Tidel Technologies Inc. 10-Q/A #1 12-31-2004
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________

FORM 10-Q/A

(Mark One)

R
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004

or

£
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file Number 000-17288

TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 
Delaware
  
75-2193593
  
 
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
 
 
      
 
2900 Wilcrest Drive, Suite 205
Houston, Texas
  
77042
  
 
(Address of principal executive offices)
  
(Zip Code)
  

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 783-8200

___________________________________________
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. YES £ NO R

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on July 6, 2005 was 20,677,210.


TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Description
  
Page
     
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 3
 
 3
 
 4
 
 5
 
 6
 
 7
 
11
 
17
 
17
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
18
 
18
 
18
 
19
 
21
 
23
 
2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.

TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

   
December 31,
2004
  
September 30,
2004
  
ASSETS
  
(unaudited)
      
Current Assets:
          
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
725,927
  
$
258,120
  
Restricted cash
    
417,833
    
—
  
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $6,425 and $6,230, respectively
    
5,077,596
    
1,313,918
  
Notes and other receivables
    
1,014,641
    
1,016,167
  
Inventories
    
675,699
    
1,350,630
  
Prepaid expenses and other
    
160,881
    
135,240
  
Assets held for sale, net of accumulated depreciation of $4,054,549 and $3,977,412, respectively
    
7,032,711
    
5,910,752
  
Total current assets
    
15,105,288
    
9,984,827
  
Property, plant and equipment, at cost
    
1,174,509
    
1,151,898
  
Accumulated depreciation
    
(1,035,663
)
  
(1,027,417
)
Net property, plant and equipment
    
138,846
    
124,481
  
Other assets
    
1,341,064
    
668,936
  
Total assets
  
$
16,585,198
  
$
10,778,244
  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
              
Current Liabilities:
              
Current maturities, net of debt discount of $0 and $725,259, respectively
  
$
2,832,221
  
$
183,692
  
Accounts payable
    
1,356,544
    
1,711,630
  
Accrued interest payable
    
2,112,291
    
793,577
  
Reserve for settlement of class action litigation
    
—
    
1,564,490
  
Other accrued expenses
    
1,977,111
    
1,384,675
  
Liabilities held for sale
    
2,692,938
    
2,523,022
  
Total current liabilities
    
10,971,105
    
8,161,086
  
Long-term debt, net of current maturities and debt discount of $6,525,446 and $5,767,988, respectively
    
696,250
    
28,709
  
Total liabilities
    
11,667,355
    
8,189,795
  
Commitments and contingencies
              
Shareholders’ Equity:
              
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 20,677,210 shares and 17,426,210 shares, respectively
    
206,772
    
174,262
  
Additional paid-in capital
    
30,993,862
    
28,100,674
  
Accumulated deficit
    
(26,775,452
)
  
(25,619,888
)
Receivable from officer
    
(31,675
)
  
(31,675
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    
524,336
    
(34,924
)
Total shareholders’ equity
    
4,917,843
    
2,588,449
  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  
$
16,585,198
  
$
10,778,244
  

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)

   
Three Months Ended December 31.
  
   
2004
  
2003
  
Revenues
  
$
6,512,542
  
$
3,035,927
  
Cost of sales
    
3,467,773
    
1,891,797
  
Gross profit
    
3,044,769
    
1,144,130
  
Selling, general and administrative
    
1,249,601
    
1,205,621
  
Depreciation and amortization
    
8,246
    
10,904
  
Operating income (loss)
    
1,786,922
    
(72,395
)
Other income (expense):
              
Gain on extinguishment of debt
    
—
    
18,823,000
  
Interest expense, net
    
(3,075,000
)
  
(805,515
)
Total other income (expense)
    
(3,075,000
)
  
18,017,485
  
Income (loss) before discontinued operations
    
(1,288,078
)
  
17,945,090
  
Discontinued operations
    
132,514
    
25,415
  
Net income (loss)
  
$
(1,155,564
)
$
17,970,505
  
Basic income (loss) per share:
              
Income (loss) before discontinued operations
  
$
(0.07
)
$
1.03
  
Income from discontinued operations
    
0.01
    
—
  
Net income (loss)
  
$
(0.06
)
$
1.03
  
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    
19,152,090
    
17,426,210
  
Diluted income (loss) per share:
              
Income (loss) before discontinued operations
  
$
(0.06
)
$
0.45
  
Income from discontinued operations
    
0.01
    
—
  
Net income (loss)
  
$
(0.05
)
$
0.45
  
Weighted average common and dilutive shares outstanding
    
19,152,090
    
40,296,299
  

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)

   
Three Months Ended December 31,
  
 
  
2004
  
2003
  
Net income (loss)
  
$
(1,155,564
)
$
17,970,505
  
Other comprehensive gain:
              
Unrealized gain on investment in 3CI
    
559,260
    
—
  
Comprehensive income (loss)
  
$
(596,304
)
$
17,970,505
  

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

   
Three Months Ended December 31,
  
   
2004
  
2003
  
Cash flows from continuing operating activities:
          
Net income (loss)
  
$
(1,155,564
)
$
17,970,505
  
Income from discontinued operations
    
(132,514
)
  
(25,415
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    
(1,288,078
)
  
17,945,090
  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in continuing operating activities:
              
Depreciation and amortization
    
8,246
    
10,904
  
Amortization of debt discount and financing costs
    
858,698
    
339,622
  
Gain on extinguishment of convertible debentures
    
—
    
(18,823,000
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
              
Trade accounts receivable, net
    
(3,763,678
)
  
(1,040,829
)
Notes and other receivables
    
1,526
    
31,860
  
Inventories
    
674,931
    
(1,340
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    
(25,641
)
  
(116,848
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    
2,194,074
    
472,050
  
Net cash used in continuing operating activities
    
(1,339,922
)
  
(1,182,491
)
Cash flows from continuing investing activities:
              
(Purchases) disposals of property, plant and equipment, net
    
(22,611
)
  
13,224
  
Cash flows from continuing financing activities:
              
Proceeds from borrowings
    
2,100,000
    
7,370,000
  
Repayments of notes payable
    
(1,731
)
  
(2,090,000
)
Borrowing on revolver
    
1,250,000
    
—
  
Repayments of convertible debentures
    
—
    
(6,000,000
)
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash
    
(417,833
)
  
2,200,000
  
Increase in deferred financing costs
    
(280,567
)
  
(595,765
)
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities
    
2,649,869
    
884,235
  
Net change in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations
    
1,287,336
    
(285,032
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations
    
(817,529
)
  
299,401
  
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    
467,807
    
14,369
  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    
258,120
    
915,097
  
               
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  
$
725,927
  
$
929,466
  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
              
Cash paid for interest
  
$
258,920
  
$
173,676
  
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
              
Discount on issuance of debt with beneficial conversion premium and detachable warrants
  
$
723,198
  
$
6,899,181
  
Warrants issued for deferred financing costs
  
$
—
  
$
229,180
  
Issuance of shares to lender in payment of fees
  
$
638,010
  
$
—
  
Issuance of shares and warrants in connection with settlement of class-action litigation
  
$
1,564,490
  
$
—
  

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1.
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Tidel Technologies, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a Delaware corporation which, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, sells and supports automated teller machines (“ATMs”) and electronic cash security systems, consisting of the Timed Access Cash Controller (“TACC”) products and the Sentinel products (together, the “Cash Security” products), primarily in the United States. Sales of ATM, TACC and Sentinel products are generally made on a wholesale basis to more than 200 distributors and manufacturers’ representatives. TACC and Sentinel products are often sold directly to end-users as well as distributors.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, assuming we continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of the assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of December 31, 2004, the statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Although management believes the unaudited interim disclosures in these consolidated interim financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual audited financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year ending September 30, 2005. The consolidated unaudited interim financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Comprehensive Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2004 (the “ ‘03/’04 Annual Report”).

Status of Tidel Technologies, Inc.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on generating sufficient cash flows from operations for meeting our liquidity needs, servicing our debt requirements and meeting financial covenants. During the past four years and for the first six months of 2005, we have experienced net losses. Also, our inability to collect outstanding receivables continues to impact our liquidity. On November 25, 2003, we completed a $6,850,000 financing transaction (the “Financing”) with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”), and we also completed a $3,350,000 financing transaction (the “Additional Financing”) on November 26, 2004 with Laurus in order to meet our current liquidity needs. We have substantial debt obligations of approximately $10,053,917 as of December 31, 2004.

Management’s Current Plans with Regard to Our Liquidity Include the Following: 

Proposed Sale of ATM Business

On February 19, 2005, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Tidel Engineering, L.P. (together with the Company, the “Sellers”) entered into an asset purchase agreement with NCR Texas LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company (“NCR”) that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NCR Corporation, a Maryland corporation, for the sale of the registrant’s ATM business (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). The purchase price for our ATM business is $10,175,000 plus the assumption of certain liabilities related to the ATM business, subject to certain adjustments as provided in the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price is also subject to adjustment based upon the actual value of the assets delivered, to the extent the value of the assets delivered is 5% greater than or less than a predetermined value as stated in the Asset Purchase Agreement. The Asset Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities. The proceeds from the sale of the Sellers’ ATM business will be applied towards the repayment of our outstanding loans from Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. Pursuant to contractual arrangements with Laurus, we are required to be current in our SEC filings no later than July 31, 2005, after which time we will commence seeking shareholder approval for this transaction. We believe that the transaction will likely close during the fourth quarter of calendar 2005.

7

Engagement of Investment Banker to Evaluate Strategic Alternatives for the Sale of the Cash Security Business

We engaged Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (“Stifel”) in October 2004, to assist the Board of Directors in connection with the proposed sale of our Cash Security business, deliver a fairness opinion, and render such additional assistance as we may reasonably request in connection with the proposed sale of our Cash Security business. We are currently working with Stifel in connection with such a proposed sale.

Major Customers and Credit Risks

We generally retain a security interest in our underlying equipment that is sold to customers until it receives payment in full. We would incur an accounting loss equal to the carrying value of the accounts receivable, less any amounts recovered from liquidation of collateral, if a customer failed to perform according to the terms of our credit arrangements with them.

The concentration of customers in the ATM market may impact our overall credit exposure, either positively or negatively, since these customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. Sales of Sentinel cash security systems are currently to a small number of customers as well. The loss of a single customer could have an adverse effect on our sales revenue. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, we sold 578 Sentinel units to a national convenience store operator. This generated sales revenue from continuing operations of $4,707,000, or 72% of total revenue for the quarter. This had a significant positive impact on our first quarter earnings.

The majority of our sales during the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 were to customers within the United States. Foreign sales accounted for 15% and 19% of the Company’s total sales during the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which were to one foreign distributor. All sales are transacted in U.S. dollars.

In September 2004, our subsidiary entered into separate supply and credit facility agreements (the “Supply Agreement,” the “Facility Agreement” and the “Share Warrant Agreement” respectively) with a foreign distributor related to our ATM products. The Supply Agreement required the distributor, during the initial term of the agreement, to purchase ATMs only from us, effectively making us its sole supplier of ATMs. During each of the subsequent terms, the distributor is required to purchase from us not less than 85% of all ATMs purchased by the distributor. The initial term of the agreement was set as of the earlier of: (i) the expiration or termination of the debenture, (ii) a termination for default, (iii) the mutual agreement of the parties, and (iv) August 15, 2009.

The Facility Agreement provides a credit facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2,280,000 to the distributor with respect to outstanding invoices already issued to the distributor and with respect to invoices which may be issued in the future related to the purchase of our ATM products. Repayment of the credit facility is set by schedule for the last day of each month beginning November 2004 and continuing through August 2005. The distributor fell into default due to non-payment during February 2005. Notwithstanding our current commitment to aggressively pursue our rights to collect the outstanding balance of the facility and in view of the uncertainty of the ultimate outcome, we increased the reserve to approximately $500,000 due to the delinquency of payment during the first quarter of fiscal year 2005

Stock Based Compensation

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”), requires companies to recognize stock-based expense based on the estimated fair value of employee stock options. Alternatively, SFAS No. 123 allows companies to retain the current approach set forth in APB Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” provided that expanded footnote disclosure is presented. We apply APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for our Plans and, accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for our stock options in the consolidated financial statements. Had we determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for our stock options and warrants under SFAS No. 123, our net income (loss) would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated as follows:

8
 
 
  
Three months ended
December 31,
  
 
  
2004
  
2003
  
Net income (loss) as reported
  
$
(1,155,564
)
$
17,970,505
  
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under FAS 123, net of taxes
    
(139
)
  
(3,841
)
Net income (loss), pro forma
  
$
(1,155,703
)
$
17,966,664
  
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
              
As reported
    
(0.06
)
  
1.03
  
Pro forma
    
(0.06
)
  
1.03
  
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
              
As reported
    
(0.05
)
  
0.45
  
Pro forma
    
(0.05
)
  
0.45
  

Discontinued Operations

During the first quarter ended December 31, 2004, we committed to a plan to sell our ATM business. On February 19, 2005, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with NCR Texas LLC for the sale of our ATM business. For additional information, see aforementioned discussion in “Proposed Sale of ATM Business”. We have classified the ATM business has been classified as a discontinued operation since October 1, 2004, including for the comparative period in the prior year. This division manufactures and sells automated teller machines primarily in the United States. The results of this operation are segregated on the accompanying statements of operations as income or loss from discontinued operations and reflected as Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale on the accompanying balance sheets.

We recorded a net loss of $(1,155,564) and net income of $17,970,505 for the quarters ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The discontinued operation recorded income of $132,514 for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 and income of $25,415 for the quarter ended December 31, 2003. The sale of this division is expected to be consummated sometime during the fourth calendar quarter of 2005.

An analysis of the assets and liabilities held for sale and revenues is as follows:

Assets held for sale:
      
Trade accounts receivable (net of allowances for bad debt)
  
$
2,769,028
  
Inventories (net of reserves for obsolescence)
    
3,820,458
  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    
197,724
  
Property, plant and equipment, at cost net of depreciation
    
218,204
  
Other assets
    
27,297
  
Assets held for sale
  
$
7,032,711
  
Liabilities held for sale:
        
Accounts payable
  
$
1,866,688
  
Other accrued expenses
    
826,250
  
Liabilities held for sale
  
$
2,692,938
  

Revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 for the discontinued operations were $7,653,835 and $4,617,908, respectively.

9

2.
Long-Term Debt

On November 26, 2004, we completed a $3,350,000 financing transaction (the “Additional Financing”) with Laurus pursuant to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and Laurus, dated as of November 26, 2004 (the “2004 SPA”). The Additional Financing was comprised of (i) a three-year convertible note issued to Laurus in the amount of $1,500,000, which bears interest at a rate of 14% and is convertible into our common stock at a conversion price of $3.00 per share (the “$1,500,000 Note”), (ii) a one-year convertible note in the amount of $600,000 which bears interest at a rate of 10% and is convertible into our common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per share (the “$600,000 Note”), (iii) a one-year convertible note of our subsidiary, Tidel Engineering, L.P., in the amount of $1,250,000, which is a revolving working capital facility for the purpose of financing purchase orders of our subsidiary, Tidel Engineering, L.P., (the “Purchase Order Note”), which bears interest at a rate of 14% and is convertible into our common stock at a price of $3.00 per share and (iv) our issuance to Laurus of 1,251,000 shares of common stock, or approximately 7% of the total shares outstanding, (the “2003 Fee Shares”) in satisfaction of fees totaling $375,300 incurred in connection with the convertible term notes issued in the Financing discussed above. As a result of the sale of the 2003 Fee Shares, we recorded an additional charge in fiscal 2004 of $638,010 based on the market value of the stock on November 26, 2004. We also increased the principal balance of the original note by $292,987, of which $226,312 bears interest at the default rate of 18%. This amount represents interest accrued but not paid to Laurus as of August 1, 2004. In addition, Laurus received warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share. The proceeds of the Additional Financing were allocated to the notes based on the relative fair value of the notes and the warrants, with the value of the warrants resulting in a discount against the notes. In addition, the conversion terms of the $600,000 Note resulted in a beneficial conversion feature, further discounting the carrying value of the notes. As a result, we will record additional interest charges related to these discounts totaling $840,000 over the terms of the notes. Laurus was also granted registration rights in connection with the 2003 Fee Shares and other shares issuable pursuant to the Additional Financing. The obligations pursuant to the Additional Financing are secured by all of our assets and are guaranteed by our subsidiaries. Net proceeds from the Additional Financing in the amount of $3,232,750 were primarily used for (i) general working capital payments made directly to vendors, (ii) past due interest on Laurus’s $6,450,000 convertible note due pursuant to the Financing and (iii) the establishment of an escrow for future principal and interest payments due pursuant to the Additional Financing.

THE NOTES AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN THE FINANCING AND THE ADDITIONAL FINANCING ARE CONVERTIBLE INTO AN AGGREGATE OF 28,226,625 SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND, WHEN COUPLED WITH THE 2003 FEE SHARES, REPRESENT APPROXIMATELY 60% OF OUR OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT AS PROVIDED IN THE TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS. IF THESE NOTES AND WARRANTS WERE COMPLETELY CONVERTED TO COMMON STOCK BY LAURUS, THEN THE OTHER EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS’ OWNERSHIP IN THE COMPANY WOULD BE SIGNIFICANTLY DILUTED TO APPROXIMATELY 40% OF THEIR PRESENT OWNERSHIP POSITION.

In connection with the Financing, Laurus required that we covenant to become current in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission according to a predetermined schedule. Effective November 26, 2004, the Additional Financing documents require, among other things, that we provide evidence of filing to Laurus of our fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004 and year-to-date interim 2005 filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before July 31, 2005. The 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 (the “2002 10-K”) was filed on February 1, 2005, in accordance with Additional Financing documents requirements. Fourteen (14) days following such time as we become current in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we must deliver to Laurus evidence of the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Over The Counter Bulletin Board (the “Listing Requirement”).

On February 4, 2005, we received a letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission stating that the Division of Corporate Finance of the SEC would not object to the Company filing a comprehensive annual report on Form 10-K which covers all of the periods during which it has been a delinquent filer, together with its filing all Forms 10-Q which are due for quarters subsequent to the latest fiscal year included in that comprehensive annual report. However, the SEC Letter also stated that, upon filing such a comprehensive Form 10-K, the Company would not be considered “current” for purposes of Regulation S, Rule 144 or filing on Forms S-8, and that the Company would not be eligible to use Forms S-2 or S-3 until a sufficient history of making timely filings is established. Laurus consented to the filing of such a comprehensive annual report in satisfaction of the Filing Requirements mandated on or before July 31, 2005. Laurus also consented to a modification of the requirement that a Registration Statement be filed within 20 days of satisfaction of the Filing Requirements to instead require that the Registration Statement be filed by September 20, 2006.

Pursuant to the terms of the Financing and the Additional Financing, an Event of Default occurs if, among other things, we do not complete our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the timetable set forth in the Additional Financing documents, or we do not comply with the Listing Requirement or any other material covenant or other term or condition of the 2003 SPA, the 2004 SPA, the notes we issued to Laurus or any of the other documents related to the Financing or the Additional Financing. If there is an Event of Default, including any of the items specified above or in the transaction documents, Laurus may declare all unpaid sums of principal, interest and other fees due and payable within five (5) days after we receive a written notice from Laurus. If we cure the Event of Default within that five (5) day period, the Event of Default will no longer be considered to be occurring.

If we do not cure such Event of Default, Laurus shall have, among other things, the right to have two (2) of its designees appointed to our Board, and the interest rate of the notes shall be increased to the greater of 18% or the rate in effect at that time.

10

On November 26, 2004, in connection with the Additional Financing, we entered into an agreement with Laurus (the “Asset Sales Agreement”) whereby we agreed to pay a fee in the amount of at least $2,000,000 (the “Reorganization Fee”) to Laurus upon the occurrence of certain events as specified below and therein, which Reorganization Fee is secured by all of our assets, and is guaranteed by our subsidiaries. The Asset Sales Agreement provides that (i) once our obligations to Laurus have been paid in full (other than the Reorganization Fee), we shall be able to seek additional financing in the form of a non-convertible bank loan in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4,000,000, subject to Laurus’s right of first refusal; (ii) the net proceeds of an asset sale to the party named therein shall be applied to our obligations to Laurus under the Financing and the Additional Financing, as described above (collectively, the “Obligations”), but not to the Reorganization Fee; and (iii) the proceeds of any of our subsequent sales of equity interests or assets or of our subsidiaries consummated on or before the fifth anniversary of the Assets Sales Agreement (each, a “Company Sale”) shall be applied first to any remaining obligations, then paid to Laurus pursuant to an increasing percentage of at least 55.5% set forth therein, which amount shall be applied to the Reorganization Fee. Under this formula, the existing shareholders could receive less than 45% of the proceeds of any sale of our assets or equity interests, after payment of the Additional Financing and Reorganization Fee as defined. The Reorganization Fee shall be $2,000,000 at a minimum, but could equal a higher amount based upon a percentage of the proceeds of any company sale, as such term is defined in the Asset Sales Agreement. In the event that Laurus has not received the full amount of the Reorganization Fee on or before the fifth anniversary of the date of the Asset Sales Agreement, then we shall pay any remaining balance due on the Reorganization Fee to Laurus. We have recorded a $2,000,000 charge in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 to interest expense.

3.
Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share data for all periods presented have been computed pursuant to SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” that requires a presentation of basic earnings per share (basic EPS) and diluted earnings per share (diluted EPS). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is determined by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities and other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. As of December 31, 2004, we had outstanding options covering an aggregate of 796,000 shares of common stock, of which 731,000 shares were exercisable. We also had outstanding warrants covering an aggregate of 6,079,473 shares of common stock. Excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for the three months ended December 31, 2004 are options to purchase 976,000 shares to purchase common stock at a weighted average of $1.66 per share and 6,079,473 warrants, with a remaining exercise price ranging from $0.30 to $0.40, as they would be anti-dilutive. As of December 31, 2003, we had outstanding options covering an aggregate of 981,000 shares of common stock, of which 811,000 shares were exercisable. We also had outstanding warrants covering an aggregate of 6,379,473 shares of common stock. Excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for the three months ended December 31, 2004 are options to purchase 981,000 shares to purchase common stock at a weighted average of $1.64 per share and 6,079,473 warrants, with a remaining exercise price ranging from $0.30 to $11.17, as they would be anti-dilutive.

4.
Shareholders’ Equity

Existing shareholders’ ownership in the Company will be significantly diluted due to outstanding warrants. The notes and warrants issued in the Financing and the Additional Financing are convertible into an aggregate of 28,226,625 shares of our common stock and, when coupled with the 2003 Fee Shares, represent approximately 60% of our outstanding common stock, subject to adjustment as provided in the transaction documents. If these notes and warrants were completely converted to common stock by Laurus, then the other existing shareholders’ ownership in the Company would be significantly diluted to approximately 40% of their present ownership position.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, we issued issued 2,000,000 shares of our common stock related to the settlement of the class action litigation. In addition, we issued 1,251,000 shares of our common stock to Laurus (see Note 2, “Long-Term Debt”) related to settlement of late filing penalties. As of September 30, 2004, we accrued $1,564,490 for the settlement of the class action litigation and $638,010 for the settlement of the late filing penalties.

ITEM 2.

You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the discussion “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” included in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2004 (the “‘03/’04 Annual Report”). The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements

11

General

During the past three years, we have experienced operating losses. Our liquidity has been negatively impacted by our inability to collect outstanding receivables and claims as a result of the bankruptcy of our former largest customer, JRA 222, Inc. d/b/a Credit Card Center (“CCC”) the inability to collect outstanding accounts receivable from certain customers, under-absorbed fixed costs associated with the production facilities, and reduced sales of our products resulting from general difficulties in the ATM market. In order to meet our liquidity needs during the past three years, we have incurred a substantial amount of debt. This decline in financial condition is significant, and if the operating conditions do not improve there can be no assurance we will continue operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, assets held for sale, long-lived assets, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions and factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Based on our ongoing review, we make adjustments we consider appropriate under the facts and circumstances. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using the same critical accounting policies discussed in our ‘03/’04 Annual Report.

Results of Operations

Quarter Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to the Quarter Ended December 31, 2003

Our revenues from continuing operations were $6,512,542 for the three months ended December 31, 2004, representing an increase of $3,476,615, or 114%, from revenues of $3,035,927 in the same quarter of the prior year. This increase was primarily related to increased sales of our Sentinel products, as described more fully hereinafter in “Product Revenues”.

We had a net loss from continuing operations of $(1,288,078) for the three months ended December 31, 2004, compared to income from continuing operations of $17,945,090 in the same quarter of the prior year. The decrease is mainly attributable to a gain on debt extinguishment incurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 of $18,823,000, partially offset by a $2,000,000 Reorganization Fee related to the Additional Financing that was charged to interest expense in the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

Operating Segments

We conduct business within one operating segment, principally in the United States.

Product Revenues

A breakdown of net sales by individual product line is provided in the following table, excluding discontinued operations:

   
(Dollars in 000’s)
Three Months Ended December 31,
  
 
  
2004
  
2003
  
CASH SECURITY BUSINESS
  
$
6,050
  
$
2,797
  
OTHER
    
463
    
239
  
   
$
6,513
  
$
3,036
  

The Company’s sales of Cash Security products vary with the timing of large orders and variances from quarter to quarter are not meaningful.

12

Gross Profit, Operating Expenses and Non-Operating Items

A comparison of certain operating information is provided in the following table:

 
 
  
(Dollars in 000’s)
Three Months Ended December 31,
  
 
  
2004
  
2003
  
Gross profit
  
$
3,045
  
$
1,144
  
Selling, general and administrative
    
1,250
    
1,205
  
Depreciation and amortization
    
8
    
11
  
Operating income (loss)
    
1,787
    
(72
)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
    
—
    
18,823
  
Interest expense, net
    
(3,075
)
  
(806
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    
(1,288
)
  
17,945
  
Income from discontinued operations
    
132
    
26
  
Net Income (loss)
  
$
(1,156
)
$
17,971
  

Revenues during the first quarter ended December 31, 2004 were $6,512,542, compared with $3,035,927 for the quarter ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily a result of sales of the Sentinel product. We sold 616 sentinel units during the first quarter of 2005, compared with 113 units in the first quarter of 2004. Of the 616 Sentinel units sold during the first quarter of 2005, 578 units were sold to a national convenience store operator. This accounted for approximately $4,707,000 of revenue from continuing operations, or 72% of revenue for the first quarter ended December 31, 2004.

Gross profit on product sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, increased $1,901,000 from the same quarter a year ago. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 46.8 % in the quarter ended December 31, 2004, compared to only 37.7 % in the same quarter of the previous year. The improvement is directly related to the increase in the volume of Cash Security Products produced during the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 increased only 3.6 % compared with the same quarter of the previous year despite increased sales for the period. The increase is generally attributable to additional costs associated with updating our filings with the SEC during quarter ended December 31, 2004.

Interest expense was $3,075,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, compared to $805,515 for the quarter ended December 31, 2003. The net increase is primarily due to the Reorganization Fee (as hereinafter defined) and additional debt discount amortization incurred in connection with the Additional Financing (as hereinafter defined).

Income tax expense (benefit). In assessing the realizability of deferred tax asset, management considers whether it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. We have established a valuation allowance for such deferred tax assets to the extent such amounts are not utilized to offset existing deferred tax liabilities reversing in the same periods.

Discontinued operations (net of tax). During the first quarter ended December 31, 2004, we committed to a plan to sell our ATM business. On February 19, 2005, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with NCR Texas LLC for the sale of our ATM business. For additional information, see aforementioned discussion in Note 1, “Proposed Sale of ATM Business” to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 (this “Quarterly Report”). The ATM division has been classified as a discontinued operation since October 1, 2004, including the comparative period in the prior year. This division manufactures and sells automated teller machines primarily in the United States. The results of this operation are segregated on the accompanying statements of operations as income or loss from discontinued operations and reflected as Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale on the accompanying balance sheets.

The discontinued operation recorded income of $132,514 for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 and income of $25,415 for the quarter ended December 31, 2003. Such increase was primarily the result of an increase in parts sales and service. The sale of the ATM division pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement is expected to be consummated within the next twelve months, although there can be no assurance that such sale will be consummated in such time frame, if at all.

13

An analysis of the assets and liabilities held for sale and revenues is as follows:

Assets held for sale:
      
Trade accounts receivable
  
$
2,769,028
  
Inventories
    
3,820,458
  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    
197,724
  
Property, plant and equipment, at cost net of depreciation
    
218,204
  
Other assets
    
27,297
  
Assets held for sale
  
$
7,032,711
  
Liabilities held for sale:
        
Accounts payable
  
$
1,866,688
  
Other accrued expenses
    
826,250
  
Liabilities held for sale
  
$
2,692,938
  

Revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 for the discontinued operations were $7,653,835 and $4,617,908, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

During the past three years, we have experienced operating losses. Our liquidity has been negatively impacted by our inability to collect outstanding receivables and claims as a result of CCC’s bankruptcy, the inability to collect outstanding receivables from certain customers, under-absorbed fixed costs associated with the production facilities, and reduced sales of our products resulting from general difficulties in the ATM market. In order to meet our liquidity needs during the past three years, we have incurred a substantial amount of debt.

 
  
(Dollars in 000’s)
  
 
  
December 31, 2004
  
September 30, 2004
  
Cash
  
$
726
  
$
258
  
Working capital
    
4,143
    
1,824
  
Total assets
    
16,585
    
10,788
  
Total short-term notes payable and long-term debt, net of discount
    
3,528
    
212
  
Shareholders’ equity
    
4,918
    
2,588
  

Cash used in continuing operations was $(1,339,992) for the three months ended December 31, 2004 compared to cash used in continuing operations of $(1,182,491) for the three months ended December 31, 2003. Cash used in operations is primarily attributable to increased sales of our TACC line.

Cash provided by financing activities was $2,649,869 for the three months ended December 31, 2004 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $884,235 for same period of 2003. The net increase resulted primarily from the proceeds from the Additional Financing.

After several months of unsuccessful efforts to remedy its financial difficulties, CCC filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on June 6, 2001. At that time, we had accounts and a note receivable due from CCC totaling approximately $27 million. The proceeding was subsequently converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding and a Trustee was appointed in April 2002. We have written off substantially all of the $24.1 million owed to us by CCC against the remaining balance of the note and trade accounts receivable, resulting in a $250,000 balance in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2004. Our management intends to continue monitoring this matter and to take all actions that it determines to be necessary based upon its findings. Our liquidity was negatively impacted by our inability to collect the outstanding receivables and claims from CCC.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on generating sufficient cash flows from operations for meeting our liquidity needs, servicing our debt requirements and meeting financial covenants. During the past four years and for the first six months of 2005, we have experienced operating and net losses. Also, our inability to collect outstanding receivables continues to impact our liquidity. On November 25, 2003, we completed the Financing totaling $6,850,000 with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”), and we also completed the Additional Financing totaling $3,350,000 on November 26, 2004 with Laurus in order to meet our current liquidity needs. We have substantial debt obligations of approximately $10,053,917 as of December 31, 2004.

14

As of July 31, 2005, we have $1,250,000 available for borrowing under the Additional Financing. There can be no assurance that our current financing facilities will be sufficient to meet our current working capital needs or that we will have sufficient working capital in the future.

The aforementioned problems, coupled with increasing debt, have continued to negatively impact our financial condition. If the operating conditions do not improve, there can be no assurance we will continue operations. There can be no assurance that the sale of the ATM business will be consummated. If we need to seek additional financing, there can be no assurances that we will obtain such additional financing for working capital purposes. The failure to obtain such additional financing could cause a material adverse effect upon our financial condition.

Management’s Current Plans with Regard to Our Liquidity Include the Following: 

Proposed Sale of ATM Business

On February 19, 2005, We and our wholly-owned subsidiary Tidel Engineering, L.P. (together with the Company, the “Sellers”) entered into an asset purchase agreement with NCR Texas LLC, a single member Delaware limited liability company (“NCR”) that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NCR Corporation, a Maryland corporation, for the sale of the registrant’s ATM business (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”).

Engagement of Investment Banker to Evaluate Strategic Alternatives for the Sale of the Cash Security Business

We engaged Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (“Stifel”) in October 2004, to assist the Board of Directors in connection with the proposed sale of our Cash Security business, deliver a fairness opinion, and render such additional assistance as we may reasonably request in connection with the proposed sale of our Cash Security business. We are currently working with Stifel in connection with such a proposed sale.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations and Capital Expenditures

We have fixed debt service and lease payment obligations under notes payable and operating leases for which we have material contractual cash obligations. Interest rates on our debt vary from prime rate plus 2% to 14%.

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2004:

   
PAYMENTS DUE BY FISCAL YEAR
  
   
2005
  
2006
  
2007
  
2008
  
2009
  
Thereafter
  
Operating leases
  
$
484,135
  
$
168,520
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
Long-term debt, including current portion (1)
    
1,885,929
    
3,000,000
    
3,667,988
    
1,500,000
    
—
    
—
  
Total
  
$
2,370,064
  
$
3,168,520
  
$
3,667,988
  
$
1,500,000
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
____________
 
(1)
Our total debt was $10,053,917 as of December 31, 2004.

Planned capital expenditures for 2005 and 2006 are estimated to be approximately $200,000 per year. These expenditures will depend upon available funds, levels of orders received and future operating activity.
 
15

Risk Factors

Please see the risk factors contained in the ‘03/’04 Annual Report.

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes certain forward-looking statements regarding events and financial trends that may affect our future operating results and financial position. Some important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements include the following:

•
our substantial current indebtedness continues to adversely affect our financial condition and the availability of cash to fund our working capital needs;

•
our ability to comply with our financial covenants in the future;

•
our ability to meet our obligations under the terms of our indebtedness;

•
our need for additional financing in the future;

•
the potential receipt of an audit opinion with a “going concern” explanatory paragraph from our independent registered public accounting firm;

•
our history of operating losses and our inability to make assurances that we will generate operating income in the future;

•
the outcome of the outstanding receivable from CCC;

•
the levels of orders which are received and can be shipped in a quarter;

•
customer order patterns and seasonality;

•
costs of labor, raw materials, supplies and equipment; technological changes;

•
the delisting of our common stock from the NASDAQ Small Cap Market, effective as of the close of business on March 26, 2003, and the possibility of devaluation of our common stock as a result;

•
the economic condition of the ATM industry and the possibility that it is a mature industry;

•
the risks involved in the expansion of our operations into international offshore oil and gas producing areas, where we have previously not been operating;

•
the continued active participation of our executive officers and key operating personnel; and

•
our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the significant expansion of securities law regulation of corporate governance, accounting practices, reporting and disclosure that affects publicly traded companies, particularly related to Section 404 dealing with our system of internal controls.

Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report, whether as a result of receiving new information, the occurrence of future events or otherwise.

These and other uncertainties related to the business are described in detail under the headings of “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7A of our ‘03/’04 Annual Report.

16

ITEM 3.

At December 31, 2004, we were exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of significant financing through our issuance of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt. However, with the retirement of our 6% subordinated convertible debentures subsequent to September 30, 2002, and the associated overall reduction in outstanding debt balances, our exposure to interest rate risks has significantly decreased. If market interest rates had increased 1% in the first three months of fiscal 2005, there would have been no material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

ITEM 4.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

Mark K. Levenick, our Interim Chief Executive Officer, and Robert D. Peltier, our Interim Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures”, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). James T. Rash was Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer during the fiscal years ended 2002, 2003 and 2004. Mr. Rash died on December 19, 2004. Mr. Levenick was appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer on December 22, 2004. During fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004, Mr. Levenick served as Chief Operating Officer and Director of the Company, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Tidel Engineering, L.P., the Company’s principal operating subsidiary. In February 2005, Mr. Robert D. Peltier joined the Company as Interim Chief Financial Officer, having had no prior affiliation with the Company. Mr. Peltier began his assessment of disclosure controls and internal controls without having ever been in a position of active management or knowledge over transactions during fiscal years 2002, 2003 or 2004.

In conducting our evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer made inquiries with accounting, administrative and operational personnel and reviewed the historical facts, including the Company’s failure to file its periodic reports on a timely basis. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer noted that the Company had failed to file any periodic report required to be filed under the Exchange Act from September 30, 2002 to February 1, 2005, on which date we filed our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, which was more than two years late. Furthermore, it was noted that this Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 2003 and 2004, and the Company’s Forms 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 were filed on August 1, 2005, were each at least several months delinquent. In their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer noted that the Company’s periodic reporting failure was caused by (1) limited financial and personnel resources at the times such forms were due that restricted our ability to compile our financial statements and cause such statements to be reviewed and/or audited by an independent registered public accounting firm when such forms were due and (2) the prolonged illness and death of our former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during the year ended December 31, 2004. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company had a significant deficiency in its disclosure controls and procedures related to timely periodic reporting and such controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

In February 2005, in order to remedy this deficiency the Company began implementing new disclosure controls and procedures, which consisted of: (1) the hiring of a new Chief Financial Officer to oversee the Company’s financial reporting process, (2) the establishment of a reporting timetable to file all delinquent reports by August 1, 2005 and return to timely periodic reporting by August 19, 2005, which was submitted and approved by our Board of Directors and (3) the establishment of new guidelines for completion of periodic accounting and reporting tasks. Such implementation was completed by August 19, 2005, at which time we resumed the timely filing of our periodic reports. As of August 19, 2005, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer believe that this significant deficiency has been remedied.

17

In addition, in a report to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company dated July 28, 2005, the Company’s independent registered public accountants noted that the following significant deficiencies in our internal controls and procedures were discovered during the course of their audit of the financial statements for fiscal years ended September 30, 2003 and 2004: (1) established credit policies were overridden on occasion by executive management based on their business judgment at that time, (2) bookkeeping at the corporate level was not administrated on a timely basis during 2003 and 2004 and (3) the Company’s accounts payable supervisor had access to the check signature and the ability to prepare check runs without proper review prior to distribution. In examining the significant deficiencies, both the Company and our independent registered public accountants performed expanded reviews of our procedures and mitigating controls to determine whether such deficiencies constituted a material weakness. In the expanded reviews, both the Company and our independent registered public accountants noted the following controls were in place prior to the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003 and 2004: (1) Management of the Company consistently performed weekly and monthly reviews of actual and budgeted results during the periods, (2) the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company provided additional oversight with respect to financial reporting beginning immediately after the death of our Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer in December 2004, and (3) the Company hired a new Chief Financial Officer in February 2005 to oversee the Company’s financial reporting process. We collectively concluded that since such additional controls were in place the Company was able to conclude that none of the deficiencies constituted a material weakness that resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected. Further, the report of the independent registered public accountants indicated no inappropriate or unauthorized activity during the periods reviewed.

In August 2005, the Company began implementing revised internal controls and procedures to correct the significant deficiencies in our internal controls and procedures noted by our independent registered public accountants, which consisted of: (1) the establishment of new credit approval policies, including Board-level approval for certain amounts, (2) the establishment new guidelines for timely administration of bookkeeping tasks at the corporate level, including the implementation of monthly, quarterly and annual closing schedules and (3) removal of check signature access from the Company’s accounts payable supervisor. Such implementation was completed by August 30, 2005, and as of that date our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer believe that these significant internal controls and procedures deficiencies no longer exist.

A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affect the entity’s ability to authorize, initiate, record, process or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.

A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations on all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all errors, control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with a company have been detected. The design of any system of controls is also based in part on certain assumptions regarding the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at this reasonable assurance level as of August 19, 2005.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting

Following the evaluations discussed above and the identification of significant deficiencies, the Company took the actions and implemented the procedures described above. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the quarter ending December 31, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

18

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

As discussed in our ‘03/’04 Annual Report, on June 9, 2005, Corporate Safe Specialists, Inc. (“CSS”) filed a lawsuit against Tidel Technologies, Inc. and Tidel Engineering, L.P. The lawsuit, Civil Action No. 02-C-3421, was filed in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. CSS alleges that the Sentinel product sold by Tidel Engineering, L.P. infringes one or more patent claims found in CSS patent U.S. Patent No. 6,885,281 (the ‘281 patent). CSS seeks injunctive relief against future infringement, unspecified damages for past infringement and attorney’s fees and costs. Tidel Technologies, Inc. was released from this lawsuit, but Tidel Engineering, L.P. remains a defendant. We continue to vigorously defend this litigation.

Also, as discussed in our ‘03/’04 Annual Report, we have filed a motion to dismiss the case CSS filed in Illinois, and Tidel Engineering, L.P. has filed a motion to transfer the Illinois case to the Eastern District of Texas. We have also filed a declaratory judgment action pending in the Eastern District of Texas. In that action, we are asking the Eastern District of Texas to find, among other things, that we have not infringed on CSS’s ‘281 patent. Both companies have also requested that an injunction be issued by the Eastern District of Texas against CSS for intentional interference with the sale or bid process for our cash security business. We are vigorously pursuing this declaratory judgment action.

We and several of our officers and directors were named as defendants (the “Defendants”) in a purported class action filed on October 31, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Southern District”), George Lehockey v. Tidel Technologies, et al., H-01-3741. Prior to the suit’s filing, four identical suits were also filed in the Southern District. On or about March 18, 2002, the Court consolidated all of the pending class actions and appointed a lead plaintiff under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act”). On April 10, 2002, the lead plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”) that alleged that the Defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions concerning our financial condition and prospects between January 14, 2000 and February 8, 2001 (the putative class period). In June 2004, we reached an agreement in principle to settle these class action lawsuits. The settlement, which was subject to a definitive agreement and court approval, provided for a cash payment of $3 million to be funded by our liability insurance carrier and our issuance of two million shares of common stock. In addition, in August 2004, we reached an agreement with the liability insurance carrier to issue warrants to the carrier to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.67 per share in exchange for the carrier’s acceptance of the terms of the class action lawsuit. We provided a reserve of $1,564,490 in fiscal 2002 to cover any losses from this litigation, which consisted of $1,340,000 related to the shares of common stock issued and $224,490 related to the value of the warrants issued. The common stock was valued using the stock price on the date issued and the warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing method. In October 2004, the Court approved the settlement and the shares were issued in November 2004.

ITEM 2.

We and several of our officers and directors were named as defendants (the “Defendants”) in a purported class action filed on October 31, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Southern District”). The settlement, which was subject to a definitive agreement and court approval, provided for a cash payment of $3 million to be funded by our liability insurance carrier and our issuance of two million shares of common stock. In October 2004, the Court approved the settlement and 2,000,000 shares were issued in November 2004.

Pursuant to the $3,350,000 Additional Financing with Laurus on November 26, 2004, we issued 1,251,000 shares of our common stock during November 2004.

ITEM 6.

*31.1
Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
*31.2
Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
*32.1
Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
*32.2
Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
____________
* - Filed herewith.

19

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

   
TIDEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  
   
(Company)
  
       
November 30, 2005
  
/s/ MARK K. LEVENICK
  
   
Mark K. Levenick
  
   
Interim Chief Executive Officer
  
       
November 30, 2005
  
/s/ ROBERT D. PELTIER
  
   
Robert D. Peltier
 
   
Interim Chief Financial Officer
  

James T. Rash, our former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, died on December 19, 2004. We appointed Mark K. Levenick to the position of Interim Chief Executive Officer but no permanent Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer has been hired or appointed as of the date hereof. Robert D. Peltier was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officer in February 2005.

20

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibits
  
Description
 
Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
 
Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
 
Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
 
Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
21