mines operated by large mining companies. The MAC’s villages are developments intended to be in operation for 15 plus years and comprise manufactured relocatable buildings, with two to six rooms per building. The accommodations are built around central facilities such as housing, kitchen, dining, retail, entertainment and fitness areas.

 

From 2007 to 2009 it added 1,657 rooms (net of retirements) by expanding existing villages and opening new villages. During 2010, given the uncertain global economic outlook, it consolidated its position incurring only maintenance capital expenditure while retiring 278 rooms. At December 31, 2010, The MAC had 5,210 rooms under management.

 

In addition to our large-scale lodge and village facilities, we offer a broad range of semi-permanent and mobile options to house workers in remote regions. Our fleet of temporary camps is designed to be deployed on short notice and can be relocated as a project site moves. Our camps range in size from a 25 person drilling camp to a 2,000 person camp supporting varied operations, including pipeline construction, Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) drilling operations and large shale oil projects.

 

We own two accommodations manufacturing plants near Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and a manufacturing location in Adelaide, Australia, which specialize in the design, engineering, production, transportation and

installation of a variety of portable modular buildings, predominately for our own use. We manufacture accommodations facilities to suit the climate, terrain and population of a specific project site.

 

To a significant extent, the Company’s recent capital expenditures have focused on opportunities in the oil sands region in northern Alberta. Since the beginning of 2005, we have spent $489.7 million, or 48.6%, of our total consolidated capital expenditures in our Canadian accommodations business. Most of these capital investments have been in support of oil sands developments, both for initial construction phases and ongoing operations. Oil sands related accommodations revenues have increased from 33% of total accommodations revenues in 2005 to 71% in 2010.

 

Regions of Operations

 

Our accommodations business is focused primarily in northern Canada and, more recently, in Queensland, Australia, but also operates in Western Australia, the U.S. Rocky Mountain corridor and the Bakken Shale region (Wyoming, Colorado, Utah and North Dakota), the Fayetteville Shale region of Arkansas and offshore locations in the Gulf of Mexico. In the past, we have also served companies operating in international markets including the Middle East, Europe, Asia and South America.

 

Customers and Competitors

 

Our customers operate in a diverse mix of industries including primarily oil sands mining and development; drilling, exploration and extraction of oil and natural gas and coal and other extractive industries. To a lesser extent, we also operate in other industries, including pipeline construction, forestry, humanitarian aid and disaster relief, and support for military operations. Our primary competitors in North America include Aramark Corporation, Compass Group PLC, ATCO Structures and Logistics Ltd., Black Diamond Group Limited and Horizon North Logistics, Inc. Our primary competitors in Australia include Ausco Modular Pty Limited, Fleetwood Corporation Limited, Nomad Building Solutions Limited and Decmil Group Limited. Although not direct competitors, accommodations are sometimes owned and/or operated by our potential customers.

 

Offshore Products

 

Overview

 

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we generated approximately 18% of our revenue and 21% of our operating income, before corporate charges, from our offshore products segment. Through this segment, we design and manufacture a number of cost-effective, technologically advanced products for the offshore energy industry. In addition, we supply other lower margin products and services such as fabrication and inspection services. Our products and services are used primarily in deepwater producing regions and include flex-element technology, advanced connector systems, deepwater mooring systems, cranes, offshore equipment, installation services and subsea pipeline products and blow-out preventer stack integration and repair services. We have facilities in Arlington, Houston and Lampasas, Texas; Houma, Louisiana; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Scotland; Brazil; England; Singapore, Thailand and India that support our offshore products segment.

 

Offshore Products Market

 

The market for our offshore products and services depends primarily upon development of infrastructure for offshore production activities, drilling rig refurbishments and upgrades and new rig and vessel construction. Demand for oil and natural gas and related drilling and production in offshore areas throughout the world, particularly in deeper water, will drive spending on these activities.

 

Products and Services

 

Our offshore products segment provides a broad range of products and services for use in offshore drilling and development activities. To a lesser extent, this segment provides onshore oil and natural gas, defense and general industrial products and services. Our offshore products segment is dependent in part on the industry’s continuing innovation and creative applications of existing technologies.

Offshore Development and Drilling Activities.  We design, manufacture, fabricate, inspect, assemble, repair, test and market subsea equipment and offshore vessel and rig equipment. Our products are components of equipment used for the drilling and production of oil and natural gas wells on offshore fixed platforms and mobile production units, including floating platforms, such as Spars, tension leg platforms, floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels, and on other marine vessels, floating rigs, vessels and jack-up rigs. Our products and services include:

 

 

Flexible Bearings and Connector Products.  We are the principal supplier of flexible bearings, or FlexJoints^®, to the offshore oil and gas industry. We also supply weld-on connectors and fittings that join lengths of large diameter conductor or casing used in offshore drilling operations. FlexJoints^® are flexible bearings that permit the controlled movement of riser pipes or tension leg platform tethers under high tension and pressure. They are used on drilling, production and export risers and are used increasingly as offshore production moves to deeper water areas. Drilling riser systems provide the vertical conduit between the floating drilling vessel and the subsea wellhead. Through the drilling riser, equipment is guided into the well and drilling fluids are returned to the surface. Production riser systems provide the vertical conduit for the hydrocarbons from the subsea wellhead to the floating production platform. Oil and natural gas flows to the surface for processing through the production riser. Export risers provide the vertical conduit from the floating production platform to the subsea export pipelines. FlexJoints^® are a critical element in the construction and operation of production and export risers on floating production systems in deepwater.

 

Floating production systems, including tension leg platforms, Spars and FPSO facilities, are a significant means of producing oil and gas, particularly in deepwater environments. We provide many important products for the construction of these facilities. A tension leg platform is a floating platform that is moored by vertical pipes, or tethers, attached to both the platform and the sea floor. Our FlexJoint^® tether bearings are used at the top and bottom connections of each of the tethers, and our Merlin connectors are used to efficiently assemble the tethers during offshore installation. A Spar is a floating vertical cylindrical structure which is approximately six to seven times longer than its diameter and is anchored in place. An FPSO is a floating vessel, typically ship shaped, used to produce, and process oil and gas from subsea wells. Our FlexJoints^® are also used to attach the steel catenary risers to a Spar, FPSO or tension leg platform and for use on import or export risers.

 

Subsea Pipeline Products.  We design and manufacture a variety of equipment used in the construction, maintenance, expansion and repair of offshore oil and natural gas pipelines. New construction equipment includes:

 

 

We provide diverless connection systems for subsea flowlines and pipelines. Our HydroTech^® collet connectors provide a high-integrity, proprietary metal-to-metal sealing system for the final hook-up of deep offshore pipelines and production systems. They also are used in diverless pipeline repair systems and in future pipeline tie-in systems. Our lateral tie-in sled, which is installed with the original pipeline, allows a subsea tie-in to be made quickly and efficiently using proven HydroTech^® connectors without costly offshore equipment mobilization and without shutting off product flow.

 

We provide pipeline repair hardware, including deepwater applications beyond the depth of diver intervention. Our products include:

 

 

Marine Winches, Mooring Systems, Cranes and Rig Equipment.  We design, engineer and manufacture marine winches, mooring systems, cranes and certain rig equipment. Our Skagit^® winches are specifically designed for mooring floating and semi-submersible drilling rigs and positioning pipelay and derrick barges, anchor handling boats and jack-ups, while our Nautilus^® marine cranes are used on production platforms throughout the world. We also design and fabricate rig equipment such as automatic pipe racking and blow-out preventer handling equipment. Our engineering teams, manufacturing capability and service technicians who install and service our products provide our customers with a broad range of equipment and services to support their operations. Aftermarket service and support of our installed base of equipment to our customers is also an important source of revenue to us.

 

BOP Stack Assembly, Integration, Testing and Repair Services.  We design and fabricate lifting and protection frames and offer system integration of blow-out preventer stacks and subsea production trees. We can provide complete turnkey and design fabrication services. We also design and manufacture a variety of custom subsea equipment, such as riser flotation tank systems, guide bases, running tools and manifolds. In addition, we also offer blow-out preventer and drilling riser testing and repair services.

 

To a lesser extent, our offshore products segment also produces a variety of products for use in applications other than in the offshore oil and gas industry. For example, we provide:

 

 

Backlog.  Backlog in our offshore products segment was $354 million at December 31, 2010, compared to $206 million at December 31, 2009 and $362 million at December 31, 2008. We expect in excess of 75% of our backlog at December 31, 2010 to be recognized as revenue during 2011. Our offshore products backlog consists of firm customer purchase orders for which contractual commitments exist and delivery is scheduled. In some instances, these purchase orders are cancelable by the customer, subject to the payment of termination fees and/or the reimbursement of our costs incurred. Our backlog is an important indicator of future offshore products shipments and revenues; however, backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of our actual operating results for any future period. We believe that the offshore construction and development business is characterized by lengthy projects and a long “lead-time” order cycle. The change in backlog levels from one period to the next does not necessarily evidence a long-term trend.

 

Regions of Operations

 

Our offshore products segment provides products and services to customers in the major offshore oil and gas producing regions of the world, including the Gulf of Mexico, West Africa, Azerbaijan, the North Sea, Brazil,

Southeast Asia and India. We are currently expanding our capabilities in Southeast Asia by constructing a new facility in Singapore.

 

Customers and Competitors

 

We market our products and services to a broad customer base, including direct end users, engineering and design companies, prime contractors, and at times, our competitors through outsourcing arrangements. Our largest customers in 2010 were Transocean Ltd., Halliburton Company and BP p.l.c.

 

Well Site Services

 

Overview

 

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we generated approximately 20% of our revenue and 16% of our operating income, before corporate charges, from our well site services segment. Our well site services segment includes a broad range of products and services that are used to drill for, establish and maintain the flow of oil and natural gas from a well throughout its lifecycle. In this segment, our operations include completion-focused rental tools and land drilling services. We use our fleet of drilling rigs and rental equipment to serve our customers at well sites and project development locations. Our products and services are used primarily in onshore applications throughout the exploration, development and production phases of a well’s life.

 

Well Site Services Market

 

Demand for our drilling rigs and rental equipment has historically been tied to the level of oil and natural gas exploration and production activity. The primary driver for this activity is the price of oil and natural gas. Activity levels have been, and we expect will continue to be, highly correlated with hydrocarbon commodity prices.

 

Products and Services

 

Rental Equipment.  Our rental equipment business provides a wide range of products and services for use in the onshore and offshore oil and gas industry, including:

 

 

Our rental equipment is primarily used during the completion and production stages of a well. As of December 31, 2010, we provided rental equipment at 58 distribution points throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico and Argentina, compared to 64 distribution points at December 31, 2009. We continue to consolidate operations in areas where our product lines previously had separate facilities and close facilities in areas where operations are marginal in order to streamline operations, enhance our facilities and improve marketing efficiency. We provide rental equipment on a daily rental basis with rates varying depending on the type of equipment and the length of time rented. In certain operations, we also provide service personnel in connection with the equipment rental. We own patents covering some of our rental tools, particularly in our wellhead isolation equipment product line. Our customers in the rental equipment business include major, independent and private oil and gas companies and other large oilfield service companies. Competition in the rental tool business is widespread and includes many

smaller companies, although we also compete with the larger oilfield service companies for certain products and services. The recovery in our industry during 2010 resulted in a shortage of both equipment and personnel, contributing to both higher revenues and margins during the year when compared to 2009.

 

Drilling Services.  Our drilling services business is located in the United States and provides land drilling services for shallow to medium depth wells ranging from 1,500 to 15,000 feet. Drilling services are typically used during the exploration and development stages of a field. As of December 31, 2010, after the sale of one of our rigs in 2010, we had a total of 36 semi-automatic drilling rigs with hydraulic pipe handling booms and lift capacities ranging from 75,000 to 500,000 pounds, 14 of which were fabricated and/or assembled in our Odessa, Texas facility with components purchased from specialty vendors. Twenty-two of these drilling rigs are based in Odessa, Texas and fourteen are based in the Rocky Mountains region. Utilization of our drilling rigs increased from an average of 37% in 2009 to an average of 72% in 2010. On December 31, 2010, 28 of our rigs were working or under contract with utilization of approximately 78%.

 

We market our drilling services directly to a diverse customer base, consisting of major, independent and private oil and gas companies. We contract on both footage and dayrate basis and have one rig in West Texas operating under a multi-well turnkey contract. Under a footage or turnkey drilling contract, we assume responsibility for certain costs (such as bits and fuel) and assume more risk (such as time necessary to drill) than we would on a daywork contract. Depending on market conditions and availability of drilling rigs, we see changes in pricing, utilization and contract terms. The land drilling business is highly fragmented, and our competition consists of a small number of larger companies and many smaller companies. Our Permian Basin drilling activities target primarily oil reservoirs while our Rocky Mountain drilling activities target both oil and natural gas reservoirs.

 

Tubular Services

 

Overview

 

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we generated approximately 40% of our revenue and 12% of our operating income, before corporate charges, from our tubular services segment. Through our Sooner, Inc. subsidiary, we distribute OCTG and provide associated OCTG finishing and logistics services to the oil and gas industry. OCTG consist of downhole casing and production tubing. Through our tubular services segment, we:

 

 

We serve a customer base ranging from major oil and gas companies to small independents. Through our key relationships with more than 20 domestic and foreign manufacturers and related service providers and suppliers of OCTG, we deliver tubular products and ancillary services to oil and gas companies, drilling contractors and consultants predominantly in the United States. The OCTG distribution market is highly fragmented and competitive, and is focused in the United States. We purchase tubular goods from a variety of sources. However, during 2010, we purchased 56% of our total tubular goods from a single domestic supplier and 72% of our total OCTG purchases from three domestic suppliers.

 

OCTG Market

 

Our tubular services segment primarily distributes casing and tubing. Casing forms the structural wall in oil and natural gas wells to provide support, control pressure and prevent collapse during drilling operations. Casing is also used to protect water-bearing formations during the drilling of a well. Casing is generally not removed after it has been installed in a well. Production tubing, which is used to bring oil and natural gas to the surface, may be replaced during the life of a producing well.

 

A key indicator of domestic demand for OCTG is the aggregate footage of wells drilled onshore and offshore in the United States. The OCTG market is also affected by the level of inventories maintained by manufacturers, distributors and end users. Inventory on the ground, when at high levels, can cause tubular sales to lag a rig count increase due to inventory destocking and can put downward pressure on OCTG pricing. Demand for tubular products is positively impacted by increased drilling of deeper, horizontal and offshore wells. Deeper wells require

incremental tubular footage and enhanced mechanical capabilities to ensure the integrity of the well. Premium tubulars are generally used in deeper wells and in horizontal drilling to withstand the increased bending and compression loading associated with a horizontal well. Operators typically specify premium tubulars for the completion of offshore wells.

 

Products and Services

 

Tubular Products and Services.  We distribute various types of OCTG produced by both domestic and foreign manufacturers to major and independent oil and gas exploration and production companies and other OCTG distributors. We have distribution relationships with most major domestic and certain international steel mills. We do not manufacture any of the tubular goods that we distribute. As a result, gross margins in this segment are generally lower than those reported by our other business segments. We operate our tubular services segment from a total of ten offices and facilities located near areas of oil and natural gas exploration and development activity.

 

In our tubular services segment, inventory management is critical to our success. We maintain on-the-ground inventory in five company-owned yards and approximately 60 third-party yards located in the United States, giving us the flexibility to fill customer orders from our own stock or directly from the manufacturer. We have a proprietary inventory management system, designed specifically for the OCTG industry, which enables us to track our product shipments.

 

A-Z Terminal.  Our A-Z Terminal pipe maintenance and storage facility in Crosby, Texas is equipped to provide a full range of tubular services, giving us strong customer service capabilities. Our A-Z Terminal is on 109 acres, is an ISO 9001-certified facility, has a rail spur and more than 1,400 pipe racks and two double-ended thread lines. We have exclusive use of a permanent third-party inspection center within the facility. The facility also includes indoor chrome storage capability and patented pipe cleaning machines. We offer services at our A-Z Terminal facility typically outsourced by other distributors, including the following: threading, inspection, cleaning, cutting, logistics, rig returns, installation of float equipment and non-destructive testing.

 

Other Facilities.  We also offer tubular services at our facilities in Midland and Godley, Texas, Searcy, Arkansas and Montoursville, Pennsylvania. Our Midland, Texas facility covers approximately 60 acres and has more than 400 pipe racks. Our Godley, Texas facility, which services the Barnett shale area, has approximately 60 pipe racks on approximately 31 developed acres and is serviced by a rail spur. Our Searcy location has approximately 140 pipe racks on 14 acres. Our Montoursville location has approximately 99 pipe racks on 24 acres. Independent third party inspection companies operate within each of these facilities either with mobile or permanent inspection equipment.

 

Tubular Products and Services Sales Arrangements.  We provide our tubular products and logistics services through a variety of arrangements, including spot market sales and alliances. We provide some of our tubular products and services to independent and major oil and gas companies under alliance or program arrangements. Although our alliances are generally not as profitable as the spot market and can generally be cancelled by the customer, they provide us with more stable and predictable revenues and an improved ability to forecast required inventory levels, which allows us to manage our inventory more efficiently.

 

Regions of Operations

 

Our tubular services segment provides tubular products and services principally to customers in the United States both for land and offshore applications. However, we also sell a small percentage for export worldwide.

 

Suppliers and Competitors

 

Our largest supplier is U.S. Steel Group. Although we have a leading market share position in tubular services distribution, the market is highly fragmented. Our main competitors in tubular distribution are Bourland & Leverich Supply Company, L.C., McJunkin Red Man Corporation, Pipeco Services Inc. and Premier Pipe L.P.

 

* * * * *

Seasonality of Operations

 

Our operations are directly affected by seasonal differences in weather in the areas in which we operate, most notably in Canada, Australia, the Rocky Mountain region and the Gulf of Mexico. A portion of our Canadian accommodations operations is conducted during the winter months when the winter freeze in remote regions is required for exploration and production activity to occur. The spring thaw in these frontier regions restricts operations in the second quarter and adversely affects our operations and sales of products and services. Our operations in the Gulf of Mexico are also affected by weather patterns. Weather conditions in the Gulf Coast region generally result in higher drilling activity in the spring, summer and fall months with the lowest activity in the winter months. As a result of these seasonal differences, full year results are not likely to be a direct multiple of any particular quarter or combination of quarters. In addition, summer and fall drilling activity can be restricted due to hurricanes and other storms prevalent in the Gulf of Mexico and along the Gulf Coast. For example, during 2005, a significant disruption occurred in oil and natural gas drilling and production operations in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico due to damage inflicted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and, during 2008, from Hurricane Ike. Cyclones can affect our operations in Australia.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had 6,904 full-time employees on a consolidated basis, 44% of whom are in our accommodations segment, 24% of whom are in our offshore products segment, 29% of whom are in our well site services segment, 2% of whom are in our tubular services segment and 1% of whom are in our corporate headquarters. We are party to collective bargaining agreements covering 1,689 employees located in Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom and Argentina as of December 31, 2010. We believe relations with our employees are good.

 

Government Regulation

 

Our business is significantly affected by foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the oil and gas industry, worker safety and environmental protection. Changes in these laws, including more stringent regulations and increased levels of enforcement of these laws and regulations, could significantly affect our business. We cannot predict changes in the level of enforcement of existing laws and regulations or how these laws and regulations may be interpreted or the effect changes in these laws and regulations may have on us or our future operations or earnings. We also are not able to predict whether additional laws and regulations will be adopted.

 

We depend on the demand for our products and services from oil and gas companies. This demand is affected by changing taxes, price controls and other laws and regulations relating to the oil and gas industry generally, including those specifically directed to oilfield and offshore operations. The adoption of laws and regulations curtailing exploration and development drilling for oil and natural gas in our areas of operation could also adversely affect our operations by limiting demand for our products and services. We cannot determine the extent to which our future operations and earnings may be affected by new legislation, new regulations or changes in existing regulations or enforcement.

 

Some of our employees who perform services on offshore platforms and vessels are covered by the provisions of the Jones Act, the Death on the High Seas Act and general maritime law. These laws operate to make the liability limits established under states’ workers’ compensation laws inapplicable to these employees and permit them or their representatives generally to pursue actions against us for damages or job-related injuries with no limitations on our potential liability.

 

Our operations are subject to numerous stringent and comprehensive foreign, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing the release and/or discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. Numerous governmental agencies issue regulations to implement and enforce these laws, for which compliance is often costly and difficult. The violation of these laws and regulations may result in the denial or revocation of permits, issuance of corrective action orders, modification or cessation of operations, assessment of administrative and civil penalties, and even criminal prosecution. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations and we do not anticipate that future compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations will have a material effect on our Consolidated

Financial Statements. However, there can be no assurance that substantial costs for compliance or penalties for non-compliance with these existing requirements will not be incurred in the future. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as the adoption of stricter environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies or more stringent enforcement of existing environmental laws and regulations, could result in additional costs or liabilities that we cannot currently quantify.

 

For example, in Canada, the Federal Government of Canada in September 2010 appointed an Oil Sands Advisory Panel to review and comment upon existing scientific studies and literature regarding water monitoring in the Lower Athabasca region and provide recommendations for improving such monitoring. The Oil Sands Advisory Panel presented its final report to the Minister of the Environment in December 2010. The recommendations of the Oil Sands Advisory Panel, if accepted, would increase the level and cost of government oversight and implement an industrial user pay system. The Province of Alberta has also established a Provincial Environmental Monitoring Panel with a mandate to recommend a world class environmental evaluation, monitoring and reporting system, generally for the Province and specifically for the lower Athabasca Region where oil sands are produced. While it is unclear if and when such new monitoring systems or requirements will be in place, it would appear the Province of Alberta is taking steps to implement the recommendations of the Federal Oil Sands Advisory Panel.

 

Further, the Province of Alberta released a report in December 2010 regarding regulatory changes to be implemented in 2011 regarding Alberta Environment’s regulation of oil sands operations. The report suggests regulatory changes will include increased reclamation security requirements, increased monitoring requirements for water quality, and additional requirements for the management of tailings ponds. These changes, if and when they are implemented, may result in additional costs or liabilities for our customers’ operations.

 

We generate wastes, including hazardous wastes, which are subject to the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, and comparable state statutes. The United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and state agencies have limited the approved methods of disposal for some types of hazardous and nonhazardous wastes. Some wastes handled by us in our field service activities currently are exempt from treatment as hazardous wastes under RCRA because that act specifically excludes drilling fluids, produced waters and other wastes associated with the exploration, development or exploration of oil or natural gas from regulation as hazardous waste. However, these wastes may in the future be designated as “hazardous wastes” under RCRA or other applicable statutes. This would subject us to more rigorous and costly operating and disposal requirements. In any event, such wastes may remain subject to regulation under RCRA as solid wastes.

 

With regard to our U.S. operations, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, also known as the “Superfund” law, and comparable state statutes impose liability, without regard to fault or legality of the original conduct, on classes of persons that are considered to have contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of the disposal site or the site where the release occurred and companies that transported, disposed of, or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances at the site where the release occurred. Under CERCLA, these persons may be subject to joint and several, strict liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment and for damages to natural resources, and it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. We currently have operations in the United States on properties where activities involving the handling of hazardous substances or wastes may have been conducted prior to our operations on such properties or by third parties whose operations were not under our control. These properties may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous state laws. Under these laws and related regulations, we could be required to remove or remediate previously discarded hazardous substances and wastes or property contamination that was caused by these third parties. These laws and regulations may also expose us to liability for our acts that were in compliance with applicable laws at the time the acts were performed.

 

In the course of our domestic operations, some of our equipment may be exposed to naturally occurring radiation associated with oil and natural gas deposits, and this exposure may result in the generation of wastes containing naturally occurring radioactive materials or “NORM.” NORM wastes exhibiting trace levels of naturally occurring radiation in excess of established state standards are subject to special handling and disposal requirements, and any storage vessels, piping, and work area affected by NORM may be subject to remediation or

restoration requirements. Because many of the properties presently or previously owned, operated, or occupied by us have been used for oil and gas production operations for many years, it is possible that we may incur costs or liabilities associated with elevated levels of NORM.

 

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act and analogous state laws impose restrictions and strict controls regarding the discharge of pollutants into state waters or waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into jurisdictional waters is prohibited unless the discharge is permitted by the EPA or applicable state agencies. Many of our domestic properties and operations require permits for discharges of wastewater and/or storm water, and we have a system for securing and maintaining these permits. In addition, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 imposes a variety of requirements on responsible parties related to the prevention of oil spills and liability for damages, including natural resource damages, resulting from such spills in waters of the United States. A responsible party includes the owner or operator of a facility or vessel, or the lessee or permittee of the area in which an offshore facility is located. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act and analogous state laws provide for administrative, civil and criminal penalties for unauthorized discharges and, together with the Oil Pollution Act, impose rigorous requirements for spill prevention and response planning, as well as substantial potential liability for the costs of removal, remediation, and damages in connection with any unauthorized discharges.

 

A certain portion of our rental tools business supports other contractors actually performing hydraulic fracturing to enhance the production of natural gas from formations with low permeability, such as shales. Due to concerns raised concerning potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on groundwater quality, legislative and regulatory efforts at the federal level and in some states have been initiated in the United States to render permitting and compliance requirements more stringent for hydraulic fracturing. Congress has considered two companion bills for the “Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act,” or FRAC Act. The bills would repeal an exemption in the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, or SWDA, for the underground injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids near drinking water sources. Sponsors of the FRAC Act have asserted that chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect drinking water supplies. If enacted, the FRAC Act could result in additional regulatory burdens on the oil and gas industry generally, primarily on our customers, such as permitting, construction, financial assurance, monitoring, recordkeeping, and plugging and abandonment requirements. The FRAC Act also proposes requiring the disclosure of chemical constituents used in the fracturing process to state or federal regulatory authorities, who would then make such information publicly available. The availability of this information could make it easier for third parties opposing the hydraulic fracturing process to initiate legal proceedings based on allegations that specific chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect groundwater. The Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of the U.S. House of Representatives is currently examining the practice of hydraulic fracturing in the United States and is gathering information on its potential impacts on human health and the environment. The EPA also has commenced a study of the potential adverse effects that hydraulic fracturing may have on water quality and public health. In addition, various state and local governments have implemented or are considering increased regulatory oversight of hydraulic fracturing through additional permit requirements, operational restrictions, requirements for disclosure of chemical constituents, and temporary or permanent bans on hydraulic fracturing in certain environmentally sensitive areas such as watersheds.

 

The adoption of the FRAC Act or any other federal or state laws or regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or otherwise limiting, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult, or less economic, to complete oil or natural gas wells in shale formations, increase our customers’ costs of compliance, and cause delays in permitting. Such regulatory and legislative efforts could have an adverse effect on oil and natural gas production activities by operators or other contractors with whom we have a business relationship, which in turn could have an adverse effect on demand for our North American completion products and services.

 

In April 2010, there was a fire and explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig leading to an oil spill from the Macondo well operated in the ultra deep water in the Gulf of Mexico. In response to the explosion and spill, there have been many proposals by governmental and private constituencies to address the direct impact of the incident and to prevent similar incidents in the future. Beginning in May 2010, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, or BOEMRE (formerly the Minerals Management Service), of the United States Department of the Interior implemented a moratorium on certain drilling activities in water depths greater than 500 feet in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that effectively shut down deepwater drilling activities through at least October 2010. In addition, BOEMRE issued Notices to Lessees and Operators, or NTLS, implemented

additional safety and certification requirements applicable to drilling activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and imposed additional requirements with respect to development and production activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and has delayed the approval of applications to drill in both deepwater and shallow-water areas. Even without the “official” moratorium, offshore drilling activity is being delayed by adjustments in operating procedures, compliance certifications, and lead times for permits and inspections, as a result of the changes in the regulatory environment. In addition, there have been a variety of proposals to change existing laws and regulations that could affect offshore development and production, including proposals to significantly increase the minimum financial responsibility demonstration required under the federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Uncertainties and delays caused by the new regulatory environment have and will continue to have an overall negative effect on Gulf of Mexico drilling activity and, to a certain extent, the financial results of each of our business segments.

 

Some of our operations also result in emissions of regulated air pollutants. The federal Clean Air Act, or CAA, and analogous state laws require permits for facilities in the United States that have the potential to emit substances into the atmosphere that could adversely affect environmental quality. Failure to obtain a permit or to comply with permit requirements could result in the imposition of substantial administrative, civil and even criminal penalties.

 

Past scientific studies have suggested that emissions of certain gases, commonly referred to as greenhouse gases, or GHG, and including carbon dioxide and methane, may be contributing to warming of the Earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. In response to such studies, many foreign nations, including Canada, have agreed to limit emissions of these gases pursuant to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, also known as the “Kyoto Protocol.” In December 2002, Canada ratified the Kyoto Protocol, which requires Canada to reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases to 6% below 1990 levels by 2012. The Canadian federal government previously released the Regulatory Framework for Air Emissions, updated March 10, 2008 by Turning the Corner: Regulatory Framework for Industrial Greenhouse Emissions (collectively, the “Regulatory Framework”) for regulating GHG emissions and in doing so proposed mandatory emissions intensity reduction obligations on a sector by sector basis. Recently, the Government of Canada has announced a number of regulatory changes to address GHG emissions from motor vehicles and coal fired electricity generation. These changes may have implications for our costs of operations.

 

On January 29, 2010, Canada affirmed its desire to be associated with the Copenhagen Accord that was negotiated in December 2009 as part of the international meetings on climate change regulation in Copenhagen. The Copenhagen Accord, which is not legally binding, allows countries to commit to specific efforts to reduce GHG emissions, although how and when the commitments may be converted into binding emission reduction obligations is currently uncertain. Pursuant to the Copenhagen Accord process, Canada has indicated an economy-wide GHG emissions target that equates to a 17 per cent reduction from 2005 levels by 2020, and the Canadian federal government has also indicated an objective of reducing overall Canadian GHG emissions by 60% to 70% by 2050. Additionally, in 2009, the Canadian federal government announced its commitment to work with the provincial governments to implement a North America-wide cap and trade system for GHG emissions, in cooperation with the United States. Under the system, Canada would have a cap-and-trade market for Canadian-specific industrial sectors that could be integrated into a North American market for carbon permits. It is uncertain whether either federal GHG regulations or an integrated North American cap-and-trade system will be implemented, or what obligations might be imposed under any such systems.

 

Additionally, GHG regulation can take place at the provincial and municipal level. For example, Alberta introduced the Climate Change and Emissions Management Act, which provides a framework for managing GHG emissions by reducing specified gas emissions, relative to gross domestic product, to an amount that is equal to or less than 50% of 1990 levels by December 31, 2020. The accompanying regulation, the Specified Gas Emitters Regulation, effective July 1, 2007, requires mandatory emissions reductions through the use of emissions intensity targets, and a company can meet the applicable emissions limits by making emissions intensity improvements at facilities, offsetting GHG emissions by purchasing offset credits or emission performance credits in the open market, or acquiring “fund credits” by making payments of $15 per ton of GHG emissions to the Alberta Climate Change and Management Fund. The Alberta government recently announced its intention to raise the price of fund credits. The Specified Gas Reporting Regulation imposes GHG emissions reporting requirements if a company has GHG emissions of 100,000 tons or more from a facility in a year. In addition, Alberta facilities must currently report emissions of industrial air pollutants and comply with obligations in permits and under other environmental

regulations. The Canadian federal government currently proposes to enter into equivalency agreements with provinces to establish a consistent regulatory regime for GHGs, but the success of any such plan is uncertain, possibly leaving overlapping levels of regulation. The direct and indirect costs of these regulations may adversely affect our operations and financial results as well as those of our customers.

 

Our recently acquired Australian accommodations businesss is regulated by general statutory environmental controls at both the state and federal level. These controls include: the regulation of hard and liquid waste, including the requirement for trade waste and/or wastewater permits or licences; the regulation of water, noise, heat, and atmospheric gases emissions; the regulation of the production, transport and storage of dangerous and hazardous materials (including asbestos); and the regulation of pollution and site contamination. Some specified activities, for example, sewage treatment works, may require regulation at a state level by way of environmental protection licenses which also impose monitoring and reporting obligations on the holder. National and state based regulations for the monitoring and reduction of green house gas emissions have been proposed or commenced but no national mandatory emissions trading market has yet commenced. Federal requirements for the disclosure of energy performance under building rating regulations have been introduced and are to be expanded. These regulations require the tracking of specific environmental performance factors.

 

Although the United States is not participating in the Kyoto Protocol, in December 2009, the U.S. EPA determined that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other GHGs present an endangerment to public health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to warming of the earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. Based on these findings, the EPA has begun adopting and implementing regulations to restrict emissions of greenhouse gases under existing provisions of the CAA. The EPA recently adopted two sets of rules regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the CAA, one of which requires a reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases from motor vehicles and the other of which regulates emissions of greenhouse gases from certain large stationary sources, effective January 2, 2011. The EPA has also adopted rules requiring the reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from specified large greenhouse gas emission sources in the United States, including petroleum refineries, on an annual basis, beginning in 2011 for emissions occurring after January 1, 2010, as well as certain oil and natural gas production facilities, on an annual basis, beginning in 2012 for emissions occurring in 2011.

 

In addition, the United States Congress has from time to time considered adopting legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and almost one-half of the states have already taken legal measures to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases primarily through the planned development of greenhouse gas emission inventories and/or regional greenhouse gas cap and trade programs. Most of these cap and trade programs work by requiring major sources of emissions, such as electric power plants, or major producers of fuels, such as refineries and gas processing plants, to acquire and surrender emission allowances. The number of allowances available for purchase is reduced each year in an effort to achieve the overall greenhouse gas emission reduction goal.

 

The adoption of legislation or regulatory programs to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases could require us or our customers to incur increased operating costs, such as costs to purchase and operate emissions control systems, to acquire emissions allowances or comply with new regulatory or reporting requirements. Any such legislation or regulatory programs could also increase the cost of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for, the oil and natural gas, which could reduce the demand for our products and services. Consequently, legislation and regulatory programs to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Finally, it should be noted that some scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, floods and other climatic events. If any such effects were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our operations outside of the United States are potentially subject to similar foreign governmental controls relating to protection of the environment. We believe that, to date, our operations outside of the United States have been in substantial compliance with existing requirements of these foreign governmental bodies and that such compliance has not had a material adverse effect on our operations. However, this trend of compliance with existing requirements may not continue in the future or the cost of such compliance may become material. For instance, any future restrictions on emissions of greenhouse gases that are imposed in foreign countries in which we operate, such

as in Canada and Australia, pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol or other locally enforceable requirements, could adversely affect demand for our services.

 

 

The risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.

 

Our business is subject to a number of economic risks.

 

Financial markets worldwide experienced extreme disruption in the past three years, including, among other things, extreme volatility in securities prices, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades of certain investments and declining valuations of others. Governments took unprecedented actions intended to address extreme market conditions such as severely restricted credit and declines in real estate values. Such economic events can recur and can potentially affect businesses such as ours in a number of ways. Tightening of credit in financial markets and a slowing economy adversely affects the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing for significant operations, can result in lower demand for our products and services, and could result in a decrease in or cancellation of orders included in our backlog and adversely affect the collectability of our receivables. Additionally, tightening of credit in financial markets coupled with a slowing economy could negatively impact our cost of capital and ability to grow. Our business is also adversely affected when energy demand declines as a result of lower overall economic activity. Typically, lower energy demand negatively affects commodity prices which reduces the earnings and cash flow of our E&P and mining customers, reducing their spending and demand for our products and services. These conditions could have an adverse effect on our operating results and our ability to recover our assets at their stated values. Likewise, our suppliers may be unable to sustain their current level of operations, fulfill their commitments and/or fund future operations and obligations, each of which could adversely affect our operations. Strengthening of the rate of exchange for the U.S. Dollar against certain major currencies, such as the Euro, the British Pound and the Canadian and Australian Dollar, could also adversely affect our results.

 

Decreased customer expenditure levels will adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Demand for our products and services is particularly sensitive to the level of exploration, development and production activity of, and the corresponding capital spending by, oil and gas and mining companies, including national oil companies. If our customers’ expenditures decline, our business will suffer. The industry’s willingness to explore, develop and produce depends largely upon the availability of attractive drilling prospects and the prevailing view of future commodity prices. Prices for oil, coal, natural gas, and other minerals are subject to large fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty, and a variety of other factors that are beyond our control. A sudden or long-term decline in product pricing would have material adverse effects on our results of operations. Any prolonged reduction in oil and natural gas prices will depress levels of exploration, development, and production activity, often reflected as reductions in rig counts. Additionally, significant new regulatory requirements, including climate change legislation, could have an impact on the demand for and the cost of producing oil and gas. Many factors affect the supply and demand for oil, coal, natural gas and other minerals and, therefore, influence product prices, including:

 

 

 

Our business may be adversely affected by extended periods of low oil prices or unsuccessful exploration results may decrease deepwater exploration and production activity or oil sands development and production in Canada.

 

Two of our businesses, where we manufacture offshore products for deepwater exploration and production and where we supply accommodations for oil sands developments, typically support our customers’ projects that are more capital intensive and take longer to generate first production than traditional oil and natural gas exploration and development activities. The economic analyses conducted by exploration and production companies in deepwater and oil sands areas have historically assumed a relatively conservative longer-term price outlook for production from such projects to determine economic viability. Perceptions of lower longer-term oil prices by these companies can cause our customers to reduce or defer major expenditures given the long-term nature of many large scale development projects, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability in our offshore products segment and our accommodations segment.

 

Federal legislation and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs and additional operating restrictions or delays as well as adversely affect our services.

 

The federal Congress is currently considering two companion bills in the United States, known as the “Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act,” or FRAC Act, that would repeal an exemption in the federal Safe Drinking Water Act for the underground injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids near drinking water sources. Hydraulic fracturing is an important and commonly used process for the completion of oil and natural gas wells in formations with low permeabilities, such as shale formations, and involves the pressurized injection of water, sand and chemicals into rock formations to stimulate production. Sponsors of the FRAC Act have asserted that chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect drinking water supplies. If enacted, the FRAC Act could result in additional regulatory burdens such as permitting, construction, financial assurance, monitoring, recordkeeping, and plugging and abandonment requirements. The FRAC Act also proposes requiring the disclosure of chemical constituents used in the fracturing process to state or federal regulatory authorities, who would then make such information publicly available. The availability of this information could make it easier for third parties

opposing the hydraulic fracturing process to initiate legal proceedings based on allegations that specific chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect groundwater. The Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of the U.S. House of Representatives is currently examining the practice of hydraulic fracturing in the United States and is gathering information on its potential impacts on human health and the environment. The EPA has commenced a study of the potential adverse effects that hydraulic fracturing may have on water quality and public health. In addition, various state and local governments have implemented or are considering increased regulatory oversight of hydraulic fracturing through additional permit requirements, operational restrictions, disclosure requirements and temporary or permanent bans on hydraulic fracturing in certain environmentally sensitive areas such as certain watersheds. The adoption of the FRAC Act or any other federal, state or local laws or regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or otherwise limiting, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete natural gas wells in certain formations, increase our costs of compliance, and adversely affect the demand for the well site services that we provide.

 

Our financial results could be adversely impacted by the Macondo well incident and the resulting changes in regulation of offshore oil and natural gas exploration and development activity.

 

The U.S. Department of the Interior has issued Notices to Lessees and Operators (NTLs), has implemented additional safety and certification requirements applicable to drilling activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, has imposed additional requirements with respect to development and production activities in U.S. waters and has delayed the approval of drilling plans and well permits in both deepwater and shallow-water areas. The delays caused by new regulations and requirements have and will continue to have an overall negative effect on Gulf of Mexico drilling activity, and to a certain extent, our financial results.

 

The Macondo well incident, the subsequent oil spill and moratorium on drilling has caused offshore drilling delays, and is expected to result in increased state, federal and international regulation of our and our customer’s operations that could negatively impact our earnings, prospects and the availability and cost of insurance coverage. This delay could result in decreased demand for all of our business segments. There have been a variety of proposals to change existing laws and regulations that could affect offshore development and production, including proposals to significantly increase the minimum financial responsibility demonstration required under the federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Any increased regulation of the exploration and production industry as a whole that arises out of the Macondo well incident could result in fewer companies being financially qualified to operate offshore in the U.S., could result in higher operating costs for our customers and could reduce demand for our services.

 

We have a significant concentration of our accommodations business located in the oil sands region of Alberta, Canada.

 

Because of the concentration of our accommodations business in the Canadian oil sands in one relatively small geographic area, we have increased exposure to political, regulatory, environmental, labor, climate or natural disaster events or developments that could negatively impact our operations and financial results.

 

In our accommodations business supporting mining, our clients’ production or price issues may adversely affect us.

 

The volumes and prices of the products of our clients, including coal and gold, have historically varied significantly and are difficult to predict. The demand for, and price of, these minerals and commodities is highly dependent on a variety of factors, including international supply and demand, the price and availability of alternative fuels, actions taken by governments and global economic and political developments. Mineral and commodity prices have fluctuated in recent years and may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future. We expect that a material decline in mineral and commodity prices could result in a decrease in the activity of our clients with the possibility that this would materially adversely affect us. No assurance can be given regarding future volumes and/or prices relating to the activities of our clients.

Because the oil and gas industry is cyclical, our operating results may fluctuate.

 

Oil and natural gas prices have been and are expected to remain volatile. This volatility causes oil and gas companies and drilling contractors to change their strategies and expenditure levels. Supplies of oil and natural gas can be influenced by many factors, including improved technology such as the hydraulic fracturing of horizontally drilled wells in shale discoveries, access to potential productive regions and availability of required infrastructure to deliver production to the marketplace. We have experienced in the past, and expect to experience in the future, significant fluctuations in operating results based on these changes.

 

The cyclical nature of our business and a severe prolonged downturn could negatively affect the value of our goodwill.

 

As of December 31, 2010, goodwill represented approximately 16% of our total assets. We have recorded goodwill because we paid more for some of our businesses than the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets of those businesses. Current accounting standards, which were effective January 1, 2002, require a periodic review of goodwill for impairment in value and a non-cash charge against earnings with a corresponding decrease in stockholders’ equity if circumstances, some of which are beyond our control, indicate that the carrying amount will not be recoverable. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized an impairment of a portion of our goodwill totaling $85.6 million as a result of several factors affecting our tubular services and drilling reporting units. In the second quarter of 2009, we recognized an impairment of $94.5 million representing a portion of our remaining goodwill as a result of several factors affecting our rental tools reporting unit. It is possible that we could recognize additional goodwill impairment losses in the future if, among other factors:

 

 

The level and pricing of tubular goods imported into the United States could decrease demand for our tubular goods inventory and adversely impact our results of operations. Also, if steel mills were to sell a substantial amount of goods directly to end users in the United States, our results of operations could be adversely impacted.

 

Although imports of OCTG from China are currently restricted by trade sanctions imposed by the U.S. government, lower-priced tubular goods from a number of foreign countries are still imported into the U.S. tubular goods market. If the level of imported lower-priced tubular goods were to otherwise increase from current levels, our tubular services segment could be adversely affected to the extent that we would then have higher-cost tubular goods in inventory or if prices and margins are driven down by increased supplies of tubular goods. If prices were to decrease significantly, we might not be able to profitably sell our inventory of tubular goods. In addition, significant price decreases could result in a longer holding period for some of our inventory, which could also have an adverse effect on our tubular services segment.

 

We do not manufacture any of the tubular goods that we distribute. Historically, users of tubular goods in the United States, in contrast to those outside the United States, have purchased tubular goods through distributors. If customers were to purchase tubular goods directly from steel mills, our results of operations could be adversely impacted.

We do business in international jurisdictions whose political and regulatory environments and compliance regimes differ from those in the United States.

 

A portion of our revenue is attributable to operations in foreign countries. These activities accounted for approximately 29% (7.9% excluding Canada) of our consolidated revenue in the year ended December 31, 2010. Risks associated with our operations in foreign areas include, but are not limited to:

 

 

Additionally, in some jurisdictions we are subject to foreign governmental regulations favoring or requiring the awarding of contracts to local contractors or requiring foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. These regulations may adversely affect our ability to compete.

 

Our international business operations also include projects in countries where governmental corruption has been known to exist and where our competitors who are not subject to the same ethics related laws and regulations such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the U.S. and the Anti-Bribery law in the U.K., can gain competitive advantages over us by securing business awards, licenses or other preferential treatment in those jurisdictions using methods that certain ethics related laws and regulations prohibit us from using. For example, our non-U.S. competitors are not subject to the anti-bribery restrictions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which make it illegal to give anything of value to foreign officials or employees or agents of nationally owned oil companies in order to obtain or retain any business or other advantage. While many countries, like the U.S. and the U.K., have adopted similar anti-bribery statutes, there has not been universal adoption and enforcement of such statutes. Therefore, we may be subject to competitive disadvantages to the extent that our competitors are able to secure business, licenses or other preferential treatment by making payments to government officials and others in positions of influence.

 

Violations of these laws could result in monetary and criminal penalties against us or our subsidiaries and could damage our reputation and, therefore, our ability to do business.

 

We are subject to extensive and costly environmental laws and regulations that may require us to take actions that will adversely affect our results of operations.

 

All of our operations are significantly affected by stringent and complex foreign, federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations governing the discharge of substances into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. We could be exposed to liability for cleanup costs, natural resource damages and other damages as a result of our conduct that was lawful at the time it occurred or the conduct of, or conditions caused by, prior operators or other third parties. Environmental laws and regulations are subject to change in the future, possibly resulting in more stringent requirements. If existing regulatory requirements or enforcement policies change or are more stringently enforced, we may be required to make significant unanticipated capital and operating expenditures.

Any failure by us to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations may result in governmental authorities taking actions against our business that could adversely impact our operations and financial condition, including the:

 

 

We may be exposed to certain regulatory and financial risks related to climate change.

 

Climate change is receiving increasing attention from scientists and legislators alike. The debate is ongoing as to the extent to which our climate is changing, the potential causes of this change and its potential impacts. Some attribute global warming to increased levels of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, which has led to significant legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions. A significant focus is being made on companies that are active producers of depleting natural resources.

 

There are a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to address greenhouse gas emissions, which are in various phases of discussion or implementation. The outcome of foreign, U.S. federal, regional, provincial and state actions to address global climate change could result in a variety of regulatory programs including potential new regulations, additional charges to fund energy efficiency activities, or other regulatory actions. These actions could:

 

 

Any adoption by foreign, U.S. federal, regional or state governments mandating a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and implementation of the Kyoto Protocol (the Copenhagen Accord,) or other foreign, U.S. federal, regional or state requirements or other efforts to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, could have far-reaching and significant impacts on the energy industry. Although it is not possible at this time to predict how legislation or new regulations that may be adopted to address greenhouse gas emissions would impact our business, any such future laws and regulations could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions, and could have a material adverse effect on our business or demand for our services. See “Item 1. Government Regulation” for a more detailed description of our climate-change related risks.

 

Currently proposed legislative changes could materially, negatively impact the Company, increase the costs of doing business and decrease the demand for our products.

 

The current U.S. administration and Congress have proposed several new articles of legislation or legislative and administration changes which could have a material negative effect on our Company. Some of the proposed changes that could negatively impact us are:

 

 

 

Our customers in the accommodations business are exposed to a number of unique operating risks which could also adversely affect us.

 

We could be materially adversely affected by disruptions to the operation of our clients caused by any one of or all of the following singularly or in combination:

 

 

Our accommodations business is exposed to a number of general risks that could materially adversely affect our assets and liabilities, financial position, profits, prospects and share price.

 

Examples of these broad general risks which may impact our performance include:

 

 

 

Development of permanent infrastructure in the oil sands region or regions of Australia where we locate accommodations villages could negatively impact our accommodations business.

 

Our accommodations business specializes in providing housing and personnel logistics for work forces in remote areas which lack the infrastructure typically available in nearby towns and cities. If permanent towns, cities and municipal infrastructure develop in the oil sands region of northern Alberta, Canada, or regions of Australia where we locate accommodations villages demand for our accommodations could decrease as customer employees move to the region and choose to utilize permanent housing and food services.

 

Construction risks exist in our accommodations business.

 

There are a number of general risks that might impinge on companies involved in the development, construction, manufacture and installation of facilities as a prerequisite to the management of those assets in an operational sense. We might be exposed to these risks from time to time by relying on these corporations and/or other third parties which could include any and/or all of the following;

 

 

We are susceptible to seasonal earnings volatility due to adverse weather conditions in our regions of operations.

 

Our operations are directly affected by seasonal differences in weather in the areas in which we operate, most notably in Canada, Australia, the Rocky Mountain region and the Gulf of Mexico. A portion of our Canadian accommodations operations is conducted during the winter months when the winter freeze in remote regions is required for exploration and production activity to occur. The spring thaw in these frontier regions restricts operations in the spring months and, as a result, adversely affects our operations and sales of products and services in the second and, to a lesser extent, third quarters. Our operations in the Gulf of Mexico are also affected by weather patterns. Weather conditions in the Gulf Coast region generally result in higher drilling activity in the spring, summer and fall months with the lowest activity in the winter months. As a result of these seasonal differences, full year results are not likely to be a direct multiple of any particular quarter or combination of quarters. In addition, summer and fall drilling activity can be restricted due to hurricanes and other storms prevalent in the Gulf of Mexico and along the Gulf Coast. For example, during 2005, a significant disruption occurred in oil and natural gas drilling and production operations in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico due to damage inflicted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and, during 2008, from Hurricane Ike. Cyclones can affect our operations in Australia.

We are exposed to risk relating to subcontractors’ performance in some of our projects.

 

In many cases, we subcontract the performance of parts of our operations to subcontractors. While we seek to obtain appropriate indemnities and guarantees from these subcontractors, we remain ultimately responsible for the performance of our subcontractors. Industrial disputes, natural disasters, financial failure or default or inadequate performance in the provision of services, or the inability to provide services by such subcontractors has the potential to materially adversely affect us.

 

Our inability to control the inherent risks of acquiring and integrating businesses could adversely affect our operations.

 

Acquisitions have been, and our management believes acquisitions will continue to be, a key element of our growth strategy. We may not be able to identify and acquire acceptable acquisition candidates on favorable terms in the future. We may be required to incur substantial indebtedness to finance future acquisitions and also may issue equity securities in connection with such acquisitions. Such additional debt service requirements could impose a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition. The issuance of additional equity securities could result in significant dilution to stockholders.

 

We expect to gain certain business, financial and strategic advantages as a result of business combinations we undertake, including synergies and operating efficiencies. Our forward-looking statements assume that we will successfully integrate our business acquisitions and realize these intended benefits. An inability to realize expected strategic advantages as a result of the acquisition would negatively affect the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Additional risks we could face in connection with acquisitions include:

 

 

Additionally, an acquisition may bring us into businesses we have not previously conducted and expose us to additional business risks that are different from those we have previously experienced. If we fail to manage any of these risks successfully, our business could be harmed. Our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly following an acquisition, and shareholders of the Company may not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and other relevant information that we will consider in evaluating future acquisitions.

 

We may not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities.

 

Our operations are subject to many hazards. We face the following risks under our insurance coverage:

 

 

 

Even a partially uninsured or underinsured claim, if successful and of significant size, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or consolidated financial position.

 

We are subject to litigation risks that may not be covered by insurance.

 

In the ordinary course of business, we become the subject of various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products, employees and other matters, including occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials as a result of our products or operations. Some of these claims relate to the activities of businesses that we have sold, and some relate to the activities of businesses that we have acquired, even though these activities may have occurred prior to our acquisition of such businesses. We maintain insurance to cover many of our potential losses, and we are subject to various self-retentions and deductibles under our insurance. It is possible, however, that a judgment could be rendered against us in cases in which we could be uninsured and beyond the amounts that we currently have reserved or anticipate incurring for such matters.

 

Our concentration of customers in two industries may impact overall exposure to credit risk.

 

Substantially all of our customers operate in the energy or mining industries. This concentration of customers in two industries may impact our overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic and industry conditions. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and do not generally require collateral in support of our trade receivables.

 

Our common stock price has been volatile.

 

The market price of common stock of companies engaged in the oil and gas services industry has been highly volatile. Likewise, the market price of our common stock has varied significantly (2010 low of $34.20 per share; 2010 high of $65.31 per share) in the past, and we expect it to continue to remain highly volatile.

 

We may assume contractual risk in developing, manufacturing and delivering products in our offshore products business segment.

 

Many of our products from our offshore products segment are ordered by customers under frame agreements or project specific contracts. In some cases these contracts stipulate a fixed price for the delivery of our products and impose liquidated damages or late delivery fees if we do not meet specific customer deadlines. In addition, some customer contracts stipulate consequential damages payable, generally as a result of our gross negligence or willful misconduct. The final delivered products may also include customer and third party supplied equipment, the delay of which can negatively impact our ability to deliver our products on time at our anticipated profitability.

 

In certain cases these orders include new technology or unspecified design elements. In some cases we may not be fully or properly compensated for the cost to develop and design the final products, negatively impacting our profitability on the projects. In addition, our customers, in many cases, request changes to the original design or bid specifications for which we may not be fully or properly compensated.

 

As is customary for our offshore products segment, we agree to provide products under fixed-price contracts, typically assuming responsibility for cost overruns. Our actual costs and any gross profit realized on these fixed-price contracts may vary from the initially expected contract economics. There is inherent risk in the estimation process including significant unforeseen technical and logistical challenges or longer than expected lead times. A fixed-price contract may prohibit our ability to mitigate the impact of unanticipated increases in raw material prices (including the price of steel) through increased pricing. In fulfilling some contracts, we provide limited warranties for our products. Although we estimate and record a provision for potential warranty claims, repair or replacement costs under warranty provisions in our contracts could exceed the estimated cost to cure the claim which could be material to our financial results. We utilize percentage completion accounting, depending on the size of a project

and variations from estimated contract performance could have a significant impact on our reported operating results as we progress toward completion of major jobs.

 

Our backlog is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and is, therefore, an imperfect indicator of our future revenues and earnings.

 

The revenues projected in our backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits. Because of potential changes in the scope or schedule of our customers’ projects, we cannot predict with certainty when or if backlog will be realized. In addition, even where a project proceeds as scheduled, it is possible that contracted parties may default and fail to pay amounts owed to us. Material delays, cancellations or payment defaults could materially affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Reductions in our backlog due to cancellations by customers or for other reasons would adversely affect, potentially to a material extent, the revenues and earnings we actually receive from contracts included in our backlog. Some of the contracts in our backlog are cancelable by the customer, subject to the payment of termination fees and/or the reimbursement of our costs incurred. We typically have no contractual right upon cancellation to the total revenues reflected in our backlog. If we experience significant project terminations, suspensions or scope adjustments to contracts reflected in our backlog, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted.

 

We might be unable to employ a sufficient number of technical personnel.

 

Many of the products that we sell, especially in our offshore products segment, are complex and highly engineered and often must perform in harsh conditions. We believe that our success depends upon our ability to employ and retain technical personnel with the ability to design, utilize and enhance these products. In addition, our ability to expand our operations depends in part on our ability to increase our skilled labor force. During periods of increased activity, the demand for skilled workers is high, and the supply is limited. We have already experienced high demand and increased wages for labor forces serving our accommodations business in Canada. When these events occur, our cost structure increases and our growth potential could be impaired.

 

We might be unable to compete successfully with other companies in our industry.

 

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and certain of them have relatively few barriers to entry. The principal competitive factors in our markets are product, equipment and service quality, availability, responsiveness, experience, technology, safety performance and price. In some of our business segments, we compete with the oil and gas industry’s largest oilfield service providers. These large national and multi-national companies have longer operating histories, greater financial, technical and other resources and greater name recognition than we do. Several of our competitors provide a broader array of services and have a stronger presence in more geographic markets. In addition, we compete with several smaller companies capable of competing effectively on a regional or local basis. Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and services and changes in customer requirements. Some contracts are awarded on a bid basis, which further increases competition based on price. As a result of competition, we may lose market share or be unable to maintain or increase prices for our present services or to acquire additional business opportunities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

If we do not develop new competitive technologies and products, our business and revenues may be adversely affected.

 

The market for our offshore products is characterized by continual technological developments to provide better performance in increasingly greater water depths, higher pressure levels and harsher conditions. If we are not able to design, develop and produce commercially competitive products in a timely manner in response to changes in technology, our business and revenues will be adversely affected. In addition, competitors or customers may develop new technology, which addresses similar or improved solutions to our existing technology. Should our technology, particularly in offshore products or in our rental tool business, become the less attractive solution, our operations and profitability would be negatively impacted.

During periods of strong demand, we may be unable to obtain critical project materials on a timely basis.

 

Our operations depend on our ability to procure, on a timely basis, certain project materials, such as forgings, to complete projects in an efficient manner. Our inability to procure critical materials during times of strong demand could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

 

Our oilfield operations involve a variety of operating hazards and risks that could cause losses.

 

Our operations are subject to the hazards inherent in the oilfield business. These include, but are not limited to, equipment defects, blowouts, explosions, fires, collisions, capsizing and severe weather conditions. These hazards could result in personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment, pollution or environmental damage and suspension of operations. We may incur substantial liabilities or losses as a result of these hazards as part of our ongoing business operations. We may agree to indemnify our customers against specific risks and liabilities. While we maintain insurance protection against some of these risks, and seek to obtain indemnity agreements from our customers requiring the customers to hold us harmless from some of these risks, our insurance and contractual indemnity protection may not be sufficient or effective enough to protect us under all circumstances or against all risks. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against or the failure of a customer to meet its indemnification obligations to us could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

If we were to lose a significant supplier of our tubular goods, we could be adversely affected.

 

During 2010, we purchased 56% of our total tubular goods from a single domestic supplier and 72% of our total OCTG purchases from three domestic suppliers. If we were to lose any of these suppliers or if production at one or more of the suppliers was interrupted, our tubular services segment’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. If the extent of the loss or interruption were sufficiently large, the impact on us could be material.

 

Our operations may suffer due to increased industry-wide capacity of certain types of equipment or assets.

 

The demand for and pricing of certain types of our assets and equipment, particularly our drilling rigs and rental tool assets, is subject to the overall availability of such assets in the marketplace. If demand for our assets were to decrease, or to the extent that we and our competitors increase our fleets in excess of current demand, we may encounter decreased pricing for or utilization of our assets and services, which could adversely impact our operations and profits.

 

In addition, we have significantly increased our accommodations capacity in the oil sands region over the past five years based on our expectation for current and future customer demand for accommodations in the area. Should our customers build their own facilities to meet their accommodations needs or our competitors likewise increase their available accommodations, or activity in the oil sands decline significantly, demand and/or pricing for our accommodations could decrease, negatively impacting the profitability of our accommodations segment.

 

We might be unable to protect our intellectual property rights.

 

We rely on a variety of intellectual property rights that we use in our offshore products and well site services segments, particularly our patents relating to our FlexJoint^® technology and intervention tools utilized in the completion or workover of oil and natural gas wells. The market success of our technologies will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce our proprietary rights in these technologies, to preserve rights in our trade secret and non-public information, and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others. We may not be able to successfully preserve these intellectual property rights in the future and these rights could be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. If any of our patents or other intellectual property rights are determined to be invalid or unenforceable, or if a court limits the scope of claims in a patent or fails to recognize our trade secret rights, our competitive advantages could be significantly reduced in the relevant technology, allowing competition for our customer base to increase. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries in which our products and services may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. The failure of our

company to protect our proprietary information and any successful intellectual property challenges or infringement proceedings against us could adversely affect our competitive position.

 

Loss of key members of our management could adversely affect our business.

 

We depend on the continued employment and performance of key members of management. If any of our key managers resign or become unable to continue in their present roles and are not adequately replaced, our business operations could be materially adversely affected. We do not maintain “key man” life insurance for any of our officers.

 

We are exposed to the credit risk of our customers and other counterparties, and a general increase in the nonpayment and nonperformance by counterparties could have an adverse impact on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Risks of nonpayment and nonperformance by our counterparties are a concern in our business. We are subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by our customers and other counterparties, such as our lenders and insurers. Many of our customers finance their activities through cash flow from operations, the incurrence of debt or the issuance of equity. In connection with the recent economic downturn, commodity prices declined sharply, and the credit markets and availability of credit were constrained. Additionally, many of our customers’ equity values declined substantially. The combination of lower cash flow due to commodity prices, a reduction in borrowing bases under reserve-based credit facilities and the lack of available debt or equity financing may result in a significant reduction in our customers’ liquidity and ability to pay or otherwise perform on their obligations to us. Furthermore, some of our customers may be highly leveraged and subject to their own operating and regulatory risks, which increases the risk that they may default on their obligations to us. Any increase in the nonpayment and nonperformance by our counterparties could have an adverse impact on our operating results and could adversely affect our liquidity.

 

Employee and customer labor problems could adversely affect us.

 

We are party to collective bargaining agreements covering 1,283 employees in Canada, 374 employees in Australia, 16 employees in the United Kingdom and 16 employees in Argentina. In addition, our accommodations facilities serving oil sands development work in Northern Alberta, Canada house both union and non-union customer employees. We have not experienced strikes, work stoppages or other slowdowns in the recent past, but we cannot guarantee that we will not experience such events in the future. A prolonged strike, work stoppage or other slowdown by our employees or by the employees of our customers could cause us to experience a disruption of our operations, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could discourage a takeover attempt, which may reduce or eliminate the likelihood of a change of control transaction and, therefore, the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares for a premium.

 

Provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, such as a classified board, limitations on the removal of directors, on stockholder proposals at meetings of stockholders and on stockholder action by written consent and the inability of stockholders to call special meetings, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of our company. Our certificate of incorporation also authorizes our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval. If our board of directors elects to issue preferred stock, it could increase the difficulty for a third party to acquire us, which may reduce or eliminate our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares of common stock at a premium.

 

 

None.

 

The following table presents information about our principal properties and facilities. For a discussion about how each of our business segments utilizes its respective properties, please see “Item 1. Business.” Except as indicated below, we own all of these properties or facilities.

 

 

We have eight tubular sales offices and a total of 58 rental tool supply and distribution points throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico and Argentina. Most of these office locations are leased and provide sales, technical support and personnel services to our customers. We also have various offices supporting our business segments which are both owned and leased. We believe that our leases are at competitive or market rates and do not anticipate any difficulty in leasing additional suitable space upon expiration of our current lease terms.

 

 

We are a party to various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products, employees and other matters, including occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials as a result of our products or operations. Some of these claims relate to matters occurring prior to our acquisition of businesses, and some relate to businesses we have sold. In certain cases, we are entitled to indemnification from the sellers of businesses, and in other cases, we have indemnified the buyers of businesses from us. Although we can give no assurance about the outcome of pending legal and administrative proceedings and the effect such outcomes may have on us, we believe that any ultimate liability resulting from the outcome of such proceedings, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by indemnity or insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

 

 

Common Stock Information

 

Our authorized common stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of common stock. There were 50,868,966 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 17, 2011. The approximate number of record holders of our common stock as of February 17, 2011 was 35. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OIS. The closing price of our common stock on February 17, 2011 was $75.41 per share.

 

The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices of our common stock.

 

 

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our initial public offering and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, our existing credit facilities restrict the payment of dividends. For additional discussion of such restrictions, please see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors that our Board of Directors considers relevant.

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

 

The following performance graph and chart compare the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock to the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and Philadelphia OSX Index, an index of oil and gas related companies that represent an industry composite of the Company’s peer group, for the period from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2010. The graph and chart show the value at the dates indicated of $100 invested at December 31, 2005 and assume the reinvestment of all dividends.

 

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Oil States International, Inc., The S&P 500 Index
And The PHLX Oil Service Sector Index

 

 

Oil States International — NYSE

 

 

 

Copyright ^© 2011, Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. www.researchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None.

 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases

 

None.

 

The selected financial data on the following pages include selected historical financial information of our company as of and for each of the five years ended December 31, 2010. The following data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Company’s financial statements, and related notes included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Selected Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

We believe that net income is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to EBITDA as defined. The following table reconciles EBITDA as defined with our net income, as derived from our financial information (in thousands):

 

 

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Overview

 

We provide a broad range of products and services to the oil and gas industry through our accommodations, offshore products, well site services and tubular services business segments. In our accommodations segment, we support both the oil and gas industry and mining industry. Demand for our products and services is cyclical and substantially dependent upon activity levels in the oil and gas and mining industries, particularly our customers’ willingness to spend capital on the exploration for and development of oil, natural gas, coal and mineral reserves. Our customers’ spending plans are generally based on their outlook for near-term and long-term commodity prices. As a result, demand for our products and services is highly sensitive to current and expected commodity prices. The activity for our accommodations and offshore products segments is primarily tied to the long-term outlook for crude oil and, to a lesser extent, coal, natural gas, and other mineral prices. In contrast, activity for our well site services and tubular services segments responds more rapidly to shorter-term movements in oil and natural gas prices and, specifically, changes in North American drilling and completion activity. Other factors that can affect our business and financial results include the general global economic environment and regulatory changes in the United States and internationally. Our offshore products segment provides highly engineered products for offshore oil and natural gas production systems and facilities. Sales of our offshore products and services depend primarily upon development of infrastructure for offshore production systems and subsea pipelines, repairs and upgrades of existing offshore drilling rigs and construction of new offshore drilling rigs and vessels. In this segment, we are particularly influenced by global deepwater drilling and production spending, which are driven largely by our customers’ longer-term outlook for oil and natural gas prices. Through our tubular services segment, we distribute a broad range of casing and tubing used in the drilling and completion of oil and natural gas wells primarily in North America. Accordingly, sales and gross margins in our tubular services segment depend upon the overall level of drilling activity, the types of wells being drilled, movements in global steel input prices and the overall industry level of OCTG inventory and pricing. Historically, tubular services’ gross margin generally expands during periods of rising OCTG prices and contracts during periods of decreasing OCTG prices. In our well site services business segment, we provide rental tools and land drilling services. Demand for our drilling services is driven by land drilling activity in our primary drilling markets in West Texas, where we primarily drill oil wells, and in the Rocky Mountains area in the U.S. where we drill both oil and natural gas wells. Our rental tools business provides equipment and service personnel utilized in the completion and initial production of new and recompleted wells. Activity for the rental tools business is dependant primarily upon the level and complexity of drilling, completion and workover activity throughout North America.

 

We have a diversified product and service offering, which has exposure to activities conducted throughout the oil and gas cycle. Demand for our tubular services, land drilling and rental tool businesses is highly correlated to

changes in the drilling rig count in the United States and, to a much lesser extent, Canada. The table below sets forth a summary of North American rig activity, as measured by Baker Hughes Incorporated, for the periods indicated.

 

 

The rig count began to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008 and fell precipitously in the first half of 2009. The average North American rig count for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased by 585 rigs, or 45%, compared to the average for the year ended December 31, 2009 largely due to growth in the U.S. land rig count.

 

We support the development of several oil and natural gas shale properties through our rental tool and tubular businesses. There is continuing exploration and development activity focused in these shale areas leading us and many of our competitors to relocate equipment to and also concentrate on these areas. Domestic U.S. natural gas prices have decreased from peak levels in 2008 to recent levels of approximately $3.90 to $4.50 per Mcf. Many experts are expecting continued weakness in natural gas prices unless the supply and demand for natural gas becomes more balanced. Gas-directed drilling could come under pressure given low natural gas prices and the supply/demand balance.

 

Generally, our customers for oil sands and mining accommodations and offshore products are making multi-billion dollar investments to develop their prospects, which have estimated reserve lives of ten to thirty years, and consequently these investments are dependent on those customers’ longer-term view of energy and coal prices. Crude oil prices have recovered to levels generally ranging from $80 to $90 per barrel compared to an average of approximately $62 per barrel experienced during 2009. With the recovery in demand for energy in several key growing markets, specifically China and India, long-term forecasts for oil demand and prices, have improved. Our Australian accommodations business is significantly influenced by metallurgical coal (met coal) mining and prices. Met Coal is used in the production of steel and demand and pricing is fundamentally linked to demand for steel, especially in China and India, which has increased in the past year. As a result, our customers have begun to announce additional investments in the oil sands region, in deepwater globally and in coal mining in Australia.

 

In May 2009, Imperial Oil announced the sanctioning of Phase I of its Kearl oil sands project. In November 2009, Suncor announced its 2010 capital expenditure plan that included spending on Phase 3 and 4 of its Firebag project. Both of these announcements have led to either extensions of existing accommodations contracts or incremental accommodations contracts for us in Canada. In addition, several major oil companies and national oil companies have acquired oil sands leases over the past twelve months that should bode well for future oil sands investment and, as a result, demand for oil sands accommodations. However, we sometimes lose major contracts which cause decreases in revenues and profits.

 

Another factor that has influenced the financial results for our accommodations segment is the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar. In the future when we begin to report results from the recently completed acquisition of The MAC, the Australian dollar and U.S. dollar exchange rate will also influence our financial results. Our accommodations segment has derived a majority of its revenues and operating income in Canada denominated in Canadian dollars. These revenues and profits are translated into U.S. dollars for U.S. GAAP financial reporting purposes. For the year 2010, the Canadian dollar was valued at an average exchange rate of U.S. $0.97 compared to U.S. $0.88 for 2009, an increase of 10%. This strengthening of the Canadian dollar had a significant positive impact on the translation of earnings generated from our Canadian subsidiaries and, therefore, the financial results of our accommodations segment. In January 2011, the value of the Canadian dollar strengthened to an average exchange rate of $1.01.

Steel and steel input prices influence the pricing decisions of our OCTG suppliers, thereby influencing the pricing and margins of our tubular services segment. Steel prices on a global basis declined precipitously during the recession in 2009. Industry inventories increased materially as the rig count declined and imports remained at high levels. These developments in the OCTG marketplace had a material detrimental impact on OCTG pricing and, accordingly, on our revenues and margins realized during the last half of 2009 in our tubular services segment. These negative trends moderated in 2010 due to a reduction in imports, largely due to the imposition of trade sanctions on Chinese OCTG imports coupled with increases in the U.S. rig count. The OCTG Situation Report suggests that industry OCTG inventory levels peaked in the first quarter of 2009 at approximately twenty months’ supply on the ground and have trended down to approximately six months’ supply currently.

 

During 2010, U.S. mills have increased production and imports have surged recently, particularly goods imported from Canada and Korea followed by India, Mexico and Japan. This increase in supply has been in response to the 42% year-over-year increase in the drilling rig count in the United States.

 

While global demand for oil and natural gas are significant factors influencing our business generally, certain other factors such as the recent global economic recession and credit crisis, the Macondo well incident and resultant oil spill and drilling moratorium as well as other changes and potential changes in the regulatory environment also influence our business.

 

We have witnessed unprecedented events in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico as a result of the Macondo well incident and resultant oil spill. As a result of the incident, in May 2010, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, or BOEMRE, of the U.S. Department of the Interior implemented a moratorium on certain drilling activities in water depths greater than 500 feet in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that effectively shut down new deepwater drilling activities in 2010. The moratorium was lifted during October 2010. However, the BOEMRE issued Notices to Lessees and Operators (NTLs), implemented additional safety and certification requirements applicable to drilling activities in the U.S. waters, imposed additional requirements with respect to development and production activities in the U.S. waters, and has delayed the approval of applications to drill in both deepwater and shallow-water areas. Despite the rescission of the moratorium, offshore drilling activity is being delayed by adjustments in operating procedures, compliance certifications, and lead times for permits and inspections, as a result of changes in the regulatory environment. In addition, there have been a variety of proposals to change existing laws and regulations that could affect offshore development and production, including proposals to significantly increase the minimum financial responsibility demonstration required under the federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Uncertainties and delays caused by the new regulatory environment have and are expected to continue to have an overall negative effect on Gulf of Mexico drilling activity and, to a certain extent, the financial results of all of our business segments.

 

Throughout the first half of 2009, we saw unprecedented declines in the global economic outlook that were initially fueled by the housing and credit crises. These market conditions led to reduced growth, and in some instances, decreased overall output. Beginning in late 2009 and throughout 2010, market factors have suggested that economic improvement is underway, notably in international markets, such as China and India.

 

We continue to monitor the fallout of the financial crisis on the global economy, the demand for crude oil, coal and natural gas prices and the resultant impact on the capital spending plans and operations of our customers in order to plan our business. Our capital expenditures in 2010 totaled $182 million compared to 2009 capital expenditures of $124 million. Our 2010 capital expenditures included funding to complete projects in progress at December 31, 2009, including (i) the continued expansion of our Wapasu Creek accommodations facility in the Canadian oil sands, (ii) international expansion at offshore products, (iii) the purchase of an accommodations facility in the Horn River Basin area of northeast British Columbia, (iv) expansion at tubular services through the addition of a facility in Pennsylvania to service the Marcellus shale area and (v) ongoing maintenance capital requirements. In our well site services segment, we continue to monitor industry capacity additions and will make future capital expenditure decisions based on a careful evaluation of both the market outlook and industry fundamentals. In our tubular services segment, we remain focused on industry inventory levels, future drilling and completion activity and OCTG prices.

 

We completed three acquisitions described below in the fourth quarter of 2010.

On December 30, 2010, we acquired all of the ordinary shares of The MAC Services Group Limited (The MAC), through a Scheme of Arrangement (the Scheme) under the Corporations Act of Australia. Headquartered in Sydney, Australia, The MAC supplies accommodations services to the coal mining, construction and resource industries. The MAC currently has 5,210 rooms in six locations in Queensland and Western Australia. Under the terms of the Scheme, each shareholder of The MAC received $3.95 (A$3.90) per share in cash. This price represents a total purchase price of $638 million, net of cash acquired plus debt assumed of $87 million. The Company funded the acquisition with cash on hand and borrowings available under our new five-year, $1.05 billion senior secured bank facilities. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on our senior secured bank facilities. The MAC’s operations will be reported as part of our accommodations segment.

 

On December 20, 2010, we also acquired all of the operating assets of Mountain West Oilfield Service and Supplies, Inc. and Ufford Leasing LLC (Mountain West) for total consideration of $47.1 million and estimated contingent consideration of $4.0 million. Headquartered in Vernal, Utah, with operations in the Rockies and the Bakken Shale region, Mountain West provides remote site workforce accommodations to the oil and gas industry. Mountain West has been included in the accommodations segment since its date of acquisition.

 

On October 5, 2010, we purchased all of the equity of Acute Technological Services, Inc. (Acute) for total consideration of $30.0 million. Headquartered in Houston, Texas and with operations in Brazil, Acute provides metallurgical and welding innovations to the oil and gas industry in support of critical, complex subsea component manufacturing and deepwater riser fabrication on a global basis. Acute has been included in the offshore products segment since its date of acquisition.

 

We funded the Acute and Mountain West acquisitions using cash on hand and our then existing credit facility.

 

Accounting for the three acquisitions made in 2010 has not been finalized and is subject to adjustments during the purchase price allocation period, which is not expected to exceed a period of one year from the respective acquisition dates.

Consolidated Results of Operations (in millions)

 

 

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009

 

We reported net income attributable to Oil States International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $168.0 million, or $3.19 per diluted share. These results compare to net income of $59.1 million, or $1.18 per diluted share, reported for the year ended December 31, 2009. The net income for 2009 included an after tax loss of

$81.2 million, or approximately $1.62 per diluted share, on the impairment of goodwill in our rental tools reporting unit.

 

Revenues.  Consolidated revenues increased $303.7 million, or 14%, in 2010 compared to 2009.

 

Our well site services revenues increased $170.9 million, or 56%, in 2010 compared to 2009. This increase was primarily due to increased rental tool revenues and significantly increased rig utilization in our drilling services operations. Our rental tool revenues increased $108.9 million, or 47%, primarily due to increased demand for completion services with the increase in the U.S. rig count, a more favorable mix of higher value rentals, increased rental tool utilization and improved pricing. Our drilling services revenues increased $62.0 million, or 87%, in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily as a result of increased utilization of our rigs. Utilization of our drilling rigs increased from an average of approximately 37% in 2009 to an average of approximately 71% in 2010.

 

Our accommodations segment reported revenues in 2010 that were $56.3 million, or 12%, above 2009. The increase in accommodations revenue resulted from increased activity at our large accommodation facilities supporting oil sands development activities in northern Alberta, Canada, the expansion of two of these facilities and the strengthening of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar, partially offset by a $63 million decrease in third-party accommodations manufacturing revenues.

 

Our offshore products revenues decreased $80.5 million, or 16%, in 2010 compared to 2009. This decrease was primarily due to lower starting backlog levels, a decrease in subsea pipeline revenues and rig and vessel equipment revenues driven principally by reductions in our customers’ spending caused by deferrals and delays of deepwater development projects and capital upgrades.

 

Tubular services revenues increased $157.0 million, or 19%, in 2010 compared to 2009. This increase was a result of an increase in tons shipped from 330,800 in 2009 to 502,800 in 2010 driven by increased drilling activity, an increase of 172,000 tons, or 52%, partially offset by a 22% decrease in realized revenues per ton shipped in 2010.

 

Cost of Sales and Service.  Our consolidated cost of sales increased $234.1 million, or 14%, in 2010 compared to 2009. This increase was primarily as a result of increased cost of sales at our tubular services segment of $161.2 million, or 21%, an increase at our well site services segment of $97.8 million, or 43% and an increase at our accommodations segment of $35.7 million, or 13%, partially offset by a decrease in cost of sales at our offshore products segment of $60.6 million, or 16%. Our consolidated gross margin as a percentage of revenues was 22% in both 2010 and 2009.

 

Our well site services cost of sales increased $97.8 million, or 43%, in 2010 compared to 2009 as a result of a $50.5 million, or 30%, increase in rental tools services cost of sales and a $47.3 million, or 81%, increase in drilling services cost of sales. Our well site services segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues increased from 25% in 2009 to 32% in 2010. Our rental tool gross margin as a percentage of revenues increased from 28% in 2009 to 36% in 2010 primarily due to a more favorable mix of higher value rentals and improved pricing along with improved fixed cost absorption as a result of increased rental tool utilization. Our drilling services gross margin as a percentage of revenues increased from 18% in 2009 to 21% in 2010 primarily due to the increase in drilling activity levels.

 

Our accommodations cost of sales increased $35.7 million, or 13%, in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily as a result of increased activity at our large accommodation facilities supporting oil sands development activities in northern Alberta, Canada, the expansion of two of these facilities and the strengthening of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar, partially offset by a decrease in third-party accommodations manufacturing and installation costs. Our accommodations segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues was 42% in 2009 and 2010.

 

Our offshore products cost of sales decreased $60.6 million, or 16%, in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily due to a decrease in subsea pipeline and rig and vessel equipment costs. Our offshore products segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues was 26% in both 2009 and 2010.

 

Tubular services segment cost of sales increased $161.2 million, or 21%, in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily as a result of an increase in tons shipped driven by increased drilling activity, partially offset by lower priced OCTG inventory being sold. Our tubular services gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased from 7% in 2009 to 5% in 2010 primarily due to a larger portion of service related costs expensed on certain program work.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense increased $11.6 million, or 8%, in 2010 compared to 2009 due primarily to an increased accrual for incentive bonuses, increased salaries, wages and benefits and an increase in our accommodations SG&A expenses as a result of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar. SG&A was 6.3% of revenues in 2010 compared to 6.6% of revenues in 2009.

 

Depreciation and Amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expense increased $6.1 million, or 5%, in 2010 compared to 2009 due primarily to capital expenditures made during the previous twelve months largely related to our Canadian accommodations business, partially offset by decreased depreciation in our drilling services business where several major assets have become fully-depreciated.

 

Impairment of Goodwill.  We recorded a goodwill impairment of $94.5 million, before tax, in 2009. The impairment was the result of our assessment of several factors affecting our rental tools reporting unit. We did not record an impairment of goodwill in 2010.

 

Operating Income.  Consolidated operating income increased $136.9 million, or 115%, in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily as a result of the $94.5 million pre-tax goodwill impairment loss recognized in the second quarter of 2009, a $67.6 million increase in operating income from our well site services segment (excluding the goodwill impairment) primarily due to increased U.S. completion activity, the more favorable mix of higher value rentals, improved pricing and increased rental tool utilization in our rental tools operation and increased utilization of our rigs in our drilling services business, partially offset by a $20.4 million decrease in operating income from our offshore products segment. Operating income in 2010 included $7.0 million of transaction costs related to the three acquisitions made during the year.

 

Interest Expense and Interest Income.  Net interest expense increased $0.6 million, or 4%, in 2010 compared to 2009 due to an increase in non-cash interest expense related to the write-off of the remaining balance of debt issuance costs for our prior revolving credit facility, partially offset by reduced average debt levels in 2010. The weighted average interest rate on the Company’s credit facilities was 3.6% in 2010 compared to 1.5% in 2009. Interest income increased as a result of increased cash balances in interest bearing accounts partially offset by the repayment during the first quarter of 2009 of a note receivable from Boots & Coots International Well Control, Inc. (Boots & Coots).

 

Income Tax Expense.  Our income tax provision for 2010 totaled $72.0 million, or 29.9% of pretax income, compared to $46.1 million, or 43.6% of pretax income, for 2009. The effective tax rate in 2009 was impacted by a significant portion of the goodwill impairment loss recognized during the period being non-deductible for tax purposes. Excluding the goodwill impairment, the effective tax rate for 2009 would have approximated 29.7%.

 

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

 

We reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2009 of $59.1 million, or $1.18 per diluted share. These results compare to net income of $218.9 million, or $4.26 per diluted share, reported for the year ended December 31, 2008. The net income in 2009 included an after tax loss of $81.2 million, or approximately $1.62 per diluted share, on the impairment of goodwill in our rental tools reporting unit. Net income in 2008 included an after tax loss of $79.8 million, or approximately $1.55 per diluted share, on the impairment of goodwill in our tubular services and drilling reporting units. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Net income in 2008 also included an after tax gain of $3.6 million, or approximately $0.07 per diluted share, on the sale of 11.51 million shares of common stock of Boots & Coots.

 

Revenues.  Consolidated revenues decreased $840.2 million, or 28%, in 2009 compared to 2008.

 

Our well site services revenues decreased $227.9 million, or 43%, in 2009 compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily due to reductions in both activity and pricing from the Company’s North American drilling and rental tool operations as a result of the 42% year-over-year decrease in the North American rig count.

 

Our accommodations segment reported revenues in 2009 that were $54.3 million, or 13%, above 2008. The increase in the accommodations revenue resulted from the expansion of our large accommodation facilities supporting oil sands development activities in northern Alberta, Canada and increased third-party accommodations

manufacturing revenues, partially offset by lower accommodations activities in support of conventional oil and natural gas drilling activity in Canada and the weakening of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar.

 

Our rental tool revenues decreased $121.7 million, or 34%, in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily due to lower rental tool utilization and pricing primarily as a result of significantly reduced completion activity in the U.S. and greater competition.

 

Our drilling services revenues decreased $106.2 million, or 60%, in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily as a result of reduced utilization and pricing in all of our drilling operating regions. Our land drilling utilization averaged 36.7% during 2009 compared to 82.4% in 2008.

 

Our offshore products revenues decreased $18.8 million, or 4%, in 2009 compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in bearing and connectors revenue due to deepwater development project award delays and a decrease in elastomer revenues as a result of reduced drilling and completion activity in North America. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in subsea pipeline revenues.

 

Tubular services revenues decreased $647.8 million, or 44%, in 2009 compared to 2008 as a result of a 46% decrease in tons shipped in 2009, resulting from fewer wells drilled and completed in the period, partially offset by a 2% increase in average selling prices. Although OCTG prices decreased throughout 2009, our average sales price realized increased from 2008 due to sales commitments made in 2008 that extended into 2009.

 

Cost of Sales and Service.  Our consolidated cost of sales decreased $594.8 million, or 27%, in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily as a result of decreased cost of sales at tubular services of $517.1 million, or 41%, and at well site services of $93.7 million, or 29%. Our overall gross margin as a percentage of revenues declined from 24% in 2008 to 22% in 2009 primarily due to lower margins realized in our tubular services and well site services segments during 2009.

 

Our well site services segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues declined from 40% in 2008 to 25% in 2009. Our rental tool gross margin as a percentage of revenues declined from 42% in 2008 to 28% in 2009 primarily due to significant reductions in drilling and completion activity in both the U.S. and Canada, which negatively impacted pricing and demand for our equipment and services. In addition, a portion of our rental tool costs do not change proportionately with changes in revenue, leading to reduced gross margin percentages. Our drilling services cost of sales decreased $56.0 million, or 49%, in 2009 compared to 2008 as a result of significantly reduced rig utilization and pricing in each of our drilling operating areas, which led to significant cost reductions. This decline in drilling activity levels also resulted in our drilling services gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreasing from 36% in 2008 to 18% in 2009.

 

Our accommodations cost of sales included a $45.8 million increase in third-party accommodations manufacturing and installation costs, which were only partially offset by a reduction in costs stemming from the implementation of cost saving measures in response to the lower conventional oil and natural gas drilling activity levels in Canada and the weakening of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar. Our accommodations segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues was 42% in 2008 and 2009.

 

Our offshore products segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues was essentially flat (25% in 2008 compared to 26% in 2009).

 

Tubular services segment cost of sales decreased by $517.1 million, or 41%, as a result of lower tonnage shipped partially offset by higher priced OCTG inventory being sold. Our tubular services gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased from 13% in 2008 to 7% in 2009 due to excess industry-wide OCTG inventory levels in 2009 resulting in lower margins.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  SG&A expense decreased $3.8 million, or 3%, in 2009 compared to 2008 due primarily to decreases in accrued incentive bonuses. In addition, our costs decreased as a result of the implementation of cost saving measures, including headcount reductions and reductions in overhead costs such as travel and entertainment, professional fees and office expenses, in response to industry conditions. SG&A was 6.6% of revenues in 2009 compared to 4.9% of revenues in 2008 due to the significant decline in our revenues during 2009.

Depreciation and Amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expense increased $15.5 million, or 15%, in 2009 compared to 2008 due primarily to capital expenditures made during the previous twelve months.

 

Impairment of Goodwill.  We recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment in the amount of $94.5 million in 2009. The impairment was the result of our assessment of several factors affecting our rental tools reporting unit. We recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment in the amount of $85.6 million in 2008. The impairment was the result of our assessment of several factors affecting our tubular services and drilling reporting units. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Operating Income.  Consolidated operating income decreased $265.0 million, or 69%, in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily as a result of a decrease in operating income from our rental tool services and tubular operations.

 

Gain on Sale of Investment.  We reported a gain on the sale of investment of $6.2 million in 2008. The sale related to our investment in Boots & Coots common stock.

 

Interest Expense and Interest Income.  Net interest expense decreased by $5.1 million, or 26%, in 2009 compared to 2008 due to reduced debt levels and lower LIBOR interest rates applicable to borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. The weighted average interest rate on the Company’s revolving credit facilities was 1.5% in 2009 compared to 3.9% in 2008. Interest income decreased as a result of the repayment in 2009 of a note receivable due from Boots & Coots and reduced cash balances in interest bearing accounts.

 

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates.  Our equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates is $2.6 million, or 64%, lower in 2009 than in 2008 primarily due to the sale, in August of 2008, of our remaining investment in Boots & Coots.

 

Income Tax Expense.  Our income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $46.1 million, or 43.6% of pretax income, compared to $154.2 million, or 41.3% of pretax income, for the year ended December 31, 2008. The higher effective tax rate in both years was primarily due to the impairment of goodwill, the majority of which was not deductible for tax purposes. Absent the goodwill impairment in 2009, our effective tax rate was favorably influenced by lower statutory rates applicable to our foreign sourced income.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures, which in the past have included expanding our accommodations facilities, expanding and upgrading our offshore products manufacturing facilities and equipment, increasing and replacing rental tool assets, adding drilling rigs, funding new product development and general working capital needs. In addition, capital has been used to fund strategic business acquisitions. Our primary sources of funds have been cash flow from operations and proceeds from borrowings. See Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Cash totaling $230.9 million was provided by operations during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to cash totaling $453.4 million provided by operations during the year ended December 31, 2009. During 2010, $100.0 million was used to fund working capital, primarily due to increased investments in working capital for our tubular services and rental tool businesses and lower taxes payable, partially offset by a reduction in accounts receivable at our offshore products segment. In contrast, during 2009, $176.0 million was provided from net working capital reductions, primarily due to a reduction in accounts receivable and lower inventory levels, especially in our tubular services segment.

 

Cash was used in investing activities during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 in the amount of $889.7 million and $102.6 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we spent cash totaling $709.6 million, net of cash acquired, to acquire The MAC Services Group Limited in Sydney, Australia to expand our accommodations business internationally, Mountain West Oilfield Service and Supplies, Inc. in Vernal, Utah, an accommodations business servicing the U.S. Rockies and the Bakken Shale region, and Acute Technological Services, Inc. in Houston, Texas, a provider of welding services to the energy industry worldwide for both onshore and offshore activities. The Company funded the acquisition of The MAC with cash on hand and borrowings available under our new five-year, $1.05 billion senior secured bank facilities. We funded the Acute and Mountain West acquisitions using cash on hand and our then existing credit facility. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial

Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There were no significant acquisitions made by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2009. Capital expenditures totaled $182.2 million and $124.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Capital expenditures in both years consisted principally of purchases of assets for our accommodations and well site services segments, and in particular for accommodations investments made in support of Canadian oil sands developments. In 2009, we received $21.2 million from Boots & Coots in full satisfaction of a note receivable due us.

 

We currently expect to spend a total of approximately $536 million for capital expenditures during 2011 to expand our Canadian oil sands and Australian mining accommodations facilities, to fund our other product and service offerings, and for maintenance and upgrade of our equipment and facilities. We expect to fund these capital expenditures with cash available, internally generated funds and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. The foregoing capital expenditure budget does not include any funds for opportunistic acquisitions, which the Company could pursue depending on the economic environment in our industry and the availability of transactions at prices deemed attractive to the Company.

 

Net cash of $649.0 million was provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of borrowings under our new $1.05 billion credit facilities. Net cash of $296.8 million was used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2009, primarily as a result of free cash flow being used to pay off all amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility.

 

We believe that cash on hand, cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs in the coming twelve months. If our plans or assumptions change, or are inaccurate, or if we make further acquisitions, we may need to raise additional capital. Acquisitions have been, and our management believes acquisitions will continue to be, a key element of our business strategy. The timing, size or success of any acquisition effort and the associated potential capital commitments are unpredictable and uncertain. We may seek to fund all or part of any such efforts with proceeds from debt and/or equity issuances. Our ability to obtain capital for additional projects to implement our growth strategy over the longer term will depend upon our future operating performance, financial condition and, more broadly, on the availability of equity and debt financing. Capital availability will be affected by prevailing conditions in our industry, the economy, the financial markets and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, such additional debt service requirements could be based on higher interest rates and shorter maturities and could impose a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition, and the issuance of additional equity securities could result in significant dilution to stockholders.

 

Stock Repurchase Program.  On August 27, 2010, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized $100 million for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share. The authorization replaced the prior share repurchase authorization, which expired on December 31, 2009. The Company presently has approximately 50.8 million shares of common stock outstanding. The Board of Directors authorization is limited in duration and expires on September 1, 2012. Subject to applicable securities laws, such purchases will be at such times and in such amounts as the Company deems appropriate. As of December 31, 2010, we had not repurchased any shares pursuant to this board authorization.

 

Credit Facilities.  On December 10, 2010, we replaced our existing bank credit facility with $1.05 billion in senior credit facilities governed by the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement). The new facilities increased the total commitments available from $500 million under the previous facilities to $1.05 billion. In connection with the execution of the Credit Agreement, the Total U.S. Commitments (as defined in the Credit Agreement) were increased from U.S. $325 million to U.S. $700 million (including $200 million in term loans), and the total Canadian Commitments (as defined in the Credit Agreement) were increased from U.S. $175 million to U.S. $350 million (including $100 million in term loans). The maturity date of the Credit Agreement is December 10, 2015. We currently have 19 lenders in our Credit Agreement with commitments ranging from $26.6 million to $150 million. While we have not experienced, nor do we anticipate, any difficulties in obtaining funding from any of these lenders at this time, the lack of or delay in funding by a significant member of our banking group could negatively affect our liquidity position.

 

The Credit Agreement, which governs our credit facilities, contains customary financial covenants and restrictions, including restrictions on our ability to declare and pay dividends. Specifically, we must maintain an

interest coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of consolidated EBITDA, to consolidated interest expense of at least 3.0 to 1.0 and our maximum leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of total debt to consolidated EBITDA, of no greater than 3.5 to 1.0 in 2011, 3.25 to 1.0 in 2012 and 3.0 to 1.0 thereafter. Each of the factors considered in the calculations of ratios are defined in the Credit Agreement. EBITDA and consolidated interest as defined, exclude goodwill impairments, debt discount amortization and other non-cash charges. As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with our debt covenants and expect to continue to be in compliance during 2011. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by our significant subsidiaries. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement accrue interest at a rate equal to either LIBOR or another benchmark interest rate (at our election) plus an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement). We must pay a quarterly commitment fee, based on our leverage ratio, on the unused commitments under the Credit Agreement. During the year 2010, our applicable margin over LIBOR ranged from 0.5% to 2.5% and it was 2.5% as of December 31, 2010. Our weighted average interest rate paid under the Credit Agreement was 3.6% during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 1.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

As of December 31, 2010, we had $710.2 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement (including $300 million in term loans) and an additional $22.1 million of outstanding letters of credit, leaving $317.7 million available to be drawn under the facilities. We also have an Australian floating rate credit facility supporting our Australian accommodations business that provides for an aggregate borrowing capacity of $75.9 million (A$75 million) under which $25.3 million (A$25.0 million) was outstanding as of December 31, 2010. Our total debt represented 35.9% of our total debt and shareholder’s equity at December 31, 2010 compared to 10.6% at December 31, 2009.

 

Contingent Convertible Notes.  In June 2005, we sold $175 million aggregate principal amount of 23/8% contingent convertible notes due 2025. The notes provide for a net share settlement, and therefore may be convertible, under certain circumstances, into a combination of cash, up to the principal amount of the notes, and common stock of the company, if there is any excess above the principal amount of the notes, at an initial conversion price of $31.75 per share. Shares underlying the notes were included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share during the year because our stock price exceeded the initial conversion price of $31.75 during the period. The terms of the notes require that our stock price in any quarter, for any period prior to July 1, 2023, be above 120% of the initial conversion price (or $38.10 per share) for at least 20 trading days in a defined period before the notes are convertible. If a note holder chooses to present their notes for conversion during a future quarter prior to the first put/call date in July 2012, they would receive cash up to $1,000 for each 23/8% note plus Company common stock for any excess valuation over $1,000 using the conversion rate of the 23/8% notes of 31.496 multiplied by the Company’s average common stock price over a ten trading day period following presentation of the 23/8% Notes for conversion. For a more detailed description of our 23/8% contingent convertible notes, please see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

As of December 31, 2010, we had classified the $175.0 million principal amount of our 23/8% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes (23/8% Notes), net of unamortized discount, as a current liability because certain contingent conversion thresholds based on the Company’s stock price were met at that date and, as a result, note holders could present their notes for conversion during the quarter following the December 31, 2010 measurement date. For a description of these thresholds, please see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The future convertibility and resultant balance sheet classification of this liability will be monitored at each quarterly reporting date and will be analyzed dependent upon market prices of the Company common stock during the prescribed measurement periods. As of December 31, 2010, the recent trading prices of the 23/8% Notes exceeded their conversion value due to the remaining imbedded conversion option of the holder. Based on recent trading patterns of the 23/8% Notes, we do not currently expect any significant amount of the 23/8% Notes to convert over the next twelve months.

Contractual Cash Obligations.  The following summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Our debt obligations at December 31, 2010 are included in our consolidated balance sheet, which is a part of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have assumed the conversion of our 23/8% Contingent Convertible Notes due in 2025 in 2012, the first put call date for these notes. We have not entered into any material leases subsequent to December 31, 2010.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

 

Tax Matters

 

Our primary deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010, are related to employee benefit costs for our Equity Participation Plan, deductible goodwill, inventory allowance for obsolescence, foreign tax credit carryforwards and $5.6 million in available federal net operating loss carryforwards, or regular tax net operating losses (NOLs), as of that date. The regular tax NOLs will expire in varying amounts after 2011 if they are not first used to offset taxable income that we generate. Our ability to utilize a portion of the available regular tax NOLs is currently limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code due to a change of control that occurred during 1995. We currently believe that substantially all of our regular tax NOLs will be utilized. The Company has utilized all federal alternative minimum tax net operating loss carryforwards.

 

Our income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2010 totaled $72.0 million, or 29.9% of pretax income, compared to $46.1 million, or 43.6% of pretax income, for the year ended December 31, 2009. The effective tax rate in 2009 was impacted by a significant portion of the goodwill impairment loss recognized during the period being non-deductible for tax purposes. Excluding the goodwill impairment, the effective tax rate for 2009 would have approximated 29.7%.

 

There are a number of legislative proposals to change the United States tax laws related to multinational corporations. These proposals are in various stages of discussion. It is not possible at this time to predict how these proposals would impact our business or whether they could result in increased tax costs.

Critical Accounting Policies

 

In our selection of critical accounting policies, our objective is to properly reflect our financial position and results of operations in each reporting period in a manner that will be understood by those who utilize our financial statements. Often we must use our judgment about uncertainties.

 

There are several critical accounting policies that we have put into practice that have an important effect on our reported financial results.

 

Accounting for Contingencies

 

We have contingent liabilities and future claims for which we have made estimates of the amount of the eventual cost to liquidate these liabilities or claims. These liabilities and claims sometimes involve threatened or actual litigation where damages have been quantified and we have made an assessment of our exposure and recorded a provision in our accounts to cover an expected loss. Other claims or liabilities have been estimated based on our experience in these matters and, when appropriate, the advice of outside counsel or other outside experts. Upon the ultimate resolution of these uncertainties, our future reported financial results will be impacted by the difference between our estimates and the actual amounts paid to settle a liability. Examples of areas where we have made important estimates of future liabilities include litigation, taxes, interest, insurance claims, warranty claims, contract claims and discontinued operations.

 

Tangible and Intangible Assets, including Goodwill

 

Our goodwill totaled $475.2 million, or 15.8%, of our total assets, as of December 31, 2010. Our other intangible assets totaled $139.4 million, or 4.6%, of our total assets, as of December 31, 2010. The assessment of impairment on long-lived assets, intangibles and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, is conducted whenever changes in the facts and circumstances indicate a loss in value has occurred. The determination of the amount of impairment would be based on quoted market prices, if available, or upon our judgments as to the future operating cash flows to be generated from these assets throughout their estimated useful lives. Our industry is highly cyclical and our estimates of the period over which future cash flows will be generated, as well as the predictability of these cash flows and our determination of whether a decline in value of our investment has occurred, can have a significant impact on the carrying value of these assets and, in periods of prolonged down cycles, may result in impairment losses.

 

We review each reporting unit, as defined in current accounting standards regarding goodwill and other intangible assets to assess goodwill for potential impairment. Our reporting units include rental tools, drilling, accommodations, offshore products and tubular services. There is no remaining goodwill in our drilling or tubular services reporting units subsequent to the full impairment of goodwill at those reporting units as of December 31, 2008. As part of the goodwill impairment analysis, we estimate the implied fair value of each reporting unit (IFV) and compare the IFV to the carrying value of such unit (the Carrying Value). Because none of our reporting units has a publically quoted market price, we must determine the value that willing buyers and sellers would place on the reporting unit through a routine sale process (a Level 3 fair value measurement). In our analysis, we target an IFV that represents the value that would be placed on the reporting unit by market participants, and value the reporting unit based on historical and projected results throughout a cycle, not the value of the reporting unit based on trough or peak earnings. We utilize, depending on circumstances, trading multiples analyses, discounted projected cash flow calculations with estimated terminal values and acquisition comparables to estimate the IFV. The IFV of our reporting units is affected by future oil and natural gas prices, anticipated spending by our customers, and the cost of capital. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its IFV, goodwill is considered to be potentially impaired and additional analysis in accordance with current accounting standards is conducted to determine the amount of impairment, if any. At the date of our annual goodwill impairment test, the IFV’s of our offshore products, accommodations and rental tools reporting units exceeded their carrying values by 240%, 231% and 158%, respectively.

 

As part of our process to assess goodwill for impairment, we also compare the total market capitalization of the Company to the sum of the IFV’s of all of our reporting units to assess the reasonableness of the IFV’s in the aggregate.

For our intangible assets, when facts and circumstances indicate a loss in value has occurred, we compare the carrying value of the intangible asset to the fair value of the intangible asset. For intangible assets that we amortize, we review the useful life of the intangible asset and evaluate each reporting period whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining useful life. We evaluate the remaining useful life of an intangible asset that is not being amortized each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.

 

Revenue and Cost Recognition

 

We recognize revenue and profit as work progresses on long-term, fixed price contracts using the percentage-of-completion method, which relies on estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs. We follow this method since reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and costs applicable to various stages of a contract can be made. Recognized revenues and profit are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion. Revisions in profit estimates are charged to income or expense in the period in which the facts and circumstances that give rise to the revision become known. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which losses are determined.

 

Valuation Allowances

 

Our valuation allowances, especially related to potential bad debts in accounts receivable and to obsolescence or market value declines of inventory, involve reviews of underlying details of these assets, known trends in the marketplace and the application of historical factors that provide us with a basis for recording these allowances. If market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, or if our historical experience is materially different from future experience, additional allowances may be required. We have, in past years, recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized (see Note 10 — Income Taxes in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Tax Matters herein).

 

Estimation of Useful Lives

 

The selection of the useful lives of many of our assets requires the judgments of our operating personnel as to the length of these useful lives. Should our estimates be too long or short, we might eventually report a disproportionate number of losses or gains upon disposition or retirement of our long-lived assets. We believe our estimates of useful lives are appropriate.

 

Stock Based Compensation

 

Since the adoption of the accounting standards regarding share-based payments, we are required to estimate the fair value of stock compensation made pursuant to awards under our 2001 Equity Participation Plan (Plan). An initial estimate of fair value of each stock option or restricted stock award determines the amount of stock compensation expense we will recognize in the future. To estimate the value of stock option awards under the Plan, we have selected a fair value calculation model. We have chosen the Black Scholes “closed form” model to value stock options awarded under the Plan. We have chosen this model because our option awards have been made under straightforward and consistent vesting terms, option prices and option lives. Utilizing the Black Scholes model requires us to estimate the length of time options will remain outstanding, a risk free interest rate for the estimated period options are assumed to be outstanding, forfeiture rates, future dividends and the volatility of our common stock. All of these assumptions affect the amount and timing of future stock compensation expense recognition. We will continually monitor our actual experience and change assumptions for future awards as we consider appropriate.

 

Income Taxes

 

In accounting for income taxes, we are required by the provisions of current accounting standards regarding the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, to estimate a liability for future income taxes. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize

liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In October 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that modified the accounting and disclosures for revenue recognition in a multiple-element arrangement. These amendments, effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (early adoption was permitted), modify the criteria for recognizing revenue in multiple- element arrangements and the scope of what constitutes a non-software deliverable. The Company early adopted this standard. The impact of these amendments was not material to the Company’s reported results.

 

In December 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which amends previously issued accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIE’s). These amendments require a qualitative approach to identifying a controlling financial interest in a VIE, and requires ongoing assessment of whether an entity is a VIE and whether an interest in a VIE makes the holder the primary beneficiary of the VIE. These amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. Adoption of this standard had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. These amendments were effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of these amendments to have a material impact on our disclosures.

 

In December 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standards update on disclosures of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. These amendments specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. These amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. These amendments are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We have early adopted the provisions of this amendment in 2010 and they are reflected in our pro forma disclosures.

 

 

Interest Rate Risk.  We have credit facilities that are subject to the risk of higher interest charges associated with increases in interest rates. As of December 31, 2010, we had floating rate obligations totaling approximately $735.6 million drawn under our credit facilities. These floating-rate obligations expose us to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If the floating interest rate were to increase by 1% from December 31, 2010 levels, our consolidated interest expense would increase by a total of approximately $7.4 million annually.

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk.  Our operations are conducted in various countries around the world and we receive revenue from these operations in a number of different currencies. As such, our earnings are subject to movements in foreign currency exchange rates when transactions are denominated in (i) currencies other than the U.S. dollar, which is our functional currency, or (ii) the functional currency of our subsidiaries, which is not necessarily the U.S. dollar. In order to mitigate the effects of exchange rate risks in areas outside the United States, we generally pay a portion of our expenses in local currencies and a substantial portion of our contracts provide for

collections from customers in U.S. dollars. During 2010, our realized foreign exchange losses were $1.1 million and are included in other operating (income) expense in the consolidated statements of income.

 

 

Our Consolidated Financial Statements and supplementary data of the Company appear on pages 62 through 90 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated by reference into this Item 8. Selected quarterly financial data is set forth in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

There were no changes in or disagreements on any matters of accounting principles or financial statement disclosure between us and our independent auditors during our two most recent fiscal years or any subsequent interim period.

 

 

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2010 at the reasonable assurance level.

 

Pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have provided certain certifications to the SEC. These certifications accompanied this report when filed with the Commission, but are not set forth herein.

 

 

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 was conducted. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2010, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

 

 

The attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K on Page 64 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

During the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) or in other factors which have materially affected our internal control over financial reporting, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

There was no information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2010 that was not reported on a Form 8-K during such time.

 

 

(1) Information concerning directors, including the Company’s audit committee financial expert, appears in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under “Election of Directors.” This portion of the Definitive Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

(2) Information with respect to executive officers appears in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under “Executive Officers of the Registrant.” This portion of the Definitive Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

(3) Information concerning Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance appears in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.” This portion of the Definitive Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

The information required by Item 11 hereby is incorporated by reference to such information as set forth in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

 

The information required by Item 12 hereby is incorporated by reference to such information as set forth in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

 

The information required by Item 13 hereby is incorporated by reference to such information as set forth in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.