UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-Q
QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY
Investment Company Act file number |
811-06506 |
|
||||
|
||||||
Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund Inc. |
||||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
||||||
|
||||||
55 Water Street, New York, NY |
|
10041 |
||||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
||||
|
||||||
Robert I. Frenkel, Esq. Legg Mason & Co., LLC 100 First Stamford Place Stamford, CT 06902 |
||||||
(Name and address of agent for service) |
||||||
|
||||||
Registrants telephone number, including area code: |
1-888-777-0102 |
|
||||
|
||||||
Date of fiscal year end: |
November 30 |
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Date of reporting period: |
August 31, 2010 |
|
||||
ITEM 1. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
WESTERN ASSET
INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND INC.
FORM N-Q
AUGUST 31, 2010
Schedule of investments (unaudited)
August 31, 2010
WESTERN ASSET INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND INC.
SECURITY |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
FACE |
|
VALUE |
|
||
MUNICIPAL BONDS 97.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Alabama 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Saraland, AL, GO, NATL |
|
5.250% |
|
1/1/15 |
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
$ |
1,026,330 |
(a) |
Alaska 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority Revenue, Williams Lynxs Alaska Cargo Port LLC |
|
8.000% |
|
5/1/23 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
954,810 |
(b) |
||
Anchorage, AK, GO, Refunding, FGIC |
|
6.000% |
|
10/1/14 |
|
500,000 |
|
599,200 |
|
||
North Slope Boro, AK, Refunding, NATL |
|
5.000% |
|
6/30/15 |
|
1,250,000 |
|
1,451,613 |
|
||
Total Alaska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,005,623 |
|
||
Arkansas 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Warren County, AR, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, Potlatch Corp. Project |
|
7.000% |
|
4/1/12 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,018,840 |
(b) |
||
California 5.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
California Statewide CDA Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lodi Memorial Hospital |
|
5.000% |
|
12/1/22 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,098,920 |
|
||
Proposition 1A Receivables Program |
|
5.000% |
|
6/15/13 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
3,312,840 |
|
||
Los Angeles, CA, COP, Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, INDLC |
|
9.625% |
|
7/1/13 |
|
510,000 |
|
590,300 |
(c) |
||
M-S-R Energy Authority, CA, Gas Revenue |
|
6.125% |
|
11/1/29 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
3,318,360 |
|
||
San Francisco, CA, Airport Improvement Corp., Lease Revenue, United Airlines Inc. |
|
8.000% |
|
7/1/13 |
|
165,000 |
|
186,265 |
(c) |
||
San Leandro, CA, Hospital Revenue, Vesper Memorial Hospital |
|
11.500% |
|
5/1/11 |
|
25,000 |
|
26,805 |
(c) |
||
Total California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,533,490 |
|
||
Colorado 6.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Broomfield, CO, COP, Open Space Park & Recreation Facilities, AMBAC |
|
5.500% |
|
12/1/20 |
|
1,860,000 |
|
1,879,790 |
|
||
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Revenue Charter School: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Refunding & Improvement, University Lab School, XLCA |
|
5.250% |
|
6/1/24 |
|
1,350,000 |
|
1,384,439 |
|
||
Bromley East Project |
|
7.000% |
|
9/15/20 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,067,880 |
(a) |
||
Bromley School Project, XLCA |
|
5.125% |
|
9/15/20 |
|
1,155,000 |
|
1,214,771 |
|
||
University Lab School Project |
|
6.125% |
|
6/1/21 |
|
500,000 |
|
520,060 |
(a) |
||
Denver, CO, Health & Hospital Authority |
|
6.250% |
|
12/1/16 |
|
710,000 |
|
761,873 |
(a) |
||
Public Authority for Colorado Energy, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue |
|
6.125% |
|
11/15/23 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,237,980 |
|
||
Pueblo, CO, Bridge Waterworks Water Revenue, Improvement, AGM |
|
6.000% |
|
11/1/14 |
|
1,765,000 |
|
1,781,467 |
(a) |
||
SBC Metropolitan District, CO, GO, ACA |
|
5.000% |
|
12/1/25 |
|
750,000 |
|
758,558 |
|
||
Total Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,606,818 |
|
||
Connecticut 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Connecticut State HEFA Revenue, Bristol Hospital |
|
5.500% |
|
7/1/21 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
1,984,240 |
|
||
Connecticut State Special Obligation Parking Revenue, Bradley International Airport, ACA |
|
6.375% |
|
7/1/12 |
|
1,855,000 |
|
1,875,164 |
(b) |
||
Total Connecticut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,859,404 |
|
||
Florida 5.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., FL |
|
5.000% |
|
6/1/16 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
5,384,250 |
|
||
Miami-Dade County, FL, School Board, COP |
|
5.000% |
|
2/1/24 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,200,060 |
|
||
Old Palm Community Development District, FL, Palm Beach Gardens |
|
5.375% |
|
5/1/14 |
|
1,035,000 |
|
963,409 |
|
||
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
First Mortgage Healthcare Facilities |
|
8.750% |
|
7/1/11 |
|
145,000 |
|
146,047 |
|
||
Hospital Adventist Health Systems |
|
6.250% |
|
11/15/24 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,682,460 |
(a) |
||
Total Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,376,226 |
|
||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of investments (unaudited) (contd)
August 31, 2010
WESTERN ASSET INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND INC.
SECURITY |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
FACE |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Georgia 6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Athens, GA, Housing Authority Student Housing Lease Revenue, University of Georgia East Campus, AMBAC |
|
5.250% |
|
12/1/23 |
|
$ |
970,000 |
|
$ |
1,070,628 |
(a) |
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Revenue |
|
6.000% |
|
11/1/23 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,387,160 |
|
||
Chatham County, GA, Hospital Authority Revenue, Hospital Memorial Health Medical Center |
|
6.000% |
|
1/1/17 |
|
650,000 |
|
665,762 |
|
||
DeKalb Private Hospital Authority Revenue, GA, Anticipation CTFS, Childrens Health Care of Atlanta Inc. |
|
5.000% |
|
11/15/29 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,124,080 |
|
||
DeKalb, Newton & Gwinnett Counties, GA, Joint Development Authority Revenue, GGC Foundation LLC Project |
|
6.000% |
|
7/1/29 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,131,560 |
|
||
Georgia Municipal Electric Authority: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Power Revenue, Refunding, AGM |
|
5.000% |
|
1/1/18 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
3,183,870 |
|
||
Power System Revenue |
|
6.500% |
|
1/1/12 |
|
215,000 |
|
227,636 |
|
||
Griffin, GA, Combined Public Utilities Revenue, Refunding & Improvement, AMBAC |
|
5.000% |
|
1/1/21 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,057,900 |
|
||
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Georgia Sales Tax Revenue |
|
7.000% |
|
7/1/11 |
|
995,000 |
|
1,050,411 |
(c) |
||
Total Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,899,007 |
|
||
Illinois 2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Chicago, IL, OHare International Airport Revenue, Refunding Bonds, Lien A-2, AGM |
|
5.750% |
|
1/1/19 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
1,634,115 |
(b) |
||
Glendale Heights, IL, Hospital Revenue, Refunding Glendale Heights Project |
|
7.100% |
|
12/1/15 |
|
750,000 |
|
845,888 |
(c) |
||
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Chicago Charter School Foundation Project A |
|
5.250% |
|
12/1/12 |
|
230,000 |
|
241,953 |
(c) |
||
Illinois Finance Authority Revenue, Memorial Health System |
|
5.250% |
|
4/1/29 |
|
1,670,000 |
|
1,705,771 |
|
||
Illinois Health Facilities Authority Revenue, Methodist Medical Center of Illinois Project |
|
9.000% |
|
10/1/10 |
|
90,000 |
|
90,608 |
(c) |
||
Total Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,518,335 |
|
||
Indiana 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ball State University, Indiana University Revenue, Student Fee, FGIC |
|
5.750% |
|
7/1/20 |
|
800,000 |
|
857,392 |
(a) |
||
Indianapolis, IN, Thermal Energy System, Multi-Mode |
|
5.000% |
|
10/1/23 |
|
4,000,000 |
|
4,493,720 |
(d) |
||
Total Indiana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,351,112 |
|
||
Iowa 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Muscatine, IA, Electric Revenue |
|
9.700% |
|
1/1/13 |
|
465,000 |
|
520,800 |
(c) |
||
Kansas 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Burlington, KS, Environmental Improvement Revenue, Kansas City Power & Light |
|
5.250% |
|
4/1/13 |
|
2,500,000 |
|
2,701,150 |
(e) |
||
Louisiana 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Hospital Revenue, Southern Baptist Hospital Inc. Project, Aetna |
|
8.000% |
|
5/15/12 |
|
105,000 |
|
106,804 |
(c) |
||
Maryland 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Maryland State Health & Higher EFA Revenue, Refunding Mercy Medical Center, AGM |
|
6.500% |
|
7/1/13 |
|
550,000 |
|
592,119 |
|
||
Massachusetts 3.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lancaster, MA, GO, AMBAC |
|
5.375% |
|
4/15/17 |
|
1,130,000 |
|
1,200,535 |
|
||
Massachusetts State DFA Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Curry College, ACA |
|
6.000% |
|
3/1/20 |
|
470,000 |
|
474,004 |
|
||
VOA Concord, GNMA-Collateralized |
|
6.700% |
|
10/20/21 |
|
360,000 |
|
403,877 |
(a) |
||
Massachusetts State HEFA Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Caritas Christi Obligation |
|
6.500% |
|
7/1/12 |
|
1,040,000 |
|
1,053,634 |
|
||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of investments (unaudited) (contd)
August 31, 2010
WESTERN ASSET INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND INC.
SECURITY |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
FACE |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Massachusetts continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Caritas Christi Obligation |
|
6.750% |
|
7/1/16 |
|
$ |
835,000 |
|
$ |
876,291 |
|
Milford-Whitinsville Regional Hospital |
|
6.500% |
|
7/15/23 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,116,840 |
(a) |
||
Massachusetts State Industrial Finance Agency Assisted Living Facility Revenue, Arbors at Amherst Project, GNMA-Collateralized |
|
5.750% |
|
6/20/17 |
|
755,000 |
|
755,974 |
(b) |
||
Total Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,881,155 |
|
||
Michigan 4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Jenison, MI, Public Schools GO, Building and Site, FGIC |
|
5.500% |
|
5/1/20 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,050,650 |
|
||
Michigan State Housing Development Authority Rental Housing Revenue |
|
5.250% |
|
10/1/24 |
|
2,640,000 |
|
2,774,772 |
|
||
Michigan State, Hospital Finance Authority Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oakwood Obligated Group |
|
5.500% |
|
11/1/18 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,040,150 |
|
||
Refunding, Hospital Sparrow Obligated |
|
5.000% |
|
11/15/12 |
|
500,000 |
|
537,385 |
|
||
Refunding, Hospital Sparrow Obligated |
|
5.000% |
|
11/15/14 |
|
1,190,000 |
|
1,313,879 |
|
||
Walled Lake, MI, Consolidated School District, NATL |
|
5.000% |
|
5/1/22 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,077,330 |
|
||
Total Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,794,166 |
|
||
Missouri 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lees Summit, MO, IDA, Health Facilities Revenue, John Knox Village |
|
5.750% |
|
8/15/11 |
|
405,000 |
|
425,684 |
(c) |
||
Missouri State Environmental Improvement & Energy Resources Authority, KC Power & Light Co. Project |
|
4.900% |
|
7/1/13 |
|
2,500,000 |
|
2,666,975 |
(b)(e) |
||
Nevada, MO, Waterworks Systems Revenue, AMBAC |
|
10.000% |
|
10/1/10 |
|
85,000 |
|
85,605 |
(c) |
||
Total Missouri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,178,264 |
|
||
Nevada 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Humboldt County, NV, PCR, Idaho Power Co. Project |
|
5.150% |
|
12/1/24 |
|
4,000,000 |
|
4,362,480 |
|
||
New Hampshire 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New Hampshire HEFA Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Covenant Health |
|
6.500% |
|
7/1/17 |
|
445,000 |
|
482,954 |
(a) |
||
Covenant Health, Unrefunded Balance |
|
6.500% |
|
7/1/17 |
|
140,000 |
|
146,861 |
|
||
Healthcare Systems Covenant Health |
|
5.000% |
|
7/1/28 |
|
6,400,000 |
|
6,519,936 |
|
||
Total New Hampshire |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,149,751 |
|
||
New Jersey 5.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New Jersey EDA Revenue, Cigarette Tax |
|
5.625% |
|
6/15/17 |
|
295,000 |
|
295,203 |
|
||
New Jersey State EFA Revenue, University of Medicine & Dentistry |
|
7.125% |
|
12/1/23 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,403,160 |
|
||
New Jersey State Higher Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue |
|
5.375% |
|
6/1/24 |
|
4,000,000 |
|
4,301,320 |
|
||
New Jersey State Higher Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue, AGC |
|
5.875% |
|
6/1/21 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
3,299,910 |
(b) |
||
Ringwood Borough, NJ, Sewer Authority Special Obligation |
|
9.875% |
|
7/1/13 |
|
65,000 |
|
75,665 |
(c) |
||
Total New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,375,258 |
|
||
New Mexico 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Bernalillo County, NM, Gross Receipts Tax Revenue, AMBAC |
|
5.250% |
|
10/1/18 |
|
1,100,000 |
|
1,362,647 |
|
||
New Mexico Finance Authority Revenue, Subordinated Lien, Public Project Revolving Fund, NATL |
|
5.000% |
|
6/15/19 |
|
1,415,000 |
|
1,611,685 |
|
||
Total New Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,974,332 |
|
||
New York 3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New York City, NY, IDA, Civic Facilities Revenue, Community Hospital Brooklyn |
|
6.875% |
|
11/1/10 |
|
175,000 |
|
175,749 |
|
||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of investments (unaudited) (contd)
August 31, 2010
WESTERN ASSET INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND INC.
SECURITY |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
FACE |
|
VALUE |
|
||
New York continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
New York State Dormitory Authority, New York & Presbyterian Hospital, AGM |
|
5.250% |
|
2/15/24 |
|
$ |
3,025,000 |
|
$ |
3,316,882 |
|
New York State Thruway Authority Highway & Bridge Trust Fund Revenue, AMBAC |
|
5.000% |
|
4/1/21 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,249,200 |
|
||
Total New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,741,831 |
|
||
North Carolina 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power Systems Revenue |
|
5.000% |
|
1/1/26 |
|
1,750,000 |
|
1,902,530 |
|
||
Ohio 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
American Municipal Power-Ohio Inc., Electricity Purchase Revenue |
|
5.000% |
|
2/1/13 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,110,960 |
|
||
Kettering, OH, City School District, School Improvement, AGM |
|
5.000% |
|
12/1/19 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,103,010 |
|
||
Ohio State Air Quality Development Authority Revenue, FirstEnergy Generation Corp. |
|
5.625% |
|
6/1/18 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,112,160 |
|
||
Ohio State Water Development Authority Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Refunding, Safe Water Service |
|
9.375% |
|
12/1/10 |
|
110,000 |
|
112,437 |
(c) |
||
Safe Water |
|
9.000% |
|
12/1/10 |
|
25,000 |
|
25,531 |
(c) |
||
Ohio State, GO, Conservation Project |
|
5.250% |
|
9/1/13 |
|
3,010,000 |
|
3,084,166 |
(a) |
||
Total Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,548,264 |
|
||
Pennsylvania 6.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Conneaut, PA, School District, GO, AMBAC |
|
9.500% |
|
5/1/12 |
|
185,000 |
|
196,555 |
(c) |
||
Harrisburg, PA, Parking Authority Parking Revenue, AGM |
|
5.500% |
|
5/15/20 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,087,570 |
(a) |
||
Montgomery County, PA, IDA Revenue, New Regional Medical Center Project, FHA |
|
5.000% |
|
8/1/24 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,156,980 |
|
||
Northampton County, PA, IDA Revenue, Mortgage Moravian Hall Square Project, Radian |
|
5.500% |
|
7/1/19 |
|
1,365,000 |
|
1,365,300 |
|
||
Pennsylvania State IDA Revenue, Economic Development, AMBAC |
|
5.500% |
|
7/1/21 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,060,570 |
|
||
Pennsylvania State Public School Building Authority Lease Revenue, Philadelphia School District Project, AGM |
|
5.000% |
|
6/1/27 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,188,360 |
|
||
Philadelphia, PA, Gas Works Revenue, 7th General Ordinance, AMBAC |
|
5.000% |
|
10/1/17 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,115,850 |
|
||
Philadelphia, PA, Water & Wastewater, FGIC |
|
5.250% |
|
11/1/14 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,165,540 |
|
||
Pittsburgh, PA, School District GO, AGM |
|
5.375% |
|
9/1/16 |
|
1,350,000 |
|
1,607,013 |
|
||
Total Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,943,738 |
|
||
Puerto Rico 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Puerto Rico Commonwealth Government Development Bank |
|
4.750% |
|
12/1/15 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,092,260 |
|
||
Rhode Island 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Central Falls, RI, GO, Radian |
|
5.875% |
|
5/15/15 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
868,930 |
|
||
South Carolina 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Charleston, SC, Waterworks & Sewer Revenue |
|
5.250% |
|
1/1/16 |
|
1,445,000 |
|
1,480,894 |
|
||
Greenville County, SC, School District Installment Purchase, Revenue, Refunding, Building Equity |
|
6.000% |
|
12/1/21 |
|
1,100,000 |
|
1,248,665 |
(a) |
||
Total South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,729,559 |
|
||
South Dakota 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Minnehana County, SD, GO, Limited Tax Certificates |
|
5.625% |
|
12/1/20 |
|
2,400,000 |
|
2,419,680 |
(a) |
||
Tennessee 3.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Jackson, TN, Water & Sewer Revenue |
|
7.200% |
|
7/1/12 |
|
115,000 |
|
123,182 |
(c) |
||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue |
|
5.250% |
|
9/1/23 |
|
6,570,000 |
|
6,821,106 |
|
||
Total Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,944,288 |
|
||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of investments (unaudited) (contd)
August 31, 2010
WESTERN ASSET INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND INC.
SECURITY |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
FACE |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Texas 10.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District, BASF Corp. Project |
|
6.750% |
|
2/1/12 |
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Revenue, Refunding, AGM |
|
5.500% |
|
11/1/20 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,074,770 |
(b) |
||
El Paso County, TX, Housing Finance Corp., La Plaza Apartments, Subordinated |
|
8.000% |
|
7/1/30 |
|
250,000 |
|
238,300 |
|
||
El Paso County, TX, Housing Finance Corp., MFH Revenue, American Village Communities |
|
6.250% |
|
12/1/24 |
|
360,000 |
|
365,213 |
|
||
El Paso, TX, Water & Sewer Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Refunding & Improvement, AGM |
|
6.000% |
|
3/1/15 |
|
955,000 |
|
1,035,659 |
(a) |
||
Refunding & Improvement, AGM, Unrefunded Balance |
|
6.000% |
|
3/1/15 |
|
45,000 |
|
48,511 |
|
||
Fort Worth, TX, Water & Sewer Revenue |
|
5.625% |
|
2/15/17 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,153,060 |
(a) |
||
Harris County, TX, Industrial Development Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, Deer Park Refining Project |
|
4.700% |
|
5/1/18 |
|
6,250,000 |
|
6,757,313 |
|
||
North Texas Tollway Authority Revenue, NATL |
|
5.125% |
|
1/1/28 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,118,120 |
|
||
Sabine River Authority, Texas PCR, Southwestern Electric Power Co., NATL |
|
4.950% |
|
3/1/18 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
3,169,050 |
|
||
Southwest Higher Education Authority Inc., Southern Methodist University Project, AMBAC |
|
5.500% |
|
10/1/19 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,106,080 |
(a) |
||
Tarrant County, TX, Hospital Authority Revenue, Adventist Health System-Sunbelt |
|
10.250% |
|
10/1/10 |
|
65,000 |
|
65,502 |
(c) |
||
Texas State Department Housing Community Affairs Home Mortgage Revenue, RIBS, GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC-Collateralized |
|
13.019% |
|
7/2/24 |
|
175,000 |
|
214,900 |
(b)(d)(f) |
||
Total Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,146,478 |
|
||
Utah 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Spanish Fork City, UT, Water Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AGM |
|
5.500% |
|
6/1/16 |
|
350,000 |
|
381,510 |
(a) |
||
AGM, Unrefunded Balance |
|
5.500% |
|
6/1/16 |
|
1,135,000 |
|
1,236,140 |
|
||
Total Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617,650 |
|
||
Virginia 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pittsylvania County, VA, GO |
|
5.500% |
|
2/1/22 |
|
540,000 |
|
642,335 |
|
||
Pittsylvania County, VA, GO |
|
5.500% |
|
2/1/23 |
|
1,030,000 |
|
1,216,780 |
|
||
Pittsylvania County, VA, GO |
|
5.600% |
|
2/1/24 |
|
2,490,000 |
|
2,927,568 |
|
||
Total Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,786,683 |
|
||
Washington 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Energy Northwest Washington Electric Revenue, Project No. 3, AGM |
|
5.500% |
|
7/1/18 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,103,620 |
|
||
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority Revenue, Multicare Health System |
|
5.750% |
|
8/15/29 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,110,680 |
|
||
Total Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,214,300 |
|
||
Wisconsin 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
La Crosse, WI, Resource Recovery Revenue, Refunding Bonds, Northern States Power Co. Project |
|
6.000% |
|
11/1/21 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,319,960 |
(b) |
||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS BEFORE SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (Cost $171,559,972) |
|
183,107,615 |
|
||||||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS 2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Illinois 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Illinois Development Finance Authority Revenue, Evanston Northwestern, SPA-JPMorgan Chase |
|
0.230% |
|
5/1/31 |
|
1,200,000 |
|
1,200,000 |
(g)(h) |
||
Puerto Rico 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, GO, Public Improvements, AGM, LOC-Wells Fargo Bank N.A. |
|
0.190% |
|
7/1/32 |
|
3,400,000 |
|
3,400,000 |
(g)(h) |
||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of investments (unaudited) (contd)
August 31, 2010
WESTERN ASSET INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND INC.
SECURITY |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
FACE |
|
VALUE |
|
||||
Utah 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Utah Transit Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, LOC-Fortis Bank SA, NV |
|
0.250% |
|
6/15/36 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
(g)(h) |
||
Virginia 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Hospital Revenue, Carilion Clinic Obligation, SPA-Wells Fargo Bank N.A. |
|
0.250% |
|
7/1/42 |
|
400,000 |
|
400,000 |
(g)(h) |
||||
West Virginia 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
West Virginia State Hospital Finance Authority Revenue, United Hospital Center Inc., LOC-JPMorgan Chase |
|
0.260% |
|
6/1/41 |
|
400,000 |
|
400,000 |
(g)(h) |
||||
TOTAL SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (Cost $5,500,000) |
|
|
|
5,500,000 |
|
||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 100.0% (Cost $177,059,972#) |
|
|
|
188,607,615 |
|
||||||||
(a) |
Pre-Refunded bonds are escrowed with U.S. government obligations and/or U.S. government agency securities and are considered by the manager to be triple-A rated even if issuer has not applied for new ratings. |
||||||||||||
(b) |
Income from this issue is considered a preference item for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax (AMT). |
||||||||||||
(c) |
Bonds are escrowed to maturity by government securities and/or U.S. government agency securities and are considered by the manager to be triple-A rated even if issuer has not applied for new ratings. |
||||||||||||
(d) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate disclosed is that which is in effect at August 31, 2010. |
||||||||||||
(e) |
Maturity date shown represents the mandatory tender date. |
||||||||||||
(f) |
Residual interest bondscoupon varies inversely with level of short-term tax-exempt interest rates. |
||||||||||||
(g) |
Variable rate demand obligations have a demand feature under which the Fund can tender them back to the issuer or liquidity provider on no more than 7 days notice. |
||||||||||||
(h) |
Maturity date shown is the final maturity date. The security may be sold back to the issuer before final maturity. |
||||||||||||
# |
Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is substantially the same. |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Abbreviations used in this schedule: |
||||||||||||
|
ACA |
- American Capital Assurance - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
AGC |
- Assured Guaranty Corporation - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
AGM |
- Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
AMBAC |
- American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
CDA |
- Communities Development Authority |
|||||||||||
|
COP |
- Certificates of Participation |
|||||||||||
|
CTFS |
- Certificates |
|||||||||||
|
DFA |
- Development Finance Agency |
|||||||||||
|
EDA |
- Economic Development Authority |
|||||||||||
|
EFA |
- Educational Facilities Authority |
|||||||||||
|
FGIC |
- Financial Guaranty Insurance Company - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
FHA |
- Federal Housing Administration |
|||||||||||
|
FHLMC |
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
|||||||||||
|
FNMA |
- Federal National Mortgage Association |
|||||||||||
|
GNMA |
- Government National Mortgage Association |
|||||||||||
|
GO |
- General Obligation |
|||||||||||
|
HEFA |
- Health & Educational Facilities Authority |
|||||||||||
|
IDA |
- Industrial Development Authority |
|||||||||||
|
INDLC |
- Industrial Indemnity Company - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
LOC |
- Letter of Credit |
|||||||||||
|
MFH |
- Multi-Family Housing |
|||||||||||
|
NATL |
- National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
PCR |
- Pollution Control Revenue |
|||||||||||
|
Radian |
- Radian Asset Assurance - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
RIBS |
- Residual Interest Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
SPA |
- Standby Bond Purchase Agreement - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
|
XLCA |
- XL Capital Assurance Inc. - Insured Bonds |
|||||||||||
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of investments (unaudited) (contd)
August 31, 2010
WESTERN ASSET INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND INC.
Summary of Investments by Industry *
Health Care |
|
15.8 |
% |
Pre-Refunded/Escrowed to Maturity |
|
15.5 |
|
Industrial Revenue |
|
13.1 |
|
Power |
|
11.9 |
|
Local General Obligation |
|
7.7 |
|
Solid Waste/Resource Recovery |
|
5.5 |
|
Special Tax Obligation |
|
5.3 |
|
Transportation |
|
4.8 |
|
Leasing |
|
4.7 |
|
Student Municipals |
|
4.0 |
|
Water & Sewer |
|
3.2 |
|
Education |
|
2.1 |
|
Housing |
|
1.9 |
|
Other |
|
1.6 |
|
Short-Term Investments |
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
*As a percentage of total investments. Please note that Fund holdings are as of August 31, 2010 and are subject to change.
Ratings Table
S&P/Moodys/Fitch |
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
19.0 |
% |
AA/Aa |
|
23.2 |
|
A |
|
41.8 |
|
BBB/Baa |
|
5.7 |
|
BB/Ba |
|
1.5 |
|
B |
|
0.5 |
|
A-1/VMIG 1 |
|
2.9 |
|
NR |
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
As a percentage of total investments.
The ratings shown are based on each portfolio securitys rating as determined by S&P, Moodys or Fitch, each a Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organization (NRSRO). The ratings are the opinions of the NRSRO and are not measures of quality or guarantees of performance. Securities may be rated by other NRSROs, and these ratings may be higher or lower. In the event that a security is rated by multiple NRSROs and receives different ratings, the Fund will treat the security as being rated in the highest rating category received from an NRSRO.
See pages 8 through 11 for definitions of ratings.
See Notes to Schedule of Investments.
Bond Ratings (unaudited)
The definitions of the applicable rating symbols are set forth below:
Standard & Poors Ratings Service (Standard & Poors)Ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus () sign to show relative standings within the major rating categories.
AAA |
|
An obligation rated AAA has the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poors. The obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong. |
AA |
|
An obligation rated AA differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong. |
A |
|
An obligation rated A is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong. |
BBB |
|
An obligation rated BBB exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. |
BB, B, |
|
Obligations rated BB, B, CCC, CC and C are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. BB indicates the least degree of speculation and C the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions. |
D |
|
An obligation rated D is in payment default. The D rating category is used when payments on an obligation, including a regulatory capital instrument, are not made on the date due even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless Standard & Poors believes that such payments will be made during such grace period. The D rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized. An obligations rating is lowered to D upon completion of a distressed exchange offer, whereby some or all of the issue is either repurchased for an amount of cash or replaced by other instruments having a total value that is less than par. |
Moodys Investors Service (Moodys)Numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 may be applied to each generic rating from Aa to Caa, where 1 is the highest and 3 the lowest ranking within its generic category.
Aaa |
|
Bonds rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, with minimal credit risk. |
Aa |
|
Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk. |
A |
|
Obligations rated A are considered upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk. |
Baa |
|
Obligations rated Baa are subject to moderate credit risk. They are considered medium grade and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics. |
Ba |
|
Obligations rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements and are subject to substantial credit risk. |
B |
|
Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk. |
Caa |
|
Obligations rated Caa are judged to be of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk. |
Bond Ratings (unaudited)(continued)
Ca |
|
Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery for principal and interest. |
C |
|
Obligations rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds and are typically in default, with little prospect of recovery for principal and interest. |
Fitch Ratings Service (Fitch)Ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus () sign to show relative standings within the major rating categories.
AAA |
|
Bonds rated AAA by Fitch denote the lowest expectation of default risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events. |
AA |
|
Bonds rated AA denote expectations of very low default risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events. |
A |
|
Bonds rated A denote expectations of low default risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings. |
BBB |
|
Bonds rated BBB indicate that expectations of default risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity. |
BB, B, |
|
Bonds rated BB, B, CCC, CC and C are regarded, on balance, as predominantly speculative with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. BB represents a lower degree of speculation than B, and C the highest degree of speculation. While such bonds will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions. |
D |
|
Bonds rated D indicate an issuer that in Fitch Ratings opinion has entered into bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal winding-up procedure, or which has otherwise ceased business. |
NR |
|
indicates that the bond is not rated by Standard & Poors, Moodys or Fitch. |
Short-Term Security Ratings (unaudited)
Standard & Poors Short-Term Notes Ratings
SP-1 |
A short-term obligation rated SP-1 is rated in the highest category by Standard & Poors. Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+) designation. |
SP-2 |
A short-term obligation rated SP-2 is a Standard & Poors rating indicating satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest, with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes. |
Short-Term Security Ratings (unaudited)(continued)
SP-3 |
A short-term obligation rated SP-3 is a Standard & Poors rating indicating speculative capacity to pay principal and interest. |
Standard & Poors Short-Term Issuer Credit Ratings
A-1 |
A short-term obligation rated A-1 is rated in the highest category by Standard & Poors. The obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong. |
A-2 |
A short-term obligation rated A-2 by Standard & Poors is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is satisfactory. |
A-3 |
A short-term obligation rated A-3 by Standard & Poors exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. |
B |
A short-term obligation rated B by Standard & Poors is regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. Ratings of B-1, B-2 and B-3 may be assigned to indicate finer distinctions within the B category. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties which could lead to the obligors inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. |
Moodys Variable Rate Demand Obligations (VRDO) Ratings
VMIG 1 |
Moodys highest rating for issues having a demand feature VRDO. This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by the superior short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price on demand. |
VMIG 2 |
This designation denotes strong credit quality. Good protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price on demand. |
VMIG 3 |
This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Adequate protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price on demand. |
Moodys Short-Term Obligation Ratings
MIG 1 |
Moodys highest rating for short-term municipal obligations. This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support, or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing. |
Short-Term Security Ratings (unaudited)(continued)
MIG 2 |
This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample, although not as large as the preceding group. |
MIG 3 |
This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well-established. |
SG |
This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection. |
Moodys Short-Term Security Ratings
P-1 |
Moodys highest rating for commercial paper and for VRDO prior to the advent of the VMIG 1 rating. Have a superior ability to repay short-term debt obligations. |
P-2 |
Have a strong ability to repay short-term debt obligations. |
P-3 |
Have an acceptable ability to repay short-term debt obligations. |
NP |
Issuers do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories. |
Fitchs Short-Term Issuer or Obligation Ratings
F1 |
Fitchs highest rating indicating the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added + to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature. |
F2 |
Fitch rating indicating good intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments. |
F3 |
Fitch rating indicating intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate. |
Notes to Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund Inc. (the Fund) was incorporated in Maryland on December 19, 1991 and is registered as a diversified, closed-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Board of Directors authorized 100 million shares of $0.001 par value common stock. The Funds investment objective is to provide common shareholders a high level of current income exempt from regular federal income taxes consistent with prudent investing.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
(a) Investment Valuation. Securities are valued at the mean between the last quoted bid and asked prices provided by an independent pricing service, which are based on transactions in municipal obligations, quotations from municipal bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various other relationships between securities. When prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect fair value, the Fund values these securities at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures approved by the Funds Board of Directors. Short-term obligations with maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
The Fund has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 820 (ASC Topic 820). ASC Topic 820 establishes a single definition of fair value, creates a three-tier hierarchy as a framework for measuring fair value based on inputs used to value the Funds investments, and requires additional disclosure about fair value. The hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.
· Level 1quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
· Level 2other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
· Level 3significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The Fund uses valuation techniques to measure fair value that are consistent with the market approach and/or income approach, depending on the type of the security and the particular circumstance. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable securities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to discount estimated future cash flows to present value.
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Funds assets carried at fair value:
DESCRIPTION |
|
QUOTED PRICES |
|
OTHER |
|
SIGNIFICANT |
|
TOTAL |
|
||
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
$ |
183,107,615 |
|
|
|
$ |
183,107,615 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
5,500,000 |
|
|
|
5,500,000 |
|
||
Total investments |
|
|
|
$ |
188,607,615 |
|
|
|
$ |
188,607,615 |
|
See Schedule of Investments for additional detailed categorizations.
(b) Security Transactions. Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis.
2. Investments
At August 31, 2010, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for federal income tax purposes were substantially as follows:
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
11,871,288 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
(323,645 |
) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
11,547,643 |
|
Notes to Schedule of Investments (unaudited) (continued)
3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 815 requires enhanced disclosure about an entitys derivative and hedging activities.
During the period ended August 31, 2010, the Fund did not invest in any derivative instruments.
ITEM 2. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a- 3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the registrants last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 3. EXHIBITS.
Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund Inc.
By |
/s/ R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: October 25, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By |
/s/ R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: October 25, 2010
By |
/s/ Kaprel Ozsolak |
|
|
Kaprel Ozsolak |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Date: October 25, 2010