Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
INFORMATION
REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE
14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Filed by
the Registrant x
Filed by
a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the
appropriate box:
¨ Preliminary
Proxy Statement
¨ Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x Definitive
Proxy Statement
¨ Definitive
Additional Materials
¨ Soliciting
Material under § 240.14a-12
TEREX
CORPORATION
(Name of
Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x No fee
required
¨ Fee computed
on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
|
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
¨ Fee paid
previously by written preliminary materials.
¨ Check box if
any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2), and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
TEREX
CORPORATION
200
Nyala Farm Road, Westport, Connecticut 06880
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
TO
BE HELD ON MAY 14, 2009
The
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Terex Corporation (“Terex” or the “Company”)
will be held at the corporate offices of Terex Corporation, 200 Nyala Farm Road,
Westport, Connecticut, on Thursday, May 14, 2009, at 10:00 a.m., local time, for
the following purposes:
|
1.
|
To
elect eleven (11) directors of the Company to hold office for one year or
until their successors are duly elected and
qualified.
|
|
2.
|
To
ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm for the Company for
2009.
|
|
3.
|
To
approve the Terex Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive
Plan.
|
|
4.
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or
any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
|
The
foregoing items of business are described more fully in the Proxy Statement
accompanying this Notice.
The Board
of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on March 17, 2009 as
the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the Annual Meeting.
Securities
and Exchange Commission rules allow us to furnish proxy materials to our
stockholders on the Internet. We are pleased to utilize these rules and believe
that they enable us to provide our stockholders with the information that they
need, while lowering the cost of delivery and reducing the environmental impact
of our Annual Meeting.
On or
about April 3, 2009, we will be mailing our Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials to most of our stockholders, which contains instructions for our
stockholders’ use of this process, including how to access our 2009 Proxy
Statement and 2008 Annual Report and how to vote online. In addition,
the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions on
how you may receive a paper copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report, if
you received only a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials this
year.
EVERY
STOCKHOLDER’S VOTE IS IMPORTANT. While all stockholders are invited
to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote whether or not you will be
present at the Annual Meeting. You may vote by telephone or via the
Internet. If you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, you
may complete, date and sign the proxy card and return it in the envelope
provided. No postage is required if the proxy card is mailed in the
United States. You may withdraw your proxy or change your vote at any
time before your proxy is voted, either by voting in person at the Annual
Meeting, by proxy, by telephone or via the Internet. Please vote
promptly in order to avoid the additional expense of further
solicitation.
By order of the Board of Directors,
|
Eric
I Cohen
Secretary
|
March 31,
2009
Westport,
Connecticut
TEREX
CORPORATION
200
Nyala Farm Road
Westport,
Connecticut 06880
Proxy
Statement for the
Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
to be
held on May 14, 2009
This Proxy Statement is furnished to
stockholders of Terex Corporation (“Terex” or the “Company”) in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors
(the “Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be
held at 10:00 a.m. on May 14, 2009, at the corporate offices of Terex
Corporation, 200 Nyala Farm Road, Westport, Connecticut, and at any adjournments
or postponements thereof (collectively, the “Meeting”), for the purposes set
forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
“Notice”).
As of
March 17, 2009, the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to
notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting, the Company had outstanding 95,127,014
shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”).
Under
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), instead
of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each stockholder of record
or beneficial owner of our Common Stock, we are furnishing proxy materials,
which include our Proxy Statement and Annual Report, to our stockholders over
the Internet and providing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
by mail to all of our stockholders, other than to stockholders who previously
elected to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials. Those stockholders
that previously elected to receive printed proxy materials will each receive
such materials by mail. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy
materials unless you request to receive these materials in hard copy by
following the instructions provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
will instruct you how you may access and review all of the important information
contained in the proxy materials over the Internet. The Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials also instructs you how you may submit your proxy
via telephone or the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability
of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy
materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials
included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.
We are
mailing the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our
stockholders on or about April 3, 2009.
Each share of Common Stock is entitled
to one vote per share for each matter to be voted on at the
Meeting. Except for the election of directors of the Company and the
approval of the Terex Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the affirmative
vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote is required for the approval of any
matters voted upon at the Meeting. In an uncontested election of
directors, such as the election at the Meeting, each director shall be elected
by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director. The
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person
or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is required to approve the Terex
Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan, provided that the total votes cast on
this proposal represent over 50% of the total number of shares entitled to vote
on this proposal.
A quorum
of stockholders is constituted by the presence, in person or by proxy, of
holders of record of Common Stock representing a majority of the aggregate
number of votes entitled to be cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes
will be considered present for purposes of determining the presence of a
quorum. With respect to all matters to be voted upon at the Meeting,
abstentions will have the effect of a negative vote and broker non-votes will
not be considered as votes cast and thus will have no effect on the outcome of
the vote, except with respect to the proposal to approve the Terex Corporation
2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan, where broker non-votes may result in a failure to
obtain total votes cast of more than 50% of the shares entitled to vote on the
proposal.
Proxy solicitations by the Board will
be made by mail, by phone, via the Internet or by personal interviews conducted
by officers or employees of the Company. All costs of solicitations, including
(a) printing and mailing of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials, (b) the printing and mailing of this Proxy Statement and accompanying
material, (c) the reimbursement of brokerage firms and others for their expenses
in forwarding solicitation material to the beneficial owners of the Company’s
stock, and (d) supplementary solicitations to submit proxies, if any, will be
borne by the Company.
How To
Vote
In order that your shares of Common
Stock may be represented at the Meeting, you are requested to vote your proxy
using one of the following methods:
Via the
Internet – You can vote your shares via the Internet as
instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The
Internet procedures are designed to authenticate your identity to allow you to
vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record are available
24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (EDT) on May 13,
2009.
By Telephone – The Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials includes a toll-free number you can
call to request printed copies of proxy materials and instructions on how to
vote by telephone. The printed proxy materials include a different toll-free
number that you can call for voting.
By Mail – Stockholders
who receive a paper proxy card may elect to vote by mail and should complete,
sign and date their proxy card and mail it in the pre-addressed envelope that
accompanies the delivery of paper proxy cards. Proxy cards submitted by mail
must be received by the time of the Meeting in order for your shares to be
voted. Stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name may vote by mail
by requesting a paper proxy card according to the instructions contained in the
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials received from your broker or
other agent, and then completing, signing and dating the voting instruction card
provided by the brokers or other agents and mailing it in the pre-addressed
envelope provided.
If you
vote via the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card, we will vote
your shares as you direct. For the election of directors, you can specify
whether your shares should be voted for all, some or none of the nominees for
director listed. With respect to the other items being submitted for stockholder
vote, you may vote “for” or “against” any proposal or you may abstain from
voting on any proposal.
If you
submit a proxy via the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card without
indicating your instructions, we will vote your shares consistent with the
recommendations of our Board as stated in this Proxy Statement and in the Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, specifically in favor of our
nominees for directors, in favor of the ratification of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm
and in favor of the approval of the Terex Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. If any other matters are properly presented at the Meeting for
consideration, then our officers named on your proxy will have discretion to
vote for you on those matters. As of the date of the Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials, we knew of no other matters to be presented at
the Meeting.
Revocation of Proxies – Any stockholder giving a
proxy has the right to attend the Meeting to vote his or her shares of Common
Stock in person (thereby revoking any prior proxy). Any stockholder
also has the right to revoke the proxy at any time by executing a later-dated
proxy, by telephone, via the Internet or by written revocation received by the
Secretary of the Company prior to the time the proxy is voted. All
properly executed and unrevoked proxies delivered pursuant to this solicitation,
if received at or prior to the Meeting, will be voted at the
Meeting.
NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS
PROXY STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON
AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED. THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT SHALL, UNDER NO
CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE
AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY SINCE THE DATE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
PROPOSAL
1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Meeting, eleven directors of the
Company are to be elected to hold office until the Company’s next Annual Meeting
of Stockholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and
qualified. Each director shall be elected by a majority of the votes
of shares of Common Stock represented at the Meeting in person or by proxy cast
with respect to such director. Unless marked to the contrary, the proxies
received by the Company will be voted FOR the election of the eleven nominees
listed below, all of whom are presently members of the Board.
Each
nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as a
director if elected. However, should any of the nominees for director
decline or become unable to accept nomination if elected, it is intended that
the Board will vote for the election of such other person as director as it
shall designate. The Company has no reason to believe that any
nominee will decline or be unable to serve if elected.
In the
event of an uncontested election, as is the case this year, any nominee for
director who is a current director and receives less than a majority of the
votes cast in person or by proxy at the Meeting shall offer to resign from the
Board. While the Board does not believe that in each such case a
director should necessarily leave the Board, this presents an opportunity for
the Board, through its Governance and Nominating Committee, to consider the
resignation offer.
The information set forth below has
been furnished to the Company by the nominees and sets forth for each nominee,
as of March 25, 2009, such nominee’s name, business experience for at least the
past five years, other directorships held and age. There is no family
relationship between any nominee and any other nominee or executive officer of
the Company. For information regarding the beneficial ownership of
the Common Stock by the current directors of the Company, see “Security
Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners.”
The Governance and Nominating Committee
of the Board has nominated each of the following individuals based on various
criteria, including, among others, a desire to maintain a balanced experience
and knowledge base within the Board, the nominees’ personal integrity and
willingness to devote necessary time and attention to properly discharge the
duties of director, and the ability of the nominees to make positive
contributions to the leadership and governance of the Company.
The Board recommends that the
stockholders vote FOR the following nominees for director.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions
and
Offices with Company
|
|
First
Year
As
Company
Director
|
Ronald
M. DeFeo
|
|
57
|
|
Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer
and Director
|
|
1993
|
G.
Chris Andersen
|
|
70
|
|
Lead
Director
|
|
1992
|
Paula H. J. Cholmondeley
|
|
61
|
|
Director
|
|
2004
|
Don
DeFosset
|
|
60
|
|
Director
|
|
1999
|
William
H. Fike
|
|
72
|
|
Director
|
|
1995
|
Thomas
J. Hansen
|
|
60
|
|
Director
|
|
2008
|
Dr.
Donald P. Jacobs
|
|
81
|
|
Director
|
|
1998
|
David
A. Sachs
|
|
49
|
|
Director
|
|
1992
|
Oren
G. Shaffer
|
|
66
|
|
Director
|
|
2007
|
David
C. Wang
|
|
64
|
|
Director
|
|
2008
|
Helge
H. Wehmeier
|
|
66
|
|
Director
|
|
2002
|
Ronald M.
DeFeo joined the Company on May 1, 1992, was appointed President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company on October 4, 1993, Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”) of the Company on March 24, 1995 and Chairman of the Board on March 4,
1998. Mr. DeFeo relinquished the titles of President and Chief Operating Officer
of the Company on January 3, 2007. Pursuant to an Amended and Restated
Employment and Compensation Agreement between Mr. DeFeo and the Company, dated
as of October 14, 2008 (the “DeFeo Agreement”), Mr. DeFeo is to remain
Chief Executive Officer of the Company through December 31, 2012 and the Company
will use its best efforts, consistent with generally accepted best corporate
governance standards, to have Mr. DeFeo elected Chairman of the Board during
this time. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. DeFeo was a Senior Vice
President of J.I. Case Company, the former Tenneco farm and construction
equipment division, and also served as a Managing Director of Case Construction
Equipment throughout Europe. While at J.I. Case, Mr. DeFeo was also a Vice
President of North American Construction Equipment Sales and General Manager of
Retail Operations. Mr. DeFeo serves as a director of Kennametal Inc. (a supplier
of the Company).
G. Chris
Andersen has been a merchant banker since 1996 and is currently a partner of
G.C. Andersen Partners, LLC, a private merchant banking and advisory
firm.
Paula H.
J. Cholmondeley is currently a private consultant on strategic planning. Ms.
Cholmondeley served as Vice President and General Manager of Sappi Fine Paper,
North America from 2000 through 2004, where she was responsible for their
Specialty Products division. Ms. Cholmondeley held senior positions with various
other companies from 1980 through 1998, including Owens Corning, The Faxon
Company, Blue Cross of Greater Philadelphia, and Westinghouse Elevator Company,
and also served as a White House Fellow assisting the U.S. Trade Representative
during the Reagan administration. Ms. Cholmondeley, a former certified public
accountant, is an alumnus of Howard University and received a Masters Degree in
Accounting from the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Finance. Ms.
Cholmondeley is also a director of Dentsply International Inc., Ultralife
Batteries, Inc., Albany International Corp. and Minerals Technologies Inc., and
is an independent trustee of Nationwide Mutual Funds.
Don
DeFosset retired in 2005 as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Walter Industries, Inc., a diversified company with principal operating
businesses in homebuilding and home financing, water transmission products and
energy services. Mr. DeFosset had served since November 2000 as
President and CEO, and since March 2002 as Chairman, of Walter
Industries. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., a global supplier of
engineered systems, from October 1999 through June 2000. Before
joining Dura, Mr. DeFosset served as a Corporate Executive Vice President,
President of the Truck Group and a member of the Office of Chief Executive
Officer of Navistar International Corporation from October 1996 to August
1999. Mr. DeFosset also serves as a director of National Retail
Properties Inc., Regions Financial Corporation and EnPro Industries,
Inc.
William
H. Fike has been President of Fike & Associates, a consulting firm, since
January 2000. Mr. Fike retired as the Vice Chairman and Executive Vice President
of Magna International Inc., an automotive parts manufacturer based in Ontario,
Canada, in February 1999. Prior to joining Magna International in August 1994,
Mr. Fike was employed by Ford Motor Company from 1965 to 1994, where he served
most recently as a Corporate Vice President and as President of Ford
Europe.
Thomas J.
Hansen is Vice Chairman of Illinois Tool Works Inc. (“ITW”), a manufacturer of
fasteners and components, consumable systems and a variety of specialty products
and equipment, and is responsible for ITW’s worldwide Automotive Components and
Fastener, Fluids and Polymers, Industrial Metal and Plastic and Construction
businesses. From 1998 until May 2006, Mr. Hansen served as Executive Vice
President of ITW. Mr. Hansen joined ITW in 1980 as sales and marketing manager
of the Shakeproof Industrial Products businesses and held several other
positions with the company. Mr. Hansen is a member of the Northern Illinois
University’s Executive Club, a member of the Economics Club of Chicago, is
Chairman of the ITW Better Government Council, and is a former member of the
Board of Trustees of MAPI (Manufacturers Alliance).
Dr.
Donald P. Jacobs is Dean Emeritus and the Gaylord Freeman Distinguished
Professor of Banking of the J.L. Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern
University, positions he has held since 2001. Prior to that, Dr. Jacobs was Dean
of the Kellogg School from 1975 through 2001. He presently teaches government,
strategy and international business. Dr. Jacobs also serves as a director of
ProLogis Trust.
David A.
Sachs is the Co-Chairman of the Capital Markets Group Investment Committee of
Ares Management LLC, an investment management firm of which he was a founder in
1997. Mr. Sachs has been an investment banker and investment manager since
1981.
Oren G.
Shaffer was the Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Qwest
Communications International Inc. from 2002 to 2007. Prior to joining Qwest,
Mr. Shaffer was President and Chief Operating Officer of Sorrento Networks,
a maker of optical products, beginning in 2000. From 1994 to 1999, he was Chief
Financial Officer of Ameritech Corporation, a telecommunications provider that
was acquired by SBC Communications Inc. in 1999. Mr. Shaffer also serves as
a director of Belgacom SA and Intermec, Inc.
David C.
Wang is President of Boeing China Inc. and Vice President of International
Relations of The Boeing Company, a large aerospace company and a
manufacturer of commercial jetliners and military aircraft, and has held these
positions since November 2002. Prior to joining Boeing, Mr. Wang served as
Chairman and CEO of General Electric China from 1997 to 2001. Prior
to that, Mr. Wang served in various positions of increasing responsibility with
General Electric since 1980. Mr. Wang is also a director of
KLA-Tencor Corporation.
Helge H.
Wehmeier retired in December 2004 as Vice-Chairman of Bayer Corporation, a post
he held since July 1, 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Wehmeier served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Bayer Corporation from 1991 through June 2002. Mr.
Wehmeier spent more than 35 years with Bayer AG, a diversified, international
chemicals and health care group, in various positions of increasing
responsibility, including senior management positions in both Europe and the
United States. Mr. Wehmeier is an alumnus of the International Management
Development Institute, Lausanne, Switzerland and Institut European
d’Administration des Affaires, Fontainebleau, France. Mr. Wehmeier also serves
as a director of PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., a diversified banking and
financial services company, and Owens Illinois, Inc., a manufacturer of glass
containers.
Board
Meetings and Corporate Governance
The Board met seven times in 2008 at
regularly scheduled and special meetings, including telephonic
meetings. All of the directors in office during 2008 attended at
least 75% of the meetings of the Board and all committees of the Board on which
they served during 2008. It is the Company’s policy, as stated in the
Company’s Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), that each director is
expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All of the
directors then in office attended the Company’s previous annual stockholder
meeting held on May 15, 2008.
It is the
Company’s policy that the Board consists of a majority of directors who qualify
as independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange (“NYSE”), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), and the requirements of any other applicable regulatory
authority, including the SEC. The Board annually reviews the
relationship of each director with the Company, and only those directors who the
Board affirmatively determines have no material relationship with the Company
are deemed to be independent directors. The Guidelines specifically
define what is deemed to be a material relationship between the Company and an
independent director. The following are the relationships that the
Board considers in making its independence determination:
(i)
|
whether
the director or any of his or her immediate family members is or was
within the past five years an officer of the
Company;
|
(ii)
|
whether
the director is or was within the past five years an employee of the
Company;
|
(iii)
|
whether
the director or any of his or her immediate family members is or was
during the past five years affiliated with, or employed by, any past or
present auditor of the Company (or an
affiliate);
|
(iv)
|
whether
the director or any of his or her immediate family members is or was
within the past five years part of an interlocking directorate in which an
executive officer of the Company serves or served on the compensation
committee of a company that concurrently employs or employed the director
or any of his or her immediate family
members;
|
(v)
|
whether
the director is an executive officer, a partner, member, of counsel or
beneficial owner of more than ten percent (10%) of the equity interest of
a customer of, or a supplier of goods or services (including without
limitation any investment banking firm or law firm) to, the Company where
the amount involved in any of the last three fiscal years exceeds certain
thresholds;
|
(vi)
|
whether
the director is an executive officer, a partner or beneficial owner of
more than ten percent (10%) of the equity interest of a company to which
the Company was indebted at the end of any fiscal quarter during the
Company’s most recently completed fiscal year or current fiscal year in an
amount in excess of five percent (5%) of the Company’s total consolidated
assets at the end of such fiscal
year;
|
(vii)
|
whether
the director is an executive officer, a partner or beneficial owner of
more than ten percent (10%) of the equity interest of a company which was
indebted to the Company;
|
(viii)
|
whether
the director or any of his or her immediate family members was indebted to
the Company, other than in the ordinary course of business of the Company
and the business of the director or the member of his or her immediate
family, as applicable, at the end of any fiscal quarter during the
Company’s most recently completed fiscal year or current fiscal year in an
amount in excess of $100,000 at the end of such fiscal
year;
|
(ix)
|
whether
the director is affiliated with a tax exempt entity that within the
preceding three years received the greater of (x) $1 million or (y) two
percent (2%) of its consolidated gross revenues from the Company (based on
the tax exempt entity’s most recently completed fiscal
year);
|
(x)
|
whether
the director or any of his or her immediate family members is during the
current fiscal year or was during the most recently completed fiscal year
a party to a transaction or series of similar transactions with the
Company or its subsidiaries (excluding director fees, stock options and
other director compensation), other than on arms-length terms where the
amount involved is not material to either
party;
|
(xi)
|
whether
the director or any of his or her immediate family members received more
than $100,000 per year in direct compensation from the Company, other than
director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred
compensation for prior service within the past three years;
and
|
(xii)
|
whether
the director has any other relationships with the Company or the members
of management of the Company that the Board has determined to be material
and which are not described in (i) through (xi)
above.
|
After
consideration of all applicable matters, the Board determined, based on the
above criteria, that none of the directors has a material relationship with the
Company other than as a director or as a stockholder except for Mr. DeFeo, who
is not an independent director. Accordingly, the Board has determined
that all of the nominees for director are independent directors except for Mr.
DeFeo, who has been nominated to serve on the Board as a result of his position
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
Directors who are employees of the
Company receive no additional compensation by virtue of being directors of the
Company. Outside directors receive compensation for their service as
directors and reimbursement of their expenses incurred as a result of their
service as directors. See “Director Compensation” for a detailed
description of director compensation, including the Company’s Common Stock
ownership objective for outside directors.
Directors have complete access to
management and the Company’s outside advisors, and senior officers and other
members of management frequently attend Board meetings at the discretion of the
Board. It is the policy of the Board that non-management directors
also meet privately in executive sessions without the presence of any members of
management at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board and at such other
times as the Board shall determine. In addition, the Board may retain
and have access to independent advisors of its choice with respect to any issue
relating to its activities, and the Company pays the expenses of such
advisors.
Since
2003, the Board has determined that, because the offices of Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer have been combined in Mr. DeFeo, it has been desirable for the
Company to have an independent director serve as Lead Director of the
Board. The Lead Director, in conjunction with the Chairman and the
Chief Executive Officer, provides leadership and guidance to the
Board. In addition, the Lead Director presides at all executive
sessions of the non-management directors. Mr. Andersen was appointed
Lead Director in 2006. While the Board believes that generally no
director should serve as Lead Director for more than three consecutive years, a
director may serve as Lead Director for more than three consecutive years if so
approved by a majority of the Board. Although Mr. Andersen has served
as Lead Director for three consecutive years, the Board believes that Mr.
Andersen’s continued leadership would be beneficial to the Board and
accordingly, the directors intend to nominate Mr. Andersen as the Lead Director
for an additional one-year term beginning in May 2009. Thereafter,
the directors will review annually the desirability of having a Lead Director
and, if the directors determine it best to continue to have a Lead Director,
shall elect a Lead Director for the succeeding one-year period.
The Board
and the Governance and Nominating Committee annually review the Company’s
corporate governance policies and practices and the Guidelines. The
Board believes that the Guidelines effectively assist the Board in the exercise
of its duties and responsibilities and serve the best interests of the
Company. These Guidelines reflect the Board’s commitment to monitor
the effectiveness of policy and decision making both at the Board and management
levels, with a view to achieving strategic objectives of the Company while
enhancing stockholder value over the long term. The Board and the
Governance and Nominating Committee will continue to review the Guidelines
annually and may make changes as they determine are necessary and appropriate,
including changes that may be necessary to comply with new or proposed laws,
rules or regulations issued by the SEC and the NYSE. A copy of the
Guidelines is available at the Company’s website, www.terex.com, under “About
Terex” – “Investor Relations” – “Corporate Governance.” In addition, a copy of
the Guidelines is available in print, without charge, to any stockholder who
requests these materials from the Company.
If you
wish to communicate with the Board, you may correspond by filing a report
through Ethicspoint, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, via the Internet at
www.ethicspoint.com or by calling, toll free, (877) 584-8488 or
1-877-ETHICSP. Reports should be submitted under the category
“Director Communications.” Ethicspoint is an independent third-party
provider retained by the Company to offer a comprehensive, confidential and,
upon request, anonymous reporting system for receiving complaints, grievances
and communications. All communications received by Ethicspoint will
be relayed to the Board.
The Board
has an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Responsibility and
Strategy Committee, and Governance and Nominating Committee.
Audit
Committee Meetings and Responsibilities
The Audit Committee of the Board
consists of Messrs. DeFosset (chairperson), Hansen, Jacobs, Shaffer and
Wehmeier, each of whom is independent as defined in the listing standards of the
NYSE and under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee met 13 times
during 2008.
Each
member of the Audit Committee is required to be financially literate or must
become financially literate within a reasonable time after appointment to the
Audit Committee, and at least one member of the Audit Committee must have
accounting or related financial management expertise. The Board, in its business
judgment, believes that each of the current members of the Audit Committee is
financially literate and that each of its members has accounting or financial
management expertise: Mr. DeFosset through his business experience as a
corporate executive, his involvement in preparing financial statements at
various public companies and particularly his experience as a Chief Executive
Officer of a public company; Mr. Hansen through his business experience as a
corporate executive and his involvement in preparing financial statements as a
senior executive of a large multinational company; Dr. Jacobs through his years
of experience teaching business, finance, management and accounting at the
graduate level, as well as serving as a chairman of the public review board of a
national accounting firm and as Chairman of the Board of Amtrak; Mr. Shaffer
through his extensive experience and involvement in preparing financial
statements as the Chief Financial Officer of a large public company; and Mr.
Wehmeier through his business experience as a corporate executive and his
involvement in preparing financial statements as a senior executive, including
as a Chief Executive Officer, of a large multinational company. The
Board has determined that each of Mr. DeFosset, Dr. Jacobs, and Mr. Shaffer is
an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined under the
regulations of the SEC.
The Audit
Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by
meeting regularly with the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm and operating and financial management personnel. The Audit
Committee reviews the audit performed by the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm and reports the results of such audit to the
Board. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s annual financial
statements and all material financial reports provided to the stockholders and
reviews the Company’s internal auditing, accounting and financial
controls.
As stated
in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee also reviews related party
transactions and any other matters pertaining to potential conflicts of interest
or adherence to the Company’s standards of business conduct. Related
party transactions must be approved by the Audit Committee, who will approve the
transaction only if they determine that it is in the best interests of the
Company. In considering the transaction, the Audit Committee will consider all
relevant factors, including, as applicable: (i) the Company’s business
rationale for entering into the transaction; (ii) the alternatives to
entering into a related party transaction; (iii) whether the transaction is
on terms comparable to those available to third parties, or in the case of
employment relationships, to employees generally; (iv) the potential for
the transaction to lead to an actual or apparent conflict of interest and any
safeguards imposed to prevent such actual or apparent conflicts; and
(v) the overall fairness of the transaction to the Company.
The Audit
Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation for, and
overseeing the work of, the independent registered public accounting
firm. The Audit Committee has established a policy requiring its
pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the
independent registered public accounting firm. On an annual basis, or
more frequently as needed, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company provides
the Audit Committee an estimate for the services needed and seeks pre-approval
of such services from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee
considers whether such services are consistent with the rules of the SEC on
auditor independence. The policy prohibits the Audit Committee from
delegating to management the Audit Committee’s responsibility to pre-approve
permitted services of the independent registered public accounting
firm.
Requests
for pre-approval for services must be detailed as to the services to be provided
and the estimated total cost and must be submitted to the Company’s Chief
Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer then determines whether the
services requested fall within the guidance of the Audit Committee as to the
services eligible for pre-approval. If the service was not of a type
that was already pre-approved or the estimated cost would exceed the amount
already pre-approved, then the Chief Financial Officer seeks pre-approval of the
Audit Committee on a timely basis.
The Audit
Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board that complies
with all applicable requirements of the SEC and the NYSE. A copy of
the Audit Committee Charter is available at the Company’s website,
www.terex.com, under “About Terex” – “Investor Relations” – “Corporate
Governance.” In
addition, a copy of the charter is available in print, without charge, to any
stockholder who requests these materials from the Company. This
charter sets out the responsibilities, authority and duties of the Audit
Committee.
See
“Audit Committee Report” for a discussion of the Audit Committee’s review of the
audited financial statements of the Company for the Company’s fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008.
Compensation
Committee Meetings and Responsibilities
The Compensation Committee of the Board
consists of Messrs. Sachs (chairperson), DeFosset, Fike, Shaffer and Wang, each
of whom is independent as defined in the listing standards of the
NYSE. The Compensation Committee met seven times during
2008.
Each
member of the Compensation Committee must have a basic understanding of the
components of executive compensation and the role of each component as part of a
comprehensive program linking compensation to corporate and individual
performance in support of the Company’s objectives.
The
Compensation Committee assists the Board in its responsibilities regarding
compensation of the Company’s senior executives and outside directors, including
overall responsibility for approving, evaluating and modifying the Company’s
plans, policies and programs for compensation of key management
personnel. The Compensation Committee establishes compensation
arrangements for executive officers and for certain other key management
personnel.
The
Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board
that complies with all applicable requirements of the NYSE. A copy of
the Compensation Committee Charter is available at the Company’s website,
www.terex.com, under “About Terex” – “Investor Relations” – “Corporate
Governance.” In
addition, a copy of the charter is available in print, without charge, to any
stockholder who requests these materials from the Company. This
charter sets out the responsibilities, authority and duties of the Compensation
Committee. The charter does not provide for any delegation of the
Compensation Committee’s duties.
See
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a description of the Company’s
executive compensation philosophy and executive compensation program, including
a discussion of how the compensation of the Company’s executive officers was
determined.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member
of the Compensation Committee served as one of the Company’s officers or
employees during 2008 or was formerly an officer of the Company. None of the
Company’s executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee of
any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of the Board
or Compensation Committee during 2008. None of the Company’s executive officers
served as a member of the board of directors of any other company that has an
executive officer serving as a member of the Compensation Committee during
2008.
Corporate
Responsibility and Strategy Committee Meetings and Responsibilities
The Corporate Responsibility and
Strategy Committee of the Board consists of Ms. Cholmondeley (chairperson), and
Messrs. Fike, Sachs and Wang, each of whom is independent as defined in the
listing standards of the NYSE. The Corporate Responsibility and
Strategy Committee was created by the Board in October 2008 and met once during
2008.
The Corporate Responsibility and
Strategy Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility
of the Company’s social responsibilities as well as reviewing management’s
long-term strategic planning. The Committee assesses policies and activities of
the Company in light of the interests of the Company’s stockholders and the
ethical principles expected of a socially responsible
corporation.
Governance
and Nominating Committee Meetings and Responsibilities
The Governance and Nominating Committee
of the Board consists of Messrs. Wehmeier (chairperson), Hansen and Jacobs and
Ms. Cholmondeley, each of whom is independent as defined in the listing
standards of the NYSE. The Governance and Nominating Committee met
four times during 2008.
The
Governance and Nominating Committee plays a central role in planning the size
and composition of the Board, developing criteria and implementing the process
of identifying, screening and nominating candidates for election to the Board,
recommending corporate governance guidelines and actions to improve corporate
governance and evaluating individual director and full Board
performance. The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible
for overseeing a review and assessment of the performance of the Board and its
committees at least annually, including establishing the evaluation criteria and
implementing the process for evaluation.
The
Governance and Nominating Committee will consider as candidates for nomination
as directors individuals who have been recommended by the Company’s
stockholders, directors, officers, third party search firms and other
sources. For details on how stockholders may submit nominations for
directors, see “Stockholder Proposals.”
The
Company paid fees to an unaffiliated third party search firm in 2008 to assist
the Governance and Nominating Committee in identifying and screening possible
candidates for nomination, including Thomas J. Hansen and David C. Wang, and
also conducted appropriate background and reference checks on such
candidates.
In
evaluating a candidate, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the
attributes of the candidate, including his or her independence, integrity,
diversity, experience, sound judgment in areas relevant to the Company’s
businesses, and willingness to commit sufficient time to the Board, all in the
context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at that point in
time. Maintaining a balanced experience and knowledge base within the
total Board shall include considering whether the candidate: (i) is a CEO, or
has similar work experience, in companies engaged in capital and industrial
goods industries; (ii) has significant direct management experience of
multinational business operations; (iii) has extensive knowledge and experience
in financial services and capital markets; and (iv) has unique knowledge and
experience and can provide significant contributions to the Board’s
effectiveness. Each director is expected to ensure that other
existing and planned future commitments do not materially interfere with his or
her service as a director. There are no specific, minimum
qualifications that the Governance and Nominating Committee believes must be met
by a candidate. All candidates are reviewed in the same manner,
regardless of the source of the recommendation.
The
Governance and Nominating Committee operates under a written charter adopted by
the Board that complies with all applicable requirements of the
NYSE. A copy of the Governance and Nominating Committee Charter is
available at the Company’s website, www.terex.com, under “About Terex” –
“Investor Relations” – “Corporate Governance.” In addition, a copy of
the charter is available in print, without charge, to any stockholder who
requests these materials from the Company. This charter sets out the
responsibilities, authority and duties of the Governance and Nominating
Committee.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
AND
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table sets forth certain
information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock by each
person known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s
Common Stock, by each director, by each director nominee, by each executive
officer of the Company named in the summary compensation table below, and by all
directors and executive officers as a group, as of March 1, 2009 (unless
otherwise indicated below). Each person named in the following table
has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock
shown as beneficially owned by such person, except as otherwise set forth in the
notes to the table. Shares of Common Stock that any person has a
right to acquire within 60 days after March 1, 2009, pursuant to an exercise of
options or otherwise, are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing
the percentage ownership of such person, but are not deemed to be outstanding
for computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the
table.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER (1)
|
|
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP (2)
|
|
|
PERCENT
OF CLASS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays
Global Investors, NA
|
|
|
6,473,847 |
(3) |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
400
Howard Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San
Francisco, CA 94105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G.
Chris Andersen
|
|
|
206,444 |
(4) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paula
H. J. Cholmondeley
|
|
|
12,816 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald
M. DeFeo
|
|
|
1,538,716 |
(5) |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don
DeFosset
|
|
|
72,734 |
(6) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William
H. Fike
|
|
|
101,126 |
(7) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Hansen
|
|
|
5,335 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.
Donald P. Jacobs
|
|
|
60,585 |
(8) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
A. Sachs
|
|
|
307,554 |
(9) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oren
G. Shaffer
|
|
|
13,171 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
C. Wang
|
|
|
5,997 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helge
H. Wehmeier
|
|
|
41,071 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
|
289,543 |
(10) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
|
274,497 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
|
91,543 |
(11) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
|
147,580 |
(12) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
directors and executive officers
|
|
|
3,764,014 |
(13) |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
as
a group (20 persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
________________________________
* Amount
owned does not exceed one percent (1%) of the class so owned.
(1)
|
Unless
indicated otherwise, each person’s principal address is c/o Terex
Corporation, 200 Nyala Farm Road, Westport, CT
06880.
|
(2)
|
Certain
executive officers and directors maintain margin securities accounts, and
the positions held in such margin accounts, which may from time to time
include shares of Common Stock, are pledged as collateral security for the
repayment of debit balances, if any, in the accounts. At March
1, 2009, no executive officer or director had debit balances in such
accounts.
|
(3)
|
Barclays
Global Investors, NA (“Barclays”) filed a Schedule 13G, dated February 6,
2009, disclosing the beneficial ownership of 6,473,847 shares of Common
Stock. This includes Barclays having sole voting power over
5,204,546 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 6,473,847
shares of Common Stock.
|
(4)
|
Includes
5,174 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days.
|
(5)
|
Includes
190,143 shares that are owned indirectly by Mr. DeFeo through a grantor
retained annuity trust. Also includes 333,230 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60
days.
|
(6)
|
Includes
2,587 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days.
|
(7)
|
Includes
2,587 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days.
|
(8)
|
Includes
13,826 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days.
|
(9)
|
Includes
7,800 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Sachs’ wife. Mr. Sachs disclaims
the beneficial ownership of such shares. Also includes 27,524 shares of
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60
days.
|
(10)
|
Includes
47,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days.
|
(11)
|
Includes
5,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days.
|
(12)
|
Includes
36,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days.
|
(13)
|
Includes
565,393 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days.
|
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth, as of
March 25, 2009, the respective names and ages of the Company’s executive
officers, indicating all positions and offices held by each such person. Each
officer is elected by the Board to hold office for one year or until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualified.
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
POSITIONS AND OFFICES WITH
COMPANY
|
Ronald
M. DeFeo
|
|
57
|
|
Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
52
|
|
President
and Chief Operating Officer
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
54
|
|
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Eric
I Cohen
|
|
50
|
|
Senior
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
|
Brian
J. Henry
|
|
50
|
|
Senior
Vice President, Finance and Business Development
|
Kevin
A. Barr
|
|
49
|
|
Senior
Vice President, Human Resources
|
Stoyan
(Steve) Filipov
|
|
40
|
|
President,
Developing Markets and Strategic Accounts
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
47
|
|
President,
Terex Aerial Work Platforms
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
47
|
|
President,
Terex Cranes
|
Eric
A. Nielsen
|
|
49
|
|
President,
Terex Materials Processing &
Mining
|
For information regarding Mr. DeFeo,
refer to the section above titled “Election of Directors.”
Thomas J. Riordan became President and
Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of the Company on January 3,
2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Riordan was Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of SPX Corporation, a diversified global
industrial manufacturer. From 1996 to 2006, he held a number of
positions of increasing responsibility at SPX, resulting in his appointment as
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of SPX. Prior to
joining SPX, he was President of Portland, Oregon based Consolidated Sawmill
Machinery International. Prior to that, Mr. Riordan held a series of
manufacturing and management positions of increasing responsibility with J.I.
Case and Borg-Warner Automotive.
Phillip C. Widman was appointed Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company on September 16, 2002.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Widman served as Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer of Philip Services Corporation, an industrial
outsourcing and metal services company, from 1998 to 2001, and as an independent
consultant from 2001 to 2002. Prior to joining Philip Services, Mr. Widman
worked at Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (“ABB”) for eleven years in various financial
and operational capacities in the transportation, power generation and power
distribution businesses. During his last two years at ABB, he served as Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Supply Management of its diverse
businesses in the United States. Additionally, Mr. Widman’s experience includes
twelve years with Unisys Corporation in a variety of financial
roles. Mr. Widman serves as a director of The Lubrizol
Corporation.
Eric I Cohen became Senior Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company on January 1, 1998.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cohen was a partner with the New York City law
firm of Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman LLP (which firm has
since merged with Bryan Cave LLP) since January 1992 and was an associate
attorney with that firm from 1983 to 1992.
Brian J. Henry was appointed Senior
Vice President, Finance and Business Development on October 18, 2002. Mr. Henry
previously held the positions of Vice President, Finance and Business
Development, Vice President-Finance and Treasurer, and Vice President-Corporate
Development and Acquisitions. Mr. Henry also served as the Company’s Director of
Investor Relations. Mr. Henry has been employed by the Company since 1993. From
1990 to 1993, Mr. Henry was employed by KCS Industries, L.P. and its
predecessor, KCS Industries, Inc., an entity that until December 31, 1993,
provided administrative, financial, marketing, technical, real estate and legal
services to the Company and its subsidiaries.
Kevin A. Barr was named Senior Vice
President, Human Resources of the Company on January 3, 2006. Prior
to that, Mr. Barr had been serving as Vice President, Human Resources of the
Company since September 25, 2000. Prior to joining the Company, Mr.
Barr served as Vice President-Human Resources at DBT Online since 1998. From
1995 to 1998, Mr. Barr was at Nabisco, Inc. as Vice President-Human Resources,
Asia/Pacific. Prior to that, Mr. Barr served as Vice President-Human Resources,
Asia/Pacific and Latin America with Dun and Bradstreet Corporation from 1990 to
1995, and in various human resources executive positions at Chase Manhattan
Bank, N.A. from 1981 to 1990.
Stoyan (Steve) Filipov was named
President, Developing Markets and Strategic Accounts on January 16,
2008. Prior to that, Mr. Filipov had been serving as President, Terex
Cranes since January 1, 2004. At that time, Mr. Filipov had been serving as
President of the international operations for Terex Cranes since July 1, 2002.
Prior to that Mr. Filipov held various other positions with a number of the
Company’s international businesses. Mr. Filipov started with the Company on
September 1, 1995 as Export Manager for one of the Company’s crane operations in
France.
Timothy A. Ford became President, Terex
Aerial Work Platforms on October 2, 2006. Prior to joining the Company,
since 2005, Mr. Ford was Executive Vice President of The Toro Company, a lawn
care and turf maintenance product and service provider. Previous to that,
Mr. Ford held various senior executive positions with The Toro Company since
2001. Prior to that, he held various senior management positions with
Honeywell International from 1998 through 2001. Mr. Ford began his career
at General Electric in 1985, progressing through a series of positions in a
variety of disciplines culminating in General Manager, GE Lighting from 1994
through 1997.
Richard Nichols was named President,
Terex Cranes on January 16, 2008. At that time, Mr. Nichols had been
serving as President, Terex Materials Processing & Mining since January 23,
2004. Prior to that, Mr. Nichols served as the Company’s Vice President and
General Manager, Infrastructure since April 2003. Mr. Nichols previously held
the position of Vice President and General Manager of Terex Mining Trucks since
joining the Company in October 2000. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Nichols
spent 15 years in the aerospace industry at Honeywell International Inc. in
various senior management positions.
Eric A. Nielsen became President, Terex
Materials Processing & Mining on June 9, 2008. Prior to joining
the Company, Mr. Nielsen spent 15 years at Volvo Construction Equipment, a
global construction equipment manufacturer, in a number of positions of
increasing responsibility, most recently as President and Chief Executive
Officer, Volvo Excavators and Volvo Group Korea. Prior to his time at Volvo
Construction Equipment, he held various leadership positions at WECO Metals and
FMC Corporation.
Code
of Ethics and Conduct
The Company has adopted a code of
ethics and conduct that applies to all of its directors and employees, including
the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer, among others. This code of ethics and
conduct is a set of written standards reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing
and to promote: honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and
understandable disclosure; compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules
and regulations; prompt internal reporting of code violations; and
accountability for adherence to the code. The Company periodically
reviews, updates and revises its code of ethics and conduct when it considers
appropriate. A copy of the current code of ethics and conduct is
available at the Company’s website, www.terex.com, under “About Terex” –
“Investor Relations” – “Corporate Governance.” In addition, a copy of
the code of ethics and conduct is available in print, without charge, to any
stockholder who requests these materials from the Company.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Executive Compensation
Philosophy
The objectives of the Company’s
executive compensation program are to: (i) attract and retain executives with
the skills critical to the long-term success of the Company; (ii) motivate and
reward individual and team performance in attaining business objectives and
maximizing stockholder value; and (iii) link a significant portion of
compensation to achieving performance goals and appreciation in the total
stockholder return of the Company, so as to align the interests of the
executives with those of the stockholders. In keeping with its vision of being
the best place to work in its industry, the Company seeks to attract executive
officers with superb skills and leadership abilities.
To meet these objectives, the Company
designs its total compensation program to be motivational and competitive with
the programs of other corporations of comparable revenue size, corporations in
the same industry, corporations with which the Company competes for executives,
and other manufacturing corporations that may not be in the same industry as the
Company but that provide similar returns to their stockholders, as well as to be
fair and equitable to both the executives and the Company.
The
Company’s compensation program is built around a philosophy of targeting
market-median base salary compensation with incentive components of compensation
that can reflect positive, as well as negative, Company and individual
performance. The Company’s objective with respect to base salary is
to provide its executive officers with competitive salaries that are, on
average, at or slightly below the 50th
percentile of the Benchmark Companies (as defined below).
The
Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) believes that the Company’s
compensation program should deliver top-tier compensation given top-tier
individual and Company performance. Likewise, where individual
performance falls short of expectations and/or Company performance lags the
industry, the programs should deliver lower-tier
compensation. Consequently, the Company’s objective with respect to
incentive compensation is to provide its executive officers with bonuses and
long-term incentive award targets that are generally within the third quartile
of the Benchmark Companies.
The
Committee believes that its objectives of pay-for-performance and retention
should be appropriately balanced even in periods of temporary downturns, so that
programs should continue to ensure that successful, high-achieving executives
will remain motivated and committed to the Company during all phases of the
business cycle.
When
determining an executive officer’s compensation package, there are a number of
factors that the Committee takes into account. Consideration is given
to the executive’s overall responsibilities, professional qualifications,
business experience, job performance, technical expertise and career potential,
as well as the combined value of these factors to the Company’s immediate and
long-term performance and growth. The Committee believes that
generally more than half of an executive’s total compensation should be aligned
with the performance of the Company. Therefore, an executive officer
will receive a significant portion of his or her compensation in an annual bonus
and long-term incentive awards, a majority of which is linked to the performance
of the Company.
The
allocation in compensation between current and long-term compensation is based
on global employment market conditions with an emphasis on attraction and
retention, as well as attempting to motivate executive officers to achieve
excellent results. Typically, an executive will receive less than
half of his/her total compensation in salary. Generally, as an
executive has greater responsibility within the Company, salary will be a less
significant portion of the executive’s total
compensation. Accordingly, as an executive officer’s level of
responsibility increases, it is the intent of the Committee to have the largest
portion of that executive’s compensation be dependent on the Company’s
performance.
When
determining the size of equity awards, the Committee believes that there is
merit in taking into account the amount of equity that an executive owns in the
Company, and the Committee undertook an extensive review in 2008 of the equity
ownership in the Company of each of the executives. However, the
overriding factor in determining the size and amount of future equity grants is
ensuring that grants are motivational and measurable, while providing
competitive equity grants that are determined based on grant date economic
value.
The
Committee annually reviews all components of an executive officer’s
compensation, including the CEO’s, which includes a detailed review of an
executive’s salary, bonus, long-term incentives, realized and unrealized equity
gains, dollar value of perquisites received, earnings and accumulated payments
under the Deferred Compensation Plan, projected payments under the Company’s
supplemental executive retirement plans and tally sheets setting forth the
amounts that would be paid under various termination events. Examples
of this review are described throughout the “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” sections of this Proxy
Statement.
The
Committee has the sole authority to hire and dismiss outside compensation
consultants to the Committee. The Committee retained Hewitt
Associates (“Hewitt”), an independent, outside consultant, to support it in
determining the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, including its
CEO. Hewitt was not given a narrow list of instructions but rather
was engaged to provide the Committee with any and all information and advice
that might assist the Committee in performing its duties and analyzing executive
pay packages. Hewitt provides the Committee with compensation data
that it utilizes in making its decisions. In addition, Hewitt
provides the Company with compensation data for certain of its non-executive
officers that is comparable to the data provided for the Company’s executive
officers.
One of
the principal methods that the Committee uses to determine compensation is to
benchmark the Company’s executive officer’s compensation against the
compensation of executive officers at comparable companies (the “Benchmark
Companies”). The Benchmark Companies include global corporations of
similar size and similar industries to the Company, and also companies that the
Company competes with for talent. In addition, the Benchmark
Companies include manufacturing companies that are not in the same industry as
the Company, but that have historically provided similar returns for their
stockholders. The companies currently comprising the Benchmark
Companies are:
3M
Company
|
|
FMC
Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Oshkosh
Corporation
|
AGCO
Corporation
|
|
General
Electric Company*
|
|
PACCAR
Inc.
|
Astec
Industries, Inc.
|
|
Honeywell
International Inc.*
|
|
Parker
Hannifin Corporation
|
Caterpillar
Inc.
|
|
Illinois
Tool Works Inc.
|
|
Rockwell
Automation, Inc.
|
Cameron International Corporation
|
|
Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited
|
|
Sauer-Danfoss
Inc.
|
Cummins
Inc.
|
|
ITT
Corporation
|
|
Textron
Inc.
|
Danaher
Corp.
|
|
Johnson
Controls, Inc.*
|
|
The
Black & Decker Corporation
|
Deere
& Company
|
|
Joy
Global Inc.
|
|
The
Manitowoc Company, Inc.
|
Dover
Corporation
|
|
Masco
Corporation
|
|
United
Technologies Corporation*
|
Eaton
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
_________________________
* The
Benchmark Companies that are denoted with an asterisk are companies that are
used to benchmark the compensation of the heads of certain of the Company’s
business units, but are not used to benchmark the compensation of the Company’s
corporate functional executives or its CEO.
The
Benchmark Companies have a median annual revenue that is close to that of the
Company, although there is a significant variance in size among the Benchmark
Companies. The Committee and its compensation consultants believe
that some variability in annual revenue size is desirable to be able to predict
pay levels on a size adjusted basis (using a solid regression line of external
pay information).
In
general, the Company’s executive officers receive their salary and bonus in
cash, while their long-term compensation components are received in
equity. Historically, equity awards had been given in both restricted
stock and options. Over the past several years, the Company has moved
towards granting restricted stock awards only, with an increasing emphasis on
performance based shares. For the last three annual grant cycles,
there were no options awarded to executive officers. The long-term
compensation awards granted in 2009 were a mix of stock and cash based awards
due to the Committee’s concern that the granting of long-term awards solely in
stock would have had too much of a dilutive effect on the Company’s
stockholders.
Executive Compensation
Program
Compensation
is based on the level of job responsibility, individual performance, and Company
performance. As executives progress to higher levels in the Company,
an increasing proportion of their pay is linked to Company performance and
stockholder returns, because in these roles the executives have a greater
ability to affect the Company’s results.
The Committee’s aim is to achieve the
proper balance between individual goals, the corporate strategic plan and
enhancing stockholder value and stockholder interests. Each year the
Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, determines the
compensation arrangements, with guidance from Hewitt, for the Company’s
executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers (as defined
below). The Committee relies on both Hewitt and the Company’s human
resources department for support in its work. The CEO plays an
integral role, in conjunction with the Committee, in determining the
compensation of the other executive officers of the Company.
Under the
Company’s performance management system, the CEO and the COO annually evaluate
each of the Company’s senior executives that report to them. This
assessment includes setting goals for the coming year for each senior executive
and periodically evaluating the senior executive’s performance against the goals
for the prior year. Consistent with the Committee’s charter, the CEO
then makes recommendations to the Committee regarding the performance goals and
the compensation of the Company’s senior executives. Typically, the
CEO also makes recommendations to the Committee regarding salary increases,
bonus targets and amounts, and equity grants for each of the other executive
officers of the Company. These recommendations are made after the
CEO’s review of compensation materials provided by Hewitt.
The
executive compensation program has three principal components: short-term
compensation (salary and annual bonus), long-term incentive compensation and
post-employment compensation, each of which is described below. While
the components of compensation are considered separately, the Committee takes
into account the full compensation package afforded by the Company to the
individual executive and utilizes tally sheets that set forth the total
compensation earned by each of the executives.
Internal Pay
Equity
As is the
case with many companies, the Company relies more heavily on the management and
leadership skills of its Chairman and CEO than that of its other named executive
officers. Mr. DeFeo has been with the Company since 1992, has been
CEO since 1995 and Chairman since 1998, and has overseen the transformation of
Terex during that time. As a result, Mr. DeFeo receives a
significantly greater amount of compensation than the other named executive
officers.
Deductibility of Executive
Compensation
Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), limits to
$1 million a year the deduction that a publicly held corporation may take for
compensation paid to each of its chief executive officer and the three other
most highly compensated employees other than the chief financial officer, unless
the compensation is “performance-based.” Performance-based compensation must be
based on the achievement of pre-established, objective performance goals under a
plan approved by stockholders.
In order
to reduce or eliminate the amount of compensation that would not qualify for a
tax deduction should the compensation of the CEO or any other executive officer
exceed $1 million in any year, the Company’s 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan (the
“1999 LTIP”), 2004 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Annual Incentive
Plan”), 2000 Incentive Plan (the “2000 Plan”) and 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan
(the “1996 Plan”) were submitted to and previously approved by the Company’s
stockholders, so that amounts earned thereunder by certain employees will
qualify as performance-based. The Company is also submitting the Terex
Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan for approval by the Company’s
stockholders at the Meeting.
Short-Term
Compensation
Salary
Salary is determined by evaluating the
responsibilities of the position held, the individual’s past experience in
his/her current position, current performance, future potential and the
competitive marketplace for executive talent. The Company’s objective
is to provide its executive officers with competitive salaries that are, on
average, at or slightly below the median of the Benchmark
Companies. Salaries are reviewed annually to ensure that strong
performance is reflected in any increase in an executive’s base salary
level. The Committee believes that salary ranges for the Company’s
executive officers in 2008 were, in the aggregate, slightly above the 50th
percentile of the Benchmark Companies.
In March 2008, the Committee approved
increases in the annual base salary for the executives, other than the CEO, of
approximately 5% in the aggregate, effective April 1, 2008. The key
factors that the Committee considered in reaching this decision were that the
Company’s growth had outpaced the growth of most of the Benchmark Companies and
that the executives who received the greatest percent increase were the
executives who were the furthest below the 50th
percentile and who received strong performance reviews. The CEO did
not receive an increase in annual base salary in 2008, as the Committee had
previously determined when it approved an increase in his salary in May 2007,
effective July 1, 2007, that he would not be eligible for a salary increase
until 2009.
In December 2008, the Committee
determined, based upon recommendations from the CEO and management, that it
would not be increasing base salaries for the executive ranks of the Company in
2009. This was in recognition of the challenging market conditions
that the Company faces along with the uncertainty of the 2009 global economic
outlook. In March 2009, the Company implemented a program which will
result in the base salaries for its executive officers being reduced by 10% for
the remainder of 2009. This program may include some reductions in
work schedule. The salary reductions do not affect other compensation
and benefit programs, such as targets for bonus compensation, pension plan
calculations and certain other items, which will continue to be based upon the
applicable base salary prior to the reduction.
Annual Cash
Bonus
In
addition to salary, each executive officer is eligible for an annual cash bonus
under the Annual Incentive Plan, which was adopted by the Board and the
stockholders of Terex in 2004. Bonuses are given based upon the
Company’s performance and the executive’s individual performance, both measured
against previously determined targets. The individual targets are
financial and non-financial, and contain individual and Company performance
measures. The CEO’s bonus target is two times his base
salary. The bonus targets of the other executive officers generally
range from 50% - 100% of their base salary.
The
Company’s objective is to provide its executive officers with competitive
bonuses that are generally within the third quartile of bonus target percentage
ranges for the Benchmark Companies. The objective of the management
annual incentive bonus program is to provide bonus opportunity and reward
executives when their actions drive the overall performance of the
Company. For performance that meets the pre-determined objectives,
the executive would receive 100% of the bonus target. For performance
that fails to meet the pre-determined objectives, but which is within a
satisfactory range of achievement, the executive would receive less than 100% of
the bonus target, with the actual payment amount corresponding directly with the
level of achievement under the predetermined target. Alternatively,
for performance that exceeds the pre-determined objectives, the executive would
receive greater than 100% of the bonus target, with the actual payment amount
corresponding directly with the level of achievement in excess of the
predetermined target. For each 1% increase or decrease in attainment
above or below the bonus target, the payment will increase or decrease by
2.5%. For attainment at or above 120% of the bonus target, the
payment will be capped at 150%. If attainment is at 80% of the bonus
target, the payment will be 50%. For attainment below 80% of the
bonus target, no payment would be made.
The
amount of an executive’s annual bonus is greatly dependent on how the Company
performs and on how the individual performs in helping the Company reach its
objectives. While there is downside risk to the executive in having a
performance component that can result in no bonus for less than 80% achievement,
there is also an upside opportunity (bonus payments of up to 150% of target
levels) if the Company and the individual both perform well. This
meets the Committee’s objective that superior performance that adds value to the
Company should be rewarded and performance that does not meet expectations
should have significant consequences. The Committee, in its sole
discretion, may increase, decrease or eliminate the payment of a bonus to any
executive officer who is not a Covered Employee (as defined in Section 162(m) of
the Code) under certain extraordinary events in accordance with the bonus
plan.
In 2008,
for executive officers with corporate functional responsibilities who reported
directly to the Company’s CEO or COO, 60% of the bonus target was based upon an
after-tax return on invested capital (“ROIC”) measurement determined at the
overall Terex level and the other 40% was based on individual performance areas
under the individual’s control and influence. For 2008, the targeted
ROIC value was 23.0%, which was based upon the 2008 budgeted operating forecast
of the Company, approved by the Board in December 2007 and adjusted to reflect
the acquisition of A.S.V., Inc. by the Company in 2008.
In 2008,
for executive officers who reported directly to the COO and who have direct
operating responsibility, 40% of the bonus target was based on ROIC (with the
same target ROIC as described above), 20% based on Business Segment Performance,
and 40% based on individual performance. Business Segment Performance
was based upon an equal rating of cash flow and operating earnings at the
operating segment level, with performance measured against approved
management-operating plans. For 2008, the operating earnings targets
for the Company’s Aerial Work Platforms and Cranes segments were $525.0 million
and $300.2 million, respectively. For 2008, the cash flow targets for
the Company’s Aerial Work Platforms and Cranes segments were $505.1 million and
$235.1 million, respectively.
ROIC was
determined by dividing the sum of Net Operating Profit After Tax (as defined
below) for each of the previous four quarters by the average of the sum of Total
stockholders’ equity plus Debt (as defined below) less Cash and cash equivalents
for the previous five quarters. Net Operating Profit After Tax for
each quarter was calculated by multiplying Income from operations by a figure
equal to one minus the effective tax rate of the Company. The
effective tax rate was equal to the (Provision for) benefit from income taxes
divided by Income before income taxes for the respective
quarter. Debt was calculated using the amounts for Notes payable and
current portion of long-term debt plus Long-term debt, less current
portion. Non-cash impairment charges are not included in the
calculation of ROIC as the Committee does not believe they are indicative of
returns on invested capital.
The
Committee uses ROIC as one of the primary measures to assess operational
performance, as it measures how effectively the Company uses money invested in
its operations, and the Committee believes this is a metric that is strongly
aligned to stockholder interests. For example, ROIC highlights the
level of value creation when compared to the Company’s cost of
capital. The after tax measurement of ROIC is important because the
Committee believes tax performance is an important component of the Company’s
overall performance. The Committee uses operating earnings and cash
flow as additional measures to assess operational performance, as operating
earnings shows the relationship between sales and costs for a business and the
generation of cash provides the Company with the opportunity to pursue
opportunities that enhance stockholder value.
Individual
performance for each of the executive officers could include all or any
combination of personal goals, talent development, business development,
inventory management and operational excellence, as well as other financial and
non-financial measurements. The CEO and COO are responsible for
determining individual performance measurements for each of their direct
reports. The individual performance calculation for the executive
officers, other than the CEO, is done on a holistic basis in evaluating the
achievement of such goals rather than based upon a rigid formula. The
difficulty in achieving the targeted goals depends on a variety of factors, some
of which are in the executive’s control and some of which are
not. These targets are established annually based on the business
plan of the Company for the coming year and in conjunction with the executive’s
annual review by the CEO and/or COO. If the Company achieves its
business plan objectives for the year, the Committee believes the goals are
attainable.
The
following table shows the total 2008 Annual Incentive Plan bonus payout and
details the bonus amount that was earned for the quantitative and qualitative
portions of the 2008 Annual Incentive Plan bonus for each of the named executive
officers other than the CEO.
Name
|
|
Quantitative Bonus
|
|
|
Qualitative Bonus
|
|
|
Total Bonus
|
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
$ |
139,015 |
|
|
$ |
197,353 |
|
|
$ |
336,368 |
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
$ |
274,726 |
|
|
$ |
390,013 |
|
|
$ |
664,739 |
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
$ |
79,995 |
|
|
$ |
136,277 |
|
|
$ |
216,272 |
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
$ |
161,633 |
|
|
$ |
160,402 |
|
|
$ |
322,035 |
|
For 2008,
the Committee approved a bonus plan for Mr. DeFeo with an overall total bonus
target of 200% of his base salary, which equated to a bonus target of
$2,300,000. This was contingent on Mr. DeFeo satisfying both
quantitative financial performance measures and qualitative performance
measures.
The 2008
quantitative financial performance measures for Mr. DeFeo focused on three
specific areas of financial performance:
Performance Measure
|
|
Weighting (%)
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Achievement
|
|
ROIC
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
23.0%
|
|
|
|
19.2%
|
|
Earnings
Per Share, on a fully diluted basis (“EPS”)
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
$ |
6.60
|
|
|
$ |
5.50
|
|
Management
of Working Capital (as described below)
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
69 net cash days
|
|
|
107 net cash days
|
|
For 2008 for Mr. DeFeo, the targeted
EPS number was $6.60, which was based on the Company’s budget for 2008 approved
by the Board in December 2007. EPS achievement was calculated by
excluding the Company’s goodwill impairment charge and other non-recurring
items. Non-cash impairment charges and other non-recurring items are
not included in the calculation of EPS as the Committee does not believe these
charges are related to the core operating performance of the
Company.
Management
of working capital was measured based on a target of net cash
days. Net cash days are determined by using the following
mathematical formula: (i) the number of days sales are outstanding (“DSO”), plus
the inventory turn rate (measured in days), minus (ii) the number of days
payables are outstanding (“DPO”). The result of this calculation will
determine the net number of cash days. Mr. DeFeo’s target is based on
the Company’s budget for 2008 approved by the Board in December
2007. DSO is calculated by dividing Trade receivables by the trailing
three months Net sales multiplied by four, which ratio is multiplied by 365
days. Inventory turn rate is calculated by dividing Inventories by the
product of the trailing three months Cost of goods sold multiplied by four,
which ratio is multiplied by 365 days. DPO is calculated by dividing Trade
accounts payable by the product of the trailing three months Cost of goods sold
multiplied by four, which ratio is multiplied by 365 days.
Mr. DeFeo had a number of qualitative
performance measures that were considered in determining his award under the
Plan. The following table provides a detailed listing of the
qualitative performance measures that were considered by the Committee and their
percent weighting:
Performance Measure
|
|
Weighting
(%)
|
|
Goals
|
Talent
Development, Diversity and Succession Planning
|
|
7.5%
|
|
Continue
to develop and diversify talent base. Develop and implement new
programs to recruit and retain talent.
|
Financial
Controls, Ethics and Information Technology
|
|
7.5%
|
|
Continue
education of the finance department and improvements in internal
audit. Introduce a compliance officer culture. Focus
on implementation of the Terex Management System.
|
Corporate
Operational Initiatives
|
|
10%
|
|
Enhance
supply chain purchasing savings initiatives. Re-focus strategic
accounts team and integrate ASV into the Company.
|
Corporate
Marketing Initiatives
|
|
10%
|
|
Continue
to build marketing capabilities, including analyzing and acting upon
market share and research data. Recommend brand building
strategy.
|
Making
Terex a Better Place to Work
|
|
5%
|
|
Continue
to improve team member communication. Develop a measurement
tool to assess team member commitment and engagement. Increase
focus on team member health and safety.
|
Business
Development
|
|
5%
|
|
Continue
to pursue mergers and acquisitions that are attractive to the Company,
including bolt-on transactions. Continue to build strategic
planning capability at the Company’s operating
locations.
|
Financial
Structure
|
|
5%
|
|
Continue
to use the Company’s balance sheet, including implementing the Company’s
stock repurchase
program.
|
The
following tables detail the quantitative and qualitative portions of Mr. DeFeo’s
2008 Annual Incentive Plan bonus amount.
Quantitative Bonus Goal
|
|
Quantitative Bonus
Target Amount
|
|
|
Quantitative Bonus
Amount
|
|
ROIC
|
|
$ |
690,000 |
|
|
$ |
405,030 |
|
EPS
|
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
$ |
134,090 |
|
Management
of Working Capital
|
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,150,000 |
|
|
$ |
539,120 |
|
Qualitative Bonus Goal
|
|
Qualitative Bonus
Target Amount
|
|
|
Qualitative Bonus
Amount
|
|
Talent
Development, Diversity and Succession Planning
|
|
$ |
172,500 |
|
|
$ |
129,375 |
|
Financial
Controls, Ethics and Information Technology
|
|
$ |
172,500 |
|
|
$ |
129,375 |
|
Corporate
Operational Initiatives
|
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
Corporate
Marketing Initiatives
|
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
$ |
172,500 |
|
Making
Terex a Better Place to Work
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
|
$ |
86,250 |
|
Business
Development
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Financial
Structure
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,150,000 |
|
|
$ |
632,500 |
|
The
qualitative measures accounted for $632,500 of the $1,171,620 total 2008 Annual
Incentive Plan bonus amount that the CEO earned. Based on the
foregoing, Mr. DeFeo was entitled to a bonus in the amount of
$1,171,620. However, as the Company has been making significant
headcount reductions and implementing other cost reductions, Mr. DeFeo believed
that he should lead by example and share some of the economic burden and
voluntarily declined receipt of his bonus. Notwithstanding that Mr.
DeFeo has declined his bonus for 2008, the $1,171,620 bonus he would otherwise
be entitled to receive will be considered in the calculation of any benefit due
to Mr. DeFeo pursuant to the Company’s defined benefit supplemental executive
retirement plan.
The
Committee believes that bonus target percentage ranges for the Company’s
executive officers are generally within the third quartile of bonus target
percentage ranges for the Benchmark Companies. The actual 2008 bonus
payouts for Messrs. Riordan and Nichols were within the third quartile of bonus
target percentage ranges for the Benchmark Companies and for Messrs. Widman and
Ford were below the third quartile of bonus target percentage ranges for the
Benchmark Companies. If Mr. DeFeo had not declined his bonus, his
2008 bonus payout would have been below the third quartile of bonus target
percentage ranges for the Benchmark Companies.
Benefits and
Perquisites
The
Company provides certain perquisites and benefits to its executive officers as a
method of attracting and retaining its executive officers. There is
not a pre-determined set of perquisites that the Company gives to its executive
officers. Instead, an executive officer’s perquisites are determined
on an individual basis and are often influenced by benefits and perquisites that
are received by similarly positioned executives. The Committee has
reviewed the perquisites and benefits that are received by its executives and
believes they were generally below those provided by the Benchmark Companies to
their executives.
Perquisites
that were given to executive officers in 2008 included company cars, club
memberships, private airplane travel on a limited basis (which requires approval
by the CEO and in the case of travel by the CEO, approval by the Chief Financial
Officer), financial planning services, supplemental long-term disability
coverage, housing allowances and other costs in connection with
relocation. Generally, perquisites granted to executive officers are
allocated to their income and they are required to pay income taxes on such
perquisites. Executive officers, as well as certain other key
employees of the Company, may upon their election, also receive matching
contributions in the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan. In
addition to the perquisites described above, the Company generally provides its
executive officers benefits, which are also provided generally to all other U.S.
based salaried employees, such as Company-paid life insurance and matching
contributions in the Company’s 401(k) Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
medical, dental and vision plans, flexible spending accounts and long and
short-term disability coverage.
Long-Term Incentive
Compensation
The purpose of long-term incentive
compensation is both to align the interests of the executive officers with the
interests of the stockholders and to provide a level of reward and recognition
for superior performance. The Company’s objective is to provide its
executive officers with long-term incentive awards that are generally within the
third quartile of the award level at the Benchmark
Companies. Long-term incentive awards may include cash and non-cash
components. In 2008, all long-term incentive awards granted consisted
of a combination of time-based and performance-based restricted stock
awards. It is the Company’s general intention in the future to
primarily grant long-term incentive compensation in shares of restricted stock
with time and/or performance based criteria, although other forms of awards may
be considered. However, in 2009, the Company granted a significant portion of
the executives’ long-term incentive compensation in cash due to the Company’s
low stock price at the time of grant. The Committee felt that the
granting of additional shares in 2009 would have had too much of a dilutive
effect on the Company’s stockholders and did not feel that such action was
appropriate.
The
long-term incentive compensation is designed to provide wealth creation for
executives if stockholder value is created. The Committee believes
that long-term incentive compensation ensures that the Company’s executive
officers have a continuing stake in the long-term success of the Company and
fosters the retention of key management personnel. In 2008, the
Company issued long-term incentive compensation designed to provide an economic
value that was generally within the third quartile of the long-term compensation
level at the Benchmark Companies.
Stock
Awards
One of the primary components of the
Company’s long-term incentive compensation is the granting of restricted stock
awards to executive officers, including awards which have a performance-based
component. In this way, the stock awards have the dual objective of
helping to build stockholder value while also serving to retain and motivate the
Company’s senior leadership.
The
Company’s policy is to make grants of stock awards in the first quarter of each
calendar year, which is soon after the Company’s prior year’s results are
finalized and released publicly, as well as after the Company’s budget has been
finalized for the coming year. This is consistent with the Company’s
move towards restricted stock awards that have a performance component, as it is
intended that the performance component would be based upon a specific measure
or measures from the Company’s budget for the coming year.
In March
2008, the executive officers were granted restricted stock
awards. The restricted stock grants for the executive officers
contained both time-based awards and performance-based awards.
Each
time-based award will vest in full in March 2011, to the extent the executive
officer is still employed with the Company. The Committee determined
that the time-based awards would cliff vest in three years rather than have a
graded vesting period as was done in prior years and has historically been the
predominant Company practice. The Committee believes that an award
with cliff vesting generally provides more retentive benefit to the Company than
an award with graded vesting.
Each
grant also included two performance-based awards. In order for the
first performance-based restricted stock award (the “EPS Shares”) to be payable
to the executive officers, the Company must generally achieve, on average, a 10
percent average annual increase in EPS for the period January 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2010 (the “EPS Target”). The EPS for the Company was
$5.85 for the period January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 and operates as
the benchmark on which the EPS Target is based.
Each executive officer will receive
100% of the EPS Shares if the Company achieves the EPS Target. For
each one percent (1%) increase in attainment above the EPS Target, the number of
EPS Shares to be received by the executive officer will increase by ten percent
(10%). For example, an 11 percent average annual increase in Earnings
Per Share would result in the executive officer receiving 110% of the EPS
Shares. For attainment at or above a 15 percent average annual
increase in EPS, the number of EPS Shares to be received by the executive
officer will be capped at 150% of the EPS performance-based share
award.
For each one percent (1%) decrease in
attainment below the EPS Target, the number of EPS Shares to be received by the
executive officer will decrease by ten percent (10%). For
attainment at a five percent average annual increase in EPS, the number of EPS
Shares to be received by the executive officer will be 50% of the EPS
performance-based award. If less than a five percent average annual
increase in EPS is achieved, no EPS Shares will be received by the executive
officer.
In order for the second
performance-based restricted stock award (the “TSR Shares”) to be payable to the
executive officer, the Company must achieve a percentile rank of 60th (the
“TSR Target”) against a peer group of 28 companies for three year annualized
Total Stockholder Return (“TSR”) for the period January 1, 2008 through December
31, 2010. TSR combines share price appreciation and dividends paid to
show the total return to the stockholder. TSR is calculated by adding
the change in a company’s stock price during a specified time period to any
dividends paid by such company during the time period and dividing that sum by
the stock price of such company at the beginning of the period.
Each
executive officer will receive 100% of the TSR Shares if the Company achieves
the TSR Target. For each percentile increase or decrease in
attainment above or below the TSR Target, the number of TSR Shares to be
received by each executive officer will increase or decrease by
2.5%. For attainment at or above the 80th
percentile, the number of TSR Shares distributed will be capped at 150% of the
TSR performance-based share award. If attainment is at the 40th
percentile, the number of TSR Shares distributed will be 50% of the TSR
performance-based share award. For performance below the 40th
percentile, no TSR Shares will be received by the executive
officer.
The EPS
Shares and TSR Shares will vest in full in three years on the later of March 4,
2011, or after the Terex 2010 financial statements are completed and filed with
the SEC, provided the performance criteria is satisfied and further provided the
executive officer remains actively employed with Terex. The Committee
believes that the three year measurement period for these awards and these
performance metrics helps motivate long-term decision making and better aligns
the interests of the executives and the Company’s stockholders.
For each
of the executive officers, other than Messrs. DeFeo, Widman and Riordan, the
economic value of the time and performance based components were intended to
each be approximately 50% of the total restricted stock award
value. For Messrs. DeFeo, Widman and Riordan, the economic value of
the time and performance based components were intended to be approximately 20%
and 80% of the restricted stock award value, respectively. The
restricted stock awards for Messrs. DeFeo, Widman and Riordan were more heavily
performance-based than that of the other executives because the Committee
believes that they are the three executives with the greatest potential impact
on the Company’s overall performance and therefore their compensation should be
more heavily weighted to the Company’s overall performance than that of the
other executive officers.
Although
many of the Benchmark Companies continue to grant predominantly time based
awards, the Company believes that restricted stock grants that contain both time
based and performance measures provide the right mix of motivating performance
and providing for retention, which are the primary objectives of the restricted
stock awards. Accordingly, the Company intends to continue granting
long-term compensation awards that contain both time and performance based
components.
In 2009,
the long-term compensation awards granted by the Company predominantly consisted
of time based restricted stock awards and performance-based cash
awards. The long-term compensation awards were a mix of stock and
cash based awards due to the Committee’s concern that the granting of long-term
awards solely in stock would have had too much of a dilutive effect on the
Company’s stockholders. Messrs. DeFeo, Widman and Riordan received a
greater percentage of their awards in the form of performance-based awards than
the other executives as the Committee believes that they are the three
executives with the greatest potential impact on the Company’s overall
performance and that they should have a greater percentage of their long-term
compensation directly tied to the performance of the Company.
Option
Awards
Historically, one of the components of
the Company’s long-term incentive compensation had been the granting of option
awards to executive officers. However, over the past few years, the
Company has been decreasing the number of options awarded to its executive
officers. This decrease culminated in no option awards being made to
executive officers since 2006.
The
decrease in the number of options granted is not a Terex-specific
development. The implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123R”), which requires that
costs resulting from stock options be recognized in a company’s financial
statements, as well as the dilutive effect of option exercises, has caused many
companies, including Terex, to move away from the granting of
options. It is generally more cost effective for the Company to grant
restricted stock than options, as more options would need to be given for an
executive to receive the same economic value as he or she would receive from a
grant of fewer shares of restricted stock. The Company may grant
options to executive officers in the future as the Company deems
appropriate. However, the Company does not expect that the granting
of options will be a key component of an executive officers’ long-term
compensation in the near future.
Post-Employment
Compensation
Retirement Plans and Life
Insurance
The
Company offers a variety of mechanisms for its executive officers to plan for
their retirement. These plans are offered to attract and retain
executive officers by offering them benefits that are similar to what is offered
by the Benchmark Companies. The retirement plans offered by the
Company to its executive officers generally include a 401(k) plan, which is also
offered to most of the Company’s U.S. based employees, a deferred compensation
plan, a defined benefit supplemental executive retirement plan (“DB SERP”), a
defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan (“DC SERP” and
together with the DB SERP, the “SERPs”) and, for the CEO, a defined benefit
pension plan which has since been frozen. A senior executive
participating in the DB SERP is not eligible to participate in the DC
SERP. See “Pension Benefits” for a description of the SERPs and
“Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” for a description of the Company’s deferred
compensation plan. In addition, each executive officer receives a
life insurance policy that provides his or her family with a core level of
security in case of the premature death of the executive officer. The Company
provides each executive officer with a universal life insurance policy that is
two times his or her base salary. In addition, the Company owns a universal life
insurance policy on the life of Mr. DeFeo in the amount of
$10,000,000. Pursuant to the terms of this arrangement, the Trustee
of the Ronald M. DeFeo 1996 Life Insurance Trust has the right to designate a
beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive the insurance proceeds from this policy
on Mr. DeFeo’s death, subject to the Company’s right to first receive a certain
portion of the insurance proceeds.
Termination of Employment
and Change in Control Arrangements
Each of
the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. DeFeo, is a party to a Change in
Control and Severance Agreement with the Company that was entered into in April
2008 (the “Executive Agreements”). The Company and Mr. DeFeo entered
into the DeFeo Agreement that contains provisions regarding termination of
employment and change in control circumstances.
These
agreements provide the executive officers with a core level of assurance that
their actions on behalf of the Company and its stockholders can proceed without
the potential distraction of short-term issues that may affect the Company (e.g.
merger, buyout, etc.) and helps ensure that they continue to act in the best
interests of the Company. In addition, these agreements contain
measures that protect the Company as well by including confidentiality,
non-compete and non-solicitation provisions. The key terms of these
agreements are generally customary provisions for agreements of this type and
are described below in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control.”
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The Summary Compensation Table below
shows the compensation for the previous fiscal year of the Company’s CEO, Chief
Financial Officer and its three other highest paid executive officers who had
2008 total qualifying compensation in excess of $100,000 (the “Named Executive
Officers”).
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($) (1) (2)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($) (1)
(2)
|
|
|
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compens-
ation
($)
|
|
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonquali-
fied
Deferred
Compen-
sation
Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compens-
ation ($)
(3)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Ronald
M. DeFeo
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
1,150,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
8,460,358 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
(4) |
|
$ |
1,374,573 |
|
|
$ |
809,827 |
|
|
$ |
11,794,758 |
|
Chairman
and Chief
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
1,025,000 |
|
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,596,912 |
|
|
$ |
166,200 |
|
|
$ |
2,397,713 |
|
|
$ |
1,585,928 |
|
|
$ |
313,733 |
|
|
$ |
16,195,486 |
|
Executive
Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
875,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
4,942,447 |
|
|
$ |
261,200 |
|
|
$ |
8,602,600 |
|
|
$ |
584,844 |
|
|
$ |
214,293 |
|
|
$ |
15,480,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
526,250 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,825,197 |
|
|
$ |
54,352 |
|
|
$ |
336,368 |
|
|
$ |
142,353 |
|
|
$ |
90,683 |
|
|
$ |
2,975,203 |
|
Senior
Vice President
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,960,078 |
|
|
$ |
80,807 |
|
|
$ |
431,288 |
|
|
$ |
154,329 |
|
|
$ |
76,928 |
|
|
$ |
3,303,430 |
|
and Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
416,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
542,569 |
|
|
$ |
147,327 |
|
|
$ |
1,911,840 |
|
|
$ |
75,916 |
|
|
$ |
110,611 |
|
|
$ |
3,204,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
780,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,854,084 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
664,739 |
|
|
$ |
165,759 |
|
|
$ |
250,251 |
|
|
$ |
3,714,833 |
|
President and
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
744,231 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,754,686 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
857,849 |
|
|
$ |
93,595 |
|
|
$ |
269,177 |
|
|
$ |
3,719,538 |
|
Chief
Operating
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
454,250 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
918,689 |
|
|
$ |
51,600 |
|
|
$ |
216,272 |
|
|
$ |
61,945 |
|
|
$ |
524,230 |
|
|
$ |
2,226,986 |
|
President,
Terex Aerial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work
Platforms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
427,708 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,153,389 |
|
|
$ |
86,964 |
|
|
$ |
322,035 |
|
|
$ |
96,301 |
(5) |
|
$ |
80,170 |
|
|
$ |
2,166,567 |
|
President,
Terex
Cranes
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,248,241 |
|
|
$ |
128,055 |
|
|
$ |
339,979 |
|
|
$ |
204,446 |
|
|
$ |
85,008 |
|
|
$ |
2,380,729 |
|
______________________
(1) See
Note S – “Stockholders’ Equity” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 for a detailed description of the assumptions
that the Company used in determining the dollar amounts recognized for financial
statement reporting purposes of its stock and option awards.
(2) The
amounts listed in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns are the dollar
amounts recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2008, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 in
accordance with FAS 123R and comprise grants made by the Company in 2004, 2006,
2007 and 2008; 2003, 2004, 2006 and 2007; and 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2006;
respectively. There were no forfeitures that occurred during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
(3) As
part of its competitive compensation program, the Company provides its Named
Executive Officers with certain perquisites and other personal
benefits. The amounts listed are the aggregate incremental cost of
the perquisites paid by the Company. The aggregate incremental cost
to the Company is computed as the actual out-of-pocket cost to the Company of
supplying such perquisite. For example, the amount listed under the
Company Car column is the amount that the Company paid to a third party as a
result of providing a company car to the named executive officer. As
part of their compensation, each of the Named Executive Officers in 2008
received the perquisites listed in the table below:
Name
|
|
Company
Car
|
|
|
Club
Memberships
|
|
|
Use of
Private
Aircraft
|
|
|
Long Term
Disability
Premiums
|
|
|
Financial
Planning
Services
|
|
|
401(k)
Matching
Contributions
|
|
|
Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
Company
Contributions
|
|
|
Company
Paid Life
Insurance
|
|
|
Other*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald
M. DeFeo
|
|
$ |
33,631 |
|
|
$ |
11,839 |
|
|
$ |
8,930
|
|
|
$ |
9,183 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
218,802 |
|
|
$ |
501,442 |
|
|
$ |
809,827
|
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
$ |
22,825 |
|
|
$ |
7,861 |
|
|
$ |
19,159
|
|
|
$ |
8,182 |
|
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
13,106 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
90,683
|
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
$ |
32,632 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
5,110 |
|
|
$ |
14,500 |
|
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
|
$ |
14,694 |
|
|
$ |
170,515 |
|
|
$ |
250,251
|
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
$ |
26,050 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
3,446 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
5,165 |
|
|
$ |
464,469 |
|
|
$ |
524,230
|
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
$ |
25,753 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
4,911 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
4,306 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
80,170
|
|
______________________
* The
amount shown for Mr. DeFeo consists of $500,000 for a matching contribution to
the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, which matching contribution is
invested in Common Stock, $1,025 for reimbursement of accountant fees and $417
for personal use of a Company driver; the amount shown for Mr. Widman consists
of payment of a Wellness Award; the amount shown for Mr. Riordan consists of
$136,356 for a matching contribution to the Company’s Deferred Compensation
Plan, which matching contribution is invested in Common Stock, and $34,159 for
payments related to Mr. Riordan’s relocation; the amount shown for Mr. Ford
consists of payments related to Mr. Ford’s relocation; and the amount shown for
Mr. Nichols consists of payment of a housing allowance.
(4) Pursuant
to the satisfaction of the performance criteria, Mr. DeFeo was entitled to
non-equity incentive plan compensation in the amount of
$1,171,620. However, as the Company has been making significant
headcount reductions and implementing other cost reductions, Mr. DeFeo believed
that he should lead by example and share some of the economic burden and
voluntarily declined receipt of this non-equity incentive plan
compensation.
(5) The
amounts shown include $40 for Mr. Nichols, which amount was earnings that were
above-market or preferential.
Grants
of Plan-Based Award
The
following table sets forth information on grants of awards under the Company’s
equity and non-equity incentive plans during 2008 to the Named Executive
Officers. The amount of stock awards, option awards and non-equity
incentive plan compensation recognized for financial reporting purposes by the
Company for the Named Executive Officers during 2008 is also listed in the
Summary Compensation Table.
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts
Under
Equity Incentive
Plan
Awards
|
|
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
or
Units
(#)
|
|
All
Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#)
|
|
Exercise
or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)
|
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
|
Thresh-
old
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maxi-
mum
($)
|
|
|
Thresh
-old
(#)
|
|
|
Target
(#)
|
|
|
Maxi-
mum
(#)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald
M. DeFeo
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,896 |
|
|
|
61,792 |
|
|
|
92,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,078,272 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,538 |
|
|
|
37,075 |
|
|
|
55,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,584,498 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,356,366 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
57,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,299 |
|
|
|
20,597 |
|
|
|
30,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,359,402 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
12,358 |
|
|
|
18,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
861,476 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
452,100 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
118,412 |
|
|
$ |
394,705 |
|
|
$ |
592,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,299 |
|
|
|
20,597 |
|
|
|
30,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,359,402 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
12,358 |
|
|
|
18,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
861,476 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
452,100 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
234,008 |
|
|
$ |
780,027 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,145 |
|
|
|
8,290 |
|
|
|
12,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
547,140 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
3,553 |
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
247,680 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
649,968 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
17,035 |
|
|
$ |
340,693 |
|
|
$ |
511,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,145 |
|
|
|
8,290 |
|
|
|
12,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
547,140 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
3,553 |
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
247,680 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
649,968 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
16,040 |
|
|
$ |
320,805 |
|
|
$ |
481,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March
4, 2008, grants of Common Stock subject to restrictions on transfer, conditions
of forfeitability and other limitations and restrictions (“Restricted Stock”)
with performance-based criteria (“Performance Shares”) were made under the 2000
Plan to Mr. DeFeo (61,792 shares), Mr. Widman (20,597 shares), Mr. Riordan
(20,597 shares), Mr. Ford (8,290 shares) and Mr. Nichols (8,290
shares). The value of the Performance Shares granted to such Named
Executive Officers set forth in the table above is based on the closing stock
price on the NYSE of the Common Stock of $66.00 per share on March 4,
2008. With respect to this grant of Performance Shares made to a
Named Executive Officer on March 4, 2008, the Performance Shares awarded will
vest in full in 2011 if the Company achieves a targeted average annual increase
in EPS over a three year period. The number of shares in this grant
are subject to adjustment, up or down, based upon attainment above or below the
targeted EPS measurement. See the “Compensation Discussion &
Analysis” section above for a detailed description of the performance measures
used in this grant of Restricted Stock. Upon the earliest to occur of
a change in control of the Company or the death or disability of the recipient
of the grant, any unvested portion of such Performance Shares grant shall vest
immediately. Dividends, if any, are paid on Performance Shares at the
same rate as paid to all stockholders.
In
addition, on March 4, 2008, grants of Performance Shares were made under the
2000 Plan to Mr. DeFeo (37,075 shares), Mr. Widman (12,358 shares), Mr. Riordan
(12,358 shares), Mr. Ford (3,553 shares) and Mr. Nichols (3,553
shares). The value of the Performance Shares granted to such Named
Executive Officers set forth in the table above was not based on the closing
stock price on the NYSE of the Common Stock on March 4, 2008, as the Performance
Shares were based on a market condition. The Company used the Monte Carlo
method to provide grant date fair value for these Performance Shares, determined
to be $69.71 per share. See Note S – “Stockholders’ Equity” in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a
detailed description of the assumptions that the Company used to arrive at this
valuation. With respect to this grant of Performance Shares made to a
Named Executive Officer on March 4, 2008, the Performance Shares awarded will
vest in full in 2011 if the Company achieves a targeted percentile rank against
a peer group of 28 companies for three year annualized TSR. The
number of shares in this grant is subject to adjustment, up or down, based upon
attainment above or below the targeted TSR measurement. See the
“Compensation Discussion & Analysis” section above for a detailed
description of the performance measures used in this grant of Restricted
Stock. Upon the earliest to occur of a change in control of the
Company or the death or disability of the recipient of the grant, any unvested
portion of such Performance Shares grant shall vest
immediately. Dividends, if any, are paid on Performance Shares at the
same rate as paid to all stockholders.
In
addition, on March 4, 2008, grants of Restricted Stock were made under the 1996
Plan to Mr. DeFeo (20,551 shares), Mr. Widman (6,850 shares), Mr. Riordan (6,850
shares), Mr. Ford (9,848 shares) and Mr. Nichols (9,848 shares). The
value of the Restricted Stock granted to such Named Executive Officers set forth
in the table above is based on the closing stock price on the NYSE of the Common
Stock of $66.00 per share on March 4, 2008. With respect to each
grant of Restricted Stock made to a Named Executive Officer on March 4, 2008,
the shares of Restricted Stock awarded will vest in full in March 2011, to the
extent the Named Executive Officer is still employed with the
Company. Upon the earliest to occur of a change in control of the
Company or the death or disability of the recipient of the grant, any unvested
portion of such Restricted Stock grant shall vest
immediately. Dividends, if any, are paid on Restricted Stock awards
at the same rate as paid to all stockholders.
It is
generally the Company’s policy not to enter into employment contracts unless it
is legally required or customary to do so in a particular
country. However, the Board has determined that maintaining Mr.
DeFeo’s services is important to the long-term strategy of the Company and that
the loss of Mr. DeFeo’s services could have a significant, negative impact on
the Company’s business. Therefore, the Company feels it is prudent to
have an employment agreement with Mr. DeFeo. Mr. DeFeo’s employment
agreement expires on December 31, 2012. The Company relies on the
management and leadership skills of its other named executive officers, but not
to the same extent that it relies on Mr. DeFeo, and accordingly these executives
are not bound by employment agreements. The Company’s other executive
officers are strictly at-will employees. Each of the Company’s
executive officers, including Mr. DeFeo, have their compensation reviewed on an
annual basis.
Under the
DeFeo Agreement, since July 1, 2007, Mr. DeFeo has received an annual base
salary of $1,150,000, subject to increase by the Board, as well as annual
bonuses and long-term incentive compensation during his term of employment in
accordance with any plan or plans established by the Company. The
Company also agreed to use its best efforts to have Mr. DeFeo elected as a
member of the Board and, consistent with generally accepted best corporate
governance standards, Chairman of the Board during the term of the DeFeo
Agreement. For additional information regarding Mr. DeFeo’s
employment agreement, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control.”
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The table
below summarizes the amount of unexercised stock options, Restricted Stock that
has not vested and equity incentive plan awards that have not yet vested for
each of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($) (1)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($) (1)
|
|
Ronald M.
DeFeo
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.40 |
|
4/5/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.18 |
|
3/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.59 |
|
3/13/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16.35 |
|
5/7/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
2,424,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,650 |
(3) |
|
$ |
253,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,645 |
(4) |
|
$ |
1,102,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,836 |
(5) |
|
$ |
222,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,184 |
(6) |
|
$ |
592,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,551 |
(7) |
|
$ |
355,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,792 |
(8) |
|
$ |
1,070,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,075 |
(9) |
|
$ |
642,139 |
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
9/17/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.35 |
|
3/11/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
(10) |
|
|
$ |
45.75 |
|
6/1/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
(11) |
|
$ |
173,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,991 |
(3) |
|
$ |
138,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,571 |
(4) |
|
$ |
200,410 |
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($) (1)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($) (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,172 |
(5) |
|
$ |
72,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,111 |
(6) |
|
$ |
192,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,850 |
(7) |
|
$ |
118,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,597 |
(8) |
|
$ |
356,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,358 |
(9) |
|
$ |
214,041 |
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,500 |
(12) |
|
$ |
389,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,500 |
(13) |
|
$ |
389,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814 |
(5) |
|
$ |
83,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,819 |
(6) |
|
$ |
222,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,850 |
(7) |
|
$ |
118,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,597 |
(8) |
|
$ |
356,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,358 |
(9) |
|
$ |
214,041 |
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
(14) |
|
|
$ |
45.22 |
|
10/2/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
(15) |
|
$ |
173,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,418 |
(5) |
|
$ |
111,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,698 |
(6) |
|
$ |
98,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,848 |
(7) |
|
$ |
170,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,290 |
(8) |
|
$ |
143,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,553 |
(9) |
|
$ |
61,538 |
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.99 |
|
2/1/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.35 |
|
3/11/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
(10) |
|
|
$ |
45.75 |
|
6/1/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($) (1)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($) (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
(11) |
|
$ |
277,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,327 |
(3) |
|
$ |
92,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,716 |
(4) |
|
$ |
133,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,135 |
(5) |
|
$ |
88,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,557 |
(6) |
|
$ |
78,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,848 |
(7) |
|
$ |
170,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,290 |
(8) |
|
$ |
143,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,553 |
(9) |
|
$ |
61,538 |
|
______________________
(1)
Values based on the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE on
December 31, 2008 of $17.32.
(2) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest as follows: (i) 70,000 shares will vest on March
31, 2009, as the Company exceeded certain pre-determined financial targets for
2005 through 2008; and (ii) 70,000 shares will vest on March 31, 2009, as the
Company exceeded certain other pre-determined financial targets for 2006 through
2008.
(3) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest in equal increments on September 1, 2009 and
September 1, 2010.
(4) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest in equal increments on December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2010 because the Company exceeded the targeted percentage return on
invested capital for the five consecutive calendar quarter period ending
December 31, 2007.
(5) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest in equal increments on March 6, 2009, March 6,
2010 and March 6, 2011.
(6) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest in equal increments on December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2010 because the Company exceeded the targeted percentage return on
invested capital for the four consecutive calendar quarter period ending
December 31, 2007.
(7) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest on March 4, 2011.
(8) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest if the Company achieves a targeted annual
increase in EPS for the period January 1, 2008 through December 31,
2010. If this target is achieved, the shares will vest in full on the
later of March 4, 2011, or after the Terex 2010 financial statements are
completed and filed with the SEC. The number of shares in this grant
are subject to adjustment, up or down, based upon attainment above or below the
targeted EPS measurement. See the “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis” section above for more details on this grant.
(9) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest if the Company achieves a targeted TSR
percentile rank for the period January 1, 2008 through December 31,
2010. If this target is achieved, the shares will vest in full on the
later of March 4, 2011, or after the Terex 2010 financial statements are
completed and filed with the SEC. The number of shares in this grant
are subject to adjustment, up or down, based upon attainment above or below the
targeted TSR measurement. See the “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis” section above for more details on this grant.
(10) The
options vest on March 31, 2009.
(11) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest on March 31, 2010.
(12) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest in equal increments on January 31, 2009, January
31, 2010 and January 31, 2011.
(13) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest at a rate of 7,500 per year if the Company
achieves a targeted percentage ROIC for each such year. As the
Company achieved an ROIC of 19.2% in the four consecutive calendar quarter
period ending December 31, 2008, Mr. Riordan received 58.7% of the 2008 portion
of the performance-based award.
(14) The
options vest in equal increments on October 2, 2009 and October 2,
2010.
(15) The
shares of Restricted Stock vest in equal increments on October 2, 2009 and
October 2, 2010.
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
The table
below summarizes the stock options exercised and each vesting of Restricted
Stock during 2008 for each of the Named Executive Officers.
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
|
|
Ronald M.
DeFeo
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
139,430 |
|
|
$ |
6,719,306 |
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
38,066 |
|
|
$ |
1,717,019 |
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
30,060 |
|
|
$ |
1,604,115 |
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
12,836 |
|
|
$ |
527,998 |
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
429,343 |
|
|
|
24,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,413 |
|
Pension
Benefits
The table
below provides information with respect to each of the Company’s pension plans
that provide for payments at, following, or in connection with the retirement of
a Named Executive Officer.
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Number of
Years Credited
Service
(#)
|
|
|
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
|
|
|
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
|
|
Ronald
M. DeFeo
|
|
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
6,460,726 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
Terex
Pension Plan
|
|
|
1 |
(1) |
|
$ |
23,118 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
6 |
(2) |
|
$ |
470,713 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
2 |
(3) |
|
$ |
259,354 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (4)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
73,086 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
300,707 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
______________________
(1) Participation
in the Terex Corporation Salaried Employees’ Retirement Plan was frozen as of
May 7, 1993, and no participants, including Mr. DeFeo, are credited with service
for benefit purposes following such date.
(2) Upon
completing ten years of service with the Company, Mr. Widman will be credited
with an additional five years of service for benefit and vesting
purposes.
(3) Following
the completion of five years of service with the Company, Mr. Riordan will be
credited with an additional ten years of service for vesting
purposes.
(4) Effective
December 31, 2008, Mr. Ford transferred the value of his accrued benefit under
the DB SERP to the DC SERP.
The SERPs
are intended to provide certain senior executives of the Company with retirement
benefits in recognition of their contributions to the long-term growth of the
Company. The Company adopted the DB SERP effective October 1,
2002. On December 12, 2008, the Board approved certain amendments to
the DB SERP. The most significant changes were to close the DB SERP
to new participants and to reduce the vesting requirement from 15 years of
service with the Company to 10 years of service with the Company. In
addition, the Board approved the creation of the DC SERP for select senior
executives. A senior executive participating in the DB SERP is not eligible to
participate in the DC SERP. Participants in the DB SERP were given a
one time option to participate in the DC SERP and convert the value of their
accrued benefit as of December 31, 2008 under the DB SERP to an actuarially
determined lump sum and transfer such amount to the DC SERP. Certain
other changes were also made to the DB SERP, which were intended to comply with
Section 409A of the Code.
Based on
benchmarking data reviewed by the Committee, the Board believed that a vesting
requirement of 10 years of service for the SERPs is competitive with similar
plans that are offered by the Company’s peers. In addition, the Board
felt that, as there is a strong ongoing trend away from defined benefit type
pension programs, it was appropriate to close the DB SERP to existing
participants and create the DC SERP for any future participants.
Participants
in the DB SERP with ten or more years of eligible service are vested and
entitled to annual pension benefits beginning at a normal retirement age (“NRA”)
of 65 or when age plus years of service first equal 90 (the “Normal Retirement
Benefit”). The Board determined that for hiring and retention
purposes, Messrs. Riordan and Widman would be credited with additional years of
service as described above. Participants in the DB SERP who are
vested but terminate employment prior to NRA shall receive a retirement benefit
that is equal to the actuarial equivalent of the Normal Retirement
Benefit.
The compensation covered by the DB SERP
is based on a participant’s final five-year average of annual salary and
bonus. Benefits are computed assuming an NRA of 65 or when age plus
years of service first equal 90. Benefits accrue at 2% of average
compensation per year of service, payable at the NRA, up to a maximum of 20
years of service. Benefits are payable monthly as a life annuity with
120 monthly payments guaranteed. Benefits are reduced by 50% for
Social Security payments and 100% for any other Company-paid retirement
benefits.
Participants
in the DC SERP with ten or more years of eligible service are vested and
entitled to contributions made by the Company to their DC SERP
account. Annual contributions are based upon 10% of the participant’s
base salary and bonus earned. The Company credits contributions in
the DC SERP with an interest rate equal to a bond fund that mirrors an
investment strategy in corporate bonds of companies rated Baa or higher by
Moody’s. The rate of interest for 2008 would have been approximately
6% per annum. Benefits are payable in a lump sum payout following termination of
employment.
Mr. DeFeo participates in the Terex
Pension Plan (the “Retirement Plan”). None of the other Named Executive Officers
participate in the Retirement Plan. Participants in the Retirement
Plan with five or more years of eligible service are fully vested and entitled
to annual pension benefits beginning at age 65. Retirement benefits
under the Retirement Plan for Mr. DeFeo are equal to the product of (i) his
years of service (as defined in the Retirement Plan) and (ii) 1.08% of final
average earnings (as defined in the Retirement Plan) plus 0.65% of such
compensation in excess of amounts shown on the applicable Social Security
Integration Table. There is no offset for primary Social
Security. Participation in the Retirement Plan was frozen as of May
7, 1993, and no participants, including Mr. DeFeo, are credited with service for
benefit purposes following such date. However, participants not
currently fully vested will be credited with service for purposes of determining
vesting only. The annual retirement benefits payable at normal
retirement age under the Retirement Plan will be $3,687 for Mr.
DeFeo.
See Note
R – “Retirement Plans and Other Benefits” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, for a detailed description of the
assumptions that the Company uses in determining the present value of the
accumulated benefit.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
The table
below provides information for the Named Executive Officers with respect to the
Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan.
Name
|
|
Executive
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
|
|
|
Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY
($) (1)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings in Last
FY
($) (1)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Balance
at Last
FYE
($)
|
|
Ronald
M. DeFeo
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
(2,203,649 |
) |
|
$ |
9,451,073 |
(2) |
|
$ |
735,269 |
|
Phillip
C. Widman
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Thomas
J. Riordan
|
|
$ |
544,112 |
|
|
$ |
136,028 |
|
|
$ |
(470,231 |
) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
245,656 |
(3) |
Timothy
A. Ford
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Richard
Nichols
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
(544,507 |
) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
199,143 |
|
______________________
(1) The
amounts shown in the “Registrant Contributions in Last FY” column are included
in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation table
above. The amounts shown in the “Aggregate Earnings in Last FY”
column include $40 for Mr. Nichols, which amounts are included in the Summary
Compensation Table above, as these earnings were above-market or
preferential.
(2) The
amount shown relates to a previously scheduled distribution from the Company's
Deferred Compensation Plan.
(3) Includes
$41,016 for Mr. Riordan, which amount was included in Summary Compensation
Tables in previous years.
In
October 2008, the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan was bifurcated into two
plans: one for deferrals made prior to January 1, 2005 and one for deferrals
made on January 1, 2005 and thereafter. In addition, certain changes
were made which were intended to comply with Section 409A of the
Code.
Under the
Deferred Compensation Plan, a Named Executive Officer may defer up to (i) 20% of
his/her salary and (ii) 100% of his/her bonus. The deferrals may be
invested in Common Stock or in a bond index. The Company credits the
deferrals in the bond index with an interest rate equal to a bond fund that
mirrors an investment strategy in corporate bonds of companies rated Baa or
higher by Moody’s. The rate of interest for 2008 was approximately 6%
per annum. The Company makes a contribution of 25% of the Named Executive
Officer’s salary and/or bonus that is invested in Common Stock. The
Company does not make a contribution with respect to any deferrals into the bond
index.
The Named
Executive Officers may receive payments under the Deferred Compensation Plan
after their employment terminates, upon their death or if they have an
unforeseeable emergency (as defined in the Deferred Compensation
Plan). In addition, they may elect to receive all or a portion of
their deferral, including the Company’s matching contribution, after the
deferral has been in the Deferred Compensation Plan for at least three
years. Furthermore, for deferrals made prior to December 31, 2004, if
they elect to receive an accelerated distribution under the Deferred
Compensation Plan, the Named Executive Officers shall (i) forfeit 10% of the
amount of the distribution to the Company, (ii) forfeit any Company matching
contribution that has not been in the plan for at least one year due to the
accelerated distribution and (iii) be unable to make further deferrals into the
plan for at least 12 months. In accordance with Section 409A of the
Code, accelerated distributions are not allowed under the Deferred Compensation
Plan for any deferrals made after December 31, 2004.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
If Mr.
DeFeo’s employment with the Company is terminated for any reason, including for
Cause (as such term is defined in the DeFeo Agreement), due to Mr. DeFeo’s death
or disability, or by Mr. DeFeo voluntarily, or if Mr. DeFeo elects not to extend
the DeFeo Agreement at the end of its term, Mr. DeFeo or his beneficiary is to
receive, in addition to his salary, bonus and other compensation earned through
the time of such termination, (i) any deferred compensation then in effect, (ii)
any other compensation or benefits that have vested through the date of
termination or to which Mr. DeFeo may then be entitled, including long term
incentive compensation awards, stock and stock option awards, and (iii)
reimbursement of expenses incurred by Mr. DeFeo through the date of termination
but not yet reimbursed. If Mr. DeFeo’s employment with the Company is
terminated as the result of Mr. DeFeo’s death or disability, then Mr. DeFeo or
his beneficiary would also be entitled to receive a prorated portion of his
bonus for the fiscal year during which such termination occurs.
If Mr.
DeFeo’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without Cause
or by Mr. DeFeo for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the DeFeo
Agreement), or if the Company elects not to extend the DeFeo Agreement at the
end of its term, Mr. DeFeo is to receive, in addition to his salary, bonus and
other compensation earned through the time of such termination, (i) two times
his base salary, (ii) two times the average of his annual bonuses for the two
calendar years preceding termination, (iii) a prorated portion of his bonus for
the fiscal year during which such termination occurs, (iv) continuing insurance
coverage for up to two years from termination, (v) immediate vesting of
non-performance based unvested stock options and stock grants with a period of
one year following termination to exercise his options, and (vi) continuation of
all other benefits in effect at the time of termination for up to two years from
termination. The cash portion of this payment is spread over a 13-month period
following the date of termination, except if such termination occurs within 24
months following a Change in Control (as such term is defined in the DeFeo
Agreement), in which event the cash portion is to be paid in a lump
sum. In addition, if Mr. DeFeo’s employment is terminated by the
Company without Cause or by Mr. DeFeo for Good Reason within 24 months following
a Change in Control, Mr. DeFeo is entitled to (A) the greater of (1) the sum of
(i), (ii) and (iii) above and (2) an amount equal to all compensation required
to be paid to Mr. DeFeo for the balance of the term of the DeFeo Agreement, (B)
the immediate vesting of any unvested performance stock options, stock grants,
long term incentive compensation awards and other similar awards, with a period
of one year following termination to exercise any such options and (C) any
amounts payable under the SERP for the number of years of service achieved by
Mr. DeFeo on the date of termination. The DeFeo Agreement also
provides for additional payments to Mr. DeFeo in the event that any payments
under the DeFeo Agreement are subject to excise tax under the Code, such that
Mr. DeFeo retains an amount of such additional payments equal to the amount of
such excise tax.
The DeFeo
Agreement requires Mr. DeFeo to keep certain information of the Company
confidential during his employment and thereafter. The DeFeo
Agreement also contains an agreement by Mr. DeFeo not to compete with the
business of the Company during his term of employment with the Company and for a
period of 18 months thereafter (24 months thereafter, if the date of Mr. DeFeo’s
termination is within 24 months following a Change in Control).
The
following table describes the potential payments upon termination or a Change in
Control of the Company for Mr. DeFeo assuming that the triggering event took
place on December 31, 2008 using the share price of Common Stock as of that day
(both as required by the SEC). However, a termination or change in
control did not occur on December 31, 2008 and Mr. DeFeo was not terminated
on that date. There can be no assurance that a termination or change
in control would produce the same or similar results as those described if it
occurs on any other date or when the Common Stock is trading at any other
price.
Executive Benefits
and Payments Upon
Termination
|
|
Voluntary
Termination
|
|
|
Early or
Normal
Retirement
|
|
|
Involuntary Not
For Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
|
|
|
For Cause
Termination
|
|
|
Involuntary Not For
Cause or Good
Reason Termination
(CIC)
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
Base
Salary
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
2,300,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
2,300,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Annual
Incentive
|
|
$ |
1,171,620 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,620 |
|
|
$ |
6,032,333 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,620 |
|
|
$ |
6,032,333 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,620 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,620 |
|
Restricted
Shares (time-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
832,001 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
832,001 |
|
|
$ |
832,001 |
|
|
$ |
832,001 |
|
Restricted
Shares (performance-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
6,423,642 |
|
|
$ |
6,423,642 |
|
|
$ |
6,423,642 |
|
Stock
Options
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Company
Car
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Club
Memberships
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Long-term
Disability Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Life
Insurance Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Financial
Planning Services
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Use
of Private Aircraft
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Retirement
Plan Payments
|
|
$ |
7,700,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
7,700,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
7,700,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
7,700,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
7,700,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
7,700,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
7,700,000 |
(2) |
Life
Insurance Proceeds
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
12,160,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Disability
Benefits
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,900,000 |
(3) |
Excise
Tax Gross
Up
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
______________________
(1)
Reflects the estimated value of a benefit or perquisite that Mr. DeFeo would be
entitled to receive.
(2)
Reflects the estimated value of Mr. DeFeo’s qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans on December 31, 2008.
(3)
Reflects the estimated value of all future payments that Mr. DeFeo would be
entitled to receive under the Company’s disability program.
Pursuant
to the Executive Agreements, if an executive’s employment with the Company is
terminated within six months of a Change in Control (as defined in the Executive
Agreements) in anticipation of such Change in Control or within 24 months
following a Change in Control, other than for Cause, by reason of death or
Permanent Disability, or by the executive without Good Reason (each as defined
in the Executive Agreements), the executive is to receive (i) two times his base
salary, (ii) two times his annual bonus for the last calendar year preceding
termination, and (iii) any accrued vacation pay. This payment is to be paid in a
lump sum simultaneously with the executive’s termination or on a monthly basis.
The Executive Agreements also provide for additional payments to the executive
in the event that any payments under the Executive Agreements are subject to
excise tax under the Code, such that the executive retains an amount of such
additional payments equal to the amount of such excise tax. In
addition, the executive also will receive (a) immediate vesting of unvested
stock options and stock grants, with a period of up to six months following
termination to exercise such options, (b) immediate vesting of all unvested
units granted under the 1999 LTIP for their maximum cumulative value, (c)
continuing insurance coverage for 24 months from termination, (d) continuation
of all other benefits in effect at the time of termination for 24 months from
termination and (e) outplacement services for a period of at least 12 months
from termination.
In the
event an executive’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company
without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason (other than in connection with
a Change in Control), the Company is to pay the executive (i) two times his base
salary, (ii) two times his annual bonus for the last calendar year preceding
termination and (iii) any accrued vacation pay. This is to be paid in
24 equal monthly payments. In such event, the executive would also have the
right to exercise any stock options, long term incentive awards or similar
awards for up to six months following termination, and would immediately vest in
non-performance based options and stock awards granted under the Company’s
incentive plans that would vest in the 24 months following the date of
termination. In addition, the Company would also provide continuing
insurance coverage, continuation of all other benefits in effect at the time of
termination for 24 months from termination and outplacement services for a
period of at least 12 months from termination.
As part
of the Executive Agreements, the executives agree to keep confidential certain
Company information and not to disparage the Company. In addition, Messrs.
Riordan, Ford and Nichols agree that, for a period of 18 months, and Mr. Widman
agrees that, for a period of 12 months, following the date of termination (or 24
months for Messrs. Riordan, Ford and Nichols following such termination, if such
termination is within 24 months following a Change in Control), the executive
will not, without the prior written consent of the Company, directly or
indirectly engage in or render any services to any Competitive Business (as such
term is defined in the Executive Agreements) nor solicit, induce or entice any
employee of the Company to leave the Company.
Each
Executive Agreement has an initial term of one year and automatically renews for
an additional term of one year commencing on each anniversary of the date of the
agreement until and unless either party sends written notice of non-renewal to
the other party at least six months prior to a renewal date; provided, however,
that if a Change in Control shall occur during the initial or renewed term of
this Agreement, then the Executive Agreement remains in effect until the third
anniversary of the date of the Change in Control.
The
following table describes the potential payments upon termination or a Change in
Control of the Company for Mr. Widman, assuming that the triggering event took
place on December 31, 2008 using the share price of Common Stock as of that day
(both as required by the SEC). However, a termination or Change in Control did
not occur on December 31, 2008 and Mr. Widman was not terminated on that
date. There can be no assurance that a termination or Change in Control would
produce the same or similar results as those described if it occurs on any other
date or when the Common Stock is trading at any other price.
Executive Benefits
and Payments Upon
Termination
|
|
Voluntary
Termination
|
|
|
Early or
Normal
Retirement
|
|
|
Involuntary Not
For Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
|
|
|
For Cause
Termination
|
|
|
Involuntary Not For
Cause or Good
Reason Termination
(CIC)
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
Base
Salary
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,070,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,070,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Annual
Incentive
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,198,944 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,198,944 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Restricted
Shares (time-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
359,771 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
502,505 |
|
|
$ |
502,505 |
|
|
$ |
502,505 |
|
Restricted
Shares (performance-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
963,633 |
|
|
$ |
963,633 |
|
|
$ |
963,633 |
|
Stock
Options
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Company
Car
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Club
Memberships
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Long-term
Disability Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Life
Insurance Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Financial
Planning Services
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Use
of Private Aircraft
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Retirement
Plan Payments
|
|
$ |
190,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
190,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
660,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
190,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
660,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
190,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
660,000 |
(2) |
Life
Insurance Proceeds
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,070,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Disability
Benefits
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
2,400,000 |
(3) |
Excise
Tax Gross
Up
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
______________________
(1)
Reflects the estimated value of a benefit or perquisite that Mr. Widman would be
entitled to receive.
(2)
Reflects the estimated value of Mr. Widman’s qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans on December 31, 2008.
(3)
Reflects the estimated value of all future payments that Mr. Widman would be
entitled to receive under the Company’s disability program.
The
following table describes the potential payments upon termination or a Change in
Control of the Company for Mr. Riordan, assuming that the triggering event took
place on December 31, 2008 using the share price of Common Stock as of that day
(both as required by the SEC). However, a termination or Change in Control did
not occur on December 31, 2008 and Mr. Riordan was not terminated on that
date. There can be no assurance that a termination or Change in Control would
produce the same or similar results as those described if it occurs on any other
date or when the Common Stock is trading at any other price.
Executive Benefits
and Payments Upon
Termination
|
|
Voluntary
Termination
|
|
|
Early or
Normal
Retirement
|
|
|
Involuntary Not
For Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
|
|
|
For Cause
Termination
|
|
|
Involuntary Not For
Cause or Good
Reason Termination
(CIC)
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,580,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,580,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Annual
Incentive
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
2,380,437 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
2,380,437 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Restricted
Shares (time-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
315,380 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
591,720 |
|
|
$ |
591,720 |
|
|
$ |
591,720 |
|
Restricted
Shares (performance-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,182,506 |
|
|
$ |
1,182,506 |
|
|
$ |
1,182,506 |
|
Stock
Options
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Company
Car
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Club
Memberships
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Long-term
Disability Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Life
Insurance Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Financial
Planning Services
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Retirement
Plan Payments
|
|
$ |
260,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
260,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
520,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
260,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
520,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
260,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
520,000 |
(2) |
Life
Insurance Proceeds
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,580,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Disability
Benefits
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
2,700,000 |
(3) |
Excise
Tax Gross
Up
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
______________________
(1)
Reflects the estimated value of a benefit or perquisite that Mr. Riordan would
be entitled to receive.
(2)
Reflects the estimated value of Mr. Riordan’s qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans on December 31, 2008.
(3)
Reflects the estimated value of all future payments that Mr. Riordan would be
entitled to receive under the Company’s disability program.
The
following table describes the potential payments upon termination or a Change in
Control of the Company for Mr. Ford, assuming that the triggering event took
place on December 31, 2008 using the share price of Common Stock as of that day
(both as required by the SEC). However, a termination or Change in Control did
not occur on December 31, 2008 and Mr. Ford was not terminated on that
date. There can be no assurance that a termination or Change in Control would
produce the same or similar results as those described if it occurs on any other
date or when the Common Stock is trading at any other price.
Executive Benefits
and Payments Upon
Termination
|
|
Voluntary
Termination
|
|
|
Early or
Normal
Retirement
|
|
|
Involuntary Not
For Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
|
|
|
For Cause
Termination
|
|
|
Involuntary Not For
Cause or Good
Reason Termination
(CIC)
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
914,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
914,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Annual
Incentive
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,046,908 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,046,908 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Restricted
Shares (time-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
247,312 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
454,927
|
|
|
$ |
454,927
|
|
|
$ |
454,927
|
|
Restricted
Shares (performance-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
303,810 |
|
|
$ |
303,810 |
|
|
$ |
303,810 |
|
Stock
Options
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Company
Car
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Club
Memberships
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Long-term
Disability Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Life
Insurance Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Financial
Planning Services
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Retirement
Plan Payments
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
30,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
100,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
30,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
100,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
30,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
100,000 |
(2) |
Life
Insurance Proceeds
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
914,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Disability
Benefits
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
3,250,000 |
(3) |
Excise
Tax Gross
Up
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
______________________
(1)
Reflects the estimated value of a benefit or perquisite that Mr. Ford would be
entitled to receive.
(2)
Reflects the estimated value of Mr. Ford’s qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans on December 31, 2008.
(3)
Reflects the estimated value of all future payments that Mr. Ford would be
entitled to receive under the Company’s disability program.
The
following table describes the potential payments upon termination or a Change in
Control of the Company for Mr. Nichols, assuming that the triggering event took
place on December 31, 2008 using the share price of Common Stock as of that day
(both as required by the SEC). However, a termination or Change in Control did
not occur on December 31, 2008 and Mr. Nichols was not terminated on that
date. There can be no assurance that a termination or Change in Control would
produce the same or similar results as those described if it occurs on any other
date or when the Common Stock is trading at any other price.
Executive Benefits
and Payments Upon
Termination
|
|
Voluntary
Termination
|
|
|
Early or
Normal
Retirement
|
|
|
Involuntary Not
For Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
|
|
|
For Cause
Termination
|
|
|
Involuntary Not For
Cause or Good
Reason Termination
(CIC)
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
860,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
860,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Annual
Incentive
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,001,993 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
1,001,993 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Restricted
Shares (time-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
428,670 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
628,889 |
|
|
$ |
628,889 |
|
|
$ |
628,889 |
|
Restricted
Shares (performance-based)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
417,689 |
|
|
$ |
417,689 |
|
|
$ |
417,689 |
|
Stock
Options
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Company
Car
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Club
Memberships
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Long-term
Disability Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Life
Insurance Premiums
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Financial
Planning Services
|
|
|
-0 |
|
|
|
-0 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0 |
|
|
|
-0 |
|
Retirement
Plan Payments
|
|
$ |
270,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
270,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
570,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
270,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
570,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
270,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
570,000 |
(2) |
Life
Insurance Proceeds
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
860,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Disability
Benefits
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
2,900,000 |
(3) |
Excise
Tax Gross
Up
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
______________________
(1)
Reflects the estimated value of a benefit or perquisite that Mr. Nichols would
be entitled to receive.
(2)
Reflects the estimated value of Mr. Nichols’ qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans on December 31, 2008.
(3)
Reflects the estimated value of all future payments that Mr. Nichols would be
entitled to receive under the Company’s disability program.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
The
compensation program for outside directors is designed to encourage outside
directors to receive a significant portion of their annual retainer for Board
service in Common Stock, to enable directors to defer receipt of their fees, and
to satisfy the Company’s Common Stock ownership objective for outside
directors.
The Company has established a Common
Stock ownership objective for outside directors. Each director is
expected to accumulate, over the director’s first four years of Board service,
the number of shares of Common Stock that is equal in market value to two times
the annual retainer for Board service ($300,000). Once this ownership
objective is achieved, the director is expected to maintain such minimum
ownership level. The intent is to encourage acquisition and retention
of Common Stock by directors, evidencing the alignment of their interests with
the interests of stockholders. To this end, each new director
receives an award of shares of Common Stock having a market value of $25,000 on
the date of the award. Each new director must defer receipt of this
award under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan. If a director
has not achieved the ownership objective, a director is expected to invest
$75,000 per year in shares of Common Stock until the director has satisfied the
ownership objective.
Directors who are employees of the
Company receive no additional compensation by virtue of their being directors of
the Company. For their service, outside directors receive an annual
retainer, as described below. All directors of the Company are reimbursed for
travel, lodging and related expenses incurred in attending Board and committee
meetings.
Each outside director receives
annually, on the first business day of each year, the equivalent of $150,000 for
service as a Board member (or a prorated amount if a director’s service begins
other than on the first day of the year). Each director elects
annually, for the particular year, to receive this fee in (i) shares of Common
Stock currently, which may be deferred into the stock fund of the Company’s
Deferred Compensation Plan, (ii) cash currently, (iii) cash deferred into the
bond fund of the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, or (iv) any two of the
preceding alternatives in equal amounts. If a director elects to
receive shares of Common Stock currently, then 40% of this amount is paid in
cash to offset the tax liability related to such election. For
purposes of calculating the number of shares of Common Stock into which any
fixed sum translates, Common Stock is valued at its per share closing price on
the NYSE on the day immediately preceding the grant date.
Each director who serves as Lead
Director or on a committee of the Board receives an annual committee retainer as
set forth in the table below:
Committee
Position
|
|
Committee Retainer
|
|
Lead
Director
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
Audit
Committee Chair
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
Compensation
Committee Chair
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
Governance
and Nominating Committee Chair
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
Corporate
Responsibility and Strategy Committee Chair
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
Audit
Committee Member
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Compensation
Committee Member
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
Governance
and Nominating Committee
Member
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
Corporate
Responsibility and Strategy Committee Member
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
The
retainers listed above are payable in cash, and may be deferred into the bond
fund of the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan. For a director
whose service begins other than on the first day of the year, any retainer is
prorated.
A director who leaves the Board at any
time during the year, for any reason, will retain any retainer payments already
received for such year. The Compensation Committee has discretion to
authorize the payment of additional fees to any director under extraordinary
circumstances.
The compensation paid to the Company’s
outside directors in 2008 is summarized in the following table:
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($) (1) (2)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($) (1) (3) (4)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
G. Chris
Andersen
|
|
$ |
43,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
129,609 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
172,609 |
|
Paula
H. J. Cholmondeley
|
|
$ |
161,238 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
161,238 |
|
Don
DeFosset
|
|
$ |
38,000 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
64,804 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
177,804 |
|
William
H. Fike
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
64,804 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
145,804 |
|
Thomas
J. Hansen
|
|
$ |
49,063 |
|
|
$ |
72,337 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
121,400 |
|
Dr.
Donald P. Jacobs
|
|
$ |
158,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
158,000 |
|
David
A. Sachs
|
|
$ |
60,019 |
|
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
180,019 |
|
Oren
G. Shaffer
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
158,000 |
|
David
C. Wang
|
|
$ |
1,295 |
|
|
$ |
119,673 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
120,968 |
|
Helge
H. Wehmeier
|
|
$ |
158,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
158,000 |
|
______________________
(1) See
Note S – “Stockholders’ Equity” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 for a detailed description of the assumptions
that the Company used in determining the dollar amounts recognized for financial
statement reporting purposes of its stock and option awards.
(2) The
grant date fair value of each stock award computed in accordance with FAS 123R
is the following: Mr. DeFosset, $75,000 (portion of annual retainer
paid on January 2, 2008); Mr. Fike, $75,000 (portion of annual retainer paid on
January 2, 2008); Mr. Hansen, $25,000 (initial director sign-on grant paid on
May 15, 2008) and $47,337 (pro-rated portion of annual retainer paid on May 15,
2008); Mr. Sachs, $120,000 (portion of annual retainer paid on January 2, 2008);
Mr. Shaffer, $150,000 (annual retainer paid on January 2, 2008); and Mr. Wang,
$25,000 (initial director sign-on grant paid on May 15, 2008) and $94,673
(pro-rated portion of annual retainer paid on May 15, 2008).
(3) The
grant date fair value of each option award computed in accordance with FAS 123R
is the following: Mr. Andersen, $129,609 (annual retainer paid on
January 2, 2008); Mr. DeFosset, $64,804 (portion of annual retainer paid on
January 2, 2008); and Mr. Fike, $64,804 (portion of annual retainer paid on
January 2, 2008).
(4) As
of December 31, 2008, the following directors had vested outstanding options in
these amounts: Mr. Andersen, 5,174; Mr. DeFosset, 2,587; Mr. Fike, 2,587; Dr.
Jacobs, 13,826; and Mr. Sachs, 27,524.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The
Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation
S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation
Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
be included in this Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
DON DEFOSSET
WILLIAM H. FIKE
DAVID A. SACHS
OREN G. SHAFFER
DAVID C. WANG
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The
Company intends that all transactions with affiliates are to be on terms no less
favorable to the Company than could be obtained in comparable transactions with
an unrelated person. The Board will be advised in advance of any such
proposed transaction or agreement and will utilize such procedures in evaluating
their terms and provisions as are appropriate in light of the Board’s fiduciary
duties under Delaware law. In addition, the Company has an Audit
Committee consisting solely of independent directors. Pursuant to the
terms of the written Audit Committee Charter, one of the responsibilities of the
Audit Committee is to review related party transactions. See “Audit Committee
Meetings and Responsibilities.”
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table summarizes information about the Company’s equity compensation
plans as of December 31, 2008.
Plan Category
|
|
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights (a)
|
|
|
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights (b)
|
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
1,
211,035 |
(1) |
|
$ |
18.58 |
|
|
|
1,687,688 |
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
|
|
1,211,035 |
(1) |
|
$ |
18.58 |
|
|
|
1,687,688 |
|
______________________
(1)
|
This
does not include 2,304,762 of restricted stock awards, which are also not
included in the calculation of weighted average exercise price of
outstanding options, warrants and rights in column (b) of this
table.
|
SECTION
16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and each person who is
the beneficial owner of more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding equity
securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and changes in
ownership of equity securities of the Company. Specific due dates for
these reports have been established by the SEC and the Company is required to
disclose in this Proxy Statement any failure to file such reports by the
prescribed dates during 2008. Officers, directors and greater than
10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with
copies of all reports filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act.
To the Company’s knowledge, based
solely on review of the copies of reports furnished to the Company and written
representations that no other reports were required, all filings required
pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act applicable to the Company’s
officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with
during the year ended December 31, 2008.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee of the Board has
reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008, with the management of the Company and the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No.
61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in
Rule 3200T. The Audit Committee also has received the written
disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting
firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s
communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has
discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the independence of such independent
registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also has
considered whether PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of non-audit services
to the Company is compatible with the independent registered public accounting
firm’s independence.
Based on its review and discussions
referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the
Board that the audited financial statements for the Company’s fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the
SEC.
The Audit
Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee the audit and financial
reporting processes. However, the members of the Audit Committee are
not practicing certified public accountants or professional auditors and rely,
without independent verification, on the information provided to them and on the
representations made by management, and the report issued by the independent
registered public accounting firm.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
DON DEFOSSET
THOMAS J. HANSEN
DR. DONALD P. JACOBS
OREN G. SHAFFER
HELGE WEHMEIER
PROPOSAL
2: INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
has audited the consolidated financial statements and the internal control over
financial reporting of the Company for 2008. The Board, at the recommendation of
the Audit Committee, desires to continue the service of this firm for 2009.
Accordingly, the Board recommends to the stockholders ratification of the
retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009. If the stockholders do not approve PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Board and
the Audit Committee will reconsider this selection.
Representatives of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the Meeting with the
opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected
to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Audit
Fees
During the last two fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP charged the
Company $7,375,000 and $9,197,000, respectively, for professional services
rendered by such firm for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements
and internal control over financial reporting and review of the Company’s
financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
for that fiscal year.
Audit-Related
Fees
Audit-related fees consist of fees for
assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of
the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements. This
category includes fees related to various audit and attest services, due
diligence related to mergers, acquisitions and investments, and consultations
concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. The
aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for such audit-related
services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were
$1,790,000 and $1,053,000, respectively.
Tax
Fees
The aggregate fees billed for tax
services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with tax
compliance, tax consulting and tax planning services for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, were $620,000 and $856,000,
respectively.
All
Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed for services
not included in the above services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, were $16,000 and $23,000, respectively and were primarily
related to miscellaneous items, including foreign government
filings.
All of the services related to the
Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees or All Other Fees described above were approved by
the Audit Committee pursuant to the general pre-approval provisions set forth in
the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies described in “Audit Committee
Meetings and Responsibilities.”
The Board recommends that the
stockholders vote FOR the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm for
2009.
PROPOSAL
3: APPROVAL OF
THE
TEREX CORPORATION 2009 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
General
Stockholders
are being asked to approve the Terex Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(the “2009 Plan”). The purpose of the 2009 Plan is to assist the
Company in attracting and retaining selected individuals to serve as employees,
directors, officers, consultants and advisors of the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliates who will contribute to the Company’s success and to
achieve long-term objectives which will inure to the benefit of all stockholders
of the Company through the additional incentive inherent in the ownership of the
Common Stock. The 2009 Plan authorizes the granting of (i) options
(“Options”) to purchase shares of Common Stock (“Shares”), (ii) stock
appreciation rights (“SARs”), (iii) restricted stock awards, (iv) other stock
awards, (v) cash awards and (vi) performance awards. The cash awards
under the 2009 Plan will be utilized, in conjunction with the performance
awards, for incentive compensation in the form of an annual bonus award and in
certain circumstances, long-term performance awards to key executives
responsible for the success of the Company. The Board believes that
such incentive compensation can help to attract and retain outstanding
executives.
The Board
adopted the 2009 Plan on February 26, 2009, and directed that the 2009 Plan be
submitted to the stockholders of the Company for their
approval. Approval of the granting of equity awards under the 2009
Plan will require affirmative vote of a majority of the Shares present in person
or by proxy at the Meeting, provided that the total votes cast on this proposal
represent over 50% of the total number of Shares entitled to vote on this
proposal.
Stockholder
approval of the 2009 Plan is also necessary for the Company to meet the
requirements for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code for certain
awards to be made under the 2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan is designed so
that performance based compensation payable thereunder will be fully deductible
by the Company. If the stockholders fail to approve the 2009 Plan,
certain awards that would have been granted under the 2009 Plan may not qualify
as performance based compensation and, in some circumstances, the Company may be
denied a business expense deduction for such compensation.
The
following description of the 2009 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the 2009 Plan, attached to this Proxy as Appendix A.
Common
Stock Authorized
The maximum number of Shares that may
be the subject of awards under the 2009 Plan is 3,000,000 Shares, plus the
number of Shares remaining available for issuance under the 2000 Plan and 1996
Plan (the “Prior Plans”) that are not subject to outstanding awards as of the
date of stockholder approval, and the number of Shares subject to awards
outstanding under the Prior Plans as of such date but only to the extent that
such outstanding awards are forfeited, expire, or otherwise terminate without
the issuance of such Shares. Under the 2009 Plan, Shares covered by
awards shall only be counted as used to the extent that they are actually
issued. Accordingly, Shares covered by any unexercised portions of
terminated Options, Shares forfeited by participants and Shares subject to any
awards that are otherwise surrendered by a participant without receiving any
payment or other benefit with respect thereto, or are settled in cash in lieu of
Shares, or are exchanged with the Committee’s permission, prior to the issuance
of Shares may again be subject to new awards.
No
participant may be granted in any fiscal year awards for more than a total of
750,000 Shares under the 2009 Plan. The Shares to be issued or
delivered under the 2009 Plan are authorized and unissued Shares, or issued
Shares that have been acquired by the Company, or both.
2009
Plan Administration
The 2009 Plan provides that the
Compensation Committee of the Board or a subcommittee thereof, or any other
committee designated by the Board (the “Plan Committee”) consisting of not fewer
than two members of the Board who are non employee-directors and outside
directors shall administer the 2009 Plan. The Plan Committee is authorized,
subject to the provisions of the 2009 Plan, to establish such rules and
regulations as it may deem appropriate for the proper administration of the 2009
Plan. Subject to the provisions of the 2009 Plan, the Plan Committee
shall have authority, in its sole discretion, to grant awards under the 2009
Plan, to set performance goals in conjunction with any award, and to make
determinations with respect to the achievement of performance goals, to
interpret and construe the provisions of the 2009 Plan and, subject to the
requirements of applicable law, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and
regulations relating to the 2009 Plan or any award thereunder as it may deem
necessary or advisable. In general, the Plan Committee may delegate
to one or more of its members or to one or more officers of the Company the
right to grant awards under the 2009 Plan on such terms and conditions as the
Plan Committee may from time to time establish.
Eligibility
Officers, employees, directors,
consultants, advisors and independent contractors of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliates as the Plan Committee shall select from time to time
are eligible to receive awards under the 2009 Plan. As of March 1,
2009, approximately 20,000 people would be eligible to participate under the
terms of the 2009 Plan.
Stock
Option Awards
Options
to be granted under the 2009 Plan may be “Incentive Stock Options” meeting the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code or “Non-Qualified Stock Options” that do
not meet such requirements. Only employees of the Company or certain
of its subsidiaries may receive Incentive Stock Options under the 2009
Plan. The Plan Committee must grant Options to purchase Shares at a
price per share not less than 100% of the fair market value of such Share on the
date of grant of such Option. For so long as the Common Stock is
listed on the NYSE, fair market value is the closing price of a Share on the
NYSE on the trading day of the date of the award. The term of each
Option will be determined by the Plan Committee, but generally will not exceed
ten years from the date of grant.
SARs
The 2009
Plan provides that SARs may be granted to participants in the discretion of the
Plan Committee. The Plan Committee may grant SARs at a price per
share not less than 100% of the fair market value of a Share on the date of
grant of such SAR. Upon the exercise of a SAR, the recipient is
entitled to receive from the Company, without the payment of any cash (except
for any applicable withholding taxes), up to, but no more than, an amount in
cash or Shares determined by multiplying the (A) excess of the fair market value
of a Share on the date of such exercise over the grant price, by (B) the number
of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. The term of
each SAR will be determined by the Plan Committee, but generally will not exceed
ten years from the date of grant.
Restricted
Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units
The grant
of a restricted stock award gives a participant the right to receive Shares,
subject to a risk of forfeiture based upon certain conditions, such as
performance standards, length of service or other criteria as the Plan Committee
may determine. Until all restrictions are satisfied, lapsed or
waived, the Company will maintain custody over the restricted Shares but the
participant may be able to vote the Shares and may be entitled to distributions
paid with respect to the Shares, as provided by the Plan Committee. During such
restrictive period, the restricted Shares may not be sold, assigned,
transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, other than by will or the laws of
descent and distribution. If a participant terminates employment with
the Company prior to expiration of the forfeiture period, the participant
forfeits all rights to the Shares. The Company also may grant
restricted stock units under the 2009 Plan. The grant of restricted
stock units generally operates in the same manner as the grant of restricted
stock, except that no Shares are actually awarded on the date of grant and the
participant shall have no voting rights with respect to any restricted stock
units granted under the 2009 Plan.
Performance
Awards
The Plan
Committee may grant, either alone or in addition to other awards granted under
the 2009 Plan, performance awards based upon performance of the Company or the
participant. Performance awards entitle the participant to receive
cash, Options, SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units or any
other form of equity as the Plan Committee shall determine, if such participant
achieves the measures of performance or other criteria established by the Plan
Committee in its absolute discretion. The Plan Committee may
designate certain performance awards as performance-based compensation intended
to qualify for a tax deduction under the Code. Awards that are
designed to be considered performance-based compensation shall be made in a
manner that satisfies Section 162(m) of the Code.
The
performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of an award that is intended
to qualify as performance-based compensation shall be set within the shorter of:
(a) ninety (90) days after the beginning of the Performance Period, or (b)
twenty-five percent (25%) of the Performance Period has elapsed, and is limited
to the following performance measures: (1) Net earnings or net income (before or
after taxes); (2) Earnings per share; (3) Net sales or revenue growth; (4) Net
operating profit or income; (5) Return measures (including, but not limited to,
return on assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales, or revenue); (6)
Cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free cash flow,
cash flow return on equity, and cash flow return on investment); (7) Earnings
before or after taxes, interest, depreciation, and/or amortization; (8) Gross or
operating margins; (9) Productivity ratios; (10) Share price (including, but not
limited to, growth measures and total stockholder return); (11) Cost control;
(12) Margins; (13) Operating efficiency; (14) Market share; (15) Customer
satisfaction or employee satisfaction; (16) Working capital; (17) Economic value
added or EVA (net operating profit after tax minus the sum of capital multiplied
by the cost of capital); (18) Management development; (19) Diversity; (20)
Succession planning; (21) Financial controls; (22) Ethics; (23) Information
technology; (24) Marketing initiatives; (25) Business development; (26)
Financial structure; (27) Taxes; (28) Depreciation and amortization; and (29)
Total Stockholder Return.
Cash-Based
Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards
The Plan Committee may grant, either
alone or in addition to other awards granted under the 2009 Plan, cash-based
awards and other stock-based awards as determined by the Plan
Committee. Such awards may be subject to performance goals and may be
designed to comply with or take advantage of the laws of jurisdictions other
than the United States. Cash awards under the 2009 Plan will be
utilized, in conjunction with the performance awards, for incentive compensation
in the form of an annual bonus award and in certain circumstances, long-term
performance awards to key executives responsible for the success of the
Company.
Amendment
and Termination
The Board may amend or modify the 2009
Plan, subject to any required stockholder approval. The Board may not
amend the 2009 Plan to increase the number of Shares that may be the subject of
awards under the 2009 Plan (other than for antidilution adjustments) without the
approval of the Company’s stockholders. The 2009 Plan will terminate
by its terms and without any further action on the tenth anniversary of
stockholder approval of the 2009 Plan. No awards may be made after
that date under the 2009 Plan, although awards outstanding under the 2009 Plan
on such date will remain valid in accordance with their terms.
Antidilution
Adjustments
The
number of Shares authorized to be issued under the 2009 Plan and subject to
outstanding awards (and the grant or exercise price thereof) may be adjusted to
prevent dilution or enlargement of rights in the event of any dividend or other
distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split,
reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination,
repurchase or exchange of Shares or other securities, the issuance of warrants
or other rights to purchase Shares or other securities, or other similar
capitalization change.
Federal
Income Tax Consequences of Options
The following is a brief summary of
certain of the federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the
2009 Plan based on federal income tax laws currently in effect. This summary is
not intended to be exhaustive and does not describe state, local or foreign tax
consequences.
Tax
Consequences to Participants
Non-Qualified Stock
Options. In general: (i) no income will be recognized by an
optionee at the time a Non-Qualified Stock Option is granted; (ii) at the time
of exercise of a Non-Qualified Stock Option, ordinary income will be recognized
by the optionee in an amount equal to the difference between the option price
paid for the Shares and the fair market value of the Shares if they are
non-restricted on the date of exercise; and (iii) at the time of sale of Shares
acquired pursuant to the exercise of a Non-Qualified Stock Option, any
appreciation (or depreciation) in the value of the Shares after the date of
exercise will be treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or
loss) depending on how long the Shares have been held.
Incentive Stock
Options. No income generally will be recognized by an optionee
upon the grant or exercise of an Incentive Stock Option. For purposes
of the alternative minimum tax, however, the difference between the option price
and the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise is an
adjustment in computing the optionee’s alternative minimum taxable
income. If Shares are issued to an optionee pursuant to the exercise
of an Incentive Stock Option and no disposition of the Shares is made by the
optionee within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the
transfer of the Shares to the optionee (such disposition, a “Disqualifying
Disposition”), then upon the sale of the Shares any amount realized in excess of
the option price will be taxed to the optionee as long-term capital gain and any
loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss.
If Shares acquired upon the exercise of
an Incentive Stock Option are disposed of in a Disqualifying Disposition, then
the optionee generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of disposition
in an amount equal to any excess of the fair market value of the Shares at the
time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of the
Shares in a sale or exchange) over the option price paid for the
Shares.
Special Rules Applicable to
Directors and Officers. In limited circumstances where the
sale of Common Stock that is received as the result of a grant of an award could
subject a director or an officer to suit under Section 16(b) of the Exchange
Act, the tax consequences to the director or officer may differ from the tax
consequences described above.
Tax
Consequences to the Company or Subsidiary
To the extent that a participant
recognizes ordinary income in the circumstances described above, or with respect
to performance based compensation payable under the 2009 Plan, the Company or
subsidiary for which the participant performs services will be entitled to a
corresponding deduction provided that, among other things, (i) such deduction is
reasonable in amount, constitutes an ordinary and necessary business expense, is
not subject to the $1,000,000 annual compensation limitation set forth in
Section 162(m) of the Code and does not constitute an “excess parachute payment”
within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, and (ii) any applicable
withholding obligations are satisfied.
The
foregoing summary of the income tax consequences in respect of the 2009 Plan is
for general information only. Interested parties should consult their
own advisors as to specific tax consequences, including the application and
effect of foreign, state, and local tax laws.
Grants
Under the 2009 Plan
Because the 2009 Plan is a new plan and
because benefits under the 2009 Plan will depend on the discretion of the Plan
Committee and the fair market value of the Common Stock at various future dates,
it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received if the 2009
Plan is approved by stockholders. In addition, because the payment of
a bonus under the 2009 Plan for any fiscal year is contingent on the achievement
of performance goals as of the end of the fiscal year, the Company cannot
determine the amounts that will be payable or allocable for fiscal year 2009 or
in the future.
During
2008 under the Prior Plans, Options and restricted stock awards were granted as
follows:
|
·
|
Restricted
stock awards for 242,410 Shares were granted to the Named Executive
Officers (one of whom was also a Director) as a group. For more
details on these grants, including the allocation of restricted stock
awards among the Named Executive Officers, see “Executive Compensation –
Summary Compensation Table – Long Term Compensation Awards” and “Executive
Compensation – Stock Option Grants in
2008.”
|
|
·
|
Restricted
stock awards for 109,336 Shares were granted to all current executive
officers of the Company (not including the Named Executive Officers) as a
group.
|
|
·
|
Additional
Options to purchase 10,348 Shares were granted to the Directors (not
including one Director who was also a Named Executive Officer) as a
group.
|
|
·
|
Restricted
stock awards for 689,319 Shares were granted to all employees of the
Company (not including all current executive officers and Named Executive
Officers of the Company) as a
group.
|
During 2008, under the Prior Plans,
Options were granted at an exercise price of $65.57 per share. On March 2, 2009,
the closing price of a Share on the NYSE was $7.73.
No SARs were granted under the Prior
Plans during 2008.
For
details on the bonuses received in 2008 pursuant to the 2004 Annual Incentive
Compensation Plan by the Named Executive Officers, see “Executive Compensation –
Summary Compensation Table” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis –
Short-Term Compensation – Annual Cash Bonus.”
Recommendation
The Board believes that the approval
the 2009 Plan is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders
because the 2009 Plan will enable the Company to provide competitive equity
incentives to employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors to
enhance the profitability of the Company and increase stockholder
value. In addition, if the 2009 Plan is approved, then certain awards
under the 2009 Plan will qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of
the Code and the Company will be allowed to take a business expense deduction
for such compensation paid under the 2009 Plan.
The
Board recommends that the stockholders vote FOR approval of the Terex
Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
OTHER
MATTERS
The Board
does not know of any other business to be brought before the
Meeting. In the event any such matters are brought before the
Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy will vote the Proxies received
by them as they deem best with respect to all such matters.
All proposals of stockholders intended
to be included in the proxy statement to be presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders must be received at the Company’s offices at 200 Nyala Farm
Road, Westport, Connecticut 06880, no later than December 1,
2009. All proposals must meet the requirements set forth in the rules
and regulations of the SEC in order to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy
statement for that meeting.
To nominate a candidate for election as
a director at an annual meeting of stockholders or propose business for
consideration at such a meeting, the Bylaws of the Company generally provides
that notice must be given to the Secretary of the Company no more than 90 days
or less than 60 days prior to the date of the annual meeting. The
Company anticipates that in order for a stockholder to nominate a candidate for
election as a director at the Company’s 2010 annual meeting or to propose
business for consideration at such meeting, notice must be given between
February 14, 2010 and March 16, 2010. The fact that the Company may
not insist upon compliance with these requirements should not be construed as a
waiver by the Company of its right to do so at any time in the
future.
Pursuant to the rules of the SEC,
services that deliver our communications to stockholders that hold their stock
through a bank, broker or other holder of record may deliver to multiple
stockholders sharing the same address a single copy of our Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials or Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy
Statement. Upon written or oral request, we will promptly deliver a separate
copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or Annual Report
and Proxy Statement to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single
copy of each document was delivered. Stockholders may notify us of their
requests by calling (203) 222-7170 or writing Terex Corporation at 200
Nyala Farm Road, Westport, CT 06880.
STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO VOTE THEIR PROXIES WITHOUT DELAY.
A
PROMPT RESPONSE WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.
By
order of the Board of Directors,
|
Eric
I Cohen
Secretary
|
March 31,
2009
Westport,
Connecticut
Appendix
A
Terex
Corporation
2009
Omnibus Incentive Plan
Contents
Article
1. Establishment, Purpose, and Duration
|
1
|
Article
2. Definitions
|
1
|
Article
3. Administration
|
7
|
Article
4. Shares Subject to This Plan and Maximum Awards
|
9
|
Article
5. Eligibility and Participation
|
11
|
Article
6. Stock Options
|
11
|
Article
7. Stock Appreciation Rights
|
14
|
Article
8. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
|
15
|
Article
9. Performance Units/Performance Shares
|
16
|
Article
10. Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards
|
17
|
Article
11. Transferability of Awards and Shares
|
18
|
Article
12. Performance Measures
|
18
|
Article
13. Nonemployee Director Awards
|
20
|
Article
14. Dividend Equivalents
|
20
|
Article
15. Beneficiary Designation
|
20
|
Article
16. Rights of Participants
|
21
|
Article
17. Change of Control
|
21
|
Article
18. Disability
|
22
|
Article
19. Death
|
22
|
Article
20. Amendment and Termination
|
22
|
Article
21. Withholding
|
23
|
Article
22. Successors
|
23
|
Article
23. General Provisions
|
24
|
Terex
Corporation
2009
Omnibus Incentive Plan
Article
1. Establishment, Purpose, and Duration
1.1 Establishment. Terex
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”),
establishes an incentive compensation plan to be known as the Terex Corporation
2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”), as set
forth in this document. This Plan permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash-Based
Awards, and Other Stock-Based Awards. This Plan shall become effective upon
stockholder approval (the “Effective Date”) and shall remain in effect as
provided in Section 1.3 hereof.
1.2 Purpose of This Plan. The
purpose of this Plan is to provide a means whereby Employees, Directors, and
Third-Party Service Providers of the Company develop a sense of proprietorship
and personal involvement in the development and financial success of the
Company, and to encourage them to devote their best efforts to the business of
the Company, thereby advancing the interests of the Company and its
stockholders. A further purpose of this Plan is to provide a means through which
the Company may attract able individuals to become Employees or serve as
Directors or Third-Party Service Providers of the Company and to provide a means
whereby those individuals upon whom the responsibilities of the successful
administration and management of the Company are of importance can acquire and
maintain stock ownership, thereby strengthening their concern for the welfare of
the Company. The Company intends that certain compensation payable
under this Plan will constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” under
Section 162(m) of the Code. This Plan shall be administratively
interpreted and construed in a manner consistent with such intent.
1.3 Duration of This Plan. Unless
sooner terminated as provided herein, this Plan shall terminate ten (10) years
from the Effective Date. After this Plan is terminated, no Awards may be granted
but Awards previously granted shall remain outstanding in accordance with their
applicable terms and conditions and this Plan’s terms and
conditions.
Article
2. Definitions
Whenever
used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below,
and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be
capitalized.
2.1 “Affiliate” shall mean any
corporation or other entity (including, but not limited to, a partnership or a
limited liability company) that is affiliated with the Company through stock or
equity ownership or otherwise, and is designated as an Affiliate for purposes of
this Plan by the Committee.
2.2 “Annual Award Limit” or “Annual Award Limits” have the
meaning set forth in Section 4.3.
2.3 “Award” means, individually or
collectively, a grant under this Plan of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive
Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock
Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash-Based Awards, or Other
Stock-Based Awards, in each case subject to the terms of this
Plan.
2.4 “Award Agreement” means either:
(a) a written or electronic agreement entered into by the Company and a
Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award
granted under this Plan, including any amendment or modification thereof, or (b)
a written or electronic statement issued by the Company to a Participant
describing the terms and provisions of such Award, including any amendment or
modification thereof.
2.5 “Beneficial Owner” or “Beneficial Ownership” shall
have the meaning ascribed to such terms in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and
Regulations under the Exchange Act.
2.6
“Board” or “Board of Directors” means the
board of directors of the Company.
2.7 “Cash-Based Award” means an
Award, denominated in cash, granted to a Participant as described in Article
10.
|
(a)
|
Willful,
substantial and continued failure to perform
duties;
|
|
(b)
|
Willful
engagement in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the
Company; or
|
|
(c)
|
Entry
by a court or quasi-judicial governmental agency of the United States or a
political subdivision thereof of an order barring an Employee from serving
as an officer or director of a public
company.
|
For the
purposes of clauses, (a) and (b) of this definition, no act or failure to act
shall be deemed "willful" (x) if caused by a Disability or (y) unless done, or
omitted to be done, not in good faith or without reasonable belief that such act
or omission was in the best interest of the Company.
2.9 "Change in Control” shall be deemed to have
occurred if the conditions set forth in any one of the following paragraphs
shall have been satisfied:
(i) any
person or group (as described in regulations under Section 409A of the Code) is
or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the
Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person any
securities acquired directly from the Company) representing
(A) more than 50% or more of the
combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities, excluding
any person or group who becomes such a Beneficial Owner in connection with
transactions described in clauses (x), (y) or (z) of paragraph (iii) below and
excluding the acquisition by a person or group holding more than 50 percent of
such voting power or
(B) 30 percent or more of the combined
voting power of Terex’s then outstanding securities during any twelve-month
period;
(ii) there
is a change in the composition of the Board of Directors of the Company
occurring during any twelve month period, as a result of which fewer than a
majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors (“Incumbent Directors”
shall mean directors who either (x) are members of the Board as of the date of
this Agreement or (y) are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with
the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors at the
time of such election or nomination); or
(iii) there
is consummated, in any transaction or series of transactions during a
twelve-month period, a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or a
merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s
assets (collectively, a “Business
Combination”) other than a Business Combination after which
(x) the stockholders of the Company own more than 50 percent of the
common stock or combined voting power of the voting securities of the company
resulting from the Business Combination, (y) at least a majority of the board of
directors of the resulting corporation were Incumbent Directors and (z) no
individual, entity or group (excluding any corporation resulting from the
Business Combination or any employee benefit plan of such corporation or of the
Company) becomes the Beneficial Owner of 35 percent or more of the combined
voting power of the securities of the resulting corporation, who did not own
such securities immediately before the Business Combination.
This definition of “Change in Control”
is intended to comply with the definition of “Change in Control” under Code
Section 409A. For purposes of this Section 2.9, any of the events
described above shall in any case constitute a "change in the ownership or
effective control" of the Company or a "change in the ownership of a substantial
portion of the assets" of the Company, in each case, within the meaning of Code
Section 409A in order to be a “Change in Control” hereunder.
For
purposes of this Section 2.9, the rules of Code Section 318(a) and the
regulations issued thereunder shall be used to determine stock
ownership.
2.10 “Code” means the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time or any successor statute
thereto. For purposes of this Plan, references to sections of the Code shall be
deemed to include references to any applicable regulations thereunder and any
successor or similar provision.
2.11 “Committee” means the
Compensation Committee of the Board or a subcommittee thereof, or any other
committee designated by the Board to administer this Plan. The members of the
Committee shall be appointed from time to time by and shall serve at the
discretion of the Board. Each member of the Committee shall be a Nonemployee
Director and an Outside Director, except that if the Board determines that (i)
the Plan cannot or need not satisfy the requirements of Rule 16b-3 of the
Exchange Act (such that grants of Awards are not or need not be exempt from
Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act), then there may be less than two members of
the Committee, and the members of the Committee need not be Nonemployee
Directors or (ii) they no longer want the Plan to comply with the requirements
of Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder, or the Plan need
not comply with such requirements, then there may be less than two members of
the Committee and the members of the Committee need not be Outside
Directors. If the Committee does not exist or cannot function for any
reason, the Board may take any action under the Plan that would otherwise be the
responsibility of the Committee.
2.12 “Company” means Terex
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and any successor thereto as provided in
Article 20 herein.
2.13 “Covered Employee” means any
Employee who is or may become a “Covered Employee,” as defined in Code Section
162(m).
2.14
“Director” means any individual
who is a member of the Board of Directors.
2.15 “Disability” means, subject to an
examination as specified by the Committee, a Participant's inability to engage
in any substantial gainful activity because of any medically determinable
physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which
has lasted, or can be expected to last, for a continuous period of twelve (12)
months or longer.
2.16
“Dividend Equivalents” has the
meaning set forth in Section 3.2(i).
2.17
“Effective Date” has the
meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
2.18 “Employee” means any individual
performing services for the Company, an Affiliate, or a Subsidiary and
designated as an employee of the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate on the
payroll records thereof. An Employee shall not include any individual during any
period he or she is classified or treated by the Company, Affiliate, or
Subsidiary as an independent contractor, a consultant, or any employee of an
employment, consulting, or temporary agency or any other entity other than the
Company, Affiliate, or Subsidiary, without regard to whether such individual is
subsequently determined to have been, or is subsequently retroactively
reclassified as a common-law employee of the Company, Affiliate, or Subsidiary
during such period. An individual shall not cease to be an Employee in the case
of: (a) any leave of absence approved by the Company or (b) transfers between
locations of the Company or between the Company, any Affiliates, or any
Subsidiaries. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a Director’s fee by
the Company shall be sufficient to constitute "employment" by the
Company.
2.19 “Exchange Act” means the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor
act thereto.
2.20 “Extraordinary Items” means (a)
extraordinary, unusual, and/or nonrecurring items of gain or loss; (b) gains or
losses on the disposition of a business; (c) changes in tax or accounting
regulations or laws; or (d) the effect of a merger or acquisition.
2.21
“Fair Market Value” or “FMV” means:
|
(a)
|
If
the Shares are listed or admitted to trading on a securities exchange
registered under the Exchange Act, the "Fair Market Value" of a Share as
of a specified date shall mean the per Share closing price of the Shares
for the date as of which Fair Market Value is being determined (or if
there was no reported closing price on such date, on the last preceding
date on which the closing price was reported) on the principal securities
exchange on which the Shares are listed or admitted to
trading.
|
|
(b)
|
If
the Shares are not listed or admitted to trading on any such exchange but
are listed as a national market security on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.
("NASDAQ"), traded in the over-the-counter market or listed or traded on
any similar system then in use, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be
the last sales price for the date as of which the Fair Market Value is
being determined (or if there was no reported sale on such date, on the
last preceding date on which any reported sale occurred) reported on such
system. If the Shares are not listed or admitted to trading on
any such exchange, are not listed as a national market security on NASDAQ
and are not traded in the over-the-counter market or listed or traded on
any similar system then in use, but are quoted on NASDAQ or any similar
system then in use, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be the average
of the closing high bid and low asked quotations on such system for the
Shares on the date in question.
|
|
(c)
|
In
the event Shares are not publicly traded at the time a determination of
their value is required to be made hereunder, the price of a Share as
determined by the Committee in its sole discretion by application of a
reasonable valuation method. The Committee may, in its sole
discretion, seek the advice of outside experts in connection with any such
determination.
|
2.22 “Full-Value Award” means an
Award other than in the form of an ISO, NQSO, or SAR, and which is settled by
the issuance of Shares.
2.23
“Grant Date” means the date an
Award is granted to a Participant pursuant to the Plan.
2.24 “Grant Price” means the price
established at the time of grant of an SAR pursuant to Article 7, used to
determine whether there is any payment due upon exercise of the
SAR.
2.25 “Incentive Stock Option” or
“ISO” means an Option to
purchase Shares granted under Article 6 to an Employee and that is designated as
an Incentive Stock Option that is intended to meet the requirements of Code
Section 422 or any successor provision.
2.26 “Insider” shall mean an
individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer or Director of the Company,
or a Beneficial Owner of more than ten percent (10%) of any class of the
Company’s equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the
Exchange Act, as determined by the Board in accordance with Section 16 of the
Exchange Act.
2.27 “Nonemployee Director” means a
Director who is a “Non-Employee Director” within the meaning of Rule
16b-3(b)(3)(i) of the Exchange Act.
2.28
“Nonemployee Director
Award” means any NQSO, SAR, or Full-Value Award granted, whether singly,
in combination, or in tandem, to a Participant who is a Nonemployee Director
pursuant to such applicable terms, conditions, and limitations as the Board or
Committee may establish in accordance with this Plan.
2.29 “Nonqualified Stock Option” or
“NQSO” means an Option
that is not intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422, or that
otherwise does not meet such requirements.
2.30 “Option” means an Incentive
Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option, as described in Article
6.
2.31 “Option Price” means the price
at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an
Option.
2.32 “Other Stock-Based Award” means
an equity-based or equity-related Award not otherwise described by the terms of
this Plan, granted pursuant to Article 10.
2.33 “Outside Director” is a
Director who is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section
162(m)(4)(C)(i) of the Code.
2.34 “Participant” means any
eligible individual as set forth in Article 5 to whom an Award is
granted.
2.35 “Performance-Based
Compensation” means compensation under an Award that is intended to
satisfy the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for certain performance-based
compensation paid to Covered Employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing
in this Plan shall be construed to mean that an Award which does not satisfy the
requirements for performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) does
not constitute performance-based compensation for other purposes, including Code
Section 409A.
2.36
“Performance Measures”
mean measures as described in Article 12 on which the performance goals are
based and which are approved by the Company’s stockholders pursuant to this Plan
in order to qualify Awards as Performance-Based Compensation.
2.37 “Performance Period” means the
period of time during which the performance goals must be met in order to
determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to an
Award.
2.38 “Performance Share” means an
Award under Article 9 herein and subject to the terms of this Plan, denominated
in Shares, the value of which at the time it is payable is determined as a
function of the extent to which corresponding performance criteria have been
achieved.
2.39 “Performance Unit” means an
Award under Article 9 herein and subject to the terms of this Plan, denominated
in units, the value of which at the time it is payable is determined as a
function of the extent to which corresponding performance criteria have been
achieved.
2.40 “Period of Restriction” means
the period when Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units are subject to a
substantial risk of forfeiture (based on the passage of time, the achievement of
performance goals, or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the
Committee, in its discretion), as provided in Article 8.
2.41
“Plan” means the Terex
Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
2.42 “Plan Year” means the Company’s
fiscal year which begins January 1 and ends December 31.
2.43 “Prior Plans” means the Terex
Corporation 2000 Incentive Plan and the 1996 Terex Corporation Long Term
Incentive Plan, as amended.
2.44
“Restricted Stock” means an
Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 8.
2.45 “Restricted Stock Unit” means
an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 8, except no Shares are
actually awarded to the Participant on the Grant Date.
2.46 “SEC” means the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.
2.47
“Share” means a share of common
stock of the Company, no par value per share.
2.48 “Stock Appreciation Right” or
“SAR” means an Award,
designated as an SAR, pursuant to the terms of Article 7 herein.
2.49 “Subsidiary” means any
corporation or other entity, whether domestic or foreign, in which the Company
has or obtains, directly or indirectly, an interest of more than fifty percent
(50%) by reason of stock ownership or otherwise.
2.50 “Third-Party Service Provider”
means any consultant, agent, advisor, or independent contractor who renders
services to the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliate that: (a) are not in
connection with the offer and sale of the Company’s securities in a capital
raising transaction, and (b) do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a
market for the Company’s securities.
Article
3. Administration
3.1 General. The Committee shall
be responsible for administering this Plan, subject to this Article 3 and the
other provisions of this Plan. The Committee may employ attorneys, consultants,
accountants, agents, and other individuals, any of whom may be an Employee, and
the Committee, the Company, and its officers and Directors shall be entitled to
rely upon the advice, opinions, or valuations of any such individuals. All
actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee
shall be final and binding upon the Participants, the Company, and all other
interested individuals.
3.2 Authority of the Committee.
Subject to any express limitations set forth in the Plan, the Committee shall
have full and exclusive discretionary power and authority to take such actions
as it deems necessary and advisable with respect to the administration of the
Plan including, but not limited to, the following:
|
(a)
|
To
determine from time to time which of the persons eligible under the Plan
shall be granted Awards, when and how each Award shall be granted, what
type or combination of types of Awards shall be granted, the provisions of
each Award granted (which need not be identical), including the time or
times when a person shall be permitted to receive Shares pursuant to an
Award, and the number of Shares subject to an
Award;
|
|
(b)
|
To
construe and interpret the Plan and Awards granted under it, and to
establish, amend, and revoke rules and regulations for its administration.
The Committee, in the exercise of this power, may correct any defect,
omission, or inconsistency in the Plan or in an Award Agreement, in a
manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or expedient to make the
Plan fully effective;
|
|
(c)
|
To
approve forms of Award Agreements for use under the
Plan;
|
|
(d)
|
To
determine Fair Market Value of a Share in accordance with Section 2.21 of
the Plan;
|
|
(e)
|
To
amend the Plan or any Award Agreement as provided in the
Plan;
|
|
(f)
|
To
adopt subplans and/or special provisions applicable to stock awards
regulated by the laws of a jurisdiction other than and outside of the
United States. Such subplans and/or special provisions may take precedence
over other provisions of the Plan, but unless otherwise superseded by the
terms of such subplans and/or special provisions, the provisions of the
Plan shall govern;
|
|
(g)
|
To
authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument
required to effect the grant of a stock award previously granted by the
Committee or the Board;
|
|
(h)
|
To
determine whether Awards will be settled in Shares of common stock, cash,
or in any combination thereof;
|
|
(i)
|
To
determine whether Awards will be adjusted for Dividend Equivalents, with
“Dividend Equivalents” meaning a credit, made at the discretion of the
Committee, to the account of a Participant in an amount equal to the cash
dividends paid on one Share for each Share represented by an Award held by
such Participant; provided, however, that Options and SARs may not be
adjusted for Dividend
Equivalents;
|
|
(j)
|
To
establish a program whereby Participants designated by the Committee may
reduce compensation otherwise payable in cash in exchange for Awards under
the Plan;
|
|
(k)
|
To
authorize a program permitting eligible Participants to surrender
outstanding Awards in exchange for newly granted
Awards;
|
|
(l)
|
To
impose such restrictions, conditions, or limitations as it determines
appropriate as to the timing and manner of any resales by a Participant or
other subsequent transfers by the Participant of any Shares, including,
without limitation: (i) restrictions under an insider trading policy and
(ii) restrictions as to the use of a specified brokerage firm for such
resales or other transfers; and
|
|
(m)
|
To
provide, either at the time an Award is granted or by subsequent action,
that an Award shall contain as a term thereof, a right, either in tandem
with the other rights under the Award or as an alternative thereto, of the
Participant to receive, without payment to the Company, a number of
Shares, cash, or a combination thereof, the amount of which is determined
by reference to the value of
Shares.
|
3.3 Delegation. The Committee may
delegate to one or more of its members or to one or more officers of the Company
or any Subsidiary or Affiliate or to one or more agents or advisors such
administrative duties or powers as it may deem advisable, and the Committee or
any individuals to whom it has delegated duties or powers as aforesaid may
employ one or more individuals to render advice with respect to any
responsibility the Committee or such individuals may have under this Plan. The
Committee may, by resolution, authorize one or more Directors or officers, in
accordance with applicable law, of the Company to do one or both of the
following on the same basis as can the Committee: (a) designate Employees to be
recipients of Awards; (b) determine the size of any such Awards; provided,
however, (i) the Committee shall not delegate such responsibilities to any such
Director or officer for Awards granted to an Employee who is considered an
Insider or whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m) of the Code; and (ii)
the Director(s) or officer(s) shall report periodically to the Committee
regarding the nature and scope of the Awards granted pursuant to the authority
delegated.
Article
4. Shares Subject to This Plan and Maximum Awards
4.1 Number of Shares Authorized and
Available for Awards. The number of Shares authorized and available for
Awards under the Plan shall be determined in accordance with the following
provisions:
|
(a)
|
Subject
to adjustment as provided in Section 4.4 of the Plan, the maximum number
of Shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be 3,000,000 shares,
plus (i) the number of Shares remaining available for issuance under the
Prior Plans that are not subject to outstanding Awards as of the Effective
Date, and (ii) the number of Shares subject to Awards outstanding under
the Prior Plans as of the Effective Date but only to the extent that such
outstanding Awards are forfeited, expire, or otherwise terminate without
the issuance of such Shares.
|
|
(b)
|
The
maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to ISOs under the
Plan shall be 3,000,000.
|
4.2 Share Usage. Shares covered by
an Award shall be counted as used only to the extent they are actually issued.
Any Shares related to Awards under this Plan or under the Prior Plans that
terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise without the
issuance of the Shares, or are settled in cash in lieu of Shares, or are
exchanged with the Committee’s permission, prior to the issuance of Shares, for
Awards not involving Shares, shall be available again for grant under this Plan.
Moreover, if the Option Price of any Option granted under this Plan or the tax
withholding requirements with respect to any Award granted under this Plan are
satisfied by tendering Shares to the Company (by either actual delivery or by
attestation), the tendered Shares shall again be available for grant under this
Plan. Furthermore, if an SAR is exercised and settled in Shares, the difference
between the total Shares exercised and the net Shares delivered shall again be
available for grant under this Plan, with the result being that only the number
of Shares issued upon exercise of an SAR is counted against the Shares available
for issuance under the Plan. The Shares available for issuance under this Plan
may be authorized and unissued Shares or treasury Shares.
4.3 Annual Award Limits. Unless
and until the Committee determines that an Award to a Covered Employee shall not
be designed to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the following limits
(each an “Annual Award Limit” and, collectively, “Annual Award Limits”), as
adjusted pursuant to Sections 4.4 and 20.2, shall apply to grants of such Awards
under this Plan:
|
(a)
|
Options and SARs: The
maximum aggregate number of Shares subject to Options and SARs granted to
any one Participant in any one Plan Year shall be
750,000.
|
|
(b)
|
Restricted Stock and Restricted
Stock Units: The maximum aggregate number of Shares subject to
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units granted to any one Participant
in any one Plan Year shall be
750,000.
|
|
(c)
|
Performance Units: The
maximum aggregate amount awarded or credited with respect to Performance
Units to any one Participant in any one Plan Year in respect of any
performance period may not exceed $20,000,000, determined as of the date
of grant.
|
|
(d)
|
Performance Shares: The
maximum aggregate number of Performance Shares that a Participant may
receive in any one Plan Year in respect of any performance period shall be
750,000 Shares, determined as of the date of
grant.
|
|
(e)
|
Cash-Based Awards: The
maximum aggregate amount awarded or credited with respect to Cash-Based
Awards to any one Participant in any one Plan Year in respect of any
performance period may not exceed $20,000,000, determined as of the date
of grant.
|
|
(f)
|
Other Stock-Based
Awards: The maximum aggregate amount awarded or credited with
respect to Other Stock-Based Awards to any one Participant in any one Plan
Year in respect of any performance period may not exceed 750,000 Shares,
determined as of the date of grant.
|
4.4 Adjustments in Authorized
Shares. Adjustment in authorized Shares available for issuance under the
Plan or under an outstanding Award and adjustments in Annual Award Limits shall
be subject to the following provisions:
|
(a)
|
In
the event of any corporate event or transaction (including, but not
limited to, a change in the Shares of the Company or the capitalization of
the Company) such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization,
recapitalization, separation, partial or complete liquidation, stock
dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split up, spin-off or other
distribution of stock or property of the Company, combination of Shares,
exchange of Shares, dividend in-kind, or other like change in capital
structure or distribution (other than normal cash dividends) to
stockholders of the Company, or any similar corporate event or
transaction, the Committee, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of
Participants’ rights under this Plan, shall substitute or adjust, as
applicable, the number and kind of Shares that may be issued under this
Plan or under particular forms of Awards, the number and kind of Shares
subject to outstanding Awards, the Option Price or Grant Price applicable
to outstanding Awards, the Annual Award Limits, and other value
determinations applicable to outstanding Awards, provided that the
Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine the methodology or
manner of making such substitution or
adjustment.
|
|
(b)
|
The
Committee, in its sole discretion, may also make appropriate adjustments
in the terms of any Awards under this Plan to reflect such changes or
distributions described in Section
4.4(a).
|
|
(c)
|
The
determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any,
shall be conclusive and binding on Participants under this
Plan.
|
|
(d)
|
Subject
to the provisions of Article 18 and notwithstanding anything else herein
to the contrary, without affecting the number of Shares reserved or
available hereunder, the Committee may authorize the issuance or
assumption of benefits under this Plan in connection with any merger,
consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, or reorganization upon
such terms and conditions as it may deem appropriate, subject to
compliance with the rules under Code Sections 422 and 424, as and where
applicable.
|
Article
5. Eligibility and Participation
5.1 Eligibility. Individuals
eligible to participate in this Plan include all Employees, Directors, and
Third-Party Service Providers.
5.2 Actual Participation. Subject
to the provisions of this Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select
from all eligible individuals, those individuals to whom Awards shall be granted
and shall determine, in its sole discretion, the nature of any and all terms
permissible by law and the amount of each Award.
Article
6. Stock Options
6.1 Grant of Options. Subject to
the terms and provisions of this Plan, Options may be granted to Employees and
Directors in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to
time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole
discretion.
6.2 Award Agreement. Each Option
grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Option
Price, the maximum duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the
Option pertains, the conditions upon which an Option shall become vested and
exercisable, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine which
are not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan.
6.3 Option Price. The Option Price
for each grant of an Option under this Plan shall be determined by the Committee
in its sole discretion and shall be specified in the Award Agreement; provided,
however, the Option Price must be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%)
of the FMV of a Share as of the Option’s Grant Date.
6.4 Term of Options. Each Option
granted to a Participant shall expire at such time as the Committee shall
determine at the time of grant; provided, however, no Option shall be
exercisable later than the tenth (10th) anniversary date of its
grant.
6.5 Exercise of Options. Options
granted under this Article 6 shall be exercisable at such times and be subject
to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance
approve, which terms and restrictions need not be the same for each grant or for
each Participant.
6.6 Payment. Options granted under
this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery of a notice of exercise to the
Company or an agent designated by the Company in a form specified or accepted by
the Committee, or by complying with any alternative procedures which may be
authorized by the Committee, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to
which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment for the Shares.
A condition of the issuance of the Shares as to which an Option shall be
exercised shall be the payment of the Option Price. The Option Price of any
exercised Option shall be payable to the Company in accordance with one of the
following methods:
|
(a)
|
In
cash or its equivalent;
|
|
(b)
|
By
tendering (either by actual delivery or attestation) previously acquired
Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal
to the Option Price;
|
|
(c)
|
By
a cashless (broker-assisted)
exercise;
|
|
(d)
|
By
any combination of (a), (b), and (c);
or
|
|
(e)
|
Any
other method approved or accepted by the Committee in its sole
discretion.
|
Subject
to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as practicable, but in no event
later than 45 days, after receipt of written notification of exercise and full
payment (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding), the Company
shall deliver to the Participant evidence of book entry Shares. Unless otherwise
determined by the Committee, all payments under all of the methods indicated
above shall be paid in United States dollars or Shares, as
applicable.
6.7 Termination of Employment.
Each Participant’s Award Agreement may set forth the extent to which the
Participant shall have the right to exercise the Option following termination of
the Participant’s employment or provision of services to the Company or any
Affiliate or Subsidiary, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined
in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award
Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all
Options issued pursuant to this Article 6, and may reflect distinctions based on
the reasons for termination. In the absence of a specific provision
in a Participant’s Award Agreement, in the event of the termination of
employment of a Participant or the termination or separation from service of a
Third-Party Service Provider or a Director for any reason (other than by reason
of death, Disability or Change in Control), the term of any Options granted to
such Participant outstanding and vested as of the date of (or as a result of)
such termination or separation, shall expire six (6) months after the date of
such termination or separation, provided, however, that in no
instance may the term of an Award, as so extended, extend beyond the end of the
original term of the Award Agreement. Except as otherwise provided by
the Committee, any unvested options held by such Participant under this Plan
shall be forfeited upon such termination or separation.
6.8 Special Rules Regarding ISOs.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, an ISO granted to a
Participant shall be subject to the following rules:
|
(a)
|
Special ISO
Definitions.
|
|
(i)
|
“Parent
Corporation” shall mean as of any applicable date a corporation in respect
of the Company that is a parent corporation within the meaning of Code
Section 424(e).
|
|
(ii)
|
“ISO
Subsidiary” shall mean as of any applicable date any corporation in
respect of the Company that is a subsidiary corporation within the meaning
of Code Section 424(f).
|
|
(iii)
|
A
“10% Owner” is an individual who owns stock possessing more than
ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes
of stock of the Company or its Parent Corporation or any ISO
Subsidiary.
|
|
(b)
|
Eligible Employees. ISOs
may be granted solely to eligible Employees of the Company, Parent
Corporation, or ISO Subsidiary (as permitted under Code Sections 422
and 424).
|
|
(c)
|
Option Price. The Option
Price of an ISO granted under the Plan shall be determined by the
Committee in its sole discretion and shall be specified in the Award
Agreement; provided, however, the Option Price must at least equal one
hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share as of the ISO’s
Grant Date (in the case of 10% Owners, the Option Price may not be not
less than 110% of such Fair Market
Value).
|
|
(d)
|
Right to Exercise. Any
ISO granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be exercisable during
his or her lifetime solely by such
Participant.
|
|
(e)
|
Exercise Period. The
period during which a Participant may exercise an ISO shall not exceed ten
(10) years (five (5) years in the case of a Participant who is a 10%
Owner) from the date on which the ISO was
granted.
|
|
(f)
|
Termination of
Employment. In the event a Participant terminates employment due to
death or disability, as defined under Code Section 22(e)(3), the
Participant (or his beneficiary, in the case of death) shall have the
right to exercise the Participant’s ISO Award during the period specified
in the applicable Award Agreement solely to the extent the Participant had
the right to exercise the ISO on the date of his death or disability, as
applicable; provided, however that such period may not exceed one (1) year
from the date of such termination of employment or, if shorter, the
remaining term of the ISO. In the event a Participant terminates
employment for reasons other than death or disability, as defined under
Code Section 22(e)(3), the Participant shall have the right to exercise
the Participant’s ISO Award during the period specified in the applicable
Award Agreement solely to the extent the Participant had the right to
exercise the ISO on the date of such termination of employment; provided,
however that such period may not exceed three (3) months from the date of
such termination of employment or, if shorter, the remaining term of the
ISO.
|
|
(g)
|
Dollar Limitation. To
the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of: (i) the Shares with
respect to which Options designated as Incentive Stock Options plus
(ii) the Shares of common stock of the Company, Parent Corporation,
and any Subsidiary with respect to which other Incentive Stock Options are
exercisable for the first time by a holder of an ISO during any calendar
year under all plans of the Company and any Affiliate and Subsidiary
exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), such Options shall be
treated as Nonqualified Stock Options. For purposes of the preceding
sentence, Options shall be taken into account in the order in which they
were granted, and the Fair Market Value of the Shares shall be determined
as of the time the Option or other Incentive Stock Option is
granted.
|
|
(h)
|
Duration of Plan. No
Incentive Stock Options may be granted more than ten (10) years after the
earlier of: (i) adoption of this Plan by the Board, or (ii) the Effective
Date.
|
|
(i)
|
Notification of Disqualifying
Disposition. If any Participant shall make any disposition of
Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of an ISO, such Participant shall
notify the Company of such disposition within thirty (30) days thereof.
The Company shall use such information to determine whether a
disqualifying disposition as described in Code Section 421(b) has
occurred.
|
|
(j)
|
Transferability. No ISO
granted under this Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or
otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of
descent and distribution; provided, however, at the discretion of the
Committee, an ISO may be transferred to a grantor trust under which the
Participant making the transfer is the sole
beneficiary.
|
Article
7. Stock Appreciation Rights
7.1 Grant of SARs. Subject to the
terms and conditions of this Plan, SARs may be granted to Participants at any
time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee. Subject to
the terms and conditions of this Plan, the Committee shall have complete
discretion in determining the number of SARs granted to each Participant and,
consistent with the provisions of this Plan, in determining the terms and
conditions pertaining to such SARs.
7.2 Grant Price. The Grant Price
for each grant of an SAR shall be determined by the Committee and shall be
specified in the Award Agreement; provided, however, the Grant Price must be at
least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of a Share as of the Grant
Date.
7.3 SAR Agreement. Each SAR Award
shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Grant Price, the
term of the SAR, and such other provisions as the Committee shall
determine.
7.4 Term of SAR. The term of an
SAR granted under this Plan shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole
discretion, and except as determined otherwise by the Committee and specified in
the SAR Award Agreement, no SAR shall be exercisable later than the tenth (10th)
anniversary of its grant date.
7.5 Exercise of SARs. SARs may be
exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole
discretion, imposes.
7.6 Settlement of SARs. Upon the
exercise of an SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the
Company, within 45 days of the date of exercise, in an amount determined by
multiplying:
|
(a)
|
The
excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over
the Grant Price; by
|
|
(b)
|
The
number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is
exercised.
|
7.7 Form of Payment. Payment, if
any, with respect to an SAR settled in accordance with Section 7.6 of the Plan
shall be made in accordance with the terms of the applicable Award Agreement, in
cash, Shares, or a combination thereof, as the Committee
determines.
7.8 Termination of Employment.
Each Award Agreement may set forth the extent to which the Participant shall
have the right to exercise the SAR following termination of the Participant’s
employment with or provision of services to the Company, Affiliates, or
Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the
sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement
entered into with Participants, need not be uniform among all SARs issued
pursuant to this Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for
termination. In the absence of a specific provision in a
Participant’s Award Agreement, in the event of the termination of employment or
separation from service of a Participant for any reason (other than by reason of
death, Disability or Change in Control), the term of any SAR granted to such
Participant outstanding and vested as of the date (or as a result of) such
termination or separation, shall expire six (6) months after the date of such
termination or separation, provided, however, that in no
instance may the term of an Award, as so extended, extend beyond the end of the
original term of the Award Agreement. Except as otherwise provided by
the Committee, any unvested SARs held by such Participant under this Plan shall
be forfeited upon such termination or separation.
7.9 Other Restrictions. The
Committee shall impose such other conditions or restrictions on any Shares
received upon exercise of an SAR granted pursuant to this Plan as it may deem
advisable or desirable. These restrictions may include, but shall not be limited
to, a requirement that the Participant hold the Shares received upon exercise of
an SAR for a specified period of time.
Article
8. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
8.1 Grant of Restricted Stock or
Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan,
the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted
Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units to Participants in such amounts as the
Committee shall determine. Restricted Stock Units shall be similar to Restricted
Stock except that no Shares are actually awarded to the Participant on the Grant
Date.
8.2 Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock
Unit Agreement. Each Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Unit grant
shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Period(s) of
Restriction, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock, or the number of
Restricted Stock Units granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall
determine.
8.3 Other Restrictions. The Committee
shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of
Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to this Plan as it
may deem advisable including, without limitation, a requirement that
Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock
or each Restricted Stock Unit, restrictions based upon the achievement of
specific performance goals, time-based restrictions on vesting following the
attainment of the performance goals, time-based restrictions, restrictions under
applicable laws or under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon
which such Shares are listed or traded, or holding requirements or sale
restrictions placed on the Shares by the Company upon vesting of such Restricted
Stock or Restricted Stock Units. To the extent deemed appropriate by the
Committee, the Company may retain the certificates representing Shares of
Restricted Stock in the Company’s possession until such time as all conditions
and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse.
Except as otherwise provided in this Article 8, Shares of Restricted Stock
covered by each Restricted Stock Award shall become freely transferable by the
Participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have
been satisfied or lapse (including satisfaction of any applicable tax
withholding obligations), and Restricted Stock Units shall be paid in cash,
Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares as the Committee, in its sole
discretion, shall determine.
8.4 Certificate Legend. In
addition to any legends placed on certificates pursuant to Section 8.3, each
certificate representing Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this
Plan may bear a legend such as the following or as otherwise determined by the
Committee in its sole discretion: The sale or transfer of Shares of stock
represented by this certificate, whether voluntary, involuntary, or by operation
of law, is subject to certain restrictions on transfer as set forth in the Terex
Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and in the associated Award Agreement.
A copy of this Plan and such Award Agreement may be obtained from Terex
Corporation
8.5 Voting Rights. Unless
otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in a Participant’s Award
Agreement, to the extent permitted or required by law, as determined by the
Committee, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may
be granted the right to exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares
during the Period of Restriction. A Participant shall have no voting rights with
respect to any Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder.
8.6 Termination of Employment.
Each Award Agreement may set forth the extent to which the Participant shall
have the right to retain Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units
following termination of the Participant’s employment with or provision of
services to the Company or any Affiliate or Subsidiary, as the case may be. Such
provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be
included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be
uniform among all Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units issued
pursuant to this Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for
termination. In the absence of a specific provision in a
Participant’s Award Agreement, in the event of the termination of employment of
a Participant or the termination or separation from service of a Third-Party
Service Provider or a Director for any reason (other than by reason of death,
Disability or Change in Control), any unvested Restricted Stock and/or
Restricted Stock Units granted to such Participant under this Plan shall be
forfeited upon such termination or separation.
Article
9. Performance Units/Performance Shares
9.1 Grant of Performance
Units/Performance Shares. Subject to the terms and provisions of this
Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Performance
Units and/or Performance Shares to Participants in such amounts and upon such
terms as the Committee shall determine.
9.2 Value of Performance
Units/Performance Shares. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial
value that is established by the Committee at the time of grant. Each
Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to 100% of Fair Market Value
of a Share as of the Grant Date. The Committee shall set performance goals in
its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will
determine the value and/or number of Performance Units/Performance Shares that
will be paid out to the Participant.
9.3 Earning of Performance
Units/Performance Shares. Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the
applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance
Units/Performance Shares shall be entitled to receive a payout on the value and
number of Performance Units/Performance Shares earned by the Participant over
the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which
the corresponding performance goals have been achieved.
9.4 Form and Timing of Payment of
Performance Units/Performance Shares. Payment of earned Performance
Units/Performance Shares shall be as determined by the Committee and as
evidenced in the Award Agreement. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the
Committee, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Units/Performance
Shares in the form of cash or in Shares (or in a combination thereof) equal to
the value of the earned Performance Units/Performance Shares in accordance with
the terms of the Award Agreement. Any Shares may be granted subject to any
restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee. The determination of the
Committee with respect to the form of payout of such Awards shall be set forth
in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the Award.
9.5 Termination of Employment.
Each Award Agreement may set forth the extent to which the Participant shall
have the right to retain Performance Units and/or Performance Shares following
termination of the Participant’s employment with or provision of services to the
Company or any Affiliate or Subsidiary, as the case may be. Such provisions
shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included
in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform
among all Awards of Performance Units or Performance Shares issued pursuant to
this Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for
termination. In the absence of a specific provision in a
Participant’s Award Agreement, in the event of the termination of employment of
a Participant or the termination or separation from service of a Third-Party
Service Provider or a Director for any reason (other than by reason of death,
Disability or Change in Control), any unvested Performance Units and/or
Performance Shares granted to such Participant under this Plan shall be
forfeited upon such termination or separation.
Article
10. Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards
10.1 Grant of Cash-Based Awards.
Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and
from time to time, may grant Cash-Based Awards to Participants in such amounts
and upon such terms as the Committee may determine.
10.2 Other Stock-Based Awards. The
Committee may grant other types of equity-based or equity-related Awards not
otherwise described by the terms of this Plan (including the grant or offer for
sale of unrestricted Shares) in such amounts and subject to such terms and
conditions as the Committee shall determine. Such Awards may involve the
transfer of actual Shares to Participants, or payment in cash or otherwise of
amounts based on the value of Shares, and may include, without limitation,
Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of
jurisdictions other than the United States.
10.3 Value of Cash-Based and Other
Stock-Based Awards. Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a payment amount
or payment range as determined by the Committee. Each Other Stock-Based Award
shall be expressed in terms of Shares or units based on Shares, as determined by
the Committee. The Committee may establish performance goals in its discretion.
If the Committee exercises its discretion to establish performance goals, the
number and/or value of Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards that will
be paid out to the Participant will depend on the extent to which the
performance goals are met.
10.4 Payment of Cash-Based Awards and
Other Stock-Based Awards. Payment, if any, with respect to a Cash-Based
Award or an Other Stock-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms
of the Award, in cash or Shares as the Committee determines. In the
absence of an Award Agreement or a specific provision in a Participant’s Award
Agreement to the contrary, no Participant shall have any right to receive
payment of any Cash-Based Award or Other Stock-Based Award unless such
Participant remains in the employ of the Company at the time of payment of such
Award.
10.5 Termination of Employment. The
Committee shall determine the extent to which the Participant shall have the
right to receive Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards following
termination of the Participant’s employment with or provision of services to the
Company or any Affiliate or Subsidiary, as the case may be. Such provisions
shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, such provisions may
be included in an agreement entered into with each Participant, but need not be
uniform among all Awards of Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards issued
pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for
termination. In the absence of an Award Agreement or a specific
provision in a Participant’s Award Agreement, in the event of a Participant’s
termination of employment or separation from service for any reason (other than
by reason of death, Disability or Change in Control), any unvested Cash-Based
Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards granted to such Participant under this Plan
shall be forfeited upon such termination or separation.
Article
11. Transferability of Awards and Shares
11.1 Transferability of Awards. Except as provided in
Section 6.8(j) and Section 11.2, during a Participant’s lifetime, his or her
Awards shall be exercisable only by the Participant. Awards shall not be
transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or
pursuant to a domestic relation order entered into by a court of competent
jurisdiction; no Awards shall be subject, in whole or in part, to attachment,
execution, or levy of any kind; and any purported transfer in violation of this
Section 11.1 shall be null and void; provided, however, Options or SARs that
have vested may be transferred to a charitable organization or a Family Member
of such Participant. The Committee may establish such procedures as it deems
appropriate for a Participant to designate a beneficiary to whom any amounts
payable or Shares deliverable in the event of, or following, the Participant’s
death may be provided. For purposes of this provision, Family Member means any
child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former
spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law,
daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, including adoptive
relationships, any person sharing the employee's household (other than a tenant
or employee), a trust in which these persons have more than 50% of the
beneficial interest, a foundation in which these persons (or the Participant)
control the management of assets, and any other entity in which these persons
(or the Participant) own more than 50% of the voting interests.
11.2 Committee Action. Except as
provided in Section 6.8(j), the Committee may, in its discretion, determine that
notwithstanding Section 11.1, any or all Awards shall be transferable to and
exercisable by such transferees, and be subject to such terms and conditions as
the Committee may deem appropriate; provided, however, no Award may be
transferred for value without stockholder approval.
11.3 Restrictions on Share
Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares
acquired by a Participant under the Plan as it may deem advisable, including,
without limitation, minimum holding period requirements, restrictions under
applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange
or market upon which such Shares are then listed or traded, or under any blue
sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.
Article
12. Performance Measures
12.1 Performance Measures. The
performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of an Award to a Covered
Employee that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall be
set within the shorter of: (a) ninety (90) days after the beginning of the
Performance Period, or (b) twenty-five percent (25%) of the Performance Period
has elapsed, and shall be limited to the following Performance
Measures:
(a) Net
earnings or net income (before or after taxes);
(b) Earnings
per share;
(c) Net
sales or revenue growth;
(d) Net
operating profit or income;
|
(e)
|
Return
measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, capital,
invested capital, equity, sales, or
revenue);
|
|
(f)
|
Cash
flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free cash flow,
cash flow return on equity, and cash flow return on
investment);
|
(g) Earnings
before or after taxes, interest, depreciation, and/or amortization;
(h) Gross
or operating margins;
(i) Productivity
ratios;
|
(j)
|
Share
price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total
stockholder return);
|
(k) Cost
control;
(l) Margins;
(m) Operating
efficiency;
(n) Market
share;
(o) Customer
satisfaction or employee satisfaction;
(p) Working
capital;
|
(q)
|
Economic
value added or EVA®
(net operating profit after tax minus the sum of capital multiplied by the
cost of capital);
|
(r) Management
development;
(s) Diversity;
(t)
Succession planning;
(u)
Financial controls;
(v)
Ethics;
(w) Information
technology;
(x) Marketing
initiatives;
(y) Business
development;
(z) Financial
structure;
(aa) Taxes;
(bb) Depreciation
and amortization; and
(cc) Total
Stockholder Return.
Any
Performance Measure(s) may be used to measure the performance of the Company,
Subsidiary, and/or Affiliate as a whole or any business unit of the Company,
Subsidiary, and/or Affiliate, or any combination thereof, as the Committee may
deem appropriate, or any of the above Performance Measures as compared to the
performance of a group of comparator companies, or published or special index
that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, or the Company
may select Performance Measure (j) above as compared to various stock market
indices. The Committee also has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting
of any Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the
Performance Measures specified in this Article 12, provided that any such
acceleration complies with Treasury Regulation
1.162-27(e)(2)(iii)(B).
12.2 Evaluation of Performance. The
Committee may provide in any such Award that any evaluation of performance may
include or exclude any of the following events that occurs during a Performance
Period: (a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements,
(c) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or
provisions affecting reported results, (d) any reorganization and restructuring
programs, (e) Extraordinary Items, (f) acquisitions or divestitures, and (g)
foreign exchange gains and losses. To the extent such inclusions or exclusions
affect Awards to Covered Employees, they shall be prescribed in a form that
meets the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for
deductibility.
12.3 Adjustment of Performance-Based
Compensation. Awards that are intended to qualify as Performance-Based
Compensation may not be adjusted upward. The Committee shall retain the
discretion to adjust such Awards downward, either on a formula or discretionary
basis or any combination, as the Committee determines.
12.4 Committee Discretion. In the
event that applicable tax or securities laws change to permit Committee
discretion to alter the governing Performance Measures without obtaining
stockholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion
to make such changes without obtaining stockholder approval. In addition, in the
event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards that
shall not qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the Committee may make such
grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m) and base
vesting on Performance Measures other than those set forth in Section
12.1.
Article
13. Nonemployee Director Awards
The Board
or Committee shall determine and approve all Awards to Nonemployee Directors.
The terms and conditions of any grant of any Award to a Nonemployee Director
shall be set forth in an Award Agreement.
Article
14. Dividend Equivalents
Any
Participant selected by the Committee may be granted Dividend Equivalents based
on the dividends declared on Shares that are subject to any Award, to be
credited as of dividend payment dates, during the period between the date the
Award is granted and the date the Award is exercised, vests, or expires, as
determined by the Committee. Such Dividend Equivalents shall be converted to
cash or additional Shares by such formula and at such time and subject to such
limitations as may be determined by the Committee. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Committee may not grant Dividend Equivalents based on the
dividends declared on Shares that are subject to an Option, ISO, or SAR Award
and further no dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall be paid out with respect
to any unvested Performance Shares or Performance Units.
Article
15. Beneficiary Designation
Each
Participant under this Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or
beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any
benefit under this Plan is to be paid in case of his death before he receives
any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior
designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the
Committee, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing
with the Company during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such
beneficiary designation, benefits remaining unpaid or rights remaining
unexercised at the Participant’s death shall be paid to or exercised by the
Participant’s executor, administrator, or legal representative.
Article
16. Rights of Participants
16.1 Employment. Nothing in this
Plan or an Award Agreement shall: (a) interfere with or limit in any way the
right of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries to terminate any
Participant’s employment or service on the Board or to the Company at any time
or for any reason not prohibited by law, or (b) confer upon any Participant any
right to continue his employment or service as a Director or Third-Party Service
Provider for any specified period of time. Neither an Award nor any benefits
arising under this Plan shall constitute an employment contract with the Company
or any Affiliate or Subsidiary and, accordingly, subject to Articles 3 and 18,
this Plan and the benefits hereunder may be terminated at any time in the sole
and exclusive discretion of the Committee without giving rise to any liability
on the part of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its
Subsidiaries.
16.2 Participation. No individual
shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or,
having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.
16.3 Rights as a Stockholder.
Except as otherwise provided herein, a Participant shall have none of the rights
of a stockholder with respect to Shares covered by any Award until the
Participant becomes the record holder of such Shares.
Article
17. Change in Control
Notwithstanding
any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, the provisions of this Article
17 shall apply in the event of a Change in Control, unless otherwise determined
by the Committee in connection with the grant of an Award as reflected in the
applicable Award Agreement. In the event of a Change in Control, (i)
any unvested Awards granted to a Participant shall immediately vest, including
any Awards that are subject to Performance Measures, which shall vest at target,
and (ii) such Participant shall have the unqualified right to exercise any
Options or SARs that are outstanding as of the date of such Change in Control
for a period of three (3) years after such Change in Control of the Company,
provided, however, that
in no instance may the term of the Awards, as so extended, extend beyond the end
of the original term of the Award Agreement; provided, further, however that the
accelerated vesting of any Award shall not effect the distribution date of any
Award subject to Code Section 409A.
Article
18. Disability
Except
for ISOs covered by Section 6.8(f), in the absence of a specific provision in a
Participant’s Award Agreement, if a Participant terminates employment or
separates from service due to Disability, (i) any unvested Awards granted to
such Participant shall immediately vest and (ii) such Participant, or his
guardian or legal representative, shall have the unqualified right to exercise
any Options or SARs that are outstanding as of the date of such termination or
separation for a period of one year after such termination or separation,
provided, however, in no instance may the term of the Option or SAR, as so
extended, extend beyond the end of the original term of the Award Agreement;
provided, further, however that the accelerated vesting of any Award shall not
effect the distribution date of any Award subject to Code Section
409A.
Article
19. Death
Except
for ISOs covered by Section 6.8(f), in the absence of a specific provision in a
Participant’s Award Agreement, if a Participant dies while employed or otherwise
engaged by or providing services to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or
Affiliates, as the case may be, (i) any unvested Awards granted to such
Participant under the Plan shall immediately vest and (ii) any Options or SARs
outstanding as of the date of such Participant’s death shall be exercisable by
the estate of such Participant or by any person who acquired such Award by
bequest or inheritance, at any time within one year after the death of such
Participant, provided, however, that in no instance may the term of the Option
or SAR, as so extended, extend beyond the end of the original term of the Award
Agreement.
Article
20. Amendment and Termination
20.1 Amendment and Termination of the Plan
and Award Agreements.
|
(a)
|
Subject
to subparagraphs (b) and (c) of this Section 20.1 and Section 20.3 of the
Plan, the Board may at any time alter, amend, suspend or terminate the
Plan as it shall deem advisable and the Committee may, at any time and
from time to time, amend an outstanding Award
Agreement.
|
|
(b)
|
Except
in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company
(including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split,
extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger,
consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, or exchange of shares),
the terms of an outstanding Award may not be amended to reduce the
exercise price of outstanding Options or to reduce the Grant Price of
outstanding SARs or cancel outstanding Options or SARs in exchange for
cash, other Awards, or Options or SARs with an exercise price or Grant
Price, as applicable, that is less than the exercise price of the
cancelled Options or the Grant Price of the cancelled SARs without
shareholder approval.
|
|
(c)
|
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, no amendment of this Plan shall be made without stockholder
approval if stockholder approval is required pursuant to rules promulgated
by any stock exchange or quotation system on which Shares are listed or
quoted or by applicable U.S. state corporate laws or regulations,
applicable U.S. federal laws or regulations, and the applicable laws of
any foreign country or jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted
under the Plan.
|
20.2 Adjustment of Awards Upon the
Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. Subject to Section
12.3, the Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the
criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events
(including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.4 hereof)
affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company or of changes
in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the
Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent
unintended dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits
intended to be made available under this Plan. The determination of the
Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and
binding on Participants under this Plan. By accepting an Award under this Plan,
a Participant agrees to any adjustment to the Award made pursuant to this
Section 20.2 without further consideration or action.
20.3 Awards Previously Granted.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, other than
Sections 20.2, 20.4, or 23.14, no termination or amendment of this Plan or an
Award Agreement shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously
granted under this Plan, without the written consent of the Participant holding
such Award.
20.4 Amendment to Conform to Law.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, the Committee
may amend the Plan or an Award Agreement, to take effect as deemed necessary or
advisable for the purpose of conforming the Plan or an Award Agreement to any
present or future law relating to plans of this or similar nature, and to the
administrative regulations and rulings promulgated thereunder. By accepting an
Award under this Plan, a Participant agrees to any amendment made pursuant to
this Section 20.4 to any Award granted under the Plan without further
consideration or action.
Article
21. Withholding
21.1 Tax Withholding. The Company
shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a
Participant to remit to the Company, the minimum statutory amount to satisfy
federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or
regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result
of this Plan.
21.2 Share Withholding. With
respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, the lapse
of restrictions on Restricted Stock, the delivery of cash or Shares in the
settlement of Restricted Stock Units, or the achievement of performance goals
related to Performance Units or Performance Shares, or any other taxable event
arising as a result of an Award granted hereunder (collectively and individually
referred to as a “Share Payment”), Participants may elect, subject to the
approval of the Committee, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or
in part, by having the Company withhold from a Share Payment the number of
Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the withholding is to be
determined equal to the minimum withholding requirement. All such elections
shall be irrevocable, made electronically or in writing and signed by the
Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the
Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.
Article
22. Successors
All
obligations of the Company under this Plan with respect to Awards granted
hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the
existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase,
merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business
and/or assets of the Company.
Article
23. General Provisions
23.1 Forfeiture
Events.
|
(a)
|
The
Committee may specify in an Award Agreement that the Participant’s rights,
payments, and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to
reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of
certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting
or performance conditions of an Award. Such events may include, but shall
not be limited to, termination of employment for Cause, termination of the
Participant’s provision of services to the Company, Affiliate, or
Subsidiary, violation of material Company, Affiliate, or Subsidiary
policies, breach of noncompetition, confidentiality, or other restrictive
covenants that may apply to the Participant, or other conduct by the
Participant that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the
Company, any Affiliate, or
Subsidiary.
|
|
(b)
|
If
a Participant fails to sign an Award Agreement within six (6) months of
such Award Agreement being delivered to the Participant by the Company,
the Award being granted pursuant to such Award Agreement shall be subject
to forfeiture.
|
|
(c)
|
If
any of the Company’s financial statements are required to be restated
resulting from errors, omissions, or fraud, the Committee may (in its sole
discretion, but acting in good faith) direct that the Company recover all
or a portion of any Award granted or paid to a Participant or make
additional payments or grants to a Participant for any Award with respect
to any fiscal year of the Company the financial results of which are
affected by such restatement. The amount to be recovered from or paid to
the Participant shall be the amount by which the Award differed from the
amount that would have been payable to the Participant had the financial
statements been initially filed as restated. In no event shall the amount
to be recovered by the Company be less than the amount required to be
repaid or recovered as a matter of law (including but not limited to
amounts that are required to be recovered or forfeited under Section 304
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). The Committee shall determine the
method of any recovery or payment pursuant to this
provision.
|
23.2 Legend. The certificates for
Shares may include any legend which the Committee deems appropriate to reflect
any restrictions on transfer of such Shares.
23.3 Gender and Number. Except
where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also
shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular, and the
singular shall include the plural.
23.4 Severability. In the event any
provision of this Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the
illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of this Plan, and
this Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision
had not been included.
23.5 Requirements of Law. The
granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under this Plan shall be subject
to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any
governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be
required.
23.6 Delivery of Title. The Company
shall have no obligation to issue or deliver evidence of title for Shares issued
under this Plan prior to:
|
(a)
|
Obtaining
any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are
necessary or advisable; and
|
|
(b)
|
Completion
of any registration or other qualification of the Shares under any
applicable national or foreign law or ruling of any governmental body that
the Company determines to be necessary or
advisable.
|
23.7 Inability to Obtain Authority.
The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having
jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary
to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the
Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares
as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.
23.8 Investment Representations.
The Committee may require any individual receiving Shares pursuant to an Award
under this Plan to represent and warrant in writing that the individual is
acquiring the Shares for investment and without any present intention to sell or
distribute such Shares.
23.9 Employees Based Outside of the United
States. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, in
order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company, its
Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries operate or have Employees, Directors, or
Third-Party Service Providers, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have
the power and authority to:
|
(a)
|
Determine
which Affiliates and Subsidiaries shall be covered by this
Plan;
|
|
(b)
|
Determine
which Employees, Directors, or Third-Party Service Providers outside the
United States are eligible to participate in this
Plan;
|
|
(c)
|
Modify
the terms and conditions of any Award granted to Employees, Directors, or
Third-Party Service Providers outside the United States to comply with
applicable foreign laws;
|
|
(d)
|
Establish
subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to
the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable. Any subplans and
modifications to Plan terms and procedures established under this Section
23.9 by the Committee shall be attached to this Plan document as
appendices; and
|
|
(e)
|
Take
any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems advisable to
obtain approval or comply with any necessary local government regulatory
exemptions or approvals.
|
Notwithstanding
the above, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall
be granted, that would violate applicable law.
23.10 Uncertificated Shares. To the
extent that this Plan provides for issuance of certificates to reflect the
transfer of Shares, the transfer of such Shares may be effected on a
noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the
rules of any stock exchange.
23.11 Unfunded Plan. Participants
shall have no right, title, or interest whatsoever in or to any investments that
the Company, its Subsidiaries, or its Affiliates may make to aid it in meeting
its obligations under this Plan. Nothing contained in this Plan, and no action
taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust
of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any
Participant, beneficiary, legal representative, or any other individual. To the
extent that any individual acquires a right to receive payments from the Company
or any Affiliate or Subsidiary under this Plan, such right shall be no greater
than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company or the Subsidiary
or Affiliate, as the case may be. All payments to be made hereunder shall be
paid from the general funds of the Company, or the Subsidiary or Affiliate, as
the case may be and no special or separate fund shall be established and no
segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts except as
expressly set forth in this Plan.
23.12 No Fractional Shares. No
fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to this Plan or any
Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, Awards, or other property
shall be issued or paid in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional
Shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise
eliminated.
23.13 Retirement and Welfare Plans.
Neither Awards made under this Plan nor Shares or cash paid pursuant to such
Awards may be included as “compensation” for purposes of computing the benefits
payable to any Participant under the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s or
Affiliate’s retirement plans (both qualified and nonqualified) or welfare
benefit plans unless such other plan expressly provides that such compensation
shall be taken into account in computing a Participant’s benefit.
23.14 Deferred
Compensation.
|
(a)
|
The
Committee may grant Awards under the Plan that provide for the deferral of
compensation within the meaning of Code Section 409A. It is intended that
such Awards comply with the requirements Section 409A so that amounts
deferred thereunder are not includible in income and are not subject to an
additional tax of twenty percent (20%) at the time the deferred amounts
are no longer subject to a substantial risk of
forfeiture.
|
|
(b)
|
Notwithstanding
any provision of the Plan or Award Agreement to the contrary, if one or
more of the payments or benefits to be received by a Participant pursuant
to an Award would constitute deferred compensation subject to Code Section
409A and would cause the Participant to incur any penalty tax or interest
under Code Section 409A or any regulations or Treasury guidance
promulgated thereunder, the Committee may reform the Plan and Award
Agreement to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A and to the
extent practicable maintain the original intent of the Plan and Award
Agreement. By accepting an Award under this Plan, a Participant agrees to
any amendments to the Award made pursuant to this Section 21.14(b)
without further consideration or
action.
|
23.15 Nonexclusivity of this Plan.
The adoption of this Plan shall not be construed as creating any limitations on
the power of the Board or Committee to adopt such other compensation
arrangements as it may deem desirable for any Participant.
23.16 No Constraint on Corporate
Action. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to: (a) limit, impair, or
otherwise affect the Company’s or a Subsidiary’s or an Affiliate’s right or
power to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations, or changes of its
capital or business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve,
liquidate, sell, or transfer all or any part of its business or assets; or (b)
limit the right or power of the Company or a Subsidiary or an Affiliate to take
any action which such entity deems to be necessary or appropriate.
23.17 Governing Law. The Plan and
each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware,
excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise
refer construction or interpretation of this Plan to the substantive law of
another jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement,
recipients of an Award under this Plan are deemed to submit to the exclusive
jurisdiction and venue of the federal or state courts of Delaware to resolve any
and all issues that may arise out of or relate to this Plan or any related Award
Agreement.
23.18 Delivery and Execution of Electronic
Documents. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Company may:
(a) deliver by email or other electronic means (including posting on a Web site
maintained by the Company or by a third party under contract with the Company)
all documents relating to the Plan or any Award thereunder (including without
limitation, prospectuses required by the SEC) and all other documents that the
Company is required to deliver to its security holders (including without
limitation, annual reports and proxy statements), and (b) permit Participants to
electronically execute applicable Plan documents (including, but not limited to,
Award Agreements) in a manner prescribed to the Committee.
23.19 No Representations or Warranties
Regarding Tax Effect. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the
contrary, the Company, its Affiliates and Subsidiaries, the Board, and the
Committee neither represent nor warrant the tax treatment under any federal,
state, local, or foreign laws and regulations thereunder (individually and
collectively referred to as the “Tax Laws”) of any Award granted or any amounts
paid to any Participant under the Plan including, but not limited to, when and
to what extent such Awards or amounts may be subject to tax, penalties and
interest under the Tax Laws.
23.20 Indemnification. Subject to
requirements of Delaware law, each individual who is or shall have been a member
of the Board, or a Committee appointed by the Board, or an officer of the
Company to whom authority was delegated in accordance with Article 3, shall be
indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from any loss, cost,
liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or
her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding
to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by
reason of any action taken or failure to act under this Plan and against and
from any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with the
Company’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any
such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall
give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the
same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his/her own behalf,
unless such loss, cost, liability, or expense is a result of his/her own willful
misconduct or except as expressly provided by statute. The foregoing right of
indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to
which such individuals may be entitled under the Company’s Certificate of
Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the
Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.