UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
 
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 



Filed by the Registrant  
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  
  
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
 
Destination Maternity Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
Nathan G. Miller
Peter O’Malley
Holly N. Alden
Christopher B. Morgan
Marla A. Ryan
Anne-Charlotte Windal
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
 



Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 
No fee required.
 
 
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
 
 
 
 
1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5)
Total fee paid:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
   
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 
 
 
1)
Amount Previously Paid:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3)
Filing Party:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4)
Date Filed:
 
 
 
 
 


 
Nathan G. Miller
c/o NGM Asset Management, LLC
27 Pine Street, Suite 700
New Canaan, CT 06840
May 18, 2018
Via Email

Board of Directors
Destination Maternity Corporation
232 Strawbridge Drive
Moorestown, NJ 08057
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are writing to express our concern regarding the unprecedented actions taken by the board of directors (the “Board”) of Destination Maternity Corporation (the “Company”) to disenfranchise the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s 2018 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2018 Annual Meeting”).
In April 2018, the Board approved the Company’s entry into a support agreement (the “Orchestra Agreement”) with Orchestra-Prémaman (“Orchestra”).  We, like many of our fellow stockholders, were deeply troubled by the terms of the Orchestra Agreement, which entrenched the incumbent directors by effectively selling corporate assets – Board seats – in exchange for Orchestra’s votes.  Moreover, Orchestra has refused to designate a replacement director for one of its Board seats and appears to be reserving the right to designate this replacement after the 2018 Annual Meeting.  In doing so, Orchestra appears to be intentionally acting to deprive stockholders of an opportunity to approve of its designee, and the Company bears responsibility for permitting this through the one-sided Orchestra Agreement.  We initially indicated that we would approve of an expansion of the Board and the addition of Orchestra representatives to the Board based on our belief that having stockholders represented on a board improves alignment of interests between a board and a company’s stockholders.  Such representation should not, however, be gained as part of a vote buying scheme designed to extinguish accountability to stockholders.
As you know, it is well-established that stockholders’ ability to elect directors at a company’s annual meeting, in a fair and equitable manner without improper interference from the incumbent board, is a fundamental principle of corporate governance.  That this Board would approve the Orchestra Agreement, and purportedly guarantee board-level influence to a stockholder who only months earlier you publicly stated was “unconstructive, distracting and value-destructive,” made a “calculated decision to conceal its true intentions from Destination’s Board and stockholders,” had a “distinct and potentially conflicting set of interests” and has “repeatedly violated U.S. securities laws,” is an affront to that principle and in our view constitutes a clear dereliction of your duties to the stockholders that you serve.

This is a critical inflection point for the Company, and time is of the essence.  The Board should immediately take action to reject the Orchestra Agreement as invalid.  If you as directors are unable or unwilling to act in the interests of all of the Company’s stockholders, then we trust that at the 2018 Annual Meeting our fellow stockholders will do what is needed and elect a new Board that will.  We reserve all rights and remedies.


Very truly yours,
 
/s/ Nathan G. Miller                              
 
Nathan G. Miller