defm14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
No fee required |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY STATEMENT FOR SPECIAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PUBLIC WARRANTHOLDERS
OF HICKS ACQUISITION
COMPANY I, INC.
AND PROSPECTUS FOR UP TO
120,650,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
AND UP TO 48,400,000 WARRANTS TO
PURCHASE COMMON STOCK OF
RESOLUTE ENERGY
CORPORATION
Dear Stockholders and Public Warrantholders of Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc. (HACI):
You are cordially invited to attend the special meeting in lieu
of 2009 annual meeting of HACI stockholders and special meeting
of HACI Public Warrantholders. HACI stockholders will be asked
to: (i) elect four directors to serve on HACIs board
of directors (the Director Election Proposal);
(ii) approve an amendment to HACIs amended and
restated certificate of incorporation (the Charter)
to provide for its perpetual existence and, in the event HACI
fails to consummate the Acquisition (as defined below) by
October 5, 2009, to provide that HACIs corporate
existence would terminate on such date (the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal);
(iii) approve an amendment to the Charter to permit a
business combination with an energy company despite the
provisions in the Charter prohibiting HACI from consummating
such business combination as previously disclosed in the
prospectus used to offer and sell HACI units (HACI
units) in connection with HACIs initial public
offering (the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal, together with the Charter Amendment
Existence Proposal, the Charter Amendment
Proposals); and (iv) adopt the Purchase and IPO
Reorganization Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2009, and
approve the transactions contemplated thereby (collectively, the
Acquisition), pursuant to which, through a series of
transactions, HACI stockholders will acquire a majority of the
outstanding common stock of Resolute Energy Corporation (the
Company), par value $0.0001 per share (the
Company Common Stock), and the Company will acquire
HACI and the business and operations of Seller (the
Acquisition Proposal).
HACI warrantholders owning Public Warrants, as defined below
(the HACI Public Warrantholders) will be asked to
approve an amendment to the warrant agreement that governs all
of the warrants of HACI (HACI warrants), each of
which is exercisable for one share of common stock of HACI, par
value $0.0001 per share (HACI Common Stock), in
order to allow each HACI Public Warrantholder to elect to
receive in the Acquisition, for each outstanding HACI warrant
that was issued in HACIs initial public offering (the
Public Warrants), either (i) the right to
receive $0.55 in cash or (ii) a new warrant exercisable for
one share of Company Common Stock, subject to adjustment and
proration as described in this proxy statement/prospectus (the
Warrant Amendment Proposal). If the Acquisition is
consummated, any warrantholder who votes against the approval of
the Warrant Amendment Proposal or who makes no election will
receive $0.55 in cash in exchange for each of its Public
Warrants. HACI stockholders who also are HACI Public
Warrantholders may suffer adverse tax consequences as a result
of the Warrant Amendment Proposal, even though the exchange of
HACI Common Stock for Company Common Stock otherwise will be tax
neutral. Holders should review the section entitled
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Tax Consequences of the
Merger commencing on page 272 for a more
comprehensive discussion of the tax aspects of the merger
applicable to them.
If each of the Charter Amendment Proposals, the Acquisition
Proposal and the Warrant Amendment Proposal is not approved or
if holders of 30% or more of the shares of HACI Common Stock
issued as part of the HACI units in HACIs initial public
offering (the Public Shares) vote against the
Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights, then HACI will not consummate the Acquisition. If the
Acquisition is not consummated, another business combination
will not be presented to HACI stockholders and HACI will be
required to dissolve and liquidate and outstanding HACI warrants
will expire worthless. See section entitled HACIs
Business Liquidation If No Business
Combination for additional information.
Each of these proposals is more fully described in the
accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.
The Company intends to apply to have its common stock and
warrants listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbols, REN and REN WS,
respectively. If the Company is unable to satisfy the listing
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, it will apply to
have its stock listed on another stock exchange and if such
listing is not approved, the Company Common Stock will be traded
in the over-the-counter market. If the Company Common Stock is
not listed on a national securities exchange, you will have
appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law with
respect to your shares of HACI Common Stock if you (i) do
not exercise conversion rights, (ii) abstain from voting or
vote against the Acquisition Proposal and (iii) properly
demand appraisal rights.
Pursuant to HACIs Charter each holder of Public Shares has
the right to vote against approval of the Acquisition Proposal
and demand that HACI convert such shares into cash. To make such
a demand, you must make a request for conversion prior to the
vote taken with respect to the Acquisition Proposal and vote
against the Acquisition Proposal. If you purchased your HACI
units in HACIs initial public offering and do not exercise
conversion rights or demand appraisal rights, regardless of how
you vote, you may have securities law claims against HACI for
rescission or damages which must be asserted prior to the
expiration of the applicable statute of limitations for such
claims. See the sections entitled Special Meeting of
HACI Public Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of 2009
Annual Meeting of HACI Stockholders Conversion
Rights, Special Meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of 2009 Annual
Meeting of HACI Stockholders Appraisal
Rights and The Acquisition
Rescission and Damages Rights for additional
information.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to
attend the special meetings in person, please submit your proxy
card without delay.
We encourage you to read this proxy statement/prospectus
carefully. In particular, you should review the matters
discussed under the caption RISK FACTORS beginning
on page 46.
By vote of a majority HACIs board of directors
recommends (i) that HACI stockholders vote FOR approval of
the Director Election Proposal, FOR approval of the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, FOR the approval of
the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal and FOR
approval of the Acquisition Proposal and (ii) that HACI
Public Warrantholders vote FOR the Warrant Amendment Proposal.
When you consider the recommendation of HACIs board of
directors in favor of the Warrant Amendment Proposal, the
Charter Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal and the Acquisition
Proposal, you should keep in mind that certain of HACIs
directors and officers, including Chairman of the Board
Thomas O. Hicks, have interests in the Acquisition that may
conflict with your interests as a warrantholder and stockholder.
See the section entitled, The Acquisition
Potential Conflicts of Interests of HACIs Directors and
Officers in the Acquisition.
Thank you for your consideration of these matters.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. Armes
Director, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Hicks Acquisition Company I,
Inc.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting of HACI
stockholders or the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders, please submit your proxy by completing, signing,
dating and mailing the enclosed proxy cards in the pre-addressed
postage paid envelope or by using the telephone or Internet
procedures provided to you by your broker or bank. If your
shares or warrants are held in an account at a brokerage firm or
bank, you must instruct your broker or bank on how to vote your
shares or warrants or, if you wish to attend the special meeting
of HACI stockholders or the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders and vote in person, you must obtain a proxy from
your broker or bank. HACI has confirmed that approximately 99%
of street name holders will have access to telephone
and Internet voting.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued in the transaction or otherwise, or
passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this proxy
statement/prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is
criminal offense.
This proxy statement/prospectus is dated September 14, 2009
and is first being mailed to HACI stockholders and HACI Public
Warrantholders on or about September 14, 2009.
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75201
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
PUBLIC WARRANTHOLDERS
OF HICKS ACQUISITION
COMPANY I, INC.
To Be Held On September 24, 2009
To the Public Warrantholders of Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc. (HACI):
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the special meeting of HACI
warrantholders owning Public Warrants, as defined below (the
HACI Public Warrantholders) will be held at 10:00
A.M., Central Daylight time, on September 24, 2009, at the
offices of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, 1700
Pacific Avenue,
39th Floor,
Dallas, Texas 75201 for the following purposes:
1. to approve an amendment (the Warrant
Amendment) to the warrant agreement (the Warrant
Agreement) that governs all of the warrants of HACI (the
HACI warrants), each of which is exercisable for one
share of common stock of HACI, par value $0.0001 per share
(HACI Common Stock), in connection with the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase
and IPO Reorganization Agreement, dated as of August 2,
2009, as amended by the Letter Agreement dated September 9,
2009, included in Annex A to the enclosed proxy
statement/prospectus, (the Acquisition Agreement),
by and among HACI, Resolute Energy Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), Resolute Subsidiary
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Resolute Aneth LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, Resolute Holdings, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company (Seller), and
HH-HACI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, pursuant to
which, through a series of transactions, HACI stockholders will
acquire a majority of the outstanding common stock of the
Company, par value $0.0001 per share (the Company Common
Stock), and the Company will acquire HACI and the business
and operations of Seller. The Warrant Amendment would allow each
HACI Public Warrantholder, to elect to receive in the
Acquisition, for each outstanding HACI warrant that was issued
in HACIs initial public offering (the Public
Warrants) either (i) the right to receive $0.55 in
cash or (ii) a new warrant exercisable for one share of
Company Common Stock, subject to adjustment and proration as
described in this proxy statement/prospectus (the Warrant
Amendment Proposal). If the Acquisition is consummated,
any warrantholder who votes against the approval of the Warrant
Amendment Proposal or who makes no election will receive $0.55
in cash in exchange for each of its Public Warrants.
2. to approve the adjournment of the special meeting of
HACI Public Warrantholders, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation and vote of proxies in favor of the Warrant
Amendment Proposal (the Warrantholder Adjournment
Proposal); and
3. such other matters as may properly come before the
special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders or any adjournment
or postponement thereof.
By vote of a majority, HACIs board of directors
recommends that HACI Public Warrantholders vote FOR the Warrant
Amendment Proposal and FOR the Warrantholder Adjournment
Proposal. When you consider the recommendation of HACIS
board of directors in favor of the Warrant Amendment Proposal,
you should keep in mind that certain of HACIS directors
and officers, including Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks,
have interests in the Acquisition that may conflict with your
interests as a stockholder. See the section entitled,
The Acquisition Potential Conflicts of
Interests of HACIS Directors and Officers in the
Acquisition.
These items of business are described in the enclosed proxy
statement/prospectus, which you are encouraged to read in its
entirety before voting. Only holders of record of HACI Public
Warrants at the close of business on September 8, 2009 are
entitled to notice of the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders and to vote at the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
A complete list of HACI Public Warrantholders of record entitled
to vote at the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders
will be available for ten days before the special meeting at the
principal executive offices of HACI for inspection by
warrantholders during ordinary business hours for any purpose
germane to the special meeting.
All HACI Public Warrantholders are cordially invited to
attend the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders in
person. Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to
attend the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders, please
read the enclosed proxy statement/prospectus carefully, sign,
date and return the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible in
the envelope provided. If your warrants are held in street
name or are in a margin or similar account, your broker or
bank may provide you with voting instructions (including any
instructions for voting by telephone or the Internet). HACI has
confirmed that approximately 99% of street name holders will
have access to telephone and Internet voting. You should contact
your broker or bank to ensure that votes related to the warrants
you beneficially own are properly counted.
Thank you for your participation. We look forward to your
continued support.
September 14, 2009
By Order of the Board of Directors
Joseph B. Armes
Director, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
IF YOU SUBMIT YOUR PROXY CARD WITHOUT AN INDICATION OF HOW
YOU WISH TO VOTE, YOUR WARRANTS WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF EACH
OF THE PROPOSALS.
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75201
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING IN
LIEU OF 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
To Be Held On September 24, 2009
To the Stockholders of Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
(HACI):
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the special meeting in lieu of 2009
annual meeting of HACI stockholders will be held at 10:30 A.M.,
Central Daylight time, on September 24, 2009 (postponed
from the previously announced September 22, 2009 meeting
date), at the offices of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP, 1700 Pacific Avenue,
39th Floor,
Dallas, Texas 75201 for the following purposes:
1. to elect four directors to serve on HACIs board of
directors (the Director Election Proposal);
2. to approve an amendment to HACIs amended and
restated certificate of incorporation (the Charter)
to provide for its perpetual existence (the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal);
3. to approve an amendment to HACIs Charter to permit
a business combination with an entity engaged in the energy
industry as its principal business (the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal) despite the
provisions in the Charter prohibiting HACI from consummating a
business combination with an entity engaged in the energy
industry, as previously disclosed throughout the registration
statement used to offer and sell HACI units;
4. to adopt the Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement,
dated as of August 2, 2009, as amended by the Letter
Agreement dated September 9, 2009, included in Annex A
to the enclosed proxy statement/prospectus, by and among HACI,
Resolute Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
Company), Resolute Subsidiary Corporation, a
Delaware corporation, Resolute Aneth, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, Resolute Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (Seller), and HH-HACI,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and to approve the
transactions contemplated thereby, pursuant to which, through a
series of transactions, HACI stockholders will acquire a
majority of the outstanding common stock of the Company, par
value $0.0001 per share (the Company Common Stock),
and the Company will acquire HACI and the business and
operations of Seller (the Acquisition Proposal);
5. to approve the adjournment of the special meeting of
HACI stockholders, if necessary (the Stockholder
Adjournment Proposal), in order to permit further
solicitation and vote of proxies in favor of the foregoing
proposals; and
6. such other matters as may properly come before the
special meeting of HACI stockholders or any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
By vote of a majority, HACIs board of directors
recommends that HACI stockholders vote FOR the Director Election
Proposal, FOR the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal, FOR the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal, FOR the Acquisition Proposal and FOR the Stockholder
Adjournment Proposal. When you consider the recommendation of
HACIS board of directors in favor of the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal and the Acquisition
Proposal, you should keep in mind that certain of HACIS
directors and officers, including Chairman of the Board Thomas
O. Hicks, have interests in the Acquisition that may conflict
with your interests as a stockholder. See the section entitled,
The Acquisition Potential Conflicts of
Interests of HACIS Directors and Officers in the
Acquisition.
These items of business are described in the enclosed proxy
statement/prospectus, which you are encouraged to read in its
entirety before voting. Only holders of record of HACIs
common stock at the close of business on August 31, 2009
are entitled to notice of the special meeting of HACI
stockholders and to vote at the special meeting of stockholders
and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
A complete list of HACI stockholders of record entitled to vote
at the special meeting in lieu of 2009 annual meeting of HACI
stockholders will be available for ten days before the special
meeting at the principal executive offices of HACI for
inspection by stockholders during ordinary business hours for
any purpose germane to the special meeting.
All HACI stockholders are cordially invited to attend the
special meeting of HACI stockholders in person. Your vote is
important regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether
you plan to attend the special meeting of HACI stockholders,
please read the enclosed proxy statement/prospectus carefully,
sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card as soon as
possible in the envelope provided. If your shares are held in
street name or are in a margin or similar account,
your broker or bank may provide you with voting instructions
(including any instructions for voting by telephone or
Internet). HACI has confirmed that approximately 99% of street
name holders will have access to telephone and Internet voting.
You should contact your broker or bank to ensure that votes
related to the shares you beneficially own are properly
counted.
Thank you for your participation. We look forward to your
continued support.
September 14, 2009
By Order of the Board of Directors
Joseph B. Armes
Director, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
IF YOU SUBMIT YOUR PROXY CARD WITHOUT AN INDICATION OF HOW
YOU WISH TO VOTE, YOUR SHARES WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF EACH OF
THE PROPOSALS.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
THE CHARTER AMENDMENT PURPOSE PROPOSAL
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
H-1
|
|
ii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSALS
FOR HACI PUBLIC WARRANTHOLDERS AND HACI STOCKHOLDERS
The following questions and answers briefly address some
commonly asked questions about the proposals to be presented at
the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and the
special meeting of HACI stockholders including the proposed
transaction. The following questions and answers may not include
all the information that is important to warrantholders and
stockholders of HACI. We urge HACI Public Warrantholders and
stockholders to read carefully this entire proxy
statement/prospectus, including Risk Factors,, the
disclosure of potential conflicts under the question headed
Do any of HACIs directors or officers have interests
that may conflict with my interests with respect to the
Acquisition?, the annexes and the other documents included
or referred to herein.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the purpose of this document? |
|
A: |
|
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
or HACI, and Resolute Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, or Parent, have agreed to a business
combination under the terms of a Purchase and IPO Reorganization
Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2009, as amended by the
Letter Agreement dated September 9, 2009, included in Annex
A to this proxy statement/prospectus, which we refer to as the
Acquisition Agreement, by and among HACI, Parent, Resolute
Holdings Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or
Seller, Resolute Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of Seller, or the Company, Resolute
Subsidiary Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, or Merger Sub, Resolute
Aneth, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and subsidiary
of Seller, or Aneth, and HH-HACI, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership, or the Sponsor in which approximately 80% of the
partnership interests attributable to the Founder Shares and
Founder Warrants and 100% of the partnership interests
attributable to the Sponsor Warrants are owned by Thomas O.
Hicks, his charitable foundation and estate planning entities
for his family and approximately 20% of the partnership
interests attributable to Founder Shares and Founder Warrants
are owned directly or indirectly by various employees of
Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers. The consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement is
referred to as the Acquisition and the proposal to approve the
Acquisition and adopt the Acquisition Agreement is referred to
as the Acquisition Proposal. A copy of the Acquisition Agreement
is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A
and is incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by
reference. You are encouraged to read this proxy
statement/prospectus, including Risk Factors
and all the annexes hereto. |
|
|
|
HACI warrantholders owning Public Warrants, as described below,
which we refer to as HACI Public Warrantholders, are being asked
to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve an amendment,
which we refer to as the Warrant Amendment, to the warrant
agreement, which we refer to as the Warrant Agreement, that
governs the warrants of HACI, which we refer to as the HACI
warrants, each of which is exercisable for one share of common
stock of HACI, par value $0.0001 per share, which we refer to as
the HACI Common Stock, to allow each HACI Public Warrantholder
to elect to receive in the Acquisition, for each outstanding
HACI warrant that was issued in HACIs initial public
offering, which we refer to as the Public Warrants, either (i)
the right to receive $0.55 in cash, or the Cash Amount, or (ii)
a new warrant, which we refer to as a Company warrant, that is
exercisable for one share of common stock of the Company, par
value $0.0001 per share, or Company Common Stock, at an exercise
price of $13.00 per share, which we refer to as a Company
warrant, subject to adjustment and proration as described in
this proxy statement/prospectus. If the Acquisition is
consummated, any holder of Public Warrants who votes against the
approval of the Warrant Amendment or who makes no election will
receive the Cash Amount in exchange for each of its Public
Warrants. The exchange of the Public Warrants for cash is
referred to herein as the Cash Exchange and the exchange of
Public Warrants for Company warrants is referred to herein as
the Warrant Exchange. This proposal to amend the Warrant
Agreement in order to effect the Cash Exchange and the Warrant
Exchange is referred to herein as the Warrant Amendment
Proposal. The form of the Warrant Amendment is attached to this
proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C and is incorporated into
this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. |
|
|
|
HACI stockholders are being asked to elect two Class I and
two Class II directors to serve on HACIs board of
directors, which we refer to as the Director Election Proposal.
The four director nominees, if |
1
|
|
|
|
|
elected, will serve on HACIs board of directors until the
consummation of the Acquisition, or if the Acquisition Proposal
is not approved, until HACIs dissolution. |
|
|
|
HACI stockholders are also being asked to consider and vote upon
a proposal to approve an amendment to HACIs amended and
restated certificate of incorporation, or HACIs charter,
to provide for its perpetual existence, or the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, and to consider and
vote upon a proposal to approve an amendment to HACIs
charter to permit a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business despite the
provisions in HACIs charter prohibiting it from
consummating a business combination with an entity engaged in
the energy industry, as previously disclosed in the prospectus
used to offer and sell HACI units in HACIs initial public
offering, or the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal.
The form of the amendment to HACIs charter reflecting both
charter amendment proposals, is attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex B and is incorporated into
this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. We refer to the
amendments of HACIs charter as the Charter Amendment and
to the proposals to amend HACIs charter as the Charter
Amendment Proposals. |
|
|
|
HACI stockholders are also being asked to consider and vote upon
a proposal to adopt the Acquisition Agreement, which, among
other things, provides for a series of transactions pursuant to
which HACI stockholders will acquire a majority of the
outstanding Company Common Stock, and the Company will own 100%
of HACI and all of the business and operations of Seller. Upon
the consummation of the Acquisition, (i) all of the
outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock will be exchanged for an
equal number of shares of Company Common Stock and
(ii) each outstanding Public Warrant will be exchanged for
either the Cash Amount or a Company warrant pursuant to the Cash
Exchange and the Warrant Exchange in connection with the closing
of the Acquisition. |
|
|
|
HACIs units, each consisting of one share of HACI Common
Stock and one HACI warrant, which we refer to as the HACI units,
will not be exchanged in the Acquisition. The HACI units will be
separated into the component common stock and warrants, each of
which will be exchanged for either Company Common Stock, the
Company warrants or cash, as described herein, and will cease to
trade following the consummation of the Acquisition. |
|
|
|
The approval of the Warrant Amendment Proposal by HACI
warrantholders and the approval of the Charter Amendment
Proposals and the Acquisition Proposal by HACI stockholders are
preconditions to the consummation of the Acquisition. If the
Warrant Amendment Proposal and each of the Charter Amendment
Proposals are not approved, the Acquisition Proposal will not be
presented to the HACI stockholders for a vote. |
|
|
|
This proxy statement/prospectus contains important information
about the proposed Acquisition and the other matters to be acted
upon at the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and
the special meeting of HACI stockholders. You should read it
carefully. |
|
Q: |
|
What is being voted on by HACI warrantholders and
stockholders? |
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
Below are proposals on which HACI warrantholders are being asked
to vote and proposals on which HACI stockholders are being asked
to vote. |
|
|
|
Warrantholder Proposals |
|
|
|
the Warrant Amendment Proposal; and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the special
meeting of HACI warrantholders to a later date or dates, if
necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in
the event that, based upon the tabulated vote at the time of the
special meeting, there are not sufficient votes to approve the
Warrant Amendment Proposal. This is referred to herein as the
Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal. This proposal will only be
presented to the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders
if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Warrant
Amendment Proposal.
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Proposals |
|
|
|
the Director Election Proposal;
|
|
|
|
the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal;
|
|
|
|
the Acquisition Proposal, provided that each of the
Charter Amendment Proposals is approved at the special meeting
of HACI stockholders and the Warrant Amendment Proposal is
approved at the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders;
and |
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the special
meeting of HACI stockholders to a later date or dates, if
necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in
the event that, based upon the tabulated vote at the time of the
special meeting, there are not sufficient votes to approve each
of the Charter Amendment Proposals or to approve the Acquisition
Proposal. This is referred to herein as the Stockholder
Adjournment Proposal. This proposal will only be presented at
the special meeting of HACI stockholders if there are not
sufficient votes to approve one of the other proposals presented
to the stockholders.
|
|
|
|
It is important for you to note that in the event that the
Charter Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal, the Warrant Amendment
Proposal or the Acquisition Proposal does not receive the
requisite vote for approval, then HACI will not consummate the
Acquisition, the Cash Exchange or the Warrant Exchange. If HACI
does not consummate the Acquisition, HACI will be required to
dissolve and liquidate and all HACI warrants will expire
worthless. |
|
Q: |
|
Are the proposals conditioned on one another? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Unless the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal
and the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal are
approved at the special meeting of HACI stockholders and the
Warrant Amendment Proposal is approved at the special meeting of
HACI Public Warrantholders, the Acquisition Proposal will not be
presented to the HACI stockholders for a vote. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen in the Acquisition? |
|
A: |
|
At the closing of the Acquisition, through a series of
transactions, the holders of HACI Common Stock, including the
Sponsor, William H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery,
Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn, who previously
received HACI Common Stock and warrants, which we refer to as
the Founder Shares and the Founder Warrants, respectively, as
part of the HACI units issued prior to HACIs initial
public offering, or the Founder Units, and who, together with
the Sponsor, we refer to as the Initial Stockholders, will own
approximately 82% of the outstanding Company Common Stock
(excluding Company Earnout Shares). To accomplish this result,
HACI will transfer amounts remaining in the trust account (an
estimated $346 million) to Aneth in exchange for a
membership interest in Aneth. Through Sellers subsequent
contribution of its operating subsidiaries and the simultaneous
merger of HACI with Merger Sub, the Company will acquire HACI
and all of Sellers business and operations. The
$346 million paid by HACI to Aneth will be used to repay
part of the Companys outstanding indebtedness on its first
lien credit facility and all of its outstanding indebtedness on
its second lien credit facility. As a result of the Acquisition: |
|
|
|
Seller will receive (i) 9,200,000 shares
of Company Common Stock, (ii) 4,600,000 warrants to
purchase Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share
subject to a trigger price of $13.75 per share to be exceeded
within five years following the closing of the Acquisition, or
Company Founders Warrants, (iii) 2,333,333 warrants to
purchase Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share, or
Company Sponsors Warrants, and (iv) 1,385,000 shares
of Company Common Stock subject to forfeiture in the event a
trigger price of $15.00 is not exceeded within five years
following the closing of the Acquisition, or Company Earnout
Shares;
|
|
|
|
the Sponsor will receive
(i) 4,508,000 shares of Company Common Stock,
(ii) 9,016,000 Company Founders Warrants,
(iii) 4,666,667 Company Sponsors Warrants, and
(iv) 1,827,700 Company Earnout Shares;
|
|
|
|
the other Initial Stockholders will each receive
(i) 23,000 shares of Company Common Stock; (ii) 46,000
Founders Warrants; and (iii) 9,325 Company Earnout
Shares;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
the holders of HACI Common Stock who do not vote
against the Acquisition Proposal and exercise their conversion
rights will receive one share of Company Common Stock for each
share of HACI Common Stock they own immediately prior to the
closing of the Acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
the holders of HACI Public Warrants will receive
either (i) $0.55 in cash or (ii) a Company warrant,
for each Public Warrant they own immediately prior to the
Acquisition (subject to adjustment and proration).
|
|
|
|
Each of the Company warrants, Company Founders Warrants and
Company Sponsors Warrants will have an exercise price of
$13.00 per share, expire within five years after the
closing of the Acquisition, and will be redeemable by the
Company at $0.01 subject to an $18.00 redemption trigger price
per share. However, the Company Founders Warrants and Company
Sponsors Warrants will not be redeemable so long as they are
held by the Initial Stockholders or Seller or their permitted
transferees. |
|
|
|
For more information, see the sections entitled The
Acquisition, The Acquisition
Agreement and Description of
Securities. |
|
Q: |
|
Do any of HACIs directors or officers have interests
that may conflict with my interests with respect to the
Acquisition? |
|
A: |
|
HACIs directors and officers may have interests in the
Acquisition that are different from your interests as a
stockholder. You should keep in mind the following interests of
HACIs directors and officers: |
|
|
|
|
|
If HACI does not complete the Acquisition by September 28,
2009, or October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes
effective, HACI will be required to commence proceedings to
dissolve and liquidate. In such event, the 13,800,000 Founder
Units (each consisting of a Founder Share and Founder Warrant)
held by the Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.), William H. Cunningham,
William A. Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn and
7,000,000 HACI warrants that were acquired by HH-HACI, L.P.
simultaneously with the consummation of the IPO, or the Sponsor
Warrants, will be worthless because such holders have waived any
rights to receive any liquidation proceeds with respect to these
securities. HH-HACI, L.P.s general partner is owned by
Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks, who, together with his
charitable foundation and estate planning entities for his
family, owns approximately 80% of the limited partnership
interests in HH-HACI, L.P. attributable to the Founder Shares
and Founder Warrants and 100% of the partnership interests
attributable to the Sponsor Warrants. The remaining limited
partnership interests in HH-HACI, L.P. attributable to the
Founder Shares and Founder Warrants are owned directly or
indirectly by various employees of Mr. Hicks, including
HACI officers. Each of directors William H. Cunningham, William
A. Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn held 69,000
Founder Shares and 69,000 Founder Warrants with an aggregate
market value (without taking into account any discount due to
the restricted nature of such securities) of $2,851,080 (or
$712,770 individually by each director) based on the
closing sale prices of $9.74 and $0.59, respectively, on the
NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009. Mr. Hicks, together
with his charitable foundation and estate planning entities for
his family, holds through the Sponsor an economic interest in
(i) approximately 10,819,200 Founder Shares and 10,819,200
Founder Warrants (based on an approximate 80% ownership of the
partnership interests of the Sponsor that are attributable to
the Founder Shares and Founder Warrants) and (ii) 7,000,000
Sponsor Warrants (based on a 100% interest of the partnership
interests attributable to the Sponsor Warrants).
|
After giving effect to the forfeiture of Founder Shares and
Founder Warrants and the transfer to Seller of Sponsor Warrants,
the indirect ownership of (i) Mr. Hicks, his
charitable foundation and family estate planning entities,
through the Sponsor, would be 5,068,560 Founders Shares
(including 1,462,160 Founder Shares that would be converted to
Company Earnout Shares), 7,212,800 Founder Warrants and
4,666,667 Sponsor Warrants and (ii) various employees of
Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers, through the Sponsor,
would be 1,267,140 Founder Shares (including 365,540 Founder
Shares that would be converted to Company Earnout Shares) and
1,803,200 Founder Warrants.
|
|
|
|
|
The 13,800,000 Founder Units and the 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants
were purchased by the Sponsor for consideration of $25,000 and
$7.0 million, respectively. HACIs independent
directors hold an aggregate of 276,000 Founder Units and the
Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.), an entity in which HACI officers and
HACI Chairman of the Board, Thomas O. Hicks hold a financial
interest, holds 13,524,000 Founder
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Units, as well as the 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants. HH-HACI,
L.P., transferred a total of 276,000 Founder Units to
Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn for no
cash consideration. In light of the amount of consideration
paid, HACIs directors and officers will likely benefit
from the completion of the Acquisition even if the Acquisition
causes the market price of HACIs securities to
significantly decrease. Even though 7,335,000 Founder Units and
4,600,000 Founder Warrants will be cancelled and 2,333,333
Sponsor Warrants will be sold to Seller in connection with the
Acquisition, the likely benefit to HACIs directors and
officers may influence their motivation for promoting the
Acquisition
and/or
soliciting proxies for the approval of the Acquisition Proposal.
For instance, in the event the Acquisition is not consummated,
(i) the Founder Units held by each of
Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn, as well
as those Founder Units held by Mr. Hicks through his
interest in the Sponsor, will be worth nothing because each of
the directors and Sponsor have waived any right to receive a
liquidation distribution with respect to the Founder Shares in
the event HACI does not complete an initial business combination
and (ii) all HACI warrants held by Initial Stockholders,
including the Founder Warrants and Sponsor Warrants, will expire
worthless. On the other hand, in the event the Acquisition is
consummated, Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and
Quinn would hold shares of Company Common Stock and Company
warrants with an aggregate market value of $1,367,942 (or
$341,986 individually by each director), based on the closing
sales price of HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of $9.74 and
$0.59, respectively, on the NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009
(without applying a discount for Founder Shares that would be
converted into Company Earnout Shares).
|
Additionally, Mr. Hicks, his charitable foundation and
family estate planning entities, through the Sponsor, would have
an economic interest in shares of Company Common Stock and
Company warrants with an aggregate value of $56,376,660 if the
Acquisition is consummated, based on the closing sales price of
HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of $9.74 and $0.59,
respectively, on the NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009
(without applying a discount for Founder Shares that would be
converted into Company Earnout Shares). Various employees of
Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers, through the Sponsor,
would have an economic interest in shares of Company Common
Stock and Company warrants with an aggregate value of
$13,405,832 if the Acquisition is consummated, based on the
closing sales price of HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of
$9.74 and $0.59, respectively, on the NYSE Amex on
September 10, 2009 (without applying a discount for Founder
Shares that would be converted into Company Earnout Shares).
Therefore, based on the $25,000 and $7.0 million purchase
price paid by the Sponsor for the Founder Units and the Sponsor
Warrants, respectively, if the Acquisition is consummated:
|
|
|
|
|
each of Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn
would stand to gain approximately $341,986;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hicks, together with his charitable foundation and
family estate planning entities, through the Sponsor, would
stand to gain approximately $51,023,327 if the Acquisition is
consummated (after giving to effect of $1,666,667 for the
Sponsor Warrants that would be transferred to the
Seller); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various employees of Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers,
would stand to gain approximately $13,400,832.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the HACI s initial public offering,
HACI and the representative of the underwriters in the HACI
s initial public offering entered into agreements with the
Initial Stockholders pursuant to which the Initial Stockholders
have agreed to vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of
the votes cast with respect to an initial business combination
by the Public Stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any Public Shares acquired in or after the HACI s initial
public offering in favor of an initial business
combination; and
|
|
|
|
all shares of HACI Common Stock held by them in favor of
amending HACIs charter to provide for its perpetual
existence.
|
5
The Initial Stockholders did not agree, however, to vote in
favor of an amendment to HACIs charter that would permit
HACI to complete a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business, as such
amendment was not contemplated at the time of HACIs IPO.
At the special meeting, the Initial Stockholders intend to vote
in favor of the Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal, which will
include the amendment to HACIs charter to permit
HACIs perpetual existence and the Charter
Amendment-Purpose Proposal and, in the event HACI fails to
consummate the Acquisition by October 5, 2009, to provide
that HACIs corporate existence would terminate on
October 5, 2009, and to permit a business combination with
an entity engaged in the energy industry as its principal
business.
Approval of each of the Acquisition Proposal, the Charter
Amendment-Existence Proposal and the Charter Amendment-Purpose
Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding HACI Common Stock as of the record date. As of the
record date of the special meeting of HACI stockholders,
13,800,000 Founder Shares, or 20% of the outstanding HACI Common
Stock, would be voted in accordance with the majority of the
votes cast by HACI Public Stockholders with respect to the
Acquisition Proposal and 20% of the outstanding HACI Common
Stock would be voted in favor of each of the Charter Amendment
Proposals. If the Initial Stockholders or HACIs officers
and directors purchase Public Shares from existing HACI
stockholders that are likely to vote against the Acquisition
Proposal, or that are likely to elect to convert their Public
Shares, the probability that the Acquisition Proposal will be
approved would increase.
|
|
|
|
|
After the completion of the Acquisition, William H. Cunningham,
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., and Robert M. Swartz will become
members of the board of directors of the Company. As such, in
the future each may receive cash compensation, board fees, stock
options or stock awards if the Companys board of directors
so determines.
|
|
|
|
Although he recused himself from meetings of HACIs board
of directors related to the Acquisition, William F. Quinn is the
father of William J. Quinn, who is employed by Natural Gas
Partners, one of Resolutes principal equity holders, and
who is also expected to serve on the Companys board of
directors after the Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
If HACI dissolves and liquidates prior to the consummation of a
business combination, Mr. Hicks has agreed that he will be
liable to HACI if and to the extent any claims by a third party
for services rendered or products sold to HACI, or by a
prospective target business, reduce the amounts in the trust
account available for distribution to HACI stockholders in the
event of a liquidation, except as to (x) any claims by a
third party who executed a waiver (even if such waiver is
subsequently found to be invalid and unenforceable) of any and
all rights to seek access to the funds in the trust account, or
(y) any claims under HACIs indemnity of the
underwriters of HACI s initial public offering against
certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. This agreement
was entered into to reduce the risk that, in the event of
HACIs dissolution and liquidation, the trust account is
reduced by claims of creditors. However, HACI cannot assure its
stockholders that Mr. Hicks will be able to satisfy these
indemnification obligations. If the Acquisition is completed,
such obligations will terminate. In addition, the exercise of
HACIs directors and officers discretion in
agreeing to changes or waivers in the terms of the Acquisition
may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether
such changes or waivers are appropriate and in HACI Public
Stockholders best interest.
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why is HACI proposing the Acquisition? |
|
A: |
|
HACI is a blank check company that was organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware on February 26, 2007. HACI was
formed to acquire through a merger, capital stock exchange,
asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar
business combination, one or more businesses or assets, which we
refer to as an initial business combination or a business
combination. |
|
|
|
HACI consummated its initial public offering on October 3,
2007. Approximately $536.1 million of the proceeds of HACI
s initial public offering (including deferred underwriting
commissions) and the sale to the Sponsor of warrants to purchase
7,000,000 shares of HACI Common Stock simultaneously with
the consummation of HACI s initial public offering, which
we refer to as the Sponsor Warrants, was placed in a trust
account immediately following the IPO. Upon the consummation of
an initial business |
6
|
|
|
|
|
combination, the amounts held in the trust account will be
released to HACI. As of June 30, 2009, $539.8 million
was held in the trust account. If the Acquisition Proposal is
approved, HACI intends to use a portion of the funds held in the
trust account to pay (i) HACIs aggregate costs, fees
and expenses in connection with the consummation of an initial
business combination, (ii) tax obligations and deferred
underwriting commissions, (iii) HACI stockholders who vote
against the Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their
conversion rights, (iv) warrantholders in connection with
the Cash Exchange, and (iv) for any repurchases by HACI of
Public Shares, if any, prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
The remaining balance in the trust account will be contributed
to Aneth in exchange for a membership interest in Aneth in
connection with the Acquisition. See the sections entitled
The Acquisition HACIs Board of
Directors Reasons for the Approval of the
Acquisition and The Acquisition
Agreement for additional information. |
|
Q: |
|
Why is HACI proposing the Charter Amendment? |
|
A: |
|
HACIs charter currently provides that HACIs
corporate existence will terminate on September 28, 2009.
In order to consummate a business combination, an amendment to
HACIs charter providing for HACIs perpetual
existence must be approved by a majority of the outstanding
shares of HACI Common Stock at a duly held stockholder meeting.
Also, because HACIs dissolution date is so close to the
date of the special meeting of HACI stockholders, HACI has
deemed it advisable to postpone the dissolution date in order to
close the Acquisition. In addition, pursuant to HACIs
charter, HACI is prohibited from completing a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry as its
principal business. Resolute is an independent oil and gas
company engaged in the exploitation and development of petroleum
properties and as such, is engaged in the energy industry as its
principal business. Accordingly, an amendment to HACIs
charter to provide for its perpetual existence and to permit a
business combination with an entity engaged in the energy
industry as its principal business, despite the provisions in
HACIs charter prohibiting it from consummating a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry as
previously discussed in the prospectus used to offer and sell
HACI units in connection with the IPO, must be approved by HACI
stockholders in order to consummate the Acquisition.
Additionally, the Charter Amendment would postpone HACIs
dissolution date from September 28, 2009 to October 5,
2009. If the requisite stockholder approval is received for each
of the Charter Amendment Proposals, which are embodied in the
Charter Amendment, such Charter Amendment will be filed with the
Delaware Secretary of State immediately after the approval of
the Charter Amendment Proposals and the Acquisition Proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
Why is HACI proposing the Warrant Amendment Proposal? |
|
A: |
|
HACI Public Warrantholders are being asked to approve the
Warrant Amendment Proposal because the approval of the Warrant
Amendment Proposal is a condition to consummation of the
Acquisition and because the Warrant Amendment is necessary to
allow the consummation of the Cash Exchange and the Warrant
Exchange in connection with the Acquisition. In addition,
HACIs board of directors believes that the reduction of
the warrants in the Companys capital structure will
increase the Companys strategic opportunities and
attractiveness to future investors. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve the proposals presented at
the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders? |
|
A: |
|
Approval of the Warrant Amendment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Public
Warrants as of the record date. |
|
|
|
Approval of the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
outstanding Public Warrants represented in person or by proxy at
the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and entitled
to vote thereon as of the record date. |
|
|
|
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the Warrant Amendment Proposal and the
Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal. A broker non-vote will have
the effect of a vote AGAINST the Warrant Amendment
Proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the
Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal. |
7
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve the proposals presented at
the special meeting of HACI stockholders? |
|
A: |
|
Directors are elected by a plurality of all of the votes cast,
in person or by proxy. This means that the four nominees will be
elected if they receive more affirmative votes than any other
nominee for the same position. Abstentions and broker non-votes
will have no effect on the election of directors. Stockholders
may not cumulate their votes with respect to the election of
directors. |
|
|
|
Approval of the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal
and approval of the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
issued and outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock entitled to
vote thereon as of the record date. |
|
|
|
Approval of the Acquisition Proposal requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of HACI
Common Stock entitled to vote thereon as of the record date. In
addition, if holders of 30% or more of the shares of HACI Common
Stock issued as part of the HACI units issued in HACI s
initial public offering, or the Public Shares, vote against the
Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights, HACI will not be permitted to consummate the
Acquisition. See the section entitled Special Meeting
of HACI Public Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of
2009 Annual Meeting of HACI Stockholders Conversion
Rights for additional information. |
|
|
|
Approval of the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
HACI Common Stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled
to vote thereon at the special meeting. |
|
|
|
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal,
the Charter Amendment-Purpose Proposal, the Acquisition Proposal
and the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal. A broker non-vote will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the Charter
Amendment-Existence Proposal, the Charter Amendment-Purpose
Proposal and the Acquisition Proposal. Broker non-votes, while
considered present for the purposes of establishing a quorum,
will have no effect on the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
How will the Initial Stockholders vote? |
|
A: |
|
Prior to the consummation of HACI s initial public
offering, the Sponsor transferred an aggregate of 276,000
Founder Units, each of which is comprised of one Founder Share
and one Founder Warrant, to the other Initial Stockholders. The
Initial Stockholders consist of the Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.), an
entity in which approximately 80% of the partnership interests
attributable to the Founder Shares and Founder Units and 100% of
the partnership interests attributable to the Sponsor Warrants
are owned by Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks, his
charitable foundation and estate planning entities for his
family. William H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery,
Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn. Each of Messrs. Hicks,
Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn serve on HACIs
board of directors. |
|
|
|
In connection with HACI s initial public offering, HACI
and the representative of the underwriters in HACI s
initial public offering entered into agreements with the Initial
Stockholders pursuant to which the Initial Stockholders agreed
to vote: |
|
|
|
all of their Founder Shares in accordance with the
majority of the votes cast with respect to an initial business
combination by the holders of Public Shares, or the HACI Public
Stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any Public Shares acquired in or after HACI s
initial public offering in favor of an initial business
combination; and
|
|
|
|
all shares of HACI Common Stock held by them in
favor of the amending HACIs charter to provide for its
perpetual existence.
|
|
|
|
The Initial Stockholders did not agree, however, to vote in
favor of an amendment to HACIs charter that would permit
HACI to complete a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business, as such
amendment was not contemplated at the time of HACI s
initial public offering. At the special meeting, the Initial
Stockholders intend to vote in favor of the Charter
Amendment-Existence Proposal and the Charter Amendment-Purpose
Proposal, which will include the amendment to HACIs
charter to permit HACIs perpetual existence and to permit
a business combination with an entity engaged in the energy
industry as its principal business. |
8
|
|
|
|
|
Approval of each of the Acquisition Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Proposals require the affirmative vote of a majority
of the issued and outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock
entitled to vote thereon as of the record date. As of the record
date of the special meeting of HACI stockholders, 13,800,000
Founder Shares, or 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of
HACI Common Stock, would be voted in accordance with the
majority of the votes cast by HACI Public Stockholders with
respect to the Acquisition Proposal and 20% of the issued and
outstanding HACI Common Stock would be voted in favor of the
Charter Amendment Proposals. If the Initial Stockholders or
HACIs officers and directors purchase Public Shares from
existing HACI Public Stockholders that are likely to vote
against the Acquisition Proposal or that are likely to elect to
exercise their conversion rights, the probability that the vote
to approve the Acquisition Proposal will succeed would increase. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I vote against the Acquisition Proposal? |
|
A: |
|
In accordance with the terms of HACIs charter, if you are
a HACI Public Stockholder, you have the right to vote against
the Acquisition Proposal and demand that HACI convert your
Public Shares into your pro rata share of the aggregate amount
on deposit in the trust account on the closing date of the
Acquisition (before payment of deferred underwriting commissions
and including interest earned on their pro rata portion of the
trust account, net of income taxes payable on such interest and
net of interest income of up to approximately $6.6 million
on the trust account, which interest income was previously
released to HACI to fund its working capital requirements).
These rights to demand conversion of Public Shares into cash are
sometimes referred to herein as conversion rights. |
|
|
|
If holders of 30% or more of the Public Shares vote against the
Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights, then HACI will not consummate the Acquisition and Public
Shares held by Public Stockholders exercising conversion rights
will not be converted into cash. If the Acquisition is not
consummated by September 28, 2009, or by October 5,
2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes effective, HACI will be
required to dissolve and liquidate. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I exercise my conversion rights? |
|
A: |
|
In order to exercise conversion rights, you must vote against
the Acquisition Proposal, demand that HACI convert the Public
Shares held by you into cash by marking the appropriate space on
the enclosed proxy card and providing physical or electronic
delivery of your stock certificates or shares, as appropriate,
prior to the special meeting of HACI stockholders. If you vote
against the Acquisition Proposal but fail to properly exercise
your conversion rights, you will not be entitled to have your
Public Shares converted to cash. Any request for conversion,
once made, may be withdrawn at any time up to the date of the
special meeting of HACI stockholders. The actual per share
conversion price will be equal to the aggregate amount on
deposit in HACIs trust account on the closing date of the
Acquisition (before payment of deferred underwriting discounts
and including interest earned on your pro rata portion of the
trust account, net of income taxes payable on such interest, and
net of interest income of up to $6.6 million previously
released to HACI to fund working capital requirements) divided
by the number of shares sold in HACIs initial public
offering. For illustrative purposes, based on funds in the trust
account of approximately $539 million on August 31,
2009, the estimated per share conversion price would have been
approximately $9.76. Please see the section entitled
Special Meeting of HACI Warrantholders and Special
Meeting in Lieu of 2009 Annual Meeting of HACI
Stockholders Conversion Rights for the
procedures to be followed if you wish to convert your Public
Shares into cash. |
|
Q |
|
Where will the Company Common Stock be listed for trading? |
|
A: |
|
The Company intends to apply for listing of the Company Common
Stock on the New York Stock Exchange. While the Company has been
in discussions with the New York Stock Exchange and believes
that it meets the eligibility requirements for listing on the
New York Stock Exchange, there can be no assurance that the New
York Stock Exchange will approve such listing. If the Company is
unable to satisfy the listing requirements of the New York Stock
Exchange, it will apply to have its stock listed on another
national securities exchange. If such listing is not approved,
the Company Common Stock will be traded in the over-the-counter
market. |
|
Q: |
|
Do I have appraisal rights if I object to the proposed
Acquisition? |
9
|
|
|
A: |
|
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, if the Company
Common Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange,
HACI stockholders will have appraisal rights in connection with
the Acquisition. If appraisal rights are available, holders of
shares of HACI Common Stock who do not vote in favor of the
Acquisition Proposal and who properly demand appraisal of their
shares will be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with
the Acquisition under Section 262 of the DGCL. Holders of
Public Shares electing to exercise conversion rights will not be
entitled to appraisal rights. For additional information, see
the section entitled Special Meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of 2009 Annual
Meeting of HACI Stockholders Appraisal
Rights. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens to the funds deposited in the trust account
after consummation of the Acquisition? |
|
A: |
|
If the Acquisition Proposal is approved, HACI intends to use the
funds held in the trust account to pay (i) HACIs
aggregate costs, fees and expenses in connection with the
consummation of the Acquisition Proposal, (ii) tax
obligations and deferred underwriting commissions,
(iii) HACI Public Stockholders who vote against the
Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights, (iv) HACI warrantholders in connection with the
Cash Exchange, and (v) for any repurchases by HACI of
Public Shares, if any, prior to the Acquisition. The remaining
balance in the trust account will be contributed to Aneth in
exchange for an estimated 74.0% membership in Aneth (subject to
adjustment for changes in the trust account balance contributed
to Aneth) in connection with the Acquisition. See the sections
entitled The Acquisition and The
Acquisition Agreement for additional information. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if the Acquisition is not consummated or is
terminated? |
|
A: |
|
There are certain circumstances under which HACI or Seller may
terminate the Acquisition Agreement. See the section entitled
The Acquisition Agreement
Termination for additional information regarding the
parties specific termination rights. In accordance with
HACIs charter, if the Acquisition is not consummated by
September 28, 2009, or October 5, 2009 if the Charter
Amendment becomes effective, its corporate existence will
automatically terminate and HACI will thereafter dissolve and
liquidate. In any liquidation of HACI, the funds deposited in
the trust account, plus any interest earned thereon, less
reserves for and claims requiring payment from the trust account
by creditors who have not waived their rights against the trust
account, if any, will be distributed pro rata to the HACI Public
Stockholders. |
|
|
|
HACI Public Warrantholders have no right to receive funds held
in the trust account with respect to the warrants they hold. If
the Acquisition is not consummated by September 28, 2009,
or by October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes
effective, HACI will be required to dissolve and liquidate and
the HACI warrants will expire worthless. |
|
|
|
The Initial Stockholders have waived any right to participate in
any liquidation distribution with respect to their Founder
Shares if HACI fails to consummate a business combination.
Thomas O. Hicks, HACIs founder and chairman of the board,
has agreed that he will be liable to HACI if and to the extent
any claims by a third party for services rendered or products
sold to HACI, or by a prospective target business, reduce the
amounts in the trust account available for distribution to HACI
stockholders in the event of a liquidation, except as to
(i) any claims by a third party who executed a waiver (even
if such waiver is subsequently found to be invalid and
unenforceable) of any and all rights to seek access to the funds
in the trust account, or (ii) any claims under HACIs
indemnity of the underwriters of HACIs initial public
offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Act. HACI cannot assure you that Mr. Hicks will be able to
satisfy those obligations. See the section entitled
HACIs Business Liquidation If No
Business Combination for additional information. |
|
Q: |
|
When is the Acquisition expected to be consummated? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
It is currently anticipated that the Acquisition will be
consummated promptly following the special meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders and the special meeting of HACI
stockholders to be held on September 24, 2009, provided
that all the requisite stockholder and warrantholder approvals
are obtained and other conditions to the consummation of the
Acquisition have been satisfied or waived. For a description of
the conditions for the completion of the Acquisition, see the
section entitled The Acquisition Agreement
Conditions to Closing. If the Acquisition is not
consummated by September 28, 2009, or by October 5,
2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes effective, HACI will be
forced to liquidate. See the section entitled
HACIs Business Liquidation if No
Business Combination. |
10
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the aspects of the Acquisition and the other matters
described or proposed in this proxy statement/prospectus which
are different from the matters described or proposed in the
prospectus used by HACI to sell HACI units in HACIs
initial public offering? |
|
A: |
|
There are several aspects of the Acquisition and the other
matters described or proposed in this proxy statement/prospectus
which are different from the matters described or proposed in
the prospectus used by HACI to sell HACI units in HACIs
initial public offering. Such differences include the fact that
HACI may seek to amend its charter prior to the consummation of
a business combination, that funds in the trust account might be
used, directly or indirectly, to purchase Public Shares other
than from holders who have voted against the Acquisition
Proposal and properly demanded that their Public Shares be
converted into cash, that HACI may consummate a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry or
that HACI may seek to amend the terms of the Warrant Agreement
and exchange its outstanding Public Warrants for cash financed
out of the trust account. Additionally, in connection with the
Acquisition, HACI terminated Mr. Hicks co-investment
commitment, which was entered into at the time of HACIs
initial public offering to show Mr. Hicks personal
support for a business combination, due to the concern expressed
by Citi Global Markets, Inc., a financial advisor to HACI in
connection with the Acquisition, that such co-investment
commitment would be viewed as dilutive to other security
holders. See the question and answer below and the sections
entitled The Acquisition Background of the
Acquisition and The Acquisition
Rescission and Damages Rights for more information. |
|
Q: |
|
Because the prospectus from HACIs initial public
offering did not disclose that HACI may seek to amend its
charter prior to the consummation of a business combination,
that funds in the trust account might be used, directly or
indirectly, to purchase the Public Shares, that HACI may
consummate a business combination with an entity engaged in the
energy industry as its principal business, that HACI may seek to
amend the Warrant Agreement and exchange a portion of the Public
Warrants for cash, what are my legal rights? |
|
A: |
|
You should be aware that because the prospectus from HACIs
initial public offering, or the IPO prospectus, did not disclose
that HACI may seek to amend HACIs charter prior to the
consummation of a business combination, that funds in the trust
account might be used, directly or indirectly, to purchase
Public Shares from holders who have indicated that they will
vote against the Acquisition Proposal and properly demanded that
their Public Shares be converted into cash (as HACI may
contemplate doing and which is discussed in further detail
below) or that HACI may consummate a business combination with
an entity engaged in the energy industry, that HACI may seek to
amend the terms of the Warrant Agreement and exchange a portion
of outstanding Public Warrants for cash financed out of the
trust account or that Mr. Hicks
co-investment
may terminate, each holder of HACI securities at the time of the
Acquisition who purchased HACI units in HACIs initial
public offering, or an IPO Purchaser, may have securities law
claims against HACI for rescission or damages. Rescission would
give a successful IPO Purchaser claimant the right to receive
the total amount paid for his or her securities pursuant to an
allegedly deficient prospectus, plus interest and less any
income earned on the securities, in exchange for surrender of
the securities. Damages would give a successful IPO Purchaser
claimant the right to loss on an investment caused by alleged
material misrepresentations or omissions in the sale of a
security. Such claims may entitle such IPO Purchasers asserting
them to up to $10.00 per HACI unit, based on the initial
offering price of the HACI units issued in HACIs initial
public offering, each comprised of one share of HACI Common
Stock and a HACI warrant exercisable for an additional share of
HACI Common Stock, or $10.00 per share less any amount received
by such IPO Purchasers from the sale of the original Public
Warrants purchased with such HACI units, plus interest from the
date of HACIs initial public offering (which, in the case
of holders of Public Shares who are also IPO Purchasers, may be
more than the pro rata share of the trust account to which they
are entitled if they exercise their conversion rights or
dissenters rights or if HACI liquidates). See the sections
entitled The Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal, The Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal, The Acquisition Actions That
May Be Taken to Secure Approval of HACI Stockholders, and
The Acquisition Rescission and Damages
Rights for additional information. |
11
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
You are urged to read carefully and consider the information
contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, including
Risk Factors and the annexes, and to consider
how the Acquisition will affect you as a stockholder or how the
Warrant Amendment will affect you as a warrantholder of HACI, as
the case may be. You should then vote as soon as possible in
accordance with the instructions provided in this proxy
statement/prospectus and on the enclosed proxy card or, if you
hold your shares or warrants through a brokerage firm, bank or
other nominee, on the voting instruction form provided by the
broker, bank or nominee. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If you were a holder of record of HACI Common Stock on
August 31, 2009, the record date for the special meeting of
HACI stockholders or a holder of record of Public Warrants on
September 8, 2009, the record date for the special meeting
of HACI Public Warrantholders, you may vote with respect to the
applicable proposals in person at the special meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders or the special meeting of HACI
stockholders, as the case may be, or by submitting a proxy by
mail prior to 10:00 A.M. Central Daylight time on
September 24, 2009 in the case of warrantholders and prior
to 10:30 A.M. Central Daylight time on September 24,
2009 in the case of stockholders, in accordance with the
instructions provided to you under Special Meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of 2009 Annual
Meeting of HACI Stockholders. If you hold your shares or
warrants in street name, which means your shares or
warrants are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee,
your broker or bank or other nominee may provide voting
instructions (including any telephone or Internet voting
instructions). HACI has confirmed that approximately 99% of the
street name holders will have access to telephone and Internet
voting and that such access will continue until
11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight time on the day before the
special meetings, after which time a street name holder must
contact his bank, broker or nominee to vote or change his vote.
You should contact your broker, bank or nominee in advance to
ensure that votes related to the shares or warrants, as the case
may be, you beneficially own will be properly counted. In this
regard, you must provide the record holder of your shares or
warrants with instructions on how to vote your shares or
warrants or, if you wish to attend the special meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders or the special meeting of HACI
stockholders and vote in person, obtain a proxy from your
broker, bank or nominee. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What will happen if I abstain from voting or fail to vote at
the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders or special
meeting of HACI stockholders? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
HACI will count a properly executed proxy marked
ABSTAIN with respect to a particular proposal as
present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present
at the special meeting of HACI stockholders. For purposes of
approval, an abstention or failure to vote on the Acquisition
Proposal will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST
the proposal but will preclude you from having your shares
converted into cash. In order to exercise your conversion
rights, you must cast a vote against the Acquisition, make an
election on the proxy card to convert such shares of common
stock or submit a request in writing to HACIs transfer
agent at the address listed on page 14, and deliver your
shares to HACIs transfer agent physically or
electronically through DTC prior to the special meeting of HACI
stockholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
An abstention from the Warrant Amendment Proposal presented to
HACI Public Warrantholders will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST this proposal. An abstention from voting on
the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal, the
Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal and the
Acquisition Proposal presented to the HACI stockholders will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST these
proposals. Abstentions will have no effect on the Director
Election Proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen if I sign and submit my proxy card without
indicating how I wish to vote? |
|
A: |
|
Executed and dated proxies received by HACI without an
indication of how the warrantholder or stockholder intends to
vote on a proposal will be voted in favor of each proposal
presented to the warrantholders or the stockholders, as the case
may be. |
|
|
|
Stockholders will not be entitled to exercise their conversion
rights if such stockholders submit proxy cards to HACI without
an indication of how they desire to vote with respect to the
Acquisition Proposal or, for |
12
|
|
|
|
|
stockholders holding their shares in street name, if
such stockholders fail to provide voting instructions to their
banks, brokers or other nominees. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am not going to attend the special meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders or the special meeting of HACI
stockholders in person, should I submit my proxy card
instead? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting of
HACI Public Warrantholders or the special meeting of HACI
stockholders, after carefully reading and considering the
information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, please
submit the executed stockholder and/or warrantholder proxy card
by mail or follow the voting instructions (including any
telephone or Internet voting instructions) provided by your
broker or bank if your shares are held in street
name, in each case in accordance with the instructions
provided under Special Meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, so your shares or warrants,
as the case may be, may be represented at the special meeting of
HACI Public Warrantholders or the special meeting of HACI
stockholders. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
If my shares or warrants are held in street name,
will my broker, bank or nominee automatically vote my shares for
me? |
|
A: |
|
No. Under the rules of various national and regional
securities exchanges, your broker, bank or nominee cannot vote
your shares or warrants with respect to non-discretionary
matters unless you provide instructions on how to vote in
accordance with the information and procedures provided to you
by your broker, bank or nominee. The election of directors is a
routine item so brokers who do not receive instructions as to
how to vote on the Director Election Proposal may generally vote
on this matter. HACI believes the other proposals presented to
the stockholders and to the warrantholders will be considered
non-discretionary and therefore your broker, bank or nominee
cannot vote your shares or warrants without your instruction. If
you do not provide instructions with your proxy, your bank,
broker or other nominee may submit a proxy card expressly
indicating that it is NOT voting your shares; this indication
that a bank, broker or nominee is not voting your shares is
referred to as a broker non-vote. Broker non-votes
will be counted for the purpose of determining the existence of
a quorum at the special meeting of HACI stockholders, but will
not count for purposes of determining the number of votes cast
at the special meeting of HACI stockholders or the special
meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders. Your bank, broker or
other nominee can vote your shares or warrants only if you
provide instructions on how to vote. You should instruct your
broker to vote your HACI shares or warrants in accordance with
directions you provide. |
|
Q: |
|
May I change my vote after I have submitted my executed
proxy card? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may change your vote by submitting a later-dated,
executed proxy card by mail or follow the voting instructions
(including any telephone or Internet voting instructions)
provided by your broker or bank if your shares are held in
street name, in each case in accordance with the
instructions provided under Special Meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders prior to the special meeting
of HACI stockholders or the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders or attend the special meeting of HACI
stockholders or the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders in person and vote. Street name holders with
access to telephone and Internet voting may change their vote
until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight time on the day
before the special meetings, after which time a street name
holder must contact his bank, broker or nominee to change his
vote. You also may revoke your proxy by sending a notice of
revocation to HACIs secretary, which must be received by
HACIs secretary prior to the special meeting of HACI
stockholders or the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting
materials? |
|
A: |
|
You may receive more than one set of voting materials,
including multiple copies of this proxy statement/prospectus and
multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example,
if you hold your shares or warrants in more than one brokerage
account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for
each brokerage account in which you hold shares or warrants. If
you are a holder of record and your shares or warrants are
registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one
proxy card. Please submit each proxy card executed, and voting
instruction card that you receive in order to cast your vote
with respect to all of your HACI shares and warrants. |
13
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How can I obtain additional copies of the proxy
statement/prospectus or the enclosed proxy card? |
|
A: |
|
If you need additional copies of the proxy statement/prospectus
or the enclosed proxy card you should contact: |
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., secretary
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75201
Tel:
(214) 615-2300 |
|
|
|
|
|
To obtain timely delivery, HACI stockholders and warrantholders
must request the materials no later than September 16, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
You may also obtain additional information about HACI from
documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, by
following the instructions in the section entitled
Where You Can Find Additional Information. |
|
|
|
If you intend to vote against the Acquisition Proposal and seek
conversion of your Public Shares, you will need to deliver your
shares (either physically or electronically) to HACIs
transfer agent prior to the meeting, as further described in
this proxy statement/prospectus. If you have questions regarding
the certification of your position or delivery of your shares,
please contact: |
|
|
|
Mr. Mark Zimkind
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
17 Battery Place
New York, New York 10004
Tel:
(212) 845-3287
Fax:
(212) 616-7616 |
|
Q: |
|
How will the solicitation of proxies be handled? |
|
A: |
|
HACI expects to solicit proxies primarily by mail. HACI has
retained Morrow & Co., LLC, or Morrow, for an initial
fee of $12,500 plus out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the
solicitation of proxies. HACI will pay Morrow an additional fee
of $30,000 upon successful completion of the Acquisition.
Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by
telephone, email and other electronic means, advertisements and
personal solicitations by the directors, officers and employees
of HACI. No additional compensation will be paid to HACIs
directors, officers or employees for their solicitation efforts. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can answer my questions? |
|
A: |
|
If you have any questions about the Acquisition, the Charter
Amendment or the Warrant Amendment or how to submit your proxy,
or if you need additional copies of this proxy
statement/prospectus, the enclosed proxy card or voting
instructions, you should contact HACIs third party
solicitor, which is assisting HACI in the solicitation of
proxies, at: |
|
|
|
Morrow & Co., LLC
470 West Avenue, Stamford, Connecticut 06902
Telephone:
(800) 662-5200 |
14
SUMMARY
OF THE PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
This summary highlights selected information from this proxy
statement/prospectus and may not contain all of the information
that is important to you. To better understand the Acquisition,
you should read this entire proxy statement/prospectus
carefully, including Risk Factors and the annexes.
See also the section entitled Where You Can Find
Additional Information.
Unless the context otherwise requires, a reference in this proxy
statement/prospectus to HACI means Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc., a reference to the Company
means Resolute Energy Corporation, a reference to
Parent means Resolute Holdings, LLC, a reference to
Seller means Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC, a reference
to Merger Sub means Resolute Subsidiary Corporation,
a reference to Aneth means Resolute Aneth, LLC, a
reference to the Acquired Entities means the
operating subsidiaries of Seller, and a reference to
Resolute, to the extent the context refers to
matters prior to the consummation of the Acquisition, means
Parent, Seller, the Company and the Acquired Entities and, to
the extent the context refers to matters following the
consummation of the Acquisition, means the Company, HACI and the
Acquired Entities.
This proxy statement/prospectus is:
|
|
|
|
|
a proxy statement of HACI for use in the solicitation of proxies
for the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and the
special meeting of HACI stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
a prospectus of the Company relating to (i) the issuance of
shares of the common stock of the Company, par value
$0.0001 per share, or Company Common Stock, and warrants of
the Company, or the Company warrants, each of which is
exercisable for one share of Company Common Stock, to holders of
HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants, (ii) the issuance of
shares of Company Common Stock and the Company warrants in
connection with the Acquisition and (iii) the issuance of shares
of Company Common Stock upon exercise of the Company warrants.
|
The
Warrant Amendment Proposal
HACI proposes an amendment, or the Warrant Amendment, to the
warrant agreement governing all of the HACI warrants, or the
Warrant Agreement, to provide that HACI Public Warrantholders
may elect to receive in the Acquisition for each outstanding
HACI warrant that was issued in HACIs initial public
offering, or the Public Warrants, either (i) the right to
receive $0.55 in cash, or the Cash Amount, or (ii) the
right to receive one Company warrant with an exercise price of
$13.00 per share, expiring five years from the closing of
the Acquisition, subject to adjustment and proration as
described in this proxy statement/prospectus. If the Warrant
Amendment is adopted and the Acquisition is consummated, any
warrantholder who votes against the approval of the Warrant
Amendment Proposal or who makes no election will receive $0.55
in cash in exchange for its Public Warrants. We refer to the
elections by HACI Public Warrantholders to receive the Company
warrants as the Warrant Election. We also refer to the exchange
of Public Warrants for the Cash Amount as the Cash Exchange and
the exchange of Public Warrants for the Company warrants as the
Warrant Exchange.
The form of Warrant Amendment is attached as Annex C to
this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated into this
proxy statement/prospectus by reference. You are encouraged to
read the Warrant Amendment in its entirety. See the section
entitled The Warrant Amendment Proposal for
additional information.
If the Warrant Amendment Proposal is not approved at the special
meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders, the Acquisition Proposal
will not be presented to HACI stockholders for a vote. If the
Acquisition is not consummated by September 28, 2009, or by
October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes effective,
HACI will be required to liquidate and all HACI warrants will
expire worthless.
The
Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal
If, based on the tabulated vote, there are not sufficient votes
at the time of the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders
to approve the Warrant Amendment Proposal, the Warrantholder
Adjournment Proposal
15
allows HACIs board of directors to adjourn the special
meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders to a later date or dates,
if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies
to approve the Warrant Amendment Proposal. See the section
entitled The Warrantholder Adjournment
Proposal for additional information.
The
Director Election Proposal
HACIs board of directors is divided into three classes,
being divided as equally as possible with each class having a
term of three years. Because HACI did not have a 2008 annual
stockholder meeting, the term of Class I and Class II
directors, currently consisting of four directors total, has
expired. HACIs independent directors have nominated Joseph
B. Armes and William A. Montgomery for re-election as
Class I directors, and Brian Mulroney and William H.
Cunningham for re-election as Class II directors. The four
director nominees, if elected, will serve on HACIs board
of directors until the consummation of the Acquisition or, if
the Acquisition Proposal is not approved, until HACIs
dissolution. See the section entitled The Director
Election Proposal for additional information about the
election of directors.
The
Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal
HACIs amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
which we refer to as HACIs charter, provides that
HACIs corporate existence will terminate on
September 28, 2009. Accordingly, HACI is seeking approval
of its stockholders of an amendment to its charter to provide
for its perpetual existence, and to postpone the dissolution
date from September 28, 2009 to October 5, 2009 in
order to allow time to close the Acquisition. If the requisite
HACI stockholder approval is received for this proposal, which
we refer to as the Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal, and the
requisite HACI stockholder approval is received for Charter
Amendment-Purpose Proposal, then an amendment to its Charter
which we refer to as the Charter Amendment, will be filed with
the Delaware Secretary of State immediately after approval of
both Charter Amendment Proposals and the Acquisition Proposal.
See the section entitled The Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal for
additional information about this proposal. If the Charter
Amendment-Existence Proposal is not approved at the special
meeting of HACI stockholders, the Acquisition Proposal will not
be presented to the HACI stockholders for a vote.
The Charter Amendment, which embodies the amendments to be
approved pursuant to the Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal
and Charter Amendment-Purpose Proposal, is attached as
Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and is
incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference.
You are encouraged to read the Charter Amendment in its entirety.
The
Charter Amendment-Purpose Proposal
Pursuant to HACIs charter, HACI is prohibited from
consummating a business combination with an entity engaged in
the energy industry as its principal business. Resolute is an
independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploitation and
development of petroleum properties, and is therefore engaged in
the energy business as its principal business. Accordingly, HACI
is seeking approval of its stockholders of an amendment to its
charter to permit a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business. If the
requisite HACI stockholder approval is received for this
proposal, which we refer to as the Charter Amendment-Purpose
Proposal, and the requisite HACI stockholder approval is
received for Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal, then the
Charter Amendment will be filed with the Delaware Secretary of
State immediately after approval of both Charter Amendment
Proposals and the Acquisition Proposal. See the section entitled
The Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal for additional information about this
proposal. If the Charter Amendment-Purpose Proposal is not
approved at the special meeting of HACI stockholders, the
Acquisition Proposal will not be presented to the HACI
stockholders for a vote.
The Charter Amendment, which embodies the amendments to be
approved pursuant to the Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal
and Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal, is attached
as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and is
incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference.
You are encouraged to read the Charter Amendment in its entirety.
16
The
Acquisition Proposal
The
Companies
HACI
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., or HACI, is a blank
check company that was organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware on February 26, 2007. HACI was formed to acquire
through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition,
stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination,
one or more businesses or assets. In accordance with HACIs
charter, if HACI is unable to consummate the Acquisition by
September 28, 2009, or by October 5, 2009 if the
Charter Amendment becomes effective, its corporate existence
will automatically terminate and it will dissolve and liquidate
and promptly distribute to its stockholders holding Public
Shares the amount in its trust account plus any remaining
non-trust account funds after payment of its liabilities. In the
event of its liquidation, the HACI warrants will expire
worthless.
The HACI units, common stock and warrants are currently listed
on the NYSE Amex under the symbols TOH.U, TOH and TOH.WS,
respectively. Following the consummation of the Acquisition, the
HACI units, common stock and warrants will cease trading on the
NYSE Amex and HACI will file a Form 15 with the SEC to
suspend its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
The mailing address of HACIs principal executive office is
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201 and its
telephone number is
(214) 615-2300.
The Company
Resolute Energy Corporation, or the Company, a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on
July 28, 2009, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Seller. The
Company was formed by Seller to consummate the Acquisition.
Following the Acquisition, the holders of HACI Common Stock,
together with the Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P., an entity in which
approximately 80% of the partnership interests attributable to
the Founder Shares and Founder Warrants and 100% of the
partnership interests attributable to the Sponsor Warrants are
owned by Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks, his charitable
foundation and estate planning entities for his family), William
H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William
F. Quinn, will own approximately 82% of the outstanding Company
Common Stock (excluding Company Earnout Shares) and Seller will
own approximately 18% of the outstanding Company Common Stock
(excluding Company Earnout Shares), assuming (i) 30% of the
Public Shares vote against the proposal and properly exercise
their conversion rights and (ii) no HACI Public Shares are
purchased by HACI prior to the Acquisition.
The Company expects to apply to have its common stock and
warrants listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE,
under the symbols REN and REN WS,
respectively. If the Company is unable to satisfy the listing
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, it will apply to
have its stock listed on another stock exchange and if such
listing application is not granted, the Company Common Stock
will be traded in the over-the-counter market.
The mailing address of the Companys principal executive
office is 1675 Broadway Street, Suite 1950, Denver, Colorado
80202 and its telephone number is (303) 534-4600.
Merger Sub
Resolute Subsidiary Corporation, or Merger Sub, a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on
July 28, 2009, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Merger Sub was formed by Seller to consummate the Acquisition.
In connection with the Acquisition, Merger Sub will merge with
and into HACI and Merger Sub will cease to exist.
The mailing address of Merger Subs principal executive
office is 1675 Broadway Street, Suite 1950, Denver, Colorado
80202 and its telephone number is (303) 534-4600.
17
Seller
Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC, or Seller, is a limited liability
company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on
February 7, 2006.
The mailing address of Sellers principal executive office
is 1675 Broadway Street, Denver, Suite 1950, Colorado 80202 and
its telephone number is (303) 534-4600.
The
Acquisition
HACI and Seller have agreed to combine their businesses pursuant
to the Acquisition Agreement, subject to the requisite
stockholder and warrantholder approvals and other conditions. As
a result of the Acquisition, through a series of transactions,
the holders of HACI Common Stock, including the Sponsor, William
H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William
F. Quinn, who previously received HACI Common Stock and HACI
warrants, which we refer to as the Founder Shares and the
Founder Warrants, respectively, as part of the HACI units issued
prior to HACIs initial public offering, or the Founder
Units, and who, together with the Sponsor, we refer to as the
Initial Stockholders, will own approximately 81.3% of the
outstanding Company Common Stock (including Company Earnout
Shares) and Seller will own approximately 18.7% of the
outstanding Company Common Stock (including Company Earnout
Shares). HACI will transfer funds remaining in the trust account
(an estimated $346 million) to Aneth and will receive in
exchange an estimated 74.0% membership interest in Aneth
(subject to adjustment based on the amount actually transferred
to Aneth). Seller will then contribute its direct and indirect
ownership interests in the Acquired Entities to the Company and
Merger Sub will merge with and into HACI, with HACI surviving
the merger and continuing as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Seller, which we refer to as the Merger. As required by the
Acquisition Agreement, all of the consideration paid by HACI to
Aneth will be used to repay part of the Companys
outstanding indebtedness on its First Lien Credit Facility and
all of its outstanding indebtedness on its Second Lien Credit
Facility. The Acquisition Agreement is attached as Annex A
to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by
reference. HACI and the Company encourage you to read the
Acquisition Agreement in its entirety.
Acquisition
Consideration
In exchange for the contribution of the Acquired Entities and as
a result of the other transactions contemplated by the
Acquisition Agreement, Seller will own
(i) 9,200,000 shares of Company Common Stock,
(ii) 4,600,000 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at
a price of $13.00 per share subject to a trigger price of $13.75
per share to be exceeded within five years, or Company Founders
Warrants, (iii) 2,333,333 warrants to purchase Company
Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share, or Company Sponsors
Warrants, and (iv) 1,385,000 shares of Company Common
Stock subject to forfeiture in the event a trigger price of
$15.00 is not exceeded within five years following the closing
of the Acquisition, or Company Earnout Shares.
In connection with the Acquisition, 7,335,000 Founder Shares and
4,600,000 Founder Warrants held by the Initial Stockholders will
be cancelled and forfeited and an additional 1,865,000 Founder
Shares will be converted into 1,865,000 Company Earnout Shares.
As a result of the consummation of the Acquisition, the Sponsor,
together with the other Initial Stockholders, will own
(i) 4,600,000 shares of Company Common Stock,
(ii) 9,200,000 Company Founders Warrants,
(iii) 4,666,667 Company Sponsors Warrants, and
(iv) 1,865,000 Company Earnout Shares.
At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of
HACI Common Stock (other than shares held by HACI stockholders
who do not vote in favor of the adoption of the Acquisition
Agreement and properly exercise their conversion rights) will be
converted into the right to receive one share of Company Common
Stock.
At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding Public
Warrant will be converted into either (i) the right to
receive $0.55 in cash, or the Cash Amount, or (ii) the
right to receive one Company warrant, subject to adjustment and
proration as described in this proxy statement/prospectus.
18
Conditions
to Completion of the Acquisition
A number of conditions must be satisfied, any and all of which
may be waived in writing by the parties, before the proposed
Acquisition can be consummated. These include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval by HACI stockholders of the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal and the Acquisition
Proposal and the approval by HACI Public Warrantholders of the
Warrant Amendment Proposal;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any law, injunction, restraining order or decree
of any nature that restrains or prohibits the consummation of
the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting periods
specified under the Hart-Scott Rodino Act with respect to the
Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the performance and compliance by each party, in all material
respects, of all applicable obligations, covenants and
conditions in the Acquisition Agreement;
|
|
|
|
subject to certain materiality exceptions, the accuracy of
HACIs, Parents and Sellers respective
representations and warranties in the Acquisition Agreement;
|
|
|
|
subject to exceptions for defaults that have been waived, are
subject to forbearance agreements, are subject to a standstill
covenant or otherwise do not permit any action on the collateral
securing the indebtedness, the absence of defaults with respect
to any payment obligation or financial covenant under any
material indebtedness of the Company or the Acquired Entities;
|
|
|
|
the amount to be paid by HACI to Aneth in connection with
HACIs acquisition of Aneth membership interests is at
least $275 million;
|
|
|
|
Sellers implementation of hedging arrangements resulting
in an average fixed price on its crude oil swaps in 2010 on
3,650 barrels of crude oil per day of at least $67.00 per
barrel;
|
|
|
|
none of Sellers new or amended crude oil marketing
arrangements is expected to have a material adverse effect on
the Company and the Acquired Entities at the time of the
Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
HACIs receipt of a legal opinion from counsel to the
Company regarding the existence of (i) no conflicts,
defaults, or violations under applicable laws of the Navajo
Nation and (ii) no conflicts, defaults or violations under
any of the Companys material contracts pursuant to which
the Navajo Nation or a subdivision or affiliate thereof is a
party or third beneficiary, in each case, as a result of the
transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement; and
|
|
|
|
Sellers receipt of a legal opinion from counsel to HACI
regarding the effectiveness of the Charter Amendment and no
conflicts with the equity purchase agreement between HACI and
GPC Capital Corp. II.
|
As of September 11, 2009, the following closing conditions
have been satisfied: (i) the expiration of the waiting
period under the Hart-Scott Rodino Act (which was inapplicable
to the Acquisition) and (ii) Sellers receipt of the
legal opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Charter
Amendment. All other closing conditions have not been satisfied
as of September 11, 2009. Defaults under the material
indebtedness of the Company or the Acquired Entities through
September 11, 2009 have been waived or are subject to
standstill covenants, and therefore, are excepted from the
closing condition related to defaults under material
indebtedness. See the section entitled Risk
Factors for additional information.
While HACI may not currently be able to determine whether the
waiver of any particular condition would be sufficiently
material to warrant supplemental disclosure to stockholders and
warrantholders, waiver of any of the following conditions may be
deemed sufficiently material to require supplemental disclosure:
(i) the absence of any applicable approvals, laws,
injunctions, order or decrees restraining or prohibiting the
consummation of the Acquisition, (ii) the absence of
defaults with respect to any payment obligation or financial
covenant under any material indebtedness of the Company or the
Acquired Entities (unless covered by standstill or forbearance
agreements), (iii) new or amended crude oil marketing
arrangements not reasonably being expected to have a material
adverse effect on the Company and the Acquired Entities,
(iv) depending on the degree of variance and other factors
in existence at the time, the amount being paid by HACI to Aneth
being less than $275 million or (v) depending on the
degree of variance and other factors in
19
existence at the time, the failure of Seller to comply with
required hedging arrangements. Such supplemental disclosure
would be provided via means of a press release issued by HACI,
the filing of related disclosure on Form 8-K, and a
supplement to this proxy statement/prospectus. Any supplemental
disclosure would state in bold face prominent text that
warrantholders and stockholders would be able to revoke any
votes that had been cast by them up to the time of the meeting
and would contain equally prominent notice that any such votes
may be revoked by following telephone and/or Internet voting
procedures provided by banks or brokers prior to 11:59 P.M.
Eastern Daylight time on the day before the special meetings.
Such supplemental disclosure would be issued at a minimum of two
business days prior to any vote on the matters addressed in this
proxy statement/prospectus (other than votes on adjournment
proposals), although it would be unlikely that any such
supplement to this proxy statement/prospectus would be received
by the stockholders and warrantholders prior to such vote if it
was mailed only two business days prior to the relevant vote.
In the event that there was a waiver of any particular condition
that would be sufficiently material to warrant supplemental
disclosure within two business days of the relevant vote (i.e.,
on or after 11:59 P.M. Eastern daylight time September 21,
2009), supplemental disclosure would be issued but HACI would
adjourn the meeting until the second business day following the
supplemental disclosure; provided that in no event would the
special meeting of warrantholders and special meeting of
stockholders be adjourned to a date past September 28, 2009.
Specifically, with respect to the condition to implement certain
hedging arrangements, Resolute has held initial discussions with
two financial institutions regarding possible alternatives for
achieving this condition to closing, however, as of
September 11, 2009, Resolute has not decided on any one or
more alternatives or made any commitments and therefore such
condition has not been satisfied as of such date.
Termination
of the Acquisition Agreement
The Acquisition Agreement may be terminated and the Acquisition
may be abandoned at any time prior to the closing of the
Acquisition by mutual written consent of HACI and Seller. Either
HACI or Seller (except as otherwise indicated) will also have
the right to terminate the Acquisition Agreement upon the
occurrence of any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a law, injunction, restraining order or decree is issued that
prohibits the consummation of the Acquisition or is not resolved
in HACIs favor prior to September 29, 2009, provided
that the party seeking to terminate the Acquisition Agreement
must have used its reasonable best efforts to have such law,
injunction, order or decree vacated or denied;
|
|
|
|
failure to obtain the requisite approval of the Acquisition by
HACI stockholders or the requisite approval of the Warrant
Amendment by HACI Public Warrantholders;
|
|
|
|
failure to consummate the Acquisition by October 6, 2009;
provided however, that the Buyer Stockholder Approval shall have
been obtained and the Charter Amendment shall have become
effective prior to September 28, 2009 and provided further
that the right to terminate the Acquisition Agreement is not
available to any party whose failure or inability to fulfill any
obligation under the Acquisition Agreement has been the cause
of, or resulted in, the failure of the closing of the
Acquisition to occur on or before such date;
|
|
|
|
by Seller, upon written notice to HACI, upon a material breach
of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the
part of HACI such that, if occurring or continuing on the
closing date, certain closing conditions would not be satisfied
(subject to cure provisions); or
|
|
|
|
by HACI, upon written notice to Seller, upon a material breach
of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the
part of Parent, Aneth or Seller such that, if occurring or
continuing on the closing date, certain closing conditions would
not be satisfied (subject to cure provisions).
|
If the Acquisition Agreement is terminated, HACI or Seller will
be entitled to reimbursement of expenses up to $1 million
in certain circumstances.
20
No-Solicitation
of Alternative Transaction
Under the Acquisition Agreement, Parent, Seller, the Company,
Merger Sub, Aneth and the Acquired Entities are prohibited from
soliciting any other transaction concerning any sale of a
significant portion of the assets of the Acquired Entities or
merger or sale of their respective equity interests in the
Acquired Entities, any recapitalization of Seller or the
Acquired Entities or similar transaction with respect to Seller
or the Acquired Entities or their respective businesses.
Similarly, HACI is prohibited from soliciting any initial
business combination.
Reasons
for the Acquisition
In recommending the approval of the Acquisition Proposal by HACI
stockholders, HACIs board of directors (i) concluded
that the Acquisition and the consideration to be paid in the
Acquisition is fair to and in the best interests of HACI and its
stockholders (despite potential conflicts of interests of
certain of HACIs directors and officers),
(ii) evaluated Resolutes business and financial
condition and prospects based on managements due diligence
review, (iii) considered various industry and financial
data, including certain financial analyses and metrics compiled
by HACIs management and financial advisors in evaluating
the consideration to be paid by HACI in the Acquisition and
(iv) considered a wide variety of factors in connection
with its evaluation of the Acquisition. See the sections
entitled The Acquisition HACIs Board
of Directors Reasons for the Approval of
Acquisition and Risk Factors for
additional information.
Potential
Conflicts of Interests of HACIs Directors and Officers in
the Acquisition
When you consider the recommendation of HACIs board of
directors in favor of approval of the Acquisition Proposal, you
should keep in mind that certain of HACIs directors and
officers have interests in the Acquisition that are different
from, or in addition to, your interests as a stockholder.
|
|
|
|
|
If HACI does not complete the Acquisition by September 28,
2009, or October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment become
effective, HACI will be required to commence proceedings to
dissolve and liquidate. In such event, the 13,800,000 Founder
Units (each consisting of a Founder Share and Founder Warrant)
held by the Initial Stockholders, including HACIs
independent directors, and 7,000,000 HACI warrants that were
acquired by the Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P., an entity in which
approximately 80% of the partnership interests attributable to
the Founder Shares and Founder Warrants and 100% of the
partnership interests attributable to the Sponsor Warrants are
owned by Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks, his charitable
foundation and estate planning entities for his family)
simultaneously with the consummation of the IPO, or the Sponsor
Warrants, will be worthless because such holders have waived any
rights to receive any liquidation proceeds with respect to these
securities. Each of directors William H. Cunningham,
William A. Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William F.
Quinn held 69,000 Founder Shares and 69,000 Founder Warrants
with an aggregate market value (without taking into account any
discount due to the restricted nature of such securities) of
$2,851,080 (or $712,770 individually by each director), based on
the closing sale prices of $9.74 and $0.59, respectively, on the
NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009. Mr. Hicks, together
with his charitable foundation and estate planning entities for
his family, holds through the Sponsor an economic interest in
(i) approximately 10,819,200 Founder Shares and 10,819,200
Founder Warrants (based on an approximate 80% ownership of the
partnership interests of the Sponsor that are attributable to
the Founder Shares and Founder Warrants) and (ii) 7,000,000
Sponsor Warrants (based on a 100% interest of the partnership
interests attributable to the Sponsor Warrants).
|
After giving effect to the forfeiture of Founder Shares and
Founder Warrants and the transfer to Seller of Sponsor Warrants,
the indirect ownership of (i) Mr. Hicks, his
charitable foundation and family estate planning entities,
through the Sponsor, would be 5,068,560 Founders Shares
(including 1,462,160 Founder Shares that would be converted to
Company Earnout Shares), 7,212,800 Founder Warrants and
4,666,667 Sponsor Warrants and (ii) various employees of
Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers, through the Sponsor,
would be 1,267,140 Founder Shares (including 365,540 Founder
Shares that would be converted to Company Earnout Shares) and
1,803,200 Founder Warrants.
21
|
|
|
|
|
The 13,800,000 Founder Units and the 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants
were purchased for consideration of $25,000 and
$7.0 million, respectively. HACIs independent
directors hold an aggregate of 276,000 Founder Units and the
Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.), an entity in which HACI officers and
HACIs Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks hold a
financial interest, holds 13,524,000 Founder Units, as well as
the 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants. HH-HACI, L.P. transferred a
total of 276,000 Founder Units to Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery
and Quinn for no cash consideration. In light of the amount of
consideration paid, HACIs directors and officers will
likely benefit from the completion of the Acquisition even if
the Acquisition causes the market price of HACIs
securities to significantly decrease. Even though 7,335,000
Founder Units and 4,600,000 Founder Warrants will be cancelled
and 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants will be sold to Seller in
connection with the Acquisition, the likely benefit to
HACIs directors and officers may influence their
motivation for promoting the Acquisition
and/or
soliciting proxies for the approval of the Acquisition Proposal.
For instance, in the event the Acquisition is not consummated,
(i) the Founder Units held by each of
Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn, as well
as those Founder Units held by Mr. Hicks through his
interest in the Sponsor, will be worth nothing because each of
the directors and Sponsor have waived any right to receive a
liquidation distribution with respect to the Founder Shares in
the event HACI does not complete an initial business combination
and (ii) all HACI warrants held by Initial Stockholders,
including the Founder Warrants and Sponsor Warrants, will expire
worthless. On the other hand, in the event the Acquisition is
consummated, Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and
Quinn would hold shares of Company Common Stock and Company
warrants with an aggregate market value of $1,367,942 (or
$341,986 individually by each director), based on the closing
sales price of HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of $9.74 and
$0.59, respectively, on the NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009
(without applying a discount for Founder Shares that would be
converted into Company Earnout Shares).
|
Additionally, Mr. Hicks, his charitable foundation and
family estate planning entities, through the Sponsor, would have
an economic interest in shares of Company Common Stock and
Company warrants with an aggregate value of $56,376,660 if the
Acquisition is consummated, based on the closing sales price of
HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of $9.74 and $0.59,
respectively, on the NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009
(without applying a discount for Founder Shares that would be
converted into Company Earnout Shares). Various employees of
Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers, through the Sponsor,
would have an economic interest in shares of Company Common
Stock and Company warrants with an aggregate value of
$13,405,832 if the Acquisition is consummated, based on the
closing sales price of HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of
$9.74 and $0.59, respectively, on the NYSE Amex on
September 10, 2009 (without applying a discount for Founder
Shares that would be converted into Company Earnout Shares).
Therefore, based on the $25,000 and $7.0 million purchase
price paid by the Sponsor for the Founder Units and the Sponsor
Warrants, respectively, if the Acquisition is consummated:
|
|
|
|
|
each of Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn
would stand to gain approximately $341,986;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hicks, together with his charitable foundation and
family estate planning entities, through the Sponsor, would
stand to gain approximately $51,023,327 if the Acquisition is
consummated (after giving to effect of $1,666,667 for the
Sponsor Warrants that would be transferred to the
Seller); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various employees of Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers,
would stand to gain approximately $13,400,832.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the IPO, HACI and the representative of the
underwriters in the IPO entered into agreements with the Initial
Stockholders pursuant to which the Initial Stockholders have
agreed to vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of
the votes cast with respect to an initial business combination
by the Public Stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any Public Shares acquired in or after the IPO in favor of an
initial business combination; and
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
all shares of HACI Common Stock held by them in favor of
amending HACIs charter to provide for its perpetual
existence.
|
The Initial Stockholders did not agree, however, to vote in
favor of an amendment to HACIs charter that would permit
HACI to complete a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business, as such
amendment was not contemplated at the time of HACIs IPO.
At the special meeting, the Initial Stockholders intend to vote
in favor of the Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal, and the
Charter Amendment-Purpose Proposal which will include the
amendment to HACIs charter to permit HACIs perpetual
existence and to permit a business combination with an entity
engaged in the energy industry as its principal business.
Approval of each of the Acquisition Proposal and the Charter
Amendment-Existence Proposal and the Charter Amendment-Purpose
Proposal require the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding HACI Common Stock as of the record date. As of the
record date of the special meeting of HACI stockholders,
13,800,000 Founder Shares, or 20% of the outstanding HACI Common
Stock, would be voted in accordance with the majority of the
votes cast by HACI Public Stockholders with respect to the
Acquisition Proposal and 20% of the outstanding HACI Common
Stock would be voted in favor of the Charter Amendment-Existence
Proposal and the Charter Amendment-Purpose Proposal. If the
Initial Stockholders or HACIs officers and directors
purchase Public Shares from existing HACI stockholders that are
likely to vote against the Acquisition Proposal, or that are
likely to elect to convert their Public Shares, the probability
that the Acquisition Proposal will be approved would increase.
|
|
|
|
|
After the completion of the Acquisition, William H.
Cunningham, Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., and Robert M. Swartz
will become members of the board of directors of the Company. As
such, in the future each may receive cash compensation, board
fees, stock options or stock awards if the Companys board
of directors so determines.
|
|
|
|
Although he recused himself from meetings of HACIs board
of directors related to the Acquisition, William F. Quinn is the
father of William J. Quinn, who is employed by Natural Gas
Partners, one of Resolutes principal equity holders, and
who is also expected to serve on the Companys board of
directors after the Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At any time prior to the special meeting of HACI stockholders,
during a period when they are not then aware of any material
nonpublic information regarding HACI or its securities, or the
Company or its securities, HACI, the Initial Stockholders or
HACIs directors and officers,
and/or their
respective affiliates may negotiate arrangements to provide for
the purchase of Public Shares from institutional and other
investors, or execute agreements to purchase such shares from
them in the future, or they may enter into transactions with
such persons and others to provide them with incentives to
acquire shares of Public Shares or vote their shares in favor of
the Acquisition Proposal. See section entitled The
Acquisition Actions That May Be Taken to Secure
Approval of HACI Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If HACI dissolves and liquidates prior to the consummation of a
business combination, Mr. Hicks has agreed that he will be
liable to HACI if and to the extent any claims by a third party
for services rendered or products sold to HACI, or by a
prospective target business, reduce the amounts in the trust
account available for distribution to HACI stockholders in the
event of a liquidation, except as to (x) any claims by a
third party who executed a waiver (even if such waiver is
subsequently found to be invalid and unenforceable) of any and
all rights to seek access to the funds in the trust account, or
(y) any claims under HACIs indemnity of the
underwriters of the IPO against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. This agreement was entered into to reduce the
risk that, in the event of HACIs dissolution and
liquidation, the trust account is reduced by claims of
creditors. However, HACI cannot assure its stockholders that
Mr. Hicks will be able to satisfy these indemnification
obligations. If the Acquisition is completed, such obligations
will terminate.
|
23
In addition, the exercise of HACIs directors and
officers discretion in agreeing to changes or waivers in
the terms of the Acquisition may result in a conflict of
interest when determining whether such changes or waivers are
appropriate and in HACI Public Stockholders best interest.
Certain
Other Interests in the Acquisition
In addition to the interests of HACIs directors and
officers in the Acquisition, certain individuals promoting the
Acquisition
and/or
soliciting proxies on behalf of HACI have interests in the
Acquisition that are different from, or in addition to, the
interests of HACI stockholders and HACI Public Warrantholders.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., or Citi, the lead managing
underwriter in the IPO, is assisting HACIs directors and
officers in connection with these efforts. In connection with
the IPO, the underwriters agreed to defer fees equal to 1.0% of
the gross proceeds from the sale of HACI units to the HACI
Public Stockholders, or approximately $17.4 million
(subsequently amended on August 2, 2009 to
$5.5 million), until the consummation of HACIs
initial business combination. The underwriters agreed to reduce
their deferred fees from $17.4 million to $5.5 million
to provide HACI with additional capital to facilitate its
ability to enter into and consummate the transactions
contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement. Resolute also
required that the underwriters reduce their deferred fees as a
condition to entering into the Acquisition Agreement. HACI will
not pay the underwriters additional fees in connection with
their efforts with respect to the IPO. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Citi would be paid an additional $2.0 million
fee upon consummation of the Acquisition in connection with
services performed as a financial and capital markets advisor
for HACI with respect to the Acquisition.
In addition, HACI has engaged Raymond James &
Associates, Inc., FBR Capital Markets & Co., Capital
One Southcoast, Inc. and Scarsdale Equities llc, and Resolute
has engaged Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., UBS Securities LLC,
and BMO Capital Markets Corp. for various capital market
advisory services, such as identifying potential investors,
assisting management in preparing presentations to potential
investors and general advice on strategy and tactics in respect
of consummation of the Acquisition (and in the case of Raymond
James and FBR Capital Markets, additional advice regarding prior
business combination opportunities). In connection with these
arrangements, the capital markets advisors are being paid the
fees set forth below upon a successful closing of the
Acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond James
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
FBR Capital Markets
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
UBS Securities
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
BMO Capital Markets
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
In addition, all such capital markets advisors are able to
participate in an aggregate $2.0 million bonus pool that
HACI and the Company plan to make available to the capital
markets advisors upon a successful closing of the Acquisition.
The $2.0 million bonus pool will be allocated among the
various advisors by the Company in its sole discretion based on
the Companys assessment of the value added by the various
advisors. Capital One Southcoast and Scarsdale Equities llc
would be compensated solely out of the $2.0 million bonus
pool.
In the event the Acquisition is consummated, funds in
HACIs trust account may be used, directly or indirectly,
to purchase Public Shares from HACI Public Stockholders, other
than from those holders who have voted against the Acquisition
Proposal and properly demanded that their Public Shares be
converted into cash. Although HACI contemplates that such
purchases would likely be consummated by means of a purchase
agreement entered into directly with such holders of HACI Common
Stock, it is possible that HACI may repurchase such shares
indirectly through the use of a third party intermediary who
would be compensated by HACI for its role as intermediary in the
event that some holders are reluctant to sell such shares to
HACI directly. To the extent made, such purchases would be made
in compliance with federal securities laws. See section entitled
The Acquisition Actions That May Be Taken
to Secure Approval of HACI Stockholders.
24
Actions
That May Be Taken to Secure Approval of HACI
Stockholders
Based on recently completed business combinations by other
similarly structured blank check companies, it is believed by
HACI that the present holders of 30% or more of the Public
Shares may have the intention to vote against the Acquisition
and seek conversion of their Public Shares into cash in
accordance with HACIs charter. If such event were to
occur, the Acquisition could not be completed. To preclude such
possibility, HACI, the Initial Stockholders or HACIs
directors and officers and their respective affiliates may
negotiate arrangements to provide for the purchase of the Public
Shares from holders who indicate their intention to vote against
the Acquisition and seek conversion or who otherwise wish to
sell their Public Shares. The maximum cash purchase price that
will be offered to the holders of Public Shares by HACI, the
Initial Stockholders or HACIs directors and officers and
their respective affiliates for their shares will be the
per-share conversion price at the time of the Acquisition.
Although holders of Public Shares that enter into these types of
arrangements will not receive a higher purchase price than a
holder that properly seeks conversion of his shares, entering
into such arrangements (and agreeing to vote in favor of the
Acquisition) provides the holder and HACI with greater certainty
that the Acquisition will be consummated, in which event such
holder will promptly receive his purchase price which is equal
to the conversion proceeds. If the Acquisition is not
consummated, a holder would have to wait until HACI liquidates
in connection with its dissolution to receive liquidation
proceeds, which liquidation could take 60 days or more to
complete.
HACI, the Initial Stockholders or HACIs directors and
officers would approach a limited number of large holders of
HACI that have indicated an intention to vote against the
Acquisition Proposal, and engage in direct negotiations for the
purchase of such holders positions. All holders approached
in this manner would be institutional or sophisticated holders.
Arrangements of such nature would only be entered into and
effected in accordance with applicable law, including securities
laws, at a time when HACI, the Initial Stockholders or
HACIs directors and officers
and/or their
respective affiliates are not aware of any material nonpublic
information regarding HACI, the Company and their respective
securities or pursuant to agreements between the buyer and
seller of such shares in a form that would not violate insider
trading rules. Definitive arrangements have not yet been
determined but may include: agreements between HACI, the Initial
Stockholders or HACIs directors and officers and their
respective affiliates on the one hand and the holders of Public
Shares on the other hand pursuant to which HACI would agree to
purchase Public Shares from such holders in connection with the
closing of the Acquisition for the price specified in the
arrangements. Under the terms of such an agreement, the holder
would appoint an officer of HACI as his proxy with respect to
the Acquisition Proposal and all other proposals in this proxy
statement/prospectus. HACI, the Initial Stockholders,
HACIs directors and officers
and/or their
respective affiliates have agreed to immediately notify Resolute
of any such purchases so that HACI and Resolute may file a
Current Report on
Form 8-K
describing such purchase, including the price of such purchase
and the fact that such shares will be voted in favor of the
Acquisition.
As a result of the purchases that may be effected through such
arrangements, it is likely that the number of shares of HACI
Common Stock in HACIs public float will be reduced and
that the number of beneficial holders of HACIs securities
also will be reduced. This may make it difficult to obtain the
quotation, listing or trading of the Companys securities
on the New York Stock Exchange or any other national securities
exchange after consummation of the Acquisition.
The purpose of such arrangements would be to increase the
likelihood of satisfaction of the requirements that (i) the
holders of a majority of HACI Common Stock outstanding vote in
favor of the Acquisition Proposal and (ii) holders of fewer
than 30% of the Public Shares vote against the Acquisition
Proposal and demand conversion of their Public Shares into cash
where it appears that such requirements would otherwise not be
met. The maximum cash purchase price that will be offered by
HACI, the Initial Stockholders or HACIs directors and
officers and their respective affiliates to holders of Public
Shares for their shares will be the per-share conversion price
at the time of the Acquisition. However, if holders refuse to
enter into arrangements with HACI to sell their Public Shares,
HACI may determine to engage a third party
aggregator to buy shares prior to the meeting from
such holders that have already indicated an intention to convert
their shares
and/or vote
against the Acquisition Proposal. In such a case, the aggregator
would purchase the shares from the original holder and then
subsequently sell such shares to HACI in connection with the
closing. The maximum purchase price that will be offered by such
aggregators to holders of Public Shares for their shares
25
will be the per-share conversion price at the time of the
Acquisition. HACI would, in addition to paying the purchase
price of such shares (which would be the per-share conversion
price) to this aggregator, pay it a fee. Such fee would
typically be a small percentage of the aggregators total
purchase price for such shares. Any arrangement entered into
with a third party aggregator would require it to immediately
notify Resolute of any such purchases so that HACI and Resolute
may file a Current Report on
Form 8-K
describing such purchase, including the price of such purchase
and the fact that such shares will be voted in favor of the
Acquisition.
Although HACI does not have a definitive plan to engage the
services of such an aggregator, if one is needed, the parties
believe it will be in the best interests of stockholders that
are voting in favor of the Acquisition since the retention of
the aggregator can help ensure that the Acquisition will be
completed and the additional fee payable to the aggregator is
not expected to be significant. All shares purchased pursuant to
such arrangements would remain outstanding until the closing of
the Acquisition and would be voted in favor of the Acquisition
Proposal. Any agreement between the parties will provide for the
holder to withdraw or revoke any exercise of its conversion
exercise and grant a proxy to HACIs designees to vote such
shares in favor of the Acquisition Proposal at the meeting.
Accordingly, this will effectively render the 30% threshold
established in HACIs IPO prospectus ineffective and make
it easier for the parties to complete the Acquisition because
such purchased shares would no longer be counted towards the 30%
threshold. If, for some reason, the Acquisition is not closed
despite such agreements, the sellers would be entitled to
participate in liquidation distributions from HACIs trust
account with respect to such shares.
HACI and Resolute will as immediately as possible file a Current
Report on
Form 8-K
and press release to disclose arrangements entered into or
significant purchases or transfers made by any of the
aforementioned persons, including aggregators, that would affect
the vote on the Acquisition Proposal or the conversion
threshold. Any such report will include descriptions of any
arrangements entered into or significant purchases or transfers
by any of the aforementioned persons and will include
(i) the price of such purchase and (ii) a statement
that such shares purchased would be voted in favor of the
Acquisition. If HACIs directors or officers make purchases
or transfer shares pursuant to such arrangements, they will be
required to report these purchases or transfers on beneficial
ownership reports filed with the SEC and the
Form 8-K
would reflect how those acquisitions would change the disclosure
under the section entitled, Beneficial Ownership of
Securities.
Purchases pursuant to such arrangements would be paid for with
funds in HACIs trust account and would diminish the funds
available to the Company to repay as much of the outstanding
indebtedness under the Companys First Lien Credit
Facility. In all events there will be sufficient funds available
to HACI from the trust account to pay the holders of all Public
Shares that are properly converted.
It is possible that the special meetings could be adjourned to
provide time to seek out and negotiate such transactions if, at
the time of the meetings, it appears that the requisite vote
will not be obtained or that the limitation on conversion will
be exceeded, assuming that the stockholder adjournment proposal
is approved.
Conversion
Rights
As a result of the proposed Acquisition, each Public Stockholder
will have the right to convert its Public Shares into a pro rata
share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the trust account on
the closing date of the Acquisition (before payment of deferred
underwriting commissions and including interest earned on their
pro rata portion of the trust account, net of income taxes
payable on such interest and net of interest income of up to
approximately $6.6 million on the trust account previously
released to HACI to fund its working capital requirements) if
the Acquisition Proposal is approved and completed. HACI expects
that the conversion price will be less than the per unit initial
public offering price of $10.00 per unit. The Initial
Stockholders will not have conversion rights with respect to
their Founder Shares.
HACI will not complete the Acquisition if HACI Public
Stockholders owning 30% or more of the Public Shares vote
against the Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their
conversion rights. Because the conversion price will likely be
lower than the $10.00 per unit initial public offering price of
the HACI units, and may be less than the market price of HACI
Common Stock on the date of conversion, there may be a
disincentive on the part of the HACI Public Stockholders to
exercise their conversion rights.
26
A HACI Public Stockholder may request conversion at any time
after the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus and prior
to the vote taken with respect to the Acquisition Proposal at
the special meeting of HACI stockholders. Any request for
conversion, once made, may be withdrawn at any time prior to the
date of the special meeting of HACI stockholders. If a HACI
Public Stockholder wishes to exercise its conversion rights, the
stockholder must vote against the Acquisition Proposal, demand
that HACI convert the Public Shares held by such stockholder
into cash by marking the appropriate space on the proxy card and
provide physical or electronic delivery of such
stockholders stock certificates or shares, as appropriate,
as described below, prior to the special meeting of HACI
stockholders. If, notwithstanding the stockholders vote,
the Acquisition is consummated and the stockholder follows the
procedures required for conversion, then the stockholder will be
entitled to receive a pro rata share of the trust account
(before payment of deferred underwriting commissions and
including interest earned on their pro rata portion of the trust
account, net of income taxes payable on such interest and net of
interest income of up to approximately $6.6 million on the
trust account, which interest income was previously released to
HACI to fund its working capital requirements). A HACI Public
Stockholder will not be able to transfer its shares following
the approval of the Acquisition Proposal by HACI stockholders
unless the Acquisition Agreement is terminated. A HACI Public
Stockholder who exercises its conversion rights will exchange
the Public Shares held by such stockholder for cash and will no
longer own those shares of HACI Common Stock, although the
stockholder will continue to have the right to exercise any
warrants it still holds. If the Acquisition is not consummated,
such stockholders shares will not be converted into cash
and will be returned to the stockholder, even if such
stockholder elected to convert.
HACI Public Stockholders who wish to request conversion must
tender their shares to Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, the transfer agent for HACI, prior to the
special meeting of HACI stockholders or deliver their shares to
the transfer agent electronically using the Depository
Trust Companys DWAC (Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian)
System.
In order to physically deliver stock certificates, the HACI
Public Stockholders must comply with the following steps. If the
shares are held in street name, a HACI Public Stockholder must
instruct its account executive, its bank or broker to withdraw
the shares from the HACI Public Stockholders account and
request that a physical certificate be issued in the HACI Public
Stockholders name. No later than the day prior to the
special meeting of HACI stockholders, a HACI Public Stockholder
must present a written instruction to the transfer agent that it
wishes to convert its shares into cash and confirm that the HACI
Public Stockholder has held the shares since the record date and
will not sell or transfer the shares prior to the closing of the
Acquisition. Certificates that have not been tendered in
accordance with these procedures by the day prior to the special
meeting of HACI stockholders will not be converted into cash. In
the event that a HACI Public Stockholder tenders its shares and
decides prior to the special meeting of HACI stockholders that
it does not want to convert its shares, the HACI Public
Stockholder may withdraw its tender. In the event that a HACI
Public Stockholder tenders shares and the Acquisition is not
completed, these shares will not be converted into cash and the
physical certificates representing the shares will be returned
to the HACI Public Stockholder. See the section entitled
Special Meeting of HACI Warrantholders and Special
Meeting in Lieu of 2009 Annual Meeting of HACI
Stockholders Conversion Public Rights for
additional information.
Listing
The Company intends to apply for listing of the Company Common
Stock on the New York Stock Exchange. While the Company has
been in discussions with the New York Stock Exchange and
believes that it meets the eligibility requirements for listing
on the New York Stock Exchange, there can be no assurance that
the New York Stock Exchange will approve such listing. If the
Company is unable to satisfy the listing requirements of the New
York Stock Exchange, it will apply to have its stock listed on
another national securities exchange. If such listing is not
approved, the Company Common Stock will be traded in the
over-the-counter market.
Appraisal
Rights
In the event the Companys securities are not listed on a
national securities exchange at the time the Acquisition is
consummated, appraisal rights will be available pursuant to
Section 262 of the DGCL to HACI stockholders who have not
voted in favor of the Acquisition Proposal and who have
delivered a written
27
demand for appraisal of such shares in accordance with
Section 262 of the DGCL. The shares of HACI Common Stock
held by any such holders will not be converted into the right to
receive Company Common Stock, but such holder will be entitled
to seek an appraisal of such shares under the DGCL unless and
until the dissenting holder fails to perfect or withdraws or
otherwise loses his or her right to appraisal and payment under
the DGCL. If, after the effective time of the Acquisition, a
dissenting stockholder fails to perfect or withdraws or loses
his or her right to appraisal, his or her shares of HACI Common
Stock will be treated as if they had been converted as of the
effective time of the Acquisition into the right to receive
Company Common Stock. The full text of Section 262 of the
DGCL is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex F.
Holders of Public Shares electing to exercise conversion rights
will not be entitled to appraisal rights.
Opinion
of Stephens Inc. to HACIs Board of Directors
At a meeting of HACIs board of directors on August 2,
2009, Stephens rendered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed
in writing, to the board of directors that, as of the date of
the opinion, and based upon and subject to the various
assumptions, methodologies, limitations and considerations
described in such opinion, (i) the Acquisition
Consideration (as defined in such opinion) to be paid by HACI
and its stockholders in the Acquisition is fair to HACI and its
stockholders from a financial point of view and (ii) the
fair market value of Resolute is at least 80% of the Initial
Amount (as defined in such opinion) held in the trust account,
or the Trust, established by HACI for the benefit of
its public stockholders in connection with its initial public
offering. See The Acquisition Opinion of
Stephens Inc. to HACIs Board of Directors for a
summary of such opinion and a summary of the material financial
analyses performed by Stephens in connection with rendering its
opinion. The full text of the written opinion of Stephens is
attached as Annex E to this proxy
statement/prospectus. HACIs stockholders are urged to read
the opinion in its entirety.
See the section entitled The Acquisition
Opinion of Stephens Inc. to HACIs Board of
Directors.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations
Except as described in Material Federal Income Tax
Consequences Tax Consequences of the
Merger, in the opinion of HACIs counsel, Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, (1) the Merger will
qualify as part of an exchange of property for stock
constituting control of a corporation pursuant to
Section 351(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, which we refer to as the Code, (2) no gain or loss
will be recognized by any holder of HACI Common Stock on the
exchange of the HACI Common Stock for shares of Company Common
Stock, (3) gain or loss should be recognized as a result of
the exchange of Public Warrants in return for warrants
exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock, (4) the tax
basis of the Company Common Stock received by the holders of
HACI Common Stock in the Merger should be the same as the
adjusted tax basis of the HACI Common Stock surrendered in
exchange therefor, (5) the holding period of the Company
Common Stock received in the Merger by holders of HACI Common
Stock will include the period during which such HACI Common
Stock was held, (6) holders of warrants exercisable for
shares of Company Common Stock will have an adjusted tax basis
in such warrants equal to their fair market value as of the date
of the Merger, and (7) the holding period of the warrants
exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock received by
Public Warrant holders will start on the day after the Merger.
U.S. holders (defined below) who elect conversion generally
will recognize gain or loss upon conversion.
See the section entitled Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences for a more comprehensive
discussion of the tax aspects of the Merger and Conversion.
The tax consequences to holders of HACI Common Stock or
Public Warrants will depend on their own particular situations.
Accordingly, holders of HACI Common Stock or Public Warrants are
urged to consult their tax advisors for a full understanding of
the particular tax consequences to them.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
The acquisition of Resolute by HACI will be accounted for as a
purchase. The consideration for Resolute will include the fair
value of 9,200,000 shares of Company Common Stock,
4,600,000 Company Founders
28
Warrants, 2,333,333 Company Sponsors Warrants, and
1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares Stock plus the assumption
of all outstanding debt and liabilities of Resolute in excess of
the current assets acquired. The actual fair value of the total
purchase consideration will vary with fluctuations in the price
of HACI Common Stock and with the level of debt outstanding
under Aneths credit facilities. Additionally, the actual
purchase price allocation will not be known until after closing
of the Acquisition and will be further impacted by fluctuations
in the market price of crude oil and natural gas.
Regulatory
Matters
The Acquisition and the transactions contemplated by the
Acquisition Agreement are not subject to any additional federal
or state regulatory requirements or approvals, except for the
SEC declaring effective the Companys registration
statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part and
filings with the State of Delaware necessary to effectuate the
Charter Amendment and the Merger.
Rescission
and Damages Rights
A HACI securityholder at the time of the closing of the
Acquisition that purchased HACI units in the IPO, or an IPO
Purchaser, may have securities law claims against HACI for
rescission or damages on the basis, for example, that the IPO
prospectus did not disclose that HACI may seek to amend its
charter prior to the consummation of a business combination,
that funds in the trust account might be used, directly or
indirectly, to purchase Public Shares other than from holders
who have voted against the Acquisition Proposal and properly
demanded that their Public Shares be converted into cash, that
HACI may consummate a business combination with an entity
engaged in the energy industry as its principal business, that
HACI may seek to amend the terms of the Warrant Agreement and
exchange a portion of its outstanding Public Warrants for cash
financed out of the trust account or that Mr. Hicks
co-investment
may terminate. Rescission would give a successful IPO Purchaser
claimant the right to receive the total amount paid for his or
her securities pursuant to an allegedly deficient prospectus,
plus interest and less any income earned on the securities, in
exchange for surrender of the securities. An IPO Purchaser who
has properly exercised its conversion rights or dissenters
rights will not be eligible for rescission in connection with
any securities law claims it may have against HACI in connection
with HACI units purchased in the IPO. In addition, an IPO
Purchaser who purchased HACI units in the IPO but who has
separated its HACI units into the component common stock and
warrants and no longer owns the common stock or warrants
included in such HACI units may not be entitled to rescission in
connection with any such securities law claims.
A successful IPO Purchaser claimant for damages under federal or
state law could be awarded an amount to compensate for the
decrease in value of his or her securities caused by the alleged
violation (including, possibly, punitive damages), together with
interest, while retaining such securities. Such claims may
entitle IPO Purchasers asserting them to up to $10.00 per HACI
unit, based on the initial offering price of the HACI units sold
in the IPO, or $10.00 per share less any amount received from
the sale or fair market value of the original HACI warrants
purchased as part of the HACI units, plus interest from the date
of the IPO. In the case of IPO Purchasers, this amount may be
more than the cash to which they are entitled upon exercise of
their conversion rights or dissenters rights or upon
liquidation of HACI. See the section entitled The
Acquisition Rescission and Damages Rights
for additional information about rescission and damages rights.
Board of
Directors of the Company
The Acquisition Agreement provides that effective immediately
after the closing of the Acquisition, the board of directors of
the Company will consist of nine members divided into three
separate classes. Three directors will be appointed as
Class I directors and serve until the first annual meeting
of the Companys stockholders. Three directors will be
appointed as Class II directors and will serve until the
second annual meeting of the Companys stockholders.
Three directors will be appointed as Class III
directors and will serve until the third annual meeting of the
Companys stockholders. See the section entitled
The Company Executive Officers, Directors, Executive
Compensation and Corporate Governance for additional
information.
29
Comparison
of Rights of Stockholders of HACI and the Company
HACI and the Company are incorporated under the laws of the
State of Delaware. Upon consummation of the Acquisition, HACI
stockholders will become stockholders of the Company. The
Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation
that will be in effect at the closing of the Acquisition, or the
Companys charter, differs from HACIs charter. For a
more complete description of the difference between the rights
of the stockholders of HACI and the rights of stockholders of
the Company, please refer to the section entitled
Comparison of Rights of Stockholders of HACI and the
Company.
The
Stockholder Adjournment Proposal
If, based on the tabulated vote, there are not sufficient votes
at the time of the special meeting of HACI stockholders to
permit HACI to elect the directors, effect the Charter
Amendment, or consummate the Acquisition (because either the
Acquisition Proposal is not approved by the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding HACI
Common Stock as of the record date or if holders of 30% or more
of the Public Shares have indicated that they will vote against
the Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights), the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal allows HACIs
board of directors to adjourn the special meeting of HACI
stockholders to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit
further solicitation of proxies. Such special meeting could be
adjourned to as late as September 28, 2009. See the section
entitled The Stockholder Adjournment Proposal
for additional information.
Recommendation
to HACI Public Warrantholders
By vote of a majority, HACIs board of directors recommends
that the HACI Public Warrantholders vote FOR each of
the Warrant Amendment Proposal and the Warrantholder Adjournment
Proposal, if necessary, to be presented at the special meeting
of HACI Public Warrantholders. When you consider the
recommendation of HACIs board of directors in favor of the
Warrant Amendment Proposal, you should keep in mind that certain
of HACIs directors and officers have interests in the
Acquisition that may conflict with your interests as a
warrantholder. See the section entitled, The
Acquisition Potential Conflicts of Interests of
HACIs Directors and Officers in the Acquisition.
Recommendation
to HACI Stockholders
At least a majority of HACIs board of directors believes
that each of the Director Election Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal, the Acquisition Proposal
and the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal, if necessary, to be
presented at the special meeting of HACI stockholders is fair
to, and in the best interests of, HACI and its stockholders and
recommends that its stockholders vote FOR each of
the proposals. When you consider the recommendation of
HACIs board of directors in favor of the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal and the Acquisition
Proposal, you should keep in mind that certain of HACIs
directors and officers may have interests in the Acquisition
that may conflict with your interests as a stockholder. See the
section entitled, The Acquisition Potential
Conflicts of Interests of HACIs Directors and Officers in
the Acquisition.
Date,
Time and Place of Special Meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders
and Special Meeting of HACI Stockholders
The special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and the
special meeting of HACI stockholders will be held at 10:00 am
and 10:30 am, Central Standard time, respectively, on
September 24, 2009, at the offices of Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld LLP at 1700 Pacific Avenue,
39th Floor, Dallas, Texas 75201, or such other date, time
and place to which such meeting may be adjourned or postponed,
to consider and vote upon the proposals.
30
Voting
Power; Record Date
You will be entitled to vote or direct votes to be cast at the
special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders if you owned
Public Warrants at the close of business on September 8,
2009, or the special meeting of HACI stockholders if you owned
shares of HACI Common Stock at the close of business on
August 31, 2009, which are the respective record dates for
the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and the
special meeting of HACI stockholders. You are entitled to one
vote for each share of HACI Common Stock you owned and one vote
for each share of HACI Common Stock underlying the Public
Warrants you owned at the close of business on the record date.
If your shares or warrants are held in street name
or are in a margin or similar account, you should contact your
broker, bank or other nominee to ensure that votes related to
the shares or warrants you beneficially own are properly
counted. The Public Warrants do not have voting rights other
than with respect to the Warrant Amendment Proposal and the
Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal. On the record date, there
were 76,000,000 HACI warrants outstanding, of which 55,200,000
are Public Warrants, 13,800,000 are Founder Warrants held by the
Initial Stockholders and 7,000,000 are Sponsor Warrants held by
the Sponsor. As of the record date, there were
69,000,000 shares of HACI Common Stock outstanding, of
which 55,200,000 are Public Shares and 13,800,000 are Founder
Shares held by the Initial Stockholders.
Required
Vote for Warrantholder Proposals
Approval of the Warrant Amendment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Public
Warrants as of the record date.
Approval of the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
outstanding Public Warrants represented in person or by proxy at
the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and entitled
to vote thereon as of the record date.
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the Warrant Amendment Proposal and the
Adjournment Proposal. Broker non-votes will have the same effect
as a vote AGAINST the Warrant Amendment Proposal and
will have no effect on the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal.
Holders of Founder Warrants and Sponsor Warrants will not vote
on the Warrant Amendment Proposal or the Warrantholder
Adjournment Proposal.
Quorum
and Required Vote for Stockholder Proposals
A quorum of HACI stockholders is necessary to hold a valid
meeting. A quorum will be present at the special meeting of HACI
stockholders if a majority of the HACI Common Stock outstanding
and entitled to vote at the special meeting is represented in
person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will count
as present for the purposes of establishing a quorum.
Election of the director nominees requires a plurality of all
votes cast, in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors.
Approval of the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal
and the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal require
the affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding
shares of HACI Common Stock entitled to vote thereon as of the
record date.
Approval of the Acquisition Proposal requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding HACI Common
Stock entitled to vote thereon as of the record date. In
addition, the Acquisition will not be consummated if holders of
30% or more of the Public Shares (16,560,000 shares or
more) vote against the Acquisition Proposal and properly
exercise their conversion rights. Please note that you cannot
seek conversion of your Public Shares unless you vote against
the Acquisition Proposal.
31
Approval of the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
HACI Common Stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled
to vote thereon at the special meeting.
Abstentions are considered present for purposes of establishing
a quorum but will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal, the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal,
the Acquisition Proposal and the Stockholder Adjournment
Proposal. Broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal, the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal,
and the Acquisition Proposal and will have no effect on the
remaining proposals presented to the stockholders.
Proxies
Proxies may be solicited by mail, telephone or in person.
HACIs proxy solicitor is Morrow & Co., LLC who
can be reached at 470 West Avenue, Stamford, Connecticut.
Its telephone number is
(800) 662-5200.
If you grant a proxy, you may still vote your shares or
warrants, as the case may be, in person if you revoke your proxy
before the special meeting of HACI stockholders or special
meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders. You may also change your
vote by submitting a later-dated proxy as described in the
section entitled Special Meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of 2009 Annual
Meeting of HACI Stockholders Revoking Your
Proxy.
Vote
of the Initial Stockholders
As of the record date for the special meeting of HACI
stockholders, the Initial Stockholders owned an aggregate of
approximately 20% of the outstanding shares of HACI Common
Stock, consisting of 13,800,000 Founder Shares that were
acquired prior to the IPO.
Immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO, HACI and the
representative of the underwriters in the IPO entered into
agreements with the Initial Stockholders, at the request of the
underwriter, pursuant to which the Initial Stockholders agreed
to vote:
|
|
|
|
|
all of their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of
the votes cast with respect to an initial business combination
by the Public Stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any Public Shares acquired in or after the IPO in favor of an
initial business combination; and
|
|
|
|
all shares of HACI Common Stock held by them in favor of
amending HACIs charter to provide for its perpetual
existence.
|
The Initial Stockholders did not agree, however, to vote in
favor of an amendment to HACIs charter that would permit
HACI to complete a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business, as such
amendment was not contemplated at the time of HACIs IPO.
At the special meeting, the Initial Stockholders intend to vote
in favor of the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal
and the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal, which
will include the amendment to HACIs charter to permit
HACIs perpetual existence and to permit a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry as its
principal business, despite the provisions in HACIs
charter prohibiting it from consummating a business combination
with an entity engaged in the energy industry, as previously
discussed in the prospectus used to offer and sell HACI units in
connection with the IPO.
Approval of each of the Acquisition Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal require the affirmative
vote of a majority of the outstanding HACI Common Stock. If the
Initial Stockholders or HACIs officers and directors
purchase Public Shares from existing HACI Public Stockholders
that are likely to vote against the Acquisition Proposal or that
are likely to elect to exercise their conversion rights, the
probability that the Acquisition Proposal will be approved would
increase.
32
In connection with the Acquisition, the Founder Warrants and
Sponsor Warrants are also being amended pursuant to the Warrant
Amendment, to permit the cancellation of 4,600,000 Founder
Warrants and transfer of 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants, as
contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement. Such amendment
requires the consent of a majority of the Founder Warrants and a
majority of the Sponsor Warrants. The Initial Stockholders,
which hold all of the outstanding Founder Warrants and Sponsor
Warrants, have indicated to HACI their intention to consent to
such amendment.
Description
of Securities of the Company
Company
Common Stock
Holders of Company Common Stock will have voting rights and
dividend participation rights, except in the case of the Company
Earnout Shares, which are subject to forfeiture and will not
have dividend rights unless the post-closing Company Common
Stock trading price target of $15.00 per share is met in the
established timeframe.
Warrants
Company
Warrants
Each Company warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one
share of Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share,
subject to adjustment, at any time commencing on the closing of
the Acquisition and continuing for a period that ends five years
from the closing of the Acquisition. However, the warrants will
be exercisable only if a registration statement relating to the
Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is
effective and current. At any time while the warrants are
exercisable and an effective registration statement covering the
shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
warrants is available and current throughout a
30-day
redemption period, the Company may call the outstanding warrants
(except as described below with respect to the Company Founders
Warrants and the Company Sponsors Warrants) for redemption:
|
|
|
|
|
in whole and not in part;
|
|
|
|
at a price of $.01 per warrant;
|
|
|
|
upon a minimum of 30 days prior written notice of
redemption to each warrantholder; and
|
|
|
|
if, and only if, the reported last sale price of Company Common
Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days
within a 30-trading-day period ending on the third business day
prior to the notice of redemption to warrantholders.
|
Company
Founders Warrants
The terms of the Company Founders Warrants will be identical to
the terms of the Company warrants except that the Company
Founders Warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
other than Company Founders Warrants held by Seller, may not be
sold or transferred except to permitted transferees until
180 days after the closing of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
will not be redeemable by the Company so long as they are held
by the Initial Stockholders, Seller or their permitted
transferees;
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
may not be exercised unless and until the last sale price of
Company Common Stock exceeds $13.75 for any 20 days within
any 30
trading-day-period
beginning 90 days after the closing of the
Acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
may be exercised at the option of the holder on a cashless basis.
|
Company
Sponsors Warrants
The terms of the Company Sponsors Warrants will be identical to
the terms of the Company warrants except that the Company
Sponsors Warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
other than Company Sponsors Warrants held by Seller, may not be
sold or transferred except to permitted transferees until
180 days after the closing of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
will not be redeemable by the Company so long as they are held
by the Sponsor, Seller or their permitted transferees; and
|
|
|
|
may be exercised at the option of the holder on a cashless basis.
|
Price
Range of HACI Securities
The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for
the HACI units, HACI Common Stock and Public Warrants,
respectively, on the NYSE Amex LLC, or the NYSE Amex, on
July 31, 2009, the trading day prior to HACIs
announcement of the Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Units
|
|
$
|
9.62
|
|
|
$
|
9.62
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
$
|
9.65
|
|
Public Warrants
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Ownership
Structure of HACI and the Company
The following tables and accompanying footnotes set forth
certain information regarding the ownership structure of HACI or
the Company, as indicated in such tables (assuming
(i) either maximum or minimum conversion by HACI
stockholders of their shares of HACI Common Stock pursuant to
the conversion rights granted under HACIs charter and
(ii) no Public Shares are purchased by HACI prior to the
Acquisition). The information provided in the following tables
is presented as follows:
Table 1 Pre-Acquisition Ownership Structure of
HACI as Contemplated in the IPO Prospectus. The ownership
structure of HACI immediately prior to the Acquisition is
presented as contemplated in the IPO prospectus. Specifically,
the presentation assumes that the co-investment obligation of
Mr. Thomas O. Hicks to purchase from HACI 2,000,000
co-investment units (each consisting of one share of HACI Common
Stock and one warrant, which we refer to as Co-Investment Shares
and Co-Investment Warrants, respectively) at a price of $10.00
per unit has been fulfilled.
Table 2 Pre-Merger Ownership Structure of HACI as
Modified in the Acquisition. The ownership structure of HACI
immediately prior to the Merger is presented taking into effect
changes contemplated by the terms of the Acquisition Agreement.
Specifically, the Acquisition Agreement requires the following
changes to the ownership structure of HACI immediately prior to
the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
7,335,000 Founder Shares and 4,600,000 Founder Warrants held
collectively by the Initial Stockholders are cancelled and
forfeited;
|
|
|
|
the co-investment obligation of Mr. Hicks to purchase
2,000,000 co-investment units has been terminated, pursuant to a
Termination of Purchase Agreement entered into on August 2,
2009, and is no longer an obligation of Mr. Hicks;
|
|
|
|
the Sponsor sells 2,333,333 of its 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants to
Seller; and
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
the terms of the Public Warrants are amended to allow
(i) up to 50% of the Public Warrants (or 27,600,000) to be
exchanged in the Merger for Company warrants and (ii) the
remainder of the Public Warrants to be exchanged in the Merger
for $0.55 per warrant.
|
Table 3 Post-Acquisition Ownership
Structure of the Company Assuming Exercise of All
Warrants. The beneficial ownership structure of
the Company immediately after the Acquisition is presented
taking into effect (i) changes to the pre-Merger ownership
structure of HACI as contemplated by the terms of the
Acquisition Agreement, as presented in Table 2 above, and
(ii) the consummation of the Acquisition. In addition to
the changes to the pre-Merger ownership structure of HACI as
noted above for Table 2, Table 3 reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
the Companys issuance to Seller of
(i) 9,200,000 shares of Company Common Stock,
(ii) 4,600,000 Company Founders Warrants and
(iii) 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares in exchange for
Sellers contribution of the Acquired Entities; and
|
|
|
|
1,865,000 shares of Company Common Stock issued in the
Merger in exchange for the Initial Stockholders Founder
Shares become restricted Company Earnout Shares subject to
forfeiture in the event a trigger price of $15.00 per share is
not exceeded within 5 years following the closing of the
Acquisition.
|
In addition, we have assumed for purposes of the information
presented that 27,600,000 Public Warrants are exchanged for
Company warrants and 27,600,000 Public Warrants are exchanged
for the Cash Amount.
Table 4 Post-Acquisition Ownership Structure of
the Company Without Regard to Warrants. The
ownership structure of the Company immediately after the
Acquisition is presented taking into effect (i) changes to
the pre-Merger ownership structure of HACI as contemplated by
the terms of the Acquisition Agreement and (ii) the
consummation of the Acquisition, as presented in Table 3,
provided that the information in Table 4 is presented based
solely on the shares of Company Common Stock issued and
outstanding immediately after the Acquisition, without taking
into effect Company warrants, Company Sponsors Warrants or
Company Founders Warrants.
Table 1 Pre-Acquisition Ownership Structure of
HACI as Contemplated in the IPO Prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of HACI Common Stock
|
|
|
Shares of HACI Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Immediately Prior to the Acquisition
|
|
|
Immediately Prior to the Acquisition
|
|
|
|
(Assuming Minimum Conversion)
|
|
|
(Assuming Maximum Conversion)
|
|
|
|
Without Giving
|
|
|
Assuming All Warrants
|
|
|
Without Giving
|
|
|
Assuming All Warrants
|
|
|
|
Effect to Warrants
|
|
|
Have Been Exercised
|
|
|
Effect to Warrants
|
|
|
Have Been Exercised
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(1)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(2)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(3)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(4)
|
|
|
Public Securityholders
|
|
|
55,200,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
77.7
|
%
|
|
|
110,400,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
38,640,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
71.0
|
%
|
|
|
93,840,000
|
(9)
|
|
|
70.9
|
%
|
Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.)(5)
|
|
|
15,524,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
|
38,048,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
15,524,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
38,048,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
Other Initial Stockholders
|
|
|
276,000
|
(12)
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
552,000
|
(13)
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
276,000
|
(12)
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
552,000
|
(13)
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Table 2 Pre-Merger Ownership Structure of HACI as
Modified in the Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of HACI Common Stock
|
|
|
Shares of HACI Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Immediately Prior to the Acquisition
|
|
|
Immediately Prior to the Acquisition
|
|
|
|
(Assuming Minimum Conversion)
|
|
|
(Assuming Maximum Conversion)
|
|
|
|
Without Giving
|
|
|
Assuming All Warrants
|
|
|
Without Giving
|
|
|
Assuming All Warrants
|
|
|
|
Effect to Warrants
|
|
|
Have Been Exercised
|
|
|
Effect to Warrants
|
|
|
Have Been Exercised
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(14)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(15)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(16)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(17)
|
|
|
Public Securityholders
|
|
|
55,200,000
|
(18)
|
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
|
|
82,800,000
|
(19)
|
|
|
78.5
|
%
|
|
|
38,640,000
|
(20)
|
|
|
85.7
|
%
|
|
|
66,240,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
74.5
|
%
|
Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.)(5)
|
|
|
6,335,700
|
(22)
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
20,018,367
|
(23)
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
6,335,700
|
(22)
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
20,018,367
|
(23)
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
Other Initial Stockholders
|
|
|
129,300
|
(24)
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
313,300
|
(25)
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
129,300
|
(24)
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
313,300
|
(25)
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
35
Table 3 Post-Acquisition Ownership Structure of
the Company Assuming Exercise of All Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Company
|
|
|
Shares of Company
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
After the Acquisition
|
|
|
After the Acquisition
|
|
|
|
(Assuming Minimum Conversion)
|
|
|
(Assuming Maximum Conversion)
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(26)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(27)
|
|
|
Public Securityholders
|
|
|
82,800,000
|
(28)
|
|
|
68.6
|
%
|
|
|
66,240,000
|
(29)
|
|
|
54.9
|
%
|
Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.)(5)
|
|
|
20,018,367
|
(30)
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
20,018,367
|
(30)
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
Other Initial Stockholders
|
|
|
313,300
|
(31)
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
313,300
|
(31)
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Seller
|
|
|
17,318,333
|
(32)
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
17,318,333
|
(32)
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
Table 4 Post-Acquisition Ownership Structure of
the Company Without Regards to Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Company
|
|
|
Shares of Company
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
After the Acquisition
|
|
|
After the Acquisition
|
|
|
|
(Assuming Minimum Conversion)
|
|
|
(Assuming Maximum Conversion)
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(33)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(34)
|
|
|
Public Securityholders
|
|
|
55,200,000
|
(35)
|
|
|
76.4
|
%
|
|
|
38,640,000
|
(35)
|
|
|
69.4
|
%
|
Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.)(5)
|
|
|
6,335,700
|
(36)
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
6,335,700
|
(36)
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Other Initial Stockholders
|
|
|
129,300
|
(37)
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
129,300
|
(37)
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Seller
|
|
|
10,385,000
|
(38)
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
10,385,000
|
(38)
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based upon 71,000,000 shares of HACI Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition,
assuming that (i) no Public Shares are properly converted
and (ii) 2,000,000 Co-Investment Shares are purchased by
the Sponsor. Excludes (i) 55,200,000 Public Warrants,
(ii) 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants, (iii) 2,000,000
Co-Investment Warrants, and (iv) 13,800,000 Founder
Warrants. |
|
(2) |
|
Based upon 149,000,000 shares of HACI Common Stock outstanding
immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition, assuming
that (i) no Public Shares are properly converted and
(ii) 2,000,000 Co-Investment Shares are purchased by the
Sponsor Includes (i) 55,200,000 Public Warrants,
(ii) 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants, (iii) 2,000,000
Co-Investment Warrants, and (iv) 13,800,000 Founder
Warrants. |
|
(3) |
|
Based upon 54,440,000 shares of HACI Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to the Acquisition, assuming
(i) 30% of Public Shares are properly converted,
(ii) no Public Shares are purchased by HACI prior to the
closing of the Acquisition and (iii) 2,000,000
Co-Investment Shares are purchased by the Sponsor. Excludes
(i) 55,200,000 Public Warrants, (ii) 7,000,000 Sponsor
Warrants, (iii) 2,000,000 Co-Investment Warrants, and
(iv) 13,800,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
(4) |
|
Based upon 132,440,000 shares of HACI Common Stock outstanding
immediately prior to the Acquisition, assuming (i) 30% of
Public Shares are properly converted and (ii) 2,000,000
Co-Investment Shares are purchased by the Sponsor. Includes
(i) 55,200,000 Public Warrants, (ii) 7,000,000 Sponsor
Warrants, (iii) 2,000,000 Co-Investment Warrants, and
(iv) 13,800,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
HH-HACI, L.P.s general partner is owned by Chairman of the
Board Thomas O. Hicks, who, together with his charitable
foundation and estate planning entities for his family, owns
approximately 80% of the limited partnership interests in
HH-HACI, L.P. attributable to the Founder Shares and Founder
Warrants and 100% of the partnership interests attributable to
the Sponsor Warrants. The remaining limited partnership
interests in HH-HACI, L.P. attributable to the Founder Shares
and Founder Warrants are owned directly or indirectly by various
employees of Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Includes 55,200,000 Public Shares. Excludes 55,200,000 Public
Warrants. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Includes 55,200,000 Public Shares and 55,200,000 Public Warrants. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Includes 38,640,000 Public Shares. Excludes 55,200,000 Public
Warrants. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Includes 38,640,000 Public Shares and 55,200,000 Public Warrants. |
36
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Includes (i) 13,524,000 Founder Shares and
(ii) 2,000,000 Co-Investment Shares. Excludes
(i) 2,000,000 Co-Investment Warrants, (ii) 7,000,000
Sponsor Warrants, and (iii) 13,524,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Includes (i) 13,524,000 Founder Shares, (ii) 2,000,000
Co-Investment Shares, (iii) 2,000,000 Co-Investment
Warrants, (iv) 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants, and
(v) 13,524,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(12) |
|
Includes 276,000 Founder Shares. Excludes 276,000 Founder
Warrants. |
|
|
|
(13) |
|
Includes 276,000 Founder Shares and 276,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Based upon 61,665,000 shares of HACI Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition,
assuming that no Public Shares are properly converted. Excludes
(i) up to 27,600,000 Public Warrants, (ii) 7,000,000
Sponsor Warrants, and (iii) 9,200,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(15) |
|
Based upon 105,465,000 shares of HACI Common Stock outstanding
immediately prior to the Acquisition, assuming that no Public
Shares are properly converted. Includes (i) 27,600,000
Public Warrants, (ii) 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants, and
(iii) 9,200,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(16) |
|
Based upon 45,105,000 shares of HACI Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to the Acquisition, assuming 30%
of Public Shares are properly converted. Excludes (i) up to
27,600,000 Public Warrants, (ii) 7,000,000 Sponsor
Warrants, and (iii) 9,200,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(17) |
|
Based upon 88,905,000 shares of HACI Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to the Acquisition, assuming that
30% of Public Shares are properly converted. Includes
(i) 27,600,000 Public Warrants, (ii) 7,000,000 Sponsor
Warrants, and (iii) 9,200,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(18) |
|
Includes 55,200,000 Public Shares. Excludes up to 27,600,000
Public Warrants that may be exchanged for Company warrants in
the Acquisition. |
|
|
|
(19) |
|
Includes 55,200,000 Public Shares and 27,600,000 Public Warrants. |
|
|
|
(20) |
|
Includes 38,640,000 Public Shares. Excludes up to 27,600,000
Public Warrants that may be exchanged for Company warrants in
the Acquisition. |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
Includes 38,640,000 Public Shares and 27,600,000 Public Warrants. |
|
|
|
(22) |
|
Includes, after cancellation and forfeiture of 7,188,300 Founder
Shares, 6,335,700 Founder Shares, 1,827,700 of which will become
restricted Company Earnout Shares after the Merger. Excludes
(i) 4,666,667 Sponsor Warrants (after taking into effect
the transfer of 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants to Seller), and
(ii) 9,016,000 Founder Warrants, after cancellation and
forfeiture of 4,508,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(23) |
|
Includes (i) after cancellation and forfeiture of 7,188,300
Founder Shares, 6,335,700 Founder Shares, 1,827,700 of which
will become restricted Company Earnout Shares after the Merger,
(ii) 4,666,667 Sponsor Warrants (after taking into effect
the transfer of 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants to Seller), and (iii)
9,016,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(24) |
|
Includes, after cancellation and forfeiture of 146,700 Founder
Shares, 129,300 Founder Shares, 37,300 of which will become
restricted Company Earnout Shares after the Merger. Excludes
184,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(25) |
|
Includes (i) after cancellation and forfeiture of 146,700
Founder Shares, 129,300 Founder Shares, 37,300 of which will
become restricted Earnout Shares after the Merger, and
(ii) 184,000 Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(26) |
|
Based upon 120,650,000 shares of Company Common Stock
outstanding as of the closing of the Acquisition, assuming that
no HACI Public Shares are purchased by HACI prior to the
Acquisition. Includes (i) 200,000 shares of Company
Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Retention Bonus
Awards, (ii) 3,250,000 Company Earnout Shares,
(iii) 27,600,000 Company warrants issued to holders of
Public Warrants in connection with the Acquisition,
(iv) 7,000,000 Company Sponsors Warrants, and
(v) 13,800,000 Company Founders Warrants. Excludes up to
2,760,000 shares reserved for issuance under the
Companys 2009 Performance Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
(27) |
|
Based upon 104,090,000 shares of Company Common Stock
outstanding as of the closing of the Acquisition, assuming 30%
of HACI Public Shares are properly converted. Includes
(i) 200,000 shares of Company Common Stock that may be
issued pursuant to Retention Bonus Awards, (ii) 3,250,000
Company Earnout Shares, (iii) 27,600,000 Company warrants
issued to holders of Public Warrants in connection |
37
|
|
|
|
|
with the Acquisition, (iv) 7,000,000 Company Sponsors
Warrants, and (v) 13,800,000 Company Founders Warrants.
Excludes up to 2,760,000 shares reserved for issuance under
the Companys 2009 Performance Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
(28) |
|
Includes 55,200,000 Public Shares and 27,600,000 Company
warrants issued upon exchange of Public Warrants in the
Acquisition. |
|
|
|
(29) |
|
Includes 38,640,000 Public Shares and 27,600,000 Company
warrants issued upon exchange of Public Warrants. |
|
|
|
(30) |
|
Includes (i) 1,827,700 Company Earnout Shares,
(ii) 4,666,667 Company Sponsors Warrants and
(iii) 9,016,000 Company Founders Warrants. |
|
|
|
(31) |
|
Includes 37,300 Company Earnout Shares and 184,000 Company
Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(32) |
|
Includes (i) 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares,
(ii) 2,333,333 Company Sponsors Warrants and
(iii) 4,600,000 Company Founders Warrants. Excludes
200,000 shares of Company Common Stock potentially issuable
to Resolute employee pursuant to Retention Bonus Awards. |
|
|
|
(33) |
|
Based upon 72,250,000 shares of Company Common Stock
outstanding as of the closing of the Acquisition, assuming that
no HACI Public Shares are properly converted. Includes
(i) 200,000 shares of Company Common Stock that may be
issued pursuant to Retention Bonus Awards and
(ii) 3,250,000 Company Earnout Shares. Excludes (i) up
to 27,600,000 Company warrants that may be issued to holders of
Public Warrants in connection with the Acquisition,
(ii) 7,000,000 Company Sponsors Warrants,
(iii) 13,800,000 Company Founders Warrants, and
(iv) up to 2,760,000 shares reserved for issuance
under the Companys 2009 Performance Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
(34) |
|
Based upon 55,690,000 shares of Company Common Stock
outstanding as of the closing of the Acquisition, assuming 30%
of HACI Public Shares are properly converted. Includes
(i) 200,000 shares of Company Common Stock that may be
issued pursuant to Retention Bonus Awards and
(ii) 3,250,000 Company Earnout Shares. Excludes (i) up
to 27,600,000 Company warrants that may be issued to holders of
Public Warrants in connection with the Acquisition,
(ii) 7,000,000 Company Sponsors Warrants,
(iii) 13,800,000 Company Founders Warrants, and
(iv) up to 2,760,000 shares reserved for issuance
under the Companys 2009 Performance Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
(35) |
|
Excludes 27,600,000 Company warrants issued in exchange for
Public Warrants. |
|
|
|
(36) |
|
Includes 1,827,700 Company Earnout Shares. Excludes 4,666,667
Company Sponsors Warrants and 9,016,000 Company Founders
Warrants. |
|
|
|
(37) |
|
Includes 37,300 Company Earnout Shares. Excludes 184,000 Company
Founder Warrants. |
|
|
|
(38) |
|
Includes 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares. Excludes
(i) 2,333,333 Company Sponsors Warrants,
(ii) 4,600,000 Company Founders Warrants and
(iii) 200,000 shares of Company Common Stock
potentially issuable to Resolute employee pursuant to Retention
Bonus Awards. |
For additional information on the beneficial ownership of the
Sponsor, Seller and certain other beneficial owners, see section
entitled Beneficial Ownership of Securities.
Risk
Factors
In evaluating the proposals set forth in this proxy
statement/prospectus, you should carefully read this proxy
statement/prospectus, including the annexes, and especially
consider the factors discussed in the section entitled
Risk Factors.
38
SUMMARY
HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL
INFORMATION OF RESOLUTE AND THE COMPANY
The following table presents summary historical financial data
of Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC, WYNR, LLC, BWNR,
LLC, RNRC Holdings, Inc., Resolute Aneth, LLC and Resolute
Wyoming, Inc., each of which are subsidiaries of Seller and are
collectively referred to in this proxy statement prospectus as
Resolute or the Companies, and unaudited
summary pro forma financial data of Resolute Energy Corporation.
Also, included in the following table is Adjusted EBITDA, which
is a financial measure not calculated in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Please read
Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The summary historical and unaudited pro forma financial data
have been prepared on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
|
the historical combined financial information of Resolute for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 have been
derived from the audited financial statements of
Resolute; and
|
|
|
|
the historical combined financial information of Resolute as of
and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, have
been derived from the unaudited historical combined financial
statements of Resolute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The summary unaudited pro forma financial data as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2008, and as of and for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, are derived from the unaudited
pro forma financial statements of the Company. The unaudited pro
forma financial information has been derived by the application
of pro forma adjustments to the historical consolidated and
combined financial statements of HACI and Resolute to reflect
the Acquisition, including the IPO reorganization. The unaudited
pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009,
or the pro forma balance sheet, gives effect to the Acquisition
as if it had occurred on June 30, 2009. The unaudited pro
forma consolidated statements of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31,
2008, or the pro forma statements of operations, give effect to
the Acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2008
and has been prepared assuming the level of approval of the
Acquisition by HACI Public Stockholders will occur at the
maximum conversion, which assumes HACI Public Stockholders
owning 30% less one share of the HACI Common Stock issued in
HACIs initial public offering seek conversion.
|
The summary pro forma financial data should not be considered as
indicative of the historical results the Company would have had
or the results the Company will have after the Acquisition. You
should read the following table in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Resolute, the
historical combined financial statements of Resolute and notes
thereto, and the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements of the Company and notes thereto. Among other things,
the historical and pro forma consolidated financial statements
include more detailed information regarding the basis of
presentation for the following information. In addition, the pro
forma financial information does not include the estimated
$3.0 million of annual incremental general and
administrative expenses that Resolute expects to incur as a
result of being a publicly traded company.
The following is presented in thousands, except per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$
|
108,441
|
|
|
$
|
148,431
|
|
|
$
|
193,535
|
|
|
$
|
110,952
|
|
|
$
|
44,116
|
|
|
$
|
193,535
|
|
|
$
|
44,116
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
18,203
|
|
|
|
19,592
|
|
|
|
29,376
|
|
|
|
15,568
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
|
|
29,376
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
3,141
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
130,478
|
|
|
|
173,343
|
|
|
|
229,172
|
|
|
|
129,661
|
|
|
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
229,172
|
|
|
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
54,640
|
|
|
|
66,731
|
|
|
|
85,990
|
|
|
|
40,991
|
|
|
|
31,596
|
|
|
|
87,382
|
|
|
|
32,111
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization, and asset retirement
obligation accretion
|
|
|
16,657
|
|
|
|
27,790
|
|
|
|
50,335
|
|
|
|
23,420
|
|
|
|
15,949
|
|
|
|
47,008
|
|
|
|
15,495
|
|
Impairment of proved properties(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
Write off of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
General and administrative(2)
|
|
|
6,130
|
|
|
|
40,273
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
77,427
|
|
|
|
134,794
|
|
|
|
401,563
|
|
|
|
72,487
|
|
|
|
64,689
|
|
|
|
399,628
|
|
|
|
68,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
53,051
|
|
|
|
38,549
|
|
|
|
(172,391
|
)
|
|
|
57,174
|
|
|
|
(12,177
|
)
|
|
|
(170,456
|
)
|
|
|
(15,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,293
|
)
|
|
|
(35,898
|
)
|
|
|
(33,139
|
)
|
|
|
(16,190
|
)
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
14,557
|
|
|
|
(106,228
|
)
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
|
|
(202,124
|
)
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(7,009
|
)
|
|
|
(141,221
|
)
|
|
|
63,725
|
|
|
|
(218,102
|
)
|
|
|
(53,509
|
)
|
|
|
92,215
|
|
|
|
(42,809
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
46,042
|
|
|
|
(102,672
|
)
|
|
|
(108,666
|
)
|
|
|
(160,928
|
)
|
|
|
(65,686
|
)
|
|
|
(78,241
|
)
|
|
|
(58,547
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(3,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
|
(2,082
|
)
|
|
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|
|
28,167
|
|
|
|
21,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
42,730
|
|
|
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
|
(90,419
|
)
|
|
|
(163,010
|
)
|
|
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
|
(50,074
|
)
|
|
|
(37,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: (Income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute
|
|
$
|
42,015
|
|
|
$
|
(104,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,242
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,747
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.71
|
)
|
Other Financial Data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
69,721
|
|
|
$
|
98,794
|
|
|
$
|
111,286
|
|
|
$
|
59,431
|
|
|
$
|
33,041
|
|
|
$
|
109,726
|
|
|
$
|
28,923
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
(35,578
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
(99,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(446,957
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(29,945
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
488,493
|
|
|
|
601,123
|
|
|
|
360,847
|
|
|
|
630,570
|
|
|
|
306,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623,823
|
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
417,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
332,063
|
|
|
|
458,863
|
|
|
|
421,150
|
|
|
|
437,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
Shareholders/Members equity (deficit)(4)
|
|
|
94,232
|
|
|
|
(74,147
|
)
|
|
|
145,669
|
|
|
|
(235,762
|
)
|
|
|
(219,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,850
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
42,822
|
|
|
$
|
73,789
|
|
|
$
|
97,379
|
|
|
$
|
49,740
|
|
|
$
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(269,336
|
)
|
|
|
(97,596
|
)
|
|
|
(61,021
|
)
|
|
|
(26,505
|
)
|
|
|
(9,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
231,635
|
|
|
|
22,089
|
|
|
|
(41,512
|
)
|
|
|
(21,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the results of operations of the ExxonMobil Properties
for the period beginning on the date of acquisition,
April 14, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, general and
administrative expense included a non-cash charge to
compensation expense of $34.5 million associated with
equity-based compensation recognized during the period. This
non-cash charge relates to incentive compensation provisions in
the operating agreement between Natural Gas Partners and
management. In June 2007, Resolute Holdings made a
$100.0 million cash distribution to its members that met a
financial requirement for a portion of managements
incentive compensation units to vest, triggering this
compensation expense. Please read
Note 6
Shareholders/Members Equity and Equity Based
Awards to the audited combined financial statements of
Resolute. |
|
(3) |
|
As a result of Resolutes analysis of the full cost ceiling
test related to the limitation on capitalized costs, Resolute
included a provision for an impairment of oil and gas property
costs of $245.0 and $13.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the six month period ended
June 30, 2009, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
In June 2007, Resolute Holdings made a $100.0 million cash
distribution to its members. This distribution represented a
return on equity and consequently is reflected in
Resolutes combined financial statements by a similar
reduction to its Shareholders/Members equity
(deficit) as of December 31, 2007. |
40
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
Included in this proxy statement/prospectus is the non-GAAP
financial measure Adjusted EBITDA. Set forth below is a
reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly
comparable financial measures as calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP
measure) is defined as net income plus net interest expense,
income taxes, depletion, depreciation and amortization,
impairment expense, accretion of asset retirement obligation,
change in fair value of derivative instruments, expiration of
puts and non-cash equity-based compensation expense. This
definition is consistent with the definition of EBITDA in
Resolutes existing credit agreements. Adjusted EBITDA is
also a financial measure that Resolute expects will be reported
to its lenders and used as a gauge for compliance with some of
the anticipated financial covenants under its amended revolving
credit facility.
Adjusted EBITDA is used as a supplemental liquidity or
performance measure by Resolutes management and by
external users of its financial statements such as investors,
commercial banks, research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of Resolutes assets to generate cash
sufficient to pay interest costs;
|
|
|
|
the financial metrics that support Resolutes indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Resolutes ability to finance capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
financial performance of the assets without regard to financing
methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
Resolutes operating performance and return on capital as
compared to those of other companies in the exploration and
production industry, without regard to financing methods or
capital structure; and
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities.
|
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to, or
more meaningful than, net income, operating income, cash flows
from operating activities or any other measure of financial
performance presented in accordance with GAAP as measures of
operating performance, liquidity or ability to service debt
obligations. Because Resolute has borrowed money to finance its
operations, interest expense is a necessary element of its costs
and its ability to generate gross margins. Because Resolute uses
capital assets, depletion, depreciation and amortization are
also necessary elements of its costs. Therefore, any measures
that exclude these elements have material limitations. To
compensate for these limitations, Resolute believes that it is
important to consider both net income and net cash provided by
operating activities determined under GAAP, as well as Adjusted
EBITDA, to evaluate its financial performance and liquidity.
Adjusted EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect
net income, operating income and net cash provided by operating
activities and these measures may vary among companies.
Resolutes Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to
Adjusted EBITDA or EBITDA of any other company because other
entities may not calculate these measures in the same manner.
41
The following table provides a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
to net income (loss) and net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Pro Forma Resolute
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
42,730
|
|
|
$
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,419
|
)
|
|
$
|
(163,010
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
(15,085
|
)
|
|
|
101,495
|
|
|
|
(120,573
|
)
|
|
|
175,261
|
|
|
|
55,355
|
|
|
|
(120,573
|
)
|
|
|
55,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion
|
|
|
16,657
|
|
|
|
27,790
|
|
|
|
50,335
|
|
|
|
23,420
|
|
|
|
15,949
|
|
|
|
47,008
|
|
|
|
15,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
22,293
|
|
|
|
35,898
|
|
|
|
33,139
|
|
|
|
16,190
|
|
|
|
12,236
|
|
|
|
4,481
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
(18,247
|
)
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
9,805
|
|
|
|
(28,167
|
)
|
|
|
(21,077
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,533
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
69,721
|
|
|
$
|
98,794
|
|
|
$
|
111,286
|
|
|
$
|
59,431
|
|
|
$
|
33,041
|
|
|
$
|
109,726
|
|
|
$
|
28,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest expense
|
|
|
21,628
|
|
|
|
34,942
|
|
|
|
30,658
|
|
|
|
15,713
|
|
|
|
11,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
5,271
|
|
|
|
(12,246
|
)
|
|
|
(14,726
|
)
|
|
|
(7,379
|
)
|
|
|
8,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
(2,025
|
)
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
42,822
|
|
|
$
|
73,789
|
|
|
$
|
97,379
|
|
|
$
|
49,740
|
|
|
$
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(269,336
|
)
|
|
|
(97,596
|
)
|
|
|
(61,021
|
)
|
|
|
(26,505
|
)
|
|
|
(9,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
231,635
|
|
|
|
22,089
|
|
|
|
(41,512
|
)
|
|
|
(21,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As more fully described in Note 3
Acquisitions, in Resolutes combined financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, Resolute
acquired Primary Natural Resources Inc. The 2008 amount
reflected in Other is the non-cash portion of the
purchase price allocation related to the associated deferred tax
liability. |
Summary
Historical Operating and Reserve Data
The following table shows operating data for the periods
indicated. You should refer to Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Resolute,
Resolutes Business Estimated Net
Proved Reserves and Resolutes
Business Production and Price History in
evaluating the data presented below and the data presented in
the table on the following page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Sales Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and natural gas liquids (MMcfe)(4)
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
4,645
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent volumes (MBoe)
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily equivalent volumes (Boe/d)
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
7,712
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Realized Prices (including hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
|
62.18
|
|
|
|
67.30
|
|
|
|
81.39
|
|
|
|
81.58
|
|
|
|
54.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and natural gas liquids ($/Mcfe)
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
8.38
|
|
|
|
9.77
|
|
|
|
6.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Realized Prices (excluding hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
63.58
|
|
|
$
|
69.80
|
|
|
$
|
94.47
|
|
|
$
|
106.42
|
|
|
$
|
44.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and natural gas liquids ($/Mcfe)
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
|
7.59
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense ($/Boe)
|
|
$
|
16.92
|
|
|
$
|
16.76
|
|
|
$
|
20.04
|
|
|
$
|
19.22
|
|
|
$
|
17.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production tax expense ($/Boe)
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
|
|
11.02
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
42
The following table presents Resolutes estimated net
proved oil and gas reserves and the standardized measure and has
been prepared on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
|
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 the
estimated net proved oil and gas reserves and standardized
measure reflects the Aneth Field Properties
|
|
|
|
for the year ended December 31, 2008 the estimated net
proved oil and gas reserves and standardized measure reflects
the Aneth Field Properties and the Wyoming Properties
|
The data as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are based
on reports prepared by Resolute and audited by Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum
engineers. The standardized measure values shown in the table
are not intended to represent the current market value of
Resolutes estimated net proved oil and gas reserves. The
estimates of net proved reserves have not been filed with or
included in reports to any federal authority or agency other
than the SEC.
In accordance with SEC and FASB requirements, Resolutes
estimated net proved reserves and standardized measure were
determined using end of the period prices for oil and gas that
were realized as of the date set forth below. The reserves
estimates utilized year-end NYMEX posted prices for oil for the
dates presented, NYMEX Henry Hub posted prices for gas as of
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, as shown below, but in
each case as adjusted for location differentials as of the
effective date of the report, as well as plant fees and Btu
content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Estimated net proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
78,357
|
|
|
|
74,453
|
|
|
|
44,734
|
|
Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
17,782
|
|
NGL (MBbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
Total (MBoe)
|
|
|
78,672
|
|
|
|
74,747
|
|
|
|
49,334
|
|
Proved developed reserves as a percentage of total proved
reserves
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
Degree of depletion
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
Standardized measure ($ in millions)
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Oil and gas prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
61.05
|
|
|
$
|
95.98
|
|
|
$
|
44.60
|
|
Gas ($/MMBtu)
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
43
PRICE
RANGE OF SECURITIES AND DIVIDENDS
HACI
Price
Range of HACI Securities
HACI units, which consist of one share of HACI Common Stock and
one HACI Public Warrant, have traded on the NYSE Amex under the
symbol TOH.U since October 3, 2007, the date of
HACIs initial public offering, or the IPO. HACI Common
Stock has traded separately on the NYSE Amex under the symbol
TOH since October 8, 2007. Public Warrants have
traded separately on the NYSE Amex under the symbol
TOH.WS since October 8, 2007. Each Public
Warrant entitles the holder to purchase from HACI one share of
HACI Common Stock at an exercise price of $7.50 upon the later
of the completion of an initial business combination and
September 28, 2008. The HACI Public Warrants will expire on
September 28, 2011, or earlier upon redemption. If the
Acquisition is consummated, the HACI Public Warrants will be
exchanged for the Cash Amount or a new Company warrant.
On July 31, 2009, the last trading day before the public
announcement of the Acquisition, the last sales price per
security of the HACI units, HACI Common Stock and Public
Warrants were $9.62, $9.67 and $0.03, respectively, in each case
on the NYSE Amex. On September 10, 2009, the latest
practicable date before the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus, the last sales price per share of the HACI
units, HACI Common Stock and Public Warrants were $10.24, $9.74,
and $0.59, respectively, in each case on the NYSE Amex.
The following tables set forth, for the calendar quarter
indicated, the quarterly high and low sale prices for the HACI
units, HACI Common Stock and Public Warrants, respectively, as
reported on the NYSE Amex. None of the Companys equity
securities are publicly traded, and as a result, no market
information related to such equity securities is available.
Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
September 30, 2009(1)
|
|
$
|
10.35
|
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
9.62
|
|
|
$
|
9.44
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
9.51
|
|
|
$
|
9.06
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
9.40
|
|
|
$
|
8.75
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
9.87
|
|
|
$
|
9.24
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
10.10
|
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
10.02
|
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
December 31, 2007(2)
|
|
$
|
10.07
|
|
|
$
|
9.76
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the high and low sales prices for HACI units for the
quarter as of September 10, 2009. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents the high and low sales prices for HACI units from
October 3, 2007, the date of the IPO, through
December 31, 2007 |
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
September 30, 2009(1)
|
|
$
|
9.77
|
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
9.60
|
|
|
$
|
9.40
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
9.44
|
|
|
$
|
9.14
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
9.15
|
|
|
$
|
8.64
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
9.40
|
|
|
$
|
8.89
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
9.33
|
|
|
$
|
9.07
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
9.22
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
December 31, 2007(2)
|
|
$
|
9.87
|
|
|
$
|
8.94
|
|
44
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the high and low sales prices for HACI Common Stock
for the quarter as of September 10, 2009. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents the high and low sale prices for HACI Common Stock
from October 8, 2007, the date that HACI Common Stock first
became separately tradable, through December 31, 2007. |
Public
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
September 30, 2009(1)
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
December 31, 2007(2)
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the high and low sales prices for Public Warrants for
the quarter as of September 10, 2009. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents the high and low sale prices for Public Warrants from
October 8, 2007, the date that Public Warrants first became
separately tradable, through December 31, 2007. |
Security
Holders
On the record date, there were approximately 6 record holders of
HACI Common Stock. HACI believes that the number of beneficial
owners may be greater than the number of record holders because
a portion of HACI Common Stock is held of record through
brokerage firms in street name.
As of the record date, Seller was only the holder of Company
Common Stock.
Dividends
and Other Distributions
To date, HACI has not paid any dividends on HACI Common Stock.
The Company has not paid any dividends on Company Common Stock
and does not anticipate paying any dividends in the near future.
Any decision to pay dividends in the future will be at the
discretion of the Companys board of directors and will
depend upon operations, cash requirements, legal restrictions
and other factors, deemed relevant by the Companys board
of directors.
Resolute Holdings, LLC made distributions (including tax
distributions) to its members aggregating $100,000,000 and
$6,036 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008, respectively, and $44,627 for the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
The Companys credit agreement after the Acquisition will
restrict its ability to pay dividends.
45
RISK
FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risk factors, as
well as the other information set forth in this proxy
statement/prospectus, before making a decision on the
Acquisition or the other proposals presented. As a stockholder
of the Company following the consummation of the Acquisition,
you will be subject to all risks inherent in the business of
Resolute. The market value of your shares will reflect the
performance of the business relative to, among other things,
that of the competitors of Resolute and general economic, market
and industry conditions. The value of your investment may
increase or may decline and could result in a loss. You should
carefully consider the following factors as well as the other
information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. In
particular, you should consider the risks related to potential
conflicts of interest disclosed on pages 62-63.
Risks
Related to Resolutes Business, Operations and
Industry
The risk factors set forth below are not the only risks that
may affect Resolutes business. Resolutes business
could also be affected by additional risks not currently known
to it or that it currently deems to be immaterial. If any of the
following risks were actually to occur, Resolutes
business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially adversely affected.
The
current financial crisis may have impacts on Resolutes
business and financial condition that Resolute cannot
predict.
The continued credit crisis and turmoil in the global financial
system may continue to have an impact on Resolutes
business and financial condition, and Resolute may continue to
face challenges if conditions in the financial markets do not
improve. Resolutes ability to access the capital markets
has been restricted as a result of this crisis and may be
restricted in the future when Resolute would like, or need, to
raise capital. The financial crisis may also limit the number of
prospects for Resolutes development and acquisition, or
make such transactions uneconomic or difficult to consummate,
and make it more difficult for Resolute to develop its reserves.
The economic situation could also adversely affect the
collectability of Resolutes trade receivables and cause
Resolutes commodity hedging arrangements, if any, to be
ineffective if Resolutes counterparties are unable to
perform their obligations or seek bankruptcy protection. It may
also adversely impact any of Resolutes partners
ability to fulfill their obligations under operating agreements
and Resolute may be required to fund these expenditures from
other sources or reduce Resolutes planned activities.
Additionally, the current economic situation could lead to
further reduced demand for, or lower and continued volatility in
prices of, oil and gas, or both, which would have a negative
impact on Resolutes revenues.
Inadequate
liquidity could materially and adversely affect Resolutes
business operations in the future.
Resolutes efforts to maintain its liquidity position after
the consummation of the Acquisition will be very challenging
given the current economic conditions. Resolutes ability
to generate cash flow depends upon numerous factors related to
its business that may be beyond its control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of oil and gas it produces;
|
|
|
|
the price at which it sells its oil and gas production and the
costs it incurs to market its production;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of its commodity price hedging strategy;
|
|
|
|
the development of proved undeveloped properties and the success
of its enhanced oil recovery activities;
|
|
|
|
the level of its operating and general and administrative costs;
|
|
|
|
its ability to replace produced reserves;
|
|
|
|
prevailing economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
government regulation and taxation;
|
|
|
|
the level of its capital expenditures to implement its
development projects and make acquisitions of additional
reserves;
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
its ability to borrow under its revolving credit facility;
|
|
|
|
its debt service requirements contained in its revolving credit
facility or future debt agreements;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in its working capital needs; and
|
|
|
|
timing and collectability of receivables.
|
Resolutes
planned operations, as well as replacement of its production and
reserves, will require additional capital that may not be
available, especially if current market conditions
persist.
Resolutes business is capital intensive, and requires
substantial expenditures to maintain currently producing wells,
to make the acquisitions of additional reserves
and/or
conduct its exploitation and development program necessary to
replace its reserves, to pay expenses and to satisfy its other
obligations, which will require cash flow from operations,
additional borrowings or proceeds from the issuance of
additional equity, or some combination thereof, which may not be
available to Resolute. Following the Acquisition, Resolute
intends to accelerate capital projects that it had planned to
postpone, such as the Aneth Unit Phase 3
CO2
project, because based on current commodities prices, Resolute
does not expect to be able to finance its planned capital
expenditures in 2009 and 2010 solely with cash flow from
operations. That fact makes Resolute dependent on external
financing, including borrowings under its revolving credit
facility, to a greater degree than many of its competitors.
For example, Resolute expects to spend an additional
$227.8 million of capital expenditures over the next
20 years (including
CO2
purchases) to implement and complete its proved developed
non-producing and proved undeveloped
CO2
flood projects. Resolute expects to incur approximately
$99.3 million of these future capital expenditures from
2009 through 2011 based on its year-end 2008 SEC case reserve
report. To the extent Resolutes production and reserves
decline faster than it anticipates, Resolute will require a
greater amount of capital to maintain its production.
Resolutes ability to obtain bank financing or to access
the capital markets for future equity or debt offerings may be
limited by its financial condition at the time of any such
financing or offering, the covenants in its revolving credit
facility or future debt agreements, adverse market conditions or
other contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond its
control. Resolutes failure to obtain the funds necessary
for future exploitation, development and acquisition activities
could materially affect its business, results of operations and
financial condition. Even if Resolute is successful in obtaining
the necessary funds, the terms of such financings could limit
Resolutes activities and its ability to pay dividends. In
addition, incurring additional debt may significantly increase
Resolutes interest expense and financial leverage, and
issuing additional equity may result in significant equity
holder dilution.
A
significant part of Resolutes development plan involves
the implementation of its
CO2
projects. The supply of
CO2
and efficacy of the planned projects is uncertain, and other
resources may not be available or may be more expensive than
expected, which could adversely impact production, revenue and
earnings, and may require a write-down of
reserves.
Producing oil and gas reservoirs are depleting assets generally
characterized by declining production rates that vary depending
upon factors such as reservoir characteristics. A significant
part of Resolutes business strategy depends on its ability
to successfully implement
CO2
floods and other development projects it has planned for its
Aneth Field Properties in order to counter the natural decline
in production from the field. As of December 31, 2008,
approximately 65% of Resolutes estimated net proved
reserves were classified as proved developed non-producing and
proved undeveloped, meaning Resolute must undertake additional
development activities before it can produce those reserves.
These development activities involve numerous risks, including
insufficient quantities of
CO2,
project execution risks and cost overruns, insufficient capital
to allocate to these projects, and inability to obtain equipment
and materials that are necessary to successfully implement these
projects.
A critical part of Resolutes development strategy depends
upon its ability to purchase
CO2.
Resolute currently has entered into contracts to purchase
CO2
from two suppliers, ExxonMobil Gas & Power Marketing
Company and Kinder Morgan
CO2
Company, L.P. The contract with ExxonMobil Gas & Power
Marketing expires in 2010; the contract with Kinder Morgan
CO2
Company, L.P. expires in 2016. All of the
CO2
47
Resolute has under contract comes from the McElmo Dome field. If
Resolute is unable to purchase sufficient
CO2
under either of its existing contracts, either because
Resolutes suppliers are unable or are unwilling to supply
the contracted volumes, Resolute would have to purchase
CO2
from other owners of
CO2
in the McElmo Dome field or elsewhere. In such an event,
Resolute may not be able to locate substitute supplies of
CO2
at acceptable prices or at all. In addition, certain suppliers
of
CO2,
such as Kinder Morgan, use
CO2
in their own tertiary recovery projects. As a result, if
Resolute needs to purchase additional volumes of
CO2,
these suppliers may not be willing to sell a portion of their
supply of
CO2
to Resolute if their own demand for
CO2
exceeds their supply. Additionally, even if adequate supplies
are available for delivery from the McElmo Dome field, Resolute
could experience temporary or permanent shut-ins of
Resolutes pipeline that delivers
CO2
from that field to its Aneth Field Properties. If Resolute is
unable to obtain the
CO2
it requires and is unable to undertake its development projects
or if Resolutes development projects are significantly
delayed, Resolutes recoverable reserves may not be as much
as it currently anticipates, it will not realize its expected
incremental production, and its expected decline in the rate of
production from its Aneth Field Properties will be accelerated.
If our requirements for
CO2
were to decrease, we could be required to incur costs for
CO2
that we have not purchased or to purchase more
CO2
than we could use effectively. For more information about
Resolutes minimum financial obligations under these
contracts, please read Resolutes
Business Planned Operating and Development
Activities. For more information about Resolutes
CO2
development program and Resolutes minimum financial
obligations under these contracts, please read
Resolutes Business Planned Operating
and Development Activities.
In addition, Resolutes estimate of future development
costs, including with respect to its planned
CO2
development projects, is based on Resolutes current
expectation of prices and other costs of
CO2,
equipment and personnel Resolute will need in the future to
implement such projects. Resolutes actual future
development costs may be significantly higher than Resolute
estimates, and delays in executing its development projects
could result in higher labor and other costs associated with
these projects. If costs become too high, Resolutes future
development projects may not be economical and Resolute may be
forced to abandon its development projects.
Furthermore, the results Resolute obtains from its
CO2
flood projects may not be the same as it expected when preparing
its estimate of net proved reserves. Lower than expected
production results or delays in when Resolute first realizes
additional production as a result of its
CO2
flood projects will reduce the value of its reserves, which
could reduce its ability to incur indebtedness, require Resolute
to use cash to repay indebtedness, and require Resolute to
write-down the value of its reserves. Therefore, Resolutes
future reserves, production and future cash flow are highly
dependent on Resolutes success in efficiently developing
and exploiting its current estimated net proved undeveloped
reserves.
Resolute
is a party to contracts that require it to pay for a minimum
quantity of
CO2.
These contracts limit Resolutes ability to curtail costs
if its requirements for
CO2
decrease.
Resolutes contracts with Kinder Morgan and ExxonMobil
require Resolute to take, or pay for if not taken, a minimum
volume of
CO2
on a monthly basis. The
take-or-pay
obligations result in minimum financial obligations through
2016, in the case of the Kinder Morgan contract, and through
2010 in the case of the ExxonMobil contract. The
take-or-pay
provisions in both contracts allow Resolute to subsequently
apply
take-or-pay
payments made to volumes subsequently taken, but these
provisions have limitations and Resolute may not be able to
utilize all such amounts paid if the limitations apply or if
Resolute does not subsequently take sufficient volumes to
utilize the amounts previously paid.
Resolutes
oil production from its Aneth Field Properties is presently
connected by pipeline to only one customer, and such sales are
dependent on gathering systems and transportation facilities
that Resolute does not control. With only one pipeline connected
customer, when these facilities or systems are unavailable,
Resolutes operations can be interrupted and its revenues
reduced.
The marketability of Resolutes oil and gas production
depends in part upon the availability, proximity and capacity of
pipelines, gas gathering systems, and processing facilities
owned by third parties. In general, Resolute does not control
these facilities and its access to them may be limited or denied
due to circumstances
48
beyond its control. A significant disruption in the availability
of these facilities could adversely impact Resolutes
ability to deliver to market the oil and gas Resolute produces
and thereby cause a significant interruption in its operations.
In some cases, Resolutes ability to deliver to market its
oil and gas is dependent upon coordination among third parties
who own pipelines, transportation and processing facilities that
Resolute uses, and any inability or unwillingness of those
parties to coordinate efficiently could also interrupt
Resolutes operations. These are risks for which Resolute
generally does not maintain insurance.
With respect to oil produced at its Aneth Field Properties,
Resolute operates in a remote part of southeastern Utah, and
currently Resolute sells all of its crude oil production to a
single customer, Western Refining Southwest, Inc., a subsidiary
of Western Refining, Inc., or Western, under a contract that
terminates August 31, 2009. Resolute and Western, with the
consent of NNOG, have entered into a new contract effective
September 1, 2009, covering the joint crude oil volumes of
Resolute and NNOG from Aneth Field with an initial term of one
year and continuing month-to-month thereafter, with either party
having the right to terminate after the initial term, upon
ninety days notice. The contract may also be terminated by
Western after December 31, 2009, upon sixty days notice, if
Western is not able to renew its right-of-way agreements with
the Navajo Nation or if such rights-of-way are declared invalid
and either Western is prevented from using such rights-of way or
the Navajo Nation declares Western to be in trespass with
respect to such rights-of-way. Resolutes crude oil
production is currently transported to a terminal that serves
Westerns two refineries in the region via a crude oil
pipeline owned by NNOG. There are presently no pipelines in
service that run the entire distance from Resolutes Aneth
Field Properties to any alternative markets. If Western did not
purchase Resolutes crude oil, Resolute would have to
transport its crude oil to other markets by a combination of the
NNOG pipeline, truck and rail, which would result, in the short
run, in a lower price relative to the NYMEX price than it
currently receives. Resolute may in the future receive prices
with a greater differential to NYMEX than it currently receives,
which if not offset by increases in the NYMEX price for crude
oil could result in a material adverse effect on Resolutes
financial results.
Resolute would also have to find alternative markets if
Westerns refining capacity in the region is temporarily or
permanently shut-down for any reason or if NNOGs pipeline
to Westerns refineries is temporarily or permanently
shut-in for any reason. Resolute does not have any control over
Westerns decisions with respect to its refineries.
Resolute would also not have control over similar decisions by
any replacement customers.
Resolute customarily ships crude oil to Western daily and
receives payment on the twentieth day of the month following the
month of production. As a result, at any given time, Resolute
has significant amounts of accounts receivable outstanding from
Western. As of June 30, 2009, Resolute had recorded a
$9.6 million net receivable from Western. If Western
defaults on its obligation to pay Resolute for the crude oil it
has delivered, Resolutes income would be materially and
negatively affected. Both Moodys Investor Services and
Standard & Poors have assigned credit ratings to
Westerns long-term debt that are below investment grade.
In respect of its Wyoming operations, Resolute does not have any
long-term supply or similar agreements with entities for which
it acts as a producer and currently sells most of its Wyoming
oil production under a purchase agreement with a single
purchaser. Resolute is therefore dependent upon its ability to
sell oil and gas at the prevailing wellhead market price. There
can be no assurance that purchasers will be available or that
the prices they are willing to pay will remain stable and not
decline.
Oil
and gas prices are volatile and change for reasons that are
beyond Resolutes control. Decreases in the price Resolute
receives for its oil and gas production can adversely affect its
business, financial condition, results of operations and
liquidity and impede its growth.
The oil and gas markets are highly volatile, and Resolute cannot
predict future prices. Resolutes revenue, profitability
and cash flow depend upon the prices and demand for oil and
natural gas. The markets for these commodities are very volatile
and even relatively modest drops in prices can significantly
affect Resolutes financial results and impede its growth.
Prices for oil and gas may fluctuate widely in response to
relatively
49
minor changes in the supply of and demand for the commodities,
market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are
beyond Resolutes control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign supply of and demand for oil and gas,
including as a result of technological advances affecting energy
consumption and supply;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
overall domestic and global political and economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and
other state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and
production controls;
|
|
|
|
the price of foreign imports;
|
|
|
|
political and economic conditions in oil producing countries,
including the Middle East and South America;
|
|
|
|
technological advances affecting energy consumption;
|
|
|
|
variations between product prices at sales points and applicable
index prices;
|
|
|
|
domestic, tribal and foreign governmental regulations and
taxation;
|
|
|
|
the impact of energy conservation efforts;
|
|
|
|
the capacity, cost and availability of oil and gas pipelines and
other transportation and gathering facilities, and the proximity
of these facilities to its wells;
|
|
|
|
the availability of refining and processing capability;
|
|
|
|
factors specific to the local and regional markets where
Resolutes production occurs; and
|
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels.
|
In the past, the price of crude oil has been extremely volatile,
and Resolute expects this volatility to continue. For example,
during the six months ended June 30, 2009, the NYMEX price
for light sweet crude oil ranged from a high of $72.68 per Bbl
to a low of $34.00 per Bbl. For calendar year 2008, the range
was from a high of $145.28 per Bbl to a low of $33.03 per Bbl,
and for the five years ended December 31, 2008, the price
ranged from a high of $145.28 per Bbl to a low of $25.21 per Bbl.
A decline in oil and gas prices, such as the severe drop
experienced in the second half of 2008 and the decrease in gas
prices for the first quarter of 2009, can significantly affect
many aspects of Resolutes business, including financial
condition, revenues, results of operations, liquidity, rate of
growth and the carrying value of Resolutes oil and gas
properties, all of which depend primarily or in part upon those
prices. For example, declines in the prices Resolute receives
for its oil and gas adversely affect its ability to finance
capital expenditures, make acquisitions, raise capital and
satisfy its financial obligations. In addition, declines in
prices reduce the amount of oil and gas that Resolute can
produce economically and, as a result, adversely affect its
quantities of proved reserves. Among other things, a reduction
in its reserves can limit the capital available to Resolute, as
the maximum amount of available borrowing under its revolving
credit facility is, and the availability of other sources of
capital likely will be, based to a significant degree on the
estimated quantities of those reserves.
Resolutes
estimated proved reserves are based on many assumptions that may
turn out to be inaccurate. Any significant inaccuracies in these
reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially
affect the quantities of Resolutes proved
reserves.
Resolutes estimate of proved reserves as of and for the
periods ended December 21, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are based on
the quantities of oil and gas that engineering and geological
analyses demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable
from established reservoirs in the future under current
operating and economic parameters. Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum
engineers, audited reserve
50
and economic evaluations of all properties that were prepared by
Resolute on a
well-by-well
basis. Oil and gas reserve engineering is not exact and requires
subjective estimates of underground accumulations of oil and gas
and assumptions concerning future oil and gas prices, production
levels and operating and development costs. Estimates of
economically recoverable oil and gas reserves and of future net
cash flows depend upon a number of variable factors and
assumptions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
historical production from the area compared with production
from other comparable producing areas;
|
|
|
|
the assumed effects of regulations by governmental agencies;
|
|
|
|
assumptions concerning future oil and gas prices; and
|
|
|
|
assumptions concerning future operating costs, severance and
excise taxes, development costs and workover and remedial costs.
|
Because all reserve estimates are to some degree subjective,
each of the following items may differ materially from those
assumed in estimating reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered;
|
|
|
|
the timing of the recovery of oil and gas reserves;
|
|
|
|
the production and operating costs incurred; and
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of future development expenditures.
|
Furthermore, different reserve engineers may make different
estimates of reserves and cash flows based on the same available
data. As a result of all these factors, Resolute may make
material changes to reserves estimates to take into account
changes in its assumptions and the results of its development
activities and actual drilling and production.
If these assumptions prove to be incorrect, Resolutes
estimates of reserves, the economically recoverable quantities
of oil and gas attributable to any particular group of
properties, the classifications of reserves based on risk of
recovery and Resolutes estimates of the future net cash
flows from its reserves could change significantly. In addition,
if declines in oil and gas prices result in its having to make
substantial downward adjustments to its estimated proved
reserves, or if its estimates of development costs increase,
production data factors change or drilling results deteriorate,
accounting rules may require Resolute to make downward
adjustments, as a non-cash impairment charge to earnings, to the
carrying value of Resolutes oil and gas properties. If
Resolute incurs impairment charges in the future, Resolute could
have a material adverse effect on its results of operations in
the period incurred and on its ability to borrow funds under its
credit facility.
The
standardized measure of future net cash flows from
Resolutes net proved reserves is based on many assumptions
that may prove to be inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in
Resolutes reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will
materially affect the quantities and present value of its proved
reserves.
Actual future net cash flows from Resolutes oil and gas
properties will be determined by the actual prices Resolute
receives for oil and gas, its actual operating costs in
producing oil and gas, the amount and timing of actual
production, the amount and timing of Resolutes capital
expenditures, supply of and demand for oil and gas and changes
in governmental regulations or taxation, which, may differ from
the assumptions used in creating estimates of future cash flows.
The timing of both Resolutes production and its incurrence
of expenses in connection with the development and production of
oil and gas properties will affect the timing of actual future
net cash flows from proved reserves, and thus their actual
present value. In addition, the 10% discount factor Resolute
uses when calculating discounted future net cash flows in
compliance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69 may not be the
most appropriate discount factor based on interest rates in
effect from time to time and risks associated with Resolute or
the oil and gas industry in general.
51
Currently,
substantially all of Resolutes oil producing properties
are located on the Navajo Reservation, making Resolute
vulnerable to risks associated with laws and regulations
pertaining to the operation of oil and gas properties on Native
American tribal lands.
Substantially all of Resolutes Aneth Field Properties,
which represent approximately 89% of Resolutes total
proved reserves and approximately 72% of Resolutes
production (on an equivalent barrel basis), are located on the
Navajo Reservation in Southeastern Utah. Operation of oil and
gas interests on Indian lands presents unique considerations and
complexities. These arise from the fact that Indian tribes are
dependent sovereign nations located within states,
but are subject only to tribal laws and treaties with, and the
laws and Constitution of, the United States. This creates a
potential overlay of three jurisdictional regimes
Indian, federal and state. These considerations and complexities
could arise around various aspects of Resolutes
operations, including real property considerations, employment
practices, environmental matters and taxes.
For example, Resolute is subject to the Navajo Preference in
Employment Act. This law requires that it give preference in
hiring to members of the Navajo Nation, or in some cases other
Native American Tribes, if such a person is qualified for the
position, rather than hiring the most qualified person. A
further regulatory requirement is imposed by the Navajo Nation
Business Opportunity Act which requires Resolute to give
preference to businesses owned by Navajo persons when it is
hiring contractors. These regulatory restrictions can negatively
affect Resolutes ability to recruit and retain the most
highly qualified personnel or to utilize the most experienced
and economical contractors for its projects.
Furthermore, because tribal property is considered to be held in
trust by the federal government, before Resolute can take
actions such as drilling, pipeline installation or similar
actions, it is required to obtain approvals from various federal
agencies that are in addition to customary regulatory approvals
required of oil and gas producers operating on non-Indian
property. Resolute also is required to obtain approvals from the
Resources Committee, which is a standing committee of the Navajo
Nation Tribal Council, before Resolute can take similar actions
with respect to its Aneth Field Properties. These approvals
could result in delays in its implementation of, or otherwise
prevent it from implementing, its development program. These
approvals, even if ultimately obtained, could result in delays
in Resolutes ability to implement its development program.
In addition, under the Native American laws and regulations,
Resolute could be held liable for personal injuries, property
damage (including site
clean-up and
restoration costs) and other damages. Failure to comply with
these laws and regulations may also result in the suspension or
termination of Resolutes operations and subject it to
administrative, civil and criminal penalties, including the
assessment of natural resource damages.
For additional information about the legal complexities and
considerations associated with operating on the Navajo
Reservation, please read Resolutes
Business Laws and Regulations Pertaining to Oil and
Gas Operations on Navajo Nation Lands.
The
statutory preferential purchase right held by the Navajo Nation
to acquire transferred Navajo Nation oil and gas leases and
NNOGs right of first negotiation could diminish the value
Resolute may be able to receive in a sale of its
properties.
Nearly all of Resolutes Aneth Field Properties are located
on the Navajo Reservation. The Navajo Nation has a statutory
preferential right to purchase at the offered price any Navajo
Nation oil and gas lease or working interest in such a lease at
the time the lease or interest is proposed to be transferred.
The existence of this right can make it more difficult to sell a
Navajo Nation oil and gas lease because this right may
discourage third parties from purchasing such a lease and,
therefore, could reduce the value of Resolutes leases if
it were to attempt to sell them. In addition, under the terms of
Resolutes Cooperative Agreement with NNOG, Resolute is
obligated to first negotiate with NNOG to sell its Aneth Field
Properties before it may offer to sell such properties to any
other third party. This contractual right could make it more
difficult for Resolute to sell its Aneth Field Properties. For
additional information about the right of first negotiation for
the benefit of NNOG, please read Resolutes
Business Relationship with the Navajo
Nation.
52
All of
Resolutes producing properties are located in two
geographic areas, making it vulnerable to risks associated with
operating in only two geographic areas.
A substantial amount of Resolutes sales of oil and gas and
89% of its total proved reserves are currently located in its
Aneth Field Properties in the southeast Utah portion of the
Paradox Basin in the Four Corners area of the southwestern
United States. A smaller portion of Resolutes sales of oil
and gas and 11% of its total proved reserves are predominantly
located in the Hilight Field in the Powder River Basin in
northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana. As a result of
Resolutes lack of diversification in asset type and
location, any delays or interruptions of production from these
wells caused by such factors as governmental regulation,
transportation capacity constraints, curtailment of production
or interruption of transportation of oil produced from the wells
in these fields, price fluctuations, natural disasters or
shut-downs of the pipelines connecting its Aneth Field
production to refineries would have a significantly greater
impact on Resolutes results of operations than if Resolute
maintained more diverse assets and locations.
Lack of geographic diversification also affects the prices to be
received for Resolutes oil and gas production from its
properties, since prices are determined to a significant extent
by factors affecting the regional supply of, and demand for, oil
and gas, including the adequacy of the pipeline and processing
infrastructure in the region to transport or process
Resolutes production and that of other producers. Those
factors result in basis differentials between the published
indices generally used to establish the price received for
regional oil and gas production and the actual (frequently
lower) price Resolute may receive for its production.
Resolute
may not be able to redeploy into producing oil and gas
properties or other operating assets any cash it may receive
upon NNOGs exercise of its options to purchase a portion
of Resolutes Aneth Field Properties.
NNOG has a total of six options to purchase for cash, in the
aggregate, up to 30.0% of Resolutes interest in the
Chevron Properties and 30.0% of its interest in the ExxonMobil
Properties. These options become exercisable over a period of
time if financial hurdles related to recovery by Resolute of its
investments are met. If NNOG exercises its purchase options in
full, it could acquire from Resolute undivided working interests
representing an 18.15% working interest in the Aneth Unit, a
22.5% working interest in the McElmo Creek Unit and a 17.7%
working interest in the Ratherford Unit. If NNOG were to
exercise any of these options, Resolute might not be able to
effectively redeploy the cash received from NNOG. For additional
information about NNOGs purchase right, please read
Resolutes Business Relationship with
the Navajo Nation.
Developing
and producing oil and gas are costly and high-risk activities
with many uncertainties that could adversely affect
Resolutes financial condition or results of operations,
and insurance may not be available or may not fully cover
losses.
There are numerous risks associated with developing, completing
and operating a well, and cost factors can adversely affect the
economics of a well. Resolutes development and producing
operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of
other factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
high costs, shortages or delivery delays of rigs, equipment,
labor or other services;
|
|
|
|
unexpected operational events
and/or
conditions;
|
|
|
|
reductions in oil or gas prices or increases in oil or gas price
differentials;
|
|
|
|
increases in severance taxes;
|
|
|
|
limitations on Resolutes ability to sell its crude oil or
gas production;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions and natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
facility or equipment malfunctions, and equipment failures or
accidents;
|
|
|
|
pipe or cement failures and casing collapses;
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with environmental and other governmental
requirements;
|
|
|
|
environmental hazards, such as leaks, oil spills, pipeline
ruptures and discharges of toxic gases;
|
|
|
|
lost or damaged oilfield development and service tools;
|
|
|
|
unusual or unexpected geological formations, and pressure or
irregularities in formations;
|
|
|
|
fires, blowouts, surface craterings and explosions;
|
|
|
|
shortages or delivery delays of equipment and services;
|
|
|
|
title problems;
|
|
|
|
objections from surface owners and nearby surface owners in the
areas where Resolute operates; and
|
|
|
|
uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids.
|
Any of these or other similar occurrences could reduce
Resolutes cash from operations or result in the disruption
of Resolutes operations, substantial repair costs,
significant damage to property, environmental pollution and
impairment of its operations. The occurrence of these events
could also affect third parties, including persons living near
Resolutes operations, Resolutes employees and
employees of Resolutes contractors, leading to injuries or
death.
Insurance against all operational risk is not available to
Resolute. In addition, pollution and environmental risks
generally are not fully insurable. Additionally, Resolute may
elect not to obtain insurance if it believes that the cost of
available insurance is excessive relative to the perceived risks
presented. Losses could, therefore, occur for uninsurable or
uninsured risks or in amounts in excess of existing insurance
coverage. Moreover, insurance may not be available in the future
at commercially reasonable costs and on commercially reasonable
terms. Changes in the insurance markets subsequent to the
terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, have made it more
difficult for Resolute to obtain coverage for terrorist attacks
and related risks. Resolute may not be able to obtain the levels
or types of insurance it would otherwise have obtained prior to
these market changes, and any insurance coverage Resolute does
obtain may contain large deductibles or it may not cover all
hazards or potential losses. Losses and liabilities from
uninsured and underinsured events or a delay in the payment of
insurance proceeds could adversely affect Resolutes
business, financial condition and results of operations.
If
Resolute does not make acquisitions of reserves on economically
acceptable terms, Resolutes future growth and ability to
maintain production will be limited to only the growth it
intends to achieve through the development of its proved
developed non-producing and proved undeveloped
reserves.
Producing oil and natural gas reservoirs are generally
characterized by declining production rates that vary depending
upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. The rate of
decline will change if production from Resolutes existing
wells declines in a different manner than Resolute has estimated
and can change under other circumstances. Resolutes future
oil and natural gas reserves and production and, therefore,
Resolutes cash flow and income are highly dependent upon
its success in efficiently developing and exploiting its current
reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional
recoverable reserves.
Resolute intends to grow by bringing its proved developed
non-producing reserves into production and developing its proved
undeveloped reserves. Resolutes ability to further grow
depends in part on its ability to make acquisitions,
particularly in the event NNOG exercises its options to increase
its working interest in the Aneth Field Properties. Resolute may
be unable to make such acquisitions because it is:
|
|
|
|
|
unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or
negotiate acceptable purchase contracts with the seller;
|
|
|
|
unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on
economically acceptable terms; or
|
|
|
|
outbid by competitors.
|
54
If Resolute is unable to acquire properties containing proved
reserves at acceptable costs, Resolutes total level of
proved reserves and associated future production will decline as
a result of its ongoing production of its reserves.
Any
acquisitions Resolute completes are subject to substantial risks
that could negatively impact its financial condition and results
of operations.
Even if Resolute does make acquisitions that it believes will
enhance its growth, financial condition or results of
operations, any acquisition involves potential risks, including,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the validity of Resolutes assumptions about the acquired
companys reserves, future production, the future prices of
oil and gas, infrastructure requirements, environmental and
other liabilities, revenues and costs;
|
|
|
|
an inability to integrate successfully the properties and
businesses Resolute acquires;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in Resolutes liquidity to the extent it uses a
significant portion of its available cash or borrowing capacity
to finance acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
a significant increase in its interest expense or financial
leverage if Resolute incurs debt to finance acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
the assumption of unknown liabilities, losses or costs for which
Resolute is not indemnified or for which Resolutes
indemnity is inadequate;
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business
concerns;
|
|
|
|
an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to
manage and operate Resolutes growing business and assets;
|
|
|
|
unforeseen difficulties encountered in operating in new
geographic areas; and
|
|
|
|
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.
|
Resolutes decision to acquire a property or business will
depend in part on the evaluation of data obtained from
production reports and engineering studies, geophysical and
geological analyses and seismic and other information, the
results of which are often inconclusive and subject to various
interpretations.
Also, Resolutes reviews of acquired properties are
inherently incomplete because it generally is not feasible to
perform an in-depth review of the individual properties involved
in each acquisition. Even a detailed review of records and
properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential
problems, nor will it permit a buyer to become sufficiently
familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies
and potential problems. Inspections may not always be performed
on every well, and environmental problems, such as ground water
contamination, are not necessarily observable even when an
inspection is undertaken. The potential risks in making
acquisitions could adversely affect Resolutes ability to
achieve anticipated levels of cash flows from the acquired
businesses or realize other anticipated benefits of those
acquisitions.
Resolute
is currently in default under its second lien credit agreement,
and lenders under that facility have accelerated the
indebtedness. The inability to cure such default could
materially adversely affect Resolute.
On August 28, 2009, Aneth gave notice to the lenders under
its $225 million second lien credit facility that it was in
default its Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant (calculated as the
ratio of outstanding debt to trailing four quarters EBITDA)
under that facility as measured at June 30, 2009, and on
September 1, 2009, lenders under that facility declared the
loan in default and accelerated the indebtedness. As a result of
the declaration of default, default interest of an additional 2%
per annum was imposed and the Company is prohibited from
utilizing the Eurodollar interest option in future borrowings
under the facility. Lenders under the first lien credit facility
waived a similar Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant default under
the first lien facility as of June 30, 2009, and have
waived the cross default provisions of the first lien facility
as they relate to this default under the second lien credit
facility through the earlier of October 15, 2009 or the
date the lenders determine that the Acquisition is not likely
55
to be consummated. An Intercreditor Agreement limits the ability
of the lenders under the second lien credit facility to exercise
remedies, including foreclosure on Resolutes assets, for a
minimum of 180 days after the date of delivery of written
notice of default from the Second Lien administrative agent to
the First Lien administrative agent, which period is extended to
up to 360 days if the first lien lenders are exercising
their rights with respect to a material portion of the
collateral. As these defaults have been waived or are subject to
standstill covenants, such defaults are excepted from the
condition to the consummation of the Acquisition related to
defaults under material indebtedness. However, failure to cure
the default in such 180 to 360 day period could subject
Resolute to foreclosure proceedings by the first and second lien
lenders. Resolute has been required to amend or obtain waiver of
the Maximum Leverage Ratio and current ratio provisions of its
first lien credit facility on May 12, July 28, and
August 27, 2009 in order to remain in compliance with its
financial covenants under the first lien credit facility at
March 31 and June 30, 2009, and has obtained the waiver of
the cross-default provision described above. If the Acquisition
is completed, the second lien credit facility will be repaid in
full and terminated and the indebtedness under the first lien
credit facility will be reduced. However, following the
Acquisition Resolute will continue to be subject to financial
covenants under its amended first lien credit facility. If
Resolute is unable to comply with such covenants and defaults
occur and are not waived, there is no assurance that Resolute
could cure such defaults, and such uncured defaults may also be
defaults under other material agreements. Among other
consequences of such uncured defaults, Resolutes
outstanding debt could be accelerated and the lenders could
foreclose on its assets. In such event, there can be no
assurance that Resolute could successfully satisfy its
obligations and continue as a going concern.
Resolutes
future debt levels may limit its flexibility to obtain
additional financing and pursue other business
opportunities.
After giving effect to the Acquisition and the related
transactions, Resolute estimates that its total debt as of the
closing of the Acquisition will be approximately
$81.0 million assuming maximum conversion. Following the
Acquisition, Resolute expects to have the ability to incur
additional debt under an amended revolving credit facility,
subject to borrowing base limitations. Resolutes
significant level of indebtedness could have important
consequences to Resolute, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Resolutes ability to obtain additional financing, if
necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions or other purposes may be impaired or such financing
may not be available on favorable terms;
|
|
|
|
covenants contained in Resolutes existing and future
credit and debt arrangements will require it to meet financial
tests that may affect its flexibility in planning for and
reacting to changes in its business, including possible
acquisition opportunities;
|
|
|
|
Resolute will need a substantial portion of its cash flow to
make principal and interest payments on its indebtedness,
reducing the funds that would otherwise be available for
operations and future business opportunities; and
|
|
|
|
Resolutes debt level will make it more vulnerable than its
competitors with less debt to competitive pressures or a
downturn in its business or the economy generally.
|
Resolutes ability to service its indebtedness will depend
upon, among other things, its future financial and operating
performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic
conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other
factors, some of which are beyond Resolutes control. If
Resolutes operating results are not sufficient to service
its current or future indebtedness, it will be forced to take
actions such as reducing or delaying business activities,
acquisitions, investments
and/or
capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or
refinancing Resolutes indebtedness, or seeking additional
equity capital or bankruptcy protection. Resolute may not be
able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms or at
all.
Resolutes
revolving credit facility and second lien credit facility have
substantial financial and operating covenants that restrict
Resolutes business and financing activities and prohibit
Resolute from paying dividends. Future borrowing agreements
would likely include similar restrictions.
The operating and financial covenants in Resolutes
$300 million senior secured revolving credit facility and
its second lien credit facility restrict Resolutes ability
to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage,
expand or pursue its business activities. While Resolute plans
to amend its revolving credit facility in
56
connection with the closing of the Acquisition, it expects that
its amended revolving credit facility will be substantially
similar to its existing revolving credit facility.
Resolutes revolving credit facility currently restricts,
and it anticipates that any amendment to such facility would
restrict, its ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
grant liens;
|
|
|
|
make acquisitions and investments;
|
|
|
|
lease equipment;
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures above specified amounts;
|
|
|
|
redeem or prepay other debt;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends to shareholders or repurchase shares;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
enter into a merger, consolidation or sale of assets.
|
The revolving credit agreement matures on April 13, 2011,
unless extended, and is secured by all of Resolutes oil
and gas properties as well as a pledge of all ownership
interests in operating subsidiaries. The revolving credit
agreement has a borrowing base (currently $240 million)
determined by the lenders based on their evaluation of the value
of the collateral. Resolute is required to maintain a
consolidated current ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0 at the end of
any fiscal quarter; and may not permit its Maximum Leverage
Ratio (consolidated indebtedness to consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA) to exceed specified levels at the end of each fiscal
quarter (currently 4.0 to 1.0). Resolutes revolving credit
facility does not permit it to pay dividends to shareholders.
While the second lien credit facility is expected to be repaid
at the closing of the Acquisition, Resolute may enter into other
borrowing agreements which would likely include operating and
financial covenants.
Shortages
of qualified personnel or field equipment and services could
affect Resolutes ability to execute its plans on a timely
basis, reduce its cash flow and adversely affect its results of
operations.
The demand for qualified and experienced geologists,
geophysicists, engineers, field operations specialists, landmen,
financial experts and other personnel in the oil and gas
industry can fluctuate significantly, often in correlation with
oil and gas prices, causing periodic shortages. From time to
time, there also have been shortages of drilling rigs and other
field equipment, as demand for rigs and equipment has increased
along with the number of wells being drilled. These factors can
also result in significant increases in costs for equipment,
services and personnel. Higher oil and gas prices generally
stimulate increased demand and result in increased prices for
drilling rigs, crews and associated supplies, equipment and
services. Increased demand resulting from high commodity prices
over the past several years resulted in some difficulty for
Resolute, and significantly increased costs, in obtaining
drilling rigs, experienced crews and related services. Resolute
may continue to experience such difficulties in the future. If
shortages persist or prices continue to increase,
Resolutes profit margin, cash flow and operating results
could be adversely affected and Resolutes ability to
conduct its operations in accordance with current plans and
budgets could be restricted.
Resolutes
hedging activities could reduce its net income, which could
reduce the price at which the Companys stock may
trade.
To achieve more predictable cash flow and to reduce
Resolutes exposure to adverse changes in the price of oil,
Resolute has entered into, and in the future plans to enter
into, derivative arrangements covering a significant portion of
its oil production. These derivative arrangements could result
in both realized and unrealized hedging losses. Resolutes
derivative instruments are subject to mark-to-market accounting
treatment, and the change in fair market value of the instrument
is reported in Resolutes statement of operations each
quarter, which has resulted in, and will in the future likely
result in, significant unrealized net gains or losses.
57
As of September 1, 2009, and for the remaining calendar
year 2009, Resolute had in place oil and gas swaps, oil and gas
collars and a gas basis hedge. These included oil swaps covering
approximately 81% of its anticipated 2009 oil production from
proved developed producing reserves at a weighted average price
of $62.75 per Bbl, oil collars covering approximately 5% of its
anticipated 2009 oil production from proved developed producing
reserves with a floor of $105.00 per Bbl and ceiling of $151.00
per Bbl, gas swaps covering approximately 30% of its anticipated
2009 gas production from proved developed producing reserves at
a weighted average price of $9.93 per MMBtu, gas collars
covering approximately 54% of its anticipated 2009 gas
production from proved developed producing reserves with a floor
of $5.00 MMBtu and ceiling of $9.35 MMBtu and a CIG
gas basis hedge priced at $2.10 per MMBtu covering approximately
30% of its anticipated 2009 gas production from proved developed
producing reserves. Additional instruments are also in place for
future years and are summarized in the table below. Resolute
expects to continue to use hedging arrangements to reduce
commodity price risk with respect to its estimated production
from producing properties. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Resolute How
Resolute Evaluates Its Operations Production Levels,
Trends and Prices and Managementss
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Resolute Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(NYMEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WTI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(based on
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Hedge Price
|
|
|
Bbl per
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
Year
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
|
per Bbl
|
|
|
Day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
engineering)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
$
|
62.75
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
105.00
|
|
|
$
|
151.00
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
57.83
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
105.00
|
|
|
$
|
151.00
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
2011
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
2012
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
2013
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
Basic Hedges
|
|
|
|
Gas Swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Hedged
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Gas (Henry
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
(CIG)
|
|
|
(CIG)
|
|
|
(based on
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMBtu per
|
|
|
Hub) Swap
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
Mcf per
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
Year
|
|
day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
per day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
engineering)
|
|
|
day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
$
|
7.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
Resolute currently has an average hedge price on
3,650 barrels of crude oil in 2010 of $57.83. As a
condition to closing of the Acquisition, Resolute is required to
implement hedging arrangements resulting in an average fixed
price on its crude oil swaps in year 2010 on 3,650 barrels
of crude oil per day of at least $67.00 per barrel. Resolute has
held initial discussions with two financial institutions
regarding possible alternatives for achieving this condition to
closing, however, as of September 11, 2009, Resolute has
not decided on any one or more alternatives or made any
commitments and therefore, has not achieved such condition as of
such date. Please read Resolutes
Business Resolutes Business
Strategies for additional information about this
liability.
Resolutes actual future production during a period may be
significantly higher or lower than it estimates at the time it
enters into derivative transactions for such period. If the
actual amount is higher than it estimates, it will have more
unhedged production and therefore greater commodity price
exposure than it intended. If the actual amount is lower than
the nominal amount that is subject to Resolutes derivative
financial instruments, it might be forced to satisfy all or a
portion of its derivative transactions without the benefit of
the cash flow from its sale of the underlying physical
commodity, resulting in a substantial diminution of its
liquidity. As a
58
result of these factors, Resolutes derivative activities
may not be as effective as it intends in reducing the volatility
of its cash flows, and in certain circumstances may actually
increase the volatility of its cash flows.
In addition, Resolutes derivative activities are subject
to the risk that a counterparty may not perform its obligation
under the applicable derivative instrument. Resolute previously
maintained hedge positions with Lehman Brothers Commodity
Services, Inc., which were terminated in connection with the
bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. If other hedge
counterparties, some of which have received governmental support
in connection with the ongoing credit crisis, are unable to make
payments to Resolute under its hedging arrangements,
Resolutes results of operation, financial condition and
liquidity would be adversely affected.
The
effectiveness of hedging transactions to protect Resolute from
future oil price declines will be dependent upon oil prices at
the time it enters into future hedging transactions as well as
its future levels of hedging, and as a result its future net
cash flow may be more sensitive to commodity price
changes.
As Resolutes hedges expire, more of its future production
will be sold at market prices unless it enters into additional
hedging transactions. Resolutes revolving credit facility
prohibits it from entering into hedging arrangements for more
than 80% of its production from projected proved developed
producing reserves using economic parameters specified in its
credit agreements, including escalated prices and costs. The
prices at which Resolute hedges its production in the future
will be dependent upon commodity prices at the time it enters
into these transactions, which may be substantially lower than
current prices. Accordingly, Resolutes commodity price
hedging strategy will not protect it from significant and
sustained declines in oil and gas prices received for its future
production. Conversely, Resolutes commodity price hedging
strategy may limit its ability to realize cash flow from
commodity price increases. It is also possible that a larger
percentage of Resolutes future production will not be
hedged as compared to the next few years, which would result in
its oil revenues becoming more sensitive to commodity price
changes.
The
nature of Resolutes assets exposes it to significant costs
and liabilities with respect to environmental and operational
safety matters. Resolute is responsible for costs associated
with the removal and remediation of the decommissioned Aneth Gas
Processing Plant.
Resolute may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result
of environmental, health and safety requirements applicable to
its oil and gas exploitation, production and other activities.
These costs and liabilities could arise under a wide range of
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including
agency interpretations thereof and governmental enforcement
policies, which have tended to become increasingly strict over
time. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may
result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal
penalties, the imposition of investigatory, cleanup and site
restoration costs and liens, the denial or revocation of permits
or other authorizations and the issuance of injunctions to limit
or cease operations. Compliance with these laws and regulations
also increases the cost of Resolutes operations and may
prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of a given
operation. In addition, claims for damages to persons or
property may result from environmental and other impacts of its
operations.
As a result of Resolutes acquisition of the Chevron
Properties and the ExxonMobil Properties, it acquired an
interest in the Aneth Gas Processing Plant, which is currently
being decommissioned. Under Resolutes purchase agreement
with Chevron, Chevron is responsible for indemnifying Resolute
against the decommissioning and clean-up or remediation costs
allocable to the 39% interest Resolute purchased from it. Under
Resolutes purchase agreement with ExxonMobil, however,
Resolute is responsible for the decommissioning and clean-up or
remediation cost allocable to the interests it purchased from
ExxonMobil, which is 25% of the total cost of the project. If
Chevron fails to pay its share of the decommissioning costs in
accordance with the purchase agreement, Resolute could be held
responsible for 64% of the total costs to decommission and
remediate the Aneth Gas Processing Plant. Chevron is managing
the decommissioning process and, based on Chevrons current
estimate, the total cost of the decommissioning is
$14.6 million. $12.4 million has already been incurred
and paid for as of June 30, 2009. This estimate does not
include any costs for any possible subsurface
clean-up or
remediation of the site.
59
The Aneth Gas Processing Plant site was previously evaluated by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or
EPA, for possible listing on the National Priorities
List, or NPL, of sites contaminated with hazardous
substances with the highest priority for
clean-up
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act, or CERCLA. Based on its
investigation, the EPA concluded no further investigation was
warranted and that the site was not required to be listed on the
NPL. The Navajo Environmental Protection Agency now has primary
jurisdiction over the Aneth Gas Processing Plant site, however,
and Resolute cannot predict whether it will require further
investigation and possible
clean-up,
and the ultimate cleanup liability may be affected by the recent
enactment by the Navajo Nation of a Navajo CERCLA. In some
matters, the Navajo CERCLA imposes broader obligations and
liabilities than the federal CERCLA. Resolute has been advised
by Chevron that a significant portion of the subsurface
clean-up or
remediation costs, if any, would be covered by an indemnity from
the prior owner of the plant, and Chevron has provided Resolute
with a copy of the pertinent purchase agreement that appears to
support its position. Resolute cannot predict whether any
subsurface remediation will be required or what the costs of the
subsurface
clean-up or
remediation could be. Additionally, it cannot be certain whether
any of such costs will be reimbursable to it pursuant to the
indemnity of the prior owner. To the extent any such costs are
incurred and not reimbursed pursuant to the indemnity from the
prior owner, Resolute would be liable for 25% of such costs as a
result of its acquisition of the ExxonMobil Properties. Please
read Resolutes Business Aneth Gas
Processing Plant for additional information about this
liability.
Strict or joint and several liability to remediate contamination
may be imposed under environmental laws, which could cause
Resolute to become liable for the conduct of others or for
consequences of its own actions that were in compliance with all
applicable laws at the time those actions were taken. New or
modified environmental, health or safety laws, regulations or
enforcement policies could be more stringent and impose
unforeseen liabilities or significantly increase compliance
costs. Please read Resolutes Business
Environmental, Health and Safety Matters and
Regulation for more information.
Resolute
may be unable to compete effectively with larger companies,
which may adversely affect its operations and ability to
generate and maintain sufficient revenue.
The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive, and Resolute
competes with companies that have greater resources. Many of
these companies not only explore for and produce oil and gas,
but also refine and market petroleum and other products on a
regional, national or worldwide basis. These companies may be
able to pay more for oil and gas properties and exploratory
prospects or identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater
number of properties and prospects than Resolutes
financial or human resources permit. In addition, these
companies may have a greater ability to continue exploration or
exploitation activities during periods of low oil and gas market
prices. Resolutes larger competitors may be able to absorb
the burden of present and future federal, state, local and other
laws and regulations more easily than Resolute can, which would
adversely affect Resolutes competitive position.
Resolutes ability to acquire additional properties and to
discover reserves in the future will depend upon its ability to
evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate
transactions in this highly competitive environment.
Resolute
is subject to complex federal, state, tribal, local and other
laws and regulations that could adversely affect the cost,
manner or feasibility of doing business.
Exploitation, development, production and marketing operations
in the oil and gas industry are regulated extensively at the
federal, state and local levels. In addition, substantially all
of Resolutes current leases in the Aneth Field are
regulated by the Navajo Nation. Some of its future leases may be
regulated by Native American tribes. Environmental and other
governmental laws and regulations have increased the costs to
plan, design, drill, install, operate and properly abandon oil
and gas wells and other recovery operations. Under these laws
and regulations, Resolute could also be liable for personal
injuries, property damage and other damages. Failure to comply
with these laws and regulations may result in the suspension or
termination of Resolutes operations or denial or
revocation of permits and subject Resolute to administrative,
civil and criminal penalties.
60
Part of the regulatory environment in which Resolute operates
includes, in some cases, federal requirements for obtaining
environmental assessments, environmental impact statements
and/or plans
of development before commencing exploration and production
activities. In addition, Resolutes activities are subject
to regulation by oil and gas producing states and the Navajo
Nation regarding conservation practices, protection of
correlative rights and other concerns. These regulations affect
Resolutes operations and could limit the quantity of oil
and gas it may produce and sell. A risk inherent in
Resolutes
CO2
flood project is the need to obtain permits from federal, state,
local and Navajo Nation tribal authorities. Delays or failures
in obtaining regulatory approvals or permits or the receipt of
an approval or permit with unreasonable conditions or costs
could have a material adverse effect on Resolutes ability
to exploit its properties. Additionally, the oil and gas
regulatory environment could change in ways that might
substantially increase the financial and managerial costs to
comply with the requirements of these laws and regulations and,
consequently, adversely affect Resolutes profitability.
Proposed greenhouse gas, or GHG, reporting rules, and proposed
GHG cap and trade legislation are two examples of proposed
changes in the regulatory climate that would affect Resolute.
Furthermore, Resolute may be placed at a competitive
disadvantage to larger companies in the industry that can spread
these additional costs over a greater number of wells and larger
operating staff. Please read Resolutes
Business Environmental, Health and Safety Matters
and Regulation and Resolutes
Business Other Regulation of the Oil and Gas
Industry for a description of the laws and regulations
that affect Resolute.
Possible
regulation related to global warming and climate change could
have an adverse effect on Resolutes operations and demand
for oil and gas.
Recent scientific studies have suggested that emissions of
gases, commonly referred to as greenhouse gases
including carbon dioxide and methane, may be contributing to
warming of the earths atmosphere. In response to such
studies, the U.S. Congress is actively considering
legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. In
addition, several states have already taken legal measures to
reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. As a result of the U.S.
Supreme Courts decision on April 2, 2007 in Massachusetts,
et al. v. EPA, the EPA also may be required to regulate
greenhouse gas emissions from mobile sources (e.g. cars and
trucks) even if Congress does not adopt new legislation
specifically addressing emissions of greenhouse gases. Other
nations have already agreed to regulate emissions of greenhouse
gases, pursuant to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change, also known as the Kyoto Protocol, an
international treaty pursuant to which participating countries
(not including the United States) have agreed to reduce their
emissions of greenhouse gases to below 1990 levels by 2012.
Passage of state or federal climate control legislation or other
regulatory initiatives or the adoption of regulations by the EPA
and analogous state agencies that restrict emissions of
greenhouse gases in areas in which Resolute conducts business
could have an adverse effect on Resolutes operations and
demand for oil and gas.
Resolute
depends on a limited number of key personnel who would be
difficult to replace.
Resolute depends substantially on the performance of its
executive officers and other key employees. Resolute has not
entered into any employment agreements with any of these
employees, and Resolute does not maintain key person life
insurance policies on any of these employees. The loss of any
member of the senior management team or other key employees
could negatively affect Resolutes ability to execute its
business strategy.
Terrorist
attacks aimed at Resolutes facilities or operations could
adversely affect its business.
The United States has been the target of terrorist attacks of
unprecedented scale. The U.S. government has issued
warnings that U.S. energy assets may be the future targets
of terrorist organizations. These developments have subjected
Resolutes operations to increased risks. Any terrorist
attack at Resolutes facilities, or those of its customers
or suppliers, could have a material adverse effect on
Resolutes business.
61
Work
stoppages or other labor issues at Resolutes facilities
could adversely affect its business, financial position, results
of operations, or cash flows.
As of June 30, 2009, approximately 40 of Resolutes
field level employees were represented by the United Steel,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
Industrial and Service Workers International Union, and covered
by a collective bargaining agreement. Although Resolute believes
that its relations with its employees are generally
satisfactory, if Resolute is unable to reach agreement with any
of its unionized work groups on future negotiations regarding
the terms of their collective bargaining agreements, or if
additional segments of Resolutes workforce become
unionized, Resolute may be subject to work interruptions or
stoppages. Work stoppages at the facilities of Resolutes
customers or suppliers may also negatively affect
Resolutes business. If any of Resolutes customers
experience a material work stoppage, the customer may halt or
limit the purchase of Resolutes products. Moreover, if any
of Resolutes suppliers experience a work stoppage, its
operations could be adversely affected if an alternative source
of supply is not readily available. Any of these events could be
disruptive to Resolutes operations and could adversely
affect its business, financial position, results of operations,
or cash flows.
Resolute
was required to write down the carrying value of its properties
as of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, and may be
required to do so again in the future.
Resolute uses the full cost accounting method for oil and gas
exploitation, development and exploration activities. Under the
full cost method rules, Resolute performs a ceiling test and if
the net capitalized costs for a cost center exceed the sum of
calculated values for the relevant properties it writes down the
book value of the properties. At December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, upon application of the ceiling test,
Resolute recorded an impairment of its oil and gas properties of
$245.0 million and $13.3 million, respectively.
Although no additional impairment of its oil and gas properties
from the ceiling test was necessary for the three month period
ending June 30, 2009, Resolute could recognize further
impairments in the future if oil and gas prices are low, if
Resolute has substantial downward adjustments to its estimated
proved reserves, if Resolute experiences increases in its
estimates of development costs or deterioration in its
exploration and development results.
Risk
Factors Related to HACI, the Company and the
Acquisition
The
Initial Stockholders own shares of HACI Common Stock and HACI
warrants to purchase HACI Common Stock that were issued in
private placements prior to or simultaneously with the IPO.
These shares and warrants will not participate in liquidation
distributions if HACIs initial business combination is not
consummated and, therefore, HACIs officers and directors
may have a conflict of interest in determining whether the
Acquisition is appropriate for HACIs initial business
combination.
The Initial Stockholders own an aggregate of 13,800,000 Founder
Shares and 13,800,000 Founder Warrants. The Sponsor (HH-HACI,
L.P., an entity in which approximately 80% of the partnership
interests attributable to the Founder Shares and Founder
Warrants and 100% of the partnership interests attributable to
the Sponsor Warrants are owned by Chairman of the Board Thomas
O. Hicks and his family estate planning entities and the
remaining partnership interests attributable to the Founder
Shares and Founder Warrants are owned directly or indirectly by
various employees of Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers)
also owns an additional 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants. These shares
and warrants will not participate in liquidation distributions
if the Acquisition is not consummated by September 28,
2009, or by October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment
becomes effective and, therefore, these officers and directors
of HACI may have a conflict of interest in determining whether
the Acquisition is appropriate for HACIs initial business
combination.
The personal and financial interests of these directors and
officers of HACI may have influenced their motivation in timely
identifying and selecting a target business and completing a
business combination. Consequently, the discretion of these
directors and officers in identifying and selecting
Resolute as HACIs target business may have resulted in a
conflict of interest when determining whether the terms,
conditions and timing of the Acquisition are appropriate and in
HACI stockholders best interest.
62
Activities
taken by HACI to utilize a portion of the funds in the trust
account to purchase, directly or indirectly, Public Shares will
increase the likelihood of approval of the Acquisition Proposal
and other proposals, which could present a conflict of interest
for HACIs officers and directors in determining whether to
authorize the use of the funds in the trust account in such
manner.
At any time prior to the special meeting, during a period when
they are not then aware of any material nonpublic information
regarding HACI or its securities, HACI, the Initial Stockholders
or HACIs directors and officers and their respective
affiliates may purchase shares from institutional and other
investors, or execute agreements to purchase such shares from
them in the future, or they or HACI may enter into transactions
with third parties to purchase shares from such persons. The
purpose of such share purchases and other transactions would be
to increase the likelihood of satisfaction of the requirements
that the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of HACI
Common Stock entitled to vote on the Acquisition Proposal vote
in its favor and that holders of fewer than 30% of the Public
Shares vote against the Acquisition Proposal and demand
conversion of their Public Shares into cash where it appears
that such requirements would otherwise not be met. Because the
HACI Founder Shares, Founder Warrants and Sponsor Warrants owned
directly and indirectly by certain HACI officers and directors
will not participate in liquidation distributions if the
Acquisition is not consummated, such HACI officers and directors
may have a conflict of interest in determining to use the funds
in the trust account for these purchases to increase the
likelihood the Acquisition will be consummated. See the section
entitled The Acquisition Actions That May
Be Taken to Secure Approval of HACI Stockholders.
HACI
may not be able to consummate the Acquisition within the
required timeframe, in which case HACIs corporate
existence will cease and it will liquidate its
assets.
Pursuant to HACIs charter, HACI must complete an initial
business combination with a fair market value of at least 80% of
the initial amount held in the trust account by
September 28, 2009. If HACI fails to consummate the
Acquisition within such time period, HACIs corporate
existence will cease and it will liquidate and wind up. The
foregoing requirements are set forth in Article IX of
HACIs charter and, unless approved in connection with an
initial business combination, may not be eliminated without the
vote of HACIs board of directors and the vote of 100% of
the outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock cast at a meeting of
the stockholders at which a quorum is present.
If
HACI liquidates before concluding the Acquisition, HACI Public
Stockholders may receive less than $10.00 per share on
distribution of trust account funds and the HACI warrants will
expire worthless.
If HACI is unable to complete the Acquisition and must
liquidate, the per-share liquidation amount may be less than
$10.00 because of the expenses incurred in connection with the
IPO, its general and administrative expenses and the costs
incurred in seeking the Acquisition. If HACI is unable to
conclude the Acquisition and expended all of the net proceeds of
the IPO, other than the proceeds deposited in the trust account,
and without taking into account interest, if any, earned on the
trust account, net of income taxes payable on such interest and
net of up to $6.6 million in interest income on the trust
account balance previously released to HACI to fund working
capital requirements, the per-share liquidation amount as of
June 30, 2009 would be $9.78, or $0.22 less than its
per-unit IPO
price of $10.00. Furthermore, the outstanding HACI warrants are
not entitled to participate in a liquidating distribution and
the warrants will therefore expire worthless if HACI liquidates
before completing the Acquisition.
If
HACI is unable to consummate the Acquisition, HACI Public
Stockholders will be forced to wait, at a minimum, until
September 28, 2009 before receiving liquidation
distributions.
HACI has until September 28, 2009, or by October 5,
2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes effective, to consummate
the Acquisition. If HACI does not consummate the Acquisition
during such time period, HACI will liquidate in accordance with
its charter. HACI has no obligation to return funds to HACI
Public Stockholders prior to such date unless HACI consummates
the Acquisition prior thereto and only then in cases where HACI
Public Stockholders have sought conversion of their shares. Only
after the expiration of this full time period will HACI Public
Stockholders be entitled to liquidation distributions if HACI is
unable to
63
complete the Acquisition. Further, HACI may not be able to
disburse the funds in the trust account immediately following
September 28, 2009, until it has commenced the liquidation
process in accordance with its charter and Delaware law. If HACI
has not consummated the Acquisition by September 28, 2009,
or by October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes
effective, HACI will automatically liquidate and dissolve
without the need for a stockholder vote.
The
ability of HACI Public Stockholders to exercise their conversion
rights may not allow HACI to consummate the Acquisition or
optimize its capital structure.
Each HACI Public Stockholder has the right to elect to convert
its shares of HACI Common Stock for cash if such HACI Public
Stockholder votes against the Acquisition Proposal, the
Acquisition Proposal is approved and completed and the
stockholder properly exercises its conversion rights in
accordance with this proxy statement/prospectus. If a HACI
Public Stockholder wishes to exercise its conversion rights,
such stockholder must vote against the Acquisition Proposal,
demand that HACI convert the shares held by such stockholder
into cash by marking the appropriate space on the proxy card and
provide physical or electronic delivery of such
stockholders stock certificates or shares, as appropriate,
as described in this proxy statement/prospectus prior to the
special meeting of HACI stockholders. HACI will be permitted to
proceed with the Acquisition only if it is able to confirm that
it has sufficient funds to pay the consideration to consummate
the Acquisition plus all sums due to HACI Public Stockholders
who vote against the Acquisition Proposal and duly exercise
their right to elect to convert their shares for cash. In
addition, HACI will not consummate the Acquisition if holders of
30% or more of the outstanding Public Shares properly exercise
their conversion rights. These restrictions may limit
HACIs ability to consummate the Acquisition.
If the
Acquisition is completed, a portion of the funds in the trust
account established by HACI in connection with its initial
public offering for the benefit of the holders of the Public
Shares is likely to be used for the purchase, directly or
indirectly, of Public Shares. As a consequence, if the
Acquisition is completed, such funds will not be available to
pay as much of the outstanding indebtedness under the
Companys First Lien Credit Facility and it is possible
that the number of beneficial holders of HACIs and the
Companys securities will be reduced to a number that would
preclude the quotation, trading or listing of the Companys
securities other than on the Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board.
After the payment of expenses associated with the Acquisition,
including investment banking and finders fees and deferred
underwriting commissions, the balance of funds in HACIs
trust account will be used to repay all of the Companys
Second Lien Facility and a portion of the Companys First
Lien Facility. However, it is expected that a portion of the
funds in the trust account may be used to acquire Public Shares
from holders thereof who have indicated their intention to vote
against the Acquisition Proposal and elect to convert their
shares into cash. As a consequence of such purchases:
|
|
|
|
|
the funds in HACIs trust account that are so used will not
be available to the Company after the Acquisition for repayment
of the Companys outstanding credit facilities and the
actual amount of repayment of the Companys First Lien
Credit Facility may be greatly diminished; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
it is likely that the public float of the Company
Common Stock will be reduced and the number of beneficial
holders of the Companys securities will be reduced, which
may make it difficult to obtain the quotation, listing or
trading of the Company securities on the New York Stock Exchange
or any other national securities exchange.
|
If
HACIs due diligence investigation of Resolute was
inadequate, then stockholders of the Company following the
Acquisition could lose some or all of their
investment.
Even though HACI conducted a due diligence investigation of
Resolute, it cannot be sure that this diligence surfaced all
material issues that may be present inside Resolute or its
business, or that it would be possible to uncover all material
issues through a customary amount of due diligence, or that
factors outside of Resolute and its business and outside of its
control will not later arise.
64
If
third parties bring claims against HACI, the proceeds held in
the trust account could be reduced and the per-share liquidation
price received by stockholders may be less than approximately
$9.78 per share.
HACIs placing of funds in the trust account may not
protect those funds from third-party claims against HACI.
Although HACI has received from many of the vendors, prospective
target businesses and other entities with which it does business
written waivers of any right, title, interest or claim of any
kind in or to any monies held in the trust account, there is no
guarantee that any such party with which it conducts business in
the future will agree to such waiver, and the receipt of such a
waiver is not a condition to HACI doing business with anyone.
Even if they do execute such waivers, they would not be
prevented from bringing claims against the trust account. There
is also no guarantee that a court would uphold the validity of
such waivers and, if a court failed to uphold the validity of
such waivers, HACI would not be indemnified by Mr. Hicks,
as discussed below. HACI is not aware of any significant
creditors that have not waived such rights with respect to the
trust account.
Mr. Hicks, HACIs founder and chairman of the board,
has agreed that he will be liable to HACI if and to the extent
any claims by a third party for services rendered or products
sold to HACI or by a prospective target business, reduce the
amounts in the trust account available for distribution to HACI
stockholders in the event of a liquidation, except as to
(i) any claims by a third party who executed a waiver (even
if such waiver is subsequently found to be invalid and
unenforceable) of any and all rights to seek access to the funds
in the trust account and (ii) any claims under HACIs
indemnity of the underwriters of the IPO against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. In
the event that this indemnity obligation arises and
Mr. Hicks does not comply with such obligation, HACI
believes that it would have an obligation to seek enforcement of
the obligation and that HACIs board of directors would
have a fiduciary duty to seek enforcement of such obligation on
HACIs behalf. Based on representations made to HACI by
Mr. Hicks, HACI currently believes that Mr. Hicks is
of substantial means and capable of funding his indemnity
obligations, even though HACI has not asked him to reserve funds
for such an eventuality. However, HACI cannot assure its
stockholders that Mr. Hicks will be able to satisfy those
obligations. Accordingly, the proceeds held in the trust account
could be subject to claims which could take priority over those
of HACI Public Stockholders and, as a result, the per-share
liquidation amount would be less than $9.78 due to claims of
such creditors.
Additionally, if HACI is forced to file a bankruptcy case or an
involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against it which is not
dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be
subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in
HACIs bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third
parties with priority over the claims of HACI stockholders. To
the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, HACI
cannot assure its stockholders that it will be able to return to
HACI Public Stockholders the liquidation amounts described in
this proxy statement/prospectus.
HACI
stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties
against HACI to the extent of distributions received by
them.
Under Sections 280 through 282 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, or the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable
for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent
of distributions received by them in a dissolution conducted in
accordance with the DGCL. If the corporation complies with
certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL
intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all
claims against it, including a
60-day
notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought
against the corporation, a
90-day
period during which the corporation may reject any claims
brought, and an additional
150-day
waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to
stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a
liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such
stockholders pro rata share of the claim or the amount
distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the
stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the
dissolution. However, it is HACIs intention to make
liquidating distributions to its stockholders as soon as
reasonably possible after it liquidates; therefore, HACI does
not intend to comply with those procedures.
65
Because HACI will not be in compliance with those procedures, it
is required, pursuant to Section 281(b) of the DGCL, to
adopt a plan of distribution that will reasonably provide for
the payment, based on facts known to it at such time, of
(i) all existing claims including those that are
contingent, (ii) all pending proceedings to which it is a
party and (iii) all claims that may be potentially brought
against it within the subsequent 10 years. Accordingly,
HACI would be required to provide for any creditors known to it
at that time or those that it believes could be potentially
brought against it within the subsequent 10 years prior to
distributing the funds held in the trust to stockholders.
However, because HACI is a blank check company, rather than an
operating company, and its operations are limited to searching
for prospective target businesses to acquire, the most likely
claims, if any, to arise would be from vendors that it engaged
(such as accountants, attorneys, investment bankers, etc.) and
potential target businesses. If HACIs plan of distribution
complies with Section 281(b) of the DGCL, any liability of
stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is
limited to the lesser of such stockholders pro rata share
or the amount distributed to the stockholder. HACI cannot assure
its stockholders that it will properly assess all claims that
may be potentially brought against it. As such, HACI
stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the
extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any
liability of HACI stockholders may extend well beyond the third
anniversary of the date of distribution. Accordingly, HACI
cannot assure its stockholders that third parties will not seek
to recover from its stockholders amounts owed to them by HACI.
If HACI is forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary
bankruptcy case is filed against it which is not dismissed, any
distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under
applicable debtor/creditor
and/or
bankruptcy laws as either a preferential transfer or
a fraudulent conveyance. As a result, a bankruptcy
court could seek to recover all amounts received by HACI
stockholders. Furthermore, because HACI intends to distribute
the then-remaining proceeds held in the trust account to HACI
Public Stockholders promptly after its liquidation in the event
that the Acquisition has not been consummated by
September 28, 2009, or by October 5, 2009 if the
Charter Amendment becomes effective, such distributions may be
viewed or interpreted as giving preference to HACI Public
Stockholders over any potential creditors with respect to access
to or distributions from HACIs assets. Also, HACIs
board of directors may be viewed as having breached its
fiduciary duties to its creditors
and/or
acting in bad faith by paying HACI Public Stockholders from the
trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors, which
may expose HACI to claims of punitive damages. HACI and its
board of directors cannot assure its stockholders that claims
will not be brought against it for these reasons.
If
HACI is deemed to be an investment company under the Investment
Company Act, HACI may be required to institute burdensome
compliance requirements and HACIs activities may be
restricted, which may make it difficult to complete the
Acquisition.
If HACI is deemed to be an investment company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, or the Investment Company Act,
its activities may be restricted, including restrictions on the
nature of its investments and restrictions on the issuance of
securities, each of which may make it difficult for HACI to
complete the Acquisition.
In addition, HACI may have imposed upon it burdensome
requirements, including:
|
|
|
|
|
registration as an investment company;
|
|
|
|
adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and
|
|
|
|
reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure
requirements and other rules and regulations.
|
HACI does not believe that its anticipated principal activities
will subject it to the Investment Company Act. The proceeds held
in the trust account may be invested by the trustee only in
U.S. government treasury bills with a maturity of
90 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain
conditions under
Rule 2a-7
under the Investment Company Act. Because the investment of the
proceeds will be restricted to these instruments, HACI believes
that it will meet the requirements for the exemption provided in
Rule 3a-1
promulgated under the Investment Company Act. If HACI were
deemed to be subject to the Investment
66
Company Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens
would require additional expenses for which HACI has not
allotted.
Changes
in laws or regulations, or failure to comply with any laws and
regulations, may adversely affect HACIs business,
investments and results of operations.
HACI is subject to laws and regulations enacted by national,
regional and local governments. In particular, HACI will be
required to comply with certain SEC and other legal
requirements. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable
laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and
costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and
application may also change from time to time and those changes
could have a material adverse effect on HACIs business,
investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to
comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and
applied, by any of the persons referred to above could have a
material adverse effect on HACIs business and results of
operations.
HACI
is dependent upon Mr. Hicks and his loss could adversely
affect HACIs ability to operate.
HACIs operations are dependent upon a relatively small
group of individuals and, in particular, upon its founder and
chairman of the board, Mr. Hicks. HACI believes that its
success depends on the continued service of Mr. Hicks, at
least until it has consummated the Acquisition. In addition,
Mr. Hicks is not required to commit any specified amount of
time to HACIs affairs and, accordingly, will have
conflicts of interest in allocating management time among
various business activities, including identifying potential
business combinations and monitoring the related due diligence.
HACI does not have an employment agreement with, or key-man
insurance on the life of, Mr. Hicks. The unexpected loss of
the services of Mr. Hicks could have a detrimental effect
on HACI.
The
Sponsor, which is an entity controlled by Thomas O. Hicks,
HACIs founder and chairman of the board, controls a
substantial interest in HACI and thus may influence certain
actions requiring a stockholder vote.
The Sponsor owns 19.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of
HACI Common Stock. Accordingly, the Sponsor will continue to
exert control at least until the consummation by HACI of the
Acquisition. In the event the Initial Stockholders purchase any
additional shares of HACI Common Stock, they will vote any such
shares acquired by them in favor of the Acquisition and in favor
of an amendment to HACIs charter to provide for
HACIs perpetual existence in connection with a vote to
approve the Acquisition Proposal. Furthermore, in the event that
Mr. Hicks or HACIs directors acquire Public Shares,
HACI anticipates that they would vote such shares in favor of
the Acquisition. Thus, additional purchases of Public Shares by
the Initial Stockholders, Mr. Hicks or HACIs directors
would likely allow them to exert additional influence over the
approval of the Acquisition Proposal. Factors that would be
considered in making such additional purchases would include
consideration of the current trading price of HACI Common Stock.
Another factor that would be taken into consideration would be
that any such additional purchases would likely increase the
chances that HACIs initial business combination would be
approved.
Although
the Company has agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the
registration statement registering the shares of Company Common
Stock issuable upon exercise of the Company warrants, an
effective registration statement may not be in place when an
investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such
investor from being able to exercise its warrants.
The Company is not required to issue shares of Company Common
Stock unless, at the time such holder seeks to exercise such
warrant, the Company has a registration statement under the
Securities Act in effect covering the shares of Company Common
Stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants and a current
prospectus relating to the common stock. Under the terms of the
Warrant Agreement, the Company has agreed to use its best
efforts to have a registration statement in effect covering the
shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
Company warrants from the date of the closing until the
expiration of the warrants and to maintain a current prospectus
relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the
warrants. However, the Company cannot assure holders of Company
warrants that it will be able to do so, and
67
if it does not maintain a current prospectus related to the
common stock issuable upon exercise of the Company warrants,
holders will be unable to exercise their Company warrants. If
the prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon the
exercise of the Company warrants is not current, the Company
will have no obligation to settle the Company warrants for cash
or by net settlement, and in such event the market for such
Company warrants may be limited. While the Company intends to
list the Company warrants on the New York Stock Exchange and to
maintain such listing during the period in which the warrants
are exercisable, there can be no assurance that the listing will
be approved or that the Company will be successful in
maintaining the listing.
An
investor will only be able to exercise a Company warrant if the
issuance of Company Common Stock upon such exercise has been
registered or qualified or is deemed exempt under the securities
laws of the state of residence of the holder of the Company
warrants.
No Company warrants will be exercisable, and the Company is not
required to issue shares of Company Common Stock, unless the
Company Common Stock issuable upon such exercise has been
registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt under the
securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of the
Company warrants. Because the exemptions from qualification in
certain states for resales of warrants and for issuances of
common stock by the issuer upon exercise of a warrant may be
different, a warrant may be held by a holder in a state where an
exemption is not available for issuance of Company Common Stock
upon exercise and the holder will be precluded from exercise of
the Company warrant. After the closing of the Acquisition, the
Company warrants will be exercisable and the Company expects the
Company Common Stock and warrants to be listed on a national
securities exchange, which would provide an exemption from
registration in every state. If the Companys securities
are not so listed or another exemption is not available, the
Company would be required to register the Company warrants in
every state. Accordingly, the Company believes holders in every
state will be able to exercise their Company warrants as long as
the Companys prospectus relating to the Company Common
Stock issuable upon exercise of the Company warrants is current.
However, the market for the Company warrants may be limited and
the holders of Company warrants may not be able to exercise
their Company warrants if the Company Common Stock issuable upon
such exercise is not qualified or exempt from qualification in
the jurisdictions in which the holders of the Company warrants
reside.
The
Company may redeem the Company warrants prior to their exercise
at a time that is disadvantageous to warrant holders, thereby
making their warrants worthless.
After the consummation of the Acquisition, the Company will have
the ability to redeem the outstanding Company warrants at any
time prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant,
provided that (i) the last reported sale price of Company
Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20
trading days within a 30-trading-day period, in each case ending
on the third business day prior to proper notice of such
redemption and (ii) on the date the Company gives notice of
redemption and during the entire period thereafter until the
time the warrants are redeemed, there is an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act covering the
shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
Company warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is
available. Redemption of the outstanding Company warrants could
force holders of Company warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
To exercise their Company warrants and pay the exercise price
therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for them to do
so;
|
|
|
|
To sell their Company warrants at the then current market price
when they might otherwise wish to hold their Company
warrants; or
|
|
|
|
To accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the
outstanding Company warrants are called for redemption, is
likely to be substantially less than the market value of their
warrants.
|
None of the Company Founders Warrants or Company Sponsors
Warrants will be redeemable by the Company so long as they are
held by the Sponsor, Seller, or Messrs. Cunningham,
Montgomery, Mulroney or Quinn, or their permitted transferees.
68
Members
of HACIs management team and board are, and may in the
future become, affiliated with entities engaged in business
activities similar to those conducted by HACI and may consider
transactions with entities reviewed by HACI as possible
targets.
Members of HACIs management team and board are and may in
the future become affiliated with entities engaged in business
activities similar to those conducted by HACI and may consider
transactions with entities reviewed by HACI as possible targets.
As a result, HACIs officers or directors or their
affiliates might pursue acquisitions with businesses that were
considered by HACI as possible targets.
The
price of Company Common Stock after the consummation of the
Acquisition may be volatile and the trading price of the Company
Common Shock may not reach or exceed the trading price of HACI
Common Stock.
The price of Company Common Stock after the consummation of the
Acquisition may be volatile, and may fluctuate due to factors
such as:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in oil and natural gas liquids prices;
|
|
|
|
changes in production levels;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in the Companys
quarterly and annual results and those of its publicly held
competitors;
|
|
|
|
mergers and strategic alliances among any exploration and
production companies;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in the industry;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulation and taxes;
|
|
|
|
geological developments;
|
|
|
|
the level of foreign imports of oil and natural gas and oil and
natural gas liquids;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the Companys quarterly revenues and
earnings and those of its publicly held competitors;
|
|
|
|
shortfalls in the Companys operating results from levels
forecasted by securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
investor sentiment toward the stock of exploration and
production companies in general;
|
|
|
|
announcements concerning the Company or its competitors; and
|
|
|
|
the general state of the securities markets.
|
HACI
may waive one or more of the conditions to the closing of the
Acquisition without resoliciting stockholder approval for the
Acquisition.
HACI may agree to waive, in whole or in part, some of the
conditions to its obligations to complete the Acquisition, to
the extent permitted by applicable laws. HACIs board of
directors will evaluate the materiality of any waiver to
determine whether amendment of this proxy statement/prospectus
and resolicitation of proxies is warranted. In some instances,
if HACIs board of directors determines that a waiver is
not sufficiently material to warrant resolicitation of
stockholders, HACI has the discretion to complete the
Acquisition without seeking further stockholder approval. The
waiver of any of the following conditions may be deemed
sufficiently material to require supplemental disclosure to
stockholders and warrantholders: (i) the absence of any
applicable approvals, laws, injunctions, order or decrees
restraining or prohibiting the consummation of the Acquisition,
(ii) the absence of defaults with respect to any payment
obligation or financial covenant under any material indebtedness
of the Company or the Acquired Entities (unless covered by
standstill or forbearance agreements), (iii) new or amended
crude oil marketing arrangements not reasonably being expected
to have a material adverse effect on the Company and the
Acquired Entities, (iv) depending on the degree of variance
and other factors in existence at the time, the amount being
paid by HACI to Aneth being less than $275 million or
(v) depending on the degree of variance and other factors
in existence at the time, the failure
69
of Seller to comply with required hedging arrangements. Such
supplemental disclosure would be provided via means of a press
release issued by HACI, the filing of related disclosure on Form
8-K, and a supplement to this proxy statement/prospectus. Any
supplemental disclosure would state in bold face prominent text
that warrantholders and stockholders would be able to revoke any
votes that had been cast by them up to the time of the meeting
and would contain equally prominent notice that any such votes
may be revoked by following telephone and/or Internet voting
procedures provided by banks or brokers prior to 11:59 P.M.
Eastern Daylight time on the day before the special meetings.
Such supplemental disclosure would be issued at a minimum of two
business days prior to any vote on the matters addressed in this
proxy statement/prospectus (other than votes on adjournment
proposals), although it would be unlikely that any such
supplement to this proxy statement/prospectus would be received
by the stockholders and warrantholders prior to such vote if it
was mailed only two business days prior to the relevant vote.
In the event that there was a waiver of any particular condition
that would be sufficiently material to warrant supplemental
disclosure within two business days of the relevant vote (i.e.,
on or after 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight time September 21,
2009), supplemental disclosure would be issued but HACI would
adjourn the meeting until the second business day following the
supplemental disclosure; provided that in no event would the
special meeting of warrantholders and special meeting of
stockholders be adjourned to a date past September 28, 2009.
Following
the consummation of the Acquisition, the Company will have
anti-takeover provisions in its organizational documents that
may discourage a change of control.
Following the consummation of the Acquisition, certain
provisions of the Companys charter and the Companys
bylaws may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or
prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder
might consider in its best interest, including those attempts
that might result in a premium over the market price for the
shares held by stockholders.
These provisions provide for, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
a classified board of directors divided into three classes
with staggered three-year terms;
|
|
|
|
the removal of directors only for cause and only with the
affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the voting
power of all then outstanding shares of Company Common Stock
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
the board of directors ability to authorize and issue
undesignated preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
advance notice for nominations of directors by stockholders and
for stockholders to include matters to be considered at annual
meetings;
|
|
|
|
no ability for stockholders to call special stockholder meetings;
|
|
|
|
no ability for stockholders to take action by written consent;
|
|
|
|
the stockholders ability to amend, alter or repeal, or
adopt any provision as part of the Companys charter
inconsistent with the provisions of the Companys charter
dealing with the Companys board of directors, bylaws,
meetings of the Companys stockholders or amendment of the
Companys charter only by the affirmative vote of the
holders of at least
662/3%
of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital
stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the elections
of directors, voting together as a single class (in addition to
any other vote that may be required by law or any preferred
stock designation); and
|
|
|
|
the stockholders ability to adopt, amend, alter or repeal
the Companys bylaws only by the affirmative vote of the
holders of at least
662/3%
of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital
stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the elections
of directors voting together as a single class.
|
In addition, Section 203 of the DGCL may, under certain
circumstances, make it more difficult for a person who would be
an interested stockholder, which is defined
generally as a person with 15% or more of a corporations
outstanding voting stock, to effect a business
combination with the corporation for a three-
70
year period. A business combination is defined
generally as mergers, consolidations and certain other
transactions, including sales, leases or other dispositions of
assets with an aggregate market value equal to 10% or more of
the aggregate market value of the corporation.
These anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for
a third party to acquire the Company, even if the third
partys offer may be considered beneficial by many
stockholders. As a result, stockholders may be limited in their
ability to obtain a premium for their shares.
The
New York Stock Exchange may fail to list the Companys
securities on its exchange, or delist the Companys
securities from quotation on its exchange in the future, which
could limit investors ability to make transactions in its
securities and subject the Company to additional trading
restrictions.
The Company intends to list its securities on the New York Stock
Exchange, or the NYSE, a national securities exchange. However,
the Company cannot assure you that its securities will be
listed, or will continue to be listed, on the NYSE, following
the consummation of the Acquisition. Additionally, the Company
will be required to file an initial listing application for the
NYSE and meet the NYSEs initial listing requirements as
opposed to its more lenient continued listing requirements. The
Company cannot be certain that it will be able to meet those
initial listing requirements at that time.
If the NYSE fails to list the Companys securities on its
exchange, or delists the Companys securities from trading
on its exchange in the future, the Company could face
significant material adverse consequences, including:
|
|
|
|
|
a limited availability of market quotations for its securities;
|
|
|
|
a determination that its common stock is a penny
stock which will require brokers trading in its common
stock to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a
reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading
market for Company Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
|
|
|
|
a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain
additional financing in the future.
|
Compliance
with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require substantial
financial and management resources both before and after
consummation of the Acquisition.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, will require that the Company evaluate and
report on its system of internal controls and that the Company
have such system of internal controls. If the Company fails to
maintain the adequacy of its internal controls, it could be
subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties
and/or
stockholder litigation. Any inability to provide reliable
financial reports could harm the Companys business.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires that
the Companys independent registered public accounting firm
report on managements evaluation of the Companys
system of internal controls. The development of the internal
controls in order to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete the
Acquisition. Furthermore, any failure to implement required new
or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in the
implementation of adequate controls over its financial processes
and reporting in the future, could harm the Companys
operating results or cause the Company to fail to meet its
reporting obligations. Inferior internal controls could also
cause investors to lose confidence in the Companys
reported financial information, which could have a negative
effect on the trading price of the shares of Company Common
Stock.
The
sale or availability for sale of substantial amounts of shares
of Company Common Stock and the Company warrants could cause the
price of Company Common Stock and the Company warrants to
decline.
Upon the consummation of the Acquisition, the Initial
Stockholders and Seller or its affiliate will own at least
4.6 million and 9.2 million shares of Company
Common Stock, respectively (in addition to Company
71
Earnout Shares and warrants exercisable for Company Common
Stock). In the future, such shares may be sold from time to time
in the public market pursuant to the registration rights to be
granted in connection with the Acquisition or pursuant to
Rule 144. Such sales may commence after 180 days after
the closing of the Acquisition. The sale of these shares or the
availability for future sale of these shares could adversely
affect the market price of Company Common Stock and could impair
the future ability of the Company to raise capital through
offerings of Company Common Stock.
The
financial statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus
do not take into account the consequences to HACI of a failure
to consummate a business combination by September 28,
2009.
The financial statements included in this proxy
statement/prospectus have been prepared assuming that HACI would
continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the
Notes to the HACI Financial Statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008, HACI is required to consummate an
initial business combination by September 28, 2009. The
possibility of the Acquisition not being consummated raises
substantial doubt as to HACIs ability to continue as a
going concern and the financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
HACI
securityholders at the time of the Acquisition who purchased
HACI units in the IPO and do not properly exercise their
conversion rights or dissenters rights with respect to
their Public Shares may have rescission rights and related
claims.
There are several aspects of the Acquisition and the other
matters described in this proxy statement/prospectus which were
not described in the prospectus issued by HACI in connection
with its IPO. These include that HACI may seek to amend its
charter prior to the consummation of a business combination,
that funds in the trust account might be used, directly or
indirectly, to purchase Public Shares other than from holders
who have voted against the Acquisition Proposal and properly
demanded that their Public Shares be converted into cash, that
HACI may consummate a business combination with an entity
engaged in the energy industry, that HACI may seek to amend the
terms of the Warrant Agreement and exchange its outstanding
Public Warrants for cash financed out of the trust account or
that Mr. Hicks
co-investment
may terminate. Consequently, HACIs filing of the Charter
Amendment in connection with the Acquisition, HACIs use of
funds in the trust account to purchase Public Shares from HACI
stockholders who have indicated their intention to vote against
the Acquisition Proposal and convert their Public Shares into
cash, HACIs consummation of a business combination with
Seller which operates in the energy industry and the exchange of
a portion of the outstanding Public Warrants for cash might be
grounds for a HACI stockholder who purchased HACI units in the
IPO, excluding the Initial Stockholders, and who still holds
their HACI units at the time of the Acquisition, or an IPO
Purchaser, without seeking to convert their Public Shares into a
pro rata portion of the trust account or demanding appraisal
rights with respect to their Public Shares to seek rescission of
their purchase of the HACI units that such HACI stockholder
acquired in the IPO. A successful IPO Purchaser claimant for
damages under federal or state law could be awarded an amount to
compensate for the decrease in value of such
securityholders securities caused by the alleged violation
(including, possibly, punitive damages), together with interest,
while retaining the securities.
The
Merger could fail to qualify as a Section 351 exchange
under the Code.
The conclusion of HACIs counsel, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer
& Feld, LLP that the Merger will be part of an exchange of
property for stock constituting control of a corporation
pursuant to Section 351 of the Code is based upon certain
assumptions described in Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences, and there can be no assurance that
Section 351 of the Code will apply to the Merger if these
assumptions are incorrect. If Section 351 of the Code does
not apply to the Merger, and the Merger does not otherwise
qualify as a nonrecognition transaction under the Code, a
U.S. holder of HACI Common Stock or Public Warrants would
recognize taxable gain or loss with respect to the HACI Common
Stock or Public Warrants exchanged in the Merger, and the
holding period of Company Common Stock or warrants exercisable
in exchange for Company Common Stock received in the Merger
would begin on the day after the Merger.
72
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
HACI, the Company, and Resolute make forward-looking statements
in this proxy statement/prospectus. These forward-looking
statements relate to outlooks or expectations for earnings,
revenues, expenses or other future financial or business
performance, strategies or expectations, or the impact of legal
or regulatory matters on business, results of operations or
financial condition. Specifically, forward-looking statements
may include statements relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
the benefits of the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the future financial performance of the Company following the
consummation of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the growth of the market for the Companys hydrocarbon
products;
|
|
|
|
expansion plans and opportunities; and
|
|
|
|
other statements preceded by, followed by or that include the
words estimate, plan,
project, forecast, intend,
expect, anticipate, believe,
seek, target or similar expressions.
|
These forward-looking statements are based on information
available to HACI, the Company
and/or
Resolute as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and
current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and involve a
number of risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, forward-looking
statements should not be relied upon as representing
HACIs, the Companys or Resolutes views as of
any subsequent date and none of HACI, Seller, the Company or
Resolute undertake any obligation to update forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date
they were made.
These forward-looking statements involve a number of known and
unknown risks and uncertainties or other assumptions that may
cause actual results or performance to be materially different
from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements. Some factors that could cause actual results to
differ include:
|
|
|
|
|
HACIs ability to consummate the Acquisition within the
specified time limits;
|
|
|
|
approval of the Acquisition Proposal by HACI stockholders and
satisfaction of other closing conditions to the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
costs of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
success in retaining or recruiting, or changes required in, the
Companys officers, key employees or directors following
the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
listing or delisting of HACIs securities from the NYSE
Amex or the ability to have the Companys securities listed
on the NYSE following the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the potential liquidity and trading of HACIs and the
Companys public securities;
|
|
|
|
the Companys revenues and operating performance;
|
|
|
|
the competitive environment in the industry in which Resolute
operates;
|
|
|
|
changes in overall economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
anticipated business development activities of the Company
following the consummation of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
Resolutes loss of large customers;
|
|
|
|
changes in oil and natural gas prices;
|
|
|
|
changes in production levels;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with environmental regulation and liabilities;
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
risks and costs associated with regulation of corporate
governance and disclosure standards (including pursuant to
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
risk factors listed in this proxy statement/prospectus under
Risk Factors beginning on page 46.
|
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize,
or should any of the underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual results may vary in material respects from those
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. You
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. None of HACI, the Company or Resolute undertakes any
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as may be required under
applicable securities laws.
74
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the capitalization on an
unaudited, actual basis of each of HACI and Resolute as of
June 30, 2009 and the capitalization on an unaudited, as
adjusted basis as of June 30, 2009 after giving effect to
the Acquisition, assuming both the conversion of the maximum
number of HACI Common Stock (16,559,999 shares) and the
minimum conversion of no shares of HACI Common Stock. Please
refer to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial
Information, and Special Meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders and Special Meeting in Lieu of
2009 Annual Meeting of HACI Stockholders
Conversion Rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
HACI
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
|
(in $ thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
|
$
|
808
|
|
|
$
|
81,745
|
|
Cash and marketable securities held in trust
|
|
|
539,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
539,895
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
|
$
|
808
|
|
|
$
|
81,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,570
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, subject to possible redemption
|
|
|
160,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred interest attributable to common stock subject to
possible redemption (net of taxes)
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders and members equity (deficit)
|
|
|
359,768
|
|
|
|
(219,239
|
)
|
|
|
433,850
|
|
|
|
595,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,218
|
|
|
|
(219,239
|
)
|
|
|
433,850
|
|
|
|
595,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization
|
|
$
|
523,218
|
|
|
$
|
198,331
|
|
|
$
|
514,850
|
|
|
$
|
595,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of June 30, 2009, a maximum of $240 million was
available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility and
$8.5 million of letters of credit were outstanding on
Resolutes revolving credit facility. Unused availability
under the borrowing base as of June 30, 2009 was
$38.9 million. |
75
Before you grant your proxy or instruct how your vote should be
cast or vote on the proposals set forth in this proxy
statement/prospectus, you should be aware that the occurrence of
the events described in the section entitled Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus could have a material adverse effect on
HACI, the Company or Resolute.
SPECIAL
MEETING OF HACI PUBLIC WARRANTHOLDERS
AND SPECIAL MEETING IN LIEU OF 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF HACI
STOCKHOLDERS
General
HACI is furnishing this proxy statement/prospectus to HACI
Public Warrantholders and stockholders as part of the
solicitation of proxies by its board of directors for use at the
special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and special
meeting in lieu of 2009 annual meeting of HACI stockholders to
be held on September 24, 2009, and at any adjournment or
postponement thereof. This proxy statement/prospectus is first
being mailed to HACI Public Warrantholders and HACI stockholders
on or about September 14, 2009. This proxy
statement/prospectus provides you with information you need to
know to be able to vote or instruct your vote to be cast at the
special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and special
meeting of HACI stockholders, as applicable.
Date,
Time and Place
The special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders will be held
on September 24, 2009, at 10:00 A.M., Central Daylight
time (postponed from the previously announced September 22,
2009 meeting date), at the offices of Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld, LLP at 1700 Pacific Avenue,
39th Floor, Dallas, Texas 75201, or such other date, time
and place to which such meeting may be adjourned or postponed.
The special meeting of HACI stockholders will be held
immediately following the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders at 10:30 A.M., Central Daylight time, at the
offices of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP at 1700
Pacific Avenue, 39th Floor, Dallas, Texas 75201, or such
other date, time and place to which such meeting may be
adjourned or postponed.
Purpose
of the Special Meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders
At the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders, HACI will
ask holders of Public Warrants to consider and vote upon the
following proposals:
(1) The Warrant Amendment Proposal to
consider and vote upon a proposal to amend the Warrant Agreement
which governs the terms of HACIs outstanding warrants in
connection with HACIs consummation of the Acquisition,
which we refer to as the Warrant Amendment. The Warrant
Amendment would allow HACI Public Warrantholders to elect to
receive in the Acquisition for each Public Warrant either
(i) the right to receive $0.55 in cash or (ii) one
Company warrant, subject to adjustment and proration as
described in this proxy statement/prospectus. If the Acquisition
is consummated, any warrantholder who votes against the approval
of the Warrant Amendment Proposal or who makes no election will
receive $0.55 in cash in exchange for its Public Warrants;
(2) The Warrantholder Adjournment
Proposal to consider and vote upon a proposal to
adjourn the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders to a
later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation and vote of proxies if, based upon the tabulated
vote at the time of the special meeting, there are not
sufficient votes to approve the Warrant Amendment
Proposal; and
(3) Such other procedural matters as may properly come
before the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders or any
adjournment or postponement thereof.
76
Purpose
of the Special Meeting of HACI Stockholders
At the special meeting of HACI stockholders, HACI will ask
holders of HACI Common Stock to consider and vote upon the
following proposals:
(1) The Director Election Proposal to
elect two Class I and two Class II director nominees
to serve on HACIs board of directors;
(2) The Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal to consider and vote upon an amendment
to HACIs charter to provide for its perpetual existence;
(3) The Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal to consider and vote upon an amendment
to HACIs Charter to permit a business combination with an
entity engaged in the energy industry as its principal business
despite the provisions in HACIs charter prohibiting it
from consummating a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry, as previously disclosed in the
prospectus used to offer and sell HACI units in connection with
the IPO;
(4) The Acquisition Proposal to consider
and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Acquisition Agreement and
to approve the transactions contemplated thereby, pursuant to
which through a series of transactions HACI stockholders will
acquire a majority of the outstanding Company Common Stock and
the Company will own 100% of the ownership interest in HACI and
Sellers business and operations;
(5) The Stockholder Adjournment Proposal
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special
meeting of HACI stockholders to a later date or dates, if
necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies
if, based upon the tabulated vote at the time of the special
meeting, there are not sufficient votes to approve the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, The Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal or the Acquisition
Proposal; and
(6) Such other procedural matters as may properly come
before the special meeting of HACI stockholders or any
adjournment or postponement thereof.
Recommendation
of HACIs Board of Directors
After careful consideration of each of the proposals, by vote of
a majority, HACIs board of directors recommends that HACI
Public Warrantholders vote FOR the Warrant Amendment Proposal
and FOR the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal.
After careful consideration of each of the proposals, at least a
majority of HACIs board of directors has determined that
each of the Director Election Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal, the Acquisition Proposal
and the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal is fair to, and in the
best interests of, HACI and HACI stockholders and recommends
that HACI stockholders vote FOR the Director Election Proposal,
FOR the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal, FOR
the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal, FOR the
Acquisition Proposal and FOR the Stockholder Adjournment
Proposal. When you consider the recommendation of HACIs
board of directors in favor of the Charter Amendment
Existence Proposal, the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal and the Acquisition Proposal, you should keep in mind
that certain of HACIs directors and officers have
interests in the Acquisition that may conflict with your
interests as a stockholder. See the section entitled,
The Acquisition Potential Conflicts of
Interests of HACIs Directors and Officers in the
Acquisition.
Record
Date; Who is Entitled to Vote
HACI has fixed the close of business on August 31, 2009 as
the record date for determining the HACI stockholders, and
September 8, 2009, as the record date for determining the
HACI Public Warrantholders entitled to notice of and to attend
and vote at the special meeting of HACI stockholders and the
special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders, respectively. As
of the close of business on August 31, 2009, there were
69,000,000 shares of HACI Common Stock outstanding and
entitled to vote, of which 55,200,000 are Public Shares. Each
share of HACI Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share at
the special meeting of HACI stockholders. As of the close of
business on September 8, 2009, there were
55,200,000 Public Warrants
77
outstanding and entitled to vote. Each HACI warrant is entitled
to one vote for each share of HACI Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrant at the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders.
Required
Vote for Warrantholder Proposals
Approval of the Warrant Amendment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Public
Warrants as of the record date.
Approval of the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
outstanding Public Warrants represented in person or by proxy at
the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and entitled
to vote thereon as of the record date.
Quorum
and Required Vote for Stockholder Proposals
A quorum of HACI stockholders is necessary to hold a valid
meeting. A quorum will be present at the special meeting of HACI
stockholders if a majority of the shares of HACI Common Stock
outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting of HACI
stockholders is represented in person or by proxy. Abstentions
and broker non-votes, which are discussed further below, will
count as present for the purposes of establishing a quorum.
Election of the four nominees requires a plurality of the votes
cast, in person or by proxy.
Approval of the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal
and the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal require
the affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding
shares of HACI Common Stock entitled to vote thereon, as of the
record date.
Approval of the Acquisition Proposal requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of HACI
Common Stock entitled to vote thereon, as of the record date. In
addition, the Acquisition will not be consummated if holders of
30% or more of the Public Shares vote against the Acquisition
Proposal and properly exercise their conversion rights. A HACI
stockholder cannot seek conversion of its Public Shares unless
such stockholder votes against the Acquisition Proposal.
Approval of the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal requires a
majority of the votes cast by holders of shares of HACI Common
Stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote
thereon at the special meeting of HACI stockholders.
As of the record date for the special meeting of HACI
stockholders, the Initial Stockholders held approximately 20% of
the outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock, which consists of
the Founder Shares acquired prior to the IPO. In connection with
the IPO, HACI and the representative of the underwriters in the
IPO entered into agreements with the Initial Stockholders
pursuant to which the Initial Stockholders agreed to vote:
|
|
|
|
|
all of their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of
the votes cast with respect to an initial business combination
by the Public Stockholders,
|
|
|
|
any Public Shares acquired in or after the IPO in favor of an
initial business combination, and
|
|
|
|
all shares of HACI Common Stock held by them in favor of
amending HACIs charter to provide for its perpetual
existence.
|
The Initial Stockholders did not agree, however, to vote in
favor of an amendment to HACIs charter that would permit
HACI to complete a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business, as such
amendment was not contemplated at the time of HACIs IPO.
At the special meeting, the Initial Stockholders intend to vote
in favor of the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal
and the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal, which
will include the amendment to HACIs charter to permit
HACIs perpetual existence and to permit a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry as its
principal business.
78
If the Initial Stockholders or HACIs officers and
directors purchase Public Shares from existing HACI Public
Stockholders that are likely to vote against the Acquisition
Proposal or that are likely to elect to exercise their
conversion rights, the probability that the Acquisition Proposal
will be approved would increase.
Abstentions
and Broker Non-Votes
Under the rules of various national and regional securities
exchanges your broker, bank or nominee cannot vote your shares
or warrants with respect to non-discretionary matters unless you
provide instructions on how to vote in accordance with the
information and procedures provided to you by your broker, bank
or nominee. The election of directors is a routine item so
brokers who do not receive instructions as to how to vote on the
Director Election Proposal may generally vote on this matter.
HACI believes all other proposals presented to the stockholders
and to the warrantholders will be considered non-discretionary
and therefore your broker, bank or nominee cannot vote your
shares or warrants without your instruction. If you do not
provide instructions with your proxy, your bank, broker or other
nominee may deliver a proxy card expressly indicating that it is
NOT voting your shares or warrants, as the case may be; this
indication that a bank, broker or nominee is not voting your
shares is which we refer to as a broker non-vote.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the
election of directors.
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the Warrant Amendment Proposal and the
Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal. A broker non-vote will have
the same effect as a vote AGAINST the Warrant
Amendment Proposal and will have no effect on the Warrantholder
Adjournment Proposal.
Abstentions are considered present for the purposes of
establishing a quorum but will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal, the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal,
the Acquisition Proposal and the Stockholder Adjournment
Proposal. Broker non-votes, while considered present for the
purposes of establishing a quorum, will have the affect of a
vote AGAINST the Charter Amendment
Existence Proposal, the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal, and the Acquisition Proposal and will have no effect
on the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal.
Manner of
Voting
We refer to securityholders who hold their HACI Common Stock or
Public Warrants in their own name (as opposed to being held in
the name of their broker, bank or other nominee) as
holders of record. Holders of record may vote in
person at the special meetings or by proxy. HACI recommends that
holders of record vote by proxy even if they plan to attend the
HACI Meeting. Holders of record can always revoke their proxy
and change their votes at the HACI Meeting.
Proxy
Voting by Holders of Record
Voting instructions are attached to your proxy card. If you
properly submit your proxy to HACI prior to 10:00 A.M.
Central Daylight time on September 24, 2009 in the case of
warrantholders and prior to 10:30 A.M. Central Daylight
time on September 24, 2009 in the case of stockholders, one
of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares or
warrants as you have directed. You may vote for or against any
or all of the proposals submitted at the special meetings or
abstain from voting.
If you are a holder of record, you may vote your proxy by mail.
Please follow the instructions provided on your proxy card. Your
submission of proxy authorizes Joseph B. Armes and Robert M.
Swartz, and each of them, as proxies, each with the power to
appoint his substitute, to represent and vote your shares.
Only the latest dated proxy received from you will be voted at
the special meetings.
Voting of
Shares or Warrants Held in Street Name
If your shares of HACI Common Stock or Public Warrants are not
held in your own name but rather by your broker, bank or another
nominee, we refer to your shares as being held in street
name by your nominee. If your shares or warrants are held
in street name you must instruct your nominee how to vote your
shares.
79
Your nominee may send to you a separate voting instruction form
asking you for your voting instructions. If you do not receive a
request for voting instructions well in advance of the special
meetings, we recommend that you directly contact your nominee to
determine how to cause your shares and warrants to be voted as
you wish. Your nominee may permit you to instruct the voting of
your shares and warrants electronically using the telephone or
Internet. HACI has confirmed that approximately 99% of the
street name holders will have access to telephone and Internet
voting and that such access will continue until
11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight time on the day before the
special meetings, after which time a street name holder must
contact his bank, broker or nominee to vote or change his vote.
How
Proxies Will Be Voted
All shares of HACI Common Stock and Public Warrants entitled to
vote and represented by properly completed proxies received
prior to the special meetings (unless properly revoked) will be
voted at the special meeting as instructed on the proxies. If
HACI Public Stockholders do not indicate how their shares of
HACI Common Stock should be voted on a matter, the shares of
HACI Common Stock represented by a properly completed and not
properly withdrawn proxy will be voted as HACIs board of
directors recommends and therefore will be voted:
FOR the Director Election Proposal, FOR
the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal, FOR
the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal,
FOR the Acquisition Proposal and FOR the
Stockholder Adjournment Proposal. If HACI Public Warrantholders
do not indicate how their Public Warrants should be voted on a
matter, the Public Warrants represented by a properly completed
and not properly withdrawn proxy will be voted as HACIs
board of directors recommends and therefore will be voted:
FOR the Warrant Amendment Proposal and
FOR the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal.
Revoking
Your Proxy
A record holder may revoke a proxy at any time before the
special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders or the special
meeting of HACI stockholders, as the case may be, or at such
meeting by doing any one of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
you may submit another proxy card with a later date;
|
|
|
|
|
|
you may notify Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., HACIs secretary,
in writing before the applicable special meeting that you have
revoked your proxy; or
|
|
|
|
you may attend the applicable special meeting, revoke your
proxy, and vote in person, as indicated above.
|
If you hold your shares in street name and have
instructed your bank, broker or other nominee to vote your
shares or warrants for you, you must follow instructions you
receive from your bank, broker or other nominee in order to
change or revoke your vote. Street name holders with access to
telephone and Internet voting may change their vote until
11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight time on the day before the
special meetings, after which time a street name holder must
contact his bank, broker or nominee to change his vote.
No
Additional Matters May Be Presented at the Special
Meetings
The special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders has been
called only to consider the approval of the Warrant Amendment
Proposal and the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal, if
necessary. The special meeting of HACI stockholders has been
called only to consider the approval of the Director Election
Proposal, the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal, the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal, the Acquisition Proposal and the Stockholder
Adjournment Proposal, if necessary. Under HACIs bylaws,
other than procedural matters incident to the conduct of the
meeting, no other matters may be considered at either special
meeting if they are not included in the notice of the applicable
special meeting.
Who Can
Answer Your Questions About Voting Your Shares or
Warrants
If you have any questions about how to vote or direct a vote in
respect of your shares of HACI Common Stock or your Public
Warrants, you may call Morrow & Co., LLC, at
(800) 662-5200.
80
Conversion
Rights
As a result of the proposed Acquisition, each HACI Public
Stockholder has the right to vote against the Acquisition
Proposal and demand that HACI convert its Public Shares into a
pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the trust
account on the closing date of the Acquisition, before payment
of deferred underwriting commissions and including interest
earned on its pro rata portion of the trust account, net of
income taxes payable on such interest and net of interest income
of up to $6.6 million on the trust account previously
released to HACI to fund its working capital, if the Acquisition
is approved and completed. HACI expects that the conversion
price will be less than the per unit IPO price of $10.00 per
unit. The Initial Stockholders will not have conversion rights
with respect to the Founder Shares purchased by them prior to
the IPO.
A HACI Public Stockholder who wishes to exercise its conversion
rights may request conversion of its Public Shares at any time
after the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus and prior
to the vote taken with respect to the Acquisition Proposal, but
the request will not be granted unless the HACI Public
Stockholder votes against the Acquisition Proposal, the
Acquisition Proposal is approved and the Acquisition completed,
the HACI Public Stockholder holds its shares through the closing
of the Acquisition and the HACI Public Stockholder follows the
specific procedures for conversion set forth in this proxy
statement/prospectus. If a HACI Public Stockholder votes against
the Acquisition Proposal but fails to properly exercise its
conversion rights, such stockholder will not have its shares of
HACI Common Stock converted into cash. HACI will not complete
the Acquisition if HACI Public Stockholders owning 30% or more
of the Public Shares exercise their conversion rights. Because
the conversion price will likely be lower than the $10.00 per
unit offering price of the HACI units, and may be less than the
market price of HACI Common Stock on the date of conversion,
there may be a disincentive on the part of the HACI Public
Stockholders to exercise their conversion rights.
A HACI Public Stockholder may request conversion at any time
after the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus and prior
to the vote taken with respect to the Acquisition Proposal at
the special meeting of HACI stockholders. Any request for
conversion, once made, may be withdrawn at any time prior to the
date of the special meeting of HACI stockholders. If a HACI
Public Stockholder wishes to exercise its conversion rights, the
stockholder must vote against the Acquisition Proposal, demand
that HACI convert their Public Shares into cash by marking the
appropriate space on the proxy card and provide physical or
electronic delivery of such stockholders stock
certificates or shares, as appropriate, as described below,
prior to the special meeting of HACI stockholders. If,
notwithstanding the stockholders vote, the Acquisition is
consummated and the stockholder follows the procedures required
for conversion, then the stockholder will be entitled to receive
a pro rata share of the trust account, before payment of
deferred underwriting discounts and including interest earned on
its pro rata portion of the trust account, net of income taxes
payable on such interest and net of interest income of up to
$6.6 million on the trust account released to HACI to fund
its working capital. A HACI Public Stockholder will not be able
to transfer its shares following the approval of the Acquisition
Proposal unless the Acquisition Agreement is terminated. A HACI
Public Stockholder who exercises its conversion rights will
exchange the Public Shares held by such stockholder for cash and
will no longer own those shares, although the stockholder will
still have the right to elect to receive either Company warrants
or the Cash Amount as described in this proxy
statement/prospectus. If the Acquisition is not consummated then
a stockholders shares will not be converted into cash and
will be returned to the stockholder, even if such stockholder
elected to convert. HACI anticipates that the funds to be
distributed to HACI Public Stockholders who elect conversion
will be distributed promptly after completion of the
Acquisition. HACI Public Stockholders who exercise their
conversion rights will have the right to exercise any HACI
warrants they still hold subject to the provisions of the
Warrant Amendment.
HACI Public Stockholders must tender their shares to Continental
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, the transfer
agent for HACI, prior to the special meeting of HACI
stockholders or deliver their shares to the transfer agent
electronically using the Depository Trust Companys
DWAC (Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) System.
81
In order to physically deliver stock certificates, the HACI
Public Stockholders must comply with the following steps. If the
shares are held in street name, a HACI Public Stockholder must
instruct its account executive at its bank or broker to withdraw
the shares from the HACI Public Stockholders account and
request that a physical certificate be issued in the HACI Public
Stockholders name. No later than the day prior to the
special meeting of HACI stockholders, a HACI Public Stockholder
must present a written instruction to Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company that it wishes to
convert its shares into cash and confirm that the HACI Public
Stockholder has held the shares since the record date and will
not sell or transfer the shares prior to the closing of the
Acquisition. Certificates that have not been tendered in
accordance with these procedures by the day prior to the special
meeting of HACI stockholders will not be converted into cash. In
the event that a HACI Public Stockholder tenders its shares and
decides prior to the special meeting of HACI stockholders that
it does not want to convert its shares, the HACI Public
Stockholder may withdraw its tender. In the event that a HACI
Public Stockholder tenders shares and the Acquisition is not
completed, these shares will not be converted into cash and the
physical certificates representing the shares will be returned
to the HACI Public Stockholder.
Appraisal
Rights
In the event the Companys securities are not listed on a
national securities exchange at the time the Acquisition is
consummated, appraisal rights will be available to all HACI
stockholders pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL. Appraisal
rights are not available to holders of HACI warrants. If
appraisal rights are available, holders of shares of HACI Common
Stock who continuously hold such shares through the effective
time of the Acquisition, who do not vote in favor of the
Acquisition Proposal and who properly demand appraisal of their
shares will be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with
the Acquisition under Section 262 of the DGCL. If the
Company Common Stock is listed on a national securities exchange
at the time the Acquisition is consummated, HACI stockholders
will not be entitled to assert appraisal rights under
Section 262.
Holders of Public Shares electing to exercise conversion rights
will not be entitled to appraisal rights.
The following discussion is not a complete statement of the law
pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL and is qualified
in its entirety by the full text of Section 262, which is
attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex F. The
following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice
nor does it constitute a recommendation that stockholders
exercise their appraisal rights, if any, under Section 262.
All references in Section 262 and in this summary to a
stockholder are to the record holder of the shares
of HACI Common Stock as to which appraisal rights are asserted.
A person having a beneficial interest in shares of HACI Common
Stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a
broker, fiduciary, depositary or other nominee, must act
promptly to cause the record holder to follow the steps
summarized below properly and in a timely manner to perfect
appraisal rights, if available.
In the event that appraisal rights are available, under
Section 262, holders of shares of HACI Common Stock who
continuously hold such shares through the effective time of the
Acquisition, who do not vote in favor of the Acquisition
Proposal and who otherwise follow the procedures set forth in
Section 262 will be entitled to have their shares appraised
by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment in cash
of the fair value of the shares, exclusive of any
element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation
of the Acquisition, together with interest, if any, as
determined by the court.
Under Section 262, where a merger or consolidation
agreement is to be submitted for adoption at a meeting of
stockholders, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior
to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders entitled to
appraisal rights that appraisal rights are available and include
in the notice a copy of Section 262. To the extent
appraisal rights are available in connection with the
Acquisition, this proxy statement/prospectus shall constitute
the notice, and the full text of Section 262 is attached to
this proxy statement as Annex F. In the event appraisal
rights are available in connection with the Acquisition, any
holder of HACI Common Stock who wishes to exercise appraisal
rights, or who wishes to preserve such holders right to do
so, should review the following discussion and Annex F
carefully because failure to timely and properly comply with the
procedures specified will result in the loss of appraisal
rights. Moreover, because of the complexity of the procedures
for exercising the right to seek appraisal of shares of common
stock, HACI believes that if a stockholder considers exercising
such rights, such stockholder should seek the advice of legal
counsel.
82
Filing
Written Demand
If appraisal rights are available in connection with the
Acquisition, any holder of HACI Common Stock wishing to exercise
appraisal rights must deliver to HACI, before the vote on the
Acquisition Proposal at the special meeting of HACI
stockholders, a written demand for the appraisal of the
stockholders shares. A holder of shares of HACI Common
Stock wishing to exercise appraisal rights must hold of record
the shares on the date the written demand for appraisal is made
and must continue to hold the shares of record through the
effective time of the Acquisition. The stockholder must not vote
in favor of the Acquisition Proposal. A proxy that is submitted
and does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked,
be voted in favor of the Acquisition Proposal, and it will
constitute a waiver of the stockholders right of appraisal
and will nullify any previously delivered written demand for
appraisal. Therefore, a stockholder who submits a proxy and who
wishes to exercise appraisal rights must submit a proxy
containing instructions to vote against the Acquisition Proposal
or abstain from voting on the Acquisition Proposal. Neither
voting against the adoption of the Acquisition Proposal nor
abstaining from voting or failing to vote on the Acquisition
Proposal will, in and of itself, constitute a written demand for
appraisal satisfying the requirements of Section 262. The
written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate
from any proxy or vote on the Acquisition Proposal. The demand
must reasonably inform HACI of the identity of the holder, as
well as the intention of the holder to demand an appraisal of
the fair value of the shares held by the holder. A
stockholders failure to deliver the written demand prior
to the taking of the vote on the Acquisition Proposal at the
special meeting of HACI stockholders will constitute a waiver of
appraisal rights.
If appraisal rights are available in connection with the
Acquisition, only a holder of record of shares of HACI Common
Stock is entitled to assert appraisal rights for the shares
registered in that holders name. A demand for appraisal in
respect of shares of HACI Common Stock should be executed by or
on behalf of the holder of record, fully and correctly, as the
holders name appears on the holders stock
certificates, should specify the holders name and mailing
address and the number of shares registered in the holders
name and must state that the person intends thereby to demand
appraisal of the holders shares in connection with the
Acquisition. If the shares are owned of record in a fiduciary
capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, execution
of the demand should be made in that capacity, and if the shares
are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint
tenancy and tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by
or on behalf of all joint owners. An authorized agent, including
an agent for two or more joint owners, may execute a demand for
appraisal on behalf of a holder of record; however, the agent
must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose
that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for
the record owner or owners. If the shares are held in
street name by a broker, bank or nominee, the
broker, bank or nominee may exercise appraisal rights with
respect to the shares held for one or more beneficial owners
while not exercising the rights with respect to the shares held
for other beneficial owners; in such case, however, the written
demand should set forth the number of shares as to which
appraisal is sought, and where no number of shares is expressly
mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares of
HACI Common Stock held in the name of the record owner.
Stockholders who hold their shares in brokerage accounts or
other nominee forms and who wish to exercise appraisal rights
are urged to consult with their brokers to determine the
appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal
by such a nominee.
All written demands for appraisal pursuant to Section 262
should be sent or delivered to Hicks Acquisition Company I,
Inc., Thomas O. Hicks, corporate secretary, 100 Crescent Court,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201.
Any holder of HACI Common Stock may withdraw his, her or its
demand for appraisal and accept the consideration offered
pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement by delivering to Company
as the surviving entity of the Acquisition, a written withdrawal
of the demand for appraisal. However, any such attempt to
withdraw the demand made more than 60 days after the
effective date of the Acquisition will require written approval
of the surviving corporation. No appraisal proceeding in the
Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed without the
approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval
may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just.
83
Notice
by the Surviving Corporation
If appraisal rights are available in connection with the
Acquisition, within 10 days after the effective time of the
Acquisition, the Company, as the surviving corporation, must
notify each holder of HACI Common Stock who has made a written
demand for appraisal pursuant to Section 262, and who has
not voted in favor of the Acquisition Proposal, that the
Acquisition has become effective.
Filing
a Petition for Appraisal
Within 120 days after the effective time of the
Acquisition, but not thereafter, the Company, as the surviving
entity of the Acquisition, or any holder of HACI Common Stock
who has so complied with Section 262 and is entitled to
appraisal rights under Section 262 may commence an
appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court
of Chancery and demanding a determination of the fair value of
the shares held by all dissenting holders. The Company, as the
surviving entity is under no obligation to and has no present
intention to file a petition, and holders should not assume that
the Company will file a petition. Accordingly, it is the
obligation of the holders of HACI Common Stock to initiate all
necessary action to perfect their appraisal rights in respect of
shares of HACI Common Stock within the time prescribed in
Section 262.
Within 120 days after the effective time of the
Acquisition, any holder of HACI Common Stock who has complied
with the requirements for exercise of appraisal rights will be
entitled, upon written request, to receive from the Company a
statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted
in favor of the Acquisition Proposal and with respect to which
demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate
number of holders of such shares. The statement must be mailed
within 10 days after a written request therefor has been
received by the surviving corporation.
If a petition for an appraisal is timely filed by a holder of
shares of HACI Common Stock and a copy thereof is served upon
the surviving corporation, the surviving corporation will then
be obligated within 20 days to file with the Delaware
Register in Chancery a duly verified list containing the names
and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded an appraisal
of their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of
their shares have not been reached. After notice to the
stockholders as required by the court, the Delaware Court of
Chancery is empowered to conduct a hearing on the petition to
determine those stockholders who have complied with
Section 262 and who have become entitled to appraisal
rights thereunder. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require
the stockholders who demanded payment for their shares to submit
their stock certificates to the Register in Chancery for
notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceeding,
and if any stockholder fails to comply with the direction, the
Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
Determination
of Fair Value
After determining the holders of HACI Common Stock entitled to
appraisal, the Delaware Court of Chancery, through an appraisal
proceeding, shall determine the fair value of their
shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the Acquisition, together with
interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be
the fair value. In determining fair value, the Delaware Court of
Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. In
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Supreme Court of
Delaware discussed the factors that could be considered in
determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that
proof of value by any techniques or methods that are
generally considered acceptable in the financial community and
otherwise admissible in court should be considered, and
that fair price obviously requires consideration of all
relevant factors involving the value of a company. The
Delaware Supreme Court stated that, in making this determination
of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset
value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the
enterprise and any other facts that could be ascertained as of
the date of the Acquisition that throw any light on future
prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 provides
that fair value is to be exclusive of any element of value
arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the
merger. In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor,
Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion
is a narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known
elements of value, but which rather applies
84
only to the speculative elements of value arising from such
accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Supreme
Court of Delaware also stated that elements of future
value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known
or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the
product of speculation, may be considered.
Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that
the fair value of their shares as so determined could be more
than, the same as or less than the consideration they would
receive pursuant to the Acquisition if they did not seek
appraisal of their shares and that an investment banking opinion
as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the
consideration payable in a merger is not an opinion as to fair
value under Section 262. Although HACI believes that the
exchange of HACI Common Stock for Company Common Stock is fair,
no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of
fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and
stockholders should recognize that such an appraisal could
result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or
the same as, this consideration. Neither HACI nor the Company
anticipate offering more than the applicable shares of Company
Common Stock to any stockholder of HACI exercising appraisal
rights, and each of HACI and the Company reserves the right to
assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that for purposes of
Section 262, the fair value of a share of HACI
Common Stock is less than the applicable shares of Company
Common Stock, and that the methods which are generally
considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise
admissible in court should be considered in the appraisal
proceedings. In addition, Delaware courts have decided that the
statutory appraisal remedy, depending on factual circumstances,
may or may not be a dissenters exclusive remedy. The
Delaware Court of Chancery will also determine the amount of
interest, if any, to be paid upon the amounts to be received by
persons whose shares of HACI Common Stock have been appraised.
Unless the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good
cause shown, interest from the effective date of the Acquisition
through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time
to time during the period between the effective time of the
Acquisition and the date of payment of the judgment. If a
petition for appraisal is not timely filed, then the right to an
appraisal will cease. The costs of the action (which do not
include attorneys fees or the fees and expenses of
experts) may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the
parties as the Court deems equitable under the circumstances.
The Court may also order that all or a portion of the expenses
incurred by a stockholder in connection with an appraisal,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts utilized in the appraisal
proceeding, be charged pro rata against the value of all the
shares entitled to be appraised.
If any stockholder who demands appraisal of shares of HACI
Common Stock under Section 262 fails to perfect, or
successfully withdraws or loses, such holders right to
appraisal, the stockholders shares of HACI Common Stock
will be deemed to have been converted at the effective time of
the Acquisition into the right to receive Company Common Stock.
A stockholder will fail to perfect, or lose or withdraw, the
holders right to appraisal if no petition for appraisal is
filed within 120 days after the effective time of the
Acquisition or if the stockholder delivers to the surviving
corporation a written withdrawal of the holders demand for
appraisal and an acceptance of the Company Common Stock in
accordance with Section 262.
From and after the effective time of the Acquisition, no
dissenting stockholder shall have any rights of a stockholder of
HACI with respect to that holders shares for any purpose,
except to receive payment of fair value and to receive payment
of dividends or other distributions on the holders shares
of HACI Common Stock, if any, payable to stockholders of HACI of
record as of a time prior to the effective time of the
Acquisition; provided, however, that if a dissenting stockholder
delivers to the surviving company a written withdrawal of the
demand for an appraisal within 60 days after the effective
time of the Acquisition, or subsequently with the written
approval of the surviving company, then the right of that
dissenting stockholder to an appraisal will cease and the
dissenting stockholder will be entitled to receive only the
Acquisition consideration in accordance with the terms of the
Acquisition Agreement. Once a petition for appraisal is filed
with the Delaware court, however, the appraisal proceeding may
not be dismissed as to any stockholder of HACI without the
approval of the court.
85
Failure to comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth
in Section 262 of the DGCL may result in the loss of a
stockholders statutory appraisal rights. Consequently, any
stockholder wishing to exercise appraisal rights is urged to
consult legal counsel before attempting to exercise those rights.
Proxy
Solicitation Costs
HACI is soliciting proxies on behalf of its board of directors.
All solicitation costs will be paid by HACI. This solicitation
is being made by mail but also may be made by telephone or in
person. HACI and its directors, officers and employees may also
solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other electronic
means, including
e-mail and
facsimile. Any solicitation made and information provided in
such a solicitation will be consistent with the written proxy
statement and proxy card. Morrow & Co., LLC, a proxy
solicitation firm that HACI has engaged to assist it in
soliciting proxies, will be paid an initial fee of $12,500 plus
out-of-pocket expenses for its efforts. HACI will pay Morrow an
additional fee of $30,000 upon successful completion of the
Acquisition.
HACI will ask banks, brokers and other institutions, nominees
and fiduciaries to forward its proxy materials to their
principals and to obtain their authority to execute proxies and
voting instructions. HACI will reimburse them for their
reasonable expenses.
HACI, Parent, the Company, Seller and their respective directors
and executive officers, may be deemed to be participants in the
solicitation of proxies. The underwriters of the IPO may provide
assistance to HACI, Parent, the Company, Seller and their
respective directors and executive officers, and may be deemed
to be participants in the solicitation of proxies.
$5.5 million of the underwriting commissions relating to
the IPO are deferred pending stockholder approval of HACIs
initial business combination, and HACI stockholders and
warrantholders are advised that the underwriters have a
financial interest in the successful outcome of the proxy
solicitation.
Vote of
the Initial Stockholders
As of August 31, 2009, the record date for the special
meeting of HACI stockholders, the Initial Stockholders and their
affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote
13,800,000 Founder Shares, which collectively constitute 20% of
the issued and outstanding HACI Common Stock. The Initial
Stockholders consist of the Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P.), an entity
in which approximately 80% of the partnership interests
attributable to the Founder Shares and Founder Units and 100% of
the partnership interests attributable to the Sponsor Warrants
are owned by Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks, his
charitable foundation and estate planning entities for his
family, William H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery, Brian
Mulroney and William F. Quinn.
In connection with the IPO, HACI and the representative of the
underwriters in the IPO entered into agreements with the Initial
Stockholders pursuant to which the Initial Stockholders agreed
to vote:
|
|
|
|
|
all of their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of
the votes cast with respect to an initial business combination
by the Public Stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any Public Shares acquired in or after the IPO in favor of an
initial business combination; and
|
|
|
|
all shares of HACI Common Stock held by them in favor of
amending HACIs charter to provide for its perpetual
existence.
|
The Initial Stockholders did not agree, however, to vote in
favor of an amendment to HACIs charter that would permit
HACI to complete a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business, as such
amendment was not contemplated at the time of HACIs IPO.
At the special meeting, the Initial Stockholders intend to vote
in favor of the Charter Amendment-Existence Proposal and the
Charter Amendment-Purpose Proposal which will include the
amendment to HACIs charter to permit HACIs perpetual
existence and to permit a business combination with an entity
engaged in the energy industry as its principal business,
despite the provisions in HACIs charter prohibiting it
from consummating a business
86
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry, as
previously disclosed in the prospectus used to offer and sell
HACI units in connection with the IPO.
Approval of each of the Acquisition Proposal and the Charter
Amendment-Existence Proposal and the Charter Amendment-Purpose
Proposal require the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding HACI Common Stock as of the record date. If the
Initial Stockholders or HACIs officers and directors
purchase Public Shares from existing HACI Public Stockholders
that are likely to vote against the Acquisition Proposal or that
are likely to elect to exercise their conversion rights, the
probability that the Acquisition Proposal will be approved would
increase.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Founder Warrants and
Sponsor Warrants are also being amended pursuant to the Warrant
Amendment, to permit the cancellation of 4,600,000 Founder
Warrants and transfer of 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants, as
contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement. Such amendment
requires the consent of a majority of the Founder Warrants and a
majority of the Sponsor Warrants. The Initial Stockholders,
which hold all of the outstanding Founder Warrants and Sponsor
Warrants, have indicated to HACI their intention to consent to
such amendment.
Outstanding
Public Warrants
The closing price as reported by NYSE Amex of HACI warrants on
September 10, 2009 was $0.59. Prior to voting on the
Warrant Amendment Proposal, HACI Public Warrantholders should
verify the market price of the Public Warrants as they may
receive higher proceeds from the sale of their warrants in the
public market than from HACIs exchange of the Public
Warrants for cash in connection with the Acquisition if the
market price per warrant is higher than the Cash Exchange price
of $0.55 per warrant. HACI cannot assure its warrantholders that
they will be able to sell their warrants in the open market,
even if the market price per warrant is higher than the exchange
price stated above, as there may not be sufficient liquidity in
HACIs securities when HACI Public Warrantholders wish to
sell their warrants.
If you elect to participate in the Cash Exchange, you will be
exchanging your Public Warrants for cash and will no longer own
those warrants. You will be entitled to receive cash for these
warrants only if you deliver your warrant certificate (either
physically or electronically) to HACIs transfer agent in
accordance with the procedures outlined in the section entitled
The Warrant Amendment Proposal. Additionally,
if you select the Warrant Exchange, you will be exchanging your
Public Warrants for the Company warrants subject to adjustment
and proration, and must exchange your Public Warrant in
accordance with the procedures outlined in the section entitled
The Warrant Amendment Proposal.
87
THE
WARRANT AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
Purpose
of the Warrant Amendment
In connection with the proposed Acquisition, HACI is proposing
an amendment to the Warrant Agreement governing all of the HACI
Warrants, which we refer to as the Warrant Amendment, in order
to, among other things, allow each HACI Public Warrantholder to
elect to receive in the Acquisition, for each Public Warrant
held by such holder, either (i) the right to receive $0.55
in cash, or the Cash Amount, or (ii) a new warrant
exercisable for one share of Company Common Stock, or the
Company warrant, subject to adjustment and proration as
described below. If the Acquisition is consummated, any
warrantholder who votes against the approval of the Warrant
Amendment Proposal or who makes no election will receive $0.55
in cash in exchange for each of its Public Warrants. We refer to
the elections by HACI Public Warrantholders to receive the
Company warrants as the Warrant Election. We further refer to
the exchange of Public Warrants for the Cash Amount as the Cash
Exchange and the exchange of Public Warrants for the Company
warrants as the Warrant Exchange.
HACI will exchange up to fifty percent (50%) (or 27,600,000) of
the Public Warrants outstanding immediately prior to the
consummation of the Acquisition for Company warrants, which we
refer to as the Warrant Cap. If HACI Public Warrantholders elect
to receive in the aggregate more Company warrants than the
Warrant Cap, the total Company warrants exchanged will be
proportioned among the HACI Public Warrantholders who make a
Warrant Election by multiplying the number of Company warrants
evidenced by a specific Warrant Election by a fraction
(x) the numerator of which is the Warrant Cap and
(y) the denominator of which is the aggregate number of
Company warrants evidenced by all Warrant Elections. Further,
Public Warrants for which HACI Public Warrantholders make no
election will be converted into the right to receive the Cash
Amount for each of its Public Warrants. There is, however, no
limit on the number of warrants that may be exchanged for cash.
In the event that the Warrant Amendment Proposal is approved,
HACI Public Warrantholders who voted against the Warrant
Amendment Proposal will have the right to receive the Cash
Amount.
The terms of the Company warrants will be substantially similar
to the terms of the Public Warrants, except that the Company
warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
will be exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
will have an exercise price of $13.00;
|
|
|
|
will expire five years from the closing of the
Acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
will be redeemable by the Company in whole or in part at a price
of $0.01 per warrant if the sales price of Company Common Stock
equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days
within a 30 day trading period.
|
Pursuant to Section 18 of the Warrant Agreement, HACI and
the Warrant Agent may amend any provision of the Warrant
Agreement with the consent of the holders of HACI warrants
exercisable for a majority in interest of the shares of HACI
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of all outstanding HACI
warrants that would be affected by such amendment. Approval of
the Warrant Amendment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of
a majority of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Public
Warrants as of the record date. The approval of the Warrant
Amendment Proposal is a condition to the consummation of the
Acquisition. If the HACI Public Warrantholders approve the
Warrant Amendment Proposal, then the Warrant Agreement will be
amended and the Public Warrants will be permitted to be
converted upon consummation of the Acquisition.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Founder Warrants and
Sponsor Warrants are also being amended pursuant to the Warrant
Amendment, to permit the cancellation of 4,600,000 Founder
Warrants and transfer of 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants, as
contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement. Such amendment
requires the consent of a majority of the Founder Warrants and a
majority of the Sponsor Warrants. The Initial Stockholders,
which hold all of the outstanding Founder Warrants and Sponsor
Warrants, have indicated to HACI their intention to consent to
such amendment.
88
HACI believes the Cash Exchange and Warrant Exchange will
provide benefits to HACI and its warrantholders. For example,
HACI believes that the Cash Exchange is an important step in the
consummation of the Acquisition because reduction of warrants in
the Companys capital structure following the consummation
of the Acquisition will increase the Companys strategic
opportunities and attractiveness to future investors.
In the event the Warrant Amendment Proposal is not approved, the
Acquisition Proposal will not be presented to HACI stockholders
for a vote. If the Acquisition is not consummated by
September 28, 2009, HACI will be required to liquidate and
all HACI warrants will expire worthless.
HACI Public Warrantholders should note that they will recognize
gain or loss for Federal income tax purposes if the Warrant
Amendment Proposal is approved and the Warrant Exchange and Cash
Exchange are consummated, although such treatment with respect
to the Warrant Exchange is not free from doubt for holders who
exchange both Public Warrants and HACI Common Stock in the
Acquisition. For a discussion of the tax consequences of the
Acquisition for HACI Public Warrantholders, please see the
sections entitled The Acquisition Material
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Acquisition and
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences.
Certain
Effects of the Cash Exchange
Approximately $15.2 million will be required to purchase
warrants in the Cash Exchange. The Cash Exchange will be funded
from the funds released to HACI from the trust account in
connection with the consummation of the Acquisition.
Warrant
Election/Exchange Procedures
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, or the Exchange
Agent, has been appointed by HACI to receive elections by HACI
Public Warrantholders to receive the Company warrants, or an
Election, and to act as exchange agent with respect to the
Acquisition. If a HACI Public Warrantholder wishes to make an
Election to receive the Company warrants, such Public
Warrantholder must vote in favor of the Warrant Amendment
Proposal and make an Election to receive the Company warrants by
marking the appropriate space on the proxy card and provide
physical or electronic delivery of such warrantholders
Public Warrant certificates or warrants, as appropriate, as
described below, prior to or at the special meeting of Public
Warrantholders. In order to validly make an Election, a holder
of HACI units must first separate its HACI units into the
component HACI Common Stock and Public Warrants in order to
validly tender its Public Warrants to the Exchange Agent. If the
Acquisition is consummated, a Public Warrantholder who does not
make a proper Election for Company warrants, will receive the
Cash Amount for each of its Public Warrants.
Any Public Warrant holder may at any time prior to the date and
time of the special meeting of Public Warrantholders, or the
Election Date, change such holders election if the
Exchange Agent receives (i) prior to the Election Date
written notice of such change accompanied by a new, properly
completed proxy card or (ii) at the special meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders a new, properly completed proxy card. The
Company will have the right in its sole discretion to permit
changes in Elections after the Election Date.
HACI Public Warrantholders making an Election must tender their
Public Warrants to the Exchange Agent, prior to the special
meeting of Public Warrantholders or deliver their Public
Warrants to the Exchange Agent electronically using the
Depository Trust Companys ATOP (Automated Tender
Offer Program) System. Once you tender your Public Warrants to
the Exchange Agent, you may not transfer your Public Warrants
until the Acquisition is completed, unless you properly revoke
your Election.
In order to physically deliver warrant certificates, the HACI
Public Warrantholders must comply with the following steps. If
the Public Warrants are held in street name, a HACI Public
Warrantholder must instruct its account executive at its bank or
broker or withdraw the warrants from the HACI Public
Warrantholders account and request that a physical
certificate be issued in the HACI Public Warrantholders
name. No later than the day prior to the special meeting of HACI
Public Warrantholders, a HACI Public Warrantholder must present
a written instruction to Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company that it wishes to make an Election for
Company warrants and confirm that the HACI Public Warrantholder
has held the warrants since
89
the record date and will not sell or transfer the warrants prior
to the closing of the Acquisition. Certificates that have not
been tendered in accordance with these procedures by the date
and time of the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders
will not be exchanged for Company warrants. In the event that a
HACI Public Warrantholder tenders warrants and the Acquisition
is not completed, these warrants will not be exchanged for
Company warrants and any tendered physical certificates
representing the warrants will be returned to the HACI Public
Warrantholders.
The Cash Amount, $0.55 per Public Warrant, is substantially
less than the market price of the shares of HACI Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants and is slightly
less than the price that could be obtained upon the sale of
Public Warrants in the open market based on the $0.59 closing
price of the Public Warrants on September 10, 2009. See the
section entitled Price Range of Securities and
Dividends herein for information on the historical
market prices for HACI Public Warrants and HACI Common Stock on
the NYSE Amex.
To physically surrender warrants for exchange, holders should
deliver certificates representing their warrants to the Exchange
Agent, at the following address:
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Co.
17 Battery Place 8th Flr
New York, NY 10004
Required
Vote
Approval of the Warrant Amendment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Public
Warrants as of the record date.
Recommendation
BY VOTE
OF A MAJORITY, HACIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT
HACI PUBLIC WARRANTHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF
THE WARRANT AMENDMENT PROPOSAL. WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE
RECOMMENDATION OF HACIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN FAVOR OF THE
WARRANT AMENDMENT PROPOSAL, YOU SHOULD KEEP IN MIND THAT CERTAIN
OF HACIS DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS HAVE INTERESTS IN THE
ACQUISITION THAT MAY CONFLICT WITH YOUR INTERESTS AS A
WARRANTHOLDER. SEE THE SECTION ENTITLED, THE
ACQUISITION POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS OF
HACIS DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS IN THE
ACQUISITION.
90
THE
WARRANTHOLDER ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL
The Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal, if adopted, will allow
HACIs board of directors to adjourn the special meeting of
HACI Public Warrantholders to a later date or dates to permit
further solicitation of proxies in the event, based on the
tabulated votes, there are not sufficient votes at the time of
the special meeting to approve the Warrant Amendment Proposal.
The Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal will only be presented to
HACI Public Warrantholders in the event, based on the tabulated
votes, there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special
meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders to approve the Warrant
Amendment Proposal.
Consequences
if the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal is Not
Approved
If the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal is not approved by the
HACI Public Warrantholders, HACIs board of directors may
not be able to adjourn the special meeting of HACI Public
Warrantholders to a later date in the event, based on the
tabulated votes, there are not sufficient votes at the time of
the special meeting to approve the Warrant Amendment Proposal.
In such event, the Cash Exchange and the Warrant Exchange would
not be permitted and HACI would be required to dissolve and
liquidate and all HACI warrants would expire worthless.
Required
Vote
Adoption of the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of a majority in interest of the shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the outstanding Public
Warrants as of the record date represented in person or by proxy
at the special meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and
entitled to vote thereon. Adoption of the Warrantholder
Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the adoption of any
of the other proposals.
Recommendation
HACIS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT HACI PUBLIC WARRANTHOLDERS
VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE WARRANTHOLDER
ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL.
91
THE
DIRECTOR ELECTION PROPOSAL
HACIs board of directors is divided into three classes,
being divided as equally as possible with each class having a
term of three years. Because HACI did not have a 2008 annual
stockholder meeting, the term of Classes I and II
directors, currently consisting of four directors total,
expires. HACIs independent directors have nominated each
of the current Class I directors, Joseph B. Armes and
William A. Montgomery, for re-election as a director to
HACIs board of directors, as well as each of the current
Class II directors, Brian Mulroney and William H.
Cunningham, for re-election as a director to HACIs board
of directors. Each of the Class I directors will be elected
to hold office for a term of two years until the annual meeting
of stockholders in 2011 and until his respective successor is
duly elected and qualified, unless HACI is sooner dissolved or
if the Acquisition Proposal is approved and the Acquisition is
consummated. Each of the Class II directors will be elected
to hold office for a term of three years until the annual
meeting of stockholders in 2012 and until his respective
successor is duly elected and qualified, unless HACI is sooner
dissolved or if the Acquisition Proposal is approved and the
Acquisition is consummated.
The following sets forth information regarding each nominee.
Class I
Nominees for Re-Election to HACIs Board of
Directors
Joseph B. Armes has been HACIs chief
financial officer and one of HACIs directors since its
inception and has served as HACIs president and chief
executive officer since August 2007. Mr. Armes also
previously served as HACIs chief operating officer, an
executive vice president and HACIs secretary from
HACIs inception until August 2007. Since 2005,
Mr. Armes has served as the chief operating officer of
Hicks Holdings LLC. From 1998 to 2005, Mr. Armes held
several positions, including executive vice president and
general counsel from
1998-2001
and chief financial officer from
2001-2005,
of Southwest Sports Group, a holding company for various sports
teams, including Major League Baseballs Texas Rangers and
the National Hockey Leagues Dallas Stars. From 1997 to
1998, Mr. Armes served as Executive Vice President and
General Counsel of Suiza Foods Corporation (currently known as
Dean Foods Company), a New York Stock Exchange listed food
company. Mr. Armes served as Vice President and General
Counsel of The Morningstar Group Inc., a Nasdaq listed food
company, from 1996 until its merger with Suiza Foods Corporation
in 1997. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Armes practiced law with
the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, where he
specialized in mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Armes
currently serves on the board of directors of Ocular LCD, Inc.
Mr. Armes received a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from Baylor University in 1983, a Masters of
Business Administration from Baylor University in 1984, and a
Juris Doctorate from Southern Methodist University in 1991.
William A. Montgomery has served as a director of
HACI since the closing of HACIs initial public offering.
Mr. Montgomery has been a private investor since 1999. From
1989 to 1999, Mr. Montgomery was Chief Executive Officer of
SA-SO Company, a company engaged in the distribution of
municipal and traffic control products based in Dallas, Texas.
Prior to 1989, Mr. Montgomery worked as a registered
representative in the financial services industry, most recently
serving with Morgan Stanley in the Private Client Services group
from 1985 to 1989. Mr. Montgomery is also a board member
and serves as Compensation Committee Chairman of Windstream
Corporation, a telecommunications company headquartered in
Little Rock, Arkansas. Mr. Montgomery received a Bachelor
of Science degree in Business Administration and Finance from
the University of Arkansas in 1971.
Class II
Nominees for Re-Election to HACIs Board of
Directors
Brian Mulroney has served as a director of HACI
since the closing of its IPO. Mr. Mulroney served as the
Prime Minister of Canada from September 1984 to June 1993. After
resigning as Prime Minister, Mr. Mulroney rejoined the
Montreal law firm of Ogilvy Renault as Senior Partner and
continues to serve in such capacity. In addition,
Mr. Mulroney currently serves as a director of Barrick Gold
Corporation, Blackstone Group LP, Archer Daniels Midland
Company, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, Independent News and
Media, PLC, Quebecor Inc. and Quebecor World Inc. He also serves
as Chairman of the International Advisory Board of Barrick Gold
Corporation. He is a member of the International Advisory
92
Councils of Lion Capital LLP. Mr. Mulroney is also a
trustee of the Montreal Heart Institute Foundation, the
International Advisory Council of the École des Hautes
études commerciales de Montréal and the Council on
Foreign Relations. Mr. Mulroney has been awarded
Canadas highest honour, Companion of the Order of Canada,
and has also been made a Grand Officer of the Ordre national
du Québec. He has also received honorary degrees and
awards from various universities and governments in Canada and
abroad. Mr. Mulroney received his honours undergraduate
degree from St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, N.S. in
1959, and a law degree from Université Laval in
Quebec City in 1964.
William H. Cunningham has served as a director of
HACI since the closing of its IPO. Since 1979,
Dr. Cunningham has served as a professor of marketing at
the University of Texas at Austin and he has held the James L.
Bayless Chair for Free Enterprise at the University of Texas at
Austin since 1985. From 1983 to 1985 he was Dean of the College
of Business Administration and Graduate School of Business of
the University of Texas at Austin, from 1985 to 1992 he served
as the President of the University of Texas at Austin and from
1992 to 2000 he served as the Chancellor (Chief Executive
Officer) of the University of Texas System. Dr. Cunningham
currently serves on the board of directors of Lincoln National
Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange listed holding company
for insurance, investment management, broadcasting and sports
programming businesses, Southwest Airlines, an airline listed on
the New York Stock Exchange, Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., a
biopharmaceutical company, and Hayes Lemmerz International Inc.,
a Nasdaq Global Market listed provider of automotive wheels and
other components for the automotive, commercial highway, heating
and general equipment industries. Dr. Cunningham currently
serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of John Hancock
Mutual Funds. Dr. Cunningham received a Bachelor of
Business Administration degree in 1966, a Master of Business
Administration degree in 1967 and a Ph.D. in 1971, each from
Michigan State University.
Required
Vote
Proxies will have full discretion to cast votes for other
persons in the event any nominee is unable to serve. HACIs
board of directors has no reason to believe that any nominee
will be unable to serve if elected. If a quorum is present,
directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast, in
person or by proxy. This means that the four nominees will be
elected if they receive more affirmative votes than any other
nominee for the same position. Votes marked FOR a
nominee will be counted in favor of that nominee. Abstentions
and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote since a
plurality of the votes cast required for the election of each
nominee. HACI stockholders may not cumulate their votes with
respect to the election of directors.
Recommendation
HACIS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT HACI STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
FOR EACH OF THE FOUR NOMINEES.
93
THE
CHARTER AMENDMENT EXISTENCE PROPOSAL
The purpose of the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal, together with the Charter Amendment
Purpose Proposal, is to ensure that the Acquisition is in
compliance with HACIs charter, as amended by the Charter
Amendment.
Section 9.5 of Article IX of HACIs charter
currently provides that HACIs corporate existence will
terminate on September 28, 2009 and that a proposal to
amend Section 9.5 shall be submitted to the stockholders in
connection with any proposed business combination. In addition,
Article X of HACIs charter purports to eliminate
HACIs statutory power provided by Section 242(a) of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or the
DGCL, to amend Section 9.5 of Article IX of
HACIs charter prior to the consummation by HACI of a
business combination. Specifically, Article X of
HACIs charter states: The Corporation reserves the
right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained
in this Amended and Restated Certificate (including any
Preferred Stock Designation), in the manner now or hereafter
prescribed by this Amended and Restated Certificate and the
DGCL; and, except as set forth in Article VIII, all
rights, preferences and privileges herein conferred upon
stockholders, directors or any other persons by and pursuant to
this Amended and Restated Certificate in its present form or as
hereafter amended are granted subject to the right reserved in
this Article; provided, however, that,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Amended and Restated
Certificate, and in addition to any other vote that may be
required by law or any Preferred Stock Designation, (i) the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting
power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock of the
Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required
to amend, alter or repeal, or adopt any provision as part of
this Amended and Restated Certificate inconsistent with the
purpose and intent of, Article V,
Article VI, Article VII or this
Article X and (ii) Article IX of this
Amended and Restated Certificate may not be amended except as
provided therein; provided that no amendment to any of
Article II, this Article X or
Section 9.5 may become effective prior to the
consummation of a Business Combination. HACIs
charter is attached as Annex G to this proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated in this proxy
statement/prospectus by reference.
In connection with the Acquisition, HACI obtained an opinion of
Richards, Layton and Finger, P.A., as special Delaware counsel
to HACI, or Richards Layton, as to whether Section 9.5 of
Article IX of HACIs charter may be amended as
proposed in this proxy statement/prospectus notwithstanding the
provision in Article X which purports to eliminate
HACIs statutory power to amend Section 9.5 prior to
the consummation of a business combination. As proposed, an
amendment to Section 9.5 of Article IX would extend
HACIs corporate existence until October 5, 2009,
provided, however, that if a business combination is consummated
by October 5, 2009, HACIs corporate existence would
continue perpetually. In the opinion of Richards Layton, the
statutory power to amend the certificate of incorporation is a
fundamental power of a Delaware corporation, such as HACI,
supported by the statutory language of Section 242 of the
DGCL and Delaware case law. In the opinion of Richards Layton,
to the extent Article X of HACIs charter purports to
eliminate HACIs fundamental power to amend
Section 9.5 of Article IX prior to the consummation of
a business combination, such provision is contrary to the laws
of the State of Delaware and, therefore, is invalid pursuant to
Section 102(b)(1) of the DGCL. Accordingly, in the opinion
of Richards Layton, based upon the analysis set forth in its
opinion and its examination of Delaware law, and subject to the
assumptions, qualifications, limitations and exceptions set
forth in its opinion, the proposed amendment Section 9.5 of
Article IX, if duly adopted by HACIs board of
directors and duly approved by the holders of the majority of
the outstanding stock of HACI entitled to vote thereon, would be
valid and effective when a certificate setting forth such
amendments is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware.
In light of the foregoing, in connection with the Acquisition,
HACI is seeking approval of its stockholders to amend its
charter to provide for its perpetual existence, and in the event
HACI fails to consummate a business combination by
October 5, 2009, to provide that HACIs corporate
existence would terminate on October 5, 2009. If the
requisite stockholder approval to this Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal are received, the
amendment to HACIs charter will be filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware immediately after
approval of all of the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal, Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal and the
Acquisition Proposal.
94
The Charter Amendment, which embodies the amendments to be
approved pursuant to the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal and Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal, is
attached as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and
is incorporated in this proxy statement/prospectus by reference.
You are encouraged to read the Charter Amendment in its
entirety. If either the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal or the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal
is not approved at the special meeting of HACI stockholders, the
Acquisition Proposal will not be presented to HACI stockholders
for a vote and the Charter Amendment will not be filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.
Required
Vote
Approval of the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal
will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the issued and outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock as of
the record date.
Recommendation
BY VOTE OF A MAJORITY, HACIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDS THAT HACI STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE
CHARTER AMENDMENT EXISTENCE PROPOSAL. WHEN YOU
CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATION OF HACIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN
FAVOR OF THE CHARTER AMENDMENT EXISTENCE PROPOSAL,
YOU SHOULD KEEP IN MIND THAT HACIS DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS,
INCLUDING MR. HICKS, HAVE INTERESTS IN THE ACQUISITION THAT MAY
CONFLICT WITH YOUR INTERESTS AS A STOCKHOLDER. SEE THE
SECTION ENTITLED, THE ACQUISITION
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS OF HACIS DIRECTORS AND
OFFICERS IN THE ACQUISITION.
95
THE
CHARTER AMENDMENT PURPOSE PROPOSAL
The purpose of the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal, together with the Charter Amendment
Existence Proposal, is to ensure that the Acquisition is in
compliance with HACIs charter, as amended by the Charter
Amendment.
Pursuant to Article II of HACIs charter, HACI is
prohibited from completing a business combination with an entity
engaged in the energy industry as its principal business.
Resolute is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the
exploitation and development of petroleum properties and,
therefore, is engaged in the energy industry as its principal
business. In addition, Article X of HACIs charter
purports to eliminate HACIs statutory power provided by
Section 242(a) of the DGCL to amend Article II of
HACIs charter prior to the consummation by HACI of a
business combination. Specifically, Article X of
HACIs charter states: The Corporation reserves the
right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained
in this Amended and Restated Certificate (including any
Preferred Stock Designation), in the manner now or hereafter
prescribed by this Amended and Restated Certificate and the
DGCL; and, except as set forth in Article VIII, all
rights, preferences and privileges herein conferred upon
stockholders, directors or any other persons by and pursuant to
this Amended and Restated Certificate in its present form or as
hereafter amended are granted subject to the right reserved in
this Article; provided, however, that,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Amended and Restated
Certificate, and in addition to any other vote that may be
required by law or any Preferred Stock Designation, (i) the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting
power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock of the
Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required
to amend, alter or repeal, or adopt any provision as part of
this Amended and Restated Certificate inconsistent with the
purpose and intent of, Article V,
Article VI, Article VII or this
Article X and (ii) Article IX of this
Amended and Restated Certificate may not be amended except as
provided therein; provided that no amendment to any of
Article II, this Article X or
Section 9.5 may become effective prior to the
consummation of a Business Combination. HACIs
charter is attached as Annex G to this proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated in this proxy/statement
prospectus by reference.
In connection with the Acquisition, HACI obtained an opinion of
Richards, Layton and Finger, P.A., as special Delaware counsel
to HACI, or Richards Layton, as to whether Article II of
HACIs charter may be amended as proposed in this proxy
statement/prospectus notwithstanding the provision in
Article X which purports to eliminate HACIs statutory
power to amend Article II prior to the consummation of a
business combination. As proposed, an amendment to
Article II to HACIs charter would allow HACI to
engage in all lawful business permitted by the DGCL. In the
opinion of Richards Layton, the statutory power to amend the
certificate of incorporation is a fundamental power of a
Delaware corporation, such as HACI, supported by the statutory
language of Section 242 of the DGCL and Delaware case law.
In the opinion of Richards Layton, to the extent Article X
of HACIs charter purports to eliminate HACIs
fundamental power to amend Article II prior to the
consummation of a business combination, such provision is
contrary to the laws of the State of Delaware and, therefore, is
invalid pursuant to Section 102(b)(1) of the DGCL.
Accordingly, in the opinion of Richards Layton, based upon the
analysis set forth in its opinion and its examination of
Delaware law, and subject to the assumptions, qualifications,
limitations and exceptions set forth in its opinion, the
proposed amendment to Article II, if duly adopted by
HACIs board of directors and duly approved by the holders
of the majority of the outstanding stock of HACI entitled to
vote thereon, would be valid and effective when a certificate
setting forth such amendments is filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware. The opinion of Richards Layton
is attached as Annex H to this proxy statement and is
incorporated in this proxy statement/prospectus by reference.
Richards Layton was engaged by HACI on July 29, 2009 to
prepare the opinion described above, because HACI anticipated
that such an opinion would be required under the Acquisition
Agreement. HACI received the executed opinion on August 28,
2009. Richards Layton was retained following oral discussions
between HACI and Richards Layton over the prior few months
regarding the broad ability of Delaware corporations to amend
their charters.
HACI specifically requested that Richards Layton provide the
written opinion on Sunday, July 26, 2009, and Richards
Layton confirmed on July 28, 2009 that it would be able to
provide the requested opinion. It was
96
contemplated that the legal opinion would be delivered at or
prior to closing of the Acquisition. Richards Layton provided
the executed opinion on August 28, 2009.
In light of the foregoing, in connection with the Acquisition,
HACI is seeking approval of its stockholders to permit a
business combination with an entity engaged in the energy
industry as its principal business. If the requisite stockholder
approval to this Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal
and the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal are
received, the amendment to HACIs charter will be filed
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware immediately
after approval of all of the Charter Amendment
Purpose Proposal, Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal and the Acquisition Proposal.
The Charter Amendment, which embodies the amendments to be
approved pursuant to the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal and Charter Amendment Existence Proposal,
is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus
and is incorporated in this proxy statement/prospectus by
reference. You are encouraged to read the Charter Amendment in
its entirety. If either the Charter Amendment
Purpose Proposal or the Charter Amendment Existence
Proposal is not approved at the special meeting of HACI
stockholders, the Acquisition Proposal will not be presented to
HACI stockholders for a vote and the Charter Amendment will not
be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.
Required
Vote
Approval of the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal
will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the issued and outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock as of
the record date.
Recommendation
BY VOTE OF A MAJORITY, HACIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDS THAT HACI STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE
CHARTER AMENDMENT PURPOSE PROPOSAL. WHEN YOU
CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATION OF HACIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN
FAVOR OF THE CHARTER AMENDMENT PURPOSE PROPOSAL, YOU
SHOULD KEEP IN MIND THAT HACIS DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS,
INCLUDING MR. HICKS, HAVE INTERESTS IN THE ACQUISITION THAT MAY
CONFLICT WITH YOUR INTERESTS AS A STOCKHOLDER. SEE THE
SECTION ENTITLED, THE ACQUISITION
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS OF HACIS DIRECTORS AND
OFFICERS IN THE ACQUISITION.
97
THE
ACQUISITION PROPOSAL
At the special meeting of HACI stockholders, as previously
described in this proxy statement/prospectus, HACI stockholders
will be asked to adopt the Purchase and IPO Reorganization
Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2009 as amended by the
Letter Agreement dated September 9, 2009, included in
Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus, or the
Acquisition Agreement, by and among Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc., Resolute Energy Corporation, Resolute
Subsidiary Corporation, Resolute Aneth, LLC, Resolute Holdings,
LLC, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC, and HH-HACI, L.P., a copy of
which is attached as Annex A to this proxy
statement/prospectus, pursuant to which HACI stockholders will
acquire a majority of the outstanding common stock of the
Company, which will acquire HACI and the business and operations
of Seller through Sellers contribution of its direct and
indirect ownership interests in the Acquired Entities to the
Company and the simultaneous merger of Merger Sub, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, with and into HACI, with
HACI surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company.
Vote
Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding
shares of HACI Common Stock entitled to vote thereon as of the
record date is required for the Acquisition Proposal to be
approved. In addition, if holders of 30% or more of the Public
Shares vote against the Acquisition Proposal and properly
exercise their conversion rights, HACI will not be permitted to
consummate the Acquisition.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a
vote AGAINST the Acquisition Proposal.
Board
Recommendation
After careful consideration, a majority of HACIs board of
directors determined that the Acquisition is fair to and in the
best interests of HACI and its stockholders (despite potential
conflicts of interest of certain of HACIs directors and
officers). On the basis of the foregoing, a majority of
HACIs board of directors has approved and declared
advisable the Acquisition and recommends that you vote or give
instructions to vote FOR the approval of the
Acquisition Proposal.
The discussion of the information and factors considered by
HACIs board of directors included in this proxy
statement/prospectus is not meant to be exhaustive, but includes
the material information and factors considered by HACIs
board of directors.
BY VOTE OF A MAJORITY, HACIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDS THAT HACI STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE
APPROVAL OF THE ACQUISITION PROPOSAL. WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE
RECOMMENDATION OF HACIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN FAVOR OF THE
ACQUISITION PROPOSAL, YOU SHOULD KEEP IN MIND THAT CERTAIN OF
HACIS DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS HAVE INTERESTS IN THE
ACQUISITION THAT MAY CONFLICT WITH YOUR INTERESTS AS A
STOCKHOLDER. SEE THE SECTION ENTITLED, THE ACQUISITION
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS OF HACIS
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS IN THE ACQUISITION.
98
THE
ACQUISITION
The discussion in this proxy statement/prospectus of the
Acquisition and the principal terms of the Acquisition Agreement
is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to,
the Acquisition Agreement. The full text of the Acquisition
Agreement is attached hereto as Annex A and is incorporated
into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference.
General
Description of the Acquisition
On August 2, 2009, HACI entered into the Acquisition
Agreement, pursuant to which, through a series of transactions,
HACIs stockholders will acquire a majority of the
outstanding Company Common Stock, and the Company will own HACI
and Sellers business and operations. In addition, HACI
will contribute to Aneth approximately $346 million which
will be used to repay part of the Companys outstanding
indebtedness under its First Lien Credit Facility and all of its
outstanding indebtedness under its Second Lien Credit Facility.
For a more detailed description of the Acquisition, please see
the section entitled The Acquisition
Agreement.
Background
of the Acquisition
The terms of the Acquisition Agreement are the result of
negotiations between representatives of HACI and Resolute. The
following is a brief discussion of the background of these
negotiations and the Acquisition.
HACI is a blank check company that was organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware in February 2007. HACI was formed to
acquire, or acquire control of, through a merger, capital stock
exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or
similar business combination one or more businesses or assets.
On October 3, 2007, HACI consummated its initial public
offering, or the IPO, of 55,200,000 HACI units (including
7,200,000 HACI units issued pursuant to the exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option), each consisting of
one share of HACI Common Stock and one Public Warrant, which is
exercisable for an additional share of HACI Common Stock at an
exercise price of $7.50 per warrant, and received proceeds of
approximately $529.1 million, net of underwriting discounts
and commissions and expenses of approximately
$22.6 million, excluding deferred underwriting discounts
and commissions placed in a trust account pending completion of
a business combination. Simultaneously with the consummation of
the IPO, HACI consummated the private sale of 7,000,000 Sponsor
Warrants to the Sponsor at a price of $1.00 per warrant for an
aggregate purchase price of $7.0 million. The proceeds of
this private placement were also placed in the trust account.
The proceeds outside of the trust account as well as the
interest income of up to $6.6 million (net of taxes
payable), earned on the trust account balance that may be
released to HACI may be used to pay for business, legal and
accounting due diligence on prospective acquisitions and
continuing general and administrative expenses; provided,
however, that after such release there remains in the trust
account a sufficient amount of interest income previously earned
on the trust account balance to pay any taxes on such
$6.6 million of interest income. As of June 30, 2009,
HACI had withdrawn $5.6 million in interest income for
working capital.
At no time prior to the consummation of the IPO did HACI, or any
of its officers, directors, advisors, consultants or affiliates,
have discussions with any person regarding an acquisition of, or
a business combination with, Resolute.
Subsequent to the consummation of the IPO on October 3,
2007, HACI commenced efforts to identify and evaluate potential
acquisitions with the objective of consummating a business
combination. HACI identified certain criteria that it looked for
in evaluating prospective target businesses and business
combination opportunities, including, without limitation, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
established companies with proven track records;
|
|
|
|
companies with strong free cash flow characteristics;
|
|
|
|
companies with a strong competitive industry position;
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
companies with an experienced management team; and
|
|
|
|
companies poised to take advantage of growth in the current
economy.
|
In the months following the IPO, HACI screened potential targets
based upon the following characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|
companies with management teams capable of operating and
excelling in the public equity markets;
|
|
|
|
portfolio companies in mature funds of financial sponsors;
|
|
|
|
portfolio companies of financial sponsors with whom Thomas O.
Hicks, HACIs founder and chairman of the board, maintained
long-standing personal relationships;
|
|
|
|
companies operating in industries in which Mr. Hicks has
relevant prior experience;
|
|
|
|
companies that would likely be relatively immune to a downturn
in the economic environment;
|
|
|
|
companies that would likely be less adversely affected by an
inflationary environment, including from rapidly rising oil
prices and energy costs, than other businesses generally;
|
|
|
|
companies with large near-term debt maturities; and
|
|
|
|
companies with failed or withdrawn initial public offerings.
|
In addition, HACIs management attempted to identify
potential targets by initiating conversations with
(i) managements own network of business associates
and friends, (ii) third-party companies that management
believed could make attractive business combination partners and
(iii) professional service providers (lawyers, accountants,
consultants and investment bankers). HACI educated these parties
on its structure as a special purpose acquisition company and
its criteria for an acquisition. HACI also responded to
inquiries from investment bankers or other similar professionals
representing companies engaged in sale or financing processes.
Furthermore, HACIs management conducted independent market
research to identify potential acquisition opportunities using
various databases. From time to time, HACIs database of
potential acquisition candidates was updated and supplemented
from time to time based on additional information derived from
these discussions with third parties.
HACIs board of directors was updated on a regular basis
with respect to the status of the business combination search.
Input received from HACIs board of directors was material
to managements evaluation of potential business
combinations.
The screening and sourcing efforts through HACIs
professional network and independent research resulted in
several hundred potential targets. These opportunities were
evaluated based on HACIs stated criteria. Many did not fit
HACIs screening criteria, while some were eliminated due
to an insufficient enterprise value or indications that the
sellers valuation expectations were too high. The
screening process was repeated multiple times, and HACI remained
in continual dialogue with its sourcing network. Through these
efforts, the volume of potential targets remained high.
HACI declined to move forward on some opportunities because it
did not believe the financial characteristics, industry profile
and/or
position, management teams, attainable valuations
and/or deal
structures were suitable in light of the screening criteria
detailed above. There were also companies that were not
interested in pursuing a deal with HACI based on its
publicly-traded status, capital structure or questions regarding
HACIs ability to timely consummate a transaction. Other
companies accepted competitive bids from other acquirers or
attempted their own initial public offerings.
Some companies were deemed, based on HACIs screening
efforts and criteria evaluation, as appropriate targets and were
advanced to the next phase of the selection process.
Non-disclosure agreements (and trust waivers) were executed and
preliminary discussions were initiated with these potential
targets. From this refined pool of potential targets, several
companies were further pursued, and in some instances, HACI had
substantive discussions, conducted extensive due diligence, and
engaged the potential sellers in a negotiation process.
100
From April 2008 through July 2009, HACI explored a potential
business combination opportunity and conducted due diligence
with respect to Graham Packaging Holdings Company, or Graham
Packaging, one of the potential target companies. HACI
negotiated an equity purchase agreement, dated July 1,
2008, as amended on January 27, 2009, with Graham
Packaging, pursuant to which through a series of transactions,
HACI stockholders would have acquired control of Graham
Packaging. On August 13, 2008, GPC Capital Corp. II, an
affiliate of Graham Packaging, filed a registration statement on
Form S-4
with the SEC in connection with the contemplated Graham
Packaging transaction.
In January 2009, HACI and Graham Packaging amended the equity
purchase agreement to provide that HACI and Blackstone Capital
Partners III Merchant Banking Fund L.P., as the Seller
Representative, would each have the right to terminate the
equity purchase agreement by giving written notice to the other
and provided further that each party would be released from the
equity purchase agreements exclusivity provisions. The
amendment was entered into to allow each party to pursue other
transactions given changes in market conditions. On
July 31, 2009, HACI and Blackstone mutually agreed to
terminate the equity purchase agreement.
In January 2009, HACI began to consider, among other acquisition
opportunities, acquisition candidates in the energy industry. As
a result of depressed energy prices, HACIs management
believed that various businesses in the energy industries had
become attractive possible acquisition opportunities. HACI was
aware that its charter would have to be amended, with the
approval of its stockholders, in order to complete a business
combination with any entity engaged in the energy industry as
its principal business.
Over the next few months, HACI continued to consider a number of
acquisition opportunities, both inside and outside of the energy
sector.
On June 22, 2009, Ken Hersh, a managing partner of Natural
Gas Partners, one of Resolutes principal stockholders,
approached Mr. Hicks regarding a possible business
combination with Resolute. Mr. Hersh was aware of HACI and
of Mr. Hicks background and reputation in mergers and
acquisitions transactions. Mr. Hersh provided an overview
of Resolute, its management team, capital and oil and gas assets
and operational details related to Resolute.
Later that day, HACI engaged Citi as a financial advisor in
connection with a review and analysis of the contemplated
transaction to provide capital markets, valuation and
negotiation advice. Citi was engaged promptly, as was typically
the case, when HACI commenced evaluating a potentially promising
business opportunity.
During the week of June 22, 2009, HACI and Citi commenced
conducting financial due diligence and analysis regarding the
opportunity. On June 26, 2009. HACI engaged Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, or Akin Gump, as a legal
advisor in connection with the contemplated transaction.
On June 29, 2009, representatives of HACI met via telephone
with representatives of Natural Gas Partners to discuss a
possible business combination opportunity. During the
June 29, 2009 meeting, Mr. Hersh continued discussions
with HACI regarding the proposed transaction and suggested that
Resolute management would travel to Dallas later that week to
meet with HACI. Following this meeting, the parties continued to
discuss valuation and business combination issues.
On July 1, 2009, HACIs officers met with Citi to
discuss the results of financial due diligence and financial
analysis with respect to Resolute, including a discussion of
comparable valuations and comparable companies.
On July 2, 2009, members of HACIs management met in
person with representatives of Natural Gas Partners and Resolute
in Dallas, Texas at HACIs offices to further discuss a
proposed business combination. At the July 2, 2009 meeting,
Mr. Hicks, in his capacity as chairman of HACIs board
of directors, and HACI management team members consisting of
Joseph B. Armes, HACIs president, chief executive officer,
and chief financial officer and HACIs senior vice
presidents Eric C. Neuman, Robert M. Swartz and Christina Weaver
Vest conducted negotiations on behalf of HACI. Although
Mr. Hicks, in his capacity of chairman of HACIs board
of directors, made the initial contact with Natural Gas Partners
with respect to the contemplated
101
business combination and led the July 2, 2009 negotiations
on behalf of HACI, his efforts were supplemented in negotiations
with efforts from the other foregoing HACI management team
members throughout the negotiation process and HACI management,
in their capacity as officers of HACI, continued the negotiation
process following the July 2, 2009 meeting. Resolute was
represented in negotiations at the July 2, 2009 meeting by
Nicholas J. Sutton, Resolutes chief executive officer and
Richard F. Betz, Resolutes vice president
business development. Natural Gas Partners was represented in
negotiations at such meeting by Mr. Hersh, Richard L.
Covington, a managing director of Natural Gas Partners, and
Chris Carter, a senior associate of Natural Gas Partners.
At the July 2, 2009 meeting, the following general terms
were agreed upon:
|
|
|
|
|
HACI and Resolute would enter into a transaction pursuant to
which the two companies would be combined;
|
|
|
|
Resolute would receive common stock consideration of 10,000,000
(later reduced to 9,200,000) shares of common stock in the
combined company, 5,000,000 (later reduced to 4,600,000) Company
Founder Warrants, 666,667 (later increased to 1,385,000) Company
Earnout Shares and 2,333,333 Company Sponsor Warrants, based on
an equity value of $96.1 million, subject to negotiating a
reduction in the deferred underwriting fees of the underwriters
that were attributable to HACIs initial public offering
and Resolute using HACIs trust proceeds to pay down
existing debt;
|
|
|
|
7,335,000 shares of Founder Shares and 5,000,000 (later
reduced to 4,600,000) Founder Warrants would be forfeited by the
Sponsor, 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants would be transferred by the
Sponsor to the Seller and an additional 1,333,333 (later
increased to 1,865,000) Founder Shares would be converted into
Company Earnout Shares;
|
|
|
|
Public Warrants would be redeemed at $0.40 per Public
Warrant; and
|
|
|
|
The proposed transaction would be subject to further due
diligence, negotiation of definitive terms and other matters.
|
At such meeting, the parties agreed to continue discussions
regarding the transaction on July 7 in Denver, Colorado. On
July 6, the audit committee of the board of directors of
HACI (other than William F. Quinn who did not participate) met
to discuss the potential Resolute transaction and approved the
hiring of KPMG to conduct financial and accounting due diligence
on Resolute in connection with the potential transaction.
Mr. Quinn recused himself from the boards
deliberations on the proposed transaction in view of the fact
that his son is employed by Natural Gas Partners.
On July 7, the parties resumed their discussions at the
offices of Resolutes law firm in Denver, Colorado where
the transaction was further discussed and where HACI was
accompanied in person and by telephone with its legal and
financial advisors. At the July 7 meeting, representatives of
Resolute presented HACIs management with management and
diligence presentations regarding Resolute that included
presentations regarding Resolutes assets, financial
analysis, a description of business strategies and operations,
overviews of the oil and gas fields in which Resolute operates
and related engineering reports. On the next day, July 8,
2009, the parties continued to meet to conduct
on-site due
diligence at Resolutes headquarters in Denver, Colorado to
discuss legal, tax and governance issues and review financial
information.
During the process of considering the possible opportunity with
Resolute, HACI management kept the board informed of
developments concerning such opportunity.
On July 21, 2009, HACI and Resolute met telephonically to
have a further discussion on the transaction. The July 21,
2009 discussion was preceded by the receipt of oral reports and
written analyses provided by Citi with respect to its views on
valuation, discussed below, and the likelihood of the
warrantholders to vote in favor of the contemplated transaction.
In particular, Citi provided HACI advice to the effect that the
holders of Public Warrants would be more likely to accept a new
warrant structure that would allow up to 50% of the current
Public Warrants to be converted into warrants exercisable for
shares in the Company at an increased exercise price, longer
exercise period and higher redemption price, with the
102
remainder of the warrants being redeemed for a cash amount of
$0.50 per Public Warrant (later increased to $0.55 per Public
Warrant). In the view of Citi, the then-contemplated warrant
restructuring whereby each of the Public Warrants would be
redeemed for $0.40 per Public Warrant would not be sufficiently
attractive to garner enough holders of Public Warrants to vote
in favor of the contemplated transaction. Citi based its views
on its experience with other business combinations involving
blank check companies and its perception of the capital markets
activity for warrants issued by blank check companies generally.
HACI was represented on the July 21 telephone call by
Messrs. Neuman and Swartz. Resolute was represented on such
call by Messrs. Sutton and Betz, James M. Piccone,
Resolutes president, general counsel and secretary, and
Theodore Gazulis, Resolutes chief financial officer.
Natural Gas Partners was represented on such call by
Mr. Carter.
The discussion was precipitated by a revised valuation from
Citi, which was in response to updated 2010 projections provided
by Resolute on July 17, 2009. Please see
Prospective Financial Factors.
These revised projections reflected adjustments made by Resolute
in anticipation of changes to Resolute production which would be
reflected in mid-year engineering report. The result of these
adjustments was to decrease anticipated 2010 EBITDA from
$91.4 million in Resolutes original forecast to
$88.6 million in the revised forecast, which had the effect
of lowering the anticipated enterprise value at closing to
$579 million from the originally forecasted
$594 million. In order to offset this reduction in
enterprise value, the HACI Sponsor and the current Resolute
equity holders agreed to reduce the shares they would receive at
closing from 15 million to 13.8 million. The HACI
Founders Shares would be further reduced by 400,000, from
5 million to 4.6 million, and the current Resolute
equity holders, shares would be reduced from 10 million to
9.2 million. This had the effect of increasing the
percentage of the stock retained by the Public Stockholders from
72% to 74% (excluding Company Earnout Shares) and assuming
(i) 30% of the Public Shares vote against the proposed
business combination and properly exercise their conversion
rights and (ii) no HACI Public Shares are purchased by HACI
prior to the Acquisition.
Partially to offset these concessions, HACI agreed to issue
1.25 million additional Company Earnout Shares to the
Sponsor and the Seller. The Sponsor received an additional
531,667 Company Earnout Shares, for a total 1,865,000 Company
Earnout Shares, and the Seller received 718,333 additional
Company Earnout Shares, for a total of 1,385,000 Company Earnout
Shares.
Furthermore, a new warrant structure was agreed to at the
July 21, 2009 telephonic meeting whereby HACI would
exchange up to fifty percent (50%) (or 27,600,000) of the Public
Warrants outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of
the Acquisition for Company warrants. The terms of the Company
warrants would be substantially similar to the terms of the
Public Warrants, except that the Company warrants would be
exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock at an exercise
price of $13.00, have an expiration of five years from the
closing of the Acquisition and be redeemable by the Company in
whole or in part at a price of $0.01 per warrant if the sales
price of Company Common Stock equaled or exceeded $18.00 per
share for any 20 trading days within a 30 day trading
period. The remaining Public Warrants would be redeemed at a
cash price of $0.50 per Public Warrant (subsequently increased
to $0.55 per Public Warrant to increase the attractiveness of
the business combination to holders of the Public Warrants).
On July 20, 2009, Akin Gump circulated an initial draft of
the Purchase Agreement.
Over the next 14 days, the parties engaged in extensive
negotiations and the exchange of multiple drafts of the Purchase
Agreement. In addition, during this period, there were frequent
communications between HACI and Resolute and their respective
counsel and other advisers regarding due diligence and
transaction terms.
Due diligence conducted by HACI with respect to Resolute
included:
|
|
|
|
|
conference calls with oil and gas industry experts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
research via industry publications on industry trends, cycles,
operating cost projections, and other industry factors;
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
extensive calls/discussions with Resolutes management team
regarding operations and projections;
|
|
|
|
legal review of documentation, including material customer
agreements;
|
|
|
|
discussions with consultants with expertise in the industry in
which Resolute operates;
|
|
|
|
financial, tax, environmental and accounting due diligence;
|
|
|
|
creation of an independent financial model; and
|
|
|
|
review of precedent transactions in the oil and gas industry in
general.
|
On July 23, 2009, HACI held a telephonic meeting of its
full board of directors, other than Mr. Quinn, to update
the directors regarding HACIs search for an acquisition
target and the activities related to the consideration of
Resolute as an acquisition target. At this July 23, 2009
meeting, following discussion and questions from the board of
directors, the board of directors encouraged HACIs
management to continue its evaluation of a potential business
combination with Resolute.
As it became clear that Resolute was going to require a legal
opinion with respect to the ability of HACI to amend its charter
to permit a business combination with an entity engaged in the
energy industry as its principal business despite the provisions
in its charter prohibiting HACI from consummating a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry, HACI
retained Richards, Layton and Finger, P.A. on July 29,
2009, as special Delaware counsel to provide the requested
opinion. The retention of Richards Layton to provide a written
opinion followed oral discussions with Richards Layton over the
prior few months regarding the broad ability of Delaware
corporations to amend their charters. HACI specifically asked
Richards Layton to provide the written opinion on Sunday,
July 26, 2009 and Richards Layton confirmed on
July 28, 2009 that it would be able to provide the
requested opinion. It was contemplated that the legal opinion
would be delivered at or prior to closing of the Acquisition.
Richards Layton provided the executed opinion on August 28,
2009.
On July 30, 2009, the independent members of HACIs
board of directors, other than Mr. Quinn, met
telephonically with Stephens Inc., or Stephens, which had been
retained to provide certain financial advisory services to HACI
and its board of directors in connection with the proposed
transaction, to discuss the proposed transaction and to receive
the oral opinion of Stephens that the acquisition consideration
to be paid by HACI and its stockholders in connection with the
contemplated transaction would be fair to HACI and its
stockholders from a financial point of view and that the fair
market value of Resolute was at least 80% of the initial amount
(excluding deferred underwriting fees and commissions) held in
the trust account established by HACI for the benefit of its
public stockholders in connection with its initial public
offering, as required by HACIs charter. See
Opinion of Stephens Inc. to HACIs Board of
Directors and HACI.
Later in the day on July 30, 2009, the full board of
directors of HACI, other than Mr. Quinn, met telephonically
to discuss the proposed transaction and to receive the oral
opinion of Stephens that the acquisition consideration to be
paid by HACI and its stockholders in connection with the
contemplated transaction would be fair to HACI and its
stockholders from a financial point of view and that the fair
market value of Resolute was at least 80% of the initial amount
(excluding deferred underwriting fees and commissions) held in
the trust account established by HACI for the benefit of its
public stockholders in connection with its initial public
offering, as required by HACIs charter. See
Opinion of Stephens Inc. to HACIs
Board of Directors and HACI.
In connection with its fairness opinion presentation, Stephens
answered questions from HACIs board members with respect
to
CO2
injection drilling, proven reserves and other financial
analytics related to Resolute.
Management of HACI provided an update on the status of the
proposed transaction. Citi, a financial advisor to HACI and Akin
Gump discussed the proposed transaction with the board of
directors. HACIs directors and management again discussed
the reasons for the recommendation of the transaction with
Resolute. See HACIs Board of
Directors Reasons for the Approval of the
Transaction. HACIs
104
management and legal and financial advisors answered questions
from members of the HACIs board of directors.
At the July 30, 2009 full board meeting, Citi advised the
board on the transaction and recommended that HACI terminate the
co-investment obligation of Mr. Hicks to purchase, directly
or through an affiliate, 2,000,000 co-investment units (each
consisting of one share of HACI Common Stock and one warrant) at
a purchase price of $10.00 per unit upon consummation of a
business combination. Although the co-investment commitment was
entered into at the time of HACIs initial public offering
to show Mr. Hicks personal support for a business
combination, Citi expressed concern that the co-investment
commitment would be viewed as an arrangement that would be
dilutive to other security holders. In particular, Citi noted
that the co-investment commitment drew criticism during the
contemplated Graham Packaging transaction from investors who
were concerned about its perceived dilutive effects.
HACIs board of directors then recommended that independent
directors consider the issue of Mr. Hicks
co-investment commitment further.
The members of the board of directors suggested that a
follow-up
telephonic meeting be held on August 2, 2009 to further
discuss and consider the proposed transaction.
On August 2, 2009, the full board of directors, other than
Mr. Quinn and Mr. Montgomery, met again to consider
the proposed transaction. Management and Akin Gump updated the
board on the resolution of various issues in the contemplated
purchase agreement. Stephens orally updated and reconfirmed its
earlier opinion. See Opinion of Stephens
Inc. to HACIs Board of Directors and HACI. KPMG,
accounting and financial due diligence advisors to HACI
addressed the board on the results of its due diligence.
Following the presentations and questions from the board,
HACIs directors and management again discussed the reasons
for the recommendation of the transaction with Resolute. See
HACIs Board of Directors
Reasons for the Approval of the Transaction.
Thereafter, the board of directors acted to approve the
contemplated transaction with Resolute and authorized its
officers to enter into a definitive purchase agreement with
respect to the contemplated transaction. The board of directors
also acted to create an independent committee to consider taking
action with respect to Mr. Hicks co-investment
commitment. Following the full board of directors meeting, Mr.
Cunningham and Mr. Mulroney, the independent directors of HACI,
other than Mr. Quinn and Mr. Montgomery, continued to
meet as an independent committee to discuss the proposed
termination of Mr. Hicks co-investment obligations in
light of the concerns raised by Citi and approved the
termination of the co-investment commitment.
On August 2, 2009, the parties finalized and entered into
the Acquisition Agreement. On August 3, 2009, HACI publicly
announced the execution of the Acquisition Agreement through a
press release and commenced investor presentations regarding the
proposed Acquisition.
HACIs
Board of Directors Reasons for the Approval of the
Acquisition
At least a majority HACIs board of directors concluded
that the Acquisition is fair to, and in the best interests of,
HACI and its stockholders, and that the consideration to be paid
in the Acquisition is fair to HACI and its stockholders, despite
the fact that some of HACIs directors and officers have
interests that may conflict with HACI stockholders. See the
section entitled, The Acquisition Potential
Conflicts of Interests of HACIs Directors and Officers in
the Acquisition.
HACIs management conducted a due diligence review of
Resolute that included an industry analysis, an evaluation of
Resolutes existing business, a valuation analysis and
financial projections in order to enable the board of directors
to evaluate Resolutes business and financial condition and
prospects.
HACIs board of directors considered various industry and
financial data, including certain financial analyses developed
by HACI and Citi and metrics compiled by HACIs management
and Citi, KPMG and Stephens, in evaluating the consideration to
be paid by HACI in the Acquisition.
HACIs board of directors considered a wide variety of
factors in connection with its evaluation of the Acquisition. In
light of the complexity of those factors, the board did not
consider it practicable to, nor did it
105
attempt to, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the
specific factors it considered in reaching its decision.
Furthermore, individual members of the board may have given
different weight to different factors.
Favorable
Factors
In considering the proposed Acquisition, HACIs board of
directors gave considerable weight to the following favorable
factors:
Long-Lived
Oil Reserves with Significant EOR Opportunities
One of Resolutes key strengths is its high-quality asset
base, in particular the long-lived oil reserves associated with
the Aneth Field Properties have cumulative production of
417 million barrels, and a current recovery efficiency of
28.6% and a projected ultimate recovery efficiency of 33.9%. In
order to extract additional quantities of these reserves,
Resolute has implemented an enhanced oil recovery, or EOR,
project. EOR is a technique that is most commonly applied to
large oil fields to extract additional oil after it has
undergone primary recovery. The technique involves injecting
CO2
into the oil-producing reservoir to sweep more oil and increase
production rates in nearby producing wells. EOR has been
successfully applied to parts of the Aneth Field Properties
since 1985, and Resolute has expanded, and has plans to continue
to expand, the EOR project at these properties (See
Resolutes Business for additional
information). Moreover, EOR projects usually take several years
to implement and the required capital expenditures and
investment are heavily front-end loaded. Resolute has already
invested large sums of capital in developing its EOR projects
since taking over operations of the Aneth Field Properties. As a
result of these projects, Resolute has successfully arrested the
previous production decline and forecasts that the reserves
associated with its EOR projects should result in increased
production over the next few years. This is expected to occur
with minimal capital expenditures, other than ongoing purchases
of
CO2.
These characteristics are in contrast to conventional oil and
gas properties that require significant exploration drilling,
and the attendant dry-hole risk, in order to maintain or
increase reserves and production. HACIs board of directors
believes HACI and its stockholders will benefit from the
development capital that Resolute has already invested in its
EOR projects, and from the additional EOR development
opportunities that have been identified in the Aneth Field
Properties.
Experienced
Management Team
Resolutes management team is a highly experienced group of
oil and gas professionals with operational, transactional and
financial experience in the energy industry. With an average
industry work experience of more than 25 years, the senior
management team of Resolute has considerable experience in
acquiring, exploring, exploiting, developing and operating oil
and gas properties, particularly in operationally intensive oil
and gas fields. These individuals are both well-known and
highly-respected within the industry. In particular, HACIs
board of directors believes that Resolutes chief executive
officer and chairman of the board, Nicholas Sutton, will
continue the success that he had with HS Resources, Inc. (which
was a highly-successful independent oil and gas company that was
listed on the NYSE) and has had with Resolute to-date. In
addition to Mr. Sutton, five other members of
Resolutes senior management who formed Resolute Holdings
LLC in 2004, previously worked together as part of the senior
management team of HS Resources.
Commodity
Price Outlook and Oil-Weighting
The majority of Resolutes reserves are oil, which we
believe are highly desirable in the context of falling or
stagnating oil supply and rising oil demand. On the demand side,
oil consumption is projected to continue to grow as many of the
large, emerging economies such as China, India and Brazil
continue their rapid development and industrialization. Further,
as these countries develop a middle class, car sales and
ownership levels continue to increase from relatively low levels
as compared to the wealthy OECD countries. Given the large
populations of each of the aforementioned countries, even small
changes in the car ownership rates will lead to large increases
in the absolute number of cars in use, and consequently to the
demand for oil and refined oil products. The current recession
aside, oil demand is typically inelastic as well. This
inelasticity can be witnessed by the large
run-up in
oil prices in the
2005-2008
timeframe and the continued growth in oil demand during the
majority of this period. As developing economies continue to
grow and wealthier countries
106
begin to recover from the recent recession, oil demand is
expected to recover and continue its steady growth. HACIs
board of directors also expects that this growth in demand will
lead to an increase in prices which should be supported by the
relative inelasticity of oil demand.
On the supply side, it is anticipated that global oil supply
will face many challenges in keeping pace with the growth in oil
demand, putting upward pressure on oil prices over the long-run.
Discoveries of new, large scale oil deposits have become less
frequent, and as a consequence much of the worlds current
oil supply comes from large fields discovered up to several
decades ago. As these legacy fields age, the cost to extract the
remaining oil increases while the production rates decline.
Additionally, the newly discovered fields are often more
technologically challenging which makes them more costly to both
develop and find. For example, recent discoveries in the Santos
Basin in Brazil or the Gulf of Mexico are often located in
harsh, offshore conditions in very deep water. These new fields
are also often at considerable depths underground, which can
make the reserves technologically and geologically complex to
extract given the relatively high temperatures and pressures
experienced at such depths. Finally, these deep formations are
typically riskier to explore for since typical tools to help
identify oil and gas deposits are less accurate at such depths.
In addition to the geologic and technical challenges facing oil
supply, geopolitical factors have tended to limit the effective
supply of oil. Conflicts in major supply areas like Nigeria and
Iraq have prevented oil from accessing world markets. Growing
resource nationalism in places like Latin America and Russia has
further impacted global supply by putting reserves in the hands
of typically less efficient national oil companies and by
restricting outside investment. Additionally, OPEC is expected
to constitute a larger portion of world-wide reserves and
production in the future, which should increase its leverage
over and impact on global oil prices. Recently, OPEC has
demonstrated remarkable cohesion in restricting supply to
support prices which may be expected to continue. Finally, the
recent commodity price volatility and global recession has
limited investment capital in the oil sector. Without high
levels of continued investment, it will be even more difficult
to increase supply over both the near-term and long-term as many
of the cancelled or postponed projects are very long-term in
nature. HACIs board of directors believes that keeping
pace with projected demand will be a challenge, which should
boost oil prices.
Compelling
Valuation
HACIs board of directors believes that Resolutes
purchase price represents a very attractive valuation for the
assets being acquired. The board of directors believes that this
is a great opportunity to partner with a company that has a
first-class management team with a great asset base for a
significant discount to the intrinsic value of the asset. By
reducing leverage and allowing Resolute to pursue accretive
acquisitions and more efficiently develop its asset base, HACI
has been able to negotiate an attractive purchase price.
Further, because of Resolutes higher leverage to oil
prices and the long-term value in oil discussed above, the board
of directors believes that this asset will be deemed even more
desirable by the public markets. The board of directors further
believes that the purchase price will give stockholders an
attractive entry-point. We also believe that over time, the
Company will trade more in-line with what we believe to be
Resolutes main comparable companies, resulting in further
share price appreciation of Company Common Stock.
Significant
Value Creating Opportunity
In addition to the significant value in the assets of Resolute,
HACIs board of directors believes that following the
consummation of the Acquisition, the pro forma company will be
able to create additional value for the Companys
stockholders above and beyond the intrinsic value of these
existing assets. In particular, the board of directors believes
that investing in exploration and production companies, or
E&P companies, at this stage of the commodity cycle and
using proceeds to repay debt is a highly effective investment
strategy. Creating a vehicle with low leverage in such a capital
intensive industry will allow Resolute to maximize the value of
its assets through an accelerated development schedule and to
capitalize on potentially distressed or underutilized assets in
the market to create additional value. Historically,
Resolutes management has been able to identify and acquire
assets of this nature and to operate the acquired properties
more efficiently than the previous owners. HACIs board of
directors believes that the combination of Resolutes
excellent management team along with a deleveraged balance sheet
will result in a company that can grow reserves,
107
production, and value at industry-leading rates. Much of the
anticipated value creation will be due to the management
teams ability to take advantage of distressed sellers
and/or
under-managed assets. With the recent high volatility of
commodity prices and the concomitant financial distress faced by
many in the industry, the board of directors believes that there
will be opportunities for acquiring attractive assets at
relatively low prices.
Improved
Position from Deleveraging
In connection with the Acquisition, the amounts remaining in the
trust account after the payment of the amounts necessary to pay
(i) the aggregate amount payable to HACIs aggregate
costs, fees and expenses in connection with the consummation of
an initial business combination, including deferred underwriting
commissions, (ii) HACI Public Stockholders who vote against
the Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights, (iii) the aggregate amount payable to HACI Public
Warrantholders in the Cash Exchange, and (iv) amounts
payable by HACI for repurchases of Public Shares, if any, prior
to the Acquisition. Remaining amounts will be used by Resolute
to repay amounts owed under its credit agreements. Any such
repayments will significantly reduce the financial and
operational risk to Resolute and allow Resolute to aggressively
pursue value-creating strategies. Further, Resolute will be one
of the least leveraged companies within its peer group. Although
Resolute has a leveraged capital structure, it has successfully
managed its operations under such a structure. As such, HACI
anticipates that Resolute will be even more successful operating
in the future with its pro forma capital structure following the
consummation of the Acquisition.
Natural
Gas Partners as Strong Financial Sponsor
Resolute has been supported by Natural Gas Partners private
equity funds, with which its senior management has had a
relationship, for more than 19 years. Natural Gas Partners
VII, L.P., or NGP VII, and its affiliated fund, NGP VII Income
Co-Investment Opportunities, L.P., or NGP Co-Invest, currently
owns 71.2% of the Company, and, following the consummation of
the Acquisition, will indirectly own an approximate 12% interest
in the Company. Since 1988, the Natural Gas Partners private
equity funds have made investments in more than 135 entities in
more than 170 acquisitions throughout the energy industry.
Currently, the Natural Gas Partners funds hold investments in
more than 35 private oil and gas exploration and production
companies with operations located in major producing basins
throughout North America. As such, HACIs board of
directors believes that the combined sponsorship of HACI and NGP
will be a key strength of the Company.
Opinion
of Stephens
HACIs board of directors received the oral opinion of
Stephens (which was confirmed by Stephens written opinion
dated August 2, 2009) that the acquisition
consideration to be paid by HACI and its stockholders in
connection with the contemplated transaction would be fair to
HACI and its stockholders from a financial point of view and
that the fair market value of Resolute was at least 80% of the
initial amount (excluding deferred underwriting fees and
commissions) held in the trust account established by HACI for
the benefit of its public stockholders in connection with its
initial public offering, as required by HACIs charter. See
Opinion of Stephens Inc. to HACIs
Board of Directors and HACI.
HACIs board of directors did not request that Stephens
provide an opinion as to the fairness of the transaction to
HACIs warrantholders from a financial point of view. In
not making this request, HACIs board of directors
considered that the relationship between HACI and the
warrantholders was a relationship that was contractual in
nature, as opposed to a fiduciary relationship and that if a
business combination was not consummated, the Public Warrants
would expire worthless. In addition, as noted above under
Background of the Acquisition,
HACI considered a revised structure for the Public Warrants that
it anticipated would be appealing to the holders of Public
Warrants and garner enough support from the holders of Public
Warrants for an amendment to the warrant agreement that governs
the Public Warrants.
108
Other
Factors
HACIs board of directors also considered potentially
negative factors. The potentially negative factors considered by
the board, which are more fully described in the Risk
Factors section of this proxy statement/prospectus,
were the following:
The risk
that HACI Public Stockholders would vote against the Acquisition
Proposal and exercise their conversion rights and the risk that
a large number of HACI Public Warrantholders would opt for the
Cash Exchange
HACIs board of directors considered the risk that some of
the current HACI Public Stockholders would vote against the
Acquisition Proposal and decide to convert their shares of HACI
Common Stock for cash upon consummation of the Acquisition,
thereby depleting the amount of cash available to pay down the
outstanding debt of Resolute upon consummation of the
Acquisition. HACIs board of directors also considered the
risk that up to one hundred percent of the HACI Public
Warrantholders could elect the Cash Exchange in the context of
the Warrant Amendment Proposal, thereby further depleting
available cash. Further, HACIs board of directors also
considered the risk that HACI may need to purchase Public Shares
prior to the Acquisition, thereby even further depleting
available cash. The board concluded that Resolute will still be
able to implement its business plan even if the maximum number
of HACI Public Stockholders exercised their conversion rights
one hundred percent of HACI Public Warrantholders elected the
Cash Exchange option and if HACI needed to purchase Public
Shares.
Thomas O.
Hicks, William H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery, Brian
Mulroney, William F Quinn, Thomas O. Hicks, Jr. and Robert M.
Swartz, may have different interests in the Acquisition than the
HACI Public Stockholders
HACIs board of directors considered the fact that
Thomas O. Hicks, William H. Cunningham, William A.
Montgomery, Brian Mulroney, William F Quinn, Thomas O. Hicks,
Jr. and Robert M. Swartz, may have interests in the Acquisition
that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of
HACI stockholders generally, including the matters described
under Potential Conflicts of Interests of
HACI Directors and Officers in the Acquisition below.
However, this fact would exist with respect to a business
combination with any target company, and the board of directors
does not believe that the potentially disparate interests in the
Acquisition are an issue.
Risks
associated with laws and regulations pertaining to the operation
of oil and gas properties on Native American tribal
lands
HACIs board of directors considered the fact that
Resolutes main asset, the Aneth Field, resides entirely on
the Navajo Reservation in Southeastern Utah, which presents
certain unique considerations and complexities in the operation
of oil and gas interests on Indian lands arising from the fact
that Indian tribes are dependent sovereign nations
located within states, but are subject only to tribal laws and
treaties with, and the laws and Constitution of, the United
States. These considerations and complexities could arise around
various aspects of Resolutes operations, including real
property considerations, employment practices, environmental
matters and taxes. Despite the seemingly difficult operating
environment, the board believes that Resolute has an excellent
working relationship with the Navajo Nation as well as its
Navajo employees.
The
Navajo Nation and NNOG have preferential purchase
rights
HACIs board of directors considered the fact that under
the terms of Resolutes Cooperative Agreement with NNOG,
Resolute is obligated to first negotiate with NNOG to sell its
Aneth Field Properties before it may offer to sell such
properties to any other third party. Also as a part of the
overall terms of the transaction, Resolute granted NNOG a series
of options to purchase larger shares of the asset, based on
certain performance hurdles. In addition to these options, the
Navajo Nation has a preferential right on any sale or transfer
of the Aneth assets, separate and apart from NNOGs right
of first negotiation. The board has
109
determined that the proposed Acquisition will not trigger the
preferential rights of NNOG or the Navajo Nation and that
NNOGs options will not be exercisable for a considerable
period of time.
Termination
of Western Refining Contract
HACIs board of directors considered the risk that Resolute
sells all of its oil production from the Aneth Field to Western
Refining Southwest, Inc., or Western, at a contracted price of
the NYMEX oil price less $6.25 per barrel (the differential).
This contract was set to expire on August 31, 2009. The
board of directors considered that if Resolute were not able to
negotiate an extension or replacement contract with Western at
the same or a more favorable price, Resolute would either have
to sell its crude oil to Western at Westerns posted price,
which as of July 31, 2009 was approximately NYMEX minus
$9.00, or would, in the short run, have to transport its crude
oil to other customers by a combination of truck and rail, which
could provide a net back price in the short run approximately
equal to Westerns posted price. At the time of the board
considerations, Resolute was proceeding to implement a new
marketing strategy in cooperation with NNOG which Resolute
believed would result in an average weighted net back price to
Resolute in 2010 at least as favorable as Resolutes
current net back price, whether through sales to Western or to
other customers. At the time of the board considerations, HACI
believed that Resolute would be able to successfully accomplish
this strategy.
CO2
Sources and Availability
HACIs board of directors considered the risk that
Resolutes tertiary recovery operations depend on a steady
and reliable supply of
CO2.
Without the requisite
CO2,
Resolute would be unable to produce much of its reserves, which
would materially impact the value of the properties.
Fortunately, Resolute is located relatively close to one of the
largest domestic sources of
CO2,
the McElmo Dome field in southwestern Colorado. Besides the
geographic proximity, Resolute owns and operates the
CO2
pipeline that directly connects the Aneth Field with the McElmo
Dome field. Resolute has also recently expanded the capacity of
this pipeline by 20,000 mcf/d to accommodate the volumes of
carbon dioxide that will be required for the future EOR
operations. Importantly, Resolute also has long-term supply
contracts in place with both Kinder-Morgan and ExxonMobil.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by HACIs board of directors is not meant to be
exhaustive, but includes the material information and factors
considered by HACIs board of directors.
Prospective
Financial Factors
HACIs board of directors also considered certain
projections with respect to Resolute, which were provided by
Resolute and reviewed and analyzed by HACIs board of
directors. In reviewing projected financial information,
HACIs board of directors and its financial advisors placed
emphasis on the projected financial information for the upcoming
calendar year 2010 in particular. Below are the material
projections reviewed and analyzed by HACIs board of
directors and a description of the material relevant assumptions
related thereto:
Assumptions
Production: Forecast production for 2010 was
2.642 MMBoe and was based on Resolutes reserve
engineering dated January 1, 2009 with certain adjustments
made to reflect Resolutes experience to date in 2009. For
Resolutes Aneth Field Properties, production was forecast
to be 2.039 MMBoe. This figure included forecast oil
production of 1.996 MMBbl, 115 MMcf of gas and 24
thousand barrels of NGL. For Resolutes Wyoming Properties,
production was forecast to be 0.603 MMBoe. This figure
included 130 MBbl, 2,058 MMcf and 130 thousand barrels
of NGL.
Pricing: Commodity prices were based on the
NYMEX strip prices in effect at the time the projections were
prepared. Average crude oil prices for 2010 were forecast to be
$69.03 per barrel. Average gas prices for 2010 were forecast to
be $5.58 per MMBtu. Prices for NGL were based on an observed
historical relationship
110
between NGL prices in each market and NYMEX crude oil prices.
Utah NGL prices were forecast at 57% of crude oil and Wyoming
NGL prices were forecast at 75% of crude oil.
Differentials: For crude oil sales, the
difference between the NYMEX price for each commodity and the
forecast realized price in the field was based on contracts
Resolute currently has with refiners and marketers of
Resolutes production. For Utah, the assumed differential
for 2010 was negative $6.25 per barrel which is the differential
contained in Resolutes contract with Western Refining at
the time of the assumption. For Wyoming, the differential was
negative $8.00 per barrel which represents the average of
various contracts under which the crude oil is marketed. All of
Resolutes Wyoming gas production is sold based on the
Colorado Interstate Gas price. To forecast this price for 2010,
Resolute assumed that the Colorado Interstate Gas price would be
$1.25 below the NYMEX gas price. Forecast differentials for Utah
gas production were based on estimates for the San Juan
Index and were forecast to be $2.14 below the NYMEX gas price.
Hedging: Resolutes realized revenue was
further adjusted to reflect gains and losses within
Resolutes derivative portfolio. Total estimated hedge
gains for 2010 were $5.4 million.
Projections
Based on the above assumptions, the following projections were
made:
Revenue: Total revenue for 2010 was forecast
to be $155.6 million. This includes approximately
$150.2 million of oil and gas revenue and $5.4 million
of hedge gains.
Operating Expenses: Lease operating expenses
for each of Resolutes operating units were forecast based
on Resolutes annual operating plan with certain
adjustments made to reflect Resolutes actual operating
experience through April 2009. Total lease operating expenses
were forecast to be $49.9 million for 2010 and include
$40.0 million in forecast lease operating expenses in Utah
and $9.9 million in forecast lease operating expenses in
Wyoming. Also included in Operating Expenses are production
taxes paid to both the Navajo Nation and San Juan County,
Utah. Total forecast production taxes are $10.0 million and
include forecast production taxes in Utah of $8.5 million
and forecast production taxes in Wyoming of $1.5 million.
Total Operating Expenses were forecast to be $59.9 million
for 2010.
General and Administrative Expenses: General
and administrative expenses for 2010 were forecast to be
$7.2 million. These costs include $15.2 million in
actual cash general and administrative expenses and are offset
by $7.3 million in overhead recovery from the field
(Resolutes share of which is reflected in lease operating
expenses) and $0.7 million in capitalized expenses related
to Resolutes ongoing development projects. Resolute does
not forecast non cash expenses such as equity compensation
expense. Included in the $15.2 million of general and
administrative expense was approximately $3.0 million
incremental expense related to operating as a public company.
EBITDA: EBITDA for 2010 was forecast to be
$88.6 million.
Capital Expenditures: Total net capital
expenditures for 2010 were forecast to be $51.5 million.
Potential
Conflicts of Interests of HACI Directors and Officers in the
Acquisition
When you consider the recommendation of HACIs board of
directors in favor of adoption of the Acquisition Proposal, you
should keep in mind that HACIs directors and officers have
interests in the Acquisition that are different from, or in
addition to, your interests as a stockholder.
|
|
|
|
|
If HACI does not complete the Acquisition by September 28,
2009, or by October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment
becomes effective, HACI will be required to commence proceedings
to dissolve and liquidate. In such event, the 13,800,000 Founder
Units (each consisting of a Founder Share and Founder Warrant)
held by the Initial Stockholders, including HACIs
independent directors, and the 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants held
by the Sponsor (HH-HACI, L.P., an entity in which approximately
80% of the partnership interests attributable to the Founder
Shares and Founder Warrants and 100% of the partnership
interests attributable to the Sponsor Warrants are owned by
Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks, his charitable foundation
and estate planning entities for his family) will be worthless
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
because such holders have waived any rights to receive any
liquidation proceeds with respect to these securities. Directors
William H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and
William F. Quinn held 69,000 Founder Shares and 69,000 Founder
Warrants with an aggregate market value (without taking into
account any discount due to the restricted nature of such
securities) of $2,851,080 (or $712,770 individually by each
director) based on the closing sale prices of $9.74 and $0.59,
respectively, on the NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009, the
record date. Mr. Hicks, together with his charitable
foundation and estate planning entities for his family, holds
through the Sponsor an economic interest in
(i) approximately 10,819,200 Founder Shares and 10,819,200
Founder Warrants (based on an approximate 80% ownership of the
partnership interests of the Sponsor that are attributable to
the Founder Shares and Founder Warrants) and (ii) 7,000,000
Sponsor Warrants (based on a 100% interest of the partnership
interests attributable to the Sponsor Warrants).
|
After giving effect to the forfeiture of Founder Shares and
Founder Warrants and the transfer to Seller of Sponsor Warrants,
the indirect ownership of (i) Mr. Hicks, his
charitable foundation and family estate planning entities,
through the Sponsor, would be 5,068,560 Founders Shares
(including 1,462,160 Founder Shares that would be converted to
Company Earnout Shares), 7,212,800 Founder Warrants and
4,666,667 Sponsor Warrants and (ii) various employees of
Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers, through the Sponsor,
would be 1,267,140 Founder Shares (including 365,540 Founder
Shares that would be converted to Company Earnout Shares) and
1,803,200 Founder Warrants.
|
|
|
|
|
The 13,800,000 Founder Units and the 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants
were purchased for consideration of $25,000 and
$7.0 million, respectively. The independent directors of
HACI hold an aggregate of 276,000 Founder Units and the Sponsor
(HH-HACI, L.P.), an entity in which HACI officers and
HACIs Chairman of the Board Thomas O. Hicks hold a
financial interest, holds 13,524,000 Founder Units, as well as
the 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants. HH-HACI, L.P. transferred a
total of 276,000 Founder Units to Messrs. Cunningham,
Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn for no cash consideration. In
light of the amount of consideration paid, HACIs directors
and officers will likely benefit from the completion of
Acquisition even if the Acquisition causes the market price of
HACIs securities to significantly decrease. Even though
7,335,000 Founder Units and 4,600,000 Founder Warrants will be
canceled and 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants will be sold to Seller
in connection with the Acquisition, the likely remaining benefit
to HACIs directors and officers may influence their
motivation for promoting the Acquisition
and/or
soliciting proxies for the approval of the Acquisition Proposal.
For instance, in the event the Acquisition is not consummated,
(i) the Founder Units held by each of
Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn, as well
as those Founder Units held by Mr. Hicks through his
interest in the Sponsor, will be worth nothing because each of
the directors and Sponsor have waived any right to receive a
liquidation distribution with respect to the Founder Shares in
the event HACI does not complete an initial business combination
and (ii) all HACI warrants held by Initial Stockholders,
including the Founder Warrants and Sponsor Warrants, will expire
worthless. On the other hand, in the event the Acquisition is
consummated, Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and
Quinn would hold shares of Company Common Stock and Company
warrants with an aggregate market value of $1,367,942 (or
$341,986 individually by each director), based on the closing
sales price of HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of $9.74 and
$0.59, respectively, on the NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009
(without applying a discount for Founder Shares that would be
converted into Company Earnout Shares).
|
Additionally, Mr. Hicks, his charitable foundation and
family estate planning entities, through the Sponsor, would have
an economic interest in shares of Company Common Stock and
Company warrants with an aggregate value of $56,376,660 if the
Acquisition is consummated, based on the closing sales price of
HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of $9.74 and $0.59,
respectively, on the NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009
(without applying a discount for Founder Shares that would be
converted into Company Earnout Shares). Various employees of
Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers, through the Sponsor,
would have an economic interest in shares of Company Common
Stock and Company warrants with an aggregate value of
$13,405,832 if the Acquisition is consummated, based on the
closing sales price of HACI Common Stock and HACI warrants of
$9.74 and $0.59, respectively,
112
on the NYSE Amex on September 10, 2009 (without applying a
discount for Founder Shares that would be converted into Company
Earnout Shares).
Therefore, based on the $25,000 and $7.0 million purchase
price paid by the Sponsor for the Founder Units and the Sponsor
Warrants, respectively, if the Acquisition is consummated:
|
|
|
|
|
each of Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn
would stand to gain approximately $341,986;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hicks, together with his charitable foundation and
family estate planning entities, through the Sponsor, would
stand to gain approximately $51,023,327 if the Acquisition is
consummated (after giving to effect of $1,666,667 for the
Sponsor Warrants that would be transferred to the
Seller); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various employees of Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers,
would stand to gain approximately $13,400,832.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the IPO, HACI and the representative of the
underwriters in the IPO entered into agreements with the Initial
Stockholders pursuant to which the Initial Stockholders have
agreed to vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of
the votes cast with respect to an initial business combination
by the Public Stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any Public Shares acquired in or after the IPO in favor of an
initial business combination; and
|
|
|
|
all shares of HACI Common Stock held by them in favor of
amending HACIs Charter to provide for its perpetual
existence.
|
The Initial Stockholders did not agree, however, to vote in
favor of an amendment to HACIs charter that would permit
HACI to complete a business combination with an entity engaged
in the energy industry as its principal business, as such
amendment was not contemplated at the time of HACIs IPO.
At the special meeting, the Initial Stockholders intend to vote
in favor of the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal
and the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal which
will include the amendment to HACIs charter to permit
HACIs perpetual existence and to permit a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry as its
principal business, despite the provisions in HACIs
charter prohibiting it from consummating a business combination
with an entity engaged in the energy industry and related
disclosures in the IPO prospectus.
Approval of each of the Acquisition Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal require the affirmative
vote of a majority of the outstanding HACI Common Stock as of
the record date. As of the record date of the special meeting of
HACI stockholders, 13,800,000 Founder Shares, or 20% of the
outstanding HACI Common Stock, would be voted in accordance with
the majority of the votes cast by HACI Public Stockholders with
respect to the Acquisition Proposal and 20% of the outstanding
HACI Common Stock would be voted in favor of the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal. If the Initial
Stockholders or HACIs officers and directors purchase
Public Shares from existing HACI stockholders that are likely to
vote against the Acquisition Proposal, or that are likely to
elect to convert their Public Shares, the probability that the
business combination will succeed will increase.
|
|
|
|
|
After the completion of the Acquisition, William H.
Cunningham, Thomas O. Hicks, Jr. and Robert M. Swartz, will
become members of the board of directors of the Company. As
such, in the future each may receive cash compensation, board
fees, stock options or stock awards if the Companys board
of directors so determines.
|
|
|
|
Although he recused himself from meetings of HACIs board
of directors related to the Acquisition, William F. Quinn is the
father of William J. Quinn, who is employed by Natural Gas
Partners, one of Resolutes principal equity holders, and
who is also expected to serve on the Companys board of
directors after the Acquisition.
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
At any time prior to the special meeting of HACI stockholders,
during a period when they are not then aware of any material
nonpublic information regarding HACI or its securities, or the
Company or its securities, HACI, the Initial Stockholders or
HACIs directors and officers,
and/or their
respective affiliates may negotiate arrangements to provide for
the purchase of Public Shares from institutional and other
investors, or execute agreements to purchase such shares from
them in the future, or they may enter into transactions with
such persons and others to provide them with incentives to
acquire shares of Public Shares or vote their shares in favor of
the Acquisition Proposal. See section entitled The
Acquisition Actions That May Be Taken to Secure
Approval of HACI Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If HACI dissolves and liquidates prior to the consummation of a
business combination, Mr. Hicks has agreed that he will be
liable to HACI if and to the extent any claims by a third party
for services rendered or products sold to HACI, or by a
prospective target business, reduce the amounts in the trust
account available for distribution to HACI stockholders in the
event of a liquidation, except as to (x) any claims by a
third party who executed a waiver (even if such waiver is
subsequently found to be invalid and unenforceable) of any and
all rights to seek access to the funds in the trust account, or
(y) any claims under HACIs indemnity of the
underwriters of the IPO against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act. This agreement was entered
into to reduce the risk that, in the event of HACIs
dissolution and liquidation, the trust account might be reduced
by claims of creditors. However, HACI cannot assure its
stockholders that Mr. Hicks will be able to satisfy these
indemnification obligations. If the Acquisition is completed,
such obligations will terminate.
|
Prior to the record date for the special meeting of HACI
stockholders, HACI, its officers, directors, affiliates, agents
or designees may purchase HACI Common Stock in the open market
and/or in
privately negotiated transactions. After the record date for the
special meeting of HACI stockholders, HACIs officers,
directors, affiliates, agents or designees may purchase
outstanding shares of HACI in privately negotiated transactions
with a limited number of HACI stockholders. Any such negotiated
transaction may be with a HACI stockholder who would have
otherwise elected to exercise its conversion rights. In
addition, the exercise of HACIs directors and
officers discretion in agreeing to changes or waivers in
the terms of the Acquisition may result in a conflict of
interest when determining whether such changes or waivers are
appropriate and in the HACI stockholders best interest.
Certain
Other Interests in the Acquisition
In addition to the interests of HACIs directors and
officers in the Acquisition, you should keep in mind that
certain individuals promoting the Acquisition
and/or
soliciting proxies on behalf of HACI have interests in the
Acquisition that are different from, or in addition to, the
interests of HACI stockholders.
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., or Citi, the lead managing
underwriter in the IPO, may be assisting HACIs directors
and officers in connection with these efforts. In connection
with the IPO, the underwriters have agreed to defer underwriting
commissions of approximately $17.4 million (subsequently
amended on August 2, 2009 to $5.5 million), until the
consummation of HACIs initial business combination. The
underwriters agreed to reduce their deferred fees from
$17.4 million to $5.5 million to provide HACI with
additional capital to facilitate its ability to enter into and
consummate the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition
Agreement. Resolute also required that the underwriters reduce
their deferred fees as a condition to entering into the
Acquisition Agreement. If the Acquisition is consummated, those
deferred underwriting fees will be released to the underwriters,
including Citi. HACI will not pay the underwriters additional
fees in connection with their efforts with respect to the IPO.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Citi would be paid an additional
$2.0 million fee upon consummation of the Acquisition in
connection with services performed as a financial and capital
markets advisor for HACI with respect to the Acquisition.
In addition, HACI has engaged Raymond James &
Associates, Inc., FBR Capital Markets & Co., Capital
One Southcoast, Inc. and Scarsdale Equities llc and Resolute has
engaged Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., UBS Securities LLC, and
BMO Capital Markets Corp. for various capital market advisory
services, such as identifying potential investors, assisting
management in preparing presentations to potential investors and
114
general advice on strategy and tactics in respect of
consummation of the Acquisition (and in the case of Raymond
James and FBR Capital Markets, additional advice regarding prior
business combination opportunities). In connection with these
arrangements, the capital markets advisors are being paid the
fees set forth below upon a successful closing of the
Acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond James
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
FBR Capital Markets
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
UBS Securities
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
BMO Capital Markets
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
In addition, all such capital markets advisors are able to
participate in an aggregate $2.0 million bonus pool that
HACI and the Company plan to make available to the capital
markets advisors upon a successful closing of the Acquisition.
The $2.0 million bonus pool will be allocated among the
various advisors by the Company in its sole discretion based on
the Companys assessment of the value added by the various
advisors. Capital One Southcoast and Scarsdale Equities llc
would be compensated solely out of the $2.0 million bonus
pool.
In the event that the Acquisition is consummated, funds in
HACIs trust account may be used, directly or indirectly,
to purchase Public Shares from HACI Public Stockholders, other
than from those holders who have voted against the Acquisition
Proposal and properly demanded that their Public Shares be
converted into cash. Although HACI contemplates that such
purchases would likely be consummated by means of a purchase
agreement entered into directly with such holders of HACI Common
Stock, it is possible that HACI may repurchase such shares
indirectly through the use of a third party intermediary who
would be compensated by HACI for its role as intermediary in the
event that some holders are reluctant to sell such shares to
HACI directly. To the extent made, such purchases would be made
in compliance with federal securities laws. See section entitled
The Acquisition Actions That May Be Taken
to Secure Approval of HACI Stockholders.
Opinion
of Stephens Inc. to HACIs Board of Directors and
HACI
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated July 24, 2009,
HACIs board of directors and HACI retained Stephens Inc.,
or Stephens, to render an opinion in connection with the
proposed Acquisition.
In connection with its services rendered pursuant to the
engagement letter, Stephens was paid a fee of $395,000. No
portion of such fee was contingent upon the closing of the
Acquisition. Stephens was selected by HACI through a process
that was led by one of HACIs independent directors,
William H. Cunningham. Stephens was one of three firms that was
considered in depth by HACI and was selected after consideration
of the following factors: (i) expertise in financial
fairness opinions; (ii) expertise in the exploration and
production industry; (iii) experience with transactions of
a nature similar to the proposed Acquisition;
(iv) timeliness of being able to deliver requested advice
and (v) cost considerations. During the period of two years
prior to the engagement, there had been no material relationship
between HACI and its affiliates and Stephens and its affiliates
and during the process of engaging Stephens no future
prospective material relationships were discussed with Stephens
or its affiliates. HACI imposed no restrictions on the scope of
Stephens review or any other instructions that limited the
scope of such review. In its role under the engagement letter,
Stephens did not determine the acquisition consideration to be
paid by HACI and its stockholders in connection with the
Acquisition, but rather evaluated the fairness of the
acquisition consideration to HACI and its stockholders from a
financial point of view.
At the meeting of HACIs board of directors on
August 2, 2009, Stephens rendered its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, to HACIs board of
directors that, as of the date of the opinion, and based upon
and subject to the various assumptions, methodologies,
limitations and considerations described below, (i) the
Acquisition Consideration (as defined below) to be paid by HACI
and its stockholders in connection with the Acquisition is fair
to HACI and its stockholders from a financial point of view and
(ii) the fair market value of Resolute is at least 80% of
the Initial Amount (as defined below) held in the trust account
established by HACI for the benefit of its public stockholders
in connection with its initial public offering. No limitations
115
were imposed by the board of directors upon Stephens with
respect to the investigations made or procedures followed in
rendering its opinion. The issuance of Stephens opinion
was approved by a fairness opinion committee of Stephens.
Stephens written opinion is directed to
(i) fairness to HACI and its stockholders from a financial
point of view of the Acquisition Consideration to be paid by
HACI and its stockholders in connection with the Acquisition and
(ii) whether the fair market value of Resolute is at least
80% of the Initial Amount held in the trust account, and does
not constitute a recommendation to any HACI stockholder as to
how such stockholder should vote at the special meeting.
In connection with developing its opinion Stephens:
(i) reviewed certain publicly available financial
statements and reports regarding HACI;
(ii) reviewed certain estimates of Resolutes oil and
gas reserves, including estimates of proved and non-proved
reserves, prepared by an independent engineering firm as of
January 1, 2009;
(iii) reviewed certain internal financial statements and
other financial and operating data (including financial
projections) concerning Resolute prepared by its management;
(iv) discussed the operations, financial condition, future
prospects and projected operations and performance of Resolute
with its management;
(v) discussed the oil and gas reserve report of Resolute
with its independent engineering firm;
(vi) compared the financial performance of Resolute with
that of certain publicly-traded companies that Stephens deemed
relevant;
(vii) reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly
available, of certain other transactions that Stephens deemed
relevant;
(viii) reviewed the most recent drafts of the Acquisition
Agreement and related documents that were provided to
Stephens; and
(ix) performed such other reviews and analyses and provided
such other services as Stephens deemed appropriate.
Stephens relied on the accuracy and completeness of the
information and financial and oil and gas data provided to it by
HACI and Resolute and of the other information reviewed by
Stephens in connection with the preparation of the opinion, and
Stephens opinion is based upon such information. The
managements of HACI and Resolute have assured Stephens that they
are not aware of any relevant information that has been omitted
or remains undisclosed to Stephens. Stephens has not assumed any
responsibility for independent verification of the accuracy and
completeness of any such information or financial data. Stephens
has not assumed any responsibility for making or undertaking an
independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or
liabilities of HACI or Resolute, nor has Stephens evaluated the
solvency or fair value of HACI or Resolute under any laws
relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters, and
Stephens has not been furnished with any such evaluations or
appraisals. Stephens has not assumed any obligation to conduct
any physical inspection of the properties or facilities of HACI
or Resolute. With respect to the financial forecasts provided to
Stephens by HACI and Resolute, Stephens has assumed that such
financial forecasts have been reasonably prepared and reflect
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of Resolute as to the future financial performance of
Resolute and that the financial results reflected by such
projections will be realized as predicted. With respect to the
estimates of oil and gas reserves referred to above, Stephens
has assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best available estimates and judgments of HACI,
Resolute and Resolutes independent engineering firm.
Stephens is not an expert in the evaluation of oil and gas
reserves and Stephens expresses no view as to the reserve
quantities, or the potential development or production
(including, without limitation, as to the feasibility or timing
thereof) of any oil and gas properties of Resolute. Stephens has
relied, without independent verification, upon the assessments
of Resolutes independent engineering firm and HACIs
and Resolutes respective managements and staff as to
market trends and prospects relating to the oil and gas industry
and the potential effects of such
116
trends and prospects on Resolute, including the assumptions as
to commodity prices reflected in the financial forecasts and
estimates referred to above, which prices are subject to
significant volatility and which, if different from such
assumptions, could have a material impact on Stephens
opinion. Stephens has also assumed that the representations and
warranties contained in the Acquisition Agreement and all
related documents are true, correct and complete in all material
respects.
In reaching its opinion, Stephens applied and considered the
results of valuation methods that Stephens believes are
customarily used in investment banking practice for developing
fairness opinions. The following is a summary of the material
financial analyses utilized by Stephens in connection with
providing its opinion and does not claim to be a complete
description of the analysis underlying Stephens opinion.
In preparing its opinion, Stephens performed a variety of
financial and comparative analyses. The preparation of a
fairness opinion is a complex process involving various
determinations as to the appropriate and relevant quantitative
and qualitative methods of financial analysis and the
applications of those methods to the particular circumstances
and, therefore, is not necessarily susceptible to partial
analysis or summary description. Stephens believes that its
analyses must be considered as a whole. Considering any portion
of Stephens analyses or the factors considered by
Stephens, without considering all analyses and factors, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying
the conclusions expressed in Stephens opinion. In
addition, Stephens may have given various analyses more or less
weight than other analyses, and may have deemed various
assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions, so
that the range of valuation resulting from any particular
analysis described below should not be taken to be
Stephens view of actual or future values. Accordingly, the
conclusions reached by Stephens are based on all analyses and
factors taken as a whole and also on the application of
Stephens own experience and judgment.
Acquisition
Consideration
For purposes of its opinion, Stephens assumed that the
consideration to be paid by HACI and its stockholders in
connection with the Acquisition will consist of the following,
or the Acquisition Consideration: (i) an amount of cash
equal to the current amount held in the trust account less the
sum of amounts paid to (a) repurchase shares of HACI Common
Stock and Public Warrants, (b) pay expenses in connection
with the Acquisition and (c) pay the deferred portion of
expenses incurred in connection with the Companys initial
public offering, or the Cash Consideration,
(ii) 9.20 million shares of Company Common Stock,
(iii) 4.60 million Company Founders Warrants,
(iv) 2.33 million Sponsor Warrants and
(v) 1.39 million Company Earnout Shares. The Cash
Consideration amount was assumed by Stephens to be a maximum of
$507.8 million (assuming repurchase of no HACI Common Stock
and 50% of its Public Warrants, or the Minimum
Redemption Case, and a minimum of $275.0 million as
provided in the Acquisition Agreement). For purposes of its
opinion, Stephens assumed that such minimum Cash Consideration
results from the repurchase of 50% of the Public Warrants and a
maximum number of HACI Common Stock, or the Maximum
Redemption Case. Based on the Primary Method (as defined
below), HACI stockholders would receive an aggregate equity
interest in the Company, or a Primary Equity Interest, of 79.7%
and 86.7% in the Maximum Redemption Case and Minimum
Redemption Case, respectively. Based on the Fully Converted
Method (as defined below) HACI stockholders would receive an
aggregate equity interest in the Company, or a Fully Converted
Equity Interest of 81.9% and 86.7% in the Maximum
Redemption Case and Minimum Redemption Case,
respectively.
Stephens evaluated the Acquisition Consideration under both a
Primary Method and a Fully Converted
Method. Under the Primary Method, Stephens evaluated only
the Company securities that would be considered outstanding on a
fully diluted basis (i.e., shares of the Company Common Stock).
Under the Fully Converted Method, Stephens also evaluated the
other Company securities included in Acquisition Consideration.
In evaluating such other securities under the Fully Converted
Method, Stephens principally utilized a discounted cash flow
analysis based on the Resolute financial projections provided to
Stephens in order to attribute a value to such Company Founders
Warrants, Sponsor Warrants and Company Earnout Shares.
The Primary Method implied a Acquisition (enterprise) value, or
the Implied Primary Transaction Value of approximately
$599.0 million in both the Minimum Redemption Case and
the Maximum Redemption Case. The Implied Primary
Transaction Value was calculated as (i) (a) the Cash
Consideration in the Minimum Redemption Case and Maximum
Redemption Case plus (b) 9.20 million shares of
the Company Common
117
Stock multiplied by HACIs
20-day
volume weighted average price of $9.66, (ii) divided by the
Primary Equity Interest of the former HACI stockholders in the
Minimum Redemption Case and Maximum Redemption Case,
respectively, plus (iii) pro forma net debt of
($89.7) million to $143.1 million, in the Minimum
Redemption Case and Maximum Redemption Case,
respectively.
The Fully Converted Method implied a Acquisition (enterprise)
value, or the Implied Fully Converted Transaction Value, of
approximately $599.0 million and $628.0 million in the
Minimum Redemption Case and Maximum Redemption Case,
respectively. The Implied Fully Converted Transaction Value was
calculated as (i) the Cash Consideration in the Minimum
Redemption Case and Maximum Redemption Case, plus
(ii) 9.20 million shares of the Company Common Stock
multiplied by HACIs
20-day
volume weighted average price of $9.66, plus
(iii) $0.0 million and $33.4 million of value
attributable to the Company Founders Warrants, Sponsor Warrants
and Company Earnout Shares to be held by former Resolute
stockholders, (iv) divided by the Fully Converted Equity
Interest of the former HACI stockholders in the Minimum
Redemption Case and Maximum Redemption Case,
respectively, plus (v) pro forma net debt of
($89.7) million to $143.1 million in the Minimum
Redemption Case and Maximum Redemption Case,
respectively).
Fairness
Opinion
In arriving at its fairness opinion, Stephens derived valuation
ranges for Resolute based on an analysis of publicly traded
comparable companies, an analysis of comparable transactions and
a discounted cash flow analysis, each as more fully discussed
below. Based on these analyses, Stephens determined an
enterprise value reference range for Resolute of
$650.0 million to $750.0 million. Stephens noted that
the Implied Primary Transaction Value and the Implied Fully
Converted Transaction Value are below such enterprise value
reference range.
Publicly
Traded Comparable Companies
Using publicly available information, Stephens determined the
following companies were relevant to an evaluation of Resolute
based on Stephens view of the comparability of the
operating and financial characteristics of these companies:
Berry Petroleum Company, Bill Barrett Corporation, Delta
Petroleum Corporation, Encore Acquisition Company, Gulfport
Energy Corporation, Pioneer Natural Resources Company, Plains
Exploration and Production Company and Whiting Petroleum
Corporation
These companies were selected, among other reasons, because they
share similar business characteristics to Resolute. However,
none of the companies selected is identical or directly
comparable to Resolute. Accordingly, Stephens made judgments and
assumptions concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics of the selected companies and other factors that
could affect the public trading value of the selected companies.
Mathematical analysis, such as determining a mean or median, is
not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable company
data.
The implied values for Resolute were based on a multiple range
for the following three metrics determined by reference to the
corresponding multiple ranges for the selected comparable
companies. The following table sets forth the mean and median
multiples for the selected comparable companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves
|
|
|
Daily Production
|
|
|
SEC PV-10
|
|
|
|
(BOE)
|
|
|
(BOE/d)
|
|
|
($MM)
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
$
|
12.33
|
|
|
$
|
67,024.6
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
x
|
Median
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
$
|
66,603.3
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
x
|
The proved reserves and daily production values for each of the
selected comparable companies were based on SEC filings adjusted
for public data surrounding acquisitions and divestitures made
after their respective annual reports were submitted.
PV-10 refers
to the Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
relating to proved oil and gas reserves reported as of
December 31, 2008 discounted at 10% after income taxes are
deducted. In the following analyses, implied equity value is
calculated as implied enterprise
118
value less net debt. The multiples selected to apply to Resolute
metrics were not entirely mathematical in nature, but required
careful consideration to adjust for differences in the operating
characteristics of the companies as well as other market factors
which could affect the market value of selected companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Resolute Metrics
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Proved Reserves (MMBOE)(1)
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.50 - 13.00
|
|
|
$
|
1,042.19 - 1,179.01
|
|
|
$
|
605.32 - 742.14
|
|
Daily Prod. (MBOE/d)
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
65,000 - 75,000
|
|
|
$
|
478.74 - 553.78
|
|
|
$
|
41.88 - 116.91
|
|
SEC PV-10
($MM)(2)
|
|
$
|
283.3
|
|
|
|
2.3x - 2.5
|
|
|
$
|
616.00 - 684.92
|
|
|
$
|
179.14 - 248.06
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects Resolutes proved reserves as of December 31,
2008, utilizing NYMEX futures prices as of such date. See
Resolutes Business Estimated Net
Proved Reserves for a discussion of Resolutes
reserves at December 31, 2008, utilizing NYMEX posted
prices at that date. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows
related to Resolutes proved oil and gas reserves using
December 31, 2008 NYMEX posted prices, but not adjusted for
the effect of income taxes, and utilizing different lease
operating expense assumptions than those utilized by Resolute in
the formal presentation of its reserves set forth below at
Resolutes Business Estimated Net
Proved Reserves. |
Based on the foregoing, Stephens derived an enterprise value
range of $760.5 million to $866.4 million, and noted
that the low end of the value range exceeded the Implied Primary
Transaction Value and the Implied Fully Converted Transaction
Value.
Comparable
Transactions
Using publicly available information for 15 asset and corporate
transactions announced between January 1, 2005 and
July 24, 2009 involving oil- and gas-related assets in the
Rocky Mountain region of the United States with a proved
reserve mix greater than 20% oil, Stephens reviewed the purchase
price multiples paid for proved reserves and daily production in
each transaction and Stephens selected appropriate benchmark
multiples for the valuation of Resolute. No transactions that
met the criteria used by Stephens to select the comparable
transactions, and for which multiples could be derived from
publicly available proved reserve and daily production
information, were excluded from the analysis.
These transactions were selected, among other reasons, because
they share similar business characteristics to the Acquisition.
No transaction utilized for comparison in the comparable
transaction analysis is identical to the Acquisition. In
evaluating the Acquisition, Stephens made judgments and
assumptions with regard to industry performance, general
business, economic, market, and financial conditions and
differences in the terms and other characteristics of the
selected transactions. Mathematical analysis, such as
determining a mean or median, is not in itself a meaningful
method of using comparable transaction data.
Based on public and other available market information, the
following table sets forth the summary multiples for
transactions referred to above. This analysis utilized the
relevant transaction multiples of proved reserves and daily
production and applied them to the corresponding metrics of
Resolute to determine an implied enterprise value for Resolute.
The transaction multiples selected to apply to Resolute metrics
were not entirely mathematical in nature, but required careful
consideration to adjust for differences in the prevailing
119
commodity price environments and acquisition and divestiture
markets. In light of these factors, greater weight was given to
more recent transactions in which the multiples applied were
toward the lower end of the range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves
|
|
|
Daily Production
|
|
|
|
(BOE)
|
|
|
(BOE/d)
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
20.97
|
|
|
$
|
93,692
|
|
Mean
|
|
$
|
14.21
|
|
|
$
|
72,088
|
|
Median
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
|
$
|
70,126
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
7.32
|
|
|
$
|
48,583
|
|
Applied Multiples
|
|
$
|
11.00 - $13.00
|
|
|
$
|
70,000 - $85,000
|
|
Implied Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
995.95 - 1,179.01
|
|
|
$
|
517.21 - 630.71
|
|
Implied Equity Value
|
|
$
|
559.08 - 742.14
|
|
|
$
|
80.34 - 193.85
|
|
Based on the foregoing, Stephens derived an enterprise value
range of $756.6 million to $904.9 million, and noted
that the low end of the value range exceeded the Implied Primary
Transaction Value and the Implied Fully Converted Transaction
Value.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Stephens conducted a discounted cash flow analysis for proved
reserves for the purpose of determining enterprise and equity
value ranges for Resolute. Stephens calculated the net present
value of estimates of future cash flows of Resolutes oil
and natural gas assets based on the reserve estimates referred
to above.
Stephens evaluated three discounted cash flow scenarios in which
the principal variables were oil and natural gas prices. The
price scenarios that were utilized included: (i) a NYMEX
strip pricing scenario which utilized the average oil and gas
futures contract prices quoted on NYMEX as of July 31,
2009, (ii) a NYMEX five-year historical average scenario
which utilized the five-year average of oil and gas prices
quoted on NYMEX as of July 31, 2009, and (iii) an
alternative price case which utilized pricing for oil and gas
from
2009-2014 of
$50.00/$4.50, $55.00/$5.00, $60.00/$5.50, $65.00/$6.00,
$70.00/$6.50 and $75.00/$7.00 and escalated at 2.00% thereafter.
Transportation and basis differential estimates provided by
management were applied to the above pricing scenarios to
establish a realized wellhead price.
Applying various discount rates, ranging from 8.0% to 40.0%
depending on proved reserve category, to Resolutes
estimated cash flows, adjusting for hedging, long-term debt and
net working capital, Stephens calculated the following
enterprise and equity value ranges for each pricing scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing Scenario
|
|
|
|
5 Yr NYMEX
|
|
|
5 Yr Historical
|
|
|
Alternate Price
|
|
|
|
Strip Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Case
|
|
|
Implied Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
662.5 - 797.3
|
|
|
$
|
551.0 - 636.3
|
|
|
$
|
571.9 - 682.7
|
|
Implied Equity Value
|
|
$
|
225.6 - 360.5
|
|
|
$
|
114.1 - 199.4
|
|
|
$
|
135.1 - 245.8
|
|
Based on the foregoing, Stephens derived an enterprise value
range of $595.1 million to $705.4 million. Stephens
observed that the Implied Primary Transaction Value of
approximately $599.0 million in both the Minimum
Redemption Case and the Maximum Redemption Case as
well as the Implied Fully Converted Transaction Value of
approximately $599.0 million and $628.0 million in the
Minimum Redemption Case and Maximum Redemption Case,
respectively, were below or within the enterprise value ranges
derived from the discounted cash flow analysis under each
pricing scenario above.
80%
Test
As part of its engagement, Stephens also was asked to render its
opinion as to whether the fair market value of Resolute is at
least 80%, referred to herein as the 80% Test of the initial
amount held in the trust account, excluding deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions, or the Initial Amount.
For purposes of its opinion regarding the 80% Test, Stephens
relied, without independent verification, on the calculation of
the
120
Initial Amount provided to it by HACI. In addition, Stephens
assumed, with the HACIs permission, that
(i) fair market value is the amount or range of
amounts at which, in Stephens opinion, a willing buyer and
willing seller, each having reasonable knowledge of the relevant
facts, neither being under any compulsion, could likely agree to
a purchase and sale of the Company and (ii) such fair
market value is to be determined by reference to the enterprise
value (equity value plus net debt) of the Company Accordingly,
the Initial Amount held in the trust account, was calculated by
HACI to be $518.7 million (calculated as
$536.1 million of cash held in Trust as of October 3,
2007 less $17.4 million of deferred underwriting
commissions) and 80% of the Initial Amount was calculated to be
$415.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80% of Initial Amount
|
|
$415.0
|
|
|
|
79.7%(1)
|
|
|
86.7%(2)
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
Min
|
|
|
Max
|
|
|
Min
|
|
|
Max
|
|
|
Min
|
|
|
Max
|
|
|
Enterprise Reference Value Ranges of Resolute
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Strip Pricing
|
|
$
|
528.0
|
|
|
$
|
635.5
|
|
|
$
|
574.3
|
|
|
$
|
691.3
|
|
|
$
|
662.5
|
|
|
$
|
797.3
|
|
NYMEX Five Yr. Historical Average
|
|
$
|
439.1
|
|
|
$
|
507.1
|
|
|
$
|
477.7
|
|
|
$
|
551.7
|
|
|
$
|
551.0
|
|
|
$
|
636.3
|
|
Alternate Price Case
|
|
$
|
455.8
|
|
|
$
|
544.1
|
|
|
$
|
495.9
|
|
|
$
|
591.9
|
|
|
$
|
571.9
|
|
|
$
|
682.7
|
|
Comparable Transaction Analysis
|
|
$
|
603.0
|
|
|
$
|
721.2
|
|
|
$
|
656.0
|
|
|
$
|
784.5
|
|
|
$
|
756.6
|
|
|
$
|
904.9
|
|
Comparable Public Company Analysis
|
|
$
|
606.1
|
|
|
$
|
690.5
|
|
|
$
|
659.3
|
|
|
$
|
751.2
|
|
|
$
|
760.5
|
|
|
$
|
866.4
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Applies minimum Primary Equity Interest percentage (79.7%) of
former HACI stockholders (in Maximum Redemption Case) to
enterprise value ranges determined by Stephens using the
valuation methodologies described above. |
|
(2) |
|
Applies maximum Primary Equity Interest percentage (86.7%) of
former HACI stockholders (in Minimum Redemption Case) to
enterprise value ranges determined by Stephens using the
valuation methodologies described above. |
Stephens noted that the indicated minimum enterprise values of
Resolute (or indicated portions thereof), based upon each of the
valuation methodologies employed by Stephens in the preparation
of its opinion, are greater than 80% of the Initial Amount in
each case. On this basis, Stephens was of the opinion that the
fair market value of Resolute meets the 80% Test.
The summary of the material financial analyses performed by
Stephens in connection with rendering its opinion as described
above is only a summary and does not purport to be a complete
description of the financial analyses performed. The summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
written opinion of Stephens.
The order of analyses described does not represent the relative
importance or weight given to those analyses by Stephens. Some
of the summaries of the financial analyses include information
presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together
with the full text of each summary and are alone not a complete
description of the financial analyses performed by Stephens.
Except as otherwise noted, the quantitative information included
in the summary, to the extent that it is based on market data,
is based on market data as it existed on or before July 31,
2009 and is not necessarily indicative of current market
conditions.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the
summary set forth above, without considering the analyses as a
whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes
underlying Stephens opinion. In arriving at its fairness
determination, Stephens considered the results of all of its
analyses and did not attribute any particular weight to any
factor or analysis considered by it. Rather, Stephens made its
determination as to fairness on the basis of its experience and
professional judgment after considering the results of all of
its analyses. No company or transaction used in the above
analyses as a comparison is directly comparable to Resolute or
the Acquisition.
121
Stephens prepared these analyses for purposes of providing its
opinion to the board of directors. These analyses do not purport
to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which
businesses or securities actually may be sold in the future.
Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are not
necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these
analyses. Because these analyses are inherently subject to
uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond
the control of the parties or their respective advisors, neither
Stephens nor any other person assumes responsibility if future
results are materially different from those forecasted.
As part of its investment banking business, Stephens regularly
issues fairness opinions and is continually engaged in the
valuation of companies and their securities in connection with
business reorganizations, private placements, negotiated
underwritings, mergers and acquisitions and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. Stephens is entitled to
receive a fee and reimbursement of its expenses from HACI for
providing its fairness opinion to the board of directors. HACI
has also agreed to indemnify Stephens for certain liabilities
arising out of its engagement, including certain liabilities
that could arise out of providing the opinion letter. In the
ordinary course of business, Stephens and its affiliates at any
time may hold long or short positions, and may trade or
otherwise effect transactions as principal or for the accounts
of customers, in debt or equity securities or options on
securities of HACI or the Company Stephens may in the future
pursue investment banking assignments from HACI, the Company or
Resolute or their respective sponsors or affiliates or other
related companies.
Stephens opinion is necessarily based upon market,
economic and other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated
on, and on the information made available to Stephens as of, the
date of its opinion. It should be understood that subsequent
developments may affect its opinion and that Stephens does not
have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.
Stephens has assumed that the proposed Acquisition will be
consummated on the terms of the latest draft of the Acquisition
Agreement provided to it, without material waiver or
modification. Stephens has assumed that in the course of
obtaining the necessary regulatory, lending or other consents or
approvals (contractual or otherwise) for the Acquisition, no
restrictions, including any divestiture requirements or
amendments or modifications, will be imposed that will have a
material adverse effect on the contemplated benefits of the
proposed Acquisition to HACI or its stockholders. Stephens has
not expressed any opinion as to the price at which the common
stock of HACI or the Company will trade following the
announcement or consummation of the Acquisition.
Stephens opinion is for the use and benefit of HACI and
its board of directors. However, Stephens has consented to the
disclosure regarding its opinion that is set forth in this proxy
statement/prospectus. Stephens opinion does not address
the merits of the underlying decision by HACI to engage in the
Acquisition, the merits of the Acquisition as compared to other
alternatives potentially available to HACI or the relative
effects of any alternative transaction in which HACI might
engage, nor is it intended to be a recommendation to any person
as to any specific action that should be taken in connection
with the Acquisition. Stephens opinion is not intended to
confer any rights or remedies upon any employee, creditor,
stockholder or other equity holder of HACI or the Company, or
any other party other than the Company and its board of
directors. Stephens has not been asked to address, and its
opinion does not address, the fairness to, or any other
consideration of, the holders of any class of securities (other
than HACI Common Stock), creditors or other constituencies of
HACI or the Company. Stephens has not been asked to express any
opinion, and has not expressed any opinion, as to the fairness
of the amount or nature of the compensation to any of
HACIs officers, directors or employees, or to any group of
such officers, directors or employees, relative to the
compensation to other stockholders of HACI. Stephens
fairness opinion committee has approved Stephens opinion
as to (i) the fairness to HACI and its stockholders from a
financial point of view of the Acquisition Consideration to be
paid by HACI in connection with the Acquisition and
(ii) whether the fair market value of Resolute meets the
80% Test.
Based on the foregoing and Stephens general experience as
investment bankers, and subject to the qualifications stated in
its opinion, Stephens is of the opinion on the date of its
opinion that (i) the Acquisition Consideration to be paid
by HACI in connection with the Acquisition is fair to HACI and
its stockholders from a financial point of view and
(ii) the fair market value of Resolute is at least 80% of
the Initial Amount held in the trust account.
122
Material
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Acquisition
Except as described in the Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences Tax Consequences of the
Merger, in the opinion of HACIs counsel, Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, (1) the Merger will
qualify as part of an exchange of property for stock
constituting control of a corporation pursuant to
Section 351(a) of the Code, (2) no gain or loss will
be recognized on the exchange of the HACI Common Stock by any
holder of HACI Common Stock for shares of Company Common Stock,
(3) gain or loss should be recognized as a result of the
exchange of Public Warrants in return for warrants exercisable
for shares of Company Common Stock, (4) the tax basis of
the Company Common Stock received by the holders of HACI Common
Stock in the Merger should be the same as the adjusted tax basis
of the HACI Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor,
(5) the holding period of the Company Common Stock received
in the Merger by holders of HACI Common Stock will include the
period during which such HACI Common Stock was held,
(6) holders of Public Warrants exercisable for shares of
Company Common Stock will have an adjusted tax basis in such
warrants equal to their fair market value as of the date of the
Merger, and (7) the holding period of the warrants
exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock received by
Public Warrant holders will start on the day after the Merger.
See Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences Tax Consequences of the
Merger for a more comprehensive discussion of the tax
aspects of the Merger.
The tax consequences to holders of HACI Common Stock or
Public Warrants will depend on their own particular situations.
Accordingly, holders of HACI Common Stock or Public Warrants are
urged to consult their tax advisors for a full understanding of
the particular tax consequences to them.
Actions
That May Be Taken to Secure Approval of HACI
Stockholders
Based on recently completed business combinations by other
similarly structured blank check companies, it is believed by
HACI that the present holders of 30% or more of the Public
Shares may have the intention to vote against the Acquisition
and seek conversion of their Public Shares into cash in
accordance with HACIs charter. If such event were to
occur, the Acquisition could not be completed. To preclude such
possibility, HACI, the Initial Stockholders or HACIs
directors and officers and their respective affiliates may
negotiate arrangements to provide for the purchase of the Public
Shares from holders who indicate their intention to vote against
the Acquisition and seek conversion or who otherwise wish to
sell their Public Shares. The maximum cash purchase price that
will be offered to the holders of Public Shares by HACI, the
Initial Stockholders or HACIs directors and officers and
their respective affiliates for their shares will be the
per-share conversion price at the time of the Acquisition.
Although holders of Public Shares that enter into these types of
arrangements will not receive a higher purchase price than a
holder that properly seeks conversion of his shares, entering
into such arrangements (and agreeing to vote in favor of the
Acquisition) provides the holder and HACI with greater certainty
that the Acquisition will be consummated, in which event such
holder will promptly receive his purchase price which is equal
to the conversion proceeds. If the Acquisition is not
consummated, a holder would have to wait until HACI liquidates
in connection with its dissolution to receive liquidation
proceeds, which liquidation could take 60 days or more to
complete.
HACI, the Initial Stockholders or HACIs directors and
officers would approach a limited number of large holders of
HACI that have indicated an intention to vote against the
Acquisition Proposal, and engage in direct negotiations for the
purchase of such holders positions. All holders approached
in this manner would be institutional or sophisticated holders.
Arrangements of such nature would only be entered into and
effected in accordance with applicable law, including securities
laws, at a time when HACI, the Initial Stockholders or
HACIs directors and officers
and/or their
respective affiliates are not aware of any material nonpublic
information regarding HACI, the Company and their respective
securities or pursuant to agreements between the buyer and
seller of such shares in a form that would not violate insider
trading rules. Definitive arrangements have not yet been
determined but may include: agreements between HACI, the Initial
Stockholders or HACIs directors and officers and their
respective affiliates on the one hand and the holders of Public
Shares on the other hand pursuant to which HACI would agree to
purchase Public Shares from such holders in connection with the
closing of the Acquisition for the price specified in the
arrangements. Under the terms of
123
such an agreement, the holder would appoint an officer of HACI
as his proxy with respect to the Acquisition and all other
proposals in this proxy statement/prospectus. HACI, the Initial
Stockholders, HACIs directors and officers
and/or their
respective affiliates have agreed to immediately notify Resolute
of any such purchases so that HACI and Resolute may file a
Current Report on
Form 8-K
describing such purchase, including the price of such purchase
and the fact that such shares will be voted in favor of the
Acquisition.
As a result of the purchases that may be effected through such
arrangements, it is likely that the number of shares of HACI
Common Stock in HACIs public float will be reduced and
that the number of beneficial holders of HACIs securities
also will be reduced. This may make it difficult to obtain the
quotation, listing or trading of the Companys securities
on the New York Stock Exchange or any other national securities
exchange after consummation of the Acquisition.
The purpose of such arrangements would be to increase the
likelihood of satisfaction of the requirements that (i) the
holders of a majority of HACI Common Stock outstanding vote in
favor of the Acquisition Proposal and (ii) holders of fewer
than 30% of the Public Shares vote against the Acquisition
Proposal and demand conversion of their Public Shares into cash
where it appears that such requirements would otherwise not be
met. The maximum cash purchase price that will be offered by
HACI, the Initial Stockholders or HACIs directors and
officers and their respective affiliates to holders of Public
Shares for their shares will be the per-share conversion price
at the time of the Acquisition. However, if holders refuse to
enter into arrangements with HACI to sell their Public Shares,
HACI may determine to engage a third party
aggregator to buy shares prior to the meeting from
such holders that have already indicated an intention to convert
their shares
and/or vote
against the Acquisition Proposal. In such a case, the aggregator
would purchase the shares from the original holder and then
subsequently sell such shares to HACI in connection with the
closing of the Acquisition. The maximum purchase price that will
be offered by such aggregators to holders of public shares for
their shares will be the per-share conversion price at the time
of the Acquisition. HACI would, in addition to paying the
purchase price of such shares (which would be the per-share
conversion price) to this aggregator, pay it a fee. Such fee
would typically be a small percentage of the aggregators
total purchase price for such shares. Any arrangement entered
into with a third party aggregator would require it to
immediately notify Resolute of any such purchases so that HACI
and Resolute may file a Current Report on
Form 8-K
describing such purchase, including the price of such purchase
and the fact that such shares will be voted in favor of the
Acquisition.
Although HACI does not have a definitive plan to engage the
services of such an aggregator, if one is needed, the parties
believe it will be in the best interests of stockholders that
are voting in favor of the Acquisition since the retention of
the aggregator can help ensure that the Acquisition will be
completed and the additional fee payable to the aggregator is
not expected to be significant. All shares purchased pursuant to
such arrangements would remain outstanding until the closing of
the Acquisition and would be voted in favor of the Acquisition
Proposal. Any agreement between the parties will provide for the
holder to withdraw or revoke any exercise of its conversion
exercise and grant a proxy to HACIs designees to vote such
shares in favor of the Acquisition Proposal at the meeting.
Accordingly, this will effectively render the 30% threshold
established in HACIs IPO prospectus and HACIs
ineffective and make it easier for the parties to complete the
Acquisition because such purchased shares would no longer be
counted towards the 30% threshold. If, for some reason, the
Acquisition is not closed despite such agreements, the sellers
would be entitled to participate in liquidation distributions
from HACIs trust account with respect to such shares.
HACI and Resolute will as immediately as possible file a Current
Report on
Form 8-K
and press release to disclose arrangements entered into or
significant purchases or transfers made by any of the
aforementioned persons, including aggregators, that would affect
the vote on the Acquisition Proposal or the conversion
threshold. Any such report will include descriptions of any
arrangements entered into or significant purchases or transfers
by any of the aforementioned persons and will include
(i) the price of such purchases and (ii) a statement
that such shares purchased would be voted in favor of the
Acquisition. If HACIs directors or officers make purchases
or transfer shares pursuant to such arrangements, they will be
required to report these purchases or transfers on beneficial
ownership reports filed with the SEC and the Form 8-K would
reflect how those acquisitions would change the disclosure under
the section entitled, Beneficial Ownership of
Securities.
124
Purchases pursuant to such arrangements would be paid for with
funds in HACIs trust account and would diminish the funds
available to the Company to repay as much of the outstanding
indebtedness under the Companys First Lien Credit
Facility. In all events there will be sufficient funds available
to HACI from the trust account to pay the holders of all Public
Shares that are properly converted.
It is possible that the special meetings could be adjourned to
provide time to seek out and negotiate such transactions if, at
the time of the meetings, it appears that the requisite vote
will not be obtained or that the limitation on conversion will
be exceeded, assuming that the stockholder adjournment proposal
is approved.
Rescission
and Damages Rights
A HACI securityholder at the time of the closing of the
Acquisition that purchased HACI units in the IPO, or an IPO
Purchaser, may have securities law claims against HACI for
rescission or damages on the basis, for example, that the IPO
prospectus, did not disclose that HACI may seek to amend its
charter prior to the consummation of a business combination,
that funds in the trust account might be used, directly or
indirectly, to purchase Public Shares other than from holders
who have voted against the Acquisition Proposal and properly
demanded that their Public Shares be converted into cash, that
HACI may consummate a business combination with an entity
engaged in the energy industry as its principal business, that
HACI may seek to amend the terms of the Warrant Agreement and
exchange a portion of its outstanding Public Warrants for cash
financed out of the trust account or that Mr. Hicks
co-investment
may terminate. Rescission would give a successful IPO Purchaser
claimant the right to receive the total amount paid for his or
her securities pursuant to an allegedly deficient prospectus,
plus interest and less any income earned on the securities, in
exchange for surrender of the securities. An IPO Purchaser who
has properly exercised its conversion rights or dissenters
rights will not be eligible for rescission in connection with
any securities law claims it may have against HACI in connection
with HACI units purchased in the IPO. In addition, an IPO
Purchaser who purchased HACI units in the IPO but who has
separated its HACI units into the component common stock and
warrants and no longer owns the common stock or warrants
included in such HACI units may not be entitled to rescission in
connection with any such securities law claims.
A successful IPO Purchaser claimant for damages under federal or
state law could be awarded an amount to compensate for the
decrease in value of his or her securities caused by the alleged
violation (including, possibly, punitive damages), together with
interest, while retaining such securities. Such claims may
entitle IPO Purchasers asserting them to up to $10.00 per HACI
unit, based on the initial offering price of the HACI units sold
in the IPO, or $10.00 per share less any amount received from
the sale or fair market value of the original HACI warrants
purchased as part of the HACI units, plus interest from the date
of the IPO. In the case of IPO Purchasers, this amount may be
more than the cash to which they are entitled upon exercise of
their conversion rights or dissenters rights or upon
liquidation of HACI.
In general, a person who contends that he or she purchased a
security pursuant to a prospectus that contains a material
misstatement or omission must make a claim for rescission within
the applicable statute of limitations period, which, for claims
made under Section 12 of the Securities Act and some state
statutes, is one year from the time the claimant discovered or
reasonably should have discovered the facts giving rise to the
claim, but not more than three years from the occurrence of the
event giving rise to the claim. Claims under the anti-fraud
provisions of the federal securities laws must generally be
brought within two years of discovery, but not more than five
years after occurrence. Rescission and damages claims would not
necessarily be finally adjudicated by the time the Acquisition
is completed, and such claims would not be extinguished by
consummation of that transaction.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
The acquisition of Resolute by HACI will be accounted for as a
purchase. The consideration for Resolute will include the fair
value of 9,200,000 shares of Company Common Stock, 4,600,000
Company Founders Warrants, 2,333,333 Company Sponsors Warrants,
and 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares and the assumption of all
outstanding debt and liabilities of Resolute in excess of the
current assets acquired. The actual fair value of the total
purchase consideration will vary with fluctuations in the price
of HACI Common Stock and with the level of debt outstanding
under Resolutes credit facility. Additionally, the actual
purchase price
125
allocation will not be known until after closing and will be
further impacted by fluctuations in the market price of crude
oil and natural gas.
Regulatory
Approvals
HACI and Resolute do not expect that the Acquisition will be
subject to any state or federal regulatory requirements other
than (i) filings under applicable securities laws and the
effectiveness of the registration statement of which this proxy
statement/prospectus is part, and (ii) the filing of
certain merger documents with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware. HACI and Resolute intend to comply with all
such requirements.
Listing
of Company Common Stock
The Company will use its reasonable best efforts to cause the
shares of Company Common Stock to be issued in connection with
the Acquisition to be approved for listing on the NYSE upon the
completion of the Acquisition, subject to official notice of
issuance. If the Company is unable to satisfy the listing
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, it will apply to
have its stock listed on another stock exchange, and if such
listing application is not granted, the Company Common Stock
will be traded in the over-the-counter market.
Required
Vote
Approval of the Acquisition Proposal requires the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding
shares of HACI Common Stock entitled to vote thereon as of the
record date. In addition, if holders of 30% or more of the
Public Shares vote against the Acquisition Proposal and properly
exercise their conversion rights, HACI will not be permitted to
consummate the Acquisition.
126
THE
ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
The following summary of the material provisions of the
Acquisition Agreement is qualified by reference to the complete
text of the Acquisition Agreement including the Letter Agreement
amending the Acquisition Agreement dated September 9, 2009,
copies of which are attached as Annex A to this proxy
statement/prospectus and incorporated herein by reference. You
are encouraged to read the Acquisition Agreement in its entirety
for a more complete description of the terms and conditions of
the Acquisition.
Acquisition
Structure and Consideration
On August 2, 2009, HACI entered into the Acquisition
Agreement, pursuant to which, through a series of transactions,
HACIs stockholders will collectively acquire a majority of
the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock, and the Company
will own, directly or indirectly, 100% of the equity interests
of the Acquired Entities, with the exception of Aneth, in which
the Company will indirectly own a 99.996% equity interest. The
parties have adopted a form of amendment to the Acquisition
Agreement to extend the termination date, as described further
in Termination. In connection with the
Acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
HACI Contribution. HACI will acquire an
estimated 74.0% membership interest in Aneth (subject to
adjustment) in exchange for HACIs payment to Aneth of an
amount in cash equal to the assets in the trust account after
deducting amounts necessary to pay (i) the aggregate amount
payable to HACI warrantholders in the Cash Exchange,
(ii) HACI Public Stockholders who vote against the
Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights, (iii) amounts payable by HACI for repurchases of
Public Shares, if any, prior to the Acquisition,
(iv) HACIs aggregate costs, fees and expenses in
connection with the consummation of an initial business
combination, including deferred underwriting commissions. Based
on an anticipated contribution of $346 million, HACI will
own a 74.0% membership interest in Aneth (subject to adjustment).
|
|
|
|
Bank Payoff. Immediately following the HACI
Contribution, Aneth will use all of the proceeds received from
HACI in connection with the HACI Contribution to repay a portion
of the liabilities outstanding under Aneths credit
facilities. As of June 30, 2009, there was approximately
$417.6 million outstanding under Aneths credit
facilities. We expect that the amount of the Bank Payoff will be
approximately $346 million.
|
|
|
|
Seller Contribution. Immediately following the
repayment of debt described above, Seller will contribute to the
Company its interests in the Acquired Entities and its remaining
membership interest in Aneth in exchange for:
(i) 9,200,000 shares of Company Common Stock;
(ii) 4,600,000 Company Founders Warrants; and
(iii) 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares.
|
|
|
|
Founder Shares and Founder
Warrants. Immediately prior to the Merger,
7,335,000 Founder Shares and 4,600,000 Founder Warrants
will be cancelled and forfeited. Prior to the Acquisition, the
Founder Warrants will be amended to permit such cancellation.
|
|
|
|
Sale of Sponsor Warrants. Immediately prior to
the Merger, the Sponsor will sell 2,333,333 of its Sponsor
Warrants to Seller in exchange for Sellers payment of
$1,166,667 to the Sponsor. After the sale, the Sponsor will own
4,666,667 Sponsor Warrants. Prior to the Acquisition, the
Sponsor Warrants will be amended to permit such sale to the
Company.
|
|
|
|
Merger. Immediately following the HACI
Contribution and simultaneously with the Seller Contribution,
Merger Sub will merge with and into HACI, with HACI surviving.
HACI will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
In connection with the Merger, outstanding shares of HACI Common
Stock and outstanding HACI warrants, including outstanding
Founder Warrants and Sponsor Warrants, will be exchanged for the
relevant merger consideration. After the Merger, the former HACI
Stockholders and warrantholders will not have any equity
ownership interest in HACI.
|
For a more detailed description of the securities of the Company
to be issued in the Acquisition, please see the section entitled
Description of Securities.
127
Consideration
to HACI Stockholders and Warrantholders
Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, in the Merger, each
outstanding share of HACI Common Stock will be exchanged for one
share of Company Common Stock; provided that
1,865,000 shares of Company Common Stock received by the
Initial Stockholders in the Merger will be Company Earnout
Shares and subject to forfeiture if the stock trigger price of
$15.00 is not exceeded within five years following the closing
of the Acquisition. In addition, warrants to purchase HACI
Common Stock (including Public Warrants, Founder Warrants and
Sponsor Warrants) will be exchanged as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Public Warrants: Each Public Warrant
outstanding will be exchanged, at the election of the
warrantholder, for either (i) the right to receive $0.55 in
cash, or the Cash Amount, or (ii) a Company warrant;
provided that the aggregate number of the Company warrants
issuable in the Merger is capped at fifty percent (50%) (or
27,600,000) of the Public Warrants outstanding on the date of
the Merger, which we refer to as the Warrant Cap. If HACI Public
Warrantholders elect to receive in the aggregate more Company
warrants than the Warrant Cap, the total Company warrants issued
will be proportioned among warrantholders making a Warrant
Election so that such warrantholder making a Warrant Election
will receive the number of the Company warrants equal to its pro
rata portion (based on total Warrant Elections) of the Warrant
Cap and $0.55 in cash in lieu of each Company warrant not
received. Any HACI Public Warrantholder who votes against the
Warrant Amendment Proposal or who makes no election will receive
the Cash Amount in exchange for each of its Public Warrants.
There is, however, no limit on the number of Public Warrants
that may be exchanged for cash.
|
|
|
|
Founder Warrants: Each Founder Warrant
outstanding will be exchanged for one Company Founders Warrant.
The Company Founders Warrants will have substantially similar
terms as the Founder Warrants, except that the Company Founders
Warrants will (i) be exercisable for shares of Company
Common Stock, (ii) have an exercise price of $13.00, and
(iii) have a trigger price of $13.75, and (iv) expire
five years after the closing of the Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Warrants: Each Sponsor Warrant
outstanding will be exchanged for a Company Sponsors Warrant.
The Company Sponsors Warrants will have substantially similar
terms as the Sponsor Warrants, except that the Company Sponsors
Warrants will (i) be exercisable for shares of Company
Common Stock and (ii) have an exercise price of $13.00.
|
The HACI units will not be exchanged in the Merger. The HACI
units will be separated into the component shares of HACI Common
Stock and Public Warrants, each of which will be exchanged, as
described above and the units will cease to trade following the
consummation of the Acquisition.
Consideration
to Seller
In connection with the Acquisition, Seller, in exchange for its
contribution of its equity interests in the Acquired Entities to
the Company, will receive: (i) 9,200,000 shares of
Company Common Stock; (ii) 4,600,000 Company Founders
Warrants; and (iii) 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares. In
addition, Seller will receive 2,333,333 Company Sponsors
Warrants, through Sellers purchase of Sponsor Warrants
from the Sponsor and the subsequent exchange of the Sponsor
Warrants for Company Sponsors Warrants in the Merger.
Initial
Stockholders Transactions
In connection with the Acquisition, 7,335,000 Founder
Shares and 4,600,000 Founder Warrants held by the Initial
Stockholders will be cancelled and forfeited prior to the Merger
and an additional 1,865,000 Founder Shares will be converted
into 1,865,000 Company Earnout Shares. As a result of such
cancellation and conversion, the Merger and the Sponsors
sale of Sponsor Warrants to Seller, the Sponsor, together with
the other Initial Stockholders, will own
(i) 4,600,000 shares of Company Common Stock,
(ii) 9,200,000 Company Founders Warrants,
(iii) 4,666,667 Company Sponsors Warrants, and
(iv) 1,865,000 Company Earnout Shares immediately after the
consummation of the Acquisition.
128
Completion
and Effectiveness of the Acquisition
The closing of the Acquisition will occur on the first business
day after all of the conditions to completion of the Acquisition
contained in the Acquisition Agreement (including the conditions
that HACI stockholders shall have approved the Acquisition
Proposal and HACI Public Warrantholders shall have approved the
Warrant Amendment), are satisfied or waived, unless the parties
agree otherwise in writing
(see Conditions to Closing below). The
Merger will become effective upon the filing of a certificate of
merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.
Directors
and Officers
The Acquisition Agreement provides that effective immediately
after the closing of the Acquisition, the board of directors of
the Company will consist of nine members and divided into three
separate classes. Three directors will be appointed as
Class I directors and serve until the first annual meeting
of the Companys stockholders. Three directors will be
appointed as Class II directors and will serve until the
second annual meeting of the Companys stockholders.
Three directors will be appointed as Class III
directors and will serve until the third annual meeting of the
Companys stockholders.
Representations
and Warranties
The Acquisition Agreement contains a number of representations
and warranties made by Parent, Seller, and HACI to each other.
The representations and warranties do not survive the closing of
the Acquisition.
The representations and warranties of Parent and Seller relate
to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
due organization and qualification;
|
|
|
|
authorization and validity of the Acquisition Agreement;
|
|
|
|
no conflict and no additional governmental approvals or filings
or third-party consents required;
|
|
|
|
the ownership of the equity interests in the Company and Merger
Sub;
|
|
|
|
the absence of legal proceedings; and
|
|
|
|
proper formation and ownership of all capital stock in the
Company and Merger Sub.
|
Sellers representations and warranties regarding the
Acquired Entities relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
due organization and qualification of the Acquired Entities;
|
|
|
|
authorization and validity of the Acquisition Agreement with
respect to Aneth;
|
|
|
|
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
capital structure of the Acquired Entities;
|
|
|
|
no additional governmental consents or approvals required;
|
|
|
|
no conflict and no additional governmental approvals or filings
or third party consents required;
|
|
|
|
financial statements;
|
|
|
|
the absence of a material adverse effect since December 31,
2008;
|
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed liabilities;
|
|
|
|
owned and leased property;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable legal requirements and permits;
|
|
|
|
the absence of legal proceedings;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters;
|
|
|
|
employee benefit matters;
|
|
|
|
employment matters;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
certain material contracts;
|
|
|
|
customers and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
material transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
insurance;
|
|
|
|
brokers fees or commissions;
|
|
|
|
title to oil and gas properties;
|
|
|
|
oil and gas leases;
|
|
|
|
wells and other capital projects in progress;
|
|
|
|
expenditure obligations;
|
|
|
|
the absence of claims or proceedings affecting oil and gas
properties and other assets;
|
|
|
|
payout balances with respect to oil and gas properties;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain changes regarding oil and gas properties
and other assets;
|
|
|
|
gas imbalances;
|
|
|
|
oil and gas royalty payments;
|
|
|
|
licenses and permits;
|
|
|
|
reserve report information; and
|
|
|
|
no conflict with the contract with the Navajo Nation Oil and Gas
Company, or NNOG.
|
HACIs representations and warranties relate to, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
due organization, corporate power and that the Acquisition is an
initial business combination;
|
|
|
|
authorization and validity of the Acquisition Agreement;
|
|
|
|
no conflict and no additional governmental approvals or filings
or third-party consents required;
|
|
|
|
capital structure;
|
|
|
|
SEC documents and financial statements;
|
|
|
|
the absence of a material adverse effect since December 31,
2008;
|
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed liabilities;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
the absence of legal proceedings;
|
|
|
|
certain material contracts;
|
|
|
|
material transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
no brokers fees or commissions; and
|
|
|
|
the trust account.
|
The representations and warranties set forth in the Acquisition
Agreement are made by and to Parent, Seller and HACI as of
specific dates. The statements embodied in those representations
and warranties were made for purposes of the Acquisition
Agreement between the parties and are subject to qualifications
and limitations agreed by the parties in connection with
negotiating the terms of that contract, may or may not be
accurate as of the date they were made, and do not purport to be
accurate as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Materiality
and Material Adverse Effect
Some of the representations and warranties are qualified by
materiality and material adverse effect qualifications. The
definition of material adverse effect is a material
adverse effect on the business, operations, assets or financial
condition of a person and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
excluding, in each case, any such effect resulting from or
arising out of or in connection with (i) acts of God,
calamities, national or international political or social
conditions including the engagement by any country in
hostilities, whether
130
commenced before or after the date of the Acquisition Agreement,
and whether or not pursuant to the declaration of a national
emergency or war, or the occurrence of any military or terrorist
attack, in each case, that do not have a disproportionate effect
on the person and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative
to other persons in the industry, (ii) economic, industry
or market events, occurrences, developments, circumstances or
conditions, whether general or regional in nature or limited to
any area in which the person or its subsidiaries operate, in
each case to the extent do not have a disproportionate effect on
the person and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to
other persons in the industry, (iii) changes in applicable
laws or accounting standards, principles or interpretations, in
each case, that do not have a disproportionate effect on the
person and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to other
similarly situated persons in the industry, (iv) changes in
commodity prices, or (v) the public announcement or the
pendency of the Acquisition Agreement or the Acquisition or any
actions taken or not taken in with the Acquisition Agreement or
otherwise at the request or with the consent of Seller or HACI,
as applicable.
Interim
Covenants Relating to Conduct of Business
During the period from date of the Acquisition Agreement until
the earlier of the closing date of the Acquisition or the
termination of the Acquisition Agreement, each of Seller and
HACI will, and will cause its respective subsidiaries to, carry
on its respective business only in the ordinary course of
business. During such period, the Acquired Entities will also
use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve their business
organization, to keep available the services of their present
officers and key employees, and to preserve the goodwill of
those having business relationships with them. In addition,
Seller, the Company, Merger Sub and Aneth, on the one hand, and
HACI, on the other hand, and each of their respective
subsidiaries may not, among other things and subject to the
certain exceptions and qualifications, without the written
consent of the other party (which shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed):
|
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell, or authorize the issuance, delivery or
sale of, any of its respective capital stock or other equity
interest;
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividends or distribution or other
capital return in respect of its equity interests;
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, except as required by
U.S. GAAP, change any accounting methods, principles or
practices;
|
|
|
|
except in the ordinary course of business and certain other
specified permitted actions related to Aneths credit
facilities, enter into, terminate or materially modify any
material contract;
|
|
|
|
acquire by merger or consolidation with, or merge or consolidate
with, or purchase substantially all of the equity interests or
assets of, or otherwise acquire, any material business of any
corporation, partnership, association or other business
organization or division thereof;
|
|
|
|
make or grant any bonus or any wage or salary increase to any
employee or group of employees;
|
|
|
|
make any loans or advances to, or guarantee for the benefit of,
any person (except as set forth below); or
|
|
|
|
cancel any third party indebtedness owed to it.
|
Seller, the Company, Merger Sub and Aneth may not, among other
things and subject to the certain exceptions and qualifications,
without the written consent of HACI (which shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed):
|
|
|
|
|
amend, or permit any of their respective subsidiaries to amend,
their limited partnership or operating agreement, certificate of
incorporation or bylaws; or
|
|
|
|
redeem or authorize the redemption of any of its equity
interests.
|
131
In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries may not, among
other things and subject to the certain exceptions and
qualifications, without the written consent of HACI (which shall
not be unreasonably withheld or delayed):
|
|
|
|
|
(i) materially amend or terminate any existing employee
benefit plan or arrangement or adopt any new benefit plan; or
(ii) except in the course of ordinary business consistent
with past practices (A) pay or agree to pay any pension,
retirement allowance or other employee benefit not contemplated
by any existing benefit plan or employment agreement to any
officer or employee, (B) enter into, adopt or amend any
bonus, severance or retirement contract, or any employment
contract with a non-executive officer except as required by law,
or (C) enter into, adopt or amend any employment contract
with an executive officer;
|
|
|
|
other than loans or advances made to employees in the ordinary
course of business, make any loans, or advances or capital
commitments to, or guarantees for the benefit of, any person in
excess of $5.0 million individually or $10.0 million
in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
create, incur or assume any debt in excess of $5.0 million;
|
|
|
|
make any capital expenditures in excess of $2.0 million
individually or $5.0 million in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
make any forward purchase commitment in excess of the
requirements of the Company for normal operating purposes or at
prices higher than current market prices;
|
|
|
|
implement any layoff of employees that would implicate the WARN
Act of 1998;
|
|
|
|
settle or compromise any legal proceeding if the amount of such
settlement exceeds $5.0 million or will not be paid in full
prior to the closing or which settlement or compromise would
reasonably be expected to have a continuing adverse impact on
the business of the Company after the closing of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
make or change any material tax election;
|
|
|
|
change any annual accounting period;
|
|
|
|
adopt or change any accounting method with respect to taxes;
|
|
|
|
surrender any material right to claim a refund of taxes;
|
|
|
|
file any material amended tax return;
|
|
|
|
settle or compromise any proceeding with respect to any material
tax claim or assessment; or
|
|
|
|
consent to any extension or waiver of the limitation period
applicable to any material tax claim or assessment.
|
In addition, Seller, Aneth and the Company agreed to do the
following unless HACI provides written consent permitting
otherwise (which shall not be unreasonably withheld):
|
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, act in a normal manner with
respect to certain oil and gas assets consistent with prior
practice;
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, not to sell, otherwise dispose
of, encumber or relinquish certain oil and gas assets except for
permitted encumbrances or sale of hydrocarbons in the ordinary
course of business;
|
|
|
|
not to waive, compromise or settle material right or claim with
respect to any certain oil and gas assets;
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve and perform in
all material respects all obligations under all leases and other
agreements relating to certain oil and gas assets as a
reasonable and prudent operator;
|
|
|
|
maintain all material and equipment in accordance with customary
industry operating practices and procedures in all material
respects and maintain insurance;
|
|
|
|
except in the ordinary course of business, not to agree to
participate in any reworking, deepening or other operation or
capital or workover expenditure with respect to certain oil and
gas assets, if it might reasonably be expected to exceed
$1.0 million individually or $3.0 million aggregate,
without HACIs
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
prior written consent which may be withheld in HACIs
commercially reasonable discretion unless it is an emergency;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use commercially reasonable efforts to cause others operating
certain oil and gas assets to perform existing contracts,
preserve third party relationships, and appoint HACI as the
operator to company assets if applicable;
|
|
|
|
provide HACI with material reports concerning environmental
matters in connection with certain oil and gas assets promptly
upon receipt but in any event prior to the closing; and
|
|
|
|
use all commercially reasonable efforts to obtain consents,
approvals, authorizations and waivers of preferential purchase
rights, cooperate with HACI to notify governmental authorities,
and cooperate with the surviving corporation to obtain permits,
license, and authorizations to operate certain oil and gas
assets after the closing.
|
In addition, HACI may not, among other things and subject to the
certain exceptions and qualifications, without the written
consent of Seller (which shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed):
|
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any shares of its capital stock or
other equity securities or redeem, repurchase or otherwise
acquire or offer to redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire any
shares of its capital stock or other equity securities, except
(i) in connection with the conversion to cash of its shares of
HACI Common Stock held by HACI Public Stockholders who vote
against the Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their
conversion rights (ii) limited repurchases of Public Shares, and
(iii) transactions contemplated by the Warrant Amendment;
provided purchases of Public Shares are not allowed to the
extent such purchases would cause HACIs contribution to
Aneth in connection with the Acquisition to be less than
$275 million;
|
|
|
|
create, incur or assume any Indebtedness in excess of $100,000;
|
|
|
|
amend or otherwise modify the investment management trust
agreement or any other agreement relating to the trust
account; or
|
|
|
|
undertake any other action that would be reasonably likely to
materially adversely impede consummation of the Acquisition.
|
In addition, Seller, the Company, Merger Sub, Aneth and HACI
have agreed not to undertake any other action that would be
reasonably likely to materially adversely impede consummation of
the Acquisition.
Additional
Covenants
The Acquisition Agreement also contains additional covenants of
the parties, including covenants providing for:
|
|
|
|
|
the provision of reasonable access to properties, books and
records during the period prior to the closing of the
Acquisition or the earlier termination of the Acquisition
Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the provision of reasonable access to information of the Company
and its subsidiaries to Seller for 5 years following the
closing of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the protection of confidential information of the parties;
|
|
|
|
each party to make necessary filings under the HSR Act and to
take necessary actions to obtain approvals and consent required
to consummate the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the prior written consent of HACI and Seller before making
public announcements regarding the Acquisition except for
permitted notice under the Seller contract with NNOG, or if
public announcement is required by law, consultation and
opportunity to comment on such announcement;
|
|
|
|
each party to use reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to
be taken, all actions necessary, proper or advisable to
consummate the Acquisition;
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
HACI, the Company and Seller to take all necessary action so
that the persons listed in the Acquisition Agreement are
appointed or elected as director or officer of the Company and
the company surviving the Merger;
|
|
|
|
the Company and its subsidiaries to maintain current policies of
directors and officers liability insurance with
respect to claims arising from facts and events that occurred
prior to the consummation of the Acquisition for a period of six
years after the consummation of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
HACI, the Company and Seller to jointly prepare and file this
proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
HACI to cause the special meeting to be called and held as soon
as reasonably practicable and HACIs board to recommend to
HACI stockholders their adoption of the Acquisition Agreement
and the other transactions contemplated thereunder;
|
|
|
|
prohibitions against the solicitation by Parent, Seller, the
Company, Merger Sub, Aneth and the Acquired Entities of any
person concerning any sale of a significant portion of the
assets or the Acquired Entities or merger or sale of their
respective equity interests in the Acquired Entities, any
recapitalization of Seller or the Acquired Entities or any
similar transaction with respect to Acquired Entities or their
respective businesses;
|
|
|
|
prohibitions against HACIs solicitation of any person
concerning any business combination or similar transaction;
|
|
|
|
HACI, the Sponsor and Seller to enter into a registration rights
agreement upon the closing of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
HACI to file all reports, registration statements and other
documents required to be filed or submitted to the SEC from the
date of the Acquisition Agreement to the date of the closing of
the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
each party to promptly give written notice of any event,
condition or circumstances which would cause any condition to
the consummation of the Acquisition not to be satisfied;
|
|
|
|
Seller to inform HACI of its efforts to implement specified
hedging arrangements;
|
|
|
|
Seller to terminate Sellers Amended and Restated Equity
Appreciation Plan; and
|
|
|
|
Seller to use commercially reasonable efforts to dissolve and
liquidate excluded subsidiaries except as restricted by
contractual obligations.
|
Conditions
to Closing
The consummation of the transactions contemplated by the
Acquisition Agreement is conditioned upon normal closing
conditions in a transaction of this nature, any and all of which
may be waived in writing by the parties, including:
|
|
|
|
|
delivery by each of the Parent, Seller, Aneth, Merger Sub, the
Company, and HACI of an officers certificate to the effect
that: (i) no proceeding involving such party is pending or
threatened before any judicial or governmental authority
relating to the Acquisition; (ii) the board of directors or
managers, as the case may be, of such party has adopted the
Acquisition Agreement; and (iii) stockholder or member, as
the case may be, approval of such party with respect to the
execution, delivery and performance of the Acquisition Agreement
and the consummation of all transactions contemplated thereby
has been attained;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any law, injunction, restraining order or decree
of any nature that restrains or prohibits the consummation of
the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the approval by HACI stockholders of the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal and the Acquisition
Proposal and by HACI Public Warrantholders of the Warrant
Amendment Proposal;
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting periods
specified under the HSR Act with respect to the
Acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
the delivery by each party to the other party of a certificate
to the effect that the representations and warranties of the
delivering party are true and correct in all material respects
as of the closing and all obligations, agreements, covenants and
conditions contained in the Acquisition Agreement have been
materially complied with by the delivering party.
|
In addition, the obligation of HACI to consummate the
Acquisition is subject to the following additional conditions,
unless waived in writing by HACI:
|
|
|
|
|
subject to exceptions for defaults that have been waived, are
subject to forbearance agreements, are subject to a standstill
covenant or otherwise do not permit any action on the collateral
securing the indebtedness, the absence of defaults with respect
to any payment obligation or financial covenant under any
material indebtedness of the Company or the Acquired Entities;
|
|
|
|
Sellers implementation of hedging arrangements resulting
in an average fixed price on its crude oil swaps in year 2010 on
3,650 barrels of crude oil per day is $67.00 or more per
barrel;
|
|
|
|
none of Sellers new or amended crude oil marketing
arrangements is expected to have a material adverse effect on
the Company at the time of the Acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
receipt of a legal opinion from counsel to the Company regarding
the existence of (i) no conflicts, defaults or violations
under applicable laws of the Navajo Nation and (ii) no
conflicts, defaults or violations under any of the
Companys material contracts pursuant to which the Navajo
Nation or an subdivision or affiliate thereof is a party or
third beneficiary, in each case, as a result of the transactions
contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement.
|
In addition, the obligation of Seller to consummate the
Acquisition is subject to the following additional covenants,
unless waived in writing by Seller:
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of a legal opinion from counsel to HACI regarding the
effectiveness of the Charter Amendment and no conflicts with the
equity purchase agreement between HACI and Graham Packaging; and
|
|
|
|
the amount to be paid by HACI to Aneth is at least
$275 million.
|
The waiver of any of the following conditions may be deemed
sufficiently material to require supplemental disclosure to
stockholders and warrantholders: (i) the absence of any
applicable approvals, laws, injunctions, order or decrees
restraining or prohibiting the consummation of the Acquisition,
(ii) the absence of defaults with respect to any payment
obligation or financial covenant under any material indebtedness
of the Company or the Acquired Entities (unless covered by
standstill or forbearance agreements), (iii) new or amended
crude oil marketing arrangements not reasonably being expected
to have a material adverse effect on the Company and the
Acquired Entities, (iv) depending on the degree of variance
and other factors in existence at the time, the amount being
paid by HACI to Aneth being less than $275 million or
(v) depending on the degree of variance and other factors
in existence at the time, the failure of Seller to comply with
required hedging arrangements. Such supplemental disclosure
would be provided via means of a press release issued by HACI,
the filing of related disclosure on Form 8-K, and a supplement
to this proxy statement/prospectus. Any supplemental disclosure
would state in bold face prominent text that warrantholders and
stockholders would be able to revoke any votes that had been
cast by them up to the time of the meeting and would contain
equally prominent notice that any such votes may be revoked by
following telephone and/or Internet voting procedures provided
by banks or brokers prior to 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight time on
the day before the special meetings. Such supplemental
disclosure would be issued at a minimum of two business days
prior to any vote on the matters addressed in this proxy
statement/prospectus (other than votes on adjournment
proposals), although it would be unlikely that any such
supplement to this proxy statement/prospectus would be received
by the stockholders and warrantholders prior to such vote if it
was mailed only two business days prior to the relevant vote.
135
In the event that there was a waiver of any particular condition
that would be sufficiently material to warrant supplemental
disclosure within two business days of the relevant vote (i.e.,
on or after 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight time September 21,
2009), supplemental disclosure would be issued but HACI would
adjourn the meeting until the second business day following the
supplemental disclosure; provided that in no event would the
special meeting of warrantholders and special meeting of
stockholders be adjourned to a date past September 28, 2009.
Defaults under the material indebtedness of the Company or the
Acquired Entities through September 11, 2009 have been
waived or are subject to standstill covenants, and therefore,
are excepted from the closing condition related to defaults
under material indebtedness. See the section entitled
Risk Factors for additional information.
Termination
The Acquisition Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to
the closing:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of HACI and Seller;
|
|
|
|
by HACI or Seller by giving written notice to the other party if
a law, injunction, restraining order or decree of any nature of
any governmental authority of competent jurisdiction is issued
that prohibits the consummation of the Acquisition and such
injunction, restraining order or decree is final and
non-appealable or is not resolved in HACIs favor prior to
September 29, 2009, provided that the party seeking to
terminate the Acquisition Agreement must have used its
reasonable best efforts to have such law, injunction, order or
decree vacated or denied;
|
|
|
|
by HACI or Seller by giving written notice to the other party if
HACI fails to obtain the requisite approval of the Acquisition
or the Warrant Amendment by its stockholders and the HACI Public
Warrantholders at the special meetings;
|
|
|
|
by either Seller or HACI by giving written notice to the other
party if the closing of the Acquisition has not occurred by
October 6, 2009, provided however, that the Buyer
Stockholder Approval shall have been obtained and the Charter
Amendment shall have become effective prior to
September 28, 2009, and provided further that the right to
terminate the Acquisition Agreement is not available to any
party whose failure or inability to fulfill any obligation under
the Acquisition Agreement has been the cause of, or resulted in,
the failure of the closing of the Acquisition to occur on or
before such date;
|
|
|
|
by Seller, upon written notice to HACI, upon a material breach
of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the
part of HACI such that, if occurring or continuing on the
closing date, certain closing conditions would not be satisfied
(subject to cure provisions); or
|
|
|
|
by HACI, upon written notice to Seller, upon a material breach
of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the
part of the Parent, Aneth or Seller such that, if occurring or
continuing on the closing date, certain closing conditions would
not be satisfied (subject to cure provisions).
|
Upon termination, the Acquisition Agreement will terminate and
the Acquisition will be abandoned without further action by any
of the parties to the Acquisition Agreement, provided that
nothing in the Acquisition Agreement shall relieve any party
from liability for any intentional or knowing breach of the
Acquisition Agreement. In the event that the Acquisition
Agreement terminates because of the failure by HACI to receive
the requisite stockholder or warrantholder approval for the
Acquisition or due to an injunction filed due to a violation of
HACIs charter or due to a material breach by HACI, then
HACI will be required to reimburse the Parent, Seller, Aneth and
the Acquired Entities for certain documented out-of-pocket
expenses in an amount not to exceed $1 million. If the
Acquisition Agreement is terminated by HACI because of a
material breach by Seller, then Seller will be required to
reimburse HACI for certain documented out-of-pocket expense in
an amount not to exceed $1 million. In certain limited
circumstances, the Acquisition Agreement may be terminated
without a limitation of remedies.
136
Governing
Law
The Acquisition Agreement is governed by and construed in
accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware.
137
THE
STOCKHOLDER ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL
The Stockholder Adjournment Proposal, if approved, will allow
HACIs board of directors to adjourn the special meeting of
HACI stockholders to a later date or dates to permit further
solicitation of proxies. The Stockholder Adjournment Proposal
will only be presented to HACI stockholders in the event, based
on the tabulated votes, there are not sufficient votes at the
time of the special meeting of HACI stockholders to approve the
Director Election Proposal, Charter Amendment
Existence Proposal, the Charter Amendment Purpose
Proposal or the Acquisition Proposal. In no event will HACI
adjourn the special meeting of HACI stockholders or consummate
the Acquisition beyond the date by which it may properly do so
under is charter and Delaware law.
Consequences
if the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal is Not
Approved
If the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal is not approved by HACI
stockholders, HACIs board of directors may not be able to
adjourn the special meeting of HACI stockholders to a later date
in the event, based on the tabulated votes, there are not
sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting of HACI
stockholders to authorize the consummation of the Acquisition
(because there are not sufficient votes to approve the
Acquisition Proposal or because the holders of 30% or more of
the Public Shares vote against the Acquisition Proposal and
properly exercise their conversion rights) or the approval of
the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal and the
Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal. Such special
meeting could be adjourned to as late as September 28, 2009.
Required
Vote
Approval of the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal requires the
majority of the votes cast by holders of issued and outstanding
shares of HACI Common Stock as of the record date represented in
person or by proxy at the special meeting of HACI stockholders
and entitled to vote thereon. Approval of the Stockholder
Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the adoption of any
of the other proposals.
Recommendation
HACIS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT HACI STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE STOCKHOLDER ADJOURNMENT
PROPOSAL.
138
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma financial information has been
derived by the application of pro forma adjustments to the
historical consolidated and combined financial statements of
HACI and Resolute to reflect the Acquisition, including the IPO
reorganization.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2009 (the pro forma balance sheet)
gives effect to the Acquisition as if it had occurred on
June 30, 2009. The unaudited pro forma consolidated
statements of operations for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008 (the pro
forma statements of operations) give effect to the
Acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2008.
The unaudited pro forma financial information has been prepared
using two different levels of approval of the Acquisition by
HACI Public Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming Maximum Conversion: This presentation
assumes HACI Public Stockholders owning 30% less one share of
the HACI Common Stock issued in HACIs initial public
offering seek conversion.
|
|
|
|
Assuming Minimum Conversion: This presentation
assumes that no HACI Public Stockholders seek to convert their
shares into a pro rata share of the trust account. This
presentation also assumes that a portion of the remaining cash
is used to retire the remaining debt under Resolutes
credit facility.
|
The acquisition of Resolute by HACI will be accounted for as a
purchase. The consideration to be received by Resolute will
include the fair value of 9,200,000 shares of Company
Common Stock, 4,600,000 warrants to purchase Company Common
Stock subject to a trigger of $13.75 per share to be exceeded
within five years, 2,333,333 Company Sponsors Warrants, and
1,385,000 shares of Company Common Stock subject to
forfeiture in the event a trigger of $15.00 per share is not
exceeded within five years following the closing of the
Acquisition and the assumption of all outstanding debt and
liabilities of Resolute in excess of current assets acquired.
The actual total purchase consideration will vary with
fluctuations in the price of HACI common stock and with the
level of debt actually outstanding under the Resolute credit
facility. Additionally, the actual purchase price allocation
will not be known until after closing and will be further
impacted by fluctuations in the market price of crude oil and
natural gas.
The unaudited pro forma financial information does not include
any adjustments for cost savings which are anticipated to be
realized from the elimination of HACI operating expenses. Since
its inception, HACIs efforts have been limited to
organizational activities, activities relating to its initial
public offering, activities relating to identifying and
evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, and activities
relating to general corporate matters.
The unaudited pro forma financial information does not include
any adjustments for incremental general and administrative costs
which are anticipated to be incurred by Resolute Energy
Corporation as a publicly traded company. These incremental
expenses, estimated to be approximately $3,000,000 per year,
include compensation and benefit expense for additional
personnel, fees paid to independent auditors, lawyers,
independent petroleum engineers, and other professional
advisors, investor relations activities, registrar and transfer
agent fees, incremental director and officer liability insurance
costs and director compensation.
The unaudited pro forma financial information should not be
considered indicative of actual results that would have been
achieved had the Acquisition been consummated on the dates or
for the periods indicated and do not purport to indicate balance
sheet data or results of operations as of any future date or for
any future period. The unaudited pro forma financial information
should be read together with the historical financial statements
of HACI and Resolute and Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
HACI and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Resolute included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus.
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
HACI
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
|
(in $ thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
808
|
|
|
$
|
80,937
|
a
|
|
$
|
81,745
|
|
Cash and marketable securities held in trust
|
|
|
539,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(539,790
|
)a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,916
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,501
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
540,063
|
|
|
|
31,449
|
|
|
|
(539,790
|
)
|
|
|
31,722
|
|
|
|
80,937
|
|
|
|
112,659
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,073
|
|
|
|
322,150
|
b
|
|
|
567,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567,223
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,961
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,447
|
|
|
|
(6,447
|
)b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
541,437
|
|
|
$
|
306,473
|
|
|
$
|
(224,087
|
)
|
|
$
|
623,823
|
|
|
$
|
80,937
|
|
|
$
|
704,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders / Members Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
417,570
|
|
|
$
|
(417,570
|
)a
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
|
37,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,246
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,142
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
Deferred underwriters commission
|
|
|
17,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,388
|
)a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
18,219
|
|
|
|
478,406
|
|
|
|
(434,958
|
)
|
|
|
61,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,667
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
a
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
|
$
|
(81,000
|
)a
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,065
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,950
|
|
Other non current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,219
|
|
|
|
525,712
|
|
|
|
(353,958
|
)
|
|
|
189,973
|
|
|
|
(81,000
|
)
|
|
|
108,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, subject to possible redemption
|
|
|
163,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,450
|
)a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders / members equity (deficit)
|
|
|
359,768
|
|
|
|
(219,239
|
)
|
|
|
(22,382
|
)a
|
|
|
433,850
|
|
|
|
161,937
|
a
|
|
|
595,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,703
|
b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders / members deficit
|
|
$
|
541,437
|
|
|
$
|
306,473
|
|
|
$
|
(224,087
|
)
|
|
$
|
623,823
|
|
|
$
|
80,937
|
|
|
$
|
704,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
for
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
HACI
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
|
(in $ thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,512
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
|
31,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,111
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and asset retirement
obligation accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,949
|
|
|
$
|
(454
|
)a
|
|
|
15,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,495
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
Write off of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
4,015
|
|
|
|
64,689
|
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
68,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(4,015
|
)
|
|
|
(12,177
|
)
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
(15,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,738
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense)
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
10,153
|
b
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,576
|
b
|
|
|
142
|
|
(Loss) gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
(53,509
|
)
|
|
|
10,153
|
|
|
|
(42,809
|
)
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
(41,233
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
|
(3,468
|
)
|
|
|
(65,686
|
)
|
|
|
10,607
|
|
|
|
(58,547
|
)
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
(56,971
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|
|
29,702
|
c
|
|
|
21,077
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)c
|
|
|
20,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,289
|
)
|
|
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
|
40,309
|
|
|
|
(37,470
|
)
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
(36,461
|
)
|
Deferred interest, net of taxes, attributable to common stock
subject to possible redemption
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(2,431
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,451
|
|
|
$
|
(37,470
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
$
|
(36,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
52,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
Adjustments for
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
HACI
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Conversion)
|
|
|
|
(in $ thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
229,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
229,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
229,172
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
$
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
85,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,382
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and asset retirement
obligation accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,335
|
|
|
$
|
(3,327
|
)a
|
|
|
47,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,008
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
Write off of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
401,563
|
|
|
|
(3,327
|
)
|
|
|
399,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,392
|
)
|
|
|
(172,391
|
)
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
|
|
(170,456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170,456
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense)
|
|
|
7,601
|
|
|
|
(33,139
|
)
|
|
|
21,057
|
b
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,152
|
b
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
(Loss) gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
7,433
|
|
|
|
63,725
|
|
|
|
21,057
|
|
|
|
92,215
|
|
|
|
6,152
|
|
|
|
98,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
|
6,041
|
|
|
|
(108,666
|
)
|
|
|
(24,384
|
)
|
|
|
(78,241
|
)
|
|
|
6,152
|
|
|
|
(72,089
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(2,054
|
)
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
|
11,974
|
c
|
|
|
28,167
|
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)c
|
|
|
25,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
(90,419
|
)
|
|
|
36,358
|
|
|
|
(50,074
|
)
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
(46,137
|
)
|
Deferred interest, net of taxes, attributable to common stock
subject to possible redemption
|
|
|
(1,489
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
1,489
|
d
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
2,498
|
|
|
$
|
(90,242
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,847
|
|
|
$
|
(49,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,937
|
|
|
$
|
(45,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
52,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
141
Adjustments
to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2009
a. The following table outlines the adjustments to cash and
cash and marketable securities held in trust by HACI assuming
(i) maximum conversion and (ii) additional adjustments
assuming minimum conversion of HACI Common Stock by HACI Public
Stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
Assume
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities held in trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used to repay indebtedness(1)
|
|
$
|
336,570
|
|
|
$
|
81,000
|
|
Conversion of shares(2)
|
|
|
161,937
|
|
|
|
(161,937
|
)
|
Repurchase of public warrants(3)
|
|
|
24,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of deferred underwriting commissions(4)
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fees and expenses(5)
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to cash and marketable securities held in trust
|
|
|
539,790
|
|
|
|
(80,937
|
)
|
Total adjustment to cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,937
|
|
Total adjustments to cash and cash and marketable securities
held in trust
|
|
$
|
539,790
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders/members equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of shares(2)
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
161,937
|
|
Repurchase of public warrants(3)
|
|
|
(24,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Forgiveness of deferred underwriting commissions(4)
|
|
|
11,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fees and expenses(5)
|
|
|
(11,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to total stockholders/members
equity
|
|
$
|
(22,382
|
)
|
|
$
|
161,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the repayment in full of Resolutes $225,000,000
second lien term loan and the repayment of $111,570,000 under
Resolutes revolving credit facility. Following the
repayment under Resolutes revolving credit facility,
management anticipates the remaining pro forma debt balance of
$81,000,000 would be classified as long term debt. To the extent
fewer than the maximum number of HACI Public Stockholders elect
conversion, management intends to use any remaining cash, after
payment of expenses, to first repay the remaining outstanding
under the Resolute revolving credit facility and then to retain
cash for future business operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the estimated $161,937,000 payment to HACI Public
Stockholders who elect to convert their shares of HACI Common
Stock and receive a cash payment, assuming maximum conversion of
16,559,999 shares. As of June 30, 2009, on a pro forma
basis, the conversion amount would have been approximately $9.78
per share calculated based on the aggregate amount on deposit in
HACIs trust account (before payment of deferred
underwriting discounts) including interest earned on the trust
account, net of income taxes payable on such interest divided by
55,200,000 shares of HACI Common Stock sold in its initial
public offering. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the cash component of the warrant restructuring which
will take place as part of the transaction. Coincident with the
Acquisition, HACI will offer to exchange up to 27,600,000, or
50% of the 55,200,000 outstanding public warrants for new
restructured warrants to purchase Company Common Stock with a
strike price of $13.00 per common share. Therefore between
27,600,000 and 55,200,000 warrants will be repurchased. The pro
forma information has been prepared assuming 44,151,000
warrants, or approximately 80%, will be repurchased at a price
of $0.55 per warrant. |
|
(4) |
|
As part of HACIs initial public offering HACI agreed to
pay the underwriters $17,388,000 in deferred underwriting
commission. This deferred commission was to be paid upon
completion of HACIs initial business combination. As part
of this Acquisition, the underwriters have agreed to forgo
$11,888,000 of |
142
|
|
|
|
|
this deferred underwriting commission. Upon completion of the
Acquisition HACI will pay to the underwriters $5,500,000. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents estimated fees and expenses, consisting primarily of
transaction advisory, legal, accounting and other professional
fees. |
b. Represents the allocation of the excess purchase price
over the historical book values of Resolute to property and
equipment as if the transaction was consummated on June 30,
2009, on the same terms and conditions. In the opinion of
management the carrying value of all other assets and
liabilities approximate their fair value. The aggregate purchase
price and the ultimate allocation of such will vary with
fluctuations in the market price of HACI common stock, the
amount of debt outstanding under the Resolute credit facility
and the market price of crude oil and natural gas. Such changes
could be material. A ten percent increase in the June 30,
2009 market price of HACI Common Stock would increase the
consideration by approximately $15,600,000, while a ten percent
decrease would decrease consideration by approximately
$11,800,000.
No amounts are expected to be allocated to other intangible
assets or goodwill at the transaction consummation date.
In conjunction with the repayment of Resolutes
$225,000,000 second lien term loan and the partial repayment of
Resolutes revolving credit facility, the Company will not
assign any value to the $6,447,000 deferred financing costs
which were previously being amortized over the life of the
associated financings.
For the purposes of this pro forma presentation, management has
utilized the closing price of HACI common stock on June 30,
2009, which was $9.59 per share, expected option life of five
years, risk-free interest rate of 2.5%, HACI historical common
stock volatility rate of 11.9%, expected dividend rate of 0%,
and a restricted share discount of 50%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Estimated fair value of Company Common Stock
|
|
$
|
88,228
|
|
Estimated fair value of Company Common Stock subject to
forfeiture
|
|
|
6,641
|
|
Estimated fair value of warrants, net of cash paid
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
Debt assumed in the acquisition
|
|
|
417,570
|
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
108,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
622,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price assigned to property and equipment
|
|
$
|
567,223
|
|
Purchase price assigned to other current and noncurrent assets
|
|
|
54,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
622,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30,
2009
and the Year Ended December 31, 2009
a. Represents the decrease in depletion, depreciation,
amortization and accretion computed on a unit of production
basis following the allocation of the excess of the aggregate
purchase price consideration over the historical book values of
Resolute to proved oil and gas properties, as if the transaction
was consummated on January 1, 2008.
b. Represents reduced interest income and interest expense
resulting from the repayment of Resolutes $225,000,000
second lien term loan and a portion of Resolutes revolving
credit facility. After completing the Acquisition, assuming the
maximum number HACI Public Stockholders elect to convert
their stock, Resolute anticipates having approximately
$81,000,000 of debt outstanding under its revolving credit
facility. If no shares are converted, the Company anticipates
having no debt outstanding and would have a cash balance of
approximately $81,745,000.
c. Assumes an effective tax rate of 36% on income before
income taxes and minority interest. This reflects both the
federal and state statutory income taxes rates which were in
effect during the periods presented.
d. Represents the interest (net of taxes) that would not
have been incurred upon conversion of the minimum number of HACI
Common Stock.
143
COMPARATIVE
SHARE INFORMATION
The following table sets forth selected historical equity
ownership information for HACI and Resolute and unaudited pro
forma combined per share ownership information of the Company
after giving effect to the Acquisition, assuming (i) that
no HACI Public Stockholders exercise their conversion rights and
(ii) that holders of 30% less one share of the Public
Shares have properly exercised their conversion rights. HACI is
providing this information to aid you in your analysis of the
financial aspects of the Acquisition. The historical information
should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Information
of Resolute, Selected Historical Financial
Information of the Company and Selected
Historical Financial Information of HACI included
elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus and the historical
consolidated and combined financial statements of HACI and
Resolute and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in
this proxy statement/prospectus. The unaudited pro forma per
share information is derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with, the unaudited condensed combined pro forma
financial data and related notes included elsewhere in this
proxy statement/prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated per share information does
not purport to represent what the actual results of operations
of HACI and Resolute would have been had the Acquisition been
consummated or to project HACIs or Resolutes results
of operations that may be achieved after the Acquisition. The
unaudited pro forma book value per share information below does
not purport to represent what the value of HACI and Resolute
would have been had the Acquisition been consummated nor the
book value per share for any future date or period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Historical data per share of HACI
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
6.91
|
|
|
$
|
6.86
|
|
Income (loss) per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Historical data per share of the Company(1)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Income (loss) per share, basic and diluted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Historical data per share of Resolute(2)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Income (loss) per share, basic and diluted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Pro forma data per share of the Company
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Assuming Maximum Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.27
|
|
Income (loss) per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.71
|
)
|
Assuming Minimum Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.63
|
|
Income (loss) per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company had no operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 or the six month period ended
June 30, 2009, as the Company was formed on July 28,
2009. |
|
(2) |
|
As more fully described in the notes to the audited
December 31, 2008 combined financial statements, the
combined financial statements are a combination of companies
with different legal structures, which preclude the computation
of per share or unit computations. |
144
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
OF THE COMPANY
The Company is providing the following selected historical
financial information to assist you in your analysis of the
financial aspects of the Acquisition.
Because the Company was incorporated on July 28, 2009, it
does not have any historical financial statements for any period
other than a balance sheet as of August 3, 2009 which is
included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
The historical results of HACI and Resolute included elsewhere
in this proxy statement/prospectus are not necessarily
indicative of the future performance of the Company. The
following information should be read in conjunction with each of
HACIs and Resolutes historical financial statements
and related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
HACI and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations of
Resolute contained elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of August 3, 2009
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF HACI
HACI is providing the following selected historical financial
information to assist you in your analysis of the financial
aspects of the Acquisition.
The following selected historical financial information of HACI
as of June 30, 2009 and for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 are derived from HACIs
unaudited financial statements, which are included elsewhere in
this proxy statement/prospectus. The following selected
historical financial information of HACI as of December 31,
2008 and 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
for the period from February 26, 2007 (inception) through
December 31, 2007 are derived from HACIs audited
financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus. The results of operations for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations which might be expected for the entire year.
The following information is only a summary and should be read
in conjunction with the unaudited interim financial statements
of HACI as of June 30, 2009 and for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the notes thereto and the
audited financial statements of HACI as of December 31,
2008 and 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 for
the period from February 26, 2007 (inception) through
December 31, 2007 and the notes thereto and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of HACI contained
elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formation and operating costs
|
|
$
|
673,502
|
|
|
$
|
196,885
|
|
|
$
|
278,870
|
|
|
$
|
458,499
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
718,759
|
|
|
|
722,023
|
|
|
|
235,820
|
|
|
|
167,039
|
|
Write-off of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before other income (expense) and income
tax expense
|
|
|
(1,392,261
|
)
|
|
|
(918,908
|
)
|
|
|
(4,014,643
|
)
|
|
|
(625,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
7,601,056
|
|
|
|
5,153,789
|
|
|
|
648,851
|
|
|
|
4,537,124
|
|
State taxes other than income taxes
|
|
|
(167,935
|
)
|
|
|
(116,553
|
)
|
|
|
(102,111
|
)
|
|
|
(46,621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
7,433,121
|
|
|
|
5,037,236
|
|
|
|
546,740
|
|
|
|
4,490,503
|
|
(Loss) income before income tax expense
|
|
|
6,040,860
|
|
|
|
4,118,328
|
|
|
|
(3,467,903
|
)
|
|
|
3,864,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2,053,932
|
|
|
|
1,400,652
|
|
|
|
1,179,087
|
|
|
|
(1,354,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
3,986,928
|
|
|
|
2,717,676
|
|
|
|
(2,288,816
|
)
|
|
|
2,510,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred interest, net of taxes, attributable to common stock
subject to possible redemption
|
|
|
(1,488,760
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020,426
|
)
|
|
|
(142,484
|
)
|
|
|
(891,952
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
2,498,168
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
|
(2,431,300
|
)
|
|
|
1,168,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
24,002,143
|
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
3,030,871
|
|
|
$
|
5,163,686
|
|
|
|
(990,047
|
)
|
|
|
663,072
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(2,263,863
|
)
|
|
|
(541,301,789
|
)
|
|
|
275,422
|
|
|
|
234,161
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,190,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
819,061
|
|
|
$
|
52,053
|
|
|
$
|
104,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents held in trust
|
|
|
250,023,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities held in trust
|
|
|
290,117,945
|
|
|
|
541,301,789
|
|
|
|
539,771,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
544,797,348
|
|
|
|
541,842,224
|
|
|
|
541,436,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock subject to redemption, 16,559,999 shares at
$9.71 per share
|
|
|
160,797,590
|
|
|
|
160,797,590
|
|
|
|
160,797,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred interest attributable to common stock subject to
redemption (net of taxes of $1,377,489, $1,313,840 and $525,674
at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and
June 30, 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
2,509,186
|
|
|
|
1,020,426
|
|
|
|
2,651,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
362,199,984
|
|
|
|
359,701,816
|
|
|
$
|
359,768,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF HACI
Overview
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in
conjunction with HACIs financial statements and the
related notes and schedules thereto.
HACI was formed on February 26, 2007 as a blank check
company for the purpose of acquiring, or acquiring control of,
through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition,
stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination
with one or more businesses or assets. HACIs management
team is engaged in the private equity business and evaluates
various acquisition opportunities from time to time in
connection with their ordinary course of business. HACIs
efforts in identifying prospective target businesses is not
limited to a particular industry, but HACI is prohibited from
engaging in a business combination with any entity engaged in
the energy industry as its principal business or whose principal
operations are conducted outside of the United States or Canada,
without first obtaining the approval of HACIs stockholders
to the charter amendment and amending HACIs charter to
allow for such combinations. The initial target business or
businesses with which HACI combines must have a collective fair
market value equal to at least 80% of the initial amount held in
the trust account (excluding deferred underwriting commissions).
HACI may effect its initial business combination using cash from
the proceeds held in the trust account, HACI capital stock, debt
or a combination of cash, stock and debt.
On October 3, 2007, HACIs completed its IPO of
55,200,000 units, including 7,200,000 units issued
pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option, or HACI units, with each HACI unit
consisting of one share of HACI Common Stock and one HACI
warrant to purchase one share of HACI Common Stock at an
exercise price of $7.50 per share. The HACI units from the IPO
were sold at an offering price of $10.00 per unit, generating
total gross proceeds of $552.0 million. Simultaneously with
the consummation of the IPO, HACI consummated the private sale
of 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants to the Sponsor, at a price of
$1.00 per warrant, generating gross proceeds of
$7.0 million.
After deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and
the IPO expenses, approximately $536.1 million of the
proceeds from the IPO and the private placement (including
deferred underwriting commissions that will be released to the
underwriters of the IPO upon HACIs completion of a
business combination) was deposited into a trust account at JP
Morgan Chase, N.A. with Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company as trustee. Such funds will not be released
from the trust account to HACI until the earlier of completion
of its initial business combination or its liquidation, although
HACI may withdraw up to an aggregate of approximately
$6.6 million of the interest income accumulated on the
funds. HACIs funds in the trust account are invested in
the JPMorgan U.S. Treasury Plus Money Market Fund and
U.S. Treasury securities with a maturity of 180 days
or less and consist of cash and cash equivalents and marketable
securities. See Critical Accounting Policies
below for more information.
Acquisition
Activities
From April 2008 through July 2009, HACI explored a
potential business combination opportunity and conducted due
diligence with respect to Graham Packaging Holdings Company, or
Graham Packaging, one of the potential target companies. HACI
negotiated an equity purchase agreement, dated July 1,
2008, as amended on January 27, 2009, with Graham
Packaging, pursuant to which through a series of transactions,
HACI stockholders would have acquired control of Graham
Packaging. On August 13, 2008, GPC Capital Corp. II, an
affiliate of Graham Packaging, filed a registration statement on
Form S-4 with the SEC in connection with the contemplated Graham
Packaging transaction.
In January 2009, HACI and Graham Packaging amended the
equity purchase agreement to provide that HACI and Blackstone
Capital Partners III Merchant Banking Fund L.P., as the Seller
Representative, would each have the right to terminate the
equity purchase agreement by giving written notice to the other
and provided further that each party would be released from the
equity purchase agreements exclusivity provisions. The
amendment was entered into to allow each party to pursue other
transactions given changes in
148
market conditions. On July 31, 2009, HACI and Blackstone
mutually agreed to terminate the equity purchase agreement.
On August 2, 2009, HACI entered into the Acquisition
Agreement, pursuant to which, through a series of transactions,
HACIs stockholders will collectively acquire a majority of
the outstanding Company Common Stock, and the Company will own
HACI and Sellers business and operations. See the section
entitled The Acquisition Agreement for
additional information.
Since its inception to date, HACIs efforts have been
limited to organizational activities, activities relating to the
IPO, activities relating to identifying, evaluating and, in the
case of the proposed Graham Packaging acquisition and the
Acquisition, pursuing prospective acquisitions, and activities
relating to general corporate matters. HACI has not generated
any revenues, other than interest income earned on the proceeds
of the IPO. As of June 30, 2009, approximately
$539.8 million was held in the trust account, including
$17.4 million of deferred underwriting commissions,
$7.0 million from the sale of warrants to the Initial
Stockholders and approximately $94,000 in accrued interest, and
HACI had cash outside of trust of approximately $104,000 and
approximately $831,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
As of December 31, 2008, approximately $540.1 million
was held in the trust account, $7.0 million from the sale
of warrants to the Initial Stockholders and approximately
$388,000 in accrued interest, and it had cash outside of trust
of approximately $819,000 and approximately $899,000 in accounts
payable and accrued expenses. Up to $6.6 million of
interest on the trust proceeds may be released to HACI for
activities in connection with identifying and conducting due
diligence of a suitable business combination, and for general
corporate matters. Through June 30, 2009, HACI had
withdrawn $5.6 million in interest income earned on the
trust proceeds for working capital requirements. Other than the
deferred underwriting commissions, no amounts are payable to the
underwriters in the event of a business combination, including
the Acquisition.
Comparison
of Results of Operations for the periods ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, HACI had a loss
before income tax expense of approximately $3.5 million.
This was a decrease of approximately $7.4 million from
income before income tax expense of approximately
$3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The decrease was primarily related to the write-off of deferred
acquisition costs of approximately $3.5 million with the
adoption of SFAS 141(R) and interest income as described
below.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, HACI earned
approximately $649,000 in interest income. Interest income
decreased from approximately $4.5 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 2008 due to a decrease in the average
interest rate from 0.8% during the six month period ended
June 30, 2008, to 0.12% during the six month period ended
June 30, 2009. The decrease in interest rates was a result
of market conditions. Additionally, there was a decrease in
average invested trust balance as well as a few days during 2009
when approximately $250.0 million of the trust was held in
a money market fund as treasury bills were not available for
investment.
Results
of Operations for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008
As of December 31, 2008, approximately $540.1 million
was held in the trust account (including $17.4 million of
deferred underwriting commissions, $7.0 million from the
sale of warrants to the Initial Stockholders and approximately
$388,000 in accrued interest). HACI had cash outside of trust of
approximately $819,000 and approximately $899,000 in accounts
payable and accrued expenses. Up to $6.6 million of
interest on the trust proceeds may be released to HACI for its
activities in connection with identifying and conducting due
diligence of a suitable business combination, and for general
corporate matters. Through December 31, 2008, HACI had
withdrawn $5.0 million from interest earned on the trust
proceeds for working capital requirements. Other than the
deferred underwriting commissions, no amounts are payable to the
underwriter in the event of a business combination. For the
twelve months ended December 31, 2008, HACI earned
approximately $7.6 million in interest income. During the
twelve months ended December 31, 2008, HACIs funds in
the trust account were invested in the JPMorgan
U.S. Treasury Plus Money Market Fund and U.S. Treasury
securities with a maturity of 180 days or less.
149
Results
of Operations for the period from February 26, 2007
(inception) through December 31, 2007
As of December 31, 2007, approximately $541.3 million
was held in the trust account (including $17.4 million of
deferred underwriting commissions, $7.0 million from the
sale of warrants to the Initial Stockholders and approximately
$5.2 million in accrued interest) and HACI had cash outside
of trust of approximately $52,000 and approximately
$1.3 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses. Up
to $6.6 million of interest on the trust proceeds may be
released to HACI for its activities in connection with
identifying and conducting due diligence of a suitable business
combination, and for general corporate matters. Through
December 31, 2007, HACI had not withdrawn any funds from
interest earned on the trust proceeds. Other than the deferred
underwriting commissions, no amounts are payable to the
underwriter in the event of a business combination.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, HACI earned
approximately $5.2 million in interest income. During the
twelve months ended December 31, 2007, all of HACIs
funds in the trust account were invested in U.S. Treasury
securities with a maturity of 90 days or less.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2009, HACI had approximately $104,000 of
cash held outside the trust and approximately $831,000 of
accounts payable accrued expenses. The following table shows the
total funds held in the trust account through June 30, 2009
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from HACIs initial public offering, the
underwriters over-allotment and private placement of
warrants that were placed in trust
|
|
$
|
518.8
|
|
Deferred underwriters commissions
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
Total interest income through June 30, 2009
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
Less total interest disbursed to HACI for working capital and
payment of taxes through June 30, 2009
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funds held in trust account at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
539.8
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, HACI disbursed
an aggregate of approximately $1.7 million, out of the
proceeds of the IPO not held in trust for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
$1.1 million for federal and state taxes; and
|
|
|
|
$613,000 of expenses in legal, accounting and filing fees
relating to HACIs SEC reporting obligations, general
corporate matters, and miscellaneous expenses.
|
HACI believes that it will have sufficient available funds
outside of the trust account to operate through
September 28, 2009. However, HACI cannot assure you this
will be the case. As of June 30, 2009, HACI anticipated
that it will incur expenses through September 28, 2009 for
the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
due diligence and investigation of prospective target businesses;
|
|
|
|
legal and accounting fees relating to HACIs SEC reporting
obligations and general corporate matters;
|
|
|
|
structuring and negotiating a business combination, including
the making of a down payment or the payment of exclusivity or
similar fees and expenses; and
|
|
|
|
other miscellaneous expenses.
|
As indicated in HACIs condensed financial statements
included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus, at
June 30, 2009, HACI had cash held out of trust of
approximately $104,000 and approximately $831,000 in accounts
payable and accrued expenses. HACI expects to incur significant
costs pursuing the Acquisition. There is no assurance that HACI
will be able to consummate the Acquisition by September 28,
2009. If the Acquisition is not consummated by
September 28, 2009, or October 5, 2009 if the Charter
Amendment becomes effective, HACI will be required to dissolve
and liquidate. HACIs financial statements do not include
any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
150
Off-Balance
Sheet Financing Arrangements
HACI has no obligations, assets or liabilities which would be
considered off-balance sheet arrangements. HACI does not
participate in transactions that create relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, often which
HACI refers to as variable interest entities, which would have
been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance
sheet arrangements.
HACI has not entered into any off-balance sheet financing
arrangements, established any special purpose entities,
guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities, or entered
into any non-financial assets.
Contractual
Obligations
HACI does not have any long-term debt, capital lease
obligations, operating lease obligations or long-term
liabilities other than a monthly fee of $10,000 for office space
and general and administrative services payable to Hicks
Holdings Operating LLC, an affiliate of HACIs founder and
chairman of the board. HACI began incurring this fee on
October 3, 2007, and will continue to incur this fee
monthly until the completion of the Acquisition, or HACIs
liquidation, in the event HACI fails to consummated the
Acquisition.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ materially from those estimates. HACI has identified the
following as its critical accounting policies:
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
HACI considers all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Such
cash and cash equivalents, at times, may exceed federally
insured limits. HACI maintains accounts with financial
institutions with high credit ratings.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents Held in Trust
Cash and cash equivalents held in trust are with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., and Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company serves as the trustee. HACI considers all
highly liquid investment placed in trust with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. These
consist of JPMorgan U.S. Treasury Plus Money Market Fund of
$18,325 at June 30, 2009 and $250,007,027 plus accrued
interest of $16,527 at December 31, 2008. There were no
cash and cash equivalents held in trust at December 31,
2007.
Marketable
Securities Held in Trust
Marketable securities held in trust are with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., and Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company serves as the trustee. The marketable
securities held in trust are invested in U.S. Treasury
bills with a maturity of 180 days or less.
Earnings
per Common Share
Earnings per share is computed by dividing net income applicable
to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. The weighted average common
shares issued and outstanding of 52,440,001, 52,440,001 and
24,002,143 used for the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, and for the
period from February 26, 2007 (inception) to
December 31, 2007, respectively, take into effect the
69,000,000 shares (less 16,559,999 shares subject to
possible redemption) outstanding for the entire second quarter
ended June 30, 2009 and the entire fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, the 13,800,000 shares outstanding
for the entire fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and the
55,200,000 shares (less
151
16,559,999 shares subject to possible redemption) sold in
the initial public offering and outstanding since
October 3, 2007.
The 76,000,000 warrants related to the IPO, HACIs private
placement and the Founders Units are contingently issuable
shares and are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per share.
Income
Taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided for the differences between
the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and
income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
to be realized.
HACI recorded a deferred income tax asset for the tax effect of
certain temporary differences, aggregating approximately
$1.4 million, $269,000 and $155,000 at June 30, 2009,
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Deferred
acquisition costs
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations, or SFAS 141R. SFAS 141R establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest
in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also
establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
This statement is effective for HACI beginning January 1,
2009. SFAS 141R is applied prospectively to business
combinations with an acquisition date on or after the effective
date. As a result of the adoption of SFAS 141R, HACI
expensed approximately $3.5 million representing a
write-off of deferred acquisition costs in its financial
statements on January 1, 2009 due to the deferred
acquisition costs related to the proposed Graham Packaging
acquisition. SFAS 141R no longer allows deferral of these
costs.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
HACI does not believe that any recently issued, but not
effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would
have a material effect on HACIs financial statements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Market risk is the sensitivity of income to changes in interest
rates, foreign exchanges, commodity prices, equity prices, and
other market-driven rates or prices. HACI is not presently
engaged in and, if HACI does not consummate the Acquisition
prior to September 28, 2009, or by October 5, 2009 if
the Charter Amendment becomes effective, HACI may not engage in,
any substantive commercial business. Accordingly, HACI is not
and, until such time as HACI consummates a business combination,
HACI will not be, exposed to risks associated with foreign
exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices or other
market-driven rates or prices. The net proceeds of HACIs
initial public offering held in the trust fund may be invested
by the trustee only in U.S. governmental treasury bills
with a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market
funds meeting certain conditions under
Rule 2a-7
under the Investment Company Act. Given HACIs limited risk
in its exposure to government securities and money market funds,
HACI does not view the interest rate risk to be significant. As
of June 30, 2009, the effective annualized interest rate
payable on HACIs investment was approximately 0.4%.
Assuming no other changes to HACIs holdings as of
June 30, 2009, a 1.0% decrease in the underlying interest
rate payable on HACIs investment as of June 30, 2009
would result in no interest earned on HACIs investment for
the following
90-day
period, and a decrease of $458,000 in stockholders equity
resulting from operations, if any, for that period.
HACI has not engaged in any hedging activities since its
inception on February 26, 2007. HACI does not expect to
engage in any hedging activities with respect to the market risk
to which it is exposed.
152
HACIS
BUSINESS
Overview
HACI is a blank check company formed in Delaware on
February 26, 2007 for the purpose of acquiring, or
acquiring control of, through a merger, capital stock exchange,
asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar
business combination one or more businesses or assets. To date,
HACIs efforts have been limited to organizational
activities, completion of its initial public offering and the
evaluation and pursuit of possible business combinations,
including the proposed Graham Packaging acquisition and the
Acquisition. HACI does not currently have any operations.
Offering
Proceeds Held in Trust Account
On October 3, 2007, HACIs completed its IPO of
55,200,000 HACI units, including 7,200,000 units issued
pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option, with each HACI unit consisting of one
share of HACI Common Stock and one HACI warrant to purchase one
share of HACI Common Stock at an exercise price of $7.50 per
share. The HACI units from the IPO were sold at an offering
price of $10.00 per unit, generating total gross proceeds of
$552.0 million. Simultaneously with the consummation of the
IPO, HACI consummated the private sale of 7,000,000 Sponsor
Warrants to the Sponsor, at a price of $1.00 per warrant,
generating gross proceeds of $7.0 million. After deducting
the underwriting discounts and commissions and the IPO expenses,
approximately $536.1 million of the proceeds from the IPO
and the private placement (including deferred underwriting
commissions that will be released to the underwriters of the IPO
upon HACIs completion of a business combination) was
deposited into a trust account at JP Morgan Chase, N.A. with
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company as
trustee.
Through June 30, 2009, HACI has drawn from the trust
account $5.6 million from interest earned on the trust
proceeds for working capital requirements and could draw up to
an additional $1.0 million for working capital. Except as
set forth above, no funds in the trust account have been
released and only the remaining interest income that HACI may
use for working capital requirements and amounts necessary for
its tax obligations will be released until the earlier of the
consummation of a business combination or the liquidation of
HACI. The trust account contained $539.8 million as of
June 30, 2009.
Acquisition
Activities
From April 2008 through July 2009, HACI explored a
potential business combination opportunity and conducted due
diligence with respect to Graham Packaging Holdings Company, or
Graham Packaging, one of the potential target companies. HACI
negotiated an equity purchase agreement, dated July 1,
2008, as amended on January 27, 2009, with Graham
Packaging, pursuant to which through a series of transactions,
HACI stockholders would have acquired control of Graham
Packaging. On August 13, 2008, GPC Capital Corp. II, an
affiliate of Graham Packaging, filed a registration statement on
Form S-4 with the SEC in connection with the contemplated Graham
Packaging transaction.
In January 2009, HACI and Graham Packaging amended the
equity purchase agreement to provide that HACI and Blackstone
Capital Partners III Merchant Banking Fund L.P., as the Seller
Representative, would each have the right to terminate the
equity purchase agreement by giving written notice to the other
and provided further that each party would be released from the
equity purchase agreements exclusivity provisions. The
amendment was entered into to allow each party to pursue other
transactions given changes in market conditions. On
July 31, 2009, HACI and Blackstone mutually agreed to
terminate the equity purchase agreement.
On August 2, 2009, HACI entered into the Acquisition
Agreement, pursuant to which, through a series of transactions,
HACIs stockholders will collectively acquire a majority of
the outstanding Company Common Stock, and the Company will own
HACI and Sellers business and operations. See The
Acquisition Agreement for more information.
153
If the Acquisition is consummated, HACI intends to use the funds
held in the trust account (i) to pay HACIs aggregate
costs, fees and expenses in connection with the consummation of
an initial business combination, (ii) to pay tax
obligations and the deferred underwriting commissions,
(iii) to pay HACI stockholders who vote against the
Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights, (iv) to pay warrantholders in connection with the
Cash Exchange, and (iv) to pay for any repurchases by HACI
of Public Shares, if any, prior to the Acquisition. The
remaining balance in the trust account will be contributed to
Aneth in exchange for a membership interest in Aneth in
connection with the Acquisition. The HACI Public Stockholders
will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account only in
the event of HACIs liquidation or if they vote against the
Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights and the Acquisition is completed. In no other
circumstances will a stockholder have any right or interest of
any kind to or in the trust account.
Selection
of a Target Business and Structuring of HACIs Initial
Business Combination
Subject to the requirements that (i) HACIs initial
business combination has a fair market value of at least 80% of
the initial amount held in the trust account (excluding deferred
underwriting commissions of approximately $17.4 million),
and (ii) HACI not enter into a business combination with
any entity engaged in the energy industry as its principal
business or whose principal business operations are conducted
outside of the United States or Canada without prior stockholder
approval to amend HACIs charter to allow for such business
combinations, HACIs management had virtually unrestricted
flexibility in identifying and selecting one or more prospective
target businesses. HACI will only consummate an initial business
combination in which HACI becomes the controlling shareholder of
the target.
Fair
Market Value of Target Business
Pursuant to HACIs charter, HACIs initial business
combination must have a fair market value of at least 80% of the
initial amount held in the trust account (excluding
$17.4 million held in the trust account representing the
deferred underwriting commissions).HACI obtained an opinion from
an unaffiliated, independent investment banking firm, Stephens
Inc., which is subject to oversight by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority as to the fair market value of the target
company required to obtain an opinion from an investment banking
firm as to the fair market value of a business.
Stockholder
Approval of the Acquisition
HACI will only consummate the Acquisition if:
|
|
|
|
|
the Charter Amendment Existence Proposal and
the Charter Amendment Purpose Proposal are
approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and
outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock as of the record date
and the Warrant Amendment Proposal is approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in interest of the
shares of HACI Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Public
Warrants as of the record date;
|
|
|
|
the Acquisition Proposal is approved by the affirmative vote of
a majority of the issued and outstanding HACI Common Stock as of
the record date; and
|
|
|
|
no more than 30% of the Public Shares less one share vote
against the Acquisition Proposal and properly exercise their
conversion rights.
|
In addition, the approval of the Warrant Amendment Proposal by
the HACI Public Warrantholders, the approval of the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal and the Acquisition
Proposal are each a closing condition under the Acquisition
Agreement.
In connection with the IPO, the Initial Stockholders agreed to
vote:
|
|
|
|
|
all of their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of
the votes cast with respect to an initial business combination
by the Public Stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any Public Shares acquired in or after the IPO in favor of an
initial business combination; and
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
all shares of HACI Common Stock held by them in favor of
amending HACIs charter to provide for its perpetual
existence.
|
This voting arrangement does not apply to any proposal other
than the Acquisition Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal and the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal. If the Initial
Stockholders or HACIs officers and directors purchase
Public Shares from existing HACI Public Stockholders that are
likely to vote against the Acquisition Proposal or that are
likely to elect to exercise their conversion rights, the
probability that the business combination will succeed would
increase.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Founder Warrants and
Sponsor Warrants are also being amended pursuant to the Warrant
Amendment, to permit the cancellation of 4,600,000 Founder
Warrants and transfer of 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants, as
contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement. Such amendment
requires the consent of a majority of the Founder Warrants and a
majority of the Sponsor Warrants. The Initial Stockholders,
which hold all of the outstanding Founder Warrants and Sponsor
Warrants, have indicated to HACI their intention to consent to
such amendment.
Voting against the Acquisition Proposal at the special meeting
of HACI stockholders will not result in the conversion of a HACI
stockholders Public Shares into cash. To do so, each HACI
stockholder seeking conversion must follow the conversion
procedures described below.
Conversion
Rights
As a result of the proposed Acquisition, each HACI Public
Stockholder has the right to vote against the Acquisition
Proposal and demand that HACI convert its Public Shares into a
pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the trust
account on the closing date of the Acquisition, before payment
of deferred underwriting commissions and including interest
earned on its pro rata portion of the trust account, net of
income taxes payable on such interest and net of interest income
of up to $6.6 million on the trust account previously
released to HACI to fund its working capital, if the Acquisition
is approved and completed. HACI expects that the conversion
price will be less than the per unit IPO price of $10.00 per
unit. The Initial Stockholders will not have conversion rights
with respect to the Founder Shares purchased by them prior to
the IPO.
A HACI Public Stockholder who wishes to exercise its conversion
rights may request conversion of its Public Shares at any time
after the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus and prior
to the vote taken with respect to the Acquisition Proposal, but
the request will not be granted unless the HACI Public
Stockholder votes against the Acquisition Proposal, the
Acquisition is approved and completed, the HACI Public
Stockholder holds its shares through the closing of the
Acquisition and the HACI Public Stockholder follows the specific
procedures for conversion set forth in this proxy
statement/prospectus. If a HACI Public Stockholder votes against
the Acquisition Proposal but fails to properly exercise its
conversion rights, such stockholder will not have its shares of
HACI Common Stock converted into cash. HACI will not complete
the Acquisition if HACI Public Stockholders owning 30% or more
of the Public Shares exercise their conversion rights. Because
the conversion price will likely be lower than the $10.00 per
unit offering price of the HACI units, and may be less than the
market price of HACI Common Stock on the date of conversion,
there may be a disincentive on the part of the HACI Public
Stockholders to exercise their conversion rights.
Procedures
Required for Conversion
A HACI Public Stockholder may request conversion at any time
after the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus and prior
to the votes taken with respect to the Acquisition Proposal at
the special meeting of HACI stockholders. Any request for
conversion, once made, may be withdrawn at any time prior to the
date of the special meeting. If a HACI Public Stockholder wishes
to exercise its conversion rights, the stockholder must vote
against the Acquisition Proposal, demand that HACI convert its
Public Shares into cash by marking the appropriate space on the
proxy card and provide physical or electronic delivery of such
stockholders stock certificates or shares, as appropriate,
as described below, prior to the special meeting of HACI
stockholders. If, notwithstanding the stockholders vote,
the Acquisition is consummated and the stockholder follows the
procedures required for conversion, then the stockholder will be
entitled to receive a pro rata share of the trust
155
account, before payment of deferred underwriting discounts and
including interest earned on its pro rata portion of the trust
account, net of income taxes payable on such interest and net of
interest income of up to $6.6 million on the trust account
released to HACI to fund its working capital. A HACI Public
Stockholder will not be able to transfer its shares following
the approval of the Acquisition Proposal unless the Acquisition
Agreement is terminated. A HACI Public Stockholder who exercises
its conversion rights will exchange the Public Shares held by
such stockholder for cash and will no longer own those shares.
If the Acquisition is not consummated, then a stockholders
shares will not be converted into cash and will be returned to
the stockholder, even if such stockholder elected to convert.
HACI anticipates that the funds to be distributed to HACI Public
Stockholders who elect conversion will be distributed promptly
after completion of the Acquisition.
HACI Public Stockholders must tender their shares to Continental
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, the transfer
agent for HACI, prior to the special meeting of HACI
stockholders or deliver their shares to the transfer agent
electronically using the Depository Trust Companys
DWAC (Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) System.
In order to physically deliver stock certificates, the HACI
Public Stockholders must comply with the following steps. If the
shares are held in street name, a HACI Public Stockholder must
instruct its account executive at its bank or broker to withdraw
the shares from the HACI Public Stockholders account and
request that a physical certificate be issued in the HACI Public
Stockholders name. No later than the day prior to the
special meeting of HACI stockholders, a HACI Public Stockholder
must present a written instruction to Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company that it wishes to
convert its shares into cash and confirm that the HACI Public
Stockholder has held the shares since the record date and will
not sell or transfer the shares prior to the closing of the
Acquisition. Certificates that have not been tendered in
accordance with these procedures by the day prior to the special
meeting of HACI stockholders will not be converted into cash. In
the event that a HACI Public Stockholder tenders its shares and
decides prior to the special meeting of HACI stockholders that
it does not want to convert its shares, the HACI Public
Stockholder may withdraw its tender. In the event that a HACI
Public Stockholder tenders shares and the Acquisition is not
completed, these shares will not be converted into cash and the
physical certificates representing the shares will be returned
to the HACI Public Stockholder.
Liquidation
if No Business Combination
HACIs charter provides that its corporate existence will
automatically cease on September 28, 2009, except for the
purposes of winding up HACIs affairs and liquidating
pursuant to Section 278 of the DGCL. This has the same
effect as if HACIs board of directors and stockholders had
formally voted to approve its dissolution pursuant to
Section 275 of the DGCL. Limiting its corporate existence
to a specified date as permitted by Section 102(b)(5) of
the DGCL removes the necessity to obtain formal stockholder
approval of the dissolution and liquidation and to file a
certificate of dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State.
Instead, HACI will notify the Delaware Secretary of State in
writing on the termination date that its corporate existence is
ceasing, and include with such notice payment of any franchise
taxes then due to or assessable by the state. HACI views this
provision terminating its corporate life by September 28,
2009, as an obligation to its stockholders and will not take any
action to amend or waive this provision to allow it to survive
for a longer period of time except in connection with the
consummation of its initial business combination.
If HACI is unable to consummate the Acquisition by
September 28, 2009, or October 5, 2009 if the Charter
Amendment becomes effective, as soon as practicable thereafter
HACI will adopt a plan of distribution in accordance with
Section 281(b) of the DGCL. Section 278 of the DGCL
provides that HACIs existence will continue for at least
three years after its expiration for the purpose of prosecuting
and defending suits, whether civil, criminal or administrative,
by or against HACI, and of enabling HACI gradually to settle and
close its business, to dispose of and convey its property, to
discharge its liabilities and to distribute to its stockholders
any remaining assets, but not for the purpose of continuing the
business for which it was organized. HACIs existence will
continue automatically even beyond the three-year period for the
purpose of completing the prosecution or defense of suits begun
prior to the expiration of the three-year period, until such
time as any judgments, orders or decrees resulting from such
suits are fully executed. Section 281(b) will
156
require HACI to pay or make reasonable provision for all
then-existing claims and obligations, including all contingent,
conditional, or unmatured contractual claims known to HACI, and
to make such provision as will be reasonably likely to be
sufficient to provide compensation for any then-pending claims
and for claims that have not been made known to HACI or that
have not arisen but that, based on facts known to HACI at the
time, are likely to arise or to become known to HACI within
10 years after the date of dissolution. Under
Section 281(b), the plan of distribution must provide for
all of such claims to be paid in full or make provision for
payments to be made in full, as applicable, if there are
sufficient assets. If there are insufficient assets, the plan
must provide that such claims and obligations be paid or
provided for according to their priority and, among claims of
equal priority, ratably to the extent of legally available
assets. Any remaining assets will be available for distribution
to HACIs stockholders. HACI will distribute to all of the
HACI Public Stockholders, in proportion to their respective
equity interests, an aggregate sum equal to the amount in the
trust account, inclusive of any interest, plus any remaining net
assets (subject to HACIs obligations under Delaware law to
provide for claims of creditors as described below).
HACI anticipates notifying the trustee of the trust account to
begin liquidating such assets promptly after its dissolution and
anticipates it will take no more than 10 business days to
effectuate such distribution. The Initial Stockholders have
waived their rights to participate in any liquidation
distribution with respect to the shares of HACI Common Stock
purchased by them prior to HACIs initial public offering.
There will be no distribution from the trust account with
respect to HACIs warrants, which will expire worthless.
HACI will pay the costs of liquidation from its remaining assets
outside of the trust account. If the assets remaining outside of
the trust account are insufficient to pay such liquidation
costs, HACI will pay the remaining liquidation costs from the
proceeds of the trust account prior to distributing the funds in
the trust account to HACI Public Stockholders. In such event,
the initial per-share liquidation price could be less than the
$9.78 per-share liquidation price described below.
If HACI does not complete the Acquisition by September 28,
2009, or October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes
effective and expends all of the net proceeds of its initial
public offering, other than the proceeds deposited in the trust
account, and without taking into account interest, if any,
earned on the trust account, the initial per-share liquidation
price would be $9.78, or $0.22 less than the
per-unit
initial public offering price of $10.00. The per share
liquidation price includes approximately $5.5 million in
deferred underwriting commissions that would also be
distributable to HACI Public Stockholders.
The proceeds deposited in the trust account could, however,
become subject to the claims of HACIs creditors (which
could include vendors and service providers HACI has engaged to
assist it in connection with its search for a target business
and that are owed money by HACI, as well as target businesses
themselves) which could have higher priority than the claims of
HACI Public Stockholders. Mr. Hicks, HACIs founder
and chairman of the board, has agreed that he will be liable to
HACI if and to the extent any claims by a third party for
services rendered or products sold to HACI, or by a prospective
target business, reduce the amounts in the trust account
available for distribution to HACI stockholders in the event of
a liquidation, except as to (i) any claims by a third party
who executed a waiver (even if such waiver is subsequently found
to be invalid and unenforceable) of any and all rights to seek
access to the funds in the trust account, or (ii) any
claims under HACIs indemnity of the underwriters of its
initial public offering against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act. In the event that this
indemnity obligation arose and Mr. Hicks did not comply
with such obligation, HACI believes that it would have an
obligation to seek enforcement of the obligation and that its
board of directors would have a fiduciary duty to seek
enforcement of such obligation on HACIs behalf. In the
event Mr. Hicks has liability to HACI under this
indemnification arrangement, HACI cannot assure you that he will
have the assets necessary to satisfy those obligations.
Accordingly, the actual per-share liquidation price could be
less than $9.78, plus interest, due to claims of creditors.
Additionally, if HACI is forced to file a bankruptcy case or an
involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against HACI which is not
dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be
subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in
HACIs bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third
parties with priority over the claims of HACIs
stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the
trust account, HACI cannot assure you that it will be able to
return to the HACI Public Stockholders at least $9.78 per share.
157
Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by
third parties against a corporation to the extent of
distributions received by them in a dissolution. If the
corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in
Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes
reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a
60-day
notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought
against the corporation, a
90-day
period during which the corporation may reject any claims
brought, and an additional
150-day
waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to
stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a
liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such
stockholders pro rata share of the claim or the amount
distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the
stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the
dissolution. However, HACI does not intend to comply with those
procedures since, as stated above, it is HACIs intention
to make liquidating distributions to its stockholders as soon as
reasonably possible after September 28, 2009, or
October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes effective
in the event its initial business combination has not been
consummated. As such, HACIs stockholders could potentially
be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received
by them (but no more) and any liability of HACIs
stockholders may extend beyond the third anniversary of such
date. Because HACI will not be complying with Section 280,
Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires HACI to adopt a plan
that will provide for the payment, based on facts known to HACI
at such time, of (i) all existing claims, (ii) all
pending claims and (iii) all claims that may be potentially
brought against HACI within the subsequent 10 years.
Accordingly, HACI would be required to provide for any claims of
creditors known to it at that time or those that it believes
could be potentially brought against it within the subsequent
10 years prior to its distributing the funds in the trust
account to HACI Public Stockholders. As a result, if HACI
liquidates, the per-share distribution from the trust account
could be less than $9.78 due to claims or potential claims of
creditors. However, because HACI is a blank check company,
rather than an operating company, and its operations will be
limited to searching for prospective target businesses to
acquire, the most likely claims, if any, to arise would be from
HACIs vendors and service providers (such as accountants,
lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) and potential target
businesses.
If HACI is forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary
bankruptcy case is filed against it which is not dismissed, any
distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under
applicable debtor/creditor
and/or
bankruptcy laws as either a preferential transfer or
a fraudulent conveyance. As a result, a bankruptcy
court could seek to recover all amounts received by HACI
stockholders. Furthermore, because HACI intends to distribute
the then-remaining proceeds held in the trust account, this may
be viewed or interpreted as giving preference to HACI Public
Stockholders over any potential creditors with respect to access
to or distributions from HACIs assets. Furthermore,
HACIs board of directors may be viewed as having breached
its fiduciary duties to HACIs creditors
and/or may
have acted in bad faith, and thereby exposed itself and HACI to
claims of punitive damages, by paying HACI Public Stockholders
from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of
creditors. HACI cannot assure you that claims will not be
brought against it for these reasons.
Competition
In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business for a
business combination, HACI encountered intense competition from
other entities having a business objective similar to
HACIs, including other blank check companies, private
equity groups and leveraged buyout funds, and operating
businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these
entities are well established and have extensive experience
identifying and effecting business combinations directly or
through affiliates. Moreover, many of these competitors possess
greater financial, technical, human and other resources than
HACI. HACIs ability to acquire larger target businesses is
limited by its available financial resources. This inherent
limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition
of a target business. Furthermore:
|
|
|
|
|
HACIs charter prohibits HACI from engaging in a business
combination with any entity engaged in the energy industry as
its principal business or whose principal operations are
conducted outside of the United States or Canada, without first
obtaining the approval of HACIs stockholders to the
charter amendment and amending HACIs charter to allow for
such combinations, all of which may delay or preclude HACI from
completing the Acquisition;
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
HACIs obligation to seek stockholder approval of a
business combination or obtain necessary financial information
may delay the completion of the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
HACIs obligation to repurchase for cash shares of common
stock held by HACI Public Stockholders who vote against the
business combination and exercise their conversion rights may
reduce the resources available to HACI for the Acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
HACI will not consummate the Acquisition if holders of more than
30% (minus one share) of outstanding shares of HACI Common Stock
sold in the IPO exercise their conversion rights;
|
Due to any of these factors, HACI may face competitive
disadvantage in successfully consummating the Acquisition.
Administrative
Services Agreement
HACI has agreed to pay Hicks Operating Company LLC, an entity
owned and controlled by Mr. Hicks, HACIs founder and
chairman of the board, a total of $10,000 per month for office
space and administrative services, including secretarial
support. This arrangement was agreed to by HACI and Hicks
Operating Company LLC for HACIs benefit and is not
intended to provide Mr. Hicks compensation in lieu of a
salary. HACI believes that such fees are at least as favorable
as it could have obtained from an unaffiliated third party for
such services. Upon completion of the Acquisition or HACIs
liquidation, HACI will cease paying these monthly fees.
Facilities
HACI currently maintains its executive offices at 100 Crescent
Court, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201. The cost of this
space is included in the $10,000 per month fee described above
that Hicks Operating Company LLC charges HACI for general and
administrative services. HACI believes, based on rents and fees
for similar services in the Dallas metropolitan area that the
fee charged by Hicks Operating Company LLC is at least as
favorable as HACI could have obtained from an unaffiliated
person. HACI considers its current office space adequate for its
current operations.
Employees
HACI currently has seven officers. These individuals are not
obligated to devote any specific number of hours to HACIs
matters but they intend to devote as much of their time as they
deem necessary to HACIs affairs until HACI has consummated
its initial business combination. HACI does not intend to have
any full-time employees prior to the consummation of its initial
business combination.
Periodic
Reporting and Audited Financial Statements
HACI has registered its units, common stock and warrants under
the Exchange Act, and has reporting obligations, including the
requirement that it file annual, quarterly and current reports
with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the
Exchange Act, HACIs annual reports on
Form 10-K
contain financial statements audited and reported on by its
independent registered public accountants. HACIs reports
filed with the SEC can be inspected and copied at the SECs
public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information
about the operation of the public reference room by calling the
SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains a website at
http://www.sec.gov
which contains the registration statements, reports, proxy and
information statements and information regarding issuers that
file electronically with the SEC. HACI will provide electronic
or paper copies of such materials free of charge upon request.
Legal
Proceedings
HACI is not currently subject to any material legal proceedings,
nor, to its knowledge, is any material legal proceeding
threatened against it. From time to time, HACI may be a party to
certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of its
business. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, HACI does not expect that these
proceedings will have a material effect upon its financial
condition or results of operations.
159
Stock
Price Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total return of HACI
Common Stock from October 8, 2007, the date that HACI
Common Stock first became separately tradable, through
December 31, 2008 with the comparable cumulative return of
two indices, the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones Industrial
Average Index. The graph plots the growth in value of an initial
investment of $100 in HACI Common Stock, the Dow Jones
Industrial Average Index and the S&P 500 Index over the
indicated time periods, and assuming reinvestment of all
dividends, if any, paid on its securities. HACI has not paid any
cash dividends and, therefore, the cumulative total return
calculation for HACI is based solely upon stock price
appreciation and not upon reinvestment of cash dividends. The
stock price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily
indicative of future price performance.
160
HACI
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
HACI
Executive Officers and Directors
Set forth in the table below are the names, ages and positions
of each of HACIs directors and executive officers as of
September 11, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions
|
|
Thomas O. Hicks
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Joseph B. Armes
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
|
Eric C. Neuman
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
Robert M. Swartz
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
Christina Weaver Vest
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Secretary and Vice President
|
Mack H. Hicks
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Vice President
|
William H. Cunningham
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
William A. Montgomery
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
Brian Mulroney
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
William F. Quinn
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
HACI
Directors
The following individuals, along with the four director nominees
named in this proxy statement/prospectus, serve on HACIs
board of directors.
Thomas O. Hicks HACIs founder, has been
HACIs chairman of the board since its inception. From
HACIs inception until August 2007, Mr. Hicks also
served as HACIs president and chief executive officer.
Since 2005, Mr. Hicks has served as the chairman of Hicks
Holdings LLC, or Hicks Holdings, a holding company for sports,
real estate and private equity investments of Mr. Hicks and
his family, including the National Hockey Leagues Dallas
Stars, purchased in December 1995, Major League Baseballs
Texas Rangers, acquired in June 1998 and a 50% interest in the
English Premier Leagues Liverpool Football Club, acquired
in March 2007. Hicks Holdings is also the controlling
stockholder of Latrobe Specialty Steel Company, a specialty
steel manufacturer. Its other corporate holdings include
DirecPath, a company that provides bundled DIRECTV programming,
broadband voice and data services, security and other locally
based services to multiple dwelling units across the United
States, Ocular LCD, Inc., a designer, manufacturer and marketer
of high-performance liquid crystal displays, modules and
systems, Grupo Pilar, an animal and pet food company in
Argentina and Anvita Health, a provider of decision support
systems for healthcare professionals. Mr. Hicks co-founded
Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst, a nationally prominent
private equity firm in the United States that specialized in
leveraged acquisitions, and served as chairman from 1989 through
2004. During Mr. Hicks tenure as chairman, Hicks Muse
raised over $12 billion of private equity funds, and
consummated over $50 billion of leveraged acquisitions, and
was one of the most active private investment firms in the
country. Mr. Hicks also co-founded and served as co-chief
executive officer of the leveraged buy-out firm
Hicks & Haas from 1984 until 1989. Mr. Hicks
received a Masters of Business Administration degree from
the University of Southern California in 1970 and a Bachelor of
Business Administration degree from the University of Texas in
1968. Mr. Hicks is the father of Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.,
HACIs secretary and one of HACIs vice presidents,
and Mack Hicks, a vice president of HACI.
In Mr. Hicks position as HACIs chairman, he has
general supervision and control of HACIs acquisition
activities subject to the ultimate authority of HACIs
board of directors and is responsible for the execution of the
policies of its board of directors with respect to such matters.
161
William F. Quinn has served as a director of HACI
since the closing of its initial public offering. Mr. Quinn
serves as the Chairman of American Beacon Advisors, Inc., which
has responsibility for the management of American Airlines
pension and short-term fixed income assets. Prior to being named
to his current position, Mr. Quinn served as both Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer from April 2006 to December 2007,
President from November 1986 to April 2006 and director since
2001. Mr. Quinn also served as a trustee of American Beacon
Advisors, Inc. and related mutual funds from 1987 until April
2008. He currently serves as chairman of Lighthouse Holdings,
Inc. From 1994 until August 2007, Mr. Quinn served as a
trust manager of Crescent Real Estate Equities Company. Prior to
his positions with American Beacon Advisors, Inc.,
Mr. Quinn held several management positions with American
Airlines and its subsidiaries. He has served as a director of
the Board of American Airlines Federal Credit Union from July
1979 to present, including serving as Chairman of the Board from
November 1989 to May 2003, and currently serves as chairman of
the United Way of Tarrant County where he has been a director
since 2005 (with prior tenure from
1988-2000)
and a director of the Association for Financial Professionals
since 2006. Mr. Quinn served as the Chairman of the
Committee on the Investment of Employee Benefit Assets (CIEBA)
from 2006 to 2008 and currently serves on the advisory board of
the Dallas Society of Financial Analysts. Mr. Quinn has
served on the advisory board for Southern Methodist
Universitys Endowment Fund since September 1996, the
investment committee of the United Way of Tarrant Countys
Endowment funds since 1999 and is currently serving his third
term on the New York Stock Exchange Pension Management Advisory
Committee. Mr. Quinn received a Bachelor of Science degree
in Accounting from Fordham University in 1969 and is a Certified
Public Accountant. Mr. Quinn is the father of William J. Quinn,
who is a member of Resolutes board of directors and who
will serve as a member of the Companys board of directors
upon the closing of the Acquisition.
HACI
Executive Officers
Eric C. Neuman has been a senior vice president of
HACI since its inception. Mr. Neuman currently serves as a
managing director and partner of Hicks Equity Partners LLC, and
previously served from 2005 until April 2007 as a senior vice
president of its affiliate, Hicks Holdings. Mr. Neuman has
been a partner of HM Capital (formerly Hicks, Muse,
Tate & Furst), since 2000 and has served as an officer
since 1993. At HM Capital, he was involved in the acquisition of
most of the firms media investments during that time
period. In 2002, Mr. Neuman became responsible for HM
Capitals Latin American portfolio, and he remains
responsible for monitoring the remaining investments in this
portfolio and overseeing their liquidation. Mr. Neuman
currently serves on the board of directors of DirecPath, LLC. In
addition, Mr. Neuman currently serves as a director of
several HM Capital portfolio companies, including Claxson
Interactive Group, Inc., a British Virgin Islands media company
that distributes entertainment to the Spanish and Portuguese
speaking world, Intercable, an international provider of
television, internet and telephone services, Fox Pan American
Sports LLC, an international sports programming and production
company and Persona Cable, Inc., a cable, television, internet
and telecommunications provider in Canada. Prior to joining HM
Capital in 1993, Mr. Neuman served for eight years as
managing director of Communications Partners, Ltd., a private
merchant bank focused on media and communications businesses.
From 2001 until September, 2006, Mr. Neuman was a director
of Cablevision S.A., the leading Argentine cable company.
Following the devaluation of the Argentine peso in 2002,
Cablevision S.A. entered into a consensual restructuring
agreement under Argentine law with the majority of its
creditors, which was approved by the Argentine courts. From 1976
to 1983, he served as Senior Vice President of InterFirst Bank
in Dallas and President of First Dallas Capital, a small
business investment company. Mr. Neuman received a
Bachelors of Arts degree from the University of South Florida in
1967 and a Masters of Business Administration, with distinction,
from Northwestern University in 1970.
Robert M. Swartz has been a senior vice president
of HACI since September 2007. Mr. Swartz currently serves
as a managing director and partner of Hicks Equity Partners LLC.
In 2009, Mr. Swartz was elected to the Board of Directors
of Anvita Health. From 1999 until 2007, Mr. Swartz served
in various positions at Centex Corporation, a New York Stock
Exchange home building company, serving as Senior Vice President
of Strategic Planning and Mergers and Acquisitions from 1999 to
2000 and serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Centex HomeTeam Services from 2000 to 2007. From 1997 until
1999, Mr. Swartz served as Executive Vice President of
FirstPlus Financial Group, Inc., a consumer finance company in
Dallas,
162
Texas. In 1996, Mr. Swartz served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of AMRE, Inc. a nationwide home services
provider. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Swartz served as President
of Recognition International, an NYSE high-technology company
and previously served from 1990 to 1993 as that companys
Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Swartz received a Bachelors of
Science degree in accounting from the State University of New
York in Albany in 1973 and a Master of Business Administration
degree in finance from New Hampshire College in 1976.
Mr. Swartz is a Certified Public Accountant.
Christina Weaver Vest has been a senior vice
president of HACI since its inception. Ms. Vest currently
serves as a managing director and partner of Hicks Equity
Partners LLC, and previously served from 2005 until April 2007
as a senior vice president of its affiliate, Hicks Holdings.
Prior to joining Hicks Holdings, and until 2008, Ms. Vest
served as a Principal at HM Capital (formerly Hicks, Muse,
Tate & Furst), which she joined in 1995. At HM
Capital, Ms. Vest principally focused on the firms
domestic branded consumer products investments as well as on
several Latin American media investments. Ms. Vest
currently serves as a director of Ocular LCD Inc. and of Anvita
Health. She is also a director of various Hicks, Muse,
Tate & Furst portfolio companies, including Sturm
Foods, Inc., a global dry grocery manufacturer for both retail
and food service industries and Fox Pan American Sports, an
international sports programming and production company.
Ms. Vest received a Bachelors of Arts degree from Harvard
University in 1993 and a Masters of Business
Administration degree from Harvard Business School in 1999.
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr. has been a vice
president of HACI since its inception and has served as
HACIs secretary since August 2007. Since 2005,
Mr. Hicks has served as a vice president of Hicks Holdings.
Since 2008, he has served as Executive Vice President of Hicks
Sports Group and since 2007, Alternate Governor for the Dallas
Stars Hockey Club. From 2003 to 2005, Mr. Hicks served as
director of corporate sales and suite sales for the Texas
Rangers Baseball Club. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Hicks was an
analyst at Greenhill & Co. LLC, a New York based
merchant banking firm. As an analyst, Mr. Hicks was
involved in numerous private equity, mergers and acquisition
advisory and financial restructuring transactions.
Mr. Hicks currently serves as a director of the English
Premier Leagues Liverpool Football Club. Mr. Hicks
received a Bachelors of Arts degree in government from the
University of Texas at Austin in 2001. He currently serves as
the Chairman of the Campaign for Children in Crisis for Big
Brother Big Sisters Organization of North Texas, and is on the
boards of Big Brothers Big Sisters of North Texas, the Texas
Rangers Foundation, Capital for Kids, SMU Athletic Forum and the
University of Texas at Arlington Development Board.
Mr. Hicks is the son of Thomas O. Hicks, HACIs
founder and chairman of the board, and the brother of Mack H.
Hicks, one of HACIs vice presidents.
Mack H. Hicks has been a vice president of HACI
since its inception. Since January 2007, Mr. Hicks has
served as a vice president of Hicks Holdings LLC. From January
2006 to December 2006, Mr. Hicks served as a research
analyst at Halcyon Asset Management LLC, a multi-strategy
investment firm. From June 2004 to January 2006, he served as an
analyst in the financial sponsors group of Credit Suisse, an
investment banking firm. As an analyst, Mr. Hicks was
involved with several leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations and
acquisitions. Mr. Hicks received a Bachelors of Arts degree
from the University of Texas at Austin in 2003. He currently
serves as a director for Wahanda, an online health, beauty and
wellness company based in the United Kingdom. Mr. Hicks
also serves on the board of Dallas Providence Homes, a
transformational housing ministry for victims of domestic
violence. Mr. Hicks is the son of Thomas O. Hicks,
HACIs founder and chairman of the board, and the brother
of Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., HACIs secretary and one of
its vice presidents.
HACI
Board of Directors and Committees
HACI is managed under the direction of its board of directors.
Its board of directors is divided into three classes of
directors and each class serves a three year term. The HACI
board of directors presently has one regular committee, the
audit committee. The audit committee charter, as well as
HACIs Codes of Ethics, are posted on HACIs website
at
http://www.hicksacquisition.com.
These documents are available free of charge to any stockholder
from HACIs corporate secretary upon written request.
Requests should be addressed to: Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.,
secretary, Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., 100 Crescent
Court, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201.
163
During 2008, the HACI board of directors met 6 times and the
audit committee met 4 times. Each of the directors attended at
least 75% of the meetings of the board of directors and their
respective regular committees. HACI does not have a policy
regarding director attendance at annual meetings, but encourages
the directors to attend if possible.
HACI
Audit Committee
HACIs audit committee currently consists of
Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Mulroney and Mr. Quinn, all
of whom meet the relevant standards of independence.
Mr. Quinn currently serves as chairman of the audit
committee. The audit committees duties, which are
specified in the Audit Committee Charter, include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent
auditor the annual audited financial statements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
discussing with management and the independent auditor
significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in
connection with the preparation of HACIs financial
statements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
discussing with management major risk assessment and risk
management policies;
|
|
|
|
monitoring the independence of the independent auditor;
|
|
|
|
verifying the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit
partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the
audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit as required by
law;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving all related-party transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
inquiring and discussing with management HACIs compliance
with applicable laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit
services to be performed by HACIs independent auditor,
including the fees and terms of the services to be performed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
appointing or replacing the independent auditor;
|
|
|
|
determining the compensation and oversight of the work of the
independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements
between management and the independent auditor regarding
financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an
audit report or related work; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment
of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls or reports which raise material issues
regarding HACIs financial statements or accounting
policies.
|
Prior to the completion of an initial business combination, the
audit committee will also monitor compliance on a quarterly
basis with the terms described below and the other material
terms relating to HACIs initial public offering. If any
noncompliance is identified, then the audit committee will be
charged with the responsibility to immediately take all action
necessary to rectify such noncompliance or otherwise cause
compliance with the terms of HACIs initial public offering.
There will be no fees or other cash payments paid to HACIs
existing stockholders, officers, directors or their affiliates
prior to, or for any services they render in order to
effectuate, the consummation of the initial business combination
(regardless of the type of transaction that it is) other than:
|
|
|
|
|
HACIs repayment on October 3, 2007 of a $225,000 loan
that is non-interest bearing made to HACI by Mr. Hicks to
cover operating expenses;
|
|
|
|
a payment of an aggregate of $10,000 per month to Hicks Holdings
Operating, an affiliate of Mr. Hicks, for office space,
secretarial and administrative services; and
|
|
|
|
reimbursements for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with actions on HACIs behalf, such as
identifying potential target businesses and performing due
diligence on suitable business combinations.
|
164
The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of
independent directors as defined by the NYSE Amex
who, as required by NYSE Amex, are able to read and understand
fundamental financial statements, including a companys
balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.
In addition, HACI must certify to NYSE Amex that the committee
has, and will continue to have, at least one member who has past
employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite
professional certification in accounting, or other comparable
experience or background that results in the individuals
financial sophistication. HACIs board of directors has
determined that Mr. Quinn satisfies NYSE Amexs
definition of financial sophistication and also qualifies as an
audit committee financial expert, as defined under
rules and regulations of the SEC.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
HACI does not have a standing compensation committee for the
purpose of determining compensation for executives and directors
because no current executive officer or director receives any
cash or other compensation for services rendered to HACI. Joseph
B. Armes, HACIs President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer serves on the board of directors.
However, HACIs board of directors did not engage in any
deliberations regarding executive compensation during the last
fiscal year. No interlocking relationship exists between
HACIs executive officers and HACIs board of
directors or compensation committee of any other company.
HACI
Nominating Committee
HACI does not have a standing nominating committee because it
wishes to have the input of all of the independent members of
the board of directors regarding director nominees. Each of
Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn
participate in the consideration of director nominees.
The independent members of HACIs board of directors
consider and identify candidates for the board of directors with
the goal of creating a balance of knowledge and experience. When
reviewing possible candidates, the independent members of the
board of directors will review the context of the current
composition of HACIs board of directors, the operating
requirements of the business and the long-term interests of the
HACI stockholders.
The independent members of HACIs board of directors will
consider director candidates recommended by stockholders,
provided they meet the requirements of HACI bylaws. If a
stockholder would like HACIs board of directors to
consider specific candidates for nomination at the special
meeting to HACIs board of directors, a stockholder should
deliver written notice to HACIs secretary at Hicks
Acquisition Company I, Inc., 100 Crescent Court,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201. Written notice of such
proposed candidates for director should be delivered no later
than the 10th day following public announcement of the date
of the meeting. If the Acquisition is consummated, HACI will be
a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. If the Acquisition is
not consummated prior to September 28, 2009, or
October 5, 2009 if the Charter Amendment becomes effective,
HACI will be required to dissolve and liquidate and will conduct
no annual meetings thereafter. The written notice should include
the candidates full name, age, address, biographical
background, occupation, and qualifications, as well as how many
shares of capital stock owned by such person. The stockholder
providing notice must follow all requirements set forth in
HACIs bylaws. A copy of HACIs bylaws may be
requested from HACIs secretary at Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc., 100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75201. In addition, a copy of HACIs bylaws
was furnished to the SEC as Exhibit 3.2 to HACIs
Form 8-K,
filed on October 5, 2007.
The independent members of HACIs board of directors will
evaluate each candidate for election to the board of directors
based upon whether the candidate:
|
|
|
|
|
is independent pursuant to the requirements of NYSE Amex;
|
|
|
|
|
|
is accomplished in his or her field and has a reputation, both
personally and professionally, that is consistent with
HACIs image and reputation;
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
has the ability to read and understand basic financial
statements, and, if applicable, satisfies the criteria for being
an audit committee financial expert as defined by
the SEC;
|
|
|
|
has relevant experience and expertise and would be able to
provide insights and practical wisdom based upon that experience
and expertise;
|
|
|
|
|
|
has knowledge of HACIs business and the issues affecting
HACIs business;
|
|
|
|
|
|
is committed to enhancing stockholder value;
|
|
|
|
fully understands, or has the capacity to fully understand, the
legal responsibilities of a director and the governance
processes of a public company;
|
|
|
|
is of high moral and ethical character and would be willing to
apply sound, objective and independent business judgment, and to
assume broad fiduciary responsibility;
|
|
|
|
has, or would be willing to commit, the required hours necessary
to discharge the duties of membership on the board of directors;
|
|
|
|
has any prohibitive interlocking relationships or conflicts of
interest;
|
|
|
|
is able to develop a good working relationship with other
members of the board of directors and contribute to their
working with the senior management; and
|
|
|
|
is able to suggest business opportunities.
|
Communications
with HACI Board of Directors
HACIs board of directors provides a process for HACI
stockholders and interested parties to send communications to
the board of directors or any individual director. HACI
stockholders and interested parties may forward communications
to the board of directors or any individual director through
HACIs secretary. Communications should be addressed to the
corporate secretary, Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.,
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201. All
communications will be compiled by HACIs secretary and
submitted to the board of directors or the individual directors
on a periodic basis.
HACI
Director Independence
HACIs board of directors undertook a review of director
independence and considered transactions and relationships
between each of the nominees and directors, and HACI and
determined that each of
Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn are
independent directors, as defined by the applicable NYSE Amex
and SEC standards.
HACI Code
of Ethics
HACI adopted a codes of ethics that applies to its officers,
board of directors and employees. The Code of Ethics is posted
on its website, found at
http://www.hicksacquisition.com
(HACI intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under
Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding an amendment to or waiver from a provision of this
code of ethics, if any, by posting such information on its
website).
HACI
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation
of Executive Officers and Directors of HACI
None of the executive officers or directors of HACI received any
cash compensation for services rendered. Since the closing of
the IPO, HACI has paid Hicks Holdings Operating LLC, an entity
owned and controlled by Mr. Hicks, HACIs founder and
chairman of the board, a total of $10,000 per month for office
space and administrative services, including secretarial
support. This arrangement will continue until (1) HACI
completes the Acquisition or (2) HACIs liquidation,
whichever occurs first. This arrangement was agreed to by Hicks
Holdings Operating LLC for the benefit of HACI and is not
intended to provide Mr. Hicks compensation in lieu of a
salary. HACI believes that such fees are at least as favorable
as it could have
166
obtained from an unaffiliated third party for such services.
Mr. Armes serves as an executive officer of Hicks Holdings
Operating LLC. Other than this $10,000 per month fee, no
compensation of any kind, including finders and consulting
fees, will be paid to HACIs executive officers and
directors, the Sponsor or any of their respective affiliates,
for services rendered prior to or in connection with the
consummation of the Acquisition. HACI is not a party to any
agreements with its executive officers and directors that
provide for benefits upon termination of employment. However,
these individuals are reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with activities on HACIs behalf
such as identifying potential target businesses and performing
due diligence on suitable business combinations.
After completion of the Acquisition, directors or members of
HACIs management team who remain with the combined company
may be paid consulting, management or other fees from the
combined company. Neither Seller nor the Company currently has
any agreements with members of HACIs management regarding
their employment following the Acquisition, although it is
possible that some or all of HACIs executive officers may
negotiate employment, consulting or other arrangements with the
Company after the Acquisition. After the completion of the
Acquisition, William H. Cunningham, Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., and
Robert M. Swartz will become members of the board of directors
of the Company. As such, in the future each may receive cash
compensation, board fees, stock options or stock awards if the
Companys board of directors so determines. Thomas O.
Hicks, William H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery,
Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn also have other
interests in the Acquisition that are different from, or in
addition to, your interests as a stockholder. See the section
entitled The Acquisition Potential
Conflicts of Interests of HACIs Directors and Officers in
the Acquisition.
Compensation
Committee Report
HACIs board of directors does not maintain a standing
compensation committee since it does not compensate its officers
or directors.
HACIs board of directors and management have reviewed and
discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by
Item 402(b) of
Regulation S-K.
Based on that review and discussion, HACIs board of
directors has recommended that the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement; however, because
HACI does not compensate its officers and directors, there is no
relevant disclosure for this section.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas O. Hicks
Joseph B. Armes
William H. Cunningham
William A. Montgomery
Brian Mulroney
William F. Quinn
Audit
Committee Report
HACIs Audit Committee reviewed with management and KPMG
LLP the results of the 2008 audit, including the audited
financial statements. The Audit Committee reviewed the
requirements of the Audit Committee Charter previously adopted
and the reports required to be disclosed to the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required
to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
Communication with Audit Committees, as amended by
the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants and adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board. KPMG LLP representatives reviewed
the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with
Audit Committees, as amended, regarding independence of
public accountants with the Audit Committee and presented their
Report on Auditor Independence regarding that matter to the
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has determined that KPMG
LLP was independent of HACI. The Audit Committee also discussed
with management and KPMG LLP, the
167
quality and adequacy of HACIs internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures and
internal audit organization, responsibilities, budget, staffing
and identification of audit risks.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and
KPMG LLP a draft of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Management has the responsibility for
the preparation of the financial statements and the reporting
process, including the systems of internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. The
external auditor is responsible for examining the financial
statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of the
audited financial statements with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Based on its
review of all of the above and on discussions with management
and the external auditor, the Audit Committee recommended to the
board of directors that HACIs audited financial statements
be included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the
SEC.
Respectfully submitted,
William A. Montgomery
Brian Mulroney
William F. Quinn
Fees and
Services
The billed fees for services provided by KPMG LLP for fiscal
years 2007 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
204,988
|
|
|
$
|
185,000
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Tax Fees(3)
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,958
|
|
All Other Fees(4)
|
|
$
|
160,000
|
|
|
$
|
415,723
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
374,988
|
|
|
$
|
597,681
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of fees for the audits of HACIs financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008,
reviews of HACIs interim quarterly financial statements,
and
Form 8-Ks. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
HACI did not receive audit related services that are not
reported as Audit Fees for either fiscal year 2007 or 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax consultation and advice and tax return preparation. |
|
(4) |
|
Other fees include due diligence assistance and fees for
services in connection with HACIs initial public offering
as well as the review of the registration statement on
Form S-4. |
Since HACIs audit committee was not formed until the
consummation of its initial public offering, all services
rendered prior to the formation of the audit committee were
approved by HACIs board of directors. Since the formation
of the audit committee, and on a going forward basis, the audit
committee has and will pre-approve all audit and permissible
non-audit services to be performed for us by HACIs
independent accountant, KPMG LLP.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires HACIs directors and executive officers, and
persons who beneficially own more than 10% of HACI Common Stock,
to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of HACI
Common Stock with the SEC. HACIs directors, executive
officers, and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by
SEC regulations to furnish HACI with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of
the copies furnished to HACI and representations from
HACIs directors and executive officers, HACI believes that
all Section 16(a) filing requirements for the year ended
December 31, 2008 applicable to HACIs directors,
executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners were
satisfied.
168
SELECTED
HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
OF RESOLUTE AND RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
The following table presents summary historical financial data
of Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC, WYNR, LLC, BWNR,
LLC, RNRC Holdings, Inc., Resolute Aneth, LLC and Resolute
Wyoming, Inc., each of which are subsidiaries of Resolute
Holdings Sub, LLC and are collectively referred to in this
prospectus as Resolute or the Companies,
and unaudited summary pro forma financial data of Resolute
Energy Corporation. Also, included in the following table is
Adjusted EBITDA, which is a financial measure not calculated in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or
GAAP. Please read Non-GAAP Financial
Measures.
The selected historical and unaudited pro forma financial data
have been prepared on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
|
the historical financial data of Resolute for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2005 have been derived by combining
the audited consolidated and combined financial statements of
the Companies; and
|
|
|
|
the historical financial data of Resolute for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 have been derived from the
audited combined financial statements of Resolute; and
|
|
|
|
the historical combined financial information of Resolute as of
and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, have
been derived from the unaudited historical combined financial
statements of Resolute.
|
|
|
|
The selected unaudited pro forma financial data for the year
ended December 31, 2008, and as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, are derived from the unaudited pro
forma financial statements of the Company. The unaudited pro
forma financial information has been derived by the application
of pro forma adjustments to the historical consolidated and
combined financial statements of HACI and Resolute to reflect
the Acquisition, including the IPO reorganization. The unaudited
pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009
(the pro forma balance sheet) gives effect to the
Acquisition as if it had occurred on June 30, 2009. The
unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the pro forma statements of
operations) give effect to the Acquisition as if it had
occurred on January 1, 2008 and has been prepared assuming
the level of approval of the Acquisition by HACI Public
Stockholders will occur at the maximum conversion, which assumes
HACI Public Stockholders owning 30% less one share of the HACI
Common Stock issued in HACIs initial public offering seek
conversion.
|
The selected pro forma financial data should not be considered
as indicative of the historical results the Company would have
had or the results the Company will have after this Acquisition.
You should read the following table in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Resolute, the
historical combined financial statements of Resolute and notes
thereto, and the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements of the Company and notes thereto. Among other things,
the historical and pro forma consolidated financial statements
include more detailed information regarding the basis of
presentation for the following information. In addition, the pro
forma financial information does not include the estimated
$3.0 million of annual incremental general and
administrative expenses that Resolute expects to incur as a
result of being a publicly traded company.
169
The following is presented in thousands, except per share data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$
|
2,990
|
|
|
$
|
42,061
|
|
|
$
|
108,441
|
|
|
$
|
148,431
|
|
|
$
|
193,535
|
|
|
$
|
110,952
|
|
|
$
|
44,116
|
|
|
$
|
193,535
|
|
|
$
|
44,116
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
9,311
|
|
|
|
18,203
|
|
|
|
19,592
|
|
|
|
29,376
|
|
|
|
15,568
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
|
|
29,376
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
Other
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
3,141
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
53,466
|
|
|
|
130,478
|
|
|
|
173,343
|
|
|
|
229,172
|
|
|
|
129,661
|
|
|
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
229,172
|
|
|
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
20,320
|
|
|
|
54,640
|
|
|
|
66,731
|
|
|
|
85,990
|
|
|
|
40,991
|
|
|
|
31,596
|
|
|
|
87,382
|
|
|
|
32,111
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization, and asset retirement
obligation accretion
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
6,820
|
|
|
|
16,657
|
|
|
|
27,790
|
|
|
|
50,335
|
|
|
|
23,420
|
|
|
|
15,949
|
|
|
|
47,008
|
|
|
|
15,495
|
|
Impairment of proved properties(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
Write off of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
General and administrative(3)
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
4,349
|
|
|
|
6,130
|
|
|
|
40,273
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,618
|
|
|
|
31,489
|
|
|
|
77,427
|
|
|
|
134,794
|
|
|
|
401,563
|
|
|
|
72,487
|
|
|
|
64,689
|
|
|
|
399,628
|
|
|
|
68,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,706
|
)
|
|
|
21,977
|
|
|
|
53,051
|
|
|
|
38,549
|
|
|
|
(172,391
|
)
|
|
|
57,174
|
|
|
|
(12,177
|
)
|
|
|
(170,456
|
)
|
|
|
(15,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(3,942
|
)
|
|
|
(22,293
|
)
|
|
|
(35,898
|
)
|
|
|
(33,139
|
)
|
|
|
(16,190
|
)
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
3,592
|
|
|
|
(30,318
|
)
|
|
|
14,557
|
|
|
|
(106,228
|
)
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
|
|
(202,124
|
)
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
(34,113
|
)
|
|
|
(7,009
|
)
|
|
|
(141,221
|
)
|
|
|
63,725
|
|
|
|
(218,102
|
)
|
|
|
(53,509
|
)
|
|
|
92,215
|
|
|
|
(42,809
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
(12,136
|
)
|
|
|
46,042
|
|
|
|
(102,672
|
)
|
|
|
(108,666
|
)
|
|
|
(160,928
|
)
|
|
|
(65,686
|
)
|
|
|
(78,241
|
)
|
|
|
(58,547
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
(4,084
|
)
|
|
|
(3,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
|
(2,082
|
)
|
|
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|
|
28,167
|
|
|
|
21,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(16,220
|
)
|
|
|
42,730
|
|
|
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
|
(90,419
|
)
|
|
|
(163,010
|
)
|
|
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
|
(50,074
|
)
|
|
|
(37,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: (Income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
(16,275
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,015
|
|
|
$
|
(104,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,242
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,747
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.71
|
)
|
Other Financial Data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(1,948
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,951
|
|
|
$
|
69,721
|
|
|
$
|
98,794
|
|
|
$
|
111,286
|
|
|
$
|
59,431
|
|
|
$
|
33,041
|
|
|
$
|
109,726
|
|
|
$
|
28,923
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital(4)
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
(35,578
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
(99,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(446,957
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(29,945
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
101,745
|
|
|
|
194,823
|
|
|
|
488,493
|
|
|
|
601,123
|
|
|
|
360,847
|
|
|
|
630,570
|
|
|
|
306,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623,823
|
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
417,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
46,500
|
|
|
|
92,925
|
|
|
|
332,063
|
|
|
|
458,863
|
|
|
|
421,150
|
|
|
|
437,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
Shareholders/Members equity (deficit)(5)
|
|
|
46,050
|
|
|
|
54,964
|
|
|
|
94,232
|
|
|
|
(74,147
|
)
|
|
|
145,669
|
|
|
|
(235,762
|
)
|
|
|
(219,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,850
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(3,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,562
|
|
|
$
|
42,822
|
|
|
$
|
73,789
|
|
|
$
|
97,379
|
|
|
$
|
49,740
|
|
|
$
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(87,721
|
)
|
|
|
(83,410
|
)
|
|
|
(269,336
|
)
|
|
|
(97,596
|
)
|
|
|
(61,021
|
)
|
|
|
(26,505
|
)
|
|
|
(9,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
91,721
|
|
|
|
69,828
|
|
|
|
231,635
|
|
|
|
22,089
|
|
|
|
(41,512
|
)
|
|
|
(21,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the results of operations of the Chevron Properties for
the period beginning on the date of acquisition,
November 30, 2004. In conjunction with the acquisition,
there was a revenue distribution for plant operations which
resulted in an adjustment to the proceeds for the recovery of
gas imbalances related to differences between Resolutes
equity gas produced and its gas plant entitlements, which
resulted in the recognition of gas revenues of negative $179,000. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the results of operations of the ExxonMobil Properties
for the period beginning on the date of acquisition,
April 14, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, general and
administrative expense included a non-cash charge to
compensation expense of $34.5 million associated with
equity-based compensation recognized during the period. This
non-cash charge relates to incentive compensation provisions in
the operating agreement between Natural Gas Partners and
management. In June 2007, Resolute Holdings made a
$100.0 million cash distribution to its members that met a
financial requirement for a portion of managements
incentive compensation units to vest, triggering this
compensation expense. Please read
Note 6
Shareholders/Members Equity and Equity Based
Awards to the audited combined financial statements of
Resolute. An additional $0.3 million non-cash charge was
allocated to lease operating expense related to the same
equity-based compensation. |
|
(4) |
|
As a result of Resolutes analysis of the full cost ceiling
test related to the limitation on capitalized costs, Resolute
included a provision for an impairment of oil and gas property
costs of $245.0 and $13.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the six month period ended
June 30, 2009, respectively. |
|
(5) |
|
In June 2007, Resolute Holdings made a $100.0 million cash
distribution to its members. This distribution represented a
return on equity and consequently is reflected in
Resolutes combined financial statements by a similar
reduction to its Shareholders/Members (deficit) as
of December 31, 2007. |
171
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
We include in this prospectus the non-GAAP financial measure
Adjusted EBITDA. Set forth below is a reconciliation of Adjusted
EBITDA to its most directly comparable financial measures as
calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP
measure) is defined as net income plus net interest expense,
income taxes, depletion, depreciation and amortization,
impairment expense, accretion of asset retirement obligation,
change in fair value of derivative instruments, expiration of
puts and non-cash equity-based compensation expense. This
definition is consistent with the definition of EBITDA in
Resolutes existing credit agreements. Adjusted EBITDA is
also a financial measure that Resolute expects will be reported
to its lenders and used as a gauge for compliance with some of
the anticipated financial covenants under its amended revolving
credit facility.
Adjusted EBITDA is used as a supplemental liquidity or
performance measure by Resolutes management and by
external users of its financial statements such as investors,
commercial banks, research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of Resolutes assets to generate cash
sufficient to pay interest costs;
|
|
|
|
the financial metrics that support Resolutes indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Resolutes ability to finance capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
financial performance of the assets without regard to financing
methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
Resolutes operating performance and return on capital as
compared to those of other companies in the exploration and
production industry, without regard to financing methods or
capital structure; and
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities.
|
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to, or
more meaningful than, net income, operating income, cash flows
from operating activities or any other measure of financial
performance presented in accordance with GAAP as measures of
operating performance, liquidity or ability to service debt
obligations. Because Resolute has borrowed money to finance its
operations, interest expense is a necessary element of its costs
and its ability to generate gross margins. Because Resolute uses
capital assets, depletion, depreciation and amortization are
also necessary elements of its costs. Therefore, any measures
that exclude these elements have material limitations. To
compensate for these limitations, Resolute believes that it is
important to consider both net income and net cash provided by
operating activities determined under GAAP, as well as Adjusted
EBITDA, to evaluate its financial performance and liquidity.
Adjusted EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect
net income, operating income and net cash provided by operating
activities and these measures may vary among companies.
Resolutes Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to
Adjusted EBITDA or EBITDA of any other company because other
entities may not calculate these measures in the same manner.
172
The following table provides a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
to net income (loss) and net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
(16,220
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,730
|
|
|
$
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,419
|
)
|
|
$
|
(163,010
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,470
|
)
|
Non-cash change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
(3,383
|
)
|
|
|
24,313
|
|
|
|
(15,085
|
)
|
|
|
101,495
|
|
|
|
(120,573
|
)
|
|
|
175,261
|
|
|
|
55,355
|
|
|
|
(120,573
|
)
|
|
|
55,355
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
6,820
|
|
|
|
16,657
|
|
|
|
27,790
|
|
|
|
50,335
|
|
|
|
23,420
|
|
|
|
15,949
|
|
|
|
47,008
|
|
|
|
15,495
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
|
|
22,293
|
|
|
|
35,898
|
|
|
|
33,139
|
|
|
|
16,190
|
|
|
|
12,236
|
|
|
|
4,481
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
4,084
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
(18,247
|
)
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
9,805
|
|
|
|
(28,167
|
)
|
|
|
(21,077
|
)
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,533
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(1,948
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,951
|
|
|
$
|
69,721
|
|
|
$
|
98,794
|
|
|
$
|
111,286
|
|
|
$
|
59,431
|
|
|
$
|
33,041
|
|
|
$
|
109,726
|
|
|
$
|
28,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest expense
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
3,839
|
|
|
|
21,628
|
|
|
|
34,942
|
|
|
|
30,658
|
|
|
|
15,713
|
|
|
|
11,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
|
5,271
|
|
|
|
(12,246
|
)
|
|
|
(14,726
|
)
|
|
|
(7,379
|
)
|
|
|
8,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
(2,025
|
)
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(3,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,562
|
|
|
$
|
42,822
|
|
|
$
|
73,789
|
|
|
$
|
97,379
|
|
|
$
|
49,740
|
|
|
$
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(87,721
|
)
|
|
|
(83,410
|
)
|
|
|
(269,336
|
)
|
|
|
(97,596
|
)
|
|
|
(61,021
|
)
|
|
|
(26,505
|
)
|
|
|
(9,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
91,721
|
|
|
|
69,828
|
|
|
|
231,635
|
|
|
|
22,089
|
|
|
|
(41,512
|
)
|
|
|
(21,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As more fully described in Note 3
Acquisitions, in Resolutes combined financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 Resolute
acquired Primary Natural Resources, Inc. The 2008 amount
reflected in other is the non-cash portion of the
purchase price allocation related to the associated deferred tax
liability. |
173
Summary
Historical Operating and Reserve Data
The following table shows operating data for the periods
indicated. You should refer to Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Resolute,
Resolutes Business Estimated Net Proved
Reserves, Risk Factors Risks Related to
Resolutes Business, Operations and Industry, and
Resolutes Business Production and
Price History in evaluating the data presented below
and the data presented in the table on the following page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Production Sales Data:
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
Gas and NGL (MMcfe)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
4,645
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
Equivalent volumes (MBoe)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
Daily equivalent volumes (Boe/d)
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
2,834
|
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
7,712
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
Average Realized Prices (including hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
40.08
|
|
|
$
|
46.77
|
|
|
$
|
62.18
|
|
|
$
|
67.30
|
|
|
$
|
81.39
|
|
|
$
|
81.58
|
|
|
$
|
54.13
|
|
Gas and NGL ($/Mcfe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
8.38
|
|
|
|
9.77
|
|
|
|
6.92
|
|
Average Realized Prices (excluding hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
40.08
|
|
|
$
|
54.09
|
|
|
$
|
63.58
|
|
|
$
|
69.80
|
|
|
$
|
94.47
|
|
|
$
|
106.42
|
|
|
$
|
44.92
|
|
Gas and NGL ($/Mcfe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.63
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
|
7.59
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
Other Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses ($/Boe)
|
|
$
|
12.86
|
|
|
$
|
14.49
|
|
|
$
|
16.92
|
|
|
$
|
16.76
|
|
|
$
|
20.04
|
|
|
$
|
19.22
|
|
|
$
|
17.82
|
|
Production taxes ($/Boe)
|
|
|
9.45
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
|
|
11.02
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the results of operations of the Chevron Properties for
the period beginning on the date of acquisition,
November 30, 2004. In conjunction with the acquisition,
there was a revenue distribution for plant operations which
resulted in an adjustment to the proceeds and volumes for the
recovery of the gas imbalances related to differences between
Resolutes equity gas produced and its gas plant
entitlements, which resulted in the recognition of negative gas
revenues. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the operating data of the ExxonMobil Properties for the
period beginning on the date of acquisition, April 14, 2006. |
The following table presents Resolutes estimated net
proved oil and gas reserves and the standardized measure and has
been prepared on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
|
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007
the estimated net proved oil and gas reserves and standardized
measure reflects the Aneth field properties
|
|
|
|
for the year ended December 31, 2008 the estimated net
proved oil and gas reserves and standardized measure reflects
the Aneth Field Properties and the Wyoming Properties
|
The reserve data as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 are based
on reports prepared by Resolute and audited by Sproule
Associates Inc., independent petroleum engineers and for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are based on
reports prepared by Resolute and audited by Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum
engineers. The standardized measure values shown in the table
are not intended to represent the current market value of
Resolutes estimated net proved oil and gas reserves. The
estimates of net proved reserves have not been filed with or
included in reports to any federal authority or agency other
than the SEC.
In accordance with SEC and FASB requirements, Resolutes
estimated net proved reserves and standardized measure were
determined using end of the period prices for oil and gas that
were realized as of the date set forth below. The reserves
estimates utilized year-end NYMEX posted prices for oil for the
dates presented, NYMEX Henry Hub posted prices for gas as of
December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, as shown
174
below, but in each case as adjusted for location differentials
as of the effective date of the report, as well as plant fees
and Btu content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Estimated total proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
17,828
|
|
|
|
23,938
|
|
|
|
78,357
|
|
|
|
74,453
|
|
|
|
44,734
|
|
Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
17,782
|
|
NGL (MBbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
Total (MBoe)
|
|
|
18,228
|
|
|
|
24,576
|
|
|
|
78,672
|
|
|
|
74,747
|
|
|
|
49,334
|
|
% Proved developed
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
Standardized measure (in millions)
|
|
$
|
199.3
|
|
|
$
|
331.3
|
|
|
$
|
993
|
|
|
$
|
1,518
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
43.45
|
|
|
$
|
61.06
|
|
|
$
|
61.05
|
|
|
$
|
95.98
|
|
|
$
|
44.60
|
|
Gas and NGL ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
|
9.52
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
175
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF RESOLUTE
The historical financial statements included in this proxy
statement/prospectus beginning on page F-1 reflect
Resolutes assets, liabilities and operations, all of which
will be acquired in connection with this Acquisition. You should
read the following discussion of the financial condition and
results of operations in conjunction with the historical
combined financial statements and notes and the pro forma
financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that reflect Resolutes future plans, estimates, beliefs
and expected performance. The forward-looking statements are
dependent upon events, risks and uncertainties, many of which
are outside Resolutes and the Companys control.
Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in
these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to,
market prices for oil and gas, economic and competitive
conditions, regulatory changes, estimates of proved reserves,
potential failure to achieve production from development
projects, capital expenditures and other uncertainties, as well
as those factors discussed below and elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus, particularly in Risk
Factors Risks Related to Resolutes Business,
Operations, and Industry and Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, all of which are
difficult to predict. In light of these risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed may not
occur.
Overview
General. Resolute is an independent oil and
gas company engaged in the exploitation and development of its
oil and gas properties located in Utah and Wyoming.
Approximately 85% of Resolutes revenues are generated from
the sale of oil production. Resolutes largest asset is its
property base in Greater Aneth Field, a mature, long-lived oil
producing field located in the Paradox Basin on the Navajo
Reservation in southeast Utah, which represents 89% of
Resolutes total proved reserves. Resolute owns a majority
of the working interests in, and is the operator of, three (out
of a total of four) federal production units covering
approximately 43,000 gross acres of Aneth Field, or the
Aneth Field Properties. These are the Aneth Unit, in which
Resolute owns a 62% working interest, the McElmo Creek Unit, in
which Resolute owns a 75% working interest, and the Ratherford
Unit, in which Resolute owns a 59% working interest. As of
December 31, 2008, Resolute had interests in, and operated,
392 gross (258 net) active producing wells and
323 gross (211 net) active water and
CO2
injection wells in its Aneth Field Properties. The crude oil
produced from Resolutes Aneth Field Properties is
generally characterized as light, sweet crude oil that is highly
desired as a refinery blending feedstock. The remaining assets
are primarily located in the Powder River Basin of Campbell
County, Wyoming. These Wyoming reserves, anchored by Hilight
Field, which we refer to as the Wyoming Properties, represent
11% of Resolutes total proved reserves. Hilight Field is
characterized by oil and gas production from the Muddy Formation
and unconventional coal bed methane, or CBM, production from
shallow coal deposits. As of December 31, 2008, Resolute
operated 391 gross (353 net) of the 396 gross (354
net) wells, and owns approximately 90% of the working interest
in the wells it operates.
As of December 31, 2008, Resolutes estimated net
proved reserves were approximately 49.3 MMBoe, of which
approximately 64% were proved developed reserves and
approximately 91% were oil. The standardized measure of
Resolutes estimated net proved reserves as of
December 31, 2008, was $247.8 million. For additional
information about the calculation of Resolutes
standardized measure, please read Resolutes
Business Estimated Net Proved Reserves.
Resolute believes that significantly more oil can be recovered
from its Aneth Field Properties through industry standard
secondary and tertiary recovery techniques. Resolute has
completed a number of exploitation and expansion projects that
increased its proved developed reserve base and has evaluated
additional activities, including
CO2
and waterflood expansions, infrastructure enhancements,
recompletions and workovers of producing wells, water and
CO2
injection wells and infill drilling that Resolute anticipates
will further expand its proved developed reserve base. These
activities employ technologies that have been used successfully
in
176
Aneth Field and elsewhere. Resolute believes that none of the
previous operators of the Aneth Field Properties had committed
the capital or attention necessary to fully undertake these
activities.
In addition, Resolute has evaluated more than 40 exploitation
opportunities in Hilight Field. These projects involve the
re-stimulation of the Muddy Formation through hydraulic
fracturing. The prior operator successfully completed a number
of these projects and Resolute believes there are significant
remaining opportunities to increase production and reserves.
Resolute focuses its efforts on increasing reserves and
production while controlling costs at a level that is
appropriate for long-term operations. Resolutes future
earnings and cash flow from operations are dependent on its
ability to manage its overall cost structure at a level that
allows for profitable production.
Acquisitions
Aneth Field Properties. Resolute acquired
substantially all of its Aneth Field Properties through two
significant acquisitions. Resolute completed its acquisition of
the Chevron Properties in November 2004 for total consideration
of $86.2 million and its acquisition of the ExxonMobil
Properties in April 2006 for total consideration of
$221.5 million, both in connection with its strategic
alliance with Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company, or NNOG. See
Resolutes Business Greater Aneth
Field. NNOG owns a minority interest in each of the
Chevron Properties and the ExxonMobil Properties and possesses
options to purchase additional minority interests in those
properties from Resolute if financial hurdles relating to
recovery by Resolute of its investment are met. Please read
Resolutes Business Relationship with
the Navajo Nation for additional information about
Resolutes relationship with the Navajo Nation and
NNOGs purchase options.
Wyoming Properties. Resolute acquired its
Wyoming Properties through the July 31, 2008, acquisition
of Primary Natural Resources Inc., or PNR, subsequently renamed
Resolute Wyoming, Inc., or Resolute Wyoming. A majority of
PNRs outstanding equity interests were owned by Natural
Gas Partners, VII, L.P., or NGP VII (which is also the owner of
a majority of the equity interests in Resolute Holdings, LLC).
The consideration for the acquisition of Resolute Wyomings
equity interests consisted of Holdings equity valued at
$74.8 million, and $15.4 million in cash. At the same
time as the equity purchase, Holdings entered into an asset
contribution agreement with NGP-VII Income Co-Investment
Opportunities, LLC, or NGP Co-Invest, whereby NGP Co-Invest
contributed to Holdings a net profits overriding royalty
interest, or NPI, in oil and gas properties of Resolute Wyoming,
receiving a total of 2,184,445 common units (valued at
$19.7 million) as consideration. Resolute Wyoming acquired
the contributed NPI from Holdings for $19.4 million and
allocated the $19.4 million to oil and gas properties after
normal purchase price adjustments. Please read
Resolutes Business Wyoming
Properties for additional information.
How
Resolute Evaluates Its Operations
Resolutes management uses a variety of financial and
operational measurements to analyze its operating performance.
These measurements include: (i) production levels, trends
and prices, (ii) reserve and production volumes and trends,
(iii) operating expenses and general and administrative
expenses, (iv) operating cash flow, and (v) Adjusted
EBITDA.
Production Levels, Trends and Prices. Oil and
gas revenue is the product of Resolutes production
multiplied by the price that it receives for that production.
Because the price that Resolute receives is highly dependent on
many factors outside of its control, except to the extent that
it has entered into hedging arrangements that can influence its
net price either positively or negatively, production is the
primary revenue driver over which it has some influence.
Although Resolute cannot greatly alter reservoir performance, it
can aggressively implement exploitation activities that can
increase production or diminish production declines relative to
what would have been the case without intervention. Examples of
activities that can positively influence production include
minimizing production downtime due to equipment malfunction,
well workovers and cleanouts, recompletions of existing wells in
new parts of the reservoir, and expanded secondary and tertiary
recovery programs.
177
The price of crude oil has been extremely volatile, and Resolute
expects that this volatility will continue. For example, during
the six months ended June 30, 2009, the NYMEX price for
light sweet crude oil ranged from a high of $72.68 per Bbl to a
low of $34.00 per Bbl. For calendar year 2008, the range was
from a high of $145.28 per Bbl to a low of $30.03 per Bbl, and
for the five years ended December 31, 2008, price ranged
from a high of $145.28 per Bbl to a low of $25.21 per Bbl. Given
the inherent volatility of crude oil prices, Resolute plans its
activities and budget based on sales price assumptions that it
believes to be reasonable.
Resolute uses hedging arrangements to provide a measure of
stability to its cash flows in an environment of volatile oil
and gas prices. These instruments limit its exposure to declines
in prices, but also limit its expected benefits if prices
increase. Changes in the price of oil or gas will result in the
recognition of a non-cash gain or loss recorded in other income
or expense due to changes in the fair value of the hedging
arrangements. Recognized gains or losses only arise from
payments made or received on monthly settlements of contracts or
if a contract is terminated prior to its expiration. Resolute
typically enters into hedging arrangements that cover at least
75% of its estimated future crude oil production from proved
developed producing reserves utilizing economic parameters
specified in its credit agreements, including escalated prices
and costs for the next five years. Resolute currently has such
hedging arrangements in place through 2012, with lesser volumes
hedged in 2013. Please read Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Commodity Price Risk and Hedging Arrangements.
Reserve and Production Volumes and
Trends. From inception, Resolute has grown its
reserve base through a focused acquisition strategy. It has
completed three significant acquisitions. Resolute acquired
substantially all of its Aneth Field Properties through two
significant purchases; the acquisition of the Chevron Properties
was completed in November 2004 followed by the acquisition of
the ExxonMobil Properties in April 2006. Resolute then acquired
all of its Wyoming Properties through the purchase of PNR in
July 2008. Resolute looks to acquire similar mature producing
properties that have upside potential through low-risk
development drilling and exploitation projects. Resolute
believes that its knowledge of various operating areas, strong
management and staff and solid industry relationships will allow
it to find, capitalize on and integrate strategic acquisition
opportunities.
At December 31, 2008, Resolute had estimated net proved
reserves of approximately 32.0 MMBoe that were classified
as proved developed non-producing and proved undeveloped. An
estimated 28.0 MMBoe or 88% of those reserves are
attributable to recoveries associated with expansions,
extensions and processing of the tertiary recovery
CO2
floods that are currently in operation on Resolutes Aneth
Field Properties. Resolute expects to incur approximately
$227.8 million of capital expenditures over the next
20 years (including purchases of
CO2
under existing contracts), in connection with bringing those
incremental reserves attributable to Resolutes
CO2
flood projects into production. Resolute believes that these
expenditures will result in significant increases to its oil and
gas production.
Operating
Expenses and General and Administrative Expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses are
costs associated with the operation of oil and gas properties.
Direct labor, severance, ad valorem and similar taxes, repair
and maintenance, workovers, utilities and contract services
comprise the most significant portion of operating expenses.
Resolute monitors its operating expenses in relation to the
amount of production and the number of wells operated. Some of
these expenses are relatively independent of the volume of
hydrocarbons produced, but may fluctuate depending on the
activities performed during a specific period. Other expenses,
such as taxes and utility costs, are more directly related to
production volumes or reserves. Severance taxes, for example,
are charged based on production revenues and therefore are based
on the product of the volumes that are sold and the price
received therefor. Ad valorem taxes are based on the value of
reserves. Because Resolute operates on the Navajo Reservation,
it also pays a possessory interest tax, which is effectively an
ad valorem tax assessed by the Navajo Nation. Resolutes
largest utility expense is for electricity that is used
primarily to power the pumps in producing wells and the
compression behind the injection wells. The more fluid that is
moved, the greater the amount of electricity that is consumed.
In the recent past, higher oil prices led to higher demand for
drilling rigs, workover rigs,
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
operating personnel and field supplies and services, which in
turn caused increases in the costs of those goods and services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative
Expenses. Resolutes general and
administrative expenses were $20.2 million and
$3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and
the six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. General
and administrative expenses during 2008 included non-cash
charges related to compensation expense of $7.9 million,
$3.0 million in deferred offering costs, and a bad debt of
$0.7 million. The remaining $8.6 million in expenses
for 2008 were related to salaries, wages and professional
services. General and administrative expenses for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, included a non-cash charge to
compensation expense of $1.9 million associated with
equity-based compensation recognized during the periods pursuant
to FAS 123(R).
|
|
|
|
Resolute anticipates incurring approximately $3.0 million
of additional general and administrative expenses per year
associated with being a publicly traded company. These expenses
include compensation and benefit expenses of certain additional
personnel, increased fees paid to independent auditors, lawyers,
independent petroleum engineers and other professional advisors,
costs associated with shareholder reports, investor relations
activities, registrar and transfer agent fees, increased
director and officer liability insurance costs and director
compensation.
|
Operating Cash Flow. Operating cash flow is
the cash directly derived from Resolutes oil and gas
properties, before considering such things as administrative
expenses and interest costs. Operating cash flow on a per unit
of production basis is a measure of field efficiency, and can be
compared to results obtained by operators of oil and gas
properties with characteristics similar to Resolutes to
evaluate its relative performance. Aggregate operating cash flow
is a measure of Resolutes ability to sustain overhead
expenses and costs related to capital structure, including
interest expenses.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP
measure) is defined as net income plus net interest expense,
income taxes, depletion, depreciation and amortization,
impairment expense, accretion of asset retirement obligation,
change in fair value of derivative instruments, expiration of
puts, non-cash equity-based compensation expense and
noncontrolling interest. This definition is consistent with the
definition of EBITDA in Resolutes existing credit
agreements. Adjusted EBITDA is also a financial measure that
Resolute expects will be reported to its lenders and used as a
gauge for compliance with some of the anticipated financial
covenants under its amended revolving credit facility.
Adjusted EBITDA is used as a supplemental liquidity or
performance measure by Resolutes management and by
external users of its financial statements such as investors,
commercial banks, research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of Resolutes assets to generate cash
sufficient to pay interest costs;
|
|
|
|
the financial metrics that support Resolutes indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Resolutes ability to finance capital expenditures.
|
|
|
|
financial performance of the assets without regard to financing
methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
Resolutes operating performance and return on capital as
compared to those of other companies in the exploration and
production industry, without regard to financing methods or
capital structure; and
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities.
|
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to, or
more meaningful than, net income, operating income, cash flows
from operating activities or any other measure of financial
performance presented in accordance with GAAP as measures of
operating performance, liquidity or ability to service debt
obligations. Because Resolute has borrowed money to finance its
operations, interest expense is a necessary element of its costs
and its ability to generate gross margins. Because Resolute uses
capital assets, depletion, depreciation and amortization are
also necessary elements of its costs. Therefore, any measures
that exclude
179
these elements have material limitations. To compensate for
these limitations, Resolute believes that it is important to
consider both net income and net cash provided by operating
activities determined under GAAP, as well as Adjusted EBITDA, to
evaluate its financial performance and liquidity. Adjusted
EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income,
operating income and net cash provided by operating activities
and these measures may vary among companies. Resolutes
Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to Adjusted EBITDA or
EBITDA of any other company because other entities may not
calculate these measures in the same manner.
Factors
That Significantly Affect Resolutes Financial
Results
Revenue, cash flow from operations and future growth depend
substantially on factors beyond Resolutes control, such as
economic, political and regulatory developments and competition
from other sources of energy. Crude oil prices have historically
been volatile and may be expected to fluctuate widely in the
future. Sustained periods of low prices for crude oil could
materially and adversely affect Resolutes financial
position, its results of operations, the quantities of oil and
gas that it can economically produce, and its ability to obtain
capital.
Like all businesses engaged in the exploration for and
production of oil and gas, Resolute faces the challenge of
natural production declines. As initial reservoir pressures are
depleted, oil and gas production from a given well decreases.
Thus, an oil and gas exploration and production company depletes
part of its asset base with each unit of oil or gas it produces.
Resolute attempts to overcome this natural decline by
implementing secondary and tertiary recovery techniques and by
acquiring more reserves than it produces. Resolutes future
growth will depend on its ability to enhance production levels
from existing reserves and to continue to add reserves in excess
of production. Resolute will maintain its focus on costs
necessary to produce its reserves as well as the costs necessary
to add reserves through production enhancement, drilling and
acquisitions. Resolutes ability to make capital
expenditures to increase production from existing reserves and
to acquire more reserves is dependent on availability of capital
resources, and can be limited by many factors, including the
ability to obtain capital in a cost-effective manner and to
timely obtain permits and regulatory approvals.
You should read this Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Resolute in conjunction with Resolutes
historical and Resolute Energy Corporations pro forma
financial combined statements included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus. Below are the period-to-period comparisons
of the historical results and the analysis of the financial
condition of Resolute. In addition to the impact of the matters
discussed in Risk Factors Risks Related to
Resolutes Business, Operation, and Industry,
historical results have differed materially from period to
period and future results could differ materially from
Resolutes historical results due to a variety of factors,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute made two significant acquisitions during the periods
covered by the historical combined financial statements.
Resolute acquired the ExxonMobil Properties on April 14,
2006, and acquired the Resolute Wyoming Properties on
July 31, 2008. The financial results for those periods do
not reflect the financial results of the ExxonMobil assets for
the periods prior to acquisition; however, the combined
financial statements do give retrospective effect to a
percentage of the acquisition of Resolute Wyoming.
|
|
|
|
Resolute incurred approximately $217.1 million of new
indebtedness to fund the acquisition of the ExxonMobil
Properties on April 14, 2006, including an initial
contribution to the related abandonment liability escrow account
and other payments related to the transaction.
|
|
|
|
Resolute incurred approximately $62.5 million of
indebtedness to fund the acquisition of the Resolute Wyoming
Properties. Also in conjunction with the Resolute Wyoming
acquisition, Resolute issued equity valued at $74.8 million.
|
|
|
|
As of July 1, 2009, and for the remainder of calendar year
2009, Resolute had in place oil and gas swaps, oil and gas
collars and a gas basis hedge. These included oil swaps covering
approximately 81% of its anticipated 2009 oil production from
proved developed producing reserves at a weighted average
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
price of $62.75 per Bbl, oil collars covering approximately 5%
of its anticipated 2009 oil production from proved developed
producing reserves with a floor of $105.00 per Bbl and ceiling
of $151.00 per Bbl, gas swaps covering approximately 30% of its
anticipated 2009 gas production from proved developed producing
reserves at a weighted average price of $9.93 per MMBtu, gas
collars covering approximately 54% of its anticipated 2009 gas
production from proved developed producing reserves with a floor
of $5.00 per MMBtu and ceiling of $9.35 per MMBtu and a CIG gas
basis hedge priced at $2.10 per MMBtu covering
approximately 30% of its anticipated 2009 gas production from
proved developed producing reserves. Additional instruments are
also in place for future years and are summarized in the table
below. Resolute expects to continue to use hedging arrangements
to reduce its commodity price risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
(NYMEX WTI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(based
|
|
|
|
Bbl per
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
on 12/31/08
|
|
Year
|
|
Day
|
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl
|
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
engineering)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
$
|
62.75
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
105.00
|
|
|
$
|
151.00
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
57.83
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
105.00
|
|
|
$
|
151.00
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
2011
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
2012
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
2013
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
(Henry
|
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Hedged
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Hub)
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
(CIG)
|
|
|
(CIG)
|
|
|
(based on
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
Mcf per
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
Year
|
|
per day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
per day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
engineering)
|
|
|
day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
$
|
7.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, Resolute had estimated net proved
reserves of approximately 32 MMBoe that were classified as
proved developed non-producing and proved undeveloped. An
estimated 28.0 MMBoe, or 88% of those reserves, are
attributable to recoveries associated with expansions,
extensions and processing of the tertiary recovery
CO2
floods that are currently in operation on Resolutes Aneth
Field Properties. Resolute had incurred approximately
$79.4 million of capital expenditures through
December 31, 2008, and Resolute expects to incur an
additional $227.8 million of capital expenditures over the
next 20 years (including purchases of
CO2
under existing contracts), in connection with bringing those
incremental reserves attributable to its
CO2
flood projects into production. Resolutes current plan
anticipates that approximately $99.3 million of these
future capital expenditures will be incurred from 2009 through
2011.
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, general and
administrative expense included a non-cash charge to
compensation expense of $1.9 million associated with
equity-based compensation recognized during the period pursuant
to FAS 123(R). This non-cash charge relates to incentive
compensation provisions in the operating agreement between
Natural Gas Partners and management. In June 2007, Resolute
Holdings LLC made a $100.0 million cash distribution
to its members that met a financial requirement for a portion of
managements incentive compensation units to vest,
triggering this compensation expense. Please read
Note 10
Shareholders/Members Equity and Equity Based
Awards to the unaudited condensed combined financial
statements of Resolute at F-45.
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute anticipates initially incurring approximately
$3.0 million of additional general and administrative
expenses per year associated with being a publicly traded
company. These public company expenses include compensation and
benefit expenses of additional personnel, costs associated with
reports to shareholders, fees paid to independent auditors,
lawyers, independent petroleum engineers and other professional
advisors, investor relations activities, registrar and transfer
agent fees, incremental director and officer liability insurance
costs and director compensation.
|
Results
of Operations
Set forth in the table below is Resolutes financial and
operating data for the periods indicated. The historical
financial and operating data set forth in the table and related
discussion are derived from the historical financial statements
of Resolute.
On July 31, 2008, Resolute acquired Resolute Wyoming, Inc.
87.23% of the acquisition of Resolute Wyoming, Inc. was
accounted for as a combination of entities under common control,
which is similar to the pooling of interests method of
accounting for business combinations. Accordingly, the results
of operations give retrospective effect to these transactions,
and therefore, Resolutes results from January 1,
2006, through July 31, 2008, include 87.23% of the
operations of Resolute Wyoming, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$
|
108,441
|
|
|
$
|
148,431
|
|
|
$
|
193,535
|
|
|
$
|
110,952
|
|
|
$
|
44,116
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
18,203
|
|
|
|
19,592
|
|
|
|
29,376
|
|
|
|
15,568
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
3,141
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
130,478
|
|
|
|
173,343
|
|
|
|
229,172
|
|
|
|
129,661
|
|
|
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
54,640
|
|
|
|
66,731
|
|
|
|
85,990
|
|
|
|
40,991
|
|
|
|
31,596
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,130
|
|
|
|
40,273
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
8,076
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and asset retirement
obligation accretion
|
|
|
16,657
|
|
|
|
27,790
|
|
|
|
50,335
|
|
|
|
23,420
|
|
|
|
15,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
77,427
|
|
|
|
134,794
|
|
|
|
401,563
|
|
|
|
72,487
|
|
|
|
64,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
53,051
|
|
|
|
38,549
|
|
|
|
(172,391
|
)
|
|
|
57,174
|
|
|
|
(12,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
14,557
|
|
|
|
(106,228
|
)
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
|
|
(202,124
|
)
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,293
|
)
|
|
|
(35,898
|
)
|
|
|
(33,139
|
)
|
|
|
(16,190
|
)
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(7,009
|
)
|
|
|
(141,221
|
)
|
|
|
63,725
|
|
|
|
(218,102
|
)
|
|
|
(53,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
46,042
|
|
|
|
(102,672
|
)
|
|
|
(108,666
|
)
|
|
|
(160,928
|
)
|
|
|
(65,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(3,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
|
(2,082
|
)
|
|
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
42,730
|
|
|
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
|
(90,419
|
)
|
|
|
(163,010
|
)
|
|
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to the non-controlling
interest
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute
|
|
$
|
42,015
|
|
|
$
|
(104,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,242
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,747
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Production Sales Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
Gas and NGL (MMcfe)
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
4,645
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
Combined volumes (MBoe)
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
Daily combined volumes (Boe/d)
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
7,712
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
Average Realized Prices (including hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
62.18
|
|
|
$
|
67.30
|
|
|
$
|
81.39
|
|
|
$
|
81.58
|
|
|
$
|
54.13
|
|
Gas and NGL ($/Mcfe)
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
8.38
|
|
|
|
9.77
|
|
|
|
6.92
|
|
Average Realized Prices (excluding hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
63.58
|
|
|
$
|
69.80
|
|
|
$
|
94.47
|
|
|
$
|
106.42
|
|
|
$
|
44.92
|
|
Gas and NGL ($/Mcfe)
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
|
7.59
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
Average Costs ($/Boe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
$
|
16.92
|
|
|
$
|
16.76
|
|
|
$
|
20.04
|
|
|
$
|
19.22
|
|
|
$
|
17.82
|
|
Production tax expense
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
|
|
11.02
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7.23
|
|
|
|
10.03
|
|
|
|
17.83
|
|
|
|
17.27
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
7.16
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the results of operations of the ExxonMobil Properties
for the period beginning on the date of acquisition,
April 14, 2006. |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009, Compared to the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008
In the opinion of management, the financial information
discussed below with respect to the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 contains all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for such periods. The results of
operations for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations for the full fiscal year.
Revenue. Oil, gas and NGL revenues decreased
to approximately $52.5 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2009, from $129.7 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2008. The key revenue measures were
as follows:
Sales increased by 1.2% during the first six months of 2009 as
compared to the first six months of 2008. The average sales
price per Boe decreased by 60.2% in the first six months of 2009
as compared to the first six months of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales (MBoe)
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Average daily sales (Boe/d)
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Average Sales Prices ($/Boe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales price (including hedges)
|
|
$
|
76.28
|
|
|
$
|
48.24
|
|
|
|
(38.1
|
)%
|
Average sales price (excluding hedges)
|
|
$
|
95.49
|
|
|
$
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
(60.2
|
)%
|
Lease Operating Expense. Lease operating
expenses include labor, field office rent, vehicle expenses,
supervision, transportation, minor maintenance, tools and
supplies, workover expenses, ad valorem, severance and other
taxes and other customary charges.
183
Lease operating expenses decreased to $31.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, from $41.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008. The reduction in lease
operating expenses reflects a decrease in production taxes of
approximately $7.8 million for the period ended
June 30, 2009, as compared to June 30, 2008, due to
lower product prices and production revenues. In addition, the
Aneth Field lease operating expenses decreased by approximately
$3.2 million between the period ended June 30, 2009,
as compared to June 30, 2008, due to Resolutes
concerted efforts to reduce lease operating costs. The decrease
in costs between the period ended June 30, 2009, as
compared to the period ended June 30, 2008, was partially
offset by an increase in the operating costs for Resolutes
Wyoming Properties due to the incremental operating costs
recognized in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, from the NPI
acquisition at July 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses per Boe
|
|
$
|
30.23
|
|
|
$
|
23.04
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
General and Administrative Expenses. General
and administrative expenses include the costs of Resolutes
employees and executive officers, related benefits, office
leases, professional fees and other costs not directly
associated with field operations. General and administrative
expenses decreased to $3.9 million from $8.1 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to
the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was
primarily due to the write off of deferred offering costs during
the first six months of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses per Boe
|
|
$
|
5.96
|
|
|
$
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
%
|
Impairment of Proved Properties. Pursuant to
full cost accounting rules, Resolute must perform a ceiling test
each quarter on its proved oil and gas assets. As a result of
this limitation on capitalized costs, the Companies included a
provision for an impairment of oil and gas property cost for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 of $0 and
$13.3 million, respectively.
Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization
Expenses. Depletion, depreciation, and
amortization expenses decreased to $15.9 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, from $23.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to a reduction in
the net book value of the oil and gas properties during 2008 and
the first quarter of 2009. The reduction in net book value was
attributed to impairment charges under the ceiling test at both
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009. The ceiling test
impairment charge was primarily due to a decline in the prices
of oil and natural gas.
Other Income (Expense). All of Resolutes
oil hedging agreements are accounted for under mark-to-market
accounting rules, which provide for the fair value of the
contracts to be reflected as either an asset or a liability on
the balance sheet. The change in the fair value during an
accounting period is reflected in the income statement as other
income (expense) for that period. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009, the fair value of Resolutes derivative
contracts decreased by $41.3 million. This amount included
$14.1 million of realized gains, including a
$2.1 million gain on the forward sales of derivative
contracts during the period, and an unrealized loss of
$55.4 million in the future value of the outstanding
hedges. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the fair
value of oil hedges decreased by $202.1 million. This
amount included approximately $26.9 million of realized
losses on oil hedges and a $175.2 million decline in the
future value of these hedges. A significant portion of
Resolutes estimated future production from proved
developed producing reserves is hedged through 2013. Please read
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Interest expense was $12.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to $16.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008, due to a reduction in both the
average outstanding balance of long term debt and the associated
rates of interest during those periods. Please read
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
184
Year
Ended December 31, 2008, Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2007
Revenue. Oil, gas and NGL revenues increased
to approximately $229.2 million during the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $173.3 million during the year
ended December 31, 2007. The key revenue measures were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales (MBoe)
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Average daily sales (Boe per day)
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
7,712
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Average Sales Prices ($/Boe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales price (including hedges)
|
|
$
|
61.09
|
|
|
$
|
69.60
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
Average sales price (excluding hedges)
|
|
$
|
62.81
|
|
|
$
|
81.19
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
The increase in revenue from oil, gas and NGL sales was
primarily due to a 29.3% increase in the average sales price in
2008 excluding hedges as compared to the average sales price in
2007, as well as a 2% increase in production in 2008. The
increase in production is due in part to Resolutes ongoing
efforts to enhance day-to-day production in its Aneth Field
Properties. Average sales price, excluding the effects of
hedges, increased to $81.19 per Boe during the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to $62.81 per Boe during the
year ended December 31, 2007.
Lease Operating Expenses. Lease operating
expenses increased to $86.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $66.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The increase of $19.3 million
in lease operating expenses for the year ended December 31,
2008, was attributable to an $8.9 million increase in
production taxes due principally to higher product prices, a
$3.7 million increase in field services, a
$2.4 million increase in repairs and maintenance and a
$4.3 million increase in other costs. The increase in
non-tax related production expense was due primarily to the
escalation in virtually all oil and gas industry costs induced
by the high levels of industry activity during 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd. Avg $/Boe
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses per Boe
|
|
$
|
24.18
|
|
|
$
|
30.46
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
General and Administrative Expenses. General
and administrative expenses decreased to $20.2 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008, from
$40.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2007,
due primarily to the recognition of a non-cash charge to equity
based compensation expense, pursuant to FAS 123(R), of
$34.5 million in 2007 as compared to $7.9 million in
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd. Avg $/Boe
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses per Boe
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
7.16
|
|
|
|
(51.0
|
)%
|
Impairment of Proved Properties. Pursuant to
full cost accounting rules, Resolute must perform a ceiling test
each quarter on its proved oil and gas assets. As a result of
this limitation on capitalized costs, the Companies included a
provision for an impairment of oil and gas property cost for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 of $245.0 and $0 million,
respectively.
Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization
Expenses. Depletion, depreciation and
amortization increased to $50.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $27.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, due to an increase in the
depletion, depreciation and amortization rate which was
primarily resulted from a reduction in future economic
recoverable reserves associated with significantly reduced
energy prices during the latter half of 2008.
185
Other Income (Expense). All of Resolutes
oil hedging agreements are accounted for under mark-to-market
accounting rules, which provide for the fair value of the
contracts to be reflected as either an asset or a liability on
its balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
Resolute recognized a $96.0 million gain on its derivative
contracts. This amount included approximately $32.8 million
of realized losses, which was partially offset by an
$8.2 million gain on the forward sales of derivative
contracts during the period, and a $120.6 million
unrealized gain in the future fair market value of these
contracts. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the
fair value of its oil hedges decreased by $106.2 million.
This amount included approximately $4.7 million of realized
losses and a $101.5 million decline in the future value of
future contracts.
Interest expense was $33.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, compared to $35.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease is attributable
to a reduction in long term debt during 2008 as well as a
reduction in interest rates.
Year
Ended December 31, 2007, Compared to December 31,
2006
Revenue. Oil, gas and NGL revenues increased
to approximately $173.3 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007, from $130.5 million during the year
ended December 31, 2006. The key revenue measurements were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales (M/Boe)
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
Average daily sales (Boe/d)
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
Average Sales Prices ($/Boe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales price (including hedges)
|
|
$
|
57.20
|
|
|
$
|
61.09
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Average sales price (excluding hedges)
|
|
$
|
56.65
|
|
|
$
|
62.81
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
The increase in revenue from oil, gas and NGL sales was due to
both an increase in production and sales and an increase in
product prices. Production increased from approximately
2,303 MBoe in 2006 to approximately 2,760 MBoe in
2007. Approximately 95% of this increase is attributable to the
acquisition of the ExxonMobil Properties, which increased
Resolutes average net revenue interest in the Aneth Field
Properties from approximately 24% to 57%; the remaining 5% was
attributable to Resolutes ongoing efforts to enhance
day-to-day production. The average realized product price, after
giving effect to hedges, increased to $61.09 per Boe during the
year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $57.20 per Boe
during the period ending December 31, 2006.
Lease Operating Expenses. Lease operating
expenses increased to $66.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from $54.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. On a unit of production basis,
lease operating expenses increased from $23.72 per Boe in 2006
to $24.18 per Boe in 2007. The increase in lease operating
expenses was due to Resolutes acquisition of the
ExxonMobil Properties in April 2006. As a result of
Resolutes acquisition of the ExxonMobil Properties, it
became the operator of 200 additional producing wells and its
average working interest ownership in the Aneth Field Properties
increased from approximately 28% to 68%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses per Boe
|
|
$
|
23.72
|
|
|
$
|
24.18
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
General Administrative Expenses. General and
administrative expenses increased to $40.3 million from
$6.1 million during year ended December 31, 2007, as
compared to year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in
the level of general and administrative expenses in 2007 versus
the same period in 2006 resulted from recognition of a non-cash
charge to compensation expenses, pursuant to FAS 123(R), of
$34.5 million
186
associated with equity-based compensation recognized during 2007
associated with the realization of employee incentive units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses per Boe
|
|
$
|
2.66
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
448.5
|
%
|
Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization
Expenses. Depletion, depreciation and
amortization expenses increased to $27.7 million in 2007,
from $16.7 million in 2006, due to an increase in the
depletion, depreciation and amortization rate attributable to an
increase in Resolutes estimated future development costs
on its Aneth Field Properties as well as an increase in
production primarily attributable to the acquisition of the
ExxonMobil Properties.
Other Income (Expense). All of Resolutes
oil hedging agreements are accounted for under mark-to-market
accounting rules, which provide for the fair value of the
contracts to be reflected as either an asset or a liability on
its balance sheet. During 2007, Resolute recognized a
$106.2 million loss related to oil and gas hedges. This
amount included approximately $4.7 million of realized
losses and a $101.5 million unrealized loss related to the
decline in the future value of these hedges. A significant
portion of Resolutes estimated future production from its
proved developed producing reserves is hedged through 2012 with
a lesser amount hedged in 2013. Please read
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Interest expense was $35.9 million in 2007, compared to
$22.3 million in 2006. The increase was attributable to
1) the fact that indebtedness Resolute incurred to finance
the acquisition of the ExxonMobil Properties in April 2006 was
carried for a full year in 2007 as compared to a partial year in
2006 and 2) the additional borrowing of $100.0 million
on June 27, 2007. Please read
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The combined financial statements of Resolute at
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 have been prepared
on a going concern basis which contemplates continuity of
operations, realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities
in the ordinary course of business. Resolute was not in
compliance with its June 30, 2009 Maximum Leverage Ratio
covenant under the terms of the First and Second Lien Credit
Facility. On August 27, 2009, Resolutes lenders under
its First Lien Credit Facility waived the Maximum Leverage Ratio
covenant default as of June 30, 2009, and waived the cross
default provisions as they relate to this default under the
Second Lien Credit Facility. This waiver expires no later than
October 15, 2009. Resolutes lenders under the Second
Lien Credit Facility have exercised their right to accelerate
payment obligations under that facility as a result of
noncompliance with this covenant. Due to the failure to remain
compliant with its June 30, 2009 Maximum Leverage Ratio
covenant on its First and Second Lien Credit Facility and
potential violation of financial covenants in the next twelve
months, Resolute has classified the outstanding debt balances as
current at June 30, 2009. There can be no assurance that,
if foreclosure should proceed, the carrying amounts of assets
will be realized or that liabilities will be liquidated or
settled for the amounts recorded. The ability of Resolute to
continue as a going concern is dependent on Resolutes
ability to obtain capital and its ability to sustain positive
results of operations and cash flows sufficient to pay its
current liabilities.
Resolute is pursuing a business combination with HACI Resolute
expects that if the Acquisition is successfully consummated it
will repay part of its outstanding indebtedness on its First
Lien Credit Facility and all of its outstanding indebtedness on
its Second Lien Credit Facility and that it will amend its First
Lien Credit Facility following the consummation of the
Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not successfully consummated,
Resolute intends to pursue credit agreement amendments or
forbearance arrangements, equity financings, joint ventures or
other industry partnerships, asset monetizations, debt
refinancings and other strategic initiatives to address the
long-term effects of its First and Second Lien financial
covenant situation. No assurance can be given that the
negotiations with its lenders will be successful or that equity
financing, joint ventures or other industry partnerships, asset
monetizations or debt refinancings, if and when required, will
be available on acceptable terms or sufficient to address
Resolutes liquidity needs. Please read
Revolving Credit Facility.
187
Resolutes primary sources of liquidity are expected to be
cash generated from operations, amounts available under its
credit facility and funds from future private and public equity
and debt offerings. Resolute does not anticipate paying
dividends to holders of Resolutes common stock.
Resolute plans to reinvest a sufficient amount of its cash flow
in its development operations in order to maintain its
production over the long term, and plans to use external
financing sources as well as cash flow from operations and cash
reserves to increase its production.
If cash flow from operations does not meet expectations,
Resolute may reduce its expected level of capital expenditures
and/or fund
a portion of its capital expenditures using borrowings under its
credit facility, issuances of debt and equity securities or from
other sources, such as asset sales. There can be no assurance
that needed capital will be available on acceptable terms or at
all. Resolutes ability to raise funds through the
incurrence of additional indebtedness could be limited by the
covenants in its credit facility. If Resolute is unable to
obtain funds when needed or on acceptable terms, it may not be
able to complete acquisitions that may be favorable to it or
finance the capital expenditures necessary to maintain
production or proved reserves.
If Resolute incurs significant indebtedness in the future, its
ability to obtain additional financing may be impaired, its
ability to make changes in its business may become impaired due
to covenant restrictions, a significant portion of its cash flow
will be used to make payments in respect of principal and
interest on the debt, rather than being available for operating
or capital expenditures, and thus put Resolute at a competitive
disadvantage as compared to its competitors that have less debt,
and may limit its ability to pursue other business
opportunities. Please read Risk Factors
Risks Related to Resolutes Business, Operations and
Industry for additional information about the risks
associated with the business if a significant amount of
indebtedness is incurred.
Resolute plans to continue its practice of hedging a significant
portion of its production. Hedge arrangements are generally
settled within five days of the end of the month. As is typical
in the oil and gas industry, however, Resolute does not
generally receive the proceeds from the sale of its production
until the 20th day of the month following the month of
production. As a result, when commodity prices increase above
the fixed price in the derivative contacts, Resolute will be
required to pay the derivative counterparty the difference
between the fixed price in the derivative contract and the
market price before receiving the proceeds from the sale of the
hedged production. If this occurs, Resolute may make working
capital borrowings to fund its operations.
Cash Flows. The following table presents
Resolutes sources and uses of cash for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
42,822
|
|
|
$
|
73,789
|
|
|
$
|
97,379
|
|
|
$
|
49,740
|
|
|
$
|
13,122
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(269,336
|
)
|
|
|
(97,596
|
)
|
|
|
(61,021
|
)
|
|
|
(26,505
|
)
|
|
|
(9,527
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
231,635
|
|
|
|
22,089
|
|
|
|
(41,512
|
)
|
|
|
(21,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,827
|
)
|
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by
operating activities was $49.7 million and $13.1 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The
decrease in net cash provided by operating activities in 2009
was due to a $20.6 million decrease in cash flow as a result of
lower oil prices and a $16.0 million decrease in working capital.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $97.4 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
$73.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2007,
and $42.8 million during the year ended December 31,
2006. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities
in 2008 was due to a $21.1 million increase in cash flow
from increased production and a $2.5 million increase in
working capital. The increase in net cash provided by operating
activities in 2007 was due to a $13.5 million increase in
production and a $17.5 million increase in working capital.
Resolutes cash flow from operations is subject to many
variables, the most significant of which is the volatility of
oil prices. Oil prices are determined primarily by prevailing
market conditions that are dependent
188
on regional and worldwide economic activity, weather and other
factors beyond Resolutes control. Resolutes future
cash flow from operations will depend on its ability to maintain
and increase production through its secondary and tertiary
recovery projects (primarily its
CO2
floods), acquisitions and drilling programs, as well as the
prices of oil and gas.
Resolute enters into arrangements to reduce the impact of oil
price volatility on its operations. Currently, Resolute uses
fixed price swaps and collars to hedge oil prices. Please read
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk.
Resolute currently sells all of its Aneth Field crude oil to
Western Refining Southwest, Inc., a subsidiary of Western
Refining, Inc., under a contract that terminates August 31,
2009. Resolute and Western, with the consent of NNOG, have
entered into a new contract effective September 1, 2009,
covering the joint crude oil volumes of Resolute and NNOG from
the Aneth Field with an initial term of one year and continuing
month-to-month thereafter, with either party having the right to
terminate after the initial term, upon ninety days notice.
The contract may also be terminated by Western after
December 31, 2009, upon sixty days notice, if Western is
not able to renew its right-of-way agreements with the Navajo
Nation or if such rights-of-way are declared invalid and either
Western is prevented from using such rights-of way or the Navajo
Nation declares Western to be in trespass with respect to such
rights-of-way. Please read Resolutes
Business Marketing and Customers.
Investing Activities. Resolutes capital
expenditures were $25.0 million and $8.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30,
2009, included $4.8 million for additions to its
CO2
project in the Aneth Unit and $3.3 million for expenditures
related to the acquisition, exploration and development of oil
and gas properties and other property and equipment. Capital
expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2008,
reflect a $6.7 million expenditure for the Aneth Unit
CO2
project along with $18.3 million of expenditures related to
the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas
properties.
Resolutes capital expenditures were $62.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, $95.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, and $261.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Of the 2008 capital
expenditures, $41.7 million or 67% were expended on the
Aneth Field Properties, $18.8 million, or 30%, were
expended on the Wyoming Properties, with the remaining 3%, or
$2.1 million, expended for other acquisition, exploration
and development expenditures, and other property and equipment.
The total capital expenditures for 2007 consisted of
$36.5 million related to Phases 1, 2 and 3 of the
CO2
project, including $3.5 million of acquired
CO2
for injection, $47.7 million related to drilling,
recompletions and construction of facilities, $3.0 million
related to a
3-D seismic
program and additional payments of $8.0 million to
ExxonMobil in connection with the purchase of the ExxonMobil
Properties. Resolutes capital expenditures in 2006
consisted of $212.5 million in connection with the purchase
of the ExxonMobil Properties and $49.0 million for other
acquisition, exploration and development expenditures, and other
property and equipment.
Resolute currently anticipates that its development budget for
the third and fourth quarter of 2009, which predominantly
consists of the secondary and tertiary recovery projects,
workover activities and equipment upgrades, will be
$11.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, Resolute had
$240 million available for borrowing under the existing
revolving credit facility. After giving effect to this
Acquisition and the application of the net proceeds therefrom,
Resolutes borrowing capacity under an amended revolving
credit facility will be redetermined by the lenders based on
their evaluation of the value of the collateral. Please read
Revolving Credit Facility. The
amount and timing of Resolutes capital expenditures is
largely discretionary and within its control. Resolute routinely
monitors and adjusts its capital expenditures in response to
changes in oil prices, drilling and acquisition costs, industry
conditions and internally generated cash flow. Matters outside
Resolutes control that could affect the timing of its
capital expenditures include obtaining required permits and
approvals in a timely manner and the availability of rigs and
crews. Based upon current oil price expectations for 2009,
Resolute anticipates that the proceeds of this Acquisition, its
cash flow from operations and available borrowing capacity under
its credit facility will exceed its planned capital expenditures
and other cash requirements for 2009 and 2010. However, future
cash flows are subject to a number of variables, including the
level of oil production and prevailing commodity prices. There
can be no assurance that operations and other capital resources
will provide cash in sufficient amounts to maintain planned
levels of capital expenditures.
189
Financing Activities. Net cash used by
financing activities was $21.2 million and
$4.8 million at June 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
The cash used by financing activities at June 30, 2008 and
2009 was primarily due to net borrowings for general working
capital purposes.
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2006 was
$231.6 million; the majority of which was related to the
financing of the acquisition of the ExxonMobil Properties in
April 2006. In order to finance this acquisition, Resolute
entered into an amended and restated $300.0 million first
lien revolving credit facility and a $125 million second
lien term loan facility. The amount borrowed under the first
lien credit facility at the time of the acquisition was
$147.0 million. Approximately $54.9 million of the
borrowings was used to repay all outstanding amounts under the
previous first lien credit facility and the remainder of the
proceeds was used to partially fund the acquisition of the
ExxonMobil Properties.
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2007 was
$22.1 million. On June 27, 2007, Resolute refinanced
the $125 million second lien term loan facility with an
amended and restated $225 million second lien term loan
facility. Resolute distributed the additional $100 million
borrowing under its second lien credit facility in cash to the
members of Resolute Holdings, LLC. These borrowings were offset
by $137.6 million in payment of bank borrowings.
Net cash used by financing activities in 2008 was
$41.5 million. Resolute amended and restated the first lien
credit facility in September of 2008 to refinance
$62.5 million in outstanding debt related to Resolute
Wyoming, Inc. Total borrowings in 2008 were $274.1 million
and were offset by $312.1 million in payment of bank
borrowings.
Revolving
Credit Facility
First
Lien Facility
On September 24, 2004, Resolute entered into a credit
facility with a syndicate of banks led by Wachovia Bank,
National Association. The credit facility was amended and
restated on September 15, 2005, and subsequently on
April 14, 2006, June 27, 2007, and September 30,
2008. The credit facility was amended in 2005 and 2006 to
facilitate the Aneth acquisitions as well as for general working
capital purposes. The credit facility was amended in 2007 in
conjunction with the Second Lien Facility, and was again amended
in 2008 to refinance the RWI outstanding debt and for general
working capital purposes.
Availability under the facility is governed by a borrowing base.
The determination of the borrowing base is made by the lenders
taking into consideration the estimated value of Resolutes
oil and gas properties in accordance with the lenders
customary practices for oil and gas loans. The borrowing base is
re-determined semi-annually, and the amount available for
borrowing could be increased or decreased as a result of such
redeterminations.
Under certain circumstances either Resolute or the lenders may
request an interim redetermination. As of June 30, 2009,
the borrowing base was $240.0 million. Unused availability
under the borrowing base as of June 30, 2009 was
$38.9 million. The borrowing base availability has been
reduced by $8.5 million in conjunction with letters of
credit issued to vendors at June 30, 2009. The First Lien
Facility matures on April 13, 2011 and, to the extent that
the borrowing base, as adjusted from time to time, exceeds the
outstanding balance, no repayments of principal are required
prior to maturity.
On May 12, 2009, Resolute entered into the Fourth Amendment
to the Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Facility, or the
Fourth Amendment, to redetermine its borrowing base and interest
rates, and to amend its Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant
(effective March 31, 2009). Under the terms of the Fourth
Amendment, at Resolutes option, the outstanding balance
under the First Lien Facility accrues interest at either
(a) the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin which
varies from 2.5% to 3.5%, or (b) the Alternative Base Rate
defined as the greater of (i) the Administrative
Agents Prime Rate, (ii) the Administrative
Agents Base CD rate plus 1.0%, or (iii) the Federal
Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, plus a margin which varies from
1.0% to 2.0%. Each such margin is based on the level of
utilization under the borrowing base. Pursuant to the terms of
the First Lien Facility, the borrowing base was reset to
$240.0 million, a reduction of $44.0 million from the
prior redetermination amount. On July 28, 2009, Resolute
entered into the Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated
First Lien Credit Facility, or the Fifth Amendment, to amend its
Current Ratio covenant. Under the terms of the Fifth Amendment,
the Current Ratio covenant was not applicable for the
190
quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. The
Company and the lenders under the First Lien Credit Facility
anticipate entering into a Sixth Amendment of the First Lien
Credit Facility, to be effective at the closing of the
Acquisition, pursuant to which (i) the lenders under such
facility consent to the Acquisition, (ii) the Company and
HACI become guarantors under the facility and pledge all of
their assets to secure the loan, and (iii) applicable terms
of the First Lien Credit Facility are revised to reflect the
public company status of the borrower group.
The First Lien Facility includes terms and covenants that place
limitations on types of activities that could diminish the value
of the collateral, limit the payment of dividends, and require
satisfaction of financial tests. Resolute was not in compliance
with the First Lien Facility June 30, 2009 Maximum Leverage
Ratio covenant. The Company entered into a waiver agreement with
its First Lien Facility lenders on August 27, 2009, whereby
the requirement to comply with the Maximum Leverage Ratio
covenant for the period ending June 30, 2009 has been
waived until the earlier to occur of (a) October 15,
2009 or (b) the Early Termination Date, defined as the date
on which the lenders notify Resolute that it has determined in
its sole discretion that a material condition to the merger
between Resolute and Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. is
unlikely to be satisfied by October 15, 2009, the Waiver
Termination Date. Upon the Waiver Termination Date, the Maximum
Leverage Ratio shall be calculated using the outstanding debt
amount as of the Waiver Termination Date.
Resolute plans to amend its $300 million senior secured
revolving credit facility shortly following the closing of the
Acquisition. Resolute expects that its amended revolving credit
facility will be substantially similar to its existing revolving
credit facility. The borrowing base will be determined by the
lenders based on their evaluation of the value of the
collateral, and mature four years from the effective date,
unless extended. Terms will allow Resolute to prepay all loans
under the credit facility in whole or in part from time to time
without premium or penalty. Resolute anticipates that
obligations under the amended revolving credit facility will be
secured by existing mortgages on oil and gas properties as well
as a pledge of all ownership interests in operating
subsidiaries. Resolute anticipates that the obligations under
the amended revolving credit facility will continue to be
guaranteed by all of its operating subsidiaries and may be
guaranteed by any future subsidiaries.
Resolute expects that the amended revolving credit facility will
not permit it to pay dividends to shareholders. It expects the
revolving credit facility will be available for general
corporate purposes, including working capital, capital
expenditures and other normally incurred costs and expenses.
Resolute expects that the indebtedness under the amended
revolving credit facility will bear interest at the prime rate
or LIBOR plus an applicable margin, will contain various
representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities customary
for its type, including limitations on ability to incur
indebtedness, and grant liens, and requirements that Resolute
maintain specified financial ratios. Specifically, Resolute
expects the new revolving credit facility will require it to:
maintain a consolidated current ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0 at
the end of any fiscal quarter; and not permit its ratio of
consolidated indebtedness to consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to
exceed specified levels at the end of each fiscal quarter.
Resolute expects that the term consolidated current
ratio will continue to be defined in the amended revolving
credit agreement and mean the ratio of consolidated current
assets plus the undrawn amount available to Resolute under its
credit agreement to its consolidated current liabilities, and
that the definition of the term EBITDA in the revolving credit
facility will be similar to the definition of Adjusted EBITDA as
used in this proxy statement/prospectus. Please read
Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Financial
Information of Resolute and the Company
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. The foregoing
description is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by
the terms and conditions of the credit agreement evidencing its
revolving credit facility.
In addition, Resolute expects that its amended revolving credit
facility will set a maximum level of production which may be
hedged during any calendar year. It also expects its amended
revolving credit facility to contain various covenants that
limit, among other things, Resolutes ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
grant liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain acquisitions and investments;
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
lease equipment;
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures above specified amounts;
|
|
|
|
redeem or pay other debt;
|
|
|
|
make distributions to shareholders or repurchase shares;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
enter into a merger, consolidation or material sale of assets.
|
Term Loan
Facility
Resolute currently has in place a $225 million second lien
secured term loan facility, which we refer to as the Second Lien
Facility. Upon the closing of this Acquisition, a portion of the
proceeds will be used to repay the entire outstanding balance of
the Second Lien Facility and accrued interest, thereby
extinguishing the Second Lien Facility.
The Second Lien Facility is secured by a second lien on
substantially all of the assets of the Acquired Entities. On
August 28, 2009, Aneth gave notice to the lenders under the
Second Lien Facility, or the Second Lien Lenders, that it was in
default of its Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant under that
facility (calculated as the ratio of outstanding debt to
trailing four quarter EBITDA) measured at June 30, 2009. On
September 1, 2009, the Second Lien Lenders accelerated
indebtedness under the Second Lien Facility. As a result of the
default, the Company will be required to pay penalty interest of
an additional 2% per annum and the Company may not utilize the
Eurodollar borrowing option in future borrowings. At the time
that the Second Lien Facility was entered into, the Second Lien
Lenders entered into an Intercreditor Agreement with the lenders
under the revolving credit facility, or the First Lien Lenders,
that set forth the relative rights and priorities of the first
and second lien facilities. Among other things, the
Intercreditor Agreement established that the loans under the
Second Lien Facility were junior and subordinate in all respects
to the loans under the revolving credit facility and limited the
remedies available to the Second Lien Lenders in the event of a
default under the Second Lien Loan. Under the terms of the
Intercreditor Agreement, following (i) a default under the
Second Lien Facility, (ii) acceleration by the Second Lien
Lenders of the Second Lien Facility and (iii) written
notice to the First Lien Lenders, the Second Lien Lenders are
prohibited from exercising any rights with respect to the
collateral for 180 days, or the Standstill Period. If,
notwithstanding the expiration of the Standstill Period, the
First Lien Lenders have commenced and are diligently pursuing
the exercise of their rights with respect to a material portion
of the collateral, the Second Lien Lenders continue to be
prohibited from exercising any rights with respect to the
collateral. If, after 360 days, an insolvency proceeding
has not been commenced against the Company, the Second Lien
Lenders can initiate insolvency proceedings against the Company.
The Company has obtained from the First Lien Lenders a waiver of
the cross-default provision in the revolving credit facility
through no later than October 15, 2009, so the default in
the Second Lien Facility will not cause a default under the
revolving credit facility.
If the Acquisition is completed, the Second Lien Facility will
be repaid in full and terminated. At June 30, 2009,
outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Second Lien
Facility was $227,167,000.
192
Contractual
Obligations
Resolute has the following contractual obligations and
commitments as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
After 2013
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in $ millions)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
417,570
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
417,570
|
|
Cash interest expense on debt(2)
|
|
|
12,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,073
|
|
Asset retirement obligations(3)
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
8,012
|
|
|
|
10,219
|
|
Derivative contract liability fair value(4)
|
|
|
6,749
|
|
|
|
23,117
|
|
|
|
9,089
|
|
|
|
8,973
|
|
|
|
8,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,092
|
|
Office and equipment leases
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
Operating equipment leases(5)
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
8,516
|
|
|
|
20,877
|
|
Exxon Mobil escrow agreement(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
21,700
|
|
|
|
28,900
|
|
CO2
purchases(7)
|
|
|
6,009
|
|
|
|
9,760
|
|
|
|
7,516
|
|
|
|
5,879
|
|
|
|
5,684
|
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
40,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
445,172
|
|
|
$
|
37,959
|
|
|
$
|
21,652
|
|
|
$
|
19,716
|
|
|
$
|
18,926
|
|
|
$
|
43,545
|
|
|
$
|
586,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pursuant to application of EITF
86-30,
Resolute has classified its
1st lien
and 2nd
lien debt as current. See the June 30, 2009 unaudited
combined financial statements Note 8
Long Term Debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Cash interest expense on the
1st lien
and 2nd
lien is estimated assuming no principal repayment until the due
date of the instrument and simple interest based on weighted
average interest rates for the six month period ended
June 30, 2009 of 3.89% and 4.77%. |
|
(3) |
|
Asset retirement obligations represent the present value of the
estimated amounts expected to be incurred in the future to plug
and abandon oil and gas wells, remediate oil and gas properties
and dismantle their related facilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Resolute entered into derivative contracts to hedge exposure to
crude oil and natural gas price fluctuations. With respect to
open derivative contracts at June 30, 2009 with several
counterparties, the forward price curves for crude oil and
natural gas generally exceeded the price curves that were in
effect when these contracts were entered into, resulting in a
derivative fair value liability. The ultimate settlement amounts
under our derivative contracts are unknown as they are subject
to continuing market and commodity risk. |
|
(5) |
|
Operating equipment leases represent compressors and other oil
and gas field equipment used in the
CO2project. |
|
(6) |
|
Under the terms of Resolutes purchase agreement with
ExxonMobil, Resolute is obligated to make annual deposits into
an escrow account that will be used to fund plugging and
abandonment liabilities associated with the ExxonMobil
Properties. |
|
(7) |
|
Represents the minimum take-or-pay quantities associated with
Resolutes existing
CO2purchase
contracts. For purposes of calculating the future purchase
obligation under these contracts Resolute has assumed the
purchase price over the term of the contracts was the price in
effect as of June 30, 2009. Resolutes financial
obligations under these contracts represent 26% and 35% of
Resolutes total contractual obligations for 2010 and 2011,
respectively. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Obligations
Resolute has no off-balance sheet obligations.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of Resolutes financial
condition and results of operations is based upon the combined
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of these financial statements requires
Resolute to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The
application of accounting policies involve judgments
193
and uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable
likelihood that materially different amounts could have been
reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions
had been used. Resolute evaluates estimates and assumptions on a
regular basis. Resolute bases estimates on historical experience
and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions
used in preparation of Resolutes financial statements.
Provided below is an expanded discussion of the most significant
accounting policies, estimates and judgments. After the
consummation of this Acquisition, Resolute will discuss the
development, selection and disclosure of each of these with its
audit committee. Resolute believes these accounting policies
reflect Resolutes most significant estimates and
assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements.
Please read Note 1 Description of
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies to the audited combined financial statements
of Resolute at F-7 for a discussion of additional accounting
policies and estimates made by Resolutes management.
Oil and Gas Properties. Resolute uses the full cost
method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. All
costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development
of properties, including costs of unsuccessful exploration,
costs of surrendered and abandoned leaseholds, delay lease
rentals and the fair value of estimated future costs of site
restoration, dismantlement and abandonment activities, improved
recovery systems and a portion of general and administrative
expenses are capitalized within the cost center.
Resolute conducts tertiary recovery projects on a portion of its
oil and gas properties in order to recover additional
hydrocarbons that are not recoverable from primary or secondary
recovery methods. Under the full cost method, all development
costs are capitalized at the time incurred. Development costs
include charges associated with access to and preparation of
well locations, drilling and equipping development wells, test
wells, and service wells including injection wells; acquiring,
constructing, and installing production facilities and providing
for improved recovery systems. Improved recovery systems include
all related facility development costs and the cost of the
acquisition of tertiary injectants, primarily purchased
CO2.
The development cost related to
CO2
purchases are incurred solely for the purpose of gaining access
to incremental reserves not otherwise recoverable. The
accumulation of injected
CO2,
in combination with additional purchased and recycled
CO2,
provide future economic value over the life of the project.
In contrast, other costs related to the daily operation of the
improved recovery systems include, but are not limited to,
compression, electricity, separation, re-injection of recovered
CO2
and water, are considered production costs and are expensed as
incurred. Costs incurred to maintain reservoir pressure are also
expensed as incurred.
Capitalized general and administrative costs include salaries,
employee benefits, costs of consulting services and other
specifically identifiable costs and do not include costs related
to production operations, general corporate overhead or similar
activities. Resolute capitalized general and administrative and
operating costs of $1.1 million and $0.2 million
related to its acquisition, exploration and development
activities for the periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
Investments in unproved properties are not depleted, pending
determination of the existence of proved reserves. Unproved
properties are assessed periodically to ascertain whether
impairment has occurred. Unproved properties whose costs are
individually significant are assessed individually by
considering the primary lease terms of the properties, the
holding period of the properties, and geographic and geologic
data obtained relating to the properties. Where it is not
practicable to assess individually the amount of impairment of
properties for which costs are not individually significant,
such properties are grouped for purposes of assessing
impairment. The amount of impairment assessed is added to the
costs to be amortized, or is reported as a period expense as
appropriate.
Pursuant to full cost accounting rules, Resolute must perform a
ceiling test each quarter on its proved oil and gas assets. The
ceiling test provides that capitalized costs less related
accumulated depletion and deferred income taxes for each cost
center may not exceed the sum of (1) the present value of
future net revenue from estimated production of proved oil and
gas reserves using current prices, excluding the future cash
outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations
that have been accrued on the balance sheet, and a
194
discount factor of 10%; plus (2) the cost of properties not
being amortized, if any; plus (3) the lower of cost or
estimated fair value of unproved properties included in the
costs being amortized, if any; less (4) income tax effects
related to differences in the book and tax basis of oil and gas
properties. Should the net capitalized costs for a cost center
exceed the sum of the components noted above, an impairment
charge would be recognized to the extent of the excess
capitalized costs. As a result of this limitation on capitalized
costs, the accompanying interim combined financial statements
include a provision for an impairment of oil and gas property
cost for the six months ended June 30, 2009 of
$13.3 million. There was no provision for impairment
recorded for the six month period ended June 30, 2008.
No gain or loss is recognized upon the sale or abandonment of
undeveloped or producing oil and gas properties unless the sale
represents a significant portion of oil and gas properties and
the gain significantly alters the relationship between
capitalized costs and proved oil reserves of the cost center.
Depletion and amortization of oil and gas properties is computed
on the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves.
Amortizable costs include estimates of asset retirement
obligations and future development costs of proved reserves,
including, but not limited to, costs to drill and equip
development wells, constructing and installing production and
processing facilities, and improved recovery systems including
the cost of required future
CO2
purchases.
Oil and Gas Reserve
Quantities. Resolutes estimate of proved
reserves as of and for the periods ended December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008, are based on the quantities of oil and gas that
engineering and geological analyses demonstrate, with reasonable
certainty, to be recoverable from established reservoirs in the
future under current operating and economic parameters. For each
year, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.,
independent petroleum engineers, audited 78%, 90% and 100% of
the proved reserves on a
well-by-well
and aggregate basis, reserve and economic evaluations of all
properties that were prepared by Resolute on a
well-by-well
basis. The remaining reserves are unaudited for each year and
are related to the Wyoming properties.
Reserves and their relation to estimated future net cash flows
affect Resolutes depletion and impairment calculations. As
a result, adjustments to depletion and impairment are made
concurrently with changes to reserves estimates. Resolute
prepares reserves estimates, and the projected cash flows
derived from these reserves estimates, in accordance with SEC
and FASB guidelines. Netherland, Sewell & Associates,
Inc. adheres to the same guidelines when auditing
Resolutes reserve reports. The accuracy of Resolutes
reserves estimates is a function of many factors including but
not limited to the following: the quality and quantity of
available data, the interpretation of that data, the accuracy of
various mandated economic assumptions and the judgments of the
individuals preparing the estimates.
Resolutes proved reserves estimates are a function of many
assumptions, all of which could deviate significantly from
actual results. As such, reserves estimates may vary materially
from the ultimate quantities of oil, gas and NGL reserves
eventually recovered.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. Resolute enters into commodity
derivative contracts to manage its exposure to oil and gas price
volatility. Commodity derivative contracts may take the form of
futures contracts, swaps, collars or options. Realized and
unrealized gains and losses from Resolutes price risk
management activities are recognized in other income (expense)
with realized gains and losses recognized in the period in which
the related production is sold. The cash flows from derivatives
are reported as cash flows from operating activities unless the
derivative contract is deemed to contain a financing element.
Derivatives deemed to contain a financing element are reported
as financing activities in the statement of cash flows.
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, requires recognition of all
derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either assets or
liabilities measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of
a derivative will be recognized currently in earnings unless
specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Gains and losses on
derivative hedging instruments must be recorded in either other
comprehensive income or current earnings, depending on the
nature and designation of the instrument. Presently,
Resolutes management has determined that the benefit of
the financial statement presentation available under the
provisions of SFAS No. 133, which may allow for its
derivative instruments to be reflected as cash flow
195
hedges, is not commensurate with the administrative burden
required to support that treatment. As a result, Resolute marked
its derivative instruments to fair value during 2006, 2007 and
2008 in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133
and recognized the changes in fair market value in earnings. The
gain (loss) on derivative instruments reflected in the combined
statement of operations incorporates both the realized and
unrealized values.
Asset Retirement Obligations. Asset retirement
obligations relate to future costs associated with the plugging
and abandonment of oil and gas wells, removal of equipment and
facilities from leased acreage and returning such land to its
original condition. The fair value of a liability for an asset
retirement obligation is recorded in the period in which it is
incurred (typically when the asset is installed at the
production location), and the cost of such liability increases
the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by the same
amount. The liability is accreted each period and the
capitalized cost is depleted on a units-of-production basis as
part of the full cost pool. Revisions to estimated retirement
obligations result in adjustments to the related capitalized
asset and corresponding liability.
Resolutes estimated asset retirement obligation liability
is based on estimated economic lives, estimates as to the cost
to abandon the wells in the future, and federal and state
regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using a
credit-adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time the
liability is incurred or revised. The credit-adjusted risk-free
rates used to discount Resolutes abandonment liabilities
range from 3.90% to 13.50%. Revisions to the liability could
occur due to changes in estimated abandonment costs or well
economic lives, or if federal or state regulators enact new
requirements regarding the abandonment of wells.
Equity-Based Compensation. Resolute accounts
for stock-based compensation in accordance with FAS 123(R),
which requires it to measure the grant date fair value of equity
awards given to employees in exchange for services, and to
recognize that cost, less estimated forfeitures, over the period
that such services are performed. Prior to adopting
FAS 123(R), Resolute accounted for stock-based compensation
under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
Resolutes operating expenses included a non-cash charge to
compensation expense of $0 million, $34.5 million and
$7.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008, respectively, and included a non-cash charge to
compensation expense of $1.8 million and $1.9 million
for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. In June 2007, Resolute made a $100.0 million
cash distribution to its members that met a financial
requirement for a portion of managements incentive
compensation units to vest, triggering this compensation expense.
Income taxes. Resolute Aneth, LLC, WYNR, LLC,
BWNR, LLC and Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC are
limited liability companies. As limited liability companies they
are tax flow-through entities and, therefore, the related tax
obligation, if any, is borne by the owners. RNRC Holdings, Inc.
and Resolute Wyoming, Inc. provide for income taxes in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recorded to account for the expected
future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in
the financial statements and tax returns. The ability to realize
the deferred tax assets is routinely assessed. If the conclusion
is that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the tax asset
would be reduced by a valuation allowance. The future taxable
income is considered when making such assessments. Numerous
judgments and assumptions are inherent in the determination of
future taxable income, including factors such as future
operating conditions (particularly as related to prevailing oil
and natural gas prices). In July 2006, the FASB issued
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, or (FIN 48), which requires income tax
positions to meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold
to be recognized in the financial statements. Under FIN 48,
tax positions that previously failed to meet the
more-likely-than-not threshold should be recognized in the first
subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is
met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the
more-likely-than-not threshold should be derecognized in the
first subsequent financial reporting period in which that
threshold is no longer met.
As more fully described in Note 2 to the June 30, 2009
unaudited combined financial statements, there is uncertainty of
Resolute to continue as a going concern, as such Resolute
recorded a full valuation allowance
196
against its deferred tax asset at June 30, 2009, as it
believes that this asset may not be realized if it is unable to
generate future taxable income.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Resolute adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
141(R), Business Combinations, or
SFAS No. 141(R), on January 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling
interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance
for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the
business combination and determines what information to disclose
to enable users of the financial statement to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
The nature and magnitude of the specific effects of
SFAS No. 141(R) on the combined financial statements
will depend upon the nature, terms and size of acquisitions
consummated after the effective date. There have not been any
significant acquisitions of oil and gas properties since
adoption.
Resolute adopted FSP SFAS No. 141(R)-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies or FSP 141(R)-1, on January 1,
2009, which amends the guidance in SFAS No. 141(R)
relating to the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosures of assets and
liabilities arising from contingencies in a business
combination. The impact of FSP 141(R)-1 on Resolutes
combined financial statements will largely be dependent on the
size and nature of the business combinations completed. Resolute
has not had any acquisitions of oil and gas properties since
adoption.
On December 31, 2008, the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC, published the final rules and
interpretations updating its oil and gas reporting requirements.
Many of the revisions are updates to definitions in the existing
oil and gas rules to make them consistent with the petroleum
resource management system. This system, which was developed by
several industry organizations, is a widely accepted standard
for the management of petroleum resources. Key revisions include
changes to the pricing used to estimate reserves, the ability to
include nontraditional resources in reserves, the use of new
technology for determining reserves, and permitting disclosure
of probable and possible reserves. The SEC will require
companies to comply with the amended disclosure requirements for
registration statements filed after January 1, 2010, and
for annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after
December 15, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted.
Resolute is currently assessing the impact that the adoption
will have on its disclosures, operating results, financial
position, and cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position, or FSP,
No. 107-1
and Accounting Principles Board Opinion, or APB,
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, or collectively
FSP 107-1.
FSP 107-1
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded
companies as well as in annual financial statements.
FSP 107-1
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
FSP 107-1
did not have an impact on Resolutes combined financial
statements, other than additional disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume or Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP
No. 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with SFAS No. 157 when the volume and level
of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased and requires that companies provide interim and annual
disclosures of the inputs and valuation technique(s) used to
measure fair value. FSP
No. 157-4
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009 and is to be applied prospectively. The
adoption of FSP
No. 157-4
did not have an impact on Resolutes combined financial
statements.
Resolute adopted SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an
amendment to Accounting Research Bulletin or ARB
No. 51, on January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 160
changed the accounting and reporting requirements for minority
interests, which are now characterized as noncontrolling
interests and are classified as a component of equity in the
accompanying combined balance sheets.
197
SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of the
presentation and disclosure requirements for existing
noncontrolling interests, with all other requirements applied
prospectively. Accordingly, Resolute has reclassified net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests on the combined
statements of operations, to below net income for all periods
presented.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities An Amendment of FASB Statement 133.
SFAS No. 161 enhances required disclosures regarding
derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced
disclosures regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative
instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related hedged
items are accounted for under FASB No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; and
(c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect
an entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.
Accordingly, Resolute has adopted this pronouncement as of
January 1, 2009.
Resolute adopted SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
on April 1, 2009, which established general standards
of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 requires
companies to disclose the date through which the company
evaluated subsequent events, the basis for that date, and
whether that date represents the date the financial statements
were issued. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a
material impact on Resolutes combined financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or
SFAS No. 168. This standard replaces
SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of
GAAP, authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification, or (the Codification) was not intended
to change or alter existing GAAP, and it therefore will not have
any impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements other than to modify certain existing disclosures.
The Codification will become the source of authoritative,
nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases
of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting
literature not included in the Codification will become
nonauthoritative. SFAS No. 168 is effective for financial
statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Resolute will begin to use the new
guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification
when referring to GAAP in the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The primary objective of the following information is to provide
forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about
Resolutes potential exposure to market risks. The term
market risk refers to the risk of loss arising from
adverse changes in oil and gas prices and interest rates. The
disclosures are not meant to be precise indicators of expected
future losses, but rather indicators of reasonably possible
losses. This forward-looking information provides indicators of
how Resolute views and manages ongoing market risk exposures.
All of Resolutes market risk sensitive instruments were
entered into for purposes other than speculative trading.
Commodity Price Risk and Hedging
Arrangements. Resolutes major market risk
exposure is in the pricing applicable to oil and gas production.
Realized pricing on Resolutes unhedged volumes of
production is primarily driven by the spot market prices
applicable to oil production and the prevailing price for gas.
Pricing for oil production has been volatile and unpredictable
for several years, and Resolute expects this volatility to
continue in the future. The prices Resolute receives for
unhedged production depend on many factors outside of
Resolutes control.
Resolute periodically hedges a portion of its oil and gas
production through swaps, puts, calls, collars and other such
agreements. The purpose of the hedges is to provide a measure of
stability to Resolutes cash flows in an environment of
volatile oil and gas prices and to manage Resolutes
exposure to commodity price risk. Resolute anticipates
continuing this policy upon the completion of this Acquisition.
198
Terms of Resolutes bank credit facility, prior to
amendment in April 2006, June 2007, and September 2008 required
Resolute to enter into fixed-for-floating swaps for at least 70%
of its production for the years 2005 through 2007. Terms of the
bank credit facility, as amended in September 2008, require
Resolute to enter into one or more hedging agreements for
approximately 70% of the forecast production from proved
developed producing reserves as indicated in Resolutes
then current reserve report utilizing escalated prices and costs.
The form of hedges to be entered into may be at the discretion
of Resolute, not to exceed 80% of its anticipated production
from proved developed producing properties utilizing economic
parameters specified in its credit agreements, including
escalated prices and costs. Purchased put options are considered
in the calculation of whether Resolute has met the minimum
volume test. However, because such purchased put options do not
give rise to a payment obligation on the part of Resolute, they
are not considered in the calculation of the 80% ceiling.
By removing the price volatility from a significant portion of
Resolutes oil production, Resolute has mitigated, but not
eliminated, the potential effects of changing prices on the cash
flow from operations for those periods. While mitigating
negative effects of falling commodity prices, these derivative
contracts also limit the benefits Resolute would receive from
increases in commodity prices. It is Resolutes policy to
enter into derivative contracts only with counterparties that
are major, creditworthy financial institutions deemed by
management as competent and competitive market makers. To date,
except for two small legacy contracts that came to Resolute in
the acquisition of Resolute Wyoming, all of Resolutes
hedges have been entered into with banks that are lenders under
its existing revolving credit facility.
As of July 1, 2009, Resolute had entered into commodity
swaps and crude oil put contracts. The following table
represents the commodity swaps with respect to Resolutes
estimated oil production from its proved developed producing
properties through 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(NYMEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WTI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(based on
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Hedge Price
|
|
|
Bbl per
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
Year
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
|
per Bbl
|
|
|
Day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
engineering)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
$
|
62.75
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
105.00
|
|
|
$
|
151.00
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
57.83
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
105.00
|
|
|
$
|
151.00
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
2011
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
2012
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
2013
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Basis Hedges
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Hedged
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
(Henry
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
(CIG)
|
|
|
(CIG)
|
|
|
(based on
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
Hub) Swap
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
Mcf per
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
Year
|
|
per day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
per day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
engineering)
|
|
|
day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
$
|
7.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
At December 31, 2007, Resolute had derivative assets of
approximately $33.0 million, of which $20.7 million
was classified as a current asset and $12.3 million was
classified as a long term asset. Resolute also had a derivative
liability at December 31, 2007 of $136.0 million, of
which $47.3 million and $88.7 million were classified
as current and long-term liabilities, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, Resolute had derivative assets of
approximately $37.1 million, of which $19.0 million
was classified as a current asset and $18.1 million was
classified as a long term asset. Resolute
199
also had a derivative liability at December 31, 2008, of
approximately $21.3 million, of which $1.1 million and
$20.2 million were classified as current and long-term
liabilities, respectively.
At June 30, 2009, Resolute had derivative assets of
approximately $16.5 million, of which $9.5 million was
classified as a current asset and $7.0 million was
classified as a long term asset. Resolute also had a derivative
liability at June 30, 2009, of $56.1 million, of which
$18.1 million and $38.0 million were classified as
current and long-term liabilities, respectively.
Interest Rate Risks. Upon the closing of this
Acquisition, Resolute anticipates having approximately
$81 million of outstanding debt depending on the amount
HACI contributes to Aneth in connection with the Acquisition.
Interest will be calculated under the terms of the new agreement
based on a LIBOR spread. A 1% increase in LIBOR would
result in an estimated $690,000 increase in annual interest
expense. Resolute does not currently intend to enter into any
hedging arrangements to protect against fluctuations in interest
rates applicable to its outstanding indebtedness.
200
RESOLUTES
BUSINESS
The following description applies to the current business of
Resolute as well as the business of the Company following the
consummation of the Acquisition.
Resolute is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the
exploitation and development of its oil and gas properties
located in Utah and Wyoming. Approximately 85% of
Resolutes revenues are generated from the sale of oil
production. Resolute focuses its efforts on increasing reserves
and production from its Aneth Field Properties in Utah and from
Hilight Field and related properties in Wyoming, or its Wyoming
Properties, while improving efficiency and controlling costs in
its operations. Resolute believes that significantly more oil
can be recovered from its Aneth Field Properties through
industry standard secondary and tertiary recovery techniques.
Resolute has already completed a number of exploitation projects
that have increased its proved developed reserve base, and it
has plans for additional expansion and enhancement projects. In
its Wyoming Properties, Resolute has identified more than 40
exploitation opportunities similar to those successfully
completed by the previous operator. In addition, Resolute plans
to grow its reserve base through a focused acquisition strategy
by looking to acquire mature producing properties that have
upside potential through low-risk development drilling and
exploitation projects. Also, Resolute seeks to reduce the effect
of short-term commodity price fluctuations on its cash flow
through the use of various derivative instruments.
Resolutes largest asset, constituting 89% of its reserves,
is its Aneth Field Properties, a mature, long-lived oil
producing field located in the Paradox Basin on the Navajo
Reservation in southeast Utah. Resolute owns a majority of the
working interests in, and is the operator of, three (out of a
total of four) federal production units covering approximately
43,000 gross acres. These units are the Aneth Unit, in
which Resolute owns a 62% working interest, the McElmo Creek
Unit, in which Resolute owns a 75% working interest, and the
Ratherford Unit, in which Resolute owns a 59% working interest.
As of December 31, 2008, Resolute had interests in, and
operated 392 gross (258 net) active producing wells and
323 gross (211 net) active water and
CO2
injection wells on its Aneth Field Properties. The crude oil
produced from the Aneth Field Properties is generally
characterized as light, sweet crude oil that is highly desired
as a refinery blending feedstock.
The remaining producing assets, Resolutes Wyoming
Properties, were acquired through the acquisition of PNR in July
2008. The assets are largely located in the Powder River Basin
of Wyoming and constitute approximately 11% of Resolutes
net proved reserves. Hilight Field, anchoring the Wyoming
production and reserves, produces oil and gas from the Muddy
Formation. Shallow CBM production also comes from this area.
Resolute also owns properties in eastern Wyoming and Oklahoma
that produce oil and gas. As of December 31, 2008, the
Wyoming Properties consisted of 396 gross (354 net)
active wells and Resolute operates all but 5 gross (1 net)
wells. In addition, Resolute holds exploration leasehold rights
in Wyomings Big Horn Basin and Alabamas Black
Warrior Basin.
201
As of December 31, 2008, Resolutes estimated net
proved reserves were approximately 49.3 MMBoe, of which
approximately 35% were proved developed producing reserves and
approximately 91% were oil. The standardized measure of its
estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2008, was
$247.8 million. For additional information about the
calculation of Resolutes standardized measure, please read
Estimated Net Proved Reserves. The
following table sets forth summary information attributable to
Resolutes estimated net proved reserves that is derived
from its December 31, 2008, reserve report which was
audited by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.,
independent petroleum engineers. Reserves and production
information is as of and for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Net Proved Reserves as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves to Production Ratio (In years)
|
|
|
|
(MMBoe)
|
|
|
Average Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Production
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Proved Undeveloped
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Boe per day)
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Producing Reserves
|
|
|
|
Producing
|
|
|
Non-Producing
|
|
|
CO2
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Aneth Field Properties
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
5,181
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Wyoming Properties
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
7,322
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Degree of depletion (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future operating costs ($/Boe)(4)
|
|
$
|
19.46
|
|
|
$
|
14.03
|
|
|
$
|
12.76
|
|
|
$
|
9.98
|
|
|
$
|
12.73
|
|
|
$
|
15.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future production taxes ($/Boe)(5)
|
|
$
|
4.49
|
|
|
$
|
4.36
|
|
|
$
|
4.97
|
|
|
$
|
4.26
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
|
$
|
4.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future PUD development costs (in millions)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
188.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
189.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future PUD development costs ($/Boe)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.81
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
10.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Determined by dividing total estimated net proved reserves as of
December 31, 2008, by the total estimated 2009 proved
developed producing production volumes. |
|
(3) |
|
Determined by dividing total estimated net proved developed
producing reserves as of December 31, 2008, by the total
estimated 2009 proved developed producing production volumes. |
|
(4) |
|
Determined by dividing Resolutes estimated future
operating costs as of December 31, 2008, by total estimated
net proved reserves as of December 31, 2008, for each
reserve category. |
|
(5) |
|
Determined by dividing Resolutes estimated future
production taxes as of December 31, 2008, by total
estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2008, for
each reserve category. |
|
(6) |
|
Future development costs include costs incurred in connection
with the initiation, extension and expansion of
CO2
flood projects, drilling of development wells, upgrades to field
infrastructure, workovers of producing wells and recompletion of
existing wells into new producing zones. |
|
(7) |
|
Determined by dividing Resolutes estimated total future
development costs related to reserves classified as proved
undeveloped by total estimated net proved undeveloped reserves
as of December 31, 2008. |
Resolutes
Business Strategies
Bring Proved Developed Non-Producing and Proved Undeveloped
Reserves into Production. At December 31,
2008, Resolute had estimated net proved reserves of
approximately 32.0 MMBoe that were classified as proved
developed non-producing and proved undeveloped. An estimated
28.0 MMBoe, or 88% of those reserves, are attributable to
recoveries associated with expansions, extensions and processing
of the tertiary recovery
CO2
floods that are currently in operation on Resolutes Aneth
Field Properties. Resolute had incurred approximately
$79.4 million of capital expenditures through
December 31, 2008, and it expects to incur an additional
$227.8 million of capital expenditures over the next
20 years (including purchases of
CO2
under existing contracts), in connection with bringing those
incremental reserves attributable to Resolutes
CO2
flood projects into production. Resolutes current plan
anticipates approximately $99.3 million of these future
capital expenditures will be incurred from 2009 through 2011.
Increase Production and Improve Efficiency of Operations on
Resolutes Existing
Properties. Resolutes management team has
experience in managing operationally intensive oil and gas
properties. As the operator
202
of the Aneth Field Properties, Resolute has the ability to
directly manage its costs, control the timing of its
exploitation activities and effectively implement programs to
increase production and improve the efficiency of its
operations. For example, Resolute initiated a program to
actively work with vendors to reduce labor and material costs.
Resolute also conducted a proprietary
3-D seismic
survey of the Aneth Unit in the first quarter of 2007, which is
the first
3-D seismic
survey of Greater Aneth Field. Resolute expects that the data
obtained from this seismic survey will provide the information
to enable it to more efficiently develop and improve the
recovery from its Aneth Field Properties. In addition, soon
after Resolute acquired the Chevron and the Exxon Properties and
became the operator of the Aneth, McElmo Creek and Ratherford
Units, it undertook a program of repair and maintenance of those
producing assets. As a result of these efforts, Resolute has
seen a reduction in the well workover rate. Also, because
Resolute is the operator of three of the four federal units in
Greater Aneth Field, it has been able to assemble a critical
mass of employees and projects and allocate its resources across
a broader area in a more efficient manner than was previously
the case when each unit had a different operator.
Reduce Commodity Price Risk through
Hedging. Resolute seeks to reduce the effect of
short-term commodity price fluctuations and achieve less
volatile and more predictable cash flows through the use of
various derivative instruments such as swaps, puts, calls and
collars. As of July 1, 2009, and for the remainder of
calendar year 2009, Resolute had in place oil and gas swaps, oil
and gas collars and a gas basis hedge. These included oil swaps
covering approximately 81% of its anticipated 2009 oil
production at a weighted average price of $62.75 per Bbl, oil
collars covering approximately 5% of its anticipated 2009 oil
production with a floor of $105.00 per Bbl and ceiling of
$151.00 per Bbl, gas swaps covering approximately 30% of its
anticipated 2009 gas production at a weighted average price of
$9.93 per MMBtu, gas collars covering approximately 54% of its
anticipated 2009 gas production with a floor of $5.00 per MMBtu
and ceiling of $9.35 per MMBtu and a CIG gas basis hedge priced
at $2.10 per MMBtu covering approximately 30% of its anticipated
2009 gas production. Additional instruments are also in place
for future years and are summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP Hedged
|
|
|
|
Oil Swap
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI)
|
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Based on
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
Year
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl
|
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Engineering)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
$
|
62.75
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
105.00
|
|
|
$
|
151.00
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
57.83
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
105.00
|
|
|
$
|
151.00
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
2011
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
2012
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
2013
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Basis Hedges
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
(CIG)
|
|
|
(CIG)
|
|
|
Hedged (Based
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
(Henry Hub)
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
Ceiling
|
|
|
on 12/31/08
|
|
|
Mcf
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
Year
|
|
per Day
|
|
|
Swap Price
|
|
|
per Day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Engineering)
|
|
|
per Day
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
$
|
7.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
Included among Resolutes derivative positions for 2010 are
two oil swaps with Wachovia Bank as the Companys
counterparty, each covering 1,000 barrels per day for the
calendar year 2010. Under the first position Resolute receives a
market based floating price per barrel of oil equal to the
average NYMEX oil price for the calendar month then settling and
pays to Wachovia a fixed price of $68.38 per barrel. Under the
second position Resolute receives a fixed price per barrel of
$34.04 and pays to Wachovia a floating price per barrel of oil
equal to the average NYMEX oil price for the calendar month then
settling. These two positions when combined have the effect of
Resolute paying to Wachovia a fixed sum each month equal to
$34.34
203
multiplied by 1,000 barrels multiplied by the number of
days in the month then being settled. For the full calendar year
these payments would amount to $12.5 million. Because these
positions directly offset each other they do not add any net
hedged barrels to the Companys derivative positions. The
payments made to Wachovia have the effect of lowering the
average fixed price under the Companys oil swaps in 2010
from $67.23 per barrel to $57.83 per barrel. These two positions
are the result of a trade entered into with Wachovia Bank in
2004 in conjunction with the Companys acquisition of the
Chevron assets which was subsequently rescheduled to 2010.
As a condition to the completion of the Acquisition, Resolute
has agreed to settle these two trades at or prior to closing
such that there will be no negative impact on the average fixed
price under the Companys 2010 oil swaps. Alternatives
available to the Company include amending the existing contracts
such that the negative impact from these transactions is
realized in future years, possibly spread over multiple years,
entering into additional derivative transactions covering
production beyond 2010 which would generate a current gain to
the Company of $12.5 million which gain would be used to
settle the 2010 oil swaps (an example of such a transaction
might include the sale of covered calls) or using cash available
under the Companys revolving credit facility to cash
settle the positions by paying Wachovia Bank the cash value of
the transactions. Were the Company to make a cash payment to
Wachovia Bank in 2009 to settle these transactions, irrespective
of the source of such cash payment, it is likely the company
would record a derivative loss in 2009 equal to the payment made.
Resolute expects to continue to use hedging arrangements to
reduce its commodity price risk. Pursuant to the Acquisition
Agreement, it is a condition to closing that Resolute put in
place hedging arrangements resulting in an average fixed price
on its 2010 crude oil swaps on 3,650 barrels of oil per day of
$67.00 or greater per barrel. Resolute has held initial
discussions with two financial institutions regarding possible
alternatives for achieving this condition to closing, however,
as of September 11, 2009, Resolute has not decided on any
one or more alternatives or made any commitments and therefore
such condition has not been satisfied as of such date.
Pursue Acquisitions of Mature Properties with Low-Risk
Development Potential. From inception, Resolute
has grown its reserve base through a focused acquisition
strategy. It has completed three significant acquisitions, two
in Utah and one in Wyoming. Substantially all of its Aneth Field
Properties were acquired through significant purchases in
November 2004 and April 2006. Resolute then acquired all of its
Wyoming Properties through the purchase of PNR in July 2008.
Resolute looks to acquire similar mature producing properties in
the onshore United States that have upside potential through
low-risk development drilling and exploitation projects. It
believes its knowledge of various operating areas, strong
management and staff and solid industry relationships will allow
it to find, capitalize on and integrate strategic acquisition
opportunities in various areas.
Competitive
Strengths
A High Quality Base of Long-Lived Oil Producing
Properties. The Aneth Field Properties have
several characteristics that Resolute believes will provide a
stable and marketable production platform with which to fund its
development and growth activities:
|
|
|
|
|
The properties are expected to have a long productive life. As
of December 31, 2008, the proved developed producing
reserves had a
reserves-to-production
ratio of approximately 8 years and the total proved
reserves had a reserves-to-production ratio of 26 years.
|
|
|
|
The light, sweet crude oil produced from its Aneth Field
Properties is more attractive to refineries than the heavy or
sour crude oil found in many areas, including the Permian Basin.
|
Properties with Significant Low-Risk and Low-Cost Development
Opportunities. As of December 31, 2008,
approximately 32 MMBoe, or 65% of Resolutes estimated
net proved reserves, were classified as proved developed
non-producing or proved undeveloped. An estimated
28.0 MMBoe, or 88% of those reserves, are attributable to
recoveries associated with expansions, extensions and processing
of the tertiary recovery
CO2
floods that are currently in operation on Resolutes Aneth
Field Properties. Resolute has
204
identified a twelve-year development plan for its Aneth Field
Properties pursuant to which it believes that in five years the
daily oil production will increase by 59% over the average
production achieved during the six months ended June 30,
2009. Afterward, Resolute expects the production rate to remain
relatively stable for approximately four years and then begin a
natural decline. Resolute believes these development projects,
particularly its planned
CO2
flood projects, are relatively low risk compared to other
conventional drilling-focused exploration and production
activities, in large part because of the successful results of
the McElmo Creek Unit
CO2
flood program that has been in operation since 1985. Following
the initiation of the
CO2
flood project in the McElmo Creek Unit in 1985, oil production
from the unit increased by approximately 30% over a 13 year
period (approximately 22% as a result of the
CO2
flood project and approximately 8% as a result of 24 newly
drilled wells). Production then returned to a state of natural
decline in 1998. Because of similar geological characteristics
across Resolutes Aneth Field Properties, Resolute expects
to achieve similar results with its
CO2
flood projects as was experienced with the
CO2
flood project in the McElmo Creek Unit.
Operating Control Over the Resolute
Properties. Following the acquisition of the
Chevron Properties in November 2004, Resolute became the
operator of the Aneth Unit. Following its acquisition of the
ExxonMobil Properties in April 2006, Resolute became the
operator of the McElmo Creek and the Ratherford Units. As a
result of having a critical mass of employees and projects and
operating control across the three federal units encompassing
approximately 43,000 acres, it now has the ability to
utilize its employees on a prioritized basis, where previously
the staffs of operators of the separate federal units within
Greater Aneth Field focused only on the unit to which they were
assigned. Because Resolute is the operator of all of its Aneth
Field Properties, it believes it can also attract contract
services, materials and equipment from a broader market and to
negotiate more favorable terms than would otherwise be
available. Resolute also has the ability to control the timing,
scope and costs of development projects undertaken in its Aneth
Field Properties. Resolute also operates Hilight Field and most
of its other Wyoming Properties.
Experienced Management Team with Operational, Transactional
and Financial Experience in the Energy
Industry. With an average industry work
experience of more than 25 years, the senior management
team of Resolute has considerable experience in acquiring,
exploring, exploiting, developing and operating oil and gas
properties, particularly in operationally intensive oil and gas
fields. Six members of its senior management who formed Resolute
Holdings in 2004 previously worked together as part of the
senior management team of HS Resources, Inc., an independent oil
and gas company that was listed on the New York Stock Exchange
and primarily operated in the Denver-Julesburg Basin in
northeast Colorado. HS Resources conducted resource development
programs, managed and enhanced a gas gathering and processing
system and built a hydrocarbon physical marketing and
transportation business. Its development activities included
drilling new wells, deepening wells and recompleting and
refracturing existing wells to add reserves and enhance
production. HS Resources also had an active program of acquiring
producing properties and properties with development potential.
HS Resources was acquired by Kerr-McGee Corporation in 2001.
Strong Financial Sponsors. Resolute has been
supported by Natural Gas Partners, with which its senior
management has had a relationship for more than 19 years.
Prior to the Acquisition, Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. and its
affiliated fund, NGP VII Income Co-Investment Opportunities,
L.P., owned 71.2% of Resolute Holdings. Three members of the
proposed board of directors of the Company are members of the
management of Natural Gas Partners. Since 1988, the Natural Gas
Partners private equity funds have made investments in more than
135 entities in more than 170 transactions throughout the energy
industry. Currently, the Natural Gas Partners funds hold
investments in more than 35 private oil and gas exploration and
production companies with operations located in major producing
basins throughout North America.
Greater
Aneth Field
Greater Aneth Field was discovered in 1956 and was subsequently
developed by several large integrated oil companies. It is the
largest oil field in the Paradox Basin, located in San Juan
County, Utah. Resolutes Aneth Field Properties cover
approximately 43,000 acres and during the six months ended
June 30, 2009, gross production from the Aneth Field
Properties was approximately 9,151 barrels of oil per day.
205
The primary producing horizon in Greater Aneth Field is the
Pennsylvanian-age Desert Creek Formation, which is a
carbonate algal-mound formation with average depth of
approximately 5,525 feet. While there is some reservoir
complexity in Greater Aneth Field, development of the reserves
generally has been accomplished with well-tested methodologies,
including drilling and infilling of vertical wells, waterflood
activities, horizontal drilling and
CO2
flooding. For administrative, organizational and operational
reasons, in 1961 Greater Aneth Field was divided into four
separate federal production units to facilitate efficient
development of the field and recovery of reserves. The three
units that Resolute operates, the Aneth Unit, the McElmo Creek
Unit and the Ratherford Unit, possess substantially similar
geologic and operating characteristics.
The following map shows the four federal operating units in
Greater Aneth Field. Resolute owns no interest in the White Mesa
Unit.
Resolute acquired its Aneth Field Properties primarily through
two significant acquisitions. In November 2004, it acquired a
53% operating working interest in the Aneth Unit, a 15%
non-operating working interest in the McElmo Creek Unit and a 3%
non-operating working interest in the Ratherford Unit, or the
Chevron Properties. In the April 2006 acquisition, it acquired
an additional 7.5% non-operating working interest in the Aneth
Unit, a 60% operating working interest in the McElmo Creek Unit
and a 56% operating working interest in the Ratherford Unit, or
the ExxonMobil Properties.
Resolute acquired its Aneth Field Properties in connection with
its strategic alliance with Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company,
Inc., or NNOG, an oil and gas company owned by the Navajo
Nation. NNOG maintains a minority interest in each of the
Chevron Properties and the ExxonMobil Properties and possesses
options to purchase additional minority interests in those
properties from Resolute under certain circumstances. Please
read Relationship with the Navajo
Nation.
Aneth Unit. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009, the Aneth Unit produced approximately
2,959 barrels of oil per day (gross) from 158 gross
(98 net) active producing wells. Resolute operated
148 gross (91 net) active injection wells in the Aneth
Unit. Since its discovery, the Aneth Unit has produced a total
of approximately 153 MMBbl of oil. The Aneth Unit was
originally developed with vertical wells drilled on
80-acre
spacing and was infill drilled to
40-acre
spacing in the 1970s. Since unitization in 1961, the unit has
been under waterflood. Between 1994 and 1998, an affiliate of
Texaco operated the Aneth Unit and drilled 43 multi-lateral
horizontal wells (23 producers and 20 injectors). Most of these
horizontal wells were utilized to create a horizontal waterflood
pattern on the eastern side of the unit. In 1998, the injectors
in two square miles of the Aneth Unit were converted to a
water-alternating-gas
CO2
pilot project to assess the possibility of a field-wide
CO2
injection flood program. The multi-lateral horizontal wells and
the pilot
CO2
program were successful in increasing production rate and adding
reserves. The pilot
CO2
program was never expanded into a unit-wide program. Resolute
became operator of the Aneth Unit on December 1, 2004 and
has been successful in reducing the decline rate such that the
average daily gross oil production from the Aneth Unit as a
whole has remained relatively constant since the time of
acquisition.
206
McElmo Creek Unit. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009, the McElmo Creek Unit produced approximately
3,708 barrels of oil per day (gross) from 138 gross
(104 net) active producing wells. Resolute operated
103 gross (77 net) active injection wells on the McElmo
Creek Unit. Since its discovery, the McElmo Creek Unit has
produced a total of approximately 162 MMBbl of oil. The
McElmo Creek Unit has been under waterflood since the early
1960s and prior operators commenced infill drilling to
40-acre
spacing during the 1970s. A stabilized oil production decline
trend was established for the waterflood over approximately
seven years prior to the initiation of a
CO2
flood program in 1985. Following the initiation of the
CO2
flood project in the McElmo Creek Unit in 1985, oil production
from the unit increased by approximately 30% over a 13 year
period (approximately 22% as a result of the
CO2
flood project and approximately 8% as a result of 24 newly
drilled wells). Production then returned to a state of natural
decline in 1998. Prior to Resolutes acquisition of the
ExxonMobil Properties, the McElmo Creek Unit was operated by
ExxonMobil. Resolute became operator of the McElmo Creek Unit on
June 1, 2006 and was successful in increasing the average
daily gross production rate over the first 11 months. This
is due to a number of factors, including its efforts to return
wells to operation, improve artificial lift capacity at
producing wells, improve compressor run times, increase
production from new horizontal drilling, reduce freeze problems
in the winter months and increase
CO2
injection.
Ratherford Unit. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009, the Ratherford Unit produced approximately
2,484 barrels of oil per day (gross) from 96 gross (57
net) active producing wells. Resolute operated 72 gross (42
net) active injection wells on the Ratherford Unit. Since its
discovery, the Ratherford Unit has produced a total of
approximately 102 MMBbl of oil. The core of the Ratherford
Unit has been developed with horizontal wells, while the edges
of the unit have been developed with vertical wells. Resolute
became operator of the Ratherford Unit on June 1, 2006, and
was successful in increasing the average daily gross production
rate over the first 15 months. This increase in production
resulted from a number of factors, including its efforts to
improve artificial lift capacity at producing wells, increase
production from new horizontal drillings, return wells to
operation and increase water injection resulting from injection
well cleanouts.
Wyoming
Properties
Resolutes Wyoming Properties consist of three units in
Hilight Field, minor
non-unitized
Muddy Formation production in the Hilight area,
non-unitized
CBM production in Hilight area and 12 other small fields in
Wyoming. Resolute also owns interests in two small fields in
Oklahoma. The Wyoming Properties were acquired in July 2008
through the purchase of PNR and a related Net Profits Interest.
All but one of the Wyoming Properties are operated by Resolute.
207
The following map shows the four federal operating units in
Hilight Field. Resolute owns no interest in the South Hilight
Unit.
Hilight Field consists of the Jayson Unit, the Grady Unit, the
Central Hilight Unit, and the South Hilight Unit. Resolute has
an 82.7% working interest in Jayson, an 85.1% working interest
in Grady, a 98.5% working interest in Central Hilight, and no
working interest in South Hilight. Jayson, Grady and Central
Hilight cover an area of almost 50,000 acres, and have been
operated by Resolute since August 1, 2008. Hilight Field
was discovered by Inexco Oil Company in 1969, was developed on
160-acre
spacing, unitized in
1971-1972
and underwent waterflood between 1972 and the mid-1990s. As of
December 31, 2008, there were 113 active producing wells,
and cumulative production through December 31, 2008 from
Resolutes three operated units was 68.2 MMBbl of oil
and 146.2 Bcf of gas. Average daily gross production for
the six months ending June 30, 2009, was 251 barrels
of oil per day and 10,561 Mcf of gas per day. Net proved
reserves assigned to these properties as of December 31,
2008, were 5.4 MMBoe. Muddy Formation sandstones form the
main reservoir in the field. Average depth to the Muddy
Formation is approximately 9,100 ft. Minor production also comes
from the Upper Cretaceous Niobrara, Upper Cretaceous Turner, and
Pennsylvanian Minnelusa reservoirs. Recent activity includes 21
infill wells, including three horizontal laterals drilled by PNR
in 2006-2007
and five Muddy re-stimulation, or re-frac, projects. Future
activity may include the continuation of the infill and re-frac
program, new drilling to extend the field boundaries, and
exploration for unconventional oil from the overlying Niobrara
and Mowry shales.
Resolutes CBM production in the Hilight area comes from
240 producing wells. Average daily gross production for the six
months ending June 30, 2009, was 3,681 Mcfd. Although
it varies from well to well, Resolute has an average of
approximately 93% working interest in its Hilight area CBM
properties. Net proved reserves assigned to these wells as of
December 31, 2008, were 32 MBoe. The Wyodak-Anderson
coals of the Paleocene Fort Union Formation are the
reservoir for this shallow gas reserve. Average depth to the
reservoir is less than 500 feet. Recent activity by
Resolutes predecessor includes 17 wells that were
drilled to extend the central portion of the field to the east.
Since Resolute took over operations, the CBM field has undergone
downsizing and reconfiguration in an attempt to find the most
economic balance between lease operating expenses and production.
The other Wyoming Properties consist of working interests in 12
small fields in Wyoming and two in Oklahoma. Currently, Resolute
operates wells in Campbell, Carbon, Natrona, and Crook counties,
Wyoming, and Dewey and Woodward counties, Oklahoma. During the
six months ending June 30, 2009, these properties produced
approximately 281 barrels of oil per day from 44 gross
(27 net) active producing wells. In addition, there are
4 gross (2 net) active water injection wells. Net proved
reserves assigned to these properties as of December 31,
2008, were 261 MBoe.
208
Exploration
Properties
Big Horn Basin Properties. Resolute developed
a grassroots exploration concept in early 2005 to target a
previously unrecognized unconventional oil resource in the Mowry
Shale of the Big Horn Basin in northwest Wyoming. Since that
time, the Mowry Shale has become an emerging oil play over a
larger area in northern Wyoming and southern Montana. Resolute
began leasing in June 2005 and it has acquired 82,133 gross
and 70,811 net acres in the play with more than 99% of its
leased properties having at least five years remaining on the
lease term. Resolute entered into an area of mutual interest
agreement effective November 1, 2006, with Fidelity
Exploration and Production Company covering acreage in the
southeast part of the basin where 22,644 gross acres were
jointly acquired on a
50-50 basis.
That agreement has expired, but the acreage remains subject to a
joint operating agreement for its remaining term. Resolute has
not yet commenced development of the asset.
Black Warrior Basin Properties. In mid-2005,
Resolute initiated an exploration program in the Black Warrior
Basin of northwest Alabama that targeted unconventional gas
resources in the Devonian Chattanooga Shale, the Mississippian
Floyd Shale, and the Pennsylvanian Pottsville coals.
Approximately 37,870 net acres from surface to the base of
Pottsville Formation, and 41,170 net acres below the base
of the Pottsville Formation are currently leased. Resolute
drilled a vertical well in April 2007 that penetrated all three
objectives and was cased without a completion attempt. It later
entered into a Participation Agreement with Huber Energy LLC, or
Huber, effective June 26, 2008, under which Huber can earn
an interest in the acreage by incurring all costs on specific
development activities. Huber re-entered Resolutes
vertical well and completed the Chattanooga shale, but recovered
gas at uneconomic rates. The well is currently shut-in. Huber
acquired proprietary
2-D seismic
data in July 2009 for risk reduction on potential future
operational activities targeting the Chattanooga and Floyd
shales. Huber is also undertaking permitting activities for a
potential CBM pilot program on the leasehold. The Pottsville has
been producing CBM from adjacent areas since the early 1980s.
Oil
Recovery Overview
When an oil field is first produced, the oil typically is
recovered as a result of natural pressure within the producing
formation, often assisted by pumps of various types. The only
natural force present to move the crude oil to the wellbore is
the pressure differential between the higher pressure in the
formation and the lower pressure in the wellbore. At the same
time, there are many factors that act to impede the flow of
crude oil, depending on the nature of the formation and fluid
properties, such as pressure, permeability, viscosity and water
saturation. This stage of production, referred to as
primary recovery, recovers only a small fraction of
the crude oil originally in place in a producing formation.
Many, but not all, oil fields are amenable to assistance from a
waterflood, a form of secondary recovery, which is
used to maintain reservoir pressure and to help sweep oil to the
wellbore. In a waterflood, some of the wells are used to inject
water into the reservoir while other wells are used to produce
the fluid. As the waterflood matures, the fluid produced
contains increasing amounts of water and decreasing amounts of
oil. Surface equipment is used to separate the oil from the
water, with the oil going to pipelines or holding tanks for sale
and the water being recycled to the injection facilities.
Primary recovery followed by secondary recovery usually produces
between 15% and 40% of the crude oil originally in place in a
producing formation.
A third stage of oil recovery is called tertiary
recovery or enhanced oil recovery, or EOR. In
addition to maintaining reservoir pressure, this type of
recovery seeks to alter the properties of the oil in ways that
facilitate production. The three major types of tertiary
recovery are chemical flooding, thermal recovery (such as a
steamflood) and miscible displacement involving
CO2
or hydrocarbon injection.
In a
CO2
flood,
CO2
is liquefied under high pressure and injected into the
reservoir. The
CO2
then swells the oil in a way that increases the mobilization of
by-passed oil while also reducing the oils viscosity. The
lighter components of the oil vaporize into the
CO2
while the
CO2
also condenses into the oil. In this manner, the two fluids
become miscible, mixing to form a homogeneous fluid that is
mobile and has lower viscosity and lower interfacial tension,
thus facilitating the migration of oil and gas to the producer
wells.
209
The following diagram demonstrates the equipment and processes
associated with a typical
CO2
flood project:
Miscible
CO2
flooding was first commercially successful with Chevrons
1972 miscible
CO2
flood in the SACROC field in Scurry County, Texas. According to
the Oil & Gas Journals 2008 Worldwide EOR
Survey, at that time there were 105 miscible
CO2
projects in the United States (with an additional 16 miscible
CO2
projects in the planning stages) that produced an estimated
249,700 barrels of oil per day during 2008. In addition to
Resolutes projects in its Aneth Field Properties,
CO2
projects are located in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado,
Wyoming, Michigan and Mississippi. Four companies, Occidental
Petroleum, Kinder Morgan, Amerada Hess and Chevron, are
responsible for the majority of the estimated daily production
from these
CO2
projects.
Recent
Development and Operating Activity
Aneth Field Properties. After completing the
acquisition of the Chevron Properties and the ExxonMobil
Properties, Resolute became operator of three of the four
federal production units within Greater Aneth Field; the Aneth
Unit, in which it owns a 62% working interest, the McElmo Creek
Unit, in which Resolute owns a 75% working interest, and the
Ratherford Unit, in which it owns a 59% working interest. In
that capacity, Resolute is able to control and optimize the
timing of development of and production from its three units.
Resolute is also better positioned to optimize operating costs,
not only by increasing production but also by efficiently
consolidating operating and development functions across the
three units it operates. The technical information learned
through scientific or operational activities conducted in one
unit can be used at the other units rather than being limited by
separate unit ownership and operations.
Soon after Resolute acquired and became the operator of the
Aneth Field Properties, it undertook a program of repair and
maintenance of the wells and equipment in those production
units. Resolute also expanded the
CO2
flood at Aneth Unit by implementing the first three phases of a
four-phase program. The first new
CO2
injection outside the
CO2
pilot area occurred in July 2007. As part of that project,
Resolute overhauled existing compressors and other equipment,
added new compressors, new headers, new well test equipment, new
pipelines, and new electrical substations. In addition, it
installed automated production testing and monitoring equipment.
Resolute also shot, processed and interpreted a
3-D seismic
program over the Aneth Unit. As a result of these and other
efforts, Resolute arrested the natural production decline and is
increasing production.
Wyoming Properties. After completing the acquisition of
its Wyoming Properties in July 2008, Resolute became operator of
three of the four federal production units that comprise Hilight
Field: the Jayson, Grady, and Central Hilight units. Since
taking over operations on August 1, 2008, Resolute has
engaged in an active
210
repair and maintenance program in these three units. Other
material activities have taken place on the Hilight area CBM
property. In an effort to improve the economics of the CBM
property, a significant downsizing and reconfiguration of the
field was implemented on a trial basis beginning in April 2009.
Approximately 60% of the wells active at year end 2008 have been
shut-in and more than half of the compressors were
decommissioned. The resultant drop in daily gas production and
LOE is being monitored and results will be evaluated after a
sufficient trial period. In the other 14 properties comprising
the Wyoming Properties, there have been approximately
20 wells worked over in an ongoing repair and maintenance
program.
Planned
Operating and Development Activities
Resolute has prepared a twelve-year development program for its
Aneth Field Properties that includes
CO2
flooding, field infrastructure enhancements, recompletions,
workovers of producing and injection wells, infill drilling and
waterflood enhancement. The application of each of these
activities and technologies has been successfully established in
various locations within the Aneth Field Properties, and its
development plans have been designed to enhance or extend
projects that were tested or initiated by the previous operators
but were never fully completed due to such factors as lack of
fieldwide operatorship and lower commodity prices. Resolute
believes that its close working relationship with NNOG and the
Navajo Nation will permit it to advance development of its Aneth
Field Properties.
CO2
Floods. A major component of planned activity
over the next several years involves extensions and expansions
of the
CO2
floods initiated by the major oil companies, first in the McElmo
Creek Unit in 1985 and then in the Aneth Unit in 1998. The
McElmo Creek Unit
CO2
flood is virtually unit-wide, whereas the Aneth Unit
CO2
flood was limited to a pilot project covering approximately two
square miles in the northeast corner of that unit.
The Aneth and McElmo Creek Units exhibit similar geologic and
reservoir characteristics. As a result, Resolute expects its
Aneth Unit
CO2
flood to achieve results similar to those achieved in the McElmo
Creek
CO2
flood program. Therefore, Resolute has modeled its estimate of
increased incremental proved developed non-producing and proved
undeveloped reserves based upon the results achieved in the
McElmo Creek Unit
CO2
flood. It has also modeled its projection of increased rate of
oil production based upon the oil production response of the
McElmo Creek Unit to the injection of
CO2.
The oil production rate response is related to the rate at which
CO2
is injected. The McElmo Creek
CO2
project was initiated in 1985 with a relatively low rate of
CO2
injection, and therefore experienced an oil production rate
response that was lower than what could have been achieved had
CO2
been injected at a higher rate. Resolutes estimate of the
rate of oil production response is greater than the McElmo Creek
Unit oil production response based upon its plan to inject
CO2
volumes at a greater rate than was done in connection with the
McElmo Creek Unit
CO2
flood.
Aneth Unit. Phases 1, 2 and 3 of the Aneth
Unit
CO2
expansion project are now substantially complete. This project
covers the western portion of the Aneth Unit and has cumulative
expenditures (including
CO2
acquisition) of $77.2 million. Initial
CO2
injection began in July 2007 and an oil response has been
observed for all three active Phases. Phase 4 construction is
scheduled to begin during the first quarter of 2010 and
injection of
CO2
is expected to commence in the second quarter of 2011 with
notable production response estimated in 2012.
McElmo Creek Unit. The waterflood project of
one portion of the Desert Creek reservoir was abandoned prior to
reaching the current economic limit of water-cut. Resolute
believes that more hydrocarbons can now be economically
recovered from this zone by restarting the waterflood. Resolute
has incurred approximately $1.8 million in costs to
initiate this project, and it plans to continue the waterflood
project in 2010. Resolute also plans to expand the existing
CO2
flood project into the same Desert Creek zone. This operation
will occur in several stages over the next twelve years. The
incremental production from both the waterflood restart and the
expanded
CO2
flood are expected to be realized concurrently.
Ratherford Unit. The geology and overall
operations of the Ratherford Unit are fundamentally the same as
the other two units, including an extensive waterflood of the
Desert Creek reservoir. Resolute is evaluating future plans to
include a
CO2
flood of this unit.
211
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2008,
Resolutes estimate of the future capital expenditures, net
to its interest, necessary to be made for construction, well
work and other costs and for purchases of
CO2
to implement its
CO2
flood projects in two of the units of its Aneth Field
Properties. The following table also sets forth the estimated
net proved developed non-producing and proved undeveloped
reserves included in its reserve report as of December 31,
2008, as a result of these projects. Resolute has incurred
$79.4 million of capital expenditures through
December 31, 2008, and it expects to incur an additional
$227.8 million of capital expenditures over the next
20 years (including purchases of
CO2
under existing contracts), in connection with bringing those
incremental proved developed non-producing and proved
undeveloped reserves attributable to its
CO2
flood project into production. Resolute has entered into two
long-term
CO2
purchase contracts for substantially all of the
CO2
it expects to use in connection with its
CO2
flood projects. In order to further these
CO2
flood projects, it expects to incur approximately
$99.3 million of these future capital expenditures from
2009 through 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Future Total
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Future
CO2
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Previous
|
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
(MMBoe)
|
|
|
Cost ($/Boe)
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except as otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
Aneth Unit Phases 1, 2 and 3
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
$
|
31.2
|
|
|
$
|
40.3
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
77.2
|
|
Aneth Unit Phase 4
|
|
|
81.7
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
120.7
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
13.12
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
McElmo Creek Unit
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
8.20
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
129.6
|
|
|
$
|
98.8
|
|
|
$
|
228.4
|
|
|
$
|
28.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
79.4
|
|
As Resolute advances its
CO2
projects, the injected
CO2
will displace an increasing portion of the water currently being
injected in the waterflood operation. It will need to safely
dispose of that water, and, to that end, has drilled a water
disposal well with four horizontal laterals. Engineering studies
have indicated that this initial well should be able to handle
most of the incremental water production. To protect against the
possibility that the first water disposal well might become
incapable of handling all volumes of water to be disposed of,
Resolute is presently in the process of securing permits to
drill a second water disposal well to handle any excess water
disposal needs. This well could be ready for water disposal by
the second quarter of 2011.
The success of Resolutes
CO2
projects also depends on it acquiring adequate amounts of
CO2.
In order to pursue
CO2
projects over the next eight years (the term of existing
CO2
contracts) and to continue its existing
CO2
floods, Resolute estimates that, as of December 31, 2008,
it will need gross aggregate volumes of
CO2
of approximately 140.0 Bcf, or approximately 90.2 Bcf
net to its working interest. As of December 31, 2008, it
had gross aggregate volumes of approximately 134.2 Bcf
committed to it under two contracts. One of these contracts is
with ExxonMobil Gas & Power Marketing Company. The
price per Mcf of
CO2
under this contract is 1.4% of the price of West Texas
Intermediate crude oil. The volume Resolute is allowed to take
and that ExxonMobil is required to deliver is 20,000 Mcf
per day, or approximately 10.9 Bcf over one and one-half
years remaining on the contract from January 1, 2009.
Resolute is obligated to take-or-pay for 80% of this volume,
with limited
make-up
rights if it makes take-or-pay payments. Resolute also has the
right to resell any
CO2
it is obligated to take under this contract but that it is not
able to use. Resolute has the right to take delivery into either
the McElmo Creek Pipeline (which would be for its own use) or
into Kinder Morgans Cortez Pipeline (which would occur if
it were reselling the
CO2).
The contract term runs until June 30, 2010. As of
December 31, 2008, Resolute had taken delivery of all
required
CO2
volumes under the contract and had incurred no
take-or-pay
liability.
The second contract is with Kinder Morgan
CO2
Company, L.P. This gas is also delivered from the McElmo Dome
field. The
CO2price
per Mcf of
CO2
under this contract is 1.75% of the price of West Texas
Intermediate crude oil, and the contract runs through
December 31, 2016. This contract has a variable schedule of
committed contract quantities intended to make available the
expected requirements of Phases 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Resolutes
Aneth Unit
CO2
project as well as the requirements of its Desert Creek II
expansion project in the McElmo Creek Unit, less the volumes
expected to be provided under its ExxonMobil contract. The
Kinder Morgan contract maximum daily quantities range from a
high of approximately 50,000 Mcf per day in 2009, declining
to approximately 5,000 Mcf per day during 2016, the last
year of the contract. The aggregate total
212
contract quantity over the term of the contract for these
projects is approximately 93 Bcf. Resolute has the option
to increase the total contract volume by 41 Bcf between
2011 and 2016.
Resolute is required to take on a monthly basis, or pay for if
not taken, a percentage of the total of the maximum daily
quantities for each month during the term of the Kinder Morgan
contract. The percentage is 80% for 2009 and 75% for the
remainder of the contract term. There are
make-up
provisions allowing any take or pay payments it makes to be
applied against future purchases for specified periods of time.
Resolute has a one time right to reduce committed volumes under
the contract by up to approximately 41 Bcf for 25% of the
contract price at the time the volumes are released. It does not
have the right to resell
CO2
required to be purchased under the Kinder Morgan contract. As of
December 31, 2008, Resolute had made payments of $94,290
under this contract for 134,708 Mcf of
CO2
for which it had not yet taken delivery.
The
CO2
that Resolute purchases for its use under the Kinder Morgan
contract will be delivered to it through the McElmo Creek
Pipeline. This pipeline is approximately 25 miles in length
and runs directly from the McElmo Dome Field to Resolutes
McElmo Creek Unit. Pipelines within the Aneth Field Properties
are used to distribute the
CO2
to the Aneth Unit. Resolute owns a 75% interest in, and is the
operator of, the McElmo Creek Pipeline. Resolute recently added
a pump to the pipeline to boost capacity to 70,000 Mcf per
day. An additional pump is planned to further boost capacity to
approximately 90,000 Mcf per day.
Wyoming Properties. Resolute has prepared a
six-year development plan for the Wyoming Properties. At Hilight
Field, the previous operator was successful with re-stimulating
the Muddy Formation and adding new reserves. Resolute plans to
continue this program with 41 re-fracs scheduled to be completed
between 2009 and 2014. In addition, one well is scheduled to be
returned to production in 2009. The repair and maintenance
program will continue and certain water discharge facilities are
scheduled to be reconfigured in 2009. At the Hilight area CBM
property, any new operational activities will be planned after
the results of the field reconfiguration, which was implemented
on a trial basis beginning in April 2009, are fully analyzed. At
the other 14 properties acquired in the PNR acquisition, two
proved undeveloped reserve locations are scheduled to be drilled
in 2010 and 2011, and the repair and maintenance program will
continue.
Other
Planned Activities
Aneth Field Gas
Processing. Currently gas production in the Aneth
Field falls into two categories, saleable gas and contaminated
gas. The saleable gas stream has low levels of
CO2
and is directly sold. The contaminated gas stream has high
levels of
CO2
which prevents it from being directly sold. This contaminated
stream currently is compressed and re-injected into the
reservoir. As Resolute continues its
CO2
injection and expansion plans, the volume of contaminated gas
will significantly increase. This contaminated stream is rich in
NGL and represents a valuable product. The plan is to install
new facilities and gas plant equipment to process and treat this
contaminated stream. This project would recover condensate and
also strip the majority of the
CO2
from the contaminated stream. The condensate would be sold and
the
CO2
would be compressed and re-injected allowing for reduced volumes
of purchased
CO2.
The residue gas stream will be marketed through third party
processing facilities.
Black Warrior Basin Properties. Activities
related to Resolutes Black Warrior Basin exploration
acreage in Alabama are expected to occur in 2009 and 2010. Under
the Participation Agreement with Huber Energy LLC, Huber has the
option to perform specified development activities which would
earn it an interest in Resolutes Black Warrior acreage.
Huber may drill, complete, and test a five-well CBM pilot in
2009 to earn into the CBM leasehold interests. Permitting for
such a pilot is ongoing. In addition, Huber has the option to
further develop the deeper Floyd
and/or
Chattanooga shale-gas plays to earn additional interest in the
acreage. Potential earning activities include completing the
Floyd Formation from Resolutes existing vertical well, or
drilling, completing, and testing the Chattanooga Formation in a
horizontal lateral from Resolutes existing vertical well,
or drilling, completing, and testing the Chattanooga Formation
from a new vertical well.
Big Horn Basin Properties. Activities related
to Resolutes Big Horn Basin exploration acreage are
expected to begin in 2010 or 2011. Resolute entered into an area
of mutual interest agreement with Fidelity Exploration and
Production Company, or Fidelity, covering approximately
469,000 acres in the southeast part of the basin, under
which approximately 22,644 gross acres were jointly
acquired on a
50-50 basis.
That
213
agreement has expired, but the acreage remains subject to a
joint operating agreement for its remaining term. In addition,
both Resolute and Fidelity independently control additional
leasehold in the immediate area. The emerging Mowry Shale oil
resource play is the primary reservoir target and the Frontier
and Phosphoria are secondary reservoir targets. A well to test
the Mowry is tentatively planned for 2010 or 2011.
Estimated
Net Proved Reserves
The following table presents Resolutes estimated net
proved oil, gas and NGL reserves and the present value of its
estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2006,
2007, and 2008. The reserve data as of December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008, were prepared by Resolute and audited by
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent
petroleum engineers, or NSAI. Please read Risk
Factors Risks Related to Resolutes Business,
Operations and Industry and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of Resolute in evaluating the material
presented below.
The standardized measure shown in the table below is not
intended to represent the current market value of
Resolutes estimated oil and gas reserves. Resolutes
estimates of net proved reserves have not been filed with or
included in reports to any federal authority or agency other
than the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Estimated net proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
78,357
|
|
|
|
74,453
|
|
|
|
44,734
|
|
Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
17,782
|
|
NGL (MBbl)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
Total (MBoe)
|
|
|
78,672
|
|
|
|
74,747
|
|
|
|
49,334
|
|
Proved developed reserves as a percentage of total proved
reserves
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
Standardized measure ($ in millions)(1)(2)
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with SEC and FASB requirements, Resolutes
estimated net proved reserves and standardized measure were
determined using end of the period prices for oil and gas that
were realized as of the date set forth below. The reserves
estimates utilized year-end NYMEX posted prices for oil for the
dates presented, NYMEX Henry Hub posted prices for gas as of
December 31, 2006, and the El Paso San Juan Basin
posted price for gas as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 shown
below, for the product but as adjusted for location
differentials as of the effective date of the report as well as
plant fees and Btu content. |
|
(2) |
|
Standardized measure is the present value of estimated future
net revenue to be generated from the production of proved
reserves, determined in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the FASB (using prices and costs in effect as of
the date of the estimate), less future development, production
and income tax expenses, and discounted at 10% per annum to
reflect the timing of future net revenue. Resolutes
standardized measure as of December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2007 do not reflect any future income tax
expenses because Resolute was not subject to federal income
taxes as of those dates. Standardized measure does not give
effect to derivatives transactions. For a description of
Resolutes derivatives transactions, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of
Resolute Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Oil and gas prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
|
61.05
|
|
|
|
95.98
|
|
|
|
44.60
|
|
Gas ($/MMBtu)
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
Proved developed reserves are reserves that can be expected to
be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and
operating methods. Proved undeveloped reserves are proved
reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells
drilled to known reservoirs on undrilled acreage for which the
existence and
214
recoverability of such reserves can be estimated with reasonable
certainty, or from existing wells on which a relatively major
expenditure is required to establish production.
The data in the above table represent estimates only. Oil and
gas reserve engineering is inherently a subjective process of
estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot
be measured exactly. The accuracy of any reserves estimate is a
function of the quality of available data and engineering and
geological interpretation and judgment. Accordingly, reserves
estimates may vary from the quantities of oil and gas that are
ultimately recovered. Please read Risk
Factors Risks Related to Resolutes Business,
Operations and Industry.
Future prices received for production and costs may vary,
perhaps significantly, from the prices and costs assumed for
purposes of these estimates. The 10% discount factor used to
calculate present value, which is required by FASB
pronouncements, is not necessarily the most appropriate discount
rate. The present value, no matter what discount rate is used,
is materially affected by assumptions as to timing of future
production, which may prove to be inaccurate.
Producing oil and gas reservoirs generally are characterized by
declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir
characteristics and other factors. Therefore, without reserve
additions in excess of production through successful
exploitation and development activities or acquisitions,
Resolutes reserves and production will ultimately decline
over time. Please read Risk Factors Risks
Related to Resolutes Business, Operations and
Industry and Note 14
Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (unaudited) to
the audited combined financial statements of Resolute at
F-31 for a
discussion of the risks inherent in oil and gas estimates and
for certain additional information concerning Resolutes
estimated proved reserves.
Production
and Price History
Set forth in the table below are Resolutes operating data
for the periods indicated. The historical operating data set
forth in the table are derived from the historical statements of
Resolute and its predecessors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006(1)(2)
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Production Sales Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
Gas and NGL (MMcfe)
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
4,645
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
Combined volumes (MBoe)
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
Daily combined volumes (Boe/d)
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
7,712
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
Average Realized Prices (including hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
|
62.18
|
|
|
|
67.30
|
|
|
|
81.39
|
|
|
|
81.58
|
|
|
|
54.13
|
|
Gas and NGL ($/Mcfe)
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
8.38
|
|
|
|
9.77
|
|
|
|
6.92
|
|
Average Realized Prices (excluding hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
63.58
|
|
|
$
|
69.66
|
|
|
$
|
94.36
|
|
|
$
|
106.42
|
|
|
$
|
44.92
|
|
Gas and NGL ($/Mcfe)
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
6.53
|
|
|
|
7.64
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
Average Costs ($/Boe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
$
|
19.75
|
|
|
$
|
19.96
|
|
|
$
|
24.77
|
|
|
|
19.22
|
|
|
|
17.82
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
3.98
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
5.71
|
|
|
|
11.02
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the results of operations of the ExxonMobil Properties
for the period beginning on the date of acquisition,
April 14, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the retrospective effect to a percentage of the
acquisition of Resolute Wyoming from the beginning of 2006. |
215
Productive
Wells
The following table sets forth information as of
December 31, 2008, relating to the productive wells in
which Resolute owns a working interest. Productive wells consist
of producing wells and wells capable of producing, including
wells awaiting connection to production facilities. Gross wells
are the total number of producing wells in which Resolute has an
interest, and net wells are the sum of Resolutes
fractional working interests owned in gross wells. In addition
to the wells set forth below, as of December 31, 2008,
Resolute had interests in and operated 323 gross (211 net)
active water and
CO2
injection wells on the Aneth Field Properties, and 4 gross
(2 net) active water injection wells associated with the Wyoming
Properties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producing Wells
|
|
Area
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Aneth Field Properties
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Wyoming Properties
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acreage
All of Resolutes leasehold acreage is categorized as
developed or undeveloped. Approximately 18% of the undeveloped
acreage will expire in 2010 and less than 2% will expire in each
of the years 2011 and 2012. The following table sets forth
information as of June 30, 2009, relating to its leasehold
acreage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed Acreage(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net
|
|
Area
|
|
Gross(2)
|
|
|
Net(3)
|
|
|
Revenue Interest(4)
|
|
|
Aneth Field Unit acreage (UT)
|
|
|
43,218
|
|
|
|
28,122
|
|
|
|
55.42
|
%
|
Hilight Field Unit acreage (WY)
|
|
|
48,710
|
|
|
|
44,577
|
|
|
|
75.98
|
%
|
Hilight Area
non-unit
acreage (WY)
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
|
3,432
|
|
|
|
85.00
|
%
|
Other
non-unit
acreage (WY and OK)
|
|
|
7,024
|
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
|
61.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
102,565
|
|
|
|
80,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area
|
|
Undeveloped Acreage(5)
|
|
|
Hilight Area
non-unit
acreage (WY)
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
|
9,077
|
|
|
|
81.25
|
%
|
Big Horn Basin acreage (WY)
|
|
|
82,133
|
|
|
|
70,811
|
|
|
|
86.00
|
%
|
Black Warrior Basin acreage (AL)
|
|
|
49,380
|
|
|
|
41,170
|
|
|
|
82.00
|
%
|
Other
non-unit
acreage (WY, OK and UT)
|
|
|
7,753
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
81.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
150,612
|
|
|
|
125,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiring Undeveloped Net Acreage
|
|
Area
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Hilight Area
non-unit
acreage (WY)
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Big Horn Basin acreage (WY)
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Black Warrior Basin acreage (AL)
|
|
|
17,150
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other
non-unit
acreage (WY, OK and UT)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22,220
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Developed acreage is acreage attributable to wells producing oil
or gas. |
|
(2) |
|
The number of gross acres is the total number of acres in which
Resolute owns a working interest and/or unitized interest. |
|
(3) |
|
Net acres are calculated as the sum of Resolutes working
interests in gross acres. |
216
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The net revenue interest is the percentage of total production
to which Resolute is entitled after reductions for burdens on
production such as royalties and overriding royalties. |
|
(5) |
|
Undeveloped acreage includes leases either within their primary
term or held by production. |
Drilling
Results
Resolute engaged in drilling activities on its Aneth Field
Properties and Black Warrior Basin Properties in 2006 and 2007.
PNR, the predecessor operator of the Wyoming Properties, engaged
in drilling activities on the Wyoming Properties in 2006 and
2007. The combined activity is summarized in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006(3)
|
|
|
2007(3)
|
|
|
2008(3)
|
|
|
2009(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Wells re-entered(1)
|
|
|
3.71
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells drilled(2)
|
|
|
22.54
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wells
|
|
|
26.25
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
21.59
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Laterals from wells re-entered
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
10.90
|
|
|
|
17.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laterals from wells drilled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total laterals
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
15.21
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A pre-existing well from which at least one new horizontal
lateral was drilled |
|
(2) |
|
A new well drilled from surface |
|
(3) |
|
Year in which the new well or horizontal lateral was completed |
|
(4) |
|
The six months ended June 30, 2009 |
Aneth Field Properties. Resolutes
drilling activities have primarily involved re-entering existing
vertical wells to drill new horizontal laterals. During 2006,
six gross (3.71 net) wells were re-entered from which
12 gross (7.41 net) new horizontal laterals were drilled
and completed. In 2007, 10 gross (6.22 net) wells were
re-entered from which 16 gross (10.08 net) new horizontal
laterals were drilled and completed. Twenty-seven of the
laterals targeted Desert Creek Zones I and II and a single
lateral targeted Desert Creek Zone III. These re-entry
development activities resulted in additions to reserves and
increased production rates; there were no dry holes.
One new gross (0.62 net) salt water disposal well was drilled by
Resolute on its Aneth Field Properties in 2006, from which four
gross (2.47 net) horizontal laterals were drilled and completed
in 2007. The horizontal laterals were drilled into the Lower
Leadville Formation, approximately 1,400 feet below the
base of the Desert Creek. Average daily injection rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, was 9,695 Bbl of water
injected per day, and cumulative water injection since December
2007 is 5.6 MMBbl.
Wyoming Properties. Resolute has not engaged
in any new drilling activity since taking over operations of its
Wyoming Properties on August 1, 2008. However, PNR, the
predecessor operator, drilled development wells on
Resolutes Wyoming Properties. In Hilight Field PNR drilled
15 gross new (14.00 net) wells in 2006, five gross (4.63
net) new wells in 2007, and re-entered one gross (0.82 net) well
to drill a horizontal lateral in 2007. All of the new wells
drilled in 2006 were vertical wells, three of the new wells in
2007 were vertical wells and two of the new wells in 2007 were
horizontal wells. These productive development wells resulted in
additions to reserves and increased production rates; there were
no dry holes. Development drilling for CBM in the Hilight area
by PNR totaled seven gross (6.92 net) wells in 2006 and
9 gross (8.92 net) wells in 2007. In 2006, PNR also drilled
one gross (one net) vertical development well in Wyoming,
outside of the Hilight area, that was a successful oil producer.
Black Warrior Basin Properties. Resolute
drilled one gross (one net) exploratory well on its Black
Warrior Basin Properties in 2007. A completion attempt was made
in the Chattanooga Shale resulting in uneconomic gas rates, at
which point the well was shut-in. Resolutes industry
partner, Huber, can earn interest in the Black Warrior Basin
Properties by executing specified development activities.
Re-entering the vertical
217
well to drill and complete a horizontal lateral in the
Chattanooga Shale or making a vertical completion attempt in the
Floyd Shale are potential earning activities that may occur in
2010.
Relationship
with the Navajo Nation
The purchase of Resolutes Aneth Field Properties was
facilitated by Resolutes strategic alliance with NNOG and,
through NNOG, the Navajo Nation. The Navajo Nation formed NNOG,
a wholly-owned corporate entity, under Section 17 of the
Indian Reorganization Act. Resolute supplies NNOG with
acquisition, operational and financial expertise and NNOG helps
Resolute communicate and interact with the Navajo Nation
agencies.
Resolutes strategic alliance with NNOG is embodied in a
Cooperative Agreement that Resolute entered into with NNOG in
2004 to facilitate Resolute and NNOGs joint acquisition of
Chevrons interests in Greater Aneth Field. The agreement
was amended subsequently to facilitate the joint acquisition of
ExxonMobils interests in Greater Aneth Field. Among other
things, this agreement provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute and NNOG will cooperate on the acquisition and
subsequent development of their respective properties in Greater
Aneth Field.
|
|
|
|
NNOG will assist Resolute in dealing with the Navajo Nation and
its various agencies, and Resolute will assist NNOG in expanding
its financial expertise and its operating capabilities. Since
Resolute and NNOG acquired the Aneth Field Properties, NNOG has
helped facilitate interaction between Resolute and the Navajo
Nation Minerals Department and other agencies of the Navajo
Nation.
|
|
|
|
NNOG has a right of first negotiation in the event of a proposed
sale or change of control of Resolute or a sale by Resolute of
all or substantially all of its Chevron Properties or ExxonMobil
Properties. This right is separate from and in addition to the
statutory preferential purchase right held by the Navajo Nation.
The Acquisition will not constitute a change of control under
the Cooperative Agreement.
|
In addition to the above provisions, Resolute granted NNOG three
separate but substantially similar purchase options. Each
purchase option entitles NNOG to purchase from Resolute up to
10% of the undivided working interests that Resolute acquired
from Chevron or ExxonMobil, as applicable, as to each unit in
the Aneth Field Properties. Each purchase option entitles NNOG
to purchase at fair market value, for a limited period of time,
the applicable portion of the undivided working interest
Resolute acquired. The fair market value is to be determined
without giving effect to the existence of the Navajo Nation
statutory preferential purchase right or the fact that the
properties are located on the Navajo Reservation. Each option
becomes exercisable based upon Resolutes achieving a 100%,
150% or 200% of payout of the relevant acquisition costs,
subsequent capital costs and ongoing operating costs
attributable to the applicable working interests. Revenue
applicable to the determination of payout includes the effect of
Resolutes hedging program. The multiples of payout that
trigger the exercisability of the purchase options with respect
to each of the Chevron Properties and the ExxonMobil Properties
are 100%, 150% and 200%. The options are not exercisable prior
to four years from the relevant acquisition except in the case
of a sale of such assets by, or a change of control of,
Resolute. In that case, the first option for 10% would be
accelerated and the other options would terminate. The
Acquisition will not cause a change of control under the terms
of the options.
As of June 30, 2009, the payout balance on the Chevron
Properties was approximately $50 million and payout balance
on the ExxonMobil Properties was approximately
$113 million. Assuming the purchase options are not
accelerated due to a change of control of Resolute, and assuming
Resolute continues to develop its Aneth Field Properties in
accordance with its plans, Resolute expects that the initial
payout associated with the purchase options would not occur for
a number of years.
The following table demonstrates the maximum net undivided
working interest in each of the Aneth Unit, the McElmo Creek
Unit and the Ratherford Unit that NNOG could acquire from
Resolute upon exercising
218
each of its purchase options under the Cooperative Agreement.
The exercise by NNOG of its purchase options in full would not
give it the right to remove Resolute as operator of any of
Resolutes Aneth Field Properties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aneth Unit
|
|
|
McElmo Creek Unit
|
|
|
Ratherford Unit
|
|
|
Chevron Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option 1 (100% Payout)
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
Option 2 (150% Payout)
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
Option 3 (200% Payout)
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15.90
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ExxonMobil Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option 1 (100% Payout)
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
Option 2 (150% Payout)
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
Option 3 (200% Payout)
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
18.00
|
%
|
|
|
16.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
and Customers
Aneth Field. Resolute currently sells all of
its crude from its Aneth Field Properties to a single customer,
Western Refining Southwest, Inc., a subsidiary of Western
Refining, Inc. under a contract that terminates August 31,
2009. The Western contract provides for a minimum price equal to
the NYMEX price for crude oil less a fixed differential of $6.25
per Bbl. This price represents a premium to the posted price
offered by Western, which as of July 31, 2009 represented a
negative differential to the NYMEX price of approximately $9.00.
Resolute and Western, with the consent of NNOG, have entered
into a new contract with a fixed maximum differential of
$6.25 per Bbl effective September 1, 2009, covering
the joint crude oil volumes of Resolute and NNOG from Aneth
Field with an initial term of one year and continuing
month-to-month thereafter, with either party having the right to
terminate after the initial term, upon ninety days notice.
The contract may also be terminated by Western after
December 31, 2009, upon sixty days notice, if Western is
not able to renew its right-of-way agreements with the Navajo
Nation or if such rights-of-way are declared invalid and either
Western is prevented from using such rights-of way or the Navajo
Nation declares Western to be in trespass with respect to such
rights-of-way.
Western has two refineries in the Four Corners area, the
16,800 barrel per day Bloomfield refinery in Farmington,
New Mexico, and the 26,000 barrel per day Ciniza refinery
in Gallup, New Mexico. Western refines Resolutes crude oil
at those refineries. Resolutes production is transported
to the refineries via the Running Horse crude oil pipeline owned
by NNOG to a terminal known as Bisti, approximately
20 miles south of Farmington, New Mexico, that serves the
refineries. The Resolute and NNOG oil has been jointly marketed
to Western. The combined Resolute and NNOG volumes are
approximately 7,000 barrels of oil per day.
Resolutes Aneth Field crude oil is a sweet, light crude
oil that is particularly well suited to be refined in
Westerns Four Corners refineries. Although Resolute has
sold all of its crude oil production to Western since Resolute
acquired the Chevron Properties in November 2004, and despite
the value of Resolutes crude oil production to Western,
Resolute cannot be certain that the commercial relationship with
Western will continue for the indefinite future, and Resolute
cannot be certain that one or both of the refineries will not
suffer significant down-time or be closed. If for any reason
Western is unable or unwilling to purchase Resolutes crude
oil production, Resolute has other alternatives for marketing
its crude oil production. Resolute has been working with NNOG to
establish alternative transportation and markets for
Resolutes crude oil. A joint venture comprised of
affiliates of NNOG and Resolute is in the final construction
phase of a high volume truck loading facility located at the
terminal end of NNOGs Running Horse Pipeline that will be
operative and capable of loading all of Resolute and NNOGs
production. Crude oil can be trucked a relatively short distance
from the loading facility to rail loading sites near and south
of Gallup, New Mexico, or longer distances to refineries or oil
pipelines in southern New Mexico and west Texas. Resolute can
also transport its
219
crude oil by various combinations of truck, pipeline and rail
from its Aneth Field Properties to markets north in Utah,
Colorado and Wyoming. The cost of selling Resolutes crude
oil to alternative markets in the short run would result in a
greater differential to the NYMEX price for crude oil than
Resolute currently receives. If Resolute chooses or is forced to
sell to these alternative markets for a longer period of time,
these costs can be lowered significantly. Under long term
arrangements, which may require the investment of capital,
Resolute believes it would realize a NYMEX differential
substantially equivalent to the current differential realized in
the price received from Western.
Resolutes gas production is minimally processed in the
field and then sent via pipeline to the San Juan River Gas
Plant for further processing. Resolute sells its gas at daily
market prices to numerous purchasers at the tailgate of the
plant, and it receives a contractually specified percentage of
the proceeds from the sale of NGLs and plant products.
Wyoming. Resolute sells the majority of its
crude oil in Wyoming to TEPPCO Crude Oil, LLC and minor amounts
to other purchasers in a competitive market. The price it
receives relative to the NYMEX price varies depending on supply
and demand differentials in the relevant geographic areas in
which Resolutes wells are located and the quality of
Resolutes crude oil. Resolutes conventional gas in
Wyoming comes from Hilight Field and is sold to the Anadarko
Petroleum Corporation Fort Union Gas Plant. Resolute
receives a percentage of proceeds for the liquids sold by the
plant, and Resolute can either take its residue gas in kind or
market it through Anadarko. Currently, Resolute is selling its
gas through Anadarko. Resolutes CBM gas also comes from
the Hilight areas and is minimally conditioned at the
Fort Union Gas Plant and is sold through Anadarko. Resolute
receives the Colorado Interstate Gas Company index price for all
the gas it sells.
Hedging. Resolute enters into hedging
transactions from time to time with unaffiliated third parties
for portions of its crude oil and gas production to achieve more
predictable cash flows and to reduce exposure to short-term
fluctuations in oil and gas prices. For more a detailed
discussion, please read Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Resolute Overview and
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk.
Other Factors. The market for Resolutes
production depends on factors beyond its control, including
domestic and foreign political conditions, the overall level of
supply of and demand for oil and gas, the price of imports of
oil and gas, weather conditions, the price and availability of
alternative fuels, the proximity and capacity of transportation
facilities and overall economic conditions. The oil and gas
industry as a whole also competes with other industries in
supplying the energy and fuel requirements of industrial,
commercial and individual consumers.
Aneth Gas
Processing Plant
In connection with the acquisition of the Chevron and ExxonMobil
properties, Resolute acquired an interest in gas gathering and
compression facilities located within and adjacent to its Aneth
Field Properties. Collectively called the Aneth Gas Processing
Plant, the facility comprises: a) an active gas compression
operation currently operated by Resolute and b) a larger
complex of inactive, decommissioned and partially dismantled gas
processing plant facilities for which Chevron remains the
operator of record. In 2006, Chevron began the process of
demolishing the inactive portions of the Aneth Gas Processing
Plant. It continues to manage the project, and it retains a 39%
interest in all demolition and environmental clean-up expenses.
Resolute acquired ExxonMobils 25% interest in the
decommissioned plant and is responsible for that portion of
decommissioning and cleanup costs. Activities performed to date
include removal of asbestos-containing building and insulation
materials, partial dismantling of inactive gas plant buildings
and facilities, and limited remediation of hydrocarbon-affected
soil.
As of June 30, 2009, Chevron estimated the total cost to
fully decommission the inactive portion of the Aneth Gas
Processing Plant site to be $14.6 million, of which
approximately $12.4 million had already been incurred and
paid for. The demolition liability net to Resolutes
interest is $3.65 million. Demolition activities are
scheduled to be concluded in the first quarter of 2010. These
costs do not include any costs for
clean-up or
remediation of the subsurface. The Aneth Gas Processing Plant
site was previously evaluated by the EPA for possible listing on
the National Priorities List, or NPL, of sites contaminated with
hazardous substances with
220
the highest priority for
clean-up
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act, or CERCLA. Based on its investigation, the EPA
concluded no further investigation was warranted and that the
site was not required to be listed on the NPL. The Navajo
Environmental Protection Agency now has primary jurisdiction
over the Aneth Gas Processing Plant site. Resolute cannot
predict whether it will require further investigation and
possible
clean-up,
and the ultimate clean-up liability may be affected by the
Navajo Nations recent enactment of a Navajo CERCLA. The
Navajo CERCLA, in some cases, imposes broader obligations and
liabilities than the federal CERCLA. Resolute has been advised
by Chevron that a significant portion of the subsurface
clean-up or
remediation costs, if any, would be covered by an indemnity from
the prior owner of the plant, and Chevron has provided Resolute
with a copy of the pertinent purchase agreement that appears to
support its position. Resolute cannot predict, however, whether
any subsurface remediation will be required or what the cost of
this
clean-up or
remediation could be. Additionally, it cannot be certain whether
any of such costs will be reimbursable to it pursuant to the
indemnity of the prior owner. Please read also
Environmental, Health and Safety Matters
and Regulation Waste Handling.
Title to
Properties
In connection with Resolutes acquisition of the Chevron
Properties and the ExxonMobil Properties, it obtained
attorneys title opinions showing good and defensible title
in the seller to at least 80% of the proved reserves of the
acquired properties as shown in the relevant reserve reports
presented by the sellers. Resolute also reviewed land files and
public and private records on substantially all of the acquired
properties containing proved reserves. It performed similar
title and land file reviews prior to acquiring the Wyoming
Properties; however, the prior title opinions available for it
to review and update constituted 62% of the proved reserves of
the acquired properties and only the public records for these
properties were reviewed. Resolute believes it has satisfactory
title to all of its material proved properties in accordance
with standards generally accepted in the industry. Prior to
completing an acquisition of proved hydrocarbon leases in the
future, it intends to perform title reviews on the most
significant leases, and, depending on the materiality of
properties, it may obtain a new title opinion or review
previously obtained title opinions.
The Aneth Field Properties are subject to a statutory
preferential purchase right for the benefit of the Navajo Nation
to purchase at the offered price any Navajo Nation oil and gas
lease or working interest in such a lease at the time the lease
or interest is proposed to be transferred. This could make it
more difficult to sell Resolutes oil and gas leases and,
therefore, could reduce the value of the Aneth Field leases if
it were to attempt to sell them.
Resolutes properties are also subject to encumbrances in
some cases, such as customary interests generally retained in
connection with the acquisition of real property, customary
royalty interests and contract terms and restrictions, liens
under operating agreements, liens for current taxes and other
burdens, easements, restrictions and minor encumbrances
customary in the oil and gas industry. It believes that none of
these liens, restrictions, easements, burdens and encumbrances
will materially detract from the value of these properties or
from its interest in these properties or will materially
interfere with the intended operation of its business.
Competition
Competition is intense in all areas of the oil and gas industry.
Major and independent oil and gas companies actively bid for
desirable properties, as well as for the equipment and labor
required to operate and develop such properties. Many of
Resolutes competitors have financial and personnel
resources that are substantially greater than its own, and such
companies may be able to pay more for productive properties and
to define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of
properties than its financial or human resources permit.
Resolutes ability to acquire additional properties and to
discover reserves in the future will depend on its ability to
evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate
transactions in a highly competitive environment.
Seasonality
Resolutes operations have not historically been subject to
seasonality in any material respect.
221
Environmental,
Health and Safety Matters and Regulation
General. Resolute is subject to various
stringent and complex federal, tribal, state and local laws and
regulations governing environmental protection, including the
discharge of materials into the environment, and protection of
human health and safety. These laws and regulations may, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
require the acquisition of various permits before drilling
commences or other operations are undertaken;
|
|
|
|
require the installation of expensive pollution control
equipment;
|
|
|
|
restrict the types, quantities and concentration of various
substances that can be released into the environment in
connection with oil and gas drilling, production, transportation
and processing activities;
|
|
|
|
suspend, limit or prohibit construction, drilling and other
activities in certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands
and other protected areas;
|
|
|
|
require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from historical
and ongoing operations, such as the closure of pits and plugging
of abandoned wells and remediation of releases of crude oil or
other substances; and
|
|
|
|
require preparation of an Environmental Assessment
and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement.
|
These laws and regulations may also restrict the rate of oil and
gas production to a level below the rate that would otherwise be
possible. The regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry
increases the cost of doing business in the industry and
consequently affects profitability.
Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance
with environmental laws, regulations and permits, and violations
are subject to injunctive action, as well as administrative,
civil and criminal penalties. The effects of these laws and
regulations, as well as other laws or regulations that may be
adopted in the future, could have a material adverse impact on
Resolutes business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Resolute believes its operations are in substantial compliance
with all existing environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations and that continued compliance with existing
requirements will not have a material adverse impact on its
financial condition and results of operations. Spills or
releases may occur, however, in the course of its operations.
There can be no assurance that Resolute will not incur
substantial costs and liabilities as a result of such spills or
releases, including those relating to claims for damage to
property, persons and the environment, nor can there be any
assurance that the passage of more stringent laws or regulations
in the future will not have a negative effect on Resolutes
business, financial condition, or results of operations.
The following is a summary of the more significant existing
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations to which
oil and gas business operations are generally subject and with
which compliance may have a material adverse effect on
Resolutes capital expenditures, earnings or competitive
position, as well as a discussion of certain matters that
specifically affect its operations.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act. CERCLA, also known as the
Superfund law, and comparable tribal and state laws
may impose strict, joint and several liability, without regard
to fault, on classes of persons who are considered to be
responsible for the release of CERCLA hazardous substances into
the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of
the site where a release occurred, and anyone who disposed or
arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance released at
the site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and
several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous
substances that have been released into the environment, for
damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health
studies. In addition, it is not uncommon for neighboring
landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal
injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous
substances released into the environment. Such claims may be
filed under CERCLA, as well as state common law theories or
state laws that are modeled after CERCLA. In the course of its
operations, Resolute generates waste that may fall within the
definition of hazardous substances under CERCLA, as well as
under the recently adopted Navajo Nation CERCLA which, unlike
the federal CERCLA, defines hazardous substances to
222
include crude oil and other hydrocarbons, thereby subjecting
Resolute to potential liability under CERCLA, tribal and state
law equivalents to CERCLA and common law. Therefore,
governmental agencies or third parties could seek to hold
Resolute responsible for all or part of the costs to clean up a
site at which such hazardous substances may have been released
or deposited, or other damages resulting from a release.
Waste Handling. The Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, or RCRA, and comparable tribal and state statutes,
regulate the generation, transportation, treatment, storage,
disposal and cleanup of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes.
Under the auspices of the federal EPA, the individual states
administer some or all of the provisions of RCRA, sometimes in
conjunction with their own, more stringent requirements.
Drilling fluids, produced waters and many of the other wastes
associated with the exploration, development and production of
crude oil or gas are currently exempt under federal law from
regulation as hazardous wastes and instead are regulated under
RCRAs non-hazardous waste provisions. It is possible,
however, that oil and gas exploration and production wastes now
classified federally as non-hazardous could be classified as
hazardous wastes in the future. Any such change could result in
an increase in Resolutes operating expenses, which could
have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and
financial position. Also, in the course of operations, Resolute
generates some amounts of industrial solid wastes, such as paint
wastes, waste solvents, and waste oils, that may be regulated as
hazardous wastes under RCRA, tribal and state laws and
regulations.
In connection with Resolutes acquisition of the ExxonMobil
Properties, it acquired an interest in the Aneth Gas Processing
Plant located in the Aneth Unit. This gas plant consists of a
non-operational portion of the plant that is in the process of
being decommissioned and removed by Chevron and an operational
portion dedicated to compression. Resolute is responsible for a
portion of the costs of decommissioning and removal and clean-up
of the non-operational portion of the plant and any restoration
and other costs related to the operational processing
facilities. For additional information related to
Resolutes obligations related to this plant, please read
Aneth Gas Processing Plant.
Air Emissions. The federal Clean Air Act and
comparable tribal and state laws regulate emissions of various
air pollutants through air emissions permitting programs and the
imposition of other requirements. These regulatory programs may
require Resolute to install expensive emissions control
equipment, modify its operational practices and obtain permits
for existing operations, and before commencing construction on a
new or modified source of air emissions such laws may require
Resolute to reduce its emissions at existing facilities. As a
result, Resolute may be required to incur increased capital and
operating costs. Federal, tribal and state regulatory agencies
can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties for
non-compliance with air permits or other requirements of the
federal Clean Air Act and associated tribal and state laws and
regulations.
In June 2005, the EPA and ExxonMobil entered into a consent
decree settling various alleged violations of the federal Clean
Air Act associated with ExxonMobils prior operation of the
McElmo Creek Unit. In response, ExxonMobil submitted amended
Title V and Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit
applications for the McElmo Creek Unit main flare and other
sources, and also paid a civil penalty and costs associated with
a Supplemental Environmental Project, or SEP.
Pursuant to the consent decree, upgrades to the main flare were
completed in May 2006 by ExxonMobil, and all of the remaining
material compliance measures of the consent decree have been met
by Resolute. The EPA is processing the Title V and PSD
permit applications. Resolute remains subject to the consent
decree, including stipulated penalties for violations of
emissions limits and compliance measures set forth in the
consent decree.
Actual air emissions reported for these facilities are in
material compliance with emission limits contained in the draft
permits and the consent decree when emissions associated with
qualified equipment malfunctions are taken into account.
Water Discharges. The federal Water Pollution
Control Act, or the Clean Water Act, and analogous tribal and
state laws, impose restrictions and strict controls with respect
to the discharge of pollutants, including spills and leaks of
oil and other substances, into waters of the United States,
including wetlands. The discharge of pollutants into regulated
waters is prohibited by the Clean Water Act, except in
accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an
authorized tribal or state agency. Federal, tribal and state
regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and
criminal penalties for unauthorized discharges or non-
223
compliance with discharge permits or other requirements of the
Clean Water Act and analogous tribal and state laws and
regulations.
In addition, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, augments the
Clean Water act and imposes strict liability for owners and
operators of facilities that are the source of a release of oil
into waters of the United States. OPA and its associated
regulations impose a variety of requirements on responsible
parties related to the prevention of oil spills and liability
for damages resulting from such spills. For example, operators
of oil and gas facilities must develop, implement, and maintain
facility response plans, conduct annual spill training for
employees and provide varying degrees of financial assurance to
cover costs that could be incurred in responding to oil spills.
In addition, owners and operators of oil and gas facilities may
be subject to liability for cleanup costs and natural resource
damages as well as a variety of public and private damages that
may result from oil spills.
In August 2004, the EPA and ExxonMobil entered into a consent
decree settling alleged violations of the federal Clean Water
Act related to past spills of produced water and crude oil from
the McElmo Creek and Ratherford Units and failure to prepare and
implement Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plans.
ExxonMobil paid a civil penalty and costs to implement a SEP,
and made improvements to the production and injection systems.
Resolute expects the consent decree to be terminated by the
first quarter of 2010 following confirmation by the EPA of
completion of the SEP. Until the consent decree is terminated by
the EPA, Resolute remains subject to various monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting requirements outlined in the
consent decree, as well as stipulated penalties for spills of
produced water and crude oil at the McElmo Creek and Ratherford
Units.
In November 2001, the EPA issued an administrative order to
ExxonMobil for removal and remediation of crude oil released as
a result of a shallow casing leak at the McElmo Creek
P-20 well
in January 2001. In response, ExxonMobil performed various site
assessment activities and began recovering crude oil from the
ground water. Resolute is obligated to complete the ground water
monitoring and remedial activities required under the
administrative order, at an estimated cost of approximately
$100,000 per year, with anticipated closure to occur in the
fourth quarter of 2010 or early 2011.
Underground Injection Control. Resolutes
underground injection operations are subject to the federal Safe
Drinking Water Act, as well as analogous tribal and state laws
and regulations. Under Part C of the Safe Drinking Water
Act, the EPA established the Underground Injection Control
program, which established the minimum program requirements for
tribal and state programs regulating underground injection
activities. The Underground Injection Control program includes
requirements for permitting, testing, monitoring, recordkeeping
and reporting of injection well activities, as well as a
prohibition against the migration of fluid containing any
contaminant into underground sources of drinking water. Federal,
tribal and state regulations require Resolute to obtain a permit
from applicable regulatory agencies to operate its underground
injection wells. Resolute believes it has obtained the necessary
permits from these agencies for its underground injection wells
and that it is in substantial compliance with permit conditions
and applicable federal, tribal and state rules. Nevertheless,
these regulatory agencies have the general authority to suspend
or modify one or more of these permits if continued operation of
one of the underground injection wells is likely to result in
pollution of freshwater, the substantial violation of permit
conditions or applicable rules, or leaks to the environment.
Although Resolute monitors the injection process of its wells,
any leakage from the subsurface portions of the injection wells
could cause degradation of fresh groundwater resources,
potentially resulting in cancellation of operations of a well,
issuance of fines and penalties from governmental agencies,
incurrence of expenditures for remediation of the affected
resource and imposition of liability by third parties for
property damages and personal injuries.
Pipeline Integrity, Safety, and
Maintenance. Resolutes ownership interest
in the McElmo Creek Pipeline has caused it to be subject to
regulation by the federal Department of Transportation, or the
DOT, under the Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act and
comparable state statutes, which relate to the design,
installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement and
management of hazardous liquid pipeline facilities. Any entity
that owns or operates such pipeline facilities must comply with
such regulations, permit access to and copying of records, and
file reports and provide required information. The DOT may
assess fines and penalties
224
for violations of these and other requirements imposed by its
regulations. Resolute believes it is in material compliance with
all regulations imposed by the DOT pursuant to the Hazardous
Liquid Pipeline Safety Act. Pursuant to the Pipeline Inspection,
Protection, Enforcement, and Safety Act of 2006, the DOT was
required to issue new regulations by December 31, 2007,
setting forth specific integrity management program requirements
applicable to low stress hazardous liquid pipelines. Resolute
believes that these new regulations, which have yet to be
issued, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition or results of operations.
Environmental Impact Assessments. Significant
federal decisions, such as the issuance of federal permits or
authorizations for many oil and gas exploration and production
activities are subject to the National Environmental Policy Act,
or NEPA. NEPA requires federal agencies, including the
Department of Interior, to evaluate major federal agency actions
having the potential to significantly impact the environment. In
the course of such evaluations, an agency will prepare an
environmental assessment that assesses the potential direct,
indirect and cumulative impacts of a proposed project and, if
necessary, will prepare a more detailed Environmental Impact
Statement that may be made available for public review and
comment. All of Resolutes current exploration and
production activities, as well as proposed exploration and
development plans on federal lands require governmental permits
that are subject to the requirements of NEPA. This process has
the potential to delay any oil and gas development projects.
Other
Laws and Regulations
Climate Change. Recent scientific studies have
suggested that emissions of gases commonly referred to as
greenhouse gases or GHGs, including carbon dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide and methane, may be contributing to warming of
the Earths atmosphere. Other nations have already agreed
to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases pursuant to the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or UNFCCC and
the Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty pursuant to which
many UNFCCC-member countries (not including the United States)
have agreed to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases to
below 1990 levels by 2012. In response to such studies and
international action, the U.S. Congress is now actively
considering legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases,
and the EPA has proposed a mandatory GHG reporting rule that
could take effect as early as January 1, 2010. While
reporting of
CO2
as industrial gas will primarily be the responsibility of the
CO2
supplier, such proposed regulations may have an impact on the
amount of
CO2
Resolute is able to use. On June 26, 2009, the House of
Representatives passed H.R. 2454, the Waxman-Markey
American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009,
which would require GHG emission reductions by covered
entities of 17% by 2020, relative to 2005 GHG emission
levels, and create an elaborate system of allocated and tradable
emission allowances and offsets to achieve mandated reductions
of up to 80% by the year 2050. Companion legislation is already
being considered in the Senate, and a consensus bill could be
developed by late this year, in advance of the next UNFCCC
meeting to be held in Copenhagen this December to develop the
next successor treaty to the Kyoto Protocol.
Prior to this recent legislative action on climate change by the
U.S. Congress, a number of states chose not to wait for
Congress to develop and implement climate control legislation
and have already taken legal measures to reduce emissions of
greenhouse gases, primarily through the planned development of
GHG emission inventories
and/or
regional cap and trade programs. For example, on August 22,
2007, the Western Climate Initiative, which is comprised of a
number of Western states and Canadian provinces, including the
State of Utah, issued a greenhouse gas reduction goal statement
seeking to collectively reduce regional greenhouse gas emissions
to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020. Also, as a result of the
U.S. Supreme Courts decision on April 2, 2007,
in Massachusetts, et al. v. EPA, the EPA may be required to
regulate greenhouse gas emissions from mobile sources (e.g.,
cars and trucks) even if Congress does not adopt new legislation
specifically addressing emissions of greenhouse gases. The
Courts holding in Massachusetts that greenhouse gases fall
under the federal Clean Air Acts definition of air
pollutant also may result in future regulation of
greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources under Clean Air
Act programs, due to EPAs recent endangerment
finding that links global warming to man-caused emissions
of GHGs and concludes there is an endangerment to public health
and the environment that requires regulatory action. The passage
or adoption of new legislation or regulatory programs that
restrict emissions of greenhouse gases in areas where Resolute
conducts business could adversely affect its operations.
225
Department of Homeland Security. The
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2007
requires the Department of Homeland Security, or the DHS, to
issue regulations establishing risk-based performance standards
for the security at chemical and industrial facilities,
including oil and gas facilities that are deemed to present
high levels of security risk. The DHS is in the
process of adopting regulations that will determine whether some
of Resolutes facilities or operations will be subject to
additional DHS-mandated security requirements. Presently, it is
not possible to accurately estimate the costs Resolute could
incur to comply with any such facility security laws or
regulations, but such expenditures could be substantial.
Occupational Safety and Health Act. Resolute
is subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational
Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, and comparable state statutes
that strictly govern protection of the health and safety of
workers. The Occupational Safety and Health
Administrations hazard communication standard, the
Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know
Act, and similar state statutes require that information be
maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in
operations and that this information be provided to employees,
state and local government authorities, and the public. Resolute
believes that it is in substantial compliance with these
applicable requirements and with other OSHA and comparable
requirements.
Laws and
Regulations Pertaining to Oil and Gas Operations on Navajo
Nation Lands
General. Laws and regulations pertaining to
oil and gas operations on Navajo Nation lands derive from both
Navajo law and federal law, including federal statutes,
regulations and court decisions, generally referred to as
federal Indian law.
The Federal Trust Responsibility. The
federal government has a general trust responsibility to Indian
tribes regarding lands and resources that are held in trust for
such tribes. The trust responsibility may be a consideration in
courts resolution of disputes regarding Indian trust lands
and development of oil and gas resources on Indian reservations.
Courts may consider the compliance of the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of the Interior, or the Interior
Secretary, with trust duties in determining whether
leases,
rights-of-way,
or contracts relative to tribal land are valid and enforceable.
Tribal Sovereignty and Dependent Status. The
United States Constitution vests in Congress the power to
regulate the affairs of Indian tribes. Indian tribes hold a
sovereign status that allows them to manage their internal
affairs, subject to the ultimate legislative power of Congress.
Tribes are therefore often described as domestic dependent
nations, retaining all attributes of sovereignty that have not
been taken away by Congress. Retained sovereignty includes the
authority and power to enact laws and safeguard the health and
welfare of the tribe and its members and the ability to regulate
commerce on the reservation. In many instances, tribes have the
inherent power to levy taxes and have been delegated authority
by the United States to administer certain federal health,
welfare and environmental programs.
Because of their sovereign status, Indian tribes also enjoy
sovereign immunity from suit and may not be sued in their own
courts or in any other court absent Congressional abrogation or
a valid tribal waiver of such immunity. The United States
Supreme Court has ruled that for an Indian tribe to waive its
sovereign immunity from suit, such waiver must be clear,
explicit and unambiguous.
NNOG is a federally chartered corporation incorporated under
Section 17 of the Indian Reorganization Act and is wholly
owned by the Navajo Nation. Section 17 corporations
generally have broad powers to sue and be sued. Courts will
review and construe the charter of a Section 17 corporation
to determine whether the tribe has either universally waived the
corporations sovereign immunity, or has delegated that
power to the Section 17 corporation.
The NNOG federal charter of incorporation provides that NNOG
shares in the immunities of the Navajo Nation, but empowers NNOG
to waive such immunities in accordance with processes identified
in the charter. NNOG has contractually waived its sovereign
immunity, and certain other immunities and rights it may have
regarding disputes with Resolute relating to certain of the
Aneth Field Properties, in the manner specified in its charter.
Although the NNOG waivers are similar to waivers that courts
have upheld, if challenged, only a court of competent
jurisdiction may make that determination based on the facts and
circumstances of a case in controversy.
226
Tribal sovereignty also means that in some cases a tribal court
is the only court that has jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute
involving a tribe, tribal lands or resources or business
conducted on tribal lands or with tribes. Although language
similar to that used in Resolutes agreements with NNOG
that provide for alternative dispute resolution and federal or
state court jurisdiction has been upheld in other cases, there
is no guarantee that a court would enforce these dispute
resolution provisions in a future case.
Federal Approvals of Certain Transactions Regarding Tribal
Lands. Under current federal law, the Interior
Secretary (or the Interior Secretarys appropriate
designee) must approve any contract with an Indian tribe that
encumbers, or could encumber, for a period of seven years or
more, (1) lands owned in trust by the United States for the
benefit of an Indian tribe or (2) tribal lands that are
subject to a federal restriction against alienation, or
collectively Tribal Lands. Failure to obtain such approval, when
required, renders the contract void.
Except for Resolutes oil and gas leases,
rights-of-way
and operating agreements with the Navajo Nation, Resolutes
agreements do not by their terms specifically encumber Tribal
Lands, and it believes that no Interior Secretarial approval was
required to enter into those agreements. With respect to its oil
and gas leases and unit operating agreements, these and all
assignments to Resolute have been approved by the Interior
Secretary. In the case of
rights-of-way
and assignments of these to Resolute, some of these have been
approved by the Interior Secretary and others are in various
stages of applications for renewal and approval. It is common
for these approvals to take an extended period of time, but such
approvals are routine and Resolute believes that all required
approvals will be obtained in due course.
Federal Management and Oversight. Reflecting
the federal trust relationship with tribes, the Bureau of Indian
Affairs, or the BIA, exercises oversight of matters on the
Navajo Nation reservation pertaining to health, welfare and
trust assets of the Navajo Nation. Of relevance to Resolute, the
BIA must approve all leases,
rights-of-way,
applications for permits to drill, seismic permits,
CO2
pipeline permits and other permits and agreements relating to
development of oil and gas resources held in trust for the
Navajo Nation. While NNOG has been successful in facilitating
timely approvals from the BIA, such timeliness is not guaranteed
and obtaining such approvals may cause delays in developing the
Aneth Field Properties.
Resources Committee of the Navajo Nation
Council. The Resources Committee is a standing
committee of the Navajo Nation Tribal Council, and has oversight
and regulatory authority over all lands and resources of the
Navajo Nation. The Resources Committee reviews, negotiates and
recommends to the Navajo Nation Tribal Council actions involving
the approval of energy development agreements and mineral
agreements; gives final approvals of rights of way, surface
easements, geophysical permits, geological prospecting permits,
and other surface rights for infrastructure; oversees and
regulates all activities within the Navajo Nation involving
natural resources and surface disturbance; sets policy for
natural resource development and oversees the enforcement of
federal and Navajo law in the development and utilization of
resources, including issuing cease and desist orders and
assessing fines for violation of its regulations and orders. The
Resources Committee also has oversight authority over, among
other agencies and matters, the Navajo Nation Environmental
Protection Agency and Navajo Nation environmental laws, the
Navajo Nation Minerals Department and Navajo Nation oil and gas
laws and the Navajo Nation Land Department and Navajo Nation
land use laws. While NNOG has been successful thus far in
facilitating timely approvals from the Resources Committee for
Resolutes operations, such timeliness is not guaranteed
and obtaining future approvals may cause delays in developing
the Aneth Field Properties.
Navajo Nation Minerals Department of the Division of Natural
Resources. The
day-to-day
operation of the Navajo Nation minerals program, including the
initial negotiation of agreements, applications for approval of
assignments, exercise of tribal preferential rights and most
other permits and licenses relating to oil and gas development,
is managed by the professional staff of the Navajo Nation
Minerals Department, located within the Division of Natural
Resources and subject to the oversight of the Resources
Committee. The Resources Committee and the Navajo Nation Council
typically defer to the Minerals Department in decisions to
approve all leases and other agreements relating to oil and gas
resources held in trust for the Navajo Nation. While NNOG has
been successful thus far in facilitating timely action and
favorable recommendations from the
227
Minerals Department for Resolutes operations, such
timeliness is not guaranteed and obtaining future approvals may
cause delays in developing the Aneth Field Properties.
Taxation Within the Navajo Nation. In certain
instances, federal, state and tribal taxes may be applicable to
the same event or transaction, such as severance taxes. State
taxes are rarely applicable within the Navajo Nation Reservation
except as authorized by Congress or when the application of such
taxes does not adversely affect the interests of the Navajo
Nation. Federal taxes of general application are applicable
within the Navajo Nation, unless specifically exempted by
federal law. Resolute currently pays the following taxes to the
Navajo Nation:
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas Severance Tax. Resolute pays
severance tax to the Navajo Nation. The severance tax is payable
monthly and is 4% of its gross proceeds from the sale of oil and
gas. Approximately 84% of the Aneth Unit is subject to the
Navajo Nation severance tax. The other 16% of the Aneth Unit is
exempt because it is either located off of the reservation or it
is incremental enhanced oil recovery production, which is not
subject to the severance tax. Presently all of the McElmo Creek
and Ratherford Units are subject to the severance tax.
|
|
|
|
Possessory Interest Tax. Resolute pays a
possessory interest tax to the Navajo Nation. The possessory
interest tax applies to all property rights under a lease within
the Navajo Nation boundaries, including natural resources. The
tax was $5.5 million in 2007 and $8.1 million in 2008.
|
|
|
|
Sales Tax. Resolute pays Navajo sales tax in
lieu of the Navajo Business Activity Tax. The sales tax rate was
raised from 3% to 4% effective July 1, 2007. All goods and
services purchased for use on the Navajo Nation reservation are
subject to the sales tax. The sale of oil and gas is exempt from
the sales tax.
|
Royalties from Production on Navajo Nation
Lands. Under Resolutes agreements and
leases with the Navajo Nation, it pays royalties to the Navajo
Nation. The Navajo Nation is entitled to take its royalties in
kind, which it currently does for its oil royalties but not its
gas royalties. The Minerals Management Service of the United
States Department of the Interior has the responsibility for
managing and overseeing royalty payments to the Navajo Nation as
well as the right to audit royalty payments.
Navajo Preference in Employment Act. The
Navajo Nation has enacted the Navajo Preference in Employment
Act, or the Employment Act, requiring preferential hiring of
Navajos by non-governmental employers operating within the
boundaries of the Navajo Nation. The Employment Act requires
that any Navajo candidate meeting job description requirements
receives a preference in hiring. The Employment Act also
provides that Navajo employees can only be terminated,
penalized, or disciplined for just cause, requires a
written affirmative action plan that must be filed with the
Navajo Nation, establishes the Navajo Labor Commission as a
forum to resolve employment disputes and provides authority for
the Navajo Labor Commission to establish wage rates on
construction projects. The restrictions imposed by the
Employment Act and its recent broad interpretations by the
Navajo Supreme Court may limit Resolutes pool of qualified
candidates for employment.
Navajo Business Opportunity Act. Navajo Nation
law requires companies doing business in the Navajo Nation to
provide preference priorities to certified Navajo-owned
businesses by giving them a first opportunity and contracting
preference for all contracts within the Navajo Nation. While
this law does not apply to the granting of mineral leases,
subleases, permits, licenses and transactions governed by other
applicable Navajo and federal law, Resolute treats this law as
applicable to its material non-mineral contracts and procurement
relating to its general business activities within the Navajo
Nation.
Navajo Environmental Laws. The Navajo Nation
has enacted various environmental laws that may be applicable to
Resolutes Aneth Field Properties. As a practical matter,
these laws are patterned after similar federal laws, and the EPA
currently enforces these laws in conjunction with the Navajo
EPA. The current practice does not preclude the Navajo Nation
from taking a more active role in enforcement or from changing
direction in the future. Some of the Navajo Nation environmental
laws not only provide for civil, criminal and administrative
penalties, but also provide for third-party suits brought by
Navajo Nation tribal members directly against an alleged
violator, with specified jurisdiction in the Navajo Nation
District Court in Window
228
Rock. A recent example of this relates to the March 2008
adoption by the Navajo Nation of the Navajo Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Navajo
CERCLA), which gives the Navajo EPA broad authority over
environmental assessment and remediation of facilities
contaminated with hazardous substances. Navajo CERCLA is
patterned after federal CERCLA with the important exception
that, unlike federal CERCLA, Navajo CERCLA considers crude oil
and other hydrocarbons to be hazardous substances subject to
CERCLA response actions and damages. Resolute is negotiating
with representatives of the Navajo Nation Council, Navajo
Department of Justice, Navajo Environmental Protection Agency,
NNOG, an industry group headed by the New Mexico Oil and Gas
Association and Colorado Oil and Gas Association, or the NMOGA
Group, and others, to mitigate Navajo CERCLAs potential
impact on oilfield operations on Navajo lands. The NMOGA Group
in particular has challenged the validity of the law and has
entered into a tolling agreement with Navajo EPA that should
forestall material implementation of Navajo CERCLA at oil and
gas facilities while appropriate rules and guidelines are
developed with input from the oil and gas sector.
Thirty-Two Point Agreement. An explosion at an
ExxonMobil facility in Greater Aneth Field in December 1997
prompted protests by local tribal members. The protesters
asserted concerns about environmental degradation, health
problems, employment opportunities and renegotiating leases. The
protest was settled among the local residents, ExxonMobil and
the Navajo Nation by the Thirty-Two Point Agreement that
provided, among other things, for ExxonMobil to pay partial
salaries for two Navajo public liaison specialists, follow
Navajo hiring practices, and settle further issues addressed in
the Thirty-Two Point Agreement in the Navajo Nations
peacemaker courts, which follow a community-level
conflict resolution format. After the Thirty-Two Point Agreement
was executed, Greater Aneth Field resumed normal operations.
While Resolute did not assume the obligations of ExxonMobil
under the Thirty-Two Point Agreement when it acquired the
ExxonMobil Properties in 2006, it has been its policy to
voluntarily comply with this agreement.
Moratorium on Future Oil and Gas Development Agreements and
Exploration. In February 1994, the Navajo Nation
issued a moratorium on future oil and gas development agreements
and exploration on lands situated within the Aneth Chapter on
the Navajo Reservation. All of the Aneth Unit and a significant
portion of the McElmo Creek Unit are located within the Aneth
Chapter. The Navajo Nation has recently taken the position that
the term of the moratorium is indefinite. Given that
Resolutes operations within the Aneth Chapter are based on
existing agreements and currently does not contemplate new
exploration in this mature field, the moratorium has had and is
expected to continue to have minor impact to Resolute operations.
Other
Regulation of the Oil and Gas Industry
The oil and gas industry is extensively regulated by numerous
federal, state and local authorities, including Native American
tribes. Legislation affecting the oil and gas industry is under
constant review for amendment or expansion, frequently
increasing the regulatory burden. Also, numerous departments and
agencies, both federal and state and Native American tribes, are
authorized by statute to issue rules and regulations binding on
the oil and gas industry and individual companies, some of which
carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. Although the
regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry increases
Resolutes cost of doing business and, consequently,
affects profitability, these burdens generally do not affect
Resolute any differently or to any greater or lesser extent than
they affect other companies in the industry with similar types,
quantities and locations of production.
Drilling and Production. Resolutes
operations are subject to various types of regulation at
federal, state, local and Navajo Nation levels. These types of
regulation include requiring permits for the drilling of wells,
drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. Most states,
and some counties, municipalities, the Navajo Nation and other
Native American tribes also regulate one or more of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the location of wells;
|
|
|
|
the method of drilling and casing wells;
|
|
|
|
the rates of production or allowables;
|
|
|
|
the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells
are drilled;
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
the plugging and abandoning of wells; and
|
|
|
|
notice to surface owners and other third-parties.
|
On state and, on federal and Indian lands, the Bureau of Land
Management laws and regulations regulate the size and shape of
drilling and spacing units or proration units governing the
pooling of oil and gas properties. Some states allow forced
pooling or integration of tracts to facilitate exploration while
other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In
some instances, forced pooling or unitization may be implemented
by third-parties and may reduce Resolutes interest in the
unitized properties. In addition, state conservation laws
establish maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells,
generally prohibit the venting or flaring of gas and impose
requirements regarding the ratability of production. These laws
and regulations may limit the amount of oil and gas that
Resolute can produce from its wells or limit the number of wells
or the locations where it can drill. Moreover, each state
generally imposes a production or severance tax with respect to
the production and sale of oil and gas within its jurisdiction.
Gas Sales and Transportation. Historically,
federal legislation and regulatory controls have affected the
price of gas and the manner in which Resolutes production
is marketed. FERC has jurisdiction over the transportation and
sale for resale of gas in interstate commerce by gas companies
under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 and the Natural Gas Policy Act
of 1978. Since 1978, various federal laws have been enacted
which have resulted in the complete removal of all price and
non-price controls for sales of domestic gas sold in first
sales, which include all of Resolute sales of its own
production.
FERC also regulates interstate gas transportation rates and
service conditions, which affects the marketing of gas that
Resolute produces, as well as the revenues Resolute receives for
sales of its gas. Commencing in 1985, FERC promulgated a series
of orders, regulations and rule makings that significantly
fostered competition in the business of transporting and
marketing gas. Today, interstate pipeline companies are required
to provide nondiscriminatory transportation services to
producers, marketers and other shippers, regardless of whether
such shippers are affiliated with an interstate pipeline
company. FERCs initiatives have led to the development of
a competitive, unregulated, open access market for gas purchases
and sales that permits all purchasers of gas to buy gas directly
from third-party sellers other than pipelines. However, the gas
industry historically has been very heavily regulated;
therefore, Resolute cannot guarantee that the less stringent
regulatory approach recently pursued by FERC and Congress will
continue indefinitely into the future nor can it determine what
affect, if any, future regulatory changes might have on gas
related activities.
Under FERCs current regulatory regime, transmission
services must be provided on an open-access, non-discriminatory
basis at cost-based rates or at market-based rates if the
transportation market at issue is sufficiently competitive.
Gathering service, which occurs upstream of jurisdictional
transmission services, is regulated by the states on-shore and
instate waters. Although its policy is still in flux, FERC
recently has reclassified certain jurisdictional transmission
facilities as non-jurisdictional gathering facilities, which has
the tendency to increase Resolutes costs of getting gas to
point-of-sale
locations.
Legal
Proceedings
In February of 2008, Resolute and, separately, the Navajo Nation
and NNOG, filed Protests and Motions for Intervention with FERC
objecting to a February 8, 2008, tariff filing by Western
Refining Pipeline Company, a subsidiary of Western Refining,
Inc. The filing was with respect to service on the 16 inch
diameter Tex-New Mex Crude Oil Pipeline that runs from Jal, New
Mexico to a pipeline terminal known as Bisti, south of
Farmington, New Mexico. Resolute, the Navajo Nation and NNOG
complained that Western was using the pipeline to implement an
anti-competitive market scheme designed to drive down the price
of crude oil in the Four Corners area in violation of the
Interstate Commerce Act. FERC ruled that the protesting parties
lacked standing to intervene. In August of 2008, Resolute
appealed the FERC order to the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Navajo Nation and NNOG
filed a motion to intervene in support of the appeal of
Resolute. In March of 2009, Resolute, the Navajo Nation and NNOG
filed a motion to withdraw Resolutes appeal and vacate the
FERC order on the grounds that Western had emptied the pipeline
of crude oil, making the appeal moot. On June 8, 2009, the
Court ordered that the
230
motions to dismiss be directed to a merits panel. A briefing
schedule has been issued by the Clerk of the Court.
Resolutes initial brief was filed September 11, 2009
and final briefs are due January 4, 2010.
Resolute is not a party to any other material pending legal or
governmental proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation
incidental to its business. While the ultimate outcome and
impact of any proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty,
Resolutes management believes that the resolution of any
of its pending proceedings will not have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Employees
As of September 11, 2009, Resolute had 132 full-time
employees and 3 part-time employees, including 26
geologists, geophysicists, petroleum engineers and land and
regulatory professionals. Approximately 39 of Resolutes
field level employees are represented by the United Steel, Paper
and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial
and Service Workers International Union, or USW labor union and
are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Resolute
believes that the relationship it has with its employees is
satisfactory.
Offices
Resolute Natural Resources Company currently leases
approximately 22,725 square feet of office space in Denver,
Colorado at 1675 Broadway, Suite 1950, Denver, Colorado
80202 where its principal offices are located. The lease for the
Denver office expires on December 31, 2011. In addition,
Resolute owns and maintains field offices in Cortez, Colorado,
and Montezuma Creek, Utah, and leases other, less significant,
office space in locations where staff are located. Resolute
believes that its office facilities are adequate for its current
needs and that additional office space can be obtained if
necessary.
231
THE
COMPANY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Executive
Officers and Directors
Set forth below are the names, ages as of September 11,
2009 and positions with the Company of the persons who will
serve as the Companys directors and executive officers
upon the closing of the Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
James M. Piccone
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
President, General Counsel, Secretary and Director
|
Richard F. Betz
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
Dale E. Cantwell
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Operations
|
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Janet W. Pasque
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Land and Development
|
Kenneth A. Hersh
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
Richard L. Covington
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
William J. Quinn
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
William H. Cunningham
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
Robert M. Swartz
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
James E. Duffy
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
Nicholas J. Sutton has been Chief Executive
Officer and Director of Resolute since the companys
founding in 2004. Mr. Sutton was a co-founder and the Chief
Executive Officer of HS Resources, Inc. from 1978 until the
companys acquisition by Kerr-McGee Corporation in late
2001. From 2002 until founding Resolute in 2004, Mr. Sutton
was a director of Kerr-McGee. Currently, Mr. Sutton is a
director of Tidewater Inc. and a member of the Board of the St.
Francis Memorial Hospital Foundation. He also is a member of the
Society of Petroleum Engineers and of the American Association
of Petroleum Geologists.
James M. Piccone has been President, General
Counsel, Secretary and director of Resolute since the
companys founding in 2004. From January 2002 until January
2004 Mr. Piccone was Senior Vice President and General
Counsel for Aspect Energy, LLC, a private oil and gas company.
Mr. Piccone also served as a contract attorney for Aspect
Energy from October 2001 until January 2002. Mr. Piccone
served as Vice President General Counsel and
Secretary of HS Resources from May 1995 until the acquisition of
HS Resources by Kerr-McGee in August 2001. Mr. Piccone is
admitted to the practice of law in Colorado and is a member of
local and national bar associations. He is a member of the
American Association of Corporate Counsel and is a director of
Alliance for Choice in Education.
Richard F. Betz has been Senior Vice President,
Business Development of Resolute since the companys
founding in 2004. From September 2001 to January 2004,
Mr. Betz was involved in various financial consulting
activities related to the energy industry. Prior to that,
Mr. Betz spent 17 years with Chase Securities and successor
companies, where he was involved primarily in oil and gas
corporate finance. Mr. Betz was a Managing Director in the
oil and gas investment banking coverage group with primary
responsibility for mid-cap exploration and production companies
as well as leveraged finance and private equity. In that
capacity, Mr. Betz worked with the HS Resources management
team for approximately 12 years.
Dale E. Cantwell has been Senior Vice President,
Operations of Resolute since the companys founding in
2004. From March 2003 to January 2004, Mr. Cantwell was a
private investor. After the acquisition of HS Resources by
Kerr-McGee in August 2001 until February 2003, Mr. Cantwell
was Vice President of Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corporation.
Prior to that, Mr. Cantwell was Vice President of
Operations for HS Resources D-J Basin District. From 1979 until
joining HS Resources in 1993, he worked for Amoco Production
Company in various engineering and marketing capacities.
Mr. Cantwell is a member of the Society of Petroleum
Engineers.
232
Theodore Gazulis has been Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Resolute since the companys
founding in 2004. Mr. Gazulis served as a Vice President of
HS Resources from 1984 until its merger with Kerr-McGee in 2001.
Mr. Gazulis had primary responsibility for HS
Resources capital markets activity and for investor
relations and information technology. Subsequent to HS
Resources acquisition by Kerr-McGee and prior to the
formation of Resolute, Mr. Gazulis was a private investor
and also undertook assignments with two privately-held oil and
gas companies, serving on the board of directors of Contour
Energy Co. and performing the functions of the Chief Financial
Officer of Venoco, Inc. on a consulting basis. Prior to joining
HS Resources, he worked for Amoco Production Company and Sohio
Petroleum Company. He is a member of the American Association of
Petroleum Geologists.
Janet W. Pasque has been Senior Vice President,
Land and Exploration of Resolute since the companys
founding in 2004. Ms. Pasque was a Vice President of HS
Resources where she had responsibility for the land department
and joint responsibility for the companys exploration
activities from 1993 until the companys acquisition by
Kerr-McGee in late 2001. Subsequent to the HS Resources
acquisition by Kerr-McGee, Ms. Pasque managed the land
functions at Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corp. until early 2003.
Ms. Pasque served as a land consultant from 2003 until the
founding of Resolute in 2004. Prior to joining HS Resources in
1993, Ms. Pasque worked for Texaco Inc. and Champlin
Petroleum Company. Ms. Pasque is a member of the American
Association of Professional Landmen.
Kenneth A. Hersh is the Chief Executive Officer of
NGP Energy Capital Management, L.L.C. and is a managing partner
of the Natural Gas Partners private equity funds and has served
in those or similar capacities since 1989. He has been a
director of Resolute since the companys founding in 2004.
Prior to joining Natural Gas Partners, L.P. in 1989, he was a
member of the energy group in the investment banking division of
Morgan Stanley & Co. He currently serves on the
investment committee and as a director of NGP Capital Resources
Company, serves as a director of the general partner of each of
Energy Transfer Partners LP, Energy Transfer Equity LP and Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P. and as a director on the boards of
numerous private companies.
Richard L. Covington is a managing director of the
Natural Gas Partners private equity funds. He has been a
director of Resolute since the companys founding in 2004.
Mr. Covington joined Natural Gas Partners in 1997. Prior to
joining NGP, Mr. Covington was a senior shareholder at the
law firm of Thompson & Knight, LLP, in Dallas, Texas.
Mr. Covington serves on the investment committee of NGP
Capital Resources Company and as a director of numerous private
energy companies.
William J. Quinn is the Executive Vice President
of NGP Energy Capital Management and is a managing partner of
the Natural Gas Partners private equity funds, having served in
those or similar capacities since 1998. He has been a director
of Resolute since the companys founding in 2004. He
currently serves on the investment committee of NGP Capital
Resources Company, and is a director of Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC, the general partner of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.C., and a director of numerous private energy
companies. Mr. Quinn is the son of William F. Quinn, who is
a member of current HACIs board of directors.
James E. Duffy is a co-founder and, since 2003,
Chairman of StreamWorks Products Group, Inc., a private consumer
products development company that manufactures products for the
sport fishing, industrial safety, specialty tool and outdoor
recreation industries. In addition, he is a co-founder of
Postales Argentina, a developer of boutique hotels in Argentina,
and T & R Colorado Print, a provider of printing
services and display graphics. From 1990 to 2001 he served as
Chief Financial Officer and Director of HS Resources, Inc. until
its sale to Kerr-McGee Corporation. Prior to that time, he
served as Chief Financial Officer and Director of a division of
Tidewater, Inc., an oil and gas service business. He was also a
general partner in a boutique investment banking business
specializing in the oil and gas business and began his career
with Arthur Young & Co in San Francisco.
Mr. Duffy earned his undergraduate degree from
San Jose State University.
Each of Messrs. Cunningham, Hicks and Swartz is currently a
director of HACI. For a description of their respective business
backgrounds, see HACI Executive Officers, Directors,
Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance HACI
Directors and Director Election
Proposal.
233
The
Company Board of Directors and Committees
Upon completion of the Acquisition, the Companys board of
directors will have nine members. The board of directors
will be divided into three classes, with each class serving a
three-year term and until the successors of each such class have
been elected and qualified, provided that the initial term for
certain classes of directors will be one, two or three years,
depending on the class. Messrs. Duffy, Cunningham and Quinn
will serve as Class I directors, and their initial term of
office will expire at the 2010 annual stockholders meeting.
Messrs. Covington, Swartz and Piccone will serve as
Class II directors, with an initial term of office expiring
at the 2011 annual meeting. Messrs. Hicks, Hersh and Sutton
will serve as Class III directors, with an initial term of
office expiring at the 2012 annual meeting. Pursuant to
applicable NYSE rules, the board will have an audit committee, a
compensation committee and a corporate governance/nominating
committee, the principal duties of which are described below.
Family
Relationships
Upon consummation of the Acquisition, there will be no family
relationships among any of the Companys directors and
executive officers.
Director
Independence
Under the rules of the NYSE, a majority of the members of the
board and all of the members of certain committees must be
composed of independent directors, as defined in the
rules of the NYSE. In general, an independent
director is a person other than an officer or employee of
the Company or any other individual who has a relationship,
which, in the opinion of the Companys board of directors,
would interfere with the directors exercise of independent
judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
Additional independence and qualification requirements apply to
directors serving on certain committees. The Companys
board of directors has determined that each person who will
serve on the board upon the closing of the Acquisition, other
than Messrs. Sutton and Piccone, will be independent for
purposes of the NYSE rules. In making that determination, the
board considered the relationships of Messrs. Swartz, Hicks
and Cunningham with HACI and the Sponsor, and the relationships
of Messrs. Hersh, Covington and Quinn with various NGP
entities. Upon consummation of the Acquisition, the independent
directors will have regularly scheduled meetings at which only
independent directors will be present.
Audit
Committee
The audit committees duties, which are specified in a
charter for the committee adopted by the board of directors,
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
serving as an independent and objective party to monitor the
financial reporting process, audits of financial statements and
internal control system;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and appraising the audit efforts of the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm and the
Companys internal finance department;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the Companys accounting policies;
|
|
|
|
reviewing auditor independence;
|
|
|
|
providing an open avenue of communications among the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm,
the Companys senior management, the Companys
internal finance department, and the Companys board of
directors; and
|
|
|
|
overseeing compliance with the related party transactions policy
which will be adopted by the Companys board of directors.
|
The audit committee will be required to report regularly to the
Companys board of directors to discuss any issues that
arise with respect to the quality or integrity of the
Companys financial statements, its
234
compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the
performance and independence of the Companys independent
auditors, or the performance of the internal audit function.
The members of the audit committee following the closing of the
Acquisition will be Messrs. Duffy, Cunningham and Swartz.
The board of directors has concluded that each of those persons
qualifies as independent for purposes of SEC
Rule 10A-3,
as financially literate for purposes of applicable
NYSE rules and as an audit committee financial
expert as defined under the rules of the SEC.
Compensation
Committee
The compensation committees duties, which are specified in
a charter for the committee adopted by the board of directors,
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant
to compensation of the Companys CEO;
|
|
|
|
evaluating the performance of the CEO in light of those goals
and objectives and setting CEO compensation; and
|
|
|
|
making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to
the compensation of executive officers other than the CEO.
|
Following the closing of the Acquisition, the compensation
committee will consist of at least three directors, and will not
include Messrs. Sutton or Piccone. The board of directors
has concluded that each of the potential members of the
committee qualifies as an outside director under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and as a
non-employee director under SEC
Rule 16b-3.
Corporate
Governance/Nominating Committee
The corporate governance/nominating committees duties,
which are specified in a charter for the committee adopted by
the board of directors, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
seeking out and identifying individuals qualified to become
directors;
|
|
|
|
recommending to the board of directors candidates for nomination
as directors; and
|
|
|
|
monitoring and overseeing matters of corporate governance,
including by developing and recommending corporate governance
guidelines applicable to the Company and monitoring the
Companys compliance with those guidelines.
|
Following the closing of the Acquisition, the corporate
governance/nominating committee will consist of at least three
directors, and will not include Messrs. Sutton or Piccone.
Other
Committees
Pursuant to the Companys bylaws that will be in effect at
the closing of the Acquisition, the Companys board of
directors will have the right, from time to time, to establish
other committees to facilitate the management of its business
and operations.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the Companys executive officers following the
consummation of the Acquisition served as a member of the board
of directors or the compensation committee of any entity that
has one or more executive officers serving on the Companys
board of directors or on the compensation committee of the
Companys board of directors.
Code of
Ethics
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to
directors, officers and employees that complies with the rules
and regulations of the NYSE.
235
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, the
Companys directors and executive officers, and any persons
holding 10% or more of its common stock, will be required to
report their beneficial ownership and any changes therein to the
SEC and the Company. Specific due dates for those reports will
be established, and the Company will be required to report any
failure to file such reports by those due dates.
Executive
Compensation of Resolute Before the Acquisition
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table provides summary information concerning
compensation paid or accrued by Resolute in 2008 to or on behalf
of its chief executive officer, chief financial officer and four
other most highly compensated executive officers who will
continue with the Company after the Acquisition and who served
in such capacities at December 31, 2008, which we refer to
as the Named Executive Officers or NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
852,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,027,213
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James M. Piccone
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
426,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601,107
|
|
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
426,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601,107
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard F. Betz
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
426,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601,107
|
|
Vice President, Business Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale E. Cantwell
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
426,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601,107
|
|
Vice President, Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janet W. Pasque
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
426,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601,107
|
|
Vice President, Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of amounts recorded under FAS 123R related to
Incentive Units awarded to NEOs. See Equity
Incentive Plans Incentive Units. |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate less than $10,000 per NEO. |
2008
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
No plan-based awards were granted in 2008 to the Named Executive
Officers.
Employment
Agreements
Resolute currently has no employment agreements with any of the
Named Executive Officers.
Equity
Incentive Plans
Equity
Appreciation Rights
On November 27, 2006, Resolute adopted the Equity
Appreciation Rights Terms and Conditions, which on
May 29, 2008, Resolute amended and restated as the Equity
Appreciation Rights Plan, which we refer to as the EAR Plan.
With respect to any EARs issued on or after May 29, 2008,
the EAR Plan provides for cash payments to participants measured
by the excess of the fair market value of Resolute over
$350,000,000, or the Excess Value. Fair market value is based on
the price that would be received on a sale by Resolute of all of
its assets for their fair market value, payment of indebtedness,
distribution of the remaining amount to Parent and distribution
by Parent to its members. Participants are granted a number of
236
EARs entitling them to a percentage of the Excess Value. None of
Resolutes Named Executive Officers has participated in the
EAR Plan.
EARs are earned upon issuance but vest only when a distribution
is made from Parent to its members while the participant is an
employee of Resolute (except in cases of death, disability and
termination of employment as a result of a sale of assets or a
subsidiary that does not result in a Change in Control (as
defined in the EAR Plan).
In June of 2008, holders of EARs that had been awarded prior to
2008 were permitted to make an offer to exchange EARs for a time
vested cash award equal to $2.00 per EAR unit. As a result of
that offer, time vested cash awards were made, payable in three
installments on January 1, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and bearing
simple interest at 15% per annum. In addition, in 2008, certain
non-executive employees were offered an opportunity to accept
new EAR awards or time vested cash awards equal to $1.00 per
unit similar in terms to those described above. As a result of
these offers, 140,466 EARs were granted in 2008 and remain
outstanding as of June 30, 2009. Compensation expense
recognized in 2008 with respect to the time vested cash
agreements was $485,003. As of June 30, 2009, principal
payments remaining in respect of EARs were $1,193,474, all to
non-executive officers. Payment of this amount will be made in
equal installments of principal, plus interest, on
January 1, 2010 and 2011. The EAR Plan will be terminated
immediately prior to the Acquisition and, other than payments
required in connection with the agreements entered into in 2008
and described above, no further obligation will exist with
respect to the EAR Plan.
Incentive
Units
Resolute Holdings, LLC, as the parent company of all the
Resolute operations, granted to all the NEOs an ability to
benefit from the growth in the Resolute operations through a
form of equity ownership called Incentive Units. The Incentive
Units were issued as Tier I, Tier II, Tier III,
Tier IV and Tier V Units, and payout for each tier
occurs when a specified level of cumulative cash distributions
has been received by the members of Resolute Holdings, LLC. In
2007, Resolute made a cash distribution of $100 million to
its equity holders, causing the Tier I Incentive Units to
vest and payout to occur. Tier II through V Incentive Units
are forfeited if a holder either is terminated for cause or
resigns. During 2008, no payments were made in respect of
Incentive Units and no Incentive Units vested. After the
Acquisition, executive officers of the Company will continue to
own Incentive Units, and payout and vesting will occur if
specified levels of cash distributions are made.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2008 Fiscal Year End
A summary of the outstanding equity awards as of
December 31, 2008 for each Named Executive Officer of
Resolute who will continue with the Company after the
Acquisition is as follows. No option awards have been made to
any Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
Market or Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
Number of Unearned
|
|
|
Value of Unearned
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares or
|
|
|
of Shares or
|
|
|
Shares, Units or
|
|
|
Shares, Units or
|
|
|
|
Units of Stock That
|
|
|
Units of Stock That
|
|
|
Other Rights That
|
|
|
Other Rights That
|
|
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)(1)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
Nicholas J. Sutton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,388,332
|
|
|
$
|
636,002
|
|
James M. Piccone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694,165
|
|
|
|
318,001
|
|
Theodore Gazulis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694,165
|
|
|
|
318,001
|
|
Richard F. Betz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694,165
|
|
|
|
318,001
|
|
Dale E. Cantwell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694,165
|
|
|
|
318,001
|
|
Janet W. Pasque
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694,165
|
|
|
|
318,001
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents number of Incentive Units owned. |
237
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents value of Tiers II, III, IV and V Incentive
Units. Because there is no market for the Incentive Units, the
value was determined by reference to the value of the regular
common stock consideration in the Acquisition attributable to
the respective individuals interest in the
Tier II, III, IV and V Incentive Units. |
Equity
Rights Exercised and Vested in 2008
No equity rights were exercised by Named Executive Officers, and
no equity rights of Named Executive Officers vested in 2008.
2008
Pension Benefits
Resolute has no defined benefit pension plans.
2008
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
In the year ended December 31, 2008, Resolute had no
nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control of
Resolute
There are currently no agreements under which the Named
Executive Officers would be entitled to receive payments upon a
change of control of Resolute.
Compensation
for Resolute Directors
Because Resolute is a privately held company, it does not
compensate its directors for services to Resolute in such
capacity.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis of Resolute Prior to the
Acquisition
With respect to 2008 and prior periods, Resolutes
executive compensation program for its NEOs reflected its status
as a privately-held company in which all of the NEOs were
company founders. Accordingly, the compensation of the NEOs was
established on formation, pursuant to an agreement with Natural
Gas Partners, with each NEO, including the chief executive
officer, being paid a base wage compensation of $175,000 per
year. From inception through 2008, no adjustment was made to
base compensation and no NEO received any short-term incentive
bonus compensation. Each NEO received standard vacation
allowances and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in the conduct of company business. Each NEO also was eligible
to participate in company sponsored health and disability
benefits and any 401(k) matching contribution on the same terms
as other employees. In 2008, Resolute matched employee
contributions up to 6% of employee cash compensation, for an
aggregate cash amount of $233,300, relating to employee
contributions made during 2007. No perquisites in excess of
$10,000 were provided to any NEO.
In addition to base compensation, the founding group of NEOs
participated in a form of incentive compensation whereby these
executives and certain other early-stage employees could earn,
based on a measurement of cash returned to investors in Resolute
Holdings, LLC, a greater share of the profits of Resolute
Holdings, LLC. See Equity Incentive
Plans Incentive Units.
Certain non-executive employees participated in equity growth of
Resolute through an Equity Appreciation Rights Plan. Pursuant to
this plan, employees would be entitled to a cash payment
measured by the excess of the fair market value of Resolute over
defined threshold levels. The threshold level for awards issued
in 2006 and 2007 was $250 million and for awards made in
2008 was $350 million. See Equity
Incentive Plans Equity Appreciation Rights.
238
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis of the Company after the
Acquisition
The compensation policies and philosophy of the Company will
govern the types and amount of compensation to be granted each
of the executive officers, and the board of directors has the
ultimate decision-making authority with respect to the total
compensation of these executive officers.
Overview of the Companys Compensation
Program. The Companys board of directors
has responsibility for establishing, implementing and
continually monitoring adherence with the Companys
compensation philosophy. The board has the authority to delegate
to the compensation committee of the board various
responsibilities with respect to compensation matters, in which
case such committee may review and recommend to the
Companys board of directors the compensation and benefits
for the Companys executive officers, administer its equity
incentive plans, and assist with the establishment of general
policies relating to compensation and benefits for all of the
Companys employees. In the absence of such a committee,
the board will perform these actions. The board is responsible
for ensuring that the total compensation paid to the
Companys executive officers is fair, reasonable and
competitive. Generally, the types of compensation and benefits
that will be provided to the Companys executive officers
will be similar to those provided to the Companys other
officers and employees. The Company does not have compensation
plans that are solely for executive officers.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives. The
Company believes that the most effective compensation program is
one that is designed to reward all employees, not just
executives, for the achievement of the Companys short-term
and long-term strategic goals. As a result, the Companys
compensation philosophy is to provide all employees with cash
incentives or a combination of cash and equity-based incentives
that foster the continued growth and overall success of the
Company and its affiliates and encourage employees to maximize
value. Under this philosophy, all the Company employees, from
the most senior executives of the organization to entry level,
have aligned interests. When establishing total compensation,
the Company has the following objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified and experienced
individuals;
|
|
|
|
to provide financial incentives, through an appropriate mix of
fixed and variable pay components, to achieve the
organizations key financial and operational objectives;
|
|
|
|
to ensure that a portion of total compensation is at
risk in the form of equity compensation; and
|
|
|
|
to offer competitive compensation packages that are consistent
with the Companys core values, including the balance of
fairness to the individual and the organization, and the demand
for commitment and dedication in the performance of the job.
|
Setting the Companys Executive
Compensation. Following the Acquisition,
executive compensation will be reviewed by the board of
directors no less frequently than annually. Compensation will be
based on the foregoing objectives, and will include both base
salary and annual and long-term incentive-based cash and
non-cash executive compensation. The board of directors may, but
is not obligated to, engage the services of an outside
compensation consulting firm to assist in this process.
Furthermore, the board of directors may delegate certain aspects
of the compensation review process to the compensation committee
to review, as it deems appropriate, and make recommendations
regarding the compensation of the Companys chief executive
officer. It is expected that in performing its compensation
reviews and making its compensation decisions, the board of
directors or the compensation committee of the board of
directors will review compensation data from other oil and gas
companies of comparable size and scope. It is further expected
that cash compensation will be targeted near the midpoint of a
range established by this peer review, although adjustments may
be made for such things as experience, market factors or
exceptional performance, among others. Long-term incentive
compensation may be used to reward and to encourage long-term
performance and an alignment of values between the individual
and the organization. Long-term incentive grants are used not
only to reward prior performance, but also to retain executive
officers and other employees and provide incentives for future
exceptional performance. To the extent that business success
accretes value to long-term incentive awards, an
individuals total compensation may move from the median to
the high end of ranges established with reference to peer data.
239
There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation
between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term
incentive compensation for executive officers. Rather, the board
of directors or compensation committee will rely on each
members knowledge and experience. Factors affecting
compensation include: (i) the Companys annual
performance; (ii) impact of the employees performance
on the Companys results; (iii) the Companys
objective to provide total compensation that is higher than
competitive levels when aggressive goals of the Company are
exceeded; and (iv) internal equity. It is expected that the
size of the
long-term
incentive compensation grants will increase with the level of
responsibility of the executive position. For the chief
executive officer, long term incentive grants are typically the
largest element of the total compensation package.
Executive officers generally receive the same benefits as other
employees. As is the case with compensation, any differences are
generally due to local requirements. In establishing executive
compensation, the Company believes that base salaries should be
at levels in the mid-range of comparable companies and potential
total compensation, including annual incentive compensation,
should be at the upper range of total compensation at comparable
companies if performance targets are met; and annual cash
incentive and equity incentive awards should reflect progress
toward company-wide financial goals and personal objectives, as
well as salary grade level, and should balance rewards for
short-term and long-term performance.
Executive Compensation Components. The
principal components of compensation for executive officers are
expected to be:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary;
|
|
|
|
cash bonus;
|
|
|
|
long-term incentive compensation; and
|
|
|
|
retirement and other benefits.
|
Relative Size of Major Compensation
Elements. The combination of base salary, annual
cash incentives and equity awards comprises total direct
compensation. In setting executive compensation, the board of
directors considers the aggregate compensation payable to an
executive officer and the form of that compensation. The board
of directors will seek to achieve the appropriate balance
between immediate cash rewards and long-term financial
incentives for the achievement of both annual and long-term
financial and non-financial objectives.
The board of directors may decide, as appropriate, to modify the
mix of base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity
incentives to best fit an executive officers specific
circumstances. For example, the board of directors may make the
decision to award more cash and not award an equity grant. This
provides more flexibility to the Company to reward executive
officers appropriately as they near retirement, when they may
only be able to partially fulfill the vesting required for
equity grants. The board of directors may also increase the size
of equity grants to an executive officer if the total number of
career equity grants does not adequately reflect the
executives current position with the Company.
Timing of Compensation Decisions. It is
anticipated that all elements of the executive officers
compensation will be reviewed each February, after a review of
financial, operating and personal objectives with respect to the
prior years results. At that time, the financial,
operating and personal objectives will be determined for the
current year. The board of directors may, however, review
salaries or grant equity incentives at other times as the result
of new appointments or promotions during the year, or other
circumstances that it deems appropriate.
240
The following table summarizes the approximate timing of
significant compensation events:
|
|
|
Event
|
|
Timing
|
|
Base salary review and recommendation.
|
|
First quarter of the fiscal year for base salary for the current
year.
|
Executive performance evaluation and corresponding compensation
recommendations.
|
|
Results approved in February of each fiscal year for annual cash
incentive with respect to prior year.
|
|
|
Earned incentive paid in March.
|
Merit increases for executives.
|
|
Effective first pay period in June.
|
Granting of long term incentives to executives.
|
|
No set period.
|
External consultants analyses provided to the compensation
committee to evaluate executive compensation.
|
|
No set period.
|
Establish executive officer performance objective(s).
|
|
February of each fiscal year for the current year.
|
Base Salary. The Company provides executive
officers with a base salary to compensate them for services
rendered during the fiscal year. It is expected that base
salaries for each of the Named Executive Officers will increase
following the consummation of Acquisition, reflecting increased
responsibilities associated with public company status. Base
salaries after the Acquisition will be established by the
compensation committee of the board of directors based on
consideration of relevant factors, including salary levels of
comparable companies in the oil and gas industry. Base salaries
will be reviewed and adjusted pursuant to the procedures
discussed above.
Base salary for an executive officer will take into
consideration salaries of executives of comparable companies in
the industry in which the Company competes, individual
performance, comparison to internal peer positions, the relative
performance of the Company during the year, and overall
performance against the Company objectives.
There are occasions when a base salary can be reduced such as
when an executive officer moves to a position of lesser
responsibility in the organization. Alternatively, a base salary
can be frozen for a number of years until it falls in line with
comparable positions.
Cash Bonus. Following consummation of the
Acquisition, cash bonuses to executive officers will be made at
the discretion of the board of directors. The Company expects
that year-end cash bonuses would range from 0% to 150% of each
executives annual base salary, depending on an
executives position of responsibility and an assessment of
that executives contribution to the success of the Company.
Employment Agreements. The Company expects to
enter into employment agreements with the Named Executive
Officers following the consummation of the Acquisition.
Employment agreements will be reviewed by the compensation
committee of the board of directors and approved by the
Companys board of directors. It is expected that the
employment agreements will provide for (i) base salary,
(ii) bonuses to be earned by achievement of specified
performance targets, (iii) severance and change of control
benefits, (iv) non-competition and non-solicitation
provisions, (v) obligations to maintain the confidentiality
of the Company information, and (vi) assignment of all
intellectual property rights to the Company.
Retirement and Other Benefit Plans. All of the
Companys employees will be eligible to participate in a
401(k) Plan. The Company will have the option but not the
requirement to match some portion of employee contributions to
the 401(k) Plan.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. Prior to the
Acquisition, the Company will adopt the 2009 Incentive
Performance Plan, or the Incentive Plan, providing for long-term
equity based awards intended to compensate key employees,
consultants and directors. The principal terms of the Incentive
Plan are summarized below. This summary is qualified in its
entirety by the full text of the Incentive Plan, which is filed
as an exhibit to this proxy statement/prospectus.
241
Purpose. The purpose of the Incentive Plan is
to promote the success of the Company and the interests of its
stockholders by providing an additional means for the Company to
attract, motivate, retain and reward directors, officers,
employees and other eligible persons through the grant of awards
and incentives for high levels of individual performance and
improved financial performance of the Company. Equity-based
awards are also intended to further align the interests of award
recipients and the Companys stockholders.
Administration. The Companys board of
directors or one or more committees appointed by the
Companys board of directors will administer the Incentive
Plan. A committee may delegate some or all of its authority with
respect to the Incentive Plan to another committee of directors
and certain limited authority to grant awards to employees may
be delegated to one or more officers of the Company. The
appropriate acting body, be it the Companys board of
directors, a committee within its delegated authority, or an
officer within his or her delegated authority, is referred to in
this plan description as the Administrator.
The Administrator has broad authority under the Incentive Plan
with respect to award grants including, without limitation, the
authority:
|
|
|
|
|
to select participants and determine the type(s) of award(s)
that they are to receive;
|
|
|
|
to determine the number of shares that are to be subject to
awards and the terms and conditions of awards, including the
price (if any) to be paid for the shares or the award;
|
|
|
|
to cancel, modify, or waive the Companys rights with
respect to, or modify, discontinue, suspend, or terminate any or
all outstanding awards, subject to any required consents;
|
|
|
|
to accelerate or extend the vesting or exercisability or extend
the term of any or all outstanding awards subject to any
required consent;
|
|
|
|
subject to the other provisions of the Incentive Plan, to make
certain adjustments to an outstanding award and to authorize the
conversion, succession or substitution of an award;
|
|
|
|
to allow the purchase price of an award or shares of Company
Common Stock to be paid in the form of cash, check, or
electronic funds transfer, by the delivery of already-owned
shares of Company Common Stock or by a reduction of the number
of shares deliverable pursuant to the award, by services
rendered by the recipient of the award, by notice of third party
payment or cashless exercise on such terms as the Administrator
may authorize, or any other form permitted by law.
|
Eligibility. Persons eligible to receive
awards under the Incentive Plan include officers and employees
of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, directors of the
Company, and certain consultants and advisors to the Company or
any of its subsidiaries.
Authorized Shares; Limits on Awards. The
maximum number of shares of Company Common Stock that may be
issued pursuant to awards under the Incentive Plan is 2,760,000.
The Incentive Plan generally provides that shares issued in
connection with awards that are granted by or become obligations
of the Company through the assumption of awards (or in
substitution for awards) in connection with an acquisition of
another Company will not count against the shares available for
issuance under the Incentive Plan.
No Repricing. In no case (except due to an
adjustment to reflect a stock split or similar event or any
repricing that may be approved by stockholders) will any
adjustment be made to a stock option or stock appreciation right
award under the Incentive Plan (by amendment, cancellation and
regrant, exchange or other means) that would constitute a
repricing of the per share exercise or base price of the award.
Types of Awards. The Incentive Plan authorizes
stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock bonuses and other forms of awards
that may be granted or denominated in Company Common Stock or
units of Company Common Stock, as well as cash bonus awards. The
Incentive Plan retains flexibility to offer competitive
incentives and to tailor benefits to specific needs and
circumstances. Any award may be paid or settled in cash.
242
Stock Options. A stock option is the right to
purchase shares of Company Common Stock at a future date at a
specified price per share, or the exercise price. The per share
exercise price of an option generally may not be less than the
fair market value of a share of Company Common Stock on the date
of grant. The maximum term of an option is ten years from the
date of grant. An option may be either an incentive stock option
or a nonqualified stock option. Incentive stock options are
subject to more restrictive terms and are limited in amount by
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and
the Incentive Plan. Incentive stock options may be granted only
to employees of the Company or a subsidiary.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock
appreciation right is the right to receive payment of an amount
equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of
Company Common Stock on the date of exercise of the stock
appreciation right over the base price of the stock appreciation
right. The base price will be established by the Administrator
at the time of grant of the stock appreciation right and
generally cannot be less than the fair market value of a share
of Company Common Stock on the date of grant. Stock appreciation
rights may be granted in connection with other awards or
independently. The maximum term of a stock appreciation right is
ten years from the date of grant.
Restricted Stock. Shares of restricted stock
are shares of Company Common Stock that are subject to certain
restrictions on sale, pledge, or other transfer by the recipient
during a particular period of time (the restricted period).
Subject to the restrictions provided in the applicable award
agreement and the Incentive Plan, a participant receiving
restricted stock may have all of the rights of a stockholder as
to such shares, including the right to vote and the right to
receive dividends.
Restricted Stock Units. A restricted stock
unit, or RSU, represents the right to receive one share of
Company Common Stock on a specific future vesting or payment
date. Subject to the restrictions provided in the applicable
award agreement and the Incentive Plan, a participant receiving
RSUs has no stockholder rights until shares of common stock are
issued to the participant. RSUs may be granted with dividend
equivalent rights.
Cash Awards. The Administrator, in its sole
discretion, may grant cash awards, including without limitation,
discretionary awards, awards based on objective or subjective
performance criteria, and awards subject to other vesting
criteria.
Other Awards. The other types of awards that
may be granted under the Incentive Plan include, without
limitation, stock bonuses, performance stock, dividend
equivalents, and similar rights to purchase or acquire shares of
Company Common Stock.
Performance-Based Awards. The Administrator
may grant awards that are intended to be performance-based
compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the
Code, or Performance-Based Awards. Performance-Based Awards are
in addition to any of the other types of awards that may be
granted under the Incentive Plan (including options and stock
appreciation rights which may also qualify as performance-based
compensation for Section 162(m) purposes).
Performance-Based Awards may be in the form of restricted stock,
performance stock, stock units, other rights, or cash bonus
opportunities.
The vesting or payment of Performance-Based Awards (other than
options or stock appreciation rights) will depend on the
absolute or relative performance of the Company on a
consolidated, subsidiary, segment, division, or business unit
basis. The Administrator will establish the targets on which
performance will be measured based on criterion or criteria
selected by the Administrator. The Administrator must establish
criteria and targets in advance of applicable deadlines under
the Code and while the attainment of the performance targets
remains substantially uncertain. The Administrator may use any
criteria it deems appropriate for this purpose, and applicable
criteria may include one or more of the following: earnings per
share, cash flow (which means cash and cash equivalents derived
from either net cash flow from operations or net cash flow from
operating, financing and investing activities), total
stockholder return, gross revenue, revenue growth, operating
income (before or after taxes), net earnings (before or after
interest, taxes, depreciation
and/or
amortization), return on equity, capital employed, or on assets
or net investment, cost containment or reduction, operating
margin, debt reduction, finding and development costs,
production growth or production growth per share, reserve
replacement or reserves per share growth or any combination
thereof. The
243
performance measurement period with respect to an award may be
as short as three months to as long as ten years. Performance
targets will be adjusted to mitigate the unbudgeted impact of
material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting
changes or other extraordinary events not foreseen at the time
the targets were set unless the Administrator provides otherwise
at the time of establishing the targets.
Performance-Based Awards may be paid in stock or in cash. Before
any Performance-Based Award (other than an option or stock
appreciation right) is paid, the Administrator must certify that
the performance target or targets have been satisfied. The
Administrator has discretion to determine the performance target
or targets and any other restrictions or other limitations of
Performance-Based Awards and may reserve discretion to reduce
payments below maximum award limits.
Acceleration of Awards; Possible Early Termination of
Awards. Generally, and subject to limited
exceptions set forth in the Incentive Plan, if any person
acquires more than 50% of the outstanding common stock or
combined voting power of the Company, if there are certain
changes in a majority of the Company board of directors, if
stockholders prior to a transaction do not continue to own more
than 50% of the voting securities of the Company (or a successor
or a parent) following a reorganization, merger, statutory share
exchange or consolidation or similar corporate transaction
involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries, a sale or
other disposition of all or substantially all of the
Companys assets or the acquisition of assets or stock of
another entity by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or if
the Company is dissolved or liquidated, then awards
then-outstanding under the Incentive Plan may become fully
vested or paid, as applicable, and may terminate or be
terminated upon consummation of such a change in control event.
The Administrator also has the discretion to establish other
change in control provisions with respect to awards granted
under the Incentive Plan. For example, the Administrator could
provide for the acceleration of vesting or payment of an award
in connection with a change in control event that is not
described above and provide that any such acceleration shall be
automatic upon the occurrence of any such event.
Transfer Restrictions. Awards under the
Incentive Plan generally are not transferable by the recipient
other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or
pursuant to domestic relations orders, and are generally
exercisable, during the recipients lifetime, only by the
recipient. Any amounts payable or shares issuable pursuant to an
award generally will be paid only to the recipient or the
recipients beneficiary or representative. The
Administrator has discretion, however, to establish written
conditions and procedures for the transfer of awards to other
persons or entities, as long as such transfers comply with
applicable federal and state securities laws.
Adjustments. As is customary in incentive
plans of this nature, the share limit and the number and kind of
shares available under the Incentive Plan and any outstanding
awards, as well as the exercise or purchase prices of awards,
and performance targets under certain types of performance-based
awards, are subject to adjustment in the event of certain
reorganizations, mergers, combinations, recapitalizations, stock
splits, stock dividends, or other similar events that change the
number or kind of shares outstanding, and extraordinary
dividends or distributions of property to the stockholders.
No Limit on Other Authority. The Incentive
Plan does not limit the authority of the Companys board of
directors or any committee to grant awards or authorize any
other compensation, with or without reference to Company Common
Stock, under any other plan or authority.
Termination of, or Changes to, the Incentive
Plan. The Administrator may amend or terminate
the Incentive Plan at any time and in any manner. Stockholder
approval for an amendment will be required only to the extent
then required by applicable law or any applicable listing agency
or required under Sections 162, 409A, 422 or 424 of the
Code to preserve the intended tax consequences of the Incentive
Plan. For example, stockholder approval will be required for any
amendment that proposes to increase the maximum number of shares
that may be delivered with respect to awards granted under the
Incentive Plan. Adjustments as a result of stock splits or
similar events will not, however, be considered an amendment
requiring stockholder approval. Unless terminated earlier by the
board of directors, the authority to grant new awards under the
Incentive Plan will terminate ten years from the date of its
adoption. Outstanding awards generally will continue following
the expiration or termination of the Incentive Plan. Generally
speaking, outstanding awards
244
may be amended by the Administrator (except for a repricing),
but the consent of the award holder is required if the amendment
(or any plan amendment) materially and adversely affects the
holder.
Awards Under the Incentive Plan. Because
future awards under the Incentive Plan will be granted in the
discretion of the Companys board of directors or a
committee of the board, the type, number, recipients, and other
terms of such awards cannot be determined at this time.
Employee Retention Bonus Awards. In addition
to the Incentive Plan, prior to the completion of the
Acquisition, the Companys Board will authorize the grant
of certain awards to employees of Resolute who remain employed
by the Company at the time of the Acquisition, or the Retention
Awards. The purpose of the Retention Awards is to encourage
persons who were employees of Resolute to remain employed by the
Company. No Retention Awards will be made to any Named Executive
Officer of Resolute. The Retention Awards will provide for the
payment by the Company to approximately 50 employees of a
total of up to $1,700,000 in cash, and, if requested by Seller,
issuance by the Company of up to 200,000 shares of Company
Common Stock. If such request is made by Seller, the
200,000 shares will be deducted from the 9.2 million
shares to be issued to Seller in the Acquisition. The timing of
distribution and allocation of cash and Company Common Stock
will be specified in the Retention Awards, as follows: one-half
of each cash and stock award will be paid at closing, and
one-half on the first anniversary of the closing. If any
employee is no longer employed by the Company on the first
anniversary of the closing (other than by reason of events set
forth in the award agreement), his or her award will be
forfeited, and forfeited stock will be distributed by the
Company to Seller. The shares of Company Common Stock included
in the Retention Awards would reduce the number of shares that
would otherwise be received by Seller in the Acquisition,
reflecting the desire of Seller to have the Company award shares
of Common Stock to Resolute employees.
Other Benefits Plans. The Company will offer a
variety of health and benefit programs to all employees,
including medical, dental, vision, life insurance and disability
insurance. The Companys executive officers are generally
eligible to participate in these employee benefit plans on the
same basis as the rest of the Companys employees.
Director
Compensation
Officers or employees of the Company who also serve as directors
will not receive additional compensation for their service as a
director. We currently anticipate that directors who are not
officers or employees will receive an annual retainer plus
compensation for attending meetings of the board of directors
and committee meetings and will receive awards under the
Incentive Plan. While the compensation committee of the board of
directors will make final determinations regarding director
compensation, we presently anticipate that annual compensation
for non-employee directors will amount to approximately $125,000
comprised of the following elements: a cash retainer of $50,000,
meeting fees of $25,000 and long-term incentive awards of
$50,000. The specific breakdown of meeting fees and the makeup
of long-term incentive awards for directors will be established
by the board of directors or compensation committee at its first
meeting following the completion of the Acquisition.
In addition, each director will be reimbursed for his or her
out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of
the board of directors or committees. The Company expects that
each director will be covered by a liability insurance policy
paid for by the Company and also will be indemnified, to the
fullest extent permitted under Delaware law, by the Company for
his or her actions associated with being a director. The Company
also intends to enter into indemnification agreements with each
of its directors. For more information regarding these
indemnification agreements, please read Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Indemnification Agreements.
245
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES
The following table and accompanying footnotes set forth as of
September 1, 2009, with respect to Seller and HACI, and pro
forma after closing of the Acquisition with respect to the
Company (assuming either maximum or minimum conversion by HACI
stockholders of their shares of HACI Common Stock pursuant to
conversion rights granted under HACIs charter), certain
information regarding the beneficial ownership of
(1) membership interests in Seller, (2) shares of HACI
Common Stock, each before the Acquisition, and (3) shares
of Company Common Stock after the Acquisition by (i) each
person who is known by such entity to own beneficially more than
5% of such interests, (ii) each member of, or nominee to,
the board of directors of such entity, (iii) each of the
executive officers of such entity, and (iv) all members of
the board of directors and the executive officers of such
entity, as a group.
Except as otherwise indicated, the holders listed in the table
have sole voting and investment powers with respect to the
shares or membership interests indicated. Shares or membership
interests that an individual or group has a right to acquire
within 60 days pursuant to the exercise or redemption of
options, warrants or other similar convertible or derivative
securities are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group,
but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in
the table.
In the event that the beneficial ownership information provided
in the table below changes due to any purchase agreements
entered into between holders of Public Shares and HACI, the
Initial Stockholders, HACIs directors or officers or their
affiliates, after the date of this proxy statement/prospectus,
to secure approval of the Acquisition by HACI stockholders, HACI
will file a
Form 8-K
disclosing such changes in beneficial ownership. For additional
information regarding such purchases, see the section entitled
The Acquisition Actions that May be Taken
to Secure Approval of HACI Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Company
|
|
|
Shares of Company
|
|
|
|
Shares of HACI
|
|
|
Membership Interest
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
in Resolute Sub, LLC
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
After the Acquisition
|
|
|
After the Acquisition
|
|
|
|
Prior to the
|
|
|
Prior to the
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Minimum Conversion
|
|
|
Maximum Conversion
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(1)
|
|
|
Percentage(2)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(3)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(4)
|
|
|
HH-HACI, L.P.(5)
|
|
|
13,524,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,002,367
|
(7)
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
11,002,367
|
(7)
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
Thomas O. Hicks(8)(25)
|
|
|
13,524,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,002,367
|
(7)
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
11,002,367
|
(7)
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
SPO Partners II, L.P.(9)
591 Redwood Highway, Suite 3215
Mill Valley, CA 94941
|
|
|
6,801,200
|
(10)
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,082,400
|
(11)(19)
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
18,082,400
|
(11)(19)
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
Fir Tree, Inc.(12)
|
|
|
6,160,000
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,160,000
|
(19)
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
6,160,000
|
(19)
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
Michael A. Roth and Brian J. Stark(13)
|
|
|
3,673,600
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,633,600
|
(14)(19)
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
5,633,600
|
(14)(19)
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
QVT Financial LP(15)
|
|
|
4,799,458
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,799,458
|
(19)
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
4,799,458
|
(19)
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
Aldebaran Investments LLC(16)
|
|
|
4,139,700
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,139,700
|
(19)
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
4,139,700
|
(19)
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
Millenium Management, L.L.C. and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israel A. Englander(17)
|
|
|
3,732,251
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,546,281
|
(18)(19)
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
14,546,281
|
(18)(19)
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
Joseph B. Armes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Cunningham(25)**
|
|
|
69,000
|
(20)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Thomas O. Hicks, Jr.(25)**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Montgomery
|
|
|
69,000
|
(20)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Brian Mulroney
|
|
|
69,000
|
(20)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
William F. Quinn
|
|
|
69,000
|
(20)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Robert M. Swartz(25)**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers of HACI as a group
(11 persons)
|
|
|
13,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,131,667
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
11,131,667
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
Resolute Holdings, LLC(22)(23)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
12,918,333
|
(24)
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
12,918,333
|
(24)
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
Nicholas J. Sutton(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James M. Piccone(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard F. Betz(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Company
|
|
|
Shares of Company
|
|
|
|
Shares of HACI
|
|
|
Membership Interest
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
in Resolute Sub, LLC
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
After the Acquisition
|
|
|
After the Acquisition
|
|
|
|
Prior to the
|
|
|
Prior to the
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Minimum Conversion
|
|
|
Maximum Conversion
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(1)
|
|
|
Percentage(2)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(3)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage(4)
|
|
|
Dale E. Cantwell(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore Gazulis(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janet W. Pasque(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Hersh(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard L. Covington(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Quinn(22)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers of Resolute as a group
(9 persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers of the Company as a
group (13 persons)(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,855,667
|
(7)
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
10,855,667
|
(7)
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
** |
|
Company director nominee |
|
(1) |
|
Based upon 69,000,000 shares of HACI Common Stock
outstanding as of September 1, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Seller is a limited liability company and does not denominate
its membership interest in quantified units. |
|
(3) |
|
Based upon 72,250,000 shares of Company Common Stock
outstanding as of the closing of the Acquisition, assuming that
(i) no HACI Public Shares are properly converted and
(ii) no HACI Public Shares are purchased by HACI prior to
the Acquisition. Includes (i) 200,000 shares of
Company Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Retention
Bonus Awards and if not, will be retained by Seller and
(ii) 3,250,000 Company Earnout Shares that are held by the
Sponsor and Seller subject to forfeiture unless at any time
prior to five years from the closing of the Acquisition, either
(x) the closing sale price of the Company Common Stock
exceeds $15.00 per share for 20 trading days in any 30 trading
day period beginning 90 days after the closing of the
Acquisition, or (y) a Change in Control Event occurs in
which Company Common Stock is valued at greater than $15.00 per
share. Until forfeited, Company Earnout Shares will vote but
will not participate in dividends and distributions. Excludes
(i) up to 27,600,000 shares of Company Common Stock
subject to purchase at any time following the closing of the
Acquisition upon exercise of Company warrants at an exercise
price of $13.00 per share for five years from the Acquisition,
(ii) 7,000,000 Company Sponsors Warrants to purchase
Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable upon closing of the Acquisition,
(iii) 13,800,000 Company Founders Warrants to purchase
Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable at any time prior to five years from the closing of
the Acquisition in the event that the closing sale price of the
Company Common Stock exceeds $13.75 per share for 20 trading
days in any 30 trading day period beginning 90 days after
the closing of the Acquisition, and (iv) up to
2,760,000 shares reserved for issuance under the
Companys 2009 Performance Incentive Plan. |
|
(4) |
|
Based upon 55,690,000 shares of Company Common Stock
outstanding as of the closing of the Acquisition, assuming
(i) 30% of HACI Public Shares are properly converted and
(ii) no HACI Public Shares are purchased by HACI prior to
the closing of the Acquisition. Includes (i) 200,000 shares
of Company Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Retention
Bonus Awards and if not, will be retained by Seller and
(ii) 3,250,000 Company Earnout Shares that are held by the
Sponsor and Seller subject to forfeiture, as described in more
detail above. Excludes (i) up to 27,600,000 shares of
Company Common Stock subject to purchase at any time following
the closing of the Acquisition upon exercise of Company warrants
at an exercise price of $13.00 per share for five years from the
Acquisition, (ii) 7,000,000 Company Sponsors Warrants to
purchase Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share
that will be exercisable upon closing of the Acquisition,
(iii) 13,800,000 Company Founders Warrants to purchase
Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable as described in Note 3 above; |
247
|
|
|
|
|
and (iv) up to 2,760,000 shares reserved for issuance
under the Companys 2009 Performance Incentive Plan. |
|
(5) |
|
The address of the holder is 100 Crescent Court,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201. |
|
(6) |
|
Excludes an aggregate of 20,524,000 warrants to acquire shares
of HACI Common Stock, consisting of 13,524,000 Founder Warrants
and 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants, held by the Sponsor, none of
which are exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 1,827,700 Company Earnout Shares and 4,666,667 Company
Sponsors Warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at a price of
$13.00 per share that will be exercisable upon closing of the
Acquisition. Excludes 9,016,000 Company Founders Warrants to
purchase Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share
that will be exercisable as described in Note 3 above. |
|
(8) |
|
Thomas O. Hicks is HACIs Chairman of the Board and the
sole member of HH-HACI GP, LLC, the general partner of the
Sponsor, and may be considered to have beneficial ownership of
the Sponsors interests in HACI. Mr. Hicks, or his
appointed designee, is expected to be a director of the Company
after the closing of the Acquisition. Mr. Hicks disclaims
beneficial ownership of any shares of HACI Common Stock in which
he does not have a pecuniary interest. The address of each of
the preceding holders is
c/o Hicks
Holdings LLC, 100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75201. |
|
(9) |
|
Based on Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on August 31,
2009 on behalf of SPO Partners II, L.P., SPO Advisory Partners,
L.P., San Francisco Partners, L.P., SF Advisory Partners,
L.P., SPO Advisory Corp., John H. Scully, William E. Oberndorf,
William J. Patterson and Edward H. McDermott (the SPO
Group). Messrs Scully, Oberndorf, Patterson and McDermott
are the four controlling persons of SPO Advisory Corp., which is
the sole general partner of the sole general partner of SPO
Partners II, L.P. and San Francisco Partners, L.P., which
are the record owners of the shares of HACI Common Stock and
Public Warrants. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 6,524,700 shares of HACI Common Stock owned by SPO
Partners II, L.P., 223,200 shares of HACI Common Stock
owned by San Francisco Partners, L.P., 2,900 shares of
HACI Common Stock owned by the John H. Scully Individual
Retirement Account, 49,600 shares of HACI Common Stock
owned by the William E. Oberndorf Individual Retirement Account,
300 shares of HACI Common Stock owned by the William F.
Patterson Individual Retirement Account and 500 shares of
HACI Common Stock owned by the Edward H. McDermott Individual
Retirement Account. Excludes 10,830,800 Public Warrants owned by
SPO Partners II, L.P., 368,600 Public Warrants owned by
San Francisco Partners, L.P., 1,400 Public Warrants owned
by the John H. Scully Individual Retirement Account, 79,400
Public Warrants owned by the William E. Oberndorf Individual
Retirement Account, 100 Public Warrants owned by the William F.
Patterson Individual Retirement Account, and 900 Public Warrants
owned by the Edward H. McDermott Individual Retirement Account.
Public Warrants become exercisable only if the Acquisition is
consummated. |
|
(11) |
|
Assumes that the Acquisition is completed and all members of the
SPO Group elect the Warrant Exchange in respect of the
Public Warrants owned by them. Includes 6,524,700 shares of
Company Common Stock and 10,830,800 Company warrants owned by
SPO Partners II, L.P., 223,200 shares of Company Common
Stock and 368,600 Company warrants owned by San Francisco
Partners, L.P., 2,900 shares of Company Common Stock and
1,400 Company warrants owned by the John H. Scully Individual
Retirement Account, 49,600 shares of Company Common Stock
and 79,400 Company warrants owned by the William E. Oberndorf
Individual Retirement Account, 300 shares of Company Common
Stock and 100 Company warrants owned by the William F. Patterson
Individual Retirement Account and 500 shares of Company
Common Stock and 900 Company warrants owned by the Edward H.
McDermott Individual Retirement Account. |
|
(12) |
|
Based on Amendment No. 2 to a Schedule 13G filed with
the SEC on February 11, 2009, Fir Tree, Inc., or Fir Tree,
is the investment manager for each of SPAC Holdings 1, LLC, or
SPAC Holdings 1, SPAC Holdings 2, LLC, or SPAC Holdings 2, and
Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P., or Fir Tree Value. Based on
Amendment No. 2 to a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC
on February 11, 2009, SPAC Holdings 1, SPAC Holdings 2 and
Fir Tree Value are the beneficial owners of
3,893,253 shares of HACI Common Stock,
1,641,138 shares of HACI Common Stock and
625,609 shares of HACI Common Stock, |
248
|
|
|
|
|
respectively. This amounts to beneficial ownership of 5.6%, 2.4%
and 0.9%, respectively. SPAC Holdings 1 may direct the vote
and disposition of 3,893,253 shares. SPAC Holdings
2 may direct the vote and disposition of
1,641,138 shares. Fir Tree Value may direct the vote and
disposition of 625,609 shares. Fir Tree has been granted
investment discretion over the shares of HACI Common Stock held
by SPAC Holdings 1, SPAC Holdings 2 and Fir Tree Value. The
address of each of these holders is 505 Fifth Avenue, 23rd
Floor, New York, New York 10017. |
|
(13) |
|
Based on Amendment No. 1 to a Schedule 13G filed with
the SEC on February 17, 2009 by Michael A. Roth and Brian
J. Stark, as joint filers. Mr. Roth and Mr. Stark, as
the managing members of Stark Offshore Management LLC, share
voting and dispositive power over 3,673,600 shares of HACI
Common Stock held directly by Stark Master Fund Ltd. Stark
Offshore Management LLC is the investment manager and has sole
power to direct the management of Stark Master Fund Ltd.
Excludes 1,960,000 Public Warrant held by Stark Master Fund Ltd.
The address of each of these holders is 3600 South Lake Drive,
St. Francis, Wisconsin 53235. |
|
(14) |
|
Assumes that the Acquisition is completed and each holder elects
the Warrant Exchange in respect of the Public Warrants owned by
it. Includes 3,673,600 shares of Company Common Stock and
1,960,000 Company warrants. |
|
(15) |
|
Based on Amendment No. 3 to a Schedule 13G filed with
the SEC on February 2, 2009 on behalf of QVT Financial LP,
a Delaware limited partnership, or QVT Financial, QVT Financial
GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, QVT Fund LP,
a Cayman Islands limited partnership, or the Fund, and QVT
Associates GP LLC, a Delaware limited partnership. QVT Financial
LP, QVT Financial is the investment manager for the Fund, which
beneficially owns 3,972,693 shares of HACI Common Stock, or
Quintessence Fund L.P., or Quintessence, which beneficially
owns 428,300 shares of HACI Common Stock and a separate
discretionary account managed for Deutsche Bank AG, or the
Separate Account, which holds 398,305 shares of HACI Common
Stock. QVT Financial has the power to direct the vote and
disposition of the 4,799,458 shares collectively owned by
Fund, Quintessence and held in the Separate Account. QVT
Financial GP LLC is the general partner of QVT Financial and may
be deemed to beneficially own the same number of shares of HACI
Common Stock deemed beneficially owned by QVT Financial. QVT
Associates GP LLC is the general partner of Fund and
Quintessence and may be deemed to beneficially own and aggregate
of 4,401,073 shares of HACI Common Stock. The address of
each of these holders is 1177 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor,
New York, New York 10036. |
|
(16) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
February 17, 2009, by Aldebaran Investments LLC, or
Aldebaran, Aldebaran is the investment manager of a separate
account which owns 6.00% of the outstanding HACI Common Stock.
The address of this holder is 6500 Park Avenue, 5th Floor, New
York, New York 10022. |
|
(17) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
April 21, 2009, by Integrated Core Strategies (US) LLC, or
Integrated Core Strategies, Millenco LLC, or Millenco,
Millennium Management LLC, or Millennium Management, and Israel
A. Englander, Millennium Management and Mr. Englander may
be deemed to beneficially own 3,732,251 shares or 5.4% of
the HACI Common Stock. Mr. Englander is the managing member
of Millennium Management, and Millennium Management is the
general partner of the managing member of Integrated Core
Strategies, and may be deemed to have shared voting control and
investment discretion over the 3,582,151 shares of HACI
Common Stock (of which 165,800 shares are HACI units)
beneficially owned by Integrated Core Strategies. Millennium
Management is also the manager of Millenco, and may also be
deemed to have shared voting control and investment discretion
over the 150,100 shares of HACI Common Stock beneficially
owned by Millenco. Excludes 165,810 Public Warrants included in
the HACI units and 10,648,230 Public Warrants, in each case
beneficially owned by Integral Core Strategies. The address of
each of these holders is 666 Fifth Avenue New York, New
York 10103. |
|
(18) |
|
Assumes that the Acquisition is completed and Integrated Core
Strategies elects the Warrant Exchange in respect of the Public
Warrants owned by it. Includes 3,732,251 shares of Company
Common Stock and 10,814,030 Company warrants. |
249
|
|
|
(19) |
|
Assumes each holder does not properly exercise conversion rights
which respect to its Public Shares in the Acquisition. |
|
(20) |
|
Excludes the directors 69,000 Founder Warrants to acquire
shares of HACI Common Stock, none of which Founder Warrants are
exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(21) |
|
Excludes 46,000 Company Founders Warrants to purchase Company
Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable as described in Note 3 above. |
|
(22) |
|
Resolute Holdings, LLC has a 100% membership interest in Seller
and beneficially owns equity interests in Sellers
subsidiaries. Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. and NGP-VII Income
Co-Investment Opportunities, L.P. (Co-Invest, and
collectively with Natural Gas Partners, VII, L.P., Natural
Gas Partners) have an approximately 71% membership
interest in Resolute Holdings, LLC, subject to certain
adjustments in the future that could decrease such interest.
Nicholas J. Sutton, James M. Piccone, Richard F. Betz, Dale E.
Cantwell, Theodore Gazulis and Janet W. Pasque collectively have
an approximate 26% membership interest in Resolute Holdings,
LLC. Certain other employees, and former employees, of Resolute
Holdings, LLC and its affiliates collectively own an approximate
3% membership interest in Resolute Holdings, LLC, all of which
are subject to certain adjustments in the future that could
increase such interests. None of such persons holds more than a
10% membership interest in Resolute Holdings, LLC. In addition,
Messrs. Sutton, Piccone, Kenneth A. Hersh, Richard L.
Covington and William J. Quinn serve as directors of Resolute
Holdings, LLC. G.F.W. Energy VII, L.P. is the sole general
partner of Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. and GFW VII, L.L.C. is
the sole general partner of G.F.W. Energy VII, L.P. Natural Gas
Partners VII, L.P. owns NGP Income Management, L.L.C., which is
the sole general partner of Co-Invest. Upon closing of the
Acquisition, G.F.W. Energy VII, L.L.C. may be deemed to
beneficially own any Company Common Stock, Company Earnout
Shares, Company Founders Warrants and Company Sponsors Warrants
to be issued in connection with the Acquisition to Seller and
that may be attributable to Natural Gas Partners. Upon closing
of the Acquisition, Kenneth A. Hersh, who is a member of GFW
VII, L.L.C., may also be deemed to share the power to vote, or
to direct the vote, and to dispose of, or to direct the
disposition of, Company Common Stock, Company Earnout Shares,
Company Founders Warrants and Company Sponsors Warrants to be
issued to Seller in connection with the Acquisition.
Mr. Hersh disclaims any beneficial ownership of Company
Common Stock, Company Earnout Shares, Company Founders Warrants
and Company Sponsors Warrants to be issued to Seller in
connection with the Acquisition, which he may be deemed to have
by virtue of his relationship with GFW VII, L.L.C. Because none
of Messrs. Sutton, Piccone, Betz, Cantwell, Gazulis, Hersh,
Covington or Quinn, or Ms. Pasque, will have the power to
vote, or to direct the vote, or to dispose of, or direct the
disposition of the shares of Company Common Stock, Company
Earnout Shares, Company Founders Warrants and Company Sponsors
Warrants to be issued to Seller in connection with the
Acquisition, each of such persons disclaims beneficial ownership
of such Company Common Stock, Company Earnout Shares, Company
Founders Warrants and Company Sponsors Warrants. The address of
Natural Gas Partners is 125 E. John Carpenter Fwy.,
Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75062. |
|
(23) |
|
Company Common Stock, Company Earnout Shares, Company Founders
Warrants and Company Sponsors Warrants will be issued in the
Acquisition to Seller, and Seller will distribute all of such
securities to Resolute Holdings, LLC, its sole member. Resolute
Holdings, LLC will retain the Company Common Stock, Company
Earnout Shares, Company Founders Warrants and Company Sponsors
Warrants, but may, in the discretion of the board of directors
of Resolute Holdings, LLC, distribute Company Common Stock to
members of Resolute Holdings, LLC following the Acquisition pro
rata in accordance with their membership interests in Resolute
Holdings, LLC. |
|
(24) |
|
Includes (i) 9,200,000 shares of Company Common Stock
(including 200,000 shares potentially issuable pursuant to
employee Retention Bonus Awards), (ii) 2,333,333 Company
Sponsors Warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at a price of
$13.00 per share that will be exercisable upon closing of the
Acquisition, and (iii) 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares,
which are subject to forfeitures as described in Note 3
above. Excludes 4,600,000 Company Founders Warrants to purchase
Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable as described in Note 3 above. Upon closing of
the Acquisition, 200,000 of the shares of Company Common Stock
that are receivable by Resolute Holdings, |
250
|
|
|
|
|
LLC may be allocated to Resolute employees in the form of
Retention Bonus Awards, subject, in the case of forfeiture by
such employees, to reversion to Resolute Holdings, LLC. |
|
(25) |
|
After the Acquisition, the Companys executive officers are
expected to be Messrs. Sutton, Piccone, Betz, Cantwell,
Gazulis and Ms. Pasque, and the Companys directors
are expected to by Messrs. Sutton, Piccone, Hersh,
Covington, William J. Quinn, William H. Cunningham, Robert M.
Swartz and Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., who is appointed as the
designee of Thomas O. Hicks. |
251
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
HACI
Related Person Transactions
Related
Person Policy
HACIs audit committee, pursuant to its written charter, is
responsible for reviewing and approving related-party
transactions to the extent HACI enters into such transactions.
The audit committee will consider all relevant factors when
determining whether to approve a related party transaction,
including whether the related party transaction is on terms no
less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated
third party under the same or similar circumstances and the
extent of the related partys interest in the transaction.
No director may participate in the approval of any transaction
in which he is a related party, but that director is required to
provide the audit committee with all material information
concerning the transaction. Additionally, HACI requires each of
its directors and executive officers to complete a
directors and officers questionnaire on an annual
basis that elicits information about related party transactions.
These procedures are intended to determine whether any such
related party transaction impairs the independence of a director
or presents a conflict of interest on the part of a director,
employee or officer.
All ongoing and future transactions between HACI and any
director or member of its management team, the Initial
Stockholders, or their respective affiliates, including
financing, will be on terms believed by HACI at that time, based
upon other similar arrangements known to HACI, to be no less
favorable than are available from unaffiliated third parties.
Such transactions will require prior approval in each instance
by HACIs audit committee. HACI will not enter into an
initial business combination with an entity which is affiliated
with any of its officers, directors, or the Initial Stockholders.
Founder
Units
In March 2007, HACI issued to the Sponsor an aggregate of
10,000,000 Founder Units (which was increased to 11,500,000
Founder Units in July 2007 through a stock split and later
increased to 13,524,000 Founder Units after giving effect to the
August 2007 transfer discussed below and a stock dividend in
September 2007) for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000
in cash, or $0.0018 per unit after giving effect to the July
2007 stock split and the September 2007 stock dividend. Each
Founder Unit consists of one share of HACI Common Stock and one
HACI warrant. Mr. Hicks, HACIs founder and chairman
of the board, is the sole member of HH-HACI GP LLC, the general
partner of the Sponsor. In addition, Mr. Hicks, together
with his charitable foundation and estate planning entities for
his family, owns approximately 80% of the partnership interests
in the Sponsor attributable to the Founder Shares and Founder
Warrants and 100% of the partnership interests attributable to
the Sponsor Warrants. Each of HACIs executive officers is
also a limited partner of the Sponsor. Mr. Hicks, or his
appointed designee, is expected to be a director of the Company
if the Acquisition is consummated. In August 2007, the Sponsor
transferred an aggregate of 230,000 Founder Units, which were
increased to 276,000 Founder Units as a result of the September
2007 stock dividend, to William H. Cunningham, William A.
Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn, each of whom is
a member of HACIs board of directors. As a result of these
transactions in Founder Units, these directors each owned 69,000
Founder Units. The Sponsor and these directors have agreed that
these Founder Warrants (including HACI Common Stock issuable
upon exercise of such warrants) will not, subject to certain
limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold by them
until 180 days after the completion of HACIs initial
business combination. If the Acquisition is consummated
(i) 7,335,000 Founder Shares and 4,600,000 Founder Warrants
will be cancelled and forfeited; (ii) an additional
1,865,000 Founder Shares will be converted into Company Earnout
Shares; and (iii) the remaining Founder Shares and Founder
Warrants will be exchanged for an equal number of shares of
Company Common Stock and Company Founder Warrants as a result of
which (A) each of these directors will own 23,000 shares of
Company Common Stock, 9,325 Company Earnout Shares, and 46,000
Company Founders Warrants, and (B) the Sponsor will own
4,508,000 Shares of Company Common Stock, 1,827,700 Company
Earnout Shares, and 9,016,000 Company Founders Warrants.
Sponsor
Warrants
The Sponsor purchased 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants from HACI in a
private placement which took place simultaneously with the
closing of the IPO. Each of these Sponsor Warrants entitles the
holder to purchase
252
one share of HACI Common Stock. The Sponsor has agreed that
these Sponsor Warrants (including the HACI Common Stock issuable
upon exercise of such warrants) will not, subject to certain
limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold by it until
180 days after the completion of HACIs initial
business combination. If the Acquisition is consummated, the
Sponsor will sell 2,333,333 Sponsor Warrants to Seller and the
Sponsors remaining 4,666,667 Sponsor Warrants will be
exchanged for 4,666,667 Company Sponsors Warrants.
Co-Investment
Units
Pursuant to a written agreement with HACI, Mr. Hicks was
required to purchase from HACI, directly or through a controlled
affiliate, in a private placement that will occur immediately
prior to HACIs consummation of its initial business
combination, 2,000,000 co-investment units at a price of $10.00
per unit for an aggregate purchase price of $20 million.
Upon the advice of financial advisors and the approval of
HACIs independent directors, this agreement was terminated
on August 2, 2009 and Mr. Hicks is no longer required
to purchase co-investment units.
Administrative
Services
Hicks Holdings Operating LLC, an entity controlled by
Mr. Hicks, has agreed to, from the date of the closing of
the IPO through the earlier of its consummation of a business
combination or its liquidation, make available to HACI office
space and certain office and secretarial services, as it may
require from time to time. HACI has agreed to pay Hicks Holdings
Operating $10,000 per month for these services. However, this
arrangement is solely for HACIs benefit and is not
intended to provide Mr. Hicks compensation in lieu of
salary. HACI believes, based on rents and fees for similar
services in the Dallas metropolitan area, that the fee charged
by Hicks Holdings Operating is at least as favorable as it could
have obtained from an unaffiliated person.
Loan
to HACI
Mr. Hicks also advanced to HACI $225,000 to cover expenses
related to the IPO. This loan was payable without interest on
the earlier of December 31, 2007 or the closing of the IPO.
HACI repaid this loan on October 3, 2007 from the proceeds
of the IPO not placed in trust.
Expenses
HACI has and will continue to reimburse its officers and
directors for any reasonable out-of-pocket business expenses
incurred by them in connection with certain activities on
HACIs behalf, such as identifying and investigating
possible target businesses and business combinations. As of
June 30, 2009, HACI has reimbursed its officers and
directors for $30,800 in expenses incurred by them on its
behalf. There is no limit on the amount of out-of-pocket
expenses that could be incurred; provided, however, that to the
extent such out-of-pocket expenses exceed the available proceeds
not deposited in the trust account and interest and dividend
income of up to $6.6 million on the balance in the trust
account, such out-of-pocket expenses would not be reimbursed by
HACI unless it consummates an initial business combination.
HACIs audit committee has and will continue to review and
approve all payments made to the Initial Stockholders, officers
and directors, and any payments made to members of its audit
committee will be reviewed and approved by HACIs board of
directors, with the interested director or directors abstaining
from such review and approval.
Right
of First Review Agreement
HACI entered into a business opportunity right of first review
agreement with each of its officers which provides that until
the earlier of the consummation of an initial business
combination, HACIs liquidation in the event it does not
consummate an initial business combination, or such time as he
or she ceases to be an officer, HACI will have a right of first
review with respect to business combination opportunities with a
fair market value of $200 million or more, subject to any
pre-existing fiduciary or contractual obligations such officer
may have.
253
Lack
of Compensation, Fees
Other than the $10,000 per month administrative fee paid to
Hicks Holdings Operating LLC and reimbursement of any
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on
HACIs behalf such as identifying potential target
businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business
combinations, no compensation or fees of any kind, including
finders fees, consulting fees or other similar
compensation, will be paid to the Sponsor or HACIs
officers or directors, or to any of their respective affiliates,
prior to or with respect to HACIs initial business
combination (regardless of the type of transaction that it is).
Resolute
Related Person Transactions
On July 31, 2008, through a series of transactions,
Resolute acquired properties from an NGP affiliate and a limited
partnership related to NGP. Resolute acquired Primary Natural
Resources, Inc., a Natural Gas Partners, VII, L.P., or NGP
VII, portfolio company. Prior to the transaction, NGP VII
held an approximately 71% interest in Resolute. As
consideration, Resolute paid a total of 8,286,985 common units
(value of $74.8 million) and $15.4 million in cash.
Primary Natural Resources, Inc., was subsequently renamed
Resolute Wyoming, Inc. Resolute also acquired a Net Profits
Interest from NGP-VII Income Co-Investment Opportunities, L.P.,
a limited partnership consisting of certain of the investors in
NGP-VII and advised by NGP. As consideration, Resolute paid a
total of 2,184,445 common units (value of $19.7 million).
The Net Profits Interest was subsequently acquired by Resolute
Wyoming. See Note 3 to the Combined Financial Statements of
Resolute for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and
2008 for additional information.
The
Companys Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions
with Related Persons Following the Transaction
Pursuant to the Companys Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics, or Code of Conduct, and a Policy Statement Regarding
Related Party Transactions, which the Company intends to adopt
promptly following the closing of the Acquisition, the
Companys audit committee will review and approve all
relationships and transactions in which it and its directors,
director nominees and executive officers and their immediate
family members, as well as holders of more than 5% of any class
of its voting securities and their family members, have a direct
or indirect material interest. In approving or rejecting such
proposed relationships and transactions, the Companys
audit committee shall consider the relevant facts and
circumstances available and deemed relevant to this
determination. The Company will designate a compliance officer
to generally oversee compliance with the Code of Conduct. The
Companys audit committee will annually review and assess
the adequacy of the Policy Statement Regarding Related Party
Transactions.
Indemnification
Agreements
The Company has adopted a form of indemnification agreement and
expects to enter into such an agreement with each of its
directors pursuant to which the Company will indemnify such
persons to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law
against claims arising by reason of the fact that the indemnitee
is serving as a director of the Company, including claims in
respect of an alleged breach of fiduciary duties.
Indemnification is available for costs incurred by directors who
have satisfied the applicable standard of conduct. If the
litigation is by or in the right of the Company, indemnification
for expenses is not available if a judgment has been entered
that the director is liable to the Company, unless
indemnification is otherwise determined by a court to be
available. Indemnification is required if the director has been
successful on the merits in defense of an action. The Company
may advance expenses prior to ultimate determination of
availability of indemnification if it receives an undertaking
from the director to repay such amounts if it is determined that
indemnification is not available. No indemnification is
available for (i) actions initiated by the director,
(ii) violations of Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or (iii) violations of
non-compete or nondisclosure agreements.
The Companys certificate of incorporation and bylaws
include indemnification provisions for directors and executive
officers, and the Company has also obtained directors and
officers liability insurance that provides coverage under
circumstances that may not be covered by the indemnification
agreements.
254
SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS
The selling stockholders are HH-HACI, L.P., Delaware limited
partnership, or Sponsor, and Resolute Holdings, LLC, or Parent,
a Delaware limited liability company. In the Acquisition, Seller
(a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent) will receive
9,200,000 shares of Company Common Stock, which will be
distributed to Parent. Parent will hold the Company Common Stock
initially, but may distribute the shares of Company Common Stock
to its members, pro rata in accordance with their membership
interest in Parent, from time to time. In addition, Sponsor will
receive 4,508,000 shares of Company Common Stock which it may
distribute to its partners, pro rata in accordance with their
partnership interest in Sponsor, from time to time. Set forth
below is the beneficial ownership as it is anticipated to exist
immediately following the Acquisition, after giving effect to
the distribution from Seller to Parent and the distributions
from Sponsor and Parent to their respective members and partners
(such distributions, the Offering).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Ownership Prior
|
|
Shares
|
|
Beneficial Ownership After
|
|
|
to Offering
|
|
Being
|
|
Offering
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent(1)
|
|
Offered
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent(1)
|
|
Resolute Holdings, LLC(2)(3)
|
|
|
12,918,333
|
(4)
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
|
|
9,200,000
|
|
|
|
3,718,333
|
(5)
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
HH-HACI, L.P.(6)
|
|
|
11,002,367
|
(7)
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
4,508,000
|
|
|
|
6,494,367
|
(8)
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based upon 55,690,000 shares of Company Common Stock
outstanding as of the closing of the Acquisition, assuming
(i) 30% of HACI Public Shares are properly converted and
(ii) no HACI Public Shares are purchased by HACI prior to
the closing of the Acquisition. Includes
(i) 200,000 shares of Company Common Stock that may be
issued pursuant to Retention Bonus Awards and
(ii) 3,250,000 Company Earnout Shares that are held by the
Sponsor and Seller subject to forfeiture, as described in
Note 4 below. Excludes (i) up to
27,600,000 shares of Company Common Stock subject to
purchase at any time following the closing of the Acquisition
upon exercise of Company warrants at an exercise price of $13.00
per share for five years from the Acquisition,
(ii) 7,000,000 Company Sponsors Warrants to purchase
Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable upon closing of the Acquisition,
(iii) 13,800,000 Company Founders Warrants to purchase
Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable as described in Note 4 below; and (iv) up
to 2,760,000 shares reserved for issuance under the
Companys 2009 Performance Incentive Plan. If no HACI
Public Shares are properly converted, there would be
72,250,000 shares of Company Common Stock outstanding as of
the closing of the Acquisition, and the percentage ownership of
Resolute Holdings, LLC would be 17.3% prior to the Offering and
5.0% after the Offering and the percentage ownership of HH-HACI,
L.P. would be 14.3% prior to the Offering and 8.4% after the
Offering. |
|
(2) |
|
See Beneficial Ownership of Securities for
information regarding the ownership and management of Resolute
Holdings, LLC. Prior to the Acquisition, Resolute Holdings, LLC
had a 100% membership interest in Seller and beneficially owned
all of the equity interests in, and ultimately controlled, the
Acquired Entities. Messrs. Sutton, Piccone, Kenneth A.
Hersh, Richard L. Covington and William J. Quinn serve as
directors of Resolute Holdings, LLC and, after the Acquisition,
will be directors of the Company. In addition,
Messrs. Sutton, Piccone, Richard F. Betz, Dale E. Cantwell,
Theodore Gazulis and Janet Pasque who, after the Acquisition
will be executive officers of the Company, are members of
Resolute Holdings, LLC and will be entitled to receive
distributions of Company Common Stock from Resolute Holdings,
LLC. |
|
(3) |
|
Company Common Stock, Company Earnout Shares, Company Founders
Warrants and Company Sponsors Warrants will be issued in the
Acquisition to Seller, and Seller will distribute all of such
securities to Resolute Holdings, LLC, its sole member. Resolute
Holdings, LLC will retain the Company Common Stock, Company
Earnout Shares, Company Founders Warrants and Company Sponsors
Warrants, but may, in the discretion of the board of directors
of Resolute Holdings, LLC, distribute Company Common Stock to
members of Resolute Holdings, LLC following the Acquisition pro
rata in accordance with their membership interests in Resolute
Holdings, LLC. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes (i) 9,200,000 shares of Company Common Stock
(including 200,000 shares potentially issuable pursuant to
employee Retention Bonus Awards), (ii) 2,333,333 Company
Sponsors Warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at a price of
$13.00 per share that will be exercisable upon closing of the |
255
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition, and (iii) 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares,
which are subject to forfeiture unless at any time prior to five
years from the closing of the Acquisition, either (x) the
closing sale price of the Company Common Stock exceeds $15.00
per share for 20 trading days in any 30 trading day period
beginning 90 days after the closing of the Acquisition, or
(y) a Change in Control Event occurs in which Company
Common Stock is valued at greater than $15.00 per share.
Excludes 4,600,000 Company Founders Warrants to purchase Company
Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable at any time prior to five years from the closing of
the Acquisition in the event that the closing sale price of the
Company Common Stock exceeds $13.75 per share for 20 trading
days in any 30 trading day period beginning 90 days after
the closing of the Acquisition. Upon closing of the Acquisition,
200,000 of the shares of Company Common Stock that are
receivable by Resolute Holdings, LLC may be allocated to
Resolute employees in the form of Retention Bonus Awards,
subject, in the case of forfeiture by such employees prior to
vesting, to reversion to Resolute Holdings, LLC. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes (i) 2,333,333 Company Sponsors Warrants to
purchase Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share
that will be exercisable upon closing of the Acquisition and
(ii) 1,385,000 Company Earnout Shares, which are subject to
forfeitures as described in Note 4 above. Excludes
4,600,000 Company Founders Warrants to purchase Company Common
Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be exercisable as
described in Note 4 above. |
|
(6) |
|
HH-HACI, L.P.s general partner is owned by Chairman of the
Board Thomas O. Hicks, who, together with his charitable
foundation estate planning entities for his family, owns
approximately 80% of the limited partnership interests in
HH-HACI, L.P. attributable to the Founder Shares and Founder
Warrants and 100% of the limited partnership interests
attributable to the Sponsor Warrants. The remaining limited
partnership interests attributable to the Founder Shares and
Founder Warrants directly or indirectly by various employees of
Mr. Hicks, including HACI officers. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes (i) 4,508,000 shares of Company Common Stock,
(ii) 1,827,700 Company Earnout Shares and
(iii) 4,666,667 Company Sponsors Warrants to purchase
Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that
will be exercisable upon closing of the Acquisition. Excludes
9,016,000 Company Founders Warrants to purchase Company Common
Stock at a price of $13.00 per share that will be
exercisable as described in Note 4 above. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 1,827,700 Company Earnout Shares and 4,666,667 Company
Sponsors Warrants to purchase Company Common Stock at a price of
$13.00 per share that will be exercisable upon closing of
the Acquisition. Excludes 9,016,000 Company Founders Warrants to
purchase Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per
share that will be exercisable as described in Note 4 above. |
256
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
The following discussion summarizes the material terms of the
Companys securities to be issued in connection with the
Acquisition. This discussion does not purport to be complete and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Companys
amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or the
Companys charter, and the Companys amended and
restated bylaws, or the Companys bylaws, that will be in
effect as of the closing of the Acquisition. The forms of the
Companys charter and the Companys bylaws are
exhibits to the Acquisition Agreement. You can obtain copies of
those documents by following the instructions under Where
You Can Find Additional Information. All references within
this section to securities mean the securities of the Company
unless otherwise noted.
General
The Companys purpose will be to engage in any lawful act
or activity for which corporations may now or hereafter be
organized under the DGCL. The Companys Charter will
authorize it to issue up to 225,000,000 shares of Company
Common Stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.0001 per share. No shares of preferred stock will
be issued or outstanding immediately after the consummation of
the Acquisition.
Company
Common Stock
Company Common Stock will have the voting rights described below
under Voting, and the dividend
rights described below under
Dividends. Holders of Company
Common Stock will not have conversion or redemption rights or
any preemptive rights to subscribe for any of the Companys
unissued securities. The rights, preferences and privileges of
holders of Company Common Stock will be subject to the rights of
the holders of any preferred shares which may be authorized and
issued in the future.
Voting
Holders of Company Common Stock (including Company Earnout
Shares) will each have one vote per share. The Companys
directors will be elected by the vote of a plurality of the
shares of Company Common Stock represented in person or by proxy
at such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of
directors. A majority of the outstanding shares of Company
Common Stock shall constitute a quorum.
Dividends
The DGCL permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out
of surplus or, if there is no surplus,
out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend
is declared
and/or the
preceding fiscal year. Surplus is defined as the
excess of the net assets of the corporation over the amount
determined to be the capital of the corporation by the board of
directors. The capital of the corporation is typically
calculated to be (and cannot be less than) the aggregate par
value of all issued shares of capital stock. Net assets equals
the fair value of the total assets minus total liabilities. The
DGCL also provides that dividends may not be paid out of net
profits if, after the payment of the dividend, capital is less
than the capital represented by the outstanding stock of all
classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets.
Declaration and payment of any dividend will be subject to the
discretion of the Companys board of directors, except in
the case of the Company Earnout Shares, which are subject to
forfeiture and will not have dividend participation rights
unless Company Common Stock trading price target is exceeded by
the date that is five years following the closing of the
Acquisition. The time and amount of dividends will be dependent
upon the Companys financial condition, operations, cash
requirements and availability, debt repayment obligations,
capital expenditure needs and restrictions in its debt
instruments, and industry trends, the provisions of Delaware law
affecting the payment of distributions to stockholders and other
factors.
257
Stockholder
Meetings
Under the Companys charter and the Companys bylaws,
annual stockholder meetings will be held at a time and place
selected by the Companys board of directors. Special
meeting of stockholders may be called only by the chairman of
the board, the chief executive officer, the president or by a
resolution adopted by a majority of the whole board of directors
of the Company.
Warrants
Company
Warrants
Each Company warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one
share of Company Common Stock at a price of $13.00 per share,
subject to adjustment as discussed below, at any time commencing
on the closing of the Acquisition and continuing for a period
that ends five years from the closing of the Acquisition.
However, the warrants will be exercisable only if a registration
statement relating to the Company Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrants is effective and current.
At any time while the warrants are exercisable and there is an
effective registration statement covering the shares of Company
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants available
and current throughout the
30-day
redemption period, the Company may call the outstanding warrants
(except as described below with respect to the Company Founders
Warrants and the Company Sponsors Warrants) for redemption:
|
|
|
|
|
in whole and not in part;
|
|
|
|
at a price of $0.01 per warrant;
|
|
|
|
upon a minimum of 30 days prior written notice of
redemption (the
30-day
redemption period) to each warrantholder; and
|
|
|
|
if, and only if, the reported last sale price of Company Common
Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days
within a 30-trading-day period ending on the third business day
prior to the notice of redemption to warrantholders.
|
If the foregoing conditions are satisfied and the Company issues
a notice of redemption of the warrants, each warrantholder will
be entitled to exercise its warrant prior to the scheduled
redemption date. However, the price of Company Common Stock may
fall below the $18.00 redemption trigger price as well as the
$13.00 warrant exercise price after the redemption notice is
issued.
The exercise price and number of shares of Company Common Stock
issuable on exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain
circumstances, including in the event of a stock dividend, stock
split, extraordinary dividend, or the Companys
recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation.
However, the exercise price and number of shares of Company
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants will not be
adjusted for issuances of Company Common Stock at a price below
the warrant exercise price.
The Company warrants will be issued in registered form under a
warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, as warrant agent, and the Company, to be
executed in connection with the closing of the Acquisition. You
should review a copy of the warrant agreement, a form of which
has been filed as Annex D to this proxy statement/prospectus,
for a complete description of the terms and conditions
applicable to the warrants.
The Company warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the
warrant certificate on or prior to the expiration date at the
offices of the warrant agent, with the exercise form on the
reverse side of the warrant certificate completed and executed
as indicated, accompanied by full payment of the exercise price
(or on a cashless basis, if applicable), by certified or
official bank check payable to the Company, for the number of
warrants being exercised. The warrantholders do not have any
rights or privileges as holders of Company Common Stock and any
voting rights until they exercise their warrants and receive
shares of Company Common Stock. After the issuance of shares of
Company Common Stock upon exercise of the warrants, each holder
will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on
all matters to be voted on by stockholders.
258
No Company warrants will be exercisable unless at the time of
exercise a prospectus relating to the Company Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants is current and the
Company Common Stock has been registered or qualified or deemed
to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence
of the holder of the warrants. The terms of the warrant
agreement will require the Company to use its best efforts to
effectuate and maintain the effectiveness of a registration
statement covering such shares and maintain a current prospectus
relating to common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants
until the expiration of the warrants. However, no assurances can
be provided that the Company will be able to do so, and if the
condition is not met, holders will be unable to exercise their
warrants and the Company would not be required to settle any
such warrant exercise. If the prospectus relating to the Company
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not
current or if the Company Common Stock is not qualified or
exempt from qualification in the jurisdictions in which the
holders of the warrants reside, the Company would not be
required to net cash settle or cash settle the warrant exercise,
the warrants may have no value, the market for the warrants may
be limited and the warrants may expire worthless.
No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the Company
warrants. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be
entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, the
Company would, upon exercise, round up to the nearest whole
number the number of shares of Company Common Stock to be issued
to the warrantholder.
Company
Founders Warrants and Company Sponsors Warrants
Company
Founders Warrants
The terms of the Company Founders Warrants will be identical to
the terms of the Company warrants except that the Company
Founders Warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
will be subject to the transfer restrictions described below;
|
|
|
|
will not be redeemable by the Company so long as they are held
by the Initial Stockholders, Seller or their permitted
transferees;
|
|
|
|
may not be exercised unless and until the last sale price of
Company Common Stock exceeds $13.75 for any 20 days within
any 30
trading-day-period
beginning 90 days after the closing of the
Acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
may be exercised at the option of the holder on a cashless basis.
|
If the Company Founders Warrants are held by holders other than
the Initial Stockholders, Seller or their permitted transferees,
the Company Founders Warrants will be redeemable by the Company
and exercisable by the holders on the same basis as the Company
warrants.
Company
Sponsors Warrants
The terms of the Company Sponsors Warrants will be identical to
the terms of the Company warrants except that the Company
Sponsors Warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
will be subject to the transfer restrictions described below;
|
|
|
|
will not be redeemable by the Company so long as they are held
by the Sponsor, Seller or their permitted transferees; and
|
|
|
|
may be exercised at the option of the holder on a cashless basis.
|
259
If the Company Sponsors Warrants are held by holders other than
the Sponsor, Seller or their permitted transferees, the Company
Sponsors Warrants will be redeemable by the Company and
exercisable by the holders on the same basis as the Company
warrants.
Transfer
Restrictions on Company Founders Warrants and Company Sponsors
Warrants
The Company Founders Warrants, Company Sponsors Warrants and any
shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the Company
Founders Warrants or Company Sponsors Warrants (other than the
Company Sponsors Warrants and Company Founders Warrants held by
Seller) may not be sold or transferred until 180 days after
the closing of the Acquisition, except (i) to the
Companys officers or directors, any affiliates or family
members of any of the Companys officers or directors or
any affiliates of the Sponsor, (ii) in the case of an
Initial Stockholder (other than the Sponsor), by gift to a
member of the Initial Stockholders immediate family or to
a trust, the beneficiary of which is a member of the Initial
Stockholders immediate family, an affiliate of the Initial
Stockholder or to a charitable organization, (iii) in the
case of an Initial Stockholder (other than the Sponsor) by
virtue of the laws of descent and distribution upon death of the
Initial Stockholder (other than the Sponsor), (iv) with
respect to the Sponsor by virtue of the laws of the state of
Delaware or the Sponsors limited partnership agreement
upon dissolution of the Sponsor, (v) in the case of an
Initial Stockholder (other than the Sponsor) pursuant to a
qualified domestic relations order, or (vi) in the event of
the consummation of a liquidation, merger, stock exchange or
other similar transaction which results in all of the
Companys stockholders having the right to exchange their
shares of Company Common Stock for cash, securities or other
property subsequent to the Acquisition; provided, that these
permitted transferees must enter into a written agreement
agreeing to be bound by these transfer restrictions.
Anti-takeover
Effects of Certain Provisions of the Companys Charter and
the Companys Bylaws
Some provisions of the Companys charter and the
Companys bylaws contain provisions that could make it more
difficult to acquire the Company by means of a merger, tender
offer, proxy contest or otherwise, or to remove the
Companys incumbent officers and directors. These
provisions, summarized below, are expected to discourage
coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These
provisions are also designed to encourage persons seeking to
acquire control of the Company to first negotiate with the
Companys board of directors. The Company believes that the
benefits of increased protection of its potential ability to
negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited
proposal to acquire or restructure the Company outweigh the
disadvantages of discouraging such proposals because negotiation
of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Undesignated
preferred stock
The ability to authorize and issue undesignated preferred stock
may enable the Companys board of directors to render more
difficult or discourage an attempt to change control of the
Company by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or
otherwise. For example, if in the due exercise of its fiduciary
obligations, the board of directors were to determine that a
takeover proposal is not in the best interest of the Company,
the board of directors could cause shares of preferred stock to
be issued without stockholder approval in one or more private
offerings or other transactions that might dilute the voting or
other rights of the proposed acquirer or insurgent stockholder
or stockholder group.
Classified
Board of Directors
The Companys charter will provide for a board of directors
divided into three classes and serving staggered, three-year
terms. Approximately one-third of the Companys board of
directors will be elected each year. This classified board of
directors provision could discourage a third party from making a
tender offer for the Companys shares of capital stock or
attempting to obtain control of the Company. It could also delay
stockholders who do not agree with the policies of the board of
directors from removing a majority of the board of directors for
two years.
260
Removal
of Director
The Companys charter provides that members of its board of
directors may only be removed by the affirmative vote of holders
of at least a majority of the voting power of all then
outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote generally
in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
Stockholder
meetings
The Companys charter and the Companys bylaws provide
that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the
chairman of the board, the chief executive officer, the
president or by a resolution adopted by a majority of the whole
board of directors of the Company.
Requirements
for advance notification of stockholder nominations and
proposals
The Companys bylaws establish advance notice procedures
with respect to stockholder proposals and the nomination of
candidates for election as directors, other than nominations
made by or at the direction of the board of directors.
Stockholder
action by written consent
The Companys charter and the Companys bylaws provide
that, except as may otherwise be provided with respect to the
rights of the holders of preferred stock, no action that is
required or permitted to be taken by the Companys
stockholders at any annual or special meeting may be effected by
written consent of stockholders in lieu of a meeting of
stockholders. This provision, which may not be amended except by
the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital
stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors,
voting together as a single class, makes it difficult for
stockholders to initiate or effect an action by written consent
that is opposed by the Companys board.
Amendment
of the bylaws
Under Delaware law, the power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws
is conferred upon the stockholders. A corporation may, however,
in its certificate of incorporation also confer upon the board
of directors the power to adopt, amend or repeal its bylaws. The
Companys charter and bylaws grant its board the power to
adopt, amend and repeal its bylaws at any regular or special
meeting of the board on the affirmative vote of a majority of
the directors then in office. The Companys stockholders
may adopt, amend or repeal the Companys bylaws but only at
any regular or special meeting of stockholders by an affirmative
vote of holders of at least
662/3%
of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital
stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election
of directors, voting together as a single class.
Amendment
of the Certificate of Incorporation
The Companys charter provides that, in addition to any
other vote that may be required by law or any preferred stock
designation, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
662/3%
of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital
stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election
of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to
amend, alter or repeal, or adopt any provision as part of the
Companys charter inconsistent with the provisions of the
Companys charter dealing with the Companys board of
directors, bylaws, meetings of the Companys stockholders
or amendment of the Companys charter.
The provisions of the Companys certificate of
incorporation and bylaws could have the effect of discouraging
others from attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence,
they may also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price
of Company Common Stock that often result from actual or rumored
hostile
261
takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of
preventing changes in the Companys management. It is
possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to
accomplish transactions which stockholders may otherwise deem to
be in their best interests.
New York
Stock Exchange Listing
The Company intends to apply to have its common stock and
warrants listed on the NYSE under the symbols, REN
and REN WS respectively. If the Company is unable to
satisfy the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange,
it will apply to have its stock listed on another stock exchange
and if such listing application is not granted, the Company
Common Stock will be traded in the over-the-counter market.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The Company will appoint Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company as the transfer agent and registrar for
Company Common Stock and the warrant agent for the Company
warrants.
262
COMPARISON
OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS OF HACI AND THE COMPANY
HACI and the Company are each Delaware corporations and governed
by the Delaware General Corporation Law, which is referred to
herein as the DGCL. Upon completion of the Acquisition, HACI
stockholders will receive shares of Company Common Stock and
will become stockholders of the Company The rights of the former
HACI stockholders will therefore be governed by the DGCL, the
Companys charter and the Companys bylaws.
The following description summarizes the material differences
that may affect the rights of the stockholders of HACI, but is
not a complete statement of all those differences, or a complete
description of the specific provisions referred to in this
summary. Stockholders should read carefully the relevant
provisions of the DGCL and the respective certificates of
incorporation and bylaws of both HACI and the Company. For more
information on how to obtain the documents that are not attached
to this proxy statement/prospectus, see the section entitled
Where You Can Find Additional Information.
Capitalization
HACI
The total number of shares of all classes of securities
authorized under HACIs charter, as in effect both prior
and subsequent to the merger, is 226,000,000 shares, which
is comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
225,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per
share; and
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share.
|
The
Company
The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock
authorized under the Companys charter is
226,000,000 shares, which is comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
225,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per
share; and
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share.
|
Voting
Rights
The holders of the HACI Common Stock and Company Common Stock
are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on
by stockholders.
Stockholder
Action By Written Consent
The DGCL allows actions to be taken by stockholders by written
consent to be made by the holders of the minimum number of votes
that would be needed to approve a matter at an annual or special
meeting of stockholders, unless this right to act by written
consent is denied in the certificate of incorporation.
HACIs charter and the Companys charter each prohibit
the stockholders from taking action by written consent.
Dividends
The DGCL permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out
of surplus or, if there is no surplus,
out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend
is declared
and/or the
preceding fiscal year. Surplus is defined as the
excess of the net assets of the corporation over the amount
determined to be the capital of the corporation by the board of
directors. The capital of the corporation is typically
calculated to be (and cannot be less than) the aggregate par
value of all issued shares of capital stock. Net assets equals
the fair value of the total assets minus total liabilities. The
DGCL also provides that dividends may not be paid out of net
profits if, after the payment of the dividend, capital is less
than the capital represented by the outstanding stock of all
classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets.
263
HACI
HACIs bylaws provide that the board of directors may
declare dividends at a regular or special meeting and dividends
may be paid in cash, property or shares of HACIs capital
stock.
The
Company
The Companys charter provides that subject to the rights
of the holders of preferred stock, the holders of shares of
Company Common Stock shall be entitled to receive such dividends
and other distributions (payable in cash, property or capital
stock of the Company) when, as and if declared thereon by the
Companys board of directors from time to time out of any
assets or funds of the Company legally available therefor and
shall share equally on a per share basis in such dividends and
distributions.
Number,
Election, Vacancy and Removal of Directors
Unless otherwise provided by the DGCL or the certificate of
incorporation, a majority of the directors in office can fill
any vacancy or newly created directorship. Except where the
board of directors is classified or the certificate of
incorporation provides for cumulative voting, a director may be
removed with or without cause by a majority of the shares
entitled to vote at an election of the directors.
HACI
Generally, the board of directors of HACI directors are elected
by the holders of a plurality of the votes cast by stockholders.
Any vacancy on the board of directors that results from an
increase in the number of directors may be filled by a majority
of the directors then in office or by a sole remaining director.
The members of HACIs board of directors are classified
into three classes, the members of one class of which are
elected at each meeting of the stockholders. Each board class is
elected to hold office for a three-year term and until the
successors of such class have been elected and qualified.
HACIs charter provides that, except as otherwise required
by law or any preferred stock designation, members of
HACIs board of directors may be removed from office at any
time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the voting power of all then
outstanding shares of capital stock of HACI entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, voting together as a
single class.
The
Company
Upon completion of the Acquisition, the board of directors of
the Company will consist of nine members. The Companys
charter provides that the number of directors of the Company,
other than those who may be elected by the holders of one or
more series of preferred stock voting separately by class or
series, shall be fixed from time to time exclusively by the
board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a
majority of the whole board of directors. Any newly created
directorships and any vacancies may be filled solely by a
majority vote of the directors then in office, even if less than
a quorum, or by a sole remaining director (and not by
stockholders), and any director so chosen will hold office for
the remainder of the full term of the class of directors to
which the new directorship was added or in which the vacancy
occurred and until such directors successor has been
elected and qualified.
The members of the Companys board of directors are
classified into three classes. Each board class is elected to
hold office for a staggered three-year term and until the
successors of such class have been elected and qualified,
subject to such directors earlier death, resignation,
retirement, disqualification or removal. Approximately one-third
of the Companys board of directors will be elected each
year.
The Companys charter provides that, except as otherwise
required by law or any preferred stock designation, members of
the Companys board of directors may be removed from office
at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote
of holders of a majority of the voting power of all then
outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as
a single class.
264
Amendments
to Certificate of Incorporation
Under the DGCL, an amendment to the certificate of incorporation
requires that the board of directors approve the amendment,
declare it advisable and submit it to stockholders for adoption.
Such amendment must be adopted by a majority in voting power of
all issued and outstanding shares and any greater vote required
by the certificate of incorporation. Except in limited
circumstances, any proposed amendment to the certificate of
incorporation that would increase or decrease the authorized
shares of a class of stock, increase or decrease the par value
of the shares of a class of stock, or alter or change the
powers, preferences or special rights of the shares of a class
of stock (so as to affect them adversely) requires approval of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the
affected class, voting as a separate class, in addition to the
approval of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on that
proposed amendment. If any proposed amendment would alter or
change the powers, preferences or special rights of any series
of a class of stock so as to affect them adversely, but does not
affect the entire class, then only the shares of the series
affected by the proposed amendment is considered a separate
class for purposes of the immediately preceding sentence.
HACI
HACIs charter provides that any amendments to
Article II, HACIs purpose, or Section 9.5, which
provides for the termination of HACIs existence on
September 28, 2009, may not become effective prior to the
consummation of an initial business combination.
The
Company
The Companys charter provides that, in addition to any
other vote that may be required by law or any preferred stock
designation, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
662/3%
of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital
stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election
of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to
amend, alter or repeal, or adopt any provision as part of the
Companys charter inconsistent with the provisions of the
Companys charter dealing with the Companys board of
directors, bylaws, meetings of the Companys stockholders
or amendment of the Companys charter.
Amendments
to Bylaws
HACI
HACIs bylaws provide that the original or other bylaws may
be adopted, amended or repealed by the stockholders entitled to
vote thereon at any regular or special meeting, or if the
certificate of incorporation so provides, by the board of
directors. The fact that such power has been so conferred upon
the board of directors shall not divest the stockholders of the
power nor limit their power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws.
HACIs charter provides that the board shall have the
power, without the assent or vote of the stockholders, to make,
alter, amend, change, add to or repeal the bylaws as provided in
the bylaws of the corporation, subject to the power of the
stockholders to alter or repeal any bylaw whether adopted by
them or otherwise.
The
Company
Under Delaware law, the power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws
is conferred upon the stockholders. A corporation may, however,
in its certificate of incorporation also confer upon the board
of directors the power to adopt, amend or repeal its bylaws. The
Companys charter and the Companys bylaws grant its
board the power to adopt, amend and repeal its bylaws at any
regular or special meeting of the board on the affirmative vote
of a majority of the directors then in office. The
Companys stockholders may adopt, amend, alter or repeal
the Companys bylaws but only at any regular or special
meeting of stockholders by an affirmative vote of holders of at
least
662/3%
of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital
stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election
of directors, voting together as a single class (in addition to
any other vote that may be required by law or any preferred
stock designation).
265
Special
Stockholder Meetings
Under the DGCL, a special meeting of a corporations
stockholders may be called by the board or by any other person
authorized by the corporations articles or certificate of
incorporation or bylaws. Generally, all stockholders of record
entitled to vote must receive notice of stockholder meetings not
less than 10 nor more than 60 days before the date of the
stockholder meeting.
HACI
Under HACIs bylaws, a special meeting of stockholders may
only be called by a majority of the entire board of directors,
the chief executive officer, the president or the chairman of
the board.
The
Company
Under the Companys charter and the Companys bylaws,
a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the
chairman of the board, the chief executive officer, the
president or by a resolution adopted by a majority of the whole
board of directors of the Company.
Limitation
of Personal Liability of Directors and Indemnification
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL permits a corporation, in its
certificate of incorporation, to limit or eliminate, subject to
certain statutory limitations, the liability of directors to the
corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for
breaches of fiduciary duty, except for liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to the
company or its stockholders;
|
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
in respect of certain unlawful dividend payments or stock
redemptions or repurchases; and
|
|
|
|
for any transaction from which the director derives an improper
personal benefit.
|
In accordance with Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL,
Section 8.1 of the Companys charter provides that no
director shall be personally liable to the Company or any of its
stockholders for monetary damages resulting from breaches of
their fiduciary duty as directors, except to the extent such
limitation on or exemption from liability is not permitted under
the DGCL. The effect of this provision of the Companys
charter is to eliminate the Companys rights and those of
its stockholders (through stockholders derivative suits on
the Companys behalf) to recover monetary damages against a
director for breach of the fiduciary duty of care as a director,
including breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent
behavior, except, as restricted by Section 102(b)(7) of the
DGCL. However, this provision does not limit or eliminate the
Companys rights or the rights of any stockholder to seek
non-monetary relief, such as an injunction or rescission, in the
event of a breach of a directors duty of care.
If the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action further
eliminating or limiting the liability of directors, then, in
accordance with the Companys charter, the liability of the
Companys directors to the Company or its stockholders will
be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent authorized by the
DGCL, as so amended. Any repeal or amendment of provisions of
the Companys charter limiting or eliminating the liability
of directors, whether by the Companys stockholders or by
changes in law, or the adoption of any other provisions
inconsistent therewith, will (unless otherwise required by law)
be prospective only, except to the extent such amendment or
change in law permits the Company to further limit or eliminate
the liability of directors on a retroactive basis.
Section 145(a) of the DGCL empowers a corporation to
indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent, or former
director, officer, employee or agent, who was or is a party or
is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in
the right of the corporation) by reason of his service as a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or his
service, at the corporations request, as a director,
officer,
266
employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise, against
expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and
amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by
such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding
provided that such director or officer acted in good faith and
in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the
best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any
criminal action or proceeding, provided that such director or
officer had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was
unlawful.
Section 145(b) of the DGCL empowers a corporation to
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action
or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a
judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person is
or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit provided that such director
or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, except that no indemnification may be made in
respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such director
or officer shall have been adjudged to be liable to the
corporation unless and only to the extent that the Delaware
Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was
brought shall determine upon application that, despite the
adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances
of the case, such director or officer is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the court shall
deem proper.
Section 145 of the DGCL further provides that to the extent
a director or officer of a corporation has been successful in
the defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in
Section 145(a) or Section 145(b) of the DGCL or in the
defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he shall be
indemnified against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection therewith,
provided that indemnification provided for by Section 145
of the DGCL or granted pursuant thereto shall not be deemed
exclusive of any other rights to which the indemnified party may
be entitled, and empowers the corporation to purchase and
maintain insurance on behalf of a director or officer of the
corporation against any liability asserted against him or
incurred by him in any such capacity or arising out of his
status as such whether or not the corporation would have the
power to indemnify him against such liabilities under
Section 145 of the DGCL.
HACI
HACIs charter provides that a director shall not be
personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for
monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
except for liability that is not permitted by the DGCL.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a corporation
may eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to
the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided that such
provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a
director (i) for any breach of the directors duty of
loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under
Section 174 of the DGCL (regarding, among other things, the
payment of unlawful dividends) or (iv) for any transaction
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
If the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action further
eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors,
then the liability of a director shall be eliminated or limited
to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, as so amended. Any
repeal or modification of the provision by the stockholders of
HACI shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a
director with respect to events occurring prior to the time of
such repeal or modification.
In addition, Section 145 of the DGCL provides that a
Delaware corporation has the power to indemnify its officers and
directors in certain circumstances. HACIs bylaws provides
that HACI shall indemnify all persons whom it may indemnify as
permitted by Delaware law.
267
The
Company
The Companys charter provides that no person who is or was
a director of the Company shall be personally liable to the
Company or any of its stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent
such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not
permitted by the DGCL as the same exists or hereafter may be
amended.
If the DGCL is hereafter amended to authorize corporate action
further limiting or eliminating the liability of directors, then
the liability of a director to the Company or its stockholders
shall be limited or eliminated to the fullest extent permitted
by the DGCL, as so amended.
Any repeal or amendment to the Companys charter by the
stockholders of the Company or by changes in law, or the
adoption of any other inconsistent provision to the
Companys charter will, unless otherwise required by law,
be prospective only (except to the extent such amendment or
change in law permits the Company to further limit or eliminate
the liability of directors) and will not adversely affect any
right or protection of a director of the Company existing at the
time of such repeal or amendment or adoption of such
inconsistent provision with respect to acts or omissions
occurring prior to such repeal or amendment or adoption of such
inconsistent provision.
The Companys charter also provides that the Company will,
to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by applicable law,
indemnify its current and former directors and officers, as well
as those persons who, while directors or officers of the
Company, are or were serving as directors, officers, employees
or agents of another entity, trust or other enterprise,
including service with respect to an employee benefit plan, in
connection with any threatened, pending or completed proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative,
against all expense, liability and loss (including, without
limitation, attorneys fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise
taxes and penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably
incurred or suffered by any such person in connection with any
such proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a person
eligible for indemnification pursuant to the Companys
charter will be indemnified by the Company in connection with a
proceeding initiated by such person only if such proceeding was
authorized by the Companys board of directors, except for
proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification.
The right to indemnification conferred by the Companys
charter is a contract right that includes the right to be paid
by the Company the expenses incurred in defending or otherwise
participating in any proceeding referenced above in advance of
its final disposition, provided, however, that if the DGCL
requires, an advancement of expenses incurred by the
Companys officer or director (solely in the capacity as an
officer or director of the Company) will be made only upon
delivery to the Company of an undertaking, by or on behalf of
such officer or director, to repay all amounts so advanced if it
is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be
indemnified for such expenses under the Companys charter
or otherwise.
The rights to indemnification and advancement of expenses will
not be deemed exclusive of any other rights which any person
covered by the Companys charter may have or hereafter
acquire under law, the Companys charter, the
Companys bylaws, an agreement, vote of stockholders or
disinterested directors, or otherwise.
Any repeal or amendment of provisions of the Companys
charter affecting indemnification rights, whether by the
Companys stockholders or by changes in law, or the
adoption of any other provisions inconsistent therewith, will
(unless otherwise required by law) be prospective only, except
to the extent such amendment or change in law permits the
Company to provide broader indemnification rights on a
retroactive basis, and will not in any way diminish or adversely
affect any right or protection existing at the time of such
repeal or amendment or adoption of such inconsistent provision
with respect to any act or omission occurring prior to such
repeal or amendment or adoption of such inconsistent provision.
The Companys charter also permits the Company, to the
extent and in the manner authorized or permitted by law, to
indemnify and to advance expenses to persons other that those
specifically covered by the Companys charter.
The Companys bylaws include the provisions relating to
advancement of expenses and indemnification rights consistent
with those set forth in the Companys charter. In addition,
the Companys bylaws provide for a right of indemnitee to
bring a suit in the event a claim for indemnification or
advancement of expenses is
268
not paid in full by the Company within a specified period of
time. The Companys bylaws also permit the Company to
purchase and maintain insurance, at the Companys expense,
to protect the Company
and/or any
director, officer, employee or agent of the Company or another
entity, trust or other enterprise against any expense, liability
or loss, whether or not the Company would have the power to
indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss
under the DGCL.
Any repeal or amendment of provisions of the Companys
bylaws affecting indemnification rights, whether by the
Companys board of directors, stockholders or by changes in
applicable law, or the adoption of any other provisions
inconsistent therewith, will (unless otherwise required by law)
be prospective only, except to the extent such amendment or
change in law permits the Company to provide broader
indemnification rights on a retroactive basis, and will not in
any way diminish or adversely affect any right or protection
existing thereunder with respect to any act or omission
occurring prior to such repeal or amendment or adoption of such
inconsistent provision.
Upon closing of the Acquisition, the Company intends to enter
into indemnification agreements with each of its directors.
These agreements will require the Company to indemnify these
individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law
against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to
the Company, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any
proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified.
The Company also intends to enter into indemnification
agreements with its future directors.
Under the Acquisition Agreement, the Company agreed that the
charter and bylaws (or operating agreement or other equivalent
governing instruments) of the Company and each of its
subsidiaries shall contain provisions no less favorable with
respect to indemnification than are set forth in the charter,
bylaws, operating agreement, or equivalent instruments, as
applicable, of such entities as of the date of the Acquisition
Agreement. Such indemnification provisions may not be amended,
repealed or otherwise modified for a period of six years after
the closing date of the Acquisition in any manner that would
adversely affect the rights of individuals who at or prior to
the closing date of the Acquisition were directors, officers,
managers, managing members, agents or employees of Seller or any
of Sellers subsidiaries (except for certain excluded
subsidiaries), or who were otherwise entitled to indemnification
pursuant to the charter and bylaws (or equivalent governing
instruments) of such entities. The Company also agreed to cause
(including by paying premiums on the current insurance policies)
to be maintained in effect for six years after the closing date
of the Acquisition the current policies of the directors
and officers liability or equivalent insurance maintained
by or on behalf of Seller and its subsidiaries (except for
certain excluded subsidiaries) with respect to matters occurring
prior to the closing of the Acquisition. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Company may substitute for such coverage policies
of at least the same coverage containing terms and conditions
that are not less advantageous than the existing policies
(including with respect to the period covered). In addition, the
Company agreed that it will indemnify each individual who served
as a director, officer, manager or managing member of Seller and
its subsidiaries (except for certain excluded subsidiaries) at
any time prior to the closing date of the Acquisition and
against all actions, suits, proceedings, hearings,
investigations, claims and similar actions, including all court
costs and reasonable attorney fees and expenses resulting from
or arising out of, or caused by, the Acquisition Agreement or
any of the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition
Agreement.
The Company also agreed that after the closing of the
Acquisition, the Company will cause its subsidiaries to provide
indemnification to the directors and officers of HACI who serve
in such capacity prior to the closing of the Acquisition to the
same extent as provided indemnification to such persons as of
the date of the Acquisition. Such indemnization provisions may
not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified for a period of
six years after the closing date of the Acquisition in any
manner that would adversely affect the rights thereunder of such
persons as of the date of the Acquisition Agreement.
Commission
Position on Indemnification for Securities Act
Liabilities
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or
persons controlling HACI or the Company pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, HACI and the Company have been informed
that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is
therefore unenforceable.
269
Mergers,
Consolidations and Other Transactions
Under the DGCL, the board of directors and the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote must approve
a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of a
corporations assets. However, unless the corporation
provides otherwise in its certificate of incorporation, no
stockholder vote of a constituent corporation surviving a merger
is required if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement does not amend the constituent
corporations articles or certificate of incorporation;
|
|
|
|
each share of stock of the constituent corporation outstanding
immediately before the merger is to be an identical outstanding
or treasury share of the surviving corporation after the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
either no shares of common stock of the surviving corporation
and no shares, securities or obligations convertible into such
stock are to be issued or delivered under the plan of merger, or
the authorized unissued shares or the treasury shares of common
stock of the surviving corporation to be issued or delivered
under the plan of merger plus those initially issuable upon
conversion of any other shares, securities or obligations to be
issued or delivered under such plan do not exceed 20% of the
shares of common stock of such constituent corporation
outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the
merger.
|
HACI
Neither HACIs charter nor HACIs bylaws contains any
super-majority voting requirements governing mergers,
consolidations, sales of substantially all of the assets,
liquidations, reclassifications or recapitalizations.
The
Company
Neither the Companys charter nor the Companys bylaws
contain any super-majority or class voting requirements
governing mergers, consolidations, sales of substantially all of
the assets, liquidations, reclassifications or recapitalizations.
270
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of the material U.S. Federal
income tax consequences of the Acquisition to U.S. holders
and
non-U.S. holders
(each defined below) who own HACI Common Stock or Public
Warrants of (1) the exchange pursuant to the Merger of HACI
Common Stock into Company Common Stock, (2) the exchange
pursuant to the Merger of Public Warrants into warrants
exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock, (3) the
ownership and disposition of shares of Company Common Stock,
(4) the exercise of warrants in exchange for shares of
Company Common Stock, (5) the exchange of Public Warrants
into cash and (6) the conversion of shares of HACI Common
Stock. This summary, based on the assumptions and subject to the
limitations described below, constitutes the opinion of Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. In the event Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP withdraws such opinion, HACI
would prepare and distribute a revised proxy
statement/prospectus with related disclosure to that effect and
resolicit votes for the Warrant Amendment Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Existence Proposal, the Charter
Amendment Purpose Proposal and the Acquisition
Proposal.
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. holder is a
beneficial owner of HACI Common Stock, Public Warrants, Company
Common Stock, or warrants exercisable for shares of Company
Common Stock that is:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity taxed as a corporation for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes) created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the
District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. Federal
income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (i) a court within the United States is able to
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the
trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to
control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) it
has in effect a valid election to be treated as a
U.S. person.
|
For purposes of this discussion, a
non-U.S. holder
is a beneficial owner of HACI Common Stock, Public Warrants,
Company Common Stock, or warrants exercisable for shares of
Company Common Stock that is not a U.S. holder.
This section is based on current provisions of the Code, current
and proposed Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, and
administrative and judicial decisions as of the date hereof, all
of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis.
Changes in these authorities may cause the tax consequences to
vary substantially from the consequences described below. No
ruling has been sought from the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service, which we refer to as the IRS, as to the
Federal income tax consequences of the Merger. Furthermore, this
summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded
from adopting a contrary position.
This section does not purport to be a comprehensive description
of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to each
holder of HACI Common Stock, Public Warrants, Company Common
Stock, or warrants exercisable for shares of Company Common
Stock. This section does not address all aspects of
U.S. Federal income taxation that may be relevant to any
particular investor based on such investors individual
circumstances. In particular, this section considers only
U.S. holders and
non-U.S. holders
that hold and have held HACI Common Stock or Public Warrants as
capital assets (and will hold any Company Common Stock or
warrants exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock as
capital assets) and does not address the potential application
of the alternative minimum tax or the U.S. Federal income
tax consequences to investors that are subject to special
treatment, including:
|
|
|
|
|
broker-dealers;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
taxpayers who have elected mark-to-market accounting;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
regulated investment companies;
|
|
|
|
real estate investment trusts;
|
|
|
|
financial institutions or financial services
entities;
|
|
|
|
taxpayers who hold HACI Common Stock, Company Common Stock,
Public Warrants, or warrants exercisable for Company Common
Stock as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or
other integrated transaction;
|
|
|
|
holders that acquired their HACI Common Stock or Public Warrants
through the exercise of employee stock options or other
compensation arrangements;
|
|
|
|
controlled foreign corporations;
|
|
|
|
passive foreign investment companies;
|
|
|
|
certain expatriates or former long-term residents of the United
States; and
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders whose functional currency is not the
U.S. dollar.
|
The following does not address any aspect of U.S. Federal
gift or estate tax laws, or state, local or
non-U.S. tax
laws. In addition, the section does not consider the tax
treatment of entities taxable as partnerships for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes or other pass-through
entities or persons who hold HACI Common Stock or Public
Warrants (or will hold Company Common Stock or warrants
exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock) through such
entities. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax
advisors regarding the specific tax consequences to them of the
Acquisition, the ownership or disposition of shares of Company
Common Stock or warrants exercisable for shares of Company
Common Stock, and electing conversion in light of their
particular circumstances.
This summary is based upon certain assumptions, including the
assumptions that there will be full compliance without waiver
with all of the provisions in the Acquisition Agreement, that no
substantive condition to the Merger will be waived, no
substantive term of the Acquisition Agreement will be amended
and that the representations and covenants contained in the
Acquisition Agreement and this proxy statement/prospectus are
currently true, correct and complete and will remain so, and
will be complied with, at all relevant times.
Tax
Consequences of the Merger
If (1) the Merger is consummated as described in the
Acquisition Agreement and this proxy statement/prospectus,
(2) the assumptions discussed above are accurate, and (3)
Parent and former shareholders of HACI will be in control of the
Company immediately after the Merger and no more than 20% of the
shares of Company Common Stock are owned by stockholders who
have a binding obligation, or a prearranged integrated plan, to
dispose of such shares following the Merger, the Merger will
qualify as part of an exchange of property for stock
constituting control of a corporation pursuant to
section 351(a) of the Code. For purposes of
Section 351 of the Code, the term control means
the ownership of stock possessing at least 80 percent of
the total combined voting power of all classes entitled to vote
and at least 80 percent of the total number of shares of
all other classes of stock of the corporation. Except where
otherwise indicated, the remainder of this discussion follows
from the opinion referenced in this paragraph.
Other than as discussed below, no gain or loss will be
recognized on the exchange of the HACI Common Stock held by
U.S. holders and
non-U.S. holders
for Company Common Stock. The tax basis of Company Common Stock
received by holders of HACI Common Stock in the Merger will be
the same as the adjusted tax basis of Common Stock surrendered
in exchange therefor and the holding period of the shares of
Company Common Stock received in the Merger by a holder of HACI
Common Stock will include the period during which such HACI
Common Stock was held, although, as discussed below, this
treatment is not free from doubt for a holder who exchanges both
HACI Common Stock and Public Warrants in the Merger, which we
refer to as a Combination Holder. Combination Holders may suffer
adverse tax consequences as a result of the Warrant Amendment
Proposal, even though the exchange of HACI Common Stock for
Company Common
272
Stock otherwise may be tax neutral. Although the exact number of
Combination Holders is indeterminate, HACI believes that a
substantial percentage of the holders of HACI Common Stock also
may be HACI Public Warrantholders and thus be Combination
Holders.
A holder who exchanges Public Warrants for warrants exercisable
for shares of Company Common Stock should recognize gain or loss
equal to the difference between (1) the fair market value
of the warrants received in the exchange and (2) the
holders adjusted tax basis in the Public Warrants,
although, as discussed below, this matter is not free from doubt
for a Combination Holder. Such gain or loss will be capital gain
or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
Public Warrants were held for more than one year prior to the
exchange. The basis of any warrants exercisable for shares of
Company Common Stock received by the holders of Public Warrants
in the Merger will be equal to the fair market value of such new
warrants as of the date of the Merger. The holding period of any
warrants exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock received
in the Merger by holders of Public Warrants will begin on the
day after the Merger.
There is a possibility that a Combination Holder will be subject
to a different tax treatment than holders who exchange only
Public Warrants or HACI Common Stock in the Merger, which we
refer to as the Alternative Tax Treatment. If the Alternative
Tax Treatment applies, a Combination Holder will not recognize
any loss, while the amount of any gain recognized by a
Combination Holder will depend on the allocation of the value of
amounts received in the Merger between the HACI Common Stock and
Public Warrants exchanged by such holder, which we refer to as
the Exchanged Assets. Generally, applying the Alternative Tax
Treatment, the amount of any gain recognized by a Combination
Holder will equal the sum of the amount of gain recognized with
respect to each Exchanged Asset. The amount of gain recognized
with respect to each Exchanged Asset will equal the lesser of
(1) the excess, if any, of the fair market value of each
Exchanged Asset over the holders adjusted tax basis in
such asset or (2) the fair market value of any warrants
exercisable for Company Common Stock that is allocable to such
asset. The rules in this area are complicated and holders are
urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific
tax consequences to them.
If the Alternative Tax Treatment applies, the Combination
Holders adjusted tax basis in the Company Common Stock
received in the Merger would be the same as the holders
adjusted tax basis in the HACI Common Stock and Public Warrants
exchanged, increased by any gain recognized in the Merger and
reduced by the fair market value of the warrants exercisable for
shares of Company Common Stock. A Combination Holder could have
a bifurcated holding period in the Company Common Stock received
in the Merger. The Combination Holders basis and holding
period of any warrants exercisable for shares of Company Common
Stock will be the same as discussed above.
If any of the assumptions discussed in the first sentence of
paragraph 1, above, are incorrect, then there can be no
assurances that Section 351 of the Code will apply to the
Merger. If Section 351 of the Code does not apply to the
Merger and the Merger did not otherwise qualify for
nonrecognition treatment, a U.S. holder of HACI Common
Stock or Public Warrants generally would be required to
recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between an amount
equal to the fair market value, as of the date of the Merger, of
the shares of Company Common Stock, and warrants received in the
Merger and such holders adjusted tax basis in the shares
of HACI Common Stock and Public Warrants they surrendered in the
Merger. Such gain or loss would be capital gain or loss and
would be long-term capital gain or loss if the HACI Common Stock
and Public Warrants were held for more than one year prior to
the exchange. Generally, in such event, each
U.S. holders tax basis in the shares of Company
Common Stock and warrants received in the Merger would equal
their fair market value as of the date of the Merger, and such
holders holding period for such shares and warrants would
begin on the day after the Merger.
Generally, if the Merger were not to qualify for nonrecognition
treatment,
non-U.S. holders
would be subject to tax consequences in the same manner as
described below in Tax Consequences of Owning Company
Common Stock and Warrants Exercisable for Shares of Company
Common Stock
Non-U.S. holders
Disposition of Common Stock or Warrants in respect of
dispositions of Company Common Stock and warrants exercisable
for shares of Company Common Stock. However, the tax
consequences to
non-U.S. holders
will depend on their particular situation and
non-U.S. holders
are urged to consult their own tax advisors.
273
Tax
Consequences of Owning Company Common Stock and Warrants
Exercisable for Shares of Company Common Stock
U.S.
Holders
Dividends
and Other Distributions on the Company Common Stock
Distributions on the Company Common Stock will constitute
dividends for U.S. Federal income tax purposes to the
extent paid from the Companys current or accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. Federal
income tax principles. If a distribution exceeds the
Companys current or accumulated earnings and profits, the
excess will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital and
will reduce (but not below zero) the U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in the Company Common Stock, and any
remaining excess will be treated as capital gain from a sale or
exchange of the Company Common Stock, subject to the tax
treatment described below in Disposition of Common
Stock.
Dividends received by a corporate U.S. holder generally
will qualify for the dividends received deduction if the
requisite holding period is satisfied. With certain exceptions,
and provided certain holding period requirements are met,
dividends received by a non-corporate U.S. holder generally
will constitute qualified dividends that will be
subject to tax at the maximum tax rate accorded to capital gains
for tax years beginning on or before December 31, 2010,
after which the rate applicable to dividends is currently
scheduled to change to the tax rate generally then applicable to
ordinary income.
Disposition
of Common Stock
Upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of Company Common
Stock, a U.S. holder will recognize gain or loss in an
amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on
the sale, exchange or other disposition of Company Common Stock
and the U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in such
stock. Generally, such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss
and will be long term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. holders holding period for the shares exceeds
one year. Long term capital gains of non-corporate
U.S. holders are currently subject to a reduced maximum tax
rate of 15% for tax years beginning on or before
December 31, 2010. After December 31, 2010, the
maximum capital gains rate is scheduled to increase to 20%. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Exercise
or Lapse of a Warrant
A U.S. holder generally will not recognize gain or loss
upon the exercise of a warrant exercisable for shares of Company
Common Stock. Company Common Stock acquired pursuant to the
exercise of such a warrant will have a tax basis equal to the
U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in the warrant
increased by the exercise price paid to exercise the warrant.
The holding period of such Company Common Stock will begin on
the date following the date of exercise of the warrant (or
possibly the date of exercise).
If a warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, a U.S. holder
will have a capital loss equal to such holders tax basis
in the warrant. Such loss will be long term if the warrant has
been held for more than one year.
Adjustment
to Exercise Price
Under Section 305 of the Code, if certain adjustments are
made (or not made) to the number of shares to be issued upon the
exercise of a warrant or to the warrants exercise price, a
U.S. holder may be deemed to have received a constructive
distribution, which could result in the inclusion of dividend
income.
Non-U.S.
Holders
Dividends
and Other Distributions on the Company Common Stock
In general, any distributions made to a
non-U.S. holder
of shares of Company Common Stock (and any constructive
distributions a
non-U.S. holder
may be deemed to receive, see
U.S. Holders Adjustment to Exercise
Price), to the extent paid out of current or
accumulated earnings and profits of the Company (as determined
under U.S. Federal income tax principles), will constitute
dividends for U.S. Federal income tax
274
purposes. Provided such dividends are not effectively connected
with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business within the United States, such
dividends generally will be subject to withholding of
U.S. Federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as
may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
Any distribution not constituting a dividend will be treated
first as a tax-free return of capital and will reduce (but not
below zero) the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in its shares of Company Common Stock and any
remaining excess will be treated as gain realized from the sale
or other disposition of the common stock, as described under
Disposition of Common Stock or
Warrants below.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
that are effectively connected with such
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business within the United States
generally will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax,
provided such
non-U.S. holder
complies with certain certification and disclosure requirements
(usually by providing an IRS
Form W-8ECI).
Instead, such dividends generally will be subject to
U.S. Federal income tax at the same graduated individual or
corporate rates applicable to U.S. holders. If the
non-U.S. holder
is a corporation, dividends that are effectively connected
income may also be subject to a branch profits tax
at a rate of 30% or such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
who wishes to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty rate for
dividends will be required (a) to complete IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or other applicable form) and certify under penalty of perjury
that such holder is not a United States person as defined under
the Code and is eligible for treaty benefits or (b) if the
Company Common Stock is held through certain foreign
intermediaries, to satisfy the relevant certification
requirements of applicable U.S. Treasury regulations.
A
non-U.S. holder
eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. Federal withholding tax
pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any
excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for
refund with the IRS.
Exercise
or Lapse of a Warrant
The U.S. Federal income tax treatment of a
non-U.S. holders
exercise or lapse of a warrant generally will correspond to the
U.S. Federal income tax treatment of the exercise or lapse
of a warrant by a U.S. holder, as described under
U.S. Holders Exercise or Lapse of a
Warrant above. However, capital loss recognized by a
non-U.S. Holder
on lapse of a warrant will generally be taken into account for
U.S. income tax purposes only in the circumstances
described under Disposition of Common Stock or
Warrants.
Disposition
of Common Stock or Warrants
A
non-U.S. holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. Federal income or
withholding tax in respect of gain recognized on a sale,
exchange or other disposition of Company Common Stock or
warrants exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock
(including redemption of such warrants) unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition and
certain other conditions are met; or
|
|
|
|
the Company is or has been a United States real property
holding corporation for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes at any time during the shorter of the five-year period
ending on the date of disposition or the period that the
non-U.S. holder
held Company Common Stock or warrants exercisable for shares of
Company Common Stock and, in the case where shares of Company
Common Stock are regularly traded on an established securities
market, the
non-U.S. holder
has owned, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of Company
Common Stock at any time within the shorter of the five-year
period preceding a disposition of Company Common Stock or such
non-U.S. holders
holding period for the shares of Company Common Stock (or, in
the case of a disposition of warrants exercisable for shares of
Company Common Stock, the
non-U.S. holder
owned warrants exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock
that is regularly traded on an established securities market and
that had a fair
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
market value on the date they were acquired that was greater
than the fair market value on that date of 5% of such Company
Common Stock).
|
Unless an applicable treaty provides otherwise, gain described
in the first bullet point above will be subject to tax at
generally applicable U.S. Federal income tax rates. Any
gain described in the first bullet point above of a
non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign corporation may also be subject to an
additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or such
lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax
treaty. Gain described in the second bullet point above (which
may be offset by U.S. source capital losses) will be
subject to a flat 30% U.S. Federal income tax.
With respect to the third bullet point above, there can be no
assurance that Company Common Stock will be treated as regularly
traded on an established securities market. The Company believes
that it will be a United States real property holding
corporation for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.
Information
Reporting and
Back-up
Withholding
A U.S. holder may be subject to information reporting
requirements with respect to dividends paid on shares of Company
Common Stock, and on the proceeds from the sale, exchange or
disposition of shares of Company Common Stock or warrants
exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock. In addition, a
U.S. holder may be subject to
back-up
withholding (currently at 28%) on dividends paid on common
shares, and on the proceeds from the sale, exchange or other
disposition of shares of Company Common Stock or warrants
exercisable for shares of Company Common Stock unless the
U.S. holder provides certain identifying information, such
as a duly executed IRS
Form W-9
certifying that he, she, or it is not subject to backup
withholding or appropriate
W-8, or
otherwise establishes an exemption.
Back-up
withholding is not an additional tax and the amount of any
back-up
withholding will be allowable as a credit against a
U.S. holders U.S. Federal income tax liability
and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that certain
required information is timely furnished to the IRS. In general,
a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to information reporting and backup
withholding. However, a
non-U.S. holder
may be required to establish an exemption from information
reporting and backup withholding by certifying the
non-U.S. holders
non-U.S. status
on
Form W-8BEN.
Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding
the application of the information reporting and
back-up
withholding rules to them.
Conversion
of Public Warrants
In the event that a holder elects to exchange Public Warrants
into a right to receive cash, the holder will recognize capital
gain or loss with respect to the Public Warrants equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received for the Public
Warrants and the holders adjusted basis in the Public
Warrants. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss, and
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Public Warrants
were held for more than one year at the time of the exchange.
Conversion
of Common Stock
If, rather than approving the Acquisition Proposal, a holder
converts HACI Common Stock into a right to receive cash pursuant
to the exercise of a conversion right, the transaction will be
treated for U.S. Federal income tax purposes as a
redemption of such stock. If that redemption qualifies as a sale
of HACI Common Stock by the holder under Section 302 of the
Code, the holder will be treated as described under either
U.S. Holders Gain on Disposition of
Common Stock or
Non-U.S. Holders
Gain on Disposition of Common Stock or Warrants above.
If that redemption does not qualify as a sale of common stock
under Section 302 of the Code, the holder will be treated
as receiving a corporate distribution with the tax consequences
described above under U.S. Holders
Dividends and Other Distributions on the Company Common
Stock, or
Non-U.S. Holders
Dividends and Other Distributions on the Company Common
Stock. Whether that redemption qualifies for sale
treatment will depend largely on the total number of shares of
HACI Common Stock treated as held by the holder immediately
after the conversion (including any stock constructively owned
by the holder as a result of, among other things, owning
warrants). The conversion of HACI Common Stock generally will be
treated as a sale or exchange of such stock (rather than as a
276
distribution) if the receipt of cash upon the conversion
(i) is substantially disproportionate with
respect to the holder, (ii) results in a complete
redemption of the holders interest in HACI or
(iii) is not essentially equivalent to a
dividend with respect to the holder. These tests are
explained more fully below.
In determining whether any of the foregoing tests are satisfied,
a holder takes into account not only stock actually owned by the
holder, but also shares of HACI Common Stock that are
constructively owned by it. A holder may constructively own, in
addition to stock owned directly, stock owned by certain related
individuals and entities in which the holder has an interest or
that have an interest in such holder, as well as any stock the
holder has a right to acquire by exercise of an option, which
would generally include HACI Common Stock which could be
acquired pursuant to the exercise of the Public Warrants. In
order to meet the substantially disproportionate test, the
percentage of HACI outstanding voting stock actually and
constructively owned by the holder immediately following the
conversion of common stock must, among other requirements, be
less than 80 percent of the percentage of HACIs
outstanding voting stock actually and constructively owned by
the holder immediately before the conversion. There will be a
complete redemption of a holders interest if either
(i) all of the shares of HACI Common Stock actually and
constructively owned by the holder are converted or
(ii) all of the shares of HACI Common Stock actually owned
by the holder are converted and the holder is eligible to waive,
and effectively waives in accordance with specific rules, the
attribution of stock owned by any other persons or entities
whose ownership of HACI Common Stock can be attributed to the
holder. A conversion of the HACI Common Stock will not be
essentially equivalent to a dividend if a holders
conversion results in a meaningful reduction of the
holders proportionate interest in HACI. Whether the
conversion will result in a meaningful reduction in a
holders proportionate interest in HACI will depend on the
particular facts and circumstances. However, the IRS has
indicated in a published ruling that even a small reduction in
the proportionate interest of a small minority stockholder in a
publicly held corporation who exercises no control over
corporate affairs may constitute such a meaningful
reduction. A holder should consult with its own tax
advisors as to the tax consequences of an exercise of the
conversion right.
If none of the foregoing tests is satisfied, then the conversion
will be treated as a distribution by HACI and the tax effects
will be as described under either
U.S. Holders Dividends and Other
Distributions on the Company Common Stock or
Non-U.S. Holders
Dividends and Other Distributions on the Company Common
Stock, above. After the application of those rules,
any remaining tax basis of the holder in the converted HACI
Common Stock will be added to the holders adjusted tax
basis in its remaining Company Common Stock, or, if it has none,
to the holders adjusted tax basis in its warrants or
possibly in other Company Common Stock constructively owned by
it. Proposed Treasury Regulations, which would become effective
only for transactions that occur after they are finalized, would
alter this method of basis adjustment. Holders who actually or
constructively own 5% or more of HACI Common Stock (by vote or
value) may be subject to special reporting requirements with
respect to a conversion of common stock, and such holders should
consult with their own tax advisors in that regard.
277
APPRAISAL
RIGHTS
In the event the Companys securities are not listed on a
national securities exchange at the time the Acquisition is
consummated, appraisal rights will be available to all HACI
stockholders pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL. If
appraisal rights are available, the shares of HACI Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the
Acquisition and held by a holder who has not voted in favor of
the Acquisition Proposal and who has delivered a written demand
for appraisal of such shares in accordance with Section 262
of the DGCL, will not be converted into the right to receive
Company Common Stock, but such holder will be entitled to seek
an appraisal of such shares under the DGCL unless and until the
dissenting holder fails to perfect or withdraws or otherwise
loses his or her right to appraisal and payment under the DGCL.
If, after the effective time of the Acquisition, a dissenting
stockholder fails to perfect or withdraws or loses his or her
right to appraisal, his or her shares of HACI common stock will
be treated as if they had been converted as of the effective
time of the Acquisition into the right to receive Company Common
Stock. The full text of Section 262 of the DGCL is attached
to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex F.
Holders of Public Shares electing to exercise conversion rights
will not be entitled to appraisal rights.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP has provided an opinion for
Resolute Energy Corporation regarding the validity of the shares
of Resolute Energy Corporation Common Stock offered by this
proxy statement/prospectus. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP has rendered an opinion concerning certain U.S. federal
income tax consequences to HACI stockholders as a result of the
Acquisition. Richards, Layton and Finger, P.A., as special
Delaware counsel to HACI, has rendered an opinion concerning the
validity of HACIs charter amendment.
EXPERTS
The combined financial statements of Resolute Natural Resources
Company, LLC, Resolute Aneth, LLC, WYNR, LLC, BWNR, LLC,
Resolute Wyoming, Inc., and RNRC Holdings, Inc., which we refer
to as the Companies, except Resolute Wyoming Inc., as of
December 31, 2007 and for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2007 included in this Prospectus,
have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing herein and elsewhere in the Registration
Statement (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the
financial statements and includes explanatory paragraphs
referring to the substantial doubt about the Companies
ability to continue as a going concern, as described in
Note 1, the restatement of the Companies combined
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008
as described in Note 12, and the retrospective adjustment
for the adoption of FASB Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Financial Statements
as described in Note 1). The financial statements of
Resolute Wyoming Inc. have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP as
stated in its report included herein. Such financial statements
of the Companies are included in reliance upon the report of
such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting
and auditing. All of the foregoing firms are independent public
accounting firms.
The balance sheet of Resolute Energy Corporation as of
August 3, 2009, included in this Prospectus has been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
appearing herein and elsewhere in the Registration Statement and
are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The statements of revenues and direct operating expenses of the
ExxonMobil Properties acquired by Resolute Aneth, LLC from
ExxonMobil for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and
2005, included in this proxy statement/prospectus have been
audited by Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing herein and are included in reliance upon
the reports of such firm given their authority as experts in
auditing and accounting.
278
The financial statements of Resolute Wyoming, Inc., formerly
Primary Natural Resources, Inc., as of December 31, 2007
and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (not
presented separately herein) have been audited by Grant Thornton
LLP, independent registered public accountants, as indicated in
their report with respect thereto. The report of Grant Thornton
LLP is included elsewhere herein in reliance upon the authority
of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting in giving
said report.
The financial statements of Hicks Acquisition Company I,
Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, and for each of the year ended December 31, 2008,
the period February 26, 2007 (inception) to
December 31, 2007 and the period February 27, 2007
(inception) to December 31, 2008, and managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 have been
included herein in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, appearing
elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts
in accounting and auditing.
Estimates of historical oil and natural gas reserves and related
information of the Company as of December 31, 2006, 2007
and 2008, included in this prospectus are based upon engineering
studies prepared by Resolute and audited by Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum
engineers. Such estimates and related information have been so
included in reliance upon the authority of such firms as experts
in such matters.
Estimates of historical oil and natural gas reserves and related
information of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and
2005, included in this prospectus are based upon engineering
studies prepared by Resolute and audited by Sproule Associates
Limited, independent petroleum engineers. Such estimates and
related information have been so included in reliance upon the
authority of such firms as experts in such matters.
DELIVERY
OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, HACI and services that it
employs to deliver communications to its stockholders are
permitted to deliver to two or more stockholders sharing the
same address a single copy of the proxy statement/prospectus.
Upon written or oral request, HACI will deliver a separate copy
of the proxy statement/prospectus to any stockholder at a shared
address to which a single copy of the proxy statement/prospectus
was delivered and who wishes to receive separate copies in the
future. Stockholders receiving multiple copies of the proxy
statement/prospectus may likewise request that HACI deliver
single copies of the proxy statement/prospectus in the future.
Stockholders may notify HACI of their requests by calling or
writing HACI at its principal executive offices at 100 Crescent
Court, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75291
(214) 615-2300.
FUTURE
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
If the Acquisition is consummated, HACI will be a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company. If the Acquisition is not consummated
prior to September 28, 2009, or by October 5, 2009 if
the Charter Amendment becomes effective, HACI will be required
to dissolve and liquidate and will conduct no annual meetings
thereafter. The Company expects to hold its initial annual
meeting of stockholders in May 2010. Proposals to be
included in the proxy statement for the 2010 annual meeting must
be provided to the Company a reasonable time before the Company
begins to print and send its proxy materials for the meeting,
which the Company expects to occur in April 2010. You should
direct any proposals to the Companys secretary at the
Companys principal executive office.
279
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Company has filed a registration statement on
Form S-4,
as may be amended, to register the issuance of the
Companys securities in connection with the Acquisition.
This proxy statement/prospectus is a part of that registration
statement and constitutes a prospectus of the Company in
addition to a proxy statement of HACI for the special Meeting of
HACI stockholders. As allowed by SEC rules, this proxy
statement/prospectus does not contain all of the information
that you can find in the registration statement or the exhibits
to the registration statement. You should refer to the
registration statement and its exhibits for additional
information that is not contained in this proxy
statement/prospectus.
HACI is subject to the informational requirements of the
Exchange Act, and is required to file reports, any proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. Any reports,
statements or other information that HACI or the Company files
with the SEC, including this proxy statement/prospectus, may be
inspected and copied at the public reference facilities
maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of this
material can also be obtained upon written request from the
Public Reference Section of the SEC at its principal office in
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates or from the
SECs website on the Internet at www.sec.gov, free of
charge. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on public reference rooms.
Neither HACI nor the Company has authorized anyone to provide
you with information that differs from that contained in this
proxy statement/prospectus. You should not assume that the
information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus is
accurate as on any date other than the date of the proxy
statement/prospectus, and neither the mailing of this proxy
statement/prospectus to HACI stockholders nor the consummation
of the Acquisition shall create any implication to the contrary.
This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to
sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or
the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any
person to whom it is not lawful to make any such offer or
solicitation in such jurisdiction
280
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS
|
|
|
2-D
seismic or
3-D
seismic |
|
Interpretive geophysical data that depict the subsurface strata
in two dimensions or three dimensions, respectively.
3-D seismic
typically provides a more detailed and accurate interpretation
of the subsurface strata than
2-D seismic. |
|
Bbl |
|
One stock tank barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume, used in
this proxy statement/prospectus in reference to crude oil or
other liquid hydrocarbons. Bbl is also used to refer to multiple
barrels of crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons. |
|
Bbl; Bbl per day |
|
Barrels of oil; barrels of oil produced per day. |
|
Bcf |
|
One billion cubic feet of gas. |
|
Boe; Boe per day |
|
Barrels of oil equivalent, with six thousand cubic feet of gas
being equivalent to one barrel of oil; barrels of oil equivalent
produced per day |
|
Btu or British Thermal Unit |
|
The amount of thermal energy required to raise the temperature
of one pound of water at its maximum density (which occurs at a
temperature of 39.1 degrees Fahrenheit) by one degree Fahrenheit. |
|
Completion |
|
The process of treating a drilled well followed by the
installation of permanent equipment for the production of oil or
gas, or in the case of a dry hole, the reporting of abandonment
to the appropriate agency. |
|
Developed Acreage |
|
The number of acres that are allocated or assignable to
productive wells or wells capable of production. |
|
Development Well |
|
A well drilled within the proved area of an oil or gas
reservoir, or which extends a proved reservoir, to the depth of
a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive. |
|
Dry hole |
|
A well found to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in
sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas
well. |
|
Environmental Assessment |
|
A study that can be required pursuant to federal law prior to
drilling a well or conducting certain other projects. |
|
Environmental Impact Statement |
|
A more detailed study that can be required pursuant to federal
law of the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of
a project that may be made available for public review and
comment. |
|
Formation |
|
A succession of sedimentary beds that were deposited under the
same general geologic conditions. |
|
Field |
|
An area consisting of either a single reservoir or multiple
reservoirs, all grouped on or related to the same individual
geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. |
|
GAAP |
|
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States. |
|
Gross Acres or Gross Wells |
|
The total acres or wells, as the case may be, in which a working
interest or royalty interest is owned. |
|
MBbl |
|
One thousand barrels of crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons. |
|
MBoe |
|
One thousand barrels of oil equivalent. |
281
|
|
|
Mcf |
|
One thousand cubic feet of gas. |
|
Mcf/d |
|
One Mcf per day. |
|
MMBbl |
|
One million barrels of crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons. |
|
MMBoe |
|
One million barrels of oil equivalent. |
|
MMBtu |
|
One million British Thermal Units. |
|
MMcf |
|
One million cubic feet of gas. |
|
Natural Gas Liquids or NGL |
|
Components of natural gas that are liquid at surface, consisting
primarily of ethane, propane, isobutane, normal butane and
natural gasoline. NGL is also used to refer to multiple barrels
of natural gas liquids. |
|
Net Acres or Net Wells |
|
The sum of the fractional working interest owned in gross acres
or gross wells, as the case may be. |
|
NYMEX |
|
New York Mercantile Exchange. |
|
Plugging and Abandonment |
|
Refers to the sealing off of fluids in the strata penetrated by
a well so that the fluids from one stratum will not escape into
another or to the surface. Regulations of all states require
plugging of abandoned wells. |
|
Productive Well |
|
A well that is found to be capable of producing hydrocarbons in
sufficient quantities such that proceeds from the sale of the
production exceed production expenses and taxes. |
|
Prospect |
|
A specific geographic area which, based on supporting
geological, geophysical or other data and also preliminary
economic analysis using reasonably anticipated prices and costs,
is deemed to have potential for the discovery of commercial
hydrocarbons. |
|
Proved Developed Non-Producing Reserves (PDNP) |
|
Proved developed reserves expected to be recovered from zones
behind casing in existing wells. |
|
Proved Developed Reserves (PDP) |
|
Has the meaning given to such term in
Rule 4-10(a)(3)
of
Regulation S-X,
which defines proved developed reserves as: |
|
|
|
Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be
expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing
equipment and operating methods. Additional oil and gas expected
to be obtained through the application of fluid injection or
other improved recovery techniques for supplementing the natural
forces and mechanisms of primary recovery should be included as
proved developed reserves only after testing by a pilot project
or after the operation of an installed program has confirmed
through production response that increased recovery will be
achieved. |
|
Proved Reserves |
|
Has the meaning given to such term in
Rule 4-10(a)(2)
of
Regulation S-X,
which defines proved reserves as: |
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of
the date the |
282
|
|
|
|
|
estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in
existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but
not on escalations based upon future conditions. |
|
|
|
(i) Reservoirs are considered proved if economic
predictability is supported by either actual production or
conclusive formation test. The area of a reservoir considered
proved includes (A) that portion delineated by drilling and
defined by gas-oil and/or oil-water contacts, if any, and
(B) the immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but
which can be reasonably judged as economically productive on the
basis of available geological and engineering data. In the
absence of information on fluid contacts, the lowest known
structural occurrence of hydrocarbons controls the lower proved
limit of the reservoir.
|
|
|
|
(ii) Reserves which can be produced economically through
application of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid
injection) are included in the proved classification when
successful testing by a pilot project, or the operation of an
installed program in the reservoir, provides support for the
engineering analysis on which the project or program was based.
|
|
|
|
(iii) Estimates of proved reserves do not include the
following: (A) Oil that may become available from known
reservoirs but is classified separately as indicated additional
reserves; (B) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas
liquids, the recovery of which is subject to reasonable doubt
because of uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics,
or economic factors; (C) crude oil, natural gas, and
natural gas liquids, that may occur in undrilled prospects; and
(D) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that
may be recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite and other such
sources.
|
|
Proved Undeveloped Reserves (PUD) |
|
Has the meaning given to such term in
Rule 4-10(a)(4)
of
Regulation S-X,
which defines proved undeveloped reserves as: |
|
|
|
Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are
expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or
from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is
required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage shall
be limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units
that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved
reserves for other undrilled units can be claimed only where it
can be demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity of
production from the existing productive formation. Under no
circumstances should estimates for proved undeveloped reserves
be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid
injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated,
unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual
tests in the area and in the same reservoir. |
|
Recompletion |
|
The process of re-entering an existing wellbore that is either
producing or not producing and completing new reservoirs in an
attempt to establish or increase existing production. |
283
|
|
|
Reservoir |
|
A porous and permeable underground rock formation containing a
natural accumulation of producible oil and/or gas that is
confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is separate
from other reservoirs. |
|
Royalty Interest |
|
An interest in an oil and/or natural gas property entitling the
owner to a share of oil and natural gas production free of costs
of production. |
|
Standardized Measure |
|
The present value of estimated future cash inflows from proved
oil and gas reserves, less future development and production
costs and future income tax expenses, discounted at 10% per
annum to reflect timing of future cash flows using pricing and
costs in effect on the specified date. |
|
Undeveloped Acreage |
|
Lease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed
to a point that would permit the production of commercial
quantities of oil and gas regardless of whether such acreage
contains proved reserves. |
|
Working Capital Borrowings |
|
Borrowings that are made under a credit facility, commercial
paper facility or similar financing arrangement and in all cases
are used solely for working capital purposes. |
|
Working Interest |
|
The operating interest that gives the owner the right to drill,
produce and conduct operating activities on the property and
receive a share of production and requires the owner to pay a
share of the costs of drilling and production operations. |
|
Workover |
|
Operations that are conducted on a producing well to restore or
increase production. |
284
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number
|
|
|
RESOLUTE NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC AND RELATED
COMPANIES
|
|
|
|
|
Audited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
|
|
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
Audited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
EXXONMOBIL PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
Audited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
|
|
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Audited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
|
|
|
|
|
F-80
|
|
|
|
|
F-81
|
|
|
|
|
F-82
|
|
|
|
|
F-83
|
|
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Managing Members of
Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC, Resolute Aneth, LLC,
WYNR, LLC, and BWNR, LLC
And
To the Board of Directors of RNRC Holdings, Inc. and Resolute
Wyoming, Inc.
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of
Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC and related companies as
of December 31, 2007 and 2008, and the related combined
statements of operations, shareholders/members
equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008. The combined financial
statements include the accounts of Resolute Natural Resources
Company, LLC and five related companies, Resolute Aneth, LLC,
WYNR, LLC, BWNR, LLC, RNRC Holdings, Inc. and Resolute Wyoming,
Inc. These companies are under common ownership and common
management. These combined financial statements are the
responsibility of the companies management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the combined
financial statements based on our audits. The combined financial
statements give retrospective effect to a percentage of the
acquisition of Resolute Wyoming, Inc. as discussed in
Note 1 to the combined financial statements. We did not
audit the balance sheet of Resolute Wyoming, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007 or the related statements of operations,
shareholders equity and cash flows of Resolute Wyoming,
Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, which
statements reflect total assets constituting 19% of combined
total assets as of December 31, 2007, and total revenues
constituting 18% of combined total revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007. Those statements were audited
by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our
opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for
Resolute Wyoming, Inc., is based solely on the report of the
other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The companies are not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the companies internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other
auditors, the combined financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial
position of Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC and related
companies as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 and the combined
results of their operations and combined cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
We have not audited any financial statements of the companies
for any period subsequent to December 31, 2008. However, as
discussed in Note 1 to the combined financial statements,
the companies would not have been in compliance with the Maximum
Leverage Ratio covenant of its first lien credit facility at
March 31, 2009 had they not amended such facility on
May 12, 2009. The companies difficulties in meeting
their credit facility covenants discussed in Note 1 to the
combined financial statements raise substantial doubt about the
companies ability to continue as a going concern.
Managements plans in regard to these matters are discussed
in Note 1. The combined financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
F-1
As discussed in Note 1 to the combined financial
statements, the combined financial statements have been
retrospectively adjusted for the adoption of FASB Statement
No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Financial
Statements (SFAS 160).
As discussed in Note 12 to the combined financial
statements, the accompanying 2008 combined financial statements
have been restated.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Denver, Colorado
August 5, 2009
F-2
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC,
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC,
WYNR, LLC,
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.,
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see Note 12)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,089
|
|
|
$
|
1,935
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
47,464
|
|
|
|
14,680
|
|
Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivable
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
5,839
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
20,651
|
|
|
|
19,017
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
79,570
|
|
|
|
43,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, full cost method of accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
12,330
|
|
|
|
12,724
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
522,090
|
|
|
|
348,058
|
|
Accumulated depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(48,923
|
)
|
|
|
(97,726
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties
|
|
|
485,497
|
|
|
|
263,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
|
|
4,682
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,483
|
)
|
|
|
(2,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other property and equipment
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
488,262
|
|
|
|
265,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
9,622
|
|
|
|
11,210
|
|
Notes receivable affiliated entities
|
|
|
2,134
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
5,286
|
|
|
|
6,403
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
12,261
|
|
|
|
18,114
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,705
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
33,291
|
|
|
|
51,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
601,123
|
|
|
$
|
360,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders/Members Equity
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
64,605
|
|
|
|
46,169
|
|
Accounts payable Holdings
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
47,355
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
4,913
|
|
Long term debt current
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
115,148
|
|
|
|
56,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
458,863
|
|
|
|
421,150
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
7,373
|
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
88,679
|
|
|
|
20,193
|
|
Contingent tax liability
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
560,122
|
|
|
|
449,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
675,270
|
|
|
|
506,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders/members equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolute shareholders/members equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RNRC common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized and issued at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized and issued at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RWI common stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized and issued
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
37,594
|
|
Accumulated (deficit)
|
|
|
(3,311
|
)
|
|
|
(29,436
|
)
|
Shareholders/members deficit
|
|
|
(100,189
|
)
|
|
|
(153,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Resolute shareholders/members deficit
|
|
|
(77,251
|
)
|
|
|
(145,669
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
3,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders/members deficit
|
|
|
(74,147
|
)
|
|
|
(145,669
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders/members deficit
|
|
$
|
601,123
|
|
|
$
|
360,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-3
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see Note 12)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$
|
108,441
|
|
|
$
|
148,431
|
|
|
$
|
193,535
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
18,203
|
|
|
|
19,592
|
|
|
|
29,376
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
130,478
|
|
|
|
173,343
|
|
|
|
229,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
54,640
|
|
|
|
66,731
|
|
|
|
85,990
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization, and asset retirement
obligation accretion
|
|
|
16,657
|
|
|
|
27,790
|
|
|
|
50,335
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,130
|
|
|
|
40,273
|
|
|
|
20,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
77,427
|
|
|
|
134,794
|
|
|
|
401,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
53,051
|
|
|
|
38,549
|
|
|
|
(172,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,293
|
)
|
|
|
(35,898
|
)
|
|
|
(33,139
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
14,557
|
|
|
|
(106,228
|
)
|
|
|
96,032
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income
|
|
|
(7,009
|
)
|
|
|
(141,221
|
)
|
|
|
63,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
46,042
|
|
|
|
(102,672
|
)
|
|
|
(108,666
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(3,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
42,730
|
|
|
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
|
(90,419
|
)
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Resolute
|
|
$
|
42,015
|
|
|
$
|
(104,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-4
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
(in thousands, except for shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders/
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Members
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
26,248
|
|
|
$
|
(10,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,557
|
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
|
$
|
54,964
|
|
Distribution to Holdings from Aneth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,462
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,166
|
|
|
|
36,849
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
42,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
26,248
|
|
|
$
|
(5,656
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,944
|
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
$
|
94,232
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,006
|
)
|
Adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,517
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
(107,644
|
)
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
(3,311
|
)
|
|
|
(100,189
|
)
|
|
|
3,104
|
|
|
|
(74,147
|
)
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,136
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(9,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,239
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest,
January 1, 2008 through July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,999
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Resources conversion to LLC
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,705
|
)
|
|
|
10,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,760
|
)
|
|
|
(52,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2008 (As restated)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
37,594
|
|
|
$
|
(29,436
|
)
|
|
$
|
(153,828
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(145,669
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-5
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see Note 12)
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
42,730
|
|
|
$
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,419
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,307
|
|
|
|
27,159
|
|
|
|
49,503
|
|
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
2,481
|
|
Write-off of deferred offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
(14,540
|
)
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,533
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(15,085
|
)
|
|
|
101,495
|
|
|
|
(120,573
|
)
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(14,715
|
)
|
|
|
(13,690
|
)
|
|
|
28,244
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(4,273
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
Other long term assets
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
11,319
|
|
|
|
24,963
|
|
|
|
(16,027
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
Cash overdrafts
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable Holdings
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
42,822
|
|
|
|
73,789
|
|
|
|
97,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of oil and gas properties from ExxonMobil
|
|
|
(212,507
|
)
|
|
|
(7,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of oil and gas properties from Petroleum Synergy
|
|
|
(1,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition, exploration and development expenditures
|
|
|
(45,146
|
)
|
|
|
(86,353
|
)
|
|
|
(62,042
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Purchase of other property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,404
|
)
|
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable affiliated entities
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(7,648
|
)
|
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
(1,483
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(269,336
|
)
|
|
|
(97,596
|
)
|
|
|
(61,021
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(3,790
|
)
|
|
|
(2,726
|
)
|
|
|
(3,599
|
)
|
Issuance costs
|
|
|
(2,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from bank borrowings
|
|
|
373,730
|
|
|
|
264,350
|
|
|
|
274,099
|
|
Payment of bank borrowings
|
|
|
(131,563
|
)
|
|
|
(137,550
|
)
|
|
|
(312,061
|
)
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,273
|
|
Capital distributions
|
|
|
(3,462
|
)
|
|
|
(100,006
|
)
|
|
|
(9,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
231,635
|
|
|
|
22,089
|
|
|
|
(41,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
|
(5,154
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
8,807
|
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,807
|
|
|
$
|
7,089
|
|
|
$
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
18,955
|
|
|
$
|
33,067
|
|
|
$
|
30,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
862
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase to asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
1,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase to oil and gas properties through capitalized
equity-based compensation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,983
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures financed through current liabilities
|
|
$
|
7,630
|
|
|
$
|
3,546
|
|
|
$
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital distributions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of ExxonMobil properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase to accrued purchase price payable, net of accrued
purchase price receivable
|
|
$
|
1,333
|
|
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase to asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
5,302
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-6
Note 1
Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Description
of the Business
Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC (Resources),
previously a Delaware corporation incorporated on
January 22, 2004 and converted to a limited liability
company on September 30, 2008, Resolute Aneth, LLC
(Aneth), a Delaware limited liability company
established on November 12, 2004, WYNR, LLC
(WYNR), a Delaware limited liability company
established on August 25, 2005, BWNR, LLC
(BWNR), a Delaware limited liability company
established on August 19, 2005, RNRC Holdings, Inc.
(RNRC), a Delaware corporation incorporated on
September 19, 2008 and Resolute Wyoming, Inc.
(RWI) (formerly Primary Natural Resources, Inc.
(PNR)), a Delaware corporation incorporated on
November 21, 2003 (the change of name to RWI was effective
September 29, 2008) (together, Resolute or the
Companies) are engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, development, and production of oil, gas and
hydrocarbon liquids, primarily in the Paradox Basin in
southeastern Utah and the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. The
Companies are wholly owned subsidiaries of Resolute Holdings
Sub, LLC (Sub), which in turn is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Resolute Holdings, LLC (Holdings).
Basis
of Presentation and Principles of Combination
The 2006, 2007 and 2008 combined financial statements include
the accounts of Resources and the five related companies: Aneth,
WYNR, BWNR, RNRC and RWI. The conversion of Resources to an LLC
and the formation of RNRC had no impact on the comparability of
the combined financial statements. These companies are under
common ownership and common management. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in combination.
On July 31, 2008, Resolute acquired RWI. 87.23% of the
acquisition of RWI, as discussed in Note 3, was accounted
for as a combination of entities under common control, which is
similar to the pooling of interests method of accounting for
business combinations. Accordingly, the combined financial
statements give retrospective effect to these transactions, and
therefore, Resolutes results from January 1, 2006,
through July 31, 2008, include 87.23% of the operations of
RWI.
The remaining 12.77% of the acquisition of RWI, as discussed in
Note 3, was accounted for using the purchase method in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 141 Business Combinations.
Accordingly, the accompanying combined financial statements
reflect the 12.77% not owned by Resolute as a noncontrolling
interest for results from January 1, 2007, through
July 31, 2008.
Going
Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a
going concern basis which contemplates continuity of operations,
realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business. Subsequent to the original issuance
of the 2008 combined financial statements Resolute amended its
First Lien Credit Facility on May 12, 2009, to redetermine
its borrowing base, interest rates and to amend its Maximum
Leverage Ratio (trailing four quarter period Debt to EBITDA
ratio) covenant. Resolute would not have been in compliance with
the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant of its First Lien Credit
Facility at March 31, 2009 had it not retroactively amended
such facility on May 12, 2009. Resolutes projected
Maximum Leverage Ratio for periods subsequent to March 31,
2009, indicates that Resolute may not remain in compliance with
such financial covenant for quarterly periods during the next
twelve months, and such violations, if not waived
F-7
or cured, may also be violations under the Second Lien Credit
Facility. Failure to comply with the Companies debt
covenants could result in repayment of its outstanding debt
being accelerated. As a result, and in the event that
Resolutes debt is accelerated, there can be no assurance
that the carrying amounts of assets will be realized or that
liabilities will be liquidated or settled for the amounts
recorded. The ability of Resolute to continue as a going concern
is dependent on Resolutes ability to access capital and
Resolutes ability to sustain positive results of
operations and cash flows sufficient to pay its current
liabilities.
As discussed in Note 11, the Company is pursuing a business
combination with Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. If this
transaction is consummated, Resolute expects to fully satisfy
its obligation under its Second Lien Credit Facility, partially
pay obligations under its First Lien Credit Facility, and amend
its First Lien Credit Facility. In addition, Resolute intends to
pursue credit agreement amendments or forbearance arrangements,
equity financings, joint ventures or other industry
partnerships, asset monetizations, debt refinancings and other
strategic initiatives to address the effects of its financial
covenant situation and is currently negotiating with its lenders
to put in place new amendments in an effort to avoid any future
violations of its Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant. No assurance
can be given that the negotiations with its lenders will be
successful or that equity financing, joint ventures or other
industry partnerships, asset monetizations or debt refinancings,
if and when required, will be available on acceptable terms or
sufficient to address Resolutes liquidity needs.
In connection with its consideration of going concern, Resolute
also reassessed the recoverability of its deferred tax assets.
Given the above described circumstances and the uncertainty of
Resolute to generate future taxable income, Resolute recorded a
full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset at
March 31, 2009 as Resolute believes based on the weight of
available evidence, it is more likely than not this asset will
not be realized. Additionally, due to the amendment of the First
Lien Credit Facility discussed above, and the potential
violation of financial covenants on the First and Second Lien
Credit Facilities in the next twelve months, Resolute classified
the outstanding balances as current at March 31, 2009. See
First Lien Facility discussion at Note 4. There were no
other adjustments made in the financial statements relating to
the recoverability and classification of recorded assets and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the
companies be unable to continue in existence.
Assumptions,
Judgments and Estimates
In the course of preparing the combined financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP), management is required to make
various assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses,
and in the disclosures of commitments and contingencies. Changes
in these assumptions, judgments and estimates will occur as a
result of the passage of time and the occurrence of future
events. Accordingly, actual results could differ from amounts
previously established.
Significant estimates with regard to the combined financial
statements include the estimated carrying value of unproved
properties, the estimate of proved oil and gas reserve volumes
and the related present value of estimated future net cash flows
and the ceiling test applied to capitalized oil and gas
properties, the estimated cost and timing related to asset
retirement obligations, the estimated fair value of derivative
assets and liabilities, the estimated expense for equity-based
compensation, and depletion, depreciation and amortization.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of Resolutes financial instruments,
namely cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and
accounts payable, approximate their fair value because of the
short-term nature of these instruments. The long-term debt has a
recorded value that approximates its fair market value since its
variable interest rate is tied to current market rates. The fair
value of derivative instruments is estimated based on market
conditions in effect at the end of each reporting period.
F-8
Cash
Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, Resolute considers all
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less at date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Resolute periodically maintains cash and cash equivalents in
bank deposit accounts and money market funds which may be in
excess of federally insured amounts. Resolute has not
experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not
exposed to any significant credit risk on such accounts.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject Resolute to
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade and
production receivables. Resolute derived 80% and 11% of its
total 2008 revenues, 80% and 11% of its 2007 revenues and 78%
and 13% of its 2006 revenues from Western Refining, Inc, and WGR
Asset Holding Company, LLC, respectively. If Resolute was
compelled to sell its crude oil to an alternative market, costs
associated with the transportation of its production would
increase, and such increase could materially and negatively
affect its operations. The concentration of credit risk in a
single industry affects the overall exposure to credit risk
because customers may be similarly affected by changes in
economic or other conditions. The creditworthiness of customers
and other counterparties is subject to continuing review,
including the use of master netting agreements, where
appropriate. Commodity derivative contracts expose Resolute to
the credit risk of non-performance by the counterparty to the
contracts. This exposure is diversified among major investment
grade financial institutions, each of which is a financial
institution participating in Resolutes bank credit
agreement. As of December 31, 2007 and 2008, Resolute
recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 and $687,000
respectively.
Oil
and Gas Properties
Resolute uses the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas
producing activities. All costs incurred in the acquisition,
exploration and development of properties, including costs of
unsuccessful exploration, costs of surrendered and abandoned
leaseholds, delay lease rentals and the fair value of estimated
future costs of site restoration, dismantlement and abandonment
activities, improved recovery systems and a portion of general
and administrative expenses are capitalized within the cost
center.
Resolute conducts tertiary recovery projects on certain of its
oil and gas properties in order to recover additional
hydrocarbons that are not recoverable from primary or secondary
recovery methods. Under the full cost method, all development
costs are capitalized at the time incurred. Development costs
include charges associated with access to and preparation of
well locations, drilling and equipping development wells, test
wells, and service wells including injection wells; acquiring,
constructing, and installing production facilities and providing
for improved recovery systems. Improved recovery systems include
all related facility development costs and the cost of the
acquisition of tertiary injectants, primarily purchased
CO2.
The development cost related to
CO2
purchases are incurred solely for the purpose of gaining access
to incremental reserves not otherwise recoverable. The
accumulation of injected
CO2,
in combination with additional purchased and recycled
CO2,
provide future economic value over the life of the project.
In contrast, other costs related to the daily operation of the
improved recovery systems include, but are not limited to,
compression, electricity, separation, re-injection of recovered
CO2
and water, are considered production costs and are expensed as
incurred. Costs incurred to maintain reservoir pressure are also
expensed as incurred.
Capitalized general and administrative costs include salaries,
employee benefits, costs of consulting services and other
specifically identifiable costs and do not include costs related
to production operations, general corporate overhead or similar
activities. Resolute capitalized general and administrative and
operating costs of $0, $3.5 million and $1.6 million
related to its acquisition, exploration and development
activities for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and
2008, respectively.
Investments in unproved properties are not depleted pending
determination of the existence of proved reserves. Unproved
properties are assessed periodically to ascertain whether
impairment has occurred.
F-9
Unproved properties whose costs are individually significant are
assessed individually by considering the primary lease terms of
the properties, the holding period of the properties, and
geographic and geologic data obtained relating to the
properties. Where it is not practicable to assess individually
the amount of impairment of properties for which costs are not
individually significant, such properties are grouped for
purposes of assessing impairment. The amount of impairment
assessed is added to the costs to be amortized. During 2007 and
2008 Resolute transferred $78,000 and $60,000, respectively, of
unproved property costs to the full cost pool.
Pursuant to full cost accounting rules, Resolute must perform a
ceiling test each quarter on its proved oil and gas assets. The
ceiling test provides that capitalized costs less related
accumulated depletion and deferred income taxes for each cost
center may not exceed the sum of (1) the present value of
future net revenue from estimated production of proved oil and
gas reserves using current prices, excluding the future cash
outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations
that have been accrued on the balance sheet, and a discount
factor of 10%; plus (2) the cost of properties not being
amortized, if any; plus (3) the lower of cost or estimated
fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being
amortized, if any; less (4) income tax effects related to
differences in the book and tax basis of oil and gas properties.
Should the net capitalized costs for a cost center exceed the
sum of the components noted above, an impairment charge would be
recognized to the extent of the excess capitalized costs. As a
result of this limitation on capitalized costs, the accompanying
combined financial statements include a provision for an
impairment of oil and gas property cost in 2006, 2007 and 2008
of $0, $0 and $245.0 million, respectively.
No gain or loss is recognized upon the sale or abandonment of
undeveloped or producing oil and gas properties unless the sale
represents a significant portion of oil and gas properties and
the gain significantly alters the relationship between
capitalized costs and proved oil reserves of the cost center.
Depletion and amortization of oil and gas properties is computed
on the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves.
Amortizable costs include estimates of asset retirement
obligations and future development costs of proved reserves,
including, but not limited to, costs to drill and equip
development wells, constructing and installing production and
processing facilities, and improved recovery systems including
the cost of required future
CO2
purchases.
Other
Property and Equipment
Other property and equipment are recorded at cost. Costs of
renewals and improvements that substantially extend the useful
lives of the assets are capitalized. Maintenance and repair
costs which do not extend the useful lives of property and
equipment are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation and
amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets. Office furniture,
automobiles, and computer hardware and software are depreciated
from three to five years. Field offices are depreciated from
fifteen to twenty years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated,
using the straight line method, over the shorter of the lease
term or the useful life of the asset. When other property and
equipment is sold or retired, the capitalized costs and related
accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the
accounts.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
Asset retirement obligations relate to future costs associated
with the plugging and abandonment of oil and gas wells, removal
of equipment and facilities from leased acreage and returning
such land to its original condition. The fair value of a
liability for an asset retirement obligation is recorded in the
period in which it is incurred (typically when the asset is
installed at the production location), and the cost of such
liability increases the carrying amount of the related
long-lived asset by the same amount. The liability is accreted
each period and the capitalized cost is depleted on a
units-of-production
basis as part of the full cost pool. Revisions to estimated
retirement obligations result in adjustments to the related
capitalized asset and corresponding liability.
Resolutes estimated asset retirement obligation liability
is based on estimated economic lives, estimates as to the cost
to abandon the wells in the future, and federal and state
regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using a
credit- adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time the
liability is incurred or revised. The credit-adjusted risk-free
rates used to discount Resolutes abandonment liabilities
range from 6.00 percent to
F-10
13.50 percent. Revisions to the liability could occur due
to changes in estimated abandonment costs or well economic
lives, or if federal or state regulators enact new requirements
regarding the abandonment of wells.
The following table provides a reconciliation of Resolutes
asset retirement obligations for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
4,133
|
|
|
$
|
8,866
|
|
|
$
|
8,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional liability incurred
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities settled
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed in acquisition of ExxonMobil Properties
|
|
|
5,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions to previous estimates
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations at end of period
|
|
|
8,866
|
|
|
|
8,445
|
|
|
|
9,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
7,281
|
|
|
$
|
7,373
|
|
|
$
|
8,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Resolute follows SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which requires
impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in
operations when indicators of impairment are present and the
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are less than the carrying amount of such assets. In the
evaluation of the fair value and future benefits of long-lived
assets, Resolute performs an analysis of the anticipated
undiscounted future net cash flows of the related long-lived
assets. If the carrying value of the related asset exceeds the
undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to its
fair value. Other than the full cost ceiling test impairment
discussed in the oil and gas properties accounting policy, there
were no provisions for impairment in 2006, 2007 and 2008.
Deferred
Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are amortized over the estimated lives
of the related obligations or, in certain circumstances,
accelerated if the obligation is refinanced. The unamortized
balance of these costs was approximately $5.3 million and
$6.4 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
Derivative
Instruments
Resolute enters into derivative contracts to manage its exposure
to oil and gas price volatility. Derivative contracts may take
the form of futures contracts, swaps or options. Realized and
unrealized gains and losses related to commodity derivatives are
recognized in other income (expense). Realized gains and losses
are recognized in the period in which the related contract is
settled. The cash flows from derivatives are reported as cash
flows from operating activities unless the derivative contract
is deemed to contain a financing element. Derivatives deemed to
contain a financing element are reported as financing activities
in the statement of cash flows.
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, requires recognition of all
derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either assets or
liabilities measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of
a derivative will be recognized currently in earnings unless
specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Gains and losses on
derivative hedging instruments must be recorded in either other
comprehensive income or current earnings, depending on the
nature and designation of the instrument. Presently,
Resolutes management has determined that the benefit of
the financial statement presentation available under the
provisions of SFAS No. 133, which may allow for its
derivative instruments to be reflected as cash flow hedges, is
not commensurate with the administrative burden required to
support that treatment. As a result, Resolute marked its
derivative instruments to fair value during 2006, 2007 and 2008
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133 and
recognized the changes in fair market value in earnings. The
gain (loss) on
F-11
derivative instruments reflected in the combined statement of
operations incorporates both the realized and unrealized values.
Revenue
Recognition
Oil revenues are recognized when production is sold to a
purchaser at a fixed or determinable price, when delivery has
occurred and title has transferred and if the collectability of
the revenue is probable. Gas revenues are recorded using the
sales method. Under this method, Resolute recognizes revenues
based on actual volumes of gas sold to purchasers. Resolute and
other joint interest owners may sell more or less than their
entitlement share of the volumes produced. A liability is
recorded and the revenue is deferred if Resolutes excess
sales of gas volumes exceed its estimated remaining recoverable
reserves. Resolute had no significant gas imbalances at
December 31, 2007 and 2008.
RWI is party to a twenty year Well Suspension Agreement (the
Agreement) with Thunder Basin Coal Company, LLC and
Ark Land Company (collectively TBCC). The initial
term of the agreement does not exceed 20 years from
October 1, 2006. However, both RWI or TBCC have the option
to extend the agreement 10 years beyond the expiration of
the initial term. Under the agreement, TBCC will pay RWI
$2.6 million in exchange for suspension of well operations
or deferral of drilling plans by RWI on certain acreage under
lease to RWI. The non-refundable payment is payable to RWI in
three installments over a period of three years beginning
January 1, 2008. Revenue is recognized over TBCCs
expected development plan or until such time the specified
properties are released from suspension and RWI may proceed with
exploration of these properties. RWI recognized revenue related
to the Agreement of $99,000, $398,000 and $398,000 in other
revenue during 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses are reported net of
reimbursements of overhead costs that are allocated to working
interest owners of the oil and gas properties operated by
Resolute.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are provided based on earnings reported for tax
return purposes in addition to a provision for deferred income
taxes. RNRC and RWI use the asset and liability method of
accounting for deferred income taxes. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined by applying
the enacted statutory tax rates in effect at the end of a
reporting period to the cumulative temporary differences between
the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the combined financial statements. The effect on
deferred taxes for a change in tax rates is recognized in income
in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets is established when it is more
likely than not that some portion of the benefit from deferred
tax assets will not be realized. Effective January 1, 2007,
Resources (prior to converting to an LLC) and RWI adopted
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). In
accordance with this pronouncement, Resources (prior to
converting to an LLC), RNRC and RWI income tax positions must
meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to be
recognized, and any potential accrued interest and penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized within
interest expense and general and administrative expenses,
respectively.
Aneth, WYNR, BWNR and Resources are limited liability companies.
As limited liability companies, Aneth, WYNR, BWNR and Resources
(subsequent to converting to an LLC) are tax flow-through
entities and, therefore, the related tax obligation, if any, is
borne by the owners.
Industry
Segment and Geographic Information
Resolute has evaluated how it is organized and managed and has
identified only one operating segment, which is the exploration
and production of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas
liquids. Resolute considers its gathering, processing and
marketing functions as ancillary to its oil and gas producing
activities. All of the
F-12
Companys operations and assets are located in the United
States, and substantially all of its revenues are attributable
to United States customers.
Change
in Accounting Principle
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which creates a
single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax
positions. Specifically, the pronouncement prescribes a
recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition of certain tax positions.
Resources and RWI adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007 and RNRC adopted the provisions of
FIN 48 on September 30, 2008. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, Resources recognized a
$0.5 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax
benefits, which was accounted for as a reduction to the
January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings and a
corresponding increase in other long-term liabilities.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Resolute adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, as of
January 1, 2008, electing to partially adopt
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. Resolute
did not apply SFAS No. 157 to nonrecurring fair value
measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, including nonfinancial long-lived assets measured
at fair value for an impairment assessment and asset retirement
obligations initially measured at fair value. Pursuant to the
provisions of FSP
No. 157-2,
Resolute fully adopted SFAS No. 157 as it relates to
all nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized
or disclosed on a recurring basis (e.g. those measured at fair
value in a business combination, the initial recognition of
asset retirement obligations, and impairments of goodwill and
other long-lived assets) as of January 1, 2009. The full
adoption of SFAS 157, however, did not have a material
impact on Resolutes combined financial statements or its
disclosures. Please refer to Note 9 Fair Value
Measurements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115. SFAS No. 159 expands the use of fair
value accounting but does not affect existing standards which
require assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under
SFAS No. 159, a company may elect to use fair value to
measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and
liabilities at fair value. Resolute decided not to elect fair
value accounting for any of its eligible items. The adoption of
SFAS No. 159 therefore will have no impact on
Resolutes combined financial position, cash flows or
results of operations. If the use of fair value is elected (the
fair value option), any upfront costs and fees related to the
item must be recognized in earnings and cannot be deferred,
e.g., debt issuance costs. The fair value election is
irrevocable and generally made on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects
not to measure based on fair value. At the adoption date,
unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair
value has been elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment
to beginning retained earnings. Subsequent to the adoption of
SFAS No. 159, changes in fair value are recognized in
earnings. SFAS No. 159 was effective for Resolute
beginning January 1, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141R
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of
a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also
provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill
acquired in the business combination and determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statement to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. Accordingly, any business combinations
the Companies engage in will be recorded and disclosed following
GAAP until January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 141R may
have an impact on the combined financial statements when
effective, but the nature and magnitude of the
F-13
specific effects will depend upon the nature, terms and size of
the acquisitions consummated after the effective date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, which
establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership
interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent,
the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents
ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling
equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated.
SFAS No. 160 also establishes reporting requirements
that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and
distinguish between the interests of the parent and the
interests of the noncontrolling owners. Resolute adopted
SFAS No. 160 effective January 1, 2009, which
required retrospective restatement of our combined financial
statements for all periods presented. As a result of adoption,
Resolute has reclassified its noncontrolling interest in its
combined balance sheets, from a component of liabilities to a
component of equity and has also reclassified net income (loss)
attributable to noncontrolling interest in its combined
statements of operations, to below net income for all periods
presented. Resolute also added a rollforward of the
noncontrolling interest within its combined statements of
shareholders/members equity (deficit). On
July 31, 2008, Resolute acquired all of its noncontrolling
interest, therefore, SFAS No. 160 has no impact to the
combined financial statements subsequent to such date.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities An Amendment of FASB Statement 133.
SFAS No. 161 which enhances required disclosures
regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced
disclosures regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative
instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related hedged
items are accounted for under FASB No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; and
(c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect
an entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.
Accordingly, Resolute adopted this pronouncement as of
January 1, 2009.
On December 31, 2008, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) published the final rules and
interpretations updating its oil and gas reporting requirements.
Many of the revisions are updates to definitions in the existing
oil and gas rules to make them consistent with the petroleum
resource management system. This system, which was developed by
several industry organizations, is a widely accepted standard
for the management of petroleum resources. Key revisions include
changes to the pricing used to estimate reserves, the ability to
include nontraditional resources in reserves, the use of new
technology for determining reserves, and permitting disclosure
of probable and possible reserves. The SEC will require
companies to comply with the amended disclosure requirements for
registration statements filed after January 1, 2010, and
for annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after
December 15, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted.
Resolute is currently assessing the impact that the adoption
will have on the Resolutes disclosures, operating results,
financial position, and cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position FSP
No. 107-1
and Accounting Principles Board Opinion
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(collectively
FSP 107-1).
FSP 107-1
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded
companies as well as in annual financial statements.
FSP 107-1
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
FSP 107-1
is not expected to have an impact on the combined financial
statements, other than additional disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume or Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP
No. 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with SFAS No. 157 when the volume and level
of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased and requires that companies provide interim and annual
disclosures of the inputs and valuation technique(s) used to
measure fair value. FSP
No. 157-4
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009 and is to be applied prospectively. The
adoption of FSP
No. 157-4
is not expected to have an impact on the Resolutes
combined financial statements, other than additional disclosures.
F-14
On May 9, 2008 the FASB announced the release of
SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP hierarchy). The GAAP
hierarchy sets forth levels of authority for various types of
accounting standards. Prior to FAS 162, the GAAP hierarchy
was set forth in an auditing standard, SFAS No. 69
The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. By moving the GAAP hierarchy
to the accounting literature, FAS 162 establishes that
decisions with respect to the GAAP hierarchy rest primarily with
an entity not its auditor in selecting
accounting principles for financial statements that are
presented in conformity with GAAP. The adoption of this
statement had no material impact on Resolutes combined
operating results, financial position or cash flows.
Resolute adopted SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
on April 1, 2009, which established general standards
of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 requires
companies to disclose the date through which the company
evaluated subsequent events, the basis for that date, and
whether that date represents the date the financial statements
were issued. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a
material impact on the Companys combined financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS
168). This standard replaces SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and
establishes only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and
nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(the Codification) was not intended to change or
alter existing GAAP, and it therefore will not have any impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements other
than to modify certain existing disclosures. The Codification
will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP,
except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are
sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other
nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in
the Codification will become nonauthoritative. SFAS 168 is
effective for financial statements for interim or annual
reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company
will begin to use the new guidelines and numbering system
prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in the
third quarter of fiscal 2009.
|
|
Note 2
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
On April 1, 2005, Holdings entered into a joint venture
arrangement with Wachovia Investment Holdings, LLC
(Wachovia Investment) to form an oil and gas
marketing and trading company, Odyssey Energy Services, LLC
(Odyssey), allocating profits and losses 40% to
Holdings and 60% to Wachovia Investment. Holdings made an
initial capital contribution of $2.0 million, and agreed to
be responsible for up to a total of $10.0 million of
additional capital to cover certain potential liabilities.
Holdings borrowed $2.0 million from Resources, which loan
was evidenced by a note. Terms of the note include annual
payment of interest at a rate of 4.09% and maturing no later
than April 13, 2011, the maturity date of Resolutes
First Lien Facility agreement. Interest income recognized on the
note was $88,000, $88,000 and $63,000 in 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. This note was paid in full on September 30,
2008.
Resources has received payments due Holdings for Holdings
transactions not related to Resolute that have not yet been
reimbursed to Holdings. These payables are reflected on the
combined balance sheet as Accounts payable
Holdings and carried a balance of $1.5 and
$1.3 million at December 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
ExxonMobil
Acquisition
On April 14, 2006, Aneth acquired from Exxon Mobil
Corporation and its affiliates (ExxonMobil) 75% of
the ExxonMobil interests in Greater Aneth Field, (the
ExxonMobil Properties) along with various other
related assets, including ExxonMobils interest in the
Aneth gas compression facility, its interest in a
CO2
pipeline which serves the field, and office facilities in
Cortez, Colorado. As a result of this purchase, Resources became
operator of the Ratherford and McElmo Creek Units in Greater
Aneth Field while continuing as operator of the Aneth Unit. The
proved net estimated oil and gas reserves acquired with the
F-15
ExxonMobil Properties were approximately 35.4 MMBoe
(unaudited), of which 55.2% (unaudited) were classified as
proved developed and the remaining 44.8% (unaudited) were
classified as proved undeveloped. The purchase price was
allocated to assets based on the fair values at the date of
acquisition, as estimated by management. The acquisition of the
ExxonMobil Properties was accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting and has been included in the combined
financial statements of Resolute since the date of acquisition.
The purchase price, including transaction costs and contingent
consideration, of $218.2 million was allocated primarily to
proved oil and gas properties. The acquisition of the ExxonMobil
Properties was effective as of January 1, 2005, and the
purchase price was adjusted for net revenues from that date
until closing. Final settlement of the purchase price
adjustments occurred in October 2006. The following table
presents the allocation of the purchase price at
December 31, 2007 based on estimated fair market values of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
226,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and equipment
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
(5,302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation
|
|
$
|
222,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to finance the acquisition of the ExxonMobil
Properties, on April 14, 2006, Resolute entered into an
amended and restated $300.0 million senior secured credit
facility (the First Lien Facility) and a new
$125.0 million senior secured term loan (the Second
Lien Facility). Proceeds from the two credit facilities
were used to repay outstanding indebtedness under
Resolutes existing credit facilities, to finance the
acquisition of the ExxonMobil Properties and for general working
capital purposes (see Note 4).
In addition to the cash purchase price, terms of the Purchase
and Sale Agreement pursuant to which Resolute acquired the
ExxonMobil Properties provide for certain monthly contingent
payments to ExxonMobil through December 2007. The contingent
payments are equal to the amount by which prices for West Texas
Sour (WTS) crude oil exceeds $40.00 per barrel in
any given month, multiplied by production from the ExxonMobil
Properties. As specified in the Purchase and Sale Agreement, WTS
prices are limited to a maximum of $49.00 per barrel (a maximum
differential of $9.00 per barrel), and monthly production is
limited to 98,765 barrels. Therefore, the maximum monthly
contingent payment to ExxonMobil is $888,889, or
$666,667 net to Aneths interest. Aneth has recorded
the liability for the contingent consideration when the amount
is determinable beyond a reasonable doubt. As additional
contingent payment liability is recognized and recorded, the
cost of the acquisition is adjusted and additional cost is
reflected in oil and gas properties.
Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement for the
ExxonMobil Properties, Resolute and Navajo Nation Oil and Gas
Company (NNOG) were required to fund an escrow
account sufficient to complete abandonment, well plugging, site
restoration and related obligations arising from ownership of
the acquired interests. The contribution required at the date of
acquisition of $10.0 million, or $7.5 million net to
Aneths interest, is included in restricted cash in the
combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. Aneth is required to make additional deposits to
the escrow account annually. Beginning in 2007 and continuing
through 2016, Aneth must fund approximately $1.8 million
annually. In years after 2016, Aneth must fund additional
payments averaging approximately $0.9 million until 2031.
Total contributions from the date of acquisition through 2031
will aggregate $53.4 million, or $40.0 million net to
the Aneth interest. Annual interest earned in the escrow account
becomes part of the balance and reduces the payment amount
required for funding the escrow account each year. As of
December 31, 2008 Aneth has funded the 2008 annual
contractual amount required to meet its future obligation,
approximately $1.8 million.
The following table presents the pro forma operating results for
year ended December 31, 2006. The year ended
December 31, 2006 gives effect as if the acquisition of the
ExxonMobil Properties had occurred January 1, 2006. The pro
forma results shown below are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that would have occurred if the transaction
had occurred on such date. The pro forma adjustments made are
based
F-16
on certain assumptions that Resolute believes are reasonable
based on currently available information (unaudited; in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
125,534
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
29,581
|
|
Net
Profits Overriding Royalty Interest
Contribution
On July 31, 2008, Resolute entered into an asset
contribution agreement with NGP-VII Income Co-Investment
Opportunities, LLC (NGP Co-Invest), whereby NGP
Co-Invest contributed a certain overriding net profits royalty
interests (NPI) in oil and gas properties of RWI to
Holdings for a total of 2,184,445 common units (value of
$19.7 million) as consideration.
On July 31, 2008, RWI acquired the contributed NPI from
Holdings for $19.4 million and allocated the
$19.4 million to oil and gas properties after normal
purchase price adjustments. The acquisition of the NPI was
funded with $15.4 million cash and a $4.0 million note
payable to Holdings. On December 31, 2008, Holdings
contributed the note receivable and accrued interest in the
amount of $4.1 million to Aneth.
Primary
Natural Resources Acquisition
On July 31, 2008, Holdings completed the acquisition of PNR
(a Natural Gas Partners, VII, L.P. (NGP VII)
portfolio company). Upon closing, Holdings paid, as
consideration, a total of 8,286,985 common units (value of
$74.8 million) and $15.4 million in cash. NGP VII owns
a significant equity position in Holdings.
The majority of the acquisition of PNR was accounted for as a
combination of entities under common control, which is similar
to the pooling of interests method of accounting for business
combinations. Accordingly, the combined financial statements
give retrospective effect to these transactions, and therefore,
Resolutes results from January 1, 2006 through
July 31, 2008, include 87.23% of the operations of RWI.
Accordingly, the accompanying combined financial statements
reflect the 12.77% not owned by Resolute as a noncontrolling
interest for results from January 1, 2006, through
July 31, 2008.
The remaining portion of the acquisition of RWI not under common
control, was accounted for using the purchase method in
accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business
Combinations. 12.77% of the purchase price was allocated to
acquired assets and liabilities based on their respective fair
value as determined by management. The purchase price allocation
is set forth below (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
11,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
Long term assets
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
Oil and gas properties
|
|
|
18,427
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(10,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation
|
|
$
|
11,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the pro forma operating results for
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008. The years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2008 give effect as if the
acquisition of PNR had occurred January 1, 2007. The pro
forma results shown below are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that would have occurred if the transaction
had occurred on such date. The pro forma adjustments made are
based
F-17
on certain assumptions that Resolute believes are reasonable
based on currently available information (unaudited; in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
173,343
|
|
|
$
|
229,172
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(104,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,419
|
)
|
Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31,
2007 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Credit agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Facility
|
|
$
|
169,550
|
|
|
$
|
196,150
|
|
Second Lien Facility
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
RWI First Lien Facility
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
RWI Term Loan
|
|
|
24,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
458,863
|
|
|
$
|
421,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Lien Facility
On September 24, 2004, Resolute entered into a credit
facility with a syndicate of banks led by Wachovia Bank,
National Association. The credit facility was amended and
restated on September 15, 2005, and subsequently on
April 14, 2006, June 27, 2007, and September 30,
2008. The credit facility was amended in 2005 and 2006 to
facilitate the Aneth acquisitions as well as for general working
capital purposes. The credit facility was amended in 2007 in
conjunction with the Second Lien Facility, and was again amended
in 2008 to refinance the RWI outstanding debt and for general
working capital purposes.
Availability under the facility is governed by a borrowing base.
The determination of the borrowing base is made by the lenders
taking into consideration the estimated value of Resolutes
oil and gas properties in accordance with the lenders
customary practices for oil and gas loans. The borrowing base is
re-determined semi-annually, and the amount available for
borrowing could be increased or decreased as a result of such
re-determinations. Under certain circumstances either Resolute
or the lenders may request an interim re-determination. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, the borrowing base was $205.0
and $284.0 million respectively. Unused availability under
the borrowing base as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 was
$34.2 and $77.8 million, respectively. As of April 15,
2009, Resolute had drawn down an additional net
$2.2 million under the borrowing base, resulting in an
unused availability of $75.6 million. The borrowing base
availability has been reduced by $10.0 million in letters
of credit issued to vendors at December 31, 2008 and
April 15, 2009. The First Lien Facility matures on the
fifth anniversary of the April 14, 2006 amendment and
restatement (April 13, 2011) and, to the extent that
the borrowing base, as adjusted from time to time, exceeds the
outstanding balance, no repayments of principal are required
prior to maturity. At Aneths option, the outstanding
balance under the First Lien Facility accrues interest at either
(a) the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin which
varies from 1.5% to 2.25%, or (b) the Alternative
Base Rate defined as the greater of (i) the
Administrative Agents Prime Rate, (ii) the
Administrative Agents Base CD rate plus 1%, or
(iii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, plus a
margin which varies from 0% to 0.75%. Each such margin is based
on the level of utilization under the borrowing base. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, the weighted average interest
rate on the outstanding balance under the facility was 7.01% and
4.97%, respectively. The First Lien Credit Facility is
collateralized by substantially all of the proved oil and gas
assets of Aneth and RWI, and is guaranteed by Resources and Sub.
On May 12, 2009, Resolute amended its First Lien Credit
Facility to redetermine its borrowing base, interest rates and
to amend its Maximum Leverage Ratio (trailing four quarter
period Debt to EBITDA ratio)
F-18
covenant. As discussed in Note 1, Resolute classified its
outstanding debt balances as current at March 31, 2009. On
July 28, 2009, Resolute further amended its First Lien
Credit Facility so that the current ratio covenant was not
applicable as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
Resolute was in compliance with the terms and covenants of the
First Lien Facility as of December 31, 2008 and based on
the terms of the amendments, Resolute remained in compliance
with its financial covenants at March 31, 2009. See
Note 1 for going concern discussion.
Second
Lien Facility
On April 14, 2006 Aneth entered into a Second Lien Facility
with a group of lenders with Citicorp USA, Inc. as the agent.
The Second Lien Facility was initially a single draw term loan
with a maximum draw of $125 million. On April 14,
2006, Aneth drew down the entire $125.0 million face amount
of the facility. On June 26, 2007, Aneth amended and
restated the Second Lien Facility agreement which increased the
single draw term loan from a maximum of $125.0 million to
$225.0 million and extended the maturity date from
April 13, 2012, to June 26, 2013, the sixth
anniversary of closing, with no repayments of principal required
before such date. Aneth drew down the additional
$100 million incremental face amount of the amended
facility at closing. At Aneths option, balances
outstanding under the Second Lien Facility accrues interest at
either (a) the adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus
the applicable margin of 4.5%, or (b) the greater of
(i) the Administrative Agents Prime Rate,
(ii) the Administrative Agents Base CD rate plus 1%,
or (iii) the Alternative Base Rate, plus the applicable
margin of 3.5%. Aneth may make optional prepayments. In the
first year after closing, Aneth was not subject to prepayment
penalties. However, for a period of one year starting on
June 27, 2008, such prepayments will be subject to a
prepayment penalty of 1% of the amount prepaid. Thereafter no
prepayment penalty will be assessed. Once repaid, the amounts
may not be re-borrowed. As of December 31, 2007 and 2008,
the weighted average interest rate was 9.99% and 7.71%,
respectively. The Second Lien Facility is collateralized by
substantially all of the proved oil and gas assets of Aneth and
RWI, and is guaranteed by Resources and Sub. The claim of the
Second Lien Facility lenders on the collateral is explicitly
subordinated to the claim of the First Lien Facility lenders.
The Second Lien Facility includes terms and covenants that place
limitations on certain types of activities, the payment of
dividends, and require satisfaction of certain financial tests.
Resolute was in compliance with the terms and covenants as of
December 31, 2008. See Note 1 for going concern
discussion.
RWI
First Lien Facility
The RWI Revolving Facility was with Bank of America (RWI
First Lien Facility). Availability under the facility was
governed by a borrowing base. The determination of the borrowing
base was made by the lender taking into consideration the
estimated value of RWIs oil and gas properties in
accordance with the lenders customary practices for oil
and gas loans. The borrowing base was re-determined quarterly,
and the amount available for borrowing could be increased or
decreased as a result of such re-determinations. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, the borrowing base was
$40.0 million and $0 respectively. The revolving credit
facility was available to RWI until July 2010, at which time the
outstanding balance was due. Adjusted Base Rate advances and
Eurodollar Advances under the facilities bear interest payable
quarterly at an Adjusted Base Rate or Adjusted Libor Rate plus
an applicable margin of 0.5%, respectively. Amounts outstanding
at December 31, 2007 were at a weighted average interest
rate of approximately 7.0%. RWI borrowings were collateralized
by substantially all of the proved oil and gas assets of RWI and
were subject to various financial and non-financial ratios. At
December 31, 2007, RWI was in compliance with the
covenants. On July 31, 2008, RWI entered into a
$100.0 million credit facility led by Wells Fargo Bank NA
and Bank of Montreal. Proceeds were used to finance the
acquisition of PNR, refinance the RWI First Lien Facility and
RWI Term Loan, and for general working capital purposes. This
Wells Fargo Bank NA and Bank of Montreal credit facility was
extinguished with proceeds from the First Lien Facility on
September 30, 2008.
RWI
Term Loan
The RWI Term Loan was with Bank of America. RWI was required to
repay $62,500 per quarter until the maturity date in January
2011, when the remaining outstanding balance was due. At
December 31, 2007,
F-19
$250,000 of the RWI Term Loan balance was classified as current.
Adjusted Base Rate advances and Eurodollar Advances under the
facilities bear interest payable quarterly at an Adjusted Base
Rate or Adjusted Libor Rate plus an applicable margin of 0.5%,
respectively. Amounts outstanding at December 31, 2007 were
at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 7.0%. RWI
borrowings were collateralized by substantially all of the
proved oil and gas assets of RWI and were subject to various
financial and non-financial ratios. At December 31, 2007,
RWI was in compliance with the covenants. As described above, on
July 31, 2008, RWI entered into a $100.0 million
credit facility led by Wells Fargo Bank NA and Bank of Montreal.
Proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of PNR, refinance
the RWI First Lien Facility and RWI Term Loan, and for general
working capital purposes. This Wells Fargo Bank NA and Bank of
Montreal credit facility was extinguished with proceeds from the
First Lien Facility on September 30, 2008.
Resources (prior to September 30, 2008), RNRC and RWI
recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected
future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
combined financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences
between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and
liabilities using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year
in which the differences are expected to reverse. The
measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by
the amount of any tax benefits that are not expected to be
realized based on available evidence. Resources (subsequent to
September 30, 2008), Aneth, BWNR and WYNR are pass-through
entities for federal and state income tax purposes. As such,
neither current nor deferred income taxes are recognized by
these entities. Significant components of Resolutes
deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2007
and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(4,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(11,643
|
)
|
|
|
10,673
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Federal tax credit carryovers
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
6,414
|
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term
|
|
|
(4,703
|
)
|
|
|
14,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liability)/asset
|
|
$
|
(4,748
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current income tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(3,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
|
|
18,266
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
$
|
(3,312
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Income tax expense (benefit) differed from amounts that would
result from applying the U.S. statutory income tax rate to
income before taxes as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
U.S. statutory income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
3,203
|
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
$
|
(19,732
|
)
|
State income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
Share base compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax expense (benefit)*
|
|
$
|
3,312
|
|
|
$
|
1,740
|
|
|
$
|
(18,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Tax expense (benefit) is calculated based on taxable income of
RNRC and RWI, which are taxable entities. |
As of December 31, 2008, RNRC had no federal regular tax
loss carryforward. RWI had a federal regular tax loss
carryforward of $10.6 million.
Resources and RWI adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007 and RNRC adopted the provisions of
FIN 48 on September 30, 2008. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, Resources recognized
approximately $478,000, including accrued interest and penalties
of $92,000, as a contingent liability and an increase to the
January 1, 2007 balance of accumulated deficit. As of
December 31, 2008 the total contingent income tax
liabilities and accrued interest was approximately $532,000 and
is reflected in current liabilities in the combined balance
sheet in Contingent tax liability. The statute of
limitations associated with this liability expires
September 15, 2009.
Resources (prior to September 30, 2008), RNRC and RWI
recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions in interest expense and general and administrative
expense, respectively. During the year ended December 31,
2008, Resources recognized $28,000 in interest related to
uncertain tax positions. RWI and RNRC had no uncertain tax
positions. Resources and RWI file income tax returns in the
U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. There are
currently no federal or state income tax examinations underway
for these jurisdictions. Furthermore, Resources and RWIs
tax years of 2005 and forward are subject to examination by the
federal and state taxing authorities.
The following table summarizes the activity during the years
related to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreases in unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreases in unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6
|
Shareholders/Members
Equity and Equity Based Awards
|
Common
Stock
At December 31, 2007, Resources and RWI each had
1,000 shares of common stock, par value of $.0.01 and $1.00
per share, authorized, issued and outstanding, respectively.
Resources was converted to an LLC on
F-21
September 30, 2008, and all stock was retired. At
December 31, 2008, RNRC and RWI each had 1,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 and $1.00 per share,
authorized, issued and outstanding.
Members
Equity
At December 31, 2007, members equity included Aneth,
WYNR and BWNR. At December 31, 2008, members equity
included Aneth, WYNR, BWNR and Resources.
Incentive
Interests
Resources
In 2004, Incentive Units were granted by Holdings to
certain of its members who were also officers, as well as to
other employees of Resources. The Incentive Units were intended
to be compensation for services provided to Resources. The
original terms of the five tiers of Incentive Units are as
follows. Tier I units vest ratably over three years, but
are subject to forfeiture if payout is not realized. Tier I
payout is realized at the return of members invested
capital and a specified rate of return. Tiers II through V
vest upon certain specified multiples of cash payout. Incentive
Units are forfeited if an employee of Resolute is either
terminated for cause or resigns as an employee. Any Incentive
Units that are forfeited by an individual employee revert back
to the founding senior managers of Resolute and, therefore, the
number of Tier II through V Incentive Units is not expected
to change.
On June 27, 2007, Holdings made a capital distribution of
$100 million to its equity owners from the proceeds of the
amended and restated second lien credit agreement described in
Note 4. This distribution caused both the Tier I
payout to be realized and the Tier I Incentive Units to
vest. As a result of the distribution, management has determined
that it is probable that Tiers II-V incentive unit payouts will
be achieved.
During the year-ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
Resolute recorded $0, $34.5 million and $3.7 million
of equity based compensation expense in general and
administrative expense in the combined statements of operations.
An additional $0, $2.0 million and $100,000 of equity
compensation expense was capitalized and recorded in oil and gas
properties during 2006, 2007 and 2008 respectively. Resolute
amortizes the estimated fair value of the Incentive Units over
the remaining estimated vesting period using the straight-line
method. The estimated weighted average fair value remaining of
the Incentive Units was calculated using a discounted future net
cash flows model. During the year ended December 31, 2007
and 2008, 11.6 million and 0 Incentive Units vested.
A summary of the activity associated with the Resolutes
Incentive Unit plan during 2006, 2007 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Units
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
17,797,801
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(656,480
|
)
|
Redistributed
|
|
|
656,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
17,797,801
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
17,797,801
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
17,797,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
A summary of the status and activity of non-vested Incentive
Units of Holdings for the year-ended December 31, 2008, is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Incentive Units
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested, at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
6,190,539
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested, at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
6,190,539
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to Resolutes
non-vested Incentive Units totaled $8.1 million as of
December 31, 2008, which is expected to be recognized over
a weighted-average period of 1.3 years, 2.3 years,
3.3 years and 3.3 years for the Tier II,
Tier III, Tier IV and Tier V Incentive Units,
respectively.
Resolute
Wyoming, Inc.
The Primary Natural Resources Holdings, LLC (PNRH)
Operating Agreement (the Operating Agreement) provided for the
issuance of up to 900,000 PNRH Incentive Interests,
consisting of 844,000 Incentive Units and 56,000 Incentive
Options. PNR was wholly owned by PNRH prior to the PNR
acquisition. There were two categories for Incentive Units,
described as Tier I and Tier II. There was one
category for Incentive Options described as Tier I.
Tier I Incentive Units received preferential payout over
Tier II. Of the 844,000 Incentive Units, 484,000 and
360,000 were classified as Tier I and Tier II,
respectively. Holders of Incentive Units were entitled to cash
distributions following the sale, merger or other transaction
involving the stock or assets of PNR after the recovery of
capital contributions plus a rate of return, specified as payout
levels in the Operating Agreement. The 844,000 Tier I and
Tier II Incentive Units were granted in January 2004 to
certain members of the Companys management.
The original terms of the PNRH Incentive Interests are as
follows. Tier I Incentive Units and Incentive Options vest
ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant or will
vest in full upon the occurrence of a Fundamental Change, as
defined in the Operating Agreement. However, unless a payout
level specified in the Operating Agreement is reached by
January 23, 2009, Tier I Incentive Units, whether
vested or not, will automatically become null and void. On
January 23, 2009, all unexercised Incentive Options
terminate. Tier II Units vest when a payout level specified
in the Operating Agreement is reached. If the payout level
specified for the Tier II Units is not reached by
January 23, 2009, the Tier II Units will automatically
become null and void. All Incentive Interests held by an
employee, whether vested or not, will be automatically forfeited
if the employee is terminated with or without reason, including
termination, death or disability.
Due to the acquisition of PNR on July 31, 2008, the
performance criteria related to the PNRH Incentive Interests was
achieved and the Incentive Interests fully vested. As a result,
$4.2 million of equity based compensation expense was
recorded in general and administrative expense in the combined
statements of operations during 2008. No further equity based
compensation expense will be recorded related to these Incentive
Interests.
Equity
Appreciation Rights
In November 2006 and May 2008, 2,500,000 and 3,000,000 Equity
Appreciation Rights (EARs) were authorized,
respectively. The EARs are periodically granted by Sub to
certain of Resources employees. The EARs represent
contract rights to a certain portion of future distributions of
cash by Sub. These EARs do not vest, except with respect to
distributions actually made, and are forfeited upon an
employees separation from Resolute. There is no expiration
date for the EARs.
Resolute has not assigned any value or recognized any share
based compensation expense related to the EARs because Resolute
believes it is not probable that any distributions will be made
in respect of such EARs prior to the forfeiture of such EARs,
because of managements opinion that distributions
sufficient to cause a
F-23
distribution with respect to the EARs would not occur without
additional external financing or the sale of Resolute.
On May 29, 2008, Resources, on behalf of Sub, entered into
Agreements with several employees permitting those employees to
make an offer to exchange for cash some or all of the EARs
issued in 2006 and 2007 under the EARs Plan, dated
November 27, 2006. The participant could elect to offer to
exchange all or any portion of their EARs for time vested cash
awards equal to $2.00 per unit plus simple interest of 15% per
annum on the outstanding face value of the cash awards
commencing January 1, 2008. The cash awards are payable in
three installments on January 1, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
During 2008, a total of 395,000 units were exchanged from
employees under this agreement and $381,715 of compensation
expense was recognized.
Also on May 29, 2008, several employees were offered an
agreement allowing them to accept new award units in the form of
either (a) a time vested cash award of $1 per award unit,
payable in three installments on January 1, 2009, 2010 and
2011 plus simple interest of 15% per annum, effective
January 1, 2008 or, (b) a comparable number of EARs.
During 2008, a total of 1,659,000 EARs were granted and 213,700
time vested cash award units were issued.
The time vested cash awards are accounted for as deferred
compensation. The annual payments are paid based on the
employees tenure with Resources and there is potential for
forfeiture of the time vested payment, therefore the Resolute
will accrue for each time vested payment and related return for
the respective year on an annual basis. During 2008, $103,288 of
compensation expense was recognized.
A summary of the activity associated with Resolutes EARs
plan during 2006, 2007 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,487,000
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
1,487,000
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
581,000
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,068,000
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,659,000
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(256,000
|
)
|
Purchased
|
|
|
(395,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
3,076,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
|
Effective January 1, 2005, Resolute established a 401(k)
plan for all eligible employees. For the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, Resolute contributed
$471,000, $732,000 and $171,000, respectively, in connection
with matching of employee contributions made in 2006, 2007 and
2008, respectively.
|
|
Note 8
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
Resolute has not elected to designate derivative instruments as
cash flow hedges under the provisions of SFAS No. 133.
As a result, these derivative instruments are marked to market
at the end of each reporting period and changes in the fair
value are recorded in the accompanying combined statements of
operations.
Resolute is exposed to credit risk to the extent of
nonperformance by the counterparties in the derivative contracts
discussed below. All but one of Resolutes counterparties
to its derivative transactions are banks that
F-24
are among Resolutes lenders and, therefore, Resolute does
not anticipate such nonperformance. The one counterparty that is
not among Resolutes lenders is a highly-rated entity with
a corporate credit rating exceeding AA- classified by Standard
& Poors.
Commodity
Swaps and Put Options
Resolute periodically hedges a portion of its oil and gas
production through swaps, puts, calls, and costless collars and
other such agreements. The purpose of the hedges is to provide a
measure of stability to Resolutes cash flows in an
environment of volatile oil and gas prices and to manage
Resolutes exposure to commodity price risk.
Terms of Aneths bank credit facility, prior to the
amendment in April 2006, June 2007, and September 2008, required
Resolute to enter into
fixed-for-floating
swaps for at least 70% of its production for the years 2005
through 2007. Terms of the bank credit facility, as amended in
September 2008, require Aneth to enter into one or more hedging
agreements for approximately 70% of the forecast production from
proved developed producing reserves as indicated in
Resolutes current reserve report.
The form of hedges to be entered into may be at the discretion
of Resolute, not to exceed 80% of its anticipated production
from proved developed producing properties. Purchased put
options were considered in the calculation of whether Resolute
has met the minimum volume test. However, because such purchased
put options do not give rise to a payment obligation on the part
of Resolute, they are not considered in the calculation of the
80% ceiling.
The following constitutes amounts comprising the gain (loss) on
derivative instruments reflected in other income (expense) in
the combined financial statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
15,085
|
|
|
$
|
(101,495
|
)
|
|
$
|
120,573
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on commodity contracts
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
|
|
(2,470
|
)
|
|
|
(24,541
|
)
|
Amortization of commodity derivative premiums
|
|
|
(2,941
|
)
|
|
|
(2,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
14,557
|
|
|
$
|
(106,228
|
)
|
|
$
|
96,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, Resolute had derivative assets of
approximately $32.9 million, of which $20.7 million
was classified as a current asset and $12.2 million was
classified as a long term asset. Resolute also had a derivative
liability at December 31, 2007 of $136.0 million, of
which $47.4 million and $88.7 million were classified
as current and long-term liabilities, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, Resolute had derivative assets of
approximately $37.1 million, of which $19.0 million
was classified as a current asset and $18.1 million was
classified as a long term asset. Resolute also had a derivative
liability at December 31, 2008 of approximately
$21.3 million, of which $1.1 million and
$20.2 million were classified as current and long-term
liabilities, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, Resolute had entered into certain
commodity swap contracts. The following table represents
Resolutes commodity swaps with respect to its estimated
oil and gas production from proved developed producing
properties through 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI)
|
|
|
Gas (NYMEX HH)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Year
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
|
MMBtu per Day
|
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl
|
|
|
Hedge Price per MMBtu
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
$
|
62.78
|
|
|
$
|
4.97
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
$
|
57.83
|
|
|
$
|
6.58
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
4,550
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
$
|
5.63
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
$
|
(4.00
|
)
|
2013
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
$
|
60.47
|
|
|
$
|
(3.80
|
)
|
F-25
In addition to the swaps in the above table, Resolute entered
into a gas index swap in 2008 (effective
2009-2013)
where Resolute pays Rocky Mountain NWPL gas pricing per Inside
FERC and the counter-party pays Henry Hub gas pricing per NYMEX
less a differential of $2.10 per MMBtu.
As of December 31, 2008, Resolute had entered into certain
commodity collar contracts. The following table represents
Resolutes commodity collars with respect to its estimated
oil and gas production from proved developed producing
properties through 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas CIG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI)
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Hedge Price per
|
|
Year
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
|
MMBtu per Day
|
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
105.00-151.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00-9.35
|
|
2010
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105.00-151.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105.00-151.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Resolute elected to implement SFAS No. 157 with the
one-year deferral permitted by FSP
No. 157-2,
which defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
one year for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities measured at fair value, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. As it relates to Resolute, the
deferral applies to certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities
as may be acquired in a business combination and thereby
measured at fair value; impaired oil and gas property
assessments; and the initial recognition of asset retirement
obligations for which fair value is used.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset is Not Active
(FSP 157-3),
which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in an
inactive market and provides an example to demonstrate how the
fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market
for that financial asset is inactive.
FSP 157-3
was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which
financial statements had not been issued.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (an exact price) in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. The statement
establishes market or observable inputs as the preferred sources
of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical
transactions in the absence of market inputs. The statement
establishes a hierarchy for grouping these assets and
liabilities, based on the significance level of the following
inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices in active markets for
similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active, and
model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose
significant value drivers are observable
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Significant inputs to the valuation
model are unobservable
|
The following is a listing of Resolutes assets and
liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring
basis and where they are classified within the hierarchy as of
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
A financial asset or liability is categorized within the
hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement. Resolutes assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific
to the asset or liability. Following is a description of the
valuation methodologies used by Resolute as well as the general
classification of such instruments pursuant to the hierarchy.
Derivatives
Standard oil and gas activities expose Resolute to varying
degrees of commodity price risk. To mitigate a portion of this
risk, Resolute may enter into crude oil and gas derivatives to
lower the commodity price risk when market conditions are
favorable. Resolute values these derivatives using index prices,
counterparties credit ratings, Resolutes credit
adjusted borrowing rate and the time value of money.
Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the
marketplace throughout the full term of the contract, can be
derived from observable data or are supported by observable
levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace,
and are designated as Level 2 within the valuation
hierarchy. The discount rate used in the fair values of these
instruments includes a measure of nonperformance risk.
|
|
Note 10
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Resolute entered into two
take-or-pay
purchase agreements, each with a different supplier, under which
Resolute has committed to buy specified volumes of
CO2.
The purchased
CO2
is for use in Resolutes enhanced tertiary recovery
projects in Greater Aneth Field. In each case, Resolute is
obligated to purchase a minimum daily volume of
CO2
or pay for any deficiencies at the price in effect when delivery
was to have occurred. The
CO2
volumes planned for use on the enhanced recovery projects exceed
the minimum daily volumes provided in this
take-or-pay
purchase agreement. Therefore, Resolute expects to avoid any
payments for deficiencies.
One contract was effective July 1, 2006, and has a four
year term. As of December 31, 2008, future commitments
under this purchase agreement amounted to approximately
$1.9 million for 2009 and $1.9 million in 2010, based
on prices in effect at December 31, 2008. The second
contract was entered into on May 25, 2005, and was amended
on July 1, 2007, and has a ten year term. Future
commitments under this purchase agreement amounted to
approximately $27.8 million through June 2016 based on
prices in effect on December 31, 2008. The annual minimum
obligation by year is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
2010
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future rental payments for office facilities under the remaining
terms of non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31,
2008 were approximately $410,000, $460,000, $399,000, $0 and $0
for the years ending December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
and 2013, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
rental payments charged to expense amounted to approximately
$719,500, $827,000 and $1.0 million, respectively. Rental
payments include
month-to-month
leases of office facilities and equipment. There are no leases
that are accounted for as capital leases.
In connection with the acquisition of the ExxonMobil Properties
and the acquisition from Chevron Corporation and its affiliates
(Chevron) of 75% of Chevrons interest in
Greater Aneth Field (Chevron Properties) in 2005,
pursuant to the terms of the Cooperative Agreement, Resolute
granted to NNOG three
F-27
separate but substantially similar purchase options. Each
purchase option entitles NNOG to purchase from Resolute up to
10% of Resolutes interest in the Chevron and the
ExxonMobil Properties. Each purchase option entitles NNOG to
purchase, for a limited period of time, the applicable portion
of Resolutes interest in the ExxonMobil Properties or the
Chevron Properties, at Fair Market Value (as defined in the
agreement), which is determined without giving effect to the
existence of the Navajo Nation preferential purchase right or
the fact that the properties are located within the Navajo
Nation. Each option becomes exercisable based upon
Resolutes achieving a certain multiple of payout of the
relevant acquisition costs, subsequent capital costs and ongoing
operating costs attributable to the applicable working
interests. Revenue applicable to the determination of payout
includes the effect of Resolutes hedging program. The
multiples of payout that trigger the exercisability of the
purchase option are 100%, 150% and 200%. The options are not
exercisable prior to four years from the acquisition except in
the case of a sale of such assets by, or a change of control of,
Aneth. In that case, the first option for 10% would be
accelerated and the other options would terminate. Assuming the
purchase options are not accelerated due to a change of control
of Aneth, Resolute expects that the initial payout associated
with the purchase options granted will occur no sooner than 2013.
The following table demonstrates the maximum net undivided
working interest in each of the Aneth Unit, the McElmo Creek
Unit and the Ratherford Unit that NNOG could acquire upon
exercising each of its purchase options under the Cooperative
Agreement. The exercise by NNOG of its purchase options in full
would not give it the right to remove Resolute as operator of
any of the units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McElmo
|
|
|
Ratherford
|
|
|
|
Aneth Unit
|
|
|
Creek Unit
|
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
ExxonMobil Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option 1 (100% Payout)
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
Option 2 (150% Payout)
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
Option 3 (200% Payout)
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
18.00
|
%
|
|
|
16.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McElmo
|
|
|
Ratherford
|
|
|
|
Aneth Unit
|
|
|
Creek Unit
|
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
Chevron Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option 1 (100% Payout)
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
Option 2 (150% Payout)
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
Option 3 (200% Payout)
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15.90
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On August 2, 2009, Resolute and Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc. (HACI) agreed to a business
combination under the terms of a Purchase and IPO Reorganization
Agreement (Acquisition Agreement). In connection
with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the
Acquisition Agreement HACI stockholders will acquire a majority
of the outstanding common stock of Resolute Energy Corporation
and Resolute Energy Corporation will own, either directly or
indirectly, 100% of the equity interests of HACI and Resolute
with the exception of Aneth, in which Resolute Energy
Corporation will indirectly own a 99.9943% equity interest.
|
|
Note 12
|
Financial
Statement Restatement
|
Resolute restated its combined financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Subsequent to the issuance of its
2008 combined financial statements, Resolutes management
determined that the analysis of the full cost ceiling test did
not properly take into account the impact of the deferred income
taxes. As a result, the accompanying combined financial
statements include an additional $17.0 million provision
for impairment of oil and gas properties and a related increase
to deferred tax asset of $6.1 million.
F-28
The financial statement items impacted by this restatement for
the year ended December 31, 2008 are indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties(a)
|
|
$
|
365,099
|
|
|
$
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
348,058
|
|
Net oil and gas properties(a)
|
|
|
280,097
|
|
|
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
|
263,056
|
|
Net property and equipment(a)
|
|
|
282,704
|
|
|
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
|
265,663
|
|
Deferred income taxes noncurrent asset(b)
|
|
|
8,608
|
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
|
14,705
|
|
Total other assets(a)(b)
|
|
|
45,138
|
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
|
51,235
|
|
Total assets(a)(b)
|
|
|
371,791
|
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
360,847
|
|
Accumulated deficit(c)
|
|
|
(18,492
|
)
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
(29,436
|
)
|
Total shareholders/members deficit(c)
|
|
|
(134,725
|
)
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
(145,669
|
)
|
Total liabilities and shareholders/members deficit(c)
|
|
|
371,791
|
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
360,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
Impairment of proved properties(a)
|
|
$
|
(227,986
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
(245,027
|
)
|
Total operating expenses(a)
|
|
|
(384,522
|
)
|
|
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
|
(401,563
|
)
|
Income (loss) from operations(a)
|
|
|
(155,350
|
)
|
|
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
|
(172,391
|
)
|
Loss before income taxes(a)
|
|
|
(91,625
|
)
|
|
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
|
(108,666
|
)
|
Income tax benefit(b)
|
|
|
12,150
|
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
Net loss(c)
|
|
|
(79,475
|
)
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
(90,419
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to Resolute(c)
|
|
|
(79,298
|
)
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
(90,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
Net loss(c)
|
|
$
|
(79,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,419
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes(b)
|
|
|
(8,443
|
)
|
|
|
(6,097
|
)
|
|
|
(14,540
|
)
|
Impairment of proved properties(a)
|
|
|
227,986
|
|
|
|
17,041
|
|
|
|
245,027
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Adjustment related to the full cost ceiling test based on not
properly taking into account the impact of the deferred taxes. |
|
(b) |
|
Adjustments related to the tax effect for the additional
impairment to proved properties. |
|
(c) |
|
Additional net loss incurred due to the additional impairment
and related taxes. |
F-29
|
|
Note 13
|
Oil
and Gas Producing Activities
|
Costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration
and development activities are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Development costs
|
|
$
|
48,140
|
|
|
$
|
78,430
|
|
|
$
|
52,331
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
220,629
|
|
|
|
9,045
|
|
|
|
19,448
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
3,191
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
271,960
|
|
|
$
|
91,662
|
|
|
$
|
72,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs related to Resolutes oil and gas
producing activities were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
522,090
|
|
|
$
|
348,058
|
|
Unevaluated oil and gas properties, not subject to amortization
|
|
|
12,330
|
|
|
|
12,724
|
|
Accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(48,923
|
)
|
|
|
(97,726
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, net
|
|
$
|
485,497
|
|
|
$
|
263,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
Note 14
|
Supplemental
Oil and Gas Information (unaudited)
|
Oil
and Gas Reserve Quantities:
The following table presents our estimated net proved oil and
gas reserves and the present value of such estimated net proved
reserves as of December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008. The
reserve data as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 were
prepared by Resolute and 78 percent, 90 percent and
100 percent, respectively, were audited by Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum
engineers. Users of this information should be aware that the
process of estimating quantities of proved oil and gas reserves
is very complex, requiring significant subjective decisions to
be made in the evaluation of available geological, engineering
and economic data for each reservoir. The data for a given
reservoir may also change substantially over time as a result of
numerous factors, including, but not limited to, additional
development activity, evolving production history and continual
reassessment of the viability of production under varying
economic conditions. As a result, revisions to existing reserves
estimates may occur from time to time. Although every reasonable
effort is made to ensure reserves estimates reported represent
the most accurate assessments possible, the subjective decisions
and variances in available data for various reservoirs make
these estimates generally less precise than other estimates
included in the financial statement disclosures.
Presented below is a summary of the changes in estimated
reserves (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
MBbl
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MBoe
|
|
|
Proved reserves as of January 1, 2006:
|
|
|
39,536
|
|
|
|
54,148
|
|
|
|
48,560
|
|
Purchases of minerals in place
|
|
|
35,497
|
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
35,809
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(1,706
|
)
|
|
|
(3,042
|
)
|
|
|
(2,213
|
)
|
Improved recoveries(1)(2)
|
|
|
10,270
|
|
|
|
(2,477
|
)
|
|
|
9,857
|
|
Extensions, discoveries, and other additions
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
|
|
4,664
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
4,805
|
|
|
|
(3,334
|
)
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved reserves as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
92,301
|
|
|
|
51,761
|
|
|
|
100,928
|
|
Purchases of minerals in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(2,127
|
)
|
|
|
(3,175
|
)
|
|
|
(2,656
|
)
|
Extensions, discoveries and other additions
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Improved recovery
|
|
|
2,427
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates(3)
|
|
|
(14,239
|
)
|
|
|
(25,351
|
)
|
|
|
(18,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved reserves as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
78,570
|
|
|
|
24,481
|
|
|
|
82,651
|
|
Purchases of minerals in place
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
3,240
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(2,049
|
)
|
|
|
(4,029
|
)
|
|
|
(2,721
|
)
|
Extensions, discoveries and other additions
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Improved recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates(4)
|
|
|
(30,375
|
)
|
|
|
(5,911
|
)
|
|
|
(31,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved reserves as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
46,370
|
|
|
|
17,781
|
|
|
|
49,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
37,825
|
|
|
|
33,890
|
|
|
|
43,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
44,481
|
|
|
|
22,135
|
|
|
|
44,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
28,760
|
|
|
|
19,949
|
|
|
|
31,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Negative gas reserves arise from the addition of undeveloped oil
reserves through our
CO2
injection project and the resulting contamination of a portion
of our developed gas reserves. This contamination caused some of
our developed gas reserves to become unsellable and thus a
reduction in gas reserves was recorded to accurately reflect our
total proved reserves. |
(2) |
|
This addition is due to the expansion of the
CO2
tertiary flood (Phase IV) in the Aneth Unit. |
F-31
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The oil revision is due to a reduction in the anticipated
performance of the Aneth field, Aneth drilling program and the
tertiary recovery, all amounting to approximately 35% of the
total. The majority of the remaining oil revision and the gas
revision are attributable to performance of the Wyoming
properties, all of which are partially offset by an increase in
product pricing. |
(4) |
|
The negative oil and gas revisions are attributable to the
reduction in the oil and gas prices. |
Standardized
Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved
Oil and Gas Reserves:
The following summarizes the policies used in the preparation of
the accompanying oil and gas reserves disclosures, standardized
measures of discounted future net cash flows from proved oil and
gas reserves and the reconciliations of standardized measures
from year to year. The information disclosed, as prescribed by
the SFAS No. 69, Disclosures about Oil and Gas
Producing Activities, is an attempt to present the
information in a manner comparable with industry peers.
The information is based on estimates of proved reserves
attributable to Resolutes interest in oil and gas
properties as of December 31 of the years presented. Proved
reserves are estimated quantities of oil and gas that geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions.
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
from production of proved reserves was developed as follows:
(1) Estimates were made of quantities of proved reserves
and future periods during which they are expected to be produced
based on year-end economic conditions.
(2) The estimated future cash flows was compiled by
applying year-end prices of crude oil and gas relating to
Resolutes proved reserves to the year-end quantities of
those reserves.
(3) The future cash flows were reduced by estimated
production costs, costs to develop and produce the proved
reserves and abandonment costs, all based on year-end economic
conditions.
(4) Future income tax expenses were based on year-end
statutory tax rates giving effect to the remaining tax basis in
the oil and gas properties, other deductions, credits and
allowances relating to Resolutes proved oil and natural
gas reserves.
(5) Future net cash flows were discounted to present value
by applying a discount rate of 10%.
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
does not purport, nor should it be interpreted, to present the
fair value of Resolutes oil and gas reserves. An estimate
of fair value would also take into account, among other things,
the recovery of reserves not presently classified as proved,
anticipated future changes in prices and costs and a discount
factor more representative of the time value of money and the
risks inherent in reserve estimates.
The following summary sets forth Resolutes future net cash
flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves based on the
standardized measure prescribed in SFAS No. 69:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
5,612
|
|
|
$
|
7,040
|
|
|
$
|
1,821
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(1,857
|
)
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
Future development costs
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
Future income taxes(1)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
(2,501
|
)
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
1,235
|
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Future income taxes are related to RWIs oil and gas
properties. Aneth is a pass through entity, therefore, there are
no future income taxes associated with its oil and gas
properties. |
The principal sources of change in the standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Standardized measure, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
1,235
|
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
Sales of oil and gas produced, net of production costs
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
Extensions, discoveries and other, including infill reserves in
an existing proved field, net of production costs
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved recoveries
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of minerals in place
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the year
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(419
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Sales of reserves in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Changes in timing and other
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure, end of year
|
|
$
|
1,235
|
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(As Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,935
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
14,680
|
|
|
|
18,917
|
|
Derivative receivable
|
|
|
5,839
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
19,017
|
|
|
|
9,501
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
43,949
|
|
|
|
31,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, full cost method of accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
12,724
|
|
|
|
12,787
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
348,058
|
|
|
|
342,848
|
|
Accumulated depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(97,726
|
)
|
|
|
(112,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties
|
|
|
263,056
|
|
|
|
242,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
4,682
|
|
|
|
4,673
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,075
|
)
|
|
|
(2,364
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other property and equipment
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
265,663
|
|
|
|
245,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
11,210
|
|
|
|
12,961
|
|
Notes receivable affiliated entities
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
6,403
|
|
|
|
6,447
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
18,114
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
14,705
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
51,235
|
|
|
|
29,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
360,847
|
|
|
$
|
306,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders/Members Equity
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
46,169
|
|
|
|
36,163
|
|
Accounts payable Holdings
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
18,142
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,913
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,570
|
|
Contingent tax liability
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
56,601
|
|
|
|
478,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
421,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
|
|
9,065
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
20,193
|
|
|
|
37,950
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term liabilities
|
|
|
449,915
|
|
|
|
47,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
506,516
|
|
|
|
525,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders/members equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RNRC common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized and issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RWI common stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized and issued
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
37,594
|
|
|
|
37,594
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(29,436
|
)
|
|
|
(54,272
|
)
|
Shareholders/members deficit
|
|
|
(153,828
|
)
|
|
|
(202,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Resolute shareholders/members deficit
|
|
|
(145,669
|
)
|
|
|
(219,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders/members deficit
|
|
$
|
360,847
|
|
|
$
|
306,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$
|
110,952
|
|
|
$
|
44,116
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
15,568
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,141
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
129,661
|
|
|
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
40,991
|
|
|
|
31,596
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization, and asset retirement
obligation accretion
|
|
|
23,420
|
|
|
|
15,949
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
8,076
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
72,487
|
|
|
|
64,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
57,174
|
|
|
|
(12,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(16,190
|
)
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
Loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(202,124
|
)
|
|
|
(41,316
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(218,102
|
)
|
|
|
(53,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(160,928
|
)
|
|
|
(65,686
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(2,082
|
)
|
|
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(163,010
|
)
|
|
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Resolute
|
|
$
|
(162,747
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(163,010
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
23,075
|
|
|
|
15,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off of deferred offering costs
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
9,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of other property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
175,261
|
|
|
|
55,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
|
(9,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(639
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable Holdings
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
49,740
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition, exploration and development expenditures
|
|
|
(24,866
|
)
|
|
|
(7,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of other property and equipment
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable affiliated entities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(1,483
|
)
|
|
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(26,505
|
)
|
|
|
(9,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from bank borrowings
|
|
|
131,375
|
|
|
|
61,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of bank borrowings
|
|
|
(152,600
|
)
|
|
|
(64,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(21,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,098
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
16,745
|
|
|
$
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase to asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase to oil and gas properties through capitalized
equity-based compensation
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures financed through current liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements
F-36
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
Note 1
|
Description
of the Companies and Business
|
Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC (Resources),
previously a Delaware corporation incorporated on
January 22, 2004 and converted to a limited liability
company on September 30, 2008, Resolute Aneth, LLC
(Aneth), a Delaware limited liability company
established on November 12, 2004, WYNR, LLC
(WYNR), a Delaware limited liability company
established on August 25, 2005, BWNR, LLC
(BWNR), a Delaware limited liability company
established on August 19, 2005, RNRC Holdings, Inc.
(RNRC), a Delaware corporation incorporated on
September 19, 2008 and Resolute Wyoming, Inc.
(RWI) (formerly Primary Natural Resources, Inc.
(PNR)), a Delaware corporation incorporated on
November 21, 2003 (the change of name to RWI was effective
September 29, 2008) (together, Resolute or the
Companies) are engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, development, and production of oil, gas and
hydrocarbon liquids, primarily in the Paradox Basin in
southeastern Utah and the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. The
Companies are wholly owned subsidiaries of Resolute Holdings
Sub, LLC (Sub), which in turn is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Resolute Holdings, LLC (Holdings).
|
|
Note 2
|
Basis
of Presentation and Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Going
Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a
going concern basis which contemplates continuity of operations,
realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business. Resolute was not in compliance with
its June 30, 2009 Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant
(calculated as the ratio of debt to trailing four quarter
EBITDA) under the terms of the First and Second Lien Credit
Facilities. On August 27, 2009, Resolutes lenders
under its First Lien Credit Facility waived the Maximum Leverage
Ratio covenant default as of June 30, 2009, and waived the
cross default provisions as they relate to this default under
the Second Lien Credit Facility. This waiver expires no later
than October 15, 2009. Resolutes lenders under the
Second Lien Credit Facility have exercised their right to
accelerate payment obligations under that facility, as a result
of noncompliance with this covenant. Due to the failure to
remain compliant with its June 30, 2009 Maximum Leverage
Ratio covenant on its First and Second Lien Credit Facility and
potential violation of financial covenants in the next twelve
months, Resolute has classified the outstanding debt balances as
current at June 30, 2009. There can be no assurance that,
if foreclosure should proceed, the carrying amounts of assets
will be realized or that liabilities will be liquidated or
settled for the amounts recorded. The ability of Resolute to
continue as a going concern is dependent on Resolutes
ability to access capital and its ability to sustain positive
results of operations and cash flows sufficient to pay its
current liabilities.
As discussed in Note 14, the Company is pursuing a business
combination with Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. If this
transaction is consummated, Resolute expects to fully satisfy
its obligation under its Second Lien Credit Facility, partially
repay its obligations under its First Lien Credit Facility, and
amend its First Lien Credit Facility. If the business
combination with Hicks does not occur, Resolute intends to
pursue credit agreement amendments or forbearance arrangements,
equity financings, joint ventures or other industry
partnerships, asset monetizations, debt refinancings and other
strategic initiatives to address the long-term effects of its
First and Second Lien financial covenant situation. No assurance
can be given that the negotiations with its lenders will be
successful or that equity financing, joint ventures or other
industry partnerships, asset monetizations or debt refinancings,
if and when required, will be available on acceptable terms or
sufficient to address Resolutes liquidity needs.
F-37
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
In connection with its consideration of going concern, Resolute
also reassessed the recoverability of its deferred tax assets.
Given the above described circumstances and the uncertainty of
Resolute to generate future taxable income, Resolute recorded a
full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset at
June 30, 2009, as Resolute believes based on the weight of
available evidence, that it is more likely than not this asset
will not be realized. There were no other adjustments made in
the financial statements relating to the recoverability and
classification of recorded assets and classification of
liabilities that might be necessary should the companies be
unable to continue in existence.
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited combined interim financial statements
of Resolute have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) for interim financial reporting and
Regulation S-X
for interim financial reporting. Except as disclosed herein,
there has been no material change in the information disclosed
in the notes to Resolutes combined financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2008. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
interim financial information have been included. Operating
results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the full year.
In connection with the preparation of the combined financial
statements of Resolute and in accordance with the recently
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 165, Subsequent Events,
Resolute evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet
date as of June 30, 2009, through the filing of this report
on September 11, 2009 (See Note 14 and Note 8 for
details).
On July 31, 2008, Resolute acquired RWI. 87.23% of the
acquisition of RWI was accounted for as a combination of
entities under common control, which is similar to the pooling
of interests method of accounting for business combinations.
Accordingly, the combined financial statements give
retrospective effect to these transactions, and therefore,
Resolutes results from January 1, 2008, through
July 31, 2008, include 87.23% of the operations of RWI. The
remaining 12.77% of the acquisition of RWI was accounted for
using the purchase method in accordance with
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations.
Accordingly, the accompanying combined financial statements
reflect the 12.77% not owned by Resolute as a noncontrolling
interest for results from January 1, 2008, through
July 31, 2008.
Significant
Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies followed by Resolute are set
forth in Note 1 to Resolutes combined financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. These
unaudited combined interim financial statements are to be read
in conjunction with the combined financial statements and
related notes for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Assumptions,
Judgments, and Estimates
The preparation of the combined interim financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make various
assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and in the
disclosures of commitments and contingencies. Changes in these
assumptions, judgments and estimates will occur as a result of
the passage of time and the occurrence of future events.
Accordingly, actual results could differ from amounts previously
established.
F-38
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Significant estimates with regard to the combined interim
financial statements include the estimated carrying value of
unproved properties, the estimate of proved oil and gas reserve
volumes and the related present value of estimated future net
cash flows and the ceiling test applied to capitalized oil and
gas properties, the estimated cost and timing related to asset
retirement obligations, the estimated fair value of derivative
assets and liabilities, the estimated expense for equity based
compensation and depletion, depreciation and amortization.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of Resolutes financial instruments,
namely cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and
accounts payable, approximate their fair value because of the
short-term nature of these instruments. The long-term debt has a
recorded value that approximates its fair market value since its
variable interest rate is tied to current market rates. The fair
value of derivative instruments is estimated based on market
conditions in effect at the end of each reporting period.
|
|
Note 3
|
Industry
Segment and Geographic Information
|
At June 30, 2009, Resolute conducted operations in one
industry segment, that being the crude oil, gas and natural gas
liquids exploration and production industry. All of
Resolutes operations and assets are located in the United
States, and all of its revenues are attributable to domestic
customers. Resolute considers gathering, processing and
marketing functions as ancillary to its oil and gas producing
activities, and therefore are not reported as a separate segment.
|
|
Note 4
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
Resolute adopted SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations on January 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance
for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the
business combination and determines what information to disclose
to enable users of the financial statement to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
The nature and magnitude of the specific effects of
SFAS No. 141(R) on the combined financial statements
will depend upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions
consummated after the effective date. There have not been any
acquisitions since adoption.
Resolute adopted FSP SFAS No. 141(R)-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies (FSP 141(R)-1) on
January 1, 2009, which amends the guidance in
SFAS No. 141(R) relating to the initial recognition
and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and
disclosures of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination. The impact of FSP 141(R)-1 on
Resolutes combined financial statements will largely be
dependent on the size and nature of the business combinations
completed. Resolute has not had any acquisitions of oil and gas
properties since adoption.
On December 31, 2008, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) published the final rules and
interpretations updating its oil and gas reporting requirements.
Many of the revisions are updates to definitions in the existing
oil and gas rules to make them consistent with the petroleum
resource management system.
F-39
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
This system, which was developed by several industry
organizations, is a widely accepted standard for the management
of petroleum resources. Key revisions include changes to the
pricing used to estimate reserves, the ability to include
nontraditional resources in reserves, the use of new technology
for determining reserves, and permitting disclosure of probable
and possible reserves. The SEC will require companies to comply
with the amended disclosure requirements for registration
statements filed after January 1, 2010, and for annual
reports for fiscal years ending on or after December 15,
2009. Early adoption is not permitted. Resolute is currently
assessing the impact that the adoption will have on
Resolutes disclosures, operating results, financial
position, and cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. 107-1
and Accounting Principles Board Opinion
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(collectively
FSP 107-1).
FSP 107-1
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded
companies as well as in annual financial statements.
FSP 107-1
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
FSP 107-1
did not have an impact on Resolutes combined financial
statements, other than additional disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume or Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly . FSP
No. 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with SFAS No. 157 when the volume and level
of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased and requires that companies provide interim and annual
disclosures of the inputs and valuation technique(s) used to
measure fair value. FSP
No. 157-4
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009 and is to be applied prospectively. The
adoption of FSP
No. 157-4
did not have an impact on Resolutes combined financial
statements.
Resolute adopted SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an
amendment to Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
No. 51 on January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 160
changed the accounting and reporting requirements for minority
interests, which are now characterized as noncontrolling
interests and are classified as a component of equity in the
accompanying combined balance sheets. SFAS No. 160
requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure
requirements for existing noncontrolling interests, with all
other requirements applied prospectively. Accordingly, Resolute
has reclassified net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests on the combined statements of operations, to below net
income for all periods presented.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities An Amendment of FASB Statement 133.
SFAS No. 161 enhances required disclosures regarding
derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced
disclosures regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative
instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related hedged
items are accounted for under FASB No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; and
(c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect
an entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.
Accordingly, Resolute has adopted this pronouncement as of
January 1, 2009 (see Note 11).
Resolute adopted SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
on April 1, 2009, which established general standards
of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 requires
companies to disclose the date through which the company
evaluated subsequent events, the basis for that date, and
whether that date
F-40
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
represents the date the financial statements were issued. The
adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on
Resolutes combined financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS 168). This standard replaces
SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of
GAAP, authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (the Codification) was not
intended to change or alter existing GAAP, and it therefore will
not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements other than to modify certain existing disclosures.
The Codification will become the source of authoritative,
nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases
of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting
literature not included in the Codification will become
nonauthoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial
statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Resolute will begin to use the new
guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification
when referring to GAAP in the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
|
|
Note 5
|
Oil
and Gas Properties
|
Resolute uses the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas
producing activities. All costs incurred in the acquisition,
exploration and development of properties, including costs of
unsuccessful exploration, costs of surrendered and abandoned
leaseholds, delay lease rentals and the fair value of estimated
future costs of site restoration, dismantlement and abandonment
activities, improved recovery systems and a portion of general
and administrative expenses are capitalized within the cost
center.
Resolute conducts tertiary recovery projects on certain of its
oil and gas properties in order to recover additional
hydrocarbons that are not recoverable from primary or secondary
recovery methods. Under the full cost method, all development
costs are capitalized at the time incurred. Development costs
include charges associated with access to and preparation of
well locations, drilling and equipping development wells, test
wells, and service wells including injection wells; acquiring,
constructing, and installing production facilities and providing
for improved recovery systems. Improved recovery systems include
all related facility development costs and the cost of the
acquisition of tertiary injectants, primarily purchased carbon
dioxide. The development cost related to carbon dioxide
purchases are incurred solely for the purpose of gaining access
to incremental reserves not otherwise recoverable. The
accumulation of injected carbon dioxide, in combination with
additional purchased and recycled carbon dioxide, provide future
economic value over the life of the project.
In contrast, other costs related to the daily operation of the
improved recovery systems include, but are not limited to,
compression, electricity, separation, re-injection of recovered
carbon dioxide and water, are considered production costs and
are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred to maintain reservoir
pressure are also expensed as incurred.
Capitalized general and administrative costs include salaries,
employee benefits, costs of consulting services and other
specifically identifiable costs and do not include costs related
to production operations, general corporate overhead or similar
activities. Resolute capitalized general and administrative and
operating costs of $1.1 million and $0.2 million
related to its acquisition, exploration and development
activities for the periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
F-41
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Investments in unproved properties are not depleted, pending
determination of the existence of proved reserves. Unproved
properties are assessed periodically to ascertain whether
impairment has occurred. Unproved properties whose costs are
individually significant are assessed individually by
considering the primary lease terms of the properties, the
holding period of the properties, and geographic and geologic
data obtained relating to the properties. Where it is not
practicable to assess individually the amount of impairment of
properties for which costs are not individually significant,
such properties are grouped for purposes of assessing
impairment. The amount of impairment assessed is added to the
costs to be amortized, or is reported as a period expense as
appropriate.
Pursuant to full cost accounting rules, Resolute must perform a
ceiling test each quarter on its proved oil and gas assets. The
ceiling test provides that capitalized costs less related
accumulated depletion and deferred income taxes for each cost
center may not exceed the sum of (1) the present value of
future net revenue from estimated production of proved oil and
gas reserves using current prices, excluding the future cash
outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations
that have been accrued on the balance sheet, and a discount
factor of 10%; plus (2) the cost of properties not being
amortized, if any; plus (3) the lower of cost or estimated
fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being
amortized, if any; less (4) income tax effects related to
differences in the book and tax basis of oil and gas properties.
Should the net capitalized costs for a cost center exceed the
sum of the components noted above, an impairment charge would be
recognized to the extent of the excess capitalized costs. As a
result of this limitation on capitalized costs, the accompanying
interim combined financial statements include a provision for an
impairment of oil and gas property cost for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 of $13.3 million. There was no provision
for impairment recorded for the six month period ended
June 30, 2008.
No gain or loss is recognized upon the sale or abandonment of
undeveloped or producing oil and gas properties unless the sale
represents a significant portion of oil and gas properties and
the gain significantly alters the relationship between
capitalized costs and proved oil reserves of the cost center.
Depletion and amortization of oil and gas properties is computed
on the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves.
Amortizable costs include estimates of asset retirement
obligations and future development costs of proved reserves,
including, but not limited to, costs to drill and equip
development wells, constructing and installing production and
processing facilities, and improved recovery systems including
the cost of required future carbon dioxide purchases.
|
|
Note 6
|
Asset
Retirement Obligations
|
Asset retirement obligations relate to future costs associated
with the plugging and abandonment of oil and gas wells, removal
of equipment and facilities from leased acreage and returning
such land to its original condition. The fair value of a
liability for an asset retirement obligation is recorded in the
period in which it is incurred (typically when the asset is
installed at the production location), and the cost of such
liability increases the carrying amount of the related
long-lived asset by the same amount. The liability is accreted
each period and the capitalized cost is depleted on a
units-of-production basis as part of the full cost pool.
Revisions to estimated retirement obligations result in
adjustments to the related capitalized asset and corresponding
liability.
Resolutes estimated asset retirement obligation liability
is based on estimated economic lives, estimates as to the cost
to abandon the wells in the future, and federal and state
regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using a
credit-adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time the
liability is incurred or revised. The
F-42
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
credit-adjusted risk-free rates used to discount Resolutes
abandonment liabilities range from 3.90% to 13.50%. Revisions to
the liability could occur due to changes in estimated
abandonment costs or well economic lives, or if federal or state
regulators enact new requirements regarding the abandonment of
wells.
The following table provides a reconciliation of Resolutes
asset retirement obligations for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
8,445
|
|
|
$
|
9,828
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
Additional liability incurred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities settled
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
Revisions to previous estimates
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations at end of period
|
|
|
9,138
|
|
|
|
10,248
|
|
Less current asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
7,467
|
|
|
$
|
9,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Resources has received payments due Holdings for Holdings
transactions not related to Resolute. Such payments have not yet
been reimbursed to Holdings. These payables are reflected on the
combined balance sheet as Accounts payable
Holdings and carried a balance of $1.3 million at
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009.
Long term debt and current portion of long term debt consisted
of the following at December 31, 2008 and June 30,
2009, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Credit agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Lien Facility
|
|
$
|
196,150
|
|
|
$
|
192,570
|
|
Second Lien Facility
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term debt
|
|
|
421,150
|
|
|
|
417,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
$
|
421,150
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Lien Facility
Resolutes credit facility is with a syndicate of banks led
by Wachovia Bank, National Association (the First Lien
Facility). The First Lien Facility specifies a maximum
borrowing base as determined by the
F-43
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
lenders. The determination of the borrowing base takes into
consideration the estimated value of Resolutes oil and gas
properties in accordance with the lenders customary
practices for oil and gas loans. The borrowing base is
re-determined semi-annually, and the amount available for
borrowing could be increased or decreased as a result of such
re-determinations. Under certain circumstances either Resolute
or the lenders may request an interim re-determination. As of
June 30, 2009, the borrowing base was $240 million.
Unused availability under the borrowing base as of June 30,
2009 was $38.9 million. The borrowing base availability has
been reduced by $8.5 million in conjunction with letters of
credit issued to vendors at June 30, 2009. The First Lien
Facility matures on April 13, 2011 and, to the extent that
the borrowing base, as adjusted from time to time, exceeds the
outstanding balance, no repayments of principal are required
prior to maturity. On May 12, 2009, Resolute entered into
the Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated First Lien
Credit Facility (Fourth Amendment) to redetermine
its borrowing base and interest rates, and to amend its Maximum
Leverage Ratio covenant (effective March 31, 2009). Under
the terms of the Fourth Amendment, at Aneths option, the
outstanding balance under the First Lien Facility accrues
interest at either (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate,
plus a margin which varies from 2.5% to 3.5%, or (b) the
Alternative Base Rate defined as the greater of (i) the
Administrative Agents Prime Rate, (ii) the
Administrative Agents Base CD rate plus 1%, or
(iii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, plus a
margin which varies from 1.0% to 2.0%. Each such margin is based
on the level of utilization under the borrowing base. Pursuant
to the terms of the First Lien Facility, the borrowing base was
reset to $240.0 million, a reduction of $44.0 million
from the prior redetermination amount. On July 28, 2009,
Resolute entered into the Fifth Amendment to the Amended and
Restated First Lien Credit Facility (Fifth
Amendment) to amend its Current Ratio covenant. Under the
terms of the Fifth Amendment, the Current Ratio covenant was not
applicable for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009.
As of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, the
weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balance under
the facility was 4.97% and 3.89%, respectively. The First Lien
Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the proved
oil and gas assets of Aneth and RWI, and is guaranteed by
Resources and Sub.
The First Lien Facility includes terms and covenants that place
limitations on certain types of activities, the payment of
dividends, and require satisfaction of certain financial tests.
Resolute was not in compliance with the First Lien Facility
June 30, 2009 Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant. The Company
entered into a waiver agreement with its First Lien Facility
lenders on August 27, 2009, whereby the requirement to
comply with the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant for the period
ending June 30, 2009 has been waived until the earlier to
occur of (a) October 15, 2009 or (b) the Early
Termination Date, defined as the date on which the lenders
notify Resolute that it has determined in its sole discretion
that a material condition to the merger between Resolute and
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. is unlikely to be
satisfied by October 15, 2009 (Waiver Termination
Date). Upon the Waiver Termination Date, the Maximum
Leverage Ratio shall be calculated using the outstanding debt
amount as of the Waiver Termination Date.
The terms of the waiver allowed Resolute to remain in compliance
with the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant at June 30, 2009.
However, there is evidence that Resolute may not remain in
compliance with such covenant for the next twelve months.
Therefore, in accordance with
EITF 86-30,
Resolute has classified the outstanding balance for its First
Lien Facility at June 30, 2009 as current.
As of August 28, 2009, Resolute had repaid a net
$0.1 million under the borrowing base, resulting in an
unused availability of $39.0 million.
F-44
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Second
Lien Facility
Resolutes term loan is with a group of lenders with
Wilmington Trust FSB as the agent (the Second Lien
Facility). Balances outstanding under the Second Lien
Facility accrue interest at either (a) the adjusted London
Interbank Offered Rate plus the applicable margin of 4.5%, or
(b) the greater of (i) the Administrative Agents
Prime Rate, (ii) the Administrative Agents Base CD
rate plus 1%, or (iii) the Alternative Base Rate, plus the
applicable margin of 3.5%. The Second Lien Facility matures on
June 26, 2013. Aneth may make optional prepayments. In the
first year after closing, Aneth was not subject to prepayment
penalties. However, for a period of one year starting on
June 27, 2008, such prepayments will be subject to a
prepayment penalty of 1% of the amount prepaid. Thereafter, no
prepayment penalty will be assessed. Once repaid, the amounts
may not be re-borrowed. The Second Lien Facility is
collateralized by substantially all of the proved oil and gas
assets of Aneth and RWI, and is guaranteed by Resources and Sub.
The claim of the Second Lien Facility lenders on the collateral
is explicitly subordinated to the claim of the First Lien
Facility lenders. As of December 31, 2008 and June 30,
2009, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding
balance under the facility was 7.71% and 4.77%, respectively.
The Second Lien Facility includes terms and covenants that place
limitations on certain types of activities, the payment of
dividends, and require satisfaction of certain financial tests.
On August 28, 2009, Aneth gave notice to the lenders that
it was in default of the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant
(calculated as the ratio of debt to trailing four quarter
EBITDA), as measured at June 30, 2009, and on
September 1, 2009, lenders under the Second Lien Credit
Facility declared the loan in default and accelerated the
indebtedness. As a result of the declaration of default on
September 1, 2009, default interest of an additional 2% per
annum was imposed and the Company is prohibited from utilizing
the Eurodollar interest option in future borrowings under the
facility. Per the Second Lien Facility Credit Agreement, the
Second Lien administrative agent may deliver a notice in writing
to the First Lien administrative agent that an event of default
has occurred under the Second Lien Credit Agreement. After the
passage of a minimum of 180 days and up to 360 days
from the date of delivery of the written notice of default from
the Second Lien administrative agent to the First Lien
administrative agent, if the First Lien Facility lenders are
exercising their rights with respect to the collateral
(Standstill Period), the Second Lien administrative
agent may exercise any or all rights and remedies. In the event
that the rights and remedies by the First Lien administrative
agent and/or
the First Lien claimholders during the Standstill Period
continues for a period of 360 days or more, and no
insolvency or liquidation proceeding has been commenced by or
against the applicable loan parties, the Second Lien
administrative agent
and/or
Second Lien claimholders may initiate or otherwise support the
commencement of an involuntary insolvency or liquidation
proceeding against any or all of the loan parties. Due to the
covenant violation, Resolute has classified the outstanding
balance of its Second Lien Facility at June 30, 2009 as
current.
Income tax expense during interim periods is based on applying
an estimated annual effective income tax rate to year-to-date
income, plus any significant unusual or infrequently occurring
items which are recorded in the interim period. The provision
for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 differs from the amount that would be provided by applying
the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes primarily related to state income taxes and
estimated permanent differences.
F-45
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the components of the provision
for income taxes (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current income tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(109
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(1,973
|
)
|
|
|
5,519
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax benefit (expense)*
|
|
$
|
(2,082
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Tax expense (benefit) is calculated based on taxable income of
RNRC and RWI, which are taxable entities. Aneth, Sub, BWNR and
WYNR are pass-through entities for federal and state income tax
purposes. As such, neither current nor deferred income taxes are
recognized by these entities. |
Resolute recorded a full valuation allowance against its
deferred tax asset at June 30, 2009, as Resolute believes
that this asset may not be realized if it is unable to generate
future taxable income.
|
|
Note 10
|
Shareholders/Members
Equity and Equity Based Awards
|
Common
Stock
At December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, RNRC and RWI
each had 1,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 and
$1.00 per share, authorized, issued and outstanding,
respectively.
Members
Equity
At December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, members
equity included Aneth, WYNR, BWNR and Resources.
Incentive
Interests
Resources
Incentive Units were granted by Holdings to certain
of its members who were also officers, as well as to other
employees of Resources. The Incentive Units were intended to be
compensation for services provided to Resources. The original
terms of the five tiers of Incentive Units are as follows.
Tier I units vest ratably over three years, but are subject
to forfeiture if payout is not realized. Tier I payout is
realized at the return of members invested capital and a
specified rate of return. Tiers II through V vest upon
certain specified multiples of cash payout. Incentive Units are
forfeited if an employee of Resolute is either terminated for
cause or resigns as an employee. Any Incentive Units that are
forfeited by an individual employee revert to the founding
senior managers of Resolute and, therefore, the number of
Tier II through V Incentive Units is not expected to change.
On June 27, 2007, Holdings made a capital distribution of
$100 million to its equity owners from the proceeds of the
amended and restated second lien credit agreement described in
Note 8. This distribution
F-46
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
caused both the Tier I payout to be realized and the
Tier I Incentive Units to vest. As a result of the
distribution, management has determined that it is probable that
Tiers II-V incentive unit payouts will be achieved.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009,
Resolute recorded $1.8 million and $1.9 million of
equity based compensation expense in general and administrative
expense in the combined statements of operations. An additional
$96,000 and $0 of equity compensation expense was capitalized
and recorded in oil and gas properties during the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Resolute
amortizes the estimated fair value of the Incentive Units over
the remaining estimated vesting period using the straight-line
method. The estimated weighted average fair value remaining of
the Incentive Units was calculated using a discounted future net
cash flows model. No Incentive Units vested during the period
ended June 30, 2009.
A summary of the activity associated with Resolutes
Incentive Unit plan for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Units
|
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
17,797,801
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
17,797,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the status and activity of non-vested Incentive
Units of Holdings for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Incentive Units
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested, at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
6,190,539
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested, at June, 2009
|
|
|
6,190,539
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to Resolutes
non-vested Incentive Units totaled $6.2 million as of
June 30, 2009, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 0.75 years, 1.75 years,
2.75 years and 2.75 years for the Tier II,
Tier III, Tier IV and Tier V Incentive Units,
respectively.
Resolute
Wyoming, Inc
The Primary Natural Resources Holdings, LLC (PNRH)
Operating Agreement (the Operating Agreement)
provided for the issuance of up to 900,000 PNRH Incentive
Interests, consisting of 844,000 Incentive Units and
56,000 Incentive Options. PNR was wholly owned by PNRH prior to
the PNR acquisition. There were two categories for Incentive
Units, described as Tier I and Tier II. There was one
category for Incentive Options described as Tier I.
Tier I Incentive Units received preferential payout over
Tier II. Of the 844,000 Incentive Units, 484,000 and
360,000 were classified as Tier I and Tier II,
respectively. Holders of Incentive Units were entitled to cash
distributions following the sale, merger or other transaction
involving the stock or
F-47
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
assets of PNR after the recovery of capital contributions plus a
rate of return, specified as payout levels in the Operating
Agreement. The 844,000 Tier I and Tier II Incentive
Units were granted in January 2004 to certain members of
PNRs management.
The original terms of the PNRH Incentive Interests are as
follows. Tier I Incentive Units and Incentive Options vest
ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant or will
vest in full upon the occurrence of a Fundamental Change, as
defined in the Operating Agreement. However, unless a payout
level specified in the Operating Agreement is reached by
January 23, 2009, Tier I Incentive Units, whether
vested or not, will automatically become null and void. On
January 23, 2009, all unexercised Incentive Options
terminated. Tier II Units vest when a payout level
specified in the Operating Agreement is reached. If the payout
level specified for the Tier II Units is not reached by
January 23, 2009, the Tier II Units will automatically
become null and void. All Incentive Interests held by an
employee, whether vested or not, will be automatically forfeited
if the employee is terminated with or without reason, including
termination, death or disability.
Due to the acquisition of PNR on July 31, 2008, the
performance criteria related to the PNRH Incentive Interests
were achieved and the Incentive Interests fully vested. As a
result, $4.2 million of equity based compensation expense
was recorded in general and administrative expense during the
third quarter of 2008. No further equity based compensation
expense will be recorded related to these Incentive Interests.
Equity
Appreciation Rights
In November 2006 and May 2008, 2,500,000 and 3,000,000 Equity
Appreciation Rights (EARs) were authorized,
respectively. The EARs are periodically granted by Sub to
certain of Resources employees. The EARs represent
contract rights to a certain portion of future distributions of
cash by Sub. These EARs do not vest, except with respect to
distributions actually made, and are forfeited upon an
employees separation from Resolute. There is no expiration
date for the EARs.
Resolute has not assigned any value or recognized any share
based compensation expense related to the EARs because Resolute
believes it is not probable that any distributions will be made
in respect of such EARs prior to the forfeiture of such EARs,
because of managements opinion that distributions
sufficient to cause a distribution with respect to the EARs
would not occur without additional external financing or the
sale of Resolute.
On May 29, 2008, Resources, on behalf Sub, entered into
Agreements with several employees permitting those employees to
make an offer to exchange for cash some or all of the EARs
issued in 2006 and 2007 under the EARs Plan, dated
November 27, 2006. The participant could elect to offer to
exchange all or any portion of their EARs for time vested cash
awards equal to $2.00 per unit plus simple interest of 15% per
annum on the outstanding face value of the cash awards
commencing January 1, 2008. The cash awards are payable in
three installments on January 1, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
During 2008, a total of 394,878 units were exchanged from
employees under this agreement. For the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2009, $191,000 and $124,000 of
compensation expense was recognized, respectively.
Also, on May 29, 2008, several employees were offered an
agreement allowing them to accept new award units in the form of
either (a) a time vested cash award of $1 per award unit,
payable in three installments on January 1, 2009, 2010 and
2011 plus simple interest of 15% per annum, effective
January 1, 2008 or, (b) a comparable number of EARs.
During 2008, a total of 1,659,400 EARs were granted and 213,700
time vested
F-48
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
cash award units were issued. For the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2009, $52,000 and $41,000 of compensation
expense was recognized, respectively.
The time vested cash awards are accounted for as deferred
compensation. The annual payments are paid based on the
employees tenure with Resources and there is potential for
forfeiture of the time vested payment, therefore Resolute will
accrue for each time vested payment and related return for the
respective year on an annual basis.
Total EARs issued and outstanding for the periods ended
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 was 3,076,000 and
2,636,700 respectively. A summary of the activity associated
with the EARs for the six months ended June 30, 2009, is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARs
|
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
3,076,000
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(439,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
2,636,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
Resolute enters into commodity derivative contracts to manage
its exposure to oil and gas price volatility. Resolute has not
elected to designate derivative instruments as cash flow hedges
under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. As a result,
these derivative instruments are marked to market at the end of
each reporting period and changes in the fair value are recorded
in the accompanying combined statements of operations. Realized
and unrealized gains and losses from Resolutes price risk
management activities are recognized in other income (expense)
with realized gains and losses recognized in the period in which
the related production is sold. The cash flows from derivatives
are reported as cash flows from operating activities unless the
derivative contract is deemed to contain a financing element.
Derivatives deemed to contain a financing element are reported
as financing activities in the statement of cash flows.
Commodity derivative contracts may take the form of futures
contracts, swaps or options.
As of June 30, 2009, Resolute had entered into certain
commodity swap contracts. The following table represents
Resolutes commodity swaps with respect to its estimated
oil and gas production from proved developed producing
properties through 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (NYMEX HH)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI)
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Hedge Price per
|
|
Year
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
|
MMBtu per Day
|
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
62.75
|
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
$
|
57.83
|
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
$
|
9.32
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
68.26
|
|
|
$
|
7.42
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
$
|
60.47
|
|
|
$
|
7.40
|
|
F-49
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Resolute also uses basis swaps in connection with gas swaps in
order to fix the price differential between the NYMEX Henry Hub
price and the index price at which the gas production is sold.
The table below sets forth Resolutes outstanding basis
swaps as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differential per
|
Year
|
|
Index
|
|
MMBtu per Day
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
2009-2013
|
|
|
Rocky Mountain NWPL
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, Resolute had entered into certain
commodity collar contracts. The following table represents
Resolutes commodity collars with respect to its estimated
oil and gas production from proved developed producing
properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas CIG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (NYMEX WTI)
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Hedge Price per
|
Year
|
|
Bbl per Day
|
|
MMBtu per Day
|
|
Hedge Price per Bbl
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
2009
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
105.00-151.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00-9.35
|
|
2010
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105.00-151.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolutes derivative instruments are not designated and do
not qualify as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133.
For financial reporting purposes, Resolute does not offset asset
and liability fair value amounts recognized for derivative
instruments with the same counterparty. The table below
summarizes the location and fair value amounts of
Resolutes commodity derivative instruments reported in the
combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
19,017
|
|
|
$
|
9,501
|
|
Other assets: derivative instruments
|
|
|
18,114
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
37,131
|
|
|
|
16,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: derivative instruments
|
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
|
(18,142
|
)
|
Noncurrent liabilities: derivative instruments
|
|
|
(20,193
|
)
|
|
|
(37,950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
(21,334
|
)
|
|
|
(56,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
15,797
|
|
|
$
|
(39,557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Because Resolutes derivative instruments are not
designated and do not qualify as hedging instruments under
SFAS No. 133, the gains and losses are included in
other income (expense) in the combined statements of operations.
The table below summarizes the location and amount of commodity
derivative instrument gains and losses reported in the combined
statements of operations for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2009 respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses)
|
|
$
|
(26,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,039
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
(175,261
|
)
|
|
|
(55,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: (loss) gain on derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
(202,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Risk and Contingent features in derivative instruments
Resolute is exposed to credit risk to the extent of
nonperformance by the counterparties in the derivative contracts
discussed above. With the exception of one contract, all
counterparties are also lenders under Resolutes First Lien
Facility. Resolute is not required to provide any credit support
to its counterparties other than cross collateralization with
the properties securing the First Lien Facility. The one
counterparty that is not among Resolutes lenders is a
highly-rated entity with a corporate credit rating exceeding AA-
as classified by Standard and Poors. Resolutes
derivative contracts are documented with industry standard
contracts known as a Schedule to the Master Agreement and
International Swaps and Derivative Association, Inc. Master
Agreement (ISDA). Typical terms for the ISDAs
include credit support requirements, cross default provisions,
termination events, and set-off provisions. Resolute has set-off
provisions with its lenders that, in the event of counterparty
default, allow Resolute to set-off amounts owed under the First
Lien Facility or other general obligations against monies owed
for derivative contracts. Accordingly, the maximum amount of
loss in the event of all counterparties defaulting is
$1.1 million as of June 30, 2009, after netting any
amounts payable by Resolute to its counterparties.
See Note 12 for further discussion of derivative
instruments.
|
|
Note 12
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. This statement clarifies the
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. On January 1, 2008, Resolute adopted FSP
No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, electing
to partially adopt SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. During 2008, Resolute did not apply
SFAS No. 157 to nonrecurring fair value measurements
of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, including
nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for an
impairment assessment and asset retirement obligations initially
measured at fair value.
Pursuant to the provisions of FSP
No. 157-2,
Resolute fully adopted SFAS No. 157 as it relates to
all nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized
or disclosed on a recurring basis (e.g. those measured at fair
value in a business combination, the initial recognition of
asset retirement obligations, and impairments
F-51
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
of goodwill and other long-lived assets) as of January 1,
2009. The full adoption of SFAS 157, however, did not have
a material impact on Resolutes combined financial
statements or its disclosures.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (an exact price) in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. The statement
establishes market or observable inputs as the preferred sources
of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical
transactions in the absence of market inputs. The statement
establishes a hierarchy for grouping these assets and
liabilities, based on the significance level of the following
inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices in active markets for
similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active, and
model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose
significant value drivers are observable
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Significant inputs to the valuation
model are unobservable
|
An asset or liability subject to the fair value requirements is
categorized within the hierarchy based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Resolutes assessment of the significance of a particular
input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires
judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or
liability. Following is a description of the valuation
methodologies used by Resolute as well as the general
classification of such instruments pursuant to the hierarchy.
As of June 30, 2009, Resolutes commodity derivative
instruments were required to be measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. Resolute used the income approach in
determining the fair value of its derivative instruments,
utilizing present value techniques for valuing its swaps and
basis swaps and option-pricing models for valuing its collars.
Inputs to these valuation techniques include published forward
index prices, volatilities, and credit risk considerations,
including the incorporation of published interest rates and
credit spreads. Substantially all of these assumptions are
observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the
contract, can be derived from observable data or are supported
by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the
marketplace, and are therefore designated as Level 2 within
the valuation hierarchy.
The following is a listing of Resolutes assets and
liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring
basis and where they are classified within the hierarchy as of
June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of commodity derivative assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,501
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,501
|
|
Non-current portion of commodity derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,535
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of commodity derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,142
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,142
|
)
|
Non-current portion of commodity derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(56,092
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(56,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Resolute entered into two take-or-pay purchase agreements, each
with a different supplier, under which Resolute has committed to
buy specified volumes of carbon dioxide. The purchased carbon
dioxide is for use in Resolutes enhanced tertiary recovery
projects in Greater Aneth Field. In each case, Resolute is
obligated to purchase a minimum daily volume of carbon dioxide
or pay for any deficiencies at the price in effect when delivery
was to have occurred. The carbon dioxide volumes planned for use
on the enhanced recovery projects exceed the minimum daily
volumes provided in this take-or-pay purchase agreement.
Therefore, Resolute expects to avoid any payments for
deficiencies.
One contract was effective July 1, 2006, and has a four
year term. As of June 30, 2009, future commitments under
this purchase agreement amounted to approximately
$1.1 million for the remainder of 2009 and
$2.2 million in 2010, based on prices in effect at
June 30, 2009. The second contract was entered into on
May 25, 2005, and was amended on July 1, 2007, and has
a ten year term. Future commitments under this purchase
agreement amounted to approximately $36.8 million through
June 2016 based on prices in effect on June 30, 2009. The
annual minimum obligation by year is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
July 2009 - December 2009
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On August 2, 2009, Resolute and Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc. (HACI) agreed to a business
combination under the terms of a Purchase and IPO Reorganization
Agreement (Acquisition Agreement). In connection
with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the
Acquisition Agreement HACI stockholders will acquire a majority
of the outstanding common stock of Resolute Energy Corporation
and Resolute Energy Corporation will own, either directly or
indirectly, 100% of the equity interests of HACI and Resolute
with the exception of Aneth, in which Resolute Energy
Corporation will indirectly own a 99.9943% equity interest. In
accordance with HACIs charter, if HACI is unable to
consummate a business combination by September 28, 2009,
its corporate existence will automatically terminate and it will
dissolve and liquidate and promptly distribute to its
stockholders holding public shares the amount in its trust
account plus any remaining non-trust account funds after payment
of its liabilities.
Resolute sells all of its crude oil production from the Aneth
field to a single customer, Western Refining Southwest, Inc., a
subsidiary of Western Refining, Inc., under a contract that
terminates August 31, 2009. Resolute and Western entered
into a new contract on August 27, 2009, effective
September 1, 2009, with an initial term of one year and
continuing month-to-month thereafter, with either party having
the right to terminate after the initial term, upon ninety days
written notice. The contract may also be terminated by
F-53
RESOLUTE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
WYNR, LLC
BWNR, LLC
RESOLUTE WYOMING, INC.
RNRC HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Western after December 31, 2009, upon sixty days written
notice, if Western is not able to renew its right-of-way
agreements with the Navajo Nation or if such rights-of-way are
declared invalid and it is prevented from using such rights-of
way. The new contract provides for a minimum price equal to the
NYMEX price for crude oil less a fixed differential of $6.25 per
Bbl, which is consistent with the existing contract.
|
|
Note 15
|
Financial
Statement Restatement
|
Resolute restated its combined financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Subsequent to the issuance of its
2008 combined financial statements, Resolutes management
determined that the analysis of the full cost ceiling test did
not properly take into account the impact of the deferred income
taxes. As a result, the combined balance sheet includes an
additional $17.0 million provision for impairment of oil
and gas properties and a related increase to deferred tax asset
of $6.1 million.
The balance sheet items impacted by this restatement as of
December 31, 2008 are indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties(a)
|
|
|
365,099
|
|
|
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
|
348,058
|
|
Net oil and gas properties(a)
|
|
|
280,097
|
|
|
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
|
263,056
|
|
Net property and equipment(a)
|
|
|
282,704
|
|
|
|
(17,041
|
)
|
|
|
265,663
|
|
Deferred income taxes noncurrent asset(b)
|
|
|
8,608
|
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
|
14,705
|
|
Total other assets(a)(b)
|
|
|
45,138
|
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
|
51,235
|
|
Total assets(a)(b)
|
|
|
371,791
|
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
360,847
|
|
Accumulated deficit(c)
|
|
|
(18,492
|
)
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
(29,436
|
)
|
Total shareholders/members deficit(c)
|
|
|
(134,725
|
)
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
(145,669
|
)
|
Total liabilities and shareholders/members deficit(c)
|
|
|
371,791
|
|
|
|
(10,944
|
)
|
|
|
360,847
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Adjustment related to the full cost ceiling test based on not
properly taking into account the impact of the deferred taxes. |
|
(b) |
|
Adjustments related to the tax effect for the additional
impairment to proved properties. |
|
(c) |
|
Additional net loss incurred due to the additional impairment
and related taxes. |
F-54
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board
of Directors of
Resolute Energy Corporation
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Resolute
Energy Corporation (the Company) as of
August 3, 2009. This financial statement is the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial
statement based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of
material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor
were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the balance sheet presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Resolute Energy
Corporation as of August 3, 2009, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Denver, Colorado
August 5, 2009
F-55
RESOLUTE
ENERGY CORPORATION
Balance
Sheet
August 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100 shares authorized,
issued, and outstanding at August 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to balance sheet
F-56
RESOLUTE
ENERGY CORPORATION
August 3,
2009
Note 1
Organization
Resolute Energy Corporation, or the Company, a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on
July 28, 2009, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resolute
Holdings Sub, LLC. The Company was formed by Resolute Holdings
Sub, LLC to consummate an acquisition (business combination of
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. (HACI) and Resolute
Holdings Sub, LLC). As a result of the acquisition, through a
series of transactions, the holders of HACI common stock and
HACI warrants, will own approximately 82% of the outstanding
Company Common Stock and Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC will own
approximately 18% of the outstanding Company Common Stock.
Note 2
Basis of Presentation
The Balance Sheet of Resolute Energy Corporation as of
August 3, 2009 was prepared in accordance with
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP).
Note 3
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company does not have any commitments and contingencies.
F-57
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Resolute Natural Resources Company
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying statements of revenues and
direct operating expenses of the properties (the
ExxonMobil Properties) acquired by Resolute Aneth,
LLC (the Company) from ExxonMobil for the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005. These statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the statements.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
The accompanying statements were prepared for the purpose of
complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission as described in Note 2 to the
statements and are not intended to be a complete presentation of
the Companys interests in the ExxonMobil Properties
described above.
In our opinion, the statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the revenues and direct operating
expenses, described in Note 2, of the ExxonMobil Properties
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
February 2, 2007
Denver, Colorado
F-58
EXXONMOBIL
PROPERTIES
Statements
of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues oil and gas production
|
|
$
|
44,960,851
|
|
|
$
|
50,983,837
|
|
|
$
|
67,707,944
|
|
|
$
|
15,091,644
|
|
|
$
|
16,658,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
|
9,908,790
|
|
|
|
11,889,669
|
|
|
|
12,511,167
|
|
|
|
2,926,030
|
|
|
|
3,247,802
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
5,395,302
|
|
|
|
6,305,998
|
|
|
|
8,019,769
|
|
|
|
1,787,552
|
|
|
|
2,011,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct operating expenses
|
|
|
15,304,092
|
|
|
|
18,195,667
|
|
|
|
20,530,936
|
|
|
|
4,713,582
|
|
|
|
5,259,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues in excess of direct operating expenses
|
|
$
|
29,656,759
|
|
|
$
|
32,788,170
|
|
|
$
|
47,177,008
|
|
|
$
|
10,378,062
|
|
|
$
|
11,398,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
EXXONMOBIL
PROPERTIES
Notes to
the Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating
Expenses
|
|
Note 1
|
Operations,
Organization, and Basis of Presentation
|
The accompanying statements represent the interests in the
revenues and direct operating expenses of the oil and natural
gas producing properties acquired by Resolute Aneth, LLC (the
Company) from ExxonMobil on April 16, 2006,
effective January 1, 2005. The properties are referred to
herein as the ExxonMobil Properties.
Oil and gas revenues and direct operating expenses relate to the
Companys net revenue interests and net working interests,
respectively, in the ExxonMobil Properties. With respect to gas
sales, the sales method is used for recording revenues. Under
this approach, each party recognizes revenue based on actual
sales regardless of its proportionate share of the related
sales. The revenue from oil and gas production has been based on
historical product prices at the point of sale using the net
revenue and working interests purchased by the Company. The
effect on revenues of gas imbalances is not material.
Direct operating expenses include payroll, lease and well
repairs, production and ad valorem taxes, maintenance, utilities
and other direct operating expenses.
During the periods presented, the ExxonMobil Properties were not
accounted for as a separate entity. Certain costs such as
depletion, depreciation and amortization, accretion of asset
retirement obligations, general and administrative expenses,
interest expense and corporate taxes were not allocated to the
ExxonMobil Properties.
The accompanying statements of revenues and direct operating
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006
are unaudited, and in the opinion of management, reflect all
adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of the
revenues and direct operating expenses for the periods
presented. The direct operating results for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 are not necessarily
indicative of the direct operating results for the entire year.
Use
of Estimates
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of
estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of revenues
and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled
transactions and events as of the date of the financial
statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may
differ from estimated amounts.
|
|
Note 2
|
Omitted
Financial Information
|
Historical financial statements reflecting financial position,
results of operations and cash flows required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
are not presented as such information is not available on an
individual property basis and not meaningful to the ExxonMobil
Properties. Historically, no allocation of general and
administrative, interest, corporate taxes, accretion of asset
retirement obligations, depletion, depreciation and amortization
was made to the ExxonMobil Properties. Accordingly, the
statements are presented in lieu of the financial statements
required under
Rule 3-01
of the Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-X.
F-60
EXXONMOBIL
PROPERTIES
Notes to
the Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating
Expenses (Continued)
|
|
Note 3
|
Supplemental
Disclosures on Oil and Gas Exploration, Development and
Production Activities (Unaudited)
|
Reserves
The following table summarizes the net ownership interests in
estimated quantities of the proved oil and gas reserves of the
ExxonMobil Properties at December 31, 2005, estimated by
the Companys petroleum engineers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MBbl
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
14,848
|
|
Proved undeveloped reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total proved reserves
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
15,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MBbl
|
|
|
Proved reserves as of January 1, 2003
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
14,278
|
|
Production in 2003
|
|
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
Revisions
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved reserves as of December 31, 2003
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
13,343
|
|
Production in 2004
|
|
|
(1,101
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
Revisions
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved reserves as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
14,323
|
|
Production in 2005
|
|
|
(1,145
|
)
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
Revisions
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
Improved/enhanced recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved reserves as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
15,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized
Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved
Oil and Gas Reserves
The following table presents the Standardized Measure of
Discounted Future Net Cash Flows before future income taxes from
proved oil and gas reserves of the ExxonMobil Properties. As
prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the
amounts shown are based on prices and costs at January 1,
2003, December 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005, and assume
continuation of existing economic conditions. A discount factor
of 10% was used to reflect the timing of future net cash flow.
Extensive judgments are involved in estimating the timing of
production and the costs that will be incurred throughout the
remaining lives of the fields. Accordingly, the estimates of
future net cash flows from proved reserves and the present value
thereof may not be materially correct when judged against actual
subsequent results. Further, since prices and costs do not
remain static, and no price or cost changes have been
considered, and future production and development costs are
estimates to be incurred in developing and producing the
estimated proved oil and gas reserves, the
F-61
EXXONMOBIL
PROPERTIES
Notes to
the Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating
Expenses (Continued)
results are not necessarily indicative of the fair market value
of estimated proved reserves, and the results may not be
comparable to estimates disclosed by other oil and gas producers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
398,738
|
|
|
$
|
583,115
|
|
|
$
|
932,447
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(253,079
|
)
|
|
|
(326,911
|
)
|
|
|
(435,629
|
)
|
Future development costs
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(4,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows
|
|
|
145,432
|
|
|
|
256,191
|
|
|
|
491,910
|
|
10% annual discount for estimating timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(57,682
|
)
|
|
|
(111,025
|
)
|
|
|
(245,668
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized Measure (before income taxes) of discounted future
net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves
|
|
$
|
87,750
|
|
|
$
|
145,166
|
|
|
$
|
246,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
$
|
89,173
|
|
|
$
|
87,750
|
|
|
$
|
145,166
|
|
Sales of oil and natural gas produced, net of production expenses
|
|
|
(29,387
|
)
|
|
|
(32,788
|
)
|
|
|
(47,177
|
)
|
Net change in sales and transfer prices, net of production costs
|
|
|
7,636
|
|
|
|
39,829
|
|
|
|
92,363
|
|
Extensions and discoveries and improved recovery, net of future
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,117
|
|
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,556
|
)
|
Development costs incurred
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Revisions of quantity estimates
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
25,305
|
|
|
|
34,781
|
|
Changes in production rates and other
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
16,082
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
8,917
|
|
|
|
8,775
|
|
|
|
14,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
87,750
|
|
|
$
|
145,166
|
|
|
$
|
246,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hicks
Acquisition Company I, Inc. (a development stage company)
(the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders equity and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, for the
period February 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31,
2007 and the period February 26, 2007 (inception) to
December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2008, for the period February 26, 2007
(inception) to December 31, 2007 and the period
February 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2008 in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
assuming that Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. will
continue as a going concern. As more fully described in
note 1, the Company must consummate a business combination
by September 28, 2009 or be dissolved. This condition
raises substantial doubt about the Companys ability to
continue as a going concern. Managements plans in regard
to this matter is described in note 1. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Hicks
Acquisition Company I, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated March 9, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2009
F-63
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.:
We have audited Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.s
(the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
balance sheets of Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 2008, for the period
February 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007 and
the period February 26, 2007 (inception) to
December 31, 2008, and our report dated March 9, 2009
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Our report dated March 9, 2009 contains an explanatory
paragraph that the Company must consummate a business
combination by September 28, 2009 or be dissolved, which
condition raises substantial doubt about the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2009
F-64
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
819,061
|
|
|
$
|
52,053
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents held in trust
|
|
|
250,023,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities held in trust
|
|
|
290,117,945
|
|
|
|
541,301,789
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
67,530
|
|
|
|
267,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
541,028,090
|
|
|
|
541,621,640
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
269,305
|
|
|
|
154,751
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
3,499,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
544,797,348
|
|
|
$
|
541,842,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
633,889
|
|
|
$
|
655,871
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
200,983
|
|
|
|
489,287
|
|
Accrued federal and state taxes
|
|
|
1,004,011
|
|
|
|
1,671,956
|
|
Accrued expenses related party
|
|
|
63,705
|
|
|
|
117,278
|
|
Deferred underwriters commission
|
|
|
17,388,000
|
|
|
|
17,388,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$
|
19,290,588
|
|
|
$
|
20,322,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, subject to possible redemption;
16,559,999 shares at $9.71 per share at December 31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
|
160,797,590
|
|
|
|
160,797,590
|
|
Deferred interest attributable to common stock subject to
possible redemption (net of taxes of $1,313,840 and $525,674 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
2,509,186
|
|
|
|
1,020,426
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized
1,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding at
December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized
225,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding
69,000,000 shares (less 16,559,999 shares subject to
possible redemption) at December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
5,244
|
|
|
|
5,244
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
357,999,322
|
|
|
|
357,999,322
|
|
Earnings accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
4,195,418
|
|
|
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
362,199,984
|
|
|
|
359,701,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
544,797,348
|
|
|
$
|
541,842,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-65
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(cumulative)
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formation and operating costs
|
|
$
|
673,502
|
|
|
$
|
196,885
|
|
|
$
|
870,387
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
718,759
|
|
|
|
722,023
|
|
|
|
1,440,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before other income (expense) and income
tax expense
|
|
|
(1,392,261
|
)
|
|
|
(918,908
|
)
|
|
|
(2,311,169
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
7,601,056
|
|
|
|
5,153,789
|
|
|
|
12,754,845
|
|
State taxes other than income taxes
|
|
|
(167,935
|
)
|
|
|
(116,553
|
)
|
|
|
(284,488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
7,433,121
|
|
|
|
5,037,236
|
|
|
|
12,470,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
6,040,860
|
|
|
|
4,118,328
|
|
|
|
10,159,188
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2,053,932
|
|
|
|
1,400,652
|
|
|
|
3,454,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,986,928
|
|
|
|
2,717,676
|
|
|
|
6,704,604
|
|
Deferred interest, net of taxes, attributable to common stock
subject to possible redemption
|
|
|
(1,488,760
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020,426
|
)
|
|
|
(2,509,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
2,498,168
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
$
|
4,195,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
24,002,143
|
|
|
|
39,425,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional paid-in
|
|
|
development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
stage
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
Initial capital from founding stockholder for cash
|
|
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,150
|
|
|
$
|
23,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Stock dividend
|
|
|
2,300,000
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of 55,200,000 units, net of underwriters
discount and offering costs
|
|
|
55,200,000
|
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
|
|
511,771,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511,777,156
|
|
Proceeds subject to possible redemption of 16,559,999 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
(160,795,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,797,590
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of warrants to sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
69,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,244
|
|
|
$
|
357,999,322
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
$
|
359,701,816
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,498,168
|
|
|
|
2,498,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
69,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,244
|
|
|
$
|
357,999,322
|
|
|
$
|
4,195,418
|
|
|
$
|
362,199,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(cumulative)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
2,498,168
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
$
|
4,195,418
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to common stock
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred tax asset
|
|
|
(114,554
|
)
|
|
|
(154,751
|
)
|
|
|
(269,305
|
)
|
Deferred interest attributable to common stock subject to
possible redemption
|
|
|
1,488,760
|
|
|
|
1,020,426
|
|
|
|
2,509,186
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
266,101
|
|
|
|
(333,631
|
)
|
|
|
(67,530
|
)
|
Accrued federal and state taxes
|
|
|
(667,945
|
)
|
|
|
1,671,956
|
|
|
|
1,004,011
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(97,782
|
)
|
|
|
655,871
|
|
|
|
558,089
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(288,304
|
)
|
|
|
489,287
|
|
|
|
200,983
|
|
Accrued expenses related party
|
|
|
(53,573
|
)
|
|
|
117,278
|
|
|
|
63,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,030,871
|
|
|
|
5,163,686
|
|
|
|
8,194,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents held in trust account
|
|
|
250,023,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,023,554
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities held in trust, net of
maturities
|
|
|
(248,863,264
|
)
|
|
|
(541,301,789
|
)
|
|
|
(790,165,053
|
)
|
Payment of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
(3,424,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,424,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,263,863
|
)
|
|
|
(541,301,789
|
)
|
|
|
(543,565,652
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from note payable related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Payment on note payable related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,000
|
)
|
|
|
(225,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of units to sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Proceeds from sale of warrants to initial founder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of underwriters
discount and offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,165,156
|
|
|
|
529,165,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,190,156
|
|
|
|
536,190,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
767,008
|
|
|
|
52,053
|
|
|
|
819,061
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
52,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
819,061
|
|
|
$
|
52,053
|
|
|
$
|
819,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing and investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual of deferred underwriters commission
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,388,000
|
|
|
$
|
17,388,000
|
|
Accrual of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
$
|
75,800
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,800
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
2,750,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,750,000
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-68
|
|
Note 1
|
Organization
and Nature of Business Operations
|
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. (the Company)
was incorporated in Delaware on February 26, 2007 as a
blank check company formed for the purpose of acquiring, or
acquiring control of, through a merger, capital stock exchange,
asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar
business combination one or more businesses or assets.
The Company has neither engaged in any operations nor generated
any revenue to date. The activity from February 26, 2007 to
December 31, 2008 relates to the Companys formation
and its initial public offering described below and in
Note 3. The Company has selected December 31 as its fiscal
year end.
The registration statement for the Companys initial public
offering (the Offering) was declared effective
September 27, 2007. The Company consummated the Offering on
October 3, 2007 and received proceeds of approximately
$529.1 million, net of underwriters commissions of
approximately $21.3 million and offering costs and other
expenses of $1.6 million. The Company sold to the public
55,200,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit, including
7,200,000 units issued pursuant to the exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. Simultaneously with
the consummation of the Offering, the Company consummated the
private sale of 7,000,000 warrants to HH-HACI, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership (the Sponsor), at a price of
$1.00 per sponsors warrant, generating gross proceeds,
before expenses, of $7 million (the Private
Placement). Net proceeds received by the Company from the
consummation of both the Offering and Private Placement of
sponsors warrants totaled approximately
$536.1 million, net of underwriters commissions and
offering costs. The net proceeds were placed in a trust account
at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. with Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee.
The Companys management has broad discretion with respect
to the specific application of the net proceeds of the Offering,
although substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering
are intended to be generally applied toward consummating one or
more business combinations with an operating company. The
Companys initial business combination must occur with one
or more target businesses that collectively have a fair market
value of at least 80% of the initial amount held in the trust
account (excluding the amount held in the trust account
representing the underwriters deferred commission). If the
Company acquires less than 100% of one or more target
businesses, the aggregate fair market value of the portion or
portions the Company acquires must equal at least 80% of the
amount held in the trust account. In no event, however, will the
Company acquire less than a controlling interest of a target
business (that is, not less than 50% of the voting equity
interests of the target business).
The Companys efforts in identifying prospective target
businesses will not be limited to a particular industry.
Instead, the Company intends to focus on various industries and
target businesses that may provide significant opportunities for
growth. However, the Company will not complete a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry as its
principal business or whose principal business operations are
conducted outside of the United States or Canada.
Proceeds of the Offering and Private Placement are held in a
trust account and will only be released to the Company upon the
earlier of: (i) the consummation of an initial business
combination; or (ii) the Companys liquidation. The
proceeds in the trust account include the underwriters
deferred commission which equals 3.15% of the gross proceeds of
the Offering. Upon consummation of an initial business
combination, approximately $17.4 million, which constitutes
the underwriters deferred commissions, will be paid to the
underwriters from the funds held in the trust account. The
proceeds outside of the trust account as well as the interest
income of up to $6.6 million (net of taxes payable), earned
on the trust account balance that may be released to the Company
may be used to pay for business, legal and accounting due
diligence on prospective acquisitions and continuing general and
administrative expenses; provided, however, that after such
release
F-69
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
there remains in the trust account a sufficient amount of
interest income previously earned on the trust account balance
to pay any taxes on such $6.6 million of interest income.
The Company will seek stockholder approval before it will effect
an initial business combination, even if the business
combination would not ordinarily require stockholder approval
under applicable law. In connection with the stockholder vote
required to approve any initial business combination, the
Companys existing stockholders, HH-HACI, L.P., and certain
of the Companys directors have agreed to vote the
founders shares (as defined in Note 6 below) owned by
them immediately before the Offering in accordance with the
majority of the shares of common stock voted by the public
stockholders. Public stockholders is defined as the
holders of common stock sold as part of the units, as defined,
in the Offering or in the aftermarket. The Company will proceed
with an initial business combination only if (i) the
business combination is approved by a majority of votes cast by
the Companys public stockholders at a duly held
stockholders meeting, (ii) an amendment to the
Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation
to provide for the Companys perpetual existence is
approved by holders of a majority of the Companys
outstanding shares of common stock, (iii) public
stockholders owning no more than 30% (minus one share) of the
Companys outstanding shares of common stock sold in the
Offering both vote against the business combination and exercise
their conversion rights, and (iv) the Company has confirmed
that it has sufficient cash resources to pay both (x) the
consideration required to close its initial business
combination, and (y) the cash due to public stockholders
who vote against the business combination and who exercise their
conversion rights. If the conditions to consummate the proposed
business combination are not met but sufficient time remains
before the Companys corporate life expires, the Company
may attempt to effect another business combination. With respect
to a business combination which is approved and consummated, any
Public stockholder who voted against the business combination
may exercise their conversion rights as described above, and
demand that the Company redeem their shares for cash from the
trust fund. Accordingly, the Company has classified 30% (minus
one share) of the Public stockholders shares as temporary
equity in the accompanying balance sheet.
If the initial business combination is approved and completed,
each public stockholder voting against such qualifying business
combination will be entitled to convert its shares of common
stock into a pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on
deposit in the trust account (including deferred underwriting
commissions and interest earned on the trust account, net of
income taxes payable on such interest and net of interest income
of up to $6.6 million, on the trust account released to
fund the Companys working capital requirements). Public
stockholders who convert their stock into their share of the
trust account will continue to have the right to exercise any
warrants they may hold.
The Company will liquidate and promptly distribute only to the
public stockholders the amount in the trust account, less any
income taxes payable on interest income and any interest income
of up to $6.6 million, on the balance (net of taxes
payable) of the trust account previously released to the Company
to fund its working capital requirements, plus any remaining net
assets if the Company does not consummate a business combination
by September 28, 2009. If the Company fails to consummate
such business combination by September 28, 2009, the
Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation
provides that the Companys corporate existence will
automatically cease on September 28, 2009, except for the
purpose of winding up its affairs and liquidating. In the event
of liquidation, the per share value of the residual assets
remaining available for distribution (including trust account
assets) may be more or less than the initial public offering
price per share (assuming no value is attributed to the warrants
contained in the units to be offered in the Offering discussed
in Note 3). In the event of the consummation of a
successful initial business combination, the earnings per share
will be affected by the dilution attributable to the sponsors
shares and warrants.
While the Company hopes to successfully complete a business
combination within the time frame discussed above, there is no
assurance that the Company will be able to successfully complete
a business
F-70
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
combination within such time frame. That factor and the
Companys declining cash available outside of the
Trust Account raise substantial doubt about the
Companys ability to continue as a going concern.
|
|
Note 2
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Such cash and cash equivalents, at times, may
exceed federally insured limits. The Company maintains its
accounts with financial institutions with high credit ratings.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents Held in Trust
Cash and cash equivalents held in trust are with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., and Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company serves as the trustee. The Company considers
all highly liquid investment placed in trust with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. These
consist of JPMorgan U.S. Treasury Plus Money Market Fund of
$250,007,027 plus accrued interest of $16,527 at
December 31, 2008. There were no cash and cash equivalents
held in trust at December 31, 2007. Subsequent to
December 31, 2008, we invested the funds previously held in
the JPMorgan U.S. Treasury Plus Money Market Fund in
U.S. Treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or
less.
Marketable
Securities Held in Trust
Marketable securities held in trust are with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., and Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company serves as the trustee. The marketable
securities held in trust are invested in cash, cash equivalents
and U.S. Treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or
less.
Earnings
per Common Share
Earnings per share is computed by dividing net income
attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. The weighted
average common shares issued and outstanding of 52,440,001 used
for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for
the twelve month period ending December 31, 2008, takes
into effect the 69,000,000 shares outstanding for the
entire period (less 16,559,999 shares subject to possible
redemption). The weighted average common shares issued and
outstanding of 24,002,143 used for the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the period February 26, 2007
(inception) to December 31, 2007, takes into effect the
13,800,000 shares outstanding for the entire period and the
55,200,000 shares (less 16,559,999 shares subject to
possible redemption) sold in the initial public offering and
outstanding since October 3, 2007.
The 76,000,000 warrants related to the Offering, Private
Placement and the founders unit are contingently issuable
shares and are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per share.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
F-71
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income
Taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided for the differences between
the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and
income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
to be realized. The Company recorded a deferred income tax asset
for the tax effect of certain temporary differences, aggregating
approximately $269,000 and $155,000 at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Deferred
Acquisition Costs
As of December 31, 2008, the Company has accumulated
approximately $3.5 million in deferred costs related to the
proposed Graham Transaction. These costs are capitalized
contingent upon any completion of such transaction. Deferred
acquisition costs consist primarily of approximately
$1.5 million for legal services, $1.6 million for due
diligence services and $0.4 million for other related deal
expenses.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement No. 141(revised 2007), Business
Combinations, (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R
establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill
acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. This statement is
effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. SFAS 141R
will be applied prospectively to business combinations with an
acquisition date on or after the effective date. As a result of
the adoption of SFAS 141R, we expect that approximately
$3.5 million will be expensed in our financial statements
on January 1, 2009 due to the deferred acquisition costs.
SFAS 141R no longer allows deferral of these costs.
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not
effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would
have a material effect on the Companys financial
statements, other than the adoption of SFAS 141R described
above.
|
|
Note 3
|
Initial
Public Offering
|
On October 3, 2007, the Company sold to the public
55,200,000 units at a price of $10.00, which included
7,200,000 shares issued pursuant to the underwriters
over-allotment option. Each unit consists of one share of the
Companys common stock, $0.0001 par value, and one
warrant.
Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase from the Company
one share of common stock at a price of $7.50 on the later of
completion of the initial business combination or twelve months
from the date of the closing of the Offering, provided in each
case that the Company has an effective registration statement in
effect covering the shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrants. The warrants expire September 28,
2011 unless earlier redeemed. Once the warrants become
exercisable, they will be redeemable in whole but not in part at
a price of $0.01 per warrant upon a minimum of
30 days notice, but such redemption may only occur if
the last sale price of the common stock equals or exceeds $13.75
per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period
ending three business days prior to the time that the Company
sends the notice of redemption to the warrant holders.
|
|
Note 4
|
Proposed
Business Combination
|
On July 1, 2008, the Company entered into an Equity
Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement), with
GPC Holdings, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, Graham
Packaging Corporation, a Pennsylvania
F-72
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
corporation, Graham Capital Company, a Pennsylvania limited
partnership, Graham Engineering Corporation, a Pennsylvania
corporation, BMP/Graham Holdings Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, GPC Capital Corp. II, a Delaware corporation
(Graham IPO Corp.), Graham Packing Holdings Company,
a Pennsylvania limited partnership, and the other parties
signatory thereto, pursuant to which through a series of
transactions (collectively, the Graham Transaction),
the Companys stockholders would acquire a majority of the
outstanding common stock of Graham IPO Corp., par value $0.01
per share, and Graham IPO Corp. would own, either directly or
indirectly, 100% of the partnership interests of Graham
Packaging Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.
On January 27, 2009 the Company entered into a First
Amendment (the Amendment) to the Purchase Agreement.
The Amendment stipulates that (i) the Company and
Blackstone Capital Partners III Merchant Banking
Fund L.P., as the Seller Representative, each have the
right to terminate the Purchase Agreement by giving written
notice to the other and (ii) each party is released from
the Purchase Agreements exclusivity provisions and is
permitted to consider other possible transactions.
At December 31, 2008, $3,499,953 of deferred acquisition
costs included on the Companys balance sheet consisted
principally of legal fees, accounting fees, consulting and
advisory fees and other outside costs incurred by the Company
during 2008 that are related to the Graham Transaction. These
costs will be expensed on January 1, 2009 with the adoption
of SFAS 141R.
|
|
Note 5
|
Marketable
Securities Held in Trust
|
The carrying amount, including accrued interest, gross
unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses, and
fair value of held-to-maturity treasury securities by major
security type and class of security at December 31, 2008
and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
holding
|
|
|
holding
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
(losses)
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
|
$
|
289,746,162
|
|
|
$
|
371,783
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
290,117,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
holding
|
|
|
holding
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
(losses)
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
|
$
|
536,148,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,153,789
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
541,301,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The treasury bills classified as held-to-maturity mature within
one year.
|
|
Note 6
|
Note
Payable to Affiliate and Related-Party Transactions
|
The Company issued an aggregate of $225,000 in an unsecured
promissory note to Thomas O. Hicks, the Companys founder
and chairman of the board, on March 1, 2007. The note is
non-interest bearing and is payable on the earlier of
December 31, 2007 or the consummation of an initial public
offering by the Company. With the proceeds of the Offering, this
note was paid in full effective October 3, 2007.
The Company has agreed to pay up to $10,000 a month in total for
office space and general and administrative services to Hicks
Holdings Operating LLC (Hicks Holdings), an
affiliate of the Companys founder and chairman of the
board, Mr. Hicks. Services commenced after the effective
date of the offering and terminate upon the earlier of:
(i) the consummation of an initial business combination; or
(ii) the liquidation of
F-73
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the Company. During 2008, the Company expensed $405,675 due to
Hicks Holdings and affiliates of which, $63,705, is outstanding
at year end. This amount includes $120,000 for rent and overhead
and $285,675 for reimbursable expenses primarily related to
travel. During 2007, the Company expensed $117,278 due to Hicks
Holdings, which includes $30,000 for rent and overhead as well
as $87,278 for reimbursable expenses primarily relating to
travel-related and business insurance expenses. At year end
2007, $117,278, is outstanding to be paid.
On October 3, 2007, the sponsor, through the Private
Placement, purchased 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants at $1.00 per
warrant (for a total purchase price of $7,000,000) from the
Company pursuant to Regulation D. Mr. Hicks, the
Companys founder and chairman of the board, is the sole
member of HH-HACI GP, LLC, the general partner of HH-HACI, L.P.
In addition, Mr. Hicks, Joseph B. Armes, the Companys
president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer and
one of our directors, Eric C Neuman, a senior vice president of
the Company, Robert M. Swartz, a senior vice president of the
Company, Christina Weaver Vest, a senior vice president of the
Company, Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., the Companys secretary
and a vice president, and Mack H. Hicks, a vice president of the
Company, are each limited partners of HH-HACI, L.P. The Sponsor
will be permitted to transfer the warrants held by it to the
Companys officers and directors, and other persons or
entities affiliated with the Sponsor, but the transferees
receiving such securities will be subject to the same agreements
with respect to such securities as the Sponsor. Otherwise, these
warrants will not be transferable or salable by the Sponsor
(except as described below) until 180 days after the
completion of an initial business combination. The Sponsor
Warrants will be non-redeemable so long as they are held by the
Sponsor or the Sponsors permitted transferees. If the
Sponsor Warrants are held by holders other than the Sponsor or
its permitted transferees, the Sponsor Warrants will be
redeemable by us and exercisable by the holders on the same
basis as the warrants including in the units being sold in this
offering. Otherwise, the Sponsor Warrants have terms and
provisions that are identical to those of the warrants being
sold as part of the units in the proposed offering, except that
such Sponsor Warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis. The
purchase price of the Sponsor Warrants has been determined to be
the fair value of such warrants as of the purchase date.
Mr. Hicks, the Companys founder and chairman of the
board is required, pursuant to a written co-investment
securities purchase agreement, to purchase, directly or through
a controlled affiliate, 2,000,000 co-investment units at a price
of $10.00 per unit for an aggregate purchase price of
$20.0 million in a private placement that will occur
immediately prior to the consummation of the initial business
combination.
The co-investment units will be identical to the units sold in
the proposed public offering, except that (i) the
co-investment warrants will not be redeemable by us so long as
they are held by Mr. Hicks, a controlled affiliate of
Mr. Hicks who purchases the co-investment units or their
permitted transferees, and (ii) with limited exceptions,
the co-investment shares and co-investment warrants (including
the common stock issuable upon exercise of the co-investment
warrants) may not be transferred, assigned or sold until
180 days after the completion of our initial business
combination. The proceeds of the sale of the co-investment units
will not be deposited into the trust account and will not be
available for distribution to the public stockholders in the
event of a liquidation of the trust account, or upon conversion
of shares held by public stockholders.
On March 1, 2007, the Sponsor purchased 11,500,000
founders units (after giving effect to a stock split,
discussed in greater detail in Note 9, approved by the
Companys board of directors in July 2007) for an
aggregate amount of $25,000, or $0.0022 per unit. On
August 30, 2007, the sponsor transferred an aggregate of
230,000 of these units to William H. Cunningham, William A.
Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn, each of whom is
a member of the Companys board of directors. Each
founders unit consists of one share of common stock (a
founders share), and one warrant to purchase
common stock (a founders
F-74
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
warrant). The Sponsor, together with
Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery, Mulroney and Quinn, are
referred to as the initial stockholders.
On September 27, 2007, through a stock dividend (discussed
in Note 9), the founders units increased to
13,800,000. This stock dividend also increased the number of
shares transferred to certain members of the Companys
board of directors to 276,000.
The founders shares are identical to the shares of common
stock included in the Offering, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the founders shares are subject to the transfer
restrictions described below;
|
|
|
|
the initial stockholders have agreed to vote the founders
shares in the same manner as a majority of the public
stockholders in connection with the vote required to approve a
business combination;
|
|
|
|
the initial stockholders will not be able to exercise conversion
rights granted to the public stockholders with respect to the
founders shares; and
|
|
|
|
the initial stockholders have waived their rights to participate
in any liquidation distribution with respect to the
founders shares if the Company fails to consummate a
business combination.
|
The founders warrants are identical to those included in
the units sold in the Offering, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the founders warrants are subject to the transfer
restrictions described below;
|
|
|
|
the founders warrants may not be exercised unless and
until the last sale price of the Companys common stock
equals or exceeds $13.75 per share for any 20 days within
any 30 trading day period beginning 90 days after the
Companys initial business combination and there is an
effective registration statement covering the shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants;
|
|
|
|
the founders warrants will not be redeemable by the
Company as long as they are held by our initial stockholders or
their permitted transferees; and
|
|
|
|
the founders warrants may be exercised by the holders on a
cashless basis.
|
The initial stockholders have agreed, except in limited
circumstances, not to sell or otherwise transfer any of the
founders shares or founders warrants until
180 days after the completion of the Companys initial
business combination. However, the initial stockholders will be
permitted to transfer the founders shares and
founders warrants to the Companys officers and
directors, and other persons or entities affiliated with the
initial stockholders, provided that the transferees receiving
such securities will be subject to the same agreements with
respect to such securities as the initial stockholders.
|
|
Note 8
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
Preferred
Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 with such designations,
voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined
from time to time by the board of directors. No shares were
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
Common
Stock
The authorized common stock of the Company includes up to
225,000,000 shares. The holders of the common shares are
entitled to one vote for each share of common stock. In
addition, the holders of the common stock are entitled to
receive dividends when, as and if declared by the board of
directors. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had
69,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
F-75
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On September 27, 2007, the board of directors as of that
date (Mr. Hicks and Mr. Armes) approved a stock
dividend of 0.2 shares of common stock for every share of
common stock issued and outstanding as of September 27,
2007. The stock dividend was granted in connection with an
increase in the number of units being offered in the Offering.
Total common shares increased from 11,500,000 shares to
13,800,000 shares as a result of the stock dividend. The
par value of the stock remained $0.0001 per share.
On July 24, 2007, the board of directors approved a
1.15-for-1 stock split resulting in an increase of common shares
from 10,000,000 shares to 11,500,000 shares. The par
value of the common stock remained $0.0001 per share. The stock
split approved July 24, 2007 is reflected in the per share
data in the accompanying financial statements as if it occurred
on February 26, 2007.
|
|
Note 10
|
Earnings
per Common Share
|
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
(inception)
|
|
|
ending
|
|
through
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
2,498,168
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,250
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
24,002,143
|
|
Net income per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Income tax expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
ending
|
|
|
2007 (inception) to
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
2,168,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,555,403
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,168,486
|
|
|
|
1,555,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(114,554
|
)
|
|
|
(154,751
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(114,554
|
)
|
|
|
(154,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
2,053,932
|
|
|
$
|
1,400,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-76
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income taxes differ from the expected statutory income tax
benefit, by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of
34% to pretax earnings due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
ending
|
|
|
2007 (inception) to
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected statutory income tax expense
|
|
$
|
2,053,892
|
|
|
$
|
1,400,232
|
|
Amounts not deductible for income tax
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
2,053,932
|
|
|
$
|
1,400,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred income tax assets and
deferred income tax liabilities are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net non-current deferred income tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start up and organization costs
|
|
$
|
249,173
|
|
|
$
|
249,173
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
40,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
290,069
|
|
|
|
249,173
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,269
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(20,764
|
)
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
(20,764
|
)
|
|
|
(94,422
|
)
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-current deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
269,305
|
|
|
|
154,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
269,305
|
|
|
$
|
154,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management believes it is more likely than not that results of
future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to
realize the deferred tax assets.
F-77
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 12
|
Quarterly
Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
The following table sets forth unaudited quarterly results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the
period from February 26, 2007 (inception) through
December 31, 2007. This unaudited quarterly information has
been derived from the Companys unaudited financial
statements and, in the Companys opinion, includes all
adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, necessary
for a fair presentation of the information for the periods
covered. The operating results for any quarter are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results for any future
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(288,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
(336,627
|
)
|
|
$
|
(280,117
|
)
|
|
$
|
(486,605
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,392,261
|
)
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
1,119,858
|
|
|
$
|
498,901
|
|
|
$
|
648,696
|
|
|
$
|
230,713
|
|
|
$
|
2,498,168
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
$
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
$
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
$
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
$
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from February 27,
|
|
|
|
The 34 day
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
period ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(2,176
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57,595
|
)
|
|
$
|
(670,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
(188,352
|
)
|
|
$
|
(918,908
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(2,176
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57,595
|
)
|
|
$
|
(670,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,427,806
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,250
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,415,000
|
|
|
$
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
$
|
24,002,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
104,436
|
|
|
$
|
819,061
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents held in trust
|
|
|
18,325
|
|
|
|
250,023,554
|
|
Marketable securities held in trust
|
|
|
539,771,952
|
|
|
|
290,117,945
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
168,109
|
|
|
|
67,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
540,062,822
|
|
|
|
541,028,090
|
|
Noncurrent assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,374,018
|
|
|
|
269,305
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
541,436,840
|
|
|
$
|
544,797,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
717,363
|
|
|
$
|
633,889
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
105,989
|
|
|
|
200,983
|
|
Accrued federal and state taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,011
|
|
Accrued expenses-related party
|
|
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
63,705
|
|
Deferred underwriters commission
|
|
|
17,388,000
|
|
|
|
17,388,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
18,218,896
|
|
|
|
19,290,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, subject to possible redemption:
16,559,999 shares at $9.71 per share
|
|
|
160,797,590
|
|
|
|
160,797,590
|
|
Deferred interest attributable to common stock subject to
possible redemption (net of taxes of $1,366,012 and $1,313,840
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)
|
|
|
2,651,670
|
|
|
|
2,509,186
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued or outstanding at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value 225,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding 69,000,000 shares (less
16,559,999 shares subject to possible redemption) at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively
|
|
|
5,244
|
|
|
|
5,244
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
357,999,322
|
|
|
|
357,999,322
|
|
Earnings accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
1,764,118
|
|
|
|
4,195,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
359,768,684
|
|
|
|
362,199,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
541,436,840
|
|
|
$
|
544,797,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-79
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formation and operating costs
|
|
$
|
169,187
|
|
|
$
|
261,999
|
|
|
$
|
278,870
|
|
|
$
|
458,499
|
|
|
$
|
1,267,934
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
84,157
|
|
|
|
74,628
|
|
|
|
235,820
|
|
|
|
167,039
|
|
|
|
1,557,926
|
|
Write-off (recovery) of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before other income (expense) and income
tax expense
|
|
|
(253,344
|
)
|
|
|
(336,627
|
)
|
|
|
(4,014,643
|
)
|
|
|
(625,538
|
)
|
|
|
(6,325,813
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
190,830
|
|
|
|
1,609,737
|
|
|
|
648,851
|
|
|
|
4,537,124
|
|
|
|
13,403,696
|
|
State taxes other than income taxes
|
|
|
(57,745
|
)
|
|
|
(11,655
|
)
|
|
|
(102,111
|
)
|
|
|
(46,621
|
)
|
|
|
(386,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
133,085
|
|
|
|
1,598,082
|
|
|
|
546,740
|
|
|
|
4,490,503
|
|
|
|
13,017,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income tax expense
|
|
|
(120,259
|
)
|
|
|
1,261,455
|
|
|
|
(3,467,903
|
)
|
|
|
3,864,965
|
|
|
|
6,691,285
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
40,888
|
|
|
|
449,171
|
|
|
|
1,179,087
|
|
|
|
1,354,254
|
|
|
|
2,275,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(79,371
|
)
|
|
|
812,284
|
|
|
|
(2,288,816
|
)
|
|
|
2,510,711
|
|
|
|
4,415,788
|
|
Deferred interest, net of taxes, attributable to common stock
subject to possible redemption
|
|
|
(37,772
|
)
|
|
|
(313,383
|
)
|
|
|
(142,484
|
)
|
|
|
(891,952
|
)
|
|
|
(2,651,670
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(117,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
498,901
|
|
|
$
|
(2,431,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,618,759
|
|
|
$
|
1,764,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
52,440,001
|
|
|
|
42,195,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-80
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional paid-
|
|
|
development
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
in-capital
|
|
|
stage
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
Initial capital from founding stockholder for cash
|
|
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,150
|
|
|
$
|
23,850
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Stock dividend
|
|
|
2,300,000
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of 55,200,000 units, net of underwriters
discount and offering costs
|
|
|
55,200,000
|
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
|
|
511,771,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511,777,156
|
|
Proceeds subject to possible redemption of 16,559,999 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
(160,795,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,797,590
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of warrants to sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
69,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,244
|
|
|
$
|
357,999,322
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,250
|
|
|
$
|
359,701,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,498,168
|
|
|
|
2,498,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
69,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,244
|
|
|
$
|
357,999,322
|
|
|
$
|
4,195,418
|
|
|
$
|
362,199,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,431,300
|
)
|
|
|
(2,431,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
69,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,244
|
|
|
$
|
357,999,322
|
|
|
$
|
1,764,118
|
|
|
$
|
359,768,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-81
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
(inception) to
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(2,431,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,618,759
|
|
|
$
|
1,764,118
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to common stock
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred tax asset
|
|
|
(1,104,713
|
)
|
|
|
20,413
|
|
|
|
(1,374,018
|
)
|
Deferred interest attributable to common stock subject to
possible redemption
|
|
|
142,484
|
|
|
|
891,952
|
|
|
|
2,651,670
|
|
Write-off of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
3,499,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499,953
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(26,205
|
)
|
|
|
(1,128,485
|
)
|
|
|
(168,109
|
)
|
Accrued federal and state taxes
|
|
|
(1,078,385
|
)
|
|
|
(314,651
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
159,274
|
|
|
|
(330,364
|
)
|
|
|
717,363
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(94,994
|
)
|
|
|
18,737
|
|
|
|
105,989
|
|
Accrued expenses related party
|
|
|
(56,161
|
)
|
|
|
(113,289
|
)
|
|
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(990,047
|
)
|
|
|
663,072
|
|
|
|
7,204,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents held in trust
account
|
|
|
(250,005,229
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
18,325
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities held in trust, net of
maturities
|
|
|
250,280,651
|
|
|
|
270,833
|
|
|
|
(539,884,402
|
)
|
Payment of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,682
|
)
|
|
|
(3,424,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
275,422
|
|
|
|
234,161
|
|
|
|
(543,290,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from note payable related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Payment on note payable related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of units to sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Proceeds from sale of warrants to initial founder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of underwriters
discount and offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,165,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,190,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(714,625
|
)
|
|
|
897,233
|
|
|
|
104,436
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
819,061
|
|
|
|
52,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
104,436
|
|
|
$
|
949,286
|
|
|
$
|
104,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs included in accounts payable and
accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,946,913
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrual of deferred underwriters commission
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,388,000
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
980,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,750,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,730,000
|
|
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-82
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Note 1
|
Interim
Financial Information
|
These unaudited condensed financial statements as of
June 30, 2009, the results of operations for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the period from
February 26, 2007 (inception) through June 30, 2009,
and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 and the period from February 26, 2007 (inception)
through June 30, 2009, have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions to
Form 10-Q.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements of
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. (the
Company). In the opinion of management, all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation have been included
and are of a normal recurring nature. Interim results are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the year. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current period presentation.
These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on March 11, 2009.
|
|
Note 2
|
Organization
and Nature of Business Operations
|
The Company was incorporated in Delaware on February 26,
2007, as a blank check company formed for the purpose of
acquiring, or acquiring control of, through a merger, capital
stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase,
reorganization or similar business combination one or more
businesses or assets.
The Company has neither engaged in any operations nor generated
any revenue to date. The activity from February 26, 2007 to
June 30, 2009 relates to the Companys formation and
its initial public offering described below and in Note 4.
The Company has selected December 31 as its fiscal year end.
The registration statement for the Companys initial public
offering (the Offering) was declared effective
September 27, 2007. The Company consummated the Offering on
October 3, 2007, and received proceeds of approximately
$529.1 million, net of underwriters commissions of
approximately $21.3 million and offering costs and other
expenses of $1.6 million. The Company sold to the public
55,200,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit, including
7,200,000 units issued pursuant to the exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. Simultaneously with
the consummation of the Offering, the Company consummated the
private sale of 7,000,000 warrants (the Sponsor
Warrants) to HH-HACI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
(the Sponsor), at a price of $1.00 per Sponsor
Warrant, generating gross proceeds, before expenses, of
$7 million (the Private Placement). Net
proceeds received by the Company from the consummation of both
the Offering and Private Placement of Sponsor Warrants totaled
approximately $536.1 million, net of underwriters
commissions and offering costs. The net proceeds were placed in
a trust account at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. with Continental
Stock Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee.
The Companys management has broad discretion with respect
to the specific application of the net proceeds of the Offering,
although substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering
are intended to be generally applied toward consummating one or
more business combinations with an operating company. The
Companys initial business combination must occur with one
or more target businesses that collectively have a fair market
value of at least 80% of the initial amount held in the trust
account (excluding the amount held in the trust account
representing the underwriters deferred commission). If the
Company acquires less than 100% of one or more target
businesses, the aggregate fair market value of the portion or
portions the Company acquires must equal at least 80% of the
amount held in the trust account. In no event, however, will the
Company acquire less than a controlling interest of a target
business (that is, not less than 50% of the voting equity
interests of the target business).
F-83
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The Companys efforts in identifying prospective target
businesses will not be limited to a particular industry.
Instead, the Company intends to focus on various industries and
target businesses that may provide significant opportunities for
growth. However, the Companys charter currently
contemplates that it will not complete a business combination
with an entity engaged in the energy industry as its principal
business or whose principal business operations are conducted
outside of the United States or Canada, but the Company is
currently seeking an amendment to its charter to allow a
business combination with an entity engaged in the energy
industry as its principal business.
Proceeds of the Offering and Private Placement are held in a
trust account and will only be released to the Company upon the
earlier of: (i) the consummation of an initial business
combination; or (ii) the Companys liquidation. The
proceeds in the trust account include the underwriters
deferred commission which equals 3.15% of the gross proceeds of
the Offering. Upon consummation of an initial business
combination, approximately $17.4 million, which constitutes
the underwriters deferred commissions, will be paid to the
underwriters from the funds held in the trust account. The
proceeds outside of the trust account as well as the interest
income of up to $6.6 million (net of taxes payable), earned
on the trust account balance that may be released to the Company
may be used to pay for business, legal and accounting due
diligence on prospective acquisitions and continuing general and
administrative expenses; provided, however, that after such
release there remains in the trust account a sufficient amount
of interest income previously earned on the trust account
balance to pay any taxes on such $6.6 million of interest
income.
The Company will seek stockholder approval before it will effect
an initial business combination, even if the business
combination would not ordinarily require stockholder approval
under applicable law. In connection with the stockholder vote
required to approve any initial business combination, the
Companys existing stockholders, HH-HACI, L.P., and certain
of the Companys directors have agreed to vote the
founders shares (as defined in Note 8 below) owned by
them immediately before the Offering in accordance with the
majority of the shares of common stock voted by the public
stockholders. Public stockholders is defined as the
holders of common stock sold as part of the units, as defined,
in the Offering or in the aftermarket.
The Company will proceed with an initial business combination
only if: (i) the business combination is approved by a
majority of votes cast by the Companys public stockholders
at a duly held stockholders meeting; (ii) an amendment to
the Companys amended and restated certificate of
incorporation to provide for the Companys perpetual
existence is approved by holders of a majority of the
Companys outstanding shares of common stock;
(iii) public stockholders owning no more than 30% (minus
one share) of the Companys outstanding shares of common
stock sold in the Offering both vote against the business
combination and exercise their conversion rights; and
(iv) the Company has confirmed that it has sufficient cash
resources to pay both (x) the consideration required to
close its initial business combination, and (y) the cash
due to public stockholders who vote against the business
combination and who exercise their conversion rights. If the
conditions to consummate the proposed business combination are
not met but sufficient time remains before the Companys
corporate life expires, the Company may attempt to effect
another business combination. With respect to a business
combination which is approved and consummated, any public
stockholder who voted against the business combination may
exercise their conversion rights as described below, and demand
that the Company redeem their shares for cash from the trust
fund. Accordingly, the Company has classified 30% (minus one
share) of the public stockholders shares as temporary
equity in the accompanying balance sheet.
If the initial business combination is approved and completed,
each public stockholder voting against such qualifying business
combination will be entitled to convert its shares of common
stock into a pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on
deposit in the trust account (including deferred underwriting
commissions and interest earned on the trust account, net of
income taxes payable on such interest and net of interest income
of up to $6.6 million, on the trust account released to
fund the Companys working capital requirements). Public
F-84
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
stockholders who convert their stock into their share of the
trust account will continue to have the right to exercise any
warrants they may hold.
The Company will liquidate and promptly distribute only to the
public stockholders the amount in the trust account, less any
income taxes payable on interest income and any interest income
of up to $6.6 million, on the balance (net of taxes
payable) of the trust account previously released to the Company
to fund its working capital requirements, plus any remaining net
assets if the Company does not consummate a business combination
by September 28, 2009. If the Company fails to consummate
such business combination by September 28, 2009, the
Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation
provides that the Companys corporate existence will
automatically cease on September 28, 2009, except for the
purpose of winding up its affairs and liquidating. In the event
of liquidation, the per share value of the residual assets
remaining available for distribution (including trust account
assets) may be more or less than the initial public offering
price per share (assuming no value is attributed to the warrants
contained in the units offered in the Offering). In the event of
the consummation of a successful initial business combination,
the earnings per share will be affected by the dilution
attributable to the Sponsor shares and warrants.
While the Company hopes to successfully complete a business
combination within the time frame discussed above, there is no
assurance that the Company will be able to successfully complete
a business combination within such time frame. That factor and
the Companys declining cash available outside of the trust
account raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability
to continue as a going concern.
|
|
Note 3
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Such cash and cash equivalents, at times, may
exceed federally insured limits. The Company maintains its
accounts with financial institutions with high credit ratings.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents Held in Trust
Cash and cash equivalents held in trust are with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., and Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company serves as the trustee. The Company considers
all highly liquid investment placed in trust with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. These
consist of JPMorgan U.S. Treasury Plus Money Market Fund of
$18,325 at June 30, 2009, and $250,007,027 plus accrued
interest of $16,527 at December 31, 2008.
Marketable
Securities Held in Trust
Marketable securities held in trust are with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., and Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company serves as the trustee. The marketable
securities held in trust are invested in cash, cash equivalents
and U.S. Treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or
less.
Earnings
per Common Share
Earnings per share is computed by dividing net income
attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. The weighted
average common shares issued and outstanding of 52,440,001 used
for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for
the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2009 and
2008, takes into effect the 69,000,000 shares outstanding
for the entire period (less 16,559,999 shares subject to
possible redemption).
F-85
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The 76,000,000 warrants related to the Offering, Private
Placement and the founders unit are contingently issuable
shares and are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per share.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Income
Taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided for the differences between
the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and
income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
to be realized. The Company recorded a deferred income tax asset
for the tax effect of certain temporary differences, aggregating
approximately $1.4 million and $269,000 at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Deferred
Acquisition Costs
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 141(revised 2007),
Business Combinations, (SFAS 141R).
SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how
an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill
acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R
will be applied prospectively to business combinations with an
acquisition date on or after the effective date. As a result of
the adoption of SFAS 141R, we expensed approximately
$3.5 million in our financial statements due to the
deferred acquisition costs recorded at December 31, 2008.
SFAS 141R no longer allows deferral of these costs.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had accumulated
approximately $3.5 million in deferred costs related to the
proposed Graham Transaction. Deferred acquisition costs
consisted primarily of approximately $1.5 million for legal
services, $1.6 million for due diligence services and
$0.4 million for other related deal expenses.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS 165), effective
for financial periods ending after June 15, 2009.
SFAS 165 established principles and requirements for
subsequent events, including the period after the balance sheet
date during which management of a reporting entity shall
evaluate events for potential disclosure in the financial
statements, the circumstances that warrant disclosure, and the
specific disclosure requirements for transactions that occur
after the balance sheet date. The Company has adopted
SFAS 165 in the second quarter of 2009. The implementation
of SFAS 165 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial position. We
evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after
June 30, 2009 up through August 10, 2009, the date we
issued these financial statements and identified the subsequent
events as disclosed in Note 11.
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not
effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would
have a material effect on the Companys financial
statements.
F-86
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
Note 4
|
Initial
Public Offering
|
On October 3, 2007, the Company sold to the public
55,200,000 units at a price of $10.00, which included
7,200,000 shares issued pursuant to the underwriters
over-allotment option. Each unit consists of one share of the
Companys common stock, $0.0001 par value, and one
warrant.
Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase from the Company
one share of common stock at a price of $7.50 on the later of
completion of the initial business combination or twelve months
from the date of the closing of the Offering, provided in each
case that the Company has an effective registration statement in
effect covering the shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrants. The warrants expire September 28,
2011, unless earlier redeemed. Once the warrants become
exercisable, they will be redeemable in whole but not in part at
a price of $0.01 per warrant upon a minimum of
30 days notice, but such redemption may only occur if
the last sale price of the common stock equals or exceeds $13.75
per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period
ending three business days prior to the time that the Company
sends the notice of redemption to the warrant holders.
|
|
Note 5
|
Proposed
Business Combination
|
On July 1, 2008, the Company entered into an Equity
Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement), with
GPC Holdings, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, Graham
Packaging Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, Graham
Capital Company, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, Graham
Engineering Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, BMP/Graham
Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation, GPC Capital Corp.
II, a Delaware corporation (Graham IPO Corp.),
Graham Packaging Holdings Company, a Pennsylvania limited
partnership, and the other parties signatory thereto, pursuant
to which through a series of transactions (collectively, the
Graham Transaction), the Companys stockholders
would acquire a majority of the outstanding common stock of
Graham IPO Corp., par value $0.01 per share, and Graham IPO
Corp. would own, either directly or indirectly, 100% of the
partnership interests of Graham Packaging Company, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership.
On January 27, 2009, the Company entered into a First
Amendment (the Amendment) to the Purchase Agreement.
The Amendment stipulated that (i) the Company and
Blackstone Capital Partners III Merchant Banking
Fund L.P., as the Seller Representative, each have the
right to terminate the Purchase Agreement by giving written
notice to the other and (ii) each party is released from
the Purchase Agreements exclusivity provisions and is
permitted to consider other possible transactions. On
July 31, 2009, the Company and Blackstone Capital
Partners III Merchant Banking Fund L.P., as Seller
Representative, agreed to mutually terminate the Purchase
Agreement.
At December 31, 2008, $3.5 million of deferred
acquisition costs included on the Companys balance sheet
consisted principally of legal fees, accounting fees, consulting
and advisory fees and other outside costs incurred by the
Company during 2008 that are related to the Graham Transaction.
These costs were expensed on January 1, 2009 with the
adoption of SFAS 141R.
On August 3, 2009, the Company announced the execution of a
Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement, dated as of
August 2, 2009 (the Acquisition Agreement), by
and among the Company, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC
(Seller), Resolute Energy Corporation, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Seller (REC), Resolute
Subsidiary Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of REC
(Merger Sub), Resolute Aneth, LLC, a subsidiary of
Seller (Aneth), Resolute Holdings, LLC and HH-HACI,
L.P. (the Sponsor), pursuant to which the
Companys stockholders will acquire a majority of the
outstanding shares of capital stock of REC (the Resolute
Transaction).
F-87
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The Resolute Transaction contemplates amending the
Companys charter prior to consummation of the business
combination to allow for a business combination with an entity
engaged in the energy industry and to provide for the
Companys perpetual existence. The prospectus from the
Offering did not disclose that the Company may seek to amend its
charter prior to the consummation of a business combination.
Additionally, the prospectus from the Offering did not disclose
that funds in the trust account might be used, directly or
indirectly, to purchase shares from holders who have indicated
that they will vote against the business combination and
properly demand that their shares be converted into cash (as the
Company may contemplate doing and which is discussed in further
detail below) or that the Company may consummate a business
combination with an entity engaged in the energy industry or
that the Company may seek to amend the terms of the warrant
agreement and exchange a portion of outstanding warrants for
cash financed out of the trust account. Each holder of the
Companys securities at the time of the Offering who
purchased the Companys units in the Offering may have
securities law claims against the Company for rescission or
damages. Rescission would give a successful claimant the right
to receive the total amount paid for his or her securities
pursuant to an allegedly deficient prospectus, plus interest and
less any income earned on the securities, in exchange for
surrender of the securities. A successful claimant for damages
under federal or state law could be awarded an amount to
compensate for the decrease in value of his or her securities
caused by the alleged violation (including, possibly, punitive
damages), together with interest, while retaining such
securities.
|
|
Note 6
|
Marketable
Securities Held in Trust
|
The carrying amount, including accrued interest, gross
unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses, and
fair value of held-to-maturity treasury securities by major
security type and class of security at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
holding gains
|
|
|
holding (losses)
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
|
$
|
539,678,082
|
|
|
$
|
93,870
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
539,771,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
holding gains
|
|
|
holding (losses)
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
|
$
|
289,746,162
|
|
|
$
|
371,783
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
290,117,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The treasury bills classified as held-to-maturity mature within
one year.
|
|
Note 7
|
Note
Payable to Affiliate and Related-Party Transactions
|
The Company issued an aggregate of $225,000 in an unsecured
promissory note to Thomas O. Hicks, the Companys founder
and chairman of the board, on March 1, 2007. The note is
non-interest bearing and is payable on the earlier of
December 31, 2007, or the consummation of an initial public
offering by the Company. With the proceeds of the Offering, this
note was paid in full effective October 3, 2007.
The Company has agreed to pay up to $10,000 a month in total for
office space and general and administrative services to Hicks
Holdings Operating LLC (Hicks Holdings), an
affiliate of the Companys founder and chairman of the
board, Mr. Hicks. Services commenced after the effective
date of the offering and terminate upon the earlier of:
(i) the consummation of an initial business combination; or
(ii) the liquidation of the Company. The Company expensed
$30,000 during each of the three months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008
F-88
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
and $60,000 during each of the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 under this agreement. The Company expensed $7,544
and $22,298 for reimbursable travel expenses due to Hicks
Holdings and affiliates for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company expensed $8,852 and
$30,800 for reimbursable travel expenses due to Hicks Holdings
and affiliates for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
On October 3, 2007, the Sponsor, through the Private
Placement, purchased 7,000,000 Sponsor Warrants at $1.00 per
warrant (for a total purchase price of $7,000,000) from the
Company pursuant to Regulation D. Mr. Hicks, the
Companys founder and chairman of the board, is the sole
member of HH-HACI GP, LLC, the general partner of HH-HACI, L.P.
In addition, Mr. Hicks, Joseph B. Armes, the Companys
president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer and
one of our directors, Eric C Neuman, a senior vice president of
the Company, Robert M. Swartz, a senior vice president of the
Company, Christina Weaver Vest, a senior vice president of the
Company, Thomas O. Hicks, Jr., the Companys secretary
and a vice president, and Mack H. Hicks, a vice president of the
Company, are each limited partners of HH-HACI, L.P. The Sponsor
will be permitted to transfer the warrants held by it to the
Companys officers and directors, and other persons or
entities affiliated with the Sponsor, but the transferees
receiving such securities will be subject to the same agreements
with respect to such securities as the Sponsor. Otherwise, these
warrants will not be transferable or salable by the Sponsor
(except as described below) until 180 days after the
completion of an initial business combination. The Sponsor
Warrants will be non-redeemable so long as they are held by the
Sponsor or the Sponsors permitted transferees. If the
Sponsor Warrants are held by holders other than the Sponsor or
its permitted transferees, the Sponsor Warrants will be
redeemable by the Company and exercisable by the holders on the
same basis as the warrants including in the units being sold in
this offering. Otherwise, the Sponsor Warrants have terms and
provisions that are identical to those of the warrants being
sold as part of the units in the proposed offering, except that
such Sponsor Warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis. The
purchase price of the Sponsor Warrants has been determined to be
the fair value of such warrants as of the purchase date.
Mr. Hicks, the Companys founder and chairman of the
board is required, pursuant to a written co-investment
securities purchase agreement, to purchase, directly or through
a controlled affiliate, 2,000,000 co-investment units at a price
of $10.00 per unit for an aggregate purchase price of
$20.0 million in a private placement that will occur
immediately prior to the consummation of the initial business
combination.
The co-investment units will be identical to the units sold in
the proposed public offering, except that: (i) the
co-investment warrants will not be redeemable by the Company so
long as they are held by Mr. Hicks, a controlled affiliate
of Mr. Hicks who purchases the co-investment units or their
permitted transferees; and (ii) with limited exceptions,
the co-investment shares and co-investment warrants (including
the common stock issuable upon exercise of the co-investment
warrants) may not be transferred, assigned or sold until
180 days after the completion of our initial business
combination. The proceeds of the sale of the co-investment units
will not be deposited into the trust account and will not be
available for distribution to the public stockholders in the
event of a liquidation of the trust account, or upon conversion
of shares held by public stockholders.
On August 2, 2009 the Company entered into a Termination of
Purchase Agreement (the Termination) with
Mr. Hicks and the Sponsor, pursuant to which the
Co-Investment Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of
September 26, 2007 between the Company and Mr. Hicks
(the Co-Investment Agreement) was terminated. The
Termination was done upon the advice of financial advisors to
the Company and approved by a committee of independent directors
of the Company.
F-89
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
On March 1, 2007, the Sponsor purchased 11,500,000
founders units (after giving effect to a stock split,
discussed in greater detail in Note 10, approved by the
Companys board of directors in July 2007) for an
aggregate amount of $25,000, or $0.0022 per unit. On
August 30, 2007, the Sponsor transferred an aggregate of
230,000 of these units to William H. Cunningham, William A.
Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn, each of whom is
a member of the Companys board of directors. Each
founders unit consists of one share of common stock (a
founders share), and one warrant to purchase
common stock (a founders warrant). The
Sponsor, together with Messrs. Cunningham, Montgomery,
Mulroney and Quinn, are referred to as the initial
stockholders.
On September 27, 2007, through a stock dividend (discussed
in Note 10), the founders units increased to
13,800,000. This stock dividend also increased the number of
shares transferred to certain members of the Companys
board of directors to 276,000.
The founders shares are identical to the shares of common
stock included in the Offering, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the founders shares are subject to the transfer
restrictions described below;
|
|
|
|
the initial stockholders have agreed to vote the founders
shares in the same manner as a majority of the public
stockholders in connection with the vote required to approve a
business combination;
|
|
|
|
the initial stockholders will not be able to exercise conversion
rights granted to the public stockholders with respect to the
founders shares; and
|
|
|
|
the initial stockholders have waived their rights to participate
in any liquidation distribution with respect to the
founders shares if the Company fails to consummate a
business combination.
|
The founders warrants are identical to those included in
the units sold in the Offering, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the founders warrants are subject to the transfer
restrictions described below;
|
|
|
|
the founders warrants may not be exercised unless and
until the last sale price of the Companys common stock
equals or exceeds $13.75 per share for any 20 days within
any 30 trading day period beginning 90 days after the
Companys initial business combination and there is an
effective registration statement covering the shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants;
|
|
|
|
the founders warrants will not be redeemable by the
Company as long as they are held by our initial stockholders or
their permitted transferees; and
|
|
|
|
the founders warrants may be exercised by the holders on a
cashless basis.
|
The initial stockholders have agreed, except in limited
circumstances, not to sell or otherwise transfer any of the
founders shares or founders warrants until
180 days after the completion of the Companys initial
business combination. However, the initial stockholders will be
permitted to transfer the founders shares and
founders warrants to the Companys officers and
directors, and other persons or entities affiliated with the
initial stockholders, provided that the transferees receiving
such securities will be subject to the same agreements with
respect to such securities as the initial stockholders.
F-90
HICKS
ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
Note 9
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
Preferred
Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 with such designations,
voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined
from time to time by the board of directors. No shares were
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009 or
December 31, 2008.
Common
Stock
The authorized common stock of the Company includes up to
225,000,000 shares. The holders of the common shares are
entitled to one vote for each share of common stock. In
addition, the holders of the common stock are entitled to
receive dividends when, as and if declared by the board of
directors. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company had 69,000,000 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding.
On September 27, 2007, the board of directors as of that
date (Mr. Hicks and Mr. Armes) approved a stock
dividend of 0.2 shares of common stock for every share of
common stock issued and outstanding as of September 27,
2007. The stock dividend was granted in connection with an
increase in the number of units being offered in the Offering.
Total common shares increased from 11,500,000 shares to
13,800,000 shares as a result of the stock dividend. The
par value of the stock remained $0.0001 per share.
On July 24, 2007, the board of directors approved a
1.15-for-1 stock split resulting in an increase of common shares
from 10,000,000 shares to 11,500,000 shares. The par
value of the common stock remained $0.0001 per share. The stock
split approved July 24, 2007, is reflected in the per share
data in the accompanying financial statements as if it occurred
on February 26, 2007.
|
|
Note 11
|
Subsequent
Events
|
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS 165), effective
for financial periods ending after June 15, 2009.
SFAS 165 established principles and requirements for
subsequent events, including the period after the balance sheet
date during which management of a reporting entity shall
evaluate events for potential disclosure in the financial
statements, the circumstances that warrant disclosure, and the
specific disclosure requirements for transactions that occur
after the balance sheet date. The Company has adopted
SFAS 165 in the second quarter of 2009. The implementation
of SFAS 165 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial position. We
evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after
June 30, 2009 up through August 10, 2009, the date we
issued these financial statements and identified the following
subsequent events.
On August 2, 2009 the Company entered into a Termination of
Purchase Agreement (the Termination) with
Mr. Hicks and the Sponsor, pursuant to which the
Co-Investment Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of
September 26, 2007 between the Company and Mr. Hicks
(the Co-Investment Agreement) was terminated. The
Termination was done upon the advice of financial advisors to
the Company and approved by a committee of independent directors
of the Company.
F-91
PURCHASE AND IPO
REORGANIZATION
AGREEMENT
among
HICKS ACQUISITION
COMPANY I, INC.,
RESOLUTE ENERGY
CORPORATION,
RESOLUTE SUBSIDIARY
CORPORATION,
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC,
RESOLUTE HOLDINGS,
LLC,
RESOLUTE HOLDINGS SUB,
LLC,
and
HH-HACI, L.P.
Dated as of August 2, 2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I THE IPO REORGANIZATION AND SHARE PURCHASES
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
Purchase of Acquisition Interests
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
Repayment of Debt under Credit Agreements
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
Founder Transactions
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
Exchange of Shares and Certificates
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
Charters and Bylaws of IPO Corp.
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
Board of Directors
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
Taking of Necessary Action; Further Action
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
IPO Corp. Incentive Plan
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
Termination of HACI Registration Right Agreement
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE II REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND
SELLER
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Due Organization
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
Authorization and Validity of Agreement
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
No Conflict
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
Ownership of Seller Interests
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
IPO Corp. and Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES CONCERNING
COMPANIES
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Due Organization of the Companies
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Authorization and Validity of Agreement
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Seller Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
Consents and Approvals
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
No Conflict
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
Absence of Material Adverse Change
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
Real and Personal Properties
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
3.12
|
|
|
Tax Matters
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
Compliance with Laws; Permits
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
3.18
|
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
Customers and Suppliers
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
Transactions with Affiliates
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
Brokers, Finders, etc
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
Title to the Company Assets
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
Wells/Projects in Progress
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
Expenditure Obligations
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
No Claims Affecting the Company Assets
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes Regarding the Company Assets
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
|
Gas Imbalances
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
3.32
|
|
|
Royalty Payments
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
3.33
|
|
|
Licenses and Permits
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
Reserve Report Information
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
3.35
|
|
|
NNOG Contract
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Due Organization and Power
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Authorization and Validity of Agreement
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
No Conflict
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
Buyer SEC Documents; Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
Absence of Material Adverse Change
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
Tax Matters
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
Transactions with Affiliates
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
Brokers, Finders, etc
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
Trust Account
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES GENERALLY
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
Representations and Warranties of the Parties
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
Survival of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
Schedules
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI COVENANTS
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
Access; Information and Records; Confidentiality
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
Conduct of the Business of IPO Corp., Merger Sub and the
Companies Prior to the Closing Date
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
Company Assets
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
Conduct of the Business of Buyer Prior to the Closing Date
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
Antitrust Laws
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
Further Actions
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
Directors and Officers
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
Proxy/Registration Statement; Buyer Stockholder Meeting
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
No Solicitation
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
|
SEC Reports; Proxy/Registration Statement
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
6.14
|
|
|
Notice
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
Termination of Certain Company Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
6.16
|
|
|
Hedging Arrangements
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
6.17
|
|
|
Dissolution of Certain Excluded Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
Conditions Precedent to Obligations of Parties
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
Conditions Precedent to Obligation of Buyer
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
Conditions Precedent to the Obligation of Seller
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII LABOR MATTERS
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
Collective Bargaining Agreements
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
Termination and Abandonment
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
Tax Matters
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
Entire Agreement
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
Non-Survival of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
No Third Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
Assignability
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
Amendment and Modification; Waiver
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.10
|
|
|
No Recourse
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.11
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.12
|
|
|
Section Headings
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.13
|
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.14
|
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
9.15
|
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
|
Submission to Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
|
9.17
|
|
|
Enforcement
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
|
9.18
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
|
9.19
|
|
|
No Claim Against Trust Account
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
A-4
INDEX OF
DEFINED TERMS
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Page
|
|
|
1st Lien Agreement
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
2nd Lien Agreement
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Acquired Interest
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Acquisition Consideration
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Aggregate Cash Consideration
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Agreement
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Aneth
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Antitrust Division
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Balance Sheet Date
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
BIA
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Business Day
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Business Employees
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Buyer
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Buyer Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Buyer Common Stock
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Buyer Contracts
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Buyer Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
Buyer Information
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Buyer Organizational Documents
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Buyer Returns
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
Buyer SEC Documents
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Buyer Stockholder Approval
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Buyer Stockholder Meeting
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Buyer Warrants
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Cash Consideration
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Cash Election Warrants
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Charter Amendment
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Claim
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Closing Date
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Code
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Co-Investment Agreement
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Collective Bargaining Agreements
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
Company and Companies
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Company Assets
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Company Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Company Information
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Company Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
A-5
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Contribution Consideration
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Contribution Interest
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Credit Agreements
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Defensible Title
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Defined Percentage
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
DGCL
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Discrepancy Amount
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Earnout Shares
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Election
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Election Date
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Environmental Licenses and Permits
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
ERISA
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
ERISA Affiliate
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Evaluated Properties
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Excluded Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Final Order
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
First Amendment
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Form of Election
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Founder
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Founders Transactions
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Founders Warrants
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
FTC
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Governmental Authority
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Graham Agreement
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
HACI Warrant Agreement
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Hazardous Substances
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Hedging Arrangements
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
HSR Act
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
IMDA
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Indebtedness
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Initial Business Combination
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Interim Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
IPO
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
IPO Corp.
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
A-6
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Page
|
|
|
IPO Corp. Common Stock
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
IPO Reorganization
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
IPO Shares
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Knowledge of Seller and the Companies
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Lands
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Laws
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Leased Real Property
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Lien
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Major Customers
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Merger Effective Time
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Navajo Nation
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
New Founders Warrants
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
New Sponsors Warrants
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
New Warrant Agreement
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
New Warrant Consideration
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
New Warrant Election Warrants
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
NNOG
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
NNOG Contract
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
NRI
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Owned Real Property
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Permits
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Permitted Encumbrances
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Permitted Liens
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
Person
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Proceedings
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Production
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Prospect
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Proxy/Registration Statement
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Public Stockholder
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Public Warrants
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Report Date
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Reserve Engineer
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Reserve Report
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Reserve Report Interests
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Returns
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Retention Shares
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Royalty Payments
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Scheduled Interests
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
SEC
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
SEC Reports
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Securities Act
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Seller
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Seller Interests
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Sellers Warrants
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Significant Contracts
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Special Meeting of Warrantholders
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Sponsors Warrants
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Sponsors Warrants Sale
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Stock Earnout Target
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Transfer Taxes
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Trust Account
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Trust Agreement
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Warrant Agreement Amendment
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Warrant Amendment Approval
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Warrant Cap
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Warrant Certificate
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Warrant Consideration
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Wells
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Western Refining Contract
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
WI
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
A-8
PURCHASE
AND IPO REORGANIZATION AGREEMENT
This PURCHASE AND IPO REORGANIZATION AGREEMENT is dated as of
August 2, 2009 (this Agreement)
and is among HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC., a Delaware
corporation (Buyer), RESOLUTE ENERGY
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (IPO
Corp.), RESOLUTE SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation (Merger Sub),
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(Aneth), RESOLUTE HOLDINGS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company
(Parent), RESOLUTE HOLDINGS SUB, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
(Seller), and HH-HACI, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (Founder).
RECITALS
A. Parent owns all of the issued and outstanding equity
interests in Seller.
B. Seller owns (i) all of the issued and outstanding
equity interests in IPO Corp. and (ii) directly or
indirectly, the issued and outstanding membership interests and
shares of capital stock in the Companies as set forth on
Schedule A hereto (collectively the
Contribution Interest).
C. IPO Corp. owns all of the issued and outstanding equity
interests in Merger Sub.
D. The parties hereto intend that Buyer acquire a
membership interest in Aneth equal to the Defined Percentage
(the Acquired Interest) in exchange
for Buyers payment to Aneth of an amount in cash equal to
the assets in the Trust Account less the sum of
(i) the Aggregate Cash Consideration, (ii) amounts
used to purchase shares of Buyer Common Stock from Public
Stockholders as permitted by Section 6.4(a)(ii),
(iii) amounts payable to Public Stockholders who vote
against the transactions contemplated hereby and properly
exercise their conversion rights under Section 9.3 of
Article IX of the Buyer Certificate of Incorporation, and
(iv) Buyers aggregate costs, fees and expenses
incurred in connection with the consummation of an Initial
Business Combination (including deferred underwriting
commissions) (such acquisition, the
Acquisition and such payment, the
Acquisition Consideration).
E. Immediately following the Acquisition, Aneth will use
all of the Acquisition Consideration to repay certain
outstanding liabilities of Aneth.
F. Immediately following such debt repayment, the parties
hereto intend to effect the contribution by Seller of the
Contribution Interest to IPO Corp. in exchange for
(i) 9,200,000 shares of IPO Corp. common stock, par
value $0.0001 per share (the IPO Corp. Common
Stock), (ii) founders warrants to
purchase 4,600,000 shares of IPO Corp. Common Stock; and
(iii) 1,385,000 Earnout Shares (collectively, the
Contribution).
G. Immediately prior to the Closing, (i) the
Co-Investment Agreement shall be cancelled and
(ii) 7,335,000 shares of Buyer Common Stock held by
Founder and 4,600,000 Founders Warrants held by Founder
will be cancelled (the Founders
Transactions).
H. At the Closing, immediately prior to the Merger, Founder
desires to sell to Seller and Seller desires to purchase from
Founder, 2,333,333 Sponsors Warrants for the consideration
set forth herein (the Sponsors Warrants
Sale).
I. Simultaneously with the Contribution, the parties hereto
intend to effect the merger of Merger Sub with and into Buyer
(the Merger), with Buyer continuing as
the surviving entity in the Merger, as a result of which Buyer
will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of IPO Corp. and the shares of
common stock and warrants (including Public Warrants,
Founders Warrants and Sponsors Warrants) of Buyer
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger will be
deemed for all purposes to represent shares of common stock and
warrants of IPO Corp., in accordance with the Delaware General
Corporation Law, as amended (the DGCL)
and the terms of this Agreement (the Acquisition, Contribution,
Founders Transactions, Sponsors Warrants Sale and
Merger, collectively, the IPO
Reorganization).
J. The managers of each of Parent, Aneth and Seller and the
board of directors of each of Buyer, IPO Corp. and Merger Sub
have approved this Agreement and have determined that this
Agreement, the IPO
A-9
Reorganization and the other transactions contemplated hereby
are advisable and in the respective best interests of each of
Parent, Seller, Aneth, Buyer, IPO Corp. and Merger Sub,
respectively, and their respective stockholders, equityholders
and/or
members.
STATEMENT
OF AGREEMENT
In consideration of the mutual terms, conditions and other
agreements set forth herein and intending to be legally bound
hereby, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE IPO REORGANIZATION AND SHARE PURCHASES
1.1 Closing. Unless this Agreement
shall have been terminated and the transactions herein
contemplated shall have been abandoned in accordance with
Section 9.1, and subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of the conditions set forth in ARTICLE VII,
the closing of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
(the Closing) will take place at
9:00 a.m. Dallas time on the first Business Day
following the satisfaction or waiver of each of the conditions
set forth in ARTICLE VII hereof (the
Closing Date), at the offices of Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 1700 Pacific Avenue,
Suite 4100, Dallas, Texas 75201, unless another date, time
or place is agreed to in writing by the parties hereto.
1.2 Purchase of Acquisition
Interests. At the Closing, upon the terms and
subject to the conditions of this Agreement, Buyer shall
(a) purchase from Aneth, and Aneth shall sell and issue to
Buyer, the Acquired Interest and (b) pay to Aneth by wire
transfer in immediately available funds an aggregate amount
equal to the Acquisition Consideration. Simultaneously
therewith, Buyer and Seller shall enter into (and Seller shall
cause all other members in Aneth to enter into) an amended
operating agreement for Aneth in a form mutually agreeable to
both parties; provided, however, that the operating
agreement shall provide, among other terms, that all excess
nonrecourse liabilities allocated under Treasury Regulations
Section 1.752-3(a)(3)
shall be allocated in accordance with the excess
Section 704(c) method and shall provide for tax items
to be allocated between Seller and IPO Corp. for the taxable
year that includes the Contribution based upon a closing of the
books.
1.3 Repayment of Debt under Credit
Agreements. Immediately following the purchase
described in Section 1.2, Aneth shall use the entire
amount of the Acquisition Consideration received for the
Acquired Interest to repay, by wire transfer in immediately
available funds, in respect of certain amounts due under the
Credit Agreements, in accordance with the terms thereof. As a
result of such debt repayment, there shall be no amounts
outstanding under the 2nd Lien Agreement. Immediately
following such debt repayment, the parties hereto intend to
effect the Contribution.
1.4 Contribution. At the Closing,
immediately following the debt repayment as described in
Section 1.3, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions of this Agreement, Seller shall contribute the
Contribution Interest to IPO Corp. and in exchange therefor IPO
Corp. shall issue to Seller the Contribution Consideration. As
used herein, the Contribution
Consideration means:(a) 9,200,000 shares
of IPO Corp. Common Stock, less 200,000 shares for employee
retention equity awards if directed by Seller, which, if
forfeited, will be issued to Seller (Retention
Shares); (b) warrants to purchase
4,600,000 shares of IPO Corp. Common Stock to be treated as
Founders Warrants pursuant to the New Warrant
Agreement to be entered into at the Closing (such warrants, the
Sellers Warrants); and
(c) 1,385,000 Earnout Shares. At the Closing, in addition
to the Contribution Consideration, IPO Corp. shall issue the
Retention Shares to or for the benefit of eligible employees of
Seller, if directed by Seller.
1.5 Founder Transactions.
(a) At or immediately prior to the Closing, that certain
Co-Investment Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of
September 26, 2007, by and between Buyer and Thomas O.
Hicks (the Co-Investment Agreement)
shall be terminated.
A-10
(b) At the Closing, immediately prior to the Merger,
7,335,000 shares of Buyer Common Stock held by Founder
shall be cancelled, forfeited and retired.
(c) At the Closing, immediately prior to the Merger,
4,600,000 Founders Warrants held by Founder shall be
cancelled and forfeited. To permit the cancellation contemplated
pursuant to this Section 1.5(b), the Founders
Warrants shall be amended by the Warrant Agreement Amendment.
(d) At the Closing, immediately prior to the Merger,
Founder shall sell to Seller and Seller shall purchase from
Founder 2,333,333 Sponsors Warrants and, in exchange
therefor, Seller shall pay Founder an aggregate amount equal to
$1,166,666.50 payable by wire transfer in immediately available
funds. To permit the sale contemplated pursuant to this
Section 1.5(d), the Sponsors Warrants shall be
amended by the Warrant Agreement Amendment.
1.6 The Merger.
(a) At the Closing, immediately following completion of the
Acquisition and debt repayment and simultaneously with the
Contribution, upon the terms and subject to the terms and
subject to the conditions of this Agreement, Merger Sub shall
merge with and into Buyer, with Buyer continuing as the
surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of IPO Corp,
by filing a certificate of merger with respect to such Merger
(the Certificate of Merger), which
Certificate of Merger shall be in such form as is required by,
and executed and acknowledged in accordance with the DGCL, and
reasonably acceptable to Buyer, IPO Corp. and Seller, and the
Merger shall have the effects set forth in this Agreement and in
the applicable provisions of the DGCL. Buyer, as the surviving
corporation of the Merger, is sometimes referred to herein as
the Surviving Corporation. As used in
this Agreement, the term Merger Effective
Time shall mean the date and time when the Merger
becomes effective.
(b) At the Merger Effective Time, each share of Buyer
Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time, other than any shares of Buyer Common Stock to
be canceled pursuant to Section 1.5(b), shall be
automatically converted into and become the right to receive one
fully paid and nonassessable share of IPO Corp. Common Stock
from IPO Corp. (the Merger
Consideration); provided, that
1,865,000 shares of IPO Corp. Common Stock to be received
by Founder in the Merger shall be restricted Earnout Shares. As
a result of the Merger, at the Merger Effective Time, each
holder of a Certificate shall cease to have any rights with
respect thereto, except the right to receive the Merger
Consideration payable in respect of the shares of Buyer Common
Stock represented by such Certificate immediately prior to the
Merger Effective Time, all to be issued or paid, without
interest, in consideration therefor upon the surrender of such
Certificate in accordance with Section 1.8(b) (or,
in the case of a lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate,
Section 1.8(d)).
(c) Each share of Buyer Common Stock owned by Buyer,
immediately prior to the Merger Effective Time shall
automatically be extinguished without any conversion, and no
consideration shall be delivered in respect thereof.
1.7 Warrants.
(a) Pursuant to the Merger, all Public Warrants shall, by
operation of an amendment in substantially the form of
Exhibit A hereto (the Warrant Agreement
Amendment), be treated as follows:
(i) Each Public Warrant will be converted into either
(x) the right to receive $0.55 in cash (the
Cash Consideration) or (y) a
warrant to purchase one share of IPO Corp. Common Stock (the
New Warrant Consideration and together
with the Cash Consideration, the Warrant
Consideration) pursuant to a warrant agreement in
the form of Exhibit B hereto (the New
Warrant Agreement), in each case as the holder of
Public Warrants shall have elected or be deemed to have elected
(an Election) in accordance with
Section 1.7(a)(ii). All such Public Warrants, when
so amended and converted, will automatically be retired and will
cease to be outstanding, and the holder of a warrant certificate
(a Warrant Certificate) that,
immediately prior to the Merger Effective Time, represented
outstanding Public Warrants will cease to have any rights with
respect thereto, except the right to receive,
A-11
upon the surrender of such Warrant Certificate the applicable
Warrant Consideration (in each case, either that provided in
clause (x) or clause (y) of this clause (i), as
applicable).
(ii) Subject to the procedures in
Section 1.8(e) and the limitations in
Section 1.7(a)(iv), each holder of Public Warrants
outstanding immediately prior to the Election Date who makes a
valid Election to receive the New Warrant Consideration will be
entitled to receive the New Warrant Consideration in respect of
such Public Warrants (the New Warrant Election
Warrants); provided that, notwithstanding
anything in this Agreement to the contrary, a holder of a Public
Warrant shall not be able to make a valid election to receive
the New Warrant Consideration for any Public Warrants that it
voted against the Warrant Agreement Amendment. All holders of
Public Warrants immediately prior to the Election Date who do
not make a valid Election for New Warrant Election Warrants will
be deemed to have elected to receive the Cash Consideration in
respect of their Public Warrants.
(iii) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary:
(A) the maximum number of Public Warrants to be converted
into the right to receive the New Warrant Consideration will be
equal to the Warrant Cap; and
(B) the minimum number of Public Warrants to be converted
into the right to receive the Cash Consideration will be equal
to (x) the number of Public Warrants outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time less (y) the
Warrant Cap.
(iv) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, to the extent the aggregate number of New Warrant
Election Warrants exceeds the Warrant Cap, the New Warrant
Consideration will be prorated as follows:
(A) all Public Warrants for which Elections to receive the
Cash Consideration have been made or deemed to have been made
(the Cash Election Warrants) will be
converted into the right to receive the Cash
Consideration; and
(B) the New Warrant Election Warrants will be converted
into the right to receive the Cash Consideration and the New
Warrant Consideration in the following manner: (1) the
number of New Warrant Election Warrants covered by each Form of
Election to be converted into New Warrant Consideration will be
determined by multiplying the number of New Warrant Election
Warrants covered by such Form of Election by a fraction,
(x) the numerator of which is the Warrant Cap and
(y) the denominator of which is the aggregate number of New
Warrant Election Warrants; and (2) all New Warrant Election
Warrants not converted into New Warrant Consideration in
accordance with clause (1) will be converted into the right
to receive the Cash Consideration in respect thereof.
(b) Pursuant to the Merger, each Founders Warrant and
each Sponsors Warrant, by operation of the Warrant
Agreement Amendment, will be converted into a warrant to
purchase one share of IPO Corp. Common Stock (the
New Founders Warrants and the
New Sponsors Warrants). All such
Founders Warrants and Sponsors Warrants, when so
converted, will automatically be retired and will cease to be
outstanding, and the holder of a Warrant Certificate that,
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger,
represented outstanding Founders Warrants or
Sponsors Warrants will cease to have any rights with
respect thereto, except the right to receive, upon the surrender
of such Warrant Certificate, the New Founders Warrants or
New Sponsors Warrants, as applicable. The New
Founders Warrants and New Sponsors Warrants will
have the terms and conditions set forth in the New Warrant
Agreement.
1.8 Exchange of Shares and Certificates.
(a) Deposit with Exchange Agent. Prior to
the Closing, Buyer, IPO Corp., Founder and Seller shall engage
the Exchange Agent. At or prior to the Closing, IPO Corp. shall
deposit with the Exchange Agent, in trust for the benefit of
Seller and holders of shares of Buyer Common Stock and Buyer
Warrants prior to the Closing, certificates representing the
shares of IPO Corp. Common Stock and warrants issuable pursuant
to Sections 1.4 and 1.6 (or appropriate
alternative arrangements shall be made if such securities will
be issued in book-entry form).
A-12
(b) Exchange Procedures.
(i) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Closing,
and in any event within three (3) Business Days after the
Closing, IPO Corp. shall cause the Exchange Agent to distribute
to Seller the number of shares of IPO Corp. Common Stock
(including Earnout Shares) issuable pursuant to the Contribution.
(ii) As soon as reasonably practicable after the Closing,
and in any event within three (3) Business Days after the
Closing, IPO Corp. shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail to
each holder of record of a certificate or certificates which
immediately prior to the Closing represented outstanding shares
of Buyer Common Stock (the
Certificates), which at the Closing
became entitled to receive shares of IPO Common Stock, pursuant
to Section 1.6 hereof, instructions for use in
obtaining certificates representing whole shares of IPO Corp.
Common Stock (or alternative instructions if such shares will be
issued in book-entry form). Upon delivery of the Certificate and
any power of attorney or similar document as may reasonably be
required by the Exchange Agent, the holder of such Certificates
shall be entitled to receive that number of whole shares of IPO
Corp. Common Stock to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 1.6.
(iii) Notwithstanding the time of delivery, the shares of
IPO Corp. Common Stock distributed pursuant to this
Section 1.8 shall be deemed issued at the time of
the Closing.
(iv) All shares of IPO Corp. Common Stock issued or
distributed in accordance with the terms of this
ARTICLE I, shall be deemed to have been issued (or
paid) in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the
shares of Buyer Common Stock in connection with the Merger
and/or the
Contribution, as applicable.
(c) No Liability. None of Buyer, Parent,
Aneth, IPO Corp. Seller, or the Exchange Agent or any of their
respective directors, officers, employees and agents shall be
liable to any Person in respect of any shares of IPO Corp.
Common Stock (or dividends or distributions with respect
thereto) delivered to a public official pursuant to any
applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar law.
(d) Lost, Stolen or Destroyed
Certificates. In the event any Certificates shall
have been lost, stolen or destroyed, the Exchange Agent shall
issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed
Certificates, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by
the holder thereof, such shares or IPO Corp. Common Stock
receivable pursuant to the Merger; provided, however,
that IPO Corp. may, in its discretion and as a condition
precedent to the issuance thereof, require the owner of such
lost, stolen or destroyed Certificates to deliver an agreement
of indemnification in a form reasonably satisfactory to IPO
Corp., or a bond in such sum as IPO Corp. may reasonably direct
as indemnity, against any claim that may be made against IPO
Corp. or the Exchange Agent in respect of the Certificates
alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed.
(e) Warrant Election/Exchange Procedures.
(i) Public Warrants.
(A) Buyer will authorize the Exchange Agent to receive
Elections and to act as exchange agent hereunder with respect to
the Merger.
(B) Buyer will prepare, for use by the holders of Public
Warrants in surrendering Warrant Certificates, a form (the
Form of Election) pursuant to which
each holder of Public Warrants may make an Election. The Form of
Election will be delivered to such Warrant holders by means and
at a time upon which Buyer and IPO Corp. will mutually agree.
(C) An Election will have been properly made only if a Form
of Election properly completed and signed and accompanied by the
Public Warrant certificate or certificates to which such Form of
Election relates (1) is received by the Exchange Agent
prior to the date and time of the special meeting of
warrantholders being held to approve the Warrant Agreement
Amendment (the Election Date and the
Special Meeting of Warrantholders) or
(2) is delivered to the Exchange Agent at the Special
Meeting of Warrantholders.
A-13
(D) Any Public Warrant holder may at any time prior to the
Election Date change such holders Election if the Exchange
Agent receives (1) prior to the Election Date written
notice of such change accompanied by a properly completed Form
of Election or (2) at the Special Meeting of Warrantholders
a new, properly completed Form of Election. The Company will
have the right in its sole discretion to permit changes in
Elections after the Election Date.
(E) Buyer will have the right to make rules, not
inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement or the Warrant
Amendment Agreement, governing the validity of Forms of
Election, the manner and extent to which Elections are to be
taken into account in making the determinations prescribed by
this section, the issuance and delivery of certificates for the
new warrants to purchase IPO Corp. Common Stock into which the
Public Warrants are exchangeable in the Merger, and the payment
for Public Warrants converted into the right to receive the Cash
Consideration in the Merger.
(F) In connection with the above procedures, (1) the
holders of Warrant Certificates evidencing Public Warrants will
surrender such certificates to the Exchange Agent, (2) upon
surrender of a Warrant Certificate the holder thereof will be
entitled to receive the applicable Warrant Consideration, and
(3) the Warrant Certificates so surrendered will forthwith
be canceled.
(ii) Founders Warrants and Sponsors
Warrants. As soon as practicable after the
closing of the Merger, (a) the holders of Warrant
Certificates evidencing Founders Warrants and
Sponsors Warrants will surrender such Warrant Certificates
to IPO Corp., (b) upon surrender of a Warrant Certificate
pursuant to this section the holder thereof will be entitled to
receive the New Founders Warrants or the New
Sponsors Warrants, as applicable, and (c) the Warrant
Certificates so surrendered will forthwith be canceled.
(iii) Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Warrant
Certificates. In the event any Warrant
Certificates shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, the
Exchange Agent shall issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or
destroyed Warrant Certificates, upon the making of an affidavit
of that fact by the holder thereof, such warrants receivable
pursuant to the Merger; provided, however, that IPO Corp.
may, in its discretion and as a condition precedent to the
issuance thereof, require the owner of such lost, stolen or
destroyed Warrant Certificates to deliver an agreement of
indemnification in a form reasonably satisfactory to IPO Corp.,
or a bond in such sum as IPO Corp. may reasonably direct as
indemnity, against any claim that may be made against IPO Corp.
or the Exchange Agent in respect of the Warrant Certificates
alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed.
1.9 Charters and Bylaws of IPO
Corp.. IPO Corp.s certificate of
incorporation and bylaws shall be amended and restated prior to
the Contribution and Merger, and IPO Corp.s certificate of
incorporation and bylaws shall be as set forth on
Exhibit C hereto and Exhibit D hereto,
respectively, and shall continue to be the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of IPO Corp. until thereafter amended
in accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable Law.
1.10 Board of Directors. On or
prior to the Closing, the boards of directors of IPO Corp. and
the Surviving Corporation shall cause the number of directors
that will comprise the full board of directors of IPO Corp. and
the Surviving Corporation, respectively, at the Closing to be as
set forth on Schedule 1.10. The members of the board of
directors of IPO Corp. and the Surviving Corporation at the
Closing shall be determined in accordance with
Schedule 1.10; provided, that appropriate
provisions shall be made for a staggered board of IPO Corp. as
set forth therein.
1.11 Taking of Necessary Action; Further
Action. If, at any time after the Closing, any
further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the
purposes of this Agreement, IPO Corp. and its officers and
directors, in the name and on behalf of IPO Corp., the Surviving
Corporation and the Companies, will take all such lawful and
necessary action.
1.12 IPO Corp. Incentive Plan. At
Closing, IPO Corp. shall adopt the Resolute Energy Corporation
2009 Performance Incentive Plan, as set forth on
Exhibit F hereto (Incentive
Plan).
A-14
1.13 Termination of HACI Registration Rights
Agreement. At Closing, the HACI Registration
Rights Agreement shall be terminated by HACI and the other
parties party thereto.
ARTICLE II
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND SELLER
Parent and Seller represent and warrant to Buyer as follows:
2.1 Due Organization. Each of
Parent and Seller is a limited liability company duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
State of Delaware.
2.2 Authorization and Validity of
Agreement. Each of Parent and Seller has all
requisite limited liability company power and authority to
execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform all of its
obligations hereunder. The execution, delivery and performance
by each of Parent and Seller of this Agreement and the
consummation by each of Parent and Seller of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary
limited liability company action, including the approval of the
managers and requisite members of each of Parent and Seller, and
no other action on the part of Parent or Seller is or will be
necessary for the execution, delivery and performance by Parent
and Seller of this Agreement and the consummation by it of the
transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly
executed and delivered by each of Parent and Seller and is a
legal, valid and binding obligation of Parent and Seller,
enforceable against them in accordance with its terms, except to
the extent that its enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent conveyance or
other laws relating to or affecting creditors rights
generally and by general equity principles.
2.3 No Conflict. Except as set
forth on Schedule 2.3 and except as would not
prevent, materially hinder or materially delay the ability of
each of Parent and Seller to perform its obligations under this
Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby,
the execution, delivery and performance by each of Parent and
Seller of this Agreement and the consummation by it of the
transactions contemplated hereby:
(a) will not violate any provision of applicable laws,
rules, regulations, statutes, codes, ordinances or requirements
of any Governmental Authority (collectively,
Laws), order, judgment or decree
applicable to Parent or Seller;
(b) will not require any consent, authorization or approval
of, or filing with or notice to, any Governmental Authority
under any provision of Law applicable to Parent or Seller,
except for the requirements of the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the
HSR Act), and any other applicable
antitrust or competition laws outside the United States, and
except for any consent, approval, filing or notice requirements
which become applicable solely as a result of the specific
regulatory status of Buyer or its Affiliates or that Buyer or
its Affiliates are otherwise required to obtain;
(c) will not violate any provision of the certificate of
formation or limited liability company agreement of either
Parent or Seller; and
(d) will not require any consent, approval or notice under,
and will not conflict with, or result in the breach or
termination of, or constitute a default under, or result in the
acceleration of the performance by Parent and Seller under, any
material indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, lease, license,
franchise, contract, agreement or other instrument to which
either Parent or Seller is a party or by which it or any of its
assets is bound.
2.4 Ownership of Seller
Interests. Parent is and will be on the Closing
Date the record and beneficial owner and holder of all of the
outstanding Seller Interests, free and clear of all Liens, other
than those Liens disclosed on Schedule 2.4. Except
as set forth on Schedule 2.4, Parent has no other
equity interests or rights to acquire equity interest in Seller.
Such Seller Interests are not subject to any contract
restricting or otherwise relating to the voting, dividend rights
or disposition of such Seller Interests, except as set forth on
Schedule 2.4.
A-15
2.5 Legal Proceedings. There are no
Proceedings pending, or, to the knowledge of Parent or Seller,
threatened against Parent or Seller, before any Governmental
Authority which seeks to prevent Parent or Seller from
consummating the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
2.6 IPO Corp. and Merger Sub. Each
of IPO Corp. and Merger Sub: (a) has been formed for the
sole purpose of effectuating the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement; (b) has not conducted any business
activities; and (c) does not have any material Liabilities.
As of the date hereof, (x) Seller owns all of the
outstanding equity interests in IPO Corp. and (y) IPO Corp.
owns all of the equity interests in Merger Sub. Except as set
forth on Exhibit F, there are no other equity interests of
either IPO Corp or Merger Sub authorized, issued, reserved for
issuance or outstanding and there are no contracts, commitments,
options, warrants, calls, rights, puts, convertible securities,
exchangeable securities, understandings or arrangements by which
either IPO Corp. or Merger Sub is or may be bound to issue,
redeem, purchase or sell additional equity interests or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for any other equity
interest of IPO Corp. or Merger Sub, except as set forth in this
Agreement.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES CONCERNING COMPANIES
Seller represents and warrants to Buyer that, except as set
forth in the Schedules hereto:
3.1 Due Organization of the
Companies. Each of the Companies is a limited
liability company or corporation duly formed or incorporated,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
State of Delaware, has all requisite limited liability company
or corporate power, as applicable, and authority to own, lease
and operate its properties and to carry on its business as it is
now being conducted and is in good standing and duly qualified
to do business in each jurisdiction in which the transaction of
its business makes such qualification necessary.
3.2 Authorization and Validity of
Agreement. The execution, delivery and
performance by Aneth of this Agreement and the consummation by
Aneth of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly
authorized by its members, and no other limited liability
company action on the part of Aneth is necessary for the
execution, delivery and performance by Aneth of this Agreement
and the consummation by Aneth of the transactions contemplated
hereby. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
Aneth and is a legal, valid and binding obligation of Aneth,
enforceable against Aneth in accordance with its terms, except
to the extent that its enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent
conveyance or other laws relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and by general equity
principles.
3.3 Seller Subsidiaries.
(a) Schedule 3.3(a) lists all direct or
indirect Subsidiaries of Seller and the issued and outstanding
equity interests of each such Subsidiary. Ownership interests of
the Excluded Subsidiaries identified on
Schedule 3.3(a) are not included in the Contribution
Interest.
(b) Each of the Companies has all requisite company power
and authority to own its properties and assets and to carry on
its business as it is now being conducted, except where failure
to have such power and authority or to be in good standing would
not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Companies.
3.4 Capitalization. Schedule 3.4
sets forth a true, correct and complete list, as of the date
hereof, of all of the outstanding equity interests of each of
the Companies, and except as set forth on
Schedule 3.4, which constitute the Contribution
Interest. Each of the outstanding equity interests of the
Companies is duly authorized, validly issued, and if a
corporation, fully paid and non-assessable, and is directly
owned of record by the holders set forth on
Schedule 3.4, free and clear of any Liens, other
than Permitted Liens. There are no other equity interests of any
of the Companies authorized, issued, reserved for issuance or
outstanding and there are no contracts, commitments, options,
warrants, calls, rights, puts, convertible securities,
exchangeable securities, understandings or arrangements by which
Seller or any Companies are or may be bound to issue,
A-16
redeem, purchase or sell additional equity interests or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for any other equity
interest of any Companies. Except as set forth on
Schedule 3.4, neither Seller nor any of the
Companies are a party to any partnership agreement, stockholders
agreement or joint venture agreement with any other third Person
with respect to the Contribution Interest. There are no
dividends or other distributions with respect to the Companies
that have been declared but remain unpaid.
3.5 Consents and Approvals. Neither
the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, IPO
Corp., Merger Sub and Aneth nor the consummation by Seller, IPO
Corp., Merger Sub and Aneth of the transactions contemplated
hereby will require on the part of Seller, IPO Corp., Merger Sub
and Aneth or any of the other Companies any action, consent,
order, approval, authorization or permit of, or filing with, or
notification to, any Governmental Authority, including any
approval by the U.S. Department of Interior, the BIA, the
Navajo Nation, or NNOG pursuant to the IMDA or otherwise and
will not result in any additional liabilities for site
investigation or cleanup, or require the consent, authorization
or approval of, or filing with or notice to, any Governmental
Authority, pursuant to any Environmental Law, including any
so-called transaction-triggered or responsible
property transfer requirements, except: (a) for any
applicable filings required under the HSR Act and any other
applicable antitrust or competition laws outside the United
States; (b) notice under the NNOG Contract pursuant to
Section 4.02(b)(ii) of the First Amendment of the NNOG
Contract; or (c) where the failure to obtain such action,
consent, order, approval, authorization or permit, or to make
such filing or notification, would not prevent the consummation
of the transactions contemplated hereby.
3.6 No Conflict. Neither the
execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, IPO Corp.,
Merger Sub and Aneth nor the consummation by Seller, IPO Corp.,
Merger Sub and Aneth of the transactions contemplated hereby
will: (a) conflict with or violate the certificates of
formation or incorporation of Seller, IPO Corp., Merger Sub and
Aneth, respectively, or their respective operating agreements
and bylaws; (b) except as described on
Schedule 3.6 with respect to the Credit Agreements
and the NNOG Contract, result in a violation or breach of,
constitute a default (with or without notice or lapse of time,
or both) under, give rise to any right of termination,
cancellation or acceleration of, or the trigger of any material
charge, fee, payment or requirement of consent under, or result
in the imposition of any Lien, other than a Permitted Lien, on
any assets or property of the Companies pursuant to any Material
Contract or other material indenture, mortgage, deed of trust,
lease, license, franchise, contract, agreement arrangement,
commitment, letter of intent, instrument, promise, or other
similar understanding, whether written or oral (each, a
Contract) to which the Companies are a
party or by which the Companies, IPO Corp., Merger Sub and or
any of their assets or properties are bound, except for such
violations, breaches and defaults (or rights of termination,
cancellation or acceleration or Liens) as to which requisite
waivers or consents have been obtained; (c) result in any
additional liabilities for site investigation or cleanup; or
(d) assuming the consents, approvals, authorizations or
permits and filings or notifications referred to in
Section 3.5 and this Section 3.6 are
duly and timely obtained or made, violate any Law, order, writ,
injunction, decree, statute, rule or regulation applicable to
the Companies, IPO Corp., and Merger Sub or any of their
respective assets and properties, except for such conflicts,
violations, breaches or defaults which would not prevent the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
3.7 Financial Statements. Set forth
on Schedule 3.7 are the following financial
statements (collectively the Financial
Statements):
(a) audited combined balance sheets and statements of
income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flow as
of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008 for the Companies; and
(b) unaudited combined balance sheets and statements of
income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flow (the
Interim Financial Statements) as of
and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the
Balance Sheet Date) for the Companies.
The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) applied on a consistent basis
throughout the periods covered thereby, present fairly, in all
material respects (or consistent with GAAP), the financial
condition of the Companies as of such dates and the results of
operations of the Companies for such periods, and are
consistent, in all material respects, with the books and records
of the Companies; provided, however, that the Interim
Financial
A-17
Statements are subject to normal year-end adjustments (which
will not be material individually or in the aggregate) and lack
footnotes and other presentation items. Since the Balance Sheet
Date, the Companies have not effected any change in any method
of accounting or accounting practice, except for any such change
required because of a concurrent change in GAAP or to conform a
Companys accounting policies and practices to another
Company. Prior to the filing of the Proxy/Registration
Statement, Seller shall deliver to Buyer the audited combined
balance sheets and statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flow as of and for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2008 for the Companies, and they
shall be deemed to be included in the Financial Statements.
3.8 [Reserved].
3.9 Absence of Material Adverse
Change. Except as set forth on
Schedule 3.9 and otherwise contemplated by this
Agreement, since December 31, 2008, the business of the
Companies has been conducted only in the ordinary course
consistent with past practice, and there have not been any
events, changes or developments which would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Companies.
3.10 Absence of Undisclosed
Liabilities. None of the Companies, IPO Corp. or
Merger Sub has any material obligations or liabilities (whether
accrued, absolute, contingent, unliquidated or otherwise,
whether due or to become due) which would be required to be set
forth on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP,
except: (a) liabilities reflected on the balance sheet of
the Companies at March 31, 2009 or the notes thereto,
included in the Financial Statements; (b) liabilities
incurred since March 31, 2009 in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice which, individually or in
the aggregate, are not material and are of the same character
and nature as the liabilities reflected on the Financial
Statements); (c) liabilities incurred in connection with
the transactions contemplated hereby; (d) immaterial
liabilities; and (e) obligations and liabilities on
Schedule 3.10 or as otherwise disclosed in this
Agreement (including the Schedules hereto).
3.11 Real and Personal Properties.
(a) Schedule 3.11(a) contains a complete and
correct list of all of the Leased Real Property. With respect to
each Leased Real Property, a Company owns a leasehold estate in
such Leased Real Property, free and clear of all Liens except
Permitted Liens. No material default by the Companies, or to the
Knowledge of Seller, the applicable landlord, exists under any
lease with respect to the Leased Real Property and each material
lease with respect to the Leased Real Property is legal, valid,
binding and enforceable and in full force and effect.
(b) Schedule 3.11(b) sets forth a complete and
correct list of all Owned Real Property. With respect to each
Owned Real Property: (i) a Company owns title in fee simple
to such Owned Real Property, free and clear of all Liens except
for Permitted Liens; (ii) there are no material outstanding
options or rights of first refusal in favor of any other Person
to purchase or lease such Owned Real Property or any portion
thereof or interest therein; and (iii) there are no
material leases, subleases, licenses, options, rights,
concessions or other agreements affecting any portion of such
Owned Real Property.
(c) Each of the Companies has good title to all of the
material assets (other than Owned Real Property) reflected in
its most recent balance sheet included in the Financial
Statements as being owned and all material assets thereafter
acquired by such Companies (except to the extent that such
assets have been disposed of after the date of the latest
balance sheet in the Financial Statements in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice or pursuant to
existing contracts), free and clear of all Liens other than
Permitted Liens, and all other material assets used in the
businesses of the Companies are leased or licensed by the
Companies, or the Companies have another contractual right to
use, such assets.
3.12 Tax Matters.
(a) Certain Defined Terms. For purposes
of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply:
(i) The term Taxes shall mean all
taxes, charges, levies, penalties or other assessments imposed
by any Governmental Authority, including, but not limited to
income, excise, property, sales, transfer, franchise, payroll,
withholding, social security, oil and gas or other similar
taxes, including any interest or penalties attributable thereto.
A-18
(ii) The term Returns shall mean
all reports, estimates, declarations of estimated Tax,
information statements and returns relating to, or required to
be filed in connection with, any Taxes, including any schedule
or attachment thereto, and including any amendment thereof.
(b) Returns Filed and Taxes Paid. (i) All
material Returns required to be filed by or on behalf of the
Companies have been duly filed on a timely basis and all such
Returns are complete and correct in all material respects;
(ii) all material Taxes shown to be payable on the Returns
or on subsequent assessments with respect thereto have been paid
in full on a timely basis and no other material Taxes are
payable by the Companies with respect to items or periods
covered by such Returns or with respect to any period prior to
the date of this Agreement; (iii) each of the Companies has
withheld and paid over all material Taxes required to have been
withheld and paid over, and complied with all information
reporting requirements, including maintenance of required
records with respect thereto, in connection with material
amounts paid or owing to any employee, creditor, independent
contractor or other third party for all periods for which the
statute of limitations has not expired; and (iv) there are
no material liens on any of the assets of any of the Companies
with respect to Taxes, other than liens for Taxes not yet due
and payable or for Taxes that any of the Companies is contesting
in good faith through appropriate proceedings and for which
appropriate reserves have been established.
(c) Tax Deficiencies; Audits; Statutes of
Limitations. Except in the case of audits,
actions or proceedings for which appropriate reserves have been
established on the Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP:
(i) there is no audit by a governmental or taxing authority
in process or pending with respect to any material Returns of
the Companies; (ii) no deficiencies have been asserted, in
writing, with respect to any material Taxes of the Companies and
none of the Companies has received written notice that it has
not filed a material Return or paid material Taxes required to
be filed or paid by it; and (iii) none of the Companies are
parties to any action or proceeding for assessment or collection
of any material Taxes, nor has such event been asserted, in
writing against the Companies or any of their assets.
3.13 Compliance with Laws;
Permits. Each of the Companies is, and to the
Knowledge of Seller has been, in compliance in all material
respects with all Laws which apply to such entity, except where
past
non-compliance
would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect. None of the Companies has received any (a) written
communication or (b) to the Knowledge of Seller, oral
communication, in each case during the past three (3) years
from a Governmental Authority that alleges that such Person is
not in compliance in all material respects with any Law. Neither
the Companies nor any director, officer, agent, employee or
Affiliate of the Companies has taken any action, directly or
indirectly, that would result in a violation by such persons of
the anti-bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
of 1977, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Neither the Companies nor any director, officer, agent, employee
or Affiliate of the Companies is currently subject to any
U.S. sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets
Control of the U.S. Treasury Department. Each of the
Companies owns, holds or possesses all material permits,
licenses, franchises, orders, consents, approvals and
authorizations from Governmental Authorities
(Permits) that are necessary to
entitle it to own or lease, operate and use its assets and to
carry on and conduct its business, or timely application has
been made for certain Permits for certain near-term planned
business operations and their issuance is pending. Each such
Permit held or possessed by the Companies is in full force and
effect in all material respects, and the Companies are in
compliance in all material respects with such Permits.
3.14 Legal Proceedings.
(a) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.14(a), there are
no material writs, injunctions, decrees, orders, judgments,
lawsuits, claims, actions, suits, arbitrations, investigations
or proceedings (collectively,
Proceedings) pending against or
affecting the Companies at law or in equity, or before or by any
federal, state, tribal, municipal, foreign or other governmental
department, commission, board, bureau, agency, court or
instrumentality, whether domestic or foreign, including any such
department, commission board, bureau, agency, court or
instrumentality of or within the BIA or the Navajo Nation
(Governmental Authority); and
(b) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.14(b),
the Companies are not subject to any material order, writ,
injunction, judgment or decree of any court or any Governmental
Authority.
A-19
3.15 Environmental Matters.
(a) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.15(a):
(i) the Companies are in and have been in material
compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws and all
Environmental Licenses and Permits;
(ii) the Companies possess all material Environmental
Licenses and Permits required under applicable Environmental Law
for them to occupy the Company Assets and to operate as they
currently operate and, to the Knowledge of Seller, each such
Environmental License and Permit is in full force and effect,
free from breach, and the transactions will not adversely affect
them;
(iii) there are no pending, or to the Knowledge of Seller,
threatened Proceedings and the Companies have not received any
written notice or claim against them alleging a material
violation of any Environmental Laws, other than such
Proceedings, notices or claims that have been resolved in all
material respects as of the date hereof;
(iv) the Companies have not treated, recycled, stored,
disposed of, arranged for or permitted the disposal of,
transported, handled, or released any Hazardous Substances, or
owned or operated any property or facility (and no such property
or facility is contaminated by any such substance) in a manner
that has given or would give rise to any material liability,
including any liability for investigation or response costs,
corrective action costs, personal injury, property damage or
natural resources damages, pursuant to Environmental Laws;
(v) none of the Companies is (A) subject to any
outstanding material order from or material agreement with any
Governmental Authority resulting from any judicial or
administrative proceedings under any Environmental Laws; or
(B) a party to any pending material judicial or
administrative proceedings or, to the Knowledge of Seller, the
subject of any investigations by any Governmental Authority,
pursuant to any Environmental Laws;
(vi) none of the following exists at any property or
facility currently or, to the Knowledge of Seller, previously
owned or operated by the Companies: (A) under or
above-ground storage tanks or unlined production pits;
(B) asbestos containing material in any form or condition;
(C) materials or equipment containing polychlorinated
biphenyls; or (D) landfills, surface impoundments, or
disposal areas other than permitted disposal wells and
associated facilities and equipment operated in material
compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws and all
Environmental Licenses and Permits;
(vii) to the Knowledge of Seller, there are no facts or
circumstances reasonably expected to pose a material liability
against the Companies under any applicable Environmental Law;
(viii) none of the Companies has, either expressly or by
operation of Law, assumed or undertaken any material liability,
including any obligation for corrective or remedial action, of
any other Person relating to Environmental Laws;
(ix) the Companies have provided to Buyer copies of all
material environmental site assessment reports and compliance
audits, whether draft or final, which are in its possession
addressing the Company Assets;
(x) the Companies have not received any unresolved written
notice, or to the Knowledge of Seller, oral notice, directed to
the Companies that any facility or site to which the Companies,
either directly or indirectly by a third Person, has sent any
Hazardous Substances for storage, treatment, disposal, or other
management has been or is being operated in material violation
of Environmental Laws, or pursuant to Environmental Laws is
identified or, to the Knowledge of Seller, proposed to be
identified on any list of contaminated properties or other
properties which pursuant to Environmental Laws are the subject
of an investigation, cleanup, removal, remediation, or other
response action by a Governmental Authority;
(xi) to the Knowledge of Seller, all of the wells located
on the Company Assets, have been drilled, completed, and
operated in material compliance with applicable Laws, including
without limitation applicable Environmental Laws;
A-20
(xii) there are no idle wells located on the Company Assets
that have been operated by the Companies which have not been
plugged or abandoned in accordance with applicable Laws,
including without limitation applicable Environmental Laws;
(b) For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms
shall have the meanings assigned below:
(i) Environmental Laws shall mean
any and all Laws regulating or imposing liability or standards
of conduct concerning public health and safety or pollution or
protection of the environment, including surface water,
groundwater, ambient air, surface or subsurface soil, or
wildlife habitat.
(ii) Environmental Licenses and
Permits shall mean all Permits required pursuant
to applicable Environmental Laws.
(iii) Hazardous Substances shall
mean any substance, pollutant, contaminant, material, or waste,
or combination thereof, regulated or subject to liability under
any applicable Environmental Law, gasoline or petroleum
(including crude oil or any fraction thereof) or petroleum
products, polychlorinated biphenyls, urea-formaldehyde
insulation, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, asbestos,
pollutants, or contaminants defined as such in applicable
Environmental Laws.
Notwithstanding the generality of any other representations and
warranties in this Agreement, the representations and warranties
in this Section 3.15 shall be deemed the only
representations and warranties in this Agreement with respect to
matters relating to Environmental Laws or to liabilities or
other obligations arising out of Hazardous Substances.
3.16 Employee Benefit Plans.
(a) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.16(a),
neither the Companies nor any ERISA Affiliate, sponsors,
maintains, contributes to or has any obligation to maintain,
sponsor or contribute to, or has any direct or indirect
liability, whether contingent or otherwise, with respect to any
material Benefit Plan under which any Business Employee has any
present or future right to benefits; the Benefit Plans disclosed
on Schedule 3.16(a) being the Company
Benefit Plans. The Companies have no liability
with respect to any Benefit Plan other than the Company Benefit
Plans.
(b) The Companies have made available to Buyer correct and
complete copies of the following documents with respect to each
Company Benefit Plan, to the extent applicable:
(i) any governing plan documents and related trust
documents, insurance contracts or other funding arrangements,
and all amendments thereto; (ii) the three most recent
Forms 5500 and all schedules thereto; (iii) the three
most recent audited financial statements; (iv) the most
recent determination or opinion letter from the Internal Revenue
Service; (v) the most recent summary plan description, any
subsequent summary of material modification, and any other
written communication to any Business Employees concerning
benefits provided under a Company Benefit Plan;
(vi) discrimination testing results for the three most
recent plan years; and (vii) an accurate written
description of each unwritten Company Benefit Plan.
(c) Each Company Benefit Plan has been established and
administered in all material respects in compliance with its
terms and all applicable Laws. Except as would not have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Companies, each Company Benefit
Plan that is intended to be qualified under section 401(a)
of the Code either (i) has received a favorable
determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service regarding
such qualification (covering all tax law changes required
through the Companies most recent submission period under
the five-year remedial amendment cycle established by the
Internal Revenue Service), or (ii) is adopted on a
prototype plan entitled to rely on the opinion letter issued by
the Internal Revenue Service as to the qualified status of such
plan under Section 401 of the Code to the extent provided
in Revenue Procedure
2005-16; and
there are no facts or circumstances that would reasonably be
expected to cause the loss of such qualification or the
imposition of any material liability, penalty or tax under
ERISA, the Code, or any other applicable law.
A-21
(d) Other than routine claims for benefits, to the
Knowledge of Seller and of the Companies, no Liens, lawsuits or
complaints to or by any person or Governmental Authority have
been filed against any Company Benefit Plan, the Companies or
any other person or party in respect of any Company Benefit Plan
and, to the Knowledge of Seller and of the Companies, no such
Lien, lawsuit, or complaint is contemplated or threatened with
respect to any Company Benefit Plan, except for any of the
foregoing that would be material to any of the Companies. No
material litigation, administrative or other investigation or
proceeding involving any Company Benefit Plan before the
Internal Revenue Service, the United States Department of Labor
or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation has occurred, is
pending or, to the Knowledge of Seller, is threatened.
(e) Neither the Companies nor any ERISA Affiliate
maintains, contributes or has any liability, whether contingent
or otherwise, with respect to, or has within the preceding six
years maintained, contributed to or had any liability, whether
contingent or otherwise, with respect to any Benefit Plan that
is, or has been (i) subject to Title IV of ERISA or
the funding standards of section 412 of the Code;
(ii) maintained by more than one employer within the
meaning of section 413(c) of the Code; (iii) subject
to sections 4063 or 4064 of ERISA; (iv) a
multiemployer plan as defined in section 3(37)
of ERISA; or (v) a multiple employer welfare
arrangement as defined in section 3(40) of ERISA.
(f) Neither the Companies (including their ERISA
Affiliates) nor, to the Knowledge of Seller and of the
Companies, any other party in interest or
disqualified person with respect to any Company
Benefit Plan has engaged in a non-exempt prohibited
transaction within the meaning of section 406 of
ERISA or section 4975 of the Code involving such Company
Benefit Plan that, individually or in the aggregate, could
reasonably be expected to subject any of the Companies to a
material tax imposed by section 4975 of the Code or a
material penalty imposed by section 501 or 502 of ERISA. To
the Knowledge of Seller and of the Companies, no fiduciary has
any material liability for breach of fiduciary duty or any other
failure to act or comply with the requirements of ERISA, the
Code or any other applicable law in connection with the
administration or investment of the assets of any Company
Benefit Plan.
(g) All liabilities or expenses of each of the Companies in
respect of any Company Benefit Plan (including workers
compensation) that have not been paid have been properly accrued
on the applicable Companys most recent Financial
Statements in compliance with GAAP. All contributions (including
all employer contributions and employee salary reduction
contributions) or premium payments required to have been made
under the terms of any Company Benefit Plan, or in accordance
with applicable law, as of the date hereof have been timely made
or reflected on the applicable Companys Financial
Statements in accordance with GAAP.
(h) None of the Companies has any obligation to provide or
make available post-employment benefits under any Company
Benefit Plan that is a welfare plan (as defined in
section 3(1) of ERISA) for any Business Employee, except as
may be required under Part 6 of Subtitle B of Title I
of ERISA and at the sole expense of such individual. There are
no reserves, assets, surpluses or prepaid premiums with respect
to any Company Benefit Plan that is a welfare plan.
(i) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement
nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
will (either alone or in combination with another event)
(i) result in any payment becoming due, or increase the
amount of any compensation due, to any Business Employee,
(ii) increase any benefits otherwise payable under any
Company Benefit Plan, (iii) result in the acceleration of
the time of payment or vesting of any such compensation or
benefits, (iv) result in a non-exempt prohibited
transaction as defined in section 406 of ERISA or
section 4975 of the Code, or (v) result in the payment
of any amount that could (alone or in combination with any other
payment) constitute an excess parachute payment as
defined in section 280G(b)(1) of the Code. No Business
Employee has or will obtain a right to receive a
gross-up
payment from any of the Companies with respect to any excise tax
that may be imposed upon such individual pursuant to
section 409A or 4999 of the Code.
(j) Each Company Benefit Plan that is a nonqualified
deferred compensation plan, as defined in
section 1.409A-1(a)
of the Treasury Regulations, and any award thereunder, in each
case that is subject to section 409A of the Code, has been
operated since January 1, 2005 (i) prior to
January 1, 2009, in compliance in all material respects
with section 409A of the Code, based upon a good faith,
reasonable interpretation of
A-22
section 409A of the Code and either the final regulations
issued thereunder or Internal Revenue Service Notice
2005-1; and
(ii) after December 31, 2008, in strict compliance
with section 409A of the Code and the final regulations
issued thereunder.
(k) The Companies may amend or terminate any Company
Benefit Plan (other than an employment Contract or any similar
Contract that cannot be amended or terminated without the
consent of the other party) at any time without incurring
liability thereunder, other than in respect of accrued and
vested obligations and medical or welfare claims incurred prior
to such amendment or termination.
(l) As of the date hereof, the aggregate amounts
outstanding and payable by Parent, Seller and the Companies
under the alternative cash award program authorized by the
managers of each of Parent and Seller by unanimous written
consent dated May 29, 2008, and any such similar program,
is set forth on Schedule 3.16(l).
3.17 Employment. There are no
material Proceedings pending or, to the Knowledge of Seller,
threatened involving Seller or any of the Companies and any of
their respective employees or former employees (with respect to
their status as an employee or former employee, as applicable)
including any harassment, discrimination, retaliatory act or
similar claim. To the Knowledge of Seller, since June 30,
2009, there has been: (a) no new labor union organizing or
attempting to organize any employee of Seller or any of the
Companies into one or more collective bargaining units with
respect to their employment with Seller or any of the Companies;
and (b) no labor dispute, or other collective labor action
by or with respect to any employees of Seller or any of the
Companies is pending or threatened against Seller or any of the
Companies. Except as set forth on Schedule 8.1. Neither
Seller nor any of the Companies is a party to, or bound by, any
collective bargaining agreement or other agreement with any
labor organization applicable to the employees of Seller or any
of the Companies, other than what has been previously provided
for review, and no such new agreement is currently being
negotiated. Seller and the Companies are in compliance in all
material respects with all applicable Laws respecting employment
and employment practices, terms and conditions of employment,
health and safety and wages and hours, including Laws relating
to discrimination, disability, labor relations, hours of work,
payment of wages and overtime wages, pay equity, immigration,
workers compensation, working conditions, employee scheduling,
occupational safety and health, family and medical leave, and
employee terminations, and have not received written notice, or
any other form of notice, that there is any material Proceeding
involving unfair labor practices against Seller or any of the
Companies pending.
3.18 Intellectual Property.
(a) Schedule 3.18(a) sets forth a list of all
material Intellectual Property which is owned by or used in
connection with the business of the Companies and which has been
registered or issued, or for which applications to register or
obtain issuance have been filed and are pending anywhere in the
world (the Company Intellectual
Property), an indication of the jurisdictions in
which such filings have been made and the status thereof. To the
extent indicated in Schedule 3.18(a), such Company
Intellectual Property has been duly registered in, filed in or
issued by the United States Copyright Office, the United States
Patent and Trademark Office or any similar national or local
foreign intellectual property authority. Since January 1,
2009, no application or registration for any Company
Intellectual Property that is owned by the Companies which is
material to the business of the Companies as presently conducted
has been finally rejected on the merits of such filing without
right to further appeal.
(b) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.18(b):
(i) each of the Companies possesses all right, title and
interest in and to the material Company Intellectual Property
which it owns, free and clear of any Lien or license other than
Permitted Liens, and all material registered patents,
trademarks, service marks and copyrights listed in
Schedule 3.18(b) are valid and subsisting, in full
force and effect, and have not been canceled, expired or
abandoned;
(ii) no claims are pending or, to the Knowledge of Seller,
threatened, (A) challenging the ownership, enforceability,
validity, or use by the Companies of any material Company
Intellectual Property, or (B) alleging that the Companies
are materially violating, misappropriating or infringing the
rights of any Person with regard to any material Company
Intellectual Property;
A-23
(iii) to the Knowledge of Seller, (A) no Person is
infringing the rights of the Companies with respect to any
material Company Intellectual Property owned by them and
(B) the operation of the business of the Companies as
currently conducted does not violate, misappropriate or infringe
the Intellectual Property of any other Person; and
(iv) the Companies take and have taken commercially
reasonable actions to maintain and preserve all material Company
Intellectual Property.
3.19 Material Contracts.
(a) Schedule 3.19(a) sets forth a true and
complete list of all the Material Contracts of the Companies
that are outstanding or in effect on the date of this Agreement.
As used herein, Material Contracts
means all of the following:
(i) any Contract restricting the ability of an entity or
any of its Affiliates to enter into or engage in any line of
business or compete with any Person;
(ii) a Contract under which the Companies have incurred
Indebtedness or directly or indirectly guaranteed Indebtedness,
liabilities or obligations of any other Person (other than
inter-company Indebtedness owed among the Companies) that,
individually, is in excess of $2,000,000;
(iii) a Contract involving any joint venture or partnership
involving a potential annual commitment or annual payment by any
of the Companies in excess of $5,000,000 (unless terminable
without payment or penalty upon no more than ninety
(90) days notice);
(iv) the principal Contract (and no ancillary or other
related agreements) used to effectuate (A) a material
acquisition, divestiture, merger or similar transaction that has
not been consummated or that has been consummated since
January 1, 2007, but contains representations, covenants,
indemnities or other obligations that are still in effect and
(B) the 2004 acquisition from Chevron Corporation and the
2006 acquisition from ExxonMobil Corporation;
(v) that imposes any material confidentiality, standstill
or similar obligation on the Companies, except for those entered
into in the ordinary course of business or in connection with
the process to sell the Companies;
(vi) that contains a right of first refusal, first offer or
first negotiation, except in the ordinary course of business;
(vii) pursuant to which the Companies have granted any
exclusive marketing, sales representative relationship,
consignment or distribution right to any third party, except in
the ordinary course of business;
(viii) other than leases for Leased Real Property, any
Contract or group of related contracts with the same party or
group of affiliated parties the performance of which involves
consideration in the excess of $5,000,000;
(ix) a Contract involving product sales agreements of
material amounts of products that cannot be cancelled by Seller
or the Companies upon sixty (60) days notice without
penalty to Seller or the Companies;
(x) any material seismic data license or acquisition
agreement; and
(xi) a Contract involving any Governmental Authority within
the Navajo Nation or Affiliate of the Navajo Nation, including
but not limited to that certain Cooperative Agreement effective
as of October 22, 2004 between Resolute Natural Resources
Company and NNOG, as amended by that certain First Amendment of
Cooperative Agreement effective as of October 21, 2005 (the
First Amendment) (as amended by the
First Amendment, the NNOG Contract).
(b) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.19(b),
none of the Companies is (with or without the lapse of time or
the giving of notice, or both) in breach or default of or under
any Material Contract and, to the Knowledge
A-24
of Seller, no other party to any such Material Contract is (with
or without the lapse of time or the giving of notice, or both)
in breach or default thereunder, except for breaches and
defaults which would not reasonably be expected to result in a
Material Adverse Effect on the Companies. To the Knowledge of
Seller, as of the date of this Agreement, except as disclosed in
Schedule 3.19(b), none of the Companies has received
any written notice of the intention of any Person to terminate
any Material Contract. Complete and correct copies of all
Material Contracts have been made available to Buyer prior to
the date of this Agreement.
3.20 Customers and Suppliers.
(a) Schedule 3.20(a) sets forth a complete list
of the five (5) largest customers of the Companies (on a
combined basis and by volume of sales to such customers) for the
most recent fiscal year (collectively, the Major
Customers). Except as set forth on
Schedule 3.20(a), since December 31, 2008 none
of the Major Customers has notified the Companies, in writing or
to the Knowledge of Seller, orally, that such Major Customer
intends to terminate its relationship with the Companies. The
Companies have not received any notice regarding the insolvency
of any of the Major Customers.
(b) Since December 31, 2008, none of the
Companies material suppliers has terminated, or threatened
in writing to terminate, its relationship with the Companies.
3.21 Transactions with
Affiliates. Except as set forth herein,
including, without limitation, as set forth in
ARTICLE VI hereof or as contemplated or as permitted
hereby, the Companies have not engaged in any material
transaction, outside the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice with Parent or Seller (excluding current or
former members of management of the Companies) or their
Affiliates (other than the Companies) since December 31,
2008, which was (a) material to the business of the
Companies taken as a whole or (b) undertaken in
contemplation of a sale of equity interests of the Companies.
3.22 Insurance. Schedule 3.22
sets forth a correct and complete list of each material
insurance policy that is currently in effect which is presently
owned or held by the Companies, insuring the products, physical
properties, assets, business, operations, employees, or officers
and directors of the Companies. All premiums due on such
policies have been paid and no notice of cancellation or
termination or intent to cancel, in each case which has not been
rescinded, has been received in writing by the Companies with
respect to any such insurance policy.
3.23 Brokers, Finders, etc. Except
as set forth on Schedule 3.23, none of Seller or the
Companies has employed, or is subject to any valid claim of, any
broker, finder or sales agent with this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement who might be or is
entitled to a fee or commission in connection with such
transactions.
3.24 Title to the Company Assets.
(a) Defensible Title. The Companies have
Defensible Title in all material respects to the Company Assets,
on an individual field or unit basis and when taken as a whole.
(b) Certain Terms. For purposes of this
Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings assigned
below:
(i) Company Assets shall mean the
following assets of the Companies (subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement) as follows:
(A) The undivided interests described on
Exhibit E in, and all other right, title and
interest of the Companies in and to,(i) the estates created by
the leases, licenses, permits and other agreements described in
Exhibit E (the Leases) and
the lands described in Exhibit E (the
Lands), and all rights and interests
of the Companies appurtenant thereto, including without
limitation the pertinent oil and gas WIs, NRIs, mineral fee
interests, oil, gas and mineral deeds, leases
and/or
subleases, royalties, overriding royalties, leasehold interests,
mineral servitudes, production payments and net profits
interests, fee mineral interests, surface estates, fee estates,
royalty interests, overriding royalty interests or other
non-working or carried interests, reversionary rights, farmout
and farmin rights, gas storage rights, operating rights, pooled
or unitized acreage, and all other rights, privileges and
A-25
interests in such oil, gas and other minerals (and the
production thereof), and other mineral rights of every nature;
(ii) all of the Companies rights, privileges,
benefits and powers conferred upon the holder of the Leases with
respect to the use and occupation of the surface of the Lands
that may be necessary, convenient or incidental to the
possession and enjoyment of the Leases; (iii) all of the
Companies rights in respect of any pooled, communitized or
unitized acreage located in whole or in part within the Lands by
virtue of the Leases, including rights to Production from the
pool or unit allocated to any Lease being a part thereof,
regardless of whether such production is from the Lands,
including those units specifically described on
Exhibit E, (iv) all rights, options, titles and
interests of the Companies granting the Companies the right to
obtain, or otherwise earn interests within the Lands no matter
how earned; and (v) all of the Companies tenements,
hereditaments, appurtenances, surface leases, easements,
permits, licenses, servitudes, franchises or rights of way;
(B) Identical undivided interests in, and all other right,
title and interest of the of the Companies in and to all of the
of the Companies oil and gas wells, saltwater disposal and
water wells, injection wells and underground injection wells
(whether or not currently producing), including those
specifically described on Exhibit E (the
Wells) and all of the Companies
pipelines, flowlines, plants, gathering and processing systems,
platforms, buildings, compressors, meters, tanks, machinery,
tools, pulling machines, utility lines, and all of the
Companies personal property, equipment, fixtures and
improvements in or on the Lands now or as of the Closing Date
appurtenant thereto or used in connection therewith or with the
production, treatment, sale or disposal of hydrocarbons or water
produced therefrom or attributable thereto and all other
appurtenances thereunto belonging, whether or not located on the
Leases;
(C) All files, records, documentation and data in the
Companies possession relating to (or evidencing) the
Companies ownership or rights in the Company Assets,
including all of the Companies rights and interests in
geological data and records, seismic data, information and
analysis, whether in digital or paper format, well logs, well
files, geological data, records and maps, land and contract
files and records, lease files, production sales agreement
files, division and transfer order files, written contracts,
title opinions and abstracts, legal records, governmental
filings, accounting files, data and records, computer hardware
and software, production reports, production logs, core sample
reports and maps and other materials (whether electronically
stored or otherwise) used or held for use by the Companies
regarding ownership of the Company Assets or operations and
Production which relate to the Company Assets, and other files,
documents and records which relate to the Company Assets;
(D) All of the Companies contracts and contractual
rights, obligations, title and interests, including all permits,
orders, Contracts, hedging Contracts, abstracts of title,
leases, deeds, unitization agreements, pooling agreements,
operating agreements, farmout agreements, farmin agreements,
participation agreements, division of interest statements,
division orders, transfer orders, participation agreements,
drilling contracts, sales contracts, saltwater disposal
agreements and other contracts, agreements and instruments
applicable to the Company Assets;
(E) All rights, obligations, title and interests of the
Companies Company in and to all easements, rights of way,
certificates, licenses, authorizations, permits and similar
interests and all other rights, privileges, benefits and powers
conferred upon the owner and holder of interests in the Company
Assets, or concerning software used in conjunction with
ownership or operation of the Company Assets;
(F) The Companies rights, title, obligations and
interests in or concerning any gas or pipeline imbalances
affecting the Company Assets;
(G) All of the Companies inventories, oil, gas and
production in tanks, in storage below the pipeline connection in
tanks or upstream of the sales meter (line fill) and
inventory attributable to the Company Assets;
A-26
(H) All of the Companies interests in the equipment
used by the Companies for the exploration, production,
development, collection, transmission, treatment and storage of
oil and natural gas and derivative products; and
(I) All of the Companies office equipment, computer
equipment, light tables, drafting tables, drafting equipment,
office supplies, facsimile machines, pool vehicles and any other
equipment or furniture not specifically named herein which is
used by the in their day to day operations.
(ii) Defensible Title shall mean,
with respect to the Company Assets, such title held by the
Companies that: (A) entitles any of the Companies to
receive and retain, without reduction, suspension or
termination, not less than the corresponding NRI set forth on
Exhibit E for any such Company Asset and a like
share of all hydrocarbons produced, saved and marketed from the
Company Assets throughout the productive life thereof, except as
set forth on Exhibit E; (B) obligates any of
the Companies to bear not more than that percentage of costs and
expenses relating to the maintenance, development and operation
of the WI as set forth on Exhibit E and a like share
thereof, without a corresponding increase in the associated WI,
except as set forth on Exhibit E; and (C) is
free and clear of all liens, mortgages, security interests,
encumbrances, burdens and claims of any kind, except for
Permitted Encumbrances and Permitted Liens.
(iii) Permitted Encumbrances
shall mean:
(A) Royalties, overriding royalties, reversionary interests
and similar burdens if the net cumulative effect of such burdens
does not operate to reduce the NRI of any Company Asset to less
than the NRI set forth on Exhibit E or increase the
WI of any Company Asset to more than the WI set forth on
Exhibit E;
(B) Division orders and sales contracts terminable without
penalty upon no more than thirty (30) days notice to
Buyer;
(C) Easements, rights of way, servitudes, permits, surface
leases, conditions, covenants, exceptions, reservations, surface
use restrictions and other surface uses and impediments on, over
or in respect to any of the Company Assets that do not, taken as
a whole, materially interfere with the operation, value or use
of the Company Assets;
(D) Liens relating to the Company Assets securing payments
to landlords, operators, mechanics and materialmen and
encumbrances securing payment of taxes or assessments that are
incident to the exploration, development, operation and
maintenance of the Company Assets, are not delinquent or which
are being contested in good faith by appropriate action and for
which Buyer is notified in writing before the Closing Date or
adequate reserves have been maintained in accordance with GAAP;
(E) all rights to consent by, required notices to, filings
with, or other actions by governmental entities in connection
with the sale or conveyance of the applicable Company Asset if
the same are customarily obtained subsequent to the sale or
conveyance and have been properly obtained in connection with
all prior sales and conveyances;
(F) conventional rights of reassignment obligating the any
of the Companies to reassign its interest in any portion of the
Company Assets to a third party in the event it intends to
release or abandon such Company Assets prior to the expiration
of the primary term or other termination of such Company Assets;
(G) rights reserved to or vested in any Governmental
Authority to control or regulate any of the Company Assets in
any manner, and all applicable laws, rules, and orders of
governmental authority, so long as the foregoing do not
interfere in any material respect with the operation of the
portion of the Company Assets burdened thereby;
A-27
(H) encumbrances relating to the Company Assets that arise
under operating agreements to secure payment of amounts not yet
delinquent and are of a type and nature customary in the oil and
gas industry;
(I) NNOG options under the NNOG Contract; and
(J) all other liens, charges, encumbrances, contracts,
agreements, instruments, obligations, defects and irregularities
affecting the Company Assets that do not (or would not upon
foreclosure or other enforcement) reduce the NRI set forth in
Exhibit E nor prevent the receipt of proceeds of
production therefrom, nor increase the share of costs above the
WI set forth in Exhibit E nor are of such type as
would reasonably be expected to materially to interfere with or
detract from the ownership, operation, value or use of the
Company Assets.
(iv) NRI shall mean the decimal
net revenue interest in oil and gas production from a Company
Asset as set forth on Exhibit E.
(v) WI shall mean a working
interest under an oil and gas lease or other Contract affecting
a Company Asset which shall reflect the decimal interest for
participation in the decisions, costs and risks concerning
operations, as set forth on Exhibit E.
(c) Preferential Purchase Rights and Consents to
Assign. There are no preferential rights to
purchase or rights to consent to assignment or similar
agreements applicable to the Company Assets which will be
triggered by the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or
such waivers or consents have been obtained prior to the Closing
from the appropriate parties or the appropriate time period for
asserting the right has expired prior to the Closing without an
exercise of the rights.
3.25 Leases. (a)(i) Other than
implied covenants, there are no contractual obligations to
engage in continuous development operations in order to maintain
any lease set forth on Exhibit E or (ii) there
are no provisions applicable to any such lease that increases
the royalty percentage of the lessor thereunder (other than
sliding scale royalties under federal leases); and (b) such
leases do not have terms (other than primary terms) fixed by a
certain number of years.
3.26 Wells/Projects in
Progress. Schedule 3.26 sets forth a
list and description of all wells and other capital projects in
progress or that have been proposed as of the date of this
Agreement through December 31, 2009 and associated
costs or estimates thereof to the extent such costs or estimates
could exceed $500,000 per well or project net to the applicable
Companies interest. Except as set forth on
Schedule 3.26, there are no wells included in the
Company Assets that (a) any Companies, or to the Knowledge
of Seller or the knowledge of Companies, a third party operator,
is obligated by law or contract to currently plug and abandon or
(b) are subject to exceptions to a requirement to plug and
abandon issued by a governmental authority.
3.27 Expenditure
Obligations. Except as set forth on
Schedule 3.27, the Companies have not executed and
are not otherwise contractually bound by any authority for
expenditure with respect to any of the Company Assets under any
operating agreement, unit operating agreement, farmout or farmin
agreement, pooling agreement, pooling designation, exploration
agreement, participation agreement, transportation and gathering
agreement, rig contract, pipe or other supply contract, area of
mutual interest agreement, production sales agreement, marketing
and processing agreement, contract or agreement to which any of
the Companies is a named party that evidences an obligation to
pay the deferred purchase price of property or services or other
similar agreements (collectively, the Significant
Contracts) that will obligate any of the Companies
to pay, after the Closing, more than $500,000 for a single
project, operation or expenditure. Except as set forth on
Schedule 3.27, with respect to authorizations for
expenditure relating to any of the Company Assets which obligate
any of the Companies to pay more than $500,000 for a single
project, operation or expenditure: (a) there are no
outstanding calls under such authorizations for expenditures for
payments which are due or which any of the Companies has
committed to make which have not been made; (b) there are
no material operations with respect to which any of the
Companies has become a non-consenting party where the effect of
such non-consent is not disclosed on Schedule 3.27;
and (c) there are no commitments for the expenditures of
funds for drilling or other capital projects other than projects
with respect to which the operator is not required
A-28
under the applicable operating agreement to seek consent. The
Significant Contracts and the Leases are in full force and
effect and have not been modified or amended in any material
respect, and none of the Companies is in default thereunder.
Prior to the execution of this Agreement, the Companies
furnished to Buyer true and complete copies of each Significant
Contract and all amendments thereto.
3.28 No Claims Affecting the Company
Assets. No Proceeding is pending or, to the
Knowledge of Seller or the knowledge of the Companies,
threatened against the Companies relating to, resulting from or
affecting the ownership or operation of the Company Assets. No
notice from any Governmental Authority or any other person
(including employees) has been received by Seller or any
Companies as to any material claim, demand, filing, hearing,
notice of violation, proceeding, notice or demand letter,
relating to, resulting from or affecting the ownership or
operation of the Company Assets or the Significant Contracts,
claiming any material violation of any law, statute, rule,
regulation, ordinance, order, decision or decree of any
Governmental Authority (including, without limitation, any such
law, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, decision or decree
concerning the conservation of natural resources) or claiming
any breach of contract or agreement with any third party.
3.29 Payout. The material payout
balances with respect to any of the Company Assets operated by
the Companies that are subject to future change on account of
reversionary interests, non-consent penalties or similar
agreements or arrangements are set forth on
Schedule 3.29 and are correct as of the dates shown
on such statements.
3.30 Absence of Certain Changes Regarding the
Company Assets. Since the Balance Sheet Date,
each of the Companies:
(a) has maintained and operated each of the Company Assets
operated by them as a reasonably prudent operator consistent in
all material respects with prevailing oil and gas industry
practice;
(b) has used reasonable efforts consistent with past
practice to cause each of the Company Assets not operated by any
of the Companies to be maintained and operated in a good and
workmanlike manner and in substantially the same manner as
theretofore operated;
(c) has paid timely its share of all material costs and
expenses attributable to the Company Assets, except for such
material costs and expenses that it was contesting in good faith
by appropriate action;
(d) has performed all material accounting, royalty
disbursement and reporting requirements, as applicable, related
thereto for all oil, natural gas, coalbed methane gas,
condensate, natural gas liquids, and other hydrocarbons or
products produced from or attributable to the Company
Assets; and
(e) has not agreed, whether in writing or otherwise, to
take any action inconsistent with the provisions described in
this Section 3.30.
3.31 Gas Imbalances. To the
Knowledge of Seller, as of December 31, 2008, the gas
imbalances set forth on Schedule 3.31 are the only
material gas imbalances that exist with respect to the Company
Assets.
3.32 Royalty Payments. Except as
set forth on Schedule 3.32, all material landowner
royalty, overriding royalty, net profit interests, production
payments and similar payments and other oil and gas leasehold
payments (collectively, Royalty
Payments) which are payable by any of the
Companies, have been properly calculated and paid in a timely
manner. The Companies have not received a notice of material
non-payment
or underpayment of any Royalty Payments. Except as set forth on
Schedule 3.32, there are no royalty suspense
accounts maintained by the Companies with respect to the Company
Assets. Neither the Companies, nor to the Knowledge of Seller or
the knowledge of the Companies, any other party, is under
material default under any Lease, and the Leases identified on
Exhibit E are valid and subsisting oil and gas
leases and are currently in full force and effect.
3.33 Licenses and Permits. To the
Knowledge of Seller and the Companies each third party operator
of the Company Assets has obtained and is in compliance in all
material respects with all material licenses, permits, contracts
and agreements relating to the Company Assets that are required
to be obtained by it. To the Knowledge of Seller and the
Companies, (a) all such licenses, permits, contracts and
agreements are in full
A-29
force and effect and (b) no material violations exist under
such licenses, permits, contracts and agreements. The Companies
are in compliance in all material respects with all laws, rules
and regulations of federal, state or local entities, which have
jurisdiction over the Companies, or the Company Assets. The
Companies have been and are in material compliance, and to the
Knowledge of Seller and the knowledge of the Companies, each
third party operator of the Company Assets are in compliance in
all material respects, under all environmental laws.
3.34 Reserve Report Information.
(a) Seller has made available to Buyer the report dated
December 31, 2008 (the Report
Date) prepared by Seller and audited by the
independent petroleum engineering firm of Netherland
Sewell & Associates, Inc. (the Reserve
Engineer) with respect to certain properties of
the Contributed Properties Subsidiaries as of December 31,
2008 (the Reserve Report). The Reserve
Report is the latest reserve report available to Seller relating
to the Companies reserves of oil and gas attributable to
the Company Assets (collectively, the Evaluated
Properties). The Reserve Report includes
projections of the rate of production and future net income,
taxes, operating expenses and capital expenditures with respect
to the Evaluated Properties as of such date, based upon the
pricing assumptions consistent with common industry practice at
that time; provided, however, such projections are estimates
only and may prove to be wrong. To the Knowledge of Seller, the
Companies have provided no false or misleading information to
and has not withheld any material information from the Reserve
Engineer with respect to the audit of the Reserve Report. To the
Knowledge of Seller, the Companies have provided the Reserve
Engineer with complete and accurate historical data regarding
the Evaluated Properties in all material respects. The
preliminary information currently available for an updated
reserve report being prepared, and all material components of
which have been provided to Buyer, indicates significant changes
as of June 30, 2009 from the Reserve Report, and to the
Knowledge of Seller, as of the date hereof, no material changes
to such preliminary information have been made or are pending.
(b) The WI and NRI amounts for the Company Assets set forth
on Exhibit E (the Scheduled
Interests) conform to the corresponding interests
set forth in the Reserve Report (the Reserve Report
Interests), except as would not have an material
adverse effect on the aggregate valuation of such Scheduled
Interests; provided, however, that in determining such
effect, if any (the Discrepancy
Amount), the aggregate decrease in allocated value
of the Scheduled Interests resulting from any of the Scheduled
Interests being less than the corresponding Reserve Report
Interests shall be reduced by the total aggregate increase in
such allocated values resulting from any of the Scheduled
Interests being greater than the corresponding Reserve Report
Interests, but in no event shall the Discrepancy Amount be less
than zero.
3.35 NNOG Contract. Neither the
execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby will (a) constitute a
Sale under the NNOG Contract and (b) result in
any termination, change, modification or disruption of any
rights, privileges, obligations, liabilities or otherwise under
the NNOG Contract. As of the date hereof, the options to
purchase the Aneth Assets and the Exxon Assets (each as defined
in the NNOG Contract) set forth in Section 3.01 of the NNOG
Contract and Section 3.01 of the First Amendment,
respectively, have not vested and are not currently exercisable.
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER
Buyer represents and warrants to Seller as follows and except as
set forth in the Schedules hereto, and except as disclosed in
the Buyer SEC Documents:
4.1 Due Organization and
Power. Buyer is a corporation duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
State of Delaware and has all requisite corporate power and
authority to enter into this Agreement and perform its
obligations hereunder. Buyer has heretofore made available to
Seller true and complete copies of its certificate of
incorporation and bylaws as currently in effect (the
Buyer Organizational Documents). Buyer
is not in violation of any of the provisions of the Buyer
Organizational Documents. This transaction is an
Initial Business Combination within the
meaning of the Buyer
A-30
Organizational Documents and there is no obligation under the
Buyer Organizational Documents that Buyer liquidate or dissolve
prior to September 28, 2009 as a result of Buyers
execution and delivery of this Agreement.
4.2 Authorization and Validity of Agreement.
(a) The execution, delivery and performance by Buyer of
this Agreement and the consummation by Buyer of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by the board of
directors of Buyer, and no other corporate action on the part of
Buyer is or will be necessary for the execution, delivery and
performance by Buyer of this Agreement and the consummation by
Buyer of the transactions contemplated hereby, except for the
Buyer Stockholder Approval. This Agreement has been duly
executed and delivered by Buyer and is a legal, valid and
binding obligation of Buyer, enforceable against Buyer in
accordance with its terms, except to the extent that its
enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent conveyance or other laws
relating to or affecting creditors rights generally and by
general equity principles.
(b) The affirmative vote of a majority of the IPO Shares
voted at a duly held stockholders meeting (the Buyer
Stockholder Meeting) to approve the Initial
Business Combination and Charter Amendment contemplated by this
Agreement is the only vote of any of Buyers capital stock
necessary in connection with the consummation of the Closing;
provided that holders of more than thirty percent (30%)
(minus one share) of the IPO Shares do not vote against the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and exercise their rights to convert their IPO Shares into cash
from the Trust Account in accordance with the provisions of
Section 9.3 of Article IX of Buyer Certificate of
Incorporation (the Buyer Stockholder
Approval); provided, further, Buyer must
also receive the consent of the holders of Public Warrants
exercisable for a majority of the shares of Buyer Common Stock
issuable on exercise of all outstanding Public Warrants to the
Warrant Agreement Amendment in order to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby (the Warrant
Amendment Approval).
(c) At a meeting duly called and held, Buyers board
of directors (including any required committee or subgroup of
Buyers board of directors) has: (i) determined that
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby are fair
to and in the best interests of Buyers stockholders;
(ii) approved and adopted this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby; (iii) determined that the
fair market value of the Companies are equal to at least 80% of
the initial amount held in Buyers Trust Account
excluding underwriters deferred commission; and
(iv) resolved to recommend to stockholders adoption of this
Agreement.
(d) Subject to receipt of the Buyer Stockholder Approval,
the Charter Amendment, when filed with the Delaware Secretary of
State, will be effective in modifying Article II of Buyer
Certificate of Incorporation such that consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation
of such Article II.
4.3 No Conflict. Except as set
forth on Schedule 4.3 and except for any consent,
approval, filing with or notice that would not, if not given or
made, or any violation, conflict, breach, termination, default
or acceleration which does not, materially impair the ability of
Buyer to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, the
execution, delivery and performance by Buyer of this Agreement
and the consummation by Buyer of the transactions contemplated
hereby:
(a) will not violate any provision of Law, order, judgment
or decree applicable to Buyer;
(b) will not require any consent or approval of, or filing
or notice to, any Governmental Authority under any provision of
Law applicable to Buyer, except for any applicable requirements
of the HSR Act and any other applicable antitrust or competition
laws outside the United States, and except for any consent,
approval, filing or notice requirements which become applicable
solely as a result of the specific regulatory status of Seller
or the Companies or which Seller, the Companies or any of their
respective Affiliates are otherwise required to obtain;
A-31
(c) will not violate any provision of the Buyer
Organizational Documents after giving effect to the Charter
Amendment; and
(d) except for the Warrant Amendment Approval, will not
require any consent or approval under, and will not conflict
with, or result in the breach or termination of, or constitute a
default under, or result in the acceleration of the performance
by Buyer under, any material indenture, mortgage, deed of trust,
lease, license, franchise, contract, agreement or other
instrument to which Buyer is a party or by which it or any of
its assets is bound.
4.4 Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Buyer consists of
(i) 225,000,000 shares of Buyer Common Stock and
(ii) 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.0001 per share. As of the date of this Agreement, there were
outstanding 69,000,000 shares of Buyer Common Stock (some
of which may be held in units which consist of one share of
Buyer Common Stock and one Buyer Warrant to purchase one share
of Buyer Common Stock), no shares of preferred stock, 76,000,000
Buyer Warrants (some of which may be held in units which consist
of one share of Buyer Common Stock and one Buyer Warrant to
purchase one share of Buyer Common Stock) entitling the holder
to purchase one share of Buyer Common Stock per warrant, and no
employee stock options to purchase Buyer Common Stock. All
outstanding shares of capital stock of Buyer have been duly
authorized, validly issued, are fully paid and nonassessable,
and were not issued in violation of any preemptive or other
similar right.
(b) Except as set forth in this Section 4.4 and
the Buyer SEC Documents filed prior to the date of this
Agreement, there are no outstanding: (i) shares of capital
stock or voting securities of Buyer; (ii) securities of
Buyer convertible into or exchangeable for shares of capital
stock or voting securities of Buyer; or (iii) options or
other rights to acquire from Buyer or other obligation of Buyer
to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock or voting
securities of Buyer. Except as set forth in the Buyer SEC
Documents, there are no outstanding obligations of Buyer to
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of the securities
referred to in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above.
(c) Buyer Common Stock is quoted on NYSE Amex. There is no
action or proceeding pending except as disclosed in Buyer SEC
Documents or, to Buyers knowledge, threatened against
Buyer by NYSE Amex with respect to any intention by such entity
to prohibit or terminate the quotation of such securities
thereon.
(d) All of the outstanding Buyer Common Stock and Buyer
Warrants have been duly authorized and issued in compliance in
all material respects with all requirements of Buyer Certificate
of Incorporation and all Laws applicable to Buyer, Buyer Common
Stock and Buyer Warrants.
(e) Except as contemplated by this Agreement and as set
forth in Schedule 4.4, there are no registration
rights, and there is no voting trust, proxy, rights plan,
anti-takeover plan or other understandings to which Buyer is a
party or by which Buyer is bound with respect to Buyer Common
Stock and Buyer Warrants.
(f) Except as disclosed in Buyer SEC Documents filed prior
to the date of this Agreement, as a result of the consummation
of this transaction, no shares of capital stock, warrants,
options or other securities of Buyer are issuable and no rights
in connection with any shares, warrants, rights, options or
other securities or Buyer accelerate or otherwise become
triggered (whether as to vesting, exercisability, convertibility
or otherwise).
(g) Buyer does not have any subsidiaries.
4.5 Buyer SEC Documents; Financial Statements.
(a) As of its filing date, each Buyer SEC Document
complied, and each such Buyer SEC Document filed subsequent to
the date hereof will comply, as to form in all material respects
with the applicable requirements of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the Securities Act), and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), as the case may be.
(b) As of its filing date, each Buyer SEC Document filed
pursuant to the Exchange Act did not, and each such Buyer SEC
Document filed subsequent to the date hereof will not, contain
any untrue statement of a
A-32
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements made
therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading.
(c) Each Buyer SEC Document that is a registration
statement, as amended or supplemented, if applicable, filed
pursuant to the Securities Act, as of the date such registration
statement or amendment became effective, did not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading.
(d) Buyer has devised and maintains a system of internal
accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with GAAP. To the extent required, Buyer (i) has
designed disclosure controls and procedures (within the meaning
of
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act) to ensure that material information is made
known to the management to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure and to make the certifications required by
the Exchange Act with respect to the Buyer SEC Documents and
(ii) has disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation
prior to the date of this Agreement, to its auditors and the
audit committee of its board of directors (A) any
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect in any material respect
its ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
data and have disclosed to its auditors any material weaknesses
in internal controls and (B) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in its internal controls.
(e) Each of the audited and unaudited financial statements
(including any related notes) included in the Buyer SEC
Documents (the Buyer Financial
Statements), when filed, complied in all material
respects with all applicable accounting requirements and with
the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect
thereto, has been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a
consistent basis throughout the periods involved (except as may
be indicated in the notes thereto) and, when filed, fairly
presented the financial position of Buyer at the respective date
thereof and the results of its operations and cash flows for the
periods indicated.
(f) There are no outstanding loans or other extensions of
credit made by Buyer to any executive officer (as defined in
Rule 3b-7
under the Exchange Act) or director of Buyer. Buyer has not
taken any action prohibited by Section 402 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
4.6 [Reserved]
4.7 Absence of Material Adverse
Change. Except as otherwise contemplated by this
Agreement, since December 31, 2008, the business of Buyer
has been conducted only in the ordinary course consistent with
past practice, and there have not been any Material Adverse
Effect on Buyer.
4.8 Absence of Undisclosed
Liabilities. Buyer has no obligations or
liabilities (whether accrued, absolute, contingent, unliquidated
or otherwise, whether due or to become due) which would be
required to be set forth on a balance sheet prepared in
accordance with GAAP, except: (a) liabilities incurred in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(b) liabilities reflected on the balance sheet of Buyer at
December 31, 2008 or the notes thereto, included in the
Buyer Financial Statements; (c) immaterial liabilities;
(d) liabilities disclosed in the Schedules hereto;
(e) liabilities incurred in connection with the
transactions contemplated hereby; and (f) obligations and
liabilities otherwise expressly disclosed (or within any
materiality threshold contained in any other representation) in
this Agreement (including the Schedules hereto). Buyer has no
obligation to make any payment to officers or directors as a
result of the transactions contemplated hereby other than as set
forth herein or as disclosed in the Buyer SEC Documents.
4.9 Tax Matters.
(a) Returns Filed and Taxes
Paid. (i) All material Returns required to
be filed by or on behalf of Buyer (Buyer
Returns) have been duly filed on a timely basis
and all such returns are complete and correct in all material
respects; (ii) all material Taxes shown to be payable on
the Buyer Returns or on subsequent assessments with respect
thereto have been paid in full on a timely basis and no other
material Taxes are
A-33
payable by Buyer with respect to items or periods covered by
such Buyer Returns or with respect to any period prior to the
date of this Agreement; (iii) Buyer has withheld and paid
over all material Taxes required to have been withheld and paid
over, and complied with all information reporting requirements,
including maintenance of required records with respect thereto,
in connection with material amounts paid or owing to any
employee, creditor, independent contractor or other third party
for all periods for which the statute of limitations has not
expired; and (iv) there are no material liens on any of the
assets of Buyer with respect to Taxes, other than liens for
Taxes not yet due and payable or for Taxes that Buyer is
contesting in good faith through appropriate proceedings and for
which appropriate reserves have been established.
(b) Tax Deficiencies; Audits; Statutes of
Limitations. Except in the case of audits,
actions or proceedings for which appropriate reserves have been
established on the Buyer Financial Statements in accordance with
GAAP: (i) there is no audit by a governmental or taxing
authority in process or pending with respect to any material
Returns of Buyer; (ii) no deficiencies have been asserted,
in writing, with respect to any material Taxes of Buyer and
Buyer has not received written notice that it has not filed a
material Return or paid material Taxes required to be filed or
paid by it; and (iii) Buyer is not party to any action or
proceeding for assessment or collection of any material Taxes,
nor has such event been asserted, in writing against Buyer or
any of its assets.
4.10 Legal Proceedings. Except as
set forth on Schedule 4.10, there are no Proceedings
or orders pending or, to the knowledge of Buyer, threatened
against or affecting Buyer or any of its Affiliates at law or in
equity, or before or by any Governmental Authority.
4.11 Material Contracts.
(a) Except as set forth in the Buyer SEC Documents filed
prior to the date of this Agreement, there are no Contracts or
obligations (including outstanding offers or proposals) of any
kind, whether written or oral, to which Buyer is a party or by
or to which any of the properties or assets of Buyer may be
bound, subject or affected without penalty or cost, which either
(i) creates or imposes a liability greater than $5,000,000
or (ii) may not be cancelled by Buyer on thirty
(30) days or less prior notice (the Buyer
Contracts). All Buyer Contracts are listed in
Schedule 4.11(a), other than this Agreement, those
contemplated by this Agreement and those that are exhibits to
the Buyer SEC Documents filed prior to the date of this
Agreement.
(b) Buyer is not (with or without the lapse of time or the
giving of notice, or both) in breach or default of or under any
material Buyer Contract and, to the knowledge of Buyer, no other
party to any such
currently-existing
Buyer Contract is (with or without the lapse of time or the
giving of notice, or both) in breach or default thereunder. To
the knowledge of Buyer, as of the date of this Agreement, except
as disclosed in Schedule 4.11(b), Buyer has not
received any written notice of the intention of any Person to
terminate any Buyer Contract. Complete and correct copies of all
Buyer Contracts have been made available to Seller.
(c) Buyer has terminated the Graham Agreement in its
entirety and no party to the Graham Agreement, nor any party
hereto or any of its Affiliates has or will have any liability
or obligation to the parties under the Graham Agreement (except
as expressly provided in Section 6.1(d) of the Graham
Agreement).
4.12 Transactions with
Affiliates. Except as set forth in the Buyer
Financial Statements or Buyer SEC Documents filed prior to the
date of this Agreement, Buyer has not (a) engaged in any
material transaction, contract, agreement or transaction with
any other Person of a type that would be required to be
disclosed under Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and
(b) provided loans to any of its employees, officers or
directors, or any of its Affiliates.
4.13 Brokers, Finders, etc. Except
as set forth in Schedule 4.13, Buyer has not
employed, nor is subject to the valid claim of, any broker,
finder, or sales agent in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement who might be entitled to a fee or
commission from Buyer, Seller or any of their respective
Subsidiaries in connection with such transactions.
4.14 Trust Account.
(a) As of the date hereof and at the Closing Date, Buyer
has and will have no less than $538,715,841 invested in United
States Government securities or in money market funds meeting
certain conditions under
A-34
Rule 2a-7
promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 in the
Trust Account, less: such amounts, if any (i) as Buyer
is required to pay to Public Stockholders who elect to have
their shares converted to cash in accordance with the provisions
of Section 9.3 of Article IX of the Buyer Certificate
of Incorporation; (ii) necessary to pay the Aggregate Cash
Consideration to holders of Public Warrants as contemplated
herein and by the Warrant Amendment Agreement; (iii) used
as payment to purchase Buyer Common Stock from Public
Stockholders as permitted by Section 6.4(a)(ii); and
(iv) to pay Buyers aggregate costs, fees and expenses
incurred in connection with the consummation of an Initial
Business Combination (including deferred underwriting
commissions).
(b) Effective as of the Closing Date, the obligations of
Buyer to dissolve or liquidate within the specified time period
contained in the Buyer Certificate of Incorporation will
terminate, and effective as of the Closing Date Buyer shall have
no obligation, other than as contemplated by this Agreement, to
dissolve and liquidate the assets of Buyer by reason of the
consummation of the Closing, and following the Closing Date no
Public Stockholder shall be entitled to receive any amount from
the Trust Account except as contemplated by clauses (i),
(ii) or (iii) of Section 4.14(a).
ARTICLE V
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES GENERALLY
5.1 Representations and Warranties of the
Parties. Each party hereto represents and
warrants to the other that it is the explicit intent of each
party hereto that, except for the express representations and
warranties contained in ARTICLE II and
ARTICLE III, Parent, Seller and its Affiliates are
making no representation or warranty whatsoever, express or
implied, including, but not limited to, any implied warranty or
representation as to condition, merchantability or suitability
as to any of the properties or assets of the Companies. It is
understood that any cost estimates, projections or other
predictions, any data, any financial information or any
memoranda or offering materials or presentations provided or
addressed to Buyer are not and shall not be deemed to be or to
include representations or warranties of Parent, Seller or any
of their Affiliates.
5.2 Survival of Representations and
Warranties. The respective representations and
warranties made by Parent, Seller and Buyer contained in
ARTICLE II, ARTICLE III,
ARTICLE IV this ARTICLE IV and
Section 9.3(e) shall expire and be terminated and
extinguished at the Closing and shall not survive the Closing,
and no party shall have any liability or obligation in
connection with any such representation or warranty following
the Closing.
5.3 Schedules. Disclosure of any
fact or item in any Schedule hereto shall, should the relevance
of the fact or item or its contents to any other paragraph or
section be reasonably apparent, be deemed to be disclosed with
respect to that other paragraph or section whether or not a
specific cross-reference appears. Disclosure of any fact or item
in any Schedule hereto shall not necessarily mean that such item
or fact individually is material to the business or financial
condition of (a) any of Seller or the Companies
individually or of the Companies taken as a whole or
(b) Buyer.
ARTICLE VI
COVENANTS
6.1 Access; Information and Records;
Confidentiality.
(a) Prior to the Closing Date, or, if earlier, the date
this Agreement is terminated pursuant to
Section 9.1, each of Parent, Aneth, IPO Corp.,
Merger Sub and Seller, on the one hand, and Buyer, on the other
hand, shall, and shall cause their respective Subsidiaries to,
permit the other party and its authorized agents or
representatives, including independent accountants, to have
access to the properties, books and records of such party during
normal business hours to review information and documentation
relative to the properties, books, contracts, commitments and
other records of such party as may reasonably be requested;
provided, that such investigation shall only be upon
reasonable notice and shall not disrupt personnel and operations
of the business and shall be at such partys sole cost and
expense; provided, further, that neither party, nor any
of its
A-35
Affiliates or representatives, shall conduct any environmental
site assessment without prior consultation with the other party
and without ongoing consultation with respect to any such
activity, although it being understood that neither party shall
unreasonably limit the conduct of such activity (it being
further understood and agreed that in no event shall any
subsurface investigation or testing of any environmental media
be conducted beyond that conducted as part of a phase I
environmental site assessment pursuant to ASTM
E-1527-05).
All requests for access to the offices, properties, books and
records of each party shall be made to such party or such
representatives each party shall designate, who shall be solely
responsible for coordinating all such requests and all access
permitted hereunder. It is further agreed that neither party nor
its representatives shall contact any of the employees,
customers, suppliers, parties that have business relationships
with or are joint venture partners of the other party or any of
their respective Affiliates in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby, whether in person or by telephone, mail
(electronic or otherwise) or any other means of communication,
without the specific prior authorization of such other party and
may only otherwise contact such Persons in the ordinary course
of business. Any access to the offices, properties, books and
records of each party shall be subject to the following
additional limitations: (i) such access shall not violate
any Law or any agreement to which any party or its Subsidiaries
is a party or otherwise expose any party to a material risk of
liability; (ii) each party shall give the other party
notice of at least two (2) business days before conducting
any inspections or communicating with any third party relating
to any property of the other party, and such other party or a
representative designated by such other party shall have the
right to be present when such party or its representatives
conduct its or their investigations on such property;
(iii) no party or its representatives shall materially
damage any property of the other party or any portion thereof
without repairing such damage; and (iv) each party shall
use its commercially reasonable efforts to conduct all
on-site due
diligence reviews and all communications with any Person on an
expeditious and efficient basis.
(b) At and for five (5) years after the Closing Date,
all parties shall, and shall cause their Subsidiaries to, afford
Parent and Seller (or their successors) and their
representatives, during normal business hours, upon reasonable
notice, full access to the books, records, properties and
employees of Companies to the extent that such access may be
reasonably requested by Parent, Seller or their successors,
including in connection with tax matters, financial statements
and regulatory reporting obligations; provided, however,
that nothing in this Agreement shall limit Parents and
Sellers rights of discovery.
(c) Seller agrees to hold all the books and records of the
Companies existing on the Closing Date and not to destroy or
dispose of any thereof for a period of ten (10) years from
the Closing Date or such longer time as may be required by Law.
(d) Each party will hold, and will cause its respective
directors, officers, employees, accountants, counsel, financial
advisors and other representatives and Affiliates to hold, any
nonpublic information in confidence to the extent required by,
and in accordance with, the provisions of the Confidentiality
Agreement dated July 31, 2009 the
(Confidentiality Agreement), between
Buyer and Seller.
6.2 Conduct of the Business of IPO Corp., Merger
Sub and the Companies Prior to the Closing Date.
(a) Each of Seller, IPO Corp., Merger Sub and Aneth agrees
that, except as permitted, required or specifically contemplated
by this Agreement and those actions contemplated on
Schedule 6.2 or in this ARTICLE VI or
expenditures disclosed in Sections 3.26 and
3.27, or as otherwise consented to or approved in writing
by Buyer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed, during the period commencing on the date hereof and
ending at the Closing Date:
(i) the businesses of IPO Corp., Merger Sub and the
Companies shall be conducted only in the ordinary course of
business;
(ii) except as required pursuant to
Section 1.9, neither IPO Corp., Merger Sub, Aneth,
Seller nor any Companies shall (A) amend its operating
agreement, certificate of incorporation or bylaws, as
applicable, or (B) (1) issue, deliver or sell, redeem or
authorize the issuance, delivery, redemption or sale of, any
equity interests of such entity, or (2) amend (including,
but not limited to, by way of a split, subdivision, combination
or other reorganization) any term of any outstanding equity
interests of such entities;
A-36
(iii) neither Seller, Merger Sub, Aneth nor IPO Corp. shall
(A) issue, deliver or sell, or authorize the issuance,
delivery or sale of, any capital stock or other equity
securities of the Companies, Merger Sub or IPO Corp., or
(B) amend any term of any capital stock or other equity
securities of the Companies, Merger Sub or IPO Corp.,
respectively, (in each case, whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise);
(iv) the Companies will use their commercially reasonable
efforts to preserve intact their business organization, to keep
available the services of their present officers and key
employees (as determined by the Companies), and to preserve the
goodwill of those having business relationships with them;
(v) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
declare, set aside or pay any dividend or distribution or other
capital return in respect of its equity interests except in
respect of any dividends, distributions or returns paid from one
of the Companies to another Company;
(vi) none of the Companies shall, except as required or
permitted by GAAP, materially change any accounting methods,
principles or practices;
(vii) none of IPO, Merger Sub or the Companies shall,
except in the ordinary course of business, enter into, terminate
or materially modify any Material Contract or any Contract that
would be a Material Contract if in existence on the date hereof,
except for forbearance agreements, waivers or amendments of or
related to the Credit Agreements, in each case that would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on IPO
Corp., and its Subsidiaries as of Closing;
(viii) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
acquire by merger or consolidation with, or merge or consolidate
with, or purchase substantially all of the equity interests or
assets of, or otherwise acquire, whether in a single transaction
or series of related transactions, any material business of any
corporation, partnership, association or other business
organization or division thereof;
(ix) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall:
(A) make or grant any bonus or any wage or salary increase
to any employee or group of employees (other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, or as
required pursuant to any existing Benefit Plans or any existing
Collective Bargaining Agreement); (B) materially amend or
terminate any existing employee benefit plan or arrangement or
adopt any new Benefit Plan (except to the extent reasonably
necessary to avoid the imposition of additional taxes under
section 409A of the Code or otherwise reasonably necessary
to comply with applicable Law); (C) pay or agree to pay any
pension, retirement allowance or other employee benefit not
contemplated by any existing Benefit Plan or employment
agreement to any officer or employee, whether past or present,
other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice; (D) enter into, adopt or amend any bonus,
severance or retirement Contract, or any employment Contract
with a non-executive officer, other than in the ordinary course
of business, consistent with past practices or as required by
law, including Section 409A of the Code; or (E) enter
into, adopt or amend any employment Contract with an executive
officer, other than in the ordinary course of business;
(x) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
make any loans, advances, capital commitments or guarantees for
the benefit of, any Person (other than its Subsidiaries and
other than as permitted by clause (iv) above), in excess of
$5,000,000 individually or $10,000,000 in the aggregate (other
than loans or advances made to employees in the ordinary course
of business and for which the Companies are entitled to
repayment);
(xi) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
create, incur or assume any debt in excess of an aggregate of
$5,000,000;
(xii) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
make any capital expenditures in excess of $2,000,000,
individually or $5,000,000 in the aggregate;
(xiii) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
cancel any third party indebtedness in excess of $5,000,000 in
the aggregate owed to the Companies;
A-37
(xiv) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
make any forward purchase commitment in excess of the
requirements of the Companies for normal operating purposes or
at prices higher than the current market prices;
(xv) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
implement any layoff of employees that would implicate the
Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988;
(xvi) none of IPO Corp., Merger Sub or the Companies shall
settle or compromise any Proceeding if the amount of such
settlement exceeds $5,000,000 or will not be paid in full prior
to the Closing or which settlement or compromise would
reasonably be expected to have a continuing adverse impact on
the business of Companies after the Closing;
(xvii) the Companies shall not make or change any material
Tax election;
(xviii) the Companies shall not change any annual
accounting period;
(xix) the Companies shall not adopt or change any
accounting method with respect to Taxes;
(xx) the Companies shall not surrender any material right
to claim a refund of Taxes;
(xxi) the Companies shall not file any material amended Tax
Return;
(xxii) the Companies shall not settle or compromise any
Proceeding with respect to any material Tax claim or assessment
relating to the Companies;
(xxiii) the Companies shall not consent to any extension or
waiver of the limitation period applicable to any material Tax
claim or assessment relating to the Companies; and
(xxiv) neither IPO Corp., Merger Sub, Seller, Aneth nor any
of their respective Subsidiaries shall agree with any third
party, whether in writing or otherwise, to do any of the
foregoing.
(b) Seller agrees to, and shall cause the Companies to,
make capital expenditures in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as disclosed in
Sections 3.26 and 3.27.
(c) Neither IPO Corp., Merger Sub, Aneth nor Seller shall,
during the period commencing on the date hereof and ending at
the Closing Date, undertake any other action that would be
reasonably likely to materially adversely impede consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby.
6.3 Company Assets. Subject to the
terms of applicable operating and other existing agreements,
each of Seller, Aneth and IPO Corp. agrees, except as described
below or as otherwise consented to or approved in writing by
Buyer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, during
the period commencing on the date hereof and ending at the
Closing Date, Seller and IPO Corp. shall, and shall cause the
Companies to, manage the Company Assets as follows:
(a) Disposal of Company Assets. None of the
Companies shall: (i) except as set forth on
Schedule 6.2, act in any manner with respect to the Company
Assets other than in the normal, usual and customary manner,
consistent with prior practice; (ii) except as set forth on
Schedule 6.2, sell or otherwise dispose of, encumber or
relinquish any of the Company Assets, except for Permitted
Encumbrances or the sale of hydrocarbons in the ordinary course
of business; or (iii) waive, compromise or settle any
material right or claim with respect to any of the Company
Assets.
(b) Preservation of Company Assets. The Companies
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve in full
force and effect, and perform and comply in all material
respects with all of their respective obligations under, all
leases, operating agreements, easements, rights-of-way, permits,
licenses, Contracts and other agreements which relate to the
Company Assets and shall perform and comply with its obligations
in or under any such agreement relating to such Company Assets
as a reasonable and prudent operator. Seller shall give prompt
written notice to Buyer of any notice of default (or threat of
default, whether disputed or denied) received or given by it or
the Companies under any instrument or agreement affecting the
Company Assets in any material respect to which any of the
Companies is a party or by which the Companies or any Company
Assets are bound.
A-38
(c) Maintenance of Equipment and Insurance. The
Companies shall maintain all material and equipment within the
Company Assets in accordance with customary industry operating
practices and procedures in all material respects. The Companies
shall maintain all insurance listed on Schedule 3.22.
(d) Operations. Except for operations in the
ordinary course of business, permitted by
Section 6.2 or disclosed in
Sections 3.26 and 3.27, none of the Companies
shall agree to participate in any reworking, deepening,
drilling, completion, recompletion, equipping or other operation
or capital or workover expenditure with respect to the Company
Assets, if such operation might reasonably be expected to
require expenditures by the Companies in excess of $1,000,000
individually or $3,000,000 in the aggregate, without
Buyers prior written consent (which consent may be
withheld in Buyers commercially reasonable discretion),
except if required by an emergency when there shall have been
insufficient time to obtain advance consent (in which case
Seller will promptly notify Buyer of any such emergency
expenditures).
(e) Assets Operated by Others. To the extent neither
IPO Corp., Seller nor any of the Companies is the operator of
any Company Asset, the obligations of IPO Corp. and Seller in
this Section 6.3, which have reference to operations
or activities which normally are or pursuant to existing
Contracts are to be carried out or performed by operator, shall
be construed to require only that IPO Corp. and Seller use all
commercially reasonable efforts to cause that the operator of
such Company Asset either take such actions, render such
performance or refrain from performance, within the constraints
of the applicable operating agreements, applicable agreements
and applicable Law. Seller shall, and shall cause the Companies
to, use all commercially reasonable efforts to preserve
relationships with all third parties having business dealings
with respect to the Company Assets. To the extent either IPO
Corp., Seller or the Companies is the operator of any Company
Asset, IPO Corp. Seller or the Companies, as applicable, shall
use commercially reasonable efforts to seek appointment of the
Buyer as the successor operator with respect to the applicable
Company Assets.
(f) Environmental Reports. Subject to the
confidentiality provisions of Section 6.1(d) of this
Agreement, IPO Corp. and Seller shall provide Buyer, promptly
upon receipt by such entities or Companies, but in any event
prior to Closing, any material reports concerning environmental
matters in connection with the Company Assets prepared or
received by IPO Corp., Seller or the Companies prior to Closing.
(g) Applicable Consents. Seller shall, and shall
cause the Companies to, use all commercially reasonable efforts
to obtain (i) the consents, approvals and authorizations
and (ii) waiver of any preferential purchase rights listed,
and shall cooperate with the Buyer in the notification of all
applicable Governmental Authorities of the transactions
contemplated hereby and cooperate with the Surviving Corporation
in obtaining the issuance by each such authority of such
permits, licenses and authorizations as may be necessary for the
Surviving Corporation and the Companies to own and operate the
Company Assets following the Closing.
6.4 Conduct of the Business of Buyer Prior to the
Closing Date.
(a) Buyer agrees that, except as permitted, required or
specifically contemplated by this Agreement, the Warrant
Agreement Amendment, and those actions contemplated on
Schedule 6.4 or in this ARTICLE VI or as
otherwise consented to or approved in writing by Seller, which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, during
the period commencing on the date hereof and ending at the
Closing Date:
(i) the businesses of Buyer shall be conducted only in the
ordinary course of business;
(ii) Buyer shall not split, combine or reclassify any
shares of capital stock or other equity securities of Buyer or
redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire or offer to redeem,
repurchase, or otherwise acquire any capital stock or other
equity securities of Buyer, except (A) in connection with
the conversion to cash of shares of Buyers common stock
held by its stockholders who vote against the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and properly exercise their
conversion rights under Section 9.3 of Article IX of
the Buyer Certificate of Incorporation, (B) purchases by
Buyer of Buyer Common Stock from Public Stockholders, and
(C) transactions contemplated by the Warrant Agreement
Amendment; provided, no such actions by Buyer may be taken with
respect to the actions contemplated in clause (B) of this
clause (ii) that would result in the Acquisition
Consideration being less than $275,000,000 at Closing.
A-39
(iii) Buyer shall not (A) issue, deliver or sell, or
authorize the issuance, delivery or sale of, any capital stock
or other equity securities of Buyer, or (B) amend any term
of any capital stock or other equity securities of Buyer (in
each case, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise) except
as contemplated by the Warrant Agreement Amendment;
(iv) Buyer shall not declare, set aside or pay any dividend
or distribution or other capital return in respect of its
capital stock or other equity interests except as contemplated
by the exceptions to clause (ii) of this
Section 6.4(a);
(v) Buyer shall not, except as required or permitted by
GAAP, change any accounting methods, principles or practices;
(vi) Buyer shall not, except in the ordinary course of
business, enter into, terminate or materially modify any
material Contract except as contemplated by the Warrant
Agreement Amendment;
(vii) Buyer shall not acquire by merger or consolidation
with, or merge or consolidate with, or purchase substantially
all of the equity interests or assets of, or otherwise acquire,
any material business of any corporation, partnership,
association or other business organization or division thereof;
(viii) Buyer shall not make or grant any bonus or any wage
or salary increase to any employee or group of employees;
(ix) Buyer shall not make any loans or advances to, or
guarantees for the benefit of, any Person;
(x) Buyer shall not create, incur or assume any
Indebtedness in excess of $100,000;
(xi) Buyer shall not in any material respect amend or
otherwise modify the Trust Agreement or any other agreement
relating to the Trust Account;
(xii) Buyer shall not cancel any material third party
indebtedness owed to Buyer; and
(xiii) Buyer shall not agree with any third party, whether
in writing or otherwise, to do any of the foregoing.
(b) Buyer shall not, during the period commencing on the
date hereof and ending at the Closing Date, undertake any other
action that would be reasonably likely to materially adversely
impede consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.
6.5 Antitrust Laws.
(a) Each party hereto shall: (i) make any filings
required of it or any of its Affiliates under the HSR Act in
connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby no later than the tenth Business Day following the date
hereof; (ii) comply at the earliest practicable date and
after consultation with the other party hereto with any request
for additional information or documentary material received by
it or any of its Affiliates from the Federal Trade Commission
(the FTC) or the Antitrust Division of
the Department of Justice (the Antitrust
Division); (iii) cooperate with one another
in connection with any filing under the HSR Act and in
connection with resolving any investigation or other inquiry
concerning the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
initiated by the FTC, the Antitrust Division or any other
Governmental Authority; (iv) take any other action
necessary to obtain the approvals and consents required for the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
and (v) cause the waiting periods under the HSR Act to
terminate or expire at the earliest possible date.
(b) Each party hereto shall promptly inform the other
parties of any material communication made to, or received by
such party from, the FTC, the Antitrust Division or any other
Governmental Authority regarding any of the transactions
contemplated hereby. Neither party may participate in any
meeting with the FTC, the Antitrust Division or any other
Governmental Authority without prior notice to the other party
and, to the extent permitted by that Governmental Authority, the
opportunity to attend.
(c) Any required filing fee under the HSR Act shall be
borne by Buyer.
A-40
6.6 Public Announcements. Unless
otherwise required by Law, including federal securities law
prior to the Closing Date, no news release or other public
announcement pertaining to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement (other than as may be contained in the
Proxy/Registration Statement or notice under the NNOG Contract
pursuant to Section 4.02(b)(ii) of the First Amendment of
the NNOG Contract) will be made by or on behalf of any party
without the prior written consent of Buyer and Seller. Prior to
issuing a press release or other public announcement required by
Law with respect to the execution and delivery of or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, Buyer and Seller
shall consult with each other and shall have reasonable
opportunity to comment on such press release and prior to
issuing a press release or other public announcement with
respect to the Closing, Buyer and Seller shall use reasonable
efforts to agree on the form of such press release or other
public announcement.
6.7 Further Actions. Subject to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, each of the parties
hereto agrees to use its reasonable best efforts to take, or
cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done,
all things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make
effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including using its reasonable best efforts: (a) to obtain,
in addition to approvals and consents discussed in
Section 6.5 hereof, any licenses, permits, consents,
approvals, authorizations, qualifications and orders of federal,
state, tribal, local and foreign Governmental Authorities as are
required in connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby; (b) to effect, in addition to filings
discussed in Section 6.5 hereof, all necessary
registrations and filings; (c) to defend any lawsuits or
other legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative,
whether brought derivatively or on behalf of third parties
(including Governmental Authorities or officials), challenging
this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby; and (d) to furnish to each other such
information and assistance and to consult with respect to the
terms of any registration, filing, application or undertaking as
reasonably may be requested in connection with the foregoing.
6.8 Directors and Officers. Buyer,
IPO Corp. and Seller shall take all necessary action so that the
persons listed on Schedule 6.8 are appointed or
elected, as applicable, to the position of directors and
officers of IPO Corp. and the Surviving Corporation and all
prior directors and officers have resigned or been removed, as
applicable, as set forth therein, to serve in such positions
effective immediately after the Closing. IPO Corp. shall take
all necessary actions to enter into indemnification agreements
with each of the persons who will become a director of IPO Corp.
providing indemnification for liabilities incurred in their
capacities as directors of IPO Corp.
6.9 Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
(a) The certificate of incorporation and by-laws (or
operating agreement or other equivalent governing instruments)
of IPO Corp. and each of its Subsidiaries shall contain
provisions no less favorable with respect to indemnification
than are set forth in the certificate of incorporation and
by-laws, operating agreement, or equivalent instruments, as
applicable, of such Persons as of the date hereof, which
provisions shall not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified
for a period of six (6) years after the Closing Date in any
manner that would adversely affect the rights thereunder of
individuals who at or prior to the Closing Date were directors,
officers, managers, managing members, agents or employees of
Seller or any of the Companies or who were otherwise entitled to
indemnification pursuant to the certificate of incorporation and
bylaws (or equivalent governing instruments) of such Persons.
IPO Corp. shall cause (including, without limitation, by paying
premiums on the current insurance policies) to be maintained in
effect for six (6) years after the Closing Date the current
policies of the directors and officers liability or
equivalent insurance maintained by or on behalf of Seller and
the Companies with respect to matters occurring prior to the
Closing; provided, that IPO Corp. may substitute therefor
policies of at least the same coverage containing terms and
conditions that are not less advantageous than the existing
policies (including with respect to the period covered). IPO
Corp. will indemnify each individual who served as a director,
officer, manager or managing member of Seller or the Companies
at any time prior to the Closing Date from and against all
actions, suits, proceedings, hearings, investigations, claims,
etc. including all court costs and reasonable attorney fees and
expenses resulting from or arising out of, or caused by, this
Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated hereby.
A-41
(b) After the Closing, IPO Corp. shall cause its
Subsidiaries to provide indemnification of the directors and
officers of Buyer who serve in such capacity prior to the
Closing to the same extent as Buyer provides indemnification to
such Persons as of the date hereof and provisions of which shall
not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified for a period of
six (6) years after the Closing Date in any manner that
would adversely affect the rights thereunder of such Persons as
of the date hereof.
6.10 Proxy/Registration Statement; Buyer
Stockholder Meeting.
(a) As soon as is reasonably practicable after the date of
this Agreement, Buyer, IPO Corp. and Seller shall jointly
prepare and file with the SEC under the Securities Act and the
Exchange Act, and with all other applicable regulatory bodies, a
proxy statement of Buyer and a registration statement of IPO
Corp. (together with all amendments and supplements thereto, the
Proxy/Registration Statement), for the
purpose of (i) soliciting proxies from Buyers
stockholders and warrantholders for the purpose of obtaining the
Buyer Stockholder Approval and the Warrant Amendment Approval at
the Buyer Stockholder Meeting of its stockholders and
warrantholders to be called and held for such purpose, and
(ii) registering the securities of IPO Corp. to be issued
in connection with the transactions contemplated in this
Agreement. Each of the parties hereto shall cooperate in the
preparation, filing and mailing of the Proxy/Registration
Statement. The Proxy/Registration Statement will comply in all
material respects with all applicable Law. As soon as reasonably
practicable, Buyer shall deliver the Buyer Information and
Seller shall deliver the Company Information to each other. Each
of the parties hereto shall also furnish to each other on a
timely basis all other information as may be requested in
connection with the preparation of the Proxy/Registration
Statement. Each of Buyer, IPO Corp. and Seller shall, as
promptly as practicable after receipt thereof, provide the other
party copies of any written comments and advise the other party
of any oral comments with respect to the Proxy/Registration
Statement received from the SEC or any other Governmental
Authority. The parties shall cooperate and provide the other
with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on the
Proxy/Registration Statement and any amendments or supplements
thereto in advance of filing such with the SEC
and/or each
other applicable Government Authority.
(b) Each party will advise the other parties, promptly
after it receives notice thereof, of any request by the SEC for
amendment of the Proxy/Registration Statement. If, at any time
prior to the Closing, any information relating to Buyer, IPO
Corp. or Seller or any of their respective Affiliates, officers
or directors, is discovered by any of such parties and such
information should be set forth in an amendment or supplement to
the Proxy/Registration Statement so that any of such documents
would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to
state any material fact necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading, the party discovering such information
shall promptly notify the other parties hereto and, to the
extent required by Law, an appropriate amendment or supplement
describing such information shall be promptly filed with the SEC
and disseminated to the stockholders of Buyer.
(c) Each of Buyer, IPO Corp. and Seller shall use its
reasonable best efforts to have the
Proxy/Registration
Statement cleared by the SEC as promptly as practicable. As soon
as practicable following its clearance by the SEC, Buyer shall
distribute the Proxy/Registration Statement to its stockholders
and holders of Buyer Warrants and shall in accordance with its
certificate of incorporation, bylaws and the DGCL solicit
proxies from its stockholders to vote in favor of all of the
proposals contained in the Proxy/Registration Statement and
shall use reasonable best efforts to obtain the Buyer
Stockholder Approval and the Warrant Amendment Approval.
(d) Buyer shall cause the Buyer Stockholder Meeting to be
duly called and held as soon as reasonably practicable for the
purpose of voting on the adoption of this Agreement and the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The board of
directors of Buyer shall recommend to Buyers stockholders
their adoption of this Agreement and the other transactions
contemplated hereunder and shall include such recommendation in
the Proxy/Registration Statement.
A-42
6.11 No Solicitation.
(a) Each of Parent, Seller, IPO Corp., Merger Sub, Aneth
and the Companies will not, and will cause their respective
Affiliates, employees, agents and representatives not to,
directly or indirectly, solicit or enter into discussions or
transactions with, or encourage, or provide any information to,
any Person (other than Buyer) concerning any sale of a
significant portion of the assets of the Companies or merger or
sale (directly or indirectly) of their respective equity
interests in the Companies, any recapitalization of Seller or
the Companies or similar transaction with respect to Seller or
the Companies or their respective businesses.
(b) Buyer will not, and will cause its Affiliates,
employees, agents and representatives not to, directly or
indirectly, solicit or enter into discussions or transactions
with, or encourage, or provide any information to, any Person
(other than Parent or Seller) concerning any Initial Business
Combination or similar transaction.
(c) The parties hereto recognize and agree that immediate
irreparable damages for which there is not adequate remedy at
law would occur in the event that the provisions of this
Section 6.11 are not performed in accordance with
the specific terms hereof or are otherwise breached. It is
accordingly agreed that in the event of a failure by a party to
perform its obligations under this Agreement, the non-breaching
party shall be entitled to specific performance through
injunctive relief, without the necessity of posting a bond, to
prevent breaches of the provisions and to enforce specifically
the provisions of this Section 6.11 in addition to
any other remedy to which such party may be entitled, at law or
in equity.
6.12 Registration Rights
Agreement. At or prior to the Closing, Buyer,
Founder (and/or an Affiliate thereof) and Seller shall execute
and deliver a customary registration rights agreement. Such
parties agree to promptly negotiate the form of the registration
rights agreement after the date hereof.
6.13 SEC Reports; Proxy/Registration Statement.
(a) Buyer will file all reports, registration statements
and other documents, together with any amendments thereto,
required to be filed or submitted under the Securities Act and
the Exchange Act, including but not limited to reports on
Form 8-K,
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
(all such reports, registration statements and documents, filed
or to be filed with the SEC, with the exception of the
Proxy/Registration Statement are collectively referred to herein
as SEC Reports) required to be filed
by Buyer from the date of this Agreement to the Closing Date and
will use commercially reasonable efforts to do so in a timely
manner. The SEC Reports (i) will be prepared in accordance
and comply in all material respects with the requirements of the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the
rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder applicable to such
SEC Reports, and (ii) will not at the time they are filed
(and if amended or superseded by a filing prior to the date of
this Agreement then on the date of such filing and as so amended
or superseded) contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(b) The information relating to Buyer and its Affiliates
supplied for inclusion in the Proxy/Registration Statement will
not, as of the date of its distribution to Buyers
stockholders (or any amendment or supplement thereto) or at the
time of the Buyer Stockholder Meeting, contain any statement
which, at such time and in light of the circumstances under
which it is made, is false or misleading with respect to any
material fact, or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statement
therein not false or misleading.
(c) The information relating to Seller and its Affiliates
supplied to Buyer for inclusion in the
Proxy/Registration
Statement will not, as of the date of its distribution to
Buyers stockholders (or any amendment or supplement
thereto) and at the time of the Buyer Stockholder Meeting,
contain any statement which, at such time and in light of the
circumstances under which it is made, is false or misleading
with respect to any material fact, or omit to state any material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make
the statement therein not false or misleading.
6.14 Notice. From the date hereof through the
Closing Date or the earlier termination of this Agreement, each
party shall promptly give written notice to the other parties of
any event, condition or
A-43
circumstances occurring from the date hereof through the Closing
Date, which would cause any condition precedent in
ARTICLE VII not to be satisfied.
6.15 Termination of Certain Company Benefit
Plans. Prior to the Closing, Seller shall
terminate Sellers Amended and Restated Equity Appreciation
Rights Plan, with no further liability with respect thereto on
the part of Seller, the Companies, IPO Corp. or the Surviving
Corporation.
6.16 Hedging Arrangements. Prior to the
Closing, Seller shall keep Buyer reasonably informed regarding
Sellers efforts in respect of the Hedging Arrangements.
6.17 Dissolution of Certain Excluded
Subsidiaries. Prior to the Closing, Seller shall
use its commercially reasonable efforts dissolve and liquidate
the Excluded Subsidiaries set forth in part
(b) of Schedule 3.3(a), except as such
dissolution and liquidation may be restricted by Seller or
Companies contractual obligations.
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
7.1 Conditions Precedent to Obligations of
Parties. The respective obligations of each of
the parties hereto hereunder are subject to the satisfaction, at
or prior to the Closing Date, of each of the following
conditions:
(a) Delivery of Officers
Certificate. At the Closing Date, each of Parent,
Seller, Aneth, Merger Sub, IPO Corp. and Buyer has delivered a
signed officers certificate certifying in addition to any
certifications required under Section 7.2 or
Section 7.3, as applicable, that:
(i) no Proceeding involving such party is pending or
threatened before any judicial or Governmental Authority
relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
(ii) the board of directors (or manager, as the case may
be) of such party has approved this Agreement (with copies of
all resolutions attached); and
(iii) stockholder (or member or members, as the case may
be) approval of such party (in the case of Buyer, including the
Buyer Stockholder Approval and the Warrant Amendment Approval)
with respect to the execution, delivery and performance of the
Agreement and the consummation of all transactions contemplated
thereby has been attained.
(b) No Injunction. At the Closing Date, there
shall be no Law, injunction, restraining order or decree of any
nature of any court or Governmental Authority of competent
jurisdiction that is in effect that restrains or prohibits the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
provided, however, that the parties invoking this
condition shall use their best efforts to have such injunction,
order or decree vacated or denied.
(c) Regulatory Authorizations. Any applicable
waiting periods specified under the HSR Act with respect to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall have lapsed or
been terminated.
(d) Approvals. Buyer Stockholder Approval and
the Warrant Amendment Approval shall have been obtained.
7.2 Conditions Precedent to Obligation of
Buyer. The obligation of Buyer to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement is subject to the
satisfaction at or prior to the Closing Date of each of the
following additional conditions, unless waived in writing by
Buyer:
(a) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties of
Parent. The representations and warranties of
Parent and Seller contained in ARTICLE II which are not
qualified as to materiality shall be true and accurate in all
material respects as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of
such date and the representations and warranties of Parent and
Seller contained in ARTICLE II which are qualified as to
materiality shall be true and accurate in all respects as of the
Closing Date as if made at and as of such date (except, in each
case, those representations and warranties that address matters
only as of a particular date or only with respect to a
A-44
specific period of time, which need only be true and accurate
(or true and accurate in all material respects, as applicable)
as of such date or with respect to such period).
(b) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties of
Seller. The representations and warranties of
Seller contained in ARTICLE III, disregarding all
qualifications contained herein relating to materiality or
Material Adverse Effect, shall be true and correct on and as of
the Closing Date with the same force and effect as though such
representations and warranties had been made on the Closing Date
(except for such representations and warranties which by their
express provisions are made as of an earlier date, in which case
they shall be true and correct as of such date), except to the
extent that the failure of such representations and warranties
to be true and correct would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on IPO Corp. and its
Subsidiaries.
(c) Performance of Agreement. Each of
Parent, Seller, IPO Corp., Merger Sub and Aneth shall have
performed in all material respects all obligations and
agreements, and complied in all material respects with all
covenants and conditions, contained in this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by each of them prior to or on the
Closing Date.
(d) Certificate. Buyer shall have
received a certificate of Parent, Seller and of Aneth, dated the
Closing Date, executed on behalf of each such Person by a duly
authorized officer of such Person, to the effect that the
conditions specified in paragraphs (a) and/or (b) and
(c) as applicable to it above have been satisfied.
(e) Consents and Waivers. All consents
and waivers set forth on Schedule 7.2(e) shall have
been obtained on terms satisfactory to Buyer.
(f) No Default. Except for (i) any
default under the First Lien Credit Agreement that has been
waived or is subject to a forbearance agreement, (ii) any
cross-default under any ISDA Agreement with a First Lien lender
if the conditions in Section 7.2(f)(i) apply, or
(iii) any default under the Second Lien Credit Agreement
that is subject to a standstill covenant or otherwise does not
permit the Second Lien lenders to take any action on the
collateral securing the loan made under the Second Lien Credit
Agreement, in each case where the existence of any such default
would be cured upon the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, there shall be no default with
respect to any payment obligation or financial covenant under
any material Indebtedness of the Companies. For purposes of this
Section 7.2(f), material Indebtedness shall mean the
Credit Agreement and all Indebtedness in an outstanding amount
over $2,000,000 in the aggregate.
(g) Hedging Arrangements. Seller shall
have taken such actions with respect to its hedging arrangements
such that the average fixed price on the Companies crude
oil swaps in Year 2010 on 3,650 barrels of crude oil per
day is $67.00 or more per barrel (Hedging
Arrangements).
(h) Marketing. Seller or the Companies
have not entered into any agreement, or amendment to an
agreement, with respect to their crude oil marketing
arrangements that would reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on IPO Corp., and its Subsidiaries as of
Closing.
(i) Legal Opinion. Buyer shall have
received a legal opinion dated the Closing Date, in a form
reasonably satisfactory to Buyer, from counsel reasonably
satisfactory to Buyer addressing the existence of (i) no
conflicts, defaults, or violations under applicable Laws of the
Navajo Nation or any subdivision or Affiliate thereof and
(ii) no conflicts, defaults or violations under Material
Contracts pursuant to which the Navajo Nation or any subdivision
or Affiliate thereof is a party or a third party beneficiary, in
each case as a result of the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
7.3 Conditions Precedent to the Obligation of
Seller. The obligation of Parent, Seller, IPO
Corp., Merger Sub and Aneth to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement is subject to the satisfaction at
or prior to the Closing Date of each of the following additional
conditions, unless waived in writing by Seller:
(a) Accuracy of Representations and
Warranties. The representations and warranties of
Buyer contained in this Agreement which are not qualified as to
materiality shall be true and accurate in all material respects
as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of such date and the
representations and warranties of Buyer contained in this
Agreement which are qualified as to materiality shall be true
and accurate in all respects as
A-45
of the Closing Date as if made at and as of such date (except,
in each case, those representations and warranties that address
matters only as of a particular date or only with respect to a
specific period of time, which need only be true and accurate
(or true and accurate in all material respects, as applicable)
as of such date or with respect to such period).
(b) Performance of Agreements. Buyer
shall have performed in all material respects all obligations
and agreements, and complied in all material respects with all
covenants and conditions, contained in this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by it prior to or on the Closing Date.
(c) Certificate. Seller shall have
received a certificate of Buyer, dated the Closing Date,
executed on behalf of Buyer by its President or any Vice
President, to the effect that the conditions specified in
paragraphs (a) and (b) above have been satisfied.
(d) Legal Opinion. Parent, Seller, Aneth
and IPO Corp. shall have received a legal opinion dated the
Closing Date, in a form reasonably satisfactory to them, from
counsel reasonably satisfactory to them that (i) the
Charter Amendment will be effective in modifying Article II
of Buyer Certificate of Incorporation such that consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby will not constitute a
violation of such Article II, and (ii) the execution,
delivery and performance of this Agreement by Buyer will not
conflict with the terms of the Graham Agreement.
(e) Acquisition Consideration. The
Acquisition Consideration shall not be less than $275,000,000.00.
ARTICLE VIII
LABOR MATTERS
8.1 Collective Bargaining
Agreements. From and after the Closing, the
Companies will continue to be bound by the terms of the
collective bargaining agreements set forth in
Schedule 8.1 (the Collective Bargaining
Agreements), and will comply with their
obligations under such Collective Bargaining Agreements and all
other statutory bargaining obligations.
ARTICLE IX
MISCELLANEOUS
9.1 Termination and Abandonment.
(a) General. Without prejudice to other
remedies which may be available to the parties by Law or this
Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated and the transactions
contemplated hereby may be abandoned at any time prior to the
Closing:
(i) by mutual written consent of Buyer and Seller;
(ii) by Buyer or Seller by giving written notice to the
other Person if a Law, injunction, restraining order or decree
of any nature of any Governmental Authority of competent
jurisdiction is issued that prohibits the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and such injunction,
restraining order or decree is final and non-appealable or is
not resolved in Buyers favor prior to September 29,
2009 (a Final Order); provided,
however, that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this clause (ii) shall have used its reasonable
best efforts to have such Law, injunction, order or decree
vacated or denied;
(iii) by Buyer or Seller by giving written notice to the
other Person if the Buyer Stockholder Approval or the Warrant
Amendment Approval shall not have been obtained at the Buyer
Stockholder Meeting;
(iv) by either Seller or Buyer by giving written notice to
the other Person if the Closing shall not have occurred by
September 29, 2009; provided that the foregoing
right to terminate this Agreement under this clause (iv)
shall not be available to any Person whose failure or inability
to fulfill any
A-46
obligation under this Agreement has been the cause of, or
resulted in, the failure of the Closing to occur on or before
such date;
(v) by Seller, upon written notice to Buyer, upon a
material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement on the part of Buyer set forth in this Agreement such
that, if occurring or continuing on the Closing Date, the
conditions set forth in Section 7.3(a) or
Section 7.3(b) would not be satisfied and such
breach shall be incapable of being cured or shall not have been
cured within thirty (30) days after written notice thereof
shall have been received by Buyer; or
(vi) by Buyer, upon written notice to Seller, upon a
material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement on the part of Parent, Aneth or Seller set forth in
this Agreement such that, if occurring or continuing on the
Closing Date, the conditions set forth in
Section 7.2(a), Section 7.2(b) or
Section 7.2(c), would not be satisfied and such
breach shall be incapable of being cured or shall not have been
cured within thirty (30) days after written notice thereof
shall have been received by Seller.
(b) Procedure Upon Termination. In the
event of the termination and abandonment of this Agreement,
written notice thereof shall promptly be given to the other
parties hereto and this Agreement shall terminate and the
transactions contemplated hereby shall be abandoned without
further action by any of the parties hereto; provided,
however, that nothing herein shall relieve any party from
liability for any intentional or knowing breach of any provision
hereof.
(c) Payment of Expenses.
(i) If this Agreement is terminated by Buyer or Seller
pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(iii) or
Section 9.1(a)(ii) if due to a Final Order issued
due to a violation of Article II of the Buyer Certificate
of Incorporation, or by Seller pursuant to
Section 9.1(a)(v), Buyer shall pay to Seller the
documented out of pocket expenses of Parent, Seller, IPO Corp.,
Aneth, and all of the Companies (not to exceed $1,000,000);
provided, however, such aggregate amount shall be
limited to the amount that Seller and its Affiliates would have
been able to collect from Buyer, as limited by
Section 9.19.
(ii) If this Agreement is terminated by Buyer pursuant to
Section 9.1(a)(vi), Seller shall pay to Buyer the
documented out of pocket expenses of Buyer (not to exceed
$1,000,000); provided, however, such aggregate amount
shall be limited to the amount that Seller and its Affiliates
would have been able to collect from Buyer, as limited by
Section 9.19, had Seller terminated the Agreement
pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(v).
(iii) If a party elects to terminate this Agreement as a
result of a termination contemplated by the foregoing provisions
of this Section 9.1(c), this Section 9.1(c) shall
constitute the sole remedy and entire liability and damages of
the parties as a result of a termination of this Agreement;
provided, however, in the case of a breach by Seller of
Section 6.11 that gives right to termination of this
Agreement by Buyer pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(vi)
and Buyer elects to terminate this Agreement but rejects and
waives payment from Seller under this Section 9.1(c),
then this Section 9.1(c) shall not constitute the
sole remedy and entire liability and damages of the parties
under this Agreement.
(d) Survival of Certain Provisions. The
respective obligations of the parties hereto pursuant to
Section 6.1(d), except as otherwise provided in the
Confidentiality Agreement, Section 6.6 and this
ARTICLE IX shall survive any termination of this
Agreement.
9.2 Expenses. Except as otherwise
contemplated by Section 9.1(c), (a) Buyer shall
bear all costs, fees and expenses incurred by it in connection
with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby,
(b) Aneth, IPO Corp., Merger Sub and the Companies shall
bear all costs, fees and expenses incurred by them in connection
with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and
(c) Parent and Seller shall bear all costs, fees and
expenses incurred by them in connection with this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby.
A-47
9.3 Tax Matters
(a) Transfer Taxes Notwithstanding any provision of
this Agreement to the contrary, all Transfer Taxes incurred in
connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby shall be paid by IPO Corp. and Seller. Buyer and IPO
Corp. shall cooperate in timely making all filings, returns,
reports and forms as may be required to comply with the
provisions of such tax laws. For purposes of this Agreement,
Transfer Taxes shall mean transfer,
documentary, sales, use, registration and other such taxes
(including all applicable real estate transfer taxes).
(b) Withholding. There shall be no
withholding pursuant to section 1445 of the Code;
provided that Seller delivers to Buyer at the Closing
certificates complying with the Code and Treasury Regulations,
in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer, duly
executed and acknowledged, certifying that the transactions
contemplated hereby are exempt from withholding under
section 1445 of the Code.
(c) Cooperation on Tax Matters. Seller,
the Companies and Buyer shall reasonably cooperate, and shall
cause their respective Affiliates, officers, employees, agents,
auditors and other representatives to reasonably cooperate, in
preparing and filing all Tax Returns and in resolving all
disputes and audits with respect to all taxable periods relating
to Taxes, including by maintaining and making available to each
other all records necessary in connection with Taxes and making
employees available on a mutually convenient basis to provide
additional information or explanation of any material provided
hereunder or to testify at proceedings relating to any Tax
claim. Parent, IPO Corp. and Founder will cooperate in the
preparation of the Form 1065 for Aneth for its taxable year
that includes the Effective Time, and no such return shall be
filed without the consent of each of Parent, IPO Corp. and
Founder, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned
or delayed. Parent and Seller shall jointly control (at each
partys own expense) any defense or settlement, compromise,
admission, or acknowledgment of any Tax audit or controversy
relating to Tax items of any of the Companies or their assets
for Tax periods and partial Tax periods ended on or prior to the
Effective Time that could materially affect Parent, Seller or
any member of Parent; provided, however, that Parent and
Seller must consult, in good faith, with Founder before taking
any action with respect to the conduct of such settlement,
compromise, admission or acknowledgment. No such Tax audit or
controversy shall be settled or compromised without the prior
written approval (which shall not be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed) of each of Parent, Seller and Founder.
(d) Tax Treatment. The Parties intend
(i) for the Contribution to be treated as part of a
transfer to a controlled corporation pursuant to
Section 351 of the Code and (ii) for the Merger to be
treated either as a reorganization described in
Section 368(a)(2)(e) of the Code or as part of a transfer
to a controlled corporation pursuant to Section 351 of the
Code. The Parties agree to report the transactions contemplated
hereby consistent with this treatment, except to the extent
required by a final determination pursuant to Section 1313
of the Code.
(e) Tax Representation. Other than with
respect to the Retention Shares, each of Founder, Parent and
Seller represents and warrants that it has, and at the Effective
Time will have, no binding obligation, or fixed or definite plan
or intention, to dispose, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, of any IPO Corp. Common Stock received in the
Contribution or Merger, as applicable, other than to distribute
shares of IPO Corp. to its members or partners and that it has
no knowledge of any binding obligation, or fixed or definite
plan or fixed or definite intention, of its partners or members
to dispose of Common Stock received in any such distribution.
IPO Corp. has, and at the Effective Time will have, no intention
or plan to liquidate or terminate for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, Buyer or Aneth following the Merger and
Contribution.
A-48
9.4 Notices. All notices, requests,
demands, waivers and other communications required or permitted
to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall
be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally or
mailed, certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, or
sent by telex, telegram or telecopy, as follows:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
if to Seller, Aneth or IPO Corp. prior to the Closing, to it at:
|
1675 Broadway St.
Denver, Colorado 80202
Attn: James M. Piccone
Fax:
(303) 623-3628
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP
1550 Seventeenth Street, Suite 500
Denver, Colorado 80202
Attn: Ronald R. Levine, II
Fax:
(303) 893-1379
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
if to Parent, to it at:
|
1675 Broadway St.
Denver, Colorado 80202
Attn: James M. Piccone
Fax:
(303) 623-3628
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP
1550 Seventeenth Street, Suite 500
Denver, Colorado 80202
Attn: Ronald R. Levine, II
Fax:
(303) 893-1379
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
if to Buyer or Founder, to it at:
|
c/o Hicks
Acquisition Company I, Inc.
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attn: Joseph B. Armes
Fax:
(214) 615-2223
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attn: Alan D. Feld
Fax:
(214) 969-4343
or to such other Person or address as a party shall specify by
notice in writing to the other parties. All such notices,
requests, demands, waivers and communications shall be deemed to
have been received on the date of personal delivery or on the
third Business Day after the mailing thereof or, in the case of
notice by telecopier, when receipt thereof is confirmed by
telephone.
9.5 Entire Agreement. This
Agreement (including the Schedules hereto and the documents
referred to herein) constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties hereto and supersedes all prior agreements and
understandings, oral and written, between the parties hereto
with respect to the subject matter hereof.
A-49
9.6 Non-Survival of Representations and
Warranties. None of the representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in this Agreement or in any
instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement, including any
rights arising out of any breach of such representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements, shall survive the Closing,
except for (a) those covenants and agreements contained
herein that by their terms apply or are to be performed in whole
or in part after the Closing and (b) the obligations set
forth in Sections 6.1(b) and 6.6 and this
ARTICLE IX.
9.7 No Third Party
Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall inure to the
benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their
respective successors and assigns. Nothing in this Agreement,
express or implied, is intended to confer on any Person other
than the parties hereto or their respective successors and
assigns, any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under
or by reason of this Agreement, except as provided in
Section 6.9.
9.8 Assignability. This Agreement
shall not be assigned by any of the parties hereto without the
prior written consent of the other parties hereto.
9.9 Amendment and Modification;
Waiver. Subject to applicable Law, this Agreement
may be amended, modified and supplemented by a written
instrument authorized and executed on behalf of Buyer, Parent
and Seller at any time prior to the Closing Date with respect to
any of the terms contained herein. No waiver by any party of any
of the provisions hereof shall be effective unless explicitly
set forth in writing and executed by the party so waiving.
Except as provided in the preceding sentence, no action taken
pursuant to this Agreement, including without limitation, any
investigation by or on behalf of any party, shall be deemed to
constitute a waiver by the party taking such action of
compliance with any representations, warranties, covenants, or
agreements contained herein, and in any documents delivered or
to be delivered pursuant to this Agreement and in connection
with the Closing hereunder. The waiver by any party hereto of a
breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate or
be construed as a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.
9.10 No Recourse. No recourse shall
be available to the assets of any Person that is a member,
partner, equity holder or Affiliate of Parent, Seller or Buyer,
or any officer, director, agent, employee, shareholder or
partner thereof for any obligations of Parent, Seller, IPO
Corp., Merger Sub or Aneth to Buyer or of Buyer to Parent,
Seller, IPO Corp., Merger Sub or Aneth pursuant to this
Agreement.
9.11 Severability. If any provision
of this Agreement or the application thereof under certain
circumstances is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of
competent jurisdiction, the other provisions of this Agreement
will remain in full force and effect. Any provision of this
Agreement held invalid or unenforceable only in part or degree
will remain in full force and effect to the extent not held
invalid or unenforceable.
9.12 Section Headings. The
section headings contained in this Agreement are inserted for
reference purposes only and shall not affect the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
9.13 Interpretation. The
descriptive headings contained in this Agreement are included
for convenience of reference only and shall not affect in any
way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. When
reference is made in this Agreement to a Section, such reference
shall be to a Section of this Agreement unless otherwise
indicated. Whenever the words include,
includes or including are used in this
Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words
without limitation. The words hereof,
herein, hereby and hereunder
and words of similar import when used in this Agreement shall
refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular
provision of this Agreement. The word or shall not
be exclusive. This Agreement shall be construed without regard
to any presumption or rule requiring construction or
interpretation against the party drafting or causing any
instrument to be drafted.
9.14 Definitions. As used in this
Agreement:
Affiliate means, with respect to a
specified Person, any other Person who, directly or indirectly,
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with such
specified Person. As used in this definition, the term
control means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the
management and policies of a Person, whether through ownership
of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise; provided,
however, except for Sections 6.1(d), 6.11,
6.13(c) and 9.10, in the case
Affiliate of
A-50
Seller, Company, Aneth, IPO Corp. or any of the Companies shall
expressly not include Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P., Natural
Gas Partners Income Co Investment Opportunities
Fund, L.P. or any of the Natural Gas Partners entity.
Aggregate Cash Consideration means the
aggregate amount payable in respect of all Public Warrants
converted into the right to receive the Cash Consideration as
set forth in Section 1.7(a).
Benefit Plan means (A) each
employee benefit plan (as defined in
section 3(3) of ERISA); and (B) every other plan,
program, policy, practice, Contract (including any employment
Contract or consulting Contract), or other arrangement (whether
written or oral, qualified or nonqualified, funded or unfunded,
foreign or domestic, currently effective or terminated, and
whether or not subject to ERISA and whether or not legally
binding) providing for compensation, severance, termination pay,
salary continuation, bonus or other incentive compensation,
deferred compensation, stock or other equity or equity-related
compensation, change in control benefits, fringe benefits, or
other employee benefits of any kind.
BIA means the Bureau of Indian Affairs
of the United States Department of the Interior.
Business Day means any day other than
a Saturday, Sunday or a day on which the banks in New York, New
York are authorized by law or executive order to be closed.
Business Employee means any current or
former officer, director, employee, leased employee, consultant
or agent (or their respective beneficiaries) of the Companies or
of any ERISA Affiliate.
Buyer Certificate of Incorporation
means the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Buyer as of the date hereof.
Buyer Common Stock means the common
stock, $0.0001 par value, of Buyer.
Buyer Information means information
about Buyer reasonably sufficient to permit the preparation and
filing with the SEC of the Proxy/Registration Statement or such
other statement or report as may be required by federal
securities Law.
Buyer SEC Documents means all of
Buyers reports, statements, schedules and registration
statements filed with the SEC.
Buyer Warrants means the warrants to
purchase shares of Buyer Common Stock governed by the HACI
Warrant Agreement.
Charter Amendment means the
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of Buyer to be filed with the Secretary of
State of Delaware after the receipt of the Buyer Stockholder
Approval, pursuant to which Buyers current certificate of
incorporation will be amended to, among other things, revise the
purpose and existence clauses therein.
Code means the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.
Companies means all of the
Subsidiaries of Seller except for the Excluded Subsidiaries and
Company means any one of the Companies
individually.
Company Information means information
about IPO Corp., Seller, and Companies reasonably sufficient to
permit the preparation and filing with the SEC of the
Proxy/Registration Statement or such other statement or report
as may be required by federal securities Law.
Credit Agreements means, collectively,
(a) that certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,
dated as of April 14, 2006, among Resolute Aneth, LLC,
Seller and certain of its Subsidiaries, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc., as Syndication Agent, and Deutchse Bank Securities, Inc.,
Fortis Capital Corp and U.S. Bank National Association,
Inc., as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other Lenders party
thereto (1st Lien Agreement) and
(b) that certain Amended and Restated Second Lien Credit
Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2007, among Aneth, Seller
and certain of its Subsidiaries, Citicorp USA, Inc, as
Administrative Agent, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as
Syndication Agent and the other Lenders party thereto
(2nd Lien Agreement), each as
amended.
A-51
Defined Percentage means the resulting
percentage of: (i) Acquisition Consideration, divided by
(ii) Acquisition Consideration plus $121,520,000.00.
Earnout Shares means shares of IPO
Corp. Common Stock subject to forfeiture in the event the Stock
Earnout Target is not met by the date which is five years
following the Closing Date and shall not have any economic
(except to the extent set forth in Section 1.6)
until the Stock Earnout Target is met but shall have voting
rights.
ERISA means the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
ERISA Affiliate means each employer
that, together with any of the Companies, would be considered a
single employer under section 414(t) of the Code.
Exchange Agent means an agent,
reasonably satisfactory to Buyer, IPO Corp., Seller and Founder
who shall act as the exchange agent in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement pursuant to an
exchange agent agreement, in a form reasonably acceptable to
Buyer and Seller, to be entered into among the agent, Buyer, IPO
Corp., Seller and Founder.
Excluded Subsidiaries means those
Subsidiaries of Seller set forth on Schedule 3.3(a).
Founders Warrants means the
warrants to purchase shares of Buyer Common Stock owned by
Founder and governed by that certain Warrant Agreement, dated as
of September 27, 2007, between Buyer and Continental Stock
Transfer and Trust Company, N.A., as warrant agent (the
HACI Warrant Agreement).
Graham Agreement means that certain
Equity Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 1,
2008, among Buyer, GPC Holdings, L.P., Graham Packaging
Corporation, Graham Capital Company, Graham Engineering
Corporation, BMP/Graham Holdings Corporation, GPC Capital Corp.
II, Graham Packing Holdings Company, and the other parties
signatory thereto, as amended to date.
HACI Registration Rights Agreement
shall mean the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
September 26, 2007, made and entered into by and among the
Company, the Founder, Thomas O. Hicks, William H. Cunningham,
William A. Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn
IMDA means the Indian Mineral
Development Act of 1982, 25 U.S.C.
§§ 2101-2108.
Indebtedness means with respect to any
Person at any date, without duplication: (i) all
obligations of such Person for borrowed money or in respect of
loans or advances, (ii) all obligations of such Person
evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or other similar
instruments or debt securities, (iii) all financial
obligations of such Person secured by a Lien (other than a
Permitted Lien), and (iv) all guarantees of such Person in
connection with any of the foregoing. For clarity, capital lease
obligations shall be treated as Indebtedness but operating
leases shall not be so treated.
Initial Business Combination has the
meaning set forth in the Buyer Certificate of Incorporation.
Intellectual Property means all
intellectual property, including but not limited to (a) all
trademarks, service marks, trade dress, design marks, logos,
trade names, domain names, websites, brand names and corporate
names, whether registered or unregistered, together with all
goodwill associated therewith, and all applications,
registrations and renewals in connection therewith, (b) all
copyrights, photographs, advertising and promotional materials,
including catalogs, and computer software and all copyright
applications, registrations, and renewals in connection
therewith, (c) all trade secrets and proprietary and
confidential business information (including research and
development, know-how, formulas, compositions, manufacturing and
production processes and techniques, methods, schematics,
technology, technical data, designs, drawings, flowcharts, block
diagrams, specifications, customer and supplier lists, pricing
and cost information and business and marketing plans and
proposals), (d) all inventions and designs (whether
patentable or unpatentable), and all patents, patent
applications, continuations,
continuations-in-part,
divisionals, reissues, reexaminations, term extensions and
disclosures, and (e) all rights to pursue, recover and
retain damages and costs and attorneys fees (if available)
for past, present and future infringement of any of the
foregoing.
IPO means the initial public offering
of Buyer, effected on October 3, 2007.
A-52
IPO Shares means the shares of Buyer
Common Stock issued in the IPO.
Knowledge or
knowledge of Seller or the Companies
means the actual knowledge of a particular fact or other matter
by the persons listed on Schedule 9.14.
Leased Real Property means the non oil
and gas real property leased by any of the Companies, as tenant,
together with, to the extent leased by such Companies, all
buildings and other structures, facilities or improvements
currently located thereon, all fixtures, systems and equipment
attached or appurtenant thereto.
Lien means any mortgage, pledge, lien,
encumbrance, charge or other security interest.
Material Adverse Effect means a
material adverse effect on the business, operations, assets or
financial condition of the Person and its Subsidiaries, taken as
a whole, excluding, in each case, any such effect resulting from
or arising out of or in connection with: (i) acts of God,
calamities, national or international political or social
conditions including the engagement by any country in
hostilities, whether commenced before or after the date hereof,
and whether or not pursuant to the declaration of a national
emergency or war, or the occurrence of any military or terrorist
attack, in each case, that do not have a disproportionate effect
on the Person and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative
to other Persons in the industry; (ii) economic, industry
or market events, occurrences, developments, circumstances or
conditions, whether general or regional in nature or limited to
any area in which the Person or its Subsidiaries operate, in
each case to the extent do not have a disproportionate effect on
the Person and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to
other Persons in the industry; (iii) changes in applicable
Laws or accounting standards, principles or interpretations, in
each case, that do not have a disproportionate effect on the
Person and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to other
similarly situated Persons in the industry; (iv) changes in
commodity prices; or (v) the public announcement or
pendency of this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated herein or any actions taken or not taken in
compliance herewith or otherwise at the request or with the
consent of Seller or Buyer, as applicable.
Navajo Nation means the federally
recognized Indian tribe of the Navajo Indian Reservation in the
States of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Utah, including all
of its agencies, departments, instrumentalities and entities
whether organized pursuant to federal, state or tribal law.
NNOG means Navajo Nation Oil and Gas
Company, a federally chartered corporation pursuant to
Section 17 of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934.
Owned Real Property means the non oil
and gas real property owned by any of the Companies, together
with all buildings and other structures, facilities or
improvements currently located thereon, all fixtures, systems
and equipment of such Companies attached or appurtenant thereto
and all easements, licenses, rights and appurtenances relating
to the foregoing.
Permitted Liens means: (a) Liens
for Taxes, assessments and governmental charges or levies not
yet delinquent or for which adequate reserves are maintained on
the financial statements of the Person and its Subsidiaries as
of the Closing Date; (b) Liens imposed by law, such as
materialmens, mechanics, carriers,
workmens and repairmens liens and other similar
liens arising in the ordinary course of business securing
obligations that are not overdue for a period of more than sixty
(60) days or which are being contested in good faith by
appropriate proceedings (and for which adequate reserves are
maintained on the financial statements of the Person and its
Subsidiaries as of the Closing Date in conformity with GAAP);
(c) pledges or deposits to secure obligations under
workers compensation laws or similar legislation or to
secure public or statutory obligations, and liens in connection
with unemployment insurance or other social security, old age
pension or public liability obligations which are not
delinquent; (d) deposits to secure the performance of bids,
trade contracts (other than for borrowed money), leases,
statutory obligations, surety and appeal bonds, performance
bonds and other obligations of a like nature incurred in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(e) all matters of record, including, without limitation,
survey exceptions, reciprocal easement agreements and other
encumbrances on title to real property; (f) all applicable
zoning, entitlement, conservation restrictions and other land
use and environmental regulations; (g) all exceptions,
restrictions, easements, charges, rights-of-way and other Liens
set forth in any environmental Permits, any deed restrictions,
groundwater or land use limitations or other institutional
controls utilized in connection with any
A-53
required environmental remedial actions, or other state, local
or municipal franchise applicable to the Person or any of its
Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties;
(h) Liens securing the obligations of the Person or any of
its Subsidiaries under secured indebtedness of the Person or any
of its Subsidiaries and, in respect of Seller and the Companies,
and all Excepted Liens (as defined in the Credit Agreements);
(i) Liens referred to in the Schedules hereto;
(j) Permitted Encumbrances; and (k) Liens that,
individually or in the aggregate, would not have a Material
Adverse Effect on such Person.
Person means an individual,
corporation, limited liability company, partnership,
association, joint venture, trust, unincorporated organization
or other entity, as well as any syndicate or group that would be
deemed to be a Person under Section 13(a)(3) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Production means all oil, natural gas,
coalbed methane gas, condensate, natural gas liquids, and other
hydrocarbons or products produced from or attributable to the
Company Assets.
Prospect means an oil and gas property
owned by the Companies that is set forth under the heading
Unproven Properties on Exhibit E.
Public Stockholder means each holder
of IPO Shares.
Public Warrants means the warrants to
purchase shares of Buyer Common Stock issued in the IPO.
SEC means the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Seller Interests means the limited
liability company interests in Seller.
Sponsors Warrants means the
warrants to purchase shares of Buyer Common Stock owned by
Founder and governed by that certain Sponsor Warrants Purchase
Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2007, between Buyer
and Founder.
Stock Earnout Target means
(i) the closing sale price for the regular trading session
(without considering after hours or other trading outside
regular trading session hours) of the IPO Corp. Common Stock on
the applicable stock exchange (or, if no closing price is
reported, the last reported sale price during that regular
trading session) for any twenty (20) days within any thirty
(30) day trading period which period can begin only after
ninety (90) days after the Closing Date exceeds $15.00 per
share, or (ii) a Change in Control Event (as defined by
clauses (a) and (c) of the definition of Change in
Control Event provided for in the Resolute Energy Corporation
2009 Performance Incentive Plan) occurs in which IPO Corp.
Common Stock is valued in connection with such Change in Control
Event in excess of $15.00 per share. If IPO Corp. shall at any
time or from time to time after the Closing Date effect a
subdivision (by any stock split or otherwise) of the outstanding
IPO Corp. Common Stock into a greater number of shares, the
Stock Earnout Target in effect immediately before such
subdivision shall be proportionately decreased. Conversely, if
IPO Corp. shall at any time or from time to time after the
Closing Date combine (by reverse stock split or otherwise) the
outstanding shares of IPO Corp. Common Stock into a smaller
number of shares, the Stock Earnout Target in effect immediately
before the combination shall be proportionately increased.
Subsidiary or
Subsidiaries of Seller, Buyer or any
other Person means any corporation, partnership, joint venture
or other legal entity of which Seller, Buyer or such other
Person, as the case may be (either alone or through or together
with any other subsidiary), owns, directly or indirectly, 50% or
more of the stock or other equity interests the holder of which
is generally entitled to vote for the election of the board of
directors or other governing body of such corporation or other
legal entity.
Trust Account means the trust
account established by Buyer in connection with the consummation
of the IPO and into which Buyer deposited a designated portion
of the net proceeds from the IPO.
Trust Agreement means the
agreement pursuant to which Buyer has established the
Trust Account.
Warrant Cap means 27,600,000.
Western Refining Contract means Gas
Gathering and Processing Agreement, made and entered into
December 18, 2001, by and between Western Gas Resources,
Inc., as processor, and Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc.,
as operator, of the Aneth Plant and on behalf of the Aneth Plant
Co-owners.
A-54
9.15 Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which together
shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.
9.16 Submission to
Jurisdiction. Each of the parties hereto:
(a) consents to submit itself to the personal jurisdiction
of any state or federal court in the State of Delaware in the
event any dispute arises out of this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; (b) agrees
that it will not attempt to deny or defeat such personal
jurisdiction or venue by motion or other request for leave from
any such court; and (c) agrees that it will not bring any
action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement in any court other than such
courts sitting in the State of Delaware.
9.17 Enforcement. The parties agree
that irreparable damage could occur in the event that any of the
provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance
with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is
accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement, in addition to any other remedy to which they are
entitled at law or in equity.
9.18 Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
internal laws of the State of Delaware.
9.19 No Claim Against
Trust Account. Each of Parent, Seller, Aneth
and each other Subsidiary of Seller and IPO Corp. hereby
irrevocably waives any and all right, title, interest or claim
(any Claim) of any kind it has or may
have in the future to any assets in the Trust Account other
than amounts distributed to Buyer in limited amounts from time
to time (and in no event more than $6,555,000 in total,
inclusive of amounts that have already been distributed) in
order to permit Buyer to pay its operating expenses and after
the consummation of its Initial Business Combination and hereby
agrees not to seek recourse, reimbursement, payment or
satisfaction against the Trust Account or any funds
distributed therefrom, except amounts distributed to Buyer after
the consummation of its Initial Business Combination, in respect
of any Claims against Buyer arising under this Agreement;
provided, that any Claim in respect of such amounts
distributed to Buyer after the consummation of its Initial
Business Combination shall be limited to payments required by
Section 9.1(c). This waiver is intended
and shall be deemed and construed to be irrevocable and absolute
on the part of each of Parent, Seller, Aneth and each other
Subsidiary of Seller, Seller and IPO Corp., and shall be binding
on their respective heirs, successors and assigns, as the case
may be. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this
Section 9.19 shall not constitute a waiver of the
specific performance remedy set forth in
Section 9.17.
[SIGNATURE
PAGES FOLLOW]
A-55
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and
delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written.
BUYER:
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
IPO CORP.:
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Nicholas J. Sutton
|
MERGER SUB:
RESOLUTE SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Nicholas J. Sutton
|
ANETH:
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Nicholas J. Sutton
|
A-56
SELLER:
RESOLUTE HOLDINGS SUB, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Nicholas J. Sutton
|
PARENT:
RESOLUTE HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Nicholas J. Sutton
|
FOUNDER:
HH-HACI, L.P.
By: HH-HACI GP LLC, its General Partner
A-57
Hicks
Acquisition Company I, Inc.
100
Crescent Court, Suite 1200
Dallas,
Texas 75201
Fax:
(214)615-2236
September 9,
2009
Resolute Holdings, LLC
Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC
Attn: James M. Piccone
1675 Broadway St.
Denver, Colorado 80202
Re: Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement
Reference is made to that certain Purchase and IPO
Reorganization Agreement (the Acquisition
Agreement), dated as of August 2, 2009, by
and among Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
(Buyer), Resolute Holdings, LLC,
Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC (Seller),
Resolute Aneth, LLC, Resolute Energy Corporation
(IPO Corp.), Resolute Subsidiary
Corporation (Merger Sub), and HH-HACI,
L.P. (Founder). Capitalized terms used
herein and not otherwise defined have the meanings assigned to
them in the Acquisition Agreement. The undersigned hereby agree
as follows:
Neither Seller nor Buyer shall exercise their rights under
Section 9.1(a)(iv) of the Acquisition Agreement at any time
prior to October 6, 2009 if the Buyer Stockholder Approval
shall have been obtained and the Charter Amendment shall have
become effective and in such case, the parties wont
exercise their rights under Section 9.1(a)(iv) of the
Acquisition Agreement unless the Closing shall not have occurred
by October 6, 2009.
Notwithstanding Sections 1.5(b), 1.5(c) and 1.6(b) of the
Acquisition Agreement requiring (i) the cancellation and
forfeiture of 7,335,000 shares of Buyer Common Stock and
4,600,000 Founders Warrants held by Founder and
(ii) the restriction of 1,865,000 shares of IPO Corp.
Common Stock receivable in the Merger in exchange for
1,865,000 shares of Buyer Common Stock held by Founder, the
parties hereto hereby acknowledge and agree that such
cancellation and forfeiture and such restriction shall be
allocated pro rata among Founder and each of Buyers
independent directors, as reflected on Schedule I
hereto.
The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that except as modified
herein, the Acquisition Agreement remains in full force and
effect. Please acknowledge your agreement to these terms by
signing and returning this letter to the undersigned at the
address listed above.
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
Agreed to and Acknowledged:
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
RESOLUTE SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION
RESOLUTE ANETH, LLC
RESOLUTE HOLDINGS SUB, LLC
RESOLUTE HOLDINGS, LLC
HH-HACI, L.P.
its general partner
Agreed to and Acknowledged, Solely with Respect to
Sections 1.5(b), 1.5(c) and 1.6(b) of the Acquisition
Agreement, as modified by this Letter:
/s/ William
H. Cunningham
William H. Cunningham
/s/ William
A. Montgomery
William A. Montgomery
Brian Mulroney
William F. Quinn
Purchase
and IPO Reorganization Agreement
Letter Agreement
Signature Page
Schedule I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited Common Stock and Warrants / Earnout Shares
|
|
|
|
Pre-Closing
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Closing
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
Buyer
|
|
|
Buyer Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
Founders
|
|
|
Founders
|
|
Holder
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnout Shares
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
HH-HACI, L.P.
|
|
|
13,524,000
|
|
|
|
7,188,300
|
|
|
|
1,827,700
|
|
|
|
13,524,000
|
|
|
|
4,508,000
|
|
William H. Cunningham
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
36,675
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
William A. Montgomery
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
36,675
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
Brian Mulroney
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
36,675
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
William F. Quinn
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
36,675
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,800,000
|
|
|
|
7,335,000
|
|
|
|
1,865,000
|
|
|
|
13,800,000
|
|
|
|
4,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre and Post-Closing Ownership in Resolute Energy Corporation
(IPO Corp.)
|
|
|
|
Pre-Closing
|
|
|
Post-Closing1
|
|
|
|
Buyer
|
|
|
Buyer
|
|
|
IPO Corp.
|
|
|
IPO Corp.
|
|
|
IPO Corp.
|
|
Holder
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Founders Warrants
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Earnout Shares
|
|
|
Founders Warrants
|
|
|
HH-HACI, L.P.
|
|
|
13,524,000
|
|
|
|
13,524,000
|
|
|
|
4,508,000
|
|
|
|
1,827,700
|
|
|
|
9,016,000
|
|
William H. Cunningham
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
William A. Montgomery
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
Brian Mulroney
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
William F. Quinn
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Post-Closing numbers assume none of the holders purchase
additional shares of HACI common stock or warrants (in addition
to the shares of HACI common stock or warrants issued in
connection with the initial public offering of HACI). |
Annex B
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. (the
Corporation), a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, does
hereby certify as follows:
|
|
|
FIRST:
|
|
That the name of the Corporation is Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc.
|
SECOND:
|
|
That
on ,
2009, resolutions were duly adopted by the Corporations
Board of Directors setting forth, approving and adopting this
amendment to Corporations Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation (the Certificate),
declaring this amendment to be advisable and recommending this
amendment for approval by the Corporations stockholders,
and calling a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation for
consideration thereof.
|
THIRD:
|
|
The Certificate is amended as follows:
|
1. Article II of the Certificate is amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:
ARTICLE II
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Corporation is to conduct all lawful business
permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the DGCL).
2. Article IX, Section 9.5 of the Certificate is
amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:
Section 9.5 Existence.
In the event that the transactions contemplated by the Purchase
and IPO Reorganization Agreement, dated as of August 2,
2009, among Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., Resolute
Energy Corporation, Resolute Subsidiary Corporation, Resolute
Aneth, LLC, Resolute Holdings, LLC, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC
and HH-HACI, L.P. are not consummated by October 5, 2009,
the Corporations existence shall terminate on
October 5, 2009. The Corporation shall otherwise have
perpetual existence.
3. All section references to Section 9.5 in
Certificate are hereby deleted.
|
|
|
FOURTH:
|
|
That
on ,
2009, pursuant to resolutions of the Corporations Board of
Directors, a special meeting of the Corporations
stockholders was duly called and held upon notice in accordance
with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statute were voted in favor of such amendment.
|
FIFTH:
|
|
That such amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.
|
SIXTH:
|
|
That the capital of the Corporation shall not be reduced under
or by reason of such amendment.
|
SEVENTH:
|
|
This Certificate of Amendment shall become effective upon filing
with the Secretary of State of Delaware.
|
B-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has duly caused this
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Corporation to be executed as of
this
day
of ,
2009.
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
Name: Joseph B. Armes
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
B-2
Annex C
EXHIBIT A
FORM OF
AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO WARRANT AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 1, dated as
of ,
2009 (this Amendment), to the Warrant
Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2007 (the
Warrant Agreement), by and between
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the Company), and Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, a New York corporation
(Warrant Agent).
WHEREAS, the Company consummated its initial public
offering on October 3, 2007, pursuant to which the Company
issued, after giving effect to the exercise of the overallotment
option, 55,200,000 units;
WHEREAS, each unit consisted of one share of common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company (the
Common Stock) and one warrant to
purchase one share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $7.50
per share (the Public Warrants);
WHEREAS, pursuant to a private placement, simultaneously
with the Companys initial public offering, the Company
issued to HH-HACI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
Sponsor), 7,000,000 warrants (the
Sponsors Warrants), with each
Sponsors Warrant exercisable into one share of Common
Stock at $7.50;
WHEREAS, in conjunction with its initial public offering,
the Company issued 13,800,000 warrants to certain existing
stockholders (the Founders
Warrants), with each Founders Warrant
exercisable into one share of Common Stock at $7.50 (the
Founders Warrants, together with the Sponsors
Warrants and the Public Warrants, the
Warrants);
WHEREAS, the terms of the Warrants are governed by the
Warrant Agreement and capitalized terms used, but not defined,
herein shall have the meaning given to such term in the Warrant
Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into that certain
Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement dated August 2,
2009 (the Acquisition Agreement), by
and among the Company, Resolute Energy Corporation, a Delaware
corporation and newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Resolute
Sub (IPO Corp.), Resolute Subsidiary
Corporation, a Delaware corporation and newly-formed
wholly-owned subsidiary of IPO Corp. (Merger
Sub), Resolute Aneth, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (Aneth), Resolute
Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(Holdings), Resolute Holdings Sub,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Holdings (Resolute Sub),
and HH-HACI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
Sponsor), which provides for
(i) the acquisition by the Company of a membership interest
in Aneth equal to the Defined Percentage (as defined in the
Acquisition Agreement) in exchange, (ii) the contribution
by Resolute Sub of the equity interests in Aneth and certain of
its wholly-owned subsidiaries in exchange for common stock and
warrants of IPO Corp., (iii) the Sponsors sale of
2,333,333 Sponsors Warrants to Resolute Sub (the
Sponsor Sale), (iv) the
cancellation of 4,600,000 Founders Warrants, and
(v) the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company as a
result of which the Company will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of IPO Corp. (the Merger)
and (x) outstanding shares of Common Stock will be
exchanged for common stock of IPO Corp. and (y) outstanding
Warrants will be exchanged for either cash or warrants to
purchase common stock of IPO Corp.;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, the
Company agreed to seek the approval of the holders of its
outstanding Warrants to amend the Warrant Agreement to:
(i) permit each Public Warrant to be exchanged in the
Merger for either (A) $0.55 in cash or (B) a new
warrant to purchase IPO Corp. common stock subject to a
prorationing adjustment requiring a maximum of 27,600,000 new
warrants to be issued; (ii) permit the Sponsor Sale;
(iii) require the cancellation of 4,600,000 Founders
Warrants; and (iv) permit each Sponsors Warrant and
Founders Warrant to be exchanged in the Merger for new
warrants to purchase IPO Corp. common stock (collectively, the
Warrant
Redemption Proposal); and
C-1
WHEREAS, holders of Warrants exercisable for a majority
of the Warrant Shares (as defined in the Warrant Agreement)
issuable upon exercise of all outstanding Warrants have approved
the Warrant Redemption Proposal.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree
to amend the Warrant Agreement as set forth herein:
1. Amendment of Warrant Agreement.
(a) The second paragraph of Section 5 of the Warrant
Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
The Founders Warrants and the Sponsors
Warrants may not be sold or transferred prior to the date that
is one hundred and eighty (180) days after the date (such
date, the Transfer Restriction Termination
Date) upon which the Company completes an
acquisition, through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset
acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business
combination with one or more businesses or assets (its
Initial Business Combination), except:
(A) to the Companys officers or directors, any
affiliates or family members of any of the Companys
officers or directors or any affiliates of the Sponsor (as
defined below); (B) in the case of an Initial Stockholder
(other than the Sponsor), by gift to a member of the Initial
Stockholders immediate family or to a trust, the
beneficiary of which is a member of the Initial
Stockholders immediate family, an affiliate of the Initial
Stockholder or to a charitable organization; (C) by virtue
of the laws of descent and distribution upon death of Initial
Stockholders (other than the Sponsor); (D) by virtue of the
laws of the state of Delaware or the Sponsors limited
partnership agreement upon dissolution of the Sponsor;
(E) in the case of an Initial Stockholder (other than the
Sponsor) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order;
(F) in the event of a liquidation of the Company prior to
the Companys completion of its Initial Business
Combination; (G) the consummation of a liquidation, merger,
stock exchange or other similar transaction which results in all
the Companys stockholders having the right to exchange
their shares of Common Stock for cash, securities or other
property subsequent to the Companys consummation of an
Initial Business Combination; or (H) to Resolute Holdings
Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(Resolute Sub) in connection with the
Initial Business Combination contemplated by that certain
Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement dated August 2,
2009 (the Acquisition Agreement), by
and among the Company, Resolute Energy Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (IPO Corp.), Resolute
Subsidiary Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(Merger Sub), Resolute Aneth, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, Resolute Holdings, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, Resolute Sub, and the
Sponsor, pursuant to which, among other things, Merger Sub will
be merged with and into the Company and the Company will
continue as the surviving company and be wholly-owned by IPO
Corp. (the Merger); provided,
however, that the permissive transfers set forth above may
be implemented only upon the respective transferees
written agreement with the Company to be bound by the terms and
conditions of such transfer restrictions (the
Permitted Transferees).
(b) Section 11(c) of the Warrant Agreement shall be
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
(c) The Merger. Pursuant to the
Merger, the Warrants shall be treated as follows:
(i) Public Warrants.
(A) Each Public Warrant will be converted into either
(x) the right to receive $0.55 in cash (the
Cash Consideration) or (y) a
warrant to purchase one share of common stock, par value $0.0001
per share, of IPO Corp. (IPO Corp. Common
Stock) (the New Warrant
Consideration and together with the Cash
Consideration, the Warrant
Consideration), in each case as the holder of
Public Warrants shall have elected or be deemed to have elected
(an Election) in accordance with
Section 11(c)(i)(B). All such Public Warrants, when
so converted, will automatically be retired and will cease to be
outstanding, and the holder of a Warrant Certificate that,
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger,
represented outstanding Public Warrants will cease to have any
rights
C-2
with respect thereto, except the right to receive, upon the
surrender of such Warrant Certificate the applicable Warrant
Consideration. The new warrants to purchase IPO Corp. Common
Stock issuable in respect of the New Warrant Consideration will
contain the terms and conditions set forth in the warrant
agreement attached as Exhibit D hereto (the New
Warrant Agreement).
(B) Subject to the procedures in Section 11(c)(iii)
and the limitations in Section 11(c)(i)(D), each holder of
Public Warrants outstanding immediately prior to the Election
Date who makes a valid Election to receive the New Warrant
Consideration will be entitled to receive the New Warrant
Consideration in respect of such Public Warrants (the
New Warrant Election Warrants);
provided that, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement
to the contrary, a holder of a Public Warrant shall not be able
to make a valid election to receive the New Warrant
Consideration with respect to any Public Warrants that it voted
against this Amendment. All holders of Public Warrants
immediately prior to the Election Date who do not make a valid
Election for New Warrant Election Warrants will be deemed to
have elected to receive the Cash Consideration in respect of
their Public Warrants.
(C) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary:
(1) the maximum number of Public Warrants to be converted
into the right to receive the New Warrant Consideration will be
equal to 27,600,000 (the Warrant
Cap); and
(2) the minimum number of Public Warrants to be converted
into the right to receive the Cash Consideration will be equal
to (x) the number of Public Warrants outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time less (y) the
Warrant Cap.
(D) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, to the extent the aggregate number of New Warrant
Election Warrants exceeds the Warrant Cap, the New Warrant
Consideration will be prorated as follows:
(1) all Public Warrants for which Elections to receive the
Cash Consideration have been made or deemed to have been made
(the Cash Election Warrants) will be
converted into the right to receive the Cash
Consideration; and
(2) the New Warrant Election Warrants will be converted
into the right to receive the Cash Consideration and the New
Warrant Consideration in the following manner:
(x) the number of New Warrant Election Warrants covered by
each Form of Election to be converted into New Warrant
Consideration will be determined by multiplying the number of
New Warrant Election Warrants covered by such Form of Election
by a fraction, (a) the numerator of which is the Warrant
Cap and (b) the denominator of which is the aggregate
number of New Warrant Election Warrants; and
(y) all New Warrant Election Warrants not converted into
New Warrant Consideration in accordance with clause (x)
will be converted into the right to receive the Cash
Consideration in respect thereof.
(ii) Founders Warrants and Sponsors
Warrants. Each Founders Warrant and each
Sponsors Warrant will be converted into a warrant to
purchase one share of IPO Corp. Common Stock (the
New Founders Warrants and the
New Sponsors Warrants); provided
that 4,600,000 Founders Warrants held by the Sponsor shall
be cancelled and forfeited immediately prior to the Merger. All
such Founders Warrants and Sponsors Warrants, when
so converted, will automatically be retired and will cease to be
outstanding, and the holder of a Warrant Certificate that,
immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger,
represented outstanding Founders Warrants or
Sponsors Warrants will cease to have any rights with
respect thereto, except the right to receive, upon the surrender
of such Warrant Certificate the New Founders Warrants or
New Sponsors Warrants, as applicable. The New
Founders Warrants and New Sponsors Warrants will
have the terms and conditions set forth in the New Warrant
Agreement.
C-3
(iii) Election/Exchange Procedures.
(A) Public Warrants.
(1) The Company will authorize the Exchange Agent (as
defined in the Acquisition Agreement) to receive Elections and
to act as exchange agent hereunder with respect to the Merger.
(2) The Company will prepare, for use by the holders of
Public Warrants in surrendering Warrant Certificates, a form
(the Form of Election) pursuant to
which each holder of Public Warrants may make an Election. The
Form of Election will be delivered to such Warrant holders by
means and at a time upon which the Company and IPO Corp. will
mutually agree.
(3) An Election will have been properly made only if a Form
of Election properly completed and signed and accompanied by the
Warrant Certificate or Warrant Certificates to which such Form
of Election relates (x) is received by the Exchange Agent
prior to the date and time of the special meeting of
warrantholders being held to approve Amendment No. 1 to
this Agreement (the Election Date and
the Special Meeting) or (y) is
delivered to the Exchange Agent at the Special Meeting.
(4) Any Public Warrant holder may at any time prior to the
Election Date change such holders Election if the Exchange
Agent receives (x) prior to the Election Date written
notice of such change accompanied by a properly completed Form
of Election or (y) at the Special Meeting a new, properly
completed Form of Election. The Company will have the right in
its sole discretion to permit changes in Elections after the
Election Date.
(5) The Company will have the right to make rules, not
inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement or the Acquisition
Agreement, governing the validity of Forms of Election, the
manner and extent to which Elections are to be taken into
account in making the determinations prescribed by this section,
the issuance and delivery of certificates for the new warrants
to purchase IPO Corp. Common Stock into which the Public
Warrants are exchangeable in the Merger, and the payment for
Public Warrants converted into the right to receive the Cash
Consideration in the Merger.
(7) In connection with the above procedures, (A) the
holders of Warrant Certificates evidencing Public Warrants will
surrender such certificates to the Exchange Agent, (B) upon
surrender of a Warrant Certificate the holder thereof will be
entitled to receive the applicable Warrant Consideration, and
(C) the Warrant Certificates so surrendered will forthwith
be canceled.
(B) Founders Warrants and Sponsors
Warrants. As soon as practicable after the
closing of the Merger, (i) the holders of Warrant
Certificates evidencing Founders Warrants and
Sponsors Warrants will surrender such Warrant Certificates
to IPO Corp., (ii) upon surrender of a Warrant Certificate
pursuant to this section the holder thereof will be entitled to
receive the New Founders Warrants or the New
Sponsors Warrants, as applicable, and (iii) the
Warrant Certificates so surrendered will forthwith be
canceled.
(c) The definition of Initial
Stockholders shall be revised to mean,
collectively, the Sponsor, William H. Cunningham, William A.
Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and William F. Quinn.
2. Miscellaneous.
(a) Governing Law. This Agreement and
each Warrant Certificate issued hereunder shall be deemed to be
a contract made under the laws of the State of New York and for
all purposes shall be construed in accordance with the internal
laws of the State of New York. The parties agree that all
actions and proceedings arising out of this Agreement or any of
the transactions contemplated hereby shall be brought in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York or in a New York State Court in the County of New York and
that, in connection with any such action or proceeding, the
parties will submit to the
C-4
jurisdiction of, and venue in, such court. Each of the parties
hereto also irrevocably waives all right to trial by jury in any
action, proceeding or counterclaim arising out of this Agreement
or the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) Binding Effect. This Amendment shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto
and to their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors
and assigns.
(c) Entire Agreement. This Amendment sets
forth the entire agreement and understanding between the parties
as to the subject matter thereof and merges and supersedes all
prior discussions, agreements and understandings of any and
every nature among them. Except as set forth in this Amendment,
provisions of the Warrant Agreement which are not inconsistent
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
(d) Severability. This Amendment shall be
deemed severable, and the invalidity or unenforceability of any
term or provision hereof shall not affect the validity or
enforceability of this Amendment or of any other term or
provision hereof. Furthermore, in lieu of any such invalid or
unenforceable term or provision, the parties hereto intend that
there shall be added as part of this Amendment a provision as
similar in terms to such invalid or unenforceable provision as
may be possible and be valid and enforceable.
(e) Counterparts. This Amendment may be
executed in any number of counterparts and each of such
counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original,
and all such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same
instrument.
[SIGNATURE
PAGE FOLLOWS]
C-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
Joseph B. Armes
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER &
TRUST COMPANY, as Warrant Agent
By:
Name:
Title:
C-6
FORM OF
WARRANT AGREEMENT
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
and
CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, as
Warrant Agent
WARRANT
AGREEMENT
Dated as of September , 2009
D-1
WARRANT
AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 1.
|
|
Appointment of Warrant Agent
|
|
|
D-3
|
|
Section 2.
|
|
Warrant Certificates
|
|
|
D-3
|
|
Section 3.
|
|
Execution of Warrant Certificates
|
|
|
D-3
|
|
Section 4.
|
|
Registration and Countersignature
|
|
|
D-4
|
|
Section 5.
|
|
Registration of Transfers and Exchanges; Transfer Restrictions
|
|
|
D-4
|
|
Section 6.
|
|
Terms of Warrants
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
(a)
|
|
Exercise Price and Exercise Period
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
(b)
|
|
Redemption of Warrants
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
(c)
|
|
Exercise Procedure
|
|
|
D-6
|
|
(d)
|
|
Registration Requirement
|
|
|
D-7
|
|
Section 7.
|
|
Payment of Taxes
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
Section 8.
|
|
Mutilated or Missing Warrant Certificates
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
Section 9.
|
|
Reservation of Warrant Shares
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
Section 10.
|
|
Obtaining Stock Exchange Listings
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
Section 11.
|
|
Adjustment of Number of Warrant Shares
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
(a)
|
|
Stock Dividends
Split-Ups
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
(b)
|
|
Aggregation of Shares
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
(c)
|
|
Merger, Reorganization, etc
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
(d)
|
|
Extraordinary Dividends
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
(e)
|
|
Adjustments To Exercise Price
|
|
|
D-10
|
|
(f)
|
|
Form of Warrant
|
|
|
D-10
|
|
(g)
|
|
Other Events
|
|
|
D-10
|
|
Section 12.
|
|
Fractional Interests
|
|
|
D-10
|
|
Section 13.
|
|
Notices to Warrant Holders
|
|
|
D-10
|
|
Section 14.
|
|
Merger, Consolidation or Change of Name of Warrant Agent
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Section 15.
|
|
Warrant Agent
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Section 16.
|
|
Change of Warrant Agent
|
|
|
D-13
|
|
Section 17.
|
|
Notices to Company and Warrant Agent
|
|
|
D-13
|
|
Section 18.
|
|
Supplements and Amendments
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
Section 19.
|
|
Successors
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
Section 20.
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
Section 21.
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
Section 22.
|
|
Benefits of This Agreement
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
Section 23.
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
D-15
|
|
Section 24.
|
|
Force Majeure
|
|
|
D-15
|
|
Exhibit A
|
|
Legend Founders Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit B
|
|
Legend Sponsors Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit C
|
|
Form of Warrant Certificate
|
|
|
|
|
D-2
THIS WARRANT AGREEMENT (this
Agreement), dated as of
September , 2009, is by and between Resolute
Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
Company), and Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, a New York corporation,
as Warrant Agent (the Warrant Agent).
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into that certain Purchase and
IPO Reorganization Agreement dated August 2, 2009 (the
Acquisition Agreement), by and among
the Company, Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (HACI), Resolute Aneth,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Resolute Subsidiary
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Merger
Sub), Resolute Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (Resolute
Sub), and HH-HACI, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (the Sponsor), pursuant to
which, among other things, Merger Sub will be merged with and
into HACI and HACI will continue as the surviving company and be
wholly-owned by the Company (the
Merger and together with the other
transactions contemplated in the Acquisition Agreement, the
Initial Business Combination);
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, the Company
proposes to issue in connection with the Merger up to 48,400,000
warrants consisting of (i) up to 27,600,000 warrants (the
Public Warrants), (ii) up to an
aggregate of 13,800,000 warrants bearing the legend set forth in
Exhibit A hereto to the Sponsor, Resolute Sub,
William H. Cunningham, William A. Montgomery, Brian Mulroney and
William F. Quinn (collectively, the Initial
Stockholders) (the Founders
Warrants), and (iii) up to an aggregate of
7,000,000 warrants bearing the legend set forth in
Exhibit B hereto to the Sponsor and Resolute Sub
(the Sponsors Warrants), which
in each case entitle the holders thereof to purchase shares of
common stock of the Company, $0.0001 par value per share
(the Common Stock and the Common Stock
issuable on exercise of the Public Warrants, the Founders
Warrants or the Sponsors Warrants, the Warrant
Shares); and
WHEREAS, the Company desires the Warrant Agent to act on behalf
of the Company, and the Warrant Agent is willing to so act, in
connection with the issuance, transfer, exchange and exercise of
Warrants and other matters as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
Section 1. Appointment
of Warrant Agent. The Company hereby appoints the
Warrant Agent to act as agent for the Company in accordance with
the instructions set forth in this Agreement, and the Warrant
Agent hereby accepts such appointment.
Section 2. Warrant
Certificates. The certificates evidencing the
Warrants (the Warrant Certificates) to
be delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall be in registered
form only and shall be substantially in the form set forth in
Exhibit C attached hereto.
Section 3. Execution
of Warrant Certificates. Warrant Certificates
shall be signed on behalf of the Company by its Chairman of the
Board or its President or Chief Executive Officer or a Vice
President and by its Secretary or an Assistant Secretary. Each
such signature upon the Warrant Certificates may be in the form
of a facsimile signature of the present or any future Chairman
of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, Vice
President, Secretary or Assistant Secretary and may be imprinted
or otherwise reproduced on the Warrant Certificates and for that
purpose the Company may adopt and use the facsimile signature of
any person who shall have been Chairman of the Board, President,
Chief Executive Officer, Vice President, Secretary or Assistant
Secretary, notwithstanding the fact that at the time the Warrant
Certificates shall be countersigned and delivered or disposed of
he or she shall have ceased to hold such office.
In case any officer of the Company who shall have signed any of
the Warrant Certificates shall cease to be such officer before
the Warrant Certificates so signed shall have been countersigned
by the Warrant Agent, or disposed of by the Company, such
Warrant Certificates nevertheless may be countersigned and
delivered or disposed of as though such person had not ceased to
be such officer of the Company; and any Warrant Certificate may
be signed on behalf of the Company by any person who, at the
actual date of the execution of such Warrant Certificate, shall
be a proper officer of the Company to sign such Warrant
Certificate, although at the date of the execution of this
Warrant Agreement any such person was not such officer.
D-3
Warrant Certificates shall be dated the date of countersignature
by the Warrant Agent.
Section 4. Registration
and Countersignature. Warrant Certificates shall
be countersigned by the Warrant Agent and shall not be valid for
any purpose unless so countersigned. The Warrant Agent shall,
upon the written instructions of the Chairman of the Board, the
President or Chief Executive Officer, a Vice President, the
Treasurer or the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
countersign, issue and deliver Warrants as provided in this
Agreement.
The Company and the Warrant Agent may deem and treat the
registered holder(s) of the Warrant Certificates as the absolute
owner(s) thereof (notwithstanding any notation of ownership or
other writing thereon made by anyone), for all purposes, and
neither the Company nor the Warrant Agent shall be affected by
any notice to the contrary.
Section 5. Registration
of Transfers and Exchanges; Transfer
Restrictions. The Warrant Agent shall from time
to time, subject to the limitations of this
Section 5, register the transfer of any outstanding
Warrant Certificates upon the records to be maintained by it for
that purpose, upon surrender thereof duly endorsed or
accompanied (if so required by the Warrant Agent) by a written
instrument or instruments of transfer in form satisfactory to
the Warrant Agent, duly executed by the registered holder or
holders thereof or by the duly appointed legal representative
thereof or by a duly authorized attorney. Upon any such
registration of transfer, a new Warrant Certificate shall be
issued to the transferee(s) and the surrendered Warrant
Certificate shall be cancelled by the Warrant Agent. Cancelled
Warrant Certificates shall thereafter be disposed of by the
Warrant Agent in its customary manner.
The Founders Warrants and Sponsors Warrants (other
than the Founders Warrants and Sponsors Warrants
held by Resolute Sub) may not be sold or transferred prior to
the date that is one hundred and eighty (180) days after
the date (such date, the Transfer Restriction
Termination Date) of the closing of the Merger,
except: (A) to the Companys officers or directors,
any affiliates or family members of any of the Companys
officers or directors, or any affiliates or partners of the
Sponsor (as defined below) or their partners, affiliates or
family members, or to Resolute Holdings, LLC or its members,
directors and officers or their partners, affiliates or family
members; (B) in the case of an Initial Stockholder (other
than the Sponsor), by gift to a member of the Initial
Stockholders immediate family or to a trust, the
beneficiary of which is a member of the Initial
Stockholders immediate family, an affiliate of the Initial
Stockholder or to a charitable organization; (C) by virtue
of the laws of descent and distribution upon death of Initial
Stockholders (other than the Sponsor); (D) by virtue of the
laws of the state of Delaware or the Sponsors limited
partnership agreement upon dissolution of the Sponsor; or
(E) in the case of an Initial Stockholder (other than the
Sponsor) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order;
provided, however, that the permissive transfers set
forth above may be implemented only upon the respective
transferees written agreement with the Company to be bound
by the terms and conditions of such transfer restrictions (the
Permitted Transferees).
The holders of any Founders Warrants or Sponsors
Warrants or Warrant Shares issued upon exercise of any
Founders Warrants or Sponsors Warrants further
agree, prior to any transfer of such securities, to give written
notice to the Company expressing its desire to effect such
transfer and describing briefly the proposed transfer. Upon
receiving such notice, the Company shall present copies thereof
to its counsel and any such holder agrees not to make any
disposition of all or any portion of such securities unless and
until:
(a) there is then in effect a registration statement under
the Securities Act covering such proposed disposition and such
disposition is made in accordance with such registration
statement, in which case the legends set forth in
Exhibit A, Exhibit B or
Section 6(c) hereof, as the case may be
(collectively, the Legends) with
respect to such securities sold pursuant to such registration
statement shall be removed; or
(b) if reasonably requested by the Company, (A) the
holder shall have furnished the Company with an opinion of
counsel, reasonably satisfactory to the Company, that such
disposition will not require registration of such Securities
under the Securities Act, (B) the Company shall have
received customary representations and warranties regarding the
transferee that are reasonably satisfactory to the Company
signed by the proposed transferee, and (C) the Company
shall have received an agreement by such transferee to the
restrictions contained in the Legends.
D-4
Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Warrant Certificates may
be exchanged at the option of the holder(s) thereof, when
surrendered to the Warrant Agent at its principal corporate
trust office, which is currently located at the address listed
in Section 17 hereof, for another Warrant Certificate or
other Warrant Certificates of like tenor and representing in the
aggregate a like number of Warrants. Any holder desiring to
exchange a Warrant Certificate shall deliver a written request
to the Warrant Agent, and shall surrender, duly endorsed or
accompanied (if so required by the Warrant Agent) by a written
instrument or instruments of transfer in form satisfactory to
the Warrant Agent, the Warrant Certificate or Certificates to be
so exchanged. Warrant Certificates surrendered for exchange
shall be cancelled by the Warrant Agent. Such cancelled Warrant
Certificates shall then be disposed of by such Warrant Agent in
its customary manner.
The Warrant Agent is hereby authorized to countersign, in
accordance with the provisions of this Section 5 and of
Section 4 hereof, the new Warrant Certificates required
pursuant to the provisions of this Section 5.
Section 6. Terms
of Warrants.
(a) Exercise Price and Exercise Period.
The initial exercise price per share at which Warrant Shares
shall be purchasable upon the exercise of Warrants (the
Exercise Price) shall be $13.00 per
share, and each Warrant shall be initially exercisable to
purchase one share of Common Stock.
Subject to the terms of this Agreement (including without
limitation Section 6(d) below), each Warrant holder
shall have the right, which may be exercised commencing at the
opening of business on the first day of the applicable Warrant
Exercise Period set forth below and until 5:00 p.m., New
York City time, on the last day of such Warrant Exercise Period,
to receive from the Company the number of fully paid and
nonassessable Warrant Shares which the holder may at the time be
entitled to receive on exercise of such Warrants and payment of
the Exercise Price then in effect for such Warrant Shares. No
adjustments as to dividends will be made upon exercise of the
Warrants.
The Warrant Exercise Period shall
commence (subject to Section 6(d) below) and end as
follows:
(i) With respect to the Public Warrants and the Sponsor
Warrants, the Warrant Exercise Period shall commence on the date
of the closing of the Merger (the Merger Closing
Date) and shall end on the earlier of:
(A) the date that is five (5) years from the Merger
Closing Date; and
(B) the Business Day preceding the date on which such
Warrants are redeemed pursuant to Section 6(b) below
or expire pursuant to Section 6(e) below.
(ii) With respect to the Founders Warrants, the
Warrant Exercise Period shall commence any time after the
Closing Price (as defined below) exceeds $13.75 for any
20 days within any 30 day trading period beginning
90 days after the Merger Closing Date and shall end on the
date that is five (5) years from the Merger Closing Date
Business Day shall mean any day on
which the New York Stock Exchange is open for trading and which
is not a Saturday, a Sunday or any other day on which banks in
the City of New York, New York, are authorized or required by
law to close.
Each Warrant not exercised prior to 5:00 p.m., New York
City time, on the last day of the Warrant Exercise Period shall
become void and all rights thereunder and all rights in respect
thereof under this Agreement shall cease as of such time.
(b) Redemption of Warrants.
The Company may call the Warrants for redemption, in whole and
not in part, at a price of $0.01 per Warrant, upon not less than
30 days prior written notice of redemption to each
Warrant holder, at any time after such Warrants have become
exercisable pursuant to Section 6(a) above, if, and
only if, (A) the Closing Price has equaled or exceeded
$18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading-day
period ending on the third Business Day prior to the notice of
redemption to Warrant holders and (B) at all times between
D-5
the date of such notice of redemption and the redemption date a
registration statement is in effect covering the Warrant Shares
issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and a current prospectus
relating to those Warrant Shares is available.
The Closing Price of the Common Stock
on any date of determination means:
(i) the closing sale price for the regular trading session
(without considering after hours or other trading outside
regular trading session hours) of the Common Stock (regular way)
on the New York Stock Exchange on that date (or, if no closing
price is reported, the last reported sale price during that
regular trading session),
(ii) if the Common Stock is not listed for trading on the
New York Stock Exchange on that date, as reported in the
composite transactions for the principal United States
securities exchange on which the Common Stock is so listed,
(iii) if the Common Stock is not so reported, the last
quoted bid price for the Common Stock in the over-the-counter
market as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, the National
Quotation Bureau or similar organization, or
(iv) if the Common Stock is not so quoted, the average of
the mid-point of the last bid and ask prices for the Common
Stock from at least three nationally recognized investment
banking firms that the Company selects for this purpose.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the Founders
Warrants or Sponsors Warrants shall be redeemable at the
option of the Company so long as they are held by the Initial
Stockholders, Sponsor or a Permitted Transferee, provided that
the fact that one or more Founders Warrants or
Sponsors Warrants are non-redeemable by operation of this
sentence shall not affect the Companys right to redeem,
pursuant to the other provisions of this Section 6(b), the
Public Warrants and all Founders Warrants and
Sponsors Warrants that are not held by the Initial
Stockholders, the Sponsor or a Permitted Transferee. Any
Founders Warrants, or Sponsors Warrant not held by
the Initial Stockholders, the Sponsor, or a Permitted Transferee
shall become Public Warrants and subject to the same terms and
conditions hereunder as all other Public Warrants.
(c) Exercise Procedure.
A Warrant may be exercised upon surrender to the Company at the
principal stock transfer office of the Warrant Agent, which is
currently located at the address listed in
Section 17 hereof, of the certificate or
certificates evidencing the Warrants to be exercised with the
form of election to purchase on the reverse thereof duly filled
in and signed and such other documentation as the Warrant Agent
may reasonably request, and upon payment to the Warrant Agent
for the account of the Company of the Exercise Price (adjusted
as herein provided if applicable) for the number of Warrant
Shares in respect of which such Warrants are then exercised.
Payment of the aggregate Exercise Price shall be made in cash or
by certified or official bank check payable to the order of the
Company in New York Clearing House Funds, or the equivalent
thereof. In no event will any Warrants be settled on a net cash
basis.
In the event the Company calls the Warrants for redemption as
described above, the Company may require all holders that wish
to exercise such warrants to do so on a cashless
basis. In such event, each such holder will pay the
exercise price by surrendering its Warrants for that number of
shares of Common Stock equal to the quotient obtained by
dividing (A) the product of the number of shares of Common
Stock underlying such Warrants, multiplied by the difference
between the Exercise Price of such Warrants and the Fair Market
Value (defined below) by (B) the Fair Market Value. The
Fair Market Value shall mean the
average reported last sale price of the Common Stock for the 10
trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date
on which the notice of redemption is sent to the Warrant holders.
The Initial Stockholders and their Permitted Transferees will be
entitled to exercise the Founders Warrants and the
Sponsors Warrants, as described above for cash or on a
cashless basis. In the event such a holder elects to
exercise the Founders Warrants or Sponsors Warrants
on a cashless basis, each such holder will pay the exercise
price by surrendering its Founders Warrants or
Sponsors Warrants, as the case may be, for that number of
shares of Common Stock equal to the quotient obtained by
dividing (A) the product of the
D-6
number of shares of Common Stock underlying its Founders
Warrants or Sponsors Warrants, as applicable, multiplied
by the difference between the Exercise Price of such Warrants
and the Fair Market Value by (B) the Fair Market Value.
Except as required to do so by the Company in the event that the
Company calls the Warrants for redemption pursuant to
Section 6(b) above, the Public Warrants may not be
exercised on a cashless basis.
Subject to the provisions of Section 7 hereof, upon
such surrender of Warrants and payment of the Exercise Price (or
notice of settlement on a cashless basis, if applicable) the
Company shall issue and cause to be delivered with all
reasonable dispatch to and in such name or names as the Warrant
holder may designate, a certificate or certificates for the
number of full Warrant Shares issuable upon the exercise of such
Warrants. Such certificate or certificates shall be deemed to
have been issued and any person so designated to be named
therein shall be deemed to have become a holder of record of
such Warrant Shares as of the date of the surrender of such
Warrants and payment of the Exercise Price.
The Warrants shall be exercisable, at the election of the
holders thereof, either in full or from time to time in part
and, in the event that a certificate evidencing Warrants is
exercised in respect of fewer than all of the Warrant Shares
issuable on such exercise at any time prior to the date of
expiration of the Warrants, a new certificate evidencing the
remaining Warrant or Warrants will be issued, and the Warrant
Agent is hereby irrevocably authorized to countersign and to
deliver the required new Warrant Certificate or Certificates
pursuant to the provisions of this Section 6 and of
Section 4 hereof, and the Company, whenever required
by the Warrant Agent, shall supply the Warrant Agent with
Warrant Certificates duly executed on behalf of the Company for
such purpose. The Warrant Agent may assume that any Warrant
presented for exercise is permitted to be so exercised under
applicable law and shall have no liability for acting in
reliance on such assumption.
All Warrant Certificates surrendered upon exercise of Warrants
shall be canceled by the Warrant Agent. Such canceled Warrant
Certificates shall then be disposed of by the Warrant Agent in
its customary manner. The Warrant Agent shall account promptly
to the Company with respect to Warrants exercised and
concurrently pay to the Company all monies received by the
Warrant Agent for the purchase of the Warrant Shares through the
exercise of such Warrants.
The Warrant Agent shall keep copies of this Agreement and any
notices given or received hereunder available for inspection by
the holders with reasonable prior written notice during normal
business hours at its office. The Company shall supply the
Warrant Agent from time to time with such numbers of copies of
this Agreement as the Warrant Agent may request.
Certificates evidencing Warrant Shares issued upon exercise of a
Sponsors Warrant shall contain the following legend,
unless such Warrant Shares were issued pursuant to an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended:
THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR ANY STATE SECURITIES
LAW, AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR OTHERWISE
DISPOSED OF UNLESS REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933,
AS AMENDED, AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR AN
EXEMPTION FROM SUCH REGISTRATION IS AVAILABLE.
SECURITIES EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE WILL BE ENTITLED TO
REGISTRATION RIGHTS UNDER A REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT TO BE
EXECUTED BY THE COMPANY.
(d) Registration
Requirement. Notwithstanding anything else in
this Section 6, no Warrant may be exercised unless
at the time of exercise (A) a registration statement
covering the Warrant Shares to be issued upon exercise is
effective under the Act and (B) a prospectus thereunder
relating to the Warrant Shares is current. The Company shall use
its best efforts to have a registration statement in effect
covering Warrant Shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants
from the date the Warrants become exercisable and to maintain a
current prospectus relating to those Warrant Shares until the
Warrants expire or are redeemed. In the event that, at the end
of the Warrant Exercise Period, a registration statement
covering the Warrant Shares to be
D-7
issued upon exercise is not effective under the Act, all the
rights of holders hereunder shall terminate and all of the
Warrants shall expire unexercised and worthless. In no event
shall the Company be required to issue unregistered shares upon
the exercise of any Warrant or settle Warrants on a net cash
basis.
Section 7. Payment
of Taxes. The Company will pay all documentary
stamp taxes attributable to the initial issuance of Warrant
Shares upon the exercise of Warrants; provided, however,
that the Company shall not be required to pay any tax or taxes
which may be payable in respect of any transfer involved in the
issue of any Warrant Certificates or any certificates for
Warrant Shares in a name other than that of the registered
holder of a Warrant Certificate surrendered upon the exercise of
a Warrant, and the Company shall not be required to issue or
deliver such Warrant Certificates unless or until the person or
persons requesting the issuance thereof shall have paid to the
Company the amount of such tax or shall have established to the
satisfaction of the Company that such tax has been paid.
Section 8. Mutilated
or Missing Warrant Certificates. In case any of
the Warrant Certificates shall be mutilated, lost, stolen or
destroyed, the Company shall issue and the Warrant Agent shall
countersign, in exchange and substitution for and upon
cancellation of the mutilated Warrant Certificate, or in lieu of
and substitution for the Warrant Certificate lost, stolen or
destroyed, a new Warrant Certificate of like tenor and
representing an equivalent number of Warrants, but only upon
receipt of evidence satisfactory to the Company and the Warrant
Agent of such loss, theft or destruction of such Warrant
Certificate and indemnity, also satisfactory to the Company and
the Warrant Agent. Applicants for such new Warrant Certificates
must pay such reasonable charges as the Company may prescribe.
Section 9. Reservation
of Warrant Shares. The Company will at all times
reserve and keep available, free from preemptive rights, out of
the aggregate of its authorized but unissued Common Stock or its
authorized and issued Common Stock held in its treasury, for the
purpose of enabling it to satisfy any obligation to issue
Warrant Shares upon exercise of Warrants, the maximum number of
shares of Common Stock which may then be deliverable upon the
exercise of all outstanding Warrants. The Warrant Agent shall
have no duty to verify availability of such shares set aside by
the Company.
The Company or, if appointed, the transfer agent for the Common
Stock (the Transfer Agent) and every
subsequent transfer agent for any shares of the Common Stock
issuable upon the exercise of any of the Warrants will be
irrevocably authorized and directed at all times to reserve such
number of authorized shares as shall be required for such
purpose. The Company will keep a copy of this Agreement on file
with the Transfer Agent and with every subsequent Transfer Agent
for any shares of the Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of
the Warrants. The Warrant Agent is hereby irrevocably authorized
to requisition from time to time from such Transfer Agent the
stock certificates required to honor outstanding Warrants upon
exercise thereof in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
The Company will supply such Transfer Agent with duly executed
certificates for such purposes. The Company will furnish such
Transfer Agent a copy of all notices of adjustments and
certificates related thereto, transmitted to each holder
pursuant to Section 13 hereof.
Before taking any action which would cause an adjustment
pursuant to Section 11 hereof to reduce the Exercise
Price below the then par value (if any) of the Warrant Shares,
the Company will take any commercially reasonable corporate
action which may, in the opinion of its counsel (which may be
counsel employed by the Company), be necessary in order that the
Company may validly and legally issue fully paid and
nonassessable Warrant Shares at the Exercise Price as so
adjusted.
The Company covenants that all Warrant Shares which may be
issued upon exercise of Warrants will, upon payment of the
Exercise Price therefor and issue, be fully paid, nonassessable,
free of preemptive rights and free from all taxes, liens,
charges and security interests with respect to the issue thereof.
Section 10. Obtaining
Stock Exchange Listings. The Company will from
time to time take all commercially reasonable actions which may
be necessary so that the Warrant Shares, immediately upon their
issuance upon the exercise of Warrants, will be listed on the
principal securities exchanges and markets within the United
States of America, if any, on which other shares of Common Stock
are then listed.
D-8
Section 11. Adjustment
of Number of Warrant Shares. The number of
Warrant Shares issuable upon the exercise of each Warrant is
subject to adjustment from time to time upon the occurrence of
the events enumerated in this Section 11. For purposes of
this Section 11, Common Stock
means shares now or hereafter authorized of any class of
common stock of the Company and any other stock of the Company,
however designated, that has the right (subject to any prior
rights of any class or series of preferred stock) to participate
in any distribution of the assets or earnings of the Company
without limit as to per share amount.
(a) Stock Dividends
Split-Ups. If
after the date hereof, and subject to the provisions of
Section 12 hereof, the number of outstanding shares
of Common Stock is increased by a stock dividend payable in
shares of Common Stock, or by a
split-up of
shares of Common Stock, or other similar event, then, on the
effective date of such stock dividend,
split-up or
similar event, the number of shares of Common Stock issuable on
exercise of each Warrant shall be increased in proportion to
such increase in outstanding shares of Common Stock.
(b) Aggregation of Shares. If after the
date hereof, and subject to the provisions of
Section 12 hereof, the number of outstanding shares
of Common Stock is decreased by a consolidation, combination,
reverse stock split or reclassification of shares of Common
Stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of
such consolidation, combination, reverse stock split,
reclassification or similar event, the number of shares of
Common Stock issuable on exercise of each Warrant shall be
decreased in proportion to such decrease in outstanding shares
of Common Stock.
(c) Merger, Reorganization, etc. In case
of any reclassification or reorganization of the outstanding
shares of Common Stock (other than a change covered by
Section 11(a) or 11(b) hereof or that solely
affects the par value of such shares of Common Stock), or in the
case of any merger or consolidation of the Company with or into
another corporation (other than a consolidation or merger in
which the Company is the continuing corporation and that does
not result in any reclassification or reorganization of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock), or in the case of any sale
or conveyance to another corporation or entity of the assets or
other property of the Company as an entirety or substantially as
an entirety in connection with which the Company is dissolved,
the Warrant holders shall thereafter have the right to purchase
and receive, upon the basis and upon the terms and conditions
specified in the Warrants and in lieu of the shares of Common
Stock of the Company immediately theretofore purchasable and
receivable upon the exercise of the rights represented thereby,
the kind and amount of shares of stock or other securities or
property (including cash) receivable upon such reclassification,
reorganization, merger or consolidation, or upon a dissolution
following any such sale or transfer, that the Warrant holder
would have received if such Warrant holder had exercised his,
her or its Warrant(s) immediately prior to such event; and if
any reclassification also results in a change in shares of
Common Stock covered by Section 11(a) or
11(b) hereof, then such adjustment shall be made pursuant
to Sections 11(a), 11(b), and 11(d)
hereof and this Section 11(c). The provisions of
this Section 11(c) shall similarly apply to
successive reclassifications, reorganizations, mergers or
consolidations, sales or other transfers.
(d) Extraordinary Dividends. If the
Company distributes to all holders of its Common Stock any of
its assets (including cash) or debt securities or any rights,
options or warrants to purchase debt securities, assets or other
securities of the Company (other than Common Stock), the number
of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of each Warrant
shall be adjusted in accordance with the formula:
N = N × M/(M-F)
where:
|
|
|
|
N =
|
the adjusted number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of each Warrant.
|
|
|
|
|
N =
|
the current number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of each Warrant.
|
|
|
M =
|
the Closing Price per share of Common Stock on the Business Day
immediately preceding the ex-dividend date for such distribution.
|
|
|
F =
|
the fair market value on the ex-dividend date for such
distribution of the assets, securities, rights or warrants
distributable to one share of Common Stock after taking into
account, in the case of any
|
D-9
|
|
|
|
|
rights, options or warrants, the consideration required to be
paid upon exercise thereof. The Companys Board of
Directors (the Board) shall reasonably
determine the fair market value in good faith.
|
The adjustment shall be made successively whenever any such
distribution is made and shall become effective immediately
after the record date for the determination of stockholders
entitled to receive such distribution.
This subsection (d) does not apply to any dividends or
distributions made in connection with, or as part of:
(i) regular quarterly or other periodic dividends; or
(ii) any of the actions contemplated by
Sections 11(a), 11(b) or 11(e). If any
adjustment is made pursuant to this subsection (d) as a
result of the issuance of rights, options or warrants and at the
end of the period during which any such rights, options or
warrants are exercisable, not all such rights, options or
warrants shall have been exercised, the Warrant shall be
immediately readjusted as if F in the above formula
was the fair market value on the ex-dividend date for such
distribution of the indebtedness or assets actually distributed
upon exercise of such rights, options or warrants divided by the
number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on the ex-dividend
date for such distribution. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary contained in this subsection (d), if M-F in
the above formula is less than $1.00, the Company may elect to,
and if M-F or is a negative number, the Company
shall, in lieu of the adjustment otherwise required by this
subsection (d), distribute to the holders of the Warrants, upon
exercise thereof, the evidences of indebtedness, assets, rights,
options or warrants (or the proceeds thereof) which would have
been distributed to such holders had such Warrants been
exercised immediately prior to the record date for such
distribution.
(e) Adjustments To Exercise
Price. Whenever the number of shares of Common
Stock purchasable upon the exercise of the Warrants is adjusted,
as provided in Sections 11(a) and 11(b)
hereof, the Exercise Price shall be adjusted (to the nearest
cent) by multiplying such Exercise Price immediately prior to
such adjustment by a fraction (A) the numerator of which
shall be the number of shares of Common Stock purchasable upon
the exercise of the Warrants immediately prior to such
adjustment, and (B) the denominator of which shall be the
number of shares of Common Stock so purchasable immediately
thereafter.
(f) Form of Warrant. The form of Warrant
need not be changed because of any adjustment pursuant to this
Section 11, and Warrants issued after such
adjustment may state the same Exercise Price and the same number
of shares as is stated in the Warrants initially issued pursuant
to this Agreement. However, the Company may at any time in its
sole discretion make any change in the form of Warrant that the
Company may deem appropriate and that does not affect the
substance thereof, and any Warrant thereafter issued or
countersigned, whether in exchange or substitution for an
outstanding Warrant or otherwise, may be in the form as so
changed.
(g) Other Events. If any event occurs as
to which the foregoing provisions of this Section 11
are not strictly applicable or, if strictly applicable, would
not, in the good faith judgment of the Board, fairly and
adequately protect the purchase rights of the registered holders
of the Warrants in accordance with the essential intent and
principles of such provisions, then the Board shall make such
adjustments in the application of such provisions, in accordance
with such essential intent and principles, as shall be
reasonably necessary, in the good faith opinion of the Board, to
protect such purchase rights as aforesaid.
Section 12. Fractional
Interests. Notwithstanding any provision
contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the Company shall
not issue fractional shares upon exercise of Warrants. If, by
reason of any adjustment made pursuant to this
Section 12, the holder of any Warrant would be
entitled, upon the exercise of such Warrant, to receive a
fractional interest in a share, the Company shall, upon such
exercise, round up or down to the nearest whole number of the
shares of Common Stock to be issued to the Warrant holder.
Section 13. Notices
to Warrant Holders. Upon every adjustment of the
Exercise Price or the number of shares issuable upon exercise of
a Warrant, the Company shall give written notice thereof to the
Warrant Agent, which notice shall state the Exercise Price
resulting from such adjustment and the increase or decrease, if
any, in the number of shares purchasable at such price upon the
exercise of a Warrant, setting forth in reasonable detail the
method of calculation and the facts upon which such calculation
is based. Upon the
D-10
occurrence of any event specified in Section 11(a),
(b), (c) or (e) hereof, then, in any
such event, the Company shall give written notice to each
Warrant holder, at the last address set forth for such holder in
the warrant register, of the record date or the effective date
of the event. Failure to give such notice, or any defect
therein, shall not affect the legality or validity of such event.
Section 14. Merger,
Consolidation or Change of Name of Warrant
Agent. Any corporation into which the Warrant
Agent may be merged or with which it may be consolidated, or any
corporation resulting from any merger or consolidation to which
the Warrant Agent shall be a party, or any corporation
succeeding to all or substantially all the corporate trust or
agency business of the Warrant Agent, shall be the successor to
the Warrant Agent hereunder without the execution or filing of
any paper or any further act on the part of any of the parties
hereto, provided that such corporation would be eligible for
appointment as a successor warrant agent under the provisions of
Section 16 hereof. In case at the time such
successor to the Warrant Agent shall succeed to the agency
created by this Agreement, and in case at that time any of the
Warrant Certificates shall have been countersigned but not
delivered, any such successor to the Warrant Agent may adopt the
countersignature of the original Warrant Agent; and in case at
that time any of the Warrant Certificates shall not have been
countersigned, any successor to the Warrant Agent may
countersign such Warrant Certificates either in the name of the
predecessor Warrant Agent or in the name of the successor to the
Warrant Agent; and in all such cases such Warrant Certificates
shall have the full force and effect provided in the Warrant
Certificates and in this Agreement.
In case at any time the name of the Warrant Agent shall be
changed and at such time any of the Warrant Certificates shall
have been countersigned but not delivered, the Warrant Agent
whose name has been changed may adopt the countersignature under
its prior name, and in case at that time any of the Warrant
Certificates shall not have been countersigned, the Warrant
Agent may countersign such Warrant Certificates either in its
prior name or in its changed name, and in all such cases such
Warrant Certificates shall have the full force and effect
provided in the Warrant Certificates and in this Agreement.
Section 15. Warrant
Agent. The Warrant Agent undertakes the duties
and obligations imposed by this Agreement (and no implied duties
or obligations shall be read into this Agreement against the
Warrant Agent) upon the following terms and conditions, by all
of which the Company and the holders of Warrants, by their
acceptance thereof, shall be bound:
(a) The statements contained herein and in the Warrant
Certificates shall be taken as statements of the Company and the
Warrant Agent assumes no responsibility for the correctness of
any of the same except to the extent that any such statements
describe the Warrant Agent or action taken or to be taken by it.
The Warrant Agent assumes no responsibility with respect to the
distribution of the Warrant Certificates except as otherwise
provided herein.
(b) The Warrant Agent shall not be responsible for any
failure of the Company to comply with any of the covenants
contained in this Agreement or in the Warrant Certificates to be
complied with by the Company.
(c) The Warrant Agent may consult at any time with counsel
of its own selection (who may be counsel for the Company) and
the Warrant Agent shall incur no liability or responsibility to
the Company or to any holder of any Warrant Certificate in
respect of any action taken, suffered or omitted by it hereunder
in good faith and in accordance with the opinion or the advice
of such counsel. The Warrant Agent may execute any of the trusts
or powers hereunder or perform any duties hereunder either
directly or through agents or attorneys and the Warrant Agent
shall not be responsible for any misconduct or negligence on the
part of any agent or attorney appointed with due care by it
hereunder.
(d) The Warrant Agent may conclusively rely, as to the
truth of the statements and the correctness of the opinions
expressed therein, upon certificates or opinions furnished to
the Warrant Agent and conforming to the requirements of this
Agreement. The Warrant Agent shall incur no liability or
responsibility to the Company or to any holder of any Warrant
Certificate for any action taken in reliance on any Warrant
Certificate, certificate of shares, notice, resolution, waiver,
consent, order, certificate, or other paper, document or
instrument (whether in its original or facsimile form) believed
by it to be genuine and to have been signed, sent or presented
by the proper party or parties.
D-11
(e) The Company hereby agrees to (A) pay to the
Warrant Agent such compensation for all services rendered by the
Warrant Agent in the administration and execution of this
Agreement as the Company and the Warrant Agent shall agree to in
writing, (B) reimburse the Warrant Agent for all expenses,
taxes and governmental charges and other charges of any kind and
nature incurred by the Warrant Agent in the execution of this
Agreement (including fees and expenses of its counsel) and
(C) indemnify the Warrant Agent (and any predecessor
Warrant Agent) and hold it harmless against any and all claims
(whether asserted by the Company, a holder or any other person),
damages, losses, expenses (including taxes other than taxes
based on the income of the Warrant Agent) and liabilities
(including judgments, costs and counsel fees and expenses),
suffered or incurred by the Warrant Agent for anything done or
omitted by the Warrant Agent in the execution of this Agreement
except as a result of its negligence or willful misconduct. The
provisions of this Section 15(e) shall survive the
expiration of the Warrants and the termination of this Agreement.
(f) The Warrant Agent shall be under no obligation to
institute any action, suit or legal proceeding or to take any
other action likely to involve expense unless the Company or one
or more registered holders of Warrant Certificates shall furnish
the Warrant Agent with security and indemnity satisfactory to it
for any costs and expenses which may be incurred, but this
provision shall not affect the power of the Warrant Agent to
take such action as it may consider proper, whether with or
without any such security or indemnity. All rights of action
under this Agreement or under any of the Warrants may be
enforced by the Warrant Agent without the possession of any of
the Warrant Certificates or the production thereof at any trial
or other proceeding relative thereto, and any such action, suit
or proceeding instituted by the Warrant Agent shall be brought
in its name as Warrant Agent and any recovery of judgment shall
be for the ratable benefit of the registered holders of the
Warrants, as their respective rights or interests may appear.
(g) The Warrant Agent, and any stockholder, director,
officer or employee of it, may buy, sell or deal in any of the
Warrants or other securities of the Company or become
pecuniarily interested in any transaction in which the Company
may be interested, or contract with or lend money to the Company
or otherwise act as fully and freely as though it were not
Warrant Agent under this Agreement. Nothing herein shall
preclude the Warrant Agent from acting in any other capacity for
the Company or for any other legal entity.
(h) The Warrant Agent shall act hereunder solely as agent
for the Company, and its duties shall be determined solely by
the provisions hereof. The Warrant Agent shall not be liable for
anything which it may do or refrain from doing in connection
with this Agreement except for its own negligence or willful
misconduct. The Warrant Agent shall not be liable for any error
of judgment made in good faith by it, unless it shall be proved
that the Warrant Agent was negligent in ascertaining the
pertinent facts. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to
the contrary, in no event shall the Warrant Agent be liable for
any special, indirect, punitive or consequential loss or damage
of any kind whatsoever (including but not limited to lost
profits), even if the Warrant Agent has been advised of the
likelihood of the loss or damage and regardless of the form of
the action.
(i) The Warrant Agent shall not at any time be under any
duty or responsibility to any holder of any Warrant Certificate
to make or cause to be made any adjustment of the Exercise Price
or number of the Warrant Shares or other securities or property
deliverable as provided in this Agreement, or to determine
whether any facts exist which may require any such adjustments,
or with respect to the nature or extent of any such adjustments,
when made, or with respect to the method employed in making the
same. The Warrant Agent shall not be accountable with respect to
the validity or value or the kind or amount of any Warrant
Shares or of any securities or property which may at any time be
issued or delivered upon the exercise of any Warrant or with
respect to whether any such Warrant Shares or other securities
will when issued be validly issued and fully paid and
nonassessable, and makes no representation with respect thereto.
(j) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, neither the Company nor the Warrant Agent shall have
any liability to any holder of a Warrant Certificate or other
Person as a result of its inability to perform any of its
obligations under this Agreement by reason of any preliminary or
permanent injunction or other order, decree or ruling issued by
a court of competent jurisdiction or by a governmental,
regulatory or administrative agency or commission, or any
statute, rule, regulation or executive order promulgated or
enacted by any governmental authority prohibiting or otherwise
restraining performance of such obligation;
D-12
provided, however, that (A) the Company must use its
reasonable best efforts to have any such order, decree or ruling
lifted or otherwise overturned as soon as possible and
(B) nothing in this Section 15(j) shall affect
the Companys obligation under Section 6(d)
hereof to use its best efforts to have a registration statement
in effect covering the Warrant Shares issuable upon exercise of
the Warrants and to maintain a current prospectus relating to
those Warrant Shares.
(k) Any application by the Warrant Agent for written
instructions from the Company may, at the option of the Warrant
Agent, set forth in writing any action proposed to be taken or
omitted by the Warrant Agent under this Agreement and the date
on and/or
after which such action shall be taken or such omission shall be
effective. The Warrant Agent shall not be liable for any action
taken by, or omission of, the Warrant Agent in accordance with a
proposal included in such application on or after the date
specified in such application (which date shall not be less than
three Business Days after the date any officer of the Company
actually receives such application, unless any such officer
shall have consented in writing to any earlier date) unless
prior to taking any such action (or the effective date in the
case of an omission), the Warrant Agent shall have received
written instructions in response to such application specifying
the action to be taken or omitted.
(l) No provision of this Agreement shall require the
Warrant Agent to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur
any financial liability in the performance of any of its duties
hereunder or in the exercise of its rights.
(m) In addition to the foregoing, the Warrant Agent shall
be protected and shall incur no liability for, or in respect of,
any action taken or omitted by it in connection with its
administration of this Agreement if such acts or omissions are
not the result of the Warrant Agents reckless disregard of
its duty, gross negligence or willful misconduct and are in
reliance upon (A) the proper execution of the certification
concerning beneficial ownership appended to the form of
assignment and the form of the election attached hereto unless
the Warrant Agent shall have actual knowledge that, as executed,
such certification is untrue, or (B) the non-execution of
such certification including, without limitation, any refusal to
honor any otherwise permissible assignment or election by reason
of such non-execution.
Section 16. Change
of Warrant Agent. The Warrant Agent may at any
time resign as Warrant Agent upon written notice to the Company.
If the Warrant Agent shall become incapable of acting as Warrant
Agent, the Company shall appoint a successor to such Warrant
Agent. If the Company shall fail to make such appointment within
a period of 30 days after it has been notified in writing
of such resignation or of such incapacity by the Warrant Agent
or by the registered holder of a Warrant Certificate, then the
registered holder of any Warrant Certificate or the Warrant
Agent may apply, at the expense of the Company, to any court of
competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor to the
Warrant Agent. Pending appointment of a successor to such
Warrant Agent, either by the Company or by such a court, the
duties of the Warrant Agent shall be carried out by the Company.
The holders of a majority of the unexercised Warrants shall be
entitled at any time to remove the Warrant Agent and appoint a
successor to such Warrant Agent. If a Successor Warrant Agent
shall not have been appointed within 30 days of such
removal, the Warrant Agent may apply, at the expense of the
Company, to any court of competent jurisdiction for the
appointment of a successor to the Warrant Agent. Such successor
to the Warrant Agent need not be approved by the Company or the
former Warrant Agent. After appointment the successor to the
Warrant Agent shall be vested with the same powers, rights,
duties and responsibilities as if it had been originally named
as Warrant Agent without further act or deed; but the former
Warrant Agent upon payment of all fees and expenses due it and
its agents and counsel shall deliver and transfer to the
successor to the Warrant Agent any property at the time held by
it hereunder and execute and deliver any further assurance,
conveyance, act or deed necessary for the purpose. Failure to
give any notice provided for in this Section 16,
however, or any defect therein, shall not affect the legality or
validity of the appointment of a successor to the Warrant Agent.
Section 17. Notices
to Company and Warrant Agent. Any notice or
demand authorized by this Agreement to be given or made by the
Warrant Agent or by the registered holder of any Warrant
Certificate to or on the Company shall be sufficiently given or
made when and if deposited in the mail, first class or
D-13
registered, postage prepaid, addressed (until another address is
filed in writing by the Company with the Warrant Agent), as
follows:
Resolute Energy Corporation
1675 Broadway Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Attention: Chief Financial Officer
In case the Company shall fail to maintain such office or agency
or shall fail to give such notice of the location or of any
change in the location thereof, presentations may be made and
notices and demands may be served at the principal corporate
trust office of the Warrant Agent.
Any notice pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the Company
or by the registered holder(s) of any Warrant Certificate to the
Warrant Agent shall be sufficiently given when and if deposited
in the mail, first-class or registered, postage prepaid,
addressed (until another address is filed in writing by the
Warrant Agent with the Company) to the Warrant Agent as follows:
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
17 Battery Place
New York, NY 10004
Attention: Compliance Department
Section 18. Supplements
and Amendments. The Company and the Warrant Agent
may from time to time supplement or amend this Agreement without
the approval of any holders of Warrant Certificates in order to
cure any ambiguity or to correct or supplement any provision
contained herein which may be defective or inconsistent with any
other provision herein, or to make any other provisions in
regard to matters or questions arising hereunder which the
Company and the Warrant Agent may deem necessary or desirable
and which shall not in any way adversely affect the interests of
the holders of Warrant Certificates theretofore issued. Upon the
delivery of a certificate from an appropriate officer of the
Company which states that the proposed supplement or amendment
is in compliance with the terms of this Section 18,
the Warrant Agent shall execute such supplement or amendment.
Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the
prior written consent of the Warrant Agent must be obtained in
connection with any supplement or amendment which alters the
rights or duties of the Warrant Agent. The Company and the
Warrant Agent may amend any provision herein with the consent of
the holders of Warrants exercisable for a majority of the
Warrant Shares issuable on exercise of all outstanding Warrants
that would be affected by such amendment.
Section 19. Successors. All
the covenants and provisions of this Agreement by or for the
benefit of the Company or the Warrant Agent shall bind and inure
to the benefit of their respective successors and assigns
hereunder.
Section 20. Termination. This
Agreement will terminate on any earlier date if all Warrants
have been exercised or expired without exercise. The provisions
of Section 15 hereof shall survive such termination.
Section 21. Governing
Law. This Agreement and each Warrant Certificate
issued hereunder shall be deemed to be a contract made under the
laws of the State of New York and for all purposes shall be
construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of
New York. The parties agree that all actions and proceedings
arising out of this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be brought in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York or in a New
York State Court in the County of New York and that, in
connection with any such action or proceeding, the parties will
submit to the jurisdiction of, and venue in, such court. Each of
the parties hereto also irrevocably waives all right to trial by
jury in any action, proceeding or counterclaim arising out of
this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 22. Benefits
of This Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed to give to any person or corporation other
than the Company, the Warrant Agent and the registered holders
of the Warrant Certificates any legal or equitable right, remedy
or claim under this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be
D-14
for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Company, the Warrant
Agent and the registered holders of the Warrant Certificates.
Section 23. Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each
of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an
original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute
but one and the same instrument.
Section 24. Force
Majeure. In no event shall the Warrant Agent be
responsible or liable for any failure or delay in the
performance of its obligations under this Agreement arising out
of or caused by, directly or indirectly, forces beyond its
reasonable control, including without limitation strikes, work
stoppages, accidents, acts of war or terrorism, civil or
military disturbances, nuclear or natural catastrophes or acts
of God, and interruptions, loss or malfunctions of utilities,
communications or computer (software or hardware) services.
D-15
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written.
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
By:
Name:
Title:
CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, as
Warrant Agent
By:
Name:
Title:
Signature Page to Warrant Agreement
D-16
Exhibit A
LEGEND
THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN
REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED OR ANY
STATE SECURITIES LAWS, AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, TRANSFERRED
OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF UNLESS REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES
LAWS OR AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION IS AVAILABLE. IN
ADDITION, IF THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE
NOT HELD BY RESOLUTE SUB, SUCH SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD OR
TRANSFERRED PRIOR TO THE DATE THAT IS 180 DAYS AFTER
[ ]
EXCEPT TO A PERMITTED TRANSFEREE (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 5
OF THE WARRANT AGREEMENT) WHO AGREES IN WRITING WITH RESOLUTE
ENERGY CORPORATION (THE COMPANY) TO BE
SUBJECT TO SUCH TRANSFER PROVISIONS AND MAY NOT BE EXERCISED
DURING SUCH PERIOD.
SECURITIES EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE AND SHARES OF COMMON
STOCK OF THE COMPANY ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF SUCH SECURITIES
WILL BE ENTITLED TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS UNDER A REGISTRATION
RIGHTS AGREEMENT TO BE EXECUTED BY THE COMPANY.
D-17
Exhibit B
LEGEND
THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN
REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED OR ANY
STATE SECURITIES LAWS, AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, TRANSFERRED
OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF UNLESS REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES
LAWS OR AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION IS AVAILABLE. IN
ADDITION, IF THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE
NOT HELD BY RESOLUTE SUB, SUCH SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD OR
TRANSFERRED PRIOR TO THE DATE THAT IS 180 DAYS AFTER
[ ]
EXCEPT TO A PERMITTED TRANSFEREE (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 5
OF THE WARRANT AGREEMENT) WHO AGREES IN WRITING WITH RESOLUTE
ENERGY CORPORATION (THE COMPANY) TO BE
SUBJECT TO SUCH TRANSFER PROVISIONS.
SECURITIES EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE AND SHARES OF COMMON
STOCK OF THE COMPANY ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF SUCH SECURITIES
WILL BE ENTITLED TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS UNDER A REGISTRATION
RIGHTS AGREEMENT TO BE EXECUTED BY THE COMPANY.
D-18
Exhibit C
[Form of
Warrant Certificate]
[FACE]
THIS
WARRANT WILL BE VOID IF NOT EXERCISED PRIOR TO
5:00 P.M. NEW YORK CITY
TIME, ,
2014
RESOLUTE
ENERGY CORPORATION
Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware
CUSIP
Warrant
Certificate
This Warrant Certificate certifies that
,
or registered assigns, is the registered holder
of
warrants (the Warrants) to purchase
shares of Common Stock, $0.0001 par value (the
Common Stock), of Resolute Energy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
Company). Each Warrant entitles the
holder, upon exercise during the period set forth in the Warrant
Agreement referred to below, to receive from the Company that
number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock
(each, a Warrant Share) as set forth
below, at the exercise price (the Exercise
Price) as determined pursuant to the Warrant
Agreement, payable in lawful money of the United States of
America upon surrender of this Warrant Certificate and payment
of the Exercise Price at the office or agency of the Warrant
Agent referred to below, subject to the conditions set forth
herein and in the Warrant Agreement. Defined terms used in this
Warrant Certificate but not defined herein shall have the
meanings given to them in the Warrant Agreement.
Each Warrant is initially exercisable for one fully paid and
non-assessable share of Common Stock. The number of Warrant
Shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants are subject to
adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events set forth in
the Warrant Agreement.
The initial Exercise Price per share of Common Stock for any
Warrant is equal to $13.00 per share. The Exercise Price is
subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events set
forth in the Warrant Agreement.
Warrants may be exercised only during the Warrant Exercise
Period subject to the conditions set forth in the Warrant
Agreement and to the extent not exercised by the end of such
Warrant Exercise Period such Warrants shall become void.
Reference is hereby made to the further provisions of this
Warrant Certificate set forth on the reverse hereof and such
further provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect
as though fully set forth at this place.
This Warrant Certificate shall not be valid unless countersigned
by the Warrant Agent, as such term is used in the Warrant
Agreement.
D-19
This Warrant Certificate shall be governed and construed in
accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York,
without regard to conflicts of laws principles thereof.
RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION
By:
Name:
Title:
Countersigned:
Dated: ,
20
CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY,
as Warrant Agent
Authorized Signatory
D-20
[Form of
Warrant Certificate]
[Reverse]
The Warrants evidenced by this Warrant Certificate are part of a
duly authorized issue of Warrants entitling the holder on
exercise to receive shares of Common Stock and are issued or to
be issued pursuant to a Warrant Agreement dated as
of ,
2009 (the Warrant Agreement), duly
executed and delivered by the Company to Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, a New York corporation,
as warrant agent (the Warrant Agent),
which Warrant Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference in
and made a part of this instrument and is hereby referred to for
a description of the rights, limitation of rights, obligations,
duties and immunities thereunder of the Warrant Agent, the
Company and the holders (the words
holders or
holder meaning the registered holders
or registered holder) of the Warrants. A copy of the Warrant
Agreement may be obtained by the holder hereof upon written
request to the Company. Defined terms used in this Warrant
Certificate but not defined herein shall have the meanings given
to them in the Warrant Agreement.
Warrants may be exercised at any time during the Warrant
Exercise Period set forth in the Warrant Agreement. The holder
of Warrants evidenced by this Warrant Certificate may exercise
them by surrendering this Warrant Certificate, with the form of
election to purchase set forth hereon properly completed and
executed, together with payment of the Exercise Price as
specified in the Warrant Agreement (or through cashless
exercise if permitted or required by the Warrant
Agreement) at the principal corporate trust office of the
Warrant Agent. In the event that upon any exercise of Warrants
evidenced hereby the number of Warrants exercised shall be less
than the total number of Warrants evidenced hereby, there shall
be issued to the holder hereof or his assignee a new Warrant
Certificate evidencing the number of Warrants not exercised. No
adjustment shall be made for any dividends on any Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of this Warrant.
Notwithstanding anything else in this Warrant Certificate or the
Warrant Agreement, no Warrant may be exercised unless at the
time of exercise (i) a registration statement covering the
Warrant Shares to be issued upon exercise is effective under the
Act and (ii) a prospectus thereunder relating to the
Warrant Shares is current. In no event shall the Company be
required to issue unregistered shares upon the exercise of any
Warrant or settle Warrants on a net cash basis.
The Warrant Agreement provides that upon the occurrence of
certain events the number of Warrant Shares set forth on the
face hereof may, subject to certain conditions, be adjusted. If,
upon exercise of a Warrant, the holder thereof would be entitled
to receive a fractional interest in a share of Common Stock, the
Company will, upon exercise, round up or down to the nearest
whole number of shares of Common Stock to be issued to the
Warrant holder.
Warrant Certificates, when surrendered at the principal
corporate trust office of the Warrant Agent by the registered
holder thereof in person or by legal representative or attorney
duly authorized in writing, may be exchanged, in the manner and
subject to the limitations provided in the Warrant Agreement,
but without payment of any service charge, for another Warrant
Certificate or Warrant Certificates of like tenor evidencing in
the aggregate a like number of Warrants.
Upon due presentation for registration of transfer of this
Warrant Certificate at the office of the Warrant Agent a new
Warrant Certificate or Warrant Certificates of like tenor and
evidencing in the aggregate a like number of Warrants shall be
issued to the transferee(s) in exchange for this Warrant
Certificate, subject to the limitations provided in the Warrant
Agreement, without charge except for any tax or other
governmental charge imposed in connection therewith.
The Company and the Warrant Agent may deem and treat the
registered holder(s) thereof as the absolute owner(s) of this
Warrant Certificate (notwithstanding any notation of ownership
or other writing hereon made by anyone), for the purpose of any
exercise hereof, of any distribution to the holder(s) hereof,
and for all other purposes, and neither the Company nor the
Warrant Agent shall be affected by any notice to the contrary.
Neither the Warrants nor this Warrant Certificate entitles any
holder hereof to any rights of a stockholder of the Company.
D-21
Election
to Purchase
(To Be
Executed Upon Exercise Of Warrant)
The undersigned hereby irrevocably elects to exercise the right,
represented by this Warrant Certificate, to
receive shares
of Common Stock and herewith tenders payment for such shares to
the order of Resolute Energy Corporation (the
Company) in the amount of
$ in accordance with the terms
hereof. The undersigned requests that a certificate for such
shares be registered in the name
of ,
whose address
is
and that such shares be delivered
to whose
address
is .
If said number of shares is less than all of the shares of
Common Stock purchasable hereunder, the undersigned requests
that a new Warrant Certificate representing the remaining
balance of such shares be registered in the name
of ,
whose address
is ,
and that such Warrant Certificate be delivered
to ,
whose address
is .
In the event that the Warrant has been called for redemption by
the Company pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Warrant
Agreement and the Company has required cashless exercise
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Warrant Agreement, the
number of shares that this Warrant is exercisable for shall be
determined in accordance with Section 6(c) of the Warrant
Agreement.
In the event that the Warrant is a Founders Warrant or
Sponsors Warrant (as such terms are defined in the Warrant
Agreement), this Warrant may be exercised, to the extent allowed
by the Warrant Agreement, through cashless exercise pursuant to
Section 6(c) of the Warrant Agreement, in which case
(i) the number of shares that this Warrant is exercisable
for would be determined in accordance with Section 6(c) of
the Warrant Agreement and (ii) the holder hereof will
complete the following: The undersigned hereby irrevocably
elects to exercise the right, represented by this Warrant
Certificate, through the cashless exercise provisions of
Section 6(c) of the Warrant Agreement, to
receive shares
of Common Stock. If said number of shares is less than all of
the shares of Common Stock purchasable hereunder (after giving
effect to the cashless exercise), the undersigned requests that
a new Warrant Certificate representing the remaining balance of
such shares be registered in the name
of ,
whose address
is ,
and that such Warrant Certificate be delivered
to ,
whose address
is .
|
|
|
Date: ___________, 20__
|
|
|
|
|
(Signature)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Address)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Tax Identification Number)
|
Signature Guaranteed:
THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C.
RULE 17Ad-15).
D-22
August 2,
2009
Board of Directors
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200
Dallas, TX 75201
Gentlemen:
This letter relates to the proposed acquisition (the
Transaction) by Hicks Acquisition Company I,
Inc. (the Company) of a controlling interest in
various entities (the Business) currently controlled
by Resolute Holdings, LLC (Resolute) pursuant to a
Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement (the
Agreement) to be entered into between the Company
and Resolute, among other parties. Pursuant to the Agreement,
the Company and its stockholders will acquire controlling
interest in a newly formed company (Newco) to which
the Business shall have been contributed, and will contribute
cash to Newco and issue or convey various securities to the
stockholders of Resolute. The terms and conditions of the
Transaction are more fully set forth in the Agreement.
Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
meanings given to them in the Agreement.
You have requested our opinion as to as to (i) the fairness
to the Company and its stockholders from a financial point of
view of the Acquisition Consideration (as defined below) to be
paid by the Company and its stockholders in the Transaction and
(ii) whether the fair market value of the Business is at
least 80% (the 80% Test) of the initial amount
(excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions) (the
Initial Amount) held in the trust fund (the
Trust) established by the Company for the benefit of
its public stockholders in connection with the Companys
initial public offering of common stock and warrants.
For purposes of our opinion, we have assumed that the
consideration to be paid by HACI and its stockholders in
connection with the Transaction will consist of the following
(the Acquisition Consideration): (i) an amount
of cash equal to the current amount held in the Trust less the
sum of amounts paid to (a) repurchase outstanding shares of
common stock of the Company (Common Shares) and
Public Warrants, (b) pay expenses in connection with the
Transaction and (c) pay the deferred portion of expenses
incurred in connection with the Companys initial public
offering (Cash Consideration),
(ii) 9.20 million shares of Newco Common Stock,
(iii) 4.60 million Founder Warrants,
(iv) 2.33 million Sponsor Warrants and
(v) 1.39 million Earnout Shares. The Company has
advised us, and we have assumed, that the Cash Consideration
amount will be a maximum of $507.8 million (assuming
repurchase of no HACI Common Shares and 50% of the outstanding
Public Warrants (the Minimum Redemption Case)
and a minimum of $275.0 million as provided in the
Agreement. For purposes of our opinion, we assumed that such
minimum Cash Consideration results from the repurchase of 50% of
the Public Warrants and a maximum number of Common Shares (the
Maximum Redemption Case). Company stockholders
would receive an aggregate equity interest in Newco (on a
primary and fully diluted basis) of 79.7% and 86.7% in the
Maximum Redemption Case and Minimum Redemption Case,
respectively.
In connection with developing our opinion we have:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
reports regarding the Company;
|
|
|
(ii)
|
reviewed certain estimates of Resolutes oil and gas
reserves, including estimates of proved and non-proved reserves,
prepared by an independent engineering firm as of
January 1, 2009;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data (including financial projections)
concerning Resolute prepared by its management;
|
|
|
(iv)
|
discussed the operations, financial condition, future prospects
and projected operations and performance of Resolute with its
management;
|
E-1
August 2,
2009
PAGE 2
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
discussed the oil and gas reserve report of Resolute with its
independent engineering firm;
|
|
|
(vi)
|
compared the financial performance of Resolute with that of
certain other publicly-traded companies that we deemed relevant;
|
|
|
(vii)
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain other transactions that we deemed relevant;
|
|
|
(viii)
|
reviewed the most recent drafts of the Agreement and related
documents that have been provided to us; and
|
|
|
(ix)
|
performed such other reviews and analyses and provided such
other services as we have deemed appropriate.
|
We have relied on the accuracy and completeness of the
information and financial and oil and gas data provided to us by
the Company and Resolute and of the other information reviewed
by us in connection with the preparation of our opinion, and our
opinion is based upon such information. The managements of the
Company and Resolute have assured us that they are not aware of
any relevant information that has been omitted or remains
undisclosed to us. We have not assumed any responsibility for
independent verification of the accuracy or completeness of any
such information or financial data. We have not assumed any
responsibility for making or undertaking an independent
evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities of
the Company or Resolute, nor have we evaluated the solvency or
fair value of the Company or Resolute under any laws relating to
bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters, and we have not been
furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. We have not
assumed any obligation to conduct any physical inspection of the
properties or facilities of the Company or Resolute. With
respect to the financial forecasts provided to us by the Company
and Resolute, we have assumed that such financial forecasts have
been reasonably prepared and reflect the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the management of Resolute
as to the future financial performance of Resolute and that the
financial results reflected by such projections will be realized
as predicted. With respect to the estimates of oil and gas
reserves referred to above, we have assumed that they have been
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best available
estimates and judgments of the Company, Resolute and
Resolutes independent engineering firm. We are not experts
in the evaluation of oil and gas reserves and we express no view
as to the reserve quantities, or the potential development or
production (including, without limitation, as to the feasibility
or timing thereof) of any oil and gas properties of Resolute. We
have relied, without independent verification, upon the
assessments of Resolutes independent engineering firm and
the Companys and Resolutes managements and staff as
to market trends and prospects relating to the oil and gas
industry and the potential effects of such trends and prospects
on Resolute, including the assumptions as to commodity prices
reflected in the financial forecasts and estimates referred to
above, which prices are subject to significant volatility and
which, if different from such assumptions, could have a material
impact on our opinion. We have also assumed that the
representations and warranties contained in the Agreement and
all related documents are true, correct and complete in all
material respects.
For purposes of our opinion regarding the 80% Test, we have
relied, without independent verification, on the calculation of
the Initial Amount provided to us by the Company. In addition,
we have assumed, with your permission, that (i) fair
market value is the amount or range of amounts at which,
in our opinion, a willing buyer and willing seller, each having
reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts, neither being under
any compulsion, could likely agree to a purchase and sale of the
Business and (ii) such fair market value is to be
determined by reference to the enterprise value (equity value
plus net debt) of the Business.
As part of our investment banking business, we regularly issue
fairness opinions and are continually engaged in the valuation
of companies and their securities in connection with business
reorganizations, private placements, negotiated underwritings,
mergers and acquisitions and valuations for estate, corporate
and other purposes. We are entitled to receive a fee and
reimbursement of our expenses from the Company for providing our
fairness opinion to the Board of Directors of the Company (the
Board of Directors). The Company has
E-2
August 2,
2009
PAGE 3
also agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out
of our engagement, including certain liabilities that could
arise out of our providing this opinion letter. In the ordinary
course of business, Stephens Inc. and its affiliates at any time
may hold long or short positions, and may trade or otherwise
effect transactions as principal or for the accounts of
customers, in debt or equity securities or options on securities
of the Company or its successor in the Transaction. Stephens may
in the future pursue investment banking assignments from the
Company, Newco or Resolute or their respective sponsors or
affiliates or other related companies.
Our opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic and other
conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on, and on the
information made available to us as of, the date hereof. It
should be understood that subsequent developments may affect
this opinion and that we do not have any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm this opinion. We have assumed that the
Transaction will be consummated on the terms of the latest draft
of the Agreement provided to us, without material waiver or
modification. We have assumed that in the course of obtaining
the necessary regulatory, lending or other consents or approvals
(contractual or otherwise) for the Transaction, no restrictions,
including any divestiture requirements or amendments or
modifications, will be imposed that will have a material adverse
effect on the contemplated benefits of the Transaction to the
Company or its stockholders. We are not expressing any opinion
herein as to the price at which the common stock of the Company
or its successor will trade following the announcement or
consummation of the Transaction.
This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Company and the
Board of Directors. Our opinion does not address the merits of
the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the
Transaction, the merits of the Transaction as compared to other
alternatives potentially available to the Company or the
relative effects of any alternative transaction in which the
Company might engage, nor is it intended to be a recommendation
to any person as to any specific action that should be taken in
connection with the Transaction. This opinion is not intended to
confer any rights or remedies upon any employee, creditor,
stockholder or other equity holder of the Company or its
successor in the Transaction, or any other party other than the
Company and the Board of Directors. In addition, except as
specifically set forth in this letter, you have not asked us to
address, and this opinion does not address, the fairness to, or
any other consideration of, the holders of any class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company. We
have not been asked to express any opinion, and do not express
any opinion, as to the fairness of the amount or nature of the
compensation to any of the Companys officers, directors or
employees, or to any group of such officers, directors or
employees, relative to the compensation to other stockholders of
the Company. Our fairness opinion committee has approved this
opinion as to the fairness of the consideration to be paid by
the Company in connection with the Transaction and whether the
fair market value of the Business meets the 80% Test. Neither
this opinion nor its substance may be disclosed by you to anyone
other than your advisors without our written permission.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, this opinion and a summary
discussion of our underlying analyses and our role on behalf of
the Board of Directors may be included in communications to the
Companys stockholders, provided that we approve of the
content of such disclosures prior to publication.
E-3
August 2,
2009
PAGE 4
Based on the foregoing and our general experience as investment
bankers, and subject to the qualifications stated herein, we are
of the opinion on the date hereof that (i) the Acquisition
Consideration to be paid by the Company in connection with the
Transaction is fair to the Company and its stockholders from a
financial point of view and (ii) the fair market value of
the Business is at least 80% of the Initial Amount held in the
Trust.
Very truly yours,
STEPHENS INC.
Kerry North
Managing Director
E-4
ANNEX
F
SECTION 262
OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to
such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise
complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has
neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor
consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this
title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery
of the fair value of the stockholders shares of stock
under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and
(c) of this section. As used in this section, the word
stockholder means a holder of record of stock in a
stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock
corporation; the words stock and share
mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and
also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock
corporation; and the words depository receipt mean a
receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing
an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely
of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the
depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of
any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a
merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
§ 251(g) of this title), § 252,
§ 254, § 257, § 258,
§ 263 or § 264 of this title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this
section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of the meeting of stockholders to act
upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either
(i) listed on a national securities exchange or
(ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further
provided that no appraisal rights shall be available for any
shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a
merger if the merger did not require for its approval the vote
of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided in
§ 251(f) of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection,
appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the
shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent
corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of
an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
§§ 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this
title to accept for such stock anything except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or
resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or
depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts
at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or held of
record by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.
and b. of this paragraph; or
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.,
b. and c. of this paragraph.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under § 253 of
this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately
prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the
shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of
incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as
a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation,
any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of
incorporation contains such a
F-1
provision, the procedures of this section, including those set
forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section,
shall apply as nearly as is practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which
appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be
submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting,
shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for notice of such meeting with respect to shares for which
appraisal rights are available pursuant to subsection (b)
or (c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any
or all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder
electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of
the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for
appraisal of such stockholders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation
shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as
herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of
such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting
corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent
corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not
voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of
the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to
§ 228 or § 253 of this title, then either a
constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger
or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation
within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders
of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation
who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the
merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available
for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such
constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy
of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also
notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may,
within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice,
demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation
the appraisal of such holders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such holders shares. If
such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such
constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of
the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent
corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the
surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second
notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such
effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is
sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first
notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder
who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded
appraisal of such holders shares in accordance with this
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary
or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to
give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the
absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated
therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled
to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix,
in advance, a record date that shall be not more than
10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided,
that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such
effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is
given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the
close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the
notice is given.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation
or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a)
and (d) of this section hereof and who is otherwise
entitled to appraisal rights, may commence an appraisal
proceeding by filing a petition in the Court of Chancery
demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such
stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within
60 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any
F-2
stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or
joined that proceeding as a named party shall have the right to
withdraw such stockholders demand for appraisal and to
accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation.
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (d) of this
section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to
receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting
from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate
number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal
have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such
shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the
stockholder within 10 days after such stockholders
written request for such a statement is received by the
surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after
expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal
under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is
later. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a
person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held
either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such
person may, in such persons own name, file a petition or
request from the corporation the statement described in this
subsection.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder,
service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or
resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after
such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in
which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the
value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in
Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the
time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by
registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting
corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the
addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1
or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court
deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by
publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs
thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall
determine the stockholders who have complied with this section
and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may
require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for
their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery
for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal
proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
(h) After the Court determines the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in
accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including
any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through
such proceeding the Court shall determine the fair value of the
shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation,
together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value,
the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless
the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through
the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time
to time during the period between the effective date of the
merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application
by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder
entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court
may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal
prior to the final determination of the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list
filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to
subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such
stockholders certificates of stock to the Register in
Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all
proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder
is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or
resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Payment shall be so made to each such
F-3
stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock
forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by
certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the
certificates representing such stock. The Courts decree
may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be
enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a
corporation of this State or of any state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court
may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata
against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be
entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of
record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition
for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder
shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a
written withdrawal of such stockholders demand for an
appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation,
either within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of
this section or thereafter with the written approval of the
corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal
shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal
proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any
stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval
may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just;
provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right
of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding
or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such
stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the terms
offered upon the merger or consolidation within 60 days
after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, as set
forth in subsection (e) of this section.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to
which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been
converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall
have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the
surviving or resulting corporation.
F-4
Annex G
AMENDED
AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY AS FOLLOWS:
1. The name of the Corporation is Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc. The Corporation was originally
incorporated under the name Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc. and the original certificate of
incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware on February 26, 2007 (the Original
Certificate).
2. This Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(the Amended and Restated Certificate)
was duly adopted by the Board of Directors and the stockholders
of the Corporation in accordance with Sections 228, 242 and
245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
3. This Amended and Restated Certificate restates,
integrates and further amends the provisions of the Original
Certificate.
4. This Amended and Restated Certificate shall be effective
on the date of filing with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware.
5. The text of the Original Certificate is hereby restated
and amended in its entirety to read as follows:
ARTICLE I
NAME
The name of the corporation is Hicks Acquisition Company I,
Inc. (the Corporation).
ARTICLE II
PURPOSE
Subject to the proviso below, the purpose of the Corporation is
to (i) acquire, or acquire control of, through a merger,
capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase,
reorganization or similar business combination, one or more
businesses or assets; provided, that the Corporation will
not complete a business combination with any entity engaged in
the energy industry as its principal business or whose principal
business operations are conducted outside of the United States
or Canada, and (ii) conduct all other lawful business
permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the DGCL).
ARTICLE III
REGISTERED AGENT
The registered office of the Corporation is 2711 Centerville
Road, Suite 400 in the City of Wilmington, County of New
Castle County, and the name of the Corporations initial
registered agent at such address is Corporation Service Company.
ARTICLE IV
CAPITALIZATION
Section 4.1 Authorized
Capital Stock.
The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which
the Corporation is authorized to issue is
226,000,000 shares, consisting of 225,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the
G-1
Common Stock), and
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share (the Preferred Stock).
Section 4.2 Preferred
Stock. Subject to Article IX of
this Amended and Restated Certificate, the Preferred Stock may
be issued from time to time in one or more series. The Board of
Directors (the Board) is hereby
expressly authorized to provide for the issuance of shares of
Preferred Stock in one or more series and to establish from time
to time the number of shares to be included in each such series
and to fix the voting rights, if any, designations, powers,
preferences and relative, participating, optional and other
special rights, if any, of each such series and any
qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, as shall
be stated in the resolution(s) adopted by the Board providing
for the issuance of such series and included in a certificate of
designations (a Preferred Stock
Designation) filed pursuant to the DGCL.
Section 4.3 Common
Stock.
(a) The holders of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled
to one vote for each such share on each matter properly
submitted to the stockholders on which the holders of shares of
Common Stock are entitled to vote. Except as otherwise required
by law or this Amended and Restated Certificate (including any
Preferred Stock Designation), at any annual or special meeting
of the stockholders the Common Stock shall have the exclusive
right to vote for the election of directors and on all other
matters properly submitted to a vote of the stockholders.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as otherwise required by
law or this Amended and Restated Certificate (including a
Preferred Stock Designation), holders of Common Stock shall not
be entitled to vote on any amendment to this Amended and
Restated Certificate (including any amendment to any Preferred
Stock Designation) that relates solely to the terms of one or
more outstanding series of Preferred Stock if the holders of
such affected series are entitled, either separately or together
with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote
thereon pursuant to this Amended and Restated Certificate
(including any Preferred Stock Designation.)
(b) Subject to the rights of the holders of Preferred Stock
and Article IX hereof, the holders of shares of Common
Stock shall be entitled to receive such dividends and other
distributions (payable in cash, property or capital stock of the
Corporation) when, as and if declared thereon by the Board from
time to time out of any assets or funds of the Corporation
legally available therefor and shall share equally on a per
share basis in such dividends and distributions.
(c) Subject to distributions to be made in connection with
a liquidation of the Corporation in accordance with
Section 9.5 and 9.8, in the event of any voluntary or
involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of the Corporation, after payment or provision for payment of
the debts and other liabilities of the Corporation, and subject
to the rights of the holders of Preferred Stock in respect
thereof, the holders of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled
to receive all the remaining assets of the Corporation available
for distribution to its stockholders, ratably in proportion to
the number of shares of Common Stock held by them.
Section 4.4 Rights
and Options.
The Corporation has the authority to create and issue rights,
warrants and options entitling the holders thereof to purchase
shares of the Corporations capital stock of any class or
series or other securities of the Corporation, and such rights,
warrants and options will be evidenced by instrument(s) approved
by the Board. The Board is empowered to set the exercise price,
duration, times for exercise and other terms of such rights,
warrants or options; provided, however, that the
consideration to be received for any shares of capital stock
subject thereto may not be less than the par value thereof.
ARTICLE V
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 5.1 Board
Powers.
The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by,
or under the direction of, the Board. In addition to the powers
and authority expressly conferred upon the Board by statute,
this Amended and Restated Certificate or the Bylaws
(Bylaws) of the Corporation, the Board
is hereby empowered to exercise
G-2
all such powers and do all such acts and things as may be
exercised or done by the Corporation, subject, nevertheless, to
the provisions of the DGCL, this Amended and Restated
Certificate and any Bylaws adopted by the stockholders;
provided, however, that no Bylaws hereafter
adopted by the stockholders shall invalidate any prior act of
the Board that would have been valid if such Bylaws had not been
adopted.
Section 5.2 Number,
Election and Term.
(a) The number of directors of the Corporation, other than
those who may be elected by the holders of one or more series of
Preferred Stock voting separately by class or series, shall be
fixed from time to time exclusively by the Board pursuant to a
resolution adopted by a majority of the Whole Board. For
purposes of this Amended and Restated Certificate,
Whole Board shall mean the total
number of directors the Corporation would have if there were no
vacancies.
(b) Subject to Section 5.5, the directors shall
be divided into three classes, as nearly equal in number as
possible and designated Class I, Class II and
Class III. The initial division of the Board into classes
shall be made by the Board. The term of the initial Class I
Directors shall terminate at the first annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2008; the term of the initial
Class II Directors shall terminate at the second annual
meeting of stockholders to be held in 2009; and the term of the
initial Class III Directors shall terminate at the third
annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2010. At each
succeeding annual meeting of stockholders beginning in 2008,
successors to the class of directors whose term expires at that
annual meeting shall be elected for a three-year term. Subject
to Section 5.5, if the number of directors is
changed, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned by the
Board among the classes so as to maintain the number of
directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, but in no
case will a decrease in the number of directors shorten the term
of any incumbent director.
(c) Subject to Section 5.5, a director shall
hold office until the annual meeting for the year in which his
or her term expires and until his or her successor has been
elected and qualified, subject, however, to such directors
earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or
removal.
(d) Unless and except to the extent that the Bylaws shall
so require, the election of directors need not be by written
ballot.
Section 5.3 Newly
Created Directorships and Vacancies.
Subject to Section 5.5, newly created directorships
resulting from an increase in the number of directors and any
vacancies on the Board resulting from death, resignation,
retirement, disqualification, removal or other cause may be
filled solely by a majority vote of the directors then in
office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining
director (and not by stockholders), and any director so chosen
shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the
class of directors to which the new directorship was added or in
which the vacancy occurred and until his or her successor has
been elected and qualified, subject, however, to such
directors earlier death, resignation, retirement,
disqualification or removal.
Section 5.4 Removal.
Subject to Section 5.5, any or all of the directors
may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and
only by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock of
the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, voting together as a single class.
Section 5.5 Preferred
Stock Directors.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Article V, and except as otherwise required by law,
whenever the holders of one or more series of Preferred Stock
shall have the right, voting separately by class or series, to
elect one or more directors, the term of office, the filling of
vacancies, the removal from office and other features of such
directorships shall be governed by the terms of such series of
Preferred Stock as set forth in this Amended and Restated
Certificate (including any Preferred Stock Designation) and such
directors shall not be included in any of the classes created
pursuant to this Article V unless expressly provided
by such terms.
G-3
Section 5.6 Compensation.
Prior to the consummation of a Business Combination, the
Corporation shall not pay any compensation of any kind,
including, but not limited to, finders fees and consulting
fees, to any officer or director for services rendered to the
Corporation prior to, or in connection with, the consummation of
a Business Combination; provided that the Corporation may
pay (i) for any officer or directors reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses related to the performance of his or her
duties, and (ii) up to $10,000 per month for office space
and administrative services commencing on the Admission Date
through the date on which the Corporation consummates a Business
Combination.
ARTICLE VI
BYLAWS
In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred
upon it by law, the Board shall have the power to adopt, amend,
alter or repeal the Bylaws. The affirmative vote of a majority
of the Whole Board shall be required to adopt, amend, alter or
repeal the Bylaws. The Bylaws also may be adopted, amended,
altered or repealed by the stockholders; provided,
however, that in addition to any vote of the holders of
any class or series of capital stock of the Corporation required
by law or by this Amended and Restated Certificate (including
any Preferred Stock Designation), the affirmative vote of the
holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all then
outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled
to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together
as a single class, shall be required for the stockholders to
adopt, amend, alter or repeal the Bylaws.
ARTICLE VII
MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS; ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT
Section 7.1 Meetings.
Except as otherwise required by law or the terms of any one or
more series of Preferred Stock, special meetings of stockholders
of the Corporation may be called only by the Chairman of the
Board, Chief Executive Officer, or the Board pursuant to a
resolution adopted by a majority of the Whole Board, and the
ability of the stockholders to call a special meeting is hereby
specifically denied.
Section 7.2 Advance
Notice.
Advance notice of stockholder nominations for the election of
directors and of business to be brought by stockholders before
any meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be
given in the manner provided in the Bylaws.
Section 7.3 Action
by Written Consent.
Subsequent to the consummation of the Offering (as defined
below), any action required or permitted to be taken by the
stockholders of the Corporation must be effected by a duly
called annual or special meeting of such holders and may not be
effected by written consent of the stockholders.
ARTICLE VIII
LIMITED LIABILITY; INDEMNIFICATION
Section 8.1 Limitation
of Personal Liability.
No person who is or was a director of the Corporation shall be
personally liable to the Corporation or any of its stockholders
for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation
thereof is not permitted by the DGCL as the same exists or
hereafter may be amended. If the DGCL is hereafter amended to
authorize corporate action further limiting or eliminating the
liability of directors, then the liability of a director to the
Corporation or its stockholders shall be limited or eliminated
to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, as so amended. Any
repeal or
G-4
amendment of this Section 8.1 by the stockholders of
the Corporation or by changes in law, or the adoption of any
other provision of this Amended and Restated Certificate
inconsistent with this Section 8.1 will, unless
otherwise required by law, be prospective only (except to the
extent such amendment or change in law permits the Corporation
to further limit or eliminate the liability of directors) and
shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director
of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or
amendment or adoption of such inconsistent provision with
respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to such repeal or
amendment or adoption of such inconsistent provision.
Section 8.2 Indemnification.
(a) Each person who is or was made a party or is threatened
to be made a party to or is otherwise involved in any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative
(hereinafter a proceeding) by reason
of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of
the Corporation or, while a director or officer of the
Corporation, is or was serving at the request of the Corporation
as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation
or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise,
including service with respect to an employee benefit plan
(hereinafter a Covered Person),
whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an
official capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent, or
in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer,
employee or agent, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the
Corporation to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by
applicable law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended,
against all expense, liability and loss (including, without
limitation, attorneys fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise
taxes and penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably
incurred or suffered by such Covered Person in connection with
such proceeding, and such right to indemnification shall
continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director,
officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of his
or her heirs, executors and administrators; provided,
however, that, except for proceedings to enforce rights
to indemnification, the Corporation shall indemnify a Covered
Person in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof)
initiated by such Covered Person only if such proceeding (or
part thereof) was authorized by the Board. The right to
indemnification conferred by this Section 8.2 shall
be a contract right and shall include the right to be paid by
the Corporation the expenses incurred in defending or otherwise
participating in any such proceeding in advance of its final
disposition.
(b) The rights conferred on any Covered Person by this
Section 8.2 shall not be exclusive of any other
rights which any Covered Person may have or hereafter acquire
under law, this Amended and Restated Certificate, the Bylaws, an
agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or
otherwise.
(c) Any repeal or amendment of this Section 8.2
by the stockholders of the Corporation or by changes in law, or
the adoption of any other provision of this Amended and Restated
Certificate inconsistent with this Section 8.2,
will, unless otherwise required by law, be prospective only
(except to the extent such amendment or change in law permits
the Corporation to provide broader indemnification rights on a
retroactive basis than permitted prior thereto), and will not in
any way diminish or adversely affect any right or protection
existing at the time of such repeal or amendment or adoption of
such inconsistent provision in respect of any act or omission
occurring prior to such repeal or amendment or adoption of such
inconsistent provision.
(d) This Section 8.2 shall not limit the right
of the Corporation, to the extent and in the manner authorized
or permitted by law, to indemnify and to advance expenses to
persons other than Covered Persons.
ARTICLE IX
BUSINESS COMBINATION REQUIREMENTS; EXISTENCE
Section 9.1 General.
(a) The provisions of this Article IX shall
apply during the period commencing upon the completion of the
Offering (as defined below) and terminating upon the
consummation of a Business Combination (as defined below) (the
Effective Period). During the
Effective Period, this Article IX may only be
amended (i) by the vote of the Corporations Board and
the unanimous affirmative vote of the stockholders, or
(ii) by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
Corporations outstanding Common Stock at any meeting of
the
G-5
Corporations stockholders held to consider approval of a
proposed Business Combination, provided that in such
instance any amendment will become effective only upon the
consummation of such proposed Business Combination. As used
herein, the term Business Combination
shall mean a business combination, whether through a merger,
capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase,
reorganization or similar type of transaction, with one or more
target businesses that have a fair market value of at least 80%
of the initial amount held in the Trust Account (as defined
below) (excluding deferred underwriting commissions payable to
underwriters in connection with the Offering (as defined below)
pursuant to the terms and conditions of any underwriting
agreement to be entered into in connection with the
Corporations initial public offering of Common Stock and
warrants to purchase Common Stock (the
Warrants) on the American Stock
Exchange (the Offering). The term
Trust Account shall mean the
trust account established by the Corporation in connection with
the Offering and into which the Corporation will deposit a
designated portion of the net proceeds from the Offering and
certain other amounts. Purchasers of the Corporations
Common Stock and Warrants in the Offering or in the secondary
market following the Offering (whether or not such purchasers
are affiliates of the Sponsor) are referred to herein as
Public Stockholders.
(b) Upon completion of the Offering, the Corporation shall
deposit, or cause to be deposited on its behalf, at least
$466.92 million into the Trust Account. If the
underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
securities in the Offering, an additional amount equal to
approximately $9.73 per additional share purchased by the
underwriters shall be deposited into the Trust Account on
behalf of the Corporation.
Section 9.2 Stockholder
Approval of Business Combination.
(a) Prior to the consummation of a Business Combination,
the Corporation shall submit any proposed Business Combination
to its stockholders for approval regardless of whether the
Business Combination is of a type which normally would require
such stockholder approval under the DGCL. In the event that a
majority of the votes cast by Public Stockholders present and
entitled to vote at the meeting to approve the Business
Combination are voted for the approval of such Business
Combination, the Corporation shall be authorized to consummate
the Business Combination; provided, however, that the
Corporation will not consummate such Business Combination if
holders owning more than 30% (minus one share) of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock sold in the Offering exercise
their Conversion Rights (as defined in Section 9.3).
(b) A Business Combination approved in accordance with
Section 9.2(a) may only be consummated if the Corporation
confirms that it has sufficient resources to pay both
(i) the consideration required to consummate the Business
Combination and (ii) the amount necessary to satisfy the
Conversion Rights exercised by Public Stockholders and
(b) an amendment to this Amended and Restated Certificate
providing for perpetual existence of the Corporation has been
approved by a majority of the outstanding shares of the
Corporations stockholders at a duly held stockholder
meeting.
Section 9.3 Conversion
Rights.
(a) At the time the Corporation seeks stockholder approval
of a Business Combination, each Public Stockholder that votes
against such Business Combination will have the right, if the
Business Combination is completed and such Public Stockholder
holds shares of Common Stock on the date on which the Business
Combination is completed (such rights being
Conversion Rights) to convert the
shares of Common Stock held by such Public Stockholder into a
cash amount per share equal to the quotient determined by
dividing (i) the aggregate amount then on deposit in the
Trust Account (including deferred underwriting commissions
incurred in connection with the Offering and being held in the
Trust Account and including interest earned on the
Trust Account, net of income taxes payable on such interest
and net of interest income previously released to the
Corporation to fund its working capital requirements) by
(ii) the total number of shares of Common Stock held by
Public Stockholders at that date. A Public Stockholder will not
be permitted to exercise any Conversion Rights unless such
Public Stockholder meets the requirements for the exercise of
such Conversion Rights set forth in the proxy statement sent to
the Public Stockholders relating to the approval of a proposed
Business Combination.
G-6
(b) Payment of the amounts necessary to satisfy the
Conversion Rights exercised shall be made no later than three
business days after the consummation of the Business Combination
and the delivery of shares by the Public Stockholder.
(c) Each Public Stockholder that does not exercise its
Conversion Rights will retain its interest in the Corporation
and shall be deemed to have given its consent to the release of
the remaining funds in the Trust Account to the
Corporation, and following payment to Public Stockholders
exercising their Conversion Rights, the remaining funds in the
Trust Account shall be released to the Corporation.
(d) The exercise of conversion rights by a Public
Stockholder will be conditioned on such Public Stockholder
following the specific procedures for conversion set forth by
the Corporation in any applicable proxy statement sent to the
Corporations Public Stockholders relating to the approval
of a proposed Business Combination.
Section 9.4 Share
Issuances.
Between the date of consummation of the Offering and the date of
consummation of a Business Combination, the Corporation will not
issue any additional shares of capital stock, rights, warrants,
options or other securities convertible into shares of capital
stock of the Corporation, provided that the foregoing
restriction should not be applicable to any shares of capital
stock, rights, warrants, options or securities convertible into
shares of capital stock issued upon the closing of a Business
Combination.
Section 9.5 Existence.
The Corporations existence shall terminate on
September 28, 2009 (such date being the
Termination Date). This provision may
only be amended in connection with, and become effective upon,
the consummation of a Business Combination. A proposal to so
amend this section shall be submitted to the stockholders of the
Corporation in connection with any proposed Business
Combination. In the event that the Corporation does not
consummate a Business Combination by the Termination Date, the
officers of the Corporation shall take all such action necessary
to dissolve and liquidate the Corporation as soon as reasonably
practicable.
Section 9.6 Distributions
from Trust Account.
Public Stockholders shall be entitled to receive distributions
from the Trust Account only in the event of a liquidation
of the Corporation or in the event such Public Stockholder
exercises his/her/its Conversion Rights. In no other
circumstances shall any stockholder have any right or interest
of any kind in or to the Trust Account. No stockholders of
the Corporation other than Public Stockholders shall be entitled
to receive distributions of any kind from the Trust Account.
Section 9.7 Expenses.
Prior to the consummation of a Business Combination, the
Corporation shall not pay to the Sponsor or any of the
Corporations officers, directors or special advisors or
any of their affiliates any compensation of any kind, including
but not limited to finders fees and consulting fees for
services rendered to the Corporation, prior to, or in connection
with, the consummation of a Business Combination, provided
that the Corporation may pay (i) the Sponsors or
any officers, directors or special advisors
(or any their affiliates) out-of-pocket expenses related
to the performance of his or her duties, and (ii) up to
$10,000 per month for office space and administrative services
commencing on the Admission Date through the date on which the
Corporation consummates a Business Combination.
Section 9.8 Liquidation.
In the event that the Corporation fails to consummate a Business
Combination in accordance with this Article IX and is
liquidated in accordance with Section 9.5, only Public
Stockholders shall be entitled to share in the distribution of
funds from the Trust Account and all such distributions
shall be made ratably in proportion to the number of shares of
Common Stock held by them.
G-7
ARTICLE X
AMENDMENT OF AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or
repeal any provision contained in this Amended and Restated
Certificate (including any Preferred Stock Designation), in the
manner now or hereafter prescribed by this Amended and Restated
Certificate and the DGCL; and, except as set forth in
Article VIII, all rights, preferences and privileges
herein conferred upon stockholders, directors or any other
persons by and pursuant to this Amended and Restated Certificate
in its present form or as hereafter amended are granted subject
to the right reserved in this Article; provided,
however, that, notwithstanding any other provision of
this Amended and Restated Certificate, and in addition to any
other vote that may be required by law or any Preferred Stock
Designation, (i) the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of
capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in
the election of directors, voting together as a single class,
shall be required to amend, alter or repeal, or adopt any
provision as part of this Amended and Restated Certificate
inconsistent with the purpose and intent of,
Article V, Article VI,
Article VII or this Article X and (ii)
Article IX of this Amended and Restated Certificate
may not be amended except as provided therein; provided
that no amendment to any of Article II, this
Article X or Section 9.5 may become
effective prior to the consummation of a Business Combination.
G-8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. has
caused this Amended and Restated Certificate to be duly executed
in its name and on its behalf by its Chief Operating Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
this 28th day of September, 2007.
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
Joseph B. Armes
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
G-9
Annex H
August 28, 2009
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75201
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as special Delaware counsel to Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), in connection with the proposed amendments
to the certificate of incorporation of the Company. In this
connection, you have requested our opinion as to certain matters
under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
General Corporation Law).
For the purpose of rendering our opinion as expressed herein, we
have been furnished and have reviewed the following documents:
(i) the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Company, as filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware (the Secretary of State) on
September 28, 2007 (the Certificate of
Incorporation);
(ii) the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as
adopted on September 28, 2007 (the Bylaws);
(iii) a form of the proposed Certificate of Amendment to
the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company (the Certificate of Amendment) (attached
hereto as Exhibit A);
(iv) the
Form S-1/A
of the Company (the Registration Statement), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on September 27, 2007 in connection with
the Companys initial public offering (IPO);
(v) the Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement, dated as
of August 2, 2009, among the Company, Resolute Energy
Corporation, Resolute Subsidiary Corporation, Resolute Aneth,
LLC, Resolute Holdings, LLC, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC, and
HH-HACI, L.P. (the Reorganization
Agreement); and
(vi) the proxy statement proposed to be filed with the SEC
in connection with the Certificate of Amendment and the
Reorganization Agreement (the Proxy Statement).
With respect to the foregoing documents, we have assumed:
(a) the genuineness of all signatures, and the incumbency,
authority, legal right and power and legal capacity under all
applicable laws and regulations, of each of the officers and
other persons and entities signing or whose signatures appear
upon each of said documents as or on behalf of the parties
thereto; (b) the conformity to authentic originals of all
documents submitted to us as certified, conformed, photostatic,
electronic or other copies; and (c) that the foregoing
documents, in the forms submitted to us for our review, have not
been and will not be altered or amended in any respect material
to our opinion as expressed herein. For the purpose of rendering
our opinion as expressed herein, we have not reviewed any
document other than the documents set forth above, and, except
as set forth in this opinion, we assume there exists no
provision of any such other document that bears upon or is
inconsistent with our opinion as expressed herein. We have
conducted no independent factual investigation of our own, but
rather have relied as to factual matters solely upon the
foregoing documents, the statements and information set forth
therein, and the additional matters recited or assumed herein,
all of which we assume to be true, complete and accurate in all
material respects.
BACKGROUND
We have been advised, and accordingly assume for purposes of our
opinion as expressed herein, that (i) the Company has
entered into a Purchase and IPO Reorganization Agreement, dated
as of August 2, 2009, among the Company, Resolute Energy
Corporation (IPO Corp), Resolute Subsidiary
Corporation (MergerSub), Resolute Aneth, LLC
(Aneth), Resolute Holdings, LLC
(Parent), Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC
H-1
(Seller), and HH-HACI, L.P. (Founder)
pursuant to which (a) the Company will acquire a membership
interest in Aneth equal to the Defined Percentage (as defined in
the Reorganization Agreement) in exchange for cash consideration
(the Acquisition); (b) immediately following
the Acquisition, Aneth will use the consideration it receives
from the Company in the Acquisition to repay certain of its
outstanding liabilities (the Debt Repayment);
(c) following the Debt Repayment, Seller will contribute
all of its issued and outstanding equity interests in all of its
subsidiaries except for the Excluded Subsidiaries (as defined in
the Reorganization Agreement) (collectively, the
Contribution Interest) to IPO Corp. and in exchange
therefor IPO Corp. will issue to Seller 9,200,000 shares of
common stock of IPO Corp., par value $0.0001 per share
(IPO Corp. Common Stock), warrants to purchase
4,600,000 shares of IPO Corp. Common Stock and 1,385,000
Earnout Shares (as defined in the Reorganization Agreement)
(collectively, the Contribution);
(d) 7,335,000 shares of the Companys common
stock held by Founder and 4,600,000 warrants to purchase the
Companys common stock held by Founder will be cancelled;
(e) Seller will acquire from Founder
2,333,333 warrants to purchase the Companys common
stock and in exchange therefor Seller will pay Founder
$1,166,666.50; (f) 1,865,000 shares of the
Companys common stock held by the Founder will be
converted into 1,865,000 Earnout Shares; and
(g) immediately following completion of the Acquisition and
the Debt Repayment and simultaneously with the Contribution,
MergerSub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company
continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of IPO Corp. ((a) through (g) collectively, the
Proposed Reorganization); (ii) the Proposed
Reorganization constitutes a Business Combination
within the meaning of Article IX of the Certificate of
Incorporation; and (iii) the Proposed Reorganization
involves an entity engaged in the energy industry as its
principal business.
Article II of the Certificate of Incorporation provides:
Subject to the proviso below, the purpose of the Corporation is
to (i) acquire, or acquire control of, through a merger,
capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase,
reorganization or similar business combination, one or more
businesses or assets; provided, that the Corporation will not
complete a business combination with any entity engaged in the
energy industry as its principal business or whose principal
business operations are conducted outside of the United States
or Canada, and (ii) conduct all other lawful business
permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the DGCL).
Accordingly, in order to consummate the Proposed Reorganization
pursuant to Article IX of the Certificate of Incorporation,
the Company is proposing to amend Article II of the
Certificate of Incorporation as set forth in the Certificate of
Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A to read in its
entirety as follows:
The purpose of the Corporation is to conduct all lawful business
permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the DGCL).
(the Article II Amendment). The Company is also
proposing to amend Article IX, Section 9.5 of the
Certificate of Incorporation simultaneously with the
Article II Amendment. Article IX, Section 9.5
provides:
The Corporations existence shall terminate on
September 28, 2009 (such date being the Termination
Date). This provision may only be amended in connection
with, and become effective upon, the consummation of a Business
Combination. A proposal to so amend this section shall be
submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation in connection
with any proposed Business Combination. In the event that the
Corporation does not consummate a Business Combination by the
Termination Date, the officers of the Corporation shall take all
such action necessary to dissolve and liquidate the Corporation
as soon as reasonably practicable.
The Company is proposing to amend Article IX,
Section 9.5 of the Certificate of Incorporation as set
forth in the Certificate of Amendment attached hereto as
Exhibit A to read in its entirety as follows:
In the event that the transactions contemplated by the Purchase
and IPO Reorganization Agreement, dated as of August 2,
2009, among Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., Resolute
Energy Corporation, Resolute Subsidiary Corporation, Resolute
Aneth, LLC, Resolute Holdings, LLC, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC
and HH-HACI, L.P. are not consummated by October 5, 2009,
the Corporations existence shall terminate on
October 5, 2009. The Corporation shall otherwise have
perpetual existence.
H-2
We have also been advised, and accordingly assume for purposes
of our opinion as expressed herein, that (i) any of the
stockholders holding IPO Shares (as defined in the
Reorganization Agreement) who affirmatively vote their IPO
Shares against the Proposed Reorganization and demand that such
shares be converted into cash will be entitled to receive a
pro rata portion of the Trust Fund if the Proposed
Reorganization is consummated (the Conversion
Rights); and (ii) the stockholders vote on any
proposal other than the proposal to approve the Proposed
Reorganization will have no impact on the stockholders
Conversion Rights.
Article X of the Certificate of Incorporation provides in
pertinent part:
[n]otwithstanding any other provision of this Amended and
Restated Certificate, and in addition to any other vote that may
be required by law or any Preferred Stock Designation,
(i) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock
of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required
to amend, alter or repeal, or adopt any provision as part of
this Amended and Restated Certificate inconsistent with the
purpose and intent of, Article V, Article VI,
Article VII or this Article X and
(ii) Article IX of this Amended and Restated
Certificate may not be amended except as provided therein;
provided that no amendment to any of Article II, this
Article X or Section 9.5 may become effective prior to
the consummation of a Business Combination.
Thus, the underlined language in Article X of the
Certificate of Incorporation purports to eliminate the
Companys (and, consequently, the Companys directors
and stockholders) power to amend Article II and
Section 9.5 prior to the consummation of a Business
Combination.1
1 Section 9.1(a)
also purports to eliminate the Companys power to amend any
provision of Article IX (including Section 9.5) prior
to the consummation of a Business Combination (when such
amendment receives majority, rather than unanimous, stockholder
approval). In addition, the second sentence of Section 9.5
purports to eliminate the Companys power to amend
Section 9.5 prior to the consummation of a Business
Combination. Because we address the validity of the provision in
Article X which purports to eliminate the Companys
power to amend Section 9.5 prior to the consummation of a
Business Combination, and the Company is proposing to amend
Section 9.5 to, among other things, eliminate the second
sentence, we have not directly addressed the validity of the
second sentence of Section 9.5. Because the application of
the provision in Section 9.1(a) depends on the vote
received on such amendment, we have not directly addressed the
validity of the proviso in Section 9.1(a). However, because
the provisions in Section 9.1(a) and Section 9.5
purport to eliminate the Companys power to amend
Section 9.5 prior to the consummation of a Business
Combination, our analysis of the provision in Article X,
which purports to eliminate the Companys power to amend
specific provisions in the Certificate of Incorporation, would
also apply to the provisions in Section 9.1(a) (when such
amendment receives majority, rather than unanimous, stockholder
approval) and Section 9.5.
H-3
DISCUSSION
You have asked our opinion as to whether Article II and
Section 9.5 may be amended as provided in the Certificate
of Amendment. For the reasons set forth below, in our opinion to
the extent Article X of the Certificate of Incorporation
purports to eliminate the Companys statutory power to
amend Article II and Section 9.5 prior to the
consummation of a Business Combination, it is not a valid
certificate of incorporation provision under the General
Corporation
Law.2
Thus, Article II and Section 9.5 may be amended as
provided in the Certificate of Amendment subject to compliance
with the amendatory procedures set forth in Section 242(b)
of the General Corporation Law.
Section 242(a) of the General Corporation Law provides that:
[a]fter a corporation has received payment for any of its
capital stock, it may amend its certificate of incorporation,
from time to time, in any and as many respects as may be
desired, so long as its certificate of incorporation as amended
would contain only such provisions as it would be lawful and
proper to insert in an original certificate of incorporation
filed at the time of the filing of the amendment ... In
particular, and without limitation upon such general power of
amendment, a corporation may amend its certificate of
incorporation, from time to time, so as ... (2) To change,
substitute, enlarge or diminish the nature of its business or
its corporate powers and purposes... .
8 Del. C. § 242(a). In addition,
Section 242(b) of the General Corporation Law provides that:
Every amendment [to the Certificate of Incorporation] ...
shall be made and effected in the following manner: (1)
[i]f the corporation has capital stock, its board of directors
shall adopt a resolution setting forth the amendment
proposed, declaring its advisability, and either calling a
special meeting of the stockholders entitled to vote in respect
thereof for the consideration of such amendment or directing
that the amendment proposed be considered at the next annual
meeting of the stockholders... If a majority of the outstanding
stock entitled to vote thereon, and a majority of the
outstanding stock of each class entitled to vote thereon as a
class has been voted in favor of the amendment, a certificate
setting forth the amendment and certifying that such amendment
has been duly adopted in accordance with this section
shall be executed, acknowledged and filed and
shall become effective in accordance with § 103
of this title.
8 Del. C. § 242(b) (emphasis added). Thus,
Section 242(a) grants Delaware corporations broad statutory
power to amend their certificates of incorporation to the extent
permitted under Delaware law, including to the extent
contemplated by the Certificate of Amendment, subject to
compliance with the amendatory procedures set forth in
Section 242(b). Implicit in the language of
Section 242 is that the power to amend the certificate of
incorporation is a fundamental power of Delaware corporations
vested in directors and stockholders of a corporation. Nothing
in Section 242 suggests that this statutory power may be
entirely eliminated by a provision of the certificate of
incorporation with respect to certain provisions thereof.
Indeed, the mandatory language in Section 242(b) supports
the proposition that the corporations broad power to amend
the certificate
2 We
note that it is ambiguous whether the language of
Article X, which prohibits amendments to Article II
prior to a Business Combination, would prohibit an
amendment that is effected simultaneously and in connection with
a Business Combination. We believe the better reading of this
provision is that it does permit an amendment that is effected
simultaneously and in connection with a Business Combination
since there would be no point in amending Article II after
a Business Combination is effected. Where a literal
interpretation of the contract leads to unreasonable results,
Delaware courts have held that such interpretation must give way
to a reasonable interpretation. See, e.g.,
Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. v. Sprint
Corp., 2006 WL 2337592, at *21 (Del. Ch. Aug. 4, 2006)
(indicating that Delaware courts strive to avoid an
interpretation which makes performance impossible and produces
an unreasonable or absurd result). If the Article X
provision were read to permit an amendment to Article II
that is effected simultaneously and in connection with a
Business Combination, there would be no issue regarding the
authorization of the Article II Amendment. However, for
purposes of this opinion, we have assumed that the purpose and
intent of the language in Article X relating to amendments
to Article II is in fact to prohibit amendments to
Article II until after a Business Combination is effected.
H-4
of incorporation cannot be eliminated. Section 242(b)
mandates that, absent a provision permitting the board to
abandon a proposed amendment, a certificate setting forth
the amendment ... shall be executed, acknowledged and
filed and shall become effective upon obtaining the
requisite board and stockholder approvals. 8 Del. C.
§ 242(b)(1) (emphasis added).
In our opinion, the language in Article X of the
Certificate of Incorporation that purports to eliminate the
statutory power of the Company (and, consequently, of the
directors and stockholders) to amend Article II and
Section 9.5 of the Certificate of Incorporation prior to
the consummation of a Business Combination is contrary to the
laws of the State of Delaware and, therefore, is invalid
pursuant to Section 102(b)(1) of the General Corporation
Law. Section 102(b)(1) provides that a certificate of
incorporation may contain:
Any provision for the management of the business and for the
conduct of the affairs of the corporation, and any provision
creating, defining, limiting and regulating the powers of the
corporation, the directors, and the stockholders, or any class
of the stockholders. . . ; if such provisions
are not contrary to the laws of [the State of Delaware].
8 Del. C. § 102(b)(1) (emphasis added).
Thus, the ability to curtail the powers of the corporation, the
directors and the stockholders through the certificate of
incorporation is not without limitation. Any provision in the
certificate of incorporation that is contrary to Delaware law is
invalid. See Lions Gate Entmt Corp. v.
Image Entmt Inc., 2006 WL 1668051, at *7 (Del. Ch.
June 5, 2006) (footnote omitted) (noting that a charter
provision purport[ing] to give the Image board the power
to amend the charter unilaterally without a shareholder
vote after the corporation had received payment for its
stock contravenes Delaware law [i.e.,
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law] and is
invalid.). In Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel
Corp., 93 A.2d 107, 118 (Del. 1952), the Court
found that a charter provision is contrary to the laws of
[Delaware] if it transgresses a statutory enactment
or a public policy settled by the common law or implicit in the
General Corporation Law itself. The Court in
Loews Theatres, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Co.,
243 A.2d 78, 81 (Del. Ch. 1968), adopted this view, noting that
a charter provision which seeks to waive a statutory right
or requirement is
unenforceable.3
That the statutory power to amend the certificate of
incorporation is a fundamental power of Delaware corporations is
supported by Delaware case law. Delaware courts have repeatedly
held that a reservation of the right to amend the certificate of
incorporation is a part of any certificate of incorporation,
whether or not such reservation is expressly included
therein.4
See, e.g., Maddock v. Vorclone
Corp.#147 A. 255 (Del. Ch. 1929); Coyne v.
Park & Tilford Distillers Corp., 154 A.2d 893
(Del. 1959); Weinberg v. Baltimore Brick Co., 114
A.2d 812, 814 (Del. 1955); Morris v. American Public
Utilities Co., 122 A. 696, 701 (Del. Ch. 1923). See
also 2 David A. Drexler, Lewis S. Black, Jr. & A.
Gilchrist Sparks, III, Delaware Corporation
Law & Practice, § 32.02 (2005) (No
case has ever questioned the fundamental right of corporations
to amend their certificates of incorporation in accordance with
statutory procedures. From the earliest decisions, it has been
held that every corporate charter implicitly contains as a
constituent part thereof every pertinent provision of the
3 We
note that Section 102(b)(4) of the General Corporation Law
expressly permits a Delaware corporation to include in its
certificate of incorporation provisions that modify the voting
rights of directors and stockholders set forth in other
provisions of the General Corporation Law. 8 Del. C.
§ 102(b)(4) (the certificate of incorporation
may also contain ... [p]rovisions requiring for any corporate
action, the vote of a larger portion of the stock ... or a
larger number of the directors, than is required by this
chapter.). While Section 102(b)(4) permits
certificate of incorporation provisions to require a greater
vote of directors or stockholders than is otherwise required by
the General Corporation Law, in our view, nothing in
Section 102(b)(4) purports to authorize a certificate of
incorporation provision that entirely eliminates the power of
directors and stockholders to amend the certificate of
incorporation, with respect to certain provisions thereof or
otherwise, as expressly permitted by Section 242. See
also Sellers v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons
Co., 2 A.2d 108, 114 (Del. Ch. 1938) (where the Court
questioned the validity of a certificate of incorporation
provision requiring the vote or consent of 100% of the preferred
stockholders to amend the certificate of incorporation in any
manner which reduced the pecuniary rights of the preferred stock
because the 100% vote requirement made such provision
practically irrepealable.).
4 This
principle is also codified in Section 394 of the General
Corporation Law. See 8 Del. C. § 394.
H-5
corporation law, including the provisions authorizing charter
amendments.); 1 R. Franklin Balotti & Jesse A.
Finkelstein, The Delaware Law of Corporations &
Business Organizations § 8.1 (2007 Supp.)
(The power of a corporation to amend its certificate of
incorporation was granted by the original General Corporation
Law and has continued to this day.) (footnotes omitted); 1
Edward P. Welch, Andrew J. Turezyn & Robert S.
Saunders, Folk on the Delaware General Corporation Law
§ 242.2.2, GCL-VIII-13
(2007-1
Supp.) (A corporation may ... do anything that
section 242 authorizes because the grant of amendment power
contained in section 242 and its predecessors is itself a
part of the charter.) (citing Goldman v. Postal
Tel., Inc., 52 F. Supp. 763, 769 (D. Del. 1943);
Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.,
142 A. 654,
656-58
(Del. Ch. 1928); Morris, 122 A. at 701;
Peters v. United States Mortgage Co., 114 A. 598,
600 (Del. Ch. 1921)); Peters, 114 A. at 600
(There is impliedly written into every corporate charter
in this state, as a constituent part thereof, every pertinent
provision of our Constitution and statutes. The corporation in
this case was created under the General Corporation Law ... That
law clearly reserves to this corporation the right to amend its
certificate in the manner proposed.).
In Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co., 142
A. 654 (Del. Ch. 1928), the Court of Chancery interpreted this
reserved right to amend the certificate of incorporation broadly
and observed that the legislature, by granting broad powers to
the stockholders to amend the certificate of incorporation,
recognized the unwisdom of casting in an unchanging mould
the corporate powers which it conferred touching these questions
so as to leave them fixed for all time. Id. at 657.
Indeed, the Court queried, [m]ay it not be assumed that
the Legislature foresaw that the interests of the corporations
created by it might, as experience supplied the material for
judgment, be best subserved by an alteration of their
intracorporate and in a sense private powers, i.e.,
by an alteration of the terms of the certificate of
incorporation? Id. The Court further confirmed the
important public policy underlying the reservation of the right
to amend the certificate of incorporation:
The very fact that the [General Corporation Law]...deal[s] in
great detail with innumerable aspects of the [certificate of
incorporation] in what upon a glance would be regarded as
relating to its private as distinguished from its public
character, has some force to suggest that the state, by dealing
with such subjects in the statute rather than by leaving them to
be arranged by the corporate membership, has impliedly impressed
upon such matters the quality of public interest and concern.
Id.
While there is no definitive case law addressing the
enforceability or validity, under Delaware law or otherwise, of
a certificate of incorporation provision that attempts to place
a blanket prohibition on amendments to certain provisions of the
certificate of incorporation during a specified period of time,
in our view, such a provision would be invalid. Indeed, in
confirming the fundamental importance of a corporations
power to amend the certificate of incorporation, Delaware courts
have suggested, in dicta, that such provision might be
unenforceable. See, e.g., Jones Apparel Group,
Inc. v. Maxwell Shoe Co., 883 A.2d 837
(Del. Ch. 2004) (The Court suggested that the
statutory power to recommend to stockholders amendments to the
certificate of incorporation is a core duty of directors and
noted that a certificate of incorporation provision purporting
to eliminate a core duty of the directors would likely
contravene Delaware public policy.); Triplex Shoe Co. v.
Rice & Hutchins, Inc., 152 A. 342, 347, 351 (Del.
1930) (Despite the absence of common stockholders who held the
sole power to vote on amendments to the certificate
of incorporation, the Court assumed that an amendment to the
certificate of incorporation nonetheless had been validly
approved by the preferred stockholders noting that, by the
very necessities of the case, the holders of preferred
stock had the power to vote where no common stock had been
validly issued because otherwise the corporation would be
unable to function.); Sellers v. Joseph
Bancroft & Sons Co., 2 A.2d 108, 114 (Del. Ch.
1938) (The Court questioned the validity of a certificate of
incorporation provision requiring the vote or consent of 100% of
the preferred stockholders to amend the certificate of
incorporation in any manner which reduced the pecuniary rights
of the preferred stock because the 100% vote requirement made
such provision practically irrepealable.).
More recently, the Court in Jones Apparel suggested that
the right of directors to recommend to stockholders amendments
to the certificate of incorporation is a core right
of fundamental importance under the General Corporation Law. In
Jones Apparel, the Delaware Court of Chancery examined
whether a
H-6
certificate of incorporation provision eliminating the power of
a board of directors to fix record dates was permitted under
Section 102(b)(1) of the General Corporation Law. While the
Court upheld the validity of the record date provision, it was
quick to point out that not all provisions in a certificate of
incorporation purporting to eliminate director rights would be
enforceable. Jones Apparel, 883 A.2d at 848. Rather, the
Court suggested that certain statutory rights involving
core director duties may not be modified or
eliminated through the certificate of incorporation. The
Jones Apparel Court observed:
[Sections] 242(b)(1) and 251 do not contain the magic words
[unless otherwise provided in the certificate of
incorporation] and they deal respectively with the
fundamental subjects of certificate amendments and mergers. Can
a certificate provision divest a board of its statutory power to
approve a merger? Or to approve a certificate amendment? Without
answering those questions, I think it fair to say that those
questions inarguably involve far more serious intrusions on core
director duties than does [the record date provision at issue].
I also think that the use by our judiciary of a more context-
and statute-specific approach to police horribles is
preferable to a sweeping rule that denudes § 102(b)(1)
of its utility and thereby greatly restricts the room for
private ordering under the DGCL.
Id. at 852. While the Court in Jones Apparel
recognized that certain provisions for the regulation of the
internal affairs of the corporation may be made subject to
modification or elimination through the private ordering system
of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws, it suggested
that other powers vested in directors such as the
power to amend the certificate of incorporation are
so fundamental to the proper functioning of the corporation that
they cannot be so modified or eliminated. Id.
As set forth above, the statutory language of Section 242
and Delaware case law confirm that the statutory power to amend
the certificate of incorporation is a fundamental power of
Delaware corporations as a matter of Delaware public policy.
Moreover, Delaware case law also suggests that the fundamental
power to amend the certificate of incorporation is a core right
of the directors of a Delaware corporation. Because the
provision in Article X of the Certificate of Incorporation
purports to eliminate the fundamental power of the Company (and
the core right of the Companys directors) to
amend Article II and Section 9.5 of the Certificate of
Incorporation prior to the consummation of a Business
Combination, such provision is contrary to the laws of the State
of Delaware and, therefore, is invalid.
Given our conclusion that Article II and Section 9.5
may be amended as provided in the Certificate of Amendment
subject to compliance with the amendatory procedures set forth
in Section 242(b) of the General Corporation Law, you have
asked our opinion as to the vote required for approval of the
Certificate of Amendment. Section 242(b) of the General
Corporation Law provides the default voting requirements for an
amendment to the certificate of incorporation. Under
Section 242(b)(1), the Board of Directors of the Company
(the Board) would be required to adopt a resolution
setting forth the Certificate of Amendment and declaring its
advisability prior to submitting the Certificate of Amendment to
the stockholders entitled to vote on amendments to the
Certificate of Incorporation. The Board may adopt such
resolution by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present, or,
alternatively, by unanimous written consent of all directors.
See 8 Del. C. §§ 141(b), 141(f).
After the Certificate of Amendment has been duly approved by the
Board, it must then be submitted to the stockholders of the
Company for a vote thereon. The affirmative vote (or written
consent) of a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote
thereon would be required for approval of the Certificate of
Amendment. See 8 Del. C.
§§ 242(b)(1), 228(a). The default voting
requirements set forth above may be increased to require a
greater vote of the directors or stockholders by a provision in
the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws (in the case of
the Board). See 8 Del. C.
§§ 102(b)(4), 141(b), 216, 242(b)(4). However,
any certificate of incorporation or bylaw provision purporting
to impose a supermajority or unanimous voting requirement must
be clear and unambiguous. Centaur Partners,
IV v. Natl Intergroup, Inc., 582 A.2d 923, 927
(Del. 1990). Moreover, a charter or bylaw provision which
purports to alter the statutory default voting requirements must
be positive, explicit, clear and readily
understandable because such provisions give a minority the
power to veto the will of the majority, thus effectively
disenfranchising the majority. Id. (quoting Standard
Power & Light Corp. v. Inv. Assocs., Inc., 51
A.2d 572, 576 (Del. 1947). Because there is no provision in the
Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws purporting to impose a
different or greater vote of the directors or stockholders for
the approval of an amendment to Article II and
Section 9.5 of the Certificate of Incorporation, in our
view, the
H-7
statutory default voting requirements would apply to the
approval of the Certificate of Amendment by the directors and
stockholders of the Company.
In addition, in our view, a Delaware court would not interpret
the provision in Article X of the Certificate of
Incorporation that purports to eliminate the power of the
Company (and, consequently, the directors and stockholders) to
amend Article II and Section 9.5 prior to the
consummation of a Business Combination as requiring a
supermajority or unanimous vote of the directors
and/or
stockholders to approve the amendments purportedly prohibited
thereby. Nothing in the language of Article X suggests that
the drafters intent was to impose a supermajority or
unanimous voting requirement on amendments to Article II or
Section 9.5. Rather, the language in Article X
purports to entirely eliminate any vote by prohibiting any
amendment to Article II and Section 9.5 prior to the
consummation of a Business Combination. Moreover, in our view, a
Delaware court would not reform the provisions of Article X
to provide for a voting requirement not intended by the
drafters. See Lions Gate, 2006 WL 1668051, at *8
(holding that reformation of a certificate of incorporation is
unavailable where the proponent fails to demonstrate that all
present and past shareholders intended the reformed provision to
be included within the certificate) (citing Waggoner v.
Laster, 581 A.2d 1127, 1135 (Del. 1990)).
CONCLUSION
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, and subject to the
limitations stated herein, it is our opinion that the
Certificate of Amendment, if duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Company (by vote of the majority of the
directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present or,
alternatively, by unanimous written consent) and duly approved
by the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of the
Company entitled to vote thereon, all in accordance with
Section 242(b) of the General Corporation Law, would be
valid and effective when the Certificate of Amendment is filed
with the Secretary of State in accordance with Sections 103
and 242 of the General Corporation Law.
The foregoing opinion is limited to the General Corporation Law.
We have not considered and express no opinion on any other laws
or the laws of any other state or jurisdiction, including
federal laws regulating securities or any other federal laws, or
the rules and regulations of stock exchanges or of any other
regulatory body.
The foregoing opinion is rendered for your benefit in connection
with the matters addressed herein. We understand that you may
furnish a copy of this opinion letter to the SEC in connection
with the matters addressed herein. We further understand that
you may include this opinion letter as an annex to your proxy
statement for the special meeting of stockholders of the Company
to consider and vote upon the Certificate of Amendment, and we
consent to your doing so. Except as stated in this paragraph,
this opinion letter may not be furnished or quoted to, nor may
the foregoing opinion be relied upon by, any other person or
entity for any purpose without our prior written consent.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
CSB/TNP
H-8
Exhibit A
Certificate
of Amendment of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
H-9
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. (the
Corporation), a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, does
hereby certify as follows:
|
|
|
FIRST: |
|
That the name of the Corporation is Hicks Acquisition
Company I, Inc. |
|
SECOND: |
|
That
on ,
2009, resolutions were duly adopted by the Corporations
Board of Directors setting forth, approving and adopting this
amendment to Corporations Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation (the Certificate),
declaring this amendment to be advisable and recommending this
amendment for approval by the Corporations stockholders,
and calling a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation for
consideration thereof. |
|
THIRD: |
|
The Certificate is amended as follows: 1. Article II of the
Certificate is amended and restated to read in its entirety as
follows: |
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
PURPOSE |
|
|
|
The purpose of the Corporation is to conduct all lawful business
permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the DGCL). |
|
|
|
2. Article IX, Section 9.5 of the Certificate is
amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: |
|
|
|
Section 9.5 Existence. |
|
|
|
In the event that the transactions contemplated by the Purchase
and IPO Reorganization Agreement, dated as of August 2,
2009, among Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc., Resolute
Energy Corporation, Resolute Subsidiary Corporation, Resolute
Aneth, LLC, Resolute Holdings, LLC, Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC
and HH-HACI, L.P. are not consummated by October 5, 2009,
the Corporations existence shall terminate on
October 5, 2009. The Corporation shall otherwise have
perpetual existence. |
|
|
|
3. All section references to Section 9.5 in Certificate are
hereby deleted. |
|
FOURTH: |
|
That
on ,
2009, pursuant to resolutions of the Corporations Board of
Directors, a special meeting of the Corporations
stockholders was duly called and held upon notice in accordance
with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of
shares as required by statute were voted in favor of such
amendment. |
|
FIFTH: |
|
That such amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware. |
H-10
|
|
|
SIXTH: |
|
That the capital of the Corporation shall not be reduced under
or by reason of such amendment. |
|
SEVENTH: |
|
This Certificate of Amendment shall become effective upon filing
with the Secretary of State of Delaware. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has duly caused this
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Corporation to be executed as of
this
day
of ,
2009.
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
Name: Joseph B. Armes
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
H-11
PROXY
FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF PUBLIC WARRANTHOLDERS OF
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
This Proxy Is Solicited On Behalf Of The Board Of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints Joseph B. Armes and Robert M. Swartz (together, the
Proxies), and each of them, with full power of substitution, as proxies to vote the warrants that
the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Special Meeting of Public Warrantholders of Hicks
Acquisition Company I, Inc. (the Company) to be held on September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. Central
Daylight Savings Time and at any adjournments and postponements thereof. Such warrants shall be
voted as indicated with respect to the proposal(s) listed on the reverse side hereof and in the
Proxies discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the enclosed proxy statement/prospectus and revokes
all prior proxies for said meeting.
THE WARRANTS REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER
DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED WARRANTHOLDER. IF NO SPECIFIC DIRECTION IS GIVEN AS TO THE
PROPOSALS ON THE REVERSE SIDE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR PROPOSAL 2. PLEASE
MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed on reverse side.)
Ù Detach here from proxy voting card. Ù |
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2.
1. Vote on Amendment to Warrant Agreement For Against Abstain
Approval of an amendment to the warrant agreement (Warrant ¨ ¨ ¨
Amendment) that governs all of the warrants of the Company
in connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the Purchase and IPO Reorganization
Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2009, by and among the
Company, Resolute Energy Corporation, Resolute Subsidiary
Corporation, Resolute Aneth, LLC, Resolute Holdings, LLC,
Resolute Holdings Sub, LLC, and HH-HACI, L.P., and the
transactions contemplated thereby.
The Warrant Amendment would allow each Company
warrantholder to elect to receive for each outstanding
Company warrant that was issued in the Companys initial
public offering, either (i) the right to receive $0.55 in
cash (the Cash Amount), or (ii) a new warrant exercisable
for one share of Resolute Energy Corporations common stock
(a Company Warrant), subject to adjustment and
proration as described in the enclosed proxy
statement/prospectus.
Warrant Election Warrant Election
Only if you voted FOR Proposal No. 1 may you select
to receive a Company
Warrant in exchange for each of your warrants by marking the Warrant Election box.
If you vote FOR Proposal No. 1 and do not mark the
Warrant Election box or if you vote AGAINST or if you
ABSTAIN you will receive the Cash Amount. ¨
2. Vote on Adjournment of Special Meeting of Public Warrantholders For Against Abstain
Approval of an adjournment of the special meeting of
Company warrantholders, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation and a vote of proxies in favor of the Warrant
Amendment. ¨ ¨ ¨
The warrants represented by the proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned warrantholder(s). If no direction is made,
this proxy will be voted FOR proposals 1 and 2. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, or if cumulative voting is required, the person named in this
proxy will vote in his/her discretion.
IMPORTANT PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY. THANK YOU FOR VOTING.
Signature ___Signature, if held jointly ___Dated ___
When warrants are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please
sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please
sign in partnership name by an authorized person.
Proxy Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting of Warrantholders
To be held on September 24, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. Central Daylight Savings Time, at
1700 Pacific Avenue, 39th Floor, Dallas, Texas, 75201 |
PROXY
FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING IN LIEU OF
THE 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF
Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
This Proxy Is Solicited On Behalf Of The Board Of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints Joseph B. Armes and Robert M. Swartz (together, the
Proxies), and each of them, with full power of substitution, as proxies to vote the shares that
the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Special Meeting In Lieu of the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. (the
Company) to be held on September 24, 2009
at 10:30 a.m. Central Daylight Savings Time and at any adjournments and postponements thereof. Such
shares shall be voted as indicated with respect to the proposals listed on the reverse side hereof
and in the Proxies discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the enclosed proxy statement/prospectus and revokes
all prior proxies for said meeting.
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER
DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO SPECIFIC DIRECTION IS GIVEN AS TO THE
PROPOSALS ON THE REVERSE SIDE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED IN PROPOSAL
1, FOR PROPOSAL 2, FOR PROPOSAL 3, FOR PROPOSAL 4, AND FOR PROPOSAL 5. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND
RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed on reverse side.)
5 Detach here from proxy voting card. 5
HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY I, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A
VOTE FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND
5. |
|
For All |
|
Withhold
All |
|
For All
Except |
|
To withhold authority
to vote for any
individual nominee(s),
mark For All Except
and write the number(s)
of the nominee(s) on
the line below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Vote on Directors |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Election of Class I Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 Joseph B. Armes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 William A. Montgomery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Election of Class II Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03 Brian Mulroney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04 William H. Cunningham |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Vote on Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation Existence Proposal |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
Approval of amendment to the Companys amended and restated
certificate of incorporation to provide for its perpetual
existence.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Vote on Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation Purpose Proposal |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
Approval of amendment to the Companys amended and restated
certificate of incorporation to permit a business combination with
an entity engaged in the energy industry as its principal
business.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Vote on Adoption of Agreement |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
Approval of adoption of the Purchase and IPO Reorganization
Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2009, by and among the Company,
Resolute Energy Corporation, Resolute Subsidiary Corporation,
Resolute Aneth, LLC, Resolute Holdings, LLC, Resolute Holdings Sub,
LLC, and HH-HACI, L.P., as amended by the Letter Agreement dated
September 9, 2009, and the transactions contemplated
thereby.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Election to Exercise Conversion Rights
|
|
Exercise Conversion Rights
|
|
|
|
|
Only if you voted AGAINST Proposal No. 4 and you hold
shares of
common stock of the Company that were issued in the Companys
initial public offering you may exercise conversion rights and
demand that the Company convert your shares of common stock into a
pro rata portion of the Companys initial public offering trust
account by marking the Exercise Conversion Rights box.
If eligible, and you choose to exercise conversion rights, you will
effectively be exchanging your shares of common stock of the
Company for cash and will no longer own those shares. You will
only be entitled to receive cash for those shares if (i) the
acquisition is completed and you continue to hold such shares
through the effective time thereof, and (ii) you tender your stock
certificate in accordance with the delivery requirements discussed
in the definitive proxy statement/prospectus under the heading
Special Meeting of HACI Public Warrantholders and Special Meeting
In Lieu of the 2009 Annual Meeting of HACI StockholdersConversion
Rights.
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Vote on Adjournment of Special Meeting In Lieu of Annual Meeting |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
Approval of an adjournment of the special meeting in lieu of
the 2009 annual meeting of Company stockholders, if
necessary, in order to permit further solicitation and a
vote of proxies in favor of proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
The shares represented by the proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in
the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder(s). If no direction
is made, this proxy will be voted FOR proposals 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. If any other
matters properly come before the meeting, or if cumulative voting is required,
the person named in this proxy will vote in his/her discretion.
IMPORTANT PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY. THANK YOU FOR VOTING.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature, if held jointly
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please
sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please
sign in partnership name by an authorized person.
Proxy Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.
You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting In Lieu of the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To be held on September 24, 2009, at 10:30 a.m. Central Daylight Savings Time, at
1700 Pacific Avenue, 39th Floor, Dallas, Texas, 75201